DOCSLIB.ORG

Full Journal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Full Journal Advisory Board Alan L. Wilkins, chair James P. Bell Donna Lee Bowen Douglas M. Chabries R. Kelly Haws Robert L. Millet Involving Readers Noel B. Reynolds in the Latter-day Saint Editor in Chief John W. Welch Academic Experience Church History Board Richard Bennett, chair 19th-century history Brian Q. Cannon 20th-century history Kathryn Daynes 19th-century history Gerrit J. Dirkmaat Joseph Smith, 19th-century Mormonism Steven C. Harper documents Frederick G. Williams cultural history Liberal Arts and Sciences Board Barry R. Bickmore, co-chair geochemistry Eric Eliason, co-chair English, folklore David C. Dollahite faith and family life Susan Howe English, poetry, drama Neal Kramer early British literature, Mormon studies Steven C. Walker Christian literature Reviews Board Eric Eliason, co-chair English, folklore John M. Murphy, co-chair Mormon and Western Trevor Alvord new media Herman du Toit art, museums Angela Hallstrom literature Greg Hansen music Emily Jensen new media Gerrit van Dyk Church history Specialists Casualene Meyer poetry editor Thomas R. Wells photography editor Ashlee Whitaker cover art editor STUDIES QUARTERLY BYU Vol. 54 • No. 4 • 2015 ARTICLES 4 From the Editor 6 The Necessity of Political Parties and the Importance of Compromise David B. Magleby 119 Grace in the Book of Mormon Brent J. Schmidt 135 Dating the Death of Jesus Christ Jeffrey R. Chadwick DOCUMENT 24 The Prophets Have Spoken, but What Did They Say? Examining the Differences between George D. Watt’s Original Shorthand Notes and the Sermons Published in the Journal of Discourses Gerrit Dirkmaat and LaJean Purcell Carruth; Shorthand transcriptions by LaJean Purcell Carruth POETRY 192 Desert Sonnet Tayva Patch ESSAY 193 Blue Cindy Gritton BOOK REVIEWS 198 American Crucifixion: The Murder of Joseph Smith and the Fate of the Mormon Church by Alex Beam Reviewed by Alexander L. Baugh 203 Helen Andelin and the Fascinating Womanhood Movement by Julie Debra Neuffer Reviewed by Mary Jane Woodger BOOK NOTICES 207 Textual and Comparative Explorations in 1 and 2 Enoch Standing Apart: Mormon Historical Consciousness and the Concept of Apostasy From the Editor his issue of BYU Studies Quarterly proudly leads off with the 2015 TKarl G. Maeser Distinguished Faculty Lecture by political science professor David Magleby. I am confident that all current readers will enjoy and benefit from the timely insights that this speech offers regard- ing the persistent pressures on political parties to justify their existence and to seek opportunities for mutually beneficial accommodations and compromises. Magley’s Maeser Lecture stands in an illustrious tradition now reaching back over half a century at Brigham Young University. Fifty years ago, the second Maeser Lecture was given by Professor Hugh W. Nibley on March 17, 1965, when I was a freshman at BYU. Like many of these annual faculty lectures, Nibley’s was promptly published in BYU Studies, entitled “The Expanding Gospel.” Its opening lines read, “The expression ‘expanding Gospel’ is not a contradiction of terms.” While “no man may add to the scriptures, . that imposes no restriction on God.” “Where has God imposed any limits on His own prerogative of imparting His word to man?” (vol. 7, no. 1, p. 3; emphasis in original). For twenty-five pages, Nibley then goes on to show how the revealed details in the plan of salvation known distinctively to Latter-day Saints can be found by careful analysis of dozens of ancient sources that “follow along familiar grooves to the end and then continue onward into new territory” (4). Although these ancient sources are often only “shattered remnants of a forgotten structure,” behind them stands “a solid reality” (26–27). In many ways, Nibley’s quest for further light and knowledge 4 BYU Studies Quarterly 54, no. 1 (2015) From the Editor V 5 has been the guiding hermeneutic of BYU Studies, in search of those solid realities, as this current issue attests. Political applications of gospel principles such as unity, love, humility, shared objectives, reconciliation, unselfishness, and community well- being are boldly brought forward and expanded in David Magleby’s wise advice on politics and compromise. Second, as Nibley also laid out, in dealing with historical writings and gospel texts, “our first obligation is to inform ourselves” about what they actually teach (4). In this regard, the groundbreaking decipher- ment and analysis by LaJean Purcell Carruth and Gerrit Dirkmaat of shorthand transcriptions of early addresses by General Authorities that were eventually published in the Journal of Discourses expands our knowledge of the unfolding of Latter-day Saint doctrines and practices. The picture above shows me seated on a bench with a statue of William Tyndale in Bristol, England, which memorializes the impor- tance of translating scripture clearly and correctly. In this spirit of understanding scripture, linguistic research by Brent Schmidt into the ancient meanings of the Greek and Hebrew words that stand behind the vital gospel term grace expands the familiar understandings of that biblical term, showing that the authors who contributed to the Book of Mormon likely understood the original, but now usually overlooked, covenantal and relational dimensions of grace. And finally, the detailed examination by Jeffrey Chadwick of the chronology of the death of Jesus expands our understanding of that key event in the Father’s eternal plan. Using scriptural, historical, astronom- ical, and archaeological evidence, Chadwick arrives at what he feels is a definite date for the crucifixion. In the process, he proposes a different interpretation of the timing of events in Jesus’s final week, an interpreta- tion that seeks to harmonize seeming discrepancies between the synop- tic Gospels and the Gospel of John. In Nibley’s words, “Israel escaped both pessimism and fatalism by being constantly reminded by the prophets of the great pre-existent plan that lies behind everything that happens. This we believe to be the most significant element in the expanding Gospel” (27). That Good News continues today to expand in ways that God has chosen to impart his knowledge and reassurance to all who will listen to and learn of him. David B. Magleby, BYU’s 2015 Karl G. Maeser Distinguished Faculty Lecturer, pre- senting the forum address on May 19, 2015, in the de Jong Concert Hall. Photo courtesy of Brigham Young University. The Necessity of Political Parties and the Importance of Compromise David B. Magleby BYU Studies has a long history of publishing the annual lecture given by the recipient of the Karl G. Maeser Distinguished Faculty Lecturer Award, BYU’s highest faculty honor. It is with great pleasure that BYU Studies Quarterly publishes this year’s lecture by Dr. David B. Magleby, a professor of political science. His speech was delivered as a forum address on May 19, 2015, at Brigham Young University. ice President Webb, other members of the administration, deans, Vcolleagues, friends, and students, I am honored and humbled to be recognized in this way. The occasion invites introspection and appreciation. I have been greatly blessed by the opportunity to study, teach, and write for now thirty-three years on the faculty at Brigham Young Univer- sity. There is a sense of mission about teaching at BYU, which for me is personified by you students and your predecessors—those I have known and taught in classes, those I have worked with as teaching or research assistants, and those who have been members of BYU wards or stakes in which I have served. You are smart and good. You have lifted me and my family. You motivate me to be a better person. You will do remarkable things in your families, church, community, and occupation. I hope my remarks today will encourage you to make civic engagement a part of who you are. I teach in a discipline whose name some find presumptuous: politi- cal science. Politics seems so disorganized, messy, personal, and some- times even evil that it can hardly be seen as science. Politics can be all BYU Studies Quarterly 54, no. 4 (2015) 7 8 v BYU Studies Quarterly of that, but as Alexander Hamilton put it in Federalist Paper no. 9, “The science of politics, however, like most other sciences, has received great improvement.”1 Similarly, James Madison wrote in Federalist no. 37 of “political science” and “science of government.”2 Or as John Adams wrote to his wife Abigail in 1780, “I must study Politicks and War that my sons may have liberty to study . Mathematicks and Philosophy, Geography, natural History, Naval Arichtecture, navigation, Commerce and Agriculture, in order to give their Children a right to study Paint- ing, Poetry, Musick, Architecture, Statuary, Tapestry and Porcelaine.”3 To Adams, Hamilton, Madison, Jay, and the other framers of our grand experiment with self-government, the data for their science came from their experience in colonial legislatures and the Continental Congress; and from their study of religion, history, and science. Think of the Con- stitution as an engineering blueprint for the design of a functioning and enduring government. By that standard, their blueprint has stood the test of time—and they were remarkable social scientists. Today, I would like to address two seemingly contradictory elements of politics that are relevant to our times; indeed, I would argue they will always be relevant: the necessity of political parties and the importance of compromise. The Necessity of Political Parties With respect to political parties I will argue an idea widely accepted in political science: that political parties are essential to modern democ- racy. This view runs counter to popular opinion, which is often anti- party. Concerns about parties include that they corrupt participants, foster contention, and turn their supporters into unthinking followers rather than informed citizens. Today, I hope to persuade you that par- ties serve important functions and that you should not only vote in 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BYU Studies Quarterly Volume 56 Number 3 (2017)
    Laurel Thatcher Ulrich. A House Full of Females: Plural Marriage and Women’s Rights in Early Mormonism, 1835–1870. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2017. Reviewed by Lowell C. “Ben” Bennion aurel Thatcher Ulrich, a distinguished history professor emerita Lfrom Harvard University, has recently released a long-awaited and widely acclaimed work on women and plural marriage in early Mor- monism, titled A House Full of Females. She has previously published four books related to Colonial and Revolutionary America, one of which, A Midwife’s Tale, won both a Bancroft and a Pulitzer Prize the year after its publication in 1990. She describes A House Full of Females, which she began a decade ago, as “my first attempt to approach early Mormonism as a work of scholarship” (389). Given her relatively late entry into Mormon Studies, readers of BYU Studies Quarterly may not be familiar with Ulrich’s work, unless they have already read the three very favorable reviews of her new book published in BYU’s 2018 issue of Mormon Studies Review and her response to them.1 Mine is another favorable review, which aims to highlight aspects of the book that BYU Studies readers will find most interesting and adds to the growing praise Ulrich is receiving for this masterful work. Ulrich begins and ends her latest book with “An Indignation Meet- ing” held in the Old Tabernacle of Salt Lake City on January 13, 1870. Despite wintry weather, at least five thousand ladies gathered there to protest the Cullom Bill, which had been passed in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Mormon Studies Review Volume 4 Mormon Studies Review
    Mormon Studies Review Volume 4 | Number 1 Article 25 1-1-2017 Mormon Studies Review Volume 4 Mormon Studies Review Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/msr2 Part of the Mormon Studies Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Review, Mormon Studies (2017) "Mormon Studies Review Volume 4," Mormon Studies Review: Vol. 4 : No. 1 , Article 25. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/msr2/vol4/iss1/25 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the All Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mormon Studies Review by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Review: <em>Mormon Studies Review</em> Volume 4 2017 MORMON Volume 4 STUDIES Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship REVIEW Brigham Young University Editor-in-chief J. Spencer Fluhman, Brigham Young University MANAGING EDITOR D. Morgan Davis, Brigham Young University ASSOCIATE EDITORS Melissa Wei-Tsing Inouye, University of Auckland Benjamin E. Park, Sam Houston State University EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD Michael Austin, Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs, University of Evansville Philip L. Barlow, Leonard J. Arrington Chair of Mormon History and Culture, Utah State University Eric A. Eliason, Professor of English, Brigham Young University Kathleen Flake, Richard L. Bushman Chair of Mormon Studies, University of Virginia Terryl L. Givens, James A. Bostwick Chair of English and Professor of Literature and Religion, University of Richmond Matthew J. Grow, Director of Publications, Church History Department, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Grant Hardy, Professor of History and Religious Studies, University of North Carolina–Asheville David F.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Knight's Recollection of Early Mormon History
    Joseph Knight’s Recollection of Early Mormon History Dean Jessee n 22 August 1842, while reflecting upon the “faithful few” who had Ostood by him “in every hour of peril,” Joseph Smith recorded the following sentiments about Joseph Knight: [He] was among the number of the first to administer to my necessi- ties, while I was laboring in the commencement of the bringing forth of the work of the Lord, and of laying the foundation of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. For fifteen years he has been faith- ful and true, and even-handed and exemplary, and virtuous and kind, never deviating to the right hand or to the left. Behold he is a righteous man, may God Almighty lengthen out the old man’s days; and may his trembling, tortured, and broken body be renewed, and in the vigor of health turn upon him if it be Thy will, consistently, O God; and it shall be said of him, by the sons of Zion, while there is one of them remain- ing, that this was a faithful man in Israel; therefore his name shall never be forgotten.1 Joseph Knight, Sr., was born 3 November 1772 at Oakham, Worces- ter, Massachusetts. In 1809 he moved to Bainbridge, Chenango County, New York and two years later to Colesville, Broome County, New York where he remained for nineteen years. He owned a farm, a gristmill and carding machine, and according to his son, Newel, “was not rich, yet possessed enough of this world’s goods to secure to himself and family the necessaries and comforts of life.” His family consisted of three sons and four daughters.2 While Joseph Smith was living in Harmony, Pennsylvania he was occasionally employed by Joseph Knight.
    [Show full text]
  • BYU Studies Quarterly Volume 60 Number 1 (2021)
    Event or Process? How “the Chamber of Old Father Whitmer” Helps Us Understand Priesthood Restoration Michael Hubbard MacKay ecent studies describing the restoration of the priesthood have Rnoted and demonstrated that we have been anachronistically shap- ing our 1829 restoration narrative around twentieth-century notions that the Melchizedek Priesthood represents a separate “authority” or “power” that is distinctly independent from the body of ordained men (it has become something we hold rather than something we join). Jona- than Stapley argues that by the early twentieth century General Authori- ties explicitly defined priesthood as “the exclusive authority and power of God,” whereas before then it was used more ecclesiastically.1 Though Joseph Smith was certainly a restorationist, like many antebellum Ameri- cans, scholars have tended to frame his restorationism in terms of how the power or authority of God was restored (emphasizing priesthood as something you hold). For example, we focus on how John the Baptist restored an independent entity called the Aaronic Priesthood and how Peter, James, and John restored the higher companion priesthood called 1. Stapley describes the priesthood within three categories developing across time. First is ecclesiastical, which describes priesthood as a body of leaders called the priest- hood who would “channel the power of God.” Second, he associates the temple theolo- gies developed in Nauvoo with the priesthood that “constituted the very structure of the cosmos.” Finally, at the turn of the twentieth century, “instead of viewing priesthood as channeling the power of God, church leaders began to describe the priesthood as the power of God.” Jonathan Stapley, The Power of Godliness: Mormon Liturgy and Cosmol- ogy (New York: Oxford University Press, 2018), 11, 12.
    [Show full text]
  • The Teachings of Church Leaders Regarding the Crucifixion of Jesus Christ: 1852–2018
    The Teachings of Church Leaders Regarding the Crucifixion of Jesus Christ: 1852–2018 John Hilton III, Emily K. Hyde, and McKenna Grace Trussel rom the beginnings of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day FSaints (herein referred to as “the Church”), the Crucifixion of Jesus Christ has been at the heart of its theology. In numerous revelations received by Joseph Smith, the Savior is identified as having been “cru- cified for the sins of the world” (D&C 53:2; see also 21:9, 35:2, 46:13, 54:1, 76:41). President Brigham Young taught that salvation was only “through the name and ministry of Jesus Christ, and the atonement he made on Mount Calvary.”1 President John Taylor said that Christ “was crucified and put to death to atone for the sins of the world.”2 President Wilford Woodruff stated, “The Lord Jesus was crucified on Mount Cal- vary for the sins of the world.”3 And President Lorenzo Snow taught that Christ “sacrificed his life on Mount Calvary for the salvation of the human family.”4 In 1918, President Joseph F. Smith wrote “that redemp- tion had been wrought through the sacrifice of the Son of God upon the cross” (D&C 138:35), and in 1941, President Heber J. Grant testified that Christ “came to this earth with a divine mission to die upon the cross as the Redeemer of mankind, atoning for the sins of the world.”5 In brief, 1. Brigham Young, in Journal of Discourses, 26 vols. (Liverpool: F. D. Rich- ards, 1855–86), 9:365 (August 31, 1862).
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Smith and the Manchester (New York) Library
    BYU Studies Quarterly Volume 22 Issue 3 Article 6 7-1-1982 Joseph Smith and the Manchester (New York) Library Robert Paul Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byusq Recommended Citation Paul, Robert (1982) "Joseph Smith and the Manchester (New York) Library," BYU Studies Quarterly: Vol. 22 : Iss. 3 , Article 6. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byusq/vol22/iss3/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in BYU Studies Quarterly by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Paul: Joseph Smith and the Manchester (New York) Library joseph smith and the manchester new york library robert paul in a recent work on mormon origins it was again suggested that joseph smith may have derived some of his religious and theological ideas from the old manchester rental library a circulating library located within five miles of the smith family farm 1 this claim has received wide circulation but it has never really received the serious critical consideration it merits this paper attempts to assess the man- chester library its origin content current disposition and possible usefulness to joseph smith and others prior to the organization of the church in 1830 the manchester library was organized around 1812 and was orig- inally called the farmington library since at this early time the village of manchester as an unincorporated entity
    [Show full text]
  • BYU Studies Quarterly Volume 52 Number 4
    Michael G. Reed. Banishing the Cross: The Emergence of a Mormon Taboo. Independence, Mo.: John Whitmer Books, 2012. Reviewed by Alonzo L. Gaskill his first book by Michael G. Reed is a revamp of his 2009 master’s Tthesis, “The Development of the LDS Church’s Attitude toward the Cross” (California State University, Sacramento). In this current work, Reed beefs up his text with some additional sources and graphics, and he adds a chapter on the cross as a symbol in the Strangite and Com- munity of Christ (RLDS) traditions. The book’s aim is to delineate the place of the cross as a symbol in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and in the two afore- mentioned Restoration churches, though the book largely focuses on the Utah Church’s position. The text does offer a brief history of the cross in the ancient Christian Church, though it does so largely to com- pare ancient Christians’ attitudes toward that symbol with the attitudes found in branches of the restored gospel. What Reed shows, rather convincingly, is that Mormonism has not always been uncomfortable utilizing the cross as one of its symbols (67– 85). He establishes that Latter-day Saints (prior to the mid-twentieth century) employed that most common of Christian symbols in archi- tecture, as jewelry, on headstones and in funeral floral arrangements, as the Church’s registered branding iron for cattle, and even on the spine of certain editions of the Doctrine and Covenants (for example, the 1852 European edition). Reed points out that in 1916, the Church approached the Salt Lake City council for permission to erect a very large concrete and steel cross on Ensign Peak—a monument so large that it would be visible from anywhere in the valley.
    [Show full text]
  • BYU Studies Quarterly Volume 52 Number 2
    Beehive in a stained-glass window at the Church History Museum, Salt Lake City. All photos in this photo essay are © Val Brinkerhoff. The Symbolism of the Beehive in Latter-day Saint Tradition Val Brinkerhoff he beehive is one of the most common and enduring symbols within TMormonism, used ubiquitously. For example, it appears in publica- tions, logos, architecture, and as the name of one of the Young Women’s classes. It is an official emblem for the state of Utah, where it is used on the state seal, the state flag, highway signs, historic money, police cars, and more. The beehive is used widely in popular culture and names of businesses in Utah. Today the beehive is seen as a symbol of indus- try, teamwork, and unity. But evidence shows that Church leaders in the late 1840s had a different concept in mind. For them, the beehive represented the kingdom of God. This photo essay presents uses of the beehive in its historical and sacred settings in Mormonism. Anciently, the beehive was associated with kingdoms: a “king” bee (the dominant bee in a hive is actually female, but that was not known among scientists until the seventeenth century, and much later among the general population1) governed a productive, cooperative society. Bees and beehives were symbols for royalty, and thus divinity, in ancient Egypt and other societies.2 In the Old Testament, bees chase (Deut. 1:44), swarm (Judg. 14:8; Ps. 118:12), and sting (Isa. 7:18)—negative symbolism, but still symbolism of power. The honey they produce is a symbol of bounty and goodness, as in a land of milk and honey.
    [Show full text]
  • BYU Studies Quarterly Volume 59 Number 4 (2020)
    Understanding Covenants and Communities: Jews and Latter-day Saints in Dialogue Edited by Mark S. Diamond and Andrew C. Reed Provo, Utah: Religious Studies Center, Brigham Young University, in cooperation with the Central Conference of Rabbis, 2020 Reviewed by Bradley J. Kramer rganized topically, this book’s sixteen essays provide a wealth of Oinformation about Jewish and Latter-day Saint perspectives, scrip- ture, experience, worship, culture, and politics. However, at least for me, the true treasure of these essays is not so much informational as it is relational. In my experience, interfaith meetings frequently bear an uncanny resemblance to middle-school dances: occasions where two groups very much want to get to know each other but have absolutely no idea how to do so. Consequently, they hang back, occasionally venturing forth to make awkward, momentary contact, only to quickly retreat to the safety of their respective camps afterwards. With this book, Jewish and Latter- day Saint scholars from Loyola Marymount University; Brigham Young University; Hebrew Union College–Jewish Institute of Religion, Los Angeles; and the Academy for Jewish Religion California attempt to rem- edy this situation not only by offering their readers several “good practices and lessons learned about successful interfaith dialogues” (xiv) but also by demonstrating in essay form what such a dialogue looks like and what it can lead to. Where to Begin? Even before their first meeting, participants in the Jewish–Latter-day Saint Academic Dialogue Project, as these scholars called their effort, rec- ognized that interfaith dialogue, if it is to be productive and meaningful, must be conducted within a framework of a close relationship and that such a relationship can only be built over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Journal
    Advisory Board Noel B. Reynolds, chair Grant Anderson James P. Bell Donna Lee Bowen Involving Readers Douglas M. Chabries Neal Kramer in the Latter-day Saint John M. Murphy Academic Experience Editor in Chief John W. Welch Church History Board Richard Bennett, chair 19th-century history Brian Q. Cannon 20th-century history Kathryn Daynes 19th-century history Gerrit J. Dirkmaat Joseph Smith, 19th-century Mormonism Steven C. Harper documents Frederick G. Williams cultural history Liberal Arts and Sciences Board Barry R. Bickmore, chair geochemistry Justin Dyer family science, family and religion Daryl Hague Spanish and Portuguese Susan Howe English, poetry, drama Steven C. Walker Christian literature Reviews Board Gerrit van Dyk, chair Church history Trevor Alvord new media Herman du Toit art, museums Specialists Casualene Meyer poetry editor Thomas R. Wells photography editor Ashlee Whitaker cover art editor STUDIES QUARTERLY BYU Vol. 57 • No. 3 • 2018 ARTICLES 4 From the Editor 7 Reclaiming Reality: Doctoring and Discipleship in a Hyperconnected Age Tyler Johnson 39 Understanding the Abrahamic Covenant through the Book of Mormon Noel B. Reynolds 81 The Language of the Original Text of the Book of Mormon Royal Skousen 111 Joseph Smith’s Iowa Quest for Legal Assistance: His Letters to Edward Johnstone and Others on Sunday, June 23, 1844 John W. Welch 143 Martin Harris Comes to Utah, 1870 Susan Easton Black and Larry C. Porter ESSAY 75 Wandering On to Glory Patrick Moran POETRY 80 Anaranjado John Alba Cutler 165 “Why Are Your Kids Late to School Today?” Lisa Martin BOOK REVIEWS 166 Saints at Devil’s Gate: Landscapes along the Mormon Trail by Laura Allred Hurtado and Bryon C.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Journal
    Editor in Chief Steven C. Harper Associate Editor Susan Elizabeth Howe Involving Readers Editorial Board in the Latter-day Saint Trevor Alvord media Academic Experience Richard E. Bennett Church history Carter Charles history W. Justin Dyer social science Dirk A. Elzinga linguistics Sherilyn Farnes history James E. Faulconer philosophy/theology Kathleen Flake religious studies Ignacio M. Garcia history Daryl R. Hague translation Taylor Halvorson, scripture and innovation David F. Holland religious history Kent P. Jackson scripture Megan Sanborn Jones theater and media arts Ann Laemmlen Lewis independent scholar Kerry Muhlestein Egyptology Armand L. Mauss sociology Marjorie Newton history Josh E. Probert material culture Susan Sessions Rugh history Herman du Toit visual arts Lisa Olsen Tait history Greg Trimble, entrepreneurship, internet engineering John G. Turner history Gerrit van Dyk Church history John W. Welch law and scripture Frederick G. Williams cultural history Jed L. Woodworth history STUDIES QUARTERLY BYU Vol. 58 • No. 3 • 2019 ARTICLES 4 The History of the Name of the Savior’s Church: A Collaborative and Revelatory Process K. Shane Goodwin 42 Voice from the Dust A Shoshone Perspective on the Bear River Massacre Darren Parry 58 The Nauvoo Music and Concert Hall: A Prelude to the Exodus Darrell Babidge 105 Naturalistic Explanations of the Origin of the Book of Mormon: A Longitudinal Study Brian C. Hales 149 The Office of Church Recorder: A Conversation with Elder Steven E. Snow Keith A. Erekson COVER ART 78 She Will Find What Is Lost: Brian Kershisnik’s Artistic Response to the Problem of Human Suffering Cris Baird ESSAY 99 Burning the Couch: Some Stories of Grace Robbie Taggart POETRY 98 First Argument Darlene Young BOOK REVIEW 186 Sex and Death on the Western Emigrant Trail: The Biology of Three American Tragedies by Donald K.
    [Show full text]
  • BYU Studies Quarterly Volume 53 Issue 3 (2014)
    DOCUMENT David Hale’s Store Ledger New Details about Joseph and Emma Smith, the Hale Family, and the Book of Mormon Mark Lyman Staker and Robin Scott Jensen s gossip filtered from one Wayne County, New York, farm to another A that Joseph Smith Jr. claimed to have a collection of ancient artifacts, including an impressively heavy set of golden plates, it became increas- ingly difficult in October 1827 for him to keep the plates safe. But even before he had them in hand, Joseph and his wife, Emma Hale Smith, had arranged with Emma’s brother Alva Hale to help the couple move with the plates to northeastern Pennsylvania. The newly married Joseph agreed with his father-in-law, Isaac Hale, that he would buy a small farm there where he “expected to work hard for a living, and was willing to do s o.” 1 He would need to work hard, since his parents’ family had limited financial resources to draw from as Joseph was starting his own family. But he also planned on translating the Book of Mormon in his new home. Joseph and Emma arrived in Pennsylvania’s Susquehanna Valley in early December 1827, and because they had little money the need to work hard was immediate and hampered whatever hopes the young couple had of quickly completing a translation. Fortunately, Emma’s older brother David Hale kept a store nearby where Joseph could trade labor and goods, which he did between January 1, 1828, and March 20, 1829, as he sought to establish his family and work on the translation.
    [Show full text]