Boston Appeals Fall 1999

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Boston Appeals Fall 1999 Presents They Had Their Beans Baked In Beantown Appeals at the 1999 Fall NABC Edited by Rich Colker ACBL Appeals Administrator Assistant Editor Linda Trent ACBL Appeals Manager CONTENTS Foreword iii The Expert Panel v Cases from San Antonio Tempo (Cases 1-24) 1 Unauthorized Information (Cases 25-35) 93 Misinformation (Cases 35-49) 125 Claims (Cases 50-52) 177 Other (Case 53-56) 187 Closing Remarks From the Expert Panelists 199 Closing Remarks From the Editor 203 Special Section: The WBF Code of Practice (for Appeals Committees) 209 The Panel’s Director and Committee Ratings 215 NABC Appeals Committee 216 Abbreviations used in this casebook: AI Authorized Information AWMPP Appeal Without Merit Penalty Point LA Logical Alternative MI Misinformation PP Procedural Penalty UI Unauthorized Information i ii FOREWORD We continue with our presentation of appeals from NABC tournaments. As always, our goal is to provide information and to foster change for the better in a manner that is entertaining, instructive and stimulating. The ACBL Board of Directors is testing a new appeals process at NABCs in 1999 and 2000 in which a Committee (called a Panel) comprised of pre-selected top Directors will hear appeals at NABCs from non-NABC+ events (including side games, regional events and restricted NABC events). Appeals from NABC+ events will continue to be heard by the National Appeals Committees (NAC). We will review both types of cases as we always have traditional Committee cases. Panelists were sent all cases and invited to comment on and rate each Director ruling and Panel/Committee decision. Not every panelist will comment on every case. Ratings (averaged over panelists and expressed as percentages) are presented along with each write-up and again in a table at the end of the casebook, which also includes separate summaries for Panels and Committees and an overall summary. Numerical ratings are provided to summarize our assessment of Director and Panel/Committee performance. They are not intended, nor should they be used, to compare the performance of Directors and Panels/Committees as each group is evaluated on a different set of criteria: Directors are rated on their handling of the situation at the table including determining facts, applying the appropriate laws, and making a ruling which allows the game to progress normally —expecting that it may be reviewed and possibly overturned on appeal; Panels/Committees are rated on their fact finding, application of law, and use of bridge judgment appropriate to the level of the event and the players involved. (Note: Ratings can be affected by panelists’ views of the use, or lack of use, of PPs and AWMPPs.) Table rulings are typically made after consultation among Directors, including the DIC of the event (who is responsible for the final ruling). This is true even if we occasionally lapse and refer to a ruling as the table Director’s. At management’s request, only the DIC’s name is included in each write-up. Panels are expected to obtain bridge advice from expert players on each case. They should be judged on the players chosen and their use of the input received. Ambiguity Department. Write-ups often refer to such things as “an X-second break in tempo.” Our policy is to treat all tempo references as the total time taken for the call (unless otherwise specified) and not how much longer than “normal” the call took (which poses the additional problem of what is “normal” for the given auction). Chairmen and scribes should adjust their reports accordingly. Mild Disclaimer Department. While we try to insure that the write-ups that appear in these pages are complete and accurate, we can offer no guarantees. Since even minor changes in the reported facts can affect our evaluations, the opinions we express are valid only for cases which match the facts reported. Otherwise, the discussions here should be regarded as theoretical exercises only. New Format: For readers who have had difficulty distinguishing the editor’s comments from those of the panelists, beginning with this edition we have inserted a symbol (a hand holding a pen) before each editorial passage. We hope this helps. And finally, my thanks everyone whose efforts help to make these casebooks possible: the scribes, reviewers and chairmen who labor to chronicle the details of each case; the panelists for their hard work and devotion to a truly arduous task for which they receive only our praise (and occasional abuse); and, of course, Linda Trent, NABC Appeals Manager. My sincere thanks to all of you. I hope my efforts have not in any way diminished your work. Rich Colker, May, 2000 iii iv THE EXPERT PANEL Tournament Directors in the European Bridge League and has been the Operations Director of the WBF since 1991. He is Chairman of the WBF Laws Committee Henry Bethe, 56, was born in Los Alamos, NM. He is a graduate of Columbia (succeeding Edgar Kaplan) and has been a member since 1993. University and currently resides in Ithaca, NY. He has a son, Paul. His other interests include stamp collecting, baseball statistics and other mathematical Chris Patrias, 50, was born in North Carolina and now lives in the St Louis area recreations. He is a Team Leader of the National Appeals Committee. He won the with his wife, Charlotte, and their two dogs. He is a graduate of the University of Life Master Men’s Pairs in 1969 but is proudest of winning the third bracket of a Minnesota. He has been directing bridge tournaments since 1977 and is a salaried Regional Knockout partnered by his son Paul at the Chicago NABC. ACBL National Director. Bart Bramley, 52, was born in Poughkeepsie, NY. He grew up in Connecticut and Jeffrey Polisner, 60, was born in Buffalo, NY and currently resides in Northern CA Boston and is a graduate of MIT. He credits Ken Lebensold as an essential where he has been a practicing attorney since 1967. He is a graduate of Ohio State influence in his bridge development. He currently resides in Chicago with his University (BS) and obtained his JD from Case Western Reserve. He is currently longtime companion Judy Wadas. He is a stock options trader at the CBOE. Bart the WBF Counsel and former ACBL League Counsel. He is a member of the ACBL is a sports fan (especially baseball and specifically the NY Yankees), a golf and WBF Laws Commissions and former Co-Chairman of the ACBL National enthusiast, a Deadhead and enjoys word games. He was 1997 Player of the Year. Appeals Committee. His NABC wins include the 1989 Reno Vanderbilt and the 1997 Reisinger. In 1998 he was second in the World Par Contest and third in the Rosenblum Teams. He also Barry Rigal, 42, was born in London, England. He currently resides in New York played in the 1991 Bermuda Bowl and captained the 1996 U.S. Olympiad team. City with his wife, Sue Picus. A bridge writer and analyst, he contributes to many periodicals worldwide and is the author of the book, Precision in the Nineties. He Jon Brissman, 55, was born in Abilene, TX. He attended Purdue University and enjoys theater, music, arts, and travel. Barry is also an outstanding Vugraph earned a B.A. from Parsons College, an M.A. from Northeast Missouri State commentator, demonstrating an extensive knowledge of bidding systems played by University, and a J.D. from Western State University College of Law. He operates pairs all over the world. He coached the USA I team to the Venice Cup in 1997. He a small law office in San Bernardino, California, teaches at the Los Angeles College is proudest of his fourth-place finish in the 1990 Geneva World Mixed Pairs and of Chiropractic, and serves as a judge pro tem in small claims and municipal court. winning the Common Market Mixed Teams in 1987 and the Gold Cup in 1991. He was Co-Chairman of the National Appeals Committee from 1982-88 and was reappointed in 1997. A Good Will Committee member, he believes that a pleasant Michael Rosenberg, 46, was born in New York where he has resided since 1978. demeanor coaxes forth his partnership's best efforts. He is a stock options trader. His mother, father and sister reside in Scotland where he grew up. His hobbies include music. Widely regarded as the expert’s expert, Ralph Cohen, 73, was born in Montreal, PQ. He currently resides in Memphis, TN. Michael won the Rosenblum KO and was second in the Open Pairs in the 1994 He has held several positions with the ACBL from 1971 until 1991 including World Championships. He was the ACBL Player of the Year in 1994 and won the Executive Director from 1984 to 1986. He has been a member of ACBL Laws World Par Contest at the 1998 World Championships. He believes the bridge Commission since 1984 and is currently a Co-Chairman. He is a Vice-Chairman of accomplishment he will be proudest of is still in the future. Michael is a leading the WBF Laws Committee. He wrote the Ruling the Game column for two years spokesman for ethical bridge play and for policies that encourage higher standards. along with other contributions for The ACBL Bridge Bulletin. He represented Canada in the World Team Olympiad in 1964 and has won four National David Stevenson, 53, was born in Kumasi, Gold Coast. He currently resides in Championships. He has been attending NABCs since 1947. Liverpool, England with his wife Elizabeth and his two cats, Quango and Nanki Poo. His hobbies include anything to do with cats and trains.
Recommended publications
  • Household and Structural Pest Management for Professionals
    Professional Pest Control Rev. 2/17 Household and Structural Pest Management for Professionals See The UT E&PP Redbook, Household and Structural Pests section (https://ag.tennessee.edu/EPP/Pages/Household-Structural.aspx) for information related to preventing and otherwise managing pests using integrated pest management. More information for the pest management professional can be found in the following UT Extension Publications https://ag.tennessee.edu/PSEP/Pages/studymanuals.aspx Vail, K.M., G. Burgess, R. Gerhardt and C. Harper [eds.]. 2007. PB1673 General Pest and Rodent Control Pesticide Applicator Licensing Manual (GRC). pp. 130. Vail, K., G. Burgess , R. Gerhardt and C. Jones [eds.]. 2002. PB1685 Public Health Mosquito Control: The Tennessee Mosquito Control Handbook (Pesticide Applicator Licensing Manual). pp. 54. Vail, K., G. Burgess, C. Pless and B. Bonds [eds.]. 2006. PB 1703 Wood-Destroying Organisms Licensing Manual. Vail, K.M., E. Burgess, R. Gerhardt, and Craig Harper. 2006. PB1732 Industrial, Institutional, Structural and Health Related Pest Management Certification Manual (Category 7). pp. 105 Vail, K.M., E.E. Burgess, R. Gerhardt, C. Jones, J. Skinner and C. Harper. 2003. PB1733. Public Health Pest Control (Certification Category 8). pp. 99 Further references for household pest identification: Manuals: Bennett, G. W., J. M. Owens, & R. M. Corrigan. 2011. Scientific Guide to Pest Management Operations, seventh edition Cleveland, OH: Questex Publishing. Mallis, A. 2011. Handbook of Pest Control - the Behavior, Life History and Control of Household Pests. 10th edition. Mallis Handbook LLC. Field Guides Hedges, S. 2010. Pest Control Technology Field Guide for the Management of Structure-Infesting Ants, 3rd edition.
    [Show full text]
  • 40Ppfinal (0708)
    Washington www.Washington BridgeLeague.org Bridge League Sept./Oct. 2002 B♣U♥L♠L♦E♥T♣I♠N Thursday, October 10 ♣Stratified Open Pairs ............................................................................ 10:30am Washington Bridge Center,,, 1620 Elton Road, Silver Spring MD ♦StrataFlighted Open Pairs (both sites) + Stratified 199er Pairs (Christ the King Church only) or Stratified 99er Pairs (Beth El only) Beth El Congregation, 3830 Seminary Rd, Alexandria .......................... 7:00pm Christ the King Church, 2301 Colston Drive, Silver Spring ................... 7:30pm Capital Beltway to Connecticut Ave. South. Left on East-West Hwy. Right on Grubb Rd. 1st left on Colston. The church is one block on the left. * * * * Remainder of Tournament held at White Oak Armory Only * * * * 12200 Cherry Hill Road, Silver Spring MD Capital Beltway East to US 29 North (Exit 30A- toward Columbia) or Capital Beltway West to MD 193 West (Exit 29 - toward Wheaton); go ½ mile and turn right on US 29 North. Go north 4 miles, then right on Cherry Hill Rd. Right on Robert L. Finn Dr. (immediately after Toyota dealer) and left into parking lot. Friday, October 11 ♥Stratified Open Pairs (single sessions).................. 10:00am, 2:00pm & 8:00pm ♠Stratified Senior Pairs (single sessions) .............................. 10:00am & 2:00pm ♣Intermediate/Novice Pairs (single sessions) ......... 10:00am, 2:00pm & 8:00pm ♦Stratified Triple Nickel Swiss Teams, VPs ............................................. 8:00pm Saturday, October 12 ♥Stratified Senior Pairs (single sessions) ................................. 9:30am &1:30pm ♠Newcomer Pairs (0-5 masterpoints) ........................................................ 1:30pm ♣50/20/10/5 Special 49er Stratified Trophy Pairs ................................ 1:30pm ♦StrataFlighted Open Pairs (single sessions)......................... 1:30pm & 7:00pm ♥StrataFlighted Open Pairs (single sessions)........................
    [Show full text]
  • WBF Convention Card 2.19 REOPENING:Cue Bid Is Only Forcing, Can Be Weaker; RESP= Suit 4Th 4Th NAT NT 4Th 4Th Category: Natural - GREEN Subseq Low=Encourage High=Disc
    DEFENSIVE AND COMPETITIVE BIDDING LEADS AND SIGNALS OVERCALLS (Style; Responses; 1/2 Level; Reopening) OPENING LEADS STYLE Sound; CUE-BID RESP:Promises support,Jump RAISE=PRE Lead In Partner's Suit WBF Convention Card 2.19 REOPENING:Cue bid is only forcing, Can be weaker; RESP= Suit 4th 4th NAT NT 4th 4th Category: Natural - GREEN Subseq low=encourage high=disc. low=encourage high=disc. Country: CHINESE TAIPEI Other: Ace=request S/p, king=count Event: Players: VIOLET LIU JOYCE HSU 1NT OVERCALL (2ND/4TH Live; Responses; Reopening) LEADS SYSTEM SUMMARY 2nd POS:15-18HCP; Same as 1NT Opening Lead Vs. Suit Vs. NT GENERAL APPROACH AND STYLE 4th POS:13-15HCP; Same as 1NT Opening Ace AK; Axx(+) AK;AKx(+) Natural; 5-card M; 1NT resp:F1(6-12)/1M; PRE:Classic; King KQ;AKx(+);AKJ10(+)KQ109x KQ;KQx(+)AKJ10(+)KQ109(+ Mutil 2D/H/S Opening; Limit jump raises/M;Weak jump Queen KQ109;QJ;QJx(+) QJ;QJx(+);KQ109 shift VS overcall. Jack AQJX;J10x(+); J10;J10x(+);HQJXX(+) JUMP OVERCALLS (Style; Responses; Unusual NT) 10 109;109x(+);HJ10(+);10x 109;109x(+);HJ10Xx(+) 1-Suit: WEAK; 2NT:asking strength and suit Quality 9 9x;98x(+);H98XX 98x(+) 2-Suit: 2NT=lower 2 unbid suits: Hi-x Sx;xSx Sx;Sxx;xSxx 1NT Openings: 15-18- HCP H+om; (1M)-2NT: D+C UNLIMITED Lo-x HxS;HxxS(+);xxxS(+) HxS;HxxS(+);xxxS(+) 2 OVER 1 Responses: Promises rebid Reopen: 2NT=NAT SIGNALS IN ORDER OF PRIORITY SPECIAL BIDS THAT MAY REQUIRE DEFENCE DIRECT and JUMP CUE BIDS (Style; Responses; Reopen) Partners Lead Declarer's Lead Discarding GAMBLING 3NT(SOL m,with 1/2 side suit STOP) MICHAELS CUE: (1m)-2m:H+S (54+); (1M)-2M:OM+m (55+); Suit:1st Hi/lo=D same EVEN=DISCOURAGE LEBENSOHL;MICHAEL Cue Bid over NAT Openig, Unlimit Seeking stopper.
    [Show full text]
  • VI. Slam-Bidding Methods
    this page intentionally left blank We-Bad System Document January 16, 2011 “We-Bad”: Contents IV. Competitive-Bidding Methods page numbers apply to PDF only A. Competition After Our Preempt 32 B. Competition After Our Two-Club Opening 32 Introduction 4 C. Competition After Our One-Notrump Opening 33 I. Definitions 5 D. Competition After Our Major-Suit Opening 34 II. General Understandings and E. Competition After Our Minor-Suit Opening 35 Defaults 6 F. Competition After Any Suit One-Bid 36 III. Partnership-Bidding Methods V. Defensive-Bidding Methods A. Opening-Bid A. Initial Defensive-Action Requirements 39 Requirements 10 A2. All-Context Actions 46 B. Choice of Suit 11 B. After Our Double of a One-Bid 46 C. After Our Preempt 12 C. After Our Suit Overcall of a One-Bid 47 D. After Our Two Clubs 13 D. After Our One-Notrump Overcall 48 E. After Our Two-Notrump- E. After We Reopen a One-Bid 48 Family Opening 14 F. When the Opener has Preempted 48 F. After Our One-Notrump G. After Our Sandwich-Position Action 50 Opening 16 G. Delayed Auction Entry 50 G. After Our Major-Suit VI. Slam-Bidding Methods 51 Opening 20 VII. Defensive Carding 59 H. After Our Minor-Suit VIII. Related Tournament-Ready Systems 65 Opening 25 IX. Other Resources 65 I. After Any Suit One-Bid 26 Bridge World Standard following 65 3 of 65 1/16/2011 9:52 AM 3 of 65 We-Bad System Document Introduction (click for BWS) We-Bad is a scientific 5-card major system very distantly descended from Bridge World Standard.
    [Show full text]
  • Bolish Club Contents
    Bolish Club A system that has evolved from EHAA+ (my version of EHAA, Every Hand An Adventure), and is now more similar to Polish Club. Other sources of inspiration are Keri by Ron Klinger, Ambra by Benito Garozzo, and Einari Club (a local Blue-team-like system, something of a standard in Turku). BC includes natural or strong 1|, 5-card majors, 2-over-1 game forcing, and responders 2| as relay in most situations. By Jari BÄoling,some based on ideas and discussions with Kurt-Erik HÄaggblom,Jyrki Lahtonen, and Ensio Lehtinen, last updated January 5, 2007 Contents 1 The 1| opening 2 1.1 Interference over 1| ......................................... 8 2 The 1} opening 10 3 Major openings 10 3.1 Choosing response in borderline cases . 12 3.2 The semi-forcing 1NT response . 12 3.3 The 1M-2| relay . 14 3.3.1 After interference . 15 3.3.2 A natural alternative . 15 4 The weak twos 16 4.1 New suit bids ask for stoppers and length . 16 4.2 Jump shifts are control asking bids . 17 4.3 2NT is an invitational or better raise . 17 4.4 The weak 2| opening . 18 4.5 Competition . 18 4.5.1 The McCabe convention . 19 5 The 2| opening as 17{18 balanced 19 6 2} Wilkosz 20 7 2| Multi-Wilkosz 20 8 Semi-balanced 2M 21 9 2} multi 22 10 The 2NT opening 22 BC Opening Bids Opening strength description conventional response frequency 1| a) 11{17 2+ clubs 2|, 2}, 2NT, 3} 8.5(9.7)% b) 18+ any shape (excluding 23-24 bal.) 1}=0{5 hcpts 3.2% 1} 11{17 4+ diamonds 2|, 2}, 2NT, 3| 8.6(9.5)% 1~ 11{17¤ 5+ hearts 2|, 2}, 2NT 6.7% 1Ä 11{17¤ 5+ spades 2|, 2~, 2NT 6.9% 1NT a)
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix O to the ACBL General Conditions of Contest: Online Play
    Appendix O to the ACBL General Conditions of Contest: Online Play 1) Cheating: Cheating online is a serious offense, subject to the same penalties as cheating in live play. It is illegal to communicate with your partner during a hand via any means other than chat to the full table, to communicate with a kibitzer during the game, to play using an account that is not yours, to gain advanced knowledge of a deal, or to play in one event using multiple accounts. Any accusation of cheating must be made privately to the director of the event, to the ACBL Recorder, or to a reporting mechanism provided by the online platform. 2) Alerts: Alerts (including announcements) are made by the player making the call. An alerted call should be accompanied by an explanation. Stating the common or popular name of the convention is not sufficient. You are encouraged to explain calls even if those calls do not require alerts. Any call that would be alerted after the auction in live bridge should be alerted at the time of the call. 3) Any contestant may request information concerning an opponent’s methods. Such inquiries should be directed to the player who made the call and must be asked in a private chat. Replies to these inquiries must likewise be given in a private chat. When playing with a Zoom (or the equivalent) screenmate follow up questions are permitted regardless of which player made the call or play. 4) Tempo: In general, bids and plays within 10 seconds are considered to be in tempo.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Summer NABC Appeals Casebook
    2010 Summer NABC Appeals Casebook Appeals at the 2010 Summer NABC New Orleans, Louisiana FOREWORD The appeal hearings and commentary descriptions are now being compiled and edited by the American Contract Bridge League. They are published on the ACBL web page. This internet publication is intended to be a tool to help improve the abilities of those serving on appeals committees and tournament directors and to communicate decisions and the process to arrive at those decisions to the membership at large. A total of thirty (20) cases were heard. Eight (8) cases were from unrestricted (by masterpoints) North American Bridge Championship Events and were heard by a committee of peers. The names of the players involved are included. Twelve (12) cases were from all other events and were heard by panels (committees) of tournament directors. The names of the players involved are included when the event from which the appeal came was a Flight A/X event or was the top bracket of a bracketed knockout event. When the names of the players are not used, the player’s masterpoint total is included. The cases are first presented without commentary. After the official panel of commentators has had an opportunity to provide their commentary (about 4 weeks) and any corrections to the cases, the commentary is added, corrections made and the internet publication is finalized. Everyone involved in this process is due praise for their efforts. Special thanks to the NABC Appeals Committee and the Tournament Directors serving on the director committees, scribes and commentators. Without their considerable contribution of time and effort, this publication would not exist.
    [Show full text]
  • This Month's Newsletter Includes the Sections Corresponding Section. If
    This month's newsletter includes the sections listed below. Click a link to jump to the corresponding section. If your browser does not support these links, scroll down to find a specific section. ♦ President's Message ♦ Board Business ♦ New Members and Rank Advancements ♦ Unit News ♦ Club News ♦ From the Editors Please visit the Unit 174 Website ( www.acblunit174.org ) to view updated information about the activities in our Unit and at our Clubs. Hope to see everyone at the Fabulous Fall Sectional tournament—it promises to be a wonderful time. Hope also that you are making plans to play in the upcoming 2019 Lone Star Regional that will be held February 4th – 10th. Information on the 2019 LSR is below and the full schedule of events can be found at http://www.acblunit174.org/Flyers/2019_LSR_Final.pdf . My wife and I were in Sedona Arizona last month and we went on a Full Moon hike at Sedona State Park. We started at the Visitors' Cen ter about an hour before sunset and were led by an experienced guide through the park and up to the top of a small mountain just before sunset. We were able to see the sun set behind the beautiful red rock mountains and then turn around 1 and watch the full moon rise in the east. It was spectacular and definitely an "ooh and aah" moment. One of the hikers was from the area and said "we see this all the time…" Well, that got me thinking. How many times do we do or see something all the time and not see the goo d in the moment? My learning from that comment is to try not to forget the awesomeness all around us and to recognize the good things that are happening.
    [Show full text]
  • Courtesy of Mary Jane Kinnebrew
    Online Chat abbreviations – Courtesy of Mary Jane Kinnebrew ------------------------------------- AFAIK: as far as I know AFK: away from keyboard ASAP: as soon as possible A/S/L?: age, sex, location B4: before B4N: bye for now BAK: back at the keyboard BBN: bye bye now BFN: bye for now BRB: be right back BTW: by the way CU: see you CUL or CUL8ER: see you later CUZ: because F2F: face to face FAQ: frequently asked question(s) FC fingers crossed FWIW: for what it’s worth FYI: for your information GA: go ahead GTG: Got to Go. IAC: in any case IC: I see IDK: I don’t know IIRC: if I remember correctly ILU: I love you IM: instant message IMHO: in my humble opinion IMing: chatting with someone online IMNSHO: in my not so humble opinion IMO: in my opinion JK: just kidding K: okay KIT: keep in touch LOL: 1. Laughing out loud. 2. Little Old Lady. L8R: later M/F: male or female MSG: message N/P: no problem OIC: oh I see OMG: oh my god OTOH: on the other hand PLZ: please PM: private message ROFL: rolling on the floor laughing SUP or WU: what’s up THX: Thanks TX: Thanks. TU: thank you UW: you’re welcome WB: welcome back WTG: Way to go! WYSIWYG: what you see is what you get Online Bridge abbreviations ---------------------------------------- 2/1 : 1. Two-over-one response (e.g. 1H : 2C). 2. Abbreviation for the 2/1 Game Force bidding system, in which a two-over-one response (with the exception of responses to 1NT) is forcing to game.
    [Show full text]
  • Double - a Call for Any Occasion ©Aib Robert S
    Adventures in Bridge Leaders in Bridge Entertainment and Education www.advinbridge.com This Week in Bridge (14) Double - A Call for Any Occasion ©AiB Robert S. Todd Level: 1, 2 [email protected] General Philosophy Level: 1 The modern approach to the meaning of doubles in low-level auctions is to use them to help our side compete in the bidding when no other explicit call is appropriate. There are many different types of doubles and many special names for them, but in general they are basically the same – these doubles show enough values to take some action and a desire to compete in the bidding. Primary Types of Doubles Takeout Negative Responsive Support Other Doubles (further explanations of these will come in later lessons) Card Showing Maximal Balancing More Takeout Snapdragon, and more… Primary Types of Doubles What different kinds of doubles are there? A good way to remember the basic types of doubles is to think about which player can make which type of double. This is a general guideline: Interferer (first opponent to act, often LHO of Opener) can make a Takeout Double. Responder (partner of Opener) can make a Negative Double. Advancer (partner of Interferer) can make a Responsive Double. Opener can make another type of takeout double called a Support Double. Note: Opener and Responder can also make “re-opening” and other types of doubles that are generally for takeout. [email protected] PO Box 14915 ♠ Tallahassee, FL 32317 850 570 6459 Adventures in Bridge, Inc. www.advinbridge.com Doubles Diagram North is the opening bidder in our diagram.
    [Show full text]
  • Veldhoven 2011 Issue
    Co-ordinator: Jean-Paul Meyer • Chief Editor: Brent Manley • Editors: Phillip Alder, Mark Horton, Jos Jacobs, Micke Melander, Brian Senior • Lay Out Editor: Akis Kanaris • Photographer: Ron Tacchi Issue No. 3 Tuesday, 18 October 2011 LONG AND WINDING ROAD The audience in the VuGraph auditorium watches the action and listens to expert commentary Two days of round robin play are in the books, time for competitors in the Bermuda Bowl, Venice Cup and D’Orsi Contents Senior Bowl to take a breath and realize they still have five Tournament Results . .2-3 days of play left to try to make it to the knockout phases A smasher called Italy . .5 of their respective events. Familiar foes (VC Round 2, Germany - Netherlands) . .6 By the time they’re done, each team will have played 21 SB Round 3, Denmark - USA 2 . .8 matches with the goal of making the top eight in their Good morning, Veldhoven . .11 brackets, the requisite for playing on after Saturday. Comeback (BB Round 2, USA 1 - China) . .12 Italy is still in the lead in the Bermuda Bowl, but with a Bermuda Bowl and Venice Cup - Round 3 . .14 loss and a narrow win over Iceland, their substantial lead Second hand high . .17 has shrunk as the Netherlands closes in. In the Venice Cup, Rub of the Green (Round 4, China - France) . .18 Sweden has a slim lead over Germany, with England in hot Meet my maker, the Mad Multi . .22 pursuit. France is setting the standard in the Senior Bowl, 9 Chinese slam swings . .24 VPs ahead of USA 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Strong and Four
    STRONG AND FOUR Apr/2020 Table of Contents 1 SYSTEM OVERVIEW ................................................................................................ 1 1.1 OPENING BIDS ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 DEFENSIVE BIDDING ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 GAME CONVENTIONS ......................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 SLAM CONVENTIONS .......................................................................................................................... 3 1.5 PLAYING CONVENTIONS ..................................................................................................................... 3 2 OPENING ONE OF A SUIT ....................................................................................... 4 2.1 CHOICE OF OPENING BIDS .................................................................................................................. 4 2.1.1 Limited hands (12-16) .............................................................................................................. 4 2.1.2 Strong hands (16-20) ............................................................................................................... 4 2.1.3 What hands to open ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]