BBC Local Democracy Reporter Allocation
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
13/2136C Rectory Farm, Knutsford Road, Church Lawton, Stoke-On
Application No: 13/2136C Location: Rectory Farm, Knutsford Road, Church Lawton, Stoke-on-Trent, ST7 3EQ Proposal: Outline application for demolition of house, garage, barns and outbuildings, removal of hardstanding and construction of housing development Applicant: Northwest Heritage Expiry Date: 27-Aug-2013 SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION Approve with conditions MAIN ISSUES • Principle of Development • Sustainability • Character and Appearance • Landscape Impact • Ecology • Highway Safety and Traffic Generation. • Affordable Housing • Drainage and Flooding • Open Space • Residential Amenity • Other Considerations REFERRAL The application has been referred to the Southern Planning Committee because the site area is just over 0.5 hectares in size and is therefore a small scale major development. 1. SITE DESCRIPTION This application relates to the former Rectory Farm situated to the northwest of Church Lawton and to the east of the Town of Alsager. The site lies wholly within the Infill Boundary Line for Lawton Gate, which is a small settlement washed over by Green Belt. The site accommodates the main rectory farm dormer bungalow, a detached dormer ancillary outbuilding and some detached barns / stables towards. To the north and the east, the site is bound by field and paddocks. Beyond the northern boundary of the site, the levels drop away significantly where the curtilage of Rectory Farm ceases. The land slopes downwards towards a brook beyond which there is the Trent and Mersey Canal which occupies an elevated position relative to the northern end of the site. The site can be viewed from the adjacent canal towpath. There are residential properties further to the east and residential properties bounding the southern boundary of the site which form part of the Lawton Gate settlement. -
COVID-19 Bi-Weekly Bristol Statistics Update Tuesday 20 October 2020
COVID-19 bi-weekly Bristol statistics update Tuesday 20 October 2020 We aim to publish a COVID-19 bi-weekly Bristol statistics update twice a week, on Tuesday and Friday afternoons. This may be delayed until the following day, depending on when data is made available. These numbers and rates do change daily but were accurate when published on the date stated on the report. Summary Bristol's rate of 211.7 new cases per 100,000 population in the last 7 days (up to the 16th October) is considerably higher than for the previous 7 days (135.9 per 100,000). The reported rate represents 981 positive cases reported for Bristol over the past 7 days within a population of over 463,000 people. The trend is very clearly moving upwards both locally and nationally and the Bristol rate remains above England rate of 170.8 per 100,000 and is now ranked 46th among 149 English local authorities. Bristol is a Tier 1 area in the new national assessment system. This means we must continue to adhere to national instructions and guidelines. We are closely monitoring any changes and are considering the situation carefully. The regional R number remains at the same level as last week: a range of 1.3 – 1.6 reflecting the rise in cases locally and nationally. The range of R is above 1 indicating the epidemic is increasing. The majority of the increase in new cases are in younger age groups, and reflect schools returning and universities opening. However, we are also seeing a rise cases in working age adults . -
Duty to Co-Operate Statement of Common Ground
CEC – Site Allocations and Development Policies – Duty to Co-operate Statement of Common Ground CHESHIRE EAST COUNCIL SITE ALLOCATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT POLICIES DUTY TO CO-OPERATE STATEMENT OF COMMON GROUND Appendix 2: List of Signatories (as at April 2021) 1.1 Alongside the Revised Draft SADPD, its Sustainability Appraisal and Habitats Regulations Assessment, a DTC SOCG was published in October 2020 (as document ED 51) for consideration by, in particular, relevant DTC organisations who were then invited to sign it, prior to it being submitted to the Secretary of State for consideration by the appointed Inspector at examination. Section 5 of the DTC statement common ground noted that signatures would be requested, and that section completed during consultation on the revised publication draft SADPD. 1.2 Individual letters were sent on the 2nd November 2020 to DTC organisations to request that they confirm their agreement to the content of the DTC Draft Statement of Common Ground [ED 51], namely that: - - there are no strategic cross boundary issues that flow from the policies and proposals set out in the SADPD. - There is ongoing engagement with other local authorities related to existing memoranda of understanding put in place to support the Local Plan Strategy. 1.3 The following signatures have been received (original versions available on request): - • Cheshire West and Chester Council; • Warrington Borough Council; • Trafford Council; • Greater Manchester Combined Authority; • Manchester City Council; • Peak District National Park Authority; • High Peak Borough Council; • Derbyshire County Council; • Staffordshire Moorlands Council; • Newcastle Under Lyme Borough Council; • Staffordshire County Council; • Stoke on Trent City Council; • Shropshire Council; • Environment Agency; • Historic England; • Natural England; • Homes England; • NHS Clinical Commissioning; • Highways England; • Cheshire and Warrington Local Enterprise Partnership. -
Newspaper Licensing Agency - NLA
Newspaper Licensing Agency - NLA Publisher/RRO Title Title code Ad Sales Newquay Voice NV Ad Sales St Austell Voice SAV Ad Sales www.newquayvoice.co.uk WEBNV Ad Sales www.staustellvoice.co.uk WEBSAV Advanced Media Solutions WWW.OILPRICE.COM WEBADMSOILP AJ Bell Media Limited www.sharesmagazine.co.uk WEBAJBSHAR Alliance News Alliance News Corporate ALLNANC Alpha Newspapers Antrim Guardian AG Alpha Newspapers Ballycastle Chronicle BCH Alpha Newspapers Ballymoney Chronicle BLCH Alpha Newspapers Ballymena Guardian BLGU Alpha Newspapers Coleraine Chronicle CCH Alpha Newspapers Coleraine Northern Constitution CNC Alpha Newspapers Countydown Outlook CO Alpha Newspapers Limavady Chronicle LIC Alpha Newspapers Limavady Northern Constitution LNC Alpha Newspapers Magherafelt Northern Constitution MNC Alpha Newspapers Newry Democrat ND Alpha Newspapers Strabane Weekly News SWN Alpha Newspapers Tyrone Constitution TYC Alpha Newspapers Tyrone Courier TYCO Alpha Newspapers Ulster Gazette ULG Alpha Newspapers www.antrimguardian.co.uk WEBAG Alpha Newspapers ballycastle.thechronicle.uk.com WEBBCH Alpha Newspapers ballymoney.thechronicle.uk.com WEBBLCH Alpha Newspapers www.ballymenaguardian.co.uk WEBBLGU Alpha Newspapers coleraine.thechronicle.uk.com WEBCCHR Alpha Newspapers coleraine.northernconstitution.co.uk WEBCNC Alpha Newspapers limavady.thechronicle.uk.com WEBLIC Alpha Newspapers limavady.northernconstitution.co.uk WEBLNC Alpha Newspapers www.newrydemocrat.com WEBND Alpha Newspapers www.outlooknews.co.uk WEBON Alpha Newspapers www.strabaneweekly.co.uk -
Local Commercial Radio Content
Local commercial radio content Qualitative Research Report Prepared for Ofcom by Kantar Media 1 Contents Contents ................................................................................................................................................. 2 1 Executive summary .................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Background .............................................................................................................................. 5 1.2 Summary of key findings .......................................................................................................... 5 2 Background and objectives ..................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Background ............................................................................................................................ 10 2.2 Research objectives ............................................................................................................... 10 2.3 Research approach and sample ............................................................................................ 11 2.3.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................. 11 2.3.2 Workshop groups: approach and sample ........................................................................... 11 2.3.3 Research flow summary .................................................................................................... -
Borough Profile 2020 Warrington
Borough profile 2020 Warrington 6 4 3 117 122 118 115 9 5 19 120 7 Warrington Wards 2 13 1 1. Appleton 12. Latchford West 110 11 12 2. Bewsey & Whitecross 13. Lymm North & Thelwall 1 14 3. Birchwood 14. Lymm South 4. Burtonwood & Winwick 15. Orford 116 21 5. Chapelford & Old Hall 16. Penketh & Cuerdley 8 6. Culcheth, Glazebury & Croft 17. Poplars & Hulme 7. Fairfield & Howley 18. Poulton North 8. Grappenhall 19. Poulton South 1 9. Great Sankey North & Whittle Hall 20. Rixton & Woolston 10. Great Sankey South 21. Stockton Heath 11. Latchford East 22. Westbrook Produced by Business Intelligence Service Back to top Contents 1. Population of Warrington 2. Deprivation 3. Education - Free School Meals (FSM) 4. Education - Special Educational Needs (SEN) 5. Education - Black Minority Ethnic (BME) 6. Education - English as an Additional Language (EAL) 7. Education - (Early Years aged 4/5) - Early Years Foundation Stage: Good Level of Development (GLD) 8. Education - (End of primary school aged 10/11) – Key Stage 2: Reading, Writing and Maths 9. Education (end of secondary school aged 15/16) – Key Stage 4: Progress 8 10. Education (end of secondary school aged 15/16) – Key Stage 4: Attainment 8 11. Health - Life expectancy 12. Health - Low Birthweight 13. Health - Smoking at time of delivery 14. Health - Overweight and obese reception children 15. Health - Overweight and obese Year 6 children 16. Children’s Social Care – Children in Need 17. Adult Social Care – Request for Support from new clients 18. Adult Social Care – Sequel to the Requests for Support 19. Adult Social Care – Number of clients accessing Long Term Support 20. -
Cheshire and Warrington
Children and Young People Health and Wellbeing Profile: Cheshire and Warrington Public Health Institute, Faculty of Education, Health and Community, Liverpool John Moores University, Henry Cotton Campus, 15-21 Webster Street, Liverpool, L3 2ET | 0151 231 4452 | [email protected] | www.cph.org.uk | ISBN: 978-1-910725-80-1 (web) Contents Acknowledgements 1 Introduction 2 Child to young person life course infographic 3 1 Children and young people in Cheshire and Warrington 4 2 Pre-birth and early years 5 3 Primary school 6 4 Secondary school to young adults 7 Interpretation guide 9 Data sources 9 Acknowledgements The Public Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University was commissioned to undertake this work by the Cheshire and Merseyside Directors of Public Health through the Cheshire and Merseyside Public Health Intelligence Network and Champs Public Health Collaborative (Cheshire and Merseyside). It was developed in collaboration with Melisa Campbell, Research Fellow in Public Health, University of Liverpool. For more information & data sources please contact: Janet Ubido, Champs Researcher, Public Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University. Email: [email protected] 1 Foreword The health and wellbeing of children and young people in our region is a key public health priority. This report presents profiles for children and young people in Cheshire and Warrington to help identify the actions that can support and improve outcomes for this population. The profiles cover a wide range of indicators which all impact upon health and social wellbeing. The first 1000 days from conception and the early years are key stages which impact on children’s health, readiness to grow, learn and succeed. -
Terms and Conditions Apply to All Users of This Website
Version date: 5 November 2020 This website is provided by Archant Community Media Limited whose registered office address is Prospect House, Rouen Road, Norwich, Norfolk NR1 1RE and whose company number is 19300 and VAT number is 362050531. Terms & Conditions These terms and conditions apply to all users of this website. If you do not accept these terms then you should immediately stop using this website. Your use of the website confirms your acceptance of these terms. We will not be liable to you for any interruption or delay that you experience in accessing the website, whatever the cause. Please ensure that you also read, understood, and agreed to our Privacy Policy prior to using this site. No metatags, hyperlinks, or other forms of linkage whatsoever to any other website may be imposed on the website unless express prior permission has been given. Access to particular areas of the website may be subject to additional terms to which you confirm your acceptance of by entering the particular areas. If you do not accept those terms then you should immediately stop using those pages. Archant does not warrant that functions contained in the website content will be uninterrupted or error free, that defects will be corrected or that the Content or the Server(s) are available free of viruses or bugs. This website is made available on the basis that there are excluded, to the extent permitted by law, any terms implied by statute or otherwise and all liability for any loss or damage however it arises out of the use of this website or reliance on its content. -
CAUGHT in the HEADLINES Scottish Media Coverage of Scottish Gypsy Travellers
CAUGHT IN THE HEADLINES Scottish media coverage of Scottish Gypsy Travellers Amnesty International FOREWORD SUMMARY Amnesty International is concerned at the wealth of evidence showing discrimination against Scottish Gypsy Travellers and the hostility and divisions between Scottish Gypsy Traveller and settled communities. We believe that both groups lose out from the current situation. Given the low level of meaningful engagement between the two communities, the media has an important role to play in how settled communities gather information and form opinions about Scottish Gypsy Travellers. Yet anyone taking a cursory interest in the issue will quickly become aware of mainly hostile press coverage. To get an overview of the situation, we commissioned a media clippings agency to identify all Scottish coverage relating to Scottish Gypsy Travellers over a Amnesty International in Scotland four-month period. We received 190 articles which we characterised according to whether each was considered positive, negative or neutral. We also noted the length of each article. Amnesty Scotland recognises the efforts of journalists in Scotland, and in particular of the National Union of Journalists, Through that analysis we found: in striving towards producing high quality reporting of ethnic minorities. • With 190 articles in Scotland over four months (or 120 days) there is an average of nearly 1.5 articles a day about Scottish Gypsy Travellers. Given that there is a very small population of However, our research into media reporting of Scottish Scottish Gypsy Travellers (c. 20,000 people or less than 0.5 per cent of the Scottish population)1 Gypsy Travellers found that a significant number of articles this group receives a disproportionate level of scrutiny. -
Locality Planning Group Maybole and North Carrick Villages Locality
Locality Planning Group Maybole and North Carrick Villages Locality Action Notes of Meeting: 19th October 2017 Present: David Kiltie (chairperson), Gus Collins, Jeanette Heggs, Callum Reilly, Stuart Lindsay, Cllr Brian Connolly, Andrea Hutchison, Helen Duthie In attendance:, Gus Collins, Maire Littlemore (Action Notes) Apologies: Mark Fletcher, Anthony McGuigan, Phil White, Heather Mundell, Stephen McCutcheon, Heather Lavalette, Lynn Anderson. Item/Descripti Discussion Action on 1. Welcome Introductions were made and David Kiltie (Chair) opened and and welcomed all to today’s meeting. Introductions Apologies Apologies were given by the following: - Mark Fletcher, Anthony McGuigan, Phil White, Heather Mundell, Stephen McCutcheon, Heather Lavalette, Lynn Anderson 2. Notes of Jeanette Heggs confirmed she attended LPG Review previous meeting at end of September. No further matters discussed meeting 3. Feedback Gus Collins gave feedback from PB Event – North Carrick from PB Event Decides. – North Carrick Decides Gus confirmed that there was a good turnout with a total of 241 people voting. Attendance followed previous pattern whereby 121 people came through the door in the first hour. The event was held in a market stall style which generated a good level of networking between stall holders. For example, Gaiety Outreach group withdrew their bid in favour of the Carrick Centre. 1 3. Feedback Only issue arising was that there was not enough detail in from PB Event the voting information sheet; this was due to lack of space – North Carrick available. Decides David Kiltie was pleased with Ayr Advertiser coverage (continued) however disappointed with the Ayrshire Post and Carrick Gazette of the event. David also spoke of confusion regarding funding monies available for schools, this being (£30,000) via North Carrick Community Benefit Company. -
Table 1. School Admissions Reforms: Documentation Appendix Manipulable (More Or Allocation System Year from to Less?) Source References
Table 1. School Admissions Reforms: Documentation Appendix Manipulable (More or Allocation System Year From To Less?) Source References (1) Abdulkadiroglu, Atila and Tayfun Sonmez. 2003. "School Choice: A Mechanism Design Approach." American Economic Review , 101(1): 399‐410. (2) Abdulkadiroglu, Atila, Parag A. Pathak, Alvin Roth and Tayfun Sonmez. 2005. "The Boston Public Schools Match." American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 96: 368‐371. (3) Abdulkadiroglu, Atila, Parag A. Pathak, Alvin E. Roth, and Tayfun Sonmez. 2006. "Changing the Boston Mechanism: Strategy‐proofness as Equal Access." NBER Working Paper 11965. (4) Cook, Gareth. 2003. "School Assignment Flaws Detailed: Two economists study problem, offer relief." Boston Boston Public Schools (K, 6, 9) 2005 Boston GS Less A,B,E Globe, September 12. (5) BPS. 2002‐2010. "Introducing the Boston Public Schools." (1) Rossi, Rosalind. 2009. "8th Graders' Shot at Elite High Schools Better." Chicago Sun‐Times, November 12. (2) CPS, 2009. "Post Consent Decree Assignment Plan." Office of Academic Enhancement, November 11. (3) Chicago Public Schools. 2009. "New Admissions Process: Frequently Asked Questions." (describes the advice 4 4 Chicago Selective High Schools 2009 Boston SD Less A,B,C for re‐ranking schools). (1) CPS. 2010. "Guidelines for Magnet and Selective Enrollment Admissions for the 2011‐2012 School Year." November 29. (2) Joseph, Abigayil and Katie Ellis, 2010. "Refinements to 2011‐2012 Selective Enrollment and Magnet School Admission Policy." November 4. (3) CPS, 2011. "Application to Selective Enrollment High 4 6 2010 SD SD Less A,B,C Schools." Available at www.cpsoae.org, Last accessed December 28, 2011. (1) Ajayi, Kehinde. -
Managing Challenging Behaviour in Meetings
Managing Challenging Behaviour in Meetings A joint authority training course designed for all councillors and council officers who experience challenging and disruptive behaviour from members of the public and colleagues, which could lead to conflict or breach of the Code of conduct in situations such as: • Council and Town and Parish Meetings • Neighbourhood Partnerships • Committees, Sub-committees & Panels • Area Boards • Public meetings & Forums • Scrutiny Meetings Course Dates (all courses will run from 9.30am to 4.45pm) 21 st September in South Gloucestershire at Council Offices, Poole Court, Yate BS37 5PT 8th October in Wiltshire at Committee Room 2, Browfort, Devizes. 12 th October in Bristol at Bristol City Council House BS1 5TR For further information on the facilitators please see web site: www.cmstraining.net Booking details [email protected] Councillor Development Officer 07789205920 South Gloucestershire Council 01454 863084 [email protected] Councillor Development Officer 0117 9222097 Bristol City Council [email protected] Democratic Services Officer 01225 713597 Wiltshire Council Course Contents Recognising & Assessing Risk: Key strategies for assessing where conflict and disruption could escalate, particularly when discussing emotive or difficult situations. Looking at assessing risk in rapidly changing situations and making appropriate choices. Understanding Aggression: Understanding of the causes of aggressive and challenging behaviour & identify early physical and emotional stages. Defusing & Resolving Conflict: Identifying what works and does not work when communicating in volatile situations and the six key elements of defusing conflict and dealing with disruption. This incorporates a simple four stage resolution model. Law Relating to Conflict: The legal and Code of Conduct context relating to conflict situations.