Professor Ole Martin Moen
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Supervisory Board of Gjensidige Forsikring ASA
The Supervisory Board of Gjensidige Forsikring ASA Name Office Born Lives in Occupation/position Education/background Organisational experience Bjørn Iversen Member 1948 Reinsvoll Farmer Degree in agricultural economics, Head of the Oppland county branch of the the Agricultural University of Norwegian Farmers' Union 1986–1989, Norway in 1972. Landbrukets head of the Norwegian Farmers' Union sentralforbund 1972–1974, Norges 1991–1997, chair of the supervisory board Kjøtt- og Fleskesentral 1974–1981, of Hed-Opp 1985–89, chair/member of the state secretary in the Ministry of board of several companies. Agriculture 1989–1990. Chair of the Supervisory Board and Chair of the Nomination Committee of Gjensidige Forsikring ASA. Hilde Myrberg Member 1957 Oslo MBA Insead, law degree. Deputy chair of the board of Petoro AS, member of the board of CGGVeritas SA, deputy member of Stålhammar Pro Logo AS, member of the nomination committee of Det Norske ASA, member of the nomination committee of NBT AS. Randi Dille Member 1962 Namsos Self-employed, and Economics subjects. Case Chair of the boards of Namsskogan general manager of officer/executive officer in the Familiepark, Nesset fiskemottak and Namdal Bomveiselskap, agricultural department of the Namdal Skogselskap, member of the board Namsos County Governor of Nord- of several other companies. Sits on Nord- Industribyggeselskap and Trøndelag, national recruitment Trøndelag County Council and the municipal Nordisk Reinskinn project manager for the council/municipal executive board of Compagnie DA. Norwegian Fur Breeders' Namsos municipality. Association, own company NTN AS from 1999. Benedikte Bettina Member 1963 Krokkleiva Company secretary and Law degree from the University of Deputy member of the corporate assembly Bjørn (Danish) advocate for Statoil ASA. -
The Supervisory Board of Gjensidige Forsikring ASA
The Supervisory Board of Gjensidige Forsikring ASA Name Office Born Address Occupation/position Education/background Organisational experience Bjørn Iversen Member 1948 Reinsvoll Farmer Agricultural economics, Agricultural Head of Oppland county branch of the Norwegian University of Norway in 1972. Landbrukets Farmers' Union 1986-1989, head of the Norwegian sentralforbund 1972-1974, Norges Kjøtt- og Farmers' Union 1991-1997, chair of the supervisory Fleskesentral 1974-1981, state secretary in board of Hed-Opp 1985-89, chair/member of the board the Ministry of Agriculture 1989-1990 of several companies. Chair of the Supervisory Board and Chair of the Nomination Committee of Gjensidige Forsikring ASA. Hilde Myrberg Member 1957 Oslo Senior Vice President MBA Insead, law degree. Chair of the board of Orkla Asia Holding AS, deputy Corporate Governance, chair of the board of Petoro AS, member of the board of Orkla ASA Renewable Energy Corporation ASA, deputy board member of Stålhammar Pro Logo AS, deputy chair of the board of Chr. Salvesen & Chr Thams's Communications Aktieselskap, member of the boards of Industriinvesteringer AS and CGGVeritas SA. Randi Dille Member 1962 Namsos Self-employed, and Economies subjects. Case officer/executive Chair of the boards of Namsskogan Familiepark, Nesset general manager of officer in the agricultural department of the fiskemottak and Namdal Skogselskap, member of the Namdal Bomveiselskap, County Governor of Nord-Trøndelag, boards of several other companies. Sits on Nord- Namsos national recruitment project manager for Trøndelag County Council and the municipal Industribyggeselskap and the Norwegian Fur Breeders' Association, council/municipal executive board of Namsos Nordisk Reinskinn own company NTN AS from 1999. -
The Normative Views of Climate Scientists and Their Bearing on Philosophy
Value-Free yet Policy-Relevant? The Normative Views of Climate Scientists and Their Bearing on Philosophy Torbjørn Gundersen Centre for the Study of Professions, OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University ARENA – Centre for European Studies, University of Oslo This article contributes to the philosophical debate on values in science by exploring how scientists themselves understand the proper role of moral, political, and social values in expert practice. I present findings from interviews with climate scientists who have participated as authors in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The climate scientists subscribe to the value-free ideal as a reg- ulative ideal that applies both to the provision of knowledge to policymakers and how they engage with political issues in the public sphere. Yet their views on the moral responsibility of scientists and the aim of providing policy-relevant output challenge the value-free ideal. The article suggests ways in which their views can be relevant to the philosophical discussion. Keywords: value-free ideal, expert role, IPCC, climate science-moral re- sponsibility, policy relevance, interview study This article has benefited from comments by Edmund Henden, Silje Maria Tellmann, Anders Molander, Marte Mangset, Kjartan Koch Mikalsen, Andreas Eriksen, and Nils Roll-Hansen (whose idea it also was to perform an empirical study of climate scientists). I would like to thank my colleagues at the Centre for the Study of Professions, OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University and participants at the workshop The Legitimacy of Depo- liticized Decision-Making at ARENA – Centre for European Studies, University of Oslo for helpful comments. Two anonymous reviewers for this journal provided very helpful com- ments. -
Post-War Philosophy in Norway. Problems, Achievements and Dilemmas
FOLIA SCANDINAVICA VOL. 5 POZNAŃ 1999 POST-WAR PHILOSOPHY IN NORWAY. PROBLEMS, ACHIEVEMENTS AND DILEMMAS E w a P io tro w sk a Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań A b stra ct. The aim of the paper is to present the main trends within philosophy in Norway. The author also discusses the most important research works carried out at university centres, the goal of which is to analyse Norwegian post-war philosophy. The predominant movement, so called ‘practical philosophy’, deals with ethical, religious, political, social and economic issues. Many Norwegian philosophers are also active as university teachers or researchers at universities in Oslo (e.g. Arne Naess, Hans Skjervheim, Trond Berg Eriksen, Torstein Tollefsen, A n fin n Stigen) and in Bergen (e.g. Gunnar Skirbekk, Nils Gilje, Vigdis Songe-M0ller, Knut Erik Tran0y). Sophie’s World (Sofies verden) by Jostein Gaarder, a Norwegian philosophy teacher, has recently become a best-selling book on the Polish publishing market. The book, written in consultation with the well-known Norwegian philosopher and historian of science Trond Berg Eriksen, was published in Norway four years earlier. It presents the main achievements of human philosophical thought, with the start ing point in antiquity, in the plain and beautiful form of a fictionized dialogue. The book is a typical example of the modern scientific and didactic im perative of those preoccupied with philosophy in Norway - difficult philo sophical issues should be presented in such a way that they become read able and comprehensible for a wide audience. What’s more, they should provide some signposts for average people who think and reflect critically upon the self and the external world. -
MOOC the Nor-Way
MOOC the Nor-way Bent Kure Senior advisor University of Oslo [email protected] This presentation Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 FlexPhil – a real Challenges Some implications Norwegian MOOC for teaching and learning Part 1 FlexPhil – a real Norwegian MOOC Examen Philosophicum • Examen Philosophicum, called “Exphil”, is a mandatory introductory course in philosophy that was introduced at the University of Copenhagen, Denmark-Norway's only university, in 1675. • Its still mandatory • The course consists of history of philosophy and science, and ethics. To varianter • Semestervarianten Forelesninger, læreboka, obligatoriske seminar, essayskriving og veiledning Mer enn 2000 påmeldte Strykprosent: Mindre enn 5% • Selvstudievarianten Høsten 2012: 1500 registrert 456 Møtte til eksamen 237 Bestod eksamen • Derfor : MOOC Hvorfor FlexPhil? • For å gjøre Selvstudiumsvarianten vesentlig bedre • Flere består eksamen -> økt studentproduksjon -> økte inntekter Veien til FlexPhil Problemstillinger • Hvordan formidle fagstoff • Hvordan gi feedback? – Veiledning? • Struktur eller fritt løp? • Teknisk plattform? • Hvordan sikre brukervennlighet? • Åpent for alle ? • Hvordan motivere? Teknisk plattform • Lage noe helt fra scratch? • Bruke eksisterende Fronter • Bruke UiOs publiseringsløsning • Bruke en MOOC-plattform Læringsaktiviteter i FlexPhil • Video: Samtale mellom to filosofer • Quiz og tester • Læreboka • ----------------------------------------------------------- • Diskusjonsgrupper • Skrive essays - Peer review • App med filosofi-quiz • Følge ordinære -
Jusqu'où Défendre Les Animaux ?
LES CAHIERS ANTISPÉCISTES JUSQU’OÙ DÉFENDRE LES ANIMAUX ? Tom REGAN Steven BEST David CHAUVET Bernard BAERTSCHI Estiva REUS NUMÉRO 39 MAI 2017 À propos des Cahiers antispécistes Les Cahiers antispécistes sont une revue fondée en 1991. La périodicité est irrégulière. Rédaction : Brigitte Gothière, Estiva Reus, Pierre Sigler. La rédaction choisit les textes en fonction de l’intérêt qu’elle y trouve et des débats qui peuvent en découler, mais les opinions qui y sont exprimées n’engagent que leurs auteurs. La revue ne fonctionne pas sur le principe de soumission spontanée de textes par des auteurs qui seraient ensuite acceptés ou refusés. Site : cahiers-antispécistes.org Mail : [email protected] FaceBook. Les Cahiers antispécistes publient quotidiennement des informations sur la question animale sur leur page Facebook. Se procurer Les Cahiers antispécistes (version papier) Le n°39 des Cahiers antispécistes (de même que le n°35) n’a pas été édité en version papier. Tous les autres numéros ont été imprimés mais certains sont épuisés. Les anciens numéros restants sont gérés par la boutique en ligne de L214. Certains peuvent être directement commandés sur https://boutique.l214.com/36-revues. Si vous cherchez des numéros plus anciens écrire à [email protected] pour savoir s’ils sont encore disponibles. Les Cahiers antispécistes n°39, mai 2017 1 Sommaire Présentation du numéro 39 3 La Rédaction Comment justifier la violence 7 Tom Regan Paralysie du pacifisme 13 Une défense de l’action directe militante et de la « violence » Steven -
Curriculum Vitae Jan Sjåvik
Curriculum vitae Jan Sjåvik Dept. of Scandinavian Studies University of Washington Box 353420 Seattle, WA 98195, U.S.A. Telephone: (206) 543-0645 Email: [email protected] EDUCATION 1974-79 Harvard University. A.M. 1976, Ph.D. 1979. Dissertation: “Arne Garborg’s Kristiania Novels: A Study in Narrative Technique.” 1973-74 Brigham Young University. B.A. 1974, magna cum laude. 1972 Univ. of Trondheim, Norway. Examen Philosophicum, 1972. EMPLOYMENT 2006- Professor of Scandinavian Studies at the University of Washington, Seattle. 1984-2006 Associate Professor of Scandinavian Studies at the University of Washington, Seattle. 1979-84 Assistant Professor of Scandinavian Studies at the University of Washington, Seattle. 1978-79 Instructor in Scandinavian Studies at the University of Washington, Seattle. RESEARCH AND TRAVEL GRANTS; HONORS 2011 Travel Grant from the Norwegian Foreign Ministry, Oslo, Norway. $2000. 2007 Nominated for the UW Distinguished Teaching Award 2007 Follow-up Writing Development Grant, College of Arts and Sciences. $500. 2006 Travel and Research Grant from the Department of Scandinavian Studies, University of Washington. $2000. 2006 Travel Grant from the Norwegian Foreign Ministry, Oslo, Norway. $1200. 2005 Nominated for the Marsha L. Landolt Distinguished Graduate Mentor Award. 2004 Travel Grant from the Modern Language Quarterly, Seattle, WA. $250. 2004 4x4 Writing Development Grant, College of Arts and Sciences. $1500. 2004 Course Development Grant, CWES, Univ. of Washington. 1 Salary for half a month. 2004 Travel Grant from the Norwegian Information Service, New York. $1500. 2004 Travel Grant from the Modern Language Quarterly, Seattle, WA. $500. 1996 Travel Grant from the Chicago Humanities Center, Chicago, Illinois. -
Gunnar Skirbekk, Was the Politician, Administrator and Farmer, Mentioned in Chap
Notes in retrospect for my Chinese friends Introductory remarks 2 (A) Background 3 (B) Nihilism? 11 (C) Post-WWII: the intellectual constellation 13 (D) Philosophy in Norway after the War 15 (i) General remarks 15 (ii) Examen philosophicum – a Norwegian phenomenon 17 (E) Philosophy as communicative practice 18 (i) Fallibilism and egalitarian culture 18 (ii) Philosophy by travelling around 20 (F) Philosophy by profession – university and politics 21 (i) At the University of Bergen 21 (ii) Achievements and decline 24 (G) A History of Western Thought 29 (i) Background 29 (ii) Pedagogical approach 31 (iii) Other people start using the book 33 (iv) Resistance 34 (v) Translation and publication abroad 35 (vi) A popular book, but why? 41 (H) Transcendental-pragmatics, gradualist and meliorist, and the discussion about conceptual adequacy 45 (I) SVT – Center for the Study of the Sciences and the Humanities 48 (J) Modernization theory 54 (K) Marco Polo 61 (L) Places and persons 63 (i) University of California San Diego 63 (ii) Dubrovnik 66 (iii) The French connection 68 (iv) The German connection 70 (v) Russo-Ukrainian connections 73 (vi) Nordic connections 76 (vii) China 77 Final remarks 79 Publications 83 1 Introductory remarks Seen in retrospect, many events in life appear to be neither foreseen nor planned. They just came about, unpredictably, due to special circumstances or interplay with other people. That was exactly what happened in the fall of 1988, when a young Chinese philosopher suddenly turned up at our institute at the University of Bergen. He came for one year, from East China Normal University in Shanghai, to do research in philosophy. -
Evaluation of the Humanities in Norway
Evaluation of the Humanities in Norway Report from Panel 6 – Philosophy and Studies in Science and Technology Evaluation Division for Science Evaluation of the Humanities in Norway Report from Panel 6 – Philosophy and Studies in Science and Technology Evaluation Division for Science © The Research Council of Norway 2017 The Research Council of Norway Visiting address: Drammensveien 288 P.O.Box 564 NO-1327 Lysaker Telephone: +47 22 03 70 00 [email protected] www.rcn.no The report can be ordered and downloaded at www.forskningsradet.no/publikasjoner Graphic design cover: Melkeveien designkontor AS Photos: Shutterstock Oslo, juni 2017 ISBN 978-82-12-03611-6 (pdf) 2 Contents Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 5 1 On the evaluation ...................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Terms of Reference ............................................................................................................ 8 1.2 The evaluation panels ........................................................................................................ 9 1.3 Methods and Limitations .................................................................................................. 11 1.3.1 Organisation of the evaluation ................................................................................... 11 1.3.2 The data available to the panels .............................................................................. -
Messages, Sages and Ages, Vol. 7, No. 1, (2019) DOI: 10.5281/Zenodo.3377115
Messages, Sages and Ages, Vol. 7, No. 1, (2019) DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3377115 Aline Ferreira Department of Languages and Cultures, University of Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, 3800 Aveiro, Portugal E-mail: [email protected] DEATH POSTPONED: CRYONICS AND A TRANSHUMAN FUTURE Abstract This essay reflects on the concept of cryonics as a technology that will in the future enable cryopreserved people to be returned to life when the cure for the disease that killed them is found. The longstanding dream of prolonging human existence, mainly with recourse to cryonics, will be examined through the lens of Don DeLillo’s Zero K (2016), Robert Begam’s courtroom thriller Long Life (2008) and Clifford D. Simak's Why Call Them Back From Heaven? (1967). The fantasy of cryonics is becoming increasingly visible in contemporary culture, with recent books and films addressing this subject. The utopian, transhumanist vision of a future where much longer life spans will be achievable is a dream that only the wealthy elites can afford, with megacorporations usually exploiting those with less funds but who also wish to undergo cryosuspension for later resurrection. Recent work by a number of bioethicists such as Francesca Minerva (2018), Ole Martin Moen (2015) and David Shaw (2009) on the case for and against cryonics from a bioethical point of view will help shed light on the main thematic concerns these works of speculative fiction engage with, pointing the way to future scenarios that the rapid advancement of biotechnologies will make possible. Key words: cryonics, bioethics, life extension, transhumanism Introduction The fantasy of cryonics, of preserving the body of a (recently and) legally “dead” person at liquid nitrogen temperatures through a process called vitrification, with the goal of reviving that person when a cure for their disease is found, is becoming increasingly visible in contemporary culture, with recent books and films addressing this subject. -
Takk Jeg Vil Gi En Stor Takk Min Veileder, Bjørn Kåre Myskja, for Hans Tålmodighet, Oppmuntringer Og Uvurderlig Hjelp Underveis I Skriveprosessen
Takk Jeg vil gi en stor takk min veileder, Bjørn Kåre Myskja, for hans tålmodighet, oppmuntringer og uvurderlig hjelp underveis i skriveprosessen. Jeg vil også takke mine medstudenter på masterlesesalen på låven (2015/2016) for å ha bidratt til å skape et utrolig godt studiemiljø, med sosialt samvære og faglige diskusjoner. Særlig takknemlig er jeg overfor Fredrik Håjodd, Herman Køhn Sæter, Sigrid Steen Haugen og Else Marí Bakken, for at de var villig til å ta seg tid til å lese og gi tilbakemelding på oppgaven. Abstract The question of the moral status of animals is a central problem in animal ethics. A range of questions arises when discussing the moral status of animals. How should we understand the concept of moral status? What kind of considerations should we consider when determining the moral status of animals? How are we to approach the question of animals’ moral status? In this thesis I set out to explore and answer these questions. An influential thesis is that animals’ moral status is wholly grounded in their capacities. This is what James Rachels has called moral individualism. Two central proponents of this thesis are Peter Singer and Tom Regan. According to Peter Singer, because many animals are sentient, they deserve to be treated according to the principle of equal consideration of interests. Moral agents are therefore obligated to take into account the interests of all sentient animals affected by an action and act according to what will produce the optimal net satisfaction of interests, whether it be human or animal. Tom Regan, on the other hand, proposes what he calls the subject-of-a-life criterion for moral status. -
Frozen Bodies and Future Imaginaries: Assisted Dying, Cryonics, and a Good Death
religions Article Frozen Bodies and Future Imaginaries: Assisted Dying, Cryonics, and a Good Death Jeremy Cohen Department of Religious Studies, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada; [email protected] Received: 8 September 2020; Accepted: 2 November 2020; Published: 5 November 2020 Abstract: In October of 2018, Norman Hardy became the first individual to be cryopreserved after successful recourse to California’s then recently passed End of Life Options Act. This was a right not afforded to Thomas Donaldson, who in 1993 was legally denied the ability to end his own life before a tumor irreversibly destroyed his brain tissue. The cases of Norman Hardy and Thomas Donaldson reflect ethical and moral issues common to the practice of assisted dying, but unique to cryonics. In this essay, I explore the intersections between ideologies of immortality and assisted dying among two social movements with seemingly opposing epistemologies: cryonicists and medical aid in dying (MAiD) advocates. How is MAiD understood among cryonicists, and how has it been deployed by cryonicists in the United States? What are the historical and cultural circumstances that have made access to euthanasia a moral necessity for proponents of cryonics and MAiD? In this comparative essay, I examine the similarities between the biotechnological and future imaginaries of cryonics and MAiD. I aim to show that proponents of both practices are in search of a good death, and how both conceptualize dying as an ethical good. Cryonics members and terminal patients constitute unique biosocial worlds, which can intersect in unconventional ways. As temporalizing practices, both cryonics and MAiD reflect a will to master the time and manner of death.