In order to minimize the spread of the COVID-19 virus, this Regular Meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the Governor's Executive Orders N-25-20 and N-29-20, which suspended certain requirements of the Brown Act. The City Council Chambers will be teleconferencing into the meeting via an electronic meeting platform. The meetings will continue to be live streamed on the City's CivicWeb Portal (sonomacity.civicweb.net) and YouTube Channel. Please see the agenda below for information on Public participation.
AGENDA City of Sonoma Design Review & Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Virtual Zoom Meeting 6:00 PM - Tuesday, June 15, 2021 Commissioners: Charles Cormany (Chair), Kelly Amar, Terry Birt, Micaelia Randolph, Christopher Johnson, Ahmad Jahromi, - Alternate
Meeting Length: No new items will be heard by the Design Review and Historic Preservation Commission after 10:00 PM, unless the Commission, by majority vote, specifically decides to continue reviewing items. If an item is not heard due to the length of the meeting, the Commission will attempt to schedule a special meeting for the following week. If a special meeting is necessary, potential dates will be established at the close of this meeting, and a date set as soon as possible thereafter. Page
1. CALL TO ORDER At this time, members of the public may comment on any item not appearing on the agenda. It is recommended that you keep your comments to three minutes or less. Under State Law, matters presented under this item cannot be discussed or acted upon by the Design Review and Historic Preservation Commission at this time. For items appearing on the agenda, the public will be invited to make comments at the time the item comes up for Commission consideration. Upon being acknowledged by the Chair, please step to the podium and speak into the microphone. Begin by stating and spelling your name.
2. NEW PUBLIC COMMENT PROCESS FOR VIRTUAL MEETING
2.1: Public Comment Process for Virtual Meetings_DRHPC 3 - 5
3. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Presentations by audience members on items not appearing on the agenda.
4. REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA: Consideration and adoption of any changes to the agenda order and/or additions to the agenda as allowed for under the Brown Act.
5. LATE CORRESPONDENCE Review of correspondence received following the posting of the agenda packet.
6. CONSENT CALENDAR - DRHPC These items will be acted upon in one motion unless removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion by Commissioners or any interested party
6.1: Approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of April 20, 2021 6 - 10 (Associate Planner) 04.20.21 DRHPC Minutes
7. PUBLIC HEARING
7.1: Discussion and possible action on an application for Design Review to allow 11 - 19 new paint colors to the exterior of an existing office building (Price Family Vineyards and Estates) located at 725 Broadway. Pursuant to Section 15301
Page 1 of 74
of the State CEQA Guidelines, exterior alterations are Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA (Class 1 -Existing Facilities) (APN 018-351-025). Project Planner Wendy Atkins DR Item Report - 7.1 - Pdf
7.2: Discuss, Consider, and Take Possible Action to Recommend to the Planning 20 - 74 Commission the approval of a Design Review and Sign Permit applications of Bennett Martin to construct a new restaurant, micro-brewery, and a two bedroom apartment at 899 Broadway (Jack's Filling Station) (APN 018-411- 012), including action to approve a Categorical Exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (Infill Development). DR Item Report - Design Review and Sign Permit application for a restaurant, microbrewery, and two bedroom apartment located at 899 Broadway - Pdf
8. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION
9. ISSUES UPDATE
10. COMMENTS FROM THE COMMISSION
11. ADJOURNMENT
I do hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on the City of Sonoma website on June 11, 2021.
WENDY ATKINS, ASSOCIATE PLANNER
Rights of Appeal: Any decision of the Design Review and Historic Preservation Commission may be appealed to the City Council. Appeals must be filed with the City Clerk within fifteen (15) calendar days following the decision, unless the fifteenth day falls on a weekend or a holiday, in which case the appeal period ends at the close of the next working day at City Hall. Appeals must be made in writing and must clearly state the reason for the appeal. Appeals will be set for hearing before the City Council on the earliest available agenda. A fee is charged for appeals.
Copies of all staff reports and documents subject to disclosure that relate to any item of business referred to on the agenda are available for public inspection the Monday before each regularly scheduled meeting at City Hall, located at No. 1 The Plaza, Sonoma CA, (707) 938-3681. Any documents subject to disclosure that are provided to all, or a majority of all, of the members of the Design Review & Historic Preservation Commission regarding any item on this agenda after the agenda has been distributed will be made available for inspection at the Administrative Assistant office, No. 1 The Plaza, Sonoma CA during regular business hours.
If you challenge the action of the Design Review and Historic Preservation Commission in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described on the agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the Administrative Assistant, at or prior to the public hearing.
In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk (707) 933-2216. Notification 48-hours before the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.
Page 2 of 74 Agenda Item #2.1:
PARTICIPATING IN CITY DESIGN REVIEW AND HISTROIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETINGS HELD IN A VIRTUAL FORMAT IN CONFORMANCE WITH SOCIAL DISTANCING REQUIREMENTS
In order to minimize the spread of the COVID-19 virus, the City of Sonoma is providing multiple alternatives to viewing Design Review and Historic Preservation Commission (DRHPC) meetings and providing comments on items on the agenda. These alternatives allow the City to adhere to social distancing requirements, follow the Governor’s Executive Order N-29-20 (which suspends certain requirements of the Brown Act), and provide numerous ways for the public to provide public comment live during the meeting.
VIEWING MEETINGS ONLINE You are able to view meetings online here: Live streamed on the City’s CivicWeb Portal (sonomacity.civicweb.net) YouTube Channel (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UChZjUrg2rNLYxTgQHhFy-Tg).
SUBMITTING COMMENTS BY E-MAIL If you choose not to attend the DRHPC meeting but wish to make a comment on a specific agenda item, please submit your comment via email at [email protected] at any time.
Prior to the Meeting as Public Correspondence -- Per the City’s standard practice, any comments received prior to the commencement of the meeting will be uploaded to the public correspondence folder on the City’s CivicWeb Portal (https://sonomacity.civicweb.net/filepro/documents/25498) and available for review by the public and the City Council. It will not be read during the meeting.
During the Meeting as Public Comment -- If you wish for your comments to be read into the record, please submit an email to [email protected] after the Chair calls the meeting to order and prior to the close of Public Comment on that item on the agenda.
VIRTUAL PARTICIPATION BY ZOOM VIDEO CONFERENCING The City of Sonoma is now offering the ability to view and participate in DRHPC meetings via video meetings and telephonic conferencing via “Zoom” video conferencing computer technology. Instructions for participating via Zoom are provided below.
How do I join the DRHPC meeting via Zoom Video Conferencing? Please visit: https://zoom.us/j/98029959654 and either sign-up for a free Zoom account or continue as a guest. Once you have downloaded the app on your smart phone, joined from your web browser, or downloaded the Zoom software on your computer you will be ready for the DRHPC meeting.
Page 1 of 2
Page 3 of 74 Agenda Item #2.1:
If you have previously signed up for Zoom, you can enter the following meeting ID to join the meeting: 980 2995 9654
Page 2 of 2
Page 4 of 74 Agenda Item #2.1:
I don’t have a computer or smart phone; can I still use Zoom? If you don’t have a smart phone or computer to access the meeting via Zoom, no problem! You can participate on the phone, by calling one of the following numbers: (669) 900-9128 or (253) 215- 8782 or (346) 248- 7799 or (301) 715-8592 or (312) 626-6799 or (646) 558-8656 and entering meeting ID 980 2995 9654
How can I provide Public Comment on Zoom? The Chair will request public comment during the Public Comment period on the agenda and during each Public Hearing and Regular Calendar Item. Once the Chair has announced the public comment period, please do one of the following.
USING A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE: Click on the “Raise Hand” feature in the webinar controls. This will notify City staff that you have raised your hand and you would like to speak. City staff will unmute your microphone when it is your turn to provide public comment. Note: the public’s video will not show on the screen because we are using a webinar format. A prompt will appear to confirm you would like to be unmuted. Once you accept the prompt, you will have three minutes to provide public comment. Once your public comment has ended, you will be muted again.
USING A REGULAR PHONE: Dial *9 (star 9), this will notify City staff that you have “raised your hand” for public comment. City staff will unmute your microphone when it is your turn to provide public comment. You will hear “you are unmuted” and then you will have three minutes to provide public comment. Once your public comment has ended, you will be muted again.
I don’t want to provide public comment live; can I provide my public comment for the record another way? Of course! Please submit all public comments via email at [email protected].
I am having difficulties preparing for the meeting and learning Zoom, do you have any resources to help me? Yes, please visit Zoom’s website support page on helpful tips to prepare for the meeting: https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/categories/201146643
Page 3 of 2
Page 5 of 74 Agenda Item #6.1:
In order to minimize the spread of the COVID-19 virus, this Regular Meeting was conducted pursuant to the provisions of the Governor's Executive Orders N-25-20 and N-29-20, which suspended certain requirements of the Brown Act. The City Council Chambers teleconferenced into the meeting via an electronic meeting platform. The meetings will continue to be live streamed on the City's Civic Web Portal (sonomacity.civicweb.net) and YouTube Channel.
CITY OF SONOMA DESIGN REVIEW AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Virtual Regular Meeting April 20, 2021 6:00 p.m. MINUTES
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chair Cormany called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
Roll Call:
Present: Chair Cormany, Vice-Chair Birt, Comms. Amar, Randolph, Johnson, Jahromi, Alternate Absent: Others: Associate Planner Atkins, Associate Planner Tierney
Chair Cormany stated that no new items would be heard after 10:00 p.m. unless the Design Review and Historic Preservation Commission so decides. Any decisions made by the Design Review and Historic Preservation Commission can be appealed within 10 days to the City Council.
2. NEW PUBLIC COMMENT PROCESS FOR VIRTUAL MEETINGS:
Chair Cormany explained the Public Comment Process for Virtual Meetings.
3. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC:
Chair Cormany opened public comment for items not on the Agenda.
No public comment.
Chair Cormany closed public comment for items not on the Agenda.
4. REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA:
1
Page 6 of 74 Agenda Item #6.1:
Comm. Johnson made a motion to approve the Agenda. Comm Randolph seconded. Roll Call Vote: Ayes: Comm. Amar, Vice-Chair Birt, Comm. Johnson, Comm. Randolph, Chair Cormany. The motion was unanimously approved 5-0.
5. LATE CORRESPONDENCE: None
6. CONSENT CALENDAR: 6.1 Approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 19, 2021 (Associate Planner Atkins) 6.2 Request to Install Banners on Plaza Light Standards – Vintage House Senior Center, Subject to a Categorical Exemption Pursuant to Section 15311 of the State CEQA Guidelines, On Premise Signs (Class 11 – Accessory Structures (APN 018-214-001).
Comm. Johnson made a motion to approve the Consent Calendar. Comm. Randolph seconded. Roll Call Vote: Ayes: Comm. Amar, Vice-Chair Birt, Comm. Johnson, Comm. Randolph, Chair Cormany. The motion was unanimously approved 5-0.
7. PUBLIC HEARING:
7.1 Discussion and possible action to approve a Sign Application for a new sign for a Commercial property (Rite Aid) located at the Maxwell Village Shopping Center at 19205 Sonoma Highway. Pursuant to Section 15311 of the State CEQA Guidelines, On Premise Signs are categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA (Class II - Accessory Structures). (APN 018-442-020). Project Planner Wendy Atkins.
Applicant: Signs of All Kinds
Associate Planner Atkins presented the staff report.
Chair Johnson opened the item to public comment
Chuck Drayer, Ken Niles, Andy Schwartzkhopff, and Dave Mon spoke.
Chair Cormany closed the item to public comment.
Comm. Johnson made a motion to continue the Sign Application for a new sign for a Commercial property (Rite Aid) located at the Maxwell Village Shopping Center at 19205 Sonoma Highway to a date uncertain. Comm. Birt seconded. Roll Call Vote: Ayes: Comm. Amar, Vice-Chair Birt, Comm. Johnson, Comm. Randolph, Chair Cormany. The motion was unanimously approved 5-0.
7.2 Discussion, Consideration and Possible Action to approve a sign permit for 7 Branches at 750 West Spain Street Pursuant to Section 15311 of the State
2
Page 7 of 74 Agenda Item #6.1:
CEQA Guidelines, On Premise Signs are categorically exempt from the provisions of CE-QA (Class II - Accessory -Structures). (APN 018-111-042) Project Planner Kristina Tierney.
Applicant: Robert Saunders
Associate Planner Tierney presented the staff report.
Chair Cormany opened the item to public comment
Robert Sanders spoke.
Chair Cormany closed the item to public comment.
Comm. Randolph made a motion to approve a sign permit for 7 Branches at 450 West Spain Street (APN 018-111-042) Comm. Johnson seconded. Roll Call Vote: Ayes: Comm. Amar, Vice-Chair Birt, Comm. Johnson, Comm. Randolph, Chair Cormany. The motion was unanimously approved 5-0.
7.3 Discussion and possible action on an application for Design Review and Sign Review for a bank (Union Bank) located at 500 Broadway. Pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the addition to a commercial building is Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA (Class 1 -Existing Facilities). Pursuant to Section 15311 of the State CEQA Guidelines, On Premise Signs are categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA (Class II - Accessory Structures). (APN 018-212-001). Project Planner Wendy Atkins.
Applicant: David Ford
Associate Planner Atkins presented the staff report.
Chair Cormany opened the item to public comment
David Ford spoke.
Chair Cormany closed the item to public comment.
Comm. Johnson made a motion to approve an application for Design Review and Sign Review for a bank (Union Bank) located at 500 Broadway, with a condition to reduce the number of signs for the business to no more than two each. Comm. Randolph seconded the motion. Roll Call Vote: Ayes: Comm. Amar, Vice-Chair Birt, Comm. Johnson, Comm. Randolph, Chair Cormany. The motion was unanimously approved 5- 0.
7.4 Discuss, Consider, and Take Possible Action to Recommend to the Planning Commission the approval of a Design Review application of Joe Walsh to add 11 new guestrooms in five new infill buildings within the 3
Page 8 of 74 Agenda Item #6.1:
existing hotel property. MacArthur Place Hotel and Spa at 29 East MacArthur Street (APN 128-181-004). An Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration is being prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Project Planner: Kristina Tierney.
Applicant: Joe Walsh
Associate Planner Tierney presented the staff report.
Chair Cormany opened the item to public comment
Joe Walsh and George Girvin spoke.
Chair Cormany closed the item to public comment.
Comm Randolph made a motion to Recommend to the Planning Commission the approval of a Design Review application of Joe Walsh to add 11 new guestrooms in five new infill buildings within the existing hotel property. MacArthur Place Hotel and Spa at 29 East MacArthur Street. Vice-Chair Birt seconded. Roll Call Vote: Ayes: Comm. Amar, Vice-Chair Birt, Comm. Johnson, Comm. Randolph, Chair Cormany. The motion was unanimously approved 5-0.
7.6 Certified Local Government Program 2019-2020 Annual Report.
Associate Planner Atkins presented the staff report.
Chair Cormany made a motion to approve the Certified Local Government Program 2019-2020 Annual report. Vice-Chair Birt seconded the motion. Roll Call Vote: Ayes: Comm. Amar, Vice-Chair Birt, Comm. Johnson, Comm. Randolph, Chair Cormany. The motion was unanimously approved 5-0.
8. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION:
9. ISSUES UPDATE: • Associate Planner Tierney proposed that for the next two months physical copies of the DRHPC agenda packet will not be delivered to the DRHPC unless requested by a commissioner. • The July DRHPC meeting is cancelled.
10. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS: Chair Cormany asked about the tent at MacArthur place and requested information on the City’s tent policy. Associate Planner Tierney explained the policy.
11. ADJOURNMENT: Chair Cormany adjourned the meeting at 8:40 p.m. to the next regular meeting scheduled.
4
Page 9 of 74 Agenda Item #6.1:
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing minutes were duly and regularly adopted at the regular meeting of the Design Review and Historic Preservation Commission on the 15th day of June 2021.
Approved:
______Wendy Atkins, Associate Planner
5
Page 10 of 74 Agenda Item #7.1:
City of Sonoma Design Review & Historic Preservation Commission STAFF REPORT Meeting: Design Review & Historic Preservation Commission - 15 Jun 2021
Prepared Date Staff Contact June 03, 2021 Wendy Atkins, Associate Planner
Agenda Item Title
Discussion and possible action on an application for Design Review to allow new paint colors to the exterior of an existing office building (Price Family Vineyards and Estates) located at 725 Broadway. Pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines, exterior alterations are Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA (Class 1 -Existing Facilities) (APN 018-351-025). Project Planner Wendy Atkins
Applicant/Owner: Bill Sikorski/725 Broadway LLC
Site Address/Location: 725 Broadway
PROJECT SUMMARY
Zoning: Base: Mixed Use (MX) Overlay: Historic Overlay Zone
Planning Area: Broadway Corridor
Site Characteristics: The subject property is a 12,629 square foot parcel on the west side of Broadway between Andrieux Street and Chase Street. The property is currently developed with an office building..
Surrounding Land Use/Zoning: North: Restaurant (Dutch Bros.)/Mixed Use South: Mixed Use/Mixed Use East: Residential (parking lot)/Mixed Use West: Office (Sotheby's) (Across Broadway)/Mixed Use
Environmental Review Environmental Impact Report Approved/Certified Negative Declaration No Action Required Exempt Action Requested Not Applicable
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends the DRHPC approve the the new paint colors subject to findings and conditions of approval.
PROJECT ANALYSIS
Detailed Project Description:
Page 11 of 74 Agenda Item #7.1:
Proposed external building modifications consist of new paint colors. The trim is proposed to be painted white (Benjamin Moore OC-151=PM-2), the doors and windows are proposed to be painted Van Deusen Blue (Benjamin More HC-156), and the siding is proposed to be painted Harrisburg Green (Benjamin Moore HC-132).
The project narrative states that the proposed colors were selected from the Benjamin Moore "Historical Collection".
General Plan Consistency ( Not Applicable to this Project): The property is designated Mixed Use by the General Plan. This designation is intended to accommodate uses that provide a transition between commercial and residential districts, to promote a pedestrian presence in adjacent commercial areas, and to provide neighborhood commercial services to adjacent residential areas. Retail and office uses are allowed subject to compatibility with adjacent neighborhoods.
On September 12,1978, the Planning Commission approved a Use Permit to allow the structures to be used as office or light commercial space.
The new paint colors are consistent with the goals and policies of the City of Sonoma 2020 General Plan.
Development Code Consistency ( Not Applicable to this Project): Repainting a commercial or mixed use building requires Design Review, except when the existing color scheme is substantially retained (SMC 19.54.080.B.2.).
Environmental Review ( Not Applicable to this Project): Pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines, exterior alterations are Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA (Class 1 -Existing Facilities).
Discussion of Project Issues: Staff is not aware of any project issues.
Recommendation: Staff recommends the DRHPC approve the the new paint colors subject to findings and conditions of approval. Attachments
1_Public Comment Attachment 2_Findings 3_DraftConditions of Approval 4_ProjectNarrative_Color Samples 5_Site Plan
CC:
Bill Sikorski, vial email
Bill Price, via email
Page 12 of 74 Agenda Item #7.1:
PUBLIC COMMENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL OR ONE OF THE CITY’S COMMISSIONS
Any Public Correspondence Received by the City Regarding an Item that Will be Considered at a Public Meeting by the City Council or One of Its Commissions Can be Found on the City’s CivicWeb Portal at the Following Link. It is Updated as New Correspondence is Received. https://sonomacity.civicweb.net/filepro/documents
STAFF CONTACTS:
City Council City Clerk (707) 933-2216
Planning, DRHP, CSEC Planning (707) 933-2204
Page 13 of 74 Agenda Item #7.1:
City of Sonoma Planning Commission FINDINGS OF PROJECT APPROVAL Design Review and Sign Review of an office building 725 Broadway
June 15, 2021
Design Review
Required Findings: As set forth in §19.54.080.G of the Development Code, in order to approve an application for site design and architectural review in the Historic Overlay Zone, the Design Review and Historic Preservation Commission must make the following findings:
1. The project complies with applicable policies and regulations, as set forth in this Development Code (except for approved Variances and Exceptions), other City ordinances, and the General Plan. The new paint colors comply with the applicable policies and regulations set forth in the Development Code and is compatible with the architecture established by adjacent development.
2. On balance, the project is consistent with the intent of applicable design guidelines set forth in the Development Code. Staff has determined the new paint colors are compatible in scale and treatment with the existing building and maintains the overall historic character and integrity of the community.
3. The project responds appropriately to the context of adjacent development, as well as existing site conditions and environmental features. The new paint colors comply with the applicable policies and regulations set forth in the Development Code and is compatible with the architecture established by adjacent development.
4. The project will not impair the historic character of its surroundings; The existing structure was constructed in 1907. New paint colors are a removal feature and will not impair the historical character of the building.
5. The project substantially preserves the qualities of any significant historic structures or other significant historic features on the site; The existing structure was constructed in 1907. New paint colors are a removal feature and will not impair the historical character of the building.
6. The project substantially complies with the applicable guidelines set forth in Chapter 19.42 SMC (Historic Preservation and Infill in the Historic Zone); and Staff has determined that the project complies with SMC 19.42 in that the project is consistent with the Guidelines for infill development in that the project meets the architectural considerations.
7. The project substantially complies with any applicable preservation plan or other guidelines or requirements pertaining to a local historic district as designated through SMC 19.42.020. The project is not located within a local historic district.
Page 14 of 74 Agenda Item #7.1:
Page 15 of 74 Agenda Item #7.1:
FINAL
City of Sonoma Planning Commission CONDITIONS OF PROJECT APPROVAL Design Review of an Office Building 725 Broadway
June 15, 2021
1. The property shall be operated in substantial conformance with the application, project narrative and the staff report..
Enforcement Responsibility: Planning Division; Building Division Timing: Ongoing
Page 16 of 74 0 0 Eu wmo>u<<>< _u_»O._mO._. Z>_»_»>._._<_.n.
o_._.
< mEom?m_<_ w___2.83: m@m::m 35 mm8.2 Agenda Item #7.1: Page 17 of 74 Um _w3mo_< . _..-___..‘-_-_ xa , r\ \ I $1 SCOPE OF UJ0?< ‘ (E) GARAGE NOTE: USE APPROVED A5 PRIVATEGARAGE ONLY. NO BLWNES5 USE OR STORAGE, .—.—‘ SCOPE OF lUOH< D (E) DECK :—.—4—.—.—.—x—. BROADwAT SITEPLAN G}w._]._o. Agenda Item #7.1: Item Agenda Agenda Item #7.2: City of Sonoma Design Review & Historic Preservation Commission STAFF REPORT Meeting: Design Review & Historic Preservation Commission - 15 Jun 2021 Prepared Date Staff Contact June 15, 2021 Kristina Tierney, Associate Planner Agenda Item Title Discuss, Consider, and Take Possible Action to Recommend to the Planning Commission the approval of a Design Review and Sign Permit applications of Bennett Martin to construct a new restaurant, micro-brewery, and a two bedroom apartment at 899 Broadway (Jack's Filling Station) (APN 018-411- 012), including action to approve a Categorical Exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (Infill Development). Applicant/Owner: BENNETT MARTIN, STRATAap/Erika Harris Site Address/Location: 899 Broadway PROJECT SUMMARY Zoning: Base: Mixed Use (MX) Overlay: Historic (/H) Planning Area: Broadway Corridor Site Characteristics: The property is a long, rectangular parcel totaling approximately 0.56 acres with frontage on Broadway, West MacArthur Street, and First Street West. The site is developed with a small service station oriented towards Broadway constructed in 1961. The area of the site behind the service station is fenced and is used primarily for storage. There is also a wooden outbuilding on the property, located near the Frist Street West frontage, on the north side of the site. Surrounding Land Use/Zoning: North:Residential/Mixed Use South:Commercial/Mixed Use East:Commercial/Mixed Use West: Residential/Medium Density Residential Environmental Review Environmental Impact Report Approved/Certified Negative Declaration No Action Required Exempt Action Requested Not Applicable Staff Recommendation PROJECT ANALYSIS Detailed Project Description: Background: On June 8, 2017, the Planning Commission approved a Use Permit and setback exception for a mixed-use project featuring the conversion and expansion of a gas station building to a restaurant with a brewery Page 20 of 74 Agenda Item #7.2: and the development of four apartment units. The applicants decided to not move forward with the project and pursuant to SMC Section 19.56.040, Time limits and extensions, the Use Permit expired on June 8, 2018. In 2019, the Design Review and Historic Preservation Commission approved exterior modifications to the existing service station, including signage. Proposed Project: The proposed project includes the demolition of an existing 2,250 sf detached accessory structure and site preparation to support the project. Onsite parking would be provided by 8 parking spaces along the northern side of the site, and will be provided by demolishing the dilapidated existing metal building. The project would be implemented in two phases, as described below: Phase 1 :Little Lou’s’ Food Truck and free standing canopy: This phase includes construction of a 10 foot tall, 600 square foot (12 feet by 50 feet) shade canopy, located along the northern property line, west of the existing gas station building and the operation of “Little Lou’s” Food Truck would serve coffee and a limited menu. The canopy would be painted steel and will seat 20 guests. The food truck would be supported by 1-3 staff members and hours of operation would be 6am-10pm. Service deliveries would be between 8am-3pm. There would be no drive-through service. The food truck currently has a Temporary Use Permit from the City of Sonoma. Phase 2: A new building located at the southern end of the property, along MacArthur Street that will include a restaurant (Broadway Hardware), a Micro-brewery and a two bedroom apartment. This phase entails the construction of a 4,775 square foot building that would support a 2,290 square foot restaurant, 1,650 square foot brewery, and an 835 square foot residence. The restaurant would include 12 interior and 60 exterior seats under the covered canopy at the rear of the property. The hours of operation would be 10am-10pm and the restaurant would be supported by approximately 5 employees. Service delivery hours would be 8am-3pm. There would be no drive-through service. The brewery would include a brewing unit producing beer to meet requirements of ABC type 75 license. Brewing would be conducted by a brew master and would be limited to on-site-sales only. The two bedroom apartment would be located at the western side of the building along First Street West, addressing the residential street. Signage The applicant is proposing 8 signs, including 3 roof signs and 5 wall signs, totaling 114 square feet. Exterior Modifications Paint Colors Paint colors on the building and structures match the colors of the existing gas station, and they are used in a similar theme: The main body is white, green accents and red signage. Lighting The dimmable LED, wall mounted downlights are designed to match the style of the building, and are painted the accent color (green) to match canopies and windows. The LED Sign lights are to match the roof color. The LED Pole lights at parking lot to be dark grey and the LED String lights at canopies, are low level, warm and dimmable. Landscaping Landscaping shall meet the City of Sonoma Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance and shall consist of water efficient planting including butterfly bush, yarrow, Mexican rock rose, prickly pear cactus, bay laurel, agave, manzanita, western red bud, madrone, palos verde, oak, and culinary herbs such as rosemary, mint, oregano. General Plan Consistency ( Not Applicable to this Project): Page 21 of 74 Agenda Item #7.2: Land Use Designation: The property is designated Mixed Use by the City of Sonoma General Plan. The Mixed Use land use designation, is intended to accommodate uses that provide a transition between commercial and residential districts, to promote a pedestrian presence in adjacent commercial areas, and to provide neighborhood commercial services to adjacent residential areas. It is also intended to provide additional opportunities for affordable housing, especially for low and very low income households. The Mixed Use designation also is intended to recognize the continued existence of uses that contribute to the character or function of their neighborhood and to allow for the possibility of their expansion. General Plan Consistency: The proposed project is consistent with the goals and policies of the City of Sonoma 2020 General Plan, which encourage infill development. Applicable General Policies include the following: Policy CDE-5.4: Preserve and continue to utilize historic buildings as much as feasible. Policy CDE-5.6: Pursue design consistency, improved pedestrian and bicycle access, and right of way beautification along the Highway 12 corridor. Policy LE 1.5: Promote and accommodate year-round tourism that is consistent with the historic, small-town character of Sonoma. Policy ERE-3.2: Encourage construction, building maintenance, landscaping, and transportation practices that promote energy and water conservation and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Policy PSE-1.3: Ensure that all development projects provide adequate fire protection. The project would be consistent with the General Plan. Development Code Consistency ( Not Applicable to this Project): Use: The property is zoned Mixed Use (MX) which is intended to allow for higher density housing types, such as apartments and condominiums, in conjunction with commercial and office development, in order to increase housing opportunities, reduce dependence on the automobile, and provide a pedestrian presence in commercial areas. A Use Permit is required for a restaurant. Setbacks: The MX zone requires a minimum 15-foot front/street side yard setback, a minimum 15-foot rear yard setback, and a minimum 5-foot side yard setback. Site Coverage: The maximum site coverage in the MX zone is 60% of the total lot area and the project site has a 24.3 percent site coverage. Floor Area Ratio (FAR): The maximum FAR in the MX zone is 1.0 (or 100% of the total lot area) and as the property would has an FAR of 0.292. Environmental Review ( Not Applicable to this Project): The project is exempt pursuant to Section of 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) of the State CEQA Guidelines as it entails the conversion of a structure less than 2,500 square feet in size and only minor exterior changes are proposed. Recommendation: Discuss, Consider, and Take Possible Action to Recommend to the Planning Commission the approval of a Design Review and Sign Permit applications of Bennett Martin, AIA to construct a new restaurant (Broadway Hardware), a micro-brewery and a two bedroom apartment at 899 Broadway (Jack's Filling Station) (APN 018- 411-012). Attachments PUBLIC COMMENT ATTACHMENT 899 Broadway_ Planning Doc-3-24-21 899 Broadway SOI Consistency Determination NEW CONSTRUCTION 050321 PDF Page 22 of 74 Agenda Item #7.2: CC: STRATAap Attn: Bennett Martin and Brad Johnson P.O. Box 1207 Sonoma, CA 95476 Erika Harris 899 Broadway Sonoma, CA 95476 Patricia Cullinan, via email Alice Duffee, via email Page 23 of 74 Agenda Item #7.2: PUBLIC COMMENT TO THE CITY COUNCIL OR ONE OF THE CITY’S COMMISSIONS Any Public Correspondence Received by the City Regarding an Item that Will be Considered at a Public Meeting by the City Council or One of Its Commissions Can be Found on the City’s CivicWeb Portal at the Following Link. It is Updated as New Correspondence is Received. https://sonomacity.civicweb.net/filepro/documents STAFF CONTACTS: City Council City Clerk (707) 933-2216 Planning, DRHP, CSEC Planning (707) 933-2204 Page 24 of 74 Agenda Item #7.2: City of Sonoma Planning Department Revised 02/01/21 Uniform Application Beforesubmittingyourapplication,haveyoucheckedwith: ✓ Planning Department? ✓ Building Department? ✓ Public Works Department? ✓Fire Department? Applicant Information Owner Information Name BENNETT MARTIN, STRATAap Name ERIKA HARRIS Address P.O. BOX 1207, SONOMA, CA Address 899 BROADWAY Phone 707-935-7944 Phone 707-732-1291 Type of Application ❑Environmental Review ❑Prezoning/Annexation ❑ Design Review ❑Conditional Use Permit ❑ Rezoning: ❑Demolition Permit from to ❑Conditional Use Permit (Minor) ❑Certificate of Compliance ❑General Plan ❑Tentative Subdivision Map (5+ lots) Amendment: from ❑Lot Line Adjustment/Merger to ❑Tentative Parcel Map (4 or fewer lots) ❑Public Notice ❑ Variance ❑Planned Unit Development ❑Other: ______❑Exception Notice of special fees: The following special fees may also apply to your application: 1) Public Notice Fee: To cover costs associated with required newspaper and mailed public notices. 2) County Processing Fee: Applies to environmental review.Collected at application submittal. 3) Fish and Game Fee: Negative Declaration and EIR. Collected at application submittal. May be waived if project meets specific criteria. Project Location (by address or nearest cross-street) 899 BROADWAY, WEST MACARTHUR Assessor's Parcel Number (s) 018-411-012 General Plan Land Use Designation Zoning Brief Project Description NEW RESTAURANT, BREWERY, APARTMENT W/FOOD TRUCK Submittal Requirements: SEE ATTACHED SHEET I, the undersigned (“Applicant”), hereby state that I am the owner of record of the affected property or a duly authorized agent of the Property owner(s) (An agent must submit a letter of authorization signed by the property owner) and that all information submitted as part of this application is true and accurate. I agree to the terms, conditions and obligations set forth in this Application. I agree that I will provide written notice to the Planning Department in the event that there is a change in Applicant’s interest in the property, the project, or the billing address or contact person for said project. Said Notice shall be mailed first class, postage paid, certified mail to: Planning Department, No. 1 The Plaza, Sonoma, CA 95476. Applicant shall remain responsible for all outstanding costs incurred by City. I agree to indemnify and hold City harmless for all costs and expenses, including attorney’s fees, incurred by City or held to be the liability of the City in connection with City’s defense of its actions in any proceeding brought in any State or Federal court challenging the City’s actions with respect to the Applicant’s project. Signature Date Page 25 of 74 Agenda Item #7.2: OFFICE USE ONLY: SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST Application Date: Received By: Project Name: ______ Assessor's Parcel Number (s) ______ Note: Imaging Indexes Indicated in Bold Submitted with Date Submitted Application: if different from Application Date: Project Narrative: ❑ Yes ❑ Not Applicable Tentative Map: 1 Full Sized Copies (24” x 36”) ❑ Yes ❑ Not Applicable 1 Reduced Copy (not to exceed 11” x 17” ) ❑ Yes ❑ Not Applicable Site Plan: ❑ 10 Full Sized Copies (24” x 36”) Yes ❑ Not Applicable 1 Reduced Copy (not to exceed 11” x 17” ) ❑ Yes ❑ Not Applicable Building Elevations: ❑ 1 Full Sized Copies (24” x 36”) Yes ❑ Not Applicable 1 Reduced Copy (not to exceed 11” x 17”) ❑ Yes ❑ Not Applicable Arborist’s Report: ❑ Yes ❑ Not Applicable Letter of Authorization from Property Owner: ❑ Yes ❑ Not Applicable Note: All drawings, along with the project narrative, should be provided electronically using the PDF form. ❑ Residential Development ❑ Rezoning Project ❑ Variance ❑ Zoning Permit ❑ Commercial ❑ ❑ Development Project Prezoning Other: ❑ Subdivision Map ❑ General Plan Amendment ❑ Parcel Map ❑ Environmental Review ❑ ❑ Conditional Use Permit Design Review ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Minor Conditional Use Permit ❑ Lot Merger ❑ Planned Unit Development ❑ Certificate of Compliance G:\_Departments\Planning & Community Services\FORMS\Uniform_Application020121.docx Page 26 of 74 Agenda Item #7.2: Total Fee Amount Receipt Number Received By Date G:\_Departments\Planning & Community Services\FORMS\Uniform_Application020121.docx Page 27 of 74 Agenda Item #7.2: CITY OF SONOMA Revised 06/17/20 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS Use the following chart to determine what additional information may need to be submitted along with your Uniform Application. If a appears in a box to the right of the application type, then that piece of information may be required in order for your application to be processed promptly. A more detailed description of each of the requirements is provided below; however, depending on the nature of the project, some of the requirements may be modified or waived. If you have any questions about whether a particular requirement applies to your project application, please contact the Planning Division as soon as possible. Applications needing Planning Commission approval will not be placed on a Planning Commission agenda until all required information is submitted and determined to be complete by Planning Division staff. Site Plan Tentative Project Building Arborist Title Cost Application Map Narrative Elevations Report Documents Recovery Type Agreement Conditional Use Permit Variance Exception Major Subdivision (5 or more lots or units) Minor Subdivision (4 or fewer lots or units) Planned Unit Development Rezoning/ Prezoning General Plan Amendment Lot Line See requirements on page 2 Adjustment/ Lot Merger Certificate of See requirements on page 2 Compliance Design Review (Only if Deposit Based Fee) Demolition Permit Temporary Use Permit Page 28 of 74 Agenda Item #7.2: A Site Plan shall contain the following information, where applicable: Adjacent lots & structures within Calculations of building density, lot Breakdown of residential and commercial 100’ and estimated setback coverage, Floor Area Ratio (FAR), space distances from adjacent public and private open space and Any designated pedestrian circulation structures paved areas Parking layout and space dimensions North arrow and scale Building footprints & setbacks Driveways and curb cuts Lot dimensions Proposed amenities (parks, etc.) Location of inclusionary affordable units Sidewalks Location of one-and two-story units Existing natural features Landscaped areas and Creeks and creek setback line Proposed indoor and outdoor seating (for dimensions Trunk and dripline of existing trees restaurants) Existing structures to remain to remain Revision date(s) for site plans revised during the review process Applicants shall submit one full-sized copies (24” x 36”) when applicable, and one (1) reduced copy (11” x 17”). Site Plans may be drawn by an architect or other licensed professional, or may be drawn by the applicant, depending on the nature of the project. A Tentative Map shall contain the following information: North arrow and scale Name & address of owner(s) Name & address of subdivider Location of known wells, leach Location, width & grade of proposed Location, name & width of all adjoining fields, and septic tanks new streets or public ways streets or other public ways Lot layout & dimensions Name, address & registration or Elevation contours Identification of all trees on the site license number of engineer or land Location of existing structures to remain Location, width & direction of all surveyor preparing the map or be removed watercourses Calculation of minimum and average Location of all areas subject to inundation lot size or storm water overflow Location, width & purpose of all existing or proposed easements Applicants shall submit ten (10) full-sized copies (24” x 36”) and one (1) reduced copy (11” x 17”). Tentative Maps must be prepared by a licensed civil engineer or land surveyor. A Lot Line Adjustment or Lot Merger shall contain the following information, as applicable: Copy of a Preliminary Title Report for each affected property; copy of legal description of the properties resulting from the lot line adjustment and a Plat Map (both prepared and stamped by a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor). A Certificate of Compliance shall contain the following information, as applicable: Copy of a chain of title, deeds, official maps, or any other officially recorded documents supporting the application. Over . . . Page 29 of 74 Agenda Item #7.2: A Project Narrative shall contain the following information, as applicable: For a Conditional Use Permit Description of the proposed use or uses, including but not limited to: number of employees; hours of operation; shipping and delivery schedule; drive-through service; outdoor storage needs; or any other information determined by the Planning Division as pertinent to the Planning Commission’s review of the application. For a Variance Description of the proposal and the justification for the request, including how the proposed variance satisfies the following state-mandated findings for approval: 1. The adjustment authorized by the Variance is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable Specific Plan; 2. There are special circumstances applicable to the property (i.e., size, shape, topography, location or surroundings), such that the strict application of the requirements of this Development Code deprives the property owner of privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and within the same zoning district; 3. Granting the Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other property owners in the same vicinity and zoning district and denied to the property owner for which the Variance is sought; 4. The adjustment authorized by the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the vicinity and in the same zoning district 5. Granting the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and in the same zoning district. For an Exception Description of the proposal and the justification for the request, including how the proposed exception satisfies the following findings for approval: 1. The adjustment authorized by the Exception is consistent with the General Plan, any applicable specific Plan, and the overall objectives of the Development Code; 2. An exception to the normal standards of the Development Code is justified by environmental features or site conditions; historic development patterns of the property or neighborhood; or the interest in promoting creativity and personal expression in site planning and development; 3. Granting the Exception will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and in the same zoning district. Over . . . g:\_departments\planning & community services\forms\uniformapplicationsubmittalrequirements020121.doc Page 30 of 74 Agenda Item #7.2: For a Planned Unit Description of the proposal and the justification for the request, including how the Development proposed planned unit development satisfies the following findings for approval: 1. The Planned Development Permit is consistent with the General Plan, any applicable specific Plan, and the intent and objective of this section; 2. The design of the development is consistent with the intent of applicable regulation 3. and design guidelines of the Development Code; 4. The various use and development elements of the Planned Development relate to one another in such a way as to justify exceptions to the normal standards of the Development Code; 5. The design flexibility allowed by the Planned Development Permit has been used to creatively address identified physical and environmental constraints; and 6. The proposed development will be well-integrated into its setting, will relate appropriately to adjacent uses, and will retain desirable natural features of the site and the surrounding area. For a Rezoning, Prezoning or Description of the proposal and the justification for the request, including but not General Plan Amendment limited to: its potential impact on neighborhood compatibility and service availability; its consistency with surrounding land use and zoning designations; and its consistency with other applicable general plan goals and policies. For a Second Unit (exception) Description of the proposal and the justification for the request, including how the proposed second unit satisfies the following findings for approval: The second dwelling unit will be compatible with the design of the main dwelling unit and the surrounding neighborhood in terms of exterior treatment, height, landscaping, scale, and setbacks. For Design Review Description of the proposal and the justification for the request, including how the proposed project satisfies the following findings for approval: 1. Basic findings. a. The project complies with applicable policies and regulations as set forth in the Development Code, other City ordinances, and the General Plan b. On balance, the project is consistent with the intent of applicable design guidelines set forth in the Development Code; and c. The project responds appropriately to the context of adjacent development, as well as existing site conditions and environmental features. 2. Projects within the Historic Overlay District. a. The project will not impair the historic character of its surroundings. b. The project substantially preserves the qualities of any significant historic structures or other significant historic features on the site. c. The project substantially complies with the applicable guidelines set forth in Chapter 19.42 (Historic preservation and infill in the Historic Zone). d. The project substantially complies with any applicable preservation plan or other guidelines or requirements pertaining to a local historic district as designated through section 19.42.020. e. The project substantially complies with the applicable Secretary of Interior Standards and Guidelines for the Treatment of Historic Properties. Color and Material Sample Requirements: • Provided ten copies of the proposed manufacture color samples (including manufacturer name and product number). • Bring color and material board to DRHPC meeting. • Provide brush-out sample on building. For Demolition Permit Description of the proposal and the justification for the request, including how the proposed project satisfies the following findings for approval: 1. The structure is not historically significant, based upon the criteria established by the State Office of Historic Preservation; or 2. The structure does not represent a unique and irreplaceable historic or architectural resource; Page 31 of 74 Agenda Item #7.2: 3. The community benefit of preserving the structure is outweighed by the cost of preservation and rehabilitation; 4. The adaptive re-use of the structure is infeasible or inappropriate, due to economic considerations, structural conditions or land use incompatibility; and 5. The relocation of the structure is infeasible due to cost, structural conditions or lack of an interested taker. Provide the number of existing residential units on the project site that will be demolished and whether each existing unit is occupied or unoccupied. Include any information necessary to determine compliance with Government code Section 66300(d), including, but not limited to, information on the number of dwelling units being removed if any, whether any dwelling units meet the definition of a “protected unit” (Cal. Gov’t Code §66300(d)(2)E(ii)), whether any dwelling units were subject to rent or price control, and whether any dwelling units are for rent. g:\_departments\planning & community services\forms\uniformapplicationsubmittalrequirements020121.doc Page 32 of 74 Agenda Item #7.2: City of Sonoma Sign Application Planning and Community Revised 06/17/20 Development No. 1, The Plaza Sonoma, CA 95476 Date: 03.24.2021 Applicant Information: Name: BENNETT MARTIN, STRATAap Telephone: 707-935-7944 Mailing Address: P.O. BOX 1207, SONOMA, CA 95476 Site Information: Site Address: ______899 BROADWAY APN: ______018-411-012 Zoning: ______Public Street Frontage: 1) Primary ______MacArthur 2) Secondary______Broadway Sign Information: Sign types include the following: awning, banner, freestanding, hanging, monument, projecting, portable freestanding, roof, wall, and window. For each proposed sign indicate the type of sign, number of faces, dimensions, and form of illumination, if any. Please attach a scale drawing (in color) of all proposed signs to the application. Type of Sign Size (in feet and inches) No. of Faces Illumination Length Height Area Single Double Exterior None ______Letter height: ______Background Color: ______Letter Color: ______Trim Color: ______Sign Area: 1) Existing ______2) Proposed ______3) Total ______Hanging, Projecting, Free-standing signs: 1) Height to top of sign from grade _____ 2) Clearance _____ Note: The maximum sign height for freestanding signs is 12 feet. The minimum clearance from hanging or projecting signs is 7 feet. See reverse side of the application for additional submittal requirements Administrative Information (office Use Only) Commission Review Administrative Review Application Complete: Yes No Determination Date: ______Decision: ______Vote: ______Staff Comments: ______Project Name:______Property Owner Authorization: I, the undersigned, hereby state that I am the owner of record on the affected property or a duly authorized agent of the property owner(s). An agent must submit a letter of authorization signed by the property owner and that all information submitted as part of this application is truce and accurate. Signature: ______Date: ______ g:\_departments\planning & community services\forms\signapplication061720.doc Page 33 of 74 899 BROADWAY ‐ PROPOSED SIGNS SIZE IN FEET AND INCHES BACKGROUND TRIM SIGN #TYPE OF SIGN LENGTH HEIGHT AREA No. OF FACES ILLUMINATION LETTER HEIGHT COLOR LETTER COLOR COLOR 1 ROOF 7'‐6" 4'‐0" 28 sf 2 EXTERIOR 10" AND 8 1/2" GREEN COLOR 2 WHITE COLOR 1 NA 2 ROOF 7'‐6" 4'‐0" 30 sf 2 EXTERIOR 10" AND 8 1/2" GREEN COLOR 2 WHITE COLOR 1 NA 3 WALL 15" RADIUS 15" RADIUS 5 sf 1 EXTERIOR 12" RED COLOR 4 WHITE COLOR 1 NA 4 WALL 15" RADIUS 15" RADIUS 5 sf 1 EXTERIOR 12" RED COLOR 4 WHITE COLOR 1 NA 5 WALL 24" RADIUS 24" RADIUS 12.5 sf 1 SELF ILLUMINATING 18" RED COLOR 4 WHITE COLOR 1 NA 6 ROOF 9'‐4"& 7'‐0" 12" 9 sf & 7 sf 1 EXTERIOR 12" NA RED COLOR 4 NA 7 WALL 15" RADIUS 15" RADIUS 5 sf 1 EXTERIOR 12" RED COLOR 4 WHITE COLOR 1 NA 8 WALL 15" RADIUS 15" RADIUS 5 sf 1 EXTERIOR 12" RED COLOR 4 WHITE COLOR 1 NA Agenda Item#7.2: Page 34 of74 PROJECT NARRATIVE Jacks Filling Station is located at 899 Broadway. The station is a historic building that sells gasoline, beer, wine, and much more. We have kept the station as period ac- curate as possible. We would like this to extend to the next phases of the project for 899 Broadway. Although we had initially planned and been approved to turn the gas station in to a restaurant the project was not physically or fi nancially feasible. In light of recent events, Covid, Cal trans upgrades, etc. we have decided to revise our plans. C I T Y O F S O N O M A The proposed project would be located at 899 Broadway, behind Jacks Filling Station. Phase 1:Little Lou’s’ Food Truck and free standing canopy: P L A N N I N G C O M M I S S I O N & “Little Lou’s” will serve coff ee and a limited menu out of our food truck. The canopy will be DESIGN REVIEW AND HISTORIC painted steel to match historic colors of the gas station and will seat 20 guests. the food truck currently has a temporary permit. PRESERVATION COMMISSION See attached menu for more detail. We would have 1-3 staff members. Our hours of APPLICATION operation would be 6am-10pm. Service deliveries would be between 8am-3pm. There would not be any drive through service. We would need a 10-foot by 10-foot storage area for paper goods. There is ample parking on the property as well as entrances from both Broadway and MacArthur Street. Phase 2: A new building located at the southern end of the property, along MacArthur USE PERMIT Street that will include a restaurant (Broadway Hardware), a Micro-brewery and a two bedroom apartment. Broadway Hardware will be a small, quick service restaurant at the east end of the build- ing. The restaurant would be a single story 2,290 square feet building with approximately 5 employees. All of the seating except 12 seats would be outdoors or under the covered REFERENCE: 899 BROADWAY canopy that sits at the rear of the property. The hours of operation would be 10am-10pm. Service delivery hours would be 8am-3pm. There would be no drive through service. See NEW MIXED USE, LIGHT COMMERCIAL BUILDING attached menu. WITH A RESTAURANT, A BREWERY AND A ONE-BED- The Micro-Brewery will be comprised of a brewing unit producing beer to meet require- ROOM RESIDENTIAL UNIT ments of ABC type 75 license. Brewing will be conducted by a brew master and will be limited to on-site-sales only. License requires a minimum of 100 barrels/year production. The two bedroom apartment is located at the western side of the building along First APN: 018 - 411 - 012 Street West, addressing the residential street. Parking will be on the northern side of the site, and will be provided by demolishing the dilapidated existing metal building. As Sonoma Residents with 3 children, we have found that there is a lack of aff ordable, family oriented, casual, non-chain restaurants on this side of town. There are very few restaurants south of the square and we feel that the neighborhoods of MacArthur East and West, would appreciate a restaurant that is both within walking distance, and is a good option for your families and seniors. The proposed uses will re-inforce the small-scale historic commercial activity along Broadway, and serves as a small improvement to the historic Broadway corridor. Agenda Item#7.2: DATE: 03.24.2021 Page 35 of74 S T R A T A A P A R C H I T E C T U R E N SCALE: 1”=10’-0” EXISTING SITE SURVEY - Agenda Item#7.2: 899 BROADWAY, SONOMA, CA Page 36 of74 S T R A T A A P A R C H I T E C T U R E N Agenda Item#7.2: DATE: 03.24.2021 OVERALL SITE PLAN - SCALE 1/32”=1’-0” Page 37 of74 S T R A T A A P A R C H I T E C T U R E N Agenda Item#7.2: DATE: 03.24.2021 PARTIAL SITE PLAN - AREA OF WORK - SCALE 1/16”=1’-0” Page 38 of74 S T R A T A A P A R C H I T E C T U R E N Agenda Item#7.2: DATE: 03.24.2021 SITE ANALYSIS AND LIGHTING - SCALE 1/16”=1’-0” Page 39 of74 S T R A T A A P A R C H I T E C T U R E PARKING ANALYSIS LOT B - 899 BROADWAY PARKING RESTAURANT SEATING INTERIOR (12 Seats) 1:4 Ratio 3 SEATING EXTERIOR (60) Seats) (No off-street parking required 1 for up to 25% of Interior seats) Total Provided BREWERY N STAFF 2 TOTAL STAFF 2 RESIDENTIAL UNIT 2 BEDROOM UNIT 1.5 TOTAL Total Required 7.5 Total Provided 8 Agenda Item#7.2: DATE: 03.24.2021 Page 40 of74 S T R A T A A P A R C H I T E C T U R E N Agenda Item#7.2: DATE: 03.24.2021 BUILDING ENLARGED FLOOR PLAN - SCALE 3/32”=1’-0” Page 41 of74 S T R A T A A P A R C H I T E C T U R E LANDSCAPING SHALL MEET CITY OF SONOMA MODEL WATER-EFFICIENT LAND- SCAPE ORDINANCE (MWELO) PLANTINGS SHALL CONSIST OF WATER-EFFICIENT PLANTS REQUIRING MINIMAL MAINTENANCE AND SHALL CONSIST OF THE FOL- LOWING VARIETY OF PLANTS: TRASH ENCLOSURE Bu erfl y bush Yarrow Mexican Rock Rose Prickly Pear Cactus Bay Laurel Agave Manzanita Western Red Bud Madrone Palos Verde Oak Culinary herbs - Rosemary, mint, oregano TABLES & CHAIRS WALKWAY LIGHTING COLOR: WHITE 2.1 W LED, 3000K Agenda Item#7.2: DATE: 03.24.2021 PROPOSED PLANT TYPES & OUTDOOR FURNITURE Page 42 of74 S T R A T A A P A R C H I T E C T U R E WEST ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION EXISTING GAS STATION ELEVATIONS - NTS Agenda Item#7.2: DATE: 03.24.2021 Page 43 of74 S T R A T A A P A R C H I T E C T U R E SOUTH ELEVATION - NTS WEST ELEVATION - NTS EAST ELEVATION - NTS EXISTING STORAGE BUILDING ELEVATIONS - NTS Agenda Item#7.2: DATE: 03.24.2021 Page 44 of74 S T R A T A A P A R C H I T E C T U R E Agenda Item#7.2: EXISTING FOOD TRUCK DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS - NTS DATE: 03.24.2021 Page 45 of74 S T R A T A A P A R C H I T E C T U R E SOUTH ELEVATION - MACARTHUR STREET NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION -FIRST STREET WEST ELEVATION Agenda Item#7.2: DATE: 03.24.2021 SITE ELEVATIONS - SCALE 1/16”=1’-0” Page 46 of74 S T R A T A A P A R C H I T E C T U R E EAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - SCALE 3/32”=1’-0” Agenda Item#7.2: DATE: 03.24.2021 Page 47 of74 S T R A T A A P A R C H I T E C T U R E WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION PROPOS ED BUILDING NG ELEVA ATIONS ONS - SCALE 3/32”=1’-0” Agenda Item#7.2: DATE: 03.24.2021 Page 48 of74 S T R A T A A P A R C H I T E C T U R E COLOR 1: WHITE TO MATCH EXISTING GAS STATION COLOR 2: GREEN TO MATCH EXISTING GAS STATION COLOR 3: COLOR 4: RED PANTONE C0 M0 Y0 K0 PANTONE C97 M22 Y100 K9 AEP SPAN - OLD TOWN GREY PANTONE C1 M100 Y92 K0 R255 G255 B255 R0 G131 B62 PANTONE C75 M14 Y91 K81 R235 G0 B41 HEX #ff ff ff f HEX #00833e HEX #eb0029 Agenda Item#7.2: DATE: 03.24.2021 EXTERIOR COLORS Page 49 of74 S T R A T A A P A R C H I T E C T U R E PAINTED CORRUGATED METAL SIDING TYPICAL WINDOW TRIM TYPICAL CANOPY TYPICAL ROOF OVERHANG TYPICAL POLE MOUNTED PARKING LOT TYPICAL WALL MOUNTED FIXTURE TYPICALAL LILIGHTGHT FIXTUREFIXTURE ATAT CANCANOPIES ROOF MOUNTED UPLIGHT LIGHTING FIXTURE 5W5 WATT LED LIG GHTS S LOW VOLTAGE STRING LED LIGHTS 5 WATT LED 136 WATT LED LIGHTS MATERIAL SAMPLES WHITE CORRUGATED METAL SIDING AND WHITE ALUMINUM WINDOWS Agenda Item#7.2: DATE: 03.24.2021 MATERIALS, DETAILS AND LIGHT FIXTURES Page 50 of74 S T R A T A A P A R C H I T E C T U R E VINTAGE SIGN TO BE RESTORED Agenda Item#7.2: DATE: 03.24.2021 RESTAURANT SIGNS - SCALE 1/2”=1’-0” Page 51 of74 S T R A T A A P A R C H I T E C T U R E BROADWAY 899 BROADWAY, SONOMA, CALIF. 95476 HARDWARE FAMILY RESTAURANT COFFEE ª• BREAKFAST • LUNCH BREAKFAST LUNCH SNACKS MAINS BREAKFAST TACO LITTLE LOU Flour tortilla, scrambled eggs, Single patty, american cheese, cheese, tots, avocado, salsa, & onion, pickles, sauce choice of BRISKET or SOYRIZO SEASONAL SALAD $10 BAKED PASTA $11 gluten free tortillas available BIG LOU Paul's lettuces, persimmon, Sunday gravy, mozzarella, rigatoni PASTRY OF THE DAY Double patty, double cheese, pomegranate, Pt. Reyes blue cheese, pickles, sauce, onions candied walnuts FRESH PASTRIES MADE DAILY ROAST CHICKEN GREEN CHILE BURGER GREEN SALAD $8 SIDES $16 GREEN CHILES & ONIONS, QUESO, Half chicken, lemon, garlic, potatoes, arugula, lemon juice, olive oil, parmesan pickled onions broccoli rabe & fennel TATOR TOTS * BEANS BRISKET SANDWICH ROMAN ARTICHOKES CHIPS & QUESO $9 BRISKET, PICKLES, ONIONS, SAUCE PIE OF THE DAY $16 JALAPENO POPPERS Whole fried artichokes w/aioli COLD DRINKS Seasonal pizza, local ingredients HOT DRINKS SOUP OF THE DAY $5 ICED COFFEE SIDES Seasonal soup & garlic bread ICED LATTE DRIP ICED BLACK TEA ESPRESSO ARANCINI $4 Seasonal vegetable ICED MATCHA $5 CAFE CON LECHE FRESH ORANGE JUICE Cheese stuffed rice balls & tomato Garlic Bread CAPPUCINO sauce HORCHATA MACHIATTO Cheesy Polenta COKE (BOTTLE) SAUSAGE & PEPPERS $10 MOCHA Meatballs TOPO CHICO HOT CHOCOLATE House made fennel sausage, peppers, BLACK TEA garlic bread MATCHA LATTE N Agenda Item#7.2: DATE: 03.24.2021 RESTAURANT AND FOOD TRUCK MENUS- NTS Page 52 of74 S T R A T A A P A R C H I T E C T U R E PERSPECTIVE VIEW FROM FIRST STREET WEST Agenda Item#7.2: DATE: 03.24.2021 PERSPECTIVE VIEW FROM BROADWAY Page 53 of74 S T R A T A A P A R C H I T E C T U R E Agenda Item#7.2: DATE: 03.24.2021 OUTDOOR SPACE CONCEPTS Page 54 of74 S T R A T A A P A R C H I T E C T U R E Agenda Item #7.2: 899 BROADWAY – SONOMA GARBAGE ACCEPTANCE OF TRASH ENCLOSURE LOCATION From: Sonoma Garbage [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, March 19, 2021 9:20 AM To: Catalina Madrinan Subject: Re: Location of trash enclosure Hi Catalina, The driver said that would work as long as there were no overhead wires...Thanks! On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 3:21 PM Catalina Madrinan From: Sonoma Garbage [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 3:16 PM To: Catalina Madrinan Subject: Re: Location of trash enclosure Hi Catalina, Yes if they are able to roll the bins out to the street, that would be fine, but we will send this to the driver and have him look at it and get back to you to confirm...Thanks On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 3:09 PM Catalina Madrinan Good afternoon, I am working on a project located on 899 Broadway in Sonoma. We are designing a light commercial development with 1 residential Unit, and The City of Sonoma wants us to provide documentation from Sonoma Garbage that the proposed trash location is accessible for collection. I have looked at the guidelines and saw that the truck may not be able to come in the site and collect the trash directly from the enclosure. I would like to know if it is acceptable to have the owner move the trash bin/s to the street for collection. You can see the proposed location of the enclosure on the attached PDF. Please let me know if this is acceptable. Thank you, Catalina Madrinan STRATAap Page 55 of 74 Agenda Item #7.2: Nu-Wave® Corrugated Nu-Wave Corrugated is an economical, structural through- fastened roof or wall panel suitable for general usage. 2 Panel is ideal for roof, vertical or 2 ⁄3" horizontal wall applications, soffit or 32" Net Coverage (Roof) 7 ⁄8" 2 interior accent panels. 34 ⁄3" Net Coverage (Wall) Properties Standard Finishes Base Steel Yield Tensile Wt. I+ S+ I- S- Metallic Gauge Paint System Thickness (in) (ksi) (ksi) (lbs/ft2) (in4/ft) (in3/ft) (in4/ft) (in3/ft) Coating 26 0.0173 80 82 0.94 0.0256 0.0579 0.0256 0.0579 AZ50 Cool Dura Tech™ nt 24 0.0232 50 65 1.25 0.0346 0.0769 0.0346 0.0769 AZ50 Cool Dura Tech™ 5000 (polyvinylidene fluoride) 22 0.0294 50 65 1.59 0.0415 0.0964 0.0415 0.0964 AZ50 or Cool Dura Tech™ mx 20 0.0354 40 55 1.91 0.0519 0.1150 0.0519 0.1150 AZ50 (metallic polyvinylidene) + - NOTES: The moments of inertia, I and I , presented for determining deflection are: (2IEffective + IGross)/3 standard features optional features 2 n 32" coverage roof panel. 34 ⁄3" coverage wall panel. n Short cut sheets from 6'-0" to 1'-0". Additional fees and lead times may apply. n Minimum recommended slope 3:12. n Custom colors, thick film primer and/or clear coat n ™ Gauges: 26ga in Dura Tech nt, 24ga and 22ga in Dura paint finishes available. Subject to 4,500 square feet ™ ® Tech 5000. 20ga available in ZINCALUME Plus. minimum order. Inquire with a sales representative n Refer to AEP Span Color Charts for full range of color for leads times and more information. options and paint systems. n Perforation options available for an additional charge. n Custom manufactured panel lengths: 6'-0" to 50'-0" Minimum order size 1,450 square feet. Select from (Straight) & 6'-0″ to 30'-0" (Curved). standard perforation patterns with open areas of 7.8%, 13.8%, or 23.4%. n Testing: ASTM E1680 (air infiltration) and ASTM E1646 (water infiltration). All testing performed by accredited n Smooth curving – third-party. 20-24 gauge: Maximum length 30'-0". Minimum outside radius 3'-0". n Roof assemblies Class A Fire Rated when installed on non-combustible deck or framing per IBC or IRC or n Stucco embossed option available in 22-26 gauge when installed in accordance to UL listings (UL790). and are subject to 1,450 square feet minimum. Wall assemblies rated for fire resistance (UL263) when n Matching polycarbonate panels available. installed in accordance with UL listings. n Building Code Approval Report: #ER-0550. n Manufactured in Sacramento, CA. Customer Service Centers For most current versions of literature please visit Tacoma, WA Phone: 800-733-4955 Fax: 253-272-0791 www.aepspan.com Page 56 of 74 Agenda Item #7.2: Architectural Metal Roofing and Siding COLOR CHART STANDARD COLORS PREMIUM COLOR1 DURA TECH™ 5000 - Premium 70% Fluoropolymer (PVDF) Coating (Subject to upcharge) ZINCALUME® Plus* Cool REGAL WHITE Cool PARCHMENT VINTAGE®1 SRI: 64 • LRV: 67 • GA: 24, 22, & 20 SRI: 88 • LRV: 75 • GA: 24 & 22 SRI: 58 • LRV: 40 • GA: 24 & 22 SRI: 22 • LRV: 20 • GA: 24 Vintage coated metal is an innovative coating process over a TruZinc® G90 metallic coated steel surface producing a beautiful, durable, aged-metallic finish. METALLIC COLORS1 Cool SIERRA TAN Cool PEBBLE Cool WALNUT DURA TECH™ mx - Premium Fluoropolymer (PVDF) SRI: 55 • LRV: 34 • GA: 24 & 22 SRI: 48 • LRV: 27 • GA: 24 & 22 SRI: 38 • LRV: 18 • GA: 24 & 22 Pearlescent Coating (Subject to upcharge) Cool WEATHERED COPPER Cool DARK BRONZE Cool TERRA-COTTA Cool METALLIC SILVER1 SRI: 34 • LRV: 11 • GA: 24 & 22 SRI: 32 • LRV: 8 • GA: 24 & 22 SRI: 41 • LRV: 15 • GA: 24 & 22 SRI: 65 • LRV: 50 • GA: 24 & 22 Cool COLONIAL RED Cool OLD TOWN GRAY Cool ZINC GRAY Cool SILVERSMITH1 SRI: 35 • LRV: 9 • GA: 24 & 22 SRI: 43 • LRV: 27 • GA: 24 & 22 SRI: 39 • LRV: 20 • GA: 24 & 22 SRI: 58 • LRV: 54 • GA: 24 & 22 Cool SLATE GRAY Cool MIDNIGHT BRONZE Cool MATTE BLACK Cool ZACtique® II1 SRI: 33 • LRV: 12 • GA: 24 & 22 SRI: 27 • LRV: 7 • GA: 24 & 22 SRI: 29 • LRV: 5 • GA: 24 & 22 SRI: 39 • LRV: 22 • GA: 24 & 22 Cool TAHOE BLUE Cool REGAL BLUE Cool SAGE GREEN Cool METALLIC CHAMPAGNE1 SRI: 33 • LRV: 14 • GA: 24 & 22 SRI: 29 • LRV: 10 • GA: 24 & 22 SRI: 41 • LRV: 21 • GA: 24 & 22 SRI: 54 • LRV: 33 • GA: 24 & 22 1 Please note that these colors are batch sensitive (may have color variation) and are directional in nature. Different batches are not to be mixed on projects. We recommend that you request a sample of current stocked material to review actual color before ordering to ensure color accuracy. We are not responsible for color variations. Cool LEAF GREEN Cool FOREST GREEN Cool METALLIC COPPER1 SRI: 30 • LRV: 11 • GA: 24 & 22 SRI: 29 • LRV: 9 • GA: 24 & 22 * Clear acrylic coated SRI: 53 • LRV: 29 • GA: 24 & 22 REPRESENTATION OF COLORS MAY VARY DUE TO PRINTING LIMITATIONS. Sample color chips are available upon request. Consult your AEP Span representative for more information. 800-733-4955 Custom colors available by request www.aepspan.com Page 57 of 74 Agenda Item #7.2: Noe Home - Looking Glass Architect: Winder Gibson Architects Photographer: Exceptional Frames Builder: CBC Construction Page 58 of 74 Agenda Item #7.2: WINDOWS Bonelli Aluminum Thermally Broken Product Offering 3000T SERIES THERMAL NAIL ON CASEMENT, AWNING AND FIXED 11 14 11 14 4 7 10 1 3 6 11sim 9 2 12 14sim 5 8 21 16 13 23 16 21 11 14 11 14 11 14 17 22 17sim 12 11sim 22sim 14sim 15 15 20 16 21 13 23 16 21 16 21 17 22 11 14 11 14 17sim 11sim 11sim 18 22sim 14sim 14sim 20 16 21 16 21 16 21 Page 59 of 74 Agenda Item #7.2: Bonelli Aluminum Thermally Broken Product Offering OUTSIDE GLAZED DOUBLE CASEMENT INSIDE GLAZED DOUBLE CASEMENT INSIDE GLAZED CASEMENT FIXED CASEMENT Page 60 of 74 Agenda Item #7.2: Bonelli Aluminum Thermally Broken Product Offering INSIDE GLAZED AWNING OVER FIXED OUTSIDE GLAZED AWNING OVER AWNING " 16 " 3 8 3 3 3 11 14 " 16 13 3 " 8 1 12 5 15 " 16 " 3 8 3 7 2 13 16 INSIDE GLAZED CASEMENT/AWNING OUTSIDE GLAZED FIXED " 8 7 1 " 8 3 3 11 22 " 8 3 3 21 23 " 8 7 1 Page 61 of 74 Agenda Item #7.2: CORNER WINDOW SECTION Bonelli Aluminum Thermally Broken Product Offering LINE OF STUCCO RETURN @ HEAD & SILL FACE OF PLYWOOD (LINE OF NAIL-FIN ) EXTERIOR INTERIOR FACE OF PLYWOOD TO R.O. 8B CORNER DETAIL AT 90 DEGREE ANGLE EXTERIOR R.O. TO FACE OF PLYWOOD Page 62 of 74 Agenda Item #7.2: Noe Home - Looking Glass Architect: Winder Gibson Architects Photographer: Exceptional Frames Builder: CBC Construction Bonelli.com [email protected] Page 63 of 74 Agenda Item #7.2: 511/521/522 A LUMINUM DOOR SYSTEMS ALUMINUM SECTIONAL DOORS VISUAL ACCESS. LIGHT INFILTRATION. CONTEMPORARY LOOK. INDUSTRY LEADING COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL SOLUTIONS Page 64 of 74 Agenda Item #7.2: ALUMINUM DOOR SYSTEMS ALUMINUM SECTIONAL DOORS ALUMINUM DOOR SYSTEMS MODELS 511/521/522 offer an attractive solution for commercial and industrial applications where visual access, light infiltration and aesthetics are key design considerations. Model 521, Clear anodized finish with Clear glass 4 Page 65 of 74 Agenda Item #7.2: ALUMINUM DOOR SYSTEMS MODEL 511 ALUMINUM SECTIONAL DOORS ALUMINUM DOOR SYSTEMS MODEL 511 doors are designed in sizes up to 16’2” wide and 16’1” high (4928 mm and 4902 mm). Featuring a narrow center stile width of 21/32” (17 mm), these doors are sleek, attractive and permit maximum visibility. An array of glazing choices, top and bottom rail widths, finishes and special options customizes the 511 Model to satisfy nearly any project requirement. Model 511, Black powder coat finish, Clear glass. 6 Page 66 of 74 Agenda Item #7.2: MODEL 511 Standard features at a glance Options Panel thickness 1 ¾" (45 mm) Glazing options*: Maximum standard height 16'1" (4902 mm) 1⁄8" (3 mm) DSB; 1⁄8" (3 mm) or 1⁄4" (6 mm) acrylic; Maximum standard width 16'2" (6147 mm) 1⁄8" (3 mm) or 1⁄4" (6 mm) tempered; Material 6063-T6 aluminum 1⁄8" (3 mm) or 1⁄4" (6 mm) clear polycarbonate; 1/4" (6mm) and 3/8" twin-wall polycarbonate, 5/8" Standard finish 204R-1 clear anodized triple-wall polycarbonate; 1/4" (6 mm) 3/8" (10 mm) and 5/8" (16 mm) twin-wall Center stile width 21/32" (17 mm) polycarbonate, triple-wall polycarbonate 1⁄4" (6 mm) End stile width 2 ¾" (70 mm) wire glass; 1⁄2" (12 mm) insulated glass Top rail width 2 3/8" (60 mm) or 3¾" (95 mm) Electric operator or chain hoist Top intermediate rail width ¾" (19 mm) Bottom sensing edge Bottom intermediate rail width 5/8" (16 mm) 3" track Bottom rail width 3 2 /8" (60 mm) or 3 ¾" (95 mm) or 4 ½" (114 mm) Bracket mounting (not available on full vertical door Weatherseals Bottom, flexible PVC tracks) Standard springs 10,000 cycle Higher-cycle springs in 25k, 50k, 75k, 100k cycles Track 2" (51 mm) Chain hoist Mounting Angle Posi-tension drums Operation Manual pull rope *Contact your local Overhead Door™ Distributor for special glazing requirements. Verify 1/4” (6 mm) glass applications with factory. Hinges and fixtures Galvanized steel Lock Galvanized, interior-mounted single unit Warranty 1-Year Limited; 3-Year Limited powder coat finish Structure options Anodized finishes Clear (standard) Light Bronze Medium Bronze Dark Bronze Powder coat finishes Select from approximately 200 RAL powder coat color options to best match your home. Actual door colors may vary from brochure photos due to fluctuations in the printing process. Always request a color sample from your Overhead Door™ Distributor for accurate color matching. Panel layout Section stack Door width Number of panels Door height Number of sections to 11’11” (3632 mm) 3 to 8’6” (2591 mm) 4 12’0” to 14’11” (3658 mm to 4547 mm) 4 8’7” to 10’1” (2616 mm to 3073 mm) 5 15’0” to 16’2” (4572 mm to 4928 mm) 5 10’2” to 12’1” (3099 mm to 3683 mm) 6 12’2” to 14’1” (3708 mm to 4293 mm) 7 14’2” to 16’1” (4318 mm to 4902 mm) 8 overheaddoor.com 7 Page 67 of 74 Agenda Item #7.2: 3 May 2021 Bennett Martin, Assoc. AIA STRATAAP Inc. 23562A Arnold Dr. Sonoma, CA 95476 Subject: “Secretary of the Interior’s” consistency evaluation for proposed new construction at 899 Broadway, Sonoma, CA 95476 (APN 018- 411-012-000) Dear Mr. Martin: I have reviewed the proposed new construction and food truck at 899 Broadway in Sonoma as presented in your email of April 27, 2021. Per your request, I have assessed the potential impact of the proposed project on the historic character of the adjacent gas station. This letter offers my determination that the project, as proposed, is consistent with the “Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Rehabilitation,” and, therefore, would have no material impact on the historic resource at 899 Broadway. CHARACTER DEFINING FEATURES (per prior “Historic Resource Evaluation”) The May 2017 “Historic Resource Evaluation” (HRE) concludes that the service/office building qualifies as an “historic resource” under CEQA because of its architectural distinction as one of Sonoma’s remaining, intact examples of a prototypical 1960s “Signal” service station. The HRE also concludes that the utilitarian warehouse does not qualify as an “historic resource” under CEQA because of its loss of integrity of design, workmanship and materials. The character defining features of the historic gas station are: • shape: “oblong box,” one story, flat roof • materials: prefabricated sheet metal panels, metal framed windows, glass paned door (on the front only), capped parapet • design: expanses of windows at the office corner, large service bay (not the current door, which is modern), overhanging stucco frieze, pent eave terminating in partition wall that screens restrooms, pair of restrooms at southwest corner PROPOSED PROJECT • Demolish the existing non-historic warehouse and replace it with a parking lot • Construct a one-story, corrugated metal, 2,290 sf building along the southern property line, behind the gas station, fronting on MacArthur Street CONSISTENCY WITH SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR’S STANDARDS Based on the analysis of the consistency of the proposed project with the “Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation” the project as proposed would have no adverse effect on the historic resource as defined in the CEQA Statute (CPRC 21084.1) and CEQA Guidelines (15064.5 (a)(2) and (b)). Each standard is addressed in the table below: Page 68 of 74 Agenda Item #7.2: Standard 899 Broadway 1. A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new CONSISTENT use that requires minimal change to its distinctive materials, Property continues to function in its historic features, spaces, and spatial relationships. commercial use. CONSISTENT 2. The historic character of a property will be retained and The proposed project would have no physical preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of impact on the materials of the historic gas features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize a station. The gas station’s historic orientation property will be avoided. to the major thoroughfare along Broadway would be unchanged. 3. Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, CONSISTENT place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical The proposed new building would not create development, such as adding conjectural features or elements from a sense of false historicism. It would clearly be other historic properties, will not be undertaken. a product of its time. 4. Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in N/A their own right will be retained and preserved. 5. Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a N/A property will be preserved. 6. Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in N/A design, color, texture, and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by documentary and physical evidence. 7. Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. Treatments that N/A cause damage to historic materials will not be used. While no resources have been previously identified, there is always the chance of an 8. Archeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. unexpected discovery. Should such a If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures will be discovery occur, every effort would be made undertaken. to document, stabilize, protect and preserve the feature in place. 9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction CONSISTENT will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work will be differentiated The proposed new construction on the rear of from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, the property would not affect the historic features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the orientation of the gas station to the primary integrity of the property and its environment. thoroughfare along Broadway. 10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be CONSISTENT undertaken in such a manner that, if removed in the future, the The new construction could be removed in essential form and integrity of the historic property and its the future with no impact whatsoever on the environment would be unimpaired. historic gas station and its environment. 2 Page 69 of 74 Agenda Item #7.2: CONCLUSION The project as proposed would have no physical impact on the historic gas station. The proposed new building--which is comparable to the warehouse that it is replacing in terms of mass, scale and materials—would have minimal visual impact on the setting of the gas station. At the same time, the new project is at the rear of the property and would have no impact on the gas station’s historic orientation to the major thoroughfare of Broadway. The proposed project, therefore, is consistent with the “Secretary of the Interior’s Standards.” I hope you find this guidance helpful. Please feel free to call me at 415-806-4549 if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, Alice P. Duffee APD Preservation LLC 3 Page 70 of 74 Agenda Item #7.2: Proposed Site Plan Proposed New Building, Elevations 4 Page 71 of 74 Agenda Item #7.2: Proposed Perspective Views of New Building Looking northeast from First Street West and MacArthur towards rear of Gas Station 5 Page 72 of 74 Agenda Item #7.2: Looking west from Gas Station towards First Street West Looking east along southern property line, proposed new building location 6 Page 73 of 74 Agenda Item #7.2: Looking East from First Street West towards rear of Gas Station 7 Page 74 of 74