DOCSLIB.ORG

Syllabus: 01:615:381:90 Sociolinguistics Fall 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Syllabus: 01:615:381:90 Sociolinguistics Fall 2017 SYLLABUS: 01:615:381:90 SOCIOLINGUISTICS FALL 2017 Course Overview Instructor Instructor: Prof. Crystal Akers Email address: [email protected] Office hours: Variable; check Sakai announcements for this week’s drop-in day and time. Also available by appointment. Course Delivery This course is fully online. To access the course, please visit sakai.rutgers.edu . For more information about course access or support, contact the Sakai Help Desk via email at [email protected] or call 848-445-8721. Course Description Sociolinguistics investigates the interactions between language and society. Generative linguistics studies the nature of grammatical systems. This course brings the two together, introducing students with prior training in linguistic theory to a broad array of sociolinguistic issues, including the relationship between linguistic variation and social factors like identity, class and power, the development of pidgins and creoles, code choices in bi-dialectal and bilingual communities, and language change. Students will also draw connections with research methods and approaches to data analysis used in other areas of linguistics, and examine attitudes toward language and culture and their social and political consequences. The course emphasizes the insights into the use of language in society provided by a generative linguistics approach to natural language. Prerequisites • 01:615:201 Introduction to Linguistic Theory 2 Important Dates • The course begins on 9/5/2017 and ends on 12/13/2017, and the last day to drop the course without a “W” grade is 9/12/2017. • The in-person midterm exam will be held on Monday, 10/23/2017 from 6:00 – 8:00 pm in room 1210/1220 of the Rutgers Academic Building . • The in-person final exam will be held on Tuesday, 12/19/2017 in room 1210/1220 of the Rutgers Academic Building . Two sessions are available for sign-up: 12:00 – 3:00 pm and 4:00 – 7:00 pm. Course Learning Objectives By the end of this course, students should successfully be able to: • Apply sociolinguistics terminology and concepts to research and real-world examples • Identify major researchers and studies in sociolinguistics • Analyze the effects of attitudes toward language use in everyday interactions Course Materials Required Text Meyerhoff, Miriam. 2011. Introducing Sociolinguistics. 2nd edition. Routledge. ISBN: 978-0415550062 Textbook companion website: http://cw.routledge.com/textbooks/meyerhoff/ Other readings will be available on the course website. Required Videos and/or Website Materials Lecture videos and additional resources are linked in the “Required Resources” section of each Sakai unit page. Optional Materials Additional resources are linked below “Optional Resources” in the “Instructional Resources” section of Sakai unit pages. 3 Technology Requirements Baseline technical skills necessary for online courses • Basic computer and web-browsing skills • Navigating Sakai Technology skills necessary for this specific course • Collaborating on VoiceThread • Recording a slide presentation with audio narration • Recording, editing, and uploading video Required Equipment • Computer: current Mac (OS X) or PC (Windows 7 or newer) with high-speed internet connection • Webcam: built-in or external webcam, fully installed • Microphone: built-in laptop or tablet mic or external microphone Required Software • Microsoft Word • Microsoft PowerPoint Assessment Assignment Summary Below are the assignments required for this course and the value of each assignment to the course grade as a whole. Please refer to the course calendar (on Sakai) and/or the course schedule (below) for specific due dates. Assignment Points Midterm Exam 20 Final Exam 30 Discussions 30 Problem Sets 10 4 Quizzes 10 Total 100 See course schedule, below, for due dates. Assignment Overview Midterm Exam The midterm exam contributes 20% toward your final grade and covers the material learned in the first seven weeks of the course. The exam may include multiple choice, matching, fill-in-the-blank, and short answer questions. Reviewing quiz questions and problem set questions will help you prepare for the exam. The midterm exam is a 1.5 hour, in-person, closed-book exam held on the New Brunswick campus, in room 1210/1220 of the Rutgers Academic Building at 17 Seminary Place. The scheduled exam time is Monday, 10/23/2017 from 6:00 – 8:00 pm. Please contact me as soon as possible to discuss conflicts. Final Exam The final exam contributes 25% toward your final grade. The exam is cumulative and questions may be like those seen on the weekly quizzes or problem sets. In addition, the final exam will ask you to demonstrate your ability to Apply sociolinguistics terminology and concepts, interpret graphs, and discuss sociolinguistics research by asking questions about an assigned research article. The kinds of questions asked about this article will be like those seen on problem sets. The in-person final exam is a 2.5 hour, in-person, closed-book exam held on the New Brunswick campus, in room 1210/1220 of the Rutgers Academic Building at 17 Seminary Place. The exam time will be held on Tuesday, 12/19/2017 in room 1210/1220 of the Rutgers Academic Building . Two sessions are available for sign-up: 12:00 – 3:00 pm and 4:00 – 7:00 pm. Use the Sakai sign-up to register for an exam session. Discussions Your weekly class participation will be evaluated through ten group discussions, which contribute 30% toward your final course grade. I will provide a grading rubric for evaluating your individual discussion responses. Problem Sets For some units, you will practice applying concepts in problem sets, which will contribute 10% toward your final grade. For example, you may be asked to interpret or explain graphs of linguistic variation, or identify examples of variation and provide an account for them. For these problem sets, I encourage you to discuss the assignments 5 with others in the class; however, you must complete the assignments individually, in accordance with the Academic Integrity Policy. Quizzes Ten short quizzes covering units’ required instructional resources will contribute 10% toward your final course grade. You will have 20 minutes to answer most quizzes, which include computer-gradable responses (T/F, multiple choice, fill-in-the blank). The exception is in Week 5, which includes a free-response question. You will have the opportunity to retake each quiz one time during the quiz availability period, with the higher grade recorded. Grading Scale (Source: Rutgers standard undergraduate grade scale) Grade Range A 90 – 100 B+ 85 – 89 B 80 – 84 C+ 75 – 79 C 70 – 74 D 60 – 69 F Below 60 Student Participation Expectations Because this is an online course, your attendance is based on your online activity and participation. The following is a summary of everyone's expected participation: • Logging in: AT LEAST TWICE PER WEEK Be sure you are logging in to the course in Sakai each week, including weeks with minimal online course activity. (During most weeks you will probably log in many times.) If you have a situation that might cause you to miss an entire week of class, discuss it with me as soon as possible. • Time Commitment To be successful in this course, you should plan to dedicate approximately 8-10 hours per week. 6 • Midterm Exam: REQUIRED, IN-PERSON The midterm exam is a 1.5 hour, in-person, closed-book exam held on the New Brunswick campus, in room 1210/1220 of the Rutgers Academic Building at 17 Seminary Place. The scheduled exam time is Monday, 10/23/2017 from 6:00 – 8:00 pm. Please contact me immediately if you have a conflict. • Final Exam: REQUIRED, IN-PERSON The in-person final exam is a 2.5 hour, in-person, closed-book exam held on the New Brunswick campus, in room 1210/1220 of the Rutgers Academic Building at 17 Seminary Place. The exam time will be held on Tuesday, 12/19/2017 in room 1210/1220 of the Rutgers Academic Building . Two sessions are available for sign-up: 12:30 – 3:00 pm and 4:00 – 7:00 pm. Use the Sakai sign-up tool to register for an exam period, or contact me immediately if you have a conflict. • Office hours and live sessions: OPTIONAL Other than the midterm and final, any live, scheduled events for the course, including my office hours, are optional. If you are required to discuss an assignment with me, please contact me at the beginning of the week if you need a time outside my scheduled office hours. • Participating in discussion forums: 2 OR MORE TIMES PER DISCUSSION As participation, during a week with an assigned discussion you can expect to post at least two times as part of our substantive class discussion on the week's topics. Discussion and Communication Guidelines The following are my expectations for how we should communicate as a class. Above all, please remember to be respectful and thoughtful. • Writing style: While there is no need to participate in class discussions as if you were writing a research paper, you should remember to write professionally, with appropriate grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Informality (including an occasional emoticon) is fine for non-academic topics. Please also refrain from using all CAPITAL LETTERS, as this is often interpreted as shouting. • Citing your sources: When we have academic discussions, please cite your sources to back up what you say. For the textbook or other course materials, list at least the title and page numbers. For online sources, include a link. • Tone and civility: Let's maintain a supportive learning community where everyone feels safe and where people can disagree amicably. Remember that sarcasm doesn't always come across online. Treat your instructor and fellow students with respect at all times, and in all communications. • Backing up your work: Consider composing your academic posts in a word processor, where you can save your work, and then copying into the Sakai discussion.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Macro-Sociolinguistics Page 1 MACRO SOCIOLINGUISTICS
    MACRO SOCIOLINGUISTICS: INSIGHT LANGUAGE Rohib Adrianto Sangia Abstract: Language can be studied internally and externally. As externally, Sociolinguistics as the branch of linguistics looked or put position in relation to language speakers in the community, because in human society is no longer as individuals, will remain as a social community. Sociolinguistics concerns with two aspects of civilization, language and society, there are appropriate terms which are micro and macro in sociolinguistics. The main differences of them are micro-sociolinguistics or sociolinguistics –in narrow sense- is the study of language in relation to society, while macro-sociolinguistics or the sociology of language is the study of society in relation to language. Macro-sociolinguistics focuses such as social factors, exactly the interaction between language and dialect, the study of the decline and stabilization of minority languages, bilingualism developmental stability in a particular group. Keywords: Language, Sociolinguistics, Macro Sociolinguistics, Bilingualism. INTRODUCTION Language is a communication tool that people use to interact with each other. By mastering the language of humans can know the content of the world through science and new knowledge and had never imagined before. As a means of communication and interaction that is only possessed by humans, language can be studied internally and externally (Thomason and Kaufman, 1988: 22). Internally means the study made against internal elements such as language course, the structure of phonological, morphological, and syntactical alone. While externally meaningful study was conducted to things or factors outside the language, but in the use of language itself, speech community or the environment. Language may refer to the specific capacity in humans to obtain and use a complex system of communication, or to a specific agency of a complex communication system.
    [Show full text]
  • AN INTRODUCTION to SOCIOLINGUISTICS Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics
    AN INTRODUCTION TO SOCIOLINGUISTICS Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics The books included in this series provide comprehensive accounts of some of the most central and most rapidly developing areas of research in linguistics. Intended primarily for introductory and post-introductory students, they include exercises, discussion points and suggestions for further reading. 1. Liliane Haegeman, Introduction to Government and Binding Theory (Second Edition) 2. Andrew Spencer, Morphological Theory 3. Helen Goodluck, Language Acquisition 4. Ronald Wardhaugh and Janet M. Fuller, An Introduction to Sociolinguistics (Seventh Edition) 5. Martin Atkinson, Children’s Syntax 6. Diane Blakemore, Understanding Utterances 7. Michael Kenstowicz, Phonology in Generative Grammar 8. Deborah Schiffrin, Approaches to Discourse 9. John Clark, Colin Yallop, and Janet Fletcher, An Introduction to Phonetics and Phonology (Third Edition) 10. Natsuko Tsujimura, An Introduction to Japanese Linguistics (Third Edition) 11. Robert D. Borsley, Modern Phrase Structure Grammar 12. Nigel Fabb, Linguistics and Literature 13. Irene Heim and Angelika Kratzer, Semantics in Generative Grammar 14. Liliane Haegeman and Jacqueline Guéron, English Grammar: A Generative Perspective 15. Stephen Crain and Diane Lillo-Martin, An Introduction to Linguistic Theory and Language Acquisition 16. Joan Bresnan, Lexical-Functional Syntax 17. Barbara A. Fennell, A History of English: A Sociolinguistic Approach 18. Henry Rogers, Writing Systems: A Linguistic Approach 19. Benjamin W. Fortson IV, Indo-European Language and Culture: An Introduc- tion (Second Edition) 20. Liliane Haegeman, Thinking Syntactically: A Guide to Argumentation and Analysis 21. Mark Hale, Historical Linguistics: Theory and Method 22. Henning Reetz and Allard Jongman, Phonetics: Transcription, Production, Acoustics and Perception 23. Bruce Hayes, Introductory Phonology 24.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: Sociolinguistics and Computer-Mediated Communication
    Journal of Sociolinguistics 10/4, 2006: 419–438 Introduction: Sociolinguistics and computer-mediated communication Jannis Androutsopoulos University of Hannover, Germany This theme issue of Journal of Sociolinguistics comprises a number of empirical studies focusing on a range of ways in which people use language in computer-mediated communication (CMC). This introduction contextualizes the contributions to this issue by providing an outline of linguistically focused CMC studies. A critique of the research on the ‘language of CMC’ is given, and aspects of CMC research from a sociolinguistic viewpoint are presented: the move from the ‘language of CMC’ to socially situated computer- mediated discourse; its grounding in the notion of online community; and the application of sociolinguistic methodologies to its study. It is argued that CMC provides a new empirical arena for various research traditions in sociolinguistics; conversely, sociolinguistics can contribute to the interdisciplinary theorizing of CMC by demonstrating the role of language useandlinguisticvariabilityintheconstructionofinterpersonalrelationships and social identities on the Internet. KEYWORDS: Computer-mediated communication, sociolinguistics ‘WEBSLANG’ AND ‘NETSPEAK’: CHALLENGING NEW LANGUAGE MYTHS In early 2005 the Bild, Germany’s most popular tabloid newspaper, launched on its website a series of quizzes dedicated to language use on the Internet. Bearing headings such as ‘Do you understand Internet slang?’ and ‘Do you speak Chattish?’ these quizzes consist of a mixture
    [Show full text]
  • The Limits of Meaning: Social Indexicality, Variation, and the Cline of Interiority
    The limits of meaning: Social indexicality, variation, and the cline of interiority Penelope Eckert Language, Volume 95, Number 4, December 2019, pp. 751-776 (Article) Published by Linguistic Society of America For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/743105 Access provided at 17 Dec 2019 23:13 GMT from Linguistic Society of America THE LIMITS OF MEANING: SOCIAL INDEXICALITY, VARIATION, AND THE CLINE OF INTERIORITY Penelope Eckert Stanford University The structural focus of linguistics has led to a static and modular treatment of meaning. View - ing language as practice allows us to transcend the boundaries of subdisciplines that deal with meaning and to integrate the social indexicality of variation into this larger system. This article presents the expression of social meaning as a continuum of decreasing reference and increasing performativity, with sociolinguistic variation at the performative extreme. The meaning potential of sociolinguistic variables in turn is based in their form and their social source, constituting a cline of ‘interiority’ from variables that index public social facts about the speaker to more inter - nal, personal affective states.* Keywords : variation, social meaning, semantics, pragmatics, iconicity, indexicality, semiotics ‘I have resisted the term sociolinguistics for many years, since it implies that there can be a successful linguistic theory or practice which is not social.’ (Labov 1972:13) 1. Introduction . Language is a social practice, a dialectic between structure and agency: structure constrains action, and action in turn reproduces structure. As Giddens (1984:2) puts it, ‘In and through their activities agents reproduce the conditions that make these activities possible’.
    [Show full text]
  • Sociolinguistics and Language Education
    Sociolinguistics and Language Education 1790.indb i 5/13/2010 3:43:18 PM NEW PERSPECTIVES ON LANGUAGE AND EDUCATION Series Editor: Professor Viv Edwards, University of Reading, Reading, Great Britain Series Advisor: Professor Allan Luke, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia Two decades of research and development in language and literacy education have yielded a broad, multidisciplinary focus. Yet education systems face constant economic and technological change, with attendant issues of identity and power, community and culture. This series will feature critical and interpretive, disciplinary and multidisciplinary perspectives on teaching and learning, language and literacy in new times. Full details of all the books in this series and of all our other publications can be found on http://www.multilingual-matters.com, or by writing to Multilingual Matters, St Nicholas House, 31–34 High Street, Bristol BS1 2AW, UK. 1790.indb ii 5/13/2010 3:43:19 PM NEW PERSPECTIVES ON LANGUAGE AND EDUCATION Series Editor: Professor Viv Edwards Sociolinguistics and Language Education Edited by Nancy H. Hornberger and Sandra Lee McKay MULTILINGUAL MATTERS Bristol • Buffalo • Toronto 1790.indb iii 5/13/2010 3:43:19 PM Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data A catalog record for this book is available from the Library of Congress. Sociolinguistics and Language Education/Edited by Nancy H. Hornberger and Sandra Lee McKay. New Perspectives on Language and Education: 18 Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Sociolinguistics. 2. Language and education. 3. Language and culture. I. Hornberger, Nancy H. II. McKay, Sandra. P40.S784 2010 306.44–dc22 2010018315 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue entry for this book is available from the British Library.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Sociolinguistics LEARNING ABOUT LANGUAGE
    An Introduction to Sociolinguistics LEARNING ABOUT LANGUAGE General Editors: Geoffrey Leech & Mick Short, Lancaster University Already published: Analysing Sentences (2nd edition) Noel Burton-Roberts Words and Their Meaning Howard Jackson An Introduction to Phonology Francis Katamba Grammar and Meaning Howard Jackson Realms of Meaning: An Introduction to Semantics Th. R. Hofmann An Introduction to Psycholinguistics Danny D. Steinberg An Introduction to Spoken Interaction Anna-Brita Stenström Watching English Change Laurie Bauer Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics Jenny Thomas An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics Friedrich Ungerer and Hans-Jörg Schmid Exploring the Language of Poems, Plays and Prose Mick Short Contemporary Linguistics: An Introduction William O’Grady, Michael Dobrovolsky and Francis Katamba Analysing Sentences Noel Burton-Roberts An Introduction to Natural Language Processing Through Prolog Clive Matthews An Introduction to Child Language Development Susan Foster-Cohen The Sounds of Language: An Introduction to Phonetics Henry Rogers An Introduction to Foreign Language Learning and Teaching Keith Johnson An Introduction to Sociolinguistics (4th edition) Janet Holmes An Introduction to Sociolinguistics Fourth Edition JANET HOLMES First published 1992 by Pearson Education Limited Second edition published 2001 Third edition published 2008 Fourth edition published 2013 Published 2013 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, USA Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business Copyright © 1992, 2001, 2008, 2013, Taylor & Francis. The right of Janet Holmes to be identified as author of this Work has been asserted by her in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • LINGUISTICS 160 Lecture #14 ANALYZING DISCOURSE
    LINGUISTICS 160 Lecture #14 ANALYZING DISCOURSE “Discourse analysis provides a tool for sociolinguists to identify the norms of talk among different social and cultural groups in different conversational and institutional contexts, and to describe the discursive resources people use in constructing different social identities in interaction”. (p. 364) Analyze the Exercise #1 on p. 363. Five approaches (among several more) to the analysis of discourse will be identified: (i) Pragmatics and politeness theory (ii) Ethnography of speaking (iii) Interactional sociolinguistics (iv) Conversation Analysis (CA) (v) Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) 1. Pragmatics and politeness theory 1.1 Pragmatics: The study of how context affects linguistic interaction. relationship between participants the analysis goes background knowledge beyond grammar and word meaning. Interpret the Examples #2 and #3 on p.364. 1.2 Conversational maxims and implicatures Assumption with regard to conversations: the speakers conform to the cooperative principle in accordance to four maxims (Grice, 1975): Quantity: say as much as but no more than is necessary Quality: do not say what you believe to be false, or that for which you lack evidence Relation: be relevant Manner: be clear, unambiguous, brief and orderly (p. 365) Do speakers always follow these maxim? 1 Study the Examples #6 and #7 on p. 366. Which maxim is not being followed? Possible reasons? These maxims are not universals – comment on the practice in the Malagasy Republic (p. 366). 1.3 Conversational maxims and politeness One of the reasons people don’t follow conversational maxims is their attempt to be polite. Lakoff’s three rules of politeness: p.367.
    [Show full text]
  • A Socio-Pragmatic Comparative Study of Ostensible Invitations in English and Farsi
    UNIVERSITY OF ISFAHAN FACULTY OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES ENGLISH DEPARTMENT A SOCIO-PRAGMATIC COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OSTENSIBLE INVITATIONS IN ENGLISH AND FARSI by Mohammad Ali Salmani-Nodoushan A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Studies Office in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of M.A. in Teaching English as a Foreign Language Khordad 8, 1374 (May 29, 1995) UNIVERSITY OF ISFAHAN FACULTY OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES ENGLISH DEPARTMENT We, members of thesis committee, hereby certify that we have read this thesis written by Mohammad Ali Salmani-Nodoushan, entitled A Sociopragmatic Comparative Study of Ostensible Invitations in English and Farsi, and that it is satisfactory in scope and quality as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in Teaching English as a Foreign Language. Dr. Akbar Afghari ……………………… (Supervisor) Dr. Mohammad Hasan Tahririan ……………………… (Advisor) Dr. Mahmoud Ketabi ……………………… (External Examiner) Dr. Mansour Koosha ……………………… (Internal Examiner) Dr. Manuchehr Tavangar Rizi ……………………… (Head of English Department) (Representative of Graduate Studies Office) May 29, 1995 ii TO MY PARENTS FOR THEIR LOVE AND SUPPORT iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am greatly indebted to Dr. A. Afghari whose help and support during the writing of this thesis were manifested in more ways than I can say without writing a whole other thesis on the subject. I also acknowledge the cooperation and assistance of Dr. M. H. Tahririan, who read the thesis and provided me with useful comments which enabled me to convert turgid prose into readable English. Grateful acknowledgement is also made to Dr. M. Kousha, whose sympathy, support, high spirit, and friendly behavior during the last three years were manifested in so many ways that I can never forget no matter how much I try.
    [Show full text]
  • What Are Historical Sociolinguistics?
    Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 2015; 1(2): 243–269 Terttu Nevalainen* What are historical sociolinguistics? DOI 10.1515/jhsl-2015-0014 Abstract: This paper takes a look at recent shifts in sociolinguistic paradigms and considers their applications to historical sociolinguistic research. Besides growth areas such as multilingualism, a current trend is convergence of established approaches. My discussion focuses on those that go even further, bridging the gap between macro- and micro-levels of analysis in the historical context of study. Presented as interdependent levels, layers or domains of analysis, these models usually imply that the analyst needs to cross boundaries between established socio- linguistic paradigms when moving from one level of analysis to another. From the analyst’s perspective the issues include the layered simultaneity of the multiple contexts present at any given point in time and the ways in which their chronologies stretch over time and space. I discuss the reconstruction of macro- and micro-contexts and their interdependence by presenting a case study of Samuel Pepys, a seventeenth- century English naval administrator. I conclude by advocating both informational maximalism and an empirical baseline for such studies. Digital humanities will no doubt facilitate this research in the future. Keywords: baseline information, community, context, ego-documents, layered simultaneity, Restoration England, sociolinguistic paradigms 1 Introduction “What are sociolinguistics?” asks Allan Bell (2013) in his recent Guidebook to Sociolinguistics. He gives a rich, multifaceted characterization of sociolinguistics, which also comprises neighbouring and overlapping fields such as contact linguistics, dialectology and pragmatics. These neighbouring fields include historical linguistics, defined as follows: “Historical linguistics studies how languages have changed in the past, often with little regard for the society in which the changes took place.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhetoric and Sociolinguistics in Times of Global Crisis
    Hancı-Azizoglu_9781799867326 IGI Global Publisher of Peer-Reviewed, Timely, and Innovative Research Content Rhetoric and Sociolinguistics in Times of Global Crisis Part of the Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies Book Series Eda Başak Hancı-Azizoglu (Indiana University of Pennsylvania, USA) and Maha Alawdat (Kaye Academic College of Education, Israel) Description: Crises often leave people in vulnerable situations in which a moment in time can function as a turning point of a catastrophic situation for the better or worse. From another perspective, the concept of crisis signifies losing control of everyday privileges, such as that of a pandemic. Therefore, the interaction of rhetoric and sociolinguistics in times of crisis is inevitable. It is crucial to internalize how rhetoric, an effective skill from ancient times to make meaning of sociological breakthrough events, changed the course of events as well as the fate of humanity. Within the same context, research should focus on diverse disciplines to explore, investigate, and analyze the concept of “crisis” from global, sociolinguistic, and rhetorical perspectives. Rhetoric and Sociolinguistics in Times of Global Crisis explores and situates the concept of global crisis within rhetoric and sociolinguistics as well as other disciplines such as education, technology, society, language, and politics. The chapters included bridge the gap to initiate a discussion on understanding how rhetoric and sociolinguistics can create critical awareness for individuals, societies, and learning environments during times of crisis. While highlighting concepts such as rhetorical evolution, political rhetoric, digital writing, and communications, this book is a valuable reference tool for language teachers, writing experts, communications specialists, politicians and government officials, academicians, researchers, and students working and studying in fields that include rhetoric, education, linguistics, culture, media, political science, and communications.
    [Show full text]
  • Embodied Sociolinguistics
    8 Embodied sociolinguistics Mary Bucholtz and Kira Hall Introduction: Habes corpus! Bodies and embodiment are central to the production, perception, and social interpretation of language. 1 In spoken languages, the body is the locus of the speaking voice and the listening ear, while in the case of sign languages the body supplies the grammar for the entire linguistic system (cf. Lucas and Bayley, this volume, Chapter 16), a fact that has important consequences for theorizing language in general as an embodied phenomenon. Embodiment is also enlisted in a variety of semiotic practices that endow linguistic communi­ cation with meaning, from the indexicalities of bodily adornment to gesture, gaze, and other fonns of movement. And just as bodies produce language, so the converse also holds: Language produces bodies. That is, language is a primary means by which the body enters the sociocultural realm as a site of semiosis, through cultural discourses about bodies as well as linguistic prac­ tices of bodily regulation and management. Moreover, even as technologically mediated forms of communication may seem to displace physical bodies as sources of linguistic production, the body insistently reasserts itself in com­ municative practices in the spheres of technology and the media. Despite the crucial role of embodiment in producing social meaning through language and vice versa, a broad-based discussion within sociocuJtural linguis­ tics concerning the theoretical relationship between language and embodiment is largely lacking. Hence what we engage here is not a current debate but a needed interdisciplinary conversation that includes sociocultural linguist<> of all stripes (see Coupland and Gwyn 2003, inter alia, for one valuable starting point for this dialogue).
    [Show full text]
  • Interactional Sociolinguistics Benjamin Bailey, University of Massachusetts-Amherst
    University of Massachusetts Amherst From the SelectedWorks of Benjamin Bailey 2008 Interactional sociolinguistics Benjamin Bailey, University of Massachusetts-Amherst Available at: https://works.bepress.com/benjamin_bailey/59/ 2314 Interactional Sociolinguistics Interactional Sociolinguistics Benjamin Bailey University of Massachusetts Amherst Interactional sociolinguistics is concerned with how speakers signal and interpret meaning in social interaction. The term and the perspective are grounded in the work of John Gumperz (1982a, 1982b), who blended insights and tools from anthropology, linguistics, pragmatics, and conversation analysis into an interpretive framework for analyzing such meanings. Interactional sociolinguistics attempts to bridge the gulf between empirical communicative forms – e.g., words, prosody, register shifts – and what speakers and listeners take themselves to be doing with these forms. Methodologically, it relies on close → discourse analysis of audio- or video-recorded interaction. Such methodology is central to uncovering meaning-making processes because many conventions for signaling and interpreting meaning in talk are fleeting, unconscious, and culturally variable. ORIGIN AND THEORY Interactional sociolinguistics was developed in an anthropological context of cross- cultural comparison, and the seminal work that defined interactional sociolinguistics focused largely on contexts of intercultural miscommunication (→ Intercultural and Inter- group Communication; Comparative Research). It is in such contexts – where
    [Show full text]