Course Structure Lecture Style

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Course Structure Lecture Style 06/04/17 Welcome! Operang Systems and Networks • Brief introduc-on of lecturer and TAs – Adrian Perrig, Professor in Department of Computer Science, Director of Network Security Group – Teaching assistants: Tae-Ho Lee, Chris Pappas, Laurent Chuat Networks Part 1: Introduc-on – Network security group research area: design and implementaon of secure future Internet architecture (SCION project hp://www.scion- architecture.net) Adrian Perrig Network Security Group ETH Zürich 2 Course Structure Lecture Style • Lectures • Student interac-on is encouraged! • Homework – Please ask ques-ons if something is unclear • Exercise sessions – Please point out any errors that you spot – • Quizzes Please focus on lecture instead of Facebook, TwiUer, etc. • Please turn off your phone and other devices during class 3 4 Minds open… … Laptops closed and cell phones / ipads off 6 1 06/04/17 Textbook and Slide Credit Problems with Being Online During Class • Textbook: TANENBAUM, ANDREW S.; WETHERALL, DAVID j., COMPUTER NETWORKS, 5th Edi-on, 2011. • It takes the mind a few minutes to reach a state of deep • Slides adapted from slide deck by David Wetherall concentraon • Lecture video at: hUp://media.pearsoncmg.com/ph/streaming/esm/ – Reaching deep concentraon needs to be trained, many people tanenbaum5e_videonotes/tanenbaum_videoNotes.html have lost this ability due to constant / frequent interrup-ons • Knowing that one cannot be interrupted increases concentraon. Said another way: Expectaon of interrup-on prevents deep concentraon – Try to be off-line when studying networking! • Open laptop / iPad / cell phone used for surfing can also disrupt / interrupt people sing behind you 7 Highly Recommended as Reference Also recommended • Larry L. Peterson and Bruce S. • Kevin R. Fall and W. Davie: Richard Stevens: “Computer Networks: A Systems Approach” “TCP/IP Illustrated, • 5th Edion Volume 1: The Protocols” • 2nd Edion, 2011 9 Also recommended Study Recommendaons Computer Networking: A Top-Down Approach: Kurose and Ross • Make list of acronyms, concepts 5th Edi-on • Read corresponding sec-ons in text book – Available in INFK library • Par-cipate in exercise sessions, solve homework, Srinivasan Keshav: and DO THE PROjECTS! An Engineering Approach to Computer 11 Networking 12 2 06/04/17 Quizzes Final Grade • Extra credit!!! • 5 Quizzes in total • Exercises are op-onal – during lecture (at the beginning or end) – but highly recommended to do them – 10 minutes max. – not announced at the previous lecture • Quizzes do not harm your grade – about the previously taught set of lecture slides – highly recommended to aend class • Each quiz 1 point: • Networking grade = exam grade + quiz grade – 0.2 points for par-cipaon • Final grade = average( Networking grade, OS grade ) – 4 ques-ons x 0.2 points 13 14 Focus of the course Focus of the course (2) • Three “networking” topics: Distributed systems ??? Networking Communicaons • We mainly study the Networking aspects 15 16 The Main Point Why learn about the Internet? 1. To learn how the Internet works 1. Curiosity – What really happens when you “browse the web”? – What are TCP/IP, DNS, HTTP, NAT, VPNs, 802.11 etc. 2. Understand how the system works we’re spending anyway? most of our -me with – Interes-ng stas-c: we’re spending more -me online 2. To learn the fundamentals of computer networks than sleeping! 3. Impact on our world 4. job prospects! 17 18 3 06/04/17 From this experimental network … To this! ARPANET ~1970 Internet ~2005 • An everyday ins-tu-on used at work, home, and on-the-go • Visualizaon contains (a) Dec. 1969. (b) July 1970. (c) March 1971. millions of links Aribu-on: By The Opte Project [CC-BY-2.5], via Wikimedia Commons 19 20 Internet – Societal Impact Internet – Economic impact • An enabler of societal change • An engine of economic growth – Easy access to knowledge – Adver-sing-sponsored search – Electronic commerce – Online stores – Personal relaonships – Online marketplaces – Discussion without censorship – Crowdsourcing 21 22 The Main Point (2) Why learn the Fundamentals? 1. To learn how the Internet works 1. Apply to all computer networks 2. To learn the fundamentals of computer 2. Intellectual interest networks – What hard problems must they solve? 3. Change / reinven-on – What design strategies have proven valuable? 4. Pass this course :-) 23 24 4 06/04/17 Fundamentals – Intellectual Interest Fundamentals – Intellectual Interest (2) • Example key problem: Reliability! Key problem Example soluons – Any part of the Internet might fail Reliability despite Codes for error detec-on/correc-on (§3.2, 3.3) – Messages might be corrupted failures Rou-ng around failures (§5.2) – How to create a reliable network out of unreliable Network growth Addressing (§5.6) and naming (§7.1) components? and evolu-on Protocol layering (§1.3) Allocaon of resources Mul-ple access (§4.2) • Reliability solu-ons like bandwidth Conges-on control (§5.3, 6.3) – Codes to detect/correct errors Security against Confiden-ality of messages (§8.2, 8.6) – Rou-ng around failures ... various threats Authen-caon of communicang par-es (§8.7) 25 26 Fundamentals – Reinven-on Fundamentals – Reinven-on (2) • The Internet is constantly being re-invented! • Currently around – Growth over -me and technology trends drive 1.1 billion upheavals in Internet design and usage Internet hosts … • Today’s Internet is different from yesterday’s – And tomorrow’s will be different again – But the fundamentals remain the same 27 28 Fundamentals – Reinven-on (3) Not a Course Goal • Examples of upheavals in the past 1-2 decades • To learn IT job skills Growth / Tech Driver Upheaval – Emergence of the web Content Distribu-on Networks How to configure equipment Digital songs/videos Peer-to-peer file sharing • E.g., Cisco cer-ficaons Falling cost/bit Voice-over-IP calling – But course material is relevant, and we use hands-on Many Internet hosts IPv6 tools Wireless advances Mobile devices 29 30 5 06/04/17 Example Uses of Networks Example Uses of Networks • Work: • Work: – Email, file sharing, prin-ng, … – Email, file sharing, prin-ng, … • Home: • Home: – Movies / songs, news, calls / video / messaging, e- – Movies / songs, news, calls / video / messaging, e- commerce, … commerce, … What do these uses tell us about • Mobile: • Mobile: why we build networks? – Calls / texts, games, videos, maps, informaon access … – Calls / texts, games, videos, maps, informaon access … 31 32 For User Communicaon For Resource Sharing • • From the telephone onwards: Many users may access the same underlying resource – VoIP (voice-over-IP) – E.g., 3D printer, search index, machines in the cloud – Video conferencing → More cost effec-ve than dedicated resources per user – Instant messaging – – Social networking Even network links are shared via stas-cal mul-plexing →Enables remote communicaon – Need low latency for interac-vity 33 34 Stas-cal Mul-plexing Stas-cal Mul-plexing (2) • Sharing of network bandwidth between users according • Example: Users in an ISP network 5 to the stas-cs of their demand . – Network has 100 Mbps (units of bandwidth) 100 ISP – (Mul-plexing just means sharing) – Each user subscribes to 5 Mbps, for videos 5 – – Useful because users are mostly idle and their traffic is bursty But a user is ac-ve only 50% of the -me … 5 • How many users can the ISP support? • Key ques-on: – With dedicated bandwidth for each user: – How much does it help? – Probability all bandwidth is used: (assuming independent users) 35 36 6 06/04/17 Stas-cal Mul-plexing (3) For Content Delivery • With 30 independent users, s-ll unlikely (2% chance) to • Same content is delivered to many users need more than 100 Mbps! – Binomial probabili-es – Videos (large), songs, apps and upgrades, web pages, … → Can serve more users with the same size network – Stas-cal mul-plexing gain is →More efficient than sending a copy all the way to 30/20 or 1.5X each user – But may get unlucky; users will have degraded service – Uses replicas in the network 37 38 Content Delivery (2) Content Delivery (3) • Sending content from the source to 4 users takes 4 x 3 = • But sending content via replicas takes only 4 + 2 = 6 12 “network hops” in the example “network hops” User User . Source Source Replica User User 39 40 For Computer Communicaon To Connect Computers to the Physical World • To let computers interact with other computers • For gathering sensor data, and for manipulang the – E.g., e-commerce, backup, cloud compu-ng world – E.g., webcams, locaon on mobile phones, door locks, … → Enables automated informaon processing across different par-es • This is a rich, emerging usage (IoT: Internet of Things) 41 42 7 06/04/17 The Value of Connec-vity The Value of Connec-vity (2) • “Metcalfe’s Law” ~1980: Bob Metcalfe • Example: both sides have 12 nodes, but the le€ network – The value of a network of N nodes is has more connec-vity propor-onal to N2 – Large networks are relavely more valuable than small ones vs + 66 connecons 15 connecons 15 connecons : © 2009 IEEE 43 44 Parts of a Network Component Names Component Func0on Example applicaon Applicaon, or app, user Uses the network Skype, iTunes, Amazon Host, or end-system, edge Supports apps Laptop, mobile, desktop device, node, source, sink Router, or switch, node, Relays messages Access point, cable/DSL router hub, intermediate system between links modem host link Link, or channel Connects nodes Wires, wireless 45 46 Types of Links Wireless Links • Message is broadcast • Full-duplex – Received by all nodes in range – Bidirec-onal – Not a good fit with our model • Half-duplex
Recommended publications
  • The Future of Free Speech, Trolls, Anonymity and Fake News Online.” Pew Research Center, March 2017
    NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE MARCH 29, 2017 BY Lee Rainie, Janna Anderson, and Jonathan Albright FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES: Lee Rainie, Director, Internet, Science and Technology research Prof. Janna Anderson, Director, Elon University’s Imagining the Internet Center Asst. Prof. Jonathan Albright, Elon University Dana Page, Senior Communications Manager 202.419.4372 www.pewresearch.org RECOMMENDED CITATION: Rainie, Lee, Janna Anderson and Jonathan Albright. The Future of Free Speech, Trolls, Anonymity and Fake News Online.” Pew Research Center, March 2017. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/2017/03/29/the-future-of-free-speech- trolls-anonymity-and-fake-news-online/ 1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER About Pew Research Center Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. It does not take policy positions. The Center conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, content analysis and other data-driven social science research. It studies U.S. politics and policy; journalism and media; internet, science, and technology; religion and public life; Hispanic trends; global attitudes and trends; and U.S. social and demographic trends. All of the Center’s reports are available at www.pewresearch.org. Pew Research Center is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts, its primary funder. For this project, Pew Research Center worked with Elon University’s Imagining the Internet Center, which helped conceive the research as well as collect and analyze the data. © Pew Research Center 2017 www.pewresearch.org 2 PEW RESEARCH CENTER The Future of Free Speech, Trolls, Anonymity and Fake News Online The internet supports a global ecosystem of social interaction.
    [Show full text]
  • What Will Historians' Verdict Be 50 Years from Now About the Impact Of
    FOR RELEASE OCTOBER 29, 2019 What Will Historians’ Verdict be 50 Years from Now About the Impact of the Internet on People’s Lives Today? Experts expect that by 2069 today’s period of human-tech evolution could come to be seen as a risks-ridden time that eventually led to a grand redefinition of civilization or it could be seen as a ‘wasted opportunity’ that simply ‘updated and replicated legacy colonial hierarchies’ By Janna Anderson Executive director, Elon University’s Imagining the Internet Center FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES: Owen Covington, News Bureau Director, Elon University 336.278.7413 www.elon.edu RECOMMENDED CITATION Elon University’s Imagining the Internet Center, October 29, 2019, “2069 Historians’ Verdict of Internet Impact 2019” About the Imagining the Internet Center Elon University’s Imagining the Internet Center explores and provides insights into emerging network innovations, global development, dynamics, diffusion and governance. Its research holds a mirror to humanity’s use of communications technologies, informs policy development, exposes potential futures and provides a historic record. It works to illuminate issues in order to serve the greater good, making its work public, free and open. The Imagining the Internet Center sponsors work that brings people together to share their visions for the future of communications and the future of the world. What will historians’ verdict be 50 years from now about the impact of the internet on people’s lives today? Experts expect that by 2069 today’s period of human-tech
    [Show full text]
  • Securing Information Systems in an Uncertain World Enterprise Level Security 1 William R
    Proceedings of IMCIC - ICSIT 2016 Securing Information Systems in an Uncertain World Enterprise Level Security 1 William R. Simpson Institute for Defense Analyses, 4850 Mark Center Dr. Alexandria, Virginia 22311 1 The publication of this paper does not indicate endorsement by the Department of Defense or IDA, nor should the contents be construed as reflecting the official position of these organizations. maintenance. Of course that wasn’t going be tolerated! ABSTRACT They doubled down (Special woods, Special Increasing threat intrusions to enterprise computing systems formulated sealants, Special paints). They still leaked. have led to a formulation of guarded enterprise systems. The A set of boat builders examined the history and came to 2 approach was to put in place steel gates and prevent hostile an epiphany – boats leak . Like all epiphanies, it entities from entering the enterprise domain. The current allows us to re-examine how we handle things. The complexity level has made the fortress approach to security design was modified so that the inside of boats could implemented throughout the defense, banking, and other high accommodate leakage. Drains and channels were added trust industries unworkable. The alternative security approach to funnel water to an area, the bilge, where the water presented in this paper is the result of a concentrated fourteen could be dealt with, manually at first, and then with year program of pilots and research. Its distributed approach automated pumps. A well-sealed boat was still required has no need for passwords or accounts and derives from a set of tenets that form the basic security model requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • The People Who Invented the Internet Source: Wikipedia's History of the Internet
    The People Who Invented the Internet Source: Wikipedia's History of the Internet PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 02:49:54 UTC Contents Articles History of the Internet 1 Barry Appelman 26 Paul Baran 28 Vint Cerf 33 Danny Cohen (engineer) 41 David D. Clark 44 Steve Crocker 45 Donald Davies 47 Douglas Engelbart 49 Charles M. Herzfeld 56 Internet Engineering Task Force 58 Bob Kahn 61 Peter T. Kirstein 65 Leonard Kleinrock 66 John Klensin 70 J. C. R. Licklider 71 Jon Postel 77 Louis Pouzin 80 Lawrence Roberts (scientist) 81 John Romkey 84 Ivan Sutherland 85 Robert Taylor (computer scientist) 89 Ray Tomlinson 92 Oleg Vishnepolsky 94 Phil Zimmermann 96 References Article Sources and Contributors 99 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 102 Article Licenses License 103 History of the Internet 1 History of the Internet The history of the Internet began with the development of electronic computers in the 1950s. This began with point-to-point communication between mainframe computers and terminals, expanded to point-to-point connections between computers and then early research into packet switching. Packet switched networks such as ARPANET, Mark I at NPL in the UK, CYCLADES, Merit Network, Tymnet, and Telenet, were developed in the late 1960s and early 1970s using a variety of protocols. The ARPANET in particular led to the development of protocols for internetworking, where multiple separate networks could be joined together into a network of networks. In 1982 the Internet Protocol Suite (TCP/IP) was standardized and the concept of a world-wide network of fully interconnected TCP/IP networks called the Internet was introduced.
    [Show full text]
  • Internet Hall of Fame Announces 2013 Inductees
    Internet Hall of Fame Announces 2013 Inductees Influential engineers, activists, and entrepreneurs changed history through their vision and determination Ceremony to be held 3 August in Berlin, Germany [Washington, D.C. and Geneva, Switzerland -- 26 June 2013] The Internet Society today announced the names of the 32 individuals who have been selected for induction into the Internet Hall of Fame. Honored for their groundbreaking contributions to the global Internet, this year’s inductees comprise some of the world’s most influential engineers, activists, innovators, and entrepreneurs. The Internet Hall of Fame celebrates Internet visionaries, innovators, and leaders from around the world who believed in the design and potential of an open Internet and, through their work, helped change the way we live and work today. The 2013 Internet Hall of Fame inductees are: Pioneers Circle – Recognizing individuals who were instrumental in the early design and development of the Internet: David Clark, David Farber, Howard Frank, Kanchana Kanchanasut, J.C.R. Licklider (posthumous), Bob Metcalfe, Jun Murai, Kees Neggers, Nii Narku Quaynor, Glenn Ricart, Robert Taylor, Stephen Wolff, Werner Zorn Innovators – Recognizing individuals who made outstanding technological, commercial, or policy advances and helped to expand the Internet’s reach: Marc Andreessen, John Perry Barlow, Anne-Marie Eklund Löwinder, François Flückiger, Stephen Kent, Henning Schulzrinne, Richard Stallman, Aaron Swartz (posthumous), Jimmy Wales Global Connectors – Recognizing individuals from around the world who have made significant contributions to the global growth and use of the Internet: Karen Banks, Gihan Dias, Anriette Esterhuysen, Steven Goldstein, Teus Hagen, Ida Holz, Qiheng Hu, Haruhisa Ishida (posthumous), Barry Leiner (posthumous), George Sadowsky “This year’s inductees represent a group of people as diverse and dynamic as the Internet itself,” noted Internet Society President and CEO Lynn St.
    [Show full text]
  • Steve Crocker Resume
    STEPHEN D. CROCKER 5110 Edgemoor Lane Bethesda, MD 20814 Mobile: (301) 526-4569 [email protected] SUMMARY Over 50 years of experience in the industrial, academic and government environments involving a wide range of computing and network technologies with specialization in networking and security. Strong background in formal methods, including PhD thesis creating a new logic for reasoning about the correct operation of machine language programs and the development of a program verification system to demonstrate the method. Managed numerous innovative research and development efforts benefiting private industry and government interests. Extensive involvement in the development of the Internet, including development of the initial suite of protocols for the Arpanet, the creation of the RFC series of documents, and multiple involvements in the IETF, ISOC and ICANN organizations. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE BBQ Group 2018-present Founder, leader Development of framework and model for expressing possible, desired and existing registration data directory services policies governing collection, labeling and responses to authorized requests. Shinkuro, Inc., Bethesda, MD 2002-present Co-founder, Chief Executive Officer Development of information-sharing, collaboration and related tools for peer-to-peer cooperative work and inter-platform information management. Coordination of deployment of the DNS security protocol, DNSSEC, throughout the Internet. Longitude Systems, Inc., Chantilly, VA 1999-2001 Co-founder, Chief Executive Officer Development and sale of infrastructure tools for ISPs. Overall direction and management of the company including P&L responsibility, funding, marketing, and technical direction. Executive DSL, LLC, Bethesda, MD 1999-2001 Founder, Chief Executive Officer Creation and operation of DSL-based ISP using Covad and Bell Atlantic DSL circuits.
    [Show full text]
  • Update 6: Internet Society 20Th Anniversary and Global INET 2012
    Update 6: Internet Society 20th Anniversary and Global INET 2012 Presented is the latest update (edited from the previous “Update #6) on the Global INET 2012 and Internet Hall of Fame. Executive Summary By all accounts, Global INET was a great success. Bringing together a broad audience of industry pioneers; policy makers; technologists; business executives; global influencers; ISOC members, chapters and affiliated community; and Internet users, we hosted more than 600 attendees in Geneva, and saw more than 1,300 participate from remote locations. Global INET kicked off with our pre‐conference programs: Global Chapter Workshop, Collaborative Leadership Exchange and the Business Roundtable. These three programs brought key audiences to the event, and created a sense of energy and excitement that lasted through the week. Of key importance to the program was our outstanding line‐up of keynotes, including Dr. Leonard Kleinrock, Jimmy Wales, Francis Gurry, Mitchell Baker and Vint Cerf. The Roundtable discussions at Global INET featured critical topics, and included more than 70 leading experts engaged in active dialogue with both our in‐room and remote audiences. It was truly an opportunity to participate. The evening of Monday 23 April was an important night of celebration and recognition for the countless individuals and organizations that have dedicated time and effort to advancing the availability and vitality of the Internet. Featuring the Internet Society's 20th Anniversary Awards Gala and the induction ceremony for the Internet Hall of Fame, the importance of the evening cannot be understated. The media and press coverage we have already received is a testament to the historic nature of the Internet Hall of Fame.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Internet Pioneers
    List of Internet pioneers Instead of a single "inventor", the Internet was developed by many people over many years. The following are some Internet pioneers who contributed to its early development. These include early theoretical foundations, specifying original protocols, and expansion beyond a research tool to wide deployment. The pioneers Contents Claude Shannon The pioneers Claude Shannon Claude Shannon (1916–2001) called the "father of modern information Vannevar Bush theory", published "A Mathematical Theory of Communication" in J. C. R. Licklider 1948. His paper gave a formal way of studying communication channels. It established fundamental limits on the efficiency of Paul Baran communication over noisy channels, and presented the challenge of Donald Davies finding families of codes to achieve capacity.[1] Charles M. Herzfeld Bob Taylor Vannevar Bush Larry Roberts Leonard Kleinrock Vannevar Bush (1890–1974) helped to establish a partnership between Bob Kahn U.S. military, university research, and independent think tanks. He was Douglas Engelbart appointed Chairman of the National Defense Research Committee in Elizabeth Feinler 1940 by President Franklin D. Roosevelt, appointed Director of the Louis Pouzin Office of Scientific Research and Development in 1941, and from 1946 John Klensin to 1947, he served as chairman of the Joint Research and Development Vint Cerf Board. Out of this would come DARPA, which in turn would lead to the ARPANET Project.[2] His July 1945 Atlantic Monthly article "As We Yogen Dalal May Think" proposed Memex, a theoretical proto-hypertext computer Peter Kirstein system in which an individual compresses and stores all of their books, Steve Crocker records, and communications, which is then mechanized so that it may Jon Postel [3] be consulted with exceeding speed and flexibility.
    [Show full text]
  • SRI Alumni Association August 2012 Newsletter 333 Ravenswood Avenue • M/S AC-108 Menlo Park, CA 94025
    SRI Alumni Association August 2012 Newsletter 333 Ravenswood Avenue • M/S AC-108 Menlo Park, CA 94025 Voicemail: 650-859-5100 Email: [email protected] Web page: http://www.sri.com/about/alumni MESSAGE FROM CHAIRMAN TOM ANYOS Have you seen the new SRI website I am continually amazed at the diversity of SRI’s projects. For (www.sri.com)? If you haven’t, go there example, DARPA awarded SRI a $7.1 million contract for now and take a look at the alumni pages. phase one of an international research initiative to develop Thanks to Boyd Fair and Russ Dewey, breakthrough language translation technologies. From the these pages illustrate the activities of U.S. Department of Education, SRI has a $3.5 million the Alumni Association in living color! contract to evaluate the effectiveness of an online tutoring If you have an old SRI colleague who system for seventh-grade students’ mathematics homework. has not yet joined the association, Under a one-year grant from the Department of Defense, Tom Anyos please show him or her the website as SRI is developing a novel orally administered therapy for encouragement to join the fun. multiple sclerosis, a disease for which there is currently no cure. Further, SRI has added one more site to the portfolio of In this issue of the newsletter, we are pleased to let you know scientific facilities it manages. that Jake Feinler was recently inducted into the Internet Hall of Fame as an Internet “Pioneer.” We are proud that Jake has You’re sure to enjoy this issue’s International Journal, which been recognized with this well-deserved honor.
    [Show full text]
  • Prof. Worsak Kanok-Nukulchai Appointed Interim President Rof
    JULY 2013 1 Asian Institute of Technology JULY 2013 Prof. Worsak Kanok-Nukulchai appointed Interim President rof. Worsak Kanok-Nukulchai, Vice President for sistant Professor, Associate Professor, Professor, Dean Resource Development and Acting President, has of School of Civil Engineering, Founding Dean of SET, Pbeen appointed Interim President of the Asian In- and Vice President for Resource Development. stitute of Technology (AIT). The decision was made by Please visit Prof. Worsak’s biodata from this link: http:// the AIT Board of Trustees at a meeting on 20 June 2013, www.ait.ac.th/news-and-events/2013/news/worsak_ and was announced to the public on 1 July 2013. biodata.pdf/view#.UdE87T6OBhp Prof. Worsak had served as Acting AIT President since 1 April 2013. He also served as Acting President from Prof. Kanchana inducted 13 February - 3 March 2013. into the Internet Hall of Fame An alumnus of AIT, Prof. Worsak has served AIT as As- Read more on page 2. INSIDE ISSUE.. Recent News / Happenings at AIT................................................. 2-4 People............................................................................................ 4-5 Backpage....................................................................................... 6 RECENT NEWS / HAPPENINGS AT AIT JULY 2013 2 Prof. Kanchana inducted Thailand’s connection to the into the Internet Hall of Internet started 25 years ago at AIT Fame with “AIT.TH” Affectionately nicknamed the “Mother of the Internet in Thailand” for her pioneering work, Prof. Kanchana Kanchanasut of AIT on 26 June 2012 was inducted into the global Internet Hall of Fame by the Internet Society based in Geneva, Switzerland. Prof. Kanchana was the first Thai person to introduce electronic mail and the Internet to Thailand.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contingent Internet
    The Contingent Internet The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Clark, David D. “The Contingent Internet.” Daedalus 145, 1 (January 2016): 9–17 © 2016 David D. Clark As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/DAED_A_00361 Publisher MIT Press Version Final published version Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/115284 Terms of Use Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. The Contingent Internet David D. Clark Abstract: The Internet is so omnipresent and pervasive that its form may seem an inevitability. It is hard to imagine a “different” Internet, but the character of the Internet as we experience it today is, in fact, contingent on key decisions made in the past by its designers, those who have invested in it, and those who have regulated it. With different choices, we might have a very different Internet today. This paper uses past choices made during the emergence of the early Internet as a lens to look toward its future, which is equally contingent on decisions being made today: by industry, by governments, by users, and by the research community. This paper identi½es some of those key choices, and discusses alternative futures for the Internet, including how open, how diverse, how funded, and how protective of the rights of its users it may be. Is it possible that the Internet might never have hap- pened? Is it possible that, in a parallel universe where the Internet’s inventors had pursued different careers, we could be without a network that links all of our computers together? That we might have “personal computers” that were truly personal, not connected to the larger world unless their contents were copied to disk and mailed? Actually, that alternative outcome is highly improb - able.
    [Show full text]
  • Histories of the Internet and the Web
    LIVING BOOKS ABOUT HISTORY VALÉRIE SCHAFER & ALEXANDRE SERRES HISTORIES OF THE INTERNET AND THE WEB “There are half a dozen books on the Internet in existence, written by people who were not there when it was developed. It is tempting to begin a piece of work on the subject by quoting the old adage: ‘ Everything you know is wrong!’” (Jacques Vallée, Au Coeur d’Internet, Balland, 2004, p. 20). Just fifty years ago, in 1966, Charles Herzfeld released to the Advanced Research Projects Agency the funds which would allow the IPTO department (Information Processing Techniques Office) to launch the Arpanet project; twenty-five years ago, in 1991, the British computer scientist Tim Berners-Lee announced the invention of the Web on line in Newsgroups - the discussion 1 forums of the Usenet community ; twenty years ago, in 1996, Brewster Kahle founded Internet Archive, an organisation whose stated aim was to archive the World Wide Web... The history of the Internet is a recent one, focused on a permanently-moving object that is neither 2 finished nor fixed . This history must also confront the living memories of those involved, and the way this innovation is viewed by contemporary society – for many people it is the embodiment of the “digital revolution” – as well as the more or less wide definitions of its limits. So as not to discriminate between the different meanings and approaches to the Internet and its history, this anthology reports on a variety of historiographical trends and research work. Some of them limit their frame of reference to the network of networks and its protocol aspects.
    [Show full text]