SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, JUNE 23, 1881. 3175

Veifch v. Edye. James Borthwick's account. In Whitehurst v. Bonest. The account of the infant Master Grave's office. defendant, Elizabeth Bonest. Varley v. Gradwell. Wood v. Blackman. John Rice's account. George Vincent, a person of unsound mind. Wall v. Bayley. In the matter of the trusts of the will of Isaac Wallis v. Bell. • Virgoe, decsased. Williams v. Bigg. In Master Holford's office. Vives v. Levison. Security for costs account. Ward v. Biddies. The contingent account of the Vanzetti v. Pacifico. The account of the legacy defendant, Frederick Biddies. of Rachel Coen Potts. Williams v. Duke of Bolton, and Duke of Bolton Vanzetti v. Pacifico. The account of the legacy v. Brown. of Maria Levy. Williams v. Duke of Bolton, and Duke of Bblion Vanzetti v. Pacifico. The account of the legacy v. Brown. In Master Harris's office. of Mandolin Levi. Williams v. Duke of Bolton, and Duke of Bolton Vanzetti v. Pacifico. The account of the legacy v. Brown. The account of the creditors of of Antonio Corbato. Charles, Duke of Bolton, mentioned in the 7th Vaughan v. Parry. Schedule to a Report, dated 27th January, 1781, Vere v. Hour h. made in these causes. Vazey v. Reynolds. The account of the peli- Wray v. Brown. tjoners John Dixon, Piper, Robert Daniells, and Wilding v. Bolden. The Dundas legacy account. Will'am Moye. White v. Bloxam. Verrion v. Sahdfovd. The charity account. In Waring v. Brammer. The plaintiff's indemnity Master Ord's office. account. Vernon v. Thellusson. Whitmore v. Bainbrigge, and Thompson v. Whit- Verney v. Webster. The account of the legal more. personal representative of Elizabeth Parker Walker v. Clarke. Sanderson, deceased. Webb v. Chambre. The interest account. Valence v. Weldon. In Master Montagu's office. Walmsl^y v. Cardwell. Walmsley v. Cardwell. The testator's personal In the matter of ihe trusts of the will of Elizabeth estate. Watkins. The legacy of £10 bequeathed to Walker v. Clark. William Maria and John Cozens. Woodes v. Crowfoot. In, the matter of the trusts of the will of John Williams v. Cannon. . Walter, deceased. The.account of the legacy Wirigfield v. Coates. In Master Borrett's office. of William Walter and his children. Weiitworth v.. Chevell. Ex parte George Alfred Ellis Wall. In the Wood ford v. Charnley. The account of the matter of the Settled Estates Act. The acco unt of settlement of 1848. moneys arising from the sale of the real estates Wood v. Dulamee. of John Binns Wall, deceased, situate in the Wood v. Denison. city of Worcester. Wharton v. Denton, Styles v. Attorney-General, In the matter of the trusts of John Warren's will. and Bedford v. Young. In Master Holford's The legacy to Maria Hawkins. office. In the matter of the trusts of the mortgage of an Whitehead v. Dyer, Henckell v. Dyer, and White- estate called Waenewra, in the county of Angle- head v. Dyer. In Master Lane's office. sea. Wetherby v. Dixon. Ex parte the Railway Company. In Williams v. Dowbiggen. the matter of the Wansbeck Railway Act, White v. Duane.. The account of the creditors 1359. The estate of the Rector of Morpeth. of Edmund, otherwise Edward, Lynch. In the matter of the trusts of Thomas Fullarton In the matter of the trusts of the will of Stephen Warren's will, so far as regards a sum of Wedge, deceased. The account of the children £18,125 Us. 3d. Consols arising from his of Rebecca Peters, deceased, and Hannah Jamaica property. The account o? Charlotte Farrel, deceased. Harriet Croft Ryland, or those entitled under In the matter of the trusts of the will of James her subject to duty. Marsh Weldon, late of Brickden, in .the county In the matter of the trusts of Thomas Wain- of Huntingdon, Gentleman, deceased. wright's share, No. 515, made under the Liver- In the matter of the trusts of Webber's Trusts pool Exchange Act, 1859. The account of under the will of John Deane, deceased. The Thomas Wainwright or his representatives. share of Edward Sutton. Ward v. Alsager. Ex parte the Company of Proprietors of the Wey Weldon v. AJdridge. The account of Emma and Arun Junction Canal; Jane Clayworth, deceased, late the Wife of Ex parte the West End of London and Crystal Joseph Clayworth, subject to duty. Palace Railway Company. The account of Williams v. Allen. Joshua Alexander and William Bradshaw. White v. Barton, The separate account of Jane Ex parte the West End of London and Crystal Bancks and Mary Bancks, two of the children Palace Railway Company. The account of of Gerrard Bancks, late of Manchester, Stationer Robert Henry Ashley and Ann Ashley, execu- and Printer, deceased, and their respective tors of Elizabeth Ashley, deceased. issue, and the children and issue of John Bancks, Ex. parte the West Cornwall Railway Company. late of Manchester, Physician, deceased, and the The account of John Allen, Esq. children and issue of Isabella Wigan, of Man- In the matter of Wenckcnbacli's. Trust. , Widow. Ex parte the Weymouth and Portland Railway Wright v. Beacall. Company. The account of the Mayor, Alder- Wotton v. Brydges, Elizabeth Colenian, late Scott. men, and Burgesses of the borough of Weymouth Weatherall v. Browne. and Melf.ombe Regis, in the county tif , Wilson v. Bott. The separate account of the and the Reverend Henry Clarence Pigou. defendants, Thomas Bott and Eliza, his wife. Walleii v. Eastleak, Elizabeth, the wife qf Samuel Whitehurst v. Bonest. The account of the infant Slade, and the defendant, Elizabeth Talmadge. defendant, Rachel Bonest. The annuitant's account. F 2