DOCSLIB.ORG

University of Oklahoma Graduate College Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
University of Oklahoma Graduate College Analysis UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE ANALYSIS OF REQUIREMENTS OF A MARS ROVER MISSION TO ACTIVE GULLIES A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE By LISA BILLINGSLEY Norman, Oklahoma 2010 ANALYSIS OF REQUIREMENTS OF A MARS ROVER MISSION TO ACTIVE GULLIES A THESIS APPROVED FOR THE SCHOOL OF AEROSPACE AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING BY Dr. David Miller, Chair Dr. Alfred Striz Dr. Kyran Mish © Copyright by LISA BILLINGSLEY 2010 All Rights Reserved. This Thesis is dedicated to my parents Leonard and Patricia Billingsley Acknowledgements I would like to express my sincere thanks to Dr. David Miller for mentoring and supporting me through my Master’s program. I am especially indebted to my family for setting me on this path to begin with. My parents, Leonard and Patricia Billingsley, raised me in an environment of math and science. They taught me logical thinking and a love of information and discussion. My older sister, Sarah, blazed the first few steps of the path I’ve walked in college. Finally, I have to thank my younger sister, Deborah, for breaking the serious pattern and providing an atmosphere of fun and relaxation. iv Table of Contents Page Chapter 1: Introduction 1 1.1 The Red Planet 1 1.2 Water: Why We Care 6 1.2.1 Life As We Know It 6 1.2.2 Astrobiology 6 1.2.3 Human Use 10 1.3 Evidence for Water 11 Chapter Two: Gullies on Mars 13 2.1 Gully Detection and Statistics 13 2.2 Dry Granular Theories 18 2.3 Solid or Liquid CO 2 20 2.4 Water/Brine 21 2.4.1 Sources of Water 24 2.5 New Gully Deposits 27 Chapter Three: Planetary Rovers 30 3.1 Lunokhod 30 3.1.1 Lunokhod 1 31 3.1.2 Lunokhod 2 32 3.1.2 Lunokhod 3 34 3.1.2 Lunokhod Mobility 34 3.2 PROP-M Rover 36 3.3 Pathfinder-Sojourner 38 3.4 Mars Exploration Rovers 41 3.5 Mars Science Laboratory 44 3.6 ExoMars 47 3.7 Marsokhod 49 3.8 Nanokhod 52 3.8.1 Nanoknod Mercury 52 Chapter Four: The Martian Environment 54 4.1 Power 54 4.2.1 Solar Power 56 4.1.2 Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators 59 4.2 Thermal Effects 63 4.2.1 Seasons on Mars 63 4.2.2 Temperature Swings 65 4.3 Atmospheric Conditions 68 4.3.1 Pressure 69 4.3.2 Atmospheric Dust 71 v Chapter Five: Landing and Movement 76 5.1 Landing Methods 76 5.1.1 Powered Descent 76 5.1.2 Airbags 77 5.1.2 Sky Crane 80 5.2 Choosing a Landing Site 82 5.2.1 Altitude Considerations 82 5.2.1 Terrain Considerations 84 5.3 Inside the Crater 89 5.3.1 Slope 89 5.3.2 Surface and Chemicals 91 Chapter Six: Straw Man Mission 93 6.1 Payload 93 6.1.1 Cameras 93 6.1.2 Chemistry 94 6.2 Rover Base 97 6.3 Power 101 6.3.1 Time 102 6.3.2 Battery Calculations 103 6.3.3 Solar Panel Calculations 104 6.4 Entry, Descent, and Landing 107 6.5 Summary 109 6.5.1 Mission Summary 109 6.5.2 Rover Summary 110 Chapter Seven: Summary and Conclusions 112 7.1 Summary 112 7.2 Future Work 115 7.2.1 Information 115 7.2.2 Hardware 116 7.3 Conclusion 117 References 119 vi List of Tables Page 1-1 Physical properties of Earth and Mars 5 3-1 Wheel modes and their uses 51 3-2 Operational analysis of a 7 day mission 53 4-1 Properties of RTG materials 60 4-2 Length of Mars seasons 63 4-3 Solar irradiance at Mars 65 4-4 Mars’s atmospheric information 68 4-5 Mars’s atmospheric composition 69 6-1 Marsokhod specifications 98 6-2 Small Marsokhod specifications 99 6-3 Solar panel size vs. energy generated 106 6-4 Details on the rover 111 vii List of Figures Page 1-1 Two pictures of the planet Mars 2 1-2 Topographical map of Mars 3 1-3 Comparison between Earth and Mars 4 1-4 Map of hydrogen distribution 12 2-1 An example of gullies on Mars 14 2-2 Statistics on gullies 16 2-3 Gullies on Earth and Mars 22 2-4 Gully apron over sand dunes 23 2-5 Pictures of the Barringer Crater 26 2-6 Gully streak in Terra Sirenum 27 2-7 Map showing slope streak and gully locations 28 3-1 Lunokhod 1 31 3-2 Lunokhod 2 34 3-3 Lunokhod Wheels 35 3-4 PROP-M rover 36 3-5 Sojourner rover 38 3-6 Computer model of Sojourner 39 3-7 Sojourner’s wheel 40 3-8 Mars Exploration Rover 41 3-9 Mars Exploration Rover wheel 43 3-10 Mars Science Laboratory 44 3-11 Comparison of Sojourner, MER, MSL, and Phoenix 45 3-12 Wheels from Sojourner, MER, and MSL 45 3-13 Schematic of MSL’s components 46 3-14 Elements of the ESA-NASA ExoMars Program 47 3-15 Marsokhod wheel design and ground clearance 49 3-16 Marsokhod images 50 3-17 Marsokhod wheel walking 50 3-18 Nanokhod with labeled parts 52 4-1 Lifespan versus wattage for various types of power systems 55 4-2 Effects of temperature on voltage and current 57 4-3 Two types of solar concentrators 57 4-4 Cassini’s Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator 60 4-5 Seasonal images of Mars 64 4-6 Daytime temperature on Mars 66 4-7 Nighttime temperature on Mars 67 4-8 Mars elevation area distribution 70 4-9 Filter and capture magnets on Opportunity 74 4-10 Views of Mars with and without a dust storm 75 5-1 MER airbags 78 5-2 Opportunity with the landing petals partially opened 79 5-3 Proposed decent sequence for Mars Science Laboratory 80 5-4 Curve of atmospheric transmittance by altitude 83 viii 5-5 Altitude map of the Terra Sirenum region 85 5-6 Topographical map of the Terra Sirenum region 86 5-7 Altitude map of the Centauri Montes region 87 5-8 Topographical map of the Centauri Montes region 88 5-9 Model results for the deposit in the Centauri Montes region 90 6-1 One cell from Phoenix’s Wet Chemistry Laboratory 95 6-2 Marsokhod wheel walking 98 6-3 Comparison of Sojourner, MER, MSL, and Phoenix 99 ix Abstract Several rover missions to Mars have been planned and executed, and most have been successful. Still, the area of the planet that has been covered by rovers has been tiny, and there is much more to learn. This thesis covers a possible mission not currently under consideration; that of visiting areas of the surface that might be geologically active at this time. The reasons for planning this mission are covered, as well as information on past rovers. The major problems faced by rovers on Mars are reviewed, from power to atmosphere to landing. Finally, a possible rover that fits the necessary mission parameters is designed using elements of other rovers and Mars missions. Only the physical makeup of the rover is covered; the electronics, including computers and communication, are not addressed. x Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1: The Red Planet Mars is the fourth planet from the Sun. It is commonly regarded as being the most Earthlike of the other planets in the solar system: the nearest planet to Earth, a bit smaller than Earth, and one we might live on some day. Mars is also ‘known’ to be very cold, with lower gravity than Earth, no atmosphere, and water will boil instantly on the surface because it has no atmosphere. That view is not very accurate. Venus is much closer to us and much nearer in size and composition, and it is easier to reach. It is simply ignored because of its high temperature and the crushing atmosphere of the surface, which is just as deadly and is much harder to compensate for than the low pressure and temperature of Mars. Due to those difficulties, Venus has long since been forgotten as anything except a gravity well to slingshot a spacecraft. All efforts towards reaching another planet are aimed at Mars. In reality, Mars is much smaller than Earth and it does have an atmosphere, though it is a very thin one. That atmosphere permits water to stay in liquid form for at least short amounts of time, and in many places the water will freeze before it evaporates. However, some areas near the equator, in summer, do maintain temperatures in the liquid water range, and the possibilities of underground water are vast. While there are a great many difficulties facing any attempt to colonize Mars, it is the easiest other planet for humans to live on and it is expected that the Red Planet will be the first extraterrestrial colony (not counting the Moon). 1 Figure 1-1: Two pictures of the planet Mars. The top picture is centered on the Valles Marineris, while the north pole is visible in the bottom one. 2 Figure 1-2: A topographical altitude map of Mars. The left circle is the south pole, while the right circle is the north pole. Note the elevation differences between the hemispheres. [Picture from NASA JPL website; taken by Mars Global Surveyor.] 3 Figure 1-3: A comparison between Earth and Mars, showing the year, gravity, energy received from the sun, and atmospheric composition.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oxygen Exosphere of Mars: Evidence from Pickup Ions Measured By
    Oxygen Exosphere of Mars: Evidence from Pickup Ions Measured by MAVEN By Ali Rahmati Submitted to the graduate degree program in the Department of Physics and Astronomy, and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________________________________ Professor Thomas E. Cravens, Chair ________________________________ Professor Philip S. Baringer ________________________________ Professor David Braaten ________________________________ Professor Mikhail V. Medvedev ________________________________ Professor Stephen J. Sanders Date Defended: 22 January 2016 The Dissertation Committee for Ali Rahmati certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Oxygen Exosphere of Mars: Evidence from Pickup Ions Measured by MAVEN ________________________________ Professor Thomas E. Cravens, Chair Date approved: 22 January 2016 ii Abstract Mars possesses a hot oxygen exosphere that extends out to several Martian radii. The main source for populating this extended exosphere is the dissociative recombination of molecular oxygen ions with electrons in the Mars ionosphere. The dissociative recombination reaction creates two hot oxygen atoms that can gain energies above the escape energy at Mars and escape from the planet. Oxygen loss through this photochemical reaction is thought to be one of the main mechanisms of atmosphere escape at Mars, leading to the disappearance of water on the surface. In this work the hot oxygen exosphere of Mars is modeled using a two-stream/Liouville approach as well as a Monte-Carlo simulation. The modeled exosphere is used in a pickup ion simulation to predict the flux of energetic oxygen pickup ions at Mars. The pickup ions are created via ionization of neutral exospheric oxygen atoms through photo-ionization, charge exchange with solar wind protons, and electron impact ionization.
    [Show full text]
  • Tianwen-1: China's Mars Mission
    Tianwen-1: China's Mars Mission drishtiias.com/printpdf/tianwen-1-china-s-mars-mission Why In News China will launch its first Mars Mission - Tianwen-1- in July, 2020. China's previous ‘Yinghuo-1’ Mars mission, which was supported by a Russian spacecraft, had failed after it did not leave the earth's orbit and disintegrated over the Pacific Ocean in 2012. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is also going to launch its own Mars mission in July, the Perseverance which aims to collect Martian samples. Key Points The Tianwen-1 Mission: It will lift off on a Long March 5 rocket, from the Wenchang launch centre. It will carry 13 payloads (seven orbiters and six rovers) that will explore the planet. It is an all-in-one orbiter, lander and rover system. Orbiter: It is a spacecraft designed to orbit a celestial body (astronomical body) without landing on its surface. Lander: It is a strong, lightweight spacecraft structure, consisting of a base and three sides "petals" in the shape of a tetrahedron (pyramid- shaped). It is a protective "shell" that houses the rover and protects it, along with the airbags, from the forces of impact. Rover: It is a planetary surface exploration device designed to move across the solid surface on a planet or other planetary mass celestial bodies. 1/3 Objectives: The mission will be the first to place a ground-penetrating radar on the Martian surface, which will be able to study local geology, as well as rock, ice, and dirt distribution. It will search the martian surface for water, investigate soil characteristics, and study the atmosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Mars, the Nearest Habitable World – a Comprehensive Program for Future Mars Exploration
    Mars, the Nearest Habitable World – A Comprehensive Program for Future Mars Exploration Report by the NASA Mars Architecture Strategy Working Group (MASWG) November 2020 Front Cover: Artist Concepts Top (Artist concepts, left to right): Early Mars1; Molecules in Space2; Astronaut and Rover on Mars1; Exo-Planet System1. Bottom: Pillinger Point, Endeavour Crater, as imaged by the Opportunity rover1. Credits: 1NASA; 2Discovery Magazine Citation: Mars Architecture Strategy Working Group (MASWG), Jakosky, B. M., et al. (2020). Mars, the Nearest Habitable World—A Comprehensive Program for Future Mars Exploration. MASWG Members • Bruce Jakosky, University of Colorado (chair) • Richard Zurek, Mars Program Office, JPL (co-chair) • Shane Byrne, University of Arizona • Wendy Calvin, University of Nevada, Reno • Shannon Curry, University of California, Berkeley • Bethany Ehlmann, California Institute of Technology • Jennifer Eigenbrode, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center • Tori Hoehler, NASA/Ames Research Center • Briony Horgan, Purdue University • Scott Hubbard, Stanford University • Tom McCollom, University of Colorado • John Mustard, Brown University • Nathaniel Putzig, Planetary Science Institute • Michelle Rucker, NASA/JSC • Michael Wolff, Space Science Institute • Robin Wordsworth, Harvard University Ex Officio • Michael Meyer, NASA Headquarters ii Mars, the Nearest Habitable World October 2020 MASWG Table of Contents Mars, the Nearest Habitable World – A Comprehensive Program for Future Mars Exploration Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Opportunity: a Review of Intellectual Property and Growth
    Digital Opportunity A Review of Intellectual Property and Growth An Independent Report by Professor Ian Hargreaves May 2011 Contents Page Foreword by Ian Hargreaves 01 Executive Summary 03 Chapter 1 Intellectual Property and Growth 10 Chapter 2 The Evidence Base 16 Chapter 3 The International Context 21 Chapter 4 Copyright Licensing: a Moment of Opportunity 26 Chapter 5 Copyright: Exceptions for the Digital Age 41 Chapter 6 Patents 53 Chapter 7 Designs 64 Chapter 8 Enforcement and Disputes 67 Chapter 9 SMEs and the IP Framework 86 Chapter 10 An Adaptive IP Framework 91 Chapter 11 Impact 97 Annex A Terms of Reference 101 Annex B Stakeholders Met during Review of IP and Growth 102 Annex C Call for Evidence Submissions 105 Annex D List of Supporting Documents 109 Foreword When the Prime Minister commissioned this review in November 2010, he did so in terms which some considered provocative. The Review was needed, the PM said, because of the risk that the current intellectual property framework might not be sufficiently well designed to promote innovation and growth in the UK economy. In the five months we have had to compile the Review, we have sought never to lose sight of David Cameron’s “exam question”. Could it be true that laws designed more than three centuries ago with the express purpose of creating economic incentives for innovation by protecting creators’ rights are today obstructing innovation and economic growth? The short answer is: yes. We have found that the UK’s intellectual property framework, especially with regard to copyright, is falling behind what is needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1: Venus Missions
    Appendix 1: Venus Missions Sputnik 7 (USSR) Launch 02/04/1961 First attempted Venus atmosphere craft; upper stage failed to leave Earth orbit Venera 1 (USSR) Launch 02/12/1961 First attempted flyby; contact lost en route Mariner 1 (US) Launch 07/22/1961 Attempted flyby; launch failure Sputnik 19 (USSR) Launch 08/25/1962 Attempted flyby, stranded in Earth orbit Mariner 2 (US) Launch 08/27/1962 First successful Venus flyby Sputnik 20 (USSR) Launch 09/01/1962 Attempted flyby, upper stage failure Sputnik 21 (USSR) Launch 09/12/1962 Attempted flyby, upper stage failure Cosmos 21 (USSR) Launch 11/11/1963 Possible Venera engineering test flight or attempted flyby Venera 1964A (USSR) Launch 02/19/1964 Attempted flyby, launch failure Venera 1964B (USSR) Launch 03/01/1964 Attempted flyby, launch failure Cosmos 27 (USSR) Launch 03/27/1964 Attempted flyby, upper stage failure Zond 1 (USSR) Launch 04/02/1964 Venus flyby, contact lost May 14; flyby July 14 Venera 2 (USSR) Launch 11/12/1965 Venus flyby, contact lost en route Venera 3 (USSR) Launch 11/16/1965 Venus lander, contact lost en route, first Venus impact March 1, 1966 Cosmos 96 (USSR) Launch 11/23/1965 Possible attempted landing, craft fragmented in Earth orbit Venera 1965A (USSR) Launch 11/23/1965 Flyby attempt (launch failure) Venera 4 (USSR) Launch 06/12/1967 Successful atmospheric probe, arrived at Venus 10/18/1967 Mariner 5 (US) Launch 06/14/1967 Successful flyby 10/19/1967 Cosmos 167 (USSR) Launch 06/17/1967 Attempted atmospheric probe, stranded in Earth orbit Venera 5 (USSR) Launch 01/05/1969 Returned atmospheric data for 53 min on 05/16/1969 M.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploration of the Moon
    Exploration of the Moon The physical exploration of the Moon began when Luna 2, a space probe launched by the Soviet Union, made an impact on the surface of the Moon on September 14, 1959. Prior to that the only available means of exploration had been observation from Earth. The invention of the optical telescope brought about the first leap in the quality of lunar observations. Galileo Galilei is generally credited as the first person to use a telescope for astronomical purposes; having made his own telescope in 1609, the mountains and craters on the lunar surface were among his first observations using it. NASA's Apollo program was the first, and to date only, mission to successfully land humans on the Moon, which it did six times. The first landing took place in 1969, when astronauts placed scientific instruments and returnedlunar samples to Earth. Apollo 12 Lunar Module Intrepid prepares to descend towards the surface of the Moon. NASA photo. Contents Early history Space race Recent exploration Plans Past and future lunar missions See also References External links Early history The ancient Greek philosopher Anaxagoras (d. 428 BC) reasoned that the Sun and Moon were both giant spherical rocks, and that the latter reflected the light of the former. His non-religious view of the heavens was one cause for his imprisonment and eventual exile.[1] In his little book On the Face in the Moon's Orb, Plutarch suggested that the Moon had deep recesses in which the light of the Sun did not reach and that the spots are nothing but the shadows of rivers or deep chasms.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Range Rovers for Mars Exploration and Sample Return
    2001-01-2138 Long-Range Rovers for Mars Exploration and Sample Return Joe C. Parrish NASA Headquarters ABSTRACT This paper discusses long-range rovers to be flown as part of NASA’s newly reformulated Mars Exploration Program (MEP). These rovers are currently scheduled for launch first in 2007 as part of a joint science and technology mission, and then again in 2011 as part of a planned Mars Sample Return (MSR) mission. These rovers are characterized by substantially longer range capability than their predecessors in the 1997 Mars Pathfinder and 2003 Mars Exploration Rover (MER) missions. Topics addressed in this paper include the rover mission objectives, key design features, and Figure 1: Rover Size Comparison (Mars Pathfinder, Mars Exploration technologies. Rover, ’07 Smart Lander/Mobile Laboratory) INTRODUCTION NASA is leading a multinational program to explore above, below, and on the surface of Mars. A new The first of these rovers, the Smart Lander/Mobile architecture for the Mars Exploration Program has Laboratory (SLML) is scheduled for launch in 2007. The recently been announced [1], and it incorporates a current program baseline is to use this mission as a joint number of missions through the rest of this decade and science and technology mission that will contribute into the next. Among those missions are ambitious plans directly toward sample return missions planned for the to land rovers on the surface of Mars, with several turn of the decade. These sample return missions may purposes: (1) perform scientific explorations of the involve a rover of almost identical architecture to the surface; (2) demonstrate critical technologies for 2007 rover, except for the need to cache samples and collection, caching, and return of samples to Earth; (3) support their delivery into orbit for subsequent return to evaluate the suitability of the planet for potential manned Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Educator's Guide
    EDUCATOR’S GUIDE ABOUT THE FILM Dear Educator, “ROVING MARS”is an exciting adventure that This movie details the development of Spirit and follows the journey of NASA’s Mars Exploration Opportunity from their assembly through their Rovers through the eyes of scientists and engineers fantastic discoveries, discoveries that have set the at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and Steve Squyres, pace for a whole new era of Mars exploration: from the lead science investigator from Cornell University. the search for habitats to the search for past or present Their collective dream of Mars exploration came life… and maybe even to human exploration one day. true when two rovers landed on Mars and began Having lasted many times longer than their original their scientific quest to understand whether Mars plan of 90 Martian days (sols), Spirit and Opportunity ever could have been a habitat for life. have confirmed that water persisted on Mars, and Since the 1960s, when humans began sending the that a Martian habitat for life is a possibility. While first tentative interplanetary probes out into the solar they continue their studies, what lies ahead are system, two-thirds of all missions to Mars have NASA missions that not only “follow the water” on failed. The technical challenges are tremendous: Mars, but also “follow the carbon,” a building block building robots that can withstand the tremendous of life. In the next decade, precision landers and shaking of launch; six months in the deep cold of rovers may even search for evidence of life itself, space; a hurtling descent through the atmosphere either signs of past microbial life in the rock record (going from 10,000 miles per hour to 0 in only six or signs of past or present life where reserves of minutes!); bouncing as high as a three-story building water ice lie beneath the Martian surface today.
    [Show full text]
  • 350 International Atlas of Lunar Exploration 8 January 1973
    :UP/3-PAGINATION/IAW-PROOFS/3B2/978«52181«5(M.3D 350 [7428] 19.8.20073:28PM 350 International Atlas of Lunar Exploration 8 January 1973: Luna 21 and Lunokhod 2 (Soviet Union) The 4850 kg Luna 21 spacecraft was launched from Baikonur at 06:56 UT on a Proton booster, placed in a low Earth parking orbit and then put on a lunar trajec­ tory. Power problems required that the Lunokhod solar panel be opened in flight to augment power, and stowed again for the trajectory correction and orbit insertion burns and for landing. On 12 January Luna 21 entered a 90 km by 100 km lunar orbit inclined 60° to the equator. After a day in orbit the low point was reduced to 16 km, and on 15 January after 40 orbits the vehicle braked and dropped to just 750 m above the surface. Then the main thrusters slowed the descent, and at :UP/3-PAGINATION/IAW-PROOFS/3B2/978«52181«5(M.3D 351 [7428] 19.8.20073:28PM Chronological sequence of missions and events 351 22 m a set of secondary thrusters took over until the After landing, Lunokhod 2 surveyed its surround­ spacecraft was only 1.5 meters high, when the thrusters ings. A rock partly blocked the west-facing ramp so the were shut off. Landing time was 23:35 UT. rover was driven east across a shallow crater, leaving the The site was in Le Monnier crater on the eastern edge lander at 01:14 UT on 16 January. It rested 30 m from of Mare Serenitatis, 180 km north of the Apollo 17 land­ the descent stage to recharge its batteries until 18 ing site, at 25.85° N, 30.45° E (Figure 327A).
    [Show full text]
  • NUCLEAR SAFETY LAUNCH APPROVAL: MULTI-MISSION LESSONS LEARNED Yale Chang the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
    ANS NETS 2018 – Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space Las Vegas, NV, February 26 – March 1, 2018, on CD-ROM, American Nuclear Society, LaGrange Park, IL (2018) NUCLEAR SAFETY LAUNCH APPROVAL: MULTI-MISSION LESSONS LEARNED Yale Chang The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, 11100 Johns Hopkins Rd, Laurel, MD 20723 240-228-5724; [email protected] Launching a NASA radioisotope power system (RPS) trajectory to Saturn used a Venus-Venus-Earth-Jupiter mission requires compliance with two Federal mandates: Gravity Assist (VVEJGA) maneuver, where the Earth the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) Gravity Assist (EGA) flyby was the primary nuclear safety and launch approval (LA), as directed by Presidential focus of NASA, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), the Directive/National Security Council Memorandum 25. Cassini Interagency Nuclear Safety Review Panel Nuclear safety launch approval lessons learned from (INSRP), and the public alike. A solid propellant fire test multiple NASA RPS missions, one Russian RPS mission, campaign addressed the MPF finding and led in part to two non-RPS launch accidents, and several solid the retrofit solid propellant breakup systems (BUSs) propellant fire test campaigns since 1996 are shown to designed and carried by MER-A and MER-B spacecraft have contributed to an ever-growing body of knowledge. and the deployment of plutonium detectors in the launch The launch accidents can be viewed as “unplanned area for PNH. The PNH mission decreased the calendar experiments” that provided real-world data. Lessons length of the NEPA/LA processes to less than 4 years by learned from the nuclear safety launch approval effort of incorporating lessons learned from previous missions and each mission or launch accident, and how they were tests in its spacecraft and mission designs and their applied to improve the NEPA/LA processes and nuclear NEPA/LA processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Sergei Fedorovich Teselkin Lavochkin Association, Russian Federation, [email protected]
    69th International Astronautical Congress 2018 Paper ID: 44581 oral IAF SPACE EXPLORATION SYMPOSIUM (A3) Solar System Exploration (5) Author: Dr. Sergei Fedorovich Teselkin Lavochkin Association, Russian Federation, [email protected] \TO VENUS TOGETHER": RUSSIAN-AMERICAN JOINT ENCORE OF VENUS RESEARCHES WITH ORBITER, LANDER AND ATMOSPHERIC PROBES IN THE PROJECT \VENUS-D" Abstract S. Lemeshevskii, Candidate of Economics, [email protected] O. Grafodatskiy, Doctor of Engineering Sci- ence,[email protected] Kh.Karchaev, Candidate of Economics, [email protected] S. Teselkin, Candi- date of PhysicsMathematics,[email protected] V. Vorontsov, Doctor of Engineering Science, [email protected] Lavochkin Association, Russia Mission "Venera-D" by Lavochkin Association implies a long-term study of Venus. International pay- load is to be installed on orbiter, lander and long-living station on Venus surface. The project is a basis for further large-scale international missions to Venus, previously carried out in 1960-80s and early 1990s by Soviet and American spacecraft. A large amount of data on structure, soil composition, atmosphere, cloud layers, wind speed on the surface were accumulated. Soviet Venus research program was completed in 1986 by landing of \VEGA" (Venus-Halley's comet), one of the most successful projects in Lavochkin history. Since 1994 (mapping with the NASA Magellan mission) Venus was studied by two spacecraft: \Venus Express" (ESA, 2005-2014) and \Akatsuki" (JAXA, launch - 2010, start of operation - 2015). The first steps of \Venera-D" appeared in the early 2000s with the idea to provide operations on the planet's surface for several hours and possibly days. With the latest developments, unification of design solutions and new technical tools used in-house Lavochkin experts consider the mission \VEGA" as a prototype for the next automatic interplanetary station destined to Venus.
    [Show full text]
  • Mars Exploration - a Story Fifty Years Long Giuseppe Pezzella and Antonio Viviani
    Chapter Introductory Chapter: Mars Exploration - A Story Fifty Years Long Giuseppe Pezzella and Antonio Viviani 1. Introduction Mars has been a goal of exploration programs of the most important space agencies all over the world for decades. It is, in fact, the most investigated celestial body of the Solar System. Mars robotic exploration began in the 1960s of the twentieth century by means of several space probes sent by the United States (US) and the Soviet Union (USSR). In the recent past, also European, Japanese, and Indian spacecrafts reached Mars; while other countries, such as China and the United Arab Emirates, aim to send spacecraft toward the red planet in the next future. 1.1 Exploration aims The high number of mission explorations to Mars clearly points out the impor- tance of Mars within the Solar System. Thus, the question is: “Why this great interest in Mars exploration?” The interest in Mars is due to several practical, scientific, and strategic reasons. In the practical sense, Mars is the most accessible planet in the Solar System [1]. It is the second closest planet to Earth, besides Venus, averaging about 360 million kilometers apart between the furthest and closest points in its orbit. Earth and Mars feature great similarities. For instance, both planets rotate on an axis with quite the same rotation velocity and tilt angle. The length of a day on Earth is 24 h, while slightly longer on Mars at 24 h and 37 min. The tilt of Earth axis is 23.5 deg, and Mars tilts slightly more at 25.2 deg [2].
    [Show full text]