New Electoral Arrangements for Northumberland County Council
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Final recommendations New electoral arrangements for Northumberland County Council March 2010 Translations and other formats For information on obtaining this publication in another language or in a large-print or Braille version, please contact the Boundary Committee: Tel: 020 7271 0500 Email: [email protected] © The Boundary Committee for England 2010 The mapping in this report is reproduced from Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, © Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. The Electoral Commission GD 03114G 2008 Contents Summary 1 1 Introduction 3 2 Analysis and final recommendations 5 Submissions received 5 Electorate figures 6 Council size 6 Electoral fairness 7 Draft recommendations 7 General analysis 8 Electoral arrangements 8 Northern Northumberland 9 Central and west Northumberland 14 South east Northumberland 18 Conclusions 19 Parish electoral arrangements 19 3 What happens next? 27 4 Mapping 29 Appendices A Glossary and abbreviations 30 B Code of practice on written consultation 34 C Table C1: Final recommendations for Northumberland 36 County Council D Additional legislation we have considered 42 E Proposed electoral divisions in Hexham town 43 F Proposed electoral divisions in Ponteland town 44 G Proposed electoral divisions in Prudhoe town 45 H Proposed electoral divisions in Morpeth town 46 Summary The Boundary Committee for England is an independent statutory body which conducts electoral reviews of local authority areas. The broad purpose of an electoral review is to decide on the appropriate electoral arrangements – the number of councillors and the names, number and boundaries of wards or divisions – for a specific local authority. We have conducted an electoral review of Northumberland to ensure that the new Council has new and appropriate electoral arrangements. The review aims to ensure that the number of voters represented by each councillor is approximately the same. The Electoral Commission directed us to undertake this review. This review of warding arrangements was conducted in four stages: Stage Stage starts Description One 17 February 2009 Submission of proposals to us Two 12 May 2009 Our analysis and deliberation Three 25 August 2009 Publication of draft recommendations and consultation on them Four 17 November 2009 Analysis of submissions received and formulation of final recommendations Draft recommendations We proposed a council size of 67 comprising a pattern of one two-member division and 66 single-member divisions. Our proposals were based on the Council’s county- wide scheme with some modification. Broadly speaking, our draft recommendations would provide good levels of electoral equality. Submissions received During Stage Three, we received 34 representations. In particular, we received comments in relation to our proposed divisions in the areas of Bamburgh and Rothbury and its hinterland. In general, respondents who made comments in relation to our draft recommendations in these areas provided well-evidenced proposals which reflected community identities and interests. Elsewhere in the county, our draft recommendations were broadly well received. All submissions can be viewed on our website at www.boundarycommittee.org.uk. Analysis and final recommendations Electorate figures During Stage One, we experienced some difficulty in confirming the accuracy of the electorate figures originally produced by the former district councils. Given the abolition of these district councils, it was difficult to address issues in respect of the figures they supplied but having audited the figures and confirmed that the new Council was content with them, we were confident in using them as the basis of our draft recommendations. During Stage Three, we did not receive any specific 1 comments on the electorate figures. We therefore remain satisfied that they are the most accurate electorate figures that could be provided. Council size In our draft recommendations, we proposed a council size of 67. During Stage Three, two respondents endorsed our proposed council size while one respondent considered that it would provide for too few councillors. However, they did not provide evidence to support this view, nor did they propose an alternative council size. We have therefore confirmed our draft recommendations for a council size of 67 members as final. General analysis Having considered the representations received during Stage Three, we are proposing modifications to divisions in the areas of Bamburgh and Rothbury. With the exception of a minor boundary modification in Cramlington, and a change to division names in Prudhoe town, we are confirming the remainder of our draft recommendations as final. During Stage Three, we also re-considered our draft recommendations for a two- member Alnwick division. We recognise that this will be the only two-member division in what is otherwise a uniform single-member arrangement. However, ensuring a uniform division pattern is not required by legislation and we consider our proposed two-member Alnwick division will provide the best balance between reflecting community identities and interests and providing for effective and convenient local government. Furthermore, it will avoid an otherwise arbitrary split of Alnwick town. We therefore confirm our draft recommendations for Alnwick as final. What happens next? We have now completed our review of electoral arrangements for Northumberland County Council. The changes we have proposed must be approved by Parliament. An Order – the legal document which brings into force our recommendations – will be laid in Parliament. Parliament can either accept or reject our recommendations. If accepted, the new electoral arrangements will come into force at the next elections for Northumberland County Council, in 2013. We are grateful to all those organisations and individuals who have contributed to the review through expressing their views and advice. The full report is available to download at www.boundarycommittee.org.uk. 2 1 Introduction 1 The Electoral Commission directed the Boundary Committee to conduct a review of the electoral arrangements for the new Northumberland unitary authority. The review commenced on 15 July 2008. We wrote to the principal local authorities in Northumberland (the former county and district councils) together with other interested parties, inviting the submission of proposals to us on council size for the new council. Following our decision on the appropriate council size, we invited submission of proposals to us on the division arrangements for the new council. The submissions we received during Stage One of this review informed our Draft recommendations on the new electoral arrangements for Northumberland County Council, which was published on 25 August 2009. We then undertook a further 12-week period of consultation which ended on 16 November 2009. We have now reconsidered the draft recommendations in the light of the further evidence received and decided whether to modify them. What is an electoral review? 2 The main aim of an electoral review is to try to ensure ‘electoral equality’, which means that all councillors in a single authority represent approximately the same number of electors. Our objective is to make recommendations that will improve electoral equality, while also trying to reflect communities in the area and provide for convenient and effective local government. 3 Our three main considerations – equalising the number of electors each councillor represents; reflecting community identity; and providing for convenient and 1 effective local government – are set out in legislation and our task is to strike the best balance between them when making our recommendations. 4 Our powers, as well as the guidance we have provided for electoral reviews and further information on the review process, can be found on our website at www.boundarycommittee.org.uk. Why are we conducting a review in Northumberland? 5 In December 2007, the Government approved a bid from Northumberland County Council to create a unitary council to take over the responsibility for all local government services in those areas in Northumberland formerly provided by the county and the five district councils. A Statutory Instrument was subsequently approved by Parliament on 25 February 2008, establishing a new Northumberland unitary authority from 1 April 2009. The Electoral Commission was obliged, by law, to consider whether an electoral review is needed following such a change in local government. Its view was that an electoral review of Northumberland was appropriate at the earliest opportunity. 6 Since the start of the review, legislation has been passed which has removed responsibility for implementing electoral reviews in England from the Electoral Commission. As a result, the Boundary Committee for England is now responsible for 1 Section 13(5) of the Local Government Act 1992 (LGA 1992), as amended by the Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007, Chapter 2, Section 56. 3 giving effect to all or any of its recommendations. The process we will follow is described in Chapter 3. The legislation also provides for the establishment of a new independent organisation – the Local Government Boundary Commission for England – that will replace the Boundary Committee for England and take on our functions. How will our recommendations