<<

1

2 Observations of volcanic tremor during the January-February 2005 eruption of Mt.

3 Veniaminof, Alaska.

4

5 Silvio De Angelis and Stephen R. McNutt

6 Alaska Observatory – Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 903 Koyukuk Drive PO

7 BOX 757320, Fairbanks, Alaska, 99775-7320, USA.

8

9

10

11 Prepared for submittal to Bullettin of

12

13 Contact author: Silvio De Angelis

14 e-mail:[email protected];

15 phone +1-907-474-7234

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

1 25 Abstract

26 Mt. Veniaminof, Alaska Peninsula, is a strato-volcano with a summit ice-filled caldera

27 containing a small intracaldera cone and active vent. From January 2 to February 21, 2005,

28 Mt. Veniaminof erupted. The eruption was characterized by numerous small ash emissions

29 (VEI 0 to 1) and accompanied by low-frequency activity and volcanic tremor. We

30 have performed spectral analyses of the seismic signals in order to characterize them and to

31 constrain their source. Continuous tremor has durations of minutes to hours with dominant

32 energy in the band 0.5-4.0 Hz, and spectra characterized by narrow peaks either irregularly

33 (non-harmonic tremor) or regularly spaced (harmonic tremor). The spectra of non-harmonic

34 tremor resemble those of low-frequency events recorded simoultaneously to surface ash

35 explosions, suggesting that the source mechanisms might be similar or related. We propose

36 that non-harmonic tremor at Mt. Veniaminof results from the coalescence of gas bubbles and

37 low-frequency events are related to the disruption of large gas pockets within the conduit.

38 Harmonic tremor, that is characterized by regular and quasi-sinusoidal waveforms, has

39 duration of hours. Spectra, containing up to five harmonics, suggest the presence of a

40 resonating source volume that vibrates in a longitudinal acoustic mode. An interesting feature

41 of harmonic tremor is that frequency is observed to change over time: spectral lines move

42 towards higher or lower values while the harmonic nature of the spectra is maintained. Factors

43 controlling the variable characteristics of harmonic tremor include changes in acoustic

44 velocity at the source and variations of the effective size of the resonator.

45 Keywords: Volcanic tremor, harmonic tremor, low-frequency events, conduit resonance,

46 ash eruptions, Mt. Veniaminof, volcanic

47

48 Introduction

2 49 Over the past decade the observation of low-frequency (LF) earthquake activity at volcanoes

50 has become increasingly important in monitoring and forecasting eruptions. LF signals with

51 durations of minutes to days or longer, frequently observed near active volcanoes, are usually

52 referred to as volcanic tremor (Aki and Koyanagi, 1981; Fujita et al., 1995; Hellweg, 2000;

53 McNutt, 2002); tremor has been documented at 160 world volcanic centers (McNutt, 1994)

54 and its detection is an important part of most volcano monitoring programs.

55 The most general appearance of a tremor waveform is that of a continuous signal with

56 emergent onset, smoothly varying amplitudes and energy confined in the band 1.0-5.0 Hz

57 (Julian, 1994; Fujita et al., 1995; Neuberg et al., 2000; McNutt, 2002). Tremor spectra can be

58 either broadband without pronounced peaks, or characterized by a variable number of

59 regularly spaced peaks. If the spectrum contains either a single peak, or a variable number of

60 regularly spaced peaks, the signal is called harmonic tremor.

61 Unlike tectonic , that involve mechanisms of shear failure of rock at the source,

62 tremor originates from complex fluid-rock interactions within volcanoes. While volcanic

63 tremor is a common precursor and accompanies most volcanic eruptions, its characteristics

64 including depth, duration and amplitude, can vary considerably. The broad range of tremor

65 properties suggests that multiple mechanisms may be responsible for its generation, even at

66 the same volcano; several models have been proposed in order to account for tremor

67 generation including free oscillations of fluid filled cavities (Sassa, 1936; Crosson and Bame,

68 1985; Fujita et al., 1995), jerky crack propagation (Aki et al., 1977), flow-induced oscillations

69 of volcanic conduits (Julian, 1994; 2000; Hellweg, 2000), and the resonance of fluid filled

70 cracks and conduits (Chouet, 1987; Benoit and McNutt, 1997; Garces, 1997; Garces and

71 McNutt, 1997). Earlier models of tremor, based on the free oscillations of chambers,

72 were able to reproduce peaked harmonic spectra but often relied on unrealistic dimensions of

3 73 the resonating volumes. Most recently, the study of tremor has received increasing attention

74 by volcano-seismologists because of its potential as a monitoring and forecasting tool for

75 unrest at volcanoes, and more refined models have been proposed. Hellweg (2000) suggested

76 that the presence of numerous overtones in harmonic spectra, and their exact relationship to a

77 fundamental frequency, is the result of non-linear flow conditions in pipe-like conduits;

78 turbulence in conduit flows with high Reynolds numbers, may generate periodic pressure

79 disturbances and produce regularly peaked spectra characteristic of harmonic tremor. Julian

80 (1994; 2000) proposed that tremor results from the oscillations of slot-like channels with

81 movable elastic (damped) walls, induced by the flow of a viscous incompressible fluid. This

82 model is described by a 3rd order system of non-linear differential equations whose solutions

83 are controlled by the fluid flow pressure; increasing values of this parameter will account for

84 steady flow without oscillations, short-lasting oscillations, sustained oscillations, period-

85 doubling cascades, and chaotic oscillations controlled by non-linear attractors. Gordeev (1993)

86 and Schlindwein et al. (1995), showed that peaked harmonic spectra can be reproduced by the

87 convolution of a series of equi-spaced spikes, i.e., a Dirac comb funcion with a source

88 wavelet. The convolution of an arbitrary function with a Dirac comb yields a series of replicas

89 of the original function with period ΔT, equal to the spacing of the teeth of the comb. The

90 theoretical spectrum of the signal consists of a fundamental frequency (defined by 1/ΔT) along

91 with a number of integer overtones, and is modulated by the spectrum of the source function.

92 The generation of volcanic tremor by resonating fluid filled fractures has been extensively

93 treated in the literature, as well. Aki et al. (1977) proposed that tremor is generated by the

94 pressure driven motion of fluids through a chain of cracks connected by narrow channels; the

95 characteristics of tremor are controlled by parameters such as the length of the cracks and the

4 96 fluid pressure. Chouet (1987) suggested that the resonance modes of a fluid-filled rectangular

97 crack, triggered by a localized pressure disturbance (acting on the crack walls), correspond to

98 the peaks observed in the spectra of long period earthquakes and volcanic tremor. The

99 predicted wavefield depends on parameters that include the crack dimensions, the position and

100 intensity of the pressure disturbance and the impedance contrast between the fluid and the

101 surrounding rocks. McNutt (1986) and Benoit and McNutt (1997) modeled the source of

102 harmonic tremor as a 1D vertical resonating conduit filled with gas-charged magma, each of

103 the observed spectral peaks representing an eigen-mode of vibration of the oscillator. Mori et

104 al. (1989) explained the observations of harmonic tremor at Langila volcano, Papua New

105 Guinea in terms of a gas filled resonating volume. The resonance modes of 1D oscillators are

106 controlled by the length of the resonator, the acoustic properties of the fluid, and a set of

107 specified boundary conditions.

108 In this paper we will present observations and spectral analyses of volcanic tremor recorded

109 during the January-February 2005 eruption of Mt. Veniaminof, Alaska. This eruption, has

110 been well documented with seismic, satellite and web camera observations, and provides the

111 best characterization to date of the eruption style of Mt. Veniaminof volcano.

112 Background

113 Mt. Veniaminof is a large stratovolcano on the Alaska Peninsula (56.2° N, 159.4° W,

114 elevation: 2507 m), 35 km wide at the base, truncated by a steep-walled caldera 8x11 km in

115 diameter that formed about 3700 years B.P. The caldera is filled by an ice field that ranges in

116 elevation from 1750 to 2000 m; an intra-caldera cone is located in the western part of the

117 caldera with a small summit crater. The cone has an elevation of 2156 m, about 330 m above

118 the surrounding ice field (Miller et al., 1998) and is the site of all historical eruptions (Simkin

5 119 and Siebert, 1994). A belt of Quaternary cinder cones (Detterman et al., 1981a,b) extends in

120 the SE-NW direction from the main volcanic edifice to the Bering Sea coast.

121 The recent activity includes moderate Strombolian eruptions in 1983, 1993 and 1994 from the

122 intra-caldera cone accompanied by lava flows and, mild explosive activity in 2002 and 2004.

123 Ash and steam explosions are a characteristic feature of the eruptive activity at Mt.

124 Veniaminof.

125 In the summer of 2001, the Alaska Volcano Obsevatory (AVO) installed a network of 8

126 vertical component, short-period (1s) seismometers (Mark Products L4-C) at Mt. Veniaminof

127 (Figure 1); continuous analog data are transmitted via radio telemetry and phone lines to AVO

128 offices where they are digitally recorded at a sample rate of 100 Hz (Thompson et al., 2002).

129 Archiving of data began in February 2002 and, since then, different types of signals have been

130 recorded including LF earthquakes, volcano tectonic (VT) earthquakes, and volcanic tremor.

131 While low rates of VT activity (< 1 event/day) constitutes the seismic background at Mt

132 Veniaminof during quiescent periods, the occurrence of a large number of LF events and

133 volcanic tremor characterized the eruptions in 2002 and 2004 (Sanchez, 2005; Sanchez et al.

134 2005). During the eruptions in January-February 2005, up to 20-30 LF events/hour were

135 detected. In addition to the seismic network, a web camera located in the town of Perryville,

136 about 35 km from the volcano, provides a photographic record of the surface activity

137 (photographs taken every 5 minutes). Images from the Advanced Very High Resolution

138 Radiometer (AVHRR) sensor on the NOAA-12 and NOAA-14 satellites are also used to

139 detect volcanic eruption clouds and thermal anomalies.

140

141

142

6 143

144 Eruption chronology

145 After a relatively long period of quiescence of about 6 years, Mt. Veniaminof first showed

146 signs of unrest in 2002-2004. During September 2002, pulses of volcanic tremor were detected

147 and bursts of steam (possibly containing small amounts of ash) were observed rising above the

148 intra-caldera cone; intermittent steaming activity accompanied by variable seismicity

149 continued until April 2003 (Sanchez, 2005). In the period February-October 2004, AVO

150 recorded several episodes of low amplitude volcanic tremor and small low-frequency volcanic

151 earthquakes accompanying ash and steam emissions from the intra-caldera cone. Short

152 duration episodes of harmonic tremor were recorded on October 12 and November 2, 2004.

153 During November and December 2004 no significant surface activity was observed and the

154 seismicity remained at background levels. On January 1, 2005, AVO started to record weak

155 tremor that lasted for about two days. On January 4, the signal character changed to that of

156 numerous low-frequency earthquakes (about 1-2 per minute), and the level-of-concern color

157 code (Table 1) was upgraded from green to yellow. Ash outbursts were observed rising to

158 heights of few hundreds meters above the intra-caldera cone starting January 3. The following

159 week was characterized by elevated levels of seismicity, and the episodic surface activity

160 evolved into more continuous emissions forming ash plumes rising up to about 1300 m above

161 the vent (Figure 2). Starting January 7, satellite images showed a persistent thermal anomaly

162 in the vicinity of the active cone; both seismic and surface activity exceeded the levels

163 observed during 2002-2004. On January 10, the level-of-concern color code was upgraded to

164 orange. Amplitude and occurrence of volcanic tremor and LF events increased over the month

165 of January, and the activity at the surface consisted of emissions forming ash clouds and ash

166 fall reaching outside the caldera boundary. On February 4, incandescence was clearly visible

7 167 on the night-time web camera images, indicating strombolian activity with ejection of hot

168 blocks from the intra-caldera cone. This activity was accompanied by an increase in the

169 amplitude and occurrence rate of LF earthquakes and continuous low amplitude volcanic

170 tremor. From February 5 onward, the seismicity was dominated by volcanic tremor; the

171 activity ranged from tremor bursts with durations of few tens of seconds to continuous tremor

172 lasting hours. Harmonic tremor was mostly observed between February 17 and February 21.

173 The pattern of seismicity was consistent with mild explosive activity from the intra-caldera

174 cone, although Mt. Veniaminof was not visible in the web camera images for almost the entire

175 month of February due to cloudy weather. On February 21, harmonic tremor was sporadically

176 observed along with non-harmonic tremor and LF events; earthquake activity abruptly ended

177 late in the evening the same day, marking the end of the eruption. The level-of-concern color

178 code was downgraded to yellow on February 25 and to green on March 4, 2005. Table 1

179 summarizes the observations during the course of the eruption.

180

181 Data analyses and results

182 The seismic activity recorded at Mt. Veniaminof during January-February 2005 included LF

183 earthquakes, non-harmonic and harmonic tremor. The occurrence of many LF earthquakes

184 overlying a low level non-harmonic tremor signal, characterized the eruption during January

185 and at the beginning of February 2005. Moderate to strong pulses of tremor (durations of few

186 tens of seconds to minutes) superimposed on a low-amplitude continuous signal, as well as

187 strong harmonic tremor lasting up to hours, were mostly observed during the month of

188 February. We performed spectral analyses of about two months of tremor data in order to

189 characterize the properties of the signal over the duration of the eruption and to constrain its

8 190 source. All data were band-pass filtered between 0.4 and 10.0 Hz in order to reduce the effects

191 of ocean microseisms and incoherent higher frequency noise.

192 Seismograms and amplitude spectra of non-harmonic tremor recorded at station VNSS (5.4

193 km from the vent) are shown in Figure 3; energy is confined to the band 0.5-5.0 Hz and

194 spectra are characterized by narrow and irregularly distributed peaks. It is worth to note that

195 the seismic sensors installed at Mt. Veniaminof have a natural period of 1 second, and they

196 may not allow to recognize spectral peaks at very low frequencies. For each trace, the

197 amplitude spectrum was averaged by use of the direct segment method (Bath, 1974), stacking

198 the amplitude spectra of six adjacent windows of data (10 seconds duration each). The use of

199 this technique enhances the part of the spectra common to the entire waveform while reducing

200 the contributions of incoherent noise. The stacked spectra (fig. 3a-c), exhibit an overall broad

201 triangular shape peaked between 1.0 and 2.0 Hz. We compared the frequency content of non-

202 harmonic tremor with that of low-frequency earthquakes recorded during periods of ash

203 explosions activity at the volcano. Figure 4 is an example of velocity seismogram and

204 amplitude spectrum of a low frequency event recorded at station VNNS; energy appears

205 concentrated in the 1.0-4.0 Hz band with dominant peaks between 1.0 and 2.0 Hz.

206 Figure 5 shows six consecutive hours of harmonic tremor recorded at station VNSS on

207 February 18, 2005. Beneath each waveform the corresponding spectrogram is shown. The

208 spectrograms were generated moving a 1024 sample (10.24 s at 100 Hz sampling rate) sliding

209 window along the waveform, and calculating its periodogram for 512-sample overlapping

210 positions of the window. Energy is spread over the interval 0.5-5.0 Hz; the fundamental

211 frequency, in the band 0.5-2.0 Hz, is accompanied by one to three integer harmonics. Figure 6

212 shows velocity seismograms and the amplitude spectra of one-minute samples of harmonic

9 213 tremor recorded at station VNSS; the spectra are characterized by sets of integer harmonics

214 which are multiples of the 1.1 Hz fundamental frequency.

215 More complicated spectra, containing up to five harmonics, were occasionally observed. For

216 instance, figure 7 shows 1 minute of harmonic tremor recorded at station VNSS and its

217 amplitude spectrum; a set of 5 regularly spaced peaks that are integer multiples of 0.6 Hz, is

218 clearly visible.

219 The frequency content of harmonic tremor was checked for consistency across the seismic

220 network. In Figure 8 we show the velocity seismograms and power spectral density of 1

221 minute data samples recorded at four different sites; the fundamental mode and the first

222 harmonic appear clearly in the spectra at all stations suggesting that it may reflect some source

223 characteristic. On the other hand, as frequency increases, spectral peaks become less visible at

224 the stations located at greater distances from the active vent; this is, probably, the result of

225 increased attenuation that affects higher frequency waves as they travel away from the source.

226 Indeed, seismic data at Mt. Veniaminof are recorded by instruments located at distances

227 between 10.8 and 20.4 km from the active cone, the only exception being station VNSS that is

228 located 5.4 km from the vent.

229 An interesting feature of harmonic tremor at Mt. Veniaminof is that frequencies are observed

230 to change over time; spectral lines systematically move towards lower (converging lines) or

231 higher (diverging lines) values while the harmonic structure of the signal is maintained. This

232 time dependent feature of tremor, known as spectral gliding, has been observed at a number of

233 other world volcanoes including Mt. Semeru, Indonesia (Schlindwein et al, 1995), Arenal,

234 Costa Rica (Benoit and McNutt, 1997; Hagerty et al,, 2000; Julian, 2000), , Chile

235 (Hellweg, 2000), and Montserrat, West Indies (Neuberg et al., 2000). Gliding episodes at Mt.

236 Veniaminof include frequency changes between 30% and 75 % with respect to the initial value

10 237 over periods of 2-3 minutes to 10-15 minutes. Figure 9 shows about 50 minutes of harmonic

238 tremor with variable harmonic frequencies; within a time interval of about 25 minutes, three

239 gliding episodes (t1, t2, t3) can be distinguished. During period t1, the fundamental frequency

240 decreases from 1.8 Hz to 0.9 Hz in about 300 s; period t2 shows an increase from 1.0 Hz to 1.6

241 Hz in 800 s; during t3 there is a decline from 1.7 Hz to 1.1 Hz in 340 s.

242

243 Discussion

244 We have reviewed data for about two months of seismic activity at Mt. Veniaminof and

245 performed spectral analyses of volcanic tremor and LF earthquakes occurring during the

246 January-February 2005 eruption. Two types of volcanic tremor were identified: broadband

247 non-harmonic and harmonic. The spectral analyses of non-harmonic tremor and low-

248 frequency earthquakes recorded during periods of mild Strombolian activity demonstrate a

249 notable similarity between the two types of seismicity, suggesting that they may share similar

250 sources. In analogy to the mechanism proposed by Ripepe and Gordeev, (1999), we suggest

251 that non-harmonic tremor is produced by coalescence (free or forced) of gas bubbles from a

252 layer of smaller bubbles, through the surface of a magma column. LF events, accompanying

253 the explosive emission of ash at the surface, are likely related to the explosive disruption of

254 individual large gas pockets within the magma in the volcanic conduit.

255 Harmonic tremor mostly occurred during the last stages of the eruption; durations of minutes

256 to hours and spectra consisting of one up to five harmonics in the band 0.5-5.0 Hz were

257 typical. Harmonic frequencies were observed to change over time, by up to 75% with respect

258 to the initial value in 5 minutes. While the irregularly peaked spectra of non-harmonic tremor

259 and low-frequency events are attributed to mechanisms that involve gas buble coalescence and

260 gas explosions, the simple and regular spectral structure of harmonic tremor seem to require a

11 261 different interpretation in terms of its source mechanisms. In the introduction section of the

262 manuscript we discussed various theoretical models potentially able to account for the

263 generation and features of volcanic tremor. They included models based on the flow-induced

264 oscillation of elastic volcanic conduits and on the resonance of gas or fluid filled cavities.

265 Models based on flow-induced oscillations generally require long and narrow conduits and

266 high flow velocities. Hellweg (2000) showed that the generation of harmonic tremor by

267 turbulence in conduit flow, would require conduit length to diameter ratios greater than 50,

268 and flow velocities on the order of 100 m/s for andesitic magma; such magma flow velocities

269 over time periods as long as hours or days, are unlikely at a volcano that is not undergoing a

270 continuous and vigorous explosive eruption. Julian (1994, 2000) proposed a model of

271 incompressible Newtonian fluid flow through a slot-like fissure with elastic damped walls.

272 This mechanism involves flow pressures on the order of 10-15 Mpa and flow velocities of 50-

273 100 m/s, to produce frequencies on the higher end of tremor observed at Mt. Veniaminof

274 (about 5 Hz). The flow of an incompressible fluid with high flow velocities, seems not

275 appropriate to our case, although it may be suitable when more continuous and vigorous

276 eruptive activity is observed.

277 Models that involve the resonance of fluid filled cavities appear to be more suitable candidates

278 to explain the characteristics of the harmonic tremor observed at Mt. Veniaminof. A pressure

279 disturbance applied at the walls of a fluid filled fracture (Chouet, 1988) of length L and width

280 W, for example, can generate standing wave vibrations in the crack; two sets of resonance

281 modes, longitudinal and lateral (2L/n and 2W/n (n=1,2,3,…)) would be observed. We don’t

282 have evidence of 2D resonance modes, although these are likely to appear at frequencies

283 higher than those observed in the spectra at Mt. Veniaminof, that may have been attenuated

284 travelling from the source region to the distant receivers.

12 285 We infer that the features of harmonic tremor at Mt. Veniaminof are explained by a 1D

286 resonant source. In 1D resonating conduits, acoustic wavelengths excited by pressure

287 disturbances propagate along a gas or fluid column, and upon reflection in correspondence

288 with specific boundaries, interfere with the initial wave. For certain characteristic frequencies

289 of the traveling waves, resonance can be established and energy is radiated into the ground in

290 the form of seismic waves through coupling with the surrounding rocks. Specific boundary

291 conditions control the reflection in correspondence of the terminations of the resonant

292 structure, and its modes of vibration. A pipe-like conduit that is an open-open or closed-closed

293 system (matched boundary conditions) has nλ /2 (λ =wavelength, n=1,2,3,…) waves as

294 longitudinal resonance modes whereas a system with one open and one closed end (unmatched

295 boundary conditions) has (2n −1)λ / 4 (λ =wavelength, n=1,2,3,…) waves. In terms of

296 frequency, pipes with matched boundary conditions are characterized by spectra with evenly

297 spaced peaks consisting of the fundamental mode, f0 , and a set of integer harmonics which

298 are multiples of f0 ( f01,fff== 2 02 , 3f0, ... , fnfnNn ==0 ; 1,.., ); spectra that have equally

299 spaced peaks and contain only odd harmonics

300 ( f01,ffff== 3 02 , 5 0 , ... , fn =−= (2 nfn 1)0 ; 1,.., N) characterize resonant systems with

301 unmatched boundary conditions. A practical realization of this model is a conduit filled with

302 gas or bubbly magma bounded at the bottom by more viscous and incompressible magma. The

303 interface between the two phases is likely to correspond to the nucleation level within the

304 conduit. Because of the strong impedance contrast between the source fluid and the underlying

305 non vesciculated magma, this termination acts like a closed termination. The upper end of the

306 conduit can be either open to the atmosphere and act as an open termination, or obstructed by

307 a relatively viscous plug at the vent acting as a closed boundary. However, as noted by Garces

13 308 and McNutt (1997), the observation that the conduit is plugged at the vent does not necessary

309 imply that it is an acoustically closed boundary and, similarly, an open vent does not necessary

310 behave as an open termination. In fact, a conduit that is plugged may enlarge at the vent,

311 causing this boundary to act as an open termination; on the other end an open conduit may act

312 as a closed boundary if it’s constricted at the vent.

313 As opposed to other volcanoes, we do not have evidence of significant emissions of fluid lava

314 at the surface neither continuous nor episodic, and the strength of tremor, measured through

315 reduced displacement, is small. Benoit and McNutt (1997), suggested that reduced

316 displacement of the order of 20 cm2 is typical for sources processes that involve gas charged

317 magma, while lower values, on the order of 5 cm2 or less, have been measured for sources

318 involving pure gas or hydrothermal fluids. Daily averages of reduced displacement at station

319 VNSS (the closest to the active vent) rarely exceeded 1.5 cm2 during the eruptive period.

320 On the basis of the available observation, we believe that the resonance of a volume filled with

321 gas bounded at its bottom by column of magma, may account for the features of harmonic

322 tremor at Mt. Veniaminof. Degassing from the underlying magma may set up standing waves

323 in the gas chamber, hence producing harmonic spectra. The spacing of spectral peaks observed

324 in Figure 6 suggests that the system has matched boundary conditions. Schlindwein et al.

325 (1995), also noted that the greater homogeneity of gases with respect to magma, allows the

326 development of long lasting oscillations without disturbing the harmonic nature of the signal

327 even when frequency changes may occur.

328 The frequency of the signal can be measured from its spectrum; by assuming specific acoustic

329 properties of the source mixture, the length of the resonator, L, can be estimated using the

330 following equation (Hagerty et al., 2000):

14 v L = 331 2 f0 (1.1)

332 where v is the acoustic velocity of the gas/fluid at the source and f0 , is the fundamental

333 frequency measured in Hz. Mori et al. (1989) suggested that an upper limit for the acoustic

334 velocity of gas in volcanic conduits at shallow depths is about 300 m/s. Schlindwein et al.

335 (1995) have used a wave velocity in hot air of 500 m/s from Bergmann and Schaffer (1990).

336 The sound speed of pure gas mixtures can be calculated in the most simple way through the

337 formula:

338 cRTgas =⋅⋅()γ gas /M (1.2)

339 where γ is the is the adiabatic constant for the gas, T is the absolute temperature, Rgas is the

340 universal gas constant, and M is the molecular mass of the gas species. For gas compounds of

341 H2O, CO2, and SO2 , within a reasonable range of temperatures for volcanic systems (300-800

2 342 K), this formula produces estimates of sound velocities on the order of 10 meters per second.

343 The topic of the sound speed of fluids and gas mixtures, however, is complex; while single-

344 phase mixtures are relatively easy to treat, the sound velocity of multi-phase compounds, as

345 found in actual volcanic environments, is dramatically different from the that of either pure

346 component (De Angelis, 2006). In liquid-gas mixtures, that have the density of liquids but the

347 compressibility of gases, even very small variations of the volume fraction of gas can greatly

348 reduce the sound speed from a few hundred to a few meters per second (Kieffer, 1977).

349 Kumagai and Chouet (2000), have studied the acoustic properties of ash-gas mixtures; they

350 found that sound velocity for SO2–ash mixtures varied from 100 to 500 m/s depending on the

351 temperature, the size of solid particles, the pressure and the composition of the mixture. For

352 the purpose of a first order estimate of the linear dimension of the resonant conduit, we

15 353 assume a velocity of 300 m/s. Using this value, and considering the 1.1 Hz fundamental mode

354 in the spectra of Figure 6, a trivial mathematical exercise would give a conduit length of about

355 136 m according to equation (1.1). Although, we can’t constrain the sound velocity of the gas

356 mixture at the source with such a degree of accuracy, based on values widely used in literature

357 (300-500 m/s), the linear dimension of the resonant conduit can be constrained to be on the

358 order of 102 m. While, we favour a gas phase at the source, it still is not possible to discard

359 entirely the hypothesis that the source fluid is bubbly magma. If this was the case, the wave

360 velocity of volcanic fluids may vary from 2500 m/s (Murase and McBirney, 1973) to as low as

361 300 m/s (Aki et al., 1978) according to different flow conditions and magma properties (for

362 example, the more rich in gas the magma, the lower the wave velocity).

363 Spectra like those of figure 7 showing 5 well defined peaks, were occasionally observed. One

364 possible interpretation is a resonant conduit with matched boundary conditions; in this case, a

365 velocity of 300 m/s would require a 250 m-long resonating conduit to account for the observed

366 0.6 Hz standing wave vibration. Another option may be that the conduit at Mt. Veniaminof

367 generates resonant modes corresponding to both matched and unmatched conditions. Similar

368 observations have been already reported at Mt. Spurr by Garces and McNutt (1997). For short

369 periods of time, one of the conduit terminations may act as a partially open and partially

370 closed boundary (i.e. partial reflection and partial transmission); as an example, the vent may

371 be partly obstructed and partly open to the atmosphere. This model is attractive because 0.6

372 Hz is roughly half of the most commonly observed 1.1 Hz fundamental peak. Thus the main

373 structure may remain intact, and only the boundary conditions need to change to produce the

374 two sets of peaks.

375 The obvious gliding of spectral lines in figure 9 can be attributed to either variations of the

376 acoustic properties at the source or changes in the effective length of the resonator. Changes of

16 377 the acoustic velocity may results from a handful of factors such as mixing of different volatile

378 species (e.g. H2O, CO2, SO2) in variable proportions, or development of multi-phase mixtures

379 due to the presence of water and steam at shallow depths in the volcanic conduit. Variations in

380 the effective length of the resonator, instead, involve rising or falling of the bubbly magma

381 within the volcanic conduit. For instance, the gliding shown in figure 9 would require the

382 magma below the gas chamber to rise (upward gliding) or fall (downward gliding) at

383 velocities of about 0.2 m/s (t1), 0.08 m/s (t2) and 0.15 m/s (t3). These velocities are not

384 unreasonable for the flow of a bubbly magma within a volcano. Closer inspection of the

385 spectrogram in figure 9, reveals the presence of bumps and wiggles of the fundamental

386 spectral line, superimposed on the overall upward gliding. Frequency changes by about 0.1-0.2

387 Hz, roughly corresponding to 10-20 % of the most common fundamental frequency, over time

388 periods of few seconds. We think that this short term oscillatory behavior may result from

389 transient instabilities such as changes in density and composition of the volatile phases;

390 alternatively, it may be attributed to small and relatively rapid variations of the magma column

391 height around a position of unstable equilibrium caused, for instance, by quasi-periodic

392 collapse of gas bubbles (this would result in short term variations of the the effective length of

393 the resonator). Similar observations have been previously reported at Arenal volcano, Costa

394 Rica (Hagerty et al., 2000).

395 It is important to point out that resonance is not a “source mechanism” itself. Resonant

396 conduits define “source regions” that, through the propagation of standing and interface waves

397 excited by a “source trigger”, can generate harmonic spectra. The source trigger is a

398 mechanism that releases the elastic energy necessary to kickstart resonance. In the specific

399 case of Mt. Veniaminof we infer that the trigger mechanism is represented by degassing pulses

400 at the lower boundary of the resonator. The period of the signal is then stabilized by a

17 401 feedback mechanism related to the resonance itself. The long duration of the harmonic signals

402 suggests that the trigger should be continuous; this may be obtained through pressure

403 oscillations in the resonator that, once initiated by a degassing pulse from the underlying

404 magma, in turn control further degassing (Schlindwein et al., 1995).

405 We suggest that the seismic activity during November-December 2005 and early January 2006

406 at Mt. Veniaminof was related to the re-activation of the system and ascent of new magma

407 reaching up the surface. Non-harmonic volcanic tremor and low-frequency earthquake activity

408 in early January 2006, reflected degassing through the surface of a magma column that had

409 reached shallow depths. Larger ash explosions and Strombolian activity during the second half

410 of January and early February 2006 were accompanyied by swarms of LF events with larger

411 amplitudes than previously. We have suggested that these LF earthquake are related to the

412 explosive fragmentation of magma within the conduit. Between early and mid-February,2006

413 the column of magma may have slowly dropped at a lower level in the conduit, leaving a

414 “plug” of viscous material at the vent. Under these conditions harmonic tremor, may have

415 been generated around mid-February, 2006. On February 21, 2006 the earthquake activity at

416 Mt. Veniaminof abruptly ended. Since then only minor and episodic ash explosions have been

417 observed. It can be considered that the volcano has returned to its normal state of persistent

418 low-level seismic and surface activity. The cartoon in Figure 10, illustrates the evolution of

419 activity at Mt. Veniaminof volcano between late 2004 and March 2005.

420 Even though a large variety of models exist accounting for the occurrence and features of LF

421 seismic activity and volcanic tremor, their source mechanisms and propagation are still not

422 fully understood, and unanimous consensus has not been reached on these topics. Theoretical

423 models often rely on a number of assumptions. We are aware, for example, of the limitations

424 of the simple model of a fluid filled resonant cavity and that it can not ultimately explain the

18 425 manifold complexities of harmonic tremor. The intent of this manuscript, is to present

426 observations of seismic activity from an interesting case study and to point out the role that a

427 resonating source may have in the generation of harmonic tremor at Mt Veniaminof. Many

428 aspects need to be refined in the formulation of tremor models. Particularly relevant are the

429 determination of the stress conditions at fluid-solid boundaries within volcanic systems,

430 leading to a comprehesive understanding of the conditions under which acoustic energy and

431 pressure disturbances within conduits are transformed into ground vibration.

432

433 Concluding remarks

434 We performed spectral analyses of volcanic tremor and LF earthquake activity recorded

435 during the January-February 2005 eruption of Mt. Veniaminof, Alaska. Tremor had durations

436 of minutes to hours; we observed energy in the band 0.5-5.0 Hz, and spectra characterized by

437 sharp peaks irregularly or regularly spaced. Sustained non-harmonic tremor was interpreted as

438 the result of coalescence of large gas bubbles from a layer of smaller bubbles through the

439 surface of a magma column. We have suggested that the resonance of a gas-filled resonating

440 cavity may account for the occurrence and spectral features of harmonic tremor at Mt.

441 Veniaminof. Within this framework, the variable acoustic properties at the source or changes

442 in the effective length of the resonator, are possible causes for the observed time varying

443 characteristics of tremor such as spectral gliding.

444 Although the quality of present data at Mt Veniaminof is intrinsically limited by

445 instrumentation, there are several avenues for future research. The installation of new

446 instruments, such as broadband seismic sensors closer to the acive vent, may help to further

447 understand the source mechanisms of seismic signals and their propagation. Neverthless, the

19 448 January-February 2005 eruption of Mt. Veniaminof remains the best studied eruption of the

449 volcano to date, and provides a benchmark for comparing future and past eruptive activity.

450

451 Acknowledgements

452 The authors are grateful to the staff of the Alaska Volcano Observatory for their efforts

453 during the course of the eruption. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for insightful

454 comments that largely improved the manuscript. This work was supported by the Alaska

455 Volcano Observatory and the U.S.Geological Survey, as a part of their Volcano Hazards

456 Program, and by additional funds from the State of Alaska.

457

458

459

460

461

462

463

464

465

466

467

468

469

470

471

20 472

473

474

475

476 References

477 Aki K, Fehler M, and Das S (1977) Source mechanism of volcanic tremor: fluid driven cracks

478 models and their application to the 1963 Kilauea eruption. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 2: 259-

479 287

480 Aki K, Koyanagi (1981) Deep volcanic tremor and magma ascent mechanism under Kilauea,

481 Hawaii. J Geophys Res 86 B8:148-227

482 Bath M (1974) Spectral analysis in geophysiscs. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

483 Benoit J, McNutt SR (1997) New constraints on source processes of volcanic tremor at Arenal

484 volcano, Costa Rica, using broadband seismic data. Geophys Res Lett 24:449-452

485 Chouet B (1987) Resonance of a fluid-driven crack: radiation properties and implications for

486 the source of long-period events and harmonic tremor. J Geophys Res 93 B5:4375-4400

487 Crosson RS, and Bame DA (1985) A spherical source model for low frequency volcanic

488 earthquakes. J Geophys Res 90 B12:10237-10248

489 De Angelis S (2006), Analyses of unusual long-period earthquakes with extended coda

490 recorded at Katmai National Park, Alaska, USA. Geophys Res Lett 33 (in press)

491 Detterman RL, Miller TP, Yount ME, Wilson FH, (1981a) Geologic map of the Chignik and

492 Sutwik Island quadrangles, Alaska. Map I-1229, USGS

493 Detterman, RL, Miller, TP, Yount, ME, Wilson, FH, (1981b) Quaternary geologic map of the

494 Chignik and Sutwik Island quadrangles, Alaska Map I-1292, USGS

495 Fehler M (1983) Volcanic tremor at Mount St. Helens volcano. J Geophys Res 88:3476-3484

21 496 Fujita E, Ida Y, and Oikawa J (1995) Eigen oscillation of a fluid sphere and source mechanism

497 of harmonic volcanic tremor. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 69:365-378

498 Garces MA (1997) On the volcanic waveguide. J Geophys Res 102: 22547-22564

499 Garces MA, and McNutt SR (1997), Theory of the airborne sound generated in a resonant

500 magma conduit. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 78:155-178

501 Ginzburg IP (1963) Applied fluid dynamics. National Science Foundation, Washington DC.

502 Gordeev E (1993) Modelling of volcanic tremor as explosive point source in a single layered

503 elastic half-space. J Geophys Res 98: 19687-19703

504 Hagerty MT, Schwartz SY, Garces MA, Protti M (2000) Analysis of seismic and acoustic

505 observations at Arenal volcano, Costa Rica. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 101:27-65

506 Hellweg M (2000) Physical models for the source of Lascar’s harmonic tremor. J Volcanol

507 Geotherm Res 101:183-198

508 Kumagai H, Chouet B (2000) Acoustic properties of a crack containing magmatic or

509 hydrothermal fluids. J Geophys Res 25493-25512

510 Julian BR (1994) Volcanic tremor: nonlinear excitation by fluid flow. J Geophys Res

511 99:11859-11877

512 Julian BR (2000) Period doubling and other non-linear phenomena in volcanic earthquakes

513 and tremor. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 101:19-26

514 Miller TM, McGimsey RG, Richter DH, Riehle JR, Nye CJ, Yount ME, Dumoulin JA (1998)

515 Catalog of the historically active volcanoes of Alaska. 98-582, USGS

516 McNutt SR (1986) Observations and analysis of B-type earthquakes, explosions and volcanic

517 tremor at Pavlof volcano , Alaska. Bull Seismol Soc Am 76:153-175

518 McNutt SR (1994) Volcanic tremor from around the world: 1992 update. Acta Volcanologica

519 5:197-200

22 520 McNutt SR (2002) Volcano seismology and monitoring for eruptions, International handbook

521 of earthquake and engineering seismology, Volume 81 A, International Assoc. Seismol. &

522 Phys. Earth’s Interior, Committee on education, 383-406

523 Mori J, Patia H, McKee C, Lowenstein P, De Saint Ours P, Talai B (1989) Seismicity

524 associated with eruptive activity at Langila Volcano, Papua New Guinea. J Volcanol

525 Geotherm Res 38:243-255

526 Neuberg J, Luckett R, Baptie B, Olsen K (2000) Models of tremor and low frequency

527 earthquake swarms on Montserrat. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 101:83-104

528 Ripepe M, Gordeev E (1999) Gas bubble dynamics model for shallow volcanic tremor at

529 Stromboli. J Geophys Res 104: 10639-10654

530 Sánchez JJ, McNutt SR, Kumagai H, Gil-Cruz F, Londoño JM (2005) The complex

531 frequencies of long-period Seismic events at Mt. Veniaminof, Alaska. J Volcanol Geotherm

532 Res (submitted)

533 Sánchez JJ (2005) A velocity model for Mt. Veniaminof, Alaska: volcano-tectonic seismicity

534 and implications for an active magmatic system. J Volcanol Geotherm Res (submitted)

535 Sánchez JJ (2005) Volcano seismology from around the world: case studies from Pinatubo

536 (Philippines), Galeras (Colombia), Mount Wrangell and Mount Veniaminof (Alaska ). PhD

537 thesis, University of Alaska Fairbanks

538 Sassa K (1936) Volcanic microtremors and eruption earthquakes. Mem. Coll. Sci. Univ.

539 Kyoto Ser A 18:255-293

540 Schlindwein V, Wasserman J, Scherbabum F (1995) Spectral analysis of harmonic tremor

541 signals at Mt Semeru volcano, Indonesia. Geophys Res Lett 22:1685-1688

542 Simkin T, Siebert L (1994) Volcanoes of the world (2nd edition). Geoscience Press, Tucson

23 543 Thompson G, McNutt, SR, Tytgat G (2002) Three distinct regimes of volcanic tremor

544 associated with the eruption of Shishaldin volcano, Alaska 1999. Bull Volcanol 64:535-547

545 Tritton DJ (1988) Physical fluid dynamics. Clarendon press, Oxford

546

547

548

549

550

551

552

553

554

555

556

557

558

559

560

561

562

563

564

565

566

24 Date Color Code (*) Seismic observations Visual observations LF earthquakes; 4 Jan Upgraded to Yellow Ash explosions Non-harmonic tremor LF earthquakes; Ash plumes (up to 7 Jan Yellow Non-harmonic tremor 3500 ft a.s.l.) 8-10 Jan Upgraded to Orange Seismic activity increases; Ash plumes (Jan 10) LF earthquakes 10 Jan -3 Feb Orange Continuous non harmonic Ash plumes tremor; Tremor bursts; LF earthquakes 4 Feb Orange Non harmonic tremor; LF Incandescence from the earthquakes intra-caldera cone (Feb 04, 05:32 UT) 5-16 Feb Orange Continuous non harmonic Persistent ash tremor; Tremor bursts emissions 17 Feb Orange Tremor bursts; Harmonic Cloudy weather tremor prevent the view of the intra-caldera cone 18 Feb Orange Continuous harmonic tremor Cloudy

19 Feb Orange Continuous tremor ends at Cloudy 02:35 AST 20 Feb Orange No seismic activity until Cloudy 11:00 AST when harmonic tremor picks up again 21 Feb Orange LF earthquakes; Tremor Cloudy bursts; Harmonic tremor. Tremor abruptly ends at 14:00 AST 25 Feb Downgraded to No relevant seismic activity Clear weather Yellow No activity observed 4 Mar Downgraded to Green No relevant seismic activity Clear weather No activity observed

(*) Level-of-concern color code definitions. To concisely describe the level of concern about possible eruptive activity at volcanoes, the Alaska Volcano Observatory has developed a color-code classification system (http://www.avo.alaska.edu/activity.php). Green: No eruption anticipated. Volcano is in a quiet, "dormant" state. Yellow: An eruption is possible in the next few weeks and may occurr with little or no additional warning. Small earthquakes detected locally and (or) increased levels of volcanic gas emissions. Orange: Explosive eruption is possible within a few days and may occurr with little or no warning. Ash plumes not expected to 25000 feet a.s.l. Increased numbers of local earthquakes. Extrusion of a lava dome or lava flows (non explosive eruptions) may be occurring. Red: Major explosive eruption expected within 24 hours. Large ash plume(s) expected to reach at least 25000 feet a.s.l. Strong earthquake activity detected even at distant monitoring stations. Explosive eruption may be in progress.

567

568 Table 1 Summary of seismic and visual observations during the January-February 2005 eruption of

569 Mt. Veniaminof, Alaska.

25 570

571

572

573

574

575

576

577

578

579

580

581

582

583

584

585

586

587

588

589

590

591

592

593

26 594 Figure 1. Seismograph stations (white squares) at Mt. Veniaminof on a shaded relief image (courtesy

595 NASA/JPL). The active intra-caldera cone is marked by a black triangle. In the bottom right corner,

596 an index map of Alaska shows the location of Mt. Veniaminof on the Alaska Peninsula.

597 Figure 2 Images from the January-February 2005 eruption at Mt. Veniaminof, Alaska. (a) Mt.

598 Veniaminof intra-caldera cone looking N-NW. Ash cloud drifting to NE. Photo taken at ~13,000 ft

599 from a Piper Navajo aircraft (Security Aviation) during an observational overflight (Photo taken on

600 January 11, 2005. Image Creator: K. L. Wallace, Image courtesy U.S. Geological Survey); (b) Mt.

601 Veniaminof intracaldera cinder cone. Ash plume drifting to NE. Photo source same as (a); (c),(d) and

602 (e) Ash plumes at Mt. Veniaminof. Images taken on January 09, 2005 from the AVO webcam located

603 in the town of Perryville (35 km SE of the active vent); c) 16:36:44 UT, d) 16:41:44 UT, e) 16:46:43

604 UT.

605 Figure 3. Seismograms (left) and amplitude spectra (right) of non-harmonic volcanic tremor recorded

606 during January 2005 at station VNSS. Average spectra (a), (b) and (c), were calculated by stacking

607 the Fourier spectra of six 10-second adjacent windows of data.

608 Figure 4. Seismogram (top) and spectrum (bottom) of a low-frequency event recorded on February

609 04, 2005, 06:06:15 UT, at station VNSS, during a period of Strombolian activity. Inset at lower right

610 is a stack of three 10-s windows of data.

611 Figure 5. Seismograms and velocity spectrograms of six hours of harmonic tremor, one hour per

612 panel, recorded at station VNSS on February 18, 2005. Spectrograms were generated moving a 1024

613 sample sliding window over the entire waveform and calculating the periodogram for 512 sample

614 overlapping positions of the window.

615

616

617

27 618 Figure 6. Seismograms (left) and amplitude spectra (right) of harmonic tremor recorded on February

619 18-19, 2005 at station VNSS. Average spectra (a), (b) and (c), were calculated by stacking the Fourier

620 spectra of six 10-second adjacent windows of data. Spectra are characterized by narrow and regularly

621 spaced peaks, which are integer multiples of 1.1 Hz.

622 Figure 7. Seismogram (top) and amplitude spectrum (bottom) of one minute of harmonic tremor

623 recorded at station VNSS on February 18, 2005. Five harmonics are clearly visible; inter-peak and

624 origin-to-first peak spacing is 0.6 Hz. Two additional peaks may be visible at 3.6 and 4.2 Hertz,

625 although their significance is lower.

626 Figure 8. One minute of harmonic tremor recorded on February 18, 2005 at four different stations

627 across the Mt. Veniaminof seismic network, and its power spectral density (PSD). PSD represents the

628 power content of a signal in an infinitesimal frequency band. Peaks at 1.1 and 2.2 Hz are well visible

629 at all stations; peaks at higher frequencies are attenuated at stations more distant from the active vent.

630 Figure 9. Seismogram and velocity spectrogram of harmonic tremor recorded at station VNSS on

631 February 18, 2005 showing gliding . t1, t2, t3 refer to time intervals discussed in the text.

632 Figure 10. Cartoon showing the evolution of activity at Mt. Veniaminof between late 2004 and

633 March 2005: a) variable conduit configuration between late 2004 and March 2005; b) free and c)

634 forced bubble coalescence; d) bubble bursting through the surface of the magma column; d) model of

635 resonant gas chamber. Representative waveforms associated with the different processes are shown

636 (non-harmonic tremor, low frequency event, harmonic tremor from the left to the right).

637

638

639

640

641

28 642

643

644

645

646 Figure 1. Seismograph stations (white squares) at Mt. Veniaminof on a shaded relief image

647 (courtesy NASA/JPL). The active intra-caldera cone is marked by a black triangle. In the

648 bottom right corner, an index map of Alaska shows the location of Mt. Veniaminof on the

649 Alaska Peninsula.

650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658

29 659 660 661 Figure 2 Images from the January-February 2005 eruption at Mt. Veniaminof, Alaska. (a) Mt.

662 Veniaminof intra-caldera cone looking N-NW. Ash cloud drifting to NE. Photo taken at

663 ~13,000 ft from a Piper Navajo aircraft (Security Aviation) during an observational overflight

664 (Photo taken on January 11, 2005. Image Creator: K. L. Wallace, Image courtesy U.S.

665 Geological Survey); (b) Mt. Veniaminof intracaldera cinder cone. Ash plume drifting to NE.

666 Photo source same as (a); (c),(d) and (e) Ash plumes at Mt. Veniaminof. Images taken on

667 January 09, 2005 from the AVO webcam located in the town of Perryville (35 km SE of the

668 active vent); c) 16:36:44 UT, d) 16:41:44 UT, e) 16:46:43 UT.

669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676

30 677 678 679 680 681 Figure 3. Seismograms (left) and amplitude spectra (right) of non-harmonic volcanic tremor

682 recorded during January 2005 at station VNSS. Average spectra (a), (b) and (c), were

683 calculated by stacking the Fourier spectra of six 10-second adjacent windows of data.

684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697

31 698 699 700 701

702 703 704 Figure 4. Seismogram (top) and spectrum (bottom) of a low-frequency event recorded on

705 February 04, 2005, 06:06:15 UT, at station VNSS, during a period of Strombolian activity.

706 Inset at lower right is a stack of three 10-s windows of data.

707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723

32 724

725 726 727 728 Figure 5. Seismograms and velocity spectrograms of six hours of harmonic tremor, one hour

729 per panel, recorded at station VNSS on February 18, 2005. Spectrograms were generated

730 moving a 1024 sample sliding window over the entire waveform and calculating the

731 periodogram for 512 sample overlapping positions of the window.

732

33 733

734

735

736

737

738 739 740 Figure 6. Seismograms (left) and amplitude spectra (right) of harmonic tremor recorded on

741 February 18-19, 2005 at station VNSS. Average spectra (a), (b) and (c), were calculated by

742 stacking the Fourier spectra of six 10-second adjacent windows of data. Spectra are

743 characterized by narrow and regularly spaced peaks, which are integer multiples of 1.1 Hz.

744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751

34 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764

765 766 767 768 Figure 7. Seismogram (top) and amplitude spectrum (bottom) of one minute of harmonic

769 tremor recorded at station VNSS on February 18, 2005. Five harmonics are clearly visible;

770 inter-peak and origin-to-first peak spacing is 0.6 Hz. Two additional peaks may be visible at

771 3.6 and 4.2 Hertz, although their significance is lower.

772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781

35 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795

796 797 798 Figure 8. One minute of harmonic tremor recorded on February 18, 2005 at four different

799 stations across the Mt. Veniaminof seismic network, and its power spectral density (PSD).

800 PSD represents the power content of a signal in an infinitesimal frequency band. Peaks at 1.1

801 and 2.2 Hz are well visible at all stations; peaks at higher frequencies are attenuated at stations

802 more distant from the active vent.

803 804 805 806 807

36 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825

826 827 828 Figure 9. Seismogram and velocity spectrogram of harmonic tremor recorded at station VNSS

829 on February 18, 2005 showing gliding . t1, t2, t3 refer to time intervals discussed in the text.

830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840

37 841 842 843 844

845 846 847 Figure 10. Cartoon showing activity at Mt. Veniaminof between late 2004 and March 2005

848 and : a) variable conduit configuration between late 2004 and March 2005; b) free and c)

849 forced bubble coalescence; d) bubble bursting through the surface of the magma column; d)

850 model of resonant gas chamber. Representative waveforms associated with the different

851 processes are shown (non-harmonic tremor, low frequency event, harmonic tremor from the

852 left to the right).

853 854 855 856

38