Western Hemlock

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Western Hemlock Tsuga heterophylla (Raf .) Sarg. Western Hemlock Pinaceae Pine family E. C. Packee Western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla), also called Pacific hemlock and west coast hemlock, thrives in humid areas of the Pacific coast and northern Rocky Mountains. Its potential for management as an effi- cient producer of fiber has long been recognized. It is an important browse species for deer and elk. Western hemlock provides an important part of the esthetic background for eight national parks-four each in the United States and Canada. It is a pioneer on many sites, yet it is commonly the climax dominant. Although western hemlock grows like a weed, its versatility and potential for management make it the “Cinderella of the Northwest.” Habitat Native Range Western hemlock (fig. 1) is an important commer- cial tree species of the Pacific coast and northern Rocky Mountains. Along the Pacific coast, its range extends north along the Coast Ranges from central California to the Kenai Peninsula in Alaska, a dis- tance of 3200 km (2,000 mi) (11,18,33). It is the dominant species in British Columbia and Alaska along the Coast Mountains and on the coastal is- lands. Inland it grows along the western and upper east- ern slopes of the Cascade Range in Oregon and Washington and the west side of the Continental Divide of the northern Rocky Mountains in Montana and Idaho north to Prince George, BC (7,18,26). Climate Western hemlock thrives in a mild, humid climate where frequent fog and precipitation occur during the growing season. Best stands are in the humid and superhumid coastal regions. In subhumid regions with relatively dry growing seasons, western hemlock is confined primarily to northerly aspects, moist stream bottoms, or seepage sites. Within the coastal range of western hemlock, mean Figure l-The native range of western hemlock. annual total precipitation ranges from less than 380 mm (15 in) in Alaska to at least 6650 mm (262 in) tains is 560 mm (22 in) to at least 1730 mm (68 in) in British Columbia. The range in the Rocky Moun- (25). Mean annual temperatures range from 0.3” to The author is Assistant Professor of Forest Management, Univer- 11.3” C (32.5” to 52.3” F) on the coast and 2.2” to 8.2” sity of Alaska, School of Agriculture and Land Resources C (36.0” to 46.8” F) in the Rocky Mountains. Ob- Management, Fairbanks, AK. served mean July temperatures lie between 11.3” 613 Tsuga heterophylla and 19.7” C (52.3” and 67.5” F) along the coast and on soils with good drainage to 43.2 cm (17.0 in) on 14.4” and 20.6” C (58.0” and 69.0” F) in the interior. poorly drained soils (15). Commonly, the majority of Mean January temperatures reported for the two roots, especially fine roots, are concentrated just areas range from -10.9” to 8.5” C (12.4” to 47.3” F) below the organic horizon. The importance of the and -11.1” to -2.4” C (12.0” to 27.6” F), respectively. organic horizon as a continual supply of available Recorded absolute maximum temperature for the nutrients for western hemlock cannot be overstated. coast is 40.6” C (105.0” F) and for the Rocky Moun- In coastal British Columbia, earthworms are com- tains, 42.2” C (108.0” F). Absolute minimum mon in the organic horizons, even where the pH is temperatures tolerated by western hemlock are less than 4; earthworms may play an important role -38.9” C (-38.0” F) for the coast and -47.8” C (-54.0” in making nutrients available for root uptake. On F) for the interior. many soils of Oregon and Washington, however, root- The frost-free period within the coastal range of ing depths exceed 1 m (3.3 ft). western hemlock averages less than 100 to more Soil reaction (pH) under stands containing western than 280 days (25). In the Rocky Mountains, the hemlock ranges from less than 3.0 to nearly 6.0 in frost-free period is 100 to 150 days (20). the organic horizons. The pH in the surface mineral horizons ranges from 4.0 to 6.3 and that of the C Soils and Topography horizon from 4.8 to 6.2 (21). Optimum range of pH for seedlings is 4.5 to 5.0. Western hemlock is highly productive on soils with Western hemlock grows on soils derived from all a broad range of available nutrients. Evidence from bedrock types (except possibly serpentines) within its various locations on the Pacific coast suggests that range. It grows well on sedimentary (argillites, the productivity of western hemlock increases as soil shales, sandstones, limestones), metamorphic (gneis- nitrogen increases (15,21). There is no evidence that ses, marbles, quartzites, schists), and igneous (an- seedlings prefer ammonium over nitrate ions (32). desites, basalts, diorites, gabbros, granites) Phosphorus may be limiting on some sites as sug- materials. Under appropriate climatic conditions, it gested by data from Oregon showing a strong rela- thrives on all major landforms-colluvial, eolian, tion between site index and soil phosphorus (21). fluvial, lacustrine, marine, morainal, residual, rock, Although the requirement of western hemlock for and organic. cations is unclear, rooting habit and field data sug- Western hemlock grows on a variety of soils and is gest that it requires or tolerates considerable a characteristic species on soils of 6 of the 10 soil amounts of calcium. orders: Alfisols, Entisols, Histosols, Inceptisols, The range in elevation at which western hemlock Spodosols, and Ultisols; and on many great groups, grows is broad, from sea level to 2130 m (7,000 ft); including: Fragiboralfs, Fragiudalfs, Hapludalfs; its distribution varies by latitude and mountain Fluvaquents, Udifluvents, Quartzipsamments; range. On the coast, western hemlock develops best Borofolists, Cryolfolists; Cryandepts, Dystrandepts, between sea level and 610 m (2,000 ft); in the Rocky Vitrandepts, Cryaquepts, Haplaquepts, Dystro- Mountains, between 490 and 1280 m (1,600 and chrepts, Cryumbrepts, Haplumbrepts; Fragiaquods, 4,200 R) (26). Placohumods, Crvorthods, Fragiorthods, Haplor- thods; and Haplohumults. ‘It is Tound on ‘most soil textural classes. Height growth, however, decreases Associated Forest Cover with increasing clay content or soil bulk density. This is attributed to inadequate soil aeration (35) or the Western hemlock (fig. 2) is either a major or a inability of roots to penetrate compact soils. minor component in at least 20 forest cover types of Western hemlock thrives on soils with perudic and the Society of American Foresters (6). udic soil moisture regimes. If, however, internal soil drainage is restricted within 1 m (3.3 R) of the soil Pacific Rocky surface, height growth decreases (35). Western hem- coast Mountains lock is poorly suited to sites where the water table is 202 White SprucePaper Birch X less than 15 cm (6 in) below the soil surface (22). 205 Mountain Hemlock X X 206 Engelmann Spruc+Subalpine Fir X Although capable of existing on soils with moisture 210 Interior Douglas-Fir X regimes tending toward ustic or xeric, it grows poor- 212 Western Larch X ly; frequently, tops die back in years of drought. 213 Grand Fir X The soil organic horizon under mature stands ran- 215 Western White Pine X ges from less than 7 to more than 57 cm (2.8 to 22.5 218 Lodgepole Pine X in); the average depth increases from 11.4 cm (4.5 in) 221 Red Alder 614 Tsuga heterophylla Pacific Rocky Coast Mountains 222 Black Cottonwood-Willow x 223 Sitka Spruce x 224 Western Hemlock X X 225 Western Hemlock-Sitka Spruce X 226 Coastal True Fir-Hemlock X 227 Western Redcedar-Western Hemlock x X 228 Western Redcedar X 229 Pacific Douglas-Fir X 230 Douglas-Fir-Western Hemlock X X 231 Port Oxford-Cedar X 232 Redwood X The forest cover types may be either seral or climax. Tree associates specific to the coast include Patic silver fir (Abies amabilis), noble fir (A procera), bigleaf maple (Acer mucrophyllum), red alder (Alnus rubra), giant chinkapin (Castanopsis chrysophylla), Port-Orford- cedar (Chamaecyparis lawsonianu), Alaska-cedar CC. nootkatensis), incense-cedar (Libocedrus decurrens), tanoak (Lithocarpus o!ensifirus), Sitka spruce (Picea sit&en.&), sugar pine (Pinus lumbertiana), redwood (Se- quoia sempervirens), and California laurel (Umbelluluria californica). Associates occurring in both the Pacific coast and Rocky Mountain portions of its range include grand fir (Abies grandis), subalpine fir (A lasiocarpa), paper birch (Betulu papyrifira), western larch (Lanjd occiden- talis), Engelmann spruce @‘icea engelmannii), white spruce (I! glauca), lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta), western white pine (I?? monticola), ponderosa pine (r! ponderosa), black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa), Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), Pacific yew (2bxu.s brevifoliu), western redcedar (l’huja plicata), and moun- tain hemlock (Tsuga mertensiana). Western hemlock is a component of the redwood forests on the coasts of northern California and ad- jacent Oregon. In Oregon and western Washington, it is a major constituent of the Picea sitchensis, Tsuga heterophylla, and Abies amabilis Zones and is less important in the Tsuga mertensiana and Mixed- Conifer Zones (7). In British Columbia, it is a major element of the Tsuga heterophylla-Picea sitchensis, l’!zga heterophylla-Abies amabilis, l3uga heterophylla, Abies amabilis-Tsuga heterophylla, and Abies amabilis-Tsuga mertensiana Vegetation Zones; it is confined to a distinct understory portion or to moist sites in the Pseudotsuga menziesii-Tsuga heterophyl- la and Pseudotsuga menziesii Zones (25). In the Rocky Mountains, it is present in the Thuja plicata and Tsuga heterophylla Vegetation Zones and the lower portion of the Abies lasiocarpa Zone (26). Various persons have described the plant associa- tions and biogeocoenoses in which western hemlock Figure 2-Open-grown western hemlock, Coeur d’Alene National is found; more than 75 are listed for the west coast Forest, ID.
Recommended publications
  • Survey of the Taxonomic and Tissue Distribution of Microsomal Binding
    Survey of the Taxonomic and Tissue Distribution of Microsomal Binding Sites for the Non-Host Selective Fungal Phytotoxin, Fusicoccin Christiane Meyer3, Kerstin Waldkötter3, Annegret Sprenger3, Uwe G. Schlösset, Markus Luther0, and Elmar W. Weiler3 a Lehrstuhl für Pflanzenphysiologie, Ruhr-Universität, D-44780 Bochum, Bundesrepublik Deutschland b Pflanzenphysiologisches Institut (SAG) der Universität, D-37073 Göttingen, Bundesrepublik Deutschland c KFA Jülich, D-52428 Jülich, Bundesrepublik Deutschland Z. Naturforsch. 48c, 595-602(1993); received June 4/July 13, 1993 Vicia faba L., Fusicoccin-Binding Sites. Taxonomie Distribution, Tissue Distribution, Guard Cell Protoplasts The recent identification of the fusicoccin-binding protein (FCBP) in plasma membranes from monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous angiosperms has opened the basis for an elucida­ tion of the toxin’s mechanism(s) of action and indicated a widespread occurrence of the FCBP in plants. Results of a detailed taxonomic survey of fusicoccin-binding sites are reported. Bind­ ing sites were not found in prokaryotes, animal tissues, fungi and algae including the most direct extant ancestors of the land plants (Coleochaete). From the Psilotales (Psilophytatae) to the monocotyledonous angiosperms, all taxa analyzed possessed high-affinity microsomal fusicoccin-binding sites. A heterogeneous picture emerged for the Bryophvta. Anthoceros cri- spulus (Anthocerotae), the only hornwort available to study, lacked fusicoccin binding. Within the Hepaticae as well as the Musci, species lacking and species exhibiting toxin binding were found. The binding site thus seems to have emerged very early in the evolution of the land plants. The tissue distribution of fusicoccin-binding sites was studied in Vicia faba L. shoots. All tissues analyzed showed fusicoccin binding, although not to the same extent.
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution and Habitat Selection of Introduced Eastern Grey Squirrels, Sciurus Carolinensis, in British Columbia
    03_03045_Squirrels.qxd 11/7/06 4:25 PM Page 343 The Distribution and Habitat Selection of Introduced Eastern Grey Squirrels, Sciurus carolinensis, in British Columbia EMILY K. GONZALES Centre for Applied Conservation Research, University of British Columbia, Forest Sciences Centre, 3004-2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4 Canada Gonzales, Emily K. 2005. The distribution and habitat selection of introduced Eastern Grey Squirrels, Sciurus carolinensis,in British Columbia. Canadian Field-Naturalist 119(3): 343-350. Eastern Grey Squirrels were first introduced to Vancouver in the Lower Mainland of British Columbia in 1909. A separate introduction to Metchosin in the Victoria region occurred in 1966. I surveyed the distribution and habitat selection of East- ern Grey Squirrels in both locales. Eastern Grey Squirrels spread throughout both regions over a period of 30 years and were found predominantly in residential land types. Some natural features and habitats, such as mountains, large bodies of water, and coniferous forests, have acted as barriers to expansion for Eastern Grey Squirrels. Given that urbanization is replacing conifer forests throughout southern British Columbia, it is predicted that Eastern Grey Squirrels will continue to spread as habitat barriers are removed. Key Words: Eastern Grey Squirrels, Sciurus carolinensis, distribution, habitat selection, invasive, British Columbia. The vast majority of introduced species do not suc- such as backyards, parks, and cemeteries (Pasitschniak- cessfully establish populations in novel environments Arts and Bendell 1990). EGS co-occur with North (Williamson 1996). Many successful non-native species American Red Squirrels (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus) are human comensals which thrive in human-modified throughout much of their range where habitat special- environments (Williamson and Fitter 1996; Sax and ization and not competition determines the differences Brown 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • November 27,2014 Available Description Potsize 4 Abies Alba
    November 27,2014 Available Description Potsize 4 Abies alba Barabit's Spreader- std 24"hd #3 8 Abies alba Pendula #2 4 Abies alba Pendula #3 2 Abies alba Pendula #5 13 Abies alba Pyramidalis #3 213 Abies balsamea Nana #1 8 Abies balsamea Prostrata- std 18"hd #3 5 Abies balsamea Prostrata- std 2' #3 10 Abies cephalonica Meyer's Dwarf- std 18"hd #3 2 Abies concolor Blue Cloak #3 15 Abies concolor Candicans #3 8 Abies delavayi Herford #5 2 Abies forestii var. Forestii #5 20 Abies fraseri Klein's Nest- std 18"hd #3 28 Abies homolepis Tomomi- std 18"hd #3 11 Abies John's Pool #5 5 Abies koreana Gelbunt #1 7 Abies koreana Green Carpet #5 2 Abies koreana Oberon -std #3 2 Abies lasiocarpa Green Globe- 12" std #3 24 Abies lasiocarpa Green Globe #3 3 Abies nordmanniana Munsterland- std 18"hd #3 3 Abies nordmanniana Trautmann #5 2 Abies pinsapo Glauca #1 6 Abies pinsapo Glauca Nana #3 2 Abies procera Blaue Hexe- std 8"hd #3 4 Abies procera Prostrata #3 5 Abies procera Sherwoodii #3 5 Abies procera Sherwoodii #5 8 Abies veitchii Olivaceae #3 3 Abies veitchii var. Olivaceae #5 6 Acer griseum #3 1 Acer griseum #7 47 Acer griseum- 6'tall #5 14 Albizzia julibrissin #3 1 Albizzia julibrissin Summer Chocolate #3 5 Buxus microphylla John Baldwin #3 840 Buxus microphylla John Baldwin #1 20 Buxus sempervirens Faulkner #3 1 Buxus sempervirens Green Velvet #3 10 Buxus sempervirens Raket #3 263 Buxus sempervirens Suffruticosa #1 100 Buxus sempervirens Vardar Valley #1 185 Buxus sinica var.
    [Show full text]
  • GIS Handbook Appendices
    Aerial Survey GIS Handbook Appendix D Revised 11/19/2007 Appendix D Cooperating Agency Codes The following table lists the aerial survey cooperating agencies and codes to be used in the agency1, agency2, agency3 fields of the flown/not flown coverages. The contents of this list is available in digital form (.dbf) at the following website: http://www.fs.fed.us/foresthealth/publications/id/id_guidelines.html 28 Aerial Survey GIS Handbook Appendix D Revised 11/19/2007 Code Agency Name AFC Alabama Forestry Commission ADNR Alaska Department of Natural Resources AZFH Arizona Forest Health Program, University of Arizona AZS Arizona State Land Department ARFC Arkansas Forestry Commission CDF California Department of Forestry CSFS Colorado State Forest Service CTAES Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station DEDA Delaware Department of Agriculture FDOF Florida Division of Forestry FTA Fort Apache Indian Reservation GFC Georgia Forestry Commission HOA Hopi Indian Reservation IDL Idaho Department of Lands INDNR Indiana Department of Natural Resources IADNR Iowa Department of Natural Resources KDF Kentucky Division of Forestry LDAF Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry MEFS Maine Forest Service MDDA Maryland Department of Agriculture MADCR Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation MIDNR Michigan Department of Natural Resources MNDNR Minnesota Department of Natural Resources MFC Mississippi Forestry Commission MODC Missouri Department of Conservation NAO Navajo Area Indian Reservation NDCNR Nevada Department of Conservation
    [Show full text]
  • Susceptibility of Larch, Hemlock, Sitka Spruce, and Douglas-Fir to Phytophthora Ramorum1
    Proceedings of the Sudden Oak Death Fifth Science Symposium Susceptibility of Larch, Hemlock, Sitka Spruce, and 1 Douglas-fir to Phytophthora ramorum Gary Chastagner,2 Kathy Riley,2 and Marianne Elliott2 Introduction The recent determination that Phytophthora ramorum is causing bleeding stem cankers on Japanese larch (Larix kaempferi (Lam.) Carrière) in the United Kingdom (Forestry Commission 2012, Webber et al. 2010), and that inoculum from this host appears to have resulted in disease and canker development on other conifers, including western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla (Raf.) Sarg.), Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco), grand fir (Abies grandis (Douglas ex D. Don) Lindl.), and Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carrière), potentially has profound implications for the timber industry and forests in the United States Pacific Northwest (PNW). A clearer understanding of the susceptibility of these conifers to P. ramorum is needed to assess the risk of this occurring in the PNW. Methods An experiment was conducted to examine the susceptibility of new growth on European (L. decidua Mill.), Japanese, eastern (L. laricina (Du Roi) K. Koch), and western larch (L. occidentalis Nutt.); western and eastern hemlock (T. canadensis (L.) Carrière); Sitka spruce; and a coastal seed source of Douglas-fir to three genotypes (NA1, NA2, and EU1) of P. ramorum in 2011. In 2012, a similar experiment was conducted using only the four larch species. Container-grown seedlings or saplings were used in all experiments. Five trees or branches of each species were inoculated with a single isolate of the three genotypes by spraying the foliage with a suspension of zoospores (105/ml).
    [Show full text]
  • Guide Alaska Trees
    x5 Aá24ftL GUIDE TO ALASKA TREES %r\ UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE Agriculture Handbook No. 472 GUIDE TO ALASKA TREES by Leslie A. Viereck, Principal Plant Ecologist Institute of Northern Forestry Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station ÜSDA Forest Service, Fairbanks, Alaska and Elbert L. Little, Jr., Chief Dendrologist Timber Management Research USD A Forest Service, Washington, D.C. Agriculture Handbook No. 472 Supersedes Agriculture Handbook No. 5 Pocket Guide to Alaska Trees United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Washington, D.C. December 1974 VIERECK, LESLIE A., and LITTLE, ELBERT L., JR. 1974. Guide to Alaska trees. U.S. Dep. Agrie., Agrie. Handb. 472, 98 p. Alaska's native trees, 32 species, are described in nontechnical terms and illustrated by drawings for identification. Six species of shrubs rarely reaching tree size are mentioned briefly. There are notes on occurrence and uses, also small maps showing distribution within the State. Keys are provided for both summer and winter, and the sum- mary of the vegetation has a map. This new Guide supersedes *Tocket Guide to Alaska Trees'' (1950) and is condensed and slightly revised from ''Alaska Trees and Shrubs" (1972) by the same authors. OXFORD: 174 (798). KEY WORDS: trees (Alaska) ; Alaska (trees). Library of Congress Catalog Card Number î 74—600104 Cover: Sitka Spruce (Picea sitchensis)., the State tree and largest in Alaska, also one of the most valuable. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402—Price $1.35 Stock Number 0100-03308 11 CONTENTS Page List of species iii Introduction 1 Studies of Alaska trees 2 Plan 2 Acknowledgments [ 3 Statistical summary .
    [Show full text]
  • Species of Alaska Scolytidae: Distribution, Hosts, and Historical Review
    1. ENTOMOL. Soc. BRIT. COLUMBIA 99. DECEMBER 2002 83 Species of Alaska Scolytidae: Distribution, hosts, and historical review MALCOLM M. FURNISS UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO, MOSCOW, ID 83843. EDWARD H. HOLSTEN U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOREST SERVICE, FOREST HEALTH PROTECTION, ANCHORAGE, AK 99503 MARK E. SCHULTZ U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOREST SERVICE, FOREST HEALTH . PROTECTION, JUNEAU, AK 99508 ABSTRACT The species of Scolytidae in Alaska have not been compiled in recent times although many of them are included in earlier broader works. The authors of these works are summarized in a brief history of forest entomologists in Alaska. Fifty-four species of Alaskan Scolytidae are listed (23 species in the subfamily Hylesininae and 31 in the subfamily Scolytinae) belonging to 24 genera (II in Hylesininae and 13 in Scolytinae). Th ey in fest IS species of trees and shrubs of which 10 are conifers (host to 48 species of Scolytidae) and 5 are angiosperms (host to 6 species of Scolytidae). Fifty species are bark beetl es that inhabit phloem and four species are ambrosia beetles that live in sapwood. All are species native to Alaska. Keywords: Bark beetles, Scolytidae, conifers, angiosperms, Alaska INTRODUCTION The biographic regions of Alaska reflect the great expanse of that state, extending over a wide range of latitude, longitude, and elevation. In broad terms, these regions are characterized by a relatively mild and moist coastal climate, particularly in the southeast and coastal south-central areas; an extensive drier, colder climate in interior and northern Alaska; and numerous mountain ranges that attain the highest elevation on the continent.
    [Show full text]
  • “VANCOUVER ISLAND” NORTHERN PYGMY-OWL Glaucidium Gnoma Swarthi Original Prepared by John Cooper and Suzanne M
    “VANCOUVER ISLAND” NORTHERN PYGMY-OWL Glaucidium gnoma swarthi Original prepared by John Cooper and Suzanne M. Beauchesne Species Information British Columbia The Vancouver Island Northern Pygmy-Owl is Taxonomy endemic to Vancouver Island and possibly the adjacent Gulf Islands (AOU 1957; Campbell et al. Of the seven subspecies of Northern Pygmy-Owl 1990; Cannings 1998). currently recognized in North America, three breed in British Columbia including Glaucidium gnoma Forest regions and districts swarthi that is endemic to Vancouver Island and Coast: Campbell River, North Island, South Island adjacent islands (AOU 1957; Cannings 1998; Campbell et al. 1990; Holt and Petersen 2000). Ecoprovinces and ecosections Glaucidium gnoma swarthi is noticeably darker than COM: NIM, NWL, OUF, QCT, WIM other subspecies; however, there is some uncertainty GED: LIM, NAL, SGI in the validity of swarthi’s status as a subspecies (Munro and McTaggart-Cowan 1947; Godfrey Biogeoclimatic units 1986). Taxonomy of the entire G. gnoma complex CDF: mm requires further examination as there may be two or CWH: dm, mm, vh, vm, xm more species within the complex (Johnsgard 1988; MH: mm, mmp, wh Holt and Petersen 2000). Broad ecosystem units Description CD, CG, CH, CW, DA, FR, GO, HP, MF, SR The Northern Pygmy-Owl is a very small owl Elevation (~17 cm in length). It has no ear tufts and has a In British Columbia, Northern Pygmy-Owls (not relatively long tail. A pair of black patches on the G. gnoma swarthi) nests have been found between nape is a distinguishing feature. 440 and 1220 m although individuals have been Distribution recorded from sea level to 1710 m (Campbell et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Larch, Which Is the Largest of the American Larches, Occurs Throughout the Forests of West- Ern Montana, Northern Idaho, and East- Ern Washington and Oregon
    Forest An American Wood Service Western United States Department of Agriculture Larch FS-243 The spectacular western larch, which is the largest of the American larches, occurs throughout the forests of west- ern Montana, northern Idaho, and east- ern Washington and Oregon. Western larch wood ranks among the strongest of the softwoods. It is especially suited for construction purposes and is exten- sively used in the manufacture of lumber and plywood. The species has also been used for poles. Water-soluble gums, readily extracted from the wood chips, are used in the printing and pharmaceutical industries. F–522053 An American Wood Western Larch (Lark occidentalis Nutt.) David P. Lowery1 Distribution Western larch grows in the upper Co- lumbia River Basin of southeastern British Columbia, northeastern Wash- ington, northwest Montana, and north- ern and west-central Idaho. It also grows on the east slopes of the Cascade Mountains in Washington and north- central Oregon and in the Blue and Wallowa Mountains of southeast Wash- ington and northeast Oregon (fig. 1). Western larch grows best in the cool climates of mountain slopes and valleys on deep porous soils that may be grav- elly, sandy, or loamy in texture. The largest trees grow in western Montana and northern Idaho. Western larch characteristically occu- pies northerly exposures, valley bot- toms, benches, and rolling topography. It occurs at elevations of from 2,000 to 5,500 feet in the northern part of its range and up to 7,000 feet in the south- ern part of its range. The species some- times grows in nearly pure stands, but is most often found in association with other northern Rocky Mountain con- ifers.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Literature on Lepidoptera
    1965 Joumal of the Lepidopterists' Society 245 RECENT LITERATURE ON LEPIDOPTERA Under this heading are ineluded abstracts of papers and books of interest to lepidopterists. The world's literature is searched systematically, and it is intended that every work on Lepidoptera published after 1946 will be noticed here. Papers of only local interest and papers from this Joumal are listed without abstract. Read­ ers, not in North America, interested in assisting with the abstracting, are invited to write Dr. P. F . Bellinger (Department of Biological Sciences, San Fernando Valley State College, Northridge, California, U.S.A.). Abstractor's initials are as follows: [P.B.] - P. F. BELLINGER [W.H.] - W. HACKMAN [N.O.] - N. S. OBRAZTSOV [I.C.] - I. F. B. COMMON [T.I.] - TARO IWASE [C.R.] - C. L. REMINGTON [W.c.] - W. C. COOK [T.L.] - T. W. LA NGER [J.T.] - J. W. TILDEN [A.D.] - A. DIAKO NOFF [J.M.] - J. MOUCHA [P.V.] - P. E. L. VIETTE [J.D.] - JULIAN DO NAHUE [E.M.] - E. G. MUNROE B. SYSTEMATICS AND NOMENCLATURE Niculescu, Eugen, "Papilionidae" [in Rumanian]. Fauna Republicii Populare Ro­ mine, vol. XI, fasc. 5, 103 pp., 8 pIs., 32 figs. Academy of Sciences, Bucuresti. 1961. [price 6,40 Lei]. In the introductory part the author describes the taxonomy of all genera of Roumanian Papilionidae with remarks on the exotic species also. In the taxonomic part (pp.41-103 ) all spp. which occur in Rou­ mania are described. In this country occur: Papilw machaon, Iphiclides podalirius, Zerynthia polyxena, Z. cerisyi, Pamassius mnemosyne, & P. apollo. [J.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Insect Conditions in the United States 1966
    FOREST INSECT CONDITIONS IN THE UNITED STATES 1966 FOREST SERVICE ' U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Foreword This report is the 18th annual account of the scope, severity, and trend of the more important forest insect infestations in the United States, and of the programs undertaken to check resulting damage and loss. It is compiled primarily for managers of public and private forest lands, but has become useful to students and others interested in outbreak trends and in the location and extent of pest populations. The report also makes possible n greater awareness of the insect prob­ lem and of losses to the timber resource. The opening section highlights the more important conditions Nationwide, and each section that pertains to a forest region is prefaced by its own brief summary. Under the Federal Forest Pest Control Act, a sharing by Federal and State Governments the costs of surveys and control is resulting in a stronger program of forest insect and disease detection and evaluation surveys on non-Federal lands. As more States avail themselves of this financial assistance from the Federal Government, damage and loss from forest insects will become less. The screening and testing of nonpersistent pesticides for use in suppressing forest defoliators continued in 1966. The carbamate insecticide Zectran in a pilot study of its effectiveness against the spruce budworm in Montana and Idaho appeared both successful and safe. More extensive 'tests are planned for 1967. Since only the smallest of the spray droplets reach the target, plans call for reducing the spray to a fine mist. The course of the fine spray, resulting from diffusion and atmospheric currents, will be tracked by lidar, a radar-laser combination.
    [Show full text]
  • The Forestry Commission's Contingency Plan
    Western Spruce Budworm (Choristoneura freemani), Eastern Spruce Budworm (Choristoneura fumiferana) Black-Headed Budworm (Acleris gloverana and Acleris variana) – Contingency Plan Combined Budworm: Draft contingency plan INTRODUCTION 1. Serious or significant pests require strategic-level plans developed at a national level describing the overall aim and high-level objectives to be achieved, and setting out the response strategy for eradicating or containing outbreaks. 2. The UK Plant Health Risk Group (PHRG) has commissioned, following identification by the UK Plant Health Risk Register, pest-specific contingency plans for those pests which pose the greatest risk and require stakeholder consultation. 3. The purpose of these pest-specific contingency plans is to ensure a rapid and effective response to outbreaks of the pests or diseases described. They are designed to help government agencies anticipate, assess, prepare for, prevent, respond to and recover from pest and disease outbreaks. 4. Contingency planning starts with the anticipation and assessment of potential threats, includes preparation and response, and finishes with recovery. Anticipate 5. Gathering information and intelligence about the pest, including surveillance and horizon scanning. Assess 6. Identifying concerns and preparing plans. 7. Setting outbreak management objectives Prepare 8. Ensuring staff and stakeholders are familiar with the pest. Response 9. Identifying the requirements for either containing or eradicating the pest or disease, including work to determine success. 10. The Defra Contingency Plan for Plant Health in England (in draft) gives details of the teams and organisations involved in pest and disease response in England, and their responsibilities and governance. It also 2 | Combined budworm contingency plan | Dafni Nianiaka | 24/01/2017 Combined Budworm: Draft contingency plan describes how these teams and organisations will work together in the event of an outbreak of a plant health pest.
    [Show full text]