DOCSLIB.ORG

What the Skin Betting Lawsuits Could Mean for Social Gaming

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
What the Skin Betting Lawsuits Could Mean for Social Gaming Law and Legislation GETTING REAL: WHAT THE SKIN BETTING LAWSUITS COULD MEAN FOR SOCIAL GAMING Faced with several lawsuits, CS:GO developer Valve has acted decisively to The plaintiff claimed the casino element of stop third-party sites offering skin betting, but if the courts now hold that skins Game of War was illegal gambling. The court have “real-world” value, the entire skins system—and all similar gaming— disagreed and held that the game itself was could be at risk, writes Jessica A. Feil of Ifrah Law. not a gambling “machine” as defined in the state statutes. While the holding focused on eSports is the new, burgeoning, competitive The social gaming cases and the physical mechanics of the game, the tone video game industry. Starting with popular virtual prizes of the opinion stressed the difference between video games for home play, now there are In four recent social gaming cases, plaintiffs real-world and virtual goods. According to international tournaments and professional sued various mobile social game creators for the court, the virtual goods have no real value leagues organized around the games. But losses due to alleged illegal gambling. Yet, in except to enhance gameplay. Further, the with growth comes legal challenges. One all of these cases, the courts have sided with ability to sell the items on an unsanctioned major game creator, Valve Corporation, has the game creators. The grounds for dismissal secondary market did not establish a real- been named as a defendant in three putative in these cases illuminate a similar theme: world value for the virtual items. class action lawsuits. The crux of these cases courts are reluctant to impose “real world” Another case, Kater v. Churchill Downs, is whether the “skins” that players win in value on virtual winnings. reached the same result as Machine Zone. their games are “things of value” as typically In Mason v. Machine Zone, the plaintiff Churchill Downs operates Big Fish Casino, understood in the gambling context. The sued Machine Zone, maker of Game of which is a free-to-play casino mobile app. skins started as a fun add-on to the game War: Fire Age, for violations of various state Within the app, players can purchase extra experience, but have now become the basis laws prohibiting gambling. Game of War is chips with real money. However, using real for an online gambling industry run by third- a mobile app that allows players to create money was not required, as players received party websites. a virtual empire. Within the game, players new chips for free every day. Further, the While there is no case law or legislation obtain virtual “gold” through completing chips could never be cashed in for real- directly on point, similar issues have been tasks, and players can also purchase gold world prizes. Nonetheless, an unauthorized addressed in the social gaming context. with real money if they so choose. The gold secondary market had developed where The social gaming cases were making can be used at a variety of in-game activities, players sold the virtual chips for real money. progress with several rulings drawing the including a casino. The in-game casino The court held that the chips the players distinction between virtual currency and offered virtual prizes that enhanced further won were not “things of value” because they real-world currency. The courts had sided gameplay. Although there was no real world were purely virtual prizes that only extended with the game operators and dismissed monetary value on the virtual gold or casino game play—there was never a chance for cases premised on illegal gambling laws. prizes, an unauthorized secondary market the player to cash out within the game. The However, the Valve lawsuits threaten to had sprung up where some players sold their court refused to consider the monetary value unravel this progress. virtual tokens for real money. established on the secondary market because 10 | iGamingBusiness North America | Issue 26 | August/September 2016 Law and Legislation doing so would reward plaintiffs for violating When Valve began releasing skins for an audience that often skews towards a the game’s terms of service. its games, their platform used an open very young demographic. In fact, two of Two other cases, Soto v. Sky Union and API to allow players to trade skins among the lawsuits against Valve specifically are Phillips v. Double Down Interactive, have themselves as an enhancement to their brought by parents of minors who engaged garnered similar results. The Sky Union case personal gaming. With access to an open in skin gambling. Given the larger potential was very similar to Machine Zone, as players API, skin gambling websites quickly evolved. monetary losses and perception of targeting spent virtual currency at a slot machine On these sites, players could wager their of children, there has been a more significant contained within a game-of-skill mobile app. skins to win better ones on casino-style public outcry over skin gambling. In holding that there was no illegal gambling, games and then cash out for real money In light of the lawsuits, Valve has begun the court stated that the “players may be on separate third-party marketplaces. to make changes. The company issued a ecstatic when they win rare [virtual prizes], but Valve, although not expressly promoting or cease-and-desist letter to 23 skin gambling these items have no measurable value. They supporting the gambling, did nothing to stop sites, ordering them to shut down—most are therefore not prizes under the statue.” In the sites even though they ran afoul of Valve’s have complied. Valve has also closed their the Double Down case, which involved a free- terms of service. API. These remedial measures show that the to-play casino mobile app, the court noted that The plaintiffs in the cases against Valve company is serious about preserving their unlike a real world casino, there is no winner claim that the skins have a real-world value business and enforcing their terms of service. or loser when a player purchases tokens in a determined by the third-party marketplace. Although Valve is reforming its operations, the lawsuits are still pending. Gamers “While the courts were quick to turn a skeptical love to extol the value of their skins, but legally, it is better if the courts continue eye to the virtual prizes in the social gaming cases, with the skepticism demonstrated in the social gaming cases. If the courts hold that there is no assurance the same would happen in skins are things of value, the entire skins Valve’s case.” system—and all similar gaming—could be at risk. A case law conflict between social virtual game. The player loses the money at Further, because these sites could not exist gaming and eSports would be daunting for the time of purchase and can only win virtual without the open API and Valve (at least) future game creators and operators. Without prizes, not real money. Further, the game looking the other way, Valve allegedly clarity in the law, there is little guidance operator never has a stake in the outcome of had implicitly sanctioned skin gambling. for developers to follow as they create new the game, so they are never a “winner” like a In contrast, the social gaming operators products. Fortunately, Valve appreciates the real world casino. had actively enforced their terms of seriousness of this moment and has followed service and regularly sought to shut down the lead of the social games by moving to Skin betting lawsuits threaten to upend unauthorized marketplaces. actively enforce its terms of service. social gaming’s progress While the courts were quick to turn a Right now, the players and operators will These four big victories for online gaming skeptical eye to the virtual prizes in the social have to wait out the lawsuits—and enjoy skins were almost for naught. Three different gaming cases, there is no assurance the only within the video games. class action lawsuits were filed against Valve same would happen in Valve’s case. In the Corporation within a six-week period, and social gaming cases, players lost relatively each of these lawsuits allege that Valve is small amounts of money—typically in the supporting unlawful online gambling in the hundreds of dollars. However, a single Jessica A. Feil is an associate at Ifrah Law, in Washington form of skin gambling. Skins are in-game skin can sell for hundreds or thousands D.C. Her practice focuses on tokens that give video game players the ability of dollars. Moreover, the gambling sites iGaming and white collar criminal to move through games more efficiently. seemingly target an underage market. defense. She graduated from the The skins can take the form of special Some of the operators have millions of Case Western Reserve University School of Law weapons, potions, or strength enhancements, followers on YouTube or other social media and worked as an Assistant Prosecuting Attorney in Cuyahoga County, Ohio prior to joining Ifrah Law. depending on the video game. outlets where they promote gambling to iGamingBusiness North America | Issue 26 | August/September 2016 | 11 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Skin Gambling
    UNDERSTANDING SKIN GAMBLING A guide to what skin gambling is, how it works, the demand for skin gambling, recent controversy, the legal issues, and the key takeaways for the regulated gambling industry. CHRIS GROVE 2016 Partner, Narus Advisors Thanks to increasing coverage from the mainstream media and a recent rash of controversies, skin betting - online wagering conducted in digital items instead of money - has become a topic of interest to many in the gambling industry . This white paper provides a concise but comprehensive education on the fundamentals of skin betting, the size and nature of the market for skin betting, the legal landscape, and some key takeaways for commercial gambling stakeholders . TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW 1 What are skins? . .2 How do players acquire skins? . 2. How do people bet skins? . .2 How large is the market for skin betting? . .3 SKIN BETTING: INDUSTRY TIMELINE 4 Introduction and growth . 4. Recent controversy . .4 SKIN GAMBLING AND THE LAW 5 KEY TAKEAWAYS FOR THE COMMERCIAL GAMBLING INDUSTRY 6 Strong demand for gambling exists among esports fans . .6 That demand may not be obvious through the prism of traditional gambling . 6. Focus on speed, simplicity, social (and skins) . .6 APPENDIX A 7 APPENDIX B 7 AN IMPORTANT NOTE As we prepare to publish this paper (July 2016), the skin gambling industry is facing an existential threat from game developer Valve. The game developer is seeking to shut down skin betting sites, a move that appears to be meeting at least some resistance from the sites. We believe that even if Valve is successful in largely eradicating skin gambling, the product still deserves careful attention as a possible template for a new class of gambling products that will prove popular with esports fans and the new generation of gamblers they represent.
    [Show full text]
  • Gambling and Video Games: Are Esports Betting and Skin Gambling Associated with Greater Gambling Involvement and Harm?
    RESEARCH REPORT Gambling and video games: are esports betting and skin gambling associated with greater gambling involvement and harm? July 2020 responsiblegambling.vic.gov.au © Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation, July 2020 This publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. The licence does not apply to any images, photographs, branding or logos. This report has been peer reviewed by two independent researchers. For further information on the foundation’s review process of research reports, please see responsiblegambling.vic.gov.au. For information on the Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation Research Program visit responsiblegambling.vic.gov.au. Disclaimer The opinions, findings and proposals contained in this report represent the views of the authors and do not necessarily represent the attitudes or opinions of the Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation or the State of Victoria. No warranty is given as to the accuracy of the information. The Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation specifically excludes any liability for any error or inaccuracy in, or omissions from, this document and any loss or damage that you or any other person may suffer. Conflict of interest declaration The authors declare no conflict of interest in relation to this report or project. To cite this report Greer, N, Rockloff, M, Russell, Alex M. T., 2020, Gambling and video games: are esports betting and skin gambling associated with greater gambling involvement and harm?, Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation,
    [Show full text]
  • DISTRIBUTING PRODUCTIVE PLAY: a MATERIALIST ANALYSIS of STEAM Daniel Joseph Doctor of Philosophy Ryerson University, 2017
    DISTRIBUTING PRODUCTIVE PLAY: A MATERIALIST ANALYSIS OF STEAM by Daniel Joseph Master of Arts, Ryerson University and York University, Toronto, Ontario 2011 Bachelor of Arts, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, 2009 A dissertation presented to Ryerson University and York University in partial fulfillment for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the program of Communication and Culture Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2017 © Daniel Joseph, 2017 AUTHOR'S DECLARATION FOR ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF A DISSERTATION I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this dissertation. This is a true copy of the dissertation, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I authorize Ryerson University to lend this dissertation to other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I further authorize Ryerson University to reproduce this dissertation by photocopying or by other means, in total or in part, at the request of other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I understand that my dissertation may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract DISTRIBUTING PRODUCTIVE PLAY: A MATERIALIST ANALYSIS OF STEAM Daniel Joseph Doctor of Philosophy Ryerson University, 2017 Valve Corporation’s digital game distribution platform, Steam, is the largest distributor of games on personal computers, analyzed here as a site where control over the production, design and use of digital games is established. Steam creates and exercises processes and techniques such as monopolization and enclosure over creative products, online labour, and exchange among game designers. Stuart Hall’s encoding/decoding framework places communication at the centre of the political economy, here of digital commodities distributed and produced by online platforms like Steam.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Esports Betting and Skin Gambling
    A brief history of esports betting and skin gambling What this article is about Electronic sports (esports) are competitive video Why is this article important? game matches. Esports are like professional sports. This article reviews and summarizes current The matches take place between skilled players or knowledge on electronic sports (esports) and skin teams. They can be viewed online or in-person with betting. The research highlights the increasing large audiences. Esports are organized events and its popularity of these newer forms of gambling. It athletes can take on celebrity status. shows that young males are more likely to engage Esports has existed since the 1980s. It has grown in esports and skin betting. Young people are also exponentially since 2011 with the launch of Twitch. exposed to advertisements for these activities. Twitch is a live-streaming platform for esports. In Esports and skin gambling may increase problem 2019, there were 454 million viewers and esports gambling. This article highlights the changes in made a total of $1.1 billion. Individuals who watch esports and skin gambling market. It also discusses esports tend to be younger and male. industry and government responses to concerns about these activities, particularly related to Today, many sports betting companies allow people underage gambling. to bet on esports. Also, people can gamble on esports through unregulated sites using skins. Skins are virtual search covered papers published in English from 2000 video game items. They are purely cosmetic and do to March 2019. not provide in-game advantages. Skins are collectible The authors found 10 journal articles and 10 and range from common to rare.
    [Show full text]
  • More Than Just Skin(S) in the Game: How One Digital Video Game Item Is Being Used for Unregulated Gambling Purposes Online
    MORE THAN JUST SKIN(S) IN THE GAME: HOW ONE DIGITAL VIDEO GAME ITEM IS BEING USED FOR UNREGULATED GAMBLING PURPOSES ONLINE John Vrooman Haskell* I. Introduction “The guy who invented poker was bright, but the guy who invented the chip was the genius.” -Julius Weintraub On September 27, 2016, the Washington State Gambling Commission (“WSGC”) issued a cease and desist letter to the popular video game developer, the Valve Corporation (“Valve”).1 Asserting that they are in violation of Washington State gambling law, the cease and desist letter emanates from Valve’s alleged involvement in a quickly evolving industry known throughout the world as “skin *J.D. Candidate, Suffolk University Law School, 2018; Editor-in-Chief, The Jour- nal of High Technology Law, 2017-18; B.A., History, Virginia Commonwealth University, 2015. 1 See Letter from David E. Trujillo, Director, Wash. State Gambling Comm’n, to Gabe Newell, Valve Corp. (Sept. 27, 2016) (on file with Esports Betting Report) (ordering Valve to cease violating Washington State gambling laws). The letter goes on to order Valve to show the steps they have made to bring Valve into “full compliance” with Washington State Gambling Law by October 14, 2016. Id. Copyright © 2017 Journal of High Technology Law and John Vrooman Haskell. All Rights Reserved. ISSN 1536-7983. 126 JOURNAL OF HIGH TECHNOLOGY LAW [Vol. XVIII: No.1 gambling” or “skin betting.”2 As denoted by the letter, the WSGC sets forth that by turning a blind eye to the enforcement of its regula- tion against the usage of “bot” accounts,
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Perspective on Loot Boxes and Gambling
    Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology Volume 20 Issue 1 Article 5 3-7-2019 Precious and Worthless: A Comparative Perspective on Loot Boxes and Gambling Andrew Vahid Moshirnia Chicago-Kent College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mjlst Part of the Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, Gaming Law Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons Recommended Citation Andrew V. Moshirnia, Precious and Worthless: A Comparative Perspective on Loot Boxes and Gambling, 20 MINN. J.L. SCI. & TECH. 77 (2018). Available at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mjlst/vol20/iss1/5 The Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology is published by the University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing. Precious and Worthless: A Comparative Perspective on Loot Boxes and Gambling Andrew V. Moshirnia* Abstract Odds-based microtransactions in video games, or “loot boxes,” offer users a chance to get special game items for actual money (i.e., legal tender), as opposed to acquiring this “loot” through in-game achievements. This feature provides revenue for game developers and allows users to acquire items that would otherwise require hours of gameplay. But loot boxes threaten to degrade game design and foist addictive mechanics on vulnerable users. Loot-box purchasers, much like pathological gamblers placing a wager, report an initial rush when opening a loot box and then a wave of regret and shame. This problem is especially acute in underage consumers who spend thousands of dollars to gain a desired item. Governments are aware of this disturbing trend and are attempting to regulate or outright ban the practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Skin Gambling: Teenage Britain's Secret Habit
    Skin gambling: teenage Britain’s secret habit A Parent Zone report 28 June 2018 Introduction This research began because one young person told us he thought skin gambling was a problem. It turned out he was not alone. Two in five young people who know about it agree. We share their concern. Our investigation has uncovered a complicated ecosystem of games, sites and services that knowingly and unknowingly facilitate gambling with virtual currencies. With the help of young gamers, we have learnt that in-game purchases and rewards can easily be used to gamble, and that young people have enterprising ways to fund gambling activity. It is a world that people who aren’t in it know little about, but gamers – including young gamers – navigate with ease. At Parent Zone, we encourage families to enjoy technology. We promote the concept of digital resilience because resilient young people are more likely to benefit from time online and less likely to experience harm. However, to help young people flourish online, we have to take steps to ensure that the digital world isn’t evolving into a space that takes advantage of them. We can’t allow new harms to emerge beyond the oversight of those who have young people’s best interests at heart. It’s important that they can take risks but that should not include being exploited by services that allow activity we have already decided is illegal for under-18s. Skin gambling is one such activity. We are calling for a special inquiry to identify ways in which this problem can be tackled.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Loot Boxes an Illegal Gambling Mechanic?
    Are Loot Boxes An Illegal Gambling Mechanic? By James Gatto and Mark Patrick A member of the United Kingdom’s Parliament has opened an inquiry into the legality of loot boxes. Loot boxes are virtual items that may be redeemed to receive a randomized selection of additional virtual items. Various countries around the world have recently moved to regulate the provision of loot boxes in video games, often in response to inquiries from consumers or legislators, such as the aforementioned inquiry in the UK. This leads to the ultimate question: are loot boxes legal? Some believe that they are a form of gambling. Others see them as an effective, but legal, game monetization technique. The answer, as it is with many legal issues, is “it depends.” The primary legal issue is whether the loot box mechanic constitutes gambling. Other issues, which are addressed below, include whether the age rating of games with loot box mechanics should be impacted based on the inclusion of the game mechanic, and whether consumer protection laws require disclosure of the odds of obtaining certain virtual items through loot boxes. The short answer on the primary issue is that most, “standard” loot box mechanics should not be deemed gambling, in most countries. However, a number of factors discussed below could alter the result. It is critical to understand that this issue is quite fact-specific and slight changes in the facts can lead to a different result. Furthermore, the relevant laws vary by jurisdiction. Various jurisdictions are looking into the need for further regulation in this area, so it is important to stay abreast of continuing developments.
    [Show full text]
  • How Video Games Expose Children to Gambling
    Gambling on games How video games expose children to gambling Gambling themes, simulated gambling and outright gambling for objects with monetary value are found in a range of video games, including some of the most popular. Changes to the classification system to restrict gambling content to adults would go some way to addressing this problem. Discussion paper Bill Browne February 2020 About The Australia Institute The Australia Institute is an independent public policy think tank based in Canberra. It is funded by donations from philanthropic trusts and individuals and commissioned research. We barrack for ideas, not political parties or candidates. Since its launch in 1994, the Institute has carried out highly influential research on a broad range of economic, social and environmental issues. About the Centre for Responsible Technology The Australia Institute established the Centre for Responsible Technology to give people greater influence over the way technology is rapidly changing our world. The Centre will collaborate with academics, activists, civil society and business to shape policy and practice around network technology by raising public awareness about the broader impacts and implications of data-driven change and advocating policies that promote the common good. Our philosophy As we begin the 21st century, new dilemmas confront our society and our planet. Unprecedented levels of consumption co-exist with extreme poverty. Through new technology we are more connected than we have ever been, yet civic engagement is declining. Environmental neglect continues despite heightened ecological awareness. A better balance is urgently needed. The Australia Institute’s directors, staff and supporters represent a broad range of views and priorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Skin Gambling
    SKIN GAMBLING January 30, 2018 HB 2881 | Public Hearing House Committee on Public Safety Washington State GAMBLING COMMISSION WHAT ARE SKINS? Skins are virtual items that can be used in games like Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS:GO). They change the appearance of a player’s weapon or equipment. The skins simply change the appearance of weapons, having no effect on the functionality or power of the weapons. CS:GO’s AWP (Arctic Warfare Police) sniper rifle is shown in its original state and with various skins. HOW DO PLAYERS GET SKINS? Players can get skins in a variety of ways. In CS:GO, players can acquire skins by: • Receiving them while playing the game • Receiving them as a promotional giveaway • Trading skins with other players • Purchasing skins on third-party marketplace sites HOW DO PLAYERS BET SKINS? To understand how skins work, it’s important to think of skins as simple units containing value – like a poker chips. Like poker chips, CS:GO skins can be traded between players and the house. This functionality enables skins to serve as a currency that can be used for wagering in any type of gambling activity you can imagine. Here’s how it works: 1. Players “deposit” skins at a skin betting site (sportsbooks, roulette, etc.). 2. They gamble using their deposited skins. 3. If they win, they’re paid in additional skins, which they “cash out” by requesting that the skin betting site transfer skins back to the player. 4. Once players have skins in their Steam account, they can: • Leave the skins in their inventory; OR • Use the skins to change the appearance of their weapons; OR • Trade skins with other players; OR • Sell skins on the Steam marketplace for Steam credit (not cash) that can be used to buy other skins and games via Steam; OR • Exchange skins for cash on third-party sites outside of Steam.
    [Show full text]
  • Response to DCMS Call for Evidence on Loot Boxes, Ending 22/11/20
    Response to DCMS call for evidence on loot boxes, ending 22/11/20 Parent Zone provides insights and projects to help families make the most of the digital future for children. We have been working on the links between gaming and gambling for several years. In the past couple of years, we have conducted two independent research projects, qualitative and quantitative (with IPSOS Mori), into the links between gambling and online games. The first focused on skin gambling, Skin Gambling: Teenage Britain’s Secret Habit, 20181. The second, ​ ​ The Rip-Off Games2, looked at loot boxes. ​ In addition, we recently partnered with GambleAware to develop Gaming or Gambling, two ​ ​ short films plus accompanying materials to help families learn about the gambling-like risks that eight-to-eleven-year-olds may face when playing online games - and give simple, practical advice to help ensure gaming remains fun and safer. Our conclusion is that on the basis of the following factors: ● the gambling-like behaviours that loot boxes inculcate; ● the techniques borrowed from the gambling industry to keep children opening loot boxes; ● the links to gambling on skin gambling websites; ● and a growing body of evidence of links between loot box opening and problem gambling, the precautionary principle dictates that the Government should classify loot boxes as gambling, and regulate them accordingly. Gambling-like behaviours The business model of online gaming has changed. When video games were first invented. they were bought on disk, complete. Now they are downloaded from the internet, opening the way for continual upgrades and updates, and providing a gateway to perpetual spending opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthesis of the Works Carried on by GREF Egambling Working Group with Regard to the Implementation of the Declaration of Gambli
    Synthesis of the works carried on by GREF1 eGambling Working Group with regard to the implementation of the Declaration of gambling regulators on their concerns related to the blurring of lines between gambling and gaming May 2019 1 Gaming Regulators’ European Forum - http://www.gref.net/ 1 Table of contents Introduction Findings 1. Game as a service/Micro-transactions 2. Loot-boxes 3. Tradability of in-game items/Skin Gambling 4. Public perceptions 5. Consumer information/Protection of minors Conclusions Annexes 1. Declaration of gambling regulators on their concerns related to the blurring of lines between gambling and gaming – signed version 2. Economic review on video games, social gaming, micro-transactions and skin gambling – January 2019 3. Available publications 2 About GREF & the eGambling Working Group The Gaming Regulators European Forum (GREF) is a platform set up by the public authorities of its respective member nations, who are tasked with the regulation of gaming and gambling within their respective territories. GREF was originally established in 1989, with the objectives of acting as a forum whereby European gaming regulators could meet to exchange views and information, and discuss policy on gaming matters. GREF is currently made up of thirty-six gaming regulators hailing from thirty-one European countries. The eGambling & Technical Standards Working Group is one of three discussion groups within the ambit of GREF. 3 Introduction The Declaration of gambling regulators on their concerns related to the blurring of lines between gambling and gaming (hereinafter the Declaration)2 was first proposed and discussed during the meeting of this Working Group on May 30th 2018 at GREF Conference 2018 in Prague.
    [Show full text]