DOCSLIB.ORG

William Shakespeare 1564 – 1616

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
William Shakespeare 1564 – 1616 William Shakespeare 1564 – 1616 1 Výběrová bibliografie William Shakespeare 1564 -1616 vznikla při příležitosti 400. výročí smrti jmenovaného britského dramatika. W. Shakespeare byl a stále zůstává jednou z nejdůležitějších autorit literárního světa. Tato bibliografie Vám nabízí přehled titulů ve fondu Městské knihovny Jihlava, příspěvkové organizace, které jsou buď dílem W. Shakespeare, nebo se jeho tvorbou či jeho životem zabývají. Všechny zde uvedené tituly se nacházejí v hlavní budově na adrese Hluboká 1, Jihlava. ©Městská knihovna Jihlava, příspěvková organizace; Barbora Balli 2016 2 Obsah První patro ...................................................................................................... s. 4 Beletrie ................................................................................... tituly číslo 1 - 53 Informační pult: .................................................................... tituly číslo 54 - 55 Cizojazyčná literatura; signatura E 821: ................................. tituly číslo 56 - 71 Poezie ................................................................................... tituly číslo 72 - 74 CD; DVD; signatura E ............................................................. tituly číslo 75 - 76 O Shakespearovi; beletrie: .................................................... tituly číslo 78 - 84 Signatura 792 ................................................................................. titul číslo 85 Signatura 820/899 ................................................................. tituly číslo 86 - 89 Cizojazyčná literatura o W. Shakespearovi ..................................... titul číslo 90 Druhé patro ..................................................................................................... s. 9 Studovna ............................................................................... tituly číslo 91 - 95 Signatura 94 ................................................................................. tituly číslo 96 Signatura 929 ...................................................................... tituly číslo 97 - 104 Signatura 001.9 .......................................................................... tituly číslo 105 Třetí patro ..................................................................................................... s. 10 Dětské oddělení – beletrie: ............................................... tituly číslo 106 - 126 Dětské oddělení - signatura 82: .................................................. tituly číslo 127 Dětské oddělení - signatura 92: ......................................... tituly číslo 128 - 130 Dětské oddělení - signatura 93/99: ............................................ tituly číslo 131 Dětské oddělení cizojazyčná literatura - signatura M E 821: .... tituly číslo 132 - 137 Studovna pro mládež: .................................................................. titul číslo 138 Audio záznamy hudební oddělení: .................................... tituly číslo 140 - 142 3 První patro Beletrie 1. SHAKESPEARE, William. Antická dramata. 1. vyd. Praha : Euromedia Group - Odeon, 1983. 539 s. 2. SHAKESPEARE, William. Antonius a Kleopatra. V tomto souboru 1. vyd. Praha : Evropský literární klub : Euromedia Group - Knižní klub, 2006. 151 s. ISBN 80-242-1774-0. 3. SHAKESPEARE, William. Benátský kupec : Komedie o 20 scénách. 1. vyd. Praha : Orbis, 1955. 189 s. 4. SHAKESPEARE, William. Bouře. Vyd. 2. Brno : Atlantis, 2007. 105 s. ISBN 978-80-7108-288-0. 5. SHAKESPEARE, William. Coriolanus : [premiéra 29. a 30. ledna 2004 v Národním divadle : divadelní program]. V Praze : Národní divadlo, c2004. 177 s. ISBN 80-7258-138-4. 6. SHAKESPEARE, William. Dobrý konec všechno spraví. V tomto souboru 1. vyd. Praha : Evropský literární klub : Euromedia Group - Knižní klub, 2006. 122 s. ISBN 80-86316-65-3. 7. SHAKESPEARE, William. Dva vznešení příbuzní. V tomto souboru 1. vyd. Praha : Evropský literární klub : Euromedia Group - Knižní klub, 2006. 123 s. ISBN 80-86316-66-1. 8. SHAKESPEARE, William. Dvojí majestát. 1. vyd. Praha : Československý spisovatel, 1970. 119 s. 9. SHAKESPEARE, William. Hamlet. V Tribunu EU vyd. 1. Brno : Tribun EU, 2010. 143 s. ISBN 978-80-7399-350-4. 10. SHAKESPEARE, William. Hamlet králevic dánský. 1. vyd. Praha : Československý spisovatel, 1981. 163 s., ilustr. 11. SHAKESPEARE, William. Historie. 1. 1. vyd. Praha : Státní nakladatelství krásné literatury a umění, 1964. 889 s. 12. SHAKESPEARE, William. Historie II. Básně : Král Richard III. Král Jindřich VIII. Perikles. Venuše a Adonis. Zneuctění Lukrécie. Sonety. 1. vyd. Praha : Státní nakladatelství krásné literatury a umění, 1964. 786 s. 13. SHAKESPEARE, William. Hry : Sen noci svatojánské : Romeo a Julie : Hamlet : Othello. 1. vyd. Praha : Mladá fronta, 1965. 444 s. 14. SHAKESPEARE, William. Jak se vám líbí. V Tribunu EU vyd. 1. Brno : Tribun EU, 2009. 87 s. ISBN 978-80-7399-222-4. 15. SHAKESPEARE, William. Jindřich IV. : Falstaffovo babí léto. Vyd. 2., V nakl. Artur vyd. 1. Praha : Artur, 2013. 111 s. ISBN 978-80-87128-99-2. 16. SHAKESPEARE, William. Jindřich V. Vyd. v tomto překladu 2., V naklad. Academia 1. Praha : Academia, 2009. 125 s. ISBN 978-80-200-1807-6. 17. SHAKESPEARE, William. Jindřich VI. Díl 1. V tomto souboru 1. vyd. Praha : Evropský literární klub, 2004. 112 s. ISBN 80-86316-57-2. 18. SHAKESPEARE, William. Jindřich VI. Díl 2. V tomto souboru 1. vyd. Praha : Evropský literární klub, 2004. 126 s. ISBN 80-86316-58-0. 19. SHAKESPEARE, William. Jindřich VI. Díl 3. V tomto souboru 1. vyd. Praha : Evropský literární klub, 2004. 142 s. ISBN 80-86316-59-9. 4 20. SHAKESPEARE, William. Jindřich VIII. V tomto souboru 1. vyd. Praha : Evropský literární klub : Knižní klub, 2009. 129 s. ISBN 978-80-86316-84-0. 21. SHAKESPEARE, William. Julius Caesar. V Tribunu EU vyd. 1. Brno : Tribun EU, 2013. 106 s. ISBN 978-80-7399-224-8. 22. SHAKESPEARE, William. Komedie. 1. 1. vyd. Praha : Státní nakladatelství krásné literatury, hudby a umění, 1959. 662 s. 23. SHAKESPEARE, William. Komedie. 2. 1. vyd. Praha : Státní nakladatelství krásné literatury, hudby a umění, 1959. 676 s. 24. SHAKESPEARE, William. Komedie omylů. Praha : Evropský kulturní klub : Euromedia Group - Knižní klub, 2000. 80 s. ISBN 80-86316-13-0. 25. SHAKESPEARE, William. Král Jan. V tomto souboru vyd. 1. Praha : Evropský literární klub : Knižní klub, 2009. 105 s. ISBN 978-80-86316-83-3. 26. SHAKESPEARE, William. Král Lear : tragédie v pěti jednáních. Praha : Dobrovský, 2014. 166 s. ISBN 978-80-7390-143-1. 27. SHAKESPEARE, William. Kupec benátský. V tomto překladu vyd. 4. Praha : Academia, 2007. 98 s. ISBN 978-80-200-1541-9. 28. SHAKESPEARE, William. Macbeth. Vyd. 2. Brno : Atlantis, 2008. 117 s. ISBN 978-80-7108- 299-6. 29. SHAKESPEARE, William. Marná lásky snaha : veselá duchaplná komedie nazvaná : jak byla provedena před Její Výsostí o posledních Vánocích. V nakl. Artur vyd. 1. Praha : Artur, 2011. 139 s. ISBN 978-80-87128-75-6. 30. SHAKESPEARE, William. Mnoho povyku pro nic. V Tribunu EU vyd. 1. Brno : Tribun EU, 2012. 93 s. ISBN 978-80-263-0280-3. 31. SHAKESPEARE, William. Něco za něco. V tomto souboru 1. vyd. Praha : Evropský literární klub : Euromedia Group - Knižní klub, 2006. 117 s. ISBN 80-86316-64-5. 32. SHAKESPEARE, William. Nesmrtelné myšlenky. Praha : Aurora, 2005. 111 s. ISBN 80-7299- 083-7. 33. SHAKESPEARE, William. Othello. V Tribunu EU vyd. 1. Brno : Tribun EU, 2009. 127 s. ISBN 978-80-7399-348-1. 34. SHAKESPEARE, William. Perikles. Vyd. 1. Praha : Nadace Lyry Pragensis, 1997. 124 s. ISBN 80- 7059-057-2. 35. SHAKESPEARE, William. Půjčka za oplátku. 1. vyd. Praha : Orbis, 1967. 128 s. 36. SHAKESPEARE, William. Richard III. V Tribunu EU vyd. 1. Brno : Tribun EU, 2008. 141 s. ISBN 978-80-7399-353-5. 37. SHAKESPEARE, William. Romeo a Julie. V nakl. Artur vyd. 1. Praha : Artur, 2010. 156 s. ISBN 978-80-87128-46-6. 38. SHAKESPEARE, William - MOLIERE. Romeo a Julie. Tartuffe. 1. vyd. Praha : Mladá fronta, 1985. 213 s. 39. SHAKESPEARE, William. Sen noci svatojánské. Vyd. 5. Brno : Atlantis, 2013. 113 s. ISBN 978- 80-7108-341-2. 40. SHAKESPEARE, William. Šest her. Svazek první. 1. vyd. tohoto souboru. Brno : Atlantis, 1992. 290 s. ISBN 80-7108-042-X. 5 41. SHAKESPEARE, William. Šest her. 2. 1. vyd. Brno : Atlantis, 1995. 392 s. ISBN 80-7108-100-0. 42. SHAKESPEARE, William. Timon Aténský. V tomto souboru 1. vyd. Praha : Evropský literární klub : Euromedia Group - Knižní klub, 2006. 111 s. ISBN 80-242-1774-0. 43. SHAKESPEARE, William. Titus Andronicus. V tomto souboru 1. vyd. Praha : Evropský literární klub : Euromedia Group - Knižní klub, 2006. 113 s. ISBN 80-242-1774-0. 44. SHAKESPEARE, William. Tragédie. 1. vyd. Praha : Odeon, 1983. 637 s. ISBN váz. 45. SHAKESPEARE, William. Tragédie. 1. díl, Troilus a Kressida. Coriolanus. Titus Andronicus. Romeo a Julie. Timon athénský. Julius Caesar. 1. vyd. Praha : Státní nakladatelství krásné literatury a umění, 1962. 669 s. 46. SHAKESPEARE, William. Tragický příběh dánského prince Hamleta. 1. vyd. Praha : Československý spisovatel, 1959. 269 s. : il. 47. SHAKESPEARE, William. Troilus a Kressida. : činohra. Praha : Národní divadlo, c2012. 142 s. ISBN 978-80-7258-411-6. 48. SHAKESPEARE, William. Tři tragédie. Praha : Odeon, 2012. 171 s. ISBN 978-80-207-1428-2. 49. SHAKESPEARE, William. Večer tříkrálový, aneb, Co kdo chce. Brno : Větrné mlýny, 2005. 113 s. ISBN 80-86151-77-8. 50. SHAKESPEARE, William. Veselé paničky windsorské. Vyd. 2. Brno : Atlantis, 2009. 133 s. ISBN 978-80-7108-310-8. 51. SHAKESPEARE, William. Veta za vetu. V Tribunu EU vyd. 1. Brno : Tribun EU,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Shakespearean Character and Cultural Change in the Eighteenth Century Amanda Cockburn, Department of Engl
    “Magical Glasses”: Shakespearean Character and Cultural Change in the Eighteenth Century Amanda Cockburn, Department of English, McGill University, Montreal October 2011 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) © Amanda Cockburn, 2011 Acknowledgements I would like to acknowledge the exceptional guidance provided by my two supervisors, Paul Yachnin and Fiona Ritchie. Paul Yachnin’s enthusiasm for this project always put wind in my sails. I invariably left our meetings with a clearer vision of my own argument, thanks to Paul’s ability to help me untangle or articulate an idea with which I’d been struggling. I also left our meetings and took from our email exchanges a renewed determination and energy with which to approach my research. I am especially grateful for such a kind and generous mentor during my intellectual growth at McGill. I am also grateful for Fiona’s expertise in shaping this dissertation. Her knowledge of the field struck me many times as dauntingly encyclopedic, and I am indebted to her learning and indispensible feedback. I thank her for consistently pointing me to articles and books that proved invaluable to the development of my argument. I also must thank both Paul and Fiona for their extraordinarily perceptive and meticulous editing. I likewise thank members of the Shakespeare and Performance Research Team at McGill University, especially Michael Bristol for our conversations about Shakespeare and moral philosophy, and Wes Folkerth, whose graduate class on Shakespearean Character helped form the initial idea for this project. I am also deeply indebted to SPRITE for sending me twice to the Folger Shakespeare Library, that wonderful treasure trove, where I whet my appetite for archival work and afternoon tea.
    [Show full text]
  • Group Sales Tickets
    SHAKESPEARE THEATRE COMPANY 21st Annual Table of Contents D.C.’s favorite Feature Letter from Michael Kahn 5 The Two Faces of Capital summer by Drew Lichtenberg 6 Program Synopsis 11 theatre event About the Playwright 13 Title Page 15 Cast 17 is back! Cast Biographies 18 PRESENTED BY Direction and Design Biographies 22 Shakespeare Theatre Company Tickets will be available Board of Trustees 8 online and in line! Shakespeare Theatre Company 26 Individual Support 28 Visit ShakespeareTheatre.org/FFA for more details on how to get your tickets via lottery Corporate Support 40 or at Sidney Harman Hall on the day of the Foundation and performance. Tickets for 2011–2012 Season Government Support 41 subscribers available through the Box Office Academy for Classical Acting 41 beginning July 5, 2011, at 10 a.m. For the Shakespeare Theatre Company 42 Join the Friends of Free Staff 44 JULIUS For All for tickets! Audience Services 50 Free For All would not be possible without Creative Conversations 50 CAESAR the hundreds of individuals who generously donate to support the program each year. “ Only with the help of the Friends of Free For All is STC able to offer free performances, All hail Julius Caesar! making Shakespeare accessible to … One of the best productions of this or any season.” Washington, D.C., area residents every summer. The Washingtonian In appreciation for this support, Friends of Free For All receive exclusive benefits during This Year's Production: the festival such as reserved Free For All tickets, the option to have tickets mailed in August 18–September 4 advance, special event invitations, program recognition and more.
    [Show full text]
  • Connie Furr Professor School of Film, Dance, and Theatre Arizona State University PO Box 872002 Tempe, AZ 85287-2002 602-617-7234 [email protected]
    Connie Furr Professor School of Film, Dance, and Theatre Arizona State University PO Box 872002 Tempe, AZ 85287-2002 602-617-7234 [email protected] EDUCATION: Master of Fine Arts – University of Tennessee, 1986 Bachelor of Creative Arts – University of North Carolina, Charlotte, 1983 ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS : Professor, Arizona State University, 2014-present Associate Professor, (with tenure), Arizona State University, 2003-2012 Assistant Professor, Arizona State University, 2001-2003 Guest Artist, Arizona State University, 2000-2001 Associate Professor (with tenure), University of Florida-Gainesville, 1994-1998 Assistant Professor, University of Florida-Gainesville, 1989-1994 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: Southeastern Theatre Conference (SETC) (1980-Present) United States International Technical Theatre (USITT) (2000-Present) United Scenic Artist, Local 829 (1998-Present) Costume Society of America (2010-Present) TEACHING: Courses at Arizona State University: History of Fashion (redesigned as an online course 2013) History of Fashion II (redesigned as an online course 2015) Costume Crafts Drawing Advanced Scenography Scenography Introduction to Costuming Costume Design Costume Design II Advanced Costume Design (Graduate Students) Advanced Scenography (Graduate Students) Design Studio Advanced Costumes Orientation to Theatre and Film Production supervision (student designers) at Arizona State University: Dryland (2015) Brooklyn Bridge (2015) Streetcar Named Desire (2015) This Girl Laughs, This Girl Cries, This Girl Does Nothing romeo & juliet
    [Show full text]
  • Christian Casper
    CHRISTIAN CASPER 1200 Braeburn Road Mobile: 704 807 8198 Charlotte, NC 28211 Home: 704 366 4828 [email protected] EDUCATION 1994 Bachelor of Fine Arts, Theatre (Performance) - Boise State University 1998 Master of Fine Arts (Acting) - University of San Diego, the Globe Theatres - Professional Actors Training Program TRAINING Sanford Meisner Acting Technique - Richard Klautsch Shakespeare Training - Richard Easton Voice - Claudia Hill Sparks Body and Movement, Yoga – Gerhard Gessner Acting - Richard Seer EMPLOYMENT 2013-Present Assistant Professor of Theatre, Johnson C. Smith University, Charlotte, NC 2017-Present Davidson College, Summer Theatre 2010-2012 Instructor of Acting, Department of Theatre, Davidson College 2012 Acting and Theatre Instructor, Central Piedmont Community College 2012 Educational Director, Shakespeare, Charlotte Shakespeare Festival 2011-2010 Instructor of Acting, Central Piedmont Community College 2008-2009 Manager, Educational Programs, Discovery Place 2005-2006 Instructor, John Robert Powers Acting Studio 2002-2004 Instructor, The Valley Shakespeare Company 2000 Instructor, Hudson Valley Shakespeare Festival 1996-1998 Instructor, The Globe Theatres 1996 Instructor, Idaho Shakespeare Festival 1991-1994 Assistant to Chair, Boise State University SERVICE 1987-1990 Honorable Discharge from the United States Army TEACHING Johnson C. Smith University, Charlotte, NC (2013- present) Introduction to Theatre, Acting, Directing, Play Analysis, Shakespeare, Modern Drama Davidson Community Players, Summer Workshops, Davidson,
    [Show full text]
  • VI Shakespeare
    VI Shakespeare GABRIEL EGAN, PETER J. SMITH, ELINOR PARSONS, JONATHAN HARTWELL, ANNALIESE CONNOLLY, RICHARD WOOD, STEVE LONGSTAFFE, JON ORTEN AND EDEL LAMB This chapter has four sections: 1. Editions and Textual Studies; 2. Shakespeare in the Theatre; 3. Shakespeare on Screen; 4. Criticism. Section 1 is by Gabriel Egan; section 2 is by Peter J. Smith; section 3 is by Elinor Parsons; section 4(b) is by Jonathan Hartwell; section 4(c) is by Annaliese Connolly; section 4(d) is by Richard Wood; section 4(e) is by Steve Longstaffe; section 4(f) is by Jon Orten; section 4(g) is by Edel Lamb. 1. Editions and Textual Studies One major critical edition of Shakespeare appeared in 2007: Katherine Duncan-Jones and H.R. Woudhuysen edited Shakespeare’s Poems: Venus and Adonis, The Rape of Lucrece and the Shorter Poems for the Arden Shakespeare series. An edition of the Complete Works of Shakespeare by Jonathan Bate and Eric Rasmussen appeared from an alliance of the Royal Shakespeare Company and Macmillan, but is of little scholarly interest. The parts of the Oxford Collected Works of Thomas Middleton, edited by Gary Taylor and John Lavagnino, that overlap with the concerns of this review are of considerable scholarly interest and will be noticed. Uniquely for an Arden edition, Duncan-Jones and Woudhuysen’s book is comprised of two major works, Venus and Adonis and The Rape of Lucrece, and they think that Shakespeare might well have conceived of them as a pair, albeit perhaps not until he began the second one. The title-page epigraph of Venus and Adonis is a quotation from Ovid about cheap shows pleasing the crowds, and this Duncan-Jones and Woudhuysen think might be an allusion to Shakespeare’s theatre work in an effort to distance the present book from it (pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Shakespeare and Modeling Political Subjectivity
    SHAKESPEARE AND MODELING POLITICAL SUBJECTIVITY Christian D. Worlow, B.A., M.A. Dissertation Prepared for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS December 2013 APPROVED: Jacqueline Vanhoutte, Major Professor Robert Upchurch, Committee Member Kevin Curran, Committee Member David Holdeman, Chair of the Department of English Mark Wardell, Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Worlow, Christian D. Shakespeare and Modeling Political Subjectivity. Doctor of Philosophy (English), December 2013, 234 pp., 5 figures, bibliography, 237 titles. This dissertation examines the role of aesthetic activity in the pursuit of political agency in readings of several of Shakespeare’s plays, including Hamlet (1600), A Midsummer Night’s Dream (1595), The Tempest (1610), the history plays of the second tetralogy (1595-9), Julius Caesar (1599), and Coriolanus (1605). I demonstrate how Shakespeare models political subjectivity—the capacity for individuals to participate meaningfully in the political realm—as necessitating active aesthetic agency. This aesthetic agency entails the fashioning of artistically conceived public personae that potential political subjects enact in the public sphere and the critical engagement of the aesthetic and political discourses of the subjects’ culture in a self- reflective and appropriative manner. Furthermore, these subjects should be wary auditors of the texts and personae they encounter within the public sphere in order to avoid internalizing constraining ideologies that reify their identities into forms less conducive to the pursuit of liberty and social mobility. Early modern audiences could discover several models for doing so in Shakespeare’s works. For example, Hamlet posits a model of Machiavellian theatricality that masks the Prince's interiority as he resists the biopolitical force and disciplinary discourses of Claudius's Denmark.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fight Master, May 1987, Vol. 10 Issue 2
    Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar Fight Master Magazine The Society of American Fight Directors 5-1987 The Fight Master, May 1987, Vol. 10 Issue 2 The Society of American Fight Directors Follow this and additional works at: https://mds.marshall.edu/fight Part of the Acting Commons, Other Theatre and Performance Studies Commons, Performance Studies Commons, and the Theatre History Commons American Fencers Supply Co 1180 Folsom Street San Francisco CA 94103 415/863-7911 UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF AMERICAN FIGHT DIRECTORS May 1987 Volume X number 2 CHARACTERIZATION BY COMBAT by Dennis R. Henneman 15 RALPH FAULKNER by Richard J. Gradkowski 19 STUNT ARRANGING FOR "KAY O'BRIEN" by Craig Turner 24 "Kill Men I' Th' Dark?" by Julie Tjaden 26 SLAPSTICK IN THE COMMEDIA DELL'ARTE by Lloyd Caldwell 34 MAKE SCABBARDS THE EASIEST WAY by Rod Casteel 37 Shogun Macbeth 37 The War Ofor The Roses 38 As You Like It 3 Editor's Comments 4 President's Report 6 Vice President's Report 7 Treasurer's Report 40 Letters 43 Points of Interest 47 Society News THE FIGHT MASTEll Society of American Fight Directors Journal of the Society of American Ficht Directors PresIdentPresident JosephJosepb Martinez Vice President PresideDt Drew Fracber Fracher Editor LindaLiDda Carlyle McCollum Treasurer Da'f'idD.'f'id Boushey AsaociateAssociate Editor Olga Lyl,.Lyl•• Secretary Linda McConum McCollum Contributing EdilOn EditoR David BoolheyBou1hcy JosephJoaepb Martjncz. Martinez. TbeThe Society of American PighlFight Duectors.waa Directora.waI founded in May, 1977. It iais aI non­non- Layout Editor GmggGregg HillmarHillmu profit organization whose aim iaill to promote the art of fight choreography as u Graphic Design AtiloAkito On&l:.a Ooat.a UJID internal part of the entertainment induatry.indu3try.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tension Between Humanism and Hegemony in Shakespeare's
    The Freedom to Enslave: The Tension Between Humanism and Hegemony in Shakespeare’s "The Tempest" The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:37736788 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA The Freedom to Enslave: The Tension between Humanism and Hegemony in Shakespeare’s The Tempest Bridget M. Martin A Thesis in the Field of English For the Degree of Master of Liberal Arts in Extension Studies Harvard University November 2017 © 2017 Bridget Mary Martin Abstract This study examines the tension between humanism and hegemony in The Tempest and how that tension situates Prospero’s island as a microcosm for Elizabethan England. The central paradox of the play is the humanist sorcerer’s decision to implement a hegemonic structure on the island mirroring the European hierarchy that betrayed him in Milan. Drawing on Hegel’s Master-Slave Dialectic and New Historicist criticism, this study interprets the play as a series of power relations, with Prospero having absolute authority over the island inhabitants – Miranda, Ariel, and Caliban – and later, the shipwrecked Europeans. Through Prospero’s relationship with his daughter, his subordination of Ariel and Caliban, and the power dynamics between the shipwrecked Italians, Shakespeare repeatedly demonstrates that human beings across social classes harbored humanist desires to shape their own identities in order to exert personal agency and strive for fulfillment – a social phenomenon epitomized by Prospero’s own ascent to becoming an omnipotent sorcerer.
    [Show full text]
  • TEXAS STATE VITA (Note: for All Entries, List Most Recent Items First.)
    1 TEXAS STATE VITA (Note: For all entries, list most recent items first.) I. ACADEMIC/PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND A. Name Joe Falocco Title Dr. B. Educational Background (Degrees, Years, Universities, Majors, Thesis/Dissertation) PhD English 2006 (Renaissance and Dramatic Literature) UNC Greensboro Doctoral Dissertation: “Elizabethan Staging in the Twentieth Century: Theatrical Practice and Cultural Context” (Winner of 2006 Dissertation of the Year Award). MFA Performance 2000 Roosevelt University BA Acting 1997 DePaul University School for New Learning C. University Experience (Position, University, Dates) June 2016 – Present Texas State University, San Marcos Associate Professor; Department of English August 2011 – June 2016 Texas State University, San Marcos Assistant Professor; Department of English August 2010 – May 2011 Livingstone College; Salisbury, NC Associate Professor; Department of English. August, 2008 – May 2010 Penn State Erie, The Behrend College; Erie, PA Lecturer; Departments of English, Communications, and Integrative Arts. August, 2007 – May 2008 Rockford College; Rockford, IL Visiting Assistant Professor; Department of Theatre. August, 2003 – May 2007 Catawba College; Salisbury, NC Adjunct Professor; Department of Theatre. August, 2000 - May, 2003 Arkansas State University; Jonesboro, AR Assistant Professor: Department of Theatre. ** Achieved within Full Professor Window 2 II. TEACHING B. Courses Taught At Texas State: ENG 2310 British Lit to 1750 ENG 3354 Early Shakespeare ENG 4355 Late Shakespeare ENG 4355/HON 3396
    [Show full text]
  • Shakespeare and the Idea of the Theatre in the Eighteenth Century
    Faculty of English Twin Stars: Shakespeare and the Idea of the Theatre in the Eighteenth Century James Harriman-Smith Peterhouse University of Cambridge This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2015 1 Acknowledgements This thesis owes much to many. Fred Parker was a true Doktorvater to me, while John Leigh, Christopher Tilmouth, Zoe Svendsen, Peter de Bolla, Stefan Uhlig, Jenny Mander and my students all made me grateful to be doing this PhD at Cambridge. Joseph Roach, Catherine Alexander, Margreta de Grazia, François Lecercle, Laurence Marie, Elizabeth Eger and Frans de Bruyn all freely gave, in a variety of media and countries, excellent advice and encouragement for the improvement of this thesis. My final manuscript benefited enormously from the keen eyes of Clare Bucknell, Matthew Ward, Roger Harcourt, Katherine Hambridge, Mike Ryall, Aurélie Wach, Sean Ferguson and, especially, Catherine Crimp. Any mistakes that remain I acknowledge mine. Last, my thanks and love to my mother, without whose sacrifices I would not be where I am today, and to Anne-Charlotte Husson, without whom I would not be one half of who I am. Declarations This dissertation does not exceed the regulation length, including footnotes, references and appendices but excluding my bibliography and translations. This dissertation is the result of my own work and includes nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration except as specified in the text. This dissertation is not substantially the same as any that I have submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for a degree or diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution.
    [Show full text]
  • VII Shakespeare
    VII Shakespeare Downloaded from GABRIEL EGAN, PETER J. SMITH, ELINOR PARSONS, ELISABETTA TARANTINO, DANIEL CADMAN, http://ywes.oxfordjournals.org/ ARUN CHETA, GAVIN SCHWARTZ-LEEPER, JOHANN GREGORY, SHEILAGH ILONA O’BRIEN, AND LOUISE GEDDES This chapter has four sections: 1. Editions and Textual Studies; 2. Shakespeare in the Theatre; 3. Shakespeare on Screen; 4. Criticism. Section 1 is by Gabriel Egan; section 2 is by Peter J. Smith; section 3 is by Elinor Parsons; section 4(a) at Keio University (PULC Consortium) on April 13, 2016 is by Elisabetta Tarantino; section 4(b) is by Daniel Cadman; section 4(c) is by Arun Cheta; section 4(d) is by Gavin Schwartz-Leeper; section 4(e) is by Johann Gregory; section 4(f) is by Sheilagh Ilona O’Brien; section 4(g) is by Louise Geddes. 1. Editions and Textual Studies No major critical editions of Shakespeare appeared this year. The only relevant monograph was MacDonald P. Jackson’s Determining the Shakespeare Canon: Arden of Faversham and A Lover’s Complaint, which is an extremely well put together combination of revised versions of previously published articles, joined together with discursive connective tissue and supplemented by fresh writing. The topic is of the highest interest to Shakespearians at all levels, and Jackson’s handling of it manages to convey the technical complexity—to satisfy the specialist who is entirely ‘up’ on the subject—without losing the newcomer to this field. The introduction (pp. 1–6) surveys the history of belief in the Shakespearian authorship of A Lover’s Complaint and at least part of Arden of Faversham, pointing out that if the former is not by Shakespeare then that changes our whole view of Sonnets [1609] in which it appeared.
    [Show full text]
  • Shakespeare's Troilus and Cressida
    Shakespeare’s Troilus and Cressida: Audience Expectation and Matters of Taste in Relation to Authorship and the Book Johann Gregory A thesis submitted in candidature for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Cardiff University 2013 © Johann Gregory, 2013 All Rights Reserved SUMMARY Questions concerning whether Shakespeare wrote for the stage or the page are a perennial issue in Shakespeare studies. Part of the problem rests on expectations of literature and theatre. These expectations are in fact voiced in Shakespearean drama itself, a drama that often articulates ideas concerning audience expectations. In Shakespeare’s Troilus and Cressida, before Troilus visits Cressida he exclaims “expectation whirls me round”. Of all the plays in the Shakespearean canon, variants of “expect” feature most in this play. Troilus and Cressida itself scrutinises expectation of a story with famous classical, medieval and contemporary precedents, for a play to be performed by the leading theatre company of the day, and of a play by a playwright who was also conscious of his role as a published author. In the play, characters are frequently staged as spectators or audience members, raising issues relating to expectations, taste, value judgements, and viewpoints. Shakespeare responds to the plays of his contemporaries and, arguably, the political scene as well. The thesis reworks Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of the literary field to gauge the way that Shakespeare’s play engages with its theatrical and literary environment, and resituates Bourdieu’s work on taste
    [Show full text]