6as. /60=76c-,
EFFECTS OF DDT ON AQUATIC ORGANISMS IN THE LUVUVHU RIVER
by
KERRY ANNE BRINK
Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree
PHILOSOPHIAE DOCTOR
in
Aquatic Health
Department of Zoology
at
University of Johannesburg
November 2009
Supervisor: Professor J.H.J. van Vuren (UJ) Co-Supervisor: Professor R. Bornman (UP)
AFFIDAVIT: MASTER'S AND DOCTORAL STUDENTS TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
This serves to confirm that I e.if\A Prinr &ink Full Name(s) and Surname
ID Number SOS %O
Student number CiaC00100 enrolled for the
Qualification PHD (\%/)..0;tic, Faculty Science 0Cf)-ArkliIrri* d\- ZrOCAC104, A Herewith declare that m y acadetnic work is in line with the Pla g iaris P4lic y of the Universit y of Johannesburg which I am familiar.
I further declare that the work •resented in the ekorc,\ (minor dissertation/dissertatio is authentic and ori g inal unless clearly indicated otherwise and in such instances full reference to the source is acknowled ged and I do not pretend to receive an y credit for such acknowled ged quotations, and that there is no cop yrig ht infrin gement in m y work. I declare that no unethical research practices were used or material gained throug h dishonesty. I understand that pla g iarism is a serious offence and that should I contravene the Pla g iarism Policy notwithstandin g sig nin g this affidavit, I ma y be found g uilty of a serious criminal offence (perj ury) that would amon gst other conseq uences compel the UJ to inform all other tertiar y institutions of the offence and to issue a correspondin g certificate of reprehensible academic conduct to whomever request such a certificate from the institution.
Signed at Johannesburg on this 1 6 of tfnGi i1 2010 . Signature Print name xtftq Er;trk
SHANAZ KHAN BRANCH MANAGER ■ aledban& Untied , Reg No 1951/000009/06 45 UPPER MALL, CNR HYDE PARK SHOPPING CENTRE, HYDE PARK MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT OF JOHANNESBURG COMMISSIONER OF OATHS EX OFFICIO
STAMP COMMISSIONER OF OATHS Affidavit certified by a Commissioner of Oaths This affidavit conforms with the requirements of the JUSTICES OF THE PEACE AND COMMISSIONERS OF OATHS ACT 16 OF 1963 and the applicable Regulations published in the GG GNR 1258 of 21 July 1972; GN 903 of 10 July 1998; GN 109 of 2 February 2001 as amended. Abstract
The toxicant dichlorodiphenyl-trichloroethane, commonly known as DDT, is a broad spectrum insecticide and is currently banned in most countries due to its toxic effects. However, in some countries restricted use of DDT has been authorized as an effective vector control within malarial control programmes. South Africa is one such country, where spraying of DDT occurs in three provinces including the Limpopo Province, KwaZulu Natal and Mpumalanga. Specifically in the Limpopo Province, spraying of DDT has been ongoing for almost 56 years within the eastern malaria belt of the province. Despite this long term spraying there is still a scarcity of data regarding DDT and its effects on indigenous aquatic organisms in South Africa. Any research regarding DDT will therefore be of the utmost value.
It was in this context that the present study was initiated, which primarily aimed to assess the extent of contamination within DDT sprayed areas in South Africa and the associated effects on indigenous species, whilst identifying techniques that could be used in future monitoring of these areas. This assessment was done in the Luvuvhu River catchment at three reference sites and four exposure sites situated within the areas where indoor residual spraying of DDT is done annually.
At these sites the extent of DDT contamination within the water, sediment and biota (using the bioindicator species C. gariepinus from only the lentic sites) in the Luvuvhu river was evaluated. The results showed that DDT concentrations were well above recommended levels in all three of the measured phases, with the highest concentrations predominantly observed at the Xikundu weir. This site was particularly impacted by DDT due to a combination of its close proximity to the DDT sprayed areas, concentration accumulation from upstream sources and environmental conditions that accentuated contamination. These elevated levels of DDT did, however, not induce significant quantifiable effects in the bioindicator C. gariepinus or in the fish and macro-invertebrate community structures.
Specifically, the effects in the catfish, C. gariepinus, were assessed using a range of biomarkers specific to the endocrine disrupting effects of DDT, including indirect measures of vitellogenin (calcium, zinc, magnesium and alkali-labile phosphate (ALP) that are all present on the VTG molecule in high abundances), gonad-somatic index (GSI), condition factor (CF), analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) manipulated gonads, protein carbonyls (PC) and intersex. Although none of these biomarkers could be significantly correlated with the DDT contaminations, DDT was shown to induce a slight sub-organismal effect by slightly inducing the synthesis of ALP and Ca as well as reducing the gonad mass (shown by GSI and adjusted gonad mass biomarkers) and body condition. In contrast, the fish and macro- invertebrate communities showed no conclusive relationship with DDT contamination, using a variety of methodologies, including informal assessments, univariate diversity indices,
ii multivariate statistics, abundance models, fish response assessment index (FRAI) as well as average score per taxon (ASPT) and Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera (EPT) richness. In conclusion, it was shown that DDT concentrations within the Luvuvhu River only induced effects at the lower levels of complexity, which highlights the importance of the utilisation of biomarkers to measure more subtle long-term effects as compared to the usage of community level effects.
In order to validate the biomarkers measured in the field, the fish species C. gariepinus was chronically exposed to environmentally relevant concentrations of p,p'-DDT, including 0.659 pg/I, 1.36 pg/I, 2 pg/I and 2.724 pg/I. The results proved to be of significant value in evaluating the dose-response relationship and identifying the baseline levels of a suite of biomarkers for the indigenous C. gariepinus exposed to DDT concentrations. These results in turn contributed toward identifying biomarkers that could be successfully utilised for future monitoring of DDT within South Africa, which included calcium, ALP, intersex, condition factor, GSI and ANCOVA treated gonads. Furthermore, within the laboratory exposures of C. gariepinus, the reproductive success of the adults and associated juveniles were also evaluated using hatching success and survival rates as measurable endpoints. Although a response was evident, too many variables influenced the responses of the exposed juveniles for a definite conclusion to be given as to the effects of DDT on juveniles.
In addition to the assessment of the effects of DDT on the aquatic ecosystems, other activities were also identified to have inducted an effect. These included effects related to agriculture and afforestation in the upper reaches as well as effects associated with the rural communities in the middle reaches. However, with appropriate monitoring and management of the catchment, it was shown that these activities can have a reduced impact.
In conclusion, although DDT concentrations were present in the water, sediment and adipose tissue of the fish species C. gariepinus, the effects related to these concentrations were generally small. Only subtle changes related to DDT were evident sub-organismally with no changes present within the community structures of both fish and macro- invertebrates. Despite these low level impacts, it is recommended that DDT contamination is monitored and managed effectively during the continuation of DDT spraying within South Africa's vector control programme. This is particularly important when considering that C. gariepinus was shown to exhibit a higher tolerance to DDT in contrast with other studies that have shown larger impacts related to DDT in more susceptible species 0. mossambicus as well as human populations within the Luvuvhu River catchment.
Table of contents
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 INTRODUCTION 2 1.2 BACKGROUND AND LITERATURE REVIEW OF DDT 2 1.2.1 DDT 2 1.2.2 History of DDT in South Africa 2 1.2.3 Fate of DDT in aquatic ecosystems 3 1.2.4 Effects of DDT in aquatic ecosystems 5 Background 5 Reproductive effects of DDT 6 1.2.5 Biomonitoring contamination and effects 9 Biomonitoring 9 Bioindicators 10 1.3 RATIONALE OF THE STUDY 11 1.4 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES 12 1.5 STRUCTURE OF THESIS 13 1.6 REFERENCES 14
CHAPTER 2. DESCRIPTION OF STUDY AREA 2.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE LUVUVHU RIVER CATCHMENT 20 2.2 POSSIBLE IMPACTING FACTION IN THE LUVUVHU RIVER 20 2.1.1 DDT Spraying 20 2.1.2 Rural Communities 21 2.1.3 Sewage Treatment Plants 21 2.1.4 Forestry and Agriculture 21 2.1.5 Mining 22 2.1.6 Dams and Weirs 22 2.3 SAMPLING SITES 23 2.4 REFERENCES 28
CHAPTER 3. DESCRIPTION OF HABITAT IN LUVUVHU RIVER 3.1 INTRODUCTION 31 3.2 METHODS 31 3.3 RESULTS 32 3.3.1 Habitat description of each site 33 3.3.2 Major impacts on the habitat 37 3.4 DISCUSSION 40 3.5 REFERENCES 41
CHAPTER 4. PESTICIDE AND METALCONTAMINATION IN THE LUVUVHU RIVER 4.1 INTRODUCTION 44 4.2 MATERIALS AND METHODS 44 4.2.1 Water analysis 44 Physico-chemical and nutrient analyses 44 Pesticide and metal analysis 45 4.2.2 Sediment analysis 46 Sediment composition 46 Pesticide and metal analysis 46 4.2.3 Biota analysis 47 Selection criteria of male C. gariepinus 47 Sampling 48 Fish Biology: mass, length and age 49
iv
d. Pesticides and metal analysis 49 4.2.4 Statistics 50 4.3 RESULTS 50 4.3.1 Water analysis 50 Physico-chemical parameters and nutrients 50 DDT and pesticide concentrations 53 Metal analysis 55 4.3.2 Sediment analysis 57 Sediment properties 57 DDT and pesticide analysis 59 Metal analysis 62 4.3.3 Bioaccumulation 64 Fish Biology 64 DDT Analysis 65 Metal Analysis 67 4.4 DISCUSSION 69 4.4.1 Water analysis 69 a. Physico-chemical and nutrient concentration 69 b. DDT and pesticide concentrations 70 c. Metal concentrations 72 4.4.2 Sediment analyses 73 a. Sediment properties 73 b. DDT and pesticide concentrations 74 c. Metal concentrations 75 4.4.3 Bioaccumulation 76 Fish biology 76 DDT and pesticide concentrations 76 d. Metal concentrations 78 4.5 REFERENCES 80
CHAPTER 5. SUB-ORGANISMAL EFFECTS OF DDT IN C. GARIEPINUS 5.1 INTRODUCTION 90 5.2 METHODS 94 5.2.1 Field Procedures 94 5.2.2 Laboratory Procedures 94 Alkali-labile phosphate 94 Plasma metal analysis 95 Protein carbonyls 95 Gonad condition 96 Histology 96 Condition factor 96 5.2.3 Statistics 96 5.3 RESULTS 96 5.3.1 Vitellogenin 96 5.3.2 Protein carbonyls 98 5.3.3 Gonad condition 99 5.3.4 Intersex 101 5.3.5 Condition factor 101 5.4 DISCUSSION 102 5.4.1 Vitellogenin 102 5.4.2 Protein carbonyls 103 5.4.3 Gonad condition 105 5.4.4 Intersex 107 5.4.5 Condition factor 108
v
5.5 REFERENCES 108
CHAPTER 6. LABORATORY EXPOSURES OF C. GARIEPINUS OF p,p-DDT 6.1 INTRODUCTION 117 6.2 METHODS 117 6.2.1 Experimental design 117 Advantages and disadvantages of C. gariepinus in toxicity testing 117 Culture and handling of test species 118 Approach 118 6.2.2 Test Conditions 118 6.2.3 Adult Exposure 119 Sample collection 120 Sample analyses 120 6.2.4 Juvenile Exposure 120 6.2.5 Statistics 121 6.3 RESULTS 121 6.3.1 Adult male biomarkers 121 Fish Biology 121 Vitellogenin 122 Protein carbonyls 123 Gonad condition 124 Intersex 124 Condition factor 125 6.3.2 Juveniles 125 6.4 DISCUSSION 127 6.4.1 Biomarkers 127 Vitellogenin 127 Protein carbonyls 128 Gonad condition 128 Intersex 129 Condition factor 129 6.4.2 Juveniles 130 Hatching success 130 Juvenile survival 131 6.5 REFERENCES 131
CHAPTER 7. DETERMINATION OF A SUITABLE SUITE OF BIOMARKERS FOR BIOMONITORING 7.1 INTRODUCTION 137 7.2 METHODS 137 7.3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 137 7.4 REFERENCES 140
CHAPTER 8. THE EFFECTS OF DDT ON FISH COMMUNITIES 8.1 INTRODUCTION 142 8.2 METHODS 144 8.2.1 Sampling 144 8.2.2 Data analysis 145 Occurrence of fish 145 Relative abundance 145 Non-parametric diversity indices 146 Abundance models 146 FRAI 148
vi 8.2.3 Statistics 150 8.3 RESULTS 151 8.3.1 Occurrence of fish 151 8.3.2 Informal assessment of number of species and relative abundances 152 8.3.3 Species diversity indices 153 8.3.4 Abundance models 157 8.3.5 FRAI 158 8.3.6 Multivariate statistics 161 8.3.7 Factors influencing fish abundance and diversity 165 8.4 DISCUSSION 167 8.4.1 Fish community changes 167 a. Latonyanda River 167 b. Hasana 168 c. Tshikonelo 169 d. Xikundu 170 e. Mhinga 171 8.4.2 Fish community assemblage methodologies 172 8.5 REFERENCES 174
CHAPTER 9. MACRO-INVERTEBRATE COMMUNITIES 9.1 INTRODUCTION .179 9.2 METHODS 181 9.2.1 Sampling 181 9.2.2 Data treatment 181 a. Occurrence of macro-invertebrates 181 b. Relative abundance 181 c. ASPT and EPT (Ephemeroptera, plecoptera, trichoptera) richness 181 d. Non-parametric diversity indices 182 9.2.3 Statistics 182 9.3 RESULTS 182 9.3.1 Occurrence of macro-invertebrate families 182 9.3.2 Informal assessments of number of taxon and relative abundances 183 9.3.3 Sensitivity scores 184 9.3.4 Ephemeroptera, plecoptera and trichoptera (EPT) richness 187 9.3.5 Species diversity 187 9.3.6 Multivariate statistics 188 9.3.7 Factors influencing macro-invertebrate abundances and diversity 194 9.4 DISCUSSION 195 9.4.1 Macro-invertebrate community changes 195 a. Latonyanda River 195 b. Hasana 196 c. Tshikonelo 196 d. Xikundu 197 e. Mhinga 198 9.4.2 Macro-invertebrate community assemblage methodologies 198 9.5 REFERENCES 199
CHAPTER 10. GENERAL DISCUSSION, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 10.1 INTRODUCTION 204 10.2 CURRENT STATUS OF THE LUVUVHU RIVER 204 10.2.1 Summary of the possible current impacts evaluated 204 Physical habitat 204 Physico-chemical and nutrient analysis of water 204 DDT contamination in water, sediment and C. gariepinus 205
VII
d. Pesticide and metal screen 205 10.2.2 Summary of the current effects in fish 206 a. Sub-organismal effects 206 b. Community effects 206 c. Level of biological complexity 207 10.2.3 Current impacts in macro-invertebrates 207 a. Community effects 207 10.3 LABORATORY ANALYSIS 207 10.4 A SUITABLE SUITE OF BIOMARKERS FOR MONITORING 208 10.5 IDENTIFY EFFECTIVENESS OF COMMUNITY LEVEL MEASUREMENTS 209 10.6 GENERAL CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 209 10.6.1 Major concerns in the Luvuvhu River catchment 209 Risk of DDT bioaccumulation and biomagnification 209 Effects of DDT on aquatic biota 209 Agriculture and afforestation 210 Rural village communities 210 10.6.2 Incorporating biomarkers in South Africa 211 10.6.3 Considerations for biomonitoring in the Luvuvhu River 212 10.6.4 Recommendations for future biomonitoring in IRS areas 213 10.6.5 Significance of laboratory work 213 10.6.6 Additional limitations of this study and recommendations for future research 214 10.5 REFERENCES 215
APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 216 APPENDIX 2 229 APPENDIX 3 224 APPENDIX 4 226 APPENDIX 5 228 APPENDIX 6 229 APPENDIX 7 232
viii Abbreviation Table
AChE Acetylcholinesterase IHI Index of Habitat Integrity ALP Alkali-labile phosphate IRS Indoor residual spraying ANCOVA Analysis of Covariance LF Low flow ANOSIM One-way analysis of similarity LS Log series models ANOVA Analysis of variance MCDA Multi Criteria Decision Analysis Approach ASPT Average score per taxon MDA Malondialdehyde ATSDR Agency for toxic substances and disease registry Mg Magnesium BOD Biological oxygen demand MIRAI Macro-invertebrate response assessment index BS Broken stick models N Abundance of species BSA Bovine Serum Albumin NMDS Non-metric multi-dimensional scaling Ca Calcium NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association CCME Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment NTMP National Toxicants Monitoring Programme CF Condition factor Q p'-D DT 1, 1 , 1 -trichloro-2-(o -chlorophenyI)-2-(p chlorophenyl)-ethane COD Chemical oxygen demand OC Organochlorine CPUE Catch per unit effort OP Organophosphate DDD Tetrachlorodiphenylethane P Probability DDE Dichlorodiphenyl-dichloroethane p,p'-DDD 1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis(p chlorophenyl) ethane DDT Dichlorodiphenyl-trichloroethane, p,p'-DDT 1,1 ,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(p -chlorophenyl df Degrees of freedom PC Protein carbonyls DWAF Departement of Water Affairs and Forestry, now DWA PCA Principle component analysis (Department of Water Afffairs) EDC Endocrine disrupting chemicals PCB Polychlorinated biphenyls ELISA Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay POP Persistent organic pollutants EPT Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera Trichoptera RHP River Health Programme EXTOXNET Extension Toxicology Network S Number of species FAIT Fish assemblage integrity index SASS South African scoring system FO Frequency of occurrence SE Standard error FRAI Fish response assessment index SIMPER Similarity percentages GC-MS Gas chromatography mass spectrophotometer TDS Total dissolved salts GnRh Gonadotrophin releasing hormone TLN Truncated log normal models GS Geometric series models TOC Total organic carbon GSI Gonad somatic index TWQR South African target water quality range GSM Gravel sand and mud UJ University of Johannesburg GST Glutathione-s-transferase USEPA US environmental protection agency HCI Hydrochloric Acid UV Ulta-Violet Rays HCR fish habitat availability index VTG Vitellogenin HD Historical data WHO World Health Organisation HF High flow Zn Zinc ICP-MS Inductive coupled plasma mass spectrophotometer
ix Acknowledgments
I would like to first and foremost acknowledge and thank the NRF and University of Johannesburg for the three year funding I received during this project and to the people that made this project possible, including Prof van Vuren, Prof Bornman and Dr Barnhoorn, for which I am very grateful.
Then a special thank you to my loving husband, Emile Brink! Thank you so very much for your undying support during this project. Your patience, incredible encouragement, help during those slimy catfish exposures in the early hours of the morning, editing of this PhD, and scientifically minded discussions are just a few of the many, things you've done for me during this project. Words can't express my gratitude to you!
Then to the many people that have helped and supported me during this project, including my mom Karen, Kieren, Richard, Giela, Liesel, Liam, Taneshka, Bridget, Solly, Lizl, Jessica, Gillian, and my parents in-law Anne-Marie and Pieter. Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 INTRODUCTION 2 1.2 BACKGROUND AND LITERATURE REVIEW OF DDT 2 1.2.1 DDT 2 1.2.2 History of DDT in South Africa 2 1.2.3 Fate of DDT in aquatic ecosystems 3 1.2.4 Effects of DDT in aquatic ecosystems 5 a. Background 5 b. Reproductive effects of DDT 6 1.2.5 Biomonitoring contamination and effects 9 a. Biomonitoring 9 b. Bioindicators 10 1.3 RATIONALE OF THE STUDY 11 1.4 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES 12 1.5 STRUCTURE OF THESIS 13 1.6 REFERENCES 14 Chapter 1
1.1 INTRODUCTION
In consideration of the following background and literature review, the rationale of this study was determined along with the aims, objectives and structure of this thesis.
1.2 BACKGROUND AND LITERATURE REVIEW OF DDT
1.2.1 DDT
The toxicant dichlorodiphenyl-trichloroethane, commonly known as DDT, is classified as an organochlorine (as it is an organic compound that contains chlorine atoms) as well as a persistent organic pollutant (POP) (as it is a toxic substance that resists degradation and can severely affect human and environmental health globally) (Bouwman, 2004). DDT is characterised as a white powder, with little to no odour as well as other physical and chemical properties, which can be observed in Appendix 1 (ATSDR, 2002). It metabolises to DDE and DDD and exists in two forms p,p'- and o,p'-DDT, which are degraded to the respective DDE and DDD isomers (these will all commonly be referred to as DDT in the present study, unless otherwise specified) (Kime, 1998). p,p'-DDT is a synthetic compound that was first discovered in 1939 to have insecticidal properties. This compound is commonly referred to as DDT because the technical grade DDT (sprayed as a pesticide) is primarily composed of the active ingredient p,p'-DDT (1,1,1- trichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl), making up 65-80% of the pesticide. The remaining percentage is made up of its isomer o,p'-DDT (1,1,1-trichloro-2-(o-chlorophenyI)-2- (pchloropheny1)-ethane) (15-21%) and its metabolite p,p'-DDD (1,1-dichloro-2,2- bis(pchlorophenyl) ethane) (approximately 4%). It is a broad spectrum insecticide that was once very popular due to its effectiveness, long residual persistence and low cost in agricultural practices, but is now only used in the control of disease vectors due to its toxicity (ATSDR, 2002).
1.2.2 History of DDT in South Africa
In the early 20th century the organochlorine pesticide DDT was used as an effective pest control within the agricultural sector of most countries worldwide. In South Africa, along with its agricultural use, DDT was also incorporated into a malarial control programme as it was relatively inexpensive; easy to produce, distribute and utilise; and was highly effective (Wells and Leonard, 2006). In this programme, technical grade DDT was applied to the interior of village huts via spraying called indoor residual spraying (IRS) (Tren and Baste, 2004; Metcalf, 1995). This programme proved to be a major success, with rapid declines in malarial incidences observed throughout the three provinces (now known as KwaZulu Natal, Limpopo and Mpumalanga), which were mostly influenced by this disease (Department of Health, South Africa, 2002).
2 Chapter 1
In the early 1970's the use of DDT for agricultural practices was banned worldwide, as it was shown by scientists to be highly persistent and toxic to humans and wildlife (Falandysz, 1994). South Africa was one of the countries that incorporated this ban within the agricultural sector, but continued to spray DDT in all of the provinces due to its effective eradication of malaria. However, in 1996 the South African government changed their policy and utilised deltamethrin as an alternative to DDT in some of the provinces. The literature regarding the time frames and the provinces that underwent this transformation was unfortunately inconclusive. Mabaso et al. (2004) made no mention of DDT spraying within Mpumalanga and Limpopo during the transition to pyrethroids in 1996, but did state that KwaZulu Natal specifically used the pyrethroid deltamethrin in 1997-1999 and that utilisation of DDT in IRS was reinstated in 2000, due to vector resistance. Gerritsen at al. (2008) generalised and said that in South Africa IRS has used DDT and pyrethroids in the past, and that DDT spraying was "scaled up since 2000". Tren and Bate (2004) mentioned that DDT spraying was stopped in 1996 in KwaZulu Natal and Mpumalanga and in 1999 in the Limpopo Province. In contrast, monthly reports done by the Department of Health (2002) suggested that DDT spraying was stopped in all three provinces, but never elaborated as to the time frame in which it had occurred. In contrast, Bornman et al. (2009) stated that in the Limpopo province, DDT spraying was introduced in 1945 and since 1966 has been sprayed annually. Despite these inconsistencies in the literature, it is still evident that DDT spraying was relatively continuous over the last 60 years in all of the provinces.
In 2004, a global, multilateral agreement known as the Stockholm convention on POPs came into force with the aim of protecting human and environmental health from the effects of POPs (such as DDT) worldwide by enforcing restrictive use and production or banning of these substances (Bouwman, 2004). Although South Africa is a party to this convention, an exemption for the use of DDT as a malaria control was secured on the premise that alternatives be incorporated where and when possible in order to eventually lead to the elimination of DDT as a vector control (Tren and Bate, 2004).
1.2.3 Fate of DDT in aquatic ecosystems
Upon entering the environment DDT distributes itself between the various phases within the environment including atmosphere, water, sediment, biota and vegetation similar to other organochlorines (OCs). Many factors can influence the distribution between these phases and are all reviewed extensively by Nowel et al. (1999). However, the most notable factor that influences the distribution of the contaminants within and between the environmental phases is the partition coefficient of contaminants. For instance, the organic-bases of DDT generally have a higher partitioning coefficient than the organic-bases of other contaminants such as heavy metals. This characteristic allows such compounds to absorb strongly in lipid/organic-rich environments such as biota, vegetation and sediment. This together with DDTs extremely long half life (reviewed in ATSDR (2002)), which results from it is resistant to volatilisation, leaching or degradation, makes DDT highly persistent and present in
3 Chapter 1
normally much greater concentrations in the sediment and biota than in the water and atmosphere (ATSDR, 2002; Kime, 1998).
In the aquatic environments DDT initially enter the aqueous phase and then redistributes into the sediment, biota or vegetation. When contaminants in the water enter the sediment phase desorption occurs into the pore water, the overlying water or the organic fraction of the sediment. Contaminants then remain in this sediment phase until certain conditions allow them to transform and/or to redistribute back into the aqueous phase or into the biological phase. Consequently, uptake in the biological phase can occur from both the water and sediment (otherwise known as bioconcentration) from biologically available (bioavailable) OCs, which are influenced by physical, chemical or biological differences (van der Oost et al., 2003). Thereafter, Uptake occurs by passive diffusion via semi-permeable membranes including gills, mouth, and gastro-intestinal tract (USEPA, 2000). Another significant route of uptake into organisms is via the food chain. Otherwise known as biomagnification, DDT can be absorbed from the prey of carnivorous species via passive diffusion from the gastrointestinal tract.
Despite the route of uptake, once within the biota, DDT can be eliminated, transformed and/or transported to various tissues for sequestration. Although DDT elimination is often negligible in biota due to its lipophilic nature, according to Nowell et al. (1999) OC with such characteristics could be eliminated by the kidney through the urine or transferred to the juveniles (Nowel et al., 1999). However, a major influencing factor in the elimination of a contaminant is the presence of other contaminants. Johnson (1973) concluded this from the findings of a study by Macek et al. (1970) that found that dieldrin residues inhibited the elimination of DDT. Nevertheless, if contaminants are not directly eliminated the aquatic organisms attempts to transform and/or sequester the compound. In the biotransformation process contaminants are either altered by inserting a functional group, which would increase their reactivity known as phase I transformation, or by reacting them with highly polar species to form more soluble compounds that are more readily excreted (phase II transformation) (Nowell et al., 1999). Of the various DDT metabolites, DDE is the most resistant to such transformation and is therefore often more persistent than the other metabolites. This is primarily due to the formation of halogen atoms that are induced during metabolism from DDT to DDE, which tends to prevent oxidation and other biotransformation processes (Walker et al., 2001; Paasivirta, 1991). Depending on the success of the transformation and excretion of contaminants, the organism then can store the DDT in an inert tissue such as in the adipose tissue, bone, or scales, which reduces its general circulation and becomes relatively inert in the biological phase. However, the storage in adipose tissue, particularly apparent in DDT, does not always guarantee permanent sequestration within an organism, as adverse conditions may lead to the utilisation of these lipid reserves and hence the release of contaminants back into the blood stream (Connell et al., 1999).
4 Chapter 1
1.2.4 Effects of DDT in aquatic ecosystems
a. Background
When exposed to sub-lethal concentrations of most contaminants, aquatic organisms do not bioaccumulate without inducing an effect, which vary in biological complexity depending on degree of exposure (duration and concentration) and to a lesser extent on the exposure mode (e.g. skin contact and ingestion), susceptibility of organism to toxicants (life cycle stage, specificity of species, excretion rates, genetic selection, stress, metabolic rates, accessibility to toxicant) and toxicant properties (Murray et al., 2003). Generally, when a foreign chemical is introduced into an organism it initially exerts effects on sub-cellular molecules such as genes, proteins and enzymes. Then if exposure continues, further alterations occur that start to influence cellular structures and functioning such as energy expenditure or secretion of a hormone. When these changes are severe enough the structure of the organs deteriorate, which lead to effects on the organ's functioning. Once the organs are affected the organism's general health, growth, ability to reproduce and function normally reduce, which in turn leads to changes observed within the populations and communities (Vasseur and Cossu-Leguille, 2006; Arcand-Hoy and Benson, 1998).
Populations and communities can either be directly or indirectly influenced. Direct influences are related to the lethal effect on individuals within a population and community. According to Connell et al. (1999), when populations are exposed to high lethal concentrations they may respond by reducing or rising in abundance relative to their tolerance. A species which is more sensitive may be eliminated (or show reduced abundance) before a more tolerant species is, which may increase in abundance in the absence of competitors. These alterations consequently influence the entire community structure within an ecosystem. In contrast to lethal concentrations, when organisms are exposed to low sub-lethal concentrations the contaminants may not necessarily eliminate a species directly, but may indirectly alter population structures and survival of species. That is, when an individual is exposed to sub-lethal concentrations, contaminants may influence the reproductive output, the recruitment and/or growth that can lead to a reduction in the abundance of species within population and changes in the community. Nevertheless, whether the influence on the populations is direct with lethal concentrations or indirect with sub-lethal concentrations, the resulting effects are generally irreversible and long-term and therefore according to many reviews much effort must be taken to avoid such changes. In order to prevent these high level impacts it is recommended that the effects of lower levels of biological complexity be measured as early warning signs of stress. This is commonly done using biological indicators called biomarkers (Connell et al., 1999).
Biomarkers, as defined by Hyne and Maher (2003), are indicators of sub-lethal changes in organisms resulting from exposure to contaminants xenobiotics. Apart from their ability to measure the extent of sub-organismal effects and act as short term indicators of future, more
5 Chapter 1 ecologically relevant effects (as shown above), have numerous other advantages. These include their ability to provide information on the relative toxicity of chemicals in both the field and laboratory, to provide temporally and spatially integrated measures of bioavailable pollutants that can detect intermittent pollution effects. Further to this they can also be used to identify specific contamination, if the responses are specific to a particular contaminant (called biomarkers of exposure i.e. acetylcholine esterase is a specific biomarker of organophosphates and carbamates, metallothioneins of metals and delta-aminolevulinic acid of lead (Slabbed et al., 2004)). Despite these advantages there are also some disadvantages that need to be considered. Firstly, natural abiotic and biotic factors interfere with the biomarker responses. Secondly, contaminants interact with each other causing interference with the organisms' responses. Thirdly, some biomarkers are not sensitive enough to detect pollutant exposure or effects at environmentally realistic concentrations and lastly biomarkers often require extensive technical expertise (Moolman, 2004; Amiard et al., 2000; Lagadic et al., 2000; Connell et al., 1999). However, these limitations can be overcome by utilising a suite of biomarkers that considers different aspects of the organisms' responses.
b. Reproductive effects of DDT
When organisms are exposed to DDT (as well as most other OC) a cascade of biological effects start (as explained above) predominantly with endocrine disrupting mechanisms, such as altering hormone secretion, interfering with hormone-receptor interaction or modifying the metabolism of circulating hormones and are therefore known as endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) (Rodrigues et al., 2007). These changes, depending on the DDT isomer and metabolite present, in turn induce alterations in the functioning of the reproductive system, nervous system, behaviour and immune systems; resulting in many different biological systems experiencing effects. Many of these effects, and the mechanisms in which they formed within aquatic organisms, have been reviewed by large organisations such as USEPA (1997, 2006) and NOAA (2002) as well as Huang et al. (2003), Kime (1998) and Vouk and Sheehan (1983).
Regardless of these varying effects, the majority of the effects due to DDT and its isomers are usually found to occur on the reproductive functioning. This is because the endocrine system is largely related to reproduction, which may manifest at various life-history stages (USEPA, 1997). In some cases the lethal or sub-lethal effects are observed directly in the life history stage which is exposed, while in other situations the sub-lethal effect of lower life stages is observed in later stages or in the progeny of exposed parents (Vouk and Sheehan, 1983). These can ultimately lead to changes in the organisms' population and in turn the aquatic communities. However, according to a review by Mills and Chichester (2005) such deductions should be done with caution, because even though there is strong evidence that EDCs such as DDT can affect the reproductive health of aquatic organisms (including fish and invertebrates), mainly through endocrine disrupting effects, it is not to say that these
6 Chapter 1 organismal impacts will influence the population levels. For example, a study by Price and Depledge (1998) showed in polychaete worms exposed to another EDC (4-n-nonylphenol) that although there were endocrine induced changes in egg production and egg viability there was no subsequent effects present on populations. Furthermore, very few studies linking the endocrine disruptive effects of individuals with the consequences at population and community level have been done. According to Ford et al. (2007) the reason for this is four-fold. Firstly, there is not enough data available to create viable models for the population level effects of endocrine disruption. Secondly, reproductive disorders are mainly investigated in species that are difficult to model the populations. Thirdly, there is a general lack of population ecologists within this field and lastly, there is often a lack of funding for research. According to many, the best documented case within the aquatic ecosystem of endocrine disruption causing alterations in populations was in a study by Bryan and Gibbs (1991). The authors showed a causal decline in the populations of gastropods exposed to tributyltin, which is associated with the imposex phenomenon. For further review of the existing literature available on the potential of endocrine disruption to induce population level effects on aquatic organisms refer to Taylor et al. (1999) and Taylor and Harrison (1999).
Even though endocrine changes (i.e. sub-organismal changes) can not always predict higher level changes, measurements of changes using biomarkers are often more responsive to subtle chronic effects of EDCs (such as DDT) and therefore can be used to successfully show sub-organismal effects. In fact, because EDCs are such high profile contaminants they have attracted a vast amount of attention, with many biomarkers been shown to identify sub-organismal effects caused by EDCs and have been reviewed by many including large organisation such as USEPA (1997) and NOAA (2002). Briefly, these sub-organismal effects from EDCs may include anything from detoxifying enzymes, to those related to oestrogen mimicking in males, oxidative stress, and other hormones, proteins, and enzymes from numerous areas within the body, as listed in Table 1.1.
7 Chapter 1
Table 1.1. Literature review of some biomarkers used to identify exposure and toxicity of DDT contamination in aquatic biota.