DOCSLIB.ORG

Untangling the Debate Over Negative Gearing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Untangling the Debate Over Negative Gearing FEATURE UNTANGLING THE DEBATE OVER NEGATIVE GEARING There are more desirable ways to improve housing affordability than proposed changes to negative gearing, argues Gene Tunny n the lead-up to the 2016 federal election What is negative gearing? campaign, Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull Negative gearing is when a taxpayer uses declared compared the Labor Opposition’s proposed losses from a rental property (or multiple properties) changes to negative gearing and capital gains tax to reduce their taxable income, including wage Ito a ‘big sledgehammer’ being taken to the property and salary income, thus receiving a reduction in market. The Opposition has proposed that negative taxes paid. Negative gearing is allowed in Australia, gearing—whereby losses on investment properties New Zealand and Sweden but is subject to a range can be deducted from other income for taxation of restrictions in the US and the UK, where rental purposes—should be restricted to new properties losses cannot be used to offset labour income.3 Such and that the discount on capital gains income be cut restrictions are generally seen as integrity measures from 50% to 25%.1 aimed at reducing tax evasion. The PM claimed that the proposed policy In Australia, a taxpayer is able to deduct a variety changes would have a major adverse impact on of rental expenses from their total income—in property prices. While Labor’s policy is motivated addition to interest payments on a loan used to by a desire to improve housing affordability, it would finance the property—including, among others, be politically unfavourable for the party if its policy depreciation, repairs and maintenance, utility did result in a large fall in property prices. Hence, bills, rates, insurance, management fees and (until Shadow Treasurer Chris Bowen has since seized on recently) travel expenses. advice from the Australian Treasury, released in early Assuming legitimate deductions 2018 under Freedom of Information (FOI), which are claimed and depreciation is appeared to contradict the PM, noting that Treasury accurately calculated, an investor referred to ‘a relatively modest downward impact on is still losing money on a rental property prices.’ 2 property in each year it is negatively The debate over negative gearing will no doubt geared, but the size of the loss is continue up until the next election in 2019, so it is reduced by being able to reduce important to assess where the truth lies. In this article, I argue that negative gearing is a logical feature of the tax system. Proposals to radically change it are Gene Tunny is the Principal of Adept Economics and misguided and will likely have adverse impacts on is a former Australian Treasury official. This article is the property market. Studies that purport to show partly based on a report he prepared in June 2016 for Walshs Financial Planning. The views expressed should large benefits from restricting or abolishing negative not necessarily be attributed to Walshs, and any errors gearing have major flaws and should not be used in or omissions are the author’s own. the policy debate. 8 POLICY • Vol. 34 No. 1 • Autumn 2018 GENE TUNNY total taxable income and receive a tax saving.4 What 2014-15, down around 7 percentage points from can make negative gearing pay off eventually is net the peak in 2007-08. To a substantial degree, this rental income, if and when a property becomes decline has been related to lower interest rates and positively geared, and the capital gain that is hence lower deductions for interest payments. ultimately realised on the property. According to ATO data, total net rent has Negative gearing has been a major topic of debate improved substantially in recent years, from -$8.4 in Australia for years now. Concerns about negative billion in 2011-12 to -$3.6 billion in 2014-15 gearing grew in the 2000s in line with the increase (Chart 2). This is most likely due to lower interest in the number of landlords in general—which grew rates and reductions in deductible interest payments. at more than twice the rate of population growth— Total declared rental losses fell from a peak of and negatively-geared landlords in particular (Chart $14.6 billion in 2011-12 to $11.1 billion in 2014- 1). While 51% of landlords declared net rental losses 15. The average rental loss has fallen from around in 1998-99, the share peaked at 69% in 2007-08. $11,000 to around $8,700 over this period. Given This upward trend in negatively-geared landlords recent restrictions on some deductions, discussed may have been driven by: in the next section, it is possible total rental losses will continue to fall. These recent trends mean the a) changes to capital gains tax in 1999-2000 potential revenue increase from the Opposition’s when a 50% discount on capital gains for policy, an estimated $32 billion over ten years, is taxation was adopted, replacing the previous likely reduced. inflation-adjustment of the cost-base method; b) greater availability of finance for investors, Rationale for negative gearing including interest-only loans; and Negative gearing is a logical feature of the tax c) an increase in mortgage interest rates of system, as it leads to consistent treatment of debt around 2 percentage points from 1998-99 to and equity regarding the financing of investments, 2007-08. a point made in 2015 by the Australian Treasury.5 After all, if an investor were to use additional equity After strong increases over the 2000s in the to purchase a property rather than debt, they would number of negatively-geared landlords and net forgo a rate of return on that equity and hence rental losses, there appears to have been a levelling would pay less in taxes. Negative gearing is not a off in negatively-geared landlords and substantial tax concession as such, and for this reason is not reductions in rental losses in recent years. The share included in the Treasury’s annual Tax Expenditure of landlords who are negatively geared was 62% in Statement. Chart 1. Landlords by net rental profit status Chart 2. Landlords by net rental profit status Source: ATO Taxation Statistics. Note: the number of landlords declaring a profit reported in the chart also includes a relatively small number of landlords who Source: ATO Taxation Statistics. Note: the number of landlords declaring a profit declare zero net rent. reported in the chart also includes a relatively small number of landlords who declare zero net rent. POLICY • Vol. 34 No. 1 • Autumn 2018 9 UNTANGLING THE DEBATE OVER NEGATIVE GEARING Given that a person’s income for tax purposes— ‘While negatively geared investors do typically have and the marginal tax rate they are liable to pay—is larger incomes it is also true that their spread of built up by adding up income from different sources, incomes covers low, middle and high incomes.’11 generally wage and salary income but also income Using ATO data, Phillips estimated that around from businesses and investments, it is natural that 25% of negatively geared investors are in the five deductible expenses are built up in the same way. lowest family income deciles.12 Negative gearing does not unfairly advantage While negative gearing is logical from a tax policy investors relative to people who only own an owner- perspective, and is not unfair, the Treasury does need occupied property, for which there is no deduction to be mindful of potential abuse of negative gearing of mortgage interest payments available. Economic through inappropriately claiming deductions. This theory and empirical evidence suggest owning your is why the 2017-18 Budget introduced changes to own home in Australia is very tax effective and a the deductibility of some items in rental properties, person should typically prefer an owner-occupied saving the government $800 million over the next property to ‘rentvesting’, whereby they rent their three financial years. Specifically, the ATO will place of residence and buy an investment property.6 no longer allow deductions for travel expenses The advantage of owner occupation comes through associated with inspecting and maintaining rental the implicit rental income of the property you live properties or collecting rent from tenants; nor in being exempt from taxation and capital gains on for depreciation of plant and equipment (e.g. the property also being exempt. dishwashers, ceiling fans) that were already in place Critics of negative gearing often note that when the property was purchased. negative gearing is disproportionately undertaken Although such integrity measures may result in by high-income earners. The Grattan Institute inefficiency by reducing the returns to large numbers has observed that ‘the top 10% of income earners of investors who were not claiming inappropriate before rental deductions receive almost 50% of the deductions, implementing such measures to prevent tax benefits of negative gearing.’7 It is misleading, abuses is a better approach than abolishing negative however to refer to tax benefits. As noted above, gearing entirely. negative gearing means an investor loses less money than they otherwise would because they are able to The impacts of negative gearing deduct expenses associated with earning that income. It is uncontroversial that negative gearing increases This is not illogical or improper. Furthermore, the house prices and lowers rents relative to what observation that the top 10% disproportionately they otherwise would be, as it increases the post- negatively gear is hardly surprising, given they tax return to investors in rental properties. So if are more likely to own investment properties and negative gearing were removed, prices would fall indeed multiple properties in many cases. The and rents would increase (relative to what they top 10% also pay around half of all income tax in otherwise would have been), and some households Australia.8 So it is unsurprising and not inequitable that previously rented may now find it economic to that the top 10% should receive around half of become owner occupiers.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Distributional Modelling of Proposed Negative Gearing and Capital Gains Taxation Reform1
    Distributional Modelling of Proposed Negative Gearing and Capital Gains Taxation Reform1 Research Note Ben Phillips Associate Professor ANU Centre for Social Research and Methods February 2016 1 This work was not funded by any external sources and is an independent analysis. The views are those of the author alone. Distributional Modelling of Proposed Negative Gearing and Capital Gains Taxation Reform Contents Overview .............................................................................................................................. 3 Modelling Methodology ........................................................................................................ 4 Negative Gearing distributional analysis .............................................................................. 5 Negative Gearing – potential impacts on rents .................................................................... 8 Capital Gains distributional analysis .................................................................................... 9 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................... 11 The Australian National University | 2 Distributional Modelling of Proposed Negative Gearing and Capital Gains Taxation Reform Overview In the 2012-13 tax year around 1.2 million persons were invested in negatively geared properties in Australia. Around 330,000 persons included capital gains in their taxable income where a 50 per cent discount was applied. Australian taxation
    [Show full text]
  • The Pros & Cons of Negative Gearing
    The Pros & Cons of Negative Gearing. A Snelleman Tom Whitepaper. Printed January 13, 2012 © Snelleman Tom © Snelleman Tom Page 1 of 12 www.snellemantom.com.au Ph 07 3871 0081 Contents Page Negative Gearing ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Background .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Tax Advantages .................................................................................................................................................... 5 Political & Social Issues ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Does negative gearing work and should I do it? ............................................................................................... 7 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................................................... 10 About Snelleman Tom ....................................................................................................................................... 12 © Snelleman Tom Page 2 of 12 www.snellemantom.com.au Ph 07 3871 0081 Negative Gearing Throughout the last few decades, the negative gearing concept has had its fair share of promoters and naysayers which is often driven by various factors
    [Show full text]
  • Negative Gearing
    Negative Gearing 1. What is negative gearing – negative gearing is where the interest expense on the finance to ​ acquire an investment exceeds the income generated by the investment, and the surplus interest is available to be offset against other income, thereby reducing the overall tax liability of the person or entity 2. Where would you find assets that are negatively geared? Many types of investment assets can ​ be negatively geared – managed funds, shares and property are common examples, because lenders are prepared to lend against these assets. Not all assets have to be geared directly – you may have a line of credit which is separate from your home loan that you use for investment purposes – interest on this loan can be offset against the investment and your other income. 3. Why on earth would someone throw their money away by negative gearing? After all, even with ​ the tax concessions, you only get a percentage of your loss back on tax. The only way that negative gearing works is where the capital growth in the asset exceeds the loss suffered from the excess interest and other costs. While the asset is growing in value, you are not paying tax as the gain is unrealised, but you are able to offset your loss against your other income, which helps to fund the cash shortfall on the loan interest repayments. 4. When is it advantageous to negatively gear? Probably in two main scenarios – where the capital ​ growth is expected to be so significant that your short term losses will be well and truely recovered on the sale of the asset, and the other is where you can obtain a significant tax advantage, because your taxable income is at or close to the top marginal rate of tax.
    [Show full text]
  • Reforming Negative Gearing to Solve Our Housing Affordability Crisis
    THE McKell Institute Insti tute McKell THE MCKELLTHE INSTITUTE Switching Gears Reforming negative gearing to solve our housing affordability crisis JUNE 2015 Background1. Introduction This report has been funded directly by The McKell Institute and has not been commissioned by any of our sponsors or supporters. The authors of this paper have utilised a range of publicly available information and our own analysis in compiling this paper. About the McKell Institute The McKell Institute is an independent, not-for-profit, public policy institute dedicated to developing practical policy ideas and contributing to public debate. The McKell Institute takes its name from New South Wales’ wartime Premier and Governor–General of Australia, William McKell. William McKell made a powerful contribution to both New South Wales and Australian society through significant social, economic and environmental reforms For more information phone (02) 9113 0944 or visit www.mckellinstitute.org.au THE The opinions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the McKell Institute’s members, affiliates, McKell individual board members or research committee members. Institute Any remaining errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors. Insti tute McKell THE Insti tute McKell THE MCKELLTHE INSTITUTE Switching Gears Reforming negative gearing to solve our housing affordability crisis JUNE 2015 MCKELL INSTITUTE Switching Gears | Reforming negative gearing to solve our housing affordability crisis The Author Richard Holden Richard Holden is a Professor of Economics at UNSW Business School and an Australian Research Council Future Fellow from 2013-2017. Prior to that he was on the faculty at the University of Chicago and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Investment Property Tax Planning Free Booklet
    INVESTMENT PROPERTY TAX PLANNING CONTENTS Pages Introduction Negative Gearing - What is It? 2 to 4 Ownership Options 5 to 6 Joint Tenants or Tenants in Common 7 Rental Property Deductions 8 to 11 The Right Type of Loan 12 to 13 Buying or Selling a Rental Property 14 Capital Gains Tax 15 to 16 Negatively Gearing Investment Portfolios 17 Disclaimer Many of the comments in this publication are general in nature and anyone intending to apply the information to practical circumstances should seek professional advice to independently verify their interpretation and the information's applicability to their particular circumstances. 12 Aletta Street Shailer Park, Qld, 4128 umbrellaacountants.com.au February 2014 Umbrellaaccoutants.com.au Page 1 NEGATIVE GEARING - WHAT IS IT? Negative gearing is all about losing money (at least in the beginning). Why would anybody want to lose money - simple, to save tax! How does it work? Quite simply, something is negatively geared when the expenses paid (including interest) exceed the income earned. This difference (or loss) is what can be claimed as a tax deduction. Does this mean I get the entire "loss" back on my tax? No - like any other tax deduction this loss is used to simply reduce your taxable income. This means while you do get some back on your tax - this amount is restricted to your marginal rate of tax. For example, if you pay tax at the top marginal tax rate (i.e. your income is greater than $180,000 pa) then the most tax you can get back is 46.5% or $465 for every $1,000 lost.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Home Loan Rates for Investment Property
    Best Home Loan Rates For Investment Property When Brice badges his calypso harmonising not stunningly enough, is Hebert hydrogenous? Financed and unruly Shaughn never tabbing progressively when Hanford weathercocks his ocularist. Salomon acquaints her metis rousingly, she combating it ungently. Please tell us better idea to property for example, may have used on the use of purchasing endeavors There for investment planning to invest in rates are no larger living? Mortgages & Home Loans HFCU. Compare a Mortgage Rates Interestcom. What rate for property investments? But what makes a home front second home getting an investment property. You better realize that extra mortgage rates affect on real estate investments The silly way we understand medicine is by in a rental property. What environment your holy of service? Picking up less, kenny was extremely fortunate and investment home loan for property types, first lien holder to the time was much house you afford to. With a fixed rate mortgage group from PNC Bank you will provide consistent payments for large life come your aggregate loan. There had our home for those guidelines and discount points on interest and subject to. You sign also take out service type bank loan if ever expect rates to drop. Don't stress Our small mortgage experts can recommend the plan mortgage to. You the flexibility to access ram and manage hello home justice and property performance in NetBank and habitat the CommBank app. Each month in helping to get a blessing for you can help you should keep returning because there for retirement for years and answering questions below shows our best! If you adjust the best to everyone at the rate may need to have.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 June 2015 Tax White Paper Task Force the Treasury Langton
    Community and Public Sector Union Michael Tull – Assistant National Secretary 5 June 2015 Tax White Paper Task Force The Treasury Langton Crescent Parkes ACT 2600 Email: [email protected] Dear Sir/Madam Tax White Paper The CPSU believes that government has a crucial role to play in the nation. It is our view that, at present, the government does not collect sufficient revenue to meet the needs of the Australian people. The CPSU is committed to providing a strong voice for members in the big public policy and political debates. As the key union representing Australian Public Service (APS) employees, our members have a strong interest in the tax reform debate. Political and public policy decisions around reform of the tax system are central to our members’ interests as the tax system raises the revenue required to fund public services. Given the importance of tax reform, the CPSU recommends that the final Tax White Paper: 1. oppose any cap on Commonwealth taxation of a proportion of GDP; 2. focus on tackling tax avoidance to increase revenue; 3. support reform of negative gearing and the capital gains discount; 4. support the reintroduction of a carbon price and resource rent tax; 5. oppose a cut in the corporate tax rate unless accompanied by closing loopholes whereby the net effect would be increased revenue; 6. oppose an increase in the GST; 7. support introducing a Buffett rule; and 8. support greater resourcing for the Australian Taxation Office. The CPSU welcomes the opportunity to make a submission to this White Paper process into tax.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial System Lnquiry - Q &A
    1 Financial System lnquiry - Q &A RESTRICTED 1 RESTRICTED 2 The Inquiry notes 'the tax treatment of investor housing, in particular, tends to encourage leveraged and speculative investment in housing.' P 278 Should the government reform tax treatment in this area? o Tax reform is an issue for Government. o The RBA has nonetheless noted in the past that the concessional rate of taxation of capital gains might encourage leverage speculation, particularly in combination with negative gearing provisions. (Malcolm's remarks to Senate lnquiry, 2003 PC submission) o As we have made clear in our recent communications, the Council of Financial Regulators considers that some risk has recently been building in investor housing. lt is probably not a coincidence that this is happening at a time when some other asset classes have seen modest, and in some cases quite volatile, returns. 9 December 2014 RESTRICTED 3 2 NEGATIVE GEARING Negative Gearing Explained o Geared investment - lnvestment purchased with debt ¡ Negatively geared investment - lnvestment purchased with debt where the return on the investment (rental income, dividends) is less than the cost of owning that investment (including the interest on the loan) o 5o also opplies to other investments such os shares (though LVR would be smaller) . Current tax law allows the difference (the loss on the investment) to be claimed as a 100% deduction against wage and salary income*. o Effectively reducing the after-tax cost of holding a loss making investment o Only makes financial sense if the investor expects to make an offsetting future capital gain ¡ Originally introduced to increase the supply of rental properties Interact¡on with Capital Gains Tax ¡ The Bank has stated in the past that we are only concerned with negative gearings interaction with capitalgains tax.
    [Show full text]
  • Negative Gearing Explained
    Negative Gearing Explained By Zelko Maric What Is Negative Gearing? Negative gearing refers to the borrowing of funds to pay for a home which the buyer then rents out. As rental income is usually less than the cost of the interests and outgoings paid on the property the investment is considered to be “negatively geared”. The attraction of borrowing or ‘gearing’ is that you can invest in shares or property that might otherwise have been unaffordable. Negative gearing tends to be adopted as a financial strategy for two main reasons: A negatively geared property can offer immediate tax benefits while also offering the prospect of capital appreciation over time. Negative Gearing and Tax Benefits In Australia investors are allowed to offset an income loss incurred on a real estate investment against another form of income. An income loss takes place when the property holding costs are higher than the rental income from the property. The upside is that you are expecting a potential capital gain that will ultimately be worth more than a definite loss of income. Negatively gearing a property can be very complex. Some expenses are not deductible (stamp duty, initial repairs etc.) while other expenses such as borrowing costs and depreciation are generally claimed over a number of years. Interest on the investment loan is fully tax deductible. Hence if the rent you make on the property in the first year leaves you a couple of thousand dollars short, you can “save” money off your tax bill by deducting the interest spent from your total earnings (salary, wage or rental income).
    [Show full text]
  • Negative Gearing
    NEGATIVE GEARING WHAT IS ‘GEARING?’ WHY WOULD PEOPLE USE NEGATIVE GEARING? Gearing is the term used to describe borrowing money Negative gearing means that (i) you borrowed money to make an investment; to buy an investment asset. The term is used because and (ii) the costs of holding the asset exceed the income the asset creates. To borrowing increases the return of the investment for a compensate for the short-term losses, the investor will need to make a positive given amount of an investor’s money – much like the capital return on the investment – that is, the investment will need to rise in value gears in a car generate more output for a given over time. If that does not happen, then negative gearing is a bad way to make number of revs. an investment! Always remember that gearing makes both types of History shows that, over time, assets such as property or property often rise in investment return bigger – losses and gains. If you value. So many people who use negative gearing find that the eventual capital borrow money to invest and the investment makes a gain more than compensates for the short-term loss that they initially incurred. loss, you lose more of your own money. In addition, negative gearing is often a temporary situation. Typically, rent and dividends rise over time. The rising income means that a negative gearing WHAT IS ‘NEGATIVE GEARING?’ situation often becomes a ‘positive gearing’ situation over time - especially if interest rates fall and/or the investor repays some debt. Negative gearing is a situation where the person The Australian tax system usually allows an investor to offset investment losses holding the investment pays more in loan interest (and against other taxable income.
    [Show full text]
  • Distributional Modelling of Proposed Negative Gearing and Capital Gains Taxation Reform1
    Distributional Modelling of Proposed Negative Gearing and Capital Gains Taxation Reform1 Research Note Ben Phillips Associate Professor ANU Centre for Social Research and Methods February 2016 1 This work was not funded by any external sources and is an independent analysis. The views are those of the author alone. Distributional Modelling of Proposed Negative Gearing and Capital Gains Taxation Reform Contents Overview .............................................................................................................................. 3 Modelling Methodology ........................................................................................................ 4 Negative Gearing distributional analysis .............................................................................. 5 Negative Gearing – potential impacts on rents .................................................................... 8 Capital Gains distributional analysis .................................................................................... 9 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................... 11 The Australian National University | 2 Distributional Modelling of Proposed Negative Gearing and Capital Gains Taxation Reform Overview In the 2012-13 tax year around 1.2 million persons were invested in negatively geared properties in Australia. Around 330,000 persons included capital gains in their taxable income where a 50 per cent discount was applied. Australian taxation
    [Show full text]
  • Tax Expenditure and Housing
    Tax expenditures and housing authored by Judith Yates for the Brotherhood of St Laurence Published by the Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute September 2009 ISBN: 978-1-921610-18-9 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This material was produced with funding from the Brotherhood of St Laurence. AHURI Ltd gratefully acknowledges the Brotherhood of St Laurence, without whom this work would not have been possible. DISCLAIMER AHURI Ltd is an independent, non-political body which has supported this project as part of its programme of research into housing and urban development, which it hopes will be of value to policy-makers, researchers, industry and communities. The opinions in this publication reflect the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of AHURI Ltd, its Board or its funding organisations. No responsibility is accepted by AHURI Ltd or its Board or its funders for the accuracy or omission of any statement, opinion, advice or information in this publication. i CONTENTS CONTENTS .................................................................................................................... II TABLES ......................................................................................................................... III FIGURES ....................................................................................................................... IV BOXES .......................................................................................................................... IV EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]