Copyright © 2017 Linda Marie Reed All Rights Reserved. the Southern
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Copyright © 2017 Linda Marie Reed All rights reserved. The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary has permission to reproduce and disseminate this document in any form by any means for purposes chosen by the Seminary, including, without limitation, preservation or instruction. THEOLOGICAL AND PRACTICAL MINISTRY TRAINING FOR WOMEN IN COMPLEMENTARIAN HIGHER EDUCATION: A MIXED METHODS STUDY __________________ A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary __________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Education __________________ by Linda Marie Reed December 2017 APPROVAL SHEET THEOLOGICAL AND PRACTICAL MINISTRY TRAINING FOR WOMEN IN COMPLEMENTARIAN HIGHER EDUCATION: A MIXED METHODS STUDY Linda Marie Reed Read and Approved by: __________________________________________ Anthony Wayne Foster (Chair) __________________________________________ John David Trentham Date ______________________________ To my Lord. And my husband, Rick. For all the extra trips made just for me. For all the printer jams that you set free. For all the courage you brought to life. For all the truth you made just right. For this dream you made come true. For all the love I found in you. I am forever grateful. I am who I am because you love me. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES . vii PREFACE . ix Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION TO RESEARCH CONCERN . 1 Research Problem . 5 Purpose Statement . 6 Research Questions . 7 Procedural Overview . 7 Research Delimitations . 9 Terminology . 10 Methodological Design . 13 Research Assumptions . 14 Thesis Overview . 15 Conclusion . 17 2. PRECEDENT LITERATURE . 18 Introduction . 18 The Biblical Foundation for Complementarianism . 19 The History of Complementarianism . 28 Complementarian Higher Education . 59 Rationale for Future Research . 75 Summary . 77 iv Chapter Page 3. METHODOLOGICAL DESIGN . 79 Purpose Statement . 80 Research Questions . 81 Research Design Overview . 82 Coding Criteria . 83 Research Delimitations . 85 Sample and Delimitations . 86 Limitations of Generalizations . 88 Research Method and Instrumentation . 88 Ethics Committee Process. 89 Research Procedural Overview . 90 Current Status of the Research Problem . 91 Research Competencies . 92 4. ANALYSIS OF FINDINGS . 94 Compilation Protocol Overview . 94 Demographics . 95 Complementarian Higher Educational Institutions . 103 Compilation of Content Analysis Data . 111 Mixed Methodology Data Analysis Summary . 113 Findings and Displays by Research Question . 113 Summary of Programs . 139 Qualitative Data Solely Based upon Interview Responses . 157 Exclusions or Defiled Data . 180 Conclusion . 181 5. CONCLUSIONS . 183 Research Purpose . 183 Research Questions. 184 v Page Research Implications: Scriptural Model . 185 Research Conclusions . 188 Conclusions Summary . 215 Applications of the Research . 217 Evaluation of Research Design . 224 Research Limitations . 227 Further Research . 227 Appendix 1. MINISTRY OPPORTUNITIES FOR COMPLEMENTARIAN WOMEN . 230 2. INSTRUMENTATION FOR CONTENT ANALYSIS OF CATALOGS ON INSTITUTIONAL WEBSITES . 235 3. INSTRUMENTATION FOR CONTENT ANALYSIS COMPARISON AND PRESENTATION . 236 4. PERMISSION TO INTERVIEW FEMALE FACULTY/DIRECTORS AT COMPLEMENTARIAN SCHOOLS . 238 5. CONTENT ANALYSIS PRESENTATION FOR RESEARCH GROUP 1 . 240 6. CONTENT ANALYSIS PRESENTATION FOR RESEARCH GROUP 2 . 266 7. COURSES BY CATEGORY AT RG1 INSTITUTIONS . 273 8. SUGGESTIONS FOR COMPLEMENTARIAN EDUCATION . 282 9. ATS SEMINARY ENROLLMENT TRENDS . 285 BIBLIOGRAPHY . 287 vi LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES Table Page 1. “U.S. Denominations and their Stances on Women in Leadership,” from Christians for Biblical Equality . 97 2. Gordon Conwell “Denominational Chart” by egalitarian/complementarian 2015 . 98 3. Combined CBE and Gordon denomination data, CBE (dark) Gordon Conwell (light) . 99 4. Enrollment at the top 25 Protestant seminaries by FTE—Fall 2016 . 105 5. Question 1. “What statement is made regarding the roles of men and women in ministry?” Content analysis of Schools listed by Wayne Grudem (RG1) . 115 6. Question 1: What statement is made regarding the roles of men and women in ministry? Additional schools with complementarian statements . 118 7. Additional complementarian statements on institutional websites and catalogs . 121 8. Search of Canadian institutions for complementarian statements . 123 9. Distribution of program concentrations designed for women at complementarian schools cited by Grudem (n=14) . 129 10. Research group 1: “What specific programs are offered to equip women for life and ministry?” . 130 11. Research group 1: Description of specific programs to equip women for life and ministry . 131 12. Programs designed for women at additional complementarian schools . 134 13. Institutions and number of courses specifically for women . 145 vii Table Page 14. Course categories noted by course titles by rank, course title, frequency in academic programs (includes all courses for B.A., M.A., D.Min, D.Ed.Min., Ph.D.) . 147 15. Course delivery methods among complementarian courses for women in RG1 . 154 16. How would you describe complementarian education at your school? . 164 17. How were the academic programs and courses developed for women? Axial coding of participant suggestions . 167 A1. Total Summary Responses to Question 7: “What suggestions would you make for the future of complementarian education?” . 283 A2. Trends in enrollment from 2009-2016 for ATS seminaries.