Land Off Church Street, Cropwell Bishop

Land off Church Street, Cropwell Bishop

Transport Statement

November 2018

On Behalf of: On behalf o:

Waterman Infrastructure & Environment Limited Halifax House, Halifax Place, Nottingham, NG1 1QN www.watermangroup.com

Client Name: Terra Strategic Document Reference: WIE14662-100-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement Project Number: WIE14662-100

Quality Assurance – Approval Status

This document has been prepared and checked in accordance with Waterman Group’s IMS (BS EN ISO 9001: 2015, BS EN ISO 14001: 2015 and BS OHSAS 18001:2007)

Issue Date Prepared by Checked by Approved by 1 July 2018 Niall Fleming Nick Jones-Hill Nick Jones-Hill Graduate Engineer Senior Associate Director Senior Associate Director

2 Nov 2018 Niall Fleming Nick Jones-Hill Nick Jones-Hill Graduate Engineer Senior Associate Director Senior Associate Director

Comments

1 - Report issued to Client on Friday 13th July 2018

2 - Report updated following changes to the site masterplan. Re-issued to Client on Thursday 8th November 2018.

Disclaimer

This report has been prepared by Waterman Infrastructure & Environment Limited, with all reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of the Contract with the client, incorporation of our General Terms and Condition of Business and taking account of the resources devoted to us by agreement with the client. We disclaim any responsibility to the client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of the above. This report is confidential to the client and we accept no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report, or any part thereof, is made known. Any such party relies on the report at its own risk.

Contents 1. Introduction ...... 1 1.1 Background ...... 1 1.2 Planning History ...... 1 1.3 Aims and Objectives ...... 2 1.4 Report Layout ...... 2 2. Existing Conditions and Sustainable Transport ...... 3 2.1 Site Location ...... 3 2.2 Cropwell Bishop ...... 3 2.3 Local Highway Network ...... 4 2.4 Collision Statistics ...... 5 2.5 Sustainable Transport ...... 6 2.5.1 Walking ...... 6 2.5.2 Cycling ...... 7 2.5.3 Public Transport – Bus ...... 7 2.5.4 Public Transport – Rail ...... 8 2.5.5 Sustainable Transport Summary ...... 8 3. Accessibility ...... 9 3.1 Accessibility to Education ...... 9 3.2 Accessibility to Health ...... 9 3.3 Accessibility to Employment ...... 9 3.4 Accessibility to Retail and Leisure ...... 9 4. Development Proposals ...... 10 4.1 Development ...... 10 4.2 Site Access Arrangement ...... 10 5. Sustainable Accessibility ...... 11 5.1 Introduction ...... 11 5.2 Sustainable Transport ...... 11 5.3 Walking ...... 11 5.4 Public Transport ...... 12 5.5 New Residents Local Sustainable Travel Pack ...... 12 5.6 Travel Plan Statement ...... 12 6. Trip Generation and Distribution ...... 13 6.1 Proposed Development Vehicular Trip Generation ...... 13 6.2 Trip Distribution ...... 14 7. Local Highway Network ...... 16

Contents Land off Church Street, Cropwell Bishop Document Reference: WIE14662-100 WIE14662-100-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement N:\Projects\WIE14662 Cropwell Bishop, Nottinghamshire\100\8_Reports\001 - Transport Statement\14662-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement.docx

7.1 Introduction ...... 16 7.2 Study Area ...... 16 7.3 Existing Traffic Flows ...... 16 7.4 Assessment Year & Traffic Growth ...... 17 7.5 Traffic Network Diagrams ...... 17 7.6 Site Access Capacity Assessment Results ...... 18 7.7 Church Street/Nottingham Road/Fern Road Capacity Assessment Results ...... 18 7.8 Summary ...... 19 8. Construction Traffic Management Plan ...... 20 8.1 Traffic Management Measures ...... 20 9. Conclusion ...... 21

Figures Figure 1: Housing Allocation at Cropwell Bishop ...... 1 Figure 2: Site Location Plan ...... 3 Figure 3: Collision Location Plan (2013-2017) ...... 5 Figure 4: Public Rights of Way - Cropwell Bishop...... 6 Figure 5: Rushcliffe 010 SOA Boundary ...... 14 Figure 6: Chruch Street/Nottingham Road/Fern Road Junction - Peak Hour Traffic Flows ...... 17

Tables Table 1: Cropwell Bishop Local Facilities ...... 4 Table 2: Bus Service Information ...... 8 Table 3: Person Based Trip Rates ...... 13 Table 4: 2011 Census Data - Method of Travel to Work - Rushcliffe 010 SOA ...... 13 Table 5: Development Generated Vechicular Trips ...... 14 Table 6: Church Street - Traffic Flows & Speeds...... 16 Table 7: Site Access - Junction Capacity Assessment Results ...... 18 Table 8: Church Street/Nottingham Road/Fern Road Junction Capacity Assessment Results .. 18

Appendices A. Site Location Plan B. Local Facilities Plan C. Public Transport Information D. Preliminary Site Masterplan E. Site Access Design F. TRICS Outputs G. Trip Distribution Calculations H. Traffic Survey Data I. Traffic Network Diagrams J. Site Access Capacity Assessment Results K. Church Street / Nottingham Road Capacity Assessment Results

1. Introduction

1.1 Background This Transport Statement report has been prepared by Waterman Infrastructure & Environment Ltd. on behalf of Terra Strategic in support of an Outline Application for a development of up to 85 dwellings on land to the east of Church Street in Cropwell Bishop, Nottinghamshire. The location of the site is shown in Appendix A. Vehicular access to the development would be achieved via a new mini-roundabout junction on Church Street. The Local Highway Authority for the area is Nottinghamshire County Council (NCC).

1.2 Planning History Terra Strategic have been promoting the site as a possible allocation for 70 dwellings through the Rushcliffe Borough Council Site Allocations DPD. The site (Policy 7.2) has been included within the Councils Local Plan Part 2 published in May 2018. Figure 1 below shows the location and proposed allocation of the site.

Figure 1: Housing Allocation at Cropwell Bishop

Source: http://www.rushcliffe.gov.uk/media/1rushcliffe/media/documents/pdf/planningandbuilding/planningpolicy

In respect to highways / transport the policy wording within the document confirms that:  “a new junction comprising a mini roundabout on Church Street will provide access to the site and an additional access and parking for the neighbouring primary school.”  “the right of way along the allocation’s eastern and southern boundaries must be retained as part of multi-functional green infrastructure buffers which retain the existing rights of way and provide a visually attractive settlement edge.”

1 Land off Church Street, Cropwell Bishop Document Reference: WIE14662-100-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement N:\Projects\WIE14662 Cropwell Bishop, Nottinghamshire\100\8_Reports\001 - Transport Statement\14662-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement.docx

The justification for inclusion within the Local Plan is (in respect to transport): “The allocation of this land offers an opportunity to provide a new access and parking for the existing primary school, which is adjacent to the site. The current access to the school, via Stockwell Lane, is not suitable for this purpose and roads in the vicinity of the school are congested at peak times. An additional access off Church Street and parking adjacent to the school site would alleviate these issues and provide a safer environment for pupils and their families. The site is bounded by public footpaths to the south and east, and by the sewage treatment works to the north. The delivery of multi-functional green infrastructure along these boundaries, which retain and improve rights of way and publicly accessible open space, deliver net-gains in biodiversity, manage surface water run-off and create a visually attractive settlement edge, should be incorporated into the design and layout of the proposal”.

1.3 Aims and Objectives The objective of this report is to provide NCC with the necessary level of detail to demonstrate that the site would be accessed safely and sustainably from Church Street, whilst also assessing the transport impact the proposals would have on the existing highway network and identifying how such impacts would be mitigated. This Transport Statement and the accompanying Travel Plan Statement are designed to ensure that sustainable transport alternatives are promoted and utilised.

1.4 Report Layout Following this introductory section, the layout of the study is as follows:  Section 2 describes the existing local conditions and sustainable transport facilities;  Section 3 considers access to local facilities;  The development proposals are outlined in Section 4;  Section 5 provides details on how the proposed development would provide appropriate measures to influence travel behaviour and promote sustainable transport modes;  Development trip generation and distribution is examined in section 6;  The impact of the development upon the local highway network is discussed in Section 7;  The Construction Traffic Management Plan is outlined in Section 8; and  Section 9 summarises the report.

2 Land off Church Street, Cropwell Bishop Document Reference: WIE14662-100-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement N:\Projects\WIE14662 Cropwell Bishop, Nottinghamshire\100\8_Reports\001 - Transport Statement\14662-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement.docx

2. Existing Conditions and Sustainable Transport

2.1 Site Location The site is located on land to the east of Church Street in Cropwell Bishop, Nottinghamshire. The location of the site is illustrated in Figure 2 below. A plan illustrating the site location is also provided in Appendix A. The application site consists of approximately 4.6 hectares of agricultural land.

Figure 2: Site Location Plan

Site Boundary

Source: https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@52.9147547,-0.9847446,1124m/data=!3m1!1e3

To the north the site is bound by a narrow lane that links the site to Cropwell Butler Road, whilst to the east it is bound by fields under the ownership of the same landowner of the proposed allocation site. To the south, the site is bound by residential properties and Cropwell Bishop School, whilst to the west it is bound by both residential properties and Church Street.

2.2 Cropwell Bishop Cropwell Bishop is a village and civil parish in the borough of Rushcliffe, located circa 7.5 miles (12 km) southeast of the centre of Nottingham. The population taken at the time of the 2011 Census was 1,853. The site is situated in an ideal location, with access to an abundance of local amenities such as schools which include Cropwell Bishop Primary School, Colston Bassett School and Kinoulton Primary School. Local pubs, shops and a GP Surgery are also located within a short walking distance of the site.

3 Land off Church Street, Cropwell Bishop Document Reference: WIE14662-100-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement N:\Projects\WIE14662 Cropwell Bishop, Nottinghamshire\100\8_Reports\001 - Transport Statement\14662-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement.docx

Table 1 below, identifies local community facilities available in the Cropwell Bishop. A plan illustrating the location of local facilities is included in Appendix B

Table 1: Cropwell Bishop Local Facilities Distance Facility Centre of Site Maximum* Co-op Food Store and Post Office (Church Street) 220m 370m Co-op Food Store (Nottingham Road) 550m 700m Church Street Bus Stop ‘The Maltings’ 220m 370m Cropwell Bishop Primary School 370m 520m Chequers Inn Public House 340m 590m The Wheatsheaf Public House 550m 700m Cropwell Bishop Surgery 710m 860m Village Hall 610m 760m * Distance measured from the north-east corner of the site. Overall it can be seen that a wide range of local facilities are available within a reasonable walking and cycling distance of the site.

2.3 Local Highway Network The site is conveniently located to access key highway routes in the vicinity of Cropwell Bishop, with access to the Greater Nottingham conurbation available via the A52 corridor to the west. The A46 also provides access to Newark/Lincoln to the north and Leicester/M1 Motorway to the south. Church Street extends between Nottingham Road to the south and Cropwell Butler Road to the north. In the vicinity of the site it is subject to a 30-mph speed limit. The carriageway measures approximately 6.2 metres wide at the site frontage, with footways measuring 1.2 metres along the eastern edge of carriageway and approximately 1.5 metres along the western edge. On-Street parking occurs along Church Street to the south of the site, primarily on the western side of the carriageway. It was evident from on-site observations shown that much of the off-peak parking along Church Street was associated with the Co-op Food Store. Photographs illustrating the existing conditions along Church Street are provided below in Photograph 1 (Northbound) and Photograph 2 (Southbound). Photographs taken on the 20th June 2018 at approximately 2:30pm.

Photograph 1: Church Street (Northbound) Photograph 2: Church Street (Southbound)

4 Land off Church Street, Cropwell Bishop Document Reference: WIE14662-100-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement N:\Projects\WIE14662 Cropwell Bishop, Nottinghamshire\100\8_Reports\001 - Transport Statement\14662-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement.docx

Existing vehicular access is provided into the site off Church Street, via a gated dropped kerb access as shown in Photograph 3 below.

Photograph 3: Church Street - Existing Site Access Arrangement

2.4 Collision Statistics Collision statistics for the most recent five-year period (2013-2017), taken from the CrashMap website identifies three collisions were recorded in Cropwell Bishop. A plan illustrating the location of these collisions, in respect to the location of the site, is provided below, Figure 3.

Figure 3: Collision Location Plan (2013-2017)

Site Boundary Slight Severity Collision Serious Severity Collision

Source: http://www.crashmap.co.uk/Search

5 Land off Church Street, Cropwell Bishop Document Reference: WIE14662-100-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement N:\Projects\WIE14662 Cropwell Bishop, Nottinghamshire\100\8_Reports\001 - Transport Statement\14662-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement.docx

Adjacent the site there have been no recorded collisions on Church Street. Overall the number and pattern of recorded collisions within the study area (Cropwell Bishop) is generally consistent with what would be expected for the levels of traffic flow and the scale/nature of the roads and junctions on the highway network. As a result, further analysis interrogating the reasons behind the collisions is not considered necessary. The development proposals and associated traffic are not considered to be detrimental to highway safety.

2.5 Sustainable Transport To minimise the impact of the proposed development upon the local highway network it is important that the site can be accessed via a range of sustainable travel options which residents could use. The following paragraphs consider the existing level of sustainable transport near the site. 2.5.1 Walking There is an extensive network of footways within the local area which offer good pedestrian access throughout Cropwell Bishop. Church Street includes footways on both sides of the carriageway extending to Nottingham Road. Cropwell Bishop Primary School, Co-op, GP Surgery, Church, hair dressers and a post office are all located within a reasonable walking distance of the site. The Public Rights of Way (PRoW) network provides alternative traffic free routs for pedestrians locally. A plan illustrating the local PRoW network is provided below, Figure 4.

Figure 4: Public Rights of Way - Cropwell Bishop

Site Boundary

Source: http://www.rowmaps.com

6 Land off Church Street, Cropwell Bishop Document Reference: WIE14662-100-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement N:\Projects\WIE14662 Cropwell Bishop, Nottinghamshire\100\8_Reports\001 - Transport Statement\14662-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement.docx

Two public footpaths route through the site:  Cropwell Bishop FP5 routes through the site in east-west direction from Church Street to Cropwell Bishop FP2  Cropwell Bishop FP2 runs through the site in a north-south direction from Fern Road to the south joining FP3 to the north. Overall it is considered that the footways within Cropwell Bishop provide safe access to the bus stops and a range of local facilities (detailed above) and leisure routes. Given the level of pedestrian infrastructure in the vicinity of the site, and links to facilities in an acceptable walking distance the site considered to be well located to encourage pedestrian journeys, in place of car journeys to local facilities. 2.5.2 Cycling It is widely recognised that cycling can act as a substitute for short car journeys, particularly those up to 5 miles (8km) in length. On this basis, Cotgrave, Radcliffe-on-Trent and Bingham are all accessible from the site by cycling. A review of the www.sustrans.org.uk website highlights that there are no formal cycle routes in the village of Cropwell Bishop. Cycling within the vicinity of the site is achieved largely by on-road cycling. Nevertheless, cycling trips should still be encouraged to/from the site as a number of local roads are considered to be suitable for cycling, due to reasonably low levels of vehicular traffic and wide street lit carriageways. Overall, the site is well located to encourage cycle journeys in place of car journeys to/from Cropwell Bishop. A key objective of the development would therefore be to encourage as many as possible of these short / local trips to be undertaken by cycling. 2.5.3 Public Transport – Bus The CIHT document ‘Planning for Public Transport in Developments’ recommends that bus stops are located within a 400m walking distance of a site, but recognises that this distance should be treated as guidance only. It is understood that NCC operate to more locally focused design guidance which is contained within the 6C’s Design Guide. This document states: “Generally walking distances to bus stops in urban areas should be a maximum of 400m and desirably no more than 250m. In rural areas the walking distance should not be more than 800m”. The nearest bus stops are located approximately 75 metres to the south of the site on Church Street. These bus stops consist of flag and pole arrangements and are served by Route Numbers 41, 822, 850 and 852. These services connect the site to Nottingham city centre, Bingham, Radcliffe on Trent and Cotgrave. Table 2 overleaf provides a summary of the bus services operating within the local area. The bus timetable is included in Appendix C.

7 Land off Church Street, Cropwell Bishop Document Reference: WIE14662-100-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement N:\Projects\WIE14662 Cropwell Bishop, Nottinghamshire\100\8_Reports\001 - Transport Statement\14662-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement.docx

Table 2: Bus Service Information

Service & Monday to Saturday Frequency Sunday Frequency Key Destinations Operator Daytime Evening Daytime 1 daytime 41 Puffery’s Cropwell Bishop – service on - - Coaches Bingham – Grantham Thursdays Nottingham – 822 Your Cotgrave – Cropwell 60 mins - - Bus Bishop - Bingham 850 NCC Colston Bassett – Transport Cropwell Bishop – 2 services - - Services Radcliffe-on-Trent 852 NCC Cotgrave – Cropwell 3 daytime Transport Bishop – Radcliffe-on- - - services Services Trent The Your Bus 822 (formally V2) is the most frequent service which operates to/from Cropwell Bishop running every hour between Nottingham, West Bridgford, Cropwell Bishop and Bingham on Monday to Saturday. This Your Bus service is run on behalf of Nottinghamshire County Council. Travel by bus would be a convenient option for trips to / from the development by many future residents.

2.5.4 Public Transport – Rail The nearest rail stations to the site are Bingham and Radcliffe on Trent, which are approximately 5km to the north of the site. These stations are both located on the Nottingham to Grantham Line (continuing through to Skegness) and provide direct rail connections to Nottingham Station which is located circa 14.5km to the west of the site. Nottingham Station provides a link to major cities including London and Birmingham. Sheltered cycle storage spaces are available at this station along with a large multi-storey car park (circa 950 spaces). The Station is also accessible via public transport via the Cropwell Bishop Connection service.

2.5.5 Sustainable Transport Summary With generally favourable local topography, walking and cycling may be considered realistic options for journeys within Cropwell Bishop. Cycling would also be a realistic option for residents wishing to travel to/from destinations such as Cotgrave, Radcliffe-on-Trent and Bingham. Existing public transport services provide a realistic opportunity for future residents of the site to travel to destinations such as Bingham, Cotgrave and Nottingham city centre. It is therefore considered that the development proposals represent a sustainable form of development, having regard to accessibility to local services and alternative modes of transport to the private car.

8 Land off Church Street, Cropwell Bishop Document Reference: WIE14662-100-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement N:\Projects\WIE14662 Cropwell Bishop, Nottinghamshire\100\8_Reports\001 - Transport Statement\14662-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement.docx

3. Accessibility This section considers the accessibility from the development, by modes of sustainable transport to local facilities including education, health services, employment, leisure and retail. To demonstrate the sustainability of the site, guidelines from the CIHT with regards to acceptable walking distances to services have been used. For a settlement such as Cropwell Bishop it is considered that a distance of 400m is desirable, 800m acceptable, with a maximum distance of 1.6km walking distance to local services. This section therefore considers the accessibility from the development, by modes of sustainable transport to local facilities including education, health services, employment, leisure and retail. The location of local facilities in Cropwell Bishop is illustrated in Appendix B.

3.1 Accessibility to Education Primary school education is available at Cropwell Bishop Primary School, located directly to the south of the site. Secondary education is available in Bingham at Toot Hill School (2.7 miles from the site) and in Radcliffe-on-Trent at South Nottinghamshire Academy (3 miles from the site).

3.2 Accessibility to Health The developments most accessible primary health care facility is the Cropwell Bishop Surgery located off Fern Road, approximately 710m to the south of the site. The surgery therefore lies within a short walking/cycle ride from the site.

3.3 Accessibility to Employment Cropwell Bishop it is not considered to be a primary employment location and many residents commute out of the village to access employment opportunities in destinations such as Nottingham, Grantham and Leicester.

3.4 Accessibility to Retail and Leisure Local retail and leisure facilities are limited to a Co-op Food Store, Post Office, public houses, church and village hall. Residents are more likely to travel to Bingham (circa 2.7 miles north of the site) which is host to a range of facilities including a leisure centre, Natwest and Lloyds banks, restaurants, public houses, library and numerous food and non-food retail outlets. Many retail and leisure facilities are also provided in Nottingham including restaurants, cinemas, theatres and a range of brand name and independent stores. Bingham and Nottingham are both accessible using the 822 YourBus service.

9 Land off Church Street, Cropwell Bishop Document Reference: WIE14662-100-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement N:\Projects\WIE14662 Cropwell Bishop, Nottinghamshire\100\8_Reports\001 - Transport Statement\14662-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement.docx

4. Development Proposals

4.1 Development The development proposals consist of up to 85 residential dwellings. A copy of the preliminary site masterplan is provided in Appendix D.

4.2 Site Access Arrangement Vehicular access to the development would be achieved via mini-roundabout directly onto Church Street as shown in Appendix E. The access road would be designed with a 5.5-metre-wide carriageway, 2 x 2m wide footways. Pedestrians would be able to access the site from Church Street and via the existing PRoW network as shown on the site masterplan in Appendix D. Road Safety Audit A Stage 1 Road Safety Audit (RSA) was undertaken on the initial site access proposals (drawing WIE14662-SA-03-002-A01) during July 2018. The Audit highlighted safety issues in respect to the location/visibility of the roundabout for drivers travelling southbound on Church Street. As a result of the Road Safety Audit the design and location of the mini-roundabout was amended so that the forward visibility to the mini-roundabout was improved. The amended design is provided in Appendix E (drawing WIE14662-SA-03-002-A02). Internal Layout The internal layout would be finalised once a Reserved Matters application is made. For this application, only the access is being considered, as described above. As part of the Reserved Matters application the applicant would submit vehicle tracking which shows that a refuse vehicle of not less than 11.6m in length can enter and exit the site safely in forward gear. The layout of the site would be designed so that a refuse vehicle would be able to get within 25m of all bin collection points.

Parking Provision Car parking provision and guidance are discussed within both the DCLG’s ‘Residential Car Parking Research’ and NCC ‘Residential Car Parking Research for Nottinghamshire – Highway Development Control Guidance’ (February 2010) document. However, it is understood from discussions with NCC Highway Development Control Officers that the following provision is now requested for residential developments in Nottinghamshire:  4 or more bedrooms – 3 parking spaces; and  3 or fewer bedrooms – 2 parking spaces. Parking provision is to be provided in line with that identified above. School Access/Parking Provision Following consultation with Cropwell Bishop Primary School the development proposals would include a new vehicular link through the site to the School. The proposals would also include a staff and parent drop off/pick up car park. The car park would include 36 spaces of which 8 spaces would be allocated for staff parking only. The additional access and parking would create a safer environment for pupils and parents to access / egress the school site.

10 Land off Church Street, Cropwell Bishop Document Reference: WIE14662-100-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement N:\Projects\WIE14662 Cropwell Bishop, Nottinghamshire\100\8_Reports\001 - Transport Statement\14662-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement.docx

5. Sustainable Accessibility

5.1 Introduction This section provides details on how the proposed development would provide appropriate measures to influence travel behaviour and promote accessibility by all modes of travel, particularly walking, cycling and public transport.

5.2 Sustainable Transport One key objective of the development is to encourage residents to travel by sustainable modes of transport to limit the number of single-occupancy vehicle movements that are generated. This objective would be achieved by:  Encouraging the use of alternative modes of transport to the private car to reduce environmental impacts for all journeys to and from the proposed development;  Delivering long-term commitment to changing travel habits by minimising the percentage of journeys to and from the development made by single occupancy cars, and maximise the proportion of trips to the development made by public transport, by car share, on foot and by cycle;  Educating residents regarding the health benefits of walking and cycling;  Addressing residents’ need for access to a full range of facilities for work, education, health, leisure, recreation and shopping;  Reducing traffic generated by development to a significantly lower level of car trips than would be predicted without the implementation of a Travel Plan; and  Promoting healthy lifestyles and vibrant communities. The following paragraphs detail a range of measures that are proposed to encourage residents to travel by sustainable modes of transport.

5.3 Walking The proposed development is within a reasonable walking distance of several local facilities in Cropwell Bishop. To promote walking trips, the following infrastructure improvements are proposed:  Pedestrian links are to be provided from the proposed development onto Church Street and to/from the PRoW network (FP2 and FP5).  Pedestrian facilities within the development would be a minimum width of 2 metres;  Appropriate pedestrian crossing facilities would be provided internally within the site and at the site access junction. i.e. uncontrolled dropped crossings and tactile paving;  All pedestrian routes would be adequately surfaced and lighting would be provided in accordance with local design standards; and  All footway routes would be designed to ensure that they are open and subject to appropriate levels of natural surveillance.

11 Land off Church Street, Cropwell Bishop Document Reference: WIE14662-100-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement N:\Projects\WIE14662 Cropwell Bishop, Nottinghamshire\100\8_Reports\001 - Transport Statement\14662-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement.docx

5.4 Public Transport It is considered that travel by bus would represent an attractive public transport mode for users of the proposed development, particularly for travel to/from Nottingham. The proposed development would seek to take advantage of public transport facilities and services within the adjacent area. Provision of information on bus services would be easily accessible to all residents, in advance of occupying the site. Information would include details on routes, services, timetables and fares. This information would be displayed in ‘New Household Sustainable Travel Packs’ (discussed below). Through the provision of ‘New Household Local Sustainable Travel Packs’ vouchers for 2 free bus passes (for 3 months) per household would be provided. These vouchers would be provided on request to the first occupiers of each property only. Such provision would significantly influence the travel patterns of residents in favour of public transport and can also be promoted in the sales material for the units. Establishing a culture of public transport use at the early stages of the development’s life would also encourage more people to use such modes in the long term.

5.5 New Residents Local Sustainable Travel Pack It is proposed that all new residents of the development would receive a local sustainable travel pack upon occupation. The travel pack would provide useful information in relation to sustainable travel options to assist residents in making informed choices for travelling to/from the site. The travel packs would include information such as:  Plans showing the location of local bus stops and rail stations;  Details of the services from the local bus stops;  Walking maps and plans showing local cycle routes;  Contact details for organisations providing public transport information;  Details of local taxi operators;  Plans showing local amenities and facilities (shops, schools and community facilities); and  Details of local discounted ticketing arrangements for public transport operators. The sales team would ensure that the travel packs contain up-to-date information on public transport services. The travel packs would be provided in hard copy, however, the information could also be provided on any website which is used to promote or advertise the proposed development.

5.6 Travel Plan Statement In support of the planning application a Travel Plan Statement report has been prepared. The Travel Plan sets out measures that would be put in place at the site in order to, as far as is practical given the rural nature of the site, promote sustainable alternatives to private car use. The scope and content of this Travel Plan would be binding through incorporation within a Section 106 Agreement on grant of the formal planning permission for the proposed development.

12 Land off Church Street, Cropwell Bishop Document Reference: WIE14662-100-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement N:\Projects\WIE14662 Cropwell Bishop, Nottinghamshire\100\8_Reports\001 - Transport Statement\14662-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement.docx

6. Trip Generation and Distribution

6.1 Proposed Development Vehicular Trip Generation To estimate the trips likely to be generated by the development, person-based trip rates have been derived from the TRICS online database (version 7.5.1). Trip rates were obtained using the ‘Houses Privately Owned’ land use category. Only multi-modal surveys were selected, with sites outside of England excluded from the analysis as unrepresentative. Only sites in the Suburban and Neighbourhood Centre zones and with between 25-150 dwellings were selected. This resulted in a dataset of 20 weekday surveys (Monday-Friday). The assessment considers only the morning and evening weekday peak hours, which are the times at which the wider highway network is typically under the greatest level of stress. Trip rates have therefore been obtained for the periods 08:00-09:00 and 17:00-18:00 only. These periods are the peak periods for ‘Houses Privately Owned’. The resulting morning and evening peak hour trip rates are shown in Table 3. The TRICS outputs are provided in Appendix F.

Table 3: Person Based Trip Rates Trip Rate per Dwelling Trip Generation for 85 Dwellings Time Period Arrivals Departures Total Arrivals Departures Total AM Peak 0.170 0.658 0.828 14 56 70 PM Peak 0.517 0.249 0.766 44 21 65

To convert the person-based trip rates into vehicle trip rates, 2011 method of travel to work census data was obtained for the Rushcliffe 010 Super Output Area (SOA). This data is presented in Table 4 below.

Table 4: 2011 Census Data - Method of Travel to Work - Rushcliffe 010 SOA

Mode Journey to Work Trips Journey to Work % Underground, Light Rail, Tram 4 0% Train 25 1% Bus, Minibus or Coach 109 4% Taxi 4 0% Motorcycle, Scooter or Moped 10 0% Driving a Car or Van 2,126 81% Passenger in a Car or Van 110 4% Bicycle 57 2% On Foot 158 6% Other 16 1% A plan illustrating the Rushcliffe 010 SOA boundary is provided overleaf in Figure 5.

13 Land off Church Street, Cropwell Bishop Document Reference: WIE14662-100-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement N:\Projects\WIE14662 Cropwell Bishop, Nottinghamshire\100\8_Reports\001 - Transport Statement\14662-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement.docx

Figure 5: Rushcliffe 010 SOA Boundary

Site Location Ward Boundary

By applying the figure for driving a car or van (81%) to the person trip generation figures presented in Table 3, the volume of trips by car/van can be calculated for the development and these are shown in Table 5 below.

Table 5: Development Generated Vechicular Trips Time Period Arrivals Departures Total AM Peak (8am-9am) 12 45 57 PM Peak (5pm-6pm) 36 17 53

The proposed development would generate 57 two-way vehicular trips during the morning peak hour and 53 two-way vehicular trips during the evening peak hour. This equates to less than 1 additional vehicle trip every minute during the highway peak periods.

6.2 Trip Distribution Origin/destination statistics included within the 2011 Census data, provide a useful indication as to where people in Cropwell Bishop travel to for work purposes. Census data for the Rushcliffe 010 Super Output Area (which incorporates the village of Cropwell Bishop) reveals that people currently travel to the following destinations (Local Authorities) for work. See Table 5. A copy of the Census data and the development trip calculations are provided within Appendix G.

14 Land off Church Street, Cropwell Bishop Document Reference: WIE14662-100-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement N:\Projects\WIE14662 Cropwell Bishop, Nottinghamshire\100\8_Reports\001 - Transport Statement\14662-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement.docx

Table 5: 2011 Travel to Work Data - Rushcliffe 010 SOA

Local Authority Number of Trips Percentage Rushcliffe 579 33% Nottingham 480 28% Melton 105 6% Charnwood 85 5% Gedling 72 4% Newark & Sherwood 67 4% Leicester 60 3% Broxtowe 45 3% Ashfield 29 2% Blaby 27 2% Other 191 11% Note: Places of work where fewer than 3 people travelling to have been excluded from the analysis. As shown in Table 5, the majority of people travel to work within Nottinghamshire i.e. to destinations such as Nottingham City and Rushcliffe (Bingham, Radcliffe-on-Trent, Ruddington, Cotgrave, West Bridgford etc). Analysis of the route people are likely to take to these destinations has been undertaken using Google maps (route planner). The development trip calculations result in 91% of trips routeing via Nottingham Road towards the A46 and Stragglethorpe Road. A plan illustrating the distribution of to/from the site is included within Appendix G.

15 Land off Church Street, Cropwell Bishop Document Reference: WIE14662-100-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement N:\Projects\WIE14662 Cropwell Bishop, Nottinghamshire\100\8_Reports\001 - Transport Statement\14662-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement.docx

7. Local Highway Network

7.1 Introduction This section of the report considers the impact of the development upon the local highway network.

7.2 Study Area Consideration has been given to the scale of the proposed development and the characteristics of the surrounding highway network when determining which off-site junctions are to be assessed. It was agreed with NCC that the impact of the development would be assessed at the site access and at the Church Street/Nottingham Road/Fern Road junction.

7.3 Existing Traffic Flows To ascertain background traffic flows on the local highway network, an Automatic Traffic Counter (ATC) was installed on Church Street (adjacent to the site) for a 7-day period, between Tuesday 19th June and Monday 25th June 2018. The ATC recorded the number of vehicles passing the site and their speed. A photograph illustrating the ATC location is provided below.

Photograph 4: Chruch Street ATC

A summary of the key ATC results is presented in Table 6. The full results are provided in Appendix H. Table 6: Church Street - Traffic Flows & Speeds Number of Vehicles th (5 Day Average) Vehicle Flow 5 Day 85 Direction 24 hours Percentile AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 5 Day Average Speed (mph) (08:00 - 09:00) (17:00 - 18:00) Northbound 79 64 873 25.9

Southbound 80 82 830 26.1

16 Land off Church Street, Cropwell Bishop Document Reference: WIE14662-100-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement N:\Projects\WIE14662 Cropwell Bishop, Nottinghamshire\100\8_Reports\001 - Transport Statement\14662-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement.docx

As shown in Table 6, Church Street is a lightly trafficked road with approximately just over 1 vehicle trip per minute in each direction during the morning/evening peak hours. The 85th percentile speed of vehicles passing the site was recorded as 25.9mph in a northbound direction and 26.1mph in a southbound direction. Results for Sunday 24th June 2018 are disproportionality higher than the rest of the week due to the Great Notts Bike Ride routing along Church Street during the day. In addition to the Church Street ATC a manual traffic survey (turning count and queue length survey) was carried out between 07:30 – 09:30 and 16:30 – 18:30 at the Church Street/Nottingham Road/Fern Road junction. A copy of the survey results are provided in Appendix H. The Passenger Car Unit’ (PCU) traffic flows for the morning and evening peak hours has been taken forward for further analysis. Figure 6 below provides a summary of the total hourly PCU traffic flows at the Church Street/Nottingham Road/Fern Road junction.

Figure 6: Chruch Street/Nottingham Road/Fern Road Junction - Peak Hour Traffic Flows

7.4 Assessment Year & Traffic Growth For the purposes of this assessment, the development impact has been assessed in 2023 (5 years after application year), in accordance with National Guidelines.To provide an estimation of the traffic growth, growth factors have been obtained using TEMPRO v7.2 and NTM dataset 09. The data is divided into government regions, down to ward level. In this case the ’Rushcliffe 010’ SOA zone includes the proposed development. The resulting growth factors are displayed below:  2018 AM to 2023 AM - 1.0794  2018 PM to 2023 PM - 1.0810

7.5 Traffic Network Diagrams Traffic network diagrams have been produced and these are shown in Appendix I. These network diagrams illustrate traffic flows for the following scenarios:  2018 Base;  2023 Base;  Development Trip Distribution;  Development Trip Assignment;  2023 Base; and  2023 Base + Development

17 Land off Church Street, Cropwell Bishop Document Reference: WIE14662-100-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement N:\Projects\WIE14662 Cropwell Bishop, Nottinghamshire\100\8_Reports\001 - Transport Statement\14662-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement.docx

7.6 Site Access Capacity Assessment Results Access into the proposed development would be achieved from Church Street via a mini-roundabout. As this would be a new junction on the highway network, capacity assessments have only been undertaken for the 2023 Base + Development scenario. The “Junctions 8” computer programme has been used to assess the capacity of the junction. The results of this are summarised in Table 7 below. The full results are included in Appendix J.

Table 7: Site Access - Junction Capacity Assessment Results

AM Peak PM Peak Junction Arm Max RFC Max Queue Max RFC Max Queue

Church Street North 0.15 0 0.15 0

Site Access 0.08 0 0.03 0

Church Street South 0.17 0 0.19 0

As can be seen from the results summarised in Table 7, the proposed mini-roundabout would operate with significant reserve capacity during both the morning and evening peak hours. It has been demonstrated therefore that the proposed site access arrangement would satisfactorily cater for the proposed development and existing background traffic.

7.7 Church Street/Nottingham Road/Fern Road Capacity Assessment Results The Church Street/Nottingham Road/Fern Road junction is located approximately 500m to the south of the site. The “Junctions 8” computer programme has been used to assess the capacity of the junction. The results of the capacity assessments are summarised in Table 8 below. The full results are included in Appendix K.

Table 8: Church Street/Nottingham Road/Fern Road Junction Capacity Assessment Results

AM Peak PM Peak Junction Arm Max RFC Max Queue Max RFC Max Queue

2018 Base

Church Street 0.69 2 0.50 1

Fern Road 0.08 0 0.18 0

2023 Base

Church Street 0.76 3 0.55 1

Fern Road 0.09 0 0.20 0

2023 Base + Development

Church Street 0.87 6 0.60 1

Fern Road 0.09 0 0.21 0

18 Land off Church Street, Cropwell Bishop Document Reference: WIE14662-100-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement N:\Projects\WIE14662 Cropwell Bishop, Nottinghamshire\100\8_Reports\001 - Transport Statement\14662-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement.docx

As can be seen from the results summarised in Table 8, the junction currently operates within capacity in both the morning and evening peak periods. The highest recorded RFC occurs on the Church Street approach arm during the morning peak hour, reaching 0.69. In 2023, the junction is predicted to continue to operate within capacity in both the morning and evening peak periods. The highest recorded RFC would again occur on the Church Street approach arm, reaching 0.76 during the morning peak hour. In 2023, with the addition of the development traffic, the junction is predicted to operate close to capacity during the morning peak hour. The RFC would increase by 0.11 to 0.87 and the maximum queue would increase by 3 vehicles (from 3 to 6). During the evening peak hour, the junction would operate well within capacity.

7.8 Summary In terms of impact upon the local/strategic highway network, it is considered that the levels of associated development traffic generated would be within the level of flow change which occurs daily on the local highway network, and therefore the development would not result in a material impact. In accordance with that National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), the impact of the associated development traffic on the operation and safety of the local highway network, is not considered to be ‘severe’. Therefore, no off-site improvement schemes are considered necessary.

19 Land off Church Street, Cropwell Bishop Document Reference: WIE14662-100-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement N:\Projects\WIE14662 Cropwell Bishop, Nottinghamshire\100\8_Reports\001 - Transport Statement\14662-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement.docx

8. Construction Traffic Management Plan

8.1 Traffic Management Measures It is important that construction traffic is managed and integrated into the existing road network. This would maintain safety on the highway whilst minimising the risk of inconvenience and disruption to the public. This would be achieved through careful management, programming and co-ordination of the works. To minimise the impact of construction traffic on the existing road and highway network the following principles would be actioned:  Delivery vehicles would access and egress the site from Church Street;  A routing strategy would be prepared and drivers advised of this in order to limit the impact of vehicles on the local highway network. The Traffic Management Plan would be agreed with the Local Highway Authority;  All contractors would be made aware of the agreed route and would be expected to enforce its use through the implementation of penalties;  Signage would be erected within the site to clearly direct traffic;  The site working hours are likely to be as follows 8:00am to 6:00pm Monday to Friday; 8:00am to 2:00pm on Saturday; and No works would take place on Sundays or Bank Holidays.  Delivery vehicles, whenever practical, would avoid peak hours to reduce traffic congestion and nuisance on the local highway network;  Vehicles associated with the development would not park on the local highway network;  Where works impact on the ‘live’ public highway, appropriate temporary traffic regulation orders would be put in place;  On site car parking would be provided for essential contractor vehicles;  The entrance to the site would be kept clear and clean. Appropriate cleaning/sweeping would be carried out;  In the interests of environmental and road safety all containers carrying materials would be appropriately covered or secured to prevent soiling of the highway network, causing a hazard to vehicles, pedestrian and cyclists;  The site would be appropriately secured; and  A 5-10mph speed limit could also be introduced across the site. The implication of the measures outlined above would ensure that there are no vehicle conflict or potential road safety issues associated with the construction of the development. Following implementation of the arrangements / measures discussed above, there should be no material impact on the existing highway network or road safety. The full package of measures would be agreed with the Local Highway Authority within a Construction Traffic Management Plan. It’s is recommended that this should be conditioned subject to a Resolution to Grant planning permission.

20 Land off Church Street, Cropwell Bishop Document Reference: WIE14662-100-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement N:\Projects\WIE14662 Cropwell Bishop, Nottinghamshire\100\8_Reports\001 - Transport Statement\14662-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement.docx

9. Conclusion This Transport Assessment report has been prepared by Waterman Infrastructure & Environment Ltd. on behalf of Terra Strategic in support of an Outline Planning Application for the development of up to 85 dwellings on land to the east of Church Street in Cropwell Bishop, Nottinghamshire. Access into the site is to be taken from Church Street and the access junction would be constructed to adoptable standards, to include footways connecting the site to the surrounding pedestrian network. The site access would consist of a mini-roundabout. The site is considered to be located in a sustainable location, with a range of local services and facilities available within acceptable walking and cycling distances. The site is located close to a good quality bus route and is within close walking distance of existing bus stops. To encourage use of public transport the applicant anticipates making provision for 2 free bus passes (time limited to 3 months) per household upon first occupation of each dwelling An analysis of road traffic collision data has been undertaken and it has been determined that the proposed development would not be detrimental to highway safety on the local highway network near the site. The development proposals include a vehicular link from the site through to the Cropwell Bishop Primary School. The proposals include a staff and parent drop off/pick up car park within the site. The car park would include 36 spaces and consultation has taken place with the school in respect of the proposals and future management / maintenance of this car park. The proposals are considered to provide significant betterment for the local area, which currently suffers from significant congestion during peak times associated with drop off / pick up from the school site. It has been demonstrated that the proposed development would have a negligible impact on the local highway network in terms of associated development traffic. NPPF states that “development should only be prevented or refused on transport grounds where the residual cumulative impacts on development are severe.” The trip generation calculations show that the proposed development would not have a severe impact on the local or wider highway networks. Overall in transportation terms, there are no overriding objections to the proposed residential development. The proposal accords with the Policy wording within Rushcliffe Borough Council Site Allocations DPD. The proposed development is therefore considered to be suitable for approval by the Highway Authority.

21 Land off Church Street, Cropwell Bishop Document Reference: WIE14662-100-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement N:\Projects\WIE14662 Cropwell Bishop, Nottinghamshire\100\8_Reports\001 - Transport Statement\14662-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement.docx

APPENDICES

A. Site Location Plan

B. Local Facilities Plan

Appendices Land off Church Street, Cropwell Bishop Document Reference: WIE14662-100 WIE14662-100-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement N:\Projects\WIE14662 Cropwell Bishop, Nottinghamshire\100\8_Reports\001 - Transport Statement\14662-R-1-2-3-Transport Statement.docx Key: Site Local Bus Stops (<800m from centre of site) Primary School Shop Public House Church Village Hall Medical Facitlity Walking distance to Pulfreys Coaches- Service 41 Bus Route Hoe View Road End Nottinghamshire County Council Transport Services- Service 822 Bus Route Bus Stops - 340m (4.1 Nottinghamshire County Council Transport Services- Service 850 Bus minutes) Route Nottinghamshire County Council Transport Services- Service 852 Bus Route Public ROW - Footpath Walking distance to Public ROW - Bridleway Etheldene Bus Stop - Notes: 340m (4.1 minutes) Walking Distance measured from the centre of the site. Time calculated using an average walking speed of 5km per hour (100m per 1.2 min)

Walking distance to Rev Date Description By The Maltings Bus Stop and Co-op Food Store Amendments Project - 220m (2.6minutes) CROPWELL BISHOP, NOTTINGHAMSHIRE

Title Walking distance Walking distance to Walking distance to to Village Hall - Church Street Bus Cropwell Bishop 1.02km (12.2 Stops and Church - Primary School - 370m LOCAL FACILITIES PLAN minutes) 420m (5.0 minutes) Walking distance to (4.4 minutes) Walking distance to Chequers Inn Public House Nottingham Road Bus Stop - 340m (4.1 minutes) Client & New Co-op Food Store - Walking distance to Village TERRA STRATEGIC 550m (6.6 minutes) Hall - 610m (7.3 minutes) Walking distance to Walking Church - 550m (6.6 aterman distance to minutes) Medical Facility - 710m Wheatsheaf (8.5 minutes) Public House - Halifax House Halifax Place The Lace Market Nottingham NG1 1QN t +44 115 9482612 550m (6.6 [email protected] www.watermangroup.com minutes) Drawing Status PRELIMINARY Designed by JB Checked by DMW Project No Drawn by JB Date June 2018 WIE14662 Computer File No Scales @ A3 work to figured dimensions only NTS 14662-SA-03-001-A01-Local Facilities Plan.dwg

Publisher Zone Category Number Revision WIE SA 03 001 A01 N:\Projects\WIE14662 Cropwell Bishop, Nottinghamshire\100\7_CAD\03_Preliminary\ File Path A3-Wat-S

C. Public Transport Information

Monday to Saturday am am am am am am am pm pm pm pm pm pm pm pm Nottingham Friar Lane ------1630 1705 1750 WEST BRIDGFORD Central Ave - - - - 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1645 1720 1810 Gamston Morrisons - - - - 0906 1006 1106 1206 1306 1406 1506 1606 1651 1726 1816 Nottingham Airport - - - - 0909 1009 1109 1209 1309 1409 1509 1609 1654 1729 1819 Tollerton Cotgrave Lane - - - - 0910 1010 1110 1210 1310 1410 1510 1610 1655 1730 1820 Cotgrave Mensing Avenue - - - - 0912 1012 1112 1212 1312 1412 1512 1612 1657 1732 1822 Cotgrave Manvers Arms - - - - 0913 1013 1113 1213 1313 1413 1513 1613 1658 1733 1823 Cotgrave Hollygate Lane - - - - 0918 1018 1118 1218 1318 1418 1518 1618 1703 1738 1828 Cropwell Bishop Hoe View Road - - - - 0924 1024 1124 1224 1324 1424 1524 - - 1744 1834 Cropwell Bishop Post Office - - - - 0925 1025 1125 1225 1325 1425 1525 1623 1708 1745 1835 Cropwell Bishop Hoe View Road ------1624 1709 - - Langar Main Street - - - - 0931 1031 1131 1231 1331 1431 1531 - - R R Barnstone - - - - 0934 1034 1134 1234 1334 1434 1534 - - R R Granby Main Street - - - - 0937 1037 1137 1237 1337 1437 1537 - - R R Sutton-cum-Granby - - - - 0939 1039 1139 1239 1339 1439 1539 - - R R Elton 0651 0731 0801 0841 0941 1041 1141 1241 1341 1441 1541 - - R R Orston Loughbon 0655 0735 0805 0845 0945 1045 1145 1245 1345 1445 1545 - - R R Aslockton Main Street 0700 0740 0810 0850 0950 1050 1150 1250 1350 1450 1550 - - R R Whatton Old Grantham Road 0702 0742 0812 0852 0952 1052 1152 1252 1352 1452 1552 - - R R BINGHAM Newgate Street 0709 0749 0819 0859 0959 1059 1159 1259 1359 1459 1559 - - R R

Bingham to Nottingham via Cropwell Bishop and West Bridgford 822

Monday to Saturday am am am am am am am pm pm pm pm pm pm pm pm BINGHAM Newgate Street - - - 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 - 1625 - 1710 1810 Whatton Old Grantham Road - - - 0907 1007 1107 1207 1307 1407 1507 - 1632 - 1717 1817 Aslockton Main Street - - - 0908 1008 1108 1208 1308 1408 1508 - 1633 - 1718 1818 Orston Loughbon - - - 0913 1013 1113 1213 1313 1413 1513 - 1638 - 1723 1823 Elton - - - 0917 1017 1117 1217 1317 1417 1517 - 1642 - 1727 1827 Sutton-cum-Granby 0629 0659 - 0919 1019 1119 1219 1319 1419 1519 - 1644 - 1729 1829 Granby Main Street 0631 0701 - 0921 1021 1121 1221 1321 1421 1521 - 1646 - 1731 1831 Barnstone 0634 0704 - 0924 1024 1124 1224 1324 1424 1524 - - - - - Langar Main Street 0637 0707 - 0927 1027 1127 1227 1327 1427 1527 - - - - - Cropwell Bishop Post Office 0643 0713 0803 0933 1033 1133 1233 1333 1433 1533 1623 - 1708 - - Cropwell Bishop Hoe View Road 0644 0714 0804 0934 1034 1134 1234 1334 1434 1534 1624 - 1709 - - Cotgrave Hollygate Lane 0650 0720 0810 0940 1040 1140 1240 1340 1440 1540 1630 - 1715 - - Cotgrave Manvers Arms 0655 0725 0815 0945 1045 1145 1245 1345 1445 1545 1635 1720 - - Cotgrave Mensing Avenue 0656 0726 0816 0946 1046 1146 1246 1346 1446 1546 1636 - 1721 - - Tollerton Cotgrave Lane 0658 0728 0818 0948 1048 1148 1248 1348 1448 1548 1638 - 1723 - - Nottingham Airport 0659 0729 0819 0949 1049 1149 1249 1349 1449 1549 1639 - 1724 - - Gamston Morrisons 0702 0732 0822 0952 1052 1152 1252 1352 1452 1552 1642 - 1727 - - WEST BRIDGFORD Central Ave 0708 0738 0828 0958 1058 1158 1258 1358 1458 1558 1648 - 1733 - - Nottingham Friar Lane 0724 0754 0844 ------1704 - 1749 - -

Bingham Aslockton Orston

Whatton

Nottingham Friar Lane

Cropwell West Bishop Bridgford Granby

Cotgrave Langar Gamston Morrisons Tollerton Route map for Pulfreys Coaches service 41 (outbound) Shelton Westborough Long Bennington Hougham Gunthorpe Screveton Staunton In The Vale Marston East Bridgford Flawborough Foston Thoroton Newton Scarrington Orston Normanton Back Lane 41 Meadowsweet Bingham Allington Hill Aslockton 41 White Lion Old Grantham Road Downtown Peach Superstore Nottingham Road Harvest 41 Whatton-In-The-Vale Bottesford Lane Close Station Road Upper Saxondale Pinfold Queen Daybells Barns Elton On Lane Street Great Gonerby 41 Cropwell The Hill Muston The Green Butler Sedgebrook Main Street Tithby Tithby Road The Granby Barrowby Maltings Etheldene

Barnstone Redmile Dirty Cropwell Bishop Duck Barkestone 41 Langar Plungar Belvoir Woolsthorpe-By-Belvoir Owthorpe Colston Bassett Belvoir Lower Lake Denton Harston Knipton Harby Stroxton © OpenStreetMap 2.5 km 5 km 7.5 km 10 km

em-18041A(-1).y08 (outbound) Route map for Pulfreys Coaches service 41 (inbound) Shelton Westborough Hougham Gunthorpe Screveton Staunton In The Vale Marston East Bridgford Car Colston Flawborough Foston Thoroton Newton Scarrington Orston Normanton Back Lane 41 Meadowsweet Bingham Allington Hill Aslockton 41 White Lion Old Grantham Road Harvest Close Whatton-In-The-Vale Bottesford Peach Nottingham Road 41 Lane Downtown Hmp Station Pinfold Lane Easthorpe View Superstore Conery Road Upper Saxondale Whatton Daybells Queen Street Lane Elton On Barns Great Gonerby 41 Muston Cropwell The Hill The Green Butler Woolsthorpe Sedgebrook Lane Main Street Tithby Tithby Road The Granby Barrowby Maltings Etheldene

Barnstone Redmile Dirty Cropwell Bishop Duck Barkestone 41 Langar Plungar Belvoir Woolsthorpe-By-Belvoir Owthorpe Colston Bassett Belvoir Lower Lake Denton Harston Knipton

em-18041A(-1).y08 (inbound) 41 Cropwell Bishop - Bingham - Grantham

Pulfreys Coaches The information on this timetable is expected to be valid until at least 4th July 2018. Where we know of variations, before or after this date, then we show these at the top of each affected column in the table.

Direction of stops: where shown (eg: W-bound) this is the compass direction towards which the bus is pointing when it stops Mondays to Fridays Service Restrictions Th Cropwell Bishop, Church Street (NE-bound) 1020 Bingham, adj White Lion 1030 Whatton, Old Grantham Road (SE-bound) 1038 Bottesford, adj Queen Street 1048 Allington, opp Back Lane 1057 Great Gonerby, adj Downtown Superstore 1102 Saturdays no service Sundays no service

Service Restrictions: Th - Operates only on Thursdays

Notts/NELincs01/06/2018 1156 41 Grantham - Bingham - Cropwell Bishop

Direction of stops: where shown (eg: W-bound) this is the compass direction towards which the bus is pointing when it stops Mondays to Fridays Service Restrictions Th Great Gonerby, adj Downtown Superstore 1400 Allington, adj Back Lane 1405 Bottesford, opp Queen Street 1414 Whatton, Old Grantham Road (SE-bound) 1424 Bingham, adj White Lion 1432 Cropwell Bishop, Church Street (SW-bound) 1442 Saturdays no service Sundays no service

Service Restrictions: Th - Operates only on Thursdays

Notts/NELincs01/06/2018 1156 41 Cropwell Bishop - Bingham - Grantham

Pulfreys Coaches

For times of the next departures from a particular stop you can use traveline-txt - by sending the SMS code to 84268. Add the service number after the code if you just want a specific service - eg: buctdgtd 60. The return message from traveline-txt will show the next three departures, and it currently costs 25p plus any message sending charge. Departure times will be real-time predictions where available, or scheduled departure times if not.

You can also get the same information by using the SMS code at www.nextbuses.mobi (only normal browsing charges apply) or through several iPhone or Android apps that offer access to NextBuses.

NOTE: SMS codes are different in each direction. Make sure you choose the right direction from these lists. SMS Code Stop Name Street ATCO Code ntsatgtp Cropwell Bishop, Church Street (NE-bound) Church Street 3300RU0287 ntsatgtj Cropwell Bishop, adj The Maltings Church Street 3300RU0285 ntsagpaw Cropwell Bishop, opp Etheldene Cropwell Butler Road 3300RU0295 ntsdjawt Cropwell Butler, opp Tithby Road Cropwell Bishop Road 3300RU0334 ntsagpdg Cropwell Butler, Main Street (N-bound) Main Street 3300RU0297 ntsagpdj Cropwell Butler, adj The Green Main Street 3300RU0298 ntsajapd Bingham, Nottingham Road (E-bound) Nottingham Road 3300RU0542 ntsgawta Bingham, opp Meadowsweet Hill Nottingham Road 3300RU0550 ntsajata Bingham, adj Harvest Close Nottingham Road 3300RU0548 ntsagagt Bingham, adj White Lion Nottingham Road 3300RU0534 ntsagagp Bingham, opp White Lion Nottingham Road 3300RU0533 ntsajapw Bingham, opp Harvest Close Nottingham Road 3300RU0547 ntsgawpw Bingham, adj Meadowsweet Hill Nottingham Road 3300RU0549 ntsadpaj Bingham, Nottingham Road (W-bound) Nottingham Road 3300RU0521 ntsdjdad Whatton, Old Grantham Road (SE-bound) Old Grantham Road 3300RU0335 ntsajdgt Elton, adj Station Road Grantham Road 3300RU0649 leidmtgt Bottesford, adj Pinfold Lane High Street 260000201 leidmtgw Bottesford, adj Queen Street High Street 260000202 leidmtjg Bottesford, opp Daybells Barns Hail & Ride Grantham Road 260000205 leidmtjt Bottesford, opp Easthorpe View Grantham Road 260000208 linjpapj Allington, opp Peach Lane Sedgebrook Road 270000013165 lingtgjg Allington, opp Back Lane Gonerby Lane 270000008555 linajmap Great Gonerby, adj Downtown Superstore Approach Road 270002701597

Notts/NELincs01/06/2018 1156 41 Grantham - Bingham - Cropwell Bishop

Pulfreys Coaches

You can also get the same information by using the SMS code at www.nextbuses.mobi (only normal browsing charges apply) or through several iPhone or Android apps that offer access to NextBuses.

NOTE: SMS codes are different in each direction. Make sure you choose the right direction from these lists. SMS Code Stop Name Street ATCO Code linajmap Great Gonerby, adj Downtown Superstore Approach Road 270002701597 lingtgjm Allington, adj Back Lane Gonerby Lane 270000008556 linapdwg Allington, adj Peach Lane Sedgebrook Road 270002700608 linjptjp Sedgebrook, adj Woolsthorpe Lane A52 270000014480 leidmtjw Bottesford, adj Easthorpe View Grantham Road 260000209 leidmtjd Bottesford, o/s Daybells Barns Grantham Road 260000204 leidmtja Bottesford, opp Queen Street High Street 260000203 leidmtgp Bottesford, opp Pinfold Lane High Street 260000200 ntsgmjta Elton, opp Station Road Grantham Road 3300RU0739 ntsdjdad Whatton, Old Grantham Road (SE-bound) Old Grantham Road 3300RU0335 ntsagdtj Whatton, opp Conery Lane Grantham Road 3300RU0306 ntsagpda Whatton, opp HMP Whatton Grantham Road 3300RU0296 ntsajapd Bingham, Nottingham Road (E-bound) Nottingham Road 3300RU0542 ntsgawta Bingham, opp Meadowsweet Hill Nottingham Road 3300RU0550 ntsajata Bingham, adj Harvest Close Nottingham Road 3300RU0548 ntsagagt Bingham, adj White Lion Nottingham Road 3300RU0534 ntsagagp Bingham, opp White Lion Nottingham Road 3300RU0533 ntsajapw Bingham, opp Harvest Close Nottingham Road 3300RU0547 ntsgawpw Bingham, adj Meadowsweet Hill Nottingham Road 3300RU0549 ntsadpaj Bingham, Nottingham Road (W-bound) Nottingham Road 3300RU0521 ntsgpdta Cropwell Butler, opp The Green Main Street 3300RU0795 ntsgpdtd Cropwell Butler, Main Street (S-bound) Main Street 3300RU0792 ntsgpdtg Cropwell Butler, adj Tithby Road Cropwell Bishop Road 3300RU0793 ntsgmjdp Cropwell Bishop, adj Etheldene Cropwell Butler Road 3300RU0733 ntsatgpa Cropwell Bishop, opp The Maltings Church Street 3300RU0275 ntsatgtw Cropwell Bishop, Church Street (SW-bound) Church Street 3300RU0288

Notts/NELincs01/06/2018 1156 Route map for Nottinghamshire County Council Transport Services service 850 (outbound)

Grantham Northfield Road Bingham Bingham Avenue Eastwood Road 850 Road Woodside Turning Vicarage Golf Road Saxondale Drive Circle Lane New Road Road Upper Saxondale 850

850

The Green Cropwell Butler Main Tithby Tithby GRANTHAM CANAL Street GRANTHAM CANAL Road

GRANTHAM CANAL GRANTHAM CANAL

GRANTHAM CANAL Hollygate GRANTHAM CANAL

G RANTHAM CANAL Scout Camp

GRANTHAM CANAL GRANTHAM CANAL Parkin Hoe View Road

NAL A C

THAM N A R G Close

G HAM CANAL RAN GRANT GRANTHAM CANAL

T H A M CAN AL Etheldene

GRANTHAM CANAL GRANTHAM CANAL GRANTHAM CANAL Hoe Brownhill Close Nook Cropwell Bishop Cotgrave

Kinoulton Road

850

Colston Owthorpe Bassett Dairy Cotgrave Hall Forest Borders Wood Lane 850

GRANTHAM CANAL GRANTHAM CANAL

GRANTHAM CANAL

em-18850_(-1).y08 (outbound) Route map for Nottinghamshire County Council Transport Services service 850 (inbound)

Grantham Bingham Woodside Road Bingham Road 850 Road 850 Eastwood Road Northfield Turning Avenue Saxondale Golf Drive Circle New Road Vicarage Road Lane Upper Saxondale

850

The Green Cropwell Butler Main Tithby Tithby GRANTHAM CANAL Street GRANTHAM CANAL Road

GRANTHAM CANAL

Hollygate GRANTHAM CANAL GRANTHAM CANAL Scout Camp

GRANTHAM CANAL HAM CANAL N T RA G Parkin L A Hoe View Road THAM CAN N A GR

GRANTHAM CANAL GRANTHAM Close GRANTHAM CANAL GRANTHAM CANAL AL M CAN THA AN GR Etheldene

GRANTHAM CANAL GRANTHAM CANAL Hoe View Road End Brownhill Close Cropwell Bishop Hoe Cotgrave Nook

Kinoulton Road

Colston Owthorpe Bassett Dairy Cotgrave Hall Forest Borders Wood Lane 850

GRANTHAM CANAL GRANTHAM CANAL Kaye GRANTHAM CANAL Wood © OpenStreetMap 1 km 2 km 3 km 4 km

em-18850_(-1).y08 (inbound) 850 Colston Bassett - Cropwell Bishop - Radcliffe On Trent

Nottinghamshire County Council Transport Services The information on this timetable is expected to be valid until at least 4th July 2018. Where we know of variations, before or after this date, then we show these at the top of each affected column in the table.

Direction of stops: where shown (eg: W-bound) this is the compass direction towards which the bus is pointing when it stops Mondays to Fridays Colston Bassett, adj Dairy 0625 0720 Cropwell Bishop, opp Parkin Close 0635 0730 Cropwell Butler, adj The Green 0639 0734 Upper Saxondale, in Turning Circle 0644 0739 Radcliffe Harlequin, opp Woodside Road 0649 0744 Radcliffe on Trent, adj Vicarage Lane 0654 0749 Saturdays Colston Bassett, adj Dairy 0625 0720 Cropwell Bishop, opp Parkin Close 0635 0730 Cropwell Butler, adj The Green 0639 0734 Upper Saxondale, in Turning Circle 0644 0739 Radcliffe Harlequin, opp Woodside Road 0649 0744 Radcliffe on Trent, adj Vicarage Lane 0654 0749 Sundays no service

Notts/NELincs01/06/2018 1156 850 Radcliffe On Trent - Cropwell Bishop - Colston Bassett

Direction of stops: where shown (eg: W-bound) this is the compass direction towards which the bus is pointing when it stops Mondays to Fridays Radcliffe on Trent, opp Vicarage Lane 1706 1806 Radcliffe Harlequin, adj Woodside Road 1711 1811 Upper Saxondale, in Turning Circle 1716 1816 Cropwell Butler, opp The Green 1721 1821 Cropwell Bishop, adj Parkin Close 1725 1825s Colston Bassett, adj Dairy 1735 1835 Saturdays Radcliffe on Trent, opp Vicarage Lane 1706 1806 Radcliffe Harlequin, adj Woodside Road 1711 1811 Upper Saxondale, in Turning Circle 1716 1816 Cropwell Butler, opp The Green 1721 1821 Cropwell Bishop, adj Parkin Close 1725 1825s Colston Bassett, adj Dairy 1735 1835 Sundays no service

Notes: s - sets down only

Notts/NELincs01/06/2018 1156 850 Colston Bassett - Cropwell Bishop - Radcliffe On Trent

Nottinghamshire County Council Transport Services

You can also get the same information by using the SMS code at www.nextbuses.mobi (only normal browsing charges apply) or through several iPhone or Android apps that offer access to NextBuses.

NOTE: SMS codes are different in each direction. Make sure you choose the right direction from these lists. SMS Code Stop Name Street ATCO Code ntsgtpam Colston Bassett, adj Dairy Harby Lane 3300RU0182 ntsdgtjg Colston Bassett, adj Bunnison Lane Church Gate 3300RU0331 ntsgpdpa Colston Bridge, Kinoulton Road (NW-bound) Colston Road 3300RU0784 ntsgpajp Cropwell Bishop, opp Hoe Nook Hoe View Road 3300RU0769 ntsgpajm Cropwell Bishop, opp Brownhill Close Hoe View Road 3300RU0768 ntsgpajg Cropwell Bishop, opp Parkin Close Hoe View Road 3300RU0767 ntsgpajd Cropwell Bishop, o/s 88 Hoe View Road Hoe View Road 3300RU0766 ntsgpaja Cropwell Bishop, Hoe View Road End (E-bound) Hoe View Road 3300RU0765 ntsagpaw Cropwell Bishop, opp Etheldene Cropwell Butler Road 3300RU0295 ntsdjawt Cropwell Butler, opp Tithby Road Cropwell Bishop Road 3300RU0334 ntsagpdg Cropwell Butler, Main Street (N-bound) Main Street 3300RU0297 ntsagpdj Cropwell Butler, adj The Green Main Street 3300RU0298 ntsdjwtw Upper Saxondale, in Turning Circle Henson Close 3300RU0102 ntsajdma Upper Saxondale, Saxondale Drive (NW-bound) Saxondale Drive 3300RU0661 ntsagjdm Upper Saxondale, Grantham Road (SW-bound) Grantham Road 3300RU0156 ntsdgjpd Radcliffe Harlequin, adj Northfield Avenue Grantham Road 3300RU0592 ntsadgwa Radcliffe Harlequin, opp Woodside Road Grantham Road 3300RU0591 ntsadgtp Radcliffe on Trent, Bingham Road (W-bound) Bingham Road 3300RU0589 ntsadgtg Radcliffe on Trent, adj Golf Road Bingham Road 3300RU0586 ntsadgta Radcliffe on Trent, adj Eastwood Road Bingham Road 3300RU0584 ntsdgjpm Radcliffe on Trent, opp New Road Bingham Road 3300RU0595 ntsadgpt Radcliffe on Trent, adj Vicarage Lane Main Road 3300RU0582

Notts/NELincs01/06/2018 1156 850 Radcliffe On Trent - Cropwell Bishop - Colston Bassett

Nottinghamshire County Council Transport Services

You can also get the same information by using the SMS code at www.nextbuses.mobi (only normal browsing charges apply) or through several iPhone or Android apps that offer access to NextBuses.

NOTE: SMS codes are different in each direction. Make sure you choose the right direction from these lists. SMS Code Stop Name Street ATCO Code ntsadgpm Radcliffe on Trent, opp Vicarage Lane Main Road 3300RU0581 ntsdmajg Radcliffe on Trent, adj New Road Bingham Road 3300RU0143 ntsdgjmd Radcliffe on Trent, opp Eastwood Road Bingham Road 3300RU0574 ntsadgtj Radcliffe on Trent, opp Golf Road Bingham Road 3300RU0587 ntsadgtm Radcliffe on Trent, Bingham Road (NE-bound) Bingham Road 3300RU0588 ntsadgtw Radcliffe Harlequin, adj Woodside Road Grantham Road 3300RU0590 ntsdgjpg Radcliffe Harlequin, opp Northfield Avenue Grantham Road 3300RU0593 ntsadjtd Upper Saxondale, Grantham Road (E-bound) Grantham Road 3300RU0474 ntsajdap Upper Saxondale, Grantham Road (SE-bound) Saxondale Drive 3300RU0615 ntsgjtgw Upper Saxondale, Saxondale Drive (SE-bound) Saxondale Drive 3300RU0696 ntsdjwtw Upper Saxondale, in Turning Circle Henson Close 3300RU0102 ntsgpdta Cropwell Butler, opp The Green Main Street 3300RU0795 ntsgpdtd Cropwell Butler, Main Street (S-bound) Main Street 3300RU0792 ntsgpdtg Cropwell Butler, adj Tithby Road Cropwell Bishop Road 3300RU0793 ntsgmjdp Cropwell Bishop, adj Etheldene Cropwell Butler Road 3300RU0733 ntsdgjwa Cropwell Bishop, Hoe View Road End (SW-bound) Hoe View Road 3300RU0626 ntsdgjtw Cropwell Bishop, o/s 53 Hoe View Road Hoe View Road 3300RU0625 ntsdgjtp Cropwell Bishop, adj Parkin Close Hoe View Road 3300RU0624 ntsdgjtm Cropwell Bishop, adj Brownhill Close Hoe View Road 3300RU0623 ntsdgjtj Cropwell Bishop, adj Hoe Nook Hoe View Road 3300RU0622 ntsatgtd Colston Bridge, Kinoulton Road (SE-bound) Colston Road 3300RU0283 ntsgtpaj Colston Bassett, opp Bunnison Lane Church Gate 3300RU0178 ntsgtpam Colston Bassett, adj Dairy Harby Lane 3300RU0182

Notts/NELincs01/06/2018 1156 Route map for Nottinghamshire County Council Transport Services service 852 (outbound)

Grantham Northfield Road Bingham 852 Bingham Avenue Road 852 Eastwood Road Woodside Turning Saxondale Drive Vicarage Golf Road Circle Lane New Road Road Upper Saxondale

852

The Green Cropwell Butler Main Tithby

GRANTHAM CANAL Street

GRANTHAM CANAL GRANTHAM CANAL Tithby GRANTH GRANTHAM CANAL

AM CANAL Road

GRANTHAM CANAL Hollygate GRANTHAM CANAL

GRAN T Scout Camp HAM CANAL GRANTHAM CANAL

852 NAL A C

GRANTHAM CANAL GRANTHAM THAM N A R G

GRANTHAM CANAL GRANTHAM CANAL Etheldene

GRANTHAM CANAL 852 GRANTHAM CANAL Cropwell Bishop The Maltings Manvers Arms Nottingham Cotgrave Road

White Furrows Daleside Kinoulton Road Gripps Common 852

Colston Owthorpe Bassett 852 Dairy Cotgrave Kinoulton Borders Lane Hall Forest Wood 852 Lane

GRANTHAM CANAL GRANTHAM CANAL

GRANTHAM CANAL

AL CAN AM TH GRAN © OpenStreetMap 1 km 2 km 3 km 4 km

em-18852_(-1).y08 (outbound) Route map for Nottinghamshire County Council Transport Services service 852 (inbound)

Grantham Woodside Road Bingham Bingham Road New Road 852 Road Northfield Saxondale Turning Vicarage Golf Avenue Drive Circle Lane Road Upper Saxondale 852

852

The Green Cropwell Butler Main Tithby Tithby GRANTHAM CANAL Street GRANTHAM CANAL Road GRANTHAM CANAL

GRANTH

AM CANAL

GRANTHAM CANAL

GRANTHAM CANAL Hollygate GRANTHAM CANAL

GRAN Scout Camp T HAM CANAL

HAM CANAL NT A GR

HAM CANAL T N

GRA

GRANTHAM CANAL GRANTHAM

GRANTHAM CANAL GRANTHAM CANAL CANAL THAM AN GR Etheldene

GRANTHAM CANAL GRANTHAM CANAL 852 Cropwell Bishop The Maltings Manvers Arms Church Cotgrave Street

White Furrows Daleside Kinoulton Road Gripps Common 852

Colston Owthorpe 852 Bassett Dairy Kinoulton Cotgrave Hall Forest Borders Lane Wood Lane 852

GRANTHAM CANAL GRANTHAM CANAL

GRANTHAM CANAL

ANTHAM CANAL GR

GRANTHAM CANAL © OpenStreetMap 1 km 2 km 3 km 4 km

em-18852_(-1).y08 (inbound) 852 Cotgrave - Cropwell Bishop - Radcliffe On Trent

Direction of stops: where shown (eg: W-bound) this is the compass direction towards which the bus is pointing when it stops Mondays to Fridays Cotgrave, o/s Manvers Arms 0955 1125 1325 Owthorpe, opp Kinoulton Lane 1002 1132 1332 Colston Bassett, adj Dairy 1007 1137 1337 Cropwell Bishop, Church Street (NE-bound) 1017 1147 1347 Cropwell Butler, adj The Green 1022 1152 1352 Upper Saxondale, in Turning Circle 1027 1157 1357 Radcliffe Harlequin, opp Woodside Road 1032 1202 1402 Radcliffe on Trent, adj Vicarage Lane 1037 1207 1407 Saturdays Cotgrave, o/s Manvers Arms 0955 1125 1325 Owthorpe, opp Kinoulton Lane 1002 1132 1332 Colston Bassett, adj Dairy 1007 1137 1337 Cropwell Bishop, Church Street (NE-bound) 1017 1147 1347 Cropwell Butler, adj The Green 1022 1152 1352 Upper Saxondale, in Turning Circle 1027 1157 1357 Radcliffe Harlequin, opp Woodside Road 1032 1202 1402 Radcliffe on Trent, adj Vicarage Lane 1037 1207 1407 Sundays no service

Notts/NELincs01/06/2018 1156 852 Radcliffe On Trent - Cropwell Bishop - Cotgrave

Direction of stops: where shown (eg: W-bound) this is the compass direction towards which the bus is pointing when it stops Mondays to Fridays Radcliffe on Trent, opp Vicarage Lane 1040 1210 1410 Radcliffe Harlequin, adj Woodside Road 1045 1215 1415 Upper Saxondale, in Turning Circle 1050 1220 1420 Cropwell Butler, opp The Green 1055 1225 1425 Cropwell Bishop, Church Street (SW-bound) 1100 1230 1430 Colston Bassett, adj Dairy 0935 1110 1240 1440 Owthorpe, adj Kinoulton Lane 0945 1115 1245 1445 Cotgrave, o/s Manvers Arms 0947 1122 1252 1452 Saturdays Radcliffe on Trent, opp Vicarage Lane 1040 1210 1410 Radcliffe Harlequin, adj Woodside Road 1045 1215 1415 Upper Saxondale, in Turning Circle 1050 1220 1420 Cropwell Butler, opp The Green 1055 1225 1425 Cropwell Bishop, Church Street (SW-bound) 1100 1230 1430 Colston Bassett, adj Dairy 0935 1110 1240 1440 Owthorpe, adj Kinoulton Lane 0945 1115 1245 1445 Cotgrave, o/s Manvers Arms 0947 1122 1252 1452 Sundays no service

Notts/NELincs01/06/2018 1156 852 Cotgrave - Cropwell Bishop - Radcliffe On Trent

Nottinghamshire County Council Transport Services

You can also get the same information by using the SMS code at www.nextbuses.mobi (only normal browsing charges apply) or through several iPhone or Android apps that offer access to NextBuses.

NOTE: SMS codes are different in each direction. Make sure you choose the right direction from these lists. SMS Code Stop Name Street ATCO Code ntsajmtg Cotgrave, o/s Manvers Arms Bingham Road 3300RU0371 ntsajgmg Cotgrave, opp White Furrows Owthorpe Road 3300RU0317 ntsdgtja Cotgrave, opp Daleside Owthorpe Road 3300RU0329 ntsgtdag Cotgrave, adj Gripps Common Owthorpe Road 3300RU0854 ntsgpdmp Owthorpe, opp Kinoulton Lane Park Lane 3300RU0781 ntsgtpaj Colston Bassett, opp Bunnison Lane Church Gate 3300RU0178 ntsgtpam Colston Bassett, adj Dairy Harby Lane 3300RU0182 ntsdgtjg Colston Bassett, adj Bunnison Lane Church Gate 3300RU0331 ntsgpdpa Colston Bridge, Kinoulton Road (NW-bound) Colston Road 3300RU0784 ntsatgwa Cropwell Bishop, Nottingham Road (E-bound) Nottingham Road 3300RU0289 ntsatgtp Cropwell Bishop, Church Street (NE-bound) Church Street 3300RU0287 ntsatgtj Cropwell Bishop, adj The Maltings Church Street 3300RU0285 ntsagpaw Cropwell Bishop, opp Etheldene Cropwell Butler Road 3300RU0295 ntsdjawt Cropwell Butler, opp Tithby Road Cropwell Bishop Road 3300RU0334 ntsagpdg Cropwell Butler, Main Street (N-bound) Main Street 3300RU0297 ntsagpdj Cropwell Butler, adj The Green Main Street 3300RU0298 ntsdjwtw Upper Saxondale, in Turning Circle Henson Close 3300RU0102 ntsajdma Upper Saxondale, Saxondale Drive (NW-bound) Saxondale Drive 3300RU0661 ntsagjdm Upper Saxondale, Grantham Road (SW-bound) Grantham Road 3300RU0156 ntsdgjpd Radcliffe Harlequin, adj Northfield Avenue Grantham Road 3300RU0592 ntsadgwa Radcliffe Harlequin, opp Woodside Road Grantham Road 3300RU0591 ntsadgtp Radcliffe on Trent, Bingham Road (W-bound) Bingham Road 3300RU0589 ntsadgtg Radcliffe on Trent, adj Golf Road Bingham Road 3300RU0586 ntsadgta Radcliffe on Trent, adj Eastwood Road Bingham Road 3300RU0584 ntsdgjpm Radcliffe on Trent, opp New Road Bingham Road 3300RU0595 ntsadgpt Radcliffe on Trent, adj Vicarage Lane Main Road 3300RU0582

Notts/NELincs01/06/2018 1156 852 Radcliffe On Trent - Cropwell Bishop - Cotgrave

Nottinghamshire County Council Transport Services

You can also get the same information by using the SMS code at www.nextbuses.mobi (only normal browsing charges apply) or through several iPhone or Android apps that offer access to NextBuses.

NOTE: SMS codes are different in each direction. Make sure you choose the right direction from these lists. SMS Code Stop Name Street ATCO Code ntsadgpm Radcliffe on Trent, opp Vicarage Lane Main Road 3300RU0581 ntsdmajg Radcliffe on Trent, adj New Road Bingham Road 3300RU0143 ntsdgjmd Radcliffe on Trent, opp Eastwood Road Bingham Road 3300RU0574 ntsadgtj Radcliffe on Trent, opp Golf Road Bingham Road 3300RU0587 ntsadgtm Radcliffe on Trent, Bingham Road (NE-bound) Bingham Road 3300RU0588 ntsadgtw Radcliffe Harlequin, adj Woodside Road Grantham Road 3300RU0590 ntsdgjpg Radcliffe Harlequin, opp Northfield Avenue Grantham Road 3300RU0593 ntsadjtd Upper Saxondale, Grantham Road (E-bound) Grantham Road 3300RU0474 ntsajdap Upper Saxondale, Grantham Road (SE-bound) Saxondale Drive 3300RU0615 ntsgjtgw Upper Saxondale, Saxondale Drive (SE-bound) Saxondale Drive 3300RU0696 ntsdjwtw Upper Saxondale, in Turning Circle Henson Close 3300RU0102 ntsgpdta Cropwell Butler, opp The Green Main Street 3300RU0795 ntsgpdtd Cropwell Butler, Main Street (S-bound) Main Street 3300RU0792 ntsgpdtg Cropwell Butler, adj Tithby Road Cropwell Bishop Road 3300RU0793 ntsgmjdp Cropwell Bishop, adj Etheldene Cropwell Butler Road 3300RU0733 ntsatgpa Cropwell Bishop, opp The Maltings Church Street 3300RU0275 ntsatgtw Cropwell Bishop, Church Street (SW-bound) Church Street 3300RU0288 ntsatgtd Colston Bridge, Kinoulton Road (SE-bound) Colston Road 3300RU0283 ntsgtpaj Colston Bassett, opp Bunnison Lane Church Gate 3300RU0178 ntsgtpam Colston Bassett, adj Dairy Harby Lane 3300RU0182 ntsdgtjg Colston Bassett, adj Bunnison Lane Church Gate 3300RU0331 ntsatgwd Owthorpe, adj Kinoulton Lane Park Lane 3300RU0290 ntsgtdaj Cotgrave, opp Gripps Common Owthorpe Road 3300RU0855 ntsdgtjd Cotgrave, adj Daleside Owthorpe Road 3300RU0330 ntsdgtgt Cotgrave, adj White Furrows Owthorpe Road 3300RU0327 ntsajmtg Cotgrave, o/s Manvers Arms Bingham Road 3300RU0371

Notts/NELincs01/06/2018 1156

D. Preliminary Site Masterplan

E. Site Access Design

33.85 34.19 34.14 34.29

34.03 NP Key cl=33.86 LP 34.16 34.32 34.01 34.11 grass 34.00 33.89 Site Boundary

34.31 bitumen 33.98 34.23 33.96 Proposed Kerb line 33.73 34.08 33.83 bitumen Proposed White Lining bitumen 34.08 ridge = 37.37 Proposed Footway 34.32 33.94 33.77 2.4m x 43m Visibility Splay (DMRB gutter = 35.30 cl=34.38 33.96 gutter = 38.56

33.86 33.61 Volume 6 S3) 34.33 32.07 grass 33.84 RS NP 33.69 FH cl=33.79 SV ridge = 40.66 34.25

33.61 33.58

33.72 33.57 ridge = 37.38 TOF 33.70 gutter = 38.56 33.57 31.98 33.46 gutter = 38.56 32.11 32.32 SV grass 468550E 33.76 468600E 468650E VM 33.40 NP 33.44 ridge = 38.09 ridge = 40.66

33.46 33.82 33.82 bitumen 33.52 C H U R C H S T R E E T 468550E 468600E 33.50 468650E gutter = 38.56 gutter = 35.30 33.56 33.68 33.32 gutter = 38.35 33.67 33.24 32.19 SV

grass 33.52

ridge = 40.39 32.11 33.12 32.40

33.17 gutter = 38.35 TOF 33.43 paving 33.56 LP 33.12 32.0 33.19 33.08 grass 32.19

32.22 33.20

gutter = 38.08 33.0 32.39 32.91 32.30 33.03 33.01 32.51 SV 2.4m x 38m 33.01 32.86 ridge = 40.50 32.85 32.0 bitumen SV

32.90 visibility splay 32.92 gutter = 38.08 31.81 32.82 grass 32.93 32.89 gutter = 37.83

buried channel paving grass 32.90 parapet = 35.24 32.37 cl=32.78 32.36 32.70 32.79 32.91 ridge = 40.26 GU 32.75 32.16 bitumen Footway 32.48 gutter = 37.83

GU 32.69 to tie into 32.75 32.0 32.63 SV existing 32.39 32.88 32.83 31.93

32.79 LP 32.74 grass 32.68 32.81 32.76 32.74

32.59 32.63 32.45

32.76 32.35 32.0

GU 32.62 6.0m Radii 32.0 cl=32.68

32.77 32.61 ST01 32.0 32.74 bitumen 32.58 32.70 32.837 bitumen 32.57 32.63 32.03 32.84 32.71 cl=32.74 32.62 32.73 32.04 RS cl=32.64 32.73 cl=32.63 32.57 bitumen RS FP grass TOF 34.06 32.61 32.65 Rev Date Description By 32.72 32.95

FP 32.70 32.63 32.60 32.62 Amendments 32.58 32.76

bin Project

32.67 32.33 32.56 32.26

32.66 2.0m Footway CROPWELL BISHOP, NOTTINGHAMSHIRE

32.57 32.65 32.58 GU Title 32.62 32.74 SV Carriageway tapers 32.65 32.59 SITE ACCESS DESIGN grass from 6.0m to 5.5m grass 32.63

bitumen 32.74 bitumen

32.67 RS 32.59 32.62 32.56 32.68 6.0m Radii LP 2.0m Footway 32.61 32.75 32.65 32.74

32.78 SV TOF 32.56 34.17 bitumen Footway32.68 to

tie into32.60 33.0 32.59 32.80 Client

existing FP 33.0 33.00 33.0 32.62 TERRA STRATEGIC VM 32.56 32.76 33.18 32.55 32.64

FH bitumen 33.0 32.56 SV 32.70 NP 32.55

SV 32.53 bitumen gutter = 37.97 33.22 SV SV 32.53 33.19 33.0 32.53 SV WO SV SV bitumen 32.73 SV SV 32.54 ridge = 40.44

cl=32.52 GU 33.0 DP 32.53 32.73 32.54 32.59 SV S P R I N G F I E L D C L O S E gutter = 37.97 parapet = 35.28 gutter = 35.93 33.21 32.65

32.63 32.54 32.57 33.50 aterman ST11 32.53 ridge = 37.65 32.682 32.51 32.51 32.50 bitumen 32.69 RS 32.66 32.63 32.53 32.63 cl=32.63 32.52 32.67 SV TOW 32.60 33.60 Halifax House Halifax Place Nottingham NG1 1QN 32.49 cl=32.60 gutter = 38.43 32.48 TOF TOW 35.17 32.48 33.66 32.50 33.77 t 0115 948 2612 GU bitumen 32.64 ridge = 40.66 [email protected] www.watermangroup.com 32.70 32.52 32.53

32.66 SV 32.45 34.0 33.86 Drawing Status GU 33.88 32.47 cl=32.55 gutter = 38.10 bitumen gutter = 38.88 32.65 32.47 32.61

cl=32.60 34.0 32.74 34.0 PRELIMINARY TOW 32.60 32.46 33.65 32.50 32.77 TP ridge = 40.63 32.61 32.51 32.79 cl=32.58 32.59 Designed by Checked by Project No ridge = 41.41 NF NJH BOL GU 32.55 GV 32.78 bitumen Drawn by NF Date JULY 2018 WIE14662 32.51 paving 32.61 32.48 32.52 32.55 Computer File No 32.45 Scales @ A3 34.56 bitumen 34.61 1:500 34.47 work to figured dimensions only 14662-SA-03-002-A02-Site access design.dwg SV 34.52 TOH 38.13 Publisher Zone Category Number Revision 32.71 32.46 32.61 32.54 32.47 32.61 32.60

SV 32.63 N:\Projects\WIE14662 Cropwell Bishop, Nottinghamshire\100\7_CAD\03_Preliminary\ gutter = 36.14 bitumen

32.81 32.48 35.0 BS paving 34.84 32.62 32.48 LP WIE SA 03 002 32.65 ridge = 41.52 32.66 34.78 A02 File Path A3-Wat-S, Cropwell Bishop Topo

H U R C H S T R E E T

F. TRICS Outputs

Calculation Reference: AUDIT-701710-180612-0619 TRIP RATE CALCULATION SELECTION PARAMETERS:

Land Use : 03 - RESIDENTIAL Category : A - HOUSES PRIVATELY OWNED MULTI-MODAL TOTAL PEOPLE

Selected regions and areas: 02 SOUTH EAST HC HAMPSHIRE 1 days KC KENT 1 days WS WEST SUSSEX 2 days 03 SOUTH WEST DV DEVON 3 days WL WILTSHIRE 1 days 04 EAST ANGLIA CA CAMBRIDGESHIRE 1 days NF NORFOLK 2 days SF SUFFOLK 1 days 06 WEST MIDLANDS WM WEST MIDLANDS 1 days 07 YORKSHIRE & NORTH LINCOLNSHIRE NY NORTH YORKSHIRE 2 days SY SOUTH YORKSHIRE 1 days 09 NORTH DH DURHAM 2 days

This section displays the number of survey days per TRICS® sub-region in the selected set

Secondary Filtering selection:

This data displays the chosen trip rate parameter and its selected range. Only sites that fall within the parameter range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Parameter: Number of dwellings Actual Range: 27 to 125 (units: ) Range Selected by User: 25 to 150 (units: )

Public Transport Provision: Selection by: Include all surveys

Date Range: 01/01/10 to 27/11/17

This data displays the range of survey dates selected. Only surveys that were conducted within this date range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Selected survey days: Monday 7 days Tuesday 2 days Wednesday 3 days Thursday 3 days Friday 3 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys by day of the week.

Selected survey types: Manual count 18 days Directional ATC Count 0 days

This data displays the number of manual classified surveys and the number of unclassified ATC surveys, the total adding up to the overall number of surveys in the selected set. Manual surveys are undertaken using staff, whilst ATC surveys are undertaking using machines.

Selected Locations: Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) 14 Neighbourhood Centre (PPS6 Local Centre) 4

This data displays the number of surveys per main location category within the selected set. The main location categories consist of Free Standing, Edge of Town, Suburban Area, Neighbourhood Centre, Edge of Town Centre, Town Centre and Not Known.

Selected Location Sub Categories: Residential Zone 16 Village 2

This data displays the number of surveys per location sub-category within the selected set. The location sub-categories consist of Commercial Zone, Industrial Zone, Development Zone, Residential Zone, Retail Zone, Built-Up Zone, Village, Out of Town, High Street and No Sub Category. TRICS 7.5.1 290318 B18.22 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2018. All rights reserved Tuesday 12/06/18 Page 2 Waterman Group Halifax Place Nottingham Licence No: 701710

Secondary Filtering selection:

Use Class: C 3 18 days

This data displays the number of surveys per Use Class classification within the selected set. The Use Classes Order 2005 has been used for this purpose, which can be found within the Library module of TRICS®.

Population within 1 mile: 1,000 or Less 1 days 1,001 to 5,000 4 days 5,001 to 10,000 4 days 10,001 to 15,000 2 days 15,001 to 20,000 2 days 20,001 to 25,000 2 days 25,001 to 50,000 3 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 1-mile radii of population.

Population within 5 miles: 5,001 to 25,000 4 days 25,001 to 50,000 3 days 50,001 to 75,000 1 days 75,001 to 100,000 3 days 125,001 to 250,000 5 days 250,001 to 500,000 2 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 5-mile radii of population.

Car ownership within 5 miles: 0.6 to 1.0 4 days 1.1 to 1.5 13 days 1.6 to 2.0 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated ranges of average cars owned per residential dwelling, within a radius of 5-miles of selected survey sites.

Travel Plan: Yes 2 days No 16 days

This data displays the number of surveys within the selected set that were undertaken at sites with Travel Plans in place, and the number of surveys that were undertaken at sites without Travel Plans.

PTAL Rating: No PTAL Present 18 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys with PTAL Ratings. TRICS 7.5.1 290318 B18.22 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2018. All rights reserved Tuesday 12/06/18 Page 3 Waterman Group Halifax Place Nottingham Licence No: 701710

LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters

1 CA-03-A-05 DETACHED HOUSES CAMBRIDGESHIRE EASTFIELD ROAD

PETERBOROUGH Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Residential Zone Total Number of dwellings: 2 8 Survey date: MONDAY 17/10/16 Survey Type: MANUAL 2 DH-03-A-01 SEMI DETACHED DURHAM GREENFIELDS ROAD

BISHOP AUCKLAND Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Residential Zone Total Number of dwellings: 5 0 Survey date: TUESDAY 28/03/17 Survey Type: MANUAL 3 DH-03-A-02 MIXED HOUSES DURHAM LEAZES LANE ST HELEN AUCKLAND BISHOP AUCKLAND Neighbourhood Centre (PPS6 Local Centre) Residential Zone Total Number of dwellings: 1 2 5 Survey date: MONDAY 27/03/17 Survey Type: MANUAL 4 DV-03-A-01 TERRACED HOUSES DEVON BRONSHILL ROAD

TORQUAY Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Residential Zone Total Number of dwellings: 3 7 Survey date: WEDNESDAY 30/09/15 Survey Type: MANUAL 5 DV-03-A-02 HOUSES & BUNGALOWS DEVON MILLHEAD ROAD

HONITON Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Residential Zone Total Number of dwellings: 1 1 6 Survey date: FRIDAY 25/09/15 Survey Type: MANUAL 6 DV-03-A-03 TERRACED & SEMI DETACHED DEVON LOWER BRAND LANE

HONITON Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Residential Zone Total Number of dwellings: 7 0 Survey date: MONDAY 28/09/15 Survey Type: MANUAL 7 HC-03-A-19 HOUSES & FLATS HAMPSHIRE CANADA WAY

LIPHOOK Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Residential Zone Total Number of dwellings: 6 2 Survey date: MONDAY 27/11/17 Survey Type: MANUAL 8 KC-03-A-03 MIXED HOUSES & FLATS KENT HYTHE ROAD WILLESBOROUGH ASHFORD Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Residential Zone Total Number of dwellings: 5 1 Survey date: THURSDAY 14/07/16 Survey Type: MANUAL TRICS 7.5.1 290318 B18.22 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2018. All rights reserved Tuesday 12/06/18 Page 4 Waterman Group Halifax Place Nottingham Licence No: 701710

LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters (Cont.)

9 NF-03-A-01 SEMI DET. & BUNGALOWS NORFOLK YARMOUTH ROAD

CAISTER-ON-SEA Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Residential Zone Total Number of dwellings: 2 7 Survey date: TUESDAY 16/10/12 Survey Type: MANUAL 10 NF-03-A-02 HOUSES & FLATS NORFOLK DEREHAM ROAD

NORWICH Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Residential Zone Total Number of dwellings: 9 8 Survey date: MONDAY 22/10/12 Survey Type: MANUAL 11 NY-03-A-06 BUNGALOWS & SEMI DET. NORTH YORKSHIRE HORSEFAIR

BOROUGHBRIDGE Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Residential Zone Total Number of dwellings: 1 1 5 Survey date: FRIDAY 14/10/11 Survey Type: MANUAL 12 NY-03-A-09 MIXED HOUSING NORTH YORKSHIRE GRAMMAR SCHOOL LANE

NORTHALLERTON Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Residential Zone Total Number of dwellings: 5 2 Survey date: MONDAY 16/09/13 Survey Type: MANUAL 13 SF-03-A-06 DETACHED & SEMI-DETACHED SUFFOLK BURY ROAD

KENTFORD Neighbourhood Centre (PPS6 Local Centre) Village Total Number of dwellings: 3 8 Survey date: FRIDAY 22/09/17 Survey Type: MANUAL 14 SY-03-A-01 SEMI DETACHED HOUSES SOUTH YORKSHIRE A19 BENTLEY ROAD BENTLEY RISE DONCASTER Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Residential Zone Total Number of dwellings: 5 4 Survey date: WEDNESDAY 18/09/13 Survey Type: MANUAL 15 WL-03-A-02 SEMI DETACHED WILTSHIRE HEADLANDS GROVE

SWINDON Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Residential Zone Total Number of dwellings: 2 7 Survey date: THURSDAY 22/09/16 Survey Type: MANUAL 16 WM-03-A-04 TERRACED HOUSES WEST MIDLANDS OSBORNE ROAD EARLSDON COVENTRY Neighbourhood Centre (PPS6 Local Centre) Residential Zone Total Number of dwellings: 3 9 Survey date: MONDAY 21/11/16 Survey Type: MANUAL TRICS 7.5.1 290318 B18.22 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2018. All rights reserved Tuesday 12/06/18 Page 5 Waterman Group Halifax Place Nottingham Licence No: 701710

LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters (Cont.)

17 WS-03-A-05 TERRACED & FLATS WEST SUSSEX UPPER SHOREHAM ROAD

SHOREHAM BY SEA Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Residential Zone Total Number of dwellings: 4 8 Survey date: WEDNESDAY 18/04/12 Survey Type: MANUAL 18 WS-03-A-07 BUNGALOWS WEST SUSSEX EMMS LANE BROOKS GREEN NEAR HORSHAM Neighbourhood Centre (PPS6 Local Centre) Village Total Number of dwellings: 5 7 Survey date: THURSDAY 19/10/17 Survey Type: MANUAL

This section provides a list of all survey sites and days in the selected set. For each individual survey site, it displays a unique site reference code and site address, the selected trip rate calculation parameter and its value, the day of the week and date of each survey, and whether the survey was a manual classified count or an ATC count. TRICS 7.5.1 290318 B18.22 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2018. All rights reserved Tuesday 12/06/18 Page 6 Waterman Group Halifax Place Nottingham Licence No: 701710

TRIP RATE for Land Use 03 - RESIDENTIAL/A - HOUSES PRIVATELY OWNED MULTI-MODAL TOTAL PEOPLE Calculation factor: 1 DWELLS BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 07:00 - 08:00 18 61 0.112 18 61 0.389 18 61 0.501 08:00 - 09:00 18 61 0.170 18 61 0.658 18 61 0.828 09:00 - 10:00 18 61 0.227 18 61 0.294 18 61 0.521 10:00 - 11:00 18 61 0.240 18 61 0.301 18 61 0.541 11:00 - 12:00 18 61 0.231 18 61 0.223 18 61 0.454 12:00 - 13:00 18 61 0.259 18 61 0.261 18 61 0.520 13:00 - 14:00 18 61 0.244 18 61 0.263 18 61 0.507 14:00 - 15:00 18 61 0.233 18 61 0.272 18 61 0.505 15:00 - 16:00 18 61 0.483 18 61 0.273 18 61 0.756 16:00 - 17:00 18 61 0.467 18 61 0.293 18 61 0.760 17:00 - 18:00 18 61 0.517 18 61 0.249 18 61 0.766 18:00 - 19:00 18 61 0.323 18 61 0.221 18 61 0.544 19:00 - 20:00 20:00 - 21:00 21:00 - 22:00 22:00 - 23:00 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 3.506 3.697 7.203

This section displays the trip rate results based on the selected set of surveys and the selected count type (shown just above the table). It is split by three main columns, representing arrivals trips, departures trips, and total trips (arrivals plus departures). Within each of these main columns are three sub-columns. These display the number of survey days where count data is included (per time period), the average value of the selected trip rate calculation parameter (per time period), and the trip rate result (per time period). Total trip rates (the sum of the column) are also displayed at the foot of the table.

To obtain a trip rate, the average (mean) trip rate parameter value (TRP) is first calculated for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated time period. The average (mean) number of arrivals, departures or totals (whichever applies) is also calculated (COUNT) for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated time period. Then, the average count is divided by the average trip rate parameter value, and multiplied by the stated calculation factor (shown just above the table and abbreviated here as FACT). So, the method is: COUNT/TRP*FACT. Trip rates are then rounded to 3 decimal places. TRICS 7.5.1 290318 B18.22 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2018. All rights reserved Tuesday 12/06/18 Page 7 Waterman Group Halifax Place Nottingham Licence No: 701710

The survey data, graphs and all associated supporting information, contained within the TRICS Database are published by TRICS Consortium Limited ("the Company") and the Company claims copyright and database rights in this published work. The Company authorises those who possess a current TRICS licence to access the TRICS Database and copy the data contained within the TRICS Database for the licence holders' use only. Any resulting copy must retain all copyrights and other proprietary notices, and any disclaimer contained thereon.

The Company accepts no responsibility for loss which may arise from reliance on data contained in the TRICS Database. [No warranty of any kind, express or implied, is made as to the data contained in the TRICS Database.]

Parameter summary

Trip rate parameter range selected: 27 - 125 (units: ) Survey date date range: 01/01/10 - 27/11/17 Number of weekdays (Monday-Friday): 18 Number of Saturdays: 0 Number of Sundays: 0 Surveys automatically removed from selection: 2 Surveys manually removed from selection: 0

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed.

G. Trip Distribution Calculations

usual residence E02005915 : place of work A B C D Rushcliffe 010 Amber Valley 6 6 Ashfield 27 27 Bassetlaw 5 5 Birmingham 6 6 Blaby 29 29 Broxtowe 45 45 Charnwood 85 85 Chesterfield 4 4 Corby 3 3 Coventry 6 6 Derby 18 18 E02005906 : Rushcliffe 001 21 14 7 E02005907 : Rushcliffe 002 61 30 31 E02005908 : Rushcliffe 003 21 21 E02005909 : Rushcliffe 004 11 11 E02005910 : Rushcliffe 005 86 86 E02005911 : Rushcliffe 006 18 18 E02005912 : Rushcliffe 007 36 36 E02005913 : Rushcliffe 008 7 7 E02005914 : Rushcliffe 009 38 38 E02005915 : Rushcliffe 010 161 65 16 48 32 E02005916 : Rushcliffe 011 37 37 E02005917 : Rushcliffe 012 35 35 E02005918 : Rushcliffe 013 18 18 E02005919 : Rushcliffe 014 23 23 E02005920 : Rushcliffe 015 6 6 East Lindsey 5 5 East Staffordshire 3 3 Erewash 22 22 Gedling 72 72 Harborough 7 7 Hillingdon 4 4 Hinckley and Bosworth 5 5 Leicester 60 60 Lincoln 3 3 Luton 8 8 Mansfield 11 11 Melton 105 105 Newark and Sherwood 67 67 North Kesteven 7 7 North West Leicestershire 21 21 Northampton 3 3 Nottingham 480 480 Nuneaton and Bedworth 7 7 Oadby and Wigston 3 3 Rutland 6 3 3 South Kesteven 25 25 Walsall 3 3 TOTAL 1,740 1,578 16 114 32 PERCENTAGE 100% 91% 1% 7% 2% B

A C

A = Nottingham Road B = Cropwell Butler Road C= Fern Road D = Kinoulton Road

H. Traffic Survey Data

Channel 1 - Northbound Vehicle Flow Week 1

19/06/2018 20/06/2018 21/06/2018 22/06/2018 23/06/2018 24/06/2018 25/06/2018 Hr Ending Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday 5 Day Ave 7 Day Ave 1 1 1 5 1 4 3 4 2 3 2 1 0 2 1 6 0 0 1 1 3 1 1 0 0 0 3 1 1 1 4 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 5 2 1 0 2 1 1 0 1 1 6 1 2 2 3 0 3 2 2 2 7 12 16 9 14 4 6 13 13 11 8 62 56 69 52 12 11 77 63 48 9 76 77 82 79 41 32 81 79 67 10 64 73 75 79 46 235 69 72 92 11 59 54 49 52 78 285 57 54 91 12 44 51 46 52 68 352 56 50 96 13 41 51 63 60 62 431 58 55 109 14 44 46 37 56 57 258 34 43 76 15 42 45 46 51 50 118 49 47 57 16 79 74 78 70 51 55 74 75 69 17 80 69 64 65 49 67 71 70 66 18 59 74 58 78 39 47 52 64 58 19 52 60 59 64 37 36 63 60 53 20 37 36 48 53 36 32 58 46 43 21 28 21 29 35 19 26 35 30 28 22 29 20 30 36 14 10 36 30 25 23 12 13 13 10 12 14 14 12 13 24 1 0 3 3 4 1 4 2 2

7-19 702 730 726 758 590 1927 741 731 882 6-22 808 823 842 896 663 2001 883 850 988 6-24 821 836 858 909 679 2016 901 865 1003 0-24 829 842 868 917 690 2027 909 873 1012

Vehicle Flow (Channel 1)

2500

2000

1500

1000

500

Number of Vehicles of Number 0-24 0 6-24 6-22 19/06/201820/06/2018 21/06/2018 22/06/2018 7-19 23/06/2018 24/06/2018 25/06/2018 Date

7-19 6-22 6-24 0-24 Church Road, Cropwell Bishop ATC

Channel 1 - Northbound Average Speed Week 1

19/06/2018 20/06/2018 21/06/2018 22/06/2018 23/06/2018 24/06/2018 25/06/2018 Hr Ending Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday 1 15.5 15.5 21.5 25.5 20.5 22.2 20.5 2 33.0 - 20.5 15.5 23.8 - - 3 25.5 25.5 - - - 25.5 25.5 4 5.0 5.0 25.5 15.5 - 25.5 25.5 5 15.5 15.5 - 5.0 15.5 15.5 - 6 15.5 20.5 20.5 22.2 - 12.0 10.2 7 23.0 22.4 21.1 20.5 20.5 17.1 20.1 8 19.5 19.2 20.1 19.2 21.3 18.1 20.7 9 18.6 18.3 18.9 17.9 17.6 18.0 18.1 10 16.9 17.5 18.7 18.1 15.6 16.6 19.7 11 18.2 18.6 17.9 16.6 17.1 16.2 16.7 12 17.3 17.6 19.0 16.8 18.4 15.7 18.5 13 18.4 18.8 14.9 18.5 17.7 15.1 14.9 14 19.1 19.0 17.9 18.3 17.8 14.9 18.1 15 18.1 17.5 19.0 18.8 18.9 15.5 18.6 16 17.6 16.7 18.1 17.0 17.2 16.5 17.6 17 17.0 18.5 17.0 19.5 19.8 17.4 16.6 18 18.4 18.6 17.3 19.3 18.8 19.8 18.0 19 17.8 18.5 15.6 17.8 18.7 18.8 15.9 20 17.9 19.9 17.1 18.7 20.2 17.7 17.3 21 20.1 17.9 18.2 17.8 17.6 20.1 18.6 22 19.6 17.5 18.5 18.3 19.1 21.2 17.4 23 18.0 22.4 21.7 20.5 21.3 21.0 19.1 24 15.5 - 18.8 18.8 23.0 15.5 18.0

10-12 17.8 18.2 18.4 16.7 17.7 15.9 17.6 14-16 17.8 17.0 18.5 17.8 18.1 15.8 18.0 0-24 18.2 18.4 18.0 18.2 18.3 16.1 17.9

Average 17.9

Channel 1 - Northbound 85th Percentile

19/06/2018 20/06/2018 21/06/2018 22/06/2018 23/06/2018 24/06/2018 25/06/2018 Hr Ending Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday 1 - - 25.8 - 26.0 26.0 26.3 2 - - 26.4 - 25.8 - - 3 - - - - - 26.3 - 4 5.3 ------5 15.8 - - 5.6 - - - 6 - 26.3 25.9 26.2 - 16.2 15.8 7 25.5 26.1 25.8 26.4 26.0 26.0 25.6 8 26.3 26.5 25.7 26.3 25.7 25.9 25.5 9 26.3 26.4 25.7 25.5 26.4 25.6 25.8 10 26.2 25.7 26.1 26.0 26.2 16.6 26.3 11 25.5 26.2 25.9 26.4 26.0 16.4 25.8 12 25.9 26.5 25.9 25.9 25.9 16.0 25.7 13 26.4 25.7 16.2 26.2 25.6 15.6 26.0 14 26.3 26.0 25.8 26.0 26.3 16.3 25.8 15 25.9 25.6 26.1 26.0 26.0 15.9 25.8 16 26.5 26.5 25.7 26.0 26.3 26.0 25.5 17 26.4 26.2 25.7 25.9 26.1 26.0 26.0 18 25.6 25.5 26.1 25.9 26.3 25.7 25.7 19 26.4 26.1 25.6 25.8 25.5 25.8 26.4 20 25.9 25.6 26.0 25.6 25.7 25.6 26.1 21 26.0 25.6 26.4 25.7 25.6 26.1 26.3 22 26.3 26.3 25.8 26.5 25.6 25.7 26.4 23 25.6 25.8 26.3 25.6 25.8 26.4 25.8 24 - - 25.9 25.9 25.6 - 26.0

10-12 26.0 25.5 25.8 25.9 25.5 15.9 25.6 14-16 25.8 25.8 26.4 26.0 26.0 15.9 26.1 0-24 26.1 25.9 26.1 25.7 26.2 16.4 25.9

85th %ile 24.6 Church Road, Cropwell Bishop ATC

Channel 1 - Northbound Speed Summary Week 1

19/06/2018 20/06/2018 21/06/2018 22/06/2018 23/06/2018 24/06/2018 25/06/2018 Speed (MPH) Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday 0-30 828 842 867 917 689 2024 908 31-45 1 0 1 0 1 3 1 46-60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL 829 842 868 917 690 2027 909

Speed Summary (MPH)

100%

100% 19/06/2018 20/06/2018 21/06/2018 22/06/2018 23/06/2018 24/06/2018 25/06/2018

Date

0-30 31-45 46-60 61- Church Road, Cropwell Bishop ATC

Channel 1 - Northbound Vehicle Class Week 1

Classes Car / LGV / OGV1 / Bus OGV2 TOTAL Day / Time Caravan - 1 - 2,3,5,6,7,12 - 4,8,9,10,11,13 - 1-13 19/06/2018 7-19 646 55 1 702 6-22 746 61 1 808 6-24 759 61 1 821 0-24 765 62 2 829 20/06/2018 7-19 667 61 2 730 6-22 756 65 2 823 6-24 769 65 2 836 0-24 775 65 2 842 21/06/2018 7-19 668 58 0 726 6-22 773 68 1 842 6-24 788 69 1 858 0-24 797 70 1 868 22/06/2018 7-19 683 72 3 758 6-22 814 79 3 896 6-24 826 80 3 909 0-24 834 80 3 917 23/06/2018 7-19 550 39 1 590 6-22 618 44 1 663 6-24 634 44 1 679 0-24 645 44 1 690 24/06/2018 7-19 1834 28 65 1927 6-22 1899 37 65 2001 6-24 1912 39 65 2016 0-24 1923 39 65 2027 25/06/2018 7-19 683 58 0 741 6-22 815 68 0 883 6-24 832 69 0 901 0-24 840 69 0 909

Average 7-19 819 53 10 882 6-22 917 60 10 988 6-24 931 61 10 1003 0-24 940 61 11 1012

Total Vehicle Class Distribution

1% 6%

93% Church Road, Cropwell Bishop ATC

Channel 2 - Southbound Vehicle Flow Week 1

19/06/2018 20/06/2018 21/06/2018 22/06/2018 23/06/2018 24/06/2018 25/06/2018 Hr Ending Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday 5 Day Ave 7 Day Ave 1 2 2 2 0 5 5 0 1 2 2 1 1 0 0 4 2 3 1 2 3 1 1 1 0 1 2 0 1 1 4 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 1 5 1 2 2 2 1 2 0 1 1 6 3 5 8 5 3 2 6 5 5 7 8 7 8 10 6 13 10 9 9 8 51 58 45 50 20 13 40 49 40 9 79 79 79 83 41 35 79 80 68 10 56 51 54 55 53 34 50 53 50 11 49 49 36 51 49 48 36 44 45 12 37 44 49 54 75 61 52 47 53 13 56 61 55 46 68 71 46 53 58 14 53 46 57 48 54 54 59 53 53 15 45 47 49 57 54 33 54 50 48 16 68 79 60 69 42 30 60 67 58 17 69 66 56 79 47 58 61 66 62 18 77 79 81 87 42 35 85 82 69 19 54 54 56 62 40 36 57 57 51 20 30 31 46 57 38 32 50 43 41 21 27 23 29 37 15 22 28 29 26 22 27 25 13 30 16 18 16 22 21 23 9 10 15 7 11 11 18 12 12 24 2 4 5 8 6 3 5 5 5

7-19 694 713 677 741 585 508 679 701 657 6-22 786 799 773 875 660 593 783 803 753 6-24 797 813 793 890 677 607 806 820 769 0-24 805 824 806 899 692 621 815 830 780

Vehicle Flow (Channel 2)

900

800

700

600

500

400

300

200

100

Number of of Vehicles Number 0-24 0 6-24 6-22 19/06/201820/06/2018 21/06/2018 22/06/2018 7-19 23/06/2018 24/06/2018 25/06/2018 Date 7-19 6-22 6-24 0-24 Church Road, Cropwell Bishop ATC

Channel 2 - Southbound Average Speed Week 1

19/06/2018 20/06/2018 21/06/2018 22/06/2018 23/06/2018 24/06/2018 25/06/2018 Hr Ending Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday 1 20.5 20.5 20.5 - 21.5 19.5 - 2 25.5 25.5 - - 23.0 25.5 24.7 3 25.5 25.5 25.5 - 25.5 25.5 - 4 - - - 25.5 15.5 15.5 - 5 15.5 15.5 20.5 20.5 33.0 20.5 - 6 22.2 21.5 23.0 19.5 25.5 20.5 23.8 7 21.8 21.2 20.4 20.4 20.5 20.1 21.4 8 18.0 18.8 17.7 19.1 21.0 17.8 17.5 9 17.6 17.8 19.5 17.5 19.1 20.1 20.1 10 16.3 17.0 17.9 18.4 17.8 18.1 17.0 11 16.7 17.1 19.4 16.4 17.6 17.6 19.4 12 17.7 18.2 17.7 18.1 17.9 17.1 17.2 13 18.2 17.6 16.9 18.3 16.6 18.2 16.8 14 17.6 17.7 18.3 18.8 16.3 15.8 18.6 15 17.2 15.3 19.2 18.8 16.8 16.9 19.6 16 16.3 16.5 17.0 16.8 18.6 18.4 16.3 17 16.9 18.2 18.4 17.2 18.3 18.4 18.6 18 17.4 17.1 16.3 17.4 17.4 20.6 16.3 19 18.3 18.1 18.2 17.9 19.0 19.1 18.1 20 18.5 17.1 18.5 19.4 18.9 19.6 18.7 21 18.1 21.2 20.9 18.7 18.2 19.6 20.5 22 19.9 20.3 18.5 19.8 18.6 21.1 20.5 23 19.9 19.4 23.3 19.8 21.0 22.8 22.6 24 25.5 25.5 21.5 18.0 22.2 18.7 21.5

10-12 17.1 17.6 18.4 17.3 17.8 17.3 18.1 14-16 16.7 16.0 18.0 17.7 17.6 17.6 17.9 0-24 17.6 17.8 18.3 18.1 18.1 18.5 18.4

Average 18.1

Channel 2 - Southbound 85th Percentile

19/06/2018 20/06/2018 21/06/2018 22/06/2018 23/06/2018 24/06/2018 25/06/2018 Hr Ending Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday 1 26.5 25.9 25.7 - 26.5 26.5 - 2 - - - - 25.7 26.3 33.4 3 - - - - - 26.2 - 4 - - - 26.2 - - - 5 - 16.0 25.7 25.5 - 26.4 - 6 25.8 25.9 26.5 25.9 26.0 25.9 25.7 7 25.6 26.0 25.6 25.9 25.6 25.6 26.4 8 26.0 25.7 25.6 25.8 26.0 26.5 26.1 9 25.7 26.1 26.3 26.5 26.5 26.3 25.9 10 26.5 26.0 25.9 26.3 26.1 26.2 25.9 11 25.6 26.2 26.0 26.2 26.4 25.9 26.4 12 25.5 26.4 25.6 25.9 26.2 25.5 26.1 13 25.8 25.9 25.6 26.2 25.9 25.7 26.4 14 26.0 25.8 25.7 25.8 26.2 25.7 26.0 15 26.4 15.8 25.5 25.9 25.6 26.0 25.8 16 26.0 25.7 26.2 25.9 26.3 25.9 16.4 17 25.9 26.0 26.0 26.4 26.2 25.6 25.8 18 26.3 25.7 26.1 25.6 26.0 25.8 25.8 19 26.3 26.1 25.7 26.1 25.7 26.1 25.7 20 26.2 25.9 26.0 25.8 25.7 26.3 25.8 21 26.2 26.4 26.2 25.6 25.8 26.0 25.5 22 26.5 26.0 26.3 25.7 26.3 25.7 26.2 23 25.8 25.7 25.9 25.6 25.6 26.4 26.3 24 26.0 26.2 26.4 25.9 26.0 25.9 25.8

10-12 25.9 26.2 26.2 26.5 26.3 25.8 26.2 14-16 26.2 16.1 25.6 26.0 26.3 26.3 25.9 0-24 25.7 26.3 26.1 26.0 25.8 25.7 26.3

85th %ile 26.0 Church Road, Cropwell Bishop ATC

Channel 2 - Southbound Speed Summary Week 1

19/06/2018 20/06/2018 21/06/2018 22/06/2018 23/06/2018 24/06/2018 25/06/2018 Speed (MPH) Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday 0-30 805 824 803 899 690 614 812 31-45 0 0 3 0 2 7 3 46-60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL 805 824 806 899 692 621 815

Speed Summary (MPH)

100%

99%

98%

98% 19/06/2018 20/06/2018 21/06/2018 22/06/2018 23/06/2018 24/06/2018 25/06/2018

Date

0-30 31-45 46-60 61- Church Road, Cropwell Bishop ATC

Channel 2 - Southbound Vehicle Class Week 1

Classes Car / LGV / OGV1 / Bus OGV2 TOTAL Day / Time Caravan - 1 - 2,3,5,6,7,12 - 4,8,9,10,11,13 - 1-13 19/06/2018 7-19 619 69 6 694 6-22 707 73 6 786 6-24 717 74 6 797 0-24 723 76 6 805 20/06/2018 7-19 642 69 2 713 6-22 726 71 2 799 6-24 740 71 2 813 0-24 749 73 2 824 21/06/2018 7-19 590 87 0 677 6-22 681 92 0 773 6-24 699 94 0 793 0-24 710 96 0 806 22/06/2018 7-19 653 84 4 741 6-22 777 94 4 875 6-24 791 95 4 890 0-24 800 95 4 899 23/06/2018 7-19 541 43 1 585 6-22 613 46 1 660 6-24 630 46 1 677 0-24 645 46 1 692 24/06/2018 7-19 469 39 0 508 6-22 545 48 0 593 6-24 559 48 0 607 0-24 572 49 0 621 25/06/2018 7-19 588 88 3 679 6-22 685 92 6 783 6-24 706 94 6 806 0-24 714 95 6 815

Average 7-19 586 68 2 657 6-22 676 74 3 753 6-24 692 75 3 769 0-24 702 76 3 780

Total Vehicle Class Distribution

0% 10%

90% Cropwell Bishop, Wednesday 20th June 2018

Junction: (1) Church Street / Nottingham Road

Approach: Church Street

Left to Nottingham Road (East) Right to Nottingham Road (West) TIME LIGHT HEAVY TOTAL PCU LIGHT HEAVY TOTAL PCU 0715 - 0730 3 0 3 12 0 12 0730 - 0745 9 0 9 18 27 1 28 56 0745 - 0800 14 1 15 30 13 1 14 28 0800 - 0815 13 0 13 26 21 0 21 42 0815 - 0830 10 0 10 20 20 0 20 40 0830 - 0845 13 0 13 26 18 1 19 38 0845 - 0900 11 0 11 22 24 0 24 48 0900 - 0915 14 0 14 28 41 1 42 84 0915 - 0930 7 1 8 16 13 0 13 26

Session Total 96 210

1630 - 1645 14 0 14 28 21 0 21 42 1645 - 1700 14 0 14 28 16 0 16 32 1700 - 1715 14 0 14 28 14 0 14 28 1715 - 1730 12 0 12 24 8 0 8 16 1730 - 1745 14 1 15 30 19 0 19 38 1745 - 1800 11 0 11 22 12 0 12 24 1800 - 1815 7 0 7 14 9 0 9 18 1815 - 1830 3 1 4 8 15 0 15 30

Session Total 108 118 Cropwell Bishop, Wednesday 20th June 2018

Junction: (1) Church Street / Nottingham Road

Approach: Uttoxeter Road (East)

Ahead to Nottingham Road (West) Right to Church street TIME LIGHT HEAVY TOTAL PCU LIGHT HEAVY TOTAL PCU 0715 - 0730 11 0 11 22 1 0 1 2 0730 - 0745 21 0 21 42 0 0 0 0 0745 - 0800 21 2 23 46 6 0 6 12 0800 - 0815 25 0 25 50 3 0 3 6 0815 - 0830 29 0 29 58 3 0 3 6 0830 - 0845 21 0 21 42 3 0 3 6 0845 - 0900 30 2 32 64 3 0 3 6 0900 - 0915 31 0 31 62 7 1 8 16 0915 - 0930 22 1 23 46 5 0 5 10

Session Total 226 34

1630 - 1645 36 0 36 72 8 0 8 16 1645 - 1700 25 3 28 56 4 0 4 8 1700 - 1715 40 0 40 80 10 0 10 20 1715 - 1730 45 0 45 90 13 0 13 26 1730 - 1745 27 2 29 58 5 0 5 10 1745 - 1800 16 2 18 36 6 0 6 12 1800 - 1815 17 0 17 34 10 0 10 20 1815 - 1830 23 0 23 46 4 0 4 8

Session Total 298 70 Cropwell Bishop, Wednesday 20th June 2018

Junction: (1) Church Street / Nottingham Road

Approach: Nottingham Road (West)

Ahead to Nottingham Road (East) Left to Church Street TIME LIGHT HEAVY TOTAL PCU LIGHT HEAVY TOTAL PCU 0715 - 0730 23 0 23 46 5 0 5 10 0730 - 0745 27 0 27 54 14 0 14 28 0745 - 0800 40 0 40 80 10 2 12 24 0800 - 0815 33 0 33 66 5 1 6 12 0815 - 0830 43 0 43 86 6 0 6 12 0830 - 0845 25 1 26 52 12 1 13 26 0845 - 0900 48 2 50 100 12 0 12 24 0900 - 0915 25 3 28 56 8 1 9 18 0915 - 0930 16 1 17 34 11 1 12 24

Session Total 294 80

1630 - 1645 25 4 29 58 20 0 20 40 1645 - 1700 40 0 40 80 28 0 28 56 1700 - 1715 32 0 32 64 19 2 21 42 1715 - 1730 25 2 27 54 20 0 20 40 1730 - 1745 30 1 31 62 18 0 18 36 1745 - 1800 25 1 26 52 21 0 21 42 1800 - 1815 22 1 23 46 17 0 17 34 1815 - 1830 25 0 25 50 26 0 26 52

Session Total 256 178

I. Traffic Network Diagrams

Church Street

85 0 87 0

1 Site Access 0 0 89 0 0 0 79 0

Church Street

118 108 178 80 210 96 256 294

Nottingham Road 2 Fern Road 34 70 226 298

Note: 2018 base flows have been taken from the traffic surveys undertaken during June 2018 2023 Base Peak Hour Traffic Flows AM PM

Church Street

92 0 94 0

1 Site Access 0 0 96 0 0 0 85 0

Church Street

128 117 192 86 227 104 277 317

Nottingham Road 2 Fern Road 37 76 244 322

Note: Growth Factor 2018 base peak hour traffic flows have been 'growthed' by the AM 1.079 relevent TEMPRO growth factors for the Rushcliffe 010 Super PM 1.081 Output Area. Development Trip Disitrbution AM PM

Church Street

0% 1% 0% 1%

1 Site Access 1% 1% 0% 99% 99% 99% 0% 99%

Church Street

93% 7% 93% 93% 93% 7% 0% 0%

Nottingham Road 2 Fern Road 7% 7% 0% 0%

Note: Development traffic has been distributed using origin destination statistics for the ‘Rushcliffe 013’ Super Output Area from the 2011 Census Development Trip Generation - Commuting Trips AM PM

Church Street

0 0 0 0

1 Site Access 0 0 0 12 45 17 0 35

Church Street

16 1 33 11 42 3 0 0

Nottingham Road 2 Fern Road 1 2 0 0

Note: Development generated trips have been derived from the Arrivals Departures TRICS online database for sites that have similar 12 45 AM characteristics 36 17 PM 2023 Base + Development Peak Hour Traffic Flows AM PM

Church Street

92 0 94 0

1 Site Access 0 0 96 12 45 17 85 35

Church Street

143 118 225 97 269 107 277 317

Nottingham Road 2 Fern Road 37 78 244 322

Note: Development generated trips have been derived from the Arrivals Departures TRICS online database for sites that have similar 10 37 AM characteristics 29 14 PM

J. Site Access Capacity Assessment Results

Junctions 8 ARCADY 8 - Roundabout Module Version: 8.0.6.541 [19821,26/11/2015] © Copyright TRL Limited, 2018 For sales and distribution information, program advice and maintenance, contact TRL: Tel: +44 (0)1344 770758 email: [email protected] Web: http://www.trlsoftware.co.uk The users of this computer program for the solution of an engineering problem are in no way relieved of their responsibility for the correctness of the solution

Filename: Site Access.arc8 Path: N:\Projects\WIE14662 Cropwell Bishop, Nottinghamshire\100\6_Calcs\Capacity Assessments\Site Access Report generation date: 07/11/2018 17:55:44

» (Default Analysis Set) - 2023 Base + Dev, AM » (Default Analysis Set) - 2023 Base + Dev, PM

Summary of junction performance

AM PM Queue (PCU) RFC Queue (PCU) RFC A1 - 2023 Base + Dev Arm 1 0.17 0.15 0.17 0.15 Arm 2 0.08 0.08 0.03 0.03 Arm 3 0.20 0.17 0.23 0.19

Values shown are the maximum values over all time segments. Delay is the maximum value of average delay per arriving vehicle.

"D1 - 2023 Base + Dev, AM " model duration: 07:45 - 09:15 "D2 - 2023 Base + Dev, PM" model duration: 16:45 - 18:15

Run using Junctions 8.0.6.541 at 07/11/2018 17:55:44

File summary

Title Proposed Site Access Location Church Street, Cropwell Bishop Site Number Date 11/07/2018 Version Status (new file) Identifier Client Terra Strategic Jobnumber WIE14662 Enumerator nmdmw Description All traffic flows are in PCU's

Analysis Options

Vehicle Length Do Queue Calculate Residual Residual Capacity Criteria RFC Average Delay Threshold Queue Threshold (m) Variations Capacity Type Threshold (s) (PCU) 5.75 N/A 0.85 36.00 20.00

1 Generated on 07/11/2018 17:55:46 using Junctions 8 (8.0.6.541)

Units

Distance Units Speed Units Traffic Units Input Traffic Units Results Flow Units Average Delay Units Total Delay Units Rate Of Delay Units m kph PCU PCU perHour s -Min perMin

(Default Analysis Set) - 2023 Base + Dev, AM

Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings

Analysis Set Details

Name Roundabout Capacity Model Description Locked Network Flow Scaling Factor (%) Reason For Scaling Factors (Default Analysis Set) ARCADY 100.000

Demand Set Details

Time Traffic Model Time Scenario Model Start Model Finish Time Segment Single Time Name Period Description Profile Period Length Locked Name Time (HH:mm) Time (HH:mm) Length (min) Segment Only Name Type (min) 2023 Base 2023 Base ONE AM 07:45 09:15 90 15 + Dev, AM + Dev HOUR

Junction Network

Junctions

Junction Name Junction Type Arm Order Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS 1 (untitled) Mini-roundabout 1,2,3 6.06 A

Junction Network Options

Driving Side Lighting Road Surface In London Left Normal/unknown Normal/unknown

Arms

Arm Arm Name Description 1 1 Church Street (North) 2 2 Site Access 3 3 Church Street (South)

Capacity Options

Arm Minimum Capacity (PCU/hr) Maximum Capacity (PCU/hr) 1 0.00 99999.00 2 0.00 99999.00 3 0.00 99999.00

2 Generated on 07/11/2018 17:55:46 using Junctions 8 (8.0.6.541)

Mini Roundabout Geometry

Approach road Minimum approach road Entry Effective flare Distance to next Entry corner kerb line Gradient over Kerbed central Arm half-width (m) half-width (m) width (m) length (m) arm (m) distance (m) 50m (%) island 1 2.50 2.40 3.00 0.25 11.16 9.90 0.00 2 2.75 2.75 3.00 0.25 8.39 5.40 0.00 3 3.00 2.80 3.30 0.25 11.11 9.03 0.00

Slope / Intercept / Capacity

Roundabout Slope and Intercept used in model

Arm Enter slope and intercept directly Entered slope Entered intercept (PCU/hr) Final Slope Final Intercept (PCU/hr) 1 (calculated) (calculated) 0.481 714.220 2 (calculated) (calculated) 0.495 705.182 3 (calculated) (calculated) 0.500 699.100 The slope and intercept shown above include any corrections and adjustments.

Traffic Flows

Demand Set Data Options

PCU Estimate Default Vehicle Vehicle Vehicle Default Turning Turning Turning Vehicle Mix Factor from Vehicle Mix Varies Mix Varies Mix Varies Turning Proportions Proportions Proportions Source for a HV entry/exit Mix Over Time Over Turn Over Entry Proportions Vary Over Time Vary Over Turn Vary Over Entry (PCU) counts HV 2.00 ü ü Percentages ü ü

Entry Flows

General Flows Data

Arm Profile Type Use Turning Counts Average Demand Flow (PCU/hr) Flow Scaling Factor (%) 1 ONE HOUR ü 94.00 100.000 2 ONE HOUR ü 45.00 100.000 3 ONE HOUR ü 108.00 100.000

Turning Proportions

Turning Counts / Proportions (PCU/hr) - Junction 1 (for whole period) To 1 2 3 1 0.000 0.000 94.000 From 2 0.000 0.000 45.000 3 96.000 12.000 0.000

Turning Proportions (PCU) - Junction 1 (for whole period) To 1 2 3 1 0.00 0.00 1.00 From 2 0.00 0.00 1.00 3 0.89 0.11 0.00

3 Generated on 07/11/2018 17:55:46 using Junctions 8 (8.0.6.541)

Vehicle Mix

Average PCU Per Vehicle - Junction 1 (for whole period) To 1 2 3 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 From 2 1.000 1.000 1.000 3 1.000 1.000 1.000

Heavy Vehicle Percentages - Junction 1 (for whole period) To 1 2 3 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 From 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 0.0 0.0 0.0

Results

Results Summary for whole modelled period

Arm Max RFC Max Delay (s) Max Queue (PCU) Max LOS 1 0.15 5.96 0.17 A 2 0.08 5.95 0.08 A 3 0.17 6.20 0.20 A

Main Results for each time segment

Main results: (07:45-08:00)

Total Demand Entry Flow Circulating Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity End Queue Delay Arm RFC LOS (PCU/hr) (PCU/hr) (PCU/hr) (Ped/hr) (PCU/hr) (PCU) (s) 1 70.77 70.33 8.98 0.00 709.90 0.100 0.11 5.625 A 2 33.88 33.67 70.33 0.00 670.38 0.051 0.05 5.653 A 3 81.31 80.79 0.00 0.00 699.10 0.116 0.13 5.817 A

Main results: (08:00-08:15)

Total Demand Entry Flow Circulating Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity End Queue Delay Arm RFC LOS (PCU/hr) (PCU/hr) (PCU/hr) (Ped/hr) (PCU/hr) (PCU) (s) 1 84.50 84.41 10.77 0.00 709.04 0.119 0.13 5.763 A 2 40.45 40.41 84.41 0.00 663.41 0.061 0.06 5.778 A 3 97.09 96.97 0.00 0.00 699.10 0.139 0.16 5.976 A

4 Generated on 07/11/2018 17:55:46 using Junctions 8 (8.0.6.541)

Main results: (08:15-08:30)

Total Demand Entry Flow Circulating Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity End Queue Delay Arm RFC LOS (PCU/hr) (PCU/hr) (PCU/hr) (Ped/hr) (PCU/hr) (PCU) (s) 1 103.50 103.35 13.19 0.00 707.87 0.146 0.17 5.953 A 2 49.55 49.48 103.35 0.00 654.04 0.076 0.08 5.954 A 3 118.91 118.74 0.00 0.00 699.10 0.170 0.20 6.201 A

Main results: (08:30-08:45)

Total Demand Entry Flow Circulating Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity End Queue Delay Arm RFC LOS (PCU/hr) (PCU/hr) (PCU/hr) (Ped/hr) (PCU/hr) (PCU) (s) 1 103.50 103.49 13.21 0.00 707.86 0.146 0.17 5.955 A 2 49.55 49.54 103.49 0.00 653.97 0.076 0.08 5.955 A 3 118.91 118.91 0.00 0.00 699.10 0.170 0.20 6.204 A

Main results: (08:45-09:00)

Total Demand Entry Flow Circulating Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity End Queue Delay Arm RFC LOS (PCU/hr) (PCU/hr) (PCU/hr) (Ped/hr) (PCU/hr) (PCU) (s) 1 84.50 84.64 10.81 0.00 709.02 0.119 0.14 5.768 A 2 40.45 40.52 84.64 0.00 663.30 0.061 0.07 5.780 A 3 97.09 97.26 0.00 0.00 699.10 0.139 0.16 5.982 A

Main results: (09:00-09:15)

Total Demand Entry Flow Circulating Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity End Queue Delay Arm RFC LOS (PCU/hr) (PCU/hr) (PCU/hr) (Ped/hr) (PCU/hr) (PCU) (s) 1 70.77 70.87 9.05 0.00 709.87 0.100 0.11 5.634 A 2 33.88 33.93 70.87 0.00 670.11 0.051 0.05 5.658 A 3 81.31 81.43 0.00 0.00 699.10 0.116 0.13 5.831 A

(Default Analysis Set) - 2023 Base + Dev, PM

Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings

Analysis Set Details

Name Roundabout Capacity Model Description Locked Network Flow Scaling Factor (%) Reason For Scaling Factors (Default Analysis Set) ARCADY 100.000

Demand Set Details

Junction Network

Junctions

Junction Name Junction Type Arm Order Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS 1 (untitled) Mini-roundabout 1,2,3 6.18 A

5 Generated on 07/11/2018 17:55:46 using Junctions 8 (8.0.6.541)

Junction Network Options

Driving Side Lighting Road Surface In London Left Normal/unknown Normal/unknown

Arms

Arm Arm Name Description 1 1 Church Street (North) 2 2 Site Access 3 3 Church Street (South)

Capacity Options

Arm Minimum Capacity (PCU/hr) Maximum Capacity (PCU/hr) 1 0.00 99999.00 2 0.00 99999.00 3 0.00 99999.00

Mini Roundabout Geometry

Slope / Intercept / Capacity

Roundabout Slope and Intercept used in model

Traffic Flows

Demand Set Data Options

6 Generated on 07/11/2018 17:55:46 using Junctions 8 (8.0.6.541)

Entry Flows

General Flows Data

Arm Profile Type Use Turning Counts Average Demand Flow (PCU/hr) Flow Scaling Factor (%) 1 ONE HOUR ü 92.00 100.000 2 ONE HOUR ü 17.00 100.000 3 ONE HOUR ü 120.00 100.000

Turning Proportions

Turning Counts / Proportions (PCU/hr) - Junction 1 (for whole period) To 1 2 3 1 0.000 0.000 92.000 From 2 0.000 0.000 17.000 3 85.000 35.000 0.000

Turning Proportions (PCU) - Junction 1 (for whole period) To 1 2 3 1 0.00 0.00 1.00 From 2 0.00 0.00 1.00 3 0.71 0.29 0.00

Vehicle Mix

Average PCU Per Vehicle - Junction 1 (for whole period) To 1 2 3 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 From 2 1.000 1.000 1.000 3 1.000 1.000 1.000

Heavy Vehicle Percentages - Junction 1 (for whole period) To 1 2 3 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 From 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 0.0 0.0 0.0

7 Generated on 07/11/2018 17:55:46 using Junctions 8 (8.0.6.541)

Results

Results Summary for whole modelled period

Arm Max RFC Max Delay (s) Max Queue (PCU) Max LOS 1 0.15 6.06 0.17 A 2 0.03 5.66 0.03 A 3 0.19 6.35 0.23 A

Main Results for each time segment

Main results: (16:45-17:00)

Total Demand Entry Flow Circulating Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity End Queue Delay Arm RFC LOS (PCU/hr) (PCU/hr) (PCU/hr) (Ped/hr) (PCU/hr) (PCU) (s) 1 69.26 68.83 26.18 0.00 701.62 0.099 0.11 5.685 A 2 12.80 12.72 68.83 0.00 671.12 0.019 0.02 5.467 A 3 90.34 89.75 0.00 0.00 699.10 0.129 0.15 5.903 A

Main results: (17:00-17:15)

Total Demand Entry Flow Circulating Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity End Queue Delay Arm RFC LOS (PCU/hr) (PCU/hr) (PCU/hr) (Ped/hr) (PCU/hr) (PCU) (s) 1 82.71 82.61 31.42 0.00 699.10 0.118 0.13 5.839 A 2 15.28 15.27 82.61 0.00 664.30 0.023 0.02 5.546 A 3 107.88 107.74 0.00 0.00 699.10 0.154 0.18 6.086 A

Main results: (17:15-17:30)

Total Demand Entry Flow Circulating Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity End Queue Delay Arm RFC LOS (PCU/hr) (PCU/hr) (PCU/hr) (Ped/hr) (PCU/hr) (PCU) (s) 1 101.29 101.15 38.48 0.00 695.71 0.146 0.17 6.053 A 2 18.72 18.69 101.15 0.00 655.13 0.029 0.03 5.656 A 3 132.12 131.92 0.00 0.00 699.10 0.189 0.23 6.346 A

Main results: (17:30-17:45)

Total Demand Entry Flow Circulating Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity End Queue Delay Arm RFC LOS (PCU/hr) (PCU/hr) (PCU/hr) (Ped/hr) (PCU/hr) (PCU) (s) 1 101.29 101.29 38.53 0.00 695.68 0.146 0.17 6.056 A 2 18.72 18.72 101.29 0.00 655.06 0.029 0.03 5.656 A 3 132.12 132.12 0.00 0.00 699.10 0.189 0.23 6.348 A

Main results: (17:45-18:00)

Total Demand Entry Flow Circulating Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity End Queue Delay Arm RFC LOS (PCU/hr) (PCU/hr) (PCU/hr) (Ped/hr) (PCU/hr) (PCU) (s) 1 82.71 82.84 31.52 0.00 699.05 0.118 0.14 5.842 A 2 15.28 15.31 82.84 0.00 664.18 0.023 0.02 5.549 A 3 107.88 108.07 0.00 0.00 699.10 0.154 0.18 6.092 A

8 Generated on 07/11/2018 17:55:46 using Junctions 8 (8.0.6.541)

Main results: (18:00-18:15)

Total Demand Entry Flow Circulating Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity End Queue Delay Arm RFC LOS (PCU/hr) (PCU/hr) (PCU/hr) (Ped/hr) (PCU/hr) (PCU) (s) 1 69.26 69.36 26.39 0.00 701.52 0.099 0.11 5.697 A 2 12.80 12.82 69.36 0.00 670.86 0.019 0.02 5.470 A 3 90.34 90.48 0.00 0.00 699.10 0.129 0.15 5.918 A

K. Church Street / Nottingham Road Capacity Assessment Results

Junctions 8 PICADY 8 - Priority Intersection Module Version: 8.0.6.541 [19821,26/11/2015] © Copyright TRL Limited, 2018 For sales and distribution information, program advice and maintenance, contact TRL: Tel: +44 (0)1344 770758 email: [email protected] Web: http://www.trlsoftware.co.uk The users of this computer program for the solution of an engineering problem are in no way relieved of their responsibility for the correctness of the solution

Filename: Church Street - Nottingham Road - Fern Road.arc8 Path: N:\Projects\WIE14662 Cropwell Bishop, Nottinghamshire\100\6_Calcs\Capacity Assessments\Church St-Nott'm Rd-Fern Rd Report generation date: 07/11/2018 18:01:00

» (Default Analysis Set) - 2018 Base, AM » (Default Analysis Set) - 2018 Base, PM » (Default Analysis Set) - 2023 Base, AM » (Default Analysis Set) - 2023 Base, PM » (Default Analysis Set) - 2023 Base + Dev, AM » (Default Analysis Set) - 2023 Base + Dev, PM

Summary of junction performance

AM PM Queue (PCU) RFC Queue (PCU) RFC A1 - 2018 Base Stream B-AC 2.09 0.69 0.97 0.50 Stream C-AB 0.14 0.08 0.37 0.18 Stream C-A - - - - Stream A-B - - - - Stream A-C - - - - A1 - 2023 Base Stream B-AC 2.95 0.76 1.22 0.55 Stream C-AB 0.17 0.09 0.43 0.20 Stream C-A - - - - Stream A-B - - - - Stream A-C - - - - A1 - 2023 Base + Dev Stream B-AC 5.72 0.87 1.48 0.60 Stream C-AB 0.17 0.09 0.46 0.21 Stream C-A - - - - Stream A-B - - - - Stream A-C - - - -

Values shown are the maximum values over all time segments. Delay is the maximum value of average delay per arriving vehicle.

"D1 - 2018 Base, AM " model duration: 07:45 - 09:15 "D2 - 2018 Base, PM" model duration: 16:45 - 18:15 "D3 - 2023 Base, AM" model duration: 07:45 - 09:15 "D4 - 2023 Base, PM" model duration: 16:45 - 18:15 "D5 - 2023 Base + Dev, AM" model duration: 07:45 - 09:15 "D6 - 2023 Base + Dev, PM" model duration: 16:45 - 18:15

Run using Junctions 8.0.6.541 at 07/11/2018 18:00:57

1 Generated on 07/11/2018 18:01:06 using Junctions 8 (8.0.6.541)

File summary

Title Nottingham Road - Church Street - Fern Road Location Cropwell Bishop Site Number Date 11/07/2018 Version Status (new file) Identifier Client Terra Strategic Jobnumber WIE14662 Enumerator nmdmw Description All traffic flows are in PCU's

Analysis Options

Vehicle Length Do Queue Calculate Residual Residual Capacity Criteria RFC Average Delay Threshold Queue Threshold (m) Variations Capacity Type Threshold (s) (PCU) 5.75 N/A 0.85 36.00 20.00

Units

Distance Units Speed Units Traffic Units Input Traffic Units Results Flow Units Average Delay Units Total Delay Units Rate Of Delay Units m kph PCU PCU perHour s -Min perMin

(Default Analysis Set) - 2018 Base, AM

Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings

Analysis Set Details

Name Roundabout Capacity Model Description Locked Network Flow Scaling Factor (%) Reason For Scaling Factors (Default Analysis Set) N/A 100.000

Demand Set Details

Time Traffic Model Time Scenario Model Start Model Finish Time Segment Single Time Name Period Description Profile Period Length Locked Name Time (HH:mm) Time (HH:mm) Length (min) Segment Only Name Type (min) 2018 2018 ONE Base, AM 07:45 09:15 90 15 Base HOUR AM

Junction Network

Junctions

Junction Name Junction Type Major Road Direction Arm Order Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS 1 (untitled) T-Junction Two-way A,B,C 20.71 C

Junction Network Options

Driving Side Lighting Left Normal/unknown

2 Generated on 07/11/2018 18:01:06 using Junctions 8 (8.0.6.541)

Arms

Arm Arm Name Description Arm Type A A Nottingham Road Major B B Church Street Minor C C Fern Road Major

Major Arm Geometry

Width of Has kerbed central Width of kerbed central Has right Width For Right Visibility For Right Blocking Queue Arm Blocks? carriageway (m) reserve reserve (m) turn bay Turn (m) Turn (m) (PCU) C 6.50 0.00 2.20 100.00 ü 0.00 Geometries for Arm C are measured opposite Arm B. Geometries for Arm A (if relevant) are measured opposite Arm D.

Minor Arm Geometry

Minor Lane Lane Lane Width at Estimate Flare Width at Width at Width at Width at Visibility To Visibility To Arm Arm Width Width Width give-way Flare Length 5m (m) 10m (m) 15m (m) 20m (m) Left (m) Right (m) Type (m) (Left) (m) (Right) (m) (m) Length (PCU) One B 3.74 34 130 lane

Slope / Intercept / Capacity

Priority Intersection Slopes and Intercepts Slope Slope Slope Slope Intercept Junction Stream for for for for (PCU/hr) A-B A-C C-A C-B 1 B-A 593.591 0.106 0.267 0.168 0.382 1 B-C 758.064 0.114 0.287 - - 1 C-B 631.874 0.240 0.240 - - The slopes and intercepts shown above do NOT include any corrections or adjustments. Streams may be combined, in which case capacity will be adjusted. Values are shown for the first time segment only; they may differ for subsequent time segments.

Traffic Flows

Demand Set Data Options

3 Generated on 07/11/2018 18:01:06 using Junctions 8 (8.0.6.541)

Entry Flows

General Flows Data

Arm Profile Type Use Turning Counts Average Demand Flow (PCU/hr) Flow Scaling Factor (%) A ONE HOUR ü 374.00 100.000 B ONE HOUR ü 306.00 100.000 C ONE HOUR ü 260.00 100.000

Turning Proportions

Turning Counts / Proportions (PCU/hr) - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 0.000 80.000 294.000 From B 210.000 0.000 96.000 C 226.000 34.000 0.000

Turning Proportions (PCU) - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 0.00 0.21 0.79 From B 0.69 0.00 0.31 C 0.87 0.13 0.00

Vehicle Mix

Average PCU Per Vehicle - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 1.000 1.000 1.000 From B 1.000 1.000 1.000 C 1.000 1.000 1.000

Heavy Vehicle Percentages - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 0.0 0.0 0.0 From B 0.0 0.0 0.0 C 0.0 0.0 0.0

4 Generated on 07/11/2018 18:01:06 using Junctions 8 (8.0.6.541)

Results

Results Summary for whole modelled period

Stream Max RFC Max Delay (s) Max Queue (PCU) Max LOS B-AC 0.69 23.10 2.09 C C-AB 0.08 5.57 0.14 A C-A - - - - A-B - - - - A-C - - - -

Main Results for each time segment

Main results: (07:45-08:00)

Stream Total Demand (PCU/hr) Entry Flow (PCU/hr) Pedestrian Demand (Ped/hr) Capacity (PCU/hr) RFC End Queue (PCU) Delay (s) LOS B-AC 230.37 227.45 0.00 538.28 0.428 0.73 11.478 B C-AB 33.77 33.47 0.00 680.29 0.050 0.07 5.565 A C-A 161.98 161.98 0.00 - - - - - A-B 60.23 60.23 0.00 - - - - - A-C 221.34 221.34 0.00 - - - - -

Main results: (08:00-08:15)

Stream Total Demand (PCU/hr) Entry Flow (PCU/hr) Pedestrian Demand (Ped/hr) Capacity (PCU/hr) RFC End Queue (PCU) Delay (s) LOS B-AC 275.09 273.64 0.00 518.79 0.530 1.09 14.595 B C-AB 42.70 42.60 0.00 690.74 0.062 0.10 5.557 A C-A 191.03 191.03 0.00 - - - - - A-B 71.92 71.92 0.00 - - - - - A-C 264.30 264.30 0.00 - - - - -

Main results: (08:15-08:30)

Stream Total Demand (PCU/hr) Entry Flow (PCU/hr) Pedestrian Demand (Ped/hr) Capacity (PCU/hr) RFC End Queue (PCU) Delay (s) LOS B-AC 336.91 333.18 0.00 491.77 0.685 2.03 22.174 C C-AB 56.52 56.35 0.00 705.55 0.080 0.14 5.547 A C-A 229.75 229.75 0.00 - - - - - A-B 88.08 88.08 0.00 - - - - - A-C 323.70 323.70 0.00 - - - - -

Main results: (08:30-08:45)

Stream Total Demand (PCU/hr) Entry Flow (PCU/hr) Pedestrian Demand (Ped/hr) Capacity (PCU/hr) RFC End Queue (PCU) Delay (s) LOS B-AC 336.91 336.64 0.00 491.73 0.685 2.09 23.098 C C-AB 56.56 56.56 0.00 705.61 0.080 0.14 5.551 A C-A 229.70 229.70 0.00 - - - - - A-B 88.08 88.08 0.00 - - - - - A-C 323.70 323.70 0.00 - - - - -

5 Generated on 07/11/2018 18:01:06 using Junctions 8 (8.0.6.541)

Main results: (08:45-09:00)

Stream Total Demand (PCU/hr) Entry Flow (PCU/hr) Pedestrian Demand (Ped/hr) Capacity (PCU/hr) RFC End Queue (PCU) Delay (s) LOS B-AC 275.09 278.80 0.00 518.72 0.530 1.17 15.225 C C-AB 42.76 42.92 0.00 690.82 0.062 0.10 5.561 A C-A 190.97 190.97 0.00 - - - - - A-B 71.92 71.92 0.00 - - - - - A-C 264.30 264.30 0.00 - - - - -

Main results: (09:00-09:15)

Stream Total Demand (PCU/hr) Entry Flow (PCU/hr) Pedestrian Demand (Ped/hr) Capacity (PCU/hr) RFC End Queue (PCU) Delay (s) LOS B-AC 230.37 231.98 0.00 538.17 0.428 0.76 11.820 B C-AB 33.86 33.97 0.00 680.37 0.050 0.08 5.571 A C-A 161.88 161.88 0.00 - - - - - A-B 60.23 60.23 0.00 - - - - - A-C 221.34 221.34 0.00 - - - - -

(Default Analysis Set) - 2018 Base, PM

Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings

Analysis Set Details

Name Roundabout Capacity Model Description Locked Network Flow Scaling Factor (%) Reason For Scaling Factors (Default Analysis Set) N/A 100.000

Demand Set Details

Time Traffic Model Time Scenario Model Start Model Finish Time Segment Single Time Name Period Description Profile Period Length Locked Name Time (HH:mm) Time (HH:mm) Length (min) Segment Only Name Type (min) 2018 2018 ONE Base, PM 16:45 18:15 90 15 Base HOUR PM

Junction Network

Junctions

Junction Name Junction Type Major Road Direction Arm Order Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS 1 (untitled) T-Junction Two-way A,B,C 11.45 B

Junction Network Options

Driving Side Lighting Left Normal/unknown

6 Generated on 07/11/2018 18:01:06 using Junctions 8 (8.0.6.541)

Arms

Arm Arm Name Description Arm Type A A Nottingham Road Major B B Church Street Minor C C Fern Road Major

Major Arm Geometry

Minor Arm Geometry

Slope / Intercept / Capacity

Traffic Flows

Demand Set Data Options

Entry Flows

General Flows Data

Arm Profile Type Use Turning Counts Average Demand Flow (PCU/hr) Flow Scaling Factor (%) A ONE HOUR ü 434.00 100.000 B ONE HOUR ü 226.00 100.000 C ONE HOUR ü 368.00 100.000

7 Generated on 07/11/2018 18:01:06 using Junctions 8 (8.0.6.541)

Turning Proportions

Turning Counts / Proportions (PCU/hr) - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 0.000 178.000 256.000 From B 118.000 0.000 108.000 C 298.000 70.000 0.000

Turning Proportions (PCU) - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 0.00 0.41 0.59 From B 0.52 0.00 0.48 C 0.81 0.19 0.00

Vehicle Mix

Average PCU Per Vehicle - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 1.000 1.000 1.000 From B 1.000 1.000 1.000 C 1.000 1.000 1.000

Heavy Vehicle Percentages - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 0.0 0.0 0.0 From B 0.0 0.0 0.0 C 0.0 0.0 0.0

Results

Results Summary for whole modelled period

Stream Max RFC Max Delay (s) Max Queue (PCU) Max LOS B-AC 0.50 14.26 0.97 B C-AB 0.18 5.87 0.37 A C-A - - - - A-B - - - - A-C - - - -

8 Generated on 07/11/2018 18:01:06 using Junctions 8 (8.0.6.541)

Main Results for each time segment

Main results: (16:45-17:00)

Stream Total Demand (PCU/hr) Entry Flow (PCU/hr) Pedestrian Demand (Ped/hr) Capacity (PCU/hr) RFC End Queue (PCU) Delay (s) LOS B-AC 170.14 168.40 0.00 553.73 0.307 0.44 9.302 A C-AB 76.92 76.19 0.00 708.71 0.109 0.18 5.690 A C-A 200.13 200.13 0.00 - - - - - A-B 134.01 134.01 0.00 - - - - - A-C 192.73 192.73 0.00 - - - - -

Main results: (17:00-17:15)

Stream Total Demand (PCU/hr) Entry Flow (PCU/hr) Pedestrian Demand (Ped/hr) Capacity (PCU/hr) RFC End Queue (PCU) Delay (s) LOS B-AC 203.17 202.49 0.00 531.80 0.382 0.61 10.909 B C-AB 99.60 99.34 0.00 725.82 0.137 0.25 5.749 A C-A 231.22 231.22 0.00 - - - - - A-B 160.02 160.02 0.00 - - - - - A-C 230.14 230.14 0.00 - - - - -

Main results: (17:15-17:30)

Stream Total Demand (PCU/hr) Entry Flow (PCU/hr) Pedestrian Demand (Ped/hr) Capacity (PCU/hr) RFC End Queue (PCU) Delay (s) LOS B-AC 248.83 247.43 0.00 501.19 0.496 0.96 14.105 B C-AB 136.28 135.82 0.00 750.31 0.182 0.36 5.866 A C-A 268.89 268.89 0.00 - - - - - A-B 195.98 195.98 0.00 - - - - - A-C 281.86 281.86 0.00 - - - - -

Main results: (17:30-17:45)

Stream Total Demand (PCU/hr) Entry Flow (PCU/hr) Pedestrian Demand (Ped/hr) Capacity (PCU/hr) RFC End Queue (PCU) Delay (s) LOS B-AC 248.83 248.77 0.00 501.10 0.497 0.97 14.258 B C-AB 136.44 136.43 0.00 750.50 0.182 0.37 5.872 A C-A 268.73 268.73 0.00 - - - - - A-B 195.98 195.98 0.00 - - - - - A-C 281.86 281.86 0.00 - - - - -

Main results: (17:45-18:00)

Stream Total Demand (PCU/hr) Entry Flow (PCU/hr) Pedestrian Demand (Ped/hr) Capacity (PCU/hr) RFC End Queue (PCU) Delay (s) LOS B-AC 203.17 204.53 0.00 531.66 0.382 0.63 11.052 B C-AB 99.80 100.25 0.00 726.11 0.137 0.25 5.762 A C-A 231.02 231.02 0.00 - - - - - A-B 160.02 160.02 0.00 - - - - - A-C 230.14 230.14 0.00 - - - - -

Main results: (18:00-18:15)

Stream Total Demand (PCU/hr) Entry Flow (PCU/hr) Pedestrian Demand (Ped/hr) Capacity (PCU/hr) RFC End Queue (PCU) Delay (s) LOS B-AC 170.14 170.86 0.00 553.50 0.307 0.45 9.425 A C-AB 77.22 77.49 0.00 708.96 0.109 0.19 5.709 A C-A 199.83 199.83 0.00 - - - - - A-B 134.01 134.01 0.00 - - - - - A-C 192.73 192.73 0.00 - - - - -

9 Generated on 07/11/2018 18:01:06 using Junctions 8 (8.0.6.541)

(Default Analysis Set) - 2023 Base, AM

Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings

Analysis Set Details

Name Roundabout Capacity Model Description Locked Network Flow Scaling Factor (%) Reason For Scaling Factors (Default Analysis Set) N/A 100.000

Demand Set Details

Junction Network

Junctions

Junction Name Junction Type Major Road Direction Arm Order Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS 1 (untitled) T-Junction Two-way A,B,C 27.01 D

Junction Network Options

Driving Side Lighting Left Normal/unknown

Arms

Arm Arm Name Description Arm Type A A Nottingham Road Major B B Church Street Minor C C Fern Road Major

Major Arm Geometry

Minor Arm Geometry

10 Generated on 07/11/2018 18:01:06 using Junctions 8 (8.0.6.541)

Slope / Intercept / Capacity

Traffic Flows

Demand Set Data Options

Entry Flows

General Flows Data

Arm Profile Type Use Turning Counts Average Demand Flow (PCU/hr) Flow Scaling Factor (%) A ONE HOUR ü 403.00 100.000 B ONE HOUR ü 331.00 100.000 C ONE HOUR ü 281.00 100.000

Turning Proportions

Turning Counts / Proportions (PCU/hr) - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 0.000 86.000 317.000 From B 227.000 0.000 104.000 C 244.000 37.000 0.000

Turning Proportions (PCU) - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 0.00 0.21 0.79 From B 0.69 0.00 0.31 C 0.87 0.13 0.00

11 Generated on 07/11/2018 18:01:06 using Junctions 8 (8.0.6.541)

Vehicle Mix

Average PCU Per Vehicle - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 1.000 1.000 1.000 From B 1.000 1.000 1.000 C 1.000 1.000 1.000

Heavy Vehicle Percentages - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 0.0 0.0 0.0 From B 0.0 0.0 0.0 C 0.0 0.0 0.0

Results

Results Summary for whole modelled period

Stream Max RFC Max Delay (s) Max Queue (PCU) Max LOS B-AC 0.76 30.55 2.95 D C-AB 0.09 5.57 0.17 A C-A - - - - A-B - - - - A-C - - - -

Main Results for each time segment

Main results: (07:45-08:00)

Stream Total Demand (PCU/hr) Entry Flow (PCU/hr) Pedestrian Demand (Ped/hr) Capacity (PCU/hr) RFC End Queue (PCU) Delay (s) LOS B-AC 249.19 245.74 0.00 530.46 0.470 0.86 12.501 B C-AB 37.58 37.24 0.00 684.65 0.055 0.09 5.560 A C-A 173.97 173.97 0.00 - - - - - A-B 64.75 64.75 0.00 - - - - - A-C 238.65 238.65 0.00 - - - - -

Main results: (08:00-08:15)

Stream Total Demand (PCU/hr) Entry Flow (PCU/hr) Pedestrian Demand (Ped/hr) Capacity (PCU/hr) RFC End Queue (PCU) Delay (s) LOS B-AC 297.56 295.62 0.00 509.38 0.584 1.35 16.683 C C-AB 47.76 47.63 0.00 696.09 0.069 0.12 5.555 A C-A 204.86 204.86 0.00 - - - - - A-B 77.31 77.31 0.00 - - - - - A-C 284.98 284.98 0.00 - - - - -

12 Generated on 07/11/2018 18:01:06 using Junctions 8 (8.0.6.541)

Main results: (08:15-08:30)

Stream Total Demand (PCU/hr) Entry Flow (PCU/hr) Pedestrian Demand (Ped/hr) Capacity (PCU/hr) RFC End Queue (PCU) Delay (s) LOS B-AC 364.44 358.62 0.00 480.13 0.759 2.80 28.319 D C-AB 65.14 64.94 0.00 715.37 0.091 0.17 5.539 A C-A 244.25 244.25 0.00 - - - - - A-B 94.69 94.69 0.00 - - - - - A-C 349.02 349.02 0.00 - - - - -

Main results: (08:30-08:45)

Stream Total Demand (PCU/hr) Entry Flow (PCU/hr) Pedestrian Demand (Ped/hr) Capacity (PCU/hr) RFC End Queue (PCU) Delay (s) LOS B-AC 364.44 363.83 0.00 480.08 0.759 2.95 30.555 D C-AB 65.20 65.19 0.00 715.45 0.091 0.17 5.540 A C-A 244.19 244.19 0.00 - - - - - A-B 94.69 94.69 0.00 - - - - - A-C 349.02 349.02 0.00 - - - - -

Main results: (08:45-09:00)

Stream Total Demand (PCU/hr) Entry Flow (PCU/hr) Pedestrian Demand (Ped/hr) Capacity (PCU/hr) RFC End Queue (PCU) Delay (s) LOS B-AC 297.56 303.52 0.00 509.30 0.584 1.47 17.961 C C-AB 47.83 48.03 0.00 696.20 0.069 0.12 5.558 A C-A 204.78 204.78 0.00 - - - - - A-B 77.31 77.31 0.00 - - - - - A-C 284.98 284.98 0.00 - - - - -

Main results: (09:00-09:15)

Stream Total Demand (PCU/hr) Entry Flow (PCU/hr) Pedestrian Demand (Ped/hr) Capacity (PCU/hr) RFC End Queue (PCU) Delay (s) LOS B-AC 249.19 251.42 0.00 530.33 0.470 0.91 13.010 B C-AB 37.70 37.83 0.00 684.75 0.055 0.09 5.567 A C-A 173.85 173.85 0.00 - - - - - A-B 64.75 64.75 0.00 - - - - - A-C 238.65 238.65 0.00 - - - - -

(Default Analysis Set) - 2023 Base, PM

Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings

Analysis Set Details

Name Roundabout Capacity Model Description Locked Network Flow Scaling Factor (%) Reason For Scaling Factors (Default Analysis Set) N/A 100.000

Demand Set Details

13 Generated on 07/11/2018 18:01:06 using Junctions 8 (8.0.6.541)

Junction Network

Junctions

Junction Name Junction Type Major Road Direction Arm Order Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS 1 (untitled) T-Junction Two-way A,B,C 12.89 B

Junction Network Options

Driving Side Lighting Left Normal/unknown

Arms

Arm Arm Name Description Arm Type A A Nottingham Road Major B B Church Street Minor C C Fern Road Major

Major Arm Geometry

Minor Arm Geometry

Slope / Intercept / Capacity

14 Generated on 07/11/2018 18:01:06 using Junctions 8 (8.0.6.541)

Traffic Flows

Demand Set Data Options

Entry Flows

General Flows Data

Arm Profile Type Use Turning Counts Average Demand Flow (PCU/hr) Flow Scaling Factor (%) A ONE HOUR ü 469.00 100.000 B ONE HOUR ü 245.00 100.000 C ONE HOUR ü 398.00 100.000

Turning Proportions

Turning Counts / Proportions (PCU/hr) - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 0.000 192.000 277.000 From B 128.000 0.000 117.000 C 322.000 76.000 0.000

Turning Proportions (PCU) - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 0.00 0.41 0.59 From B 0.52 0.00 0.48 C 0.81 0.19 0.00

Vehicle Mix

Average PCU Per Vehicle - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 1.000 1.000 1.000 From B 1.000 1.000 1.000 C 1.000 1.000 1.000

15 Generated on 07/11/2018 18:01:06 using Junctions 8 (8.0.6.541)

Heavy Vehicle Percentages - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 0.0 0.0 0.0 From B 0.0 0.0 0.0 C 0.0 0.0 0.0

Results

Results Summary for whole modelled period

Stream Max RFC Max Delay (s) Max Queue (PCU) Max LOS B-AC 0.55 16.53 1.22 C C-AB 0.20 5.96 0.43 A C-A - - - - A-B - - - - A-C - - - -

Main Results for each time segment

Main results: (16:45-17:00)

Stream Total Demand (PCU/hr) Entry Flow (PCU/hr) Pedestrian Demand (Ped/hr) Capacity (PCU/hr) RFC End Queue (PCU) Delay (s) LOS B-AC 184.45 182.43 0.00 544.53 0.339 0.50 9.889 A C-AB 86.25 85.42 0.00 715.66 0.121 0.21 5.710 A C-A 213.39 213.39 0.00 - - - - - A-B 144.55 144.55 0.00 - - - - - A-C 208.54 208.54 0.00 - - - - -

Main results: (17:00-17:15)

Stream Total Demand (PCU/hr) Entry Flow (PCU/hr) Pedestrian Demand (Ped/hr) Capacity (PCU/hr) RFC End Queue (PCU) Delay (s) LOS B-AC 220.25 219.40 0.00 520.67 0.423 0.72 11.914 B C-AB 112.50 112.18 0.00 734.47 0.153 0.29 5.789 A C-A 245.30 245.30 0.00 - - - - - A-B 172.60 172.60 0.00 - - - - - A-C 249.02 249.02 0.00 - - - - -

Main results: (17:15-17:30)

Stream Total Demand (PCU/hr) Entry Flow (PCU/hr) Pedestrian Demand (Ped/hr) Capacity (PCU/hr) RFC End Queue (PCU) Delay (s) LOS B-AC 269.75 267.84 0.00 487.29 0.554 1.19 16.260 C C-AB 155.46 154.89 0.00 761.39 0.204 0.43 5.942 A C-A 282.74 282.74 0.00 - - - - - A-B 211.40 211.40 0.00 - - - - - A-C 304.98 304.98 0.00 - - - - -

16 Generated on 07/11/2018 18:01:06 using Junctions 8 (8.0.6.541)

Main results: (17:30-17:45)

Stream Total Demand (PCU/hr) Entry Flow (PCU/hr) Pedestrian Demand (Ped/hr) Capacity (PCU/hr) RFC End Queue (PCU) Delay (s) LOS B-AC 269.75 269.66 0.00 487.17 0.554 1.22 16.531 C C-AB 155.67 155.66 0.00 761.63 0.204 0.43 5.955 A C-A 282.53 282.53 0.00 - - - - - A-B 211.40 211.40 0.00 - - - - - A-C 304.98 304.98 0.00 - - - - -

Main results: (17:45-18:00)

Stream Total Demand (PCU/hr) Entry Flow (PCU/hr) Pedestrian Demand (Ped/hr) Capacity (PCU/hr) RFC End Queue (PCU) Delay (s) LOS B-AC 220.25 222.12 0.00 520.49 0.423 0.75 12.141 B C-AB 112.75 113.30 0.00 734.83 0.153 0.29 5.804 A C-A 245.04 245.04 0.00 - - - - - A-B 172.60 172.60 0.00 - - - - - A-C 249.02 249.02 0.00 - - - - -

Main results: (18:00-18:15)

Stream Total Demand (PCU/hr) Entry Flow (PCU/hr) Pedestrian Demand (Ped/hr) Capacity (PCU/hr) RFC End Queue (PCU) Delay (s) LOS B-AC 184.45 185.36 0.00 544.28 0.339 0.52 10.057 B C-AB 86.62 86.94 0.00 715.98 0.121 0.21 5.730 A C-A 213.02 213.02 0.00 - - - - - A-B 144.55 144.55 0.00 - - - - - A-C 208.54 208.54 0.00 - - - - -

(Default Analysis Set) - 2023 Base + Dev, AM

Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings

Analysis Set Details

Name Roundabout Capacity Model Description Locked Network Flow Scaling Factor (%) Reason For Scaling Factors (Default Analysis Set) N/A 100.000

Demand Set Details

Junction Network

Junctions

Junction Name Junction Type Major Road Direction Arm Order Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS 1 (untitled) T-Junction Two-way A,B,C 47.37 E

Junction Network Options

Driving Side Lighting Left Normal/unknown

17 Generated on 07/11/2018 18:01:06 using Junctions 8 (8.0.6.541)

Arms

Arm Arm Name Description Arm Type A A Nottingham Road Major B B Church Street Minor C C Fern Road Major

Major Arm Geometry

Minor Arm Geometry

Slope / Intercept / Capacity

Traffic Flows

Demand Set Data Options

18 Generated on 07/11/2018 18:01:06 using Junctions 8 (8.0.6.541)

Entry Flows

General Flows Data

Arm Profile Type Use Turning Counts Average Demand Flow (PCU/hr) Flow Scaling Factor (%) A ONE HOUR ü 414.00 100.000 B ONE HOUR ü 376.00 100.000 C ONE HOUR ü 281.00 100.000

Turning Proportions

Turning Counts / Proportions (PCU/hr) - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 0.000 97.000 317.000 From B 269.000 0.000 107.000 C 244.000 37.000 0.000

Turning Proportions (PCU) - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 0.00 0.23 0.77 From B 0.72 0.00 0.28 C 0.87 0.13 0.00

Vehicle Mix

Average PCU Per Vehicle - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 1.000 1.000 1.000 From B 1.000 1.000 1.000 C 1.000 1.000 1.000

Heavy Vehicle Percentages - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 0.0 0.0 0.0 From B 0.0 0.0 0.0 C 0.0 0.0 0.0

19 Generated on 07/11/2018 18:01:06 using Junctions 8 (8.0.6.541)

Results

Results Summary for whole modelled period

Stream Max RFC Max Delay (s) Max Queue (PCU) Max LOS B-AC 0.87 53.46 5.72 F C-AB 0.09 5.58 0.17 A C-A - - - - A-B - - - - A-C - - - -

Main Results for each time segment

Main results: (07:45-08:00)

Stream Total Demand (PCU/hr) Entry Flow (PCU/hr) Pedestrian Demand (Ped/hr) Capacity (PCU/hr) RFC End Queue (PCU) Delay (s) LOS B-AC 283.07 278.54 0.00 524.50 0.540 1.13 14.388 B C-AB 37.62 37.28 0.00 682.87 0.055 0.09 5.576 A C-A 173.93 173.93 0.00 - - - - - A-B 73.03 73.03 0.00 - - - - - A-C 238.65 238.65 0.00 - - - - -

Main results: (08:00-08:15)

Stream Total Demand (PCU/hr) Entry Flow (PCU/hr) Pedestrian Demand (Ped/hr) Capacity (PCU/hr) RFC End Queue (PCU) Delay (s) LOS B-AC 338.02 334.87 0.00 503.13 0.672 1.92 20.988 C C-AB 47.82 47.70 0.00 694.01 0.069 0.12 5.573 A C-A 204.79 204.79 0.00 - - - - - A-B 87.20 87.20 0.00 - - - - - A-C 284.98 284.98 0.00 - - - - -

Main results: (08:15-08:30)

Stream Total Demand (PCU/hr) Entry Flow (PCU/hr) Pedestrian Demand (Ped/hr) Capacity (PCU/hr) RFC End Queue (PCU) Delay (s) LOS B-AC 413.98 401.47 0.00 473.51 0.874 5.05 43.780 E C-AB 65.28 65.07 0.00 712.90 0.092 0.17 5.561 A C-A 244.11 244.11 0.00 - - - - - A-B 106.80 106.80 0.00 - - - - - A-C 349.02 349.02 0.00 - - - - -

Main results: (08:30-08:45)

Stream Total Demand (PCU/hr) Entry Flow (PCU/hr) Pedestrian Demand (Ped/hr) Capacity (PCU/hr) RFC End Queue (PCU) Delay (s) LOS B-AC 413.98 411.31 0.00 473.46 0.874 5.72 53.457 F C-AB 65.34 65.33 0.00 712.98 0.092 0.17 5.564 A C-A 244.05 244.05 0.00 - - - - - A-B 106.80 106.80 0.00 - - - - - A-C 349.02 349.02 0.00 - - - - -

20 Generated on 07/11/2018 18:01:06 using Junctions 8 (8.0.6.541)

Main results: (08:45-09:00)

Stream Total Demand (PCU/hr) Entry Flow (PCU/hr) Pedestrian Demand (Ped/hr) Capacity (PCU/hr) RFC End Queue (PCU) Delay (s) LOS B-AC 338.02 352.11 0.00 503.05 0.672 2.19 25.704 D C-AB 47.90 48.09 0.00 694.12 0.069 0.12 5.576 A C-A 204.72 204.72 0.00 - - - - - A-B 87.20 87.20 0.00 - - - - - A-C 284.98 284.98 0.00 - - - - -

Main results: (09:00-09:15)

Stream Total Demand (PCU/hr) Entry Flow (PCU/hr) Pedestrian Demand (Ped/hr) Capacity (PCU/hr) RFC End Queue (PCU) Delay (s) LOS B-AC 283.07 286.99 0.00 524.37 0.540 1.21 15.404 C C-AB 37.74 37.87 0.00 682.97 0.055 0.09 5.585 A C-A 173.81 173.81 0.00 - - - - - A-B 73.03 73.03 0.00 - - - - - A-C 238.65 238.65 0.00 - - - - -

(Default Analysis Set) - 2023 Base + Dev, PM

Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings

Analysis Set Details

Name Roundabout Capacity Model Description Locked Network Flow Scaling Factor (%) Reason For Scaling Factors (Default Analysis Set) N/A 100.000

Demand Set Details

Junction Network

Junctions

Junction Name Junction Type Major Road Direction Arm Order Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS 1 (untitled) T-Junction Two-way A,B,C 14.62 B

Junction Network Options

Driving Side Lighting Left Normal/unknown

21 Generated on 07/11/2018 18:01:06 using Junctions 8 (8.0.6.541)

Arms

Arm Arm Name Description Arm Type A A Nottingham Road Major B B Church Street Minor C C Fern Road Major

Major Arm Geometry

Minor Arm Geometry

Slope / Intercept / Capacity

Traffic Flows

Demand Set Data Options

Entry Flows

General Flows Data

Arm Profile Type Use Turning Counts Average Demand Flow (PCU/hr) Flow Scaling Factor (%) A ONE HOUR ü 502.00 100.000 B ONE HOUR ü 261.00 100.000 C ONE HOUR ü 400.00 100.000

22 Generated on 07/11/2018 18:01:06 using Junctions 8 (8.0.6.541)

Turning Proportions

Turning Counts / Proportions (PCU/hr) - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 0.000 225.000 277.000 From B 143.000 0.000 118.000 C 322.000 78.000 0.000

Turning Proportions (PCU) - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 0.00 0.45 0.55 From B 0.55 0.00 0.45 C 0.81 0.20 0.00

Vehicle Mix

Average PCU Per Vehicle - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 1.000 1.000 1.000 From B 1.000 1.000 1.000 C 1.000 1.000 1.000

Heavy Vehicle Percentages - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 0.0 0.0 0.0 From B 0.0 0.0 0.0 C 0.0 0.0 0.0

Results

Results Summary for whole modelled period

Stream Max RFC Max Delay (s) Max Queue (PCU) Max LOS B-AC 0.60 18.97 1.48 C C-AB 0.21 6.08 0.46 A C-A - - - - A-B - - - - A-C - - - -

23 Generated on 07/11/2018 18:01:06 using Junctions 8 (8.0.6.541)

Main Results for each time segment

Main results: (16:45-17:00)

Stream Total Demand (PCU/hr) Entry Flow (PCU/hr) Pedestrian Demand (Ped/hr) Capacity (PCU/hr) RFC End Queue (PCU) Delay (s) LOS B-AC 196.49 194.22 0.00 536.04 0.367 0.57 10.465 B C-AB 88.85 87.98 0.00 710.51 0.125 0.22 5.781 A C-A 212.29 212.29 0.00 - - - - - A-B 169.39 169.39 0.00 - - - - - A-C 208.54 208.54 0.00 - - - - -

Main results: (17:00-17:15)

Stream Total Demand (PCU/hr) Entry Flow (PCU/hr) Pedestrian Demand (Ped/hr) Capacity (PCU/hr) RFC End Queue (PCU) Delay (s) LOS B-AC 234.63 233.60 0.00 511.29 0.459 0.83 12.912 B C-AB 116.08 115.75 0.00 728.52 0.159 0.30 5.879 A C-A 243.51 243.51 0.00 - - - - - A-B 202.27 202.27 0.00 - - - - - A-C 249.02 249.02 0.00 - - - - -

Main results: (17:15-17:30)

Stream Total Demand (PCU/hr) Entry Flow (PCU/hr) Pedestrian Demand (Ped/hr) Capacity (PCU/hr) RFC End Queue (PCU) Delay (s) LOS B-AC 287.37 284.89 0.00 476.70 0.603 1.45 18.525 C C-AB 160.86 160.24 0.00 754.41 0.213 0.45 6.069 A C-A 279.55 279.55 0.00 - - - - - A-B 247.73 247.73 0.00 - - - - - A-C 304.98 304.98 0.00 - - - - -

Main results: (17:30-17:45)

Stream Total Demand (PCU/hr) Entry Flow (PCU/hr) Pedestrian Demand (Ped/hr) Capacity (PCU/hr) RFC End Queue (PCU) Delay (s) LOS B-AC 287.37 287.23 0.00 476.58 0.603 1.48 18.973 C C-AB 161.08 161.07 0.00 754.67 0.213 0.46 6.081 A C-A 279.32 279.32 0.00 - - - - - A-B 247.73 247.73 0.00 - - - - - A-C 304.98 304.98 0.00 - - - - -

Main results: (17:45-18:00)

Stream Total Demand (PCU/hr) Entry Flow (PCU/hr) Pedestrian Demand (Ped/hr) Capacity (PCU/hr) RFC End Queue (PCU) Delay (s) LOS B-AC 234.63 237.07 0.00 511.10 0.459 0.87 13.253 B C-AB 116.36 116.95 0.00 728.91 0.160 0.31 5.896 A C-A 243.24 243.24 0.00 - - - - - A-B 202.27 202.27 0.00 - - - - - A-C 249.02 249.02 0.00 - - - - -

Main results: (18:00-18:15)

Stream Total Demand (PCU/hr) Entry Flow (PCU/hr) Pedestrian Demand (Ped/hr) Capacity (PCU/hr) RFC End Queue (PCU) Delay (s) LOS B-AC 196.49 197.62 0.00 535.76 0.367 0.59 10.681 B C-AB 89.24 89.58 0.00 710.85 0.126 0.22 5.805 A C-A 211.90 211.90 0.00 - - - - - A-B 169.39 169.39 0.00 - - - - - A-C 208.54 208.54 0.00 - - - - -