DOCSLIB.ORG

University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting YOU CANNOT HIDE YOUR LICHENIZE: INFIDELITY IN THE LEPTOGIUM CYANESCENS SPECIES COMPLEX AND ITS ASSOCIATED NOSTOC By BARRY SAUL KAMINSKY A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2016 © 2016 Barry Kaminsky To everyone who has helped me along this journey ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many people have helped me throughout my time as a graduate student. First and foremost, I thank Stuart McDaniel, my advisor, for his tireless enthusiasm and guidance. I also thank the members of the McDaniel lab, especially labmates Sarah Carey and Leslie Kollar. I also thank Adam Payton and Emily Woodruff for all of their patience and advice. Jared Miller helped with the fieldwork. Jacob Landis helped with the ancestral state reconstructions. My collaborators, Roger Rosentreter and Rick and Jean Seavey made helpful suggestions to refine ideas. I also thank the members of my committee, Matthew Smith, and Pamela Soltis for providing lab resources and suggestions throughout the thesis process. Their support greatly shaped how I approached science and research. Lastly I thank my family for their support throughout my entire time in graduate school. Permits were issued by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (permit # 11051410), Everglades National Park (permit # EVER-00378), and Ordway- Swisher Biological Station (permit # OSR-14-10). Funding for the research was supported by the Thad Owens Memorial Fund (Ordway-Swisher Biological Station), and the Michael May Interdisciplinary Fund (University of Florida Biology Department). 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................. 4 LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ 7 LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... 8 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................. 9 ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................... 11 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 13 2 SYMBIONT SHARING IN THE LEPTOGIUM CYANESCENS COMPLEX IN FLORIDA ................................................................................................................ 15 Methods .................................................................................................................. 17 Collection Localities and Sampling ................................................................... 17 DNA Extraction and Sequencing ...................................................................... 19 Tests for Sexual Reproduction ......................................................................... 20 Phylogenetic Analyses ..................................................................................... 20 Tests for Symbiont Switching ........................................................................... 22 Results .................................................................................................................... 22 Mycobiont Phylogenetic Analyses .................................................................... 23 Recombination ................................................................................................. 24 Nostoc Phylogeny of Florida Specimens .......................................................... 24 Symbiont Switching between Florida Populations ............................................ 24 Mycobiont Switching of Photobiont on a Global Scale ..................................... 25 Discussion .............................................................................................................. 26 High Specificity in Leptogium sp. A .................................................................. 26 Mycobiont Specificity amongst Leptogium sp. C and Leptogium sp. D ............ 27 Coevolution ...................................................................................................... 28 3 TAXONOMIC REVISION OF THE LEPTOGIUM CYANESCENS SPECIES COMPLEX IN FLORIDA ......................................................................................... 41 Methods .................................................................................................................. 44 Collection Methods ........................................................................................... 44 Phylogenetic Work ........................................................................................... 44 Morphological Work .......................................................................................... 45 Results .................................................................................................................... 46 Phylogenetic Analyses ..................................................................................... 46 Morphology ....................................................................................................... 47 5 Discussion .............................................................................................................. 47 Molecular Evidence for Cryptic Fungal Diversity .............................................. 47 Morphological Investigations and Their Impact on Taxonomy .......................... 48 Taxonomic Diversity ......................................................................................... 50 The Putative Species .............................................................................................. 50 Leptogium cf. arsenei ....................................................................................... 50 Description ................................................................................................. 50 Ecology and distribution ............................................................................. 51 Differentiation ............................................................................................. 51 Nomenclatural investigations ..................................................................... 51 Leptogium austroamericanum .......................................................................... 52 Description ................................................................................................. 52 Ecology and distribution ............................................................................. 53 Differentiation ............................................................................................. 53 Nomenclatural investigation ....................................................................... 53 Leptogium cyanescens ..................................................................................... 54 Description ................................................................................................. 54 Ecology and distribution ............................................................................. 54 Key characteristics ..................................................................................... 54 Nomenclature investigation ........................................................................ 55 Leptogium cf. denticulatum ............................................................................... 55 Description ................................................................................................. 55 Ecology and distribution ............................................................................. 55 Differentiation ............................................................................................. 55 Nomenclatural investigations ..................................................................... 56 APPENDIX: GENBANK RECORDS FOR NOSTOC PHYLOGENY ............................. 63 LIST OF REFERENCES ............................................................................................... 66 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH ............................................................................................ 71 6 LIST OF TABLES Table page 2-1 Names of localities, GPS and vegetation community of the eight localities included in analyses ........................................................................................... 30 2-2 Primers utilized for PCR amplification of mycobiont and photobiont markers. .... 31 2-3 List of all Sanger sequences utilized in analyses................................................ 32 2-4 Tests for recombination and location of breakpoints in the four mycobiont clades using the Four Gamete Test and Single Breakpoint analyses ................. 35 3-1 List of GenBank records included in the fungal gene MCM7 phylogeny ............. 57 A-1 GenBank rbcLX sequences of the cyanobacterial photobiont of free-living and lichenized Nostoc ........................................................................................ 63 7 LIST OF FIGURES Figure page 2-1 Phylogeny of the individual mycobiont genes ..................................................... 36 2-2 Phylogenetic tree for the concatenated fungal gene dataset .............................. 37 2-3 Frequency of the 4 mycobiont clades by locality ................................................ 38 2-4 A concatenated phylogeny of the Nostoc associated
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Leightoniella Zeylanensis Belongs to the Pannariaceae
    doi: 10.1111/njb.01880 00 1–6 NORDIC JOURNAL OF BOTANY Research Leightoniella zeylanensis belongs to the Pannariaceae Gothamie Weerakoon, André Aptroot, Mats Wedin and Stefan Ekman G. Weerakoon (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9550-2139), Algae, Fungi and Plant Division, Dept of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom. – A. Aptroot (https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7949-2594), ABL Herbarium, XK Soest, the Netherlands. – M. Wedin (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8295-5198), Swedish Museum of Natural History, Dept of Botany, Stockholm, Sweden. – S. Ekman (https://orcid. org/0000-0003-3021-1821) ([email protected]), Museum of Evolution, Uppsala Univ., Uppsala, Sweden. Nordic Journal of Botany Recent finds ofLeightoniella zeylanensis, classified variously in the Collemataceae and 2018: e01880 Pannariaceae, enabled us to generate DNA sequence data for investigating its phy- doi: 10.1111/njb.01880 logenetic affiliation. Newly generated sequence data from the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region and the large subunit of the nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrLSU), Subject Editor and the small subunit of the mitochondrial ribosomal (mrSSU) DNA, and the largest sub- Editor-in-Chief: Torbjörn Tyler unit of the RNA polymerase II gene (RPB1) indicate that L. zeylanensis is a member Accepted 1 June 2018 of the Pannariaceae, belonging to a strongly supported clade together with Physma, Lepidocollema, and Gibbosporina (= the ‘Physma clade’). With the currently available data, however, relationships within this clade are largely impossible to reconstruct with confidence. Leightoniella zeylanensis was found to possess ellipsoid ascospores surrounded by a thick, gelatinous perispore with pointed ends, supporting a previously published hypothesis that such a perispore type is a synapomorphy for the Physma clade.
    [Show full text]
  • Cuivre Bryophytes
    Trip Report for: Cuivre River State Park Species Count: 335 Date: Multiple Visits Lincoln County Agency: MODNR Location: Lincoln Hills - Bryophytes Participants: Bryophytes from Natural Resource Inventory Database Bryophyte List from NRIDS and Bruce Schuette Species Name (Synonym) Common Name Family COFC COFW Acarospora unknown Identified only to Genus Acarosporaceae Lichen Acrocordia megalospora a lichen Monoblastiaceae Lichen Amandinea dakotensis a button lichen (crustose) Physiaceae Lichen Amandinea polyspora a button lichen (crustose) Physiaceae Lichen Amandinea punctata a lichen Physiaceae Lichen Amanita citrina Citron Amanita Amanitaceae Fungi Amanita fulva Tawny Gresette Amanitaceae Fungi Amanita vaginata Grisette Amanitaceae Fungi Amblystegium varium common willow moss Amblystegiaceae Moss Anisomeridium biforme a lichen Monoblastiaceae Lichen Anisomeridium polypori a crustose lichen Monoblastiaceae Lichen Anomodon attenuatus common tree apron moss Anomodontaceae Moss Anomodon minor tree apron moss Anomodontaceae Moss Anomodon rostratus velvet tree apron moss Anomodontaceae Moss Armillaria tabescens Ringless Honey Mushroom Tricholomataceae Fungi Arthonia caesia a lichen Arthoniaceae Lichen Arthonia punctiformis a lichen Arthoniaceae Lichen Arthonia rubella a lichen Arthoniaceae Lichen Arthothelium spectabile a lichen Uncertain Lichen Arthothelium taediosum a lichen Uncertain Lichen Aspicilia caesiocinerea a lichen Hymeneliaceae Lichen Aspicilia cinerea a lichen Hymeneliaceae Lichen Aspicilia contorta a lichen Hymeneliaceae Lichen
    [Show full text]
  • Pannariaceae Generic Taxonomy LL Ver. 27.9.2013.Docx
    http://www.diva-portal.org Preprint This is the submitted version of a paper published in The Lichenologist. Citation for the original published paper (version of record): Ekman, S. (2014) Extended phylogeny and a revised generic classification of the Pannariaceae (Peltigerales, Ascomycota). The Lichenologist, 46: 627-656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S002428291400019X Access to the published version may require subscription. N.B. When citing this work, cite the original published paper. Permanent link to this version: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:nrm:diva-943 Extended phylogeny and a revised generic classification of the Pannariaceae (Peltigerales, Ascomycota) Stefan EKMAN, Mats WEDIN, Louise LINDBLOM & Per M. JØRGENSEN S. Ekman (corresponding author): Museum of Evolution, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 16, SE –75236 Uppsala, Sweden. Email: [email protected] M. Wedin: Dept. of Botany, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, SE –10405 Stockholm, Sweden. L. Lindblom and P. M. Jørgensen: Dept. of Natural History, University Museum of Bergen, Box 7800, NO –5020 Bergen, Norway. Abstract: We estimated phylogeny in the lichen-forming ascomycete family Pannariaceae. We specifically modelled spatial (across-site) heterogeneity in nucleotide frequencies, as models not incorporating this heterogeneity were found to be inadequate for our data. Model adequacy was measured here as the ability of the model to reconstruct nucleotide diversity per site in the original sequence data. A potential non-orthologue in the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS) of Degelia plumbea was observed. We propose a revised generic classification for the Pannariaceae, accepting 30 genera, based on our phylogeny, previously published phylogenies, as well as morphological and chemical data available.
    [Show full text]
  • 1307 Fungi Representing 1139 Infrageneric Taxa, 317 Genera and 66 Families ⇑ Jolanta Miadlikowska A, , Frank Kauff B,1, Filip Högnabba C, Jeffrey C
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 79 (2014) 132–168 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev A multigene phylogenetic synthesis for the class Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota): 1307 fungi representing 1139 infrageneric taxa, 317 genera and 66 families ⇑ Jolanta Miadlikowska a, , Frank Kauff b,1, Filip Högnabba c, Jeffrey C. Oliver d,2, Katalin Molnár a,3, Emily Fraker a,4, Ester Gaya a,5, Josef Hafellner e, Valérie Hofstetter a,6, Cécile Gueidan a,7, Mónica A.G. Otálora a,8, Brendan Hodkinson a,9, Martin Kukwa f, Robert Lücking g, Curtis Björk h, Harrie J.M. Sipman i, Ana Rosa Burgaz j, Arne Thell k, Alfredo Passo l, Leena Myllys c, Trevor Goward h, Samantha Fernández-Brime m, Geir Hestmark n, James Lendemer o, H. Thorsten Lumbsch g, Michaela Schmull p, Conrad L. Schoch q, Emmanuël Sérusiaux r, David R. Maddison s, A. Elizabeth Arnold t, François Lutzoni a,10, Soili Stenroos c,10 a Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0338, USA b FB Biologie, Molecular Phylogenetics, 13/276, TU Kaiserslautern, Postfach 3049, 67653 Kaiserslautern, Germany c Botanical Museum, Finnish Museum of Natural History, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland d Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, 358 ESC, 21 Sachem Street, New Haven, CT 06511, USA e Institut für Botanik, Karl-Franzens-Universität, Holteigasse 6, A-8010 Graz, Austria f Department of Plant Taxonomy and Nature Conservation, University of Gdan´sk, ul. Wita Stwosza 59, 80-308 Gdan´sk, Poland g Science and Education, The Field Museum, 1400 S.
    [Show full text]
  • An Evolving Phylogenetically Based Taxonomy of Lichens and Allied Fungi
    Opuscula Philolichenum, 11: 4-10. 2012. *pdf available online 3January2012 via (http://sweetgum.nybg.org/philolichenum/) An evolving phylogenetically based taxonomy of lichens and allied fungi 1 BRENDAN P. HODKINSON ABSTRACT. – A taxonomic scheme for lichens and allied fungi that synthesizes scientific knowledge from a variety of sources is presented. The system put forth here is intended both (1) to provide a skeletal outline of the lichens and allied fungi that can be used as a provisional filing and databasing scheme by lichen herbarium/data managers and (2) to announce the online presence of an official taxonomy that will define the scope of the newly formed International Committee for the Nomenclature of Lichens and Allied Fungi (ICNLAF). The online version of the taxonomy presented here will continue to evolve along with our understanding of the organisms. Additionally, the subfamily Fissurinoideae Rivas Plata, Lücking and Lumbsch is elevated to the rank of family as Fissurinaceae. KEYWORDS. – higher-level taxonomy, lichen-forming fungi, lichenized fungi, phylogeny INTRODUCTION Traditionally, lichen herbaria have been arranged alphabetically, a scheme that stands in stark contrast to the phylogenetic scheme used by nearly all vascular plant herbaria. The justification typically given for this practice is that lichen taxonomy is too unstable to establish a reasonable system of classification. However, recent leaps forward in our understanding of the higher-level classification of fungi, driven primarily by the NSF-funded Assembling the Fungal Tree of Life (AFToL) project (Lutzoni et al. 2004), have caused the taxonomy of lichen-forming and allied fungi to increase significantly in stability. This is especially true within the class Lecanoromycetes, the main group of lichen-forming fungi (Miadlikowska et al.
    [Show full text]
  • An Inventory of Lichens in Uttar Pradesh Through Bibliographic Compilation
    National Conference on Forest Biodiversity : Earth’s Living Treasure 22nd May , 2011 An Inventory of Lichens in Uttar Pradesh through Bibliographic Compilation Sanjeeva Nayaka* and Dalip K. Upreti Lichenology Laboratory, National Botanical Research Institute Rana Pratap Marg, Lucknow - 226 001 *Email : [email protected] Introduction monographic studies (Awasthi 1980, Akhtar & Awasthi 1980, Awasthi & Srivastava 1989, Joshi & Lichens are basically fungi that construct self sustainable composite thalli symbiotically in Upreti 2007, 2008, Pant & Upreti 1993, Singh & association with alga and or cyanobacteria. They are Upreti 1984, Upreti 1988, 1997, Upreti & Büdel included in the fungal Kingdom, but have members 1990). In the mean time, lichens growing over of other two kingdoms; Bacteria and Chromista monuments attracted the attention of lichenologists (Cavalier-Smith 2004). Lichens are ubiquitous, and they are studied from some major monuments sensitive indicators of air pollution, microclimate of of Uttar Pradesh (Ayub 2005, Chatterjee et al. 1996, region, anthropogenic disturbances, forest health and Saxena et al. 2004, Singh & Upreti 1991). More continuity, and constitute an important component recently, air pollution studies with the help of of terrestrial biodiversity. It is estimated that in the lichens are being conducted in Faizabad (Dubey et world, there are about 20,000 species (Sipman & al. 1999), Kanpur (Satya & Upreti 2009, 2011), Aptroot ,2001) and in India 2300 species (Singh & Lucknow (Bajpai et al. 2004, Mishra et al. 2003, Sinha 2010). Saxena 2004, Saxena et al. 2007, Upreti & Bajpai 2003), Rae Bareli (Bajpai et al. 2010a, b) districts of In India, most of the lichenological explorations Uttar Pradesh and regarding this some lichens have were under taken in lichen rich regions such as been collected.
    [Show full text]
  • FLORIDA STATE PARKS FEE SCHEDULE (Fees Are Per Day Unless Otherwise Noted) 1. Statewide Fees Admission Range $1.00**
    FLORIDA STATE PARKS FEE SCHEDULE (Fees are per day unless otherwise noted) 1. Statewide Fees Admission Range $1.00** - $10.00** (Does not include buses or admission to Ellie Schiller Homosassa Springs Wildlife State Park or Weeki Wachee Springs State Park) Single-Occupant Vehicle or Motorcycle Admission $4.00 - $6.00** (Includes motorcycles with one or more riders and vehicles with one occupant) Per Vehicle Admission $5.00 - $10.00** (Allows admission for 2 to 8 people per vehicle; over 8 people requires additional per person fees) Pedestrians, Bicyclists, Per Passenger Exceeding 8 Per Vehicle; Per $2.00 - $5.00** Passenger In Vehicles With Holder of Annual Individual Entrance Pass Admission Economically Disadvantaged Admission One-half of base (Must be Florida resident admission fee** and currently participating in Food Stamp Program) Bus Tour Admission $2.00** per person (Does not include Ellie Schiller Homosassa Springs Wildlife State Park, or $60.00 Skyway Fishing Pier State Park, or Weeki Wachee Springs State Park) whichever is less Honor Park Admission Per Vehicle $2.00 - $10.00** Pedestrians and Bicyclists $2.00 - $5.00** Sunset Admission $4.00 - $10.00** (Per vehicle, one hour before closing) Florida National Guard Admission One-half of base (Active members, spouses, and minor children; validation required) admission fee** Children, under 6 years of age Free (All parks) Annual Entrance Pass Fee Range $20.00 - $500.00 Individual Annual Entrance Pass $60.00 (Retired U. S. military, honorably discharged veterans, active-duty $45.00 U. S. military and reservists; validation required) Family Annual Entrance Pass $120.00 (maximum of 8 people in a group; only allows up to 2 people at Ellie Schiller Homosassa Springs Wildlife State Park and Weeki Wachee Springs State Park) (Retired U.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenways Trails [EL08] 20110406 Copy.Eps
    R 17 E R 18 E R 19 E R 20 E R 21 E R 22 E MULTI-USE, PAVED TRAILS Suncoast NAME MILES Air Cargo Road 1.4 G HILLSBOROUGH Al Lopez Park 3.3 BrookerBrooker CreekCreek un n CorridorCorridor Suncoast H Aldermans Ford Park 1.9 w y Trail Amberly Drive 2.8 l B LakeLake DanDan 39 Bayshore Boulevard Greenways 4.4 EquestrianEquestrian TrailTrail Lake s GREENWAYS SYSTEM F z e n Lut rn R P d w OakridgeOakridge Brandon Parkway 1.4 o EquestrianEquestrian TrailTrail HillsboroughHillsborough RRiveriver LLUTZUTZ LAKEAKE FERNF D Bruce B Downs Boulevard 4.8 BrookerBrooker CCreekreek ERN RDRD StateState ParkPark B HeadwatersHeadwaters 75 NNewew TTampaampa Y e Cheney Park 0.3 TrailTrail c A LutzLutz W u Commerce Park Boulevard 1.4 KeystoneKeystone K Tam r BlackwaterBlackwater Bruce B Downs Bl Downs B Bruce R ew pa B A N N Bl FloridaFlorida TrailTrail PPARKWAY L reek CreekCreek PreservePreserve Compton Drive 1.4 C D TrailTrail Bl E E ss Copeland Park 2.3 D K CypressCypress TATAR RRD N SUNSETSUNSET LNLN Cro O R Y P H ON GS T N A I I I O R V CreekCreek SP D G Cross County Greenway 0.8 S 275 G A R H W R H WAYNE RD A YS L R L C T 41 579 C CROOKED LN DairyDairy A O A A Cypress Point Park 1.0 N N L N KeystoneKeystone C P O D E D N LAK R FarmFarm C H D H T r Davis Island Park 0.5 U r O O R U Lake U S D SSUNCOAS 568 D A A Bo N G y S Desotto Park 0.3 co W Keystone T K u P N R I m D L E D BrookerBrooker CreekCreek t Rd 589 l RS EN R V d E VVanan DDykeyke RdRd a GRE DeadDead E Shell Point Road 1.2 Y I NNewew TampaTampa R ConeCone RanchRanch VVanan DDykeyke RRdd AV L LIVINGSTON
    [Show full text]
  • Florida State Parks Data by 2021 House District
    30, Florida State Parks FY 2019-20 Data by 2021 House Districts This compilation was produced by the Florida State Parks Foundation . FloridaStateParksFoundation.org Statewide Totals • 175 Florida State Parks and Trails (164 Parks / 11 Trails) comprising nearly 800,000 Acres • $2.2 billion direct impact to Florida’s economy • $150 million in sales tax revenue • 31,810 jobs supported • 25 million visitors served # of Economic Jobs Park House Districts Parks Impact Supported Visitors 1 Salzman, Michelle 0 2 Andrade, Robert Alexander “Alex” 3 31,073,188 436 349,462 Big Lagoon State Park 10,336,536 145 110,254 Perdido Key State Park 17,191,206 241 198,276 Tarklin Bayou Preserve State Park 3,545,446 50 40,932 3 Williamson, Jayer 3 26,651,285 416 362,492 Blackwater Heritage State Trail 18,971,114 266 218,287 Blackwater River State Park 7,101,563 99 78,680 Yellow River Marsh Preserve State Park 578,608 51 65,525 4 Maney, Thomas Patterson “Patt” 2 41,626,278 583 469,477 Fred Gannon Rocky Bayou State Park 7,558,966 106 83,636 Henderson Beach State Park 34,067,312 477 385,841 5 Drake, Brad 9 64,140,859 897 696,022 Camp Helen State Park 3,133,710 44 32,773 Deer Lake State Park 1,738,073 24 19,557 Eden Gardens State Park 3,235,182 45 36,128 Falling Waters State Park 5,510,029 77 58,866 Florida Caverns State Park 4,090,576 57 39,405 Grayton Beach State Park 17,072,108 239 186,686 Ponce de Leon Springs State Park 6,911,495 97 78,277 Three Rivers State Park 2,916,005 41 30,637 Topsail Hill Preserve State Park 19,533,681 273 213,693 6 Trumbull, Jay 2 45,103,015 632 504,860 Camp Helen State Park 3,133,710 44 32,773 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Pannaria Hookeri (Lichenised Ascomycetes) – a Remarkable New Record for Australia
    Muelleria 36: 74–80 Published online in advance of the print edition, 16 March 2018. Pannaria hookeri (lichenised Ascomycetes) – a remarkable new record for Australia Gintaras Kantvilas1 and Cécile Gueidan2 1 Tasmanian Herbarium, Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery, P.O. Box 5058, UTAS LPO, Sandy Bay, Tasmania 7005. Email: [email protected] 2 Australian National Herbarium, National Research Collections Australia, National Facilities and Collections, CSIRO, PO Box 1700, Canberra ACT 2601. Email: [email protected] Abstract Introduction Pannaria hookeri (Borrer ex Sm.) Nyl., Additions to the list of lichens recorded for Australia are made almost a bipolar lichen, is recorded for the continuously, as demonstrated very well by McCarthy (2017), whose first time for Australia (south-west checklist for Australia requires regular updates. It is no exaggeration to Tasmania) where it grew on alpine limestone outcrops. Its identity observe that, in Australia, a survey of almost any area, or a revision of any was confirmed by morphological, taxonomic group, will reveal previously overlooked novelties. The Bush anatomical and DNA-sequence data. Blitz Programme, conducted by the Australian Biological Resources Study Keywords: biodiversity, lichens, species since 2010, has been especially successful in this regard. This paper reports discovery, Tasmania a particularly interesting discovery, Pannaria hookeri (Borrer ex Sm.) Nyl., a first record for Australia. This bipolar species is widespread in arctic-alpine areas of the Northern Hemisphere (Jørgensen 1978; Thomson 1984) with scattered occurrences in the Antarctic (Øvstedal & Lewis Smith 2001), Mt Kenya in Africa (Jørgensen 2007), southern South America (Jørgensen 1978) and New Zealand (Galloway 1985).
    [Show full text]
  • FLORIDA DEPARTMENT of ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Procurement Section 3800 Commonwealth Boulevard, MS#93 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000
    FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Procurement Section 3800 Commonwealth Boulevard, MS#93 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 February 19, 2016 Addendum To: DEP RFI No. 2016033C, entitled “Point of Sale System” The Department hereby answers questions posed by prospective Respondents. Unless expressly indicated, these answers do not amend the terms of the Request for Information (RFI). The Department hereby answers the following questions: 1. Is managing the schedule of reservations within the scope of this project, or is this simply for accepting payment for the reservations? Answer #1: Neither of these items is within the scope of this project. The POS will need to function with the existing reservation system on contract, ReserveAmerica, which already schedules and accepts payments for the reservations. 2. Can you provide a list of current vendors that require integration, as well as the intended purpose of the integration? Answer #2: The current vendors that the POS System will need to integrate with are the ReserveAmerica reservation system and the State Contract for Credit Card Processing Services with Bank of America. The intended purpose is for the Department to provide a real-time dashboard, showing data related to revenue, attendance, annual pass use, etc. at a Park, District and Statewide level. 3. Is there an expected method of integration to the State Finance and Accounting systems? Answer #3: Yes, at minimum, data will need to “connect” to the State Finance and Accounting systems through an electronic data file (i.e. Excel or CSV document with specific formatting). Data will need to be integrated at minimum on a monthly basis, but the Department’s ultimate goal is to have real-time data available.
    [Show full text]
  • A Multigene Phylogenetic Synthesis for the Class Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota): 1307 Fungi Representing 1139 Infrageneric Taxa, 317 Genera and 66 Families
    A multigene phylogenetic synthesis for the class Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota): 1307 fungi representing 1139 infrageneric taxa, 317 genera and 66 families Miadlikowska, J., Kauff, F., Högnabba, F., Oliver, J. C., Molnár, K., Fraker, E., ... & Stenroos, S. (2014). A multigene phylogenetic synthesis for the class Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota): 1307 fungi representing 1139 infrageneric taxa, 317 genera and 66 families. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 79, 132-168. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2014.04.003 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.04.003 Elsevier Version of Record http://cdss.library.oregonstate.edu/sa-termsofuse Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 79 (2014) 132–168 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev A multigene phylogenetic synthesis for the class Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota): 1307 fungi representing 1139 infrageneric taxa, 317 genera and 66 families ⇑ Jolanta Miadlikowska a, , Frank Kauff b,1, Filip Högnabba c, Jeffrey C. Oliver d,2, Katalin Molnár a,3, Emily Fraker a,4, Ester Gaya a,5, Josef Hafellner e, Valérie Hofstetter a,6, Cécile Gueidan a,7, Mónica A.G. Otálora a,8, Brendan Hodkinson a,9, Martin Kukwa f, Robert Lücking g, Curtis Björk h, Harrie J.M. Sipman i, Ana Rosa Burgaz j, Arne Thell k, Alfredo Passo l, Leena Myllys c, Trevor Goward h, Samantha Fernández-Brime m, Geir Hestmark n, James Lendemer o, H. Thorsten Lumbsch g, Michaela Schmull p, Conrad L. Schoch q, Emmanuël Sérusiaux r, David R. Maddison s, A. Elizabeth Arnold t, François Lutzoni a,10,
    [Show full text]