Investment Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Investment Review Volume 9, Issue 1, 2013 AU 10252 AU CA 94105 SAN FRANCISCO, 101 MARKET STREET F U N M I T M Y O EDERAL C D E V E C E L N O T E P R M F R E O N R ESERVE T IN VE S STMENT B ANK O F S AN F RANCISCO Community Develop Community Development INVESTMENT REVIEW www.frbsf.org/cdinvestments Pay for Success Financing ment Investment Review Background and Context The Real Revolution: Ending 40 Years of Stagnant Results for Communities Pay for Success is Not a Panacea The Promise of Pay for Success Social Impact Bonds (SIBs): Lessons Learned So Far Pay for Success: Understanding the Risk Trade-offs The Ethics of Pay for Success Learning from the Low Income Housing Credit (LIHTC) Using SIBs to Spur Innovation, Knowledge Building, and Accountability Roles and Responsibilities Using Impact Investment to Expand Effective Social Programs Banks as Pioneer Investors in Pay for Success Financing Innovation Needs Foundation Support: The Case of Social Impact Bonds Pay for Success: Opportunities and Risks for Nonprofits Success Begins with a Feasibility Study Government’s Role in Pay for Success Volume 9, Issue 1, 2013 Volume Applications and Models Rikers Island: The First Social Impact Bond in the United States POSTAGE & FEES PAID POSTAGE SAN FRANCISCO, CA SAN FRANCISCO, PERMIT NO. 752 PERMIT NO. Human Capital Performance Bonds PRSRT STD Pay for Success: Building On 25 Years of Experience with the LIHTC Paying for Success to Reduce Asthma Emergencies Supporting At-Risk Youth: A Provider’s Perspective on Pay for Success NTER FO CE R C O Tax Increment Finance: A Success-Driven Tool S M T N M E Paying for Success to House the Homeless in Massachusetts U M N FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO SAN BANK OF RESERVE FEDERAL T I T S Using Performance-Based Contracting for Kids and Families Y E V D N E I VE T LOPMEN Community Development INVESTMENT REVIEW The Community Development Department of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco created the Center for Community Development Investments to research and disseminate best practices in providing capital to low- and moderate-income communities. Part of this mission is accomplished by publishing the Community Development Investment Review. The Review brings together experts to write about various community development investment topics including: Finance—new tools, techniques, or approaches that increase the volume, lower the cost, lower the risk, or in any way make investments in low-income communities more attractive; Collaborations—ways in which different groups can pool resources and expertise to address the capital needs of low-income communities; Public Policy—analysis of how government and public policy influence community development finance options; Best Practices—showcase innovative projects, people, or institutions that are improving the investment opportunities in low-income areas. The goal of the Review is to bridge the gap between theory and practice and to enlist as many viewpoints as possible—government, nonprofits, financial institutions, and beneficiaries. As a leading economist in the community development field describes it, the Review provides “ideas for people who get things done.” For submission guidelines and themes of upcoming issues contact David Erickson, Federal Community Development INVESTMENT REVIEW Reserve Bank of San Francisco, 101 Market Street, Mailstop 215, San Francisco, California, 94105-1530, [email protected]. The material herein may not represent the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco or the Federal Reserve System. Free subscriptions and additional copies are available upon request from the Community Development Department, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, 101 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94105, or email [email protected]. Change-of-address and subscription cancellations should be sent directly to the Community Development Department. Please include the current mailing label as well as any new information. Community Development Investment Review Advisory Committee The views expressed are not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of Ian Galloway, Issue Editor Frank Altman, Community Reinvestment Fund San Francisco or the Federal Reserve System. Material herein may be reprinted or abstracted as long as the Community Development Investment Review is credited. David Erickson, Journal Editor Nancy Andrews, Low Income Investment Fund Jim Carr, National Community Reinvestment Coalition Center for Community Development Investments Prabal Chakrabarti, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Joy Hoffmann, FRBSF Group Vice President Catherine Dolan, Opportunity Finance Network Scott Turner, Vice President Andrew Kelman, KGS-Alpha Capital Markets Laura Choi, Senior Research Associate Kirsten Moy, Aspen Institute Naomi Cytron, Senior Research Associate Mark Pinsky, Opportunity Finance Network Gabriella Chiarenza, Research Associate Lisa Richter, GPS Capital Partners, LLC Benson Roberts, U.S. Department of the Treasury Clifford Rosenthal, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Ruth Salzman, Russell Berrie Foundation Ellen Seidman, Consultant Bob Taylor, RDT Capital Advisors Kerwin Tesdell, Community Development Venture Capital Alliance Betsy Zeidman, Consultant Table of Contents PAY FOR SUCCESS: BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT The Real Revolution of Pay for Success: Ending 40 Years of Stagnant Results for Communities .............................................................................................................................5 George Overholser and Caroline Whistler, Third Sector Capital Partners Pay for Success is Not a Panacea ................................................................................................12 Daniel Stid, The Bridgespan Group The Promise of Pay for Success ...................................................................................................18 Jonathan Greenblatt, White House Office of Social Innovation and Civic Participation Annie Donovan, White House Council on Environmental Quality Social Impact Bonds: Lessons Learned So Far .............................................................................22 Hanna Azemati, Michael Belinsky, Ryan Gillette, Jeffrey Liebman, Alina Sellman, and Angela Wyse, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University Pay for Success: Understanding the Risk Trade-offs .....................................................................33 Kristin Giantris and Bill Pinakiewicz, Nonprofit Finance Fund The Ethics of Pay for Success.......................................................................................................38 Jodi Halpern and Douglas Jutte, University of California, Berkeley Learning from the Low Income Housing Tax Credit: Building a New Social Investment Model ..............................................................................................................44 Barry Zigas, Consumer Federation of America Using Social Impact Bonds to Spur Innovation, Knowledge Building, and Accountability ..............53 David Butler, Dan Bloom, and Timothy Rudd, MDRC PAY FOR SUCCESS: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Social Impact Bonds: Using Impact Investment to Expand Effective Social Programs .............................................................................................................59 Luther Ragin, Jr., Global Impact Investing Network and Tracy Palandjian, Social Finance Inc. Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) Banks as Pioneer Investors in Pay for Success Financing ...........................................................................................................64 Steven Godeke, Godeke Consulting Innovation Needs Foundation Support: The Case of Social Impact Bonds ....................................70 Kippy Joseph, Rockefeller Foundation Pay for Success: Opportunities and Risks for Nonprofits .............................................................. 74 Laura Callanan and Jonathan Law, McKinsey & Co. Success Begins with a Feasibility Study .......................................................................................80 Robert H. Dugger, ReadyNation Government’s Role in Pay for Success ..........................................................................................85 Kristina Costa, Center for American Progress and Sonal Shah, Case Foundation PAY FOR SUCCESS: APPLICATIONS AND MODELS Rikers Island: The First Social Impact Bond in the United States .................................................. 91 John Olson and Andrea Phillips, Goldman Sachs Human Capital Performance Bonds ..............................................................................................96 Steve Rothschild, Invest in Outcomes Pay for Success: Building On 25 Years of Experience with the Low Income Housing Tax Credit .........................................................................................................102 Terri Ludwig, Enterprise Community Partners, Inc. Can Pay for Success Reduce Asthma Emergencies and Reset a Broken Health Care System? ..........................................................................................108 Rick Brush, Collective Health Supporting At-Risk Youth: A Provider’s Perspective on Pay for Success .......................................119 Lili Elkins, Roca Inc. Tax Increment Finance: A Success-Driven Tool for Catalyzing Economic Development and Social Transformation ..................................................................................... 123 Toby Rittner, Council of Development Finance Agencies Bringing Success to Scale: Pay for
Recommended publications
  • Japan's Secretive Death Penalty Policy
    Japan’s Secretive Death Penalty Policy: Contours, Origins, Justifications, and Meanings♦ David T. Johnson I. ABSTRACT...................................................................................................62 II. “REIKO IN WONDERLAND” .....................................................................63 A. SECRECY AND SILENCE ..............................................................................70 III. ORIGINS .......................................................................................................76 A. MEIJI BIRTH ...............................................................................................76 B. THE OCCUPATION’S “CENSORED DEMOCRACY” ........................................80 C. POSTWAR ACCELERATION..........................................................................87 IV. JUSTIFICATIONS ........................................................................................97 V. MEANINGS.................................................................................................109 A. SECRECY AND LEGITIMACY......................................................................109 B. SECRECY AND SALIENCE ..........................................................................111 C. SECRECY AND DEMOCRACY.....................................................................117 D. SECRECY AND LAW ..................................................................................119 VI. CONCLUSION.............................................................................................123
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Annual Report
    2018 2 SOLUTIONS JOURNALISM NETWORK Annual Report 2018 3 n June 17, 2019, Joshua OUR Benton, the director of Harvard’s Nieman Journalism Lab, published an essay Othat discussed just how emotionally overwhelmed people are by the news. Around the world, audiences STORY IS are increasingly avoiding news. But the major complaint is less about its reliability than about how depressing it is — and how powerless they feel when they consume it. “‘It can have a negative THE STORY effect on my mood’ is consistently a bigger factor in why people avoid news than ‘I can’t rely on news to be true,’” Benton wrote. His top recommendation: to OF MANY recapture readers, news should include solutions. (He even suggested that SJN send his article to potential funders — an idea with STORIES. which we agreed.) 4 SOLUTIONS JOURNALISM NETWORK Annual Report 2018 5 Six years ago, when we founded SJN, our goal was to show that solutions journalism wasn’t ‘lite news’ or a weekend ‘add-on’, but rather vital reporting that needed to be done rigorously and systematically — reporting that should, in fact, be a core element of everyday news. There’s much more work to be done — but we are heartened by how this practice, in a relatively short time, has gained legitimacy in many parts of the world. Our most recent survey of our news organization partners found that 90 percent reported “broad institutional support” for solutions journalism and 97 percent planned to continue the approach. We now have online resources for journalists in 12 languages — all created in response to international demand.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pulitzer Prizes 2020 Winne
    WINNERS AND FINALISTS 1917 TO PRESENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Excerpts from the Plan of Award ..............................................................2 PULITZER PRIZES IN JOURNALISM Public Service ...........................................................................................6 Reporting ...............................................................................................24 Local Reporting .....................................................................................27 Local Reporting, Edition Time ..............................................................32 Local General or Spot News Reporting ..................................................33 General News Reporting ........................................................................36 Spot News Reporting ............................................................................38 Breaking News Reporting .....................................................................39 Local Reporting, No Edition Time .......................................................45 Local Investigative or Specialized Reporting .........................................47 Investigative Reporting ..........................................................................50 Explanatory Journalism .........................................................................61 Explanatory Reporting ...........................................................................64 Specialized Reporting .............................................................................70
    [Show full text]
  • Boston Tech Hub Faculty Working Group Annual Report: 2018-2019
    BOSTON TECH HUB FACULTY WORKING GROUP Annual Report 2018–2019 Technology and Public Purpose Project Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Harvard Kennedy School 79 JFK Street Cambridge, MA 02138 www.belfercenter.org/TAPP Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences 29 Oxford St., Cambridge, MA 02138 www.seas.harvard.edu Statements and views expressed in this report are solely those of the authors and do not imply endorsement by Harvard University, Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard Paulson School, or the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. Design and Layout by Andrew Facini Copyright 2019, President and Fellows of Harvard College Printed in the United States of America BOSTON TECH HUB FACULTY WORKING GROUP Annual Report 2018–2019 Contents Foreword ...............................................................................................................1 FWG Members and Guests 2018–2019 .........................................................3 Introduction ..........................................................................................................9 Summary ............................................................................................................ 10 FWG Session Briefs: Fall 2018 ....................................................................... 17 FWG Session Briefs: Spring 2019 ................................................................. 35 FWG participants explore private sector investment in emerging technologies and the impact investing
    [Show full text]
  • Peter R. Orszag
    PETER R. ORSZAG Peter R. Orszag is Vice Chairman of Corporate and Investment Banking and Chairman of the Financial Strategy and Solutions Group at Citigroup, Inc. He is also a Nonresident Senior Fellow in Economic Studies at the Brookings Institution and a Contributing Columnist at Bloomberg View. Prior to joining Citigroup in January 2011, Dr. Orszag served as a Distinguished Visiting Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and a Contributing Columnist at the New York Times. He previously served as the Director of the Office of Management and Budget in the Obama Administration, a Cabinet-level position, from January 2009 until July 2010. From January 2007 to December 2008, Dr. Orszag was the Director of the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). Under his leadership, the agency significantly expanded its focus on areas such as health care and climate change. Prior to CBO, Dr. Orszag was the Joseph A. Pechman Senior Fellow and Deputy Director of Economic Studies at the Brookings Institution. While at Brookings, he also served as Director of The Hamilton Project, Director of the Retirement Security Project, and Co-Director of the Tax Policy Center. During the Clinton Administration, he was a Special Assistant to the President for Economic Policy and before that a staff economist and then Senior Advisor and Senior Economist at the President's Council of Economic Advisers. Orszag has also founded and subsequently sold an economics consulting firm. Dr. Orszag graduated summa cum laude in economics from Princeton University and obtained a Ph.D. in economics from the London School of Economics, which he attended as a Marshall Scholar.
    [Show full text]
  • Confronting the Rise in Anti-Semitic Domestic Terrorism
    CONFRONTING THE RISE IN ANTI-SEMITIC DOMESTIC TERRORISM HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE AND COUNTERTERRORISM OF THE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JANUARY 15, 2020 Serial No. 116–58 Printed for the use of the Committee on Homeland Security Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.govinfo.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 41–310 PDF WASHINGTON : 2020 VerDate Mar 15 2010 09:11 Sep 22, 2020 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 H:\116TH\20IC0115\41310.TXT HEATH Congress.#13 COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY BENNIE G. THOMPSON, Mississippi, Chairman SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas MIKE ROGERS, Alabama JAMES R. LANGEVIN, Rhode Island PETER T. KING, New York CEDRIC L. RICHMOND, Louisiana MICHAEL T. MCCAUL, Texas DONALD M. PAYNE, JR., New Jersey JOHN KATKO, New York KATHLEEN M. RICE, New York MARK WALKER, North Carolina J. LUIS CORREA, California CLAY HIGGINS, Louisiana XOCHITL TORRES SMALL, New Mexico DEBBIE LESKO, Arizona MAX ROSE, New York MARK GREEN, Tennessee LAUREN UNDERWOOD, Illinois VAN TAYLOR, Texas ELISSA SLOTKIN, Michigan JOHN JOYCE, Pennsylvania EMANUEL CLEAVER, Missouri DAN CRENSHAW, Texas AL GREEN, Texas MICHAEL GUEST, Mississippi YVETTE D. CLARKE, New York DAN BISHOP, North Carolina DINA TITUS, Nevada BONNIE WATSON COLEMAN, New Jersey NANETTE DIAZ BARRAGA´ N, California VAL BUTLER DEMINGS, Florida HOPE GOINS, Staff Director CHRIS VIESON, Minority Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE AND COUNTERTERRORISM MAX ROSE, New York, Chairman SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas MARK WALKER, North Carolina, Ranking JAMES R. LANGEVIN, Rhode Island Member ELISSA SLOTKIN, Michigan PETER T. KING, New York BENNIE G.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States Government Manual 2009/2010
    The United States Government Manual 2009/2010 Office of the Federal Register National Archives and Records Administration The artwork used in creating this cover are derivatives of two pieces of original artwork created by and copyrighted 2003 by Coordination/Art Director: Errol M. Beard, Artwork by: Craig S. Holmes specifically to commemorate the National Archives Building Rededication celebration held September 15-19, 2003. See Archives Store for prints of these images. VerDate Nov 24 2008 15:39 Oct 26, 2009 Jkt 217558 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6996 Sfmt 6996 M:\GOVMAN\217558\217558.000 APPS06 PsN: 217558 dkrause on GSDDPC29 with $$_JOB Revised September 15, 2009 Raymond A. Mosley, Director of the Federal Register. Adrienne C. Thomas, Acting Archivist of the United States. On the cover: This edition of The United States Government Manual marks the 75th anniversary of the National Archives and celebrates its important mission to ensure access to the essential documentation of Americans’ rights and the actions of their Government. The cover displays an image of the Rotunda and the Declaration Mural, one of the 1936 Faulkner Murals in the Rotunda at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) Building in Washington, DC. The National Archives Rotunda is the permanent home of the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution of the United States, and the Bill of Rights. These three documents, known collectively as the Charters of Freeedom, have secured the the rights of the American people for more than two and a quarter centuries. In 2003, the National Archives completed a massive restoration effort that included conserving the parchment of the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights, and re-encasing the documents in state-of-the-art containers.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston Tech Hub Faculty Working Group Annual Report: 2019-2020
    BOSTON TECH HUB FACULTY WORKING GROUP Annual Report 2019–2020 Technology and Public Purpose Project Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Harvard Kennedy School 79 JFK Street Cambridge, MA 02138 www.belfercenter.org/TAPP Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences 29 Oxford St., Cambridge, MA 02138 www.seas.harvard.edu Statements and views expressed in this report are solely those of the authors and do not imply endorsement by Harvard University, Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard Paulson School, or the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. Design and Layout by Andrew Facini Copyright 2020, President and Fellows of Harvard College Printed in the United States of America BOSTON TECH HUB FACULTY WORKING GROUP Annual Report 2019-2020 Table of Contents Foreword ........................................................................................................................1 FWG Members and Guests .........................................................................................5 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 13 Summary ..................................................................................................................... 14 FWG Session Briefs: Fall 2019 ................................................................................19 FWG Session Briefs: Spring 2020 ..........................................................................31 Carol Rose, Executive Director
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of the Proposals of the President's Commission To
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES AN ASSESSMENT OF THE PROPOSALS OF THE PRESIDENT’S COMMISSION TO STRENGTHEN SOCIAL SECURITY Peter A. Diamond Peter R. Orszag Working Paper 9097 http://www.nber.org/papers/w9097 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 August 2002 The views expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Bureau of Economic Research. © 2002 by Peter A. Diamond and Peter R. Orszag. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. An Assessment of the Proposals of the President’s Commission to Strengthen Social Security Peter A. Diamond and Peter R. Orszag NBER Working Paper No. 9097 August 2002 ABSTRACT The President’s Commission to Strengthen Social Security proposed three reform plans. Two, analyzed here, restore actuarial balance in the absence of individual accounts. One achieves this balance solely through benefit reductions. The other uses new dedicated revenue to cover one-third of the actuarial deficit, reducing benefits to close the rest. Both plans cut disability and young survivor benefits in step with retirement benefits, while bolstering benefits for long-career low earners and surviving spouses with low benefits. The plans both include voluntary individual accounts that replace part of the scaled-back Social Security system. Payroll taxes are diverted to the accounts and one of the plans also requires a (subsidized) add-on contribution for those choosing accounts. Under both models, any payroll tax deposited in an individual account is also recorded in a “liability account” for the worker.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report FY16
    COLLEGE OF THE ATLANTIC Annual Report Fiscal Year 2016 COA BOARD OF TRUSTEES Timothy Bass Jay McNally '84 Ronald E. Beard Philip S.J. Moriarty Leslie C. Brewer Phyllis Anina Moriarty Alyne Cistone Lili Pew Lindsay Davies Hamilton Robinson, Jr. Beth Gardiner Nadia Rosenthal Amy Yeager Geier Abby Rowe ('98) H. Winston Holt IV Marthann Samek Jason W. Ingle Henry L.P. Schmelzer Philip B. Kunhardt III '77 Laura Z. Stone Nicholas Lapham Stephen Sullens Casey Mallinckrodt William N. Thorndike, Jr. Anthony Mazlish Cody van Heerden, MPhil '17 Linda McGillicuddy Life Trustees Trustee Emeriti Samuel M. Hamill, Jr. David Hackett Fischer John N. Kelly William G. Foulke, Jr. Susan Storey Lyman George B.E. Hambleton William V.P. Newlin Elizabeth Hodder John Reeves Sherry F. Huber Henry D. Sharpe, Jr. Helen Porter Cathy L. Ramsdell '78 John Wilmerding Every effort has been made to ensure accuracy in preparing this annual report. If a mistake has been made, or if your name was omitted, we apologize. Please notify the Dean of Institutional Advancement Lynn Boulger at 207-801-5620, or [email protected]. www.coa.edu/support COA FY16 ANNUAL REPORT (July 1, 2015–June 30, 2016) There are many analogies to describe the teaching, learning, and knowledge creation that goes on here at College of the Atlantic. The one I like best is building—we build a lot of things here. Some such building is actual, not analogous: there’s a fourth year student building a tiny house in the parking lot; another is rebuilding the battery terminals for our electric van; we just built a bed on wheels and placed third in the Bar Harbor Bed Races.
    [Show full text]
  • Expanding Economic Opportunity for More Americans
    Expanding Economic Opportunity for More Americans Bipartisan Policies to Increase Work, Wages, and Skills Foreword by HENRY M. PAULSON, JR. and ERSKINE BOWLES Edited by MELISSA S. KEARNEY and AMY GANZ Expanding Economic Opportunity for More Americans Bipartisan Policies to Increase Work, Wages, and Skills Foreword by HENRY M. PAULSON, JR. and ERSKINE BOWLES Edited by MELISSA S. KEARNEY and AMY GANZ FEBRUARY 2019 Acknowledgements We are grateful to the members of the Aspen Economic Strategy Group, whose questions, suggestions, and discussion were the motivation for this book. Three working groups of Aspen Economic Strategy Group Members spent considerable time writing the discussion papers that are contained in this volume. These groups were led by Jason Furman and Phillip Swagel, Keith Hennessey and Bruce Reed, and Austan Goolsbee and Glenn Hubbard. We are indebted to these leaders for generously lending their time and intellect to this project. We also wish to acknowledge the members who spent considerable time reviewing proposals and bringing their own expertise to bear on these issues: Sylvia M. Burwell, Mitch Daniels, Melissa S. Kearney, Ruth Porat, Margaret Spellings, Penny Pritzker, Dave Cote, Brian Deese, Danielle Gray, N. Gregory Mankiw, Magne Mogstad, Wally Adeyemo, Martin Feldstein, Maya MacGuineas, and Robert K. Steel. We are also grateful to the scholars who contributed policy memos, advanced our understanding about these issues, and inspired us to think creatively about solutions: Manudeep Bhuller, Gordon B. Dahl, Katrine V. Løken, Joshua Goodman, Joshua Gottlieb, Robert Lerman, Chad Syverson, Michael R. Strain, David Neumark, Ann Huff Stevens and James P. Ziliak. The production of this volume was supported by many individuals outside of the Aspen Economic Strategy Group organization.
    [Show full text]
  • How Are Journalists Applying Solutions
    DISCOVERING SOLUTIONS: HOW ARE JOURNALISTS APPLYING SOLUTIONS JOURNALISM TO CHANGE THE WAY NEWS IS REPORTED AND WHAT DO THEY HOPE TO ACCOMPLISH? Ashley Elizabeth Porter Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS December 201 8 APPROVED: Tracy Everbach, Committee Chair Sara Champlin, Committee Member Neil Foote, Committee Member Koji Fuse, Director of the Frank W. Mayborn Graduate Institute of Journalism Michael McPherson, Acting Dean of the Frank W. and Sue Mayborn School of Journalism Victor Prybutok, Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Porter, Ashley Elizabeth. Discovering Solutions: How are Journalists Applying Solutions Journalism to Change the Way News is Reported and What Do They Hope to Accomplish? Master of Arts (Journalism), December 2018, 78 pp., 3 appendices, references, 88 titles. Solutions journalism, rigorous reporting on responses to social problems, has gained great traction in the last decade. Using positive psychology theory, also known as the theory of well-being, this qualitative study examines the impact of reporting while using solutions journalism techniques. Applying the five pillars of positive psychology theory: positive emotion, engagement, positive relationships, meaning and accomplishment (PERMA), this study used interviews and content analysis to investigate how journalists are applying the tools of solutions journalism as well as what they hope to accomplish in the process. Findings revealed that the application of solutions journalism techniques produces hope and community engagement resulting in flourishing and positive change for individuals, communities and all involved in the reporting process. Copyright 2018 By Ashley Elizabeth Porter ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, thank you to my children Zandt and Alie.
    [Show full text]