History About

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

History About Entergy History About It all started with a handshake, some sawdust and a vision. About Us More than a century ago, Harvey Couch had the idea to bring safe, affordable, reliable power to the Middle South — power that would open the door to the modern world for the people and communities we serve. His vision lives on today: Entergy delivers electricity to 3 million utility customers in Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas. About Vision & Mission Vision Mission We Power Life. We exist to grow a world-class energy business that creates sustainable value for our four stakeholders. Customers: constantly striving for reasonable costs and providing safe, reliable products and services. Employees: provide a safe, rewarding, engaging, diverse and inclusive work environment, fair compensation and benefits, and opportunities to advance their careers. Communities: create value through economic development, philanthropy, volunteerism and advocacy, and by operating our business safely and in a socially and environmentally responsible way. Owners: provide top-quartile returns through the relentless pursuit of opportunities to optimize our business. History The Entergy story began with a pile of sawdust succeed. With the fuel source secured, Couch and a handshake. The sawdust belonged to H. H. began work on electrifying the state. How it all Foster, president of the Arkansas Land and Lumber Company. The handshake was between On Dec. 17, 1914, Malvern and Arkadelphia were Began Foster and Harvey Couch, president of Arkansas lit up as the generators at the lumber company Power Company. were turned on for the first time. Now called Arkansas Light and Power Company, Arkansas’ Couch was an entrepreneur who lived in newest endeavor to bring the benefits of electricity Arkansas at the turn of the 20th century. He to the rural South began with two 550 kilowatt invested in a phone company, radio station, generators and 22 miles of transmission lines. railroad and his biggest success, an electric power company. On Nov. 13, 1913, with a Couch’s company grew rapidly. Ten years later, $500,000 line of credit and a franchise to provide he completed construction of the Remmel electricity to the Arkansas towns of Malvern and hydroelectric dam on the Ouachita River. His Arkadelphia, Couch shook hands with H. H. transmission system now covered 300 miles. With Foster for his sawdust. Couch would use sawdust a 9,000-kilowatt generator in place, Couch set his from Foster’s lumber company as fuel to generate sights beyond the state’s boundaries. electricity for his power company. It was a new beginning for Couch and electric service in the Couch began acquiring independent electric state. properties in Jackson, Vicksburg, Columbus and Greenville, Mississippi. His plan was to develop Couch’s goal was to have an integrated electric an interconnected system much like the one in system with numerous sources of power at a Arkansas, but between states. On April 12, 1923, reasonable price. Service reliability was foremost Mississippi Power and Light Company was on his mind. He knew if he could provide a incorporated in Mississippi. reliable product at a good price, he would The fuel and electricity for this new company Elsewhere, the competition to electrify New would come from Louisiana. The Louisiana Power Orleans was fierce. Electric lighting had been Company was formed so Couch could take full introduced there at the 1884 Cotton Centennial advantage of the abundant supply of natural gas Exposition, but high costs, fear and unreliability found in northern Louisiana. In November 1925, were obstacles to electrifying the city. In the early Couch’s Sterlington generating station was placed 1900s, nine separate electric companies online. The largest power plant south of St. Louis, competed in New Orleans. Nearly all were small, its 30,000-kilowatt capacity was owned by three isolated generators that served limited areas, companies: Arkansas Light and Power, operated on different voltages and used various Mississippi Power and Light, and Louisiana Power kinds of equipment. None were interconnected, Company. even within the city. At the dedication of the Sterlington plant, Gov. Harvey Parnell of Arkansas said, “Harvey Couch has done more to develop these three states – Louisiana, Arkansas and Mississippi – than any other man.” Couch’s goal of an integrated electric system was becoming a reality. History Electric Bond and Share: The Competition Sidney Mitchel worked for Electric Bond and Share Company, which was owned by The Great Depression that began in 1929 brought hard times, reduced sales and General Electric. EBASCO was building, financing and operating struggling new shriveling capital markets to utilities. The Electric Power and Light Corporation was electric systems. By the early 1920s Mitchel had acquired all the electrical service in no exception. Then Mississippi Power and Light president Rex Brown described New Orleans and was expanding in other places including Little Rock, Arkansas, and company operations during the era: “Stockholders had to be continually assured that Memphis, Tennessee. their investments were safe. At the same time, they had to be convinced that dividends, while in arrears, would eventually be paid. Our customers, hard-pressed Like Couch, Mitchel knew the only way to grow his company was to expand. Soon for finances as our company, could not pay higher rates or increased utilization. In EBASCO was competing directly with Couch as their expansion overlapped in fact, many discontinued service because they had to choose between electricity and Arkansas and Louisiana. Both men knew that they could not continue competing for food. The meeting of payroll was a continuous nightmare for company officers.” territory, so in 1925 they joined forces, consolidating their properties into one large, interconnected system. The new system was called Electric Power and Light Despite the hardships, Arkansas Power and Light, MP&L, Louisiana Power and Corporation, owned by EBASCO and run by Couch. The system that would become Light, and New Orleans Public Service Inc., the company serving the New Orleans Entergy was born. area, made it through intact. Some of the nation’s largest utilities did not. History The Public Utility Samuel Insull was Thomas Edison’s business South Utilities Inc., Entergy's former name, was Holding Company Act secretary. He moved to Chicago to build a formed as a holding company for Arkansas Power multilevel utility organization that included holding and Light, Louisiana Power and Light, Mississippi companies, which held other holding companies. Power and Light, and New Orleans Public Service The profit-taking opportunities inherent in his Inc. By special request of New Orleans officials, pyramid scheme set off a national acquisition NOPSI was allowed to keep its gas and transit craze. By 1932, there were eight holding operations in the city. companies controlling 73% of the investor-owned electric business. The scheme collapsed and In MSU’s 1949 annual report, the company’s first public outcry produced the Public Utility Holding president, Edgar Dixon, noted in his letter to Company Act of 1935. shareholders that the year was “one of growth and progress for the companies of the Middle PUHCA broke up the multilevel holding South System.” He reported that the company companies and required them to register with the was paying a dividend of 27.5 cents a share to U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The more than 25,000 stockholders “who reside in companies were required to specialize in one every state of the country and in 24 foreign service and relinquish their non-related properties. countries.” At the end of its first year of EBASCO was one of those companies. operations, MSU served over 625,000 customers in more than 1,600 communities. In 1949, EBASCO’s Electric Power and Light Corporation was dissolved. In its place, Middle History Two Decades of Growth The 1950s and 1960s were decades of In 1965 the system was hit by Hurricane By the end of the 1960s, Andrus reported in growth and prosperity for the company. Betsy, then the worst storm in the company’s the annual report that the number of Capacity grew with demand and the system history. Betsy destroyed the southeastern customers had grown to more than 1 million. met all challenges and opportunities. The end of the system. In the New Orleans area, Generating capacity, primarily using oil and system’s largest generating station, gas-fired 90% of the system was damaged or gas, had grown, too. But this period of rapid Ninemile Point near New Orleans, came destroyed. All of Louisiana Power and expansion came to an abrupt halt in the online in the 1950s. Little Gypsy, located on Light’s customers in southern Louisiana 1970s as a result of the 1973 OPEC oil the Mississippi River upriver from New were without power. With help from their embargo. Orleans, became the world’s first fully- sister companies and neighboring utilities, automated generating unit in 1961. nearly all customers were restored within The system responded by continuing to nine days. LP&L’s publication, Fifty Years of Edgar Dixon died in 1962 and was Service, noted at the time that Hurricane diversify its fuel mix. In 1970, LP&L succeeded by Gerald Andrus. As Middle Betsy had inflicted “the greatest weather- announced plans for its Waterford 3 nuclear South Utilities’ second president, Andrus’ related damage to a single utility.” unit near Taft, Louisiana. Two years later, first major achievement was the creation of Mississippi Power and Light announced the service company, Middle South Services In 1968, the system entered the nuclear age plans for the Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Inc. (now known as Entergy Services Inc.) in when Arkansas Power and Light was near Port Gibson, Mississippi. The same 1963. The company provided the common granted a construction permit to build year, System Fuels Inc.
Recommended publications
  • Analyzing the Energy Industry in United States
    +44 20 8123 2220 [email protected] Analyzing the Energy Industry in United States https://marketpublishers.com/r/AC4983D1366EN.html Date: June 2012 Pages: 700 Price: US$ 450.00 (Single User License) ID: AC4983D1366EN Abstracts The global energy industry has explored many options to meet the growing energy needs of industrialized economies wherein production demands are to be met with supply of power from varied energy resources worldwide. There has been a clearer realization of the finite nature of oil resources and the ever higher pushing demand for energy. The world has yet to stabilize on the complex geopolitical undercurrents which influence the oil and gas production as well as supply strategies globally. Aruvian's R'search’s report – Analyzing the Energy Industry in United States - analyzes the scope of American energy production from varied traditional sources as well as the developing renewable energy sources. In view of understanding energy transactions, the report also studies the revenue returns for investors in various energy channels which manifest themselves in American energy demand and supply dynamics. In depth view has been provided in this report of US oil, electricity, natural gas, nuclear power, coal, wind, and hydroelectric sectors. The various geopolitical interests and intentions governing the exploitation, production, trade and supply of these resources for energy production has also been analyzed by this report in a non-partisan manner. The report starts with a descriptive base analysis of the characteristics of the global energy industry in terms of economic quantity of demand. The drivers of demand and the traditional resources which are used to fulfill this demand are explained along with the emerging mandate of nuclear energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Entergy Services, LLC
    Entergy Services, LLC REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL RFP Purpose: Identification of Environmental Projects For Potential Funding Issued and Coordinated by: Entergy’s Sustainability & Environmental Policy Organization Statement of Confidentiality: The information contained in this document is proprietary to Entergy Services, LLC. It may not be disclosed, duplicated, or used for any purpose, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of Entergy Services, LLC. Request for Proposal Environmental Projects General Information and Purpose of this RFP The intent of this RFP is to assist Entergy’s Sustainability & Environmental Policy (SEP) organization in the selection of environmentally beneficial projects and/or partners for those projects. The selected projects will be funded in whole or in part by the Entergy Environmental Initiatives Fund (EIF). Acceptable projects may include those that lower water usage, prevent or reduce waste, encourage recycling, promote energy efficiency, lower emissions, promote or address environmental justice education, decrease fuel consumption, increase efficiency, reduce water effluents, improve water quality, provide for registered greenhouse gas (GHG) offsets and/or develop innovative solutions to climate change impacts, or any other concepts that have an added environmental benefit for Entergy and its stakeholders. The RFP also solicits existing or developing projects targeted in the same areas whose scope of work could be modified to accomplish the goals stated above. Funding for the project must be completed in 2021. An initial screening of the high-level proposals will identify a set of proposals for which SEP will seek additional information for further consideration. SEP may engage with third-party subject matter experts (SMEs) to review, rank, and recommend projects for consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • Byron, Units 1 & 2, Dresden, Units 2 & 3, James A. Fitzpatrick, Lasalle
    200 Exelon Way Exelon Generation ® Kennett Square. PA 19348 www.exeloncorp.com 10 CFR 50.55a RS-19-089 JAFP-19-0084 August 27, 2019 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Byron Station, Units 1 and 2 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-37 and NPF-66 NRC Docket Nos. STN 50-454 and STN 50-455 Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-19 and DPR-25 NRC Docket Nos. 50-237 and 50-249 James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-59 NRC Docket No. 50-333 LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-11 and NPF-18 N RC Docket Nos. 50-373 and 50-37 4 Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-39 and NPF-85 N RC Docket Nos. 50-352 and 50-353 Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-29 and DPR-30 NRC Docket Nos. 50-254 and 50-265 Subject: Request to Use a Provision of a Later Edition of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI Reference: NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2004-12, "Clarification on Use of Later Editions and Addenda to the ASME OM Code and Section XI," dated July 28, 2004 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Request to Use a Provision of a Later Addenda of the ASME B&PV Code, Section XI August 27, 2019 Page 2 In accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a, "Codes and standards," paragraph (g)(4)(iv), and the guidance provided in the referenced document, Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon) requests NRC approval to use a specific provision of a later edition of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel (B&PV) Code, Section XI, for the units identified above.
    [Show full text]
  • Nrc Liaison Report
    SC-2Mtg07-2_Att#10 NRC LIAISON REPORT • STP first company to step forward in decades seeking new reactor license The application, a 200,000-page document submitted on a single DVD, was filed on September 24. The staff and STP officials met October 11 for the first public meeting since the application was filed. NRC staffers outlined several issues during the meeting, including a lack of supporting documents for at least two sections, outdated data for one section, missing figures for another and, in one instance, the absence of state emergency preparedness plans that were cross-referenced in the application. • TVA Opts For AP1000 Design Instead Of Completing Partially Finished Existing Reactors. TVA is submitting the combined operating license request nearly two decades after work stopped in 1988 toward building two similar-sized reactors at Bellefonte. TVA officials determined that finishing those reactors, which the agency started building in 1973, would be too costly." Application will be the first involving construction of a Westinghouse AP1000 advanced reactor, made by Westinghouse Electric Co., which is owned by Japan's Toshiba Corp. • Grid Security A video released last month by CNN illustrates the potential danger to the power grid, experts say. While in the past, most had imagined a cyberattack might shut down patches of the US grid for a few days at worst, But the video shows a demonstration by the Idaho National Laboratory that a large electric generator shaking violently, spraying metal parts, and spewing smoke before grinding to a stop. The method of attack used in that demonstration could be replicated to destroy more and larger equipment, several experts say.
    [Show full text]
  • American Nuclear Society ANS 3.5
    ANSI/ANSANSI/ANS--3.53.5 DiscussionDiscussion OrganizationalOrganizational DefinitionsDefinitions ANSANS--3.53.5 WorkingWorking GroupGroup MembersMembers ANSI/ANSANSI/ANS--33--55 UsageUsage UpdateUpdate SummarySummary ofof ChangesChanges ANSI/ANSANSI/ANS--3.53.5 OrganizationalOrganizational DefinitionsDefinitions ANSANS -- AmericanAmerican NuclearNuclear SocietySociety ANSIANSI -- AmericanAmerican NationalNational StandardsStandards InstituteInstitute ANSANS--3.53.5 -- WorkingWorking GroupGroup isis comprisedcomprised ofof Industry,Industry, Regulatory,Regulatory, andand Organizational/IndividualOrganizational/Individual VolunteersVolunteers ANSANS--3.53.5 WorkingWorking GroupGroup MembershipMembership ANSANS--3.53.5 WorkingWorking GroupGroup BalanceBalance ofof InterestsInterests NRC-1 7% VENDORS-3 20% UTILITY-9 60% ORG-2 13% ANSANS--3.53.5 WorkingWorking GroupGroup MembersMembers ANSANS--3.53.5 OfficersOfficers ListList ChairChair -- TimothyTimothy DennisDennis – Individual (chair of ANS-21/member NFSC executive committee) ViceVice--chairchair -- JimJim FlorenceFlorence – Nebraska Public Power District - Cooper Nuclear Station SecretarySecretary -- KeithKeith WelchelWelchel – Duke Energy - Oconee Nuclear Station EditorEditor -- FF JJ (Butch)(Butch) ColbyColby – L3 Communications MAPPS Inc (formerly CAE) StyleStyle EditorEditor -- WilliamWilliam MM (Mike)(Mike) ShellyShelly – Entergy Services, Inc ParliamentarianParliamentarian –– LawrenceLawrence VickVick – U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission ANSANS--3.53.5 UtilitiesUtilities JamesJames
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Power Monthly December 1997
    DOE/EIA-0226(97/12) Distribution Category UC-950 Electric Power Monthly December 1997 With Data for September 1997 Energy Information Administration Office of Coal, Nuclear, Electric and Alternate Fuels U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 mmwm OF m$ mumr is mmm This report was prepared by the Energy Information Administration, the independent statistical and analytical agency within the Department of Energy. The information contained herein should not be construed as advocating or reflecting any policy position of the Department of Energy or any other organization. Contacts The Electric Power Monthly is prepared by the U.S. Department of Energy's Energy Information Administration. Questions and comments concerning the contents of the Electric Power Monthly may be directed to: Ms. Sandra Smith, Project Leader Energy Information Administration, EI-524 U.S. Department of Energy Washington, DC, 20585 Telephone number: (202)426-1173 Internet E-Mail number: [email protected] or the following subject specialists: Subject Contact Phone Number Internet E-Mail Electricity Supply and Demand Forecast.. Rebecca McNerney 202-426-1251 [email protected] Industry Developments Kenneth McClevey 202-426-1144 [email protected] New Electric Generating Units Karen McDaniel 202-426-1234 [email protected] U.S. Electric Utility Net Generation Melvin E. Johnson 202-426-1172 [email protected] U.S. Electric Utility Consumption of Fuels . Melvin E. Johnson 202-426-1172 [email protected] U.S. Electric Utility Stocks of Fuels Melvin E. Johnson 202-426-1172 [email protected] U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 20071204-Ucs-Brief-Got-Water
    GOT WATER? Nuclear power plants are usually built next to lakes, rivers, and oceans.1 Not for the scenic views that such locales provide, but because water can absorb the waste heat produced by the plants. Nuclear power plants consume vast amounts of water during normal operation to absorb the waste heat left over after making electricity and also to cool the equipment and buildings used in generating that electricity. In event of an accident, nuclear power plants need water to remove the decay heat produced by the reactor core and also to cool the equipment and buildings used to provide the core’s heat removal. This issue brief describes the reliance of nuclear power plants on nearby bodies of water during normal operation and under accident conditions. All of the 104 nuclear reactors currently licensed to operate in the United States are light2 water reactors. Sixty-nine (69) are pressurized water reactors (PWRs) and 35 are boiling water reactors (BWRs). In a PWR, water flowing through the reactor core is In a BWR, water flowing through the reactor core is heated by its thermal energy. Because this water is heated by its thermal energy and boils. The steam flows maintained under high pressure (over 2,000 pounds per from the reactor vessel to the turbine. The steam spins the square inch), it does not boil even when heated to over turbine, which is connected to a generator that produces 500ºF. The hot water flows from the reactor vessel and electricity. The steam exits the turbine into the condenser. enters thousands of metal tubes within the steam Water from the nearby lake, river, or ocean flows through generator.
    [Show full text]
  • Entergy Grand Gulf Unit 3 COLA
    Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Unit 3 Combined License Application Part 1: General and Administrative Information Revision 0 February 2008 Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Unit 3 COL Application Part 1, General and Administrative Information Table of Contents Section Page 1.0. GENERAL INFORMATION ................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1. Applicants - Corporate Information ...................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.1. Entergy Mississippi, Inc. .............................................................................................. 1-2 1.1.2. Entergy Louisiana, LLC ............................................................................................... 1-2 1.1.3. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, LLC ............................................................................. 1-3 1.1.4. Entergy Operations, Inc. .............................................................................................. 1-3 1.1.5. System Energy Resources, Inc. .................................................................................. 1-4 1.2. Entergy Corporation - Corporate Information .................................................................... 1-13 1.3. Foreign Ownership Declaration ......................................................................................... 1-16 1.4. Requested Licenses And Authorized Uses ....................................................................... 1-16 1.5. Identification Of
    [Show full text]
  • Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 & 3
    UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION III 2443 WARRENVILLE RD. SUITE 210 LISLE, IL 60532-4352 July 19, 2017 Mr. Bryan C. Hanson Senior VP, Exelon Generation Co., LLC President and CNO, Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555 SUBJECT: DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3—NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT 05000237/2017002 AND 05000249/2017002 Dear Mr. Hanson: On June 30, 2017, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an integrated inspection at your Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3. On June 30, 2017, the NRC inspectors discussed the results of this inspection with Mr. J. Washko and other members of your staff. The results of this inspection are documented in the enclosed report. Based on the results of this inspection, one issue was self-revealed and was evaluated under the risk significance determination process as having very low safety significance (Green). The NRC has also determined a violation is associated with this issue. Because the licensee initiated a condition report to address this issue, the violation is being treated as a Non-Cited Violation (NCV), consistent with Section 2.3.2 of the Enforcement Policy. This NCV is described in the subject inspection report. If you contest the violations or significance of this NCV, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555–0001, with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region III; the Director, Office of Enforcement; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the Dresden Nuclear Power Station.
    [Show full text]
  • Map-South.Pdf
    Education Locations – Arkansas Arkansas Northeastern College ITT Technical Institute 2501 S Division 4520 South University Avenue Blytheville, Arkansas Little Rock, Arkansas Programs: Industrial Electrical Maintenance, Program: Electronics Engineering, etc. Industrial Mechanical Systems Company Name: Entergy Services Inc. Company Address: 639 Loyola Ave Arkansas State University-Newport New Orleans, LA 70113 7648 Victory Blvd. Company Contact: Dr. SchuyLer Gordon Newport, Arkansas 504-576-4000 Program: High Voltage Lineman Technology [email protected] Arkansas Technical Ouachita Technical College 1605 Coliseum Drive One College Circle Russelville, Arkansas Malvern, Arkansas Program: Process Technology Programs: Engineering and Manufacturing Company Name: Entergy Services Inc. Technology, Industrial Equipment Maintenance Company Address: 639 Loyola Ave Technology New Orleans, LA 70113 Company Name: Entergy Services Inc. Company Contact: Dr. SchuyLer Gordon Company Address: 639 Loyola Ave 504-576-4000 New Orleans, LA 70113 [email protected] Company Contact: Dr. SchuyLer Gordon 504-576-4000 Black River Technical College [email protected] 1410 Hwy 304 East Pocahontas, Arkansas South Arkansas University Technical Program: Industrial Electricity / Electronics P.O. Box 3499 Camden, Arkansas East Arkansas Community College Program: Industrial Technology and Controls 1700 Newcastle Road Company Name: Entergy Services Inc. Forrest City, Arkansas Company Address: 639 Loyola Ave Program: Industrial and Electrical Tech. New Orleans, LA 70113 Company Name: Entergy Services Inc. Company Contact: Dr. SchuyLer Gordon Company Address: 639 Loyola Ave 504-576-4000 New Orleans, LA 70113 [email protected] Company Contact: Dr. SchuyLer Gordon 504-576-4000 Southeast Arkansas [email protected] 1900 Hazel Street Pine Bluff, Arkansas Program: Electrical and Industrial Tech. Company Name: Entergy Services Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooper Public Meeting Summary from 4/7/2010
    UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIO~~ REGION IV 612 EAST LAMAR BLVD, SUITE 400 ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-4125 APR 2 0 20 Stewart B. Minahan, Vice President-Nuclear and Chief Nuclear Officer Nebraska Public Power - Cooper Nuclear Station 72676 648A Avenue Brownville, NE 68321 Dear Mr. Minahan, On April 7,2010, the NRC held a public meeting to discuss the inspection results for the Region IV license renewal inspection of nonsafety-related scoping and selected aging management programs that was conducted onsite and documented in Inspection Report 05000298/2009010. NRC held the public meeting in the Council Chambers for the City of Auburn, Nebraska. The meeting attendance list and NRC presentation are included as Enclosures 1 and 2, respectively. In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, and its enclosure, will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at (the Public Electronic Reading Room). Sincerely, (fJ/jiA../ Neil O'Ke~~~ef Engineering Branch 2 Division of Reactor Safety Docket: 50-298 License: DPR-46 Enclosures: 1. Meeting Attendance 2. NRC Presentation S. Minahan - 2 - Gene Mace Nuclear Asset Manager Nebraska Public Power District P.O. Box 98 Brownville, NE 68321 John C. McClure, Vice President and General Counsel Nebraska Public Power District 1414 15th Street P.O. Box 499 Columbus, NE 68601 David Van Der Kamp Licensing Manager Nebraska Public Power District P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Ornl/Nsic-176
    4 ggcBvePBtnc APR 291980 ORNL/NSIC-176 MASTER Descriptions of Selected Accidents that Have Occurred at Nuclear Reactor Facilities H. W. Bertini and Members of the Staff of the Nuclear Safety Information Center NUCLFAR SAFETY INFORMATION CENTER DIEmu'lhj \i 'uNLIMIlt.il c ORNL/NSIC-176 Contract No. W-7405-eng-26 Engineering Technology Division DESCRIPTIONS OF SFLEuTED ACCIDENTS THAT HAVE OCCURRED AT NUCLEAR REACTOR FACILITIES H. W. Bertini and Members of the Staff of the Nuclear Safety Information Center Date Published: April 1980 Prepared by the OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORArORY Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 operated by UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION for the DEPARTMENT OP ENERGY tP MTOWiOtl Cf THIS MCU«»T It IHWWTW iii CONTENTS (7 Page FOREWORD ...» v PREFACE . vli 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. NUCLEAR REACTORS: FUNDAMENTALS .' 3 2.1 Basic Theory 3 2.2 The Components of a Nuclear Reactor 8 2.3 Radioactivity , 11 2.4 Electric Power Plants .... 16 2.5 Classification of Reactors 17 2.6 Light-Water Reactors for the Production of Electricity ..... 19 3. CENTRAL STATION POWER PLANTS. 32 3.1 Fuel Melting Incideat at the Fermi Reactor (1966) 32 3.2 Electrical Cable Fires at San Onofre 1 (1968) 33 3.3 Fuel Meltdown at St. Laurent (1969) 35 3.4 Uncovering of the Core at La Crosse (1970) 38 3.5 Seven Injured When Steam Nozzle Breaks at Robinson 2 (1970) 39 3.6 Discharge of Primary System into Drywell at Did 'en 2 (1970) 42 3.7 Turbine Damage Caused by Human Error at Robinson 2 (1970) 45 3.8 Construction Fire at Indian Point 2 (1971) 46 3.9 Valve Separations at Turkey Point 3 (1971) 47 3.10 Turbine Basement Flooded at Quad Cities V?I2) 48 3.11 Steam Generator Damaged in Hot Tests at Oconee 1 (1972) 49 3.12 Two Fatalities in Steam Line Accident at Surry 1 (1972) 50 3.13 Seawater Intrusion into Primary System at Millstone 1 (1972) ..
    [Show full text]