DOCSLIB.ORG

Internet Service Providers (Isps)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Internet Service Providers (Isps) Resources for Districts on Internet Service Providers (ISPs) What resources are included? Page number I. Sample ISP offerings for qualifying low-income households1 2 II. Lifeline discount program (for qualifying low-income households) 4 III. ISP providers by county 5 Counties A – F 5 Counties G – K 14 Counties L – P 20 Counties R – Z 26 IV. Catalog of lowest-priced internet plans by ISP2 34 Internet Providers A – F 34 Internet Providers G – K 42 Internet Providers L – P 44 Internet Providers R – Z 47 1 As advertised online as of 7/10/2020 2 As advertised online and publicly available on company websites as of 7/10/2020 1 Sample Internet Service Provider offerings for qualifying low-income households3 Below details information on a few sample low-cost options for qualifying low-income households. School districts can support their highest need families by connecting them to affordable fixed internet plans like the ones seen below. Check the “ISP providers by county” resource on page 5 to determine, which providers service your area. Provider Plan Price Upload Data Eligibility Website per Speed month4 (Mbps) AT&T Access $10.00 25 150 GB or 1 Access from AT&T provides wireline https://w TB Home Internet to limited income ww.att.co households who participate in the m/internet Supplemental Nutrition Assistance /access/ Program (SNAP) or receive Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits in California. You’ll receive the maximum speed available at your address. Includes a data allowance of 150GB or 1TB depending on speed available in your area. $10 charge for each additional 50GB Charter Charter $14.99 30 Unlimited One or more members of your https://w Spectrum Spectrum household must be a recipient of one ww.spectr "Internet of the following assistance programs: um.com/br Assist" National School Lunch Program owse/cont (NSLP), Community Eligibility ent/spectr Provision (CEP) of the NSL, um- Supplemental Security Income (for internet- applicants age 65+ only) assist Grande Internet $9.95 25 Unlimited May qualify if you aree a participant https://my First in public assistance programs like the grande.co National School Lunch Program, m/internet housing assistance, Medicaid, SNAP, -first SSI, and others. Have not subscribed to our services within the sixty (60) day period immediately prior to applying for the program Sparklight - COVID-19 $10.00 15 Inquire for Offer available for 3 months. Low https://w Relief data limits income families and those most ww.sparkli impacted from coronavirus ght.com/n challenges, such as seniors and ews/sparkl college students through December ight- 31, 2020. extends- covid-19- relief- efforts 3 As advertised online on 7/10/2020 4 Additional fees including installation, data overage, etc. may apply 2 Suddenlink Altice $14.99 30 Unlimited Eligible for or participates in the https://w Advantage National School Lunch Program ww.alticea Internet (NSLP); or a New York City resident dvantagein and attends a New York City public ternet.com school; or eligible for or receives / Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and 65 years of age or older; or a veteran and receive state or federal public assistance. Xfinity Comcast $9.95 25 1TB You may qualify if you are eligible for https://w Essentials public assistance programs such as ww.intern the National School Lunch Program, etessential Housing Assistance, Medicaid, SNAP, s.com/ SSI, and others. 3 Lifeline Discount Program (for qualifying low-income households) Per the Federal Communications Commission Website, Lifeline “typically provides up to a $9.25 monthly discount on service for eligible low-income subscribers. Subscribers may receive a Lifeline discount on either a wireline or a wireless service, but they may not receive a discount on both services at the same time. Lifeline also supports broadband Internet access service and broadband- voice bundles. FCC rules prohibit more than one Lifeline service per household. Lifeline is available to eligible low-income consumers in every state, commonwealth, territory, and on Tribal lands. The Lifeline program is administered by the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC). USAC is responsible for data collection and maintenance, support calculation, disbursements, and assisting consumers with Lifeline eligibility and enrollment for the program. USAC's website provides additional information regarding the program, including program requirements. To participate in the Lifeline program, consumers must either have an income that is at or below 135% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines or participate in certain federal assistance programs, such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or Medicaid. You can see if you are eligible by reviewing the information available at lifelinesupport.org (see "Do I Qualify?").”5 School districts can support their families in enrolling for the Lifeline Discount program by helping them fill out an application online or assisting them by printing and sending through mail (more information here). After completing enrollment they can direct family members (here) to assist them in determining the providers in their area who accept Lifeline discounts. 5 https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/lifeline-support-affordable-communications 4 ISP by county in Texas School districts may wish to reference the information below to direct families to the internet service providers who service their county. Information provided by Connected Nation Texas Amarillo Wireless Mid-Plains Communications Anderson TransWorld Network Corporation CenturyLink Valor Telecommunications of Texas LP DCTexas Internet Atascosa East Texas Broadband Alamo Broadband, Inc. Razer Wireless AT&T Southwest Suddenlink Communications Cascom Valor Telecommunications of Texas LP Charter Communications Inc Zito Media commZoom Andrews Delcom Choice Broadband GVEC.net Net3 ISP Phoenix Broadband Suddenlink Communications Rock Solid Internet & Telephone Valor Telecommunications of Texas LP Rural Texas Broadband Angelina Skybeam AT&T Southwest VTCI Consolidated Communications VTXC Suddenlink Communications ZipLink Internet Valor Telecommunications of Texas LP Austin Aransas AT&T Southwest AT&T Southwest Colorado Valley Communications, Inc. Cable ONE Comcast Charter Communications Inc EBTX Wireless, LLC Gtek Communications En-Touch Systems, Inc. TISD, Inc. Industry I-Net VTXC Particle Communications Archer Skybeam AT&T Southwest Skynet Brazos Communications Texas Broadband Charter Communications Inc theSPECnet, Inc. Comcell Bailey Nextlink Residential West Plains Telecommunications, Inc. Santa Rosa Telephone Coop, Inc. West Texas Rural Telephone Cooperative, Inc. Skybeam Bandera Texhoma Wireless AT&T Southwest TGM Pinnacle Network Solutions Cascom Valor Telecommunications of Texas LP commZoom Armstrong Gtek Communications AMA TechTel Communications HCTC 5 IndianCreekInternet Comcast rNetworks Wireless Broadband Falcon Internet Rock Solid Internet & Telephone Grande Communications Skybeam Gtek Communications Southwest Texas Telephone Company Nextlink Residential West Central Net Skybeam Windstream Communications Kerrville LLC Skynet Bastrop SOS Communications AT&T Southwest Suddenlink Communications CG Communications, Inc. Valor Telecommunications of Texas LP Charter Communications Inc WesternBroadband Colorado Valley Communications, Inc. Bexar Guadalupe Valley Telephone Cooperative Alamo Broadband, Inc. GVEC.net AT&T Southwest Particle Communications Bee Creek Communications, Inc. Skybeam Cascom Skynet Charter Communications Inc SOS Communications Comcast Spry Wireless Inc. commZoom Suddenlink Communications En-Touch Systems, Inc. Texas Broadband Frontier Communications Corporation Texas Wireless Internet Google Fiber Texas, LLC theSPECnet, Inc. Grande Communications VTXC Guadalupe Valley Telephone Cooperative WesternBroadband GVEC.net Baylor Phoenix Broadband Santa Rosa Telephone Coop, Inc. Rock Solid Internet & Telephone Suddenlink Communications Skybeam Valor Telecommunications of Texas LP Vivint Wireless, Inc. Bee VTXC AT&T Southwest ZipLink Internet Charter Communications Inc Blanco Geckointer.net Anvil Communications Gtek Communications Bee Creek Communications, Inc. Gulf Coast WiFi Charter Communications Inc VTXC Frontier Communications Corporation Bell Guadalupe Valley Telephone Cooperative Air Net, LLC Hill Country Wireless & Technology AT&T Southwest Skybeam Centex Web Access Spry Wireless Inc. Central Link Broadband Texas Wireless Internet CenturyLink VGI Technology Charter Communications Inc West Central Net 6 Zeecon Wireless Airplexus Borden Brazos Communications AT&T Southwest BrazosWiFi Basin 2 Way CenturyLink Poka Lambro Telecommunications CEO Technologies TransWorld Network Corporation Comcast Valor Telecommunications of Texas LP En-Touch Systems, Inc. Wes-Tex Telephone Cooperative, Inc. Frontier Communications Corporation Bosque Razer Wireless Air Net, LLC Skybeam AMA TechTel Communications Suddenlink Communications AT&T Southwest Texas Broadband CenturyLink Valor Telecommunications of Texas LP Nextlink Residential Brewster Skybeam AT&T Southwest Texas Windstream Inc. Big Bend Telephone Company Totelcom Communications, LLC Mountain Zone TV Systems Valor Telecommunications of Texas LP TDS Bowie Briscoe Cable ONE Cap Rock Telephone Cooperative Comcast Mid-Plains Communications Suddenlink Communications TransWorld Network Corporation Valor Telecommunications of Texas LP Valor Telecommunications of Texas LP Vyve Broadband Brooks Brazoria Charter Communications Inc AT&T Southwest Riviera Telephone Co. BTEL VTCI
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554
    Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 April 6, 2020 DA 20-385 Jessica J. González Gaurav Laroia Free Press 1025 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 1110 Washington, D.C. 20036 Re: Free Press Emergency Petition for Inquiry Into Broadcast of False Information on COVID-19 Dear Counsel: Free Press has filed, under section 1.41 of the Federal Communications Commission’s rules,1 an emergency petition requesting an investigation into broadcasters that have aired the President of the United States’ statements and press conferences regarding the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) and related commentary by other on-air personalities. The Petition claims that the President and various commentators have made false statements regarding COVID-19, which Commission licensees have broadcast to the public, and which allegedly have caused or will cause substantial public harm.2 Free Press asks the Commission, under its section 309 public interest authority3 and its rules prohibiting broadcast hoaxes,4 to investigate these broadcasts and adopt emergency enforcement guidance “recommending that broadcasters prominently disclose when information they air is false or scientifically suspect.”5 We deny Free Press’s petition. For the reasons explained below, the Petition misconstrues the Commission’s rules and seeks remedies that would dangerously curtail the freedom of the press embodied in the First Amendment. Free Press, an organization purportedly dedicated to empowering diverse journalistic voices, demands the Commission impose significant burdens on broadcasters that are attempting to cover a rapidly evolving international pandemic in real time and punish those that, in its view, have been insufficiently critical of statements made by the President and others.
    [Show full text]
  • Reporting Facts: Free from Fear Or Favour
    Reporting Facts: Free from Fear or Favour PREVIEW OF IN FOCUS REPORT ON WORLD TRENDS IN FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND MEDIA DEVELOPMENT INDEPENDENT MEDIA PLAY AN ESSENTIAL ROLE IN SOCIETIES. They make a vital contribution to achieving sustainable development – including, topically, Sustainable Development Goal 3 that calls for healthy lives and promoting well-being for all. In the context of COVID-19, this is more important than ever. Journalists need editorial independence in order to be professional, ethical and serve the public interest. But today, journalism is under increased threat as a result of public and private sector influence that endangers editorial independence. All over the world, journalists are struggling to stave off pressures and attacks from both external actors and decision-making systems or individuals in their own outlets. By far, the greatest menace to editorial independence in a growing number of countries across the world is media capture, a form of media control that is achieved through systematic steps by governments and powerful interest groups. This capture is through taking over and abusing: • regulatory mechanisms governing the media, • state-owned or state-controlled media operations, • public funds used to finance journalism, and • ownership of privately held news outlets. Such overpowering control of media leads to a shrinking of journalistic autonomy and contaminates the integrity of the news that is available to the public. However, there is push-back, and even more can be done to support editorial independence
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Media in the USA»
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by BSU Digital Library Mass Media In The USA K. Khomtsova, V. Zavatskaya The topic of the research is «Mass media in the USA». It is topical because mass media of the United States are world-known and a lot of people use American mass media, especially internet resources. The subject matter is peculiarities of different types of mass media in the USA. The aim of the survey is to study the types of mass media that are popular in the USA nowadays. To achieve the aim the authors fulfill the following tasks: 1. to define the main types of mass media in the USA; 2. to analyze the popularity of different kinds of mass media in the USA; 3. to mark out the peculiarities of American mass media. The mass media are diversified media technologies that are intended to reach a large audience by mass communication. There are several types of mass media: the broadcast media such as radio, recorded music, film and tel- evision; the print media include newspapers, books and magazines; the out- door media comprise billboards, signs or placards; the digital media include both Internet and mobile mass communication. [4]. In the USA the main types of mass media today are: newspapers; magazines; radio; television; Internet. NEWSPAPERS The history of American newspapers goes back to the 17th century with the publication of the first colonial newspapers. It was James Franklin, Benjamin Franklin’s older brother, who first made a news sheet.
    [Show full text]
  • The Basic Economics of Internet Infrastructure
    Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 34, Number 2—Spring 2020—Pages 192–214 The Basic Economics of Internet Infrastructure Shane Greenstein his internet barely existed in a commercial sense 25 years ago. In the mid- 1990s, when the data packets travelled to users over dial-up, the main internet T traffic consisted of email, file transfer, and a few web applications. For such content, users typically could tolerate delays. Of course, the internet today is a vast and interconnected system of software applications and computing devices, which society uses to exchange information and services to support business, shopping, and leisure. Not only does data traffic for streaming, video, and gaming applications comprise the majority of traffic for internet service providers and reach users primarily through broadband lines, but typically those users would not tolerate delays in these applica- tions (for usage statistics, see Nevo, Turner, and Williams 2016; McManus et al. 2018; Huston 2017). In recent years, the rise of smartphones and Wi-Fi access has supported growth of an enormous range of new businesses in the “sharing economy” (like, Uber, Lyft, and Airbnb), in mobile information services (like, social media, ticketing, and messaging), and in many other applications. More than 80 percent of US households own at least one smartphone, rising from virtually zero in 2007 (available at the Pew Research Center 2019 Mobile Fact Sheet). More than 86 percent of homes with access to broadband internet employ some form of Wi-Fi for accessing applications (Internet and Television Association 2018). It seems likely that standard procedures for GDP accounting underestimate the output of the internet, including the output affiliated with “free” goods and the restructuring of economic activity wrought by changes in the composition of firms who use advertising (for discussion, see Nakamura, Samuels, and Soloveichik ■ Shane Greenstein is the Martin Marshall Professor of Business Administration, Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts.
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Media and the Transformation of American Politics Kristine A
    Marquette Law Review Volume 77 | Issue 2 Article 7 Mass Media and the Transformation of American Politics Kristine A. Oswald Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr Part of the Law Commons Repository Citation Kristine A. Oswald, Mass Media and the Transformation of American Politics, 77 Marq. L. Rev. 385 (2009). Available at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr/vol77/iss2/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marquette Law Review by an authorized administrator of Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MASS MEDIA AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF AMERICAN POLITICS I. INTRODUCTION The importance of the mass media1 in today's society cannot be over- estimated. Especially in the arena of policy-making, the media's influ- ence has helped shape the development of American government. To more fully understand the political decision-making process in this coun- try it is necessary to understand the media's role in the performance of political officials and institutions. The significance of the media's influ- ence was expressed by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn: "The Press has become the greatest power within Western countries, more powerful than the legislature, the executive, and the judiciary. One would then like to ask: '2 By what law has it been elected and to whom is it responsible?" The importance of the media's power and influence can only be fully appreciated through a complete understanding of who or what the media are.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Communication (MC) 1
    Media Communication (MC) 1 MC 235 (WS 235) Women and Media 3(3-0) MEDIA COMMUNICATION (MC) As Needed. Prerequisite: MC 101. A grade of C or better is required for prerequisite courses. The historical and cultural implications of the mass media's portrayal of women and the extent of their media participation from colonial to MC 101 Media and Society (GT-SS3) 3(3-0) contemporary times. Fall, Spring. Corequisite: None. Prerequisite: None. Survey course that examines the historical, sociological, economic, MC 245 Principles of Audio & Video Production 3(3-0) technological, and ethical foundations of mediated communication from Fall, Spring. a social scientific perspective. Prerequisite: MC 101. Corequisite: None. Concepts, skills, and technology needed for recording and production of digital audio and video communication. (Gen Ed: SS, GT-SS3) Corequisite: None. MC 140 Radio Station Operation 1(1-0) MC 251 Sports Writing and Statistics 3(2-3) Fall, Spring. As Needed. Prerequisite: MC 101. Prerequisite: MC 101. An introduction to radio station operation. Students gain practical Study and practical application of sports writing and statistics; emphasis experience operating KTSC 89.5, Colorado State University Pueblo's 8,000 on press box experience at intercollegiate athletic events. watt radio station. Corequisite: None. MC 211 Digital Publishing 3(1-4) MC 301 Editorial Writing 3(3-0) Spring. As Needed. Prerequisite: MC 101. Prerequisites: MC 101. Introduction to publishing and design principles on a desktop computing Study of editorial page management and policy, with emphasis on environment, preparing students for publication design and editing preparation of editorials, columns and critical reviews.
    [Show full text]
  • Five Principles of New Media: Or, Playing Lev Manovich by Madeleine Sorapure
    Five Principles of New Media: Or, Playing Lev Manovich by Madeleine Sorapure Introduction In The Language of New Media, Lev Manovich proposes five “principles of new media”—to be understood “not as absolute laws but rather as general tendencies of a culture undergoing computerization.” The five principles are numerical representation, modularity, automation, variability, and transcoding. I focus on Manovich’s work because I believe it effectively examines the materiality of new media—that is, the influence of the computer’s interface and operations, its logic and ontology, on the production, distribution, and reception of new media. This article offers an interactive explanation and demonstration of the five principles of new media, particularly as they apply to teaching writing, and drawing on work done by students in my Winter 2003 “Writing in New Media” course. Students in the course worked on three projects—two in Photoshop, one in Flash—and they wrote three project reports in which they commented on their own work as well as on theories of new media that we were reading and discussing in class. Text and images are included here with the students’ permission, along with links to some of the Flash projects they composed. The menu to the left allows you to navigate through the article. On all of the screens, you can rollover and/or click on buttons and images to make things happen and to make text visible. Directions at the top of each screen should help you determine how to proceed. 1. Numerical representation Because all new media objects are composed of digital code, they are essentially numerical representations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fastest Isps of 2017 | Pcmag.Com
    9/4/2017 The Fastest ISPs of 2017 | PCMag.com The Fastest ISPs of 2017 What happens when PCMag readers test their internet providers' bandwidth? We nd the fastest. By Eric Grifth June 2, 2017 12:32PM ESTJune 2, 2017 PCMag reviews products independently, but we may earn afliate commissions from buying links on this page. Terms of use. Internet connectivity in the US is a hot-button issue in 2017, thanks to the new FCC chairman performing an about-face on issues like net neutrality, subsidizing access for the poor, and permitting internet service providers (ISPs) to do what they please with your data. None of it bodes well. This comes as the speeds in our tests remain relatively stagnant. Despite cable companies—the major broadband providers in the US—rolling out more and more of the latest high-end modems to customers to increase speeds, and the advent https://www.pcmag.com/article/353936/the-fastest-isps-of-2017 1/21 9/4/2017 The Fastest ISPs of 2017 | PCMag.com of more and more ber-to-the-home (or to-the-premises) coverage in select areas, it's not having much impact, on average. On the world stage, the US isn't even close to the top 10 countries when it comes to average broadband speed. Maybe it's because there is far too much happening on the mergers and acquisitions end of things for domestic ISPs to even pretend to be competitive in ways that matter; you know, the little things, like speed and customer service.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Media Ownership Rules
    Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Media Ownership Rules Updated October 9, 2018 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45338 SUMMARY R45338 Federal Communications Commission (FCC) October 9, 2018 Media Ownership Rules Dana A. Scherer The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) aims, with its broadcast media ownership Specialist in rules, to promote localism and competition by restricting the number of media outlets that a Telecommunications single entity may own or control within a geographic market and, in the case of broadcast Policy television stations, nationwide. In addition, the FCC seeks to encourage diversity, including (1) the diversity of viewpoints, as reflected in the availability of media content reflecting a variety of perspectives; (2) diversity of programming, as indicated by a variety of formats and content; (3) outlet diversity, to ensure the presence of multiple independently owned media outlets within a geographic market; and (4) minority and female ownership of broadcast media outlets. Two FCC media ownership rules have proven particularly controversial. Its national media ownership rule prohibits any entity from owning commercial television stations that reach more than 39% of U.S. households nationwide. Its “UHF discount” rule discounts by half the reach of a station broadcasting in the Ultra-High Frequency (UHF) band for the purpose of applying the national media ownership rule. In December 2017, the commission opened a rulemaking proceeding, seeking comments about whether it should modify or repeal the two rules. If the FCC retains the UHF discount, even if it maintains the 39% cap, a single entity could potentially reach 78% of U.S. households through its ownership of broadcast television stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution to Approve RCN/Starpower Transfer Cable
    Committee: Directly to Council AGENDA ITEM 4C Committee Review: N/A April 27, 2021 Staff: Robert H. Drummer, Senior Legislative Attorney Introduction/Action Montgomery Purpose: Final action – vote expected County Council Keywords: # SUBJECT RCN/Starpower Transfer of control of cable franchise to Stonepeak Associates IV, LLC Lead Sponsors: Council President at the request of the County Executive EXPECTED ATTENDEES None COUNCIL DECISION POINTS & COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION • To introduce Franchise Agreement followed by Action – Council vote expected DESCRIPTION/ISSUE Resolution to approve the transfer a cable franchise from the current franchisee, Starpower Communications, LLC (doing business as RCN) to Stonepeak Associates IV, LLC. SUMMARY OF KEY DISCUSSION POINTS This report contains: This packet includes: Circle Draft resolution ©1 Executive transmittal memorandum ©2 Form 394 ©7 Transfer agreement ©80 Warranty ©92 Cable Office report ©96 F:\LAW\Resolutions\Franchise Agreements\RCN-Starpower Transfer Of Control Approval\Intro-Action Cover Sheet.Docx Alternative format requests for people with disabilities. If you need assistance accessing this report you may submit alternative format requests to the ADA Compliance Manager. The ADA Compliance Manager can also be reached at 240-777-6197 (TTY 240-777-6196) or at [email protected] AGENDA ITEM #4C April 27, 2021 Introduction/Action M E M O R A N D U M April 22, 2021 TO: County Council FROM: Robert H. Drummer, Senior Legislative Attorney SUBJECT: Introduction/Action: RCN/Starpower Transfer of control of cable franchise to Stonepeak Associates IV, LLC On April 19, 2021, County Executive Elrich submitted a request to the Council to approve the transfer a cable franchise from the current franchisee, Starpower Communications, LLC (doing business as RCN) to Stonepeak Associates IV, LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • ONN 6 Eng Codelist Only Webversion.Indd
    6-DEVICE UNIVERSAL REMOTE Model: 100020904 CODELIST Need help? We’re here for you every day 7 a.m. – 9 p.m. CST. Give us a call at 1-888-516-2630 Please visit the website “www.onn-support.com” to get more information. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS CODELIST TV 3 STREAM 5 STB 5 AUDIO SOUNDBAR 21 BLURAY DVD 22 2 CODELIST TV TV EQD 2014, 2087, 2277 EQD Auria 2014, 2087, 2277 Acer 4143 ESA 1595, 1963 Admiral 3879 eTec 2397 Affinity 3717, 3870, 3577, Exorvision 3953 3716 Favi 3382 Aiwa 1362 Fisher 1362 Akai 1675 Fluid 2964 Akura 1687 Fujimaro 1687 AOC 3720, 2691, 1365, Funai 1595, 1864, 1394, 2014, 2087 1963 Apex Digital 2397, 4347, 4350 Furrion 3332, 4093 Ario 2397 Gateway 1755, 1756 Asus 3340 GE 1447 Asustek 3340 General Electric 1447 Atvio 3638, 3636, 3879 GFM 1886, 1963, 1864 Atyme 2746 GPX 3980, 3977 Audiosonic 1675 Haier 2309, 1749, 1748, Audiovox 1564, 1276, 1769, 3382, 1753, 3429, 2121 2293, 4398, 2214 Auria 4748, 2087, 2014, Hannspree 1348, 2786 2277 Hisense 3519, 4740, 4618, Avera 2397, 2049 2183, 5185, 1660, Avol 2735, 4367, 3382, 3382, 4398 3118, 1709 Hitachi 1643, 4398, 5102, Axen 1709 4455, 3382, 0679 Axess 3593 Hiteker 3118 BenQ 1756 HKPro 3879, 2434 Blu:sens 2735 Hyundai 4618 Bolva 2397 iLo 1463, 1394 Broksonic 1892 Insignia 2049, 1780, 4487, Calypso 4748 3227, 1564, 1641, Champion 1362 2184, 1892, 1423, Changhong 4629 1660, 1963, 1463 Coby 3627 iSymphony 3382, 3429, 3118, Commercial Solutions 1447 3094 Conia 1687 JVC 1774, 1601, 3393, Contex 4053, 4280 2321, 2271, 4107, Craig 3423 4398, 5182, 4105, Crosley 3115 4053, 1670, 1892, Curtis
    [Show full text]
  • The Federal Communications Commission and Its Deregulation of Media: Encouraging Innovation Or Inhibiting Democracy?
    THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND ITS DEREGULATION OF MEDIA: ENCOURAGING INNOVATION OR INHIBITING DEMOCRACY? ABSTRACT Every text we send, Netflix show we binge, football game we watch on cable programming, or radio news report we listen to is monitored, either directly or indirectly, by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). During the twentieth century, the FCC started to relax its regulatory standards, and this deregulatory trend has continued into the twenty-first century. Currently, U.S. media is owned by only a handful of companies, controlling the majority of what Americans read, watch, or listen to. This Note explores the regulatory role of the FCC, its deregulatory trend, and the ramifications of that deregulation. Lastly, this Note discusses alternatives to the current FCC regulatory method and recommends a regulatory solution to discourage continued media consolidation. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ......................................................................................... 1037 II. Federal Communications Commission and Its Regulatory Role ....................................................................................................... 1039 III. FCC Regulation to Deregulation ...................................................... 1041 IV. Proponents and Opponents of Deregulation ................................... 1043 V. Current Deregulation ......................................................................... 1044 VI. Proposals to Improve FCC Regulation ...........................................
    [Show full text]