DOCSLIB.ORG

1996 006.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1996 006.Pdf !I Acknowledgements of this repert. Thanks.are due many people .. who have made possible and corrtributed to the production Foremost among these are Shyam Bajirnaya and Brian Peniston, Co-Managers of the Makalu-Barun Conservation Proj ect, for approval of the reporting proposal and their inputs regarding content. Shyam Bajimaya, Brian Peniston, Phil Hall and Carol Inskipp reviewed a draft of this report and provided a variety ofhelpful comments. The report has been enhanced by section maps, meticulously produced by Ramesh Shrestha. Design and layout in Kathmandu were kindly assisted by Anil Shrestha, Azad Shrestha and Suresh Shrestha of • Fonnat Graphic Studio and Patricia Roberts. The author is grateful to Dr. Tirtha M. Maskey, Director General, DNPWC, for facilitating liaison • with Department staff and local officials in the course of treks to assess the Park and adjacent I areas, and for his insight on the needs and priorities of the current management program. At the I local level, Sailendra Pokaril of the Khandbari office and Chandi Chap again at the Bung Sector • office were especially helpful, providing information on project objectives, activities and progress in the Bung and Chheskam areas. • Tip and Top Trekking (P) Ltd., Thamel, Kathmandu is warmly thanked for timely arrangement of • trekking and climbing permits, and infonnation on routes and logistics. The treks would have not been possible without the unstinting efforts of my field assistants: Dirga Shankar Rai, Chundak Sherpa, Lakhpa Sherpa, Shanta Kumar Tamang, Bhimle Bahadur Tamang, • and Tirendra Yakha. Their steadfastness, good cheer, and resourcefulness added greatly to the success and enjoyment of travel in remote areas, often under difficult conditions. Additional thanks are extended to Dirga for his assistance with data collation, and to Laxmi Basnet for assistance with • preparation of appendices. H.S. 'Kazi' Nepali and Tim and Carol Inskipp provided valuable help with identification of several • bird species. Their hospitality, support and encouragement are graciously remembered. The Inskipps and Hem Sagar Baral kindly reviewed and helped improve the bird enumeration. Tej Kumar Shrestha, I Associate Professor, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Rodney Jackson, H.S. Nepali and Phil Hall i provided comments related to mammal sightings. I The author also gratefully acknowledges the many local people who contributed their knowledge I of fauna, flora and ecology in the regions visited. Lauri Sherpa of Num, Rinzing Sherpa and other I grazers of Shersong, the settlers of Tangnag, and residents of Tashigaon deserve particular mention. Sagarmatha Pollution Control Committee (SPCC) personnel contributed information on land use I in the Lukla area., and took time to discuss at length their plans and activities in adjoining I Sagarmatha National Park. ! I Thanks are also expressed to M. S. and Suraksya Bania (owners), Gokul Lamichhane (manager), and other staff of Kathmandu Lodge, Pyaphal Tole, Kathmandu, for their hospitality and provision I of logistical and communications support. I I I Table of Contents 11 I' 11 i 1 Page Introduction 1 I 1. Area 1: Hinkhu Khola watershed from Zattara Danda to Mera Peak 5 11 (19-25 April 1995 and 7-13 November 1996) :11 ,I ,",. 1.1 Route and logistics 5 1.2 Habitat types and condition la ill ! 1.3 W:tldlife observations 11 1.4 Human interactions and impact 12 1.5 Management considerations 15 1.5.1 Stakeholders 16 1.5.2 Principal issues 17 ,I Recommendations 19 'I 1 1.5.3 11 I 2. Area 2: Hongu Khola from Amphu Lapcha to Guidel 21 I , (25 April-la May 1995 and 4-7 November 1996) 2.1. Rou:re and logistics 21 " 2.2 Habitat types and condition 29 2.2.1 Upper Hongu 29 2.2.2 Middle Hongu 31 2.3 W:tldlife observations 33 2.3.1 Upper Hongu 33 2.3.1 Middle Hongu 34 2.4 Human interactions and impact 35 2.4.1 Upper Hongu 35 2.4.2 Middle Hongu 37 2.5 Management considerations 38 2.5.1 Upper Hongu 38 2.5.2 Middle Hongu 42 3. Area 3: Sanu and Irkhuwa Kholas from Guidel to Khandbari 43 (10-17 May 1995) 3.1 Route and logistics 43 3.2 Habitat types and condition 45 3.3 W:tldlife observations 47 3.4 Human interactions and impact 48 3.5 Management considerations 49 ------- ---'-"" - --------_. __ ._ ... _-_._ .. - .------.-.--~ J 4. Area 4: Kasuwa Khola from the Arun River to Shipton La 52 .'- (25-28 May and 10-16 June 1995) . ~i 4.l. Route and logistics 52 4.2 Habitat types and condition 55 4.3 Wildlife observations 55 4.4 Human interactions and impact 56 4.4 Management considerations 57 5. Area 5: The Upper Barun River from Shipton La to Pe~k 6160m 59 (28 May - 11 June 1995) 5.l. Route and logistics 59 5.2 Habitat types and condition 63 5.3 Wildlife observations 65 5.4 Human interactions 66 5.4.1 Mountaineering 66 5.4.2 Trekking 68 5.4.3 Grazing 68 5.4.4 Timber extraction 69 5.4.5 Cultivation 69 5.5 Management considerations 69 5.5.1 Trekking and mountaineering 69 5.5.2 Timber extraction 73 55.3 Cultivation 73 6. Area 6: The Upper Arun River N of Khandbari to Ghari 75 (21-25 May and 16-21 June 1995) .. 6.1 Route and logistics 75 6.2 Habitat types and condition 75 .. 6.3 Wildlife observations 77 6.4 Human interactions 77 6.5 Management considerations 78 • Literature Cited 79 iI Appendix A: List ofbirds recorded in Makalu-Barun National Park 82 and peripheral areas. • Appendix B: Enumeration ofthe birds ofMakalu-BarunNational Park 87 and Buffer Zone. • Appendix C: List ofmammals observed in Makalu-Barun National Park 102 and peripheral areas. 11 Appendix D: Itineraries 103 • • Introduction Background. This report has been prepared as a supplemental publication for the current cooperative project implemented by the Department of National Parks and W:t1dlife Conservation (DNPWC), His Majesty's Govem.mentofNepal (HMG), in collaboration witfrThe Mountainlnstitute; West Vrrginia, USA (TMI). The aim of the Makalu-Banm Conservation Project (MRCP) is to design and establish a management program based on integrated conservation and development of the unique biodiversity in Makalu-Banm National Park and Buffer Zone (MRNPBZ). Since inception in 1988 MBCP activities have emphasized a comrnuoity-oriented approach to conserving the biota of the area Formal protection for the Makalu-Barun area was initially proposed in the late 1980s following the studies of a two-year Task Force composed mainly of Nepalese scientists. In November 1991 a 2,330 sq km National Park bufferred by an 830 sq km Conservation Area (CA) was gazetted (Figure 1). The CA was re-gazetted as a Buffer Zone in Februaty 1999. MBNPBZ is bordered by 1,148 sq km Sagarmatha National Park in the NW, and the ca. 35,000 sq km Qomolongma Nature Preserve.in Tibet. Taken together the 1bree contiguous areas comprise the second largest nature reserve in the Asia-Pacific region. ~ ~~ .. y········_···r·_·····_···r····_·_·r··_··-····l···_···-···r-·_·····r-··_··-r---·····i I -I : . i . 1 • t---- -......... -. -~.-- .-... -..... j.--_. -.... -., .. ~ .. -.. --•.. ·····i····-......... + i ~ : : . : ;: i · .................. ,.. ........ I?,.~: ....~ ....."---- ..... ,. ... ,,! .. ~. ··i !_-.... -..... ".. ,;:~~ ...... i . \ ··t:·······'···I·:;7-l·:::········1 'Zl42' ~ ... -.--.. -------l-.------ .. --..... --.;.,.. -..,,. •.•• "'.";; •..• ''''.. - .--I(---...- •. .. -...... - ... -.. -.. .... -- .... -- .. .. -.......... ----...... i ----~- ---~~---- ~ • , i , .. I • • : 1 1 : 1 • I ~. '1 1 / ~ · . ~ .......... __ .. __ .... ____ ~ ________ .. _........... ..:. .. _ .. __ .... _............ ! .......................... _......... ~ .. _............... _............... ; .................. _____ .... ,: ........................... _..!.. ,. __ ...... __ ..... _...... J.. 87 8730' Figure 1: Makalu Barun National Park and Buffer Zone showing river systems: 1. Barun, 2. Kasuwa, 3.lshuwa, 4. Apsuwa, 5. Sankhuwa, 6. Hongu, 7. Hinkhu, 8.Ir1<hhuwa 1-, , I Makalu-Barun National Park contains only one permanent human settlemen~ the small village of Saisima in the NE, but approximately ]2,000 people inhabit the BZ. Diverse ethnic groups ofRais, Sherpas and Shigsawas (Bhotias) populate arable land in the lower reaches of all river valleys below the cloudline (ca. 2400 m). Soils on these slopes tend to be poor and insufficient for subsistence fanning. Consequently, grassland for grazing and forest products at higher elevations (e.g., fodder, herbs, honey, bamboo) are exploited to meet basic dietaIy needs, aIJd for small but cmcia1 amounts, of income. Due to the remoteness and isolation of these communities, development of market economies has been seriously impeded MBCP , therefore prioritizes establishment of eco-enrerprises to both assist community development and alleviate " ;1 , the pressure of unsustainable utilization on proximate habitats. Thus far this novel approach is showing ", i promise with enhanced production and marketing of allo cloth (made from nettles Girardinia '" diversifolia), lokta paper (from the inner bark fibers of Daphne bholua shrubs) and woven handicrafts !' , (from ningalo and malingo bamboos Arundinaria spp.). MBCP also supports cultural preservation , " by assisting monkshood studies, local language programs, and the restoration of gomba(s) (monasteries) :," and shrines (Anon. 1993). il Nearly the entire spectrum ofbiomes found in the Himalayan ecosystem occms in MBNPBZ, from tropical and subtropical forest associations in lower valleys of the BZ at confluences with the Anm River (as low as 330 m), to TIbetan steppe and the aeolian zone of the Kumbhakama Himal in the upper Baron Khola, i and as high as 8475 m at the summit ofMakalu, the world's fifth highest mountain - a staggering altitudinal variation of more than 8000 m. At least 3000 species of flowering plants, including 25 species of il rhododendron Rhododendron spp., 12 species of poppies Mecanopsis spp., 48 species of primulas Primu1aceae, 47 orchid species, about 75 mammals, 30 reptiles and 25 amphibians have been recorded from the area (Majpuria and Kumar 1998). 349 species of birds have been recorded thus far (see Appendix B), and the total is likely to exceed 400 species once low altitude forest residents, seasonal I I I I .' _: I Figure 2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Feather Mites of the Genus Proterothrix Gaud (Astigmata: Proctophyllodidae) from Parrotbills (Passeriformes: Paradoxornithidae) in China
    J. Parasitol., 95(5), 2009, pp. 1093–1107 F American Society of Parasitologists 2009 FEATHER MITES OF THE GENUS PROTEROTHRIX GAUD (ASTIGMATA: PROCTOPHYLLODIDAE) FROM PARROTBILLS (PASSERIFORMES: PARADOXORNITHIDAE) IN CHINA S. V. Mironov andH. C. Proctor *À Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Quay 1, 199034, Saint Petersburg, Russia. e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: Three new species of the feather mite genus Proterothrix Gaud, 1968 (Proctophyllodidae: Pterodectinae) are reported from parrotbills (Passeriformes: Paradoxornithidae) in China. We describe Proterothrix paradoxornis n. sp. from Paradoxornis webbianus (type host) and Par. alphonsianus, P. longicaula n. sp. from Par. gularis, and P. sarahbushae n. sp. from Par. verreauxi (type host) and Par. alphonsianus. These are the first records of mites of the Pterodectinae from the Paradoxornithidae. Within Proterothrix, the new species constitutes a distinct complex, characterized by the presence of a long, whip-like aedeagus and spindle-shaped setae e on tarsi I in males. The diversity of feather mites (Acari: Astigmata: Analgoidea, In general morphological appearance, Proterothrix spp. repre- Pterolichoidea) on their avian hosts has been moderately well sent typical pterodectines, being characterized by a strongly surveyed for some non-passerine orders such as the parrots, elongated and narrow body, with a slightly convex and Psittaciformes (e.g., Dabert et al., 2008); however, many lineages extensively sclerotized dorsal side. As for most other pterodec- within the most species-rich order, the Passeriformes, remain tines, they occupy interbarb ‘‘corridors’’ on the ventral surface of almost unexplored. Among these are the parrotbills, an enigmatic vanes of the primary and secondary flight feathers of their host.
    [Show full text]
  • Cacomantis Merulinus) Nestlings and Their Common Tailorbird (Orthotomus Sutorius) Hosts Odd Helge Tunheim1, Bård G
    Tunheim et al. Avian Res (2019) 10:5 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-019-0143-z Avian Research RESEARCH Open Access Development and behavior of Plaintive Cuckoo (Cacomantis merulinus) nestlings and their Common Tailorbird (Orthotomus sutorius) hosts Odd Helge Tunheim1, Bård G. Stokke1,2, Longwu Wang3, Canchao Yang4, Aiwu Jiang5, Wei Liang4, Eivin Røskaft1 and Frode Fossøy1,2* Abstract Background: Our knowledge of avian brood parasitism is primarily based on studies of a few selected species. Recently, researchers have targeted a wider range of host–parasite systems, which has allowed further evaluation of hypotheses derived from well-known study systems but also disclosed adaptations that were previously unknown. Here we present developmental and behavioral data on the previously undescribed Plaintive Cuckoo (Cacomantis merulinus) nestling and one of its hosts, the Common Tailorbird (Orthotomus sutorius). Methods: We discovered more than 80 Common Tailorbird nests within an area of 25 km2, and we recorded nestling characteristics, body mass, tarsus length and begging display every 3 days for both species. Results: Plaintive Cuckoo nestlings followed a developmental pathway that was relatively similar to that of their well-studied relative, the Common Cuckoo (Cuculus canorus). Tailorbird foster siblings were evicted from the nest rim. The cuckoo nestlings gained weight faster than host nestlings, and required 3–9 days longer time to fedge than host nestlings. Predation was high during the early stages of development, but the nestlings acquired a warning display around 11 days in the nest, after which none of the studied cuckoo nestlings were depredated. The cuckoos’ begging display, which appeared more intense than that of host nestlings, was initially vocally similar with that of the host nestlings but began to diverge from the host sound output after day 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Diversity in Northern Myanmar and Conservation Implications
    ZOOLOGICAL RESEARCH Bird diversity in northern Myanmar and conservation implications Ming-Xia Zhang1,2, Myint Kyaw3, Guo-Gang Li1,2, Jiang-Bo Zhao4, Xiang-Le Zeng5, Kyaw Swa3, Rui-Chang Quan1,2,* 1 Southeast Asia Biodiversity Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yezin Nay Pyi Taw 05282, Myanmar 2 Center for Integrative Conservation, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla Yunnan 666303, China 3 Hponkan Razi Wildlife Sanctuary Offices, Putao Kachin 01051, Myanmar 4 Science Communication and Training Department, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla Yunnan 666303, China 5 Yingjiang Bird Watching Society, Yingjiang Yunnan 679300, China ABSTRACT Since the 1990s, several bird surveys had been carried out in the Putao area (Rappole et al, 2011). Under the leadership of We conducted four bird biodiversity surveys in the the Nature and Wildlife Conservation Division (NWCD) of the Putao area of northern Myanmar from 2015 to 2017. Myanmar Forestry Ministry, two expeditions were launched in Combined with anecdotal information collected 1997–1998 (Aung & Oo, 1999) and 2001–2009 (Rappole et al., between 2012 and 2015, we recorded 319 bird 2011), providing the most detailed inventory of local avian species, including two species (Arborophila mandellii diversity thus far. 1 and Lanius sphenocercus) previously unrecorded in Between December 2015 and May 2017, the Southeast Asia Myanmar. Bulbuls (Pycnonotidae), babblers (Timaliidae), Biodiversity Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences pigeons and doves (Columbidae), and pheasants (CAS-SEABRI), Forest Research Institute (FRI) of Myanmar, and partridges (Phasianidae) were the most Hponkan Razi Wildlife Sanctuary (HPWS), and Hkakabo Razi abundant groups of birds recorded.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Birds and Birding
    AN INTRODUCTION TO BIRDS AND BIRDWATCHING Illustration: Rohan Chakravarty Bird Count India www.birdcount.in [email protected] PART- I ABOUT INDIAN BIRDS From small to large Photos: Garima Bhatia / Rajiv Lather From common to rare Photos: Nirav Bhatt / Navendu Lad From nondescript to magnificent Photos: Mohanram Kemparaju / Rajiv Lather And from deserts to dense forests Photos: Clement Francis / Ramki Sreenivasan India is home to over 1200 species of birds! Photos: Dr. Asad Rahmani, Nikhil Devasar, Dhritiman Mukherjee, Ramana Athreya, Judd Patterson Birds in Indian Culture and Mythology Source: wikipedia.org Photo: Alex Loinaz Garuda, the vahana of Lord Vishnu is thought to be a Brahminy Kite Birds in Indian Culture and Mythology Source: wikipedia.org Jatayu, sacrificed himself to rescue Sita from being kidnapped by Ravana. He was thought to be a vulture. Birds in Indian Culture and Mythology Photo: Nayan Khanolkar Photo: Kalyan Varma Sarus Cranes have a strong cultural significance in North India for their fidelity while hornbills find mention in the traditional folklore of the tribes of Arunachal Pradesh. Bird behaviour: Foraging Illustration: Aranya Pathak Broome Bird behaviour: Foraging Photos: Mike Ross, Josep del Hoyo, Pat Bonish, Shreeram M.V Bird behaviour: Migration Photos: Arthur Morris / Dubi Shapiro | Maps: Greenland Institute of Natural Resources and R. Suresh Kumar Bird behaviour: Songs Recordings: Pronoy Baidya / Neils Poul Dreyer Threats to birds Photos: www.conservationindia.org Cartoon: Rohan Chakravarty What is
    [Show full text]
  • Passeriformes: Cisticolidae: Orthotomus) from the Mekong Floodplain of Cambodia
    FORKTAIL 29 (2013): 1–14 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F1778491-B6EE-4225-95B2-2843B32CBA08 A new species of lowland tailorbird (Passeriformes: Cisticolidae: Orthotomus) from the Mekong floodplain of Cambodia S. P. MAHOOD, A. J. I. JOHN, J. C. EAMES, C. H. OLIVEROS, R. G. MOYLE, HONG CHAMNAN, C. M. POOLE, H. NIELSEN & F. H. SHELDON Based on distinctive morphological and vocal characters we describe a new species of lowland tailorbird Orthotomus from dense humid lowland scrub in the floodplain of the Mekong, Tonle Sap and Bassac rivers of Cambodia. Genetic data place it in the O. atrogularis–O. ruficeps–O. sepium clade. All data suggest that the new species is most closely related to O. atrogularis, from which genetic differences are apparently of a level usually associated with subspecies. However the two taxa behave as biological species, existing locally in sympatry and even exceptionally in syntopy, without apparent hybridisation. The species is known so far from a small area within which its habitat is declining in area and quality. However, although birds are found in a number of small habitat fragments (including within the city limits of Phnom Penh), most individuals probably occupy one large contiguous area of habitat in the Tonle Sap floodplain. We therefore recommend it is classified as Near Threatened on the IUCN Red List. The new species is abundant in suitable habitat within its small range. Further work is required to understand more clearly the distribution and ecology of this species and in particular its evolutionary relationship with O. atrogularis. INTRODUCTION and its major tributaries (Duckworth et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    OPEN ACCESS The Journal of Threatened Taxa fs dedfcated to bufldfng evfdence for conservafon globally by publfshfng peer-revfewed arfcles onlfne every month at a reasonably rapfd rate at www.threatenedtaxa.org . All arfcles publfshed fn JoTT are regfstered under Creafve Commons Atrfbufon 4.0 Internafonal Lfcense unless otherwfse menfoned. JoTT allows unrestrfcted use of arfcles fn any medfum, reproducfon, and dfstrfbufon by provfdfng adequate credft to the authors and the source of publfcafon. Journal of Threatened Taxa Bufldfng evfdence for conservafon globally www.threatenedtaxa.org ISSN 0974-7907 (Onlfne) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Prfnt) Revfew Nepal’s Natfonal Red Lfst of Bfrds Carol Inskfpp, Hem Sagar Baral, Tfm Inskfpp, Ambfka Prasad Khafwada, Monsoon Pokharel Khafwada, Laxman Prasad Poudyal & Rajan Amfn 26 January 2017 | Vol. 9| No. 1 | Pp. 9700–9722 10.11609/jot. 2855 .9.1. 9700-9722 For Focus, Scope, Afms, Polfcfes and Gufdelfnes vfsft htp://threatenedtaxa.org/About_JoTT.asp For Arfcle Submfssfon Gufdelfnes vfsft htp://threatenedtaxa.org/Submfssfon_Gufdelfnes.asp For Polfcfes agafnst Scfenffc Mfsconduct vfsft htp://threatenedtaxa.org/JoTT_Polfcy_agafnst_Scfenffc_Mfsconduct.asp For reprfnts contact <[email protected]> Publfsher/Host Partner Threatened Taxa Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 January 2017 | 9(1): 9700–9722 Revfew Nepal’s Natfonal Red Lfst of Bfrds Carol Inskfpp 1 , Hem Sagar Baral 2 , Tfm Inskfpp 3 , Ambfka Prasad Khafwada 4 , 5 6 7 ISSN 0974-7907 (Onlfne) Monsoon Pokharel Khafwada , Laxman Prasad
    [Show full text]
  • Field Report on the Preliminary Feasibility Study
    Field report on the Preliminary Feasibility Study On Walking Trees along Lifezone Ecotones in Barun Valley, Nepal (A pilot project to develop key indicators for monitoring Biomeridians - Climate Response through Information & Local Engagement) Report Prepared By: The East Foundation (TEF), Sankhuwasabha, Nepal and Future Generations University, Franklin, WV, USA Submitted to Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation Babar Mahal, Kathmandu June 2018 1 Table of Contents Contents Page No. 1. Background ........................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Rationale ............................................................................................................................................... 5 3. Study Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Contextual Framework ...................................................................................................................... 7 3.2 Study Area Description ..................................................................................................................... 9 3.3 Experimental Design and Data Collection Methodology ............................................................... 12 4. Study Findings .................................................................................................................................... 13 4.1 Geographic Summary
    [Show full text]
  • Sichuan, China
    Tropical Birding: Sichuan (China). Custom Tour Report A Tropical Birding custom tour SICHUAN, CHINA : (Including the Southern Shans Pre-tour Extension) WHITE-THROATED TIT One of 5 endemic tits recorded on the tour. 21 May – 12 June, 2010 Tour Leader: Sam Woods All photos were taken by Sam Woods/Tropical Birding on this tour, except one photo. www.tropicalbirding.com [email protected] 1-409-515-0514 Tropical Birding: Sichuan (China). Custom Trip Report The Central Chinese province of Sichuan provided some notable challenges this year: still recovering from the catastrophic “Wenchuan 5.12” earthquake of 2008, the area is undergoing massive reconstruction. All very positive for the future of this scenically extraordinary Chinese region, but often a headache for tour arrangements, due to last minute traffic controls leading us to regularly rethink our itinerary in the Wolong area in particular, that was not far from the epicenter of that massive quake. Even in areas seemingly unaffected by the quake, huge road construction projects created similar challenges to achieving our original planned itinerary. However, in spite of regular shuffling and rethinking, the itinerary went ahead pretty much as planned with ALL sites visited. Other challenges came this year in the form of heavy regular rains that plagued us at Wawu Shan and low cloud that limited visibility during our time around the breathtaking Balang Mountain in the Wolong region. With some careful trickery, sneaking our way through week-long road blocks under cover of darkness, birding through thick and thin (mist, cloud and rains) we fought against all such challenges and came out on top.
    [Show full text]
  • Vermilion Flycatcher
    THE QUARTERLY NEWS MAGAZINE OF TUCSON AUDUBON SOCIETY | TUCSONAUDUBON.ORG VermFLYCATCHERilion July–September 2014 | Volume 59, Number 3 Birding Economics Patagonia’s Ecotourism ● Tucson Bird & Wildlife Festival What’s in a Name: Vermilion Flycatcher ● Southeastern Arizona’s Summer Sparrows Features THE QUARTERLY NEWS MAGAZINE OF TUCSON AUDUBON SOCIETY | TUCSONAUDUBON.ORG 12 What’s in a Name: Vermilion Flycatcher VermFLYCATCHERilion 13 Southeastern Arizona’s Summer July–September 2014 | Volume 59, Number 3 Sparrows 14 Hold That Note Tucson Audubon promotes the protection and stewardship of southern Arizona’s biological diversity 15 Another Important Step in Patagonia’s through the study and enjoyment of birds and the Ecotourism Efforts places they live. Founded in 1949, Tucson Audubon is southern Arizona’s leading non-profit engaging people 16 It’s the Fourth! in the conservation of birds and their habitats. 17 The Grass is Always Greener in Southeastern Arizona? Tucson Audubon Society 300 E. University Blvd. #120, Tucson, AZ 85705 629-0510 (voice) or 623-3476 (fax) Departments All phone numbers are area code 520 unless otherwise stated. tucsonaudubon.org 4 Events and Classes Birding Economics 5 Events Calendar Tucson Bird & Wildlife Festival ● Patagonia’s Ecotourism Board Officers & Directors SEAZ’s Summer Sparrows ● What’s in a Name: Vermilion Flycatcher President Cynthia Pruett 5 Living with Nature Lecture Series Vice President Bob Hernbrode Secretary Ruth Russell 6 News Roundup FRONT COVER: Sulphur-bellied Flycatcher in Ramsey Treasurer Richard Carlson 18 Conservation and Education News Directors at Large Matt Bailey, Ardeth Barnhart, Canyon by Muriel Neddermeyer. Muriel is a marketing Gavin Bieber, Les Corey, Edward Curley, Jennie Duberstein, 24 Birding Travel from Our Business Partners professional and mother of two teenagers.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics of Zoothera Thrushes, and a Synthesis of True Thrush Molecular Systematic Relationships
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 49 (2008) 377–381 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Short Communication Systematics of Zoothera thrushes, and a synthesis of true thrush molecular systematic relationships Gary Voelker a,*, John Klicka b a Department of Biology, University of Memphis, 3700 Walker Avenue, Memphis, TN 38152, USA b Barrick Museum of Natural History, Box 454012, University of Nevada Las Vegas, 4504 Maryland Parkway, Las Vegas, NV 89154-4012, USA 1. Introduction Questions regarding inter-specific relationships remain within both Catharus and Myadestes. At the inter-generic level, Klicka The true thrushes (Turdinae; Sibley and Monroe, 1990) are a et al. (2005) conducted analyses of true thrush relationships, using speciose lineage of songbirds, with a near-cosmopolitan distribu- the Sialia–Myadestes–Neocossyphus clade (hereafter referred to as tion. Following the systematic placement of true thrushes as a the ‘‘Sialia clade”) as the outgroup. While clearly a true thrush line- close relative of Old World flycatchers and chats (Muscicapinae) age, the Sialia clade is very divergent from other true thrush lin- by the DNA–DNA hybridization work of Sibley and Ahlquist eages. Homoplasy caused by the use of this divergent clade as a (1990), a number of molecular systematic studies have focused root could explain at least some of the as yet unresolved inter-gen- on various aspects of true thrush relationships. These studies have eric relationships within true thrushes. included phylogenetic assessments of genera membership in true Our main objective in this study is to use dense taxon sampling thrushes, assessments of relationships among and within true across true thrushes to resolve inter- and intra-generic relation- thrush genera, and the recognition of ‘‘new” species (Bowie et al., ships that remain unclear.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment and Conservation of Threatened Bird Species at Laojunshan, Sichuan, China
    CLP Report Assessment and conservation of threatened bird species at Laojunshan, Sichuan, China Submitted by Jie Wang Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P.R.China E-mail:[email protected] To Conservation Leadership Programme, UK Contents 1. Summary 2. Study area 3. Avian fauna and conservation status of threatened bird species 4. Habitat analysis 5. Ecological assessment and community education 6. Outputs 7. Main references 8. Acknowledgements 1. Summary Laojunshan Nature Reserve is located at Yibin city, Sichuan province, south China. It belongs to eastern part of Liangshan mountains and is among the twenty-five hotspots of global biodiversity conservation. The local virgin alpine subtropical deciduous forests are abundant, which are actually rare at the same latitudes and harbor a tremendous diversity of plant and animal species. It is listed as a Global 200 ecoregion (WWF), an Important Bird Area (No. CN205), and an Endemic Bird Area (No. D14) (Stattersfield, et al . 1998). However, as a nature reserve newly built in 1999, it is only county-level and has no financial support from the central government. Especially, it is quite lack of scientific research, for example, the avifauna still remains unexplored except for some observations from bird watchers. Furthermore, the local community is extremely poor and facing modern development pressures, unmanaged human activities might seriously disturb the local ecosystem. We conducted our project from April to June 2007, funded by Conservation Leadership Programme. Two fieldwork strategies were used: “En bloc-Assessment” to produce an avifauna census and ecological assessments; "Special Survey" to assess the conservation status of some threatened endemic bird species.
    [Show full text]