DOCSLIB.ORG

Dino Boccaletti a Historical Journey from Homer to Artificial Satellites

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dino Boccaletti a Historical Journey from Homer to Artificial Satellites Dino Boccaletti The Shape and Size of the Earth A Historical Journey from Homer to Artificial Satellites The Shape and Size of the Earth Dino Boccaletti The Shape and Size of the Earth A Historical Journey from Homer to Artificial Satellites 123 Dino Boccaletti Rome Italy ISBN 978-3-319-90592-1 ISBN 978-3-319-90593-8 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90593-8 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018941978 © Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Printed on acid-free paper This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer International Publishing AG part of Springer Nature The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland To Ruben and Matilde Preface How an Interest was Born, Developed, and Produced a Book The reader may be intrigued by the genesis of a book such as this. Actually, what stimulated me to think about this subject was another interesting reading. Many years ago, in the first phase of my teaching in the University of Rome “La Sapienza”, I was charged with teaching a course on Institutions of Mathematics to students pursuing a degree in Chemistry. In that occasion, I happened to read a very beautiful book: Mathematical Methods in Science of George Pólya, in which I found this passage: That Eratosthenes’ result is inaccurate does not really detract from the greatness of his achievement. It is his method that excites our admiration. Would not a giant measure the Earth by encircling it with his arms to compare its circumference with his span? And what did our little pygmy Eratosthenes do? At Alexandria at noon on a certain midsummer’s day long ago, he observed the shadow cast by a little stick and used his protractor. A mere shadow and the pygmy a giant who spanned the Earth.1 The reading of this passage, addressed to the measurement of the terrestrial meridian executed by Eratosthenes (in the third century BC), of which until then I had a superficial knowledge, and the appreciation—enthusiastic to say the least— that Pólya attributed to that event, inspired my interest in expanding on the subject, and I started a series of considerations. First of all, I began to think that, through the centuries, the great significance attributed to the Copernican Revolution ended up obscuring another great conquest of the human thought: the sphericity of the Earth. The idea and personal conviction, contrary to the immediate evidence, that the ground on which one was walking was not a roughly flat surface (apart from the mountains!), but was rather the surface of a sphere whose boundaries could not be discerned, was undoubtedly a great con- quest (even if it could not be defined as a revolution). Earlier on, one confused the sphere with the tangent plane! 1 G. Pólya: Mathematical Methods in Science (Washington, 1977). vii viii Preface Pólya’s admiration for Eratosthenes was based on the method he had used: Eratosthenes had, so to speak, measured the terrestrial meridian while seated in his room and using mathematics. From this, the power of mathematics is evident, as was underlined by Eugene Wigner some years before in his celebrated paper “The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences.”2 At the beginning of the paper, Wigner used the rhetorical expedient of narrating the conversation between two old high school classmates, one of whom had become a statistician working in population trends. This one showed to the other a reprint of a publication of his where a Gaussian distribution and also the symbol p appeared. The friend asked: “And what is this symbol here?”“Oh”, said the statistician, “This is pi”. “What is that?” “The ratio of the circumference of the circle to its diameter.”“Well, now you are pushing your joke too far,” said the classmate, “surely the population has nothing to do with the circumference of the circle.” Here, we are at the root of the problem of interpreting nature with the tool of mathematics and of the dual nature of mathematics as both a tool and an inde- pendent science: a problem that is up to us to deal with. We only want to emphasize the maieutic role that some problems presented by nature have had in giving birth to branches of mathematics during history. Of course, as all know, three centuries before Wigner, Galileo (in the Assayer, 1623) had upheld the indispensability of mathematics for interpreting nature. If we want go back further, even Robert Grosseteste (see Sect. 3.5.2) had upheld the same. The second consideration is this: once established that it had been demonstrated that the Earth had a spherical shape since the middle of the third century BC, and that an evaluation of its size had also been proposed, how did the thought on this question evolve in the following centuries? Had the fact that an adequately rigorous answer to such an important question had been given since the third century been sufficient to convince the general opinion? Actually, quoting the result of a dis- covery (or of a theory), such as that of Eratosthenes (as well as those of the philosophers who preceded him), means establishing only its chronological priority, but not the moment when this discovery (or theory) has become part of the cultural heritage of humanity. An investigation of the problem leads to the discovery that the notion of the Earth’s sphericity, which nowadays the children learn since the primary school, took centuries to be universally accepted. As happened with other questions, the Catholic Church also took part in the discussion, which lasted for centuries, together with all the philosophers of the Middle Ages. The debate arose from the conflict between what was written in the Bible and the results of the natural sciences. 2E. Wigner, “The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences”, in Communications in Pure and Applied Mathematics 13(1) 1960: 1–14. Preface ix Obviously, during the centuries, the scientific research evolved, even arriving to the point of stating that the reference figure is no longer a sphere (it has been called a “geoid”) and that, due to its rotation, the shape is oblate (through the disputations and the measurements occurred in the eighteenth century). Through the work of Newton, Clairaut, Maupertuis, Delambre, and others, and through the progress of technology, we have arrived to satellite geodesy. Every stage of these both theo- retical and experimental advancements has constantly involved the development of new mathematical techniques, always reinforcing Wigner’s assertion. Narrating this fascinating story from the beginning reveals more about the evolution of the human thought than only about the evolution of the specific concept of Earth’s sphericity, and is certainly worth the effort. In fact, there are many works which deal with the subject, many of which mainly concern the controversies on the Earth’s ellipsoid shape,3 but the ambition of this present book is that of pointing out how from the very beginning the speculations about the shape and the size of the Earth were not confined to the technology but traversed the evolution of human thought itself. Notice to the Reader Subjects The reader may wonder at not finding certain subjects dealt with when particular authors or particular periods are mentioned. We have set ourselves to cover exclusively what concerns the theories and the experiments on the shape and the size of the Earth and, as said above, their impact on secular society. Thus, for instance, when we dealt with Ptolemy’s Geography and projections therein, we did not seize the opportunity to talk about cartography despite the fact that it was an appealing subject given its relationship with mathematics. Excerpts Except for the Greek philosophers, we have always preferred to supply the text with English translations of works being discussed and report in footnotes the quoted excerpts in their original language. This is done to avoid arbitrary interpretations and variants of tradition in subsequent quotations. We have not always found the chosen Latin excerpts translated into English by competent scholars. In those cases, we have compensated for lack with a translation of our own. Let us hope we have obtained a passable result. Bibliography Every single chapter is equipped with footnotes referencing papers and books quoted. We considered them exhaustive and decided not to weight each chapter down with the usual ad hoc bibliography. We have rather preferred to include a list of suggested readings, often classical textbooks, for a prospective widening of the context.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Water, Air and Fire at Work in Hero's Machines
    Water, air and fire at work in Hero’s machines Amelia Carolina Sparavigna Dipartimento di Fisica, Politecnico di Torino Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, Torino, Italy Known as the Michanikos, Hero of Alexandria is considered the inventor of the world's first steam engine and of many other sophisticated devices. Here we discuss three of them as described in his book “Pneumatica”. These machines, working with water, air and fire, are clear examples of the deep knowledge of fluid dynamics reached by the Hellenistic scientists. Hero of Alexandria, known as the Mechanicos, lived during the first century in the Roman Egypt [1]. He was probably a Greek mathematician and engineer who resided in the city of Alexandria. We know his work from some of writings and designs that have been arrived nowadays in their Greek original or in Arabic translations. From his own writings, it is possible to gather that he knew the works of Archimedes and of Philo the Byzantian, who was a contemporary of Ctesibius [2]. It is almost certain that Heron taught at the Museum, a college for combined philosophy and literary studies and a religious place of cult of Muses, that included the famous Library. For this reason, Hero claimed himself a pupil of Ctesibius, who was probably the first head of the Museum of Alexandria. Most of Hero’s writings appear as lecture notes for courses in mathematics, mechanics, physics and pneumatics [2]. In optics, Hero formulated the Principle of the Shortest Path of Light, principle telling that if a ray of light propagates from a point to another one within the same medium, the followed path is the shortest possible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Blue Marble, Next Generation. This Composite Image of Satellite Data Shows Earth’S Interrelated Atmosphere, Oceans, and Land—Including Human Presence
    The blue marble, next generation. This composite image of satellite data shows Earth’s interrelated atmosphere, oceans, and land—including human presence. Its various layers include the land surface, sea ice, ocean, cloud cover, city lights, and the hazy edge of Earth’s atmosphere. M01_TRUJ3545_12_SE_C01.indd 2 15/12/15 9:43 PM 1 Before you begin reading this chapter, use the glossary at the end of this book to discover the meanings of any of the words in the word cloud Introduction To above you don’t already know.1 Planet “Earth” he oceans2 are the largest and most prominent feature on Earth. In fact, they ESSENTIAL LEARNING CONCEPTS Tare the single most defining feature of our planet. As viewed from space, our planet is a beautiful blue, white, and brown globe (see this chapter’s opening photo). At the end of this chapter, you should be able to: The abundance of liquid water on Earth’s surface is a distinguishing characteristic of our home planet. 1.1 Compare the characteristics of Yet it seems perplexing that our planet is called “Earth” when 70.8% of Earth’s oceans. its surface is covered by oceans. Many early human cultures that lived near the 1.2 Discuss how early exploration of the oceans Mediterranean (medi = middle, terra = land) Sea envisioned the world as being was achieved. composed of large landmasses surrounded by marginal bodies of water. From their 1.3 Explain why oceanography is considered an viewpoint, landmasses—not oceans—dominated the surface of Earth. How sur- interdisciplinary science. prised they must have been when they ventured into the larger oceans of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Far-Reaching Hellenistic Geographical Knowledge Hidden in Ptolemy’S Data
    NISSUNA UMANA INVESTIGAZIONE SI PUO DIMANDARE VERA SCIENZIA S’ESSA NON PASSA PER LE MATEMATICHE DIMOSTRAZIONI LEONARDO DA VINCI vol. 6 no. 3 2018 Mathematics and Mechanics of Complex Systems LUCIO RUSSO FAR-REACHING HELLENISTIC GEOGRAPHICAL KNOWLEDGE HIDDEN IN PTOLEMY’S DATA msp MATHEMATICS AND MECHANICS OF COMPLEX SYSTEMS Vol. 6, No. 3, 2018 dx.doi.org/10.2140/memocs.2018.6.181 ∩ MM FAR-REACHING HELLENISTIC GEOGRAPHICAL KNOWLEDGE HIDDEN IN PTOLEMY’S DATA LUCIO RUSSO The paper summarizes and discusses the main theses exposed in a previous book (L’America dimenticata, Mondadori Università, 2013; in Italian) in light of more recent results. Specifically, the work addresses the problem of explaining the origin of the systematic error on longitudes in Ptolemy’s Geographia and its logical relation with the reduced estimate for the dimension of the Earth given there. The thesis is sustained that, contrary to a frequently advanced conjecture, the shrinking of the dimension of the Earth is a consequence of a scale error in longitudes, which, in turn, was originated by a misidentification of the Islands of the Blessed. The location of the Islands of the Blessed according to the source of Ptolemy is identified in the Caribbean. The analysis of a passage of Pliny provides an independent and quantitative confirmation of the proposed identifi- cation, which sheds new light on possible contact among civilizations. 1. The shrinking of the Earth and the dilation of longitudes in Ptolemy’s Geographia It is well known that Eratosthenes, in the 3rd century BC, measured the circum- ference of the Earth, obtaining the value of 252,000 stadia (corresponding to 700 stadia per degree).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 a Tiny Taste of the History of Mechanics
    Classical Mechanics, Lecture 1 January 8, 2008 John Baez 1 A Tiny Taste of the History of Mechanics These are some incredibly sketchy notes, designed to convey just a tiny bit of the magnificent history of mechanics, from Aristotle to Newton. I've left out huge amounts of important and interesting stuff. Aristarchus of Samos Aristarchus (310 BC - 240 BC) argued that the Earth orbited the Sun. In his book On the Sizes and Distances of the Sun∼ and Moon he calculated the relative distances of the Sun and Moon by noting the angle between the Sun and Moon when the Moon was half full. His logic was correct, but his measurement of the angle was wrong (87 degrees instead of 89.5), so he concluded that the Sun was 20 times farther than the Moon, when it's actually about 390 times farther. Archimedes later wrote: You King Gelon are aware the `universe' is the name given by most astronomers to the sphere the centre of which is the centre of the earth, while its radius is equal to the straight line between the centre of the sun and the centre of the earth. This is the common account as you have heard from astronomers. But Aristarchus has brought out a book consisting of certain hypotheses, wherein it appears, as a consequence of the assumptions made, that the universe is many times greater than the `universe' just mentioned. His hypotheses are that the fixed stars and the sun remain unmoved, that the earth revolves about the sun on the circumference of a circle, the sun lying in the middle of the orbit, and that the sphere of fixed stars, situated about the same centre as the sun, is so great that the circle in which he supposes the earth to revolve bears such a proportion to the distance of the fixed stars as the centre of the sphere bears to its surface.
    [Show full text]
  • ``Mathematics'' and ``Physics'' in the Science of Harmonics
    NISSUNA UMANA INVESTIGAZIONE SI PUO DIMANDARE VERA SCIENZIA S’ESSA NON PASSA PER LE MATEMATICHE DIMOSTRAZIONI LEONARDO DA VINCI vol. 4 no. 3-4 2016 Mathematics and Mechanics of Complex Systems STEFANO ISOLA “MATHEMATICS” AND “PHYSICS” IN THE SCIENCE OF HARMONICS msp MATHEMATICS AND MECHANICS OF COMPLEX SYSTEMS Vol. 4, No. 3-4, 2016 dx.doi.org/10.2140/memocs.2016.4.213 ∩ MM “MATHEMATICS” AND “PHYSICS” IN THE SCIENCE OF HARMONICS STEFANO ISOLA Some aspects of the role that the science of harmonics has played in the history of science are discussed in light of Russo’s investigation of the history of the concepts of “mathematics” and “physics”. 1. The rambling route of the ancient scientific method In several places in Russo’s writings on the history of science, one can find en- lightening discussions about the meanings of the concepts of “physics” and “math- ematics”, along with the particular notions of truth involved in them; see, e.g., [58, Chapter 6.6; 60, Chapter 15; 56; 57]. Both terms derive from the Greek: the original meaning of the former was the investigation of everything that lives, grows or, more generally, comes into existence, whereas the latter referred to all that is studied, thus deriving its meaning not from its content but from its method. In the Hellenistic period, the term “physics” continued to be used to indicate that sector of philosophy that addressed nature (the other sectors being ethics and logic), thus corresponding to what came to be called “natural philosophy” in modern times. On the other hand, the term “mathematics” was used to indicate all the disciplines (including geometry, arithmetic, harmonics, astronomy, optics, mechanics, hydro- statics, pneumatics, geodesy and mathematical geography) that shared the same method of investigation, based on the construction of theories by which “theorems” are proved, leaning on explicitly stated initial assumptions.
    [Show full text]
  • Minute Genius: a Tribute to the Role of Italy in the Development of Science
    Cell Death and Differentiation (2012) 19, 2051–2052 & 2012 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 1350-9047/12 www.nature.com/cdd Book Review Minute genius: A tribute to the role of Italy in the development of science Cell Death and Differentiation (2012) 19, 2051–2052; doi:10.1038/cdd.2012.120 Ingegni Minuti, by Lucio Russo and Emanuela Santoni Feltrineli Publisher, Rome, January 2011. EAN 9788807104633. 509 pp.; 30.00 h In a recent book, ‘Ingegni minuti’, Lucio Russo and Emanuela Ingegni Minuti is full of similar interesting observations, Santoni describe the development of science in Italy and the which may help explain many aspects of the status of science global contribution of Italian scientists in plain, non-academic today in Italy and also emphasise the role of scientists in the language. The authors, a university professor of Probability unification of the country. A major point is the historic Theory and a high school teacher, start by trying to give a separation between research and industry. Until now the definition of science to distinguish it from other fields of human contribution of industry in supporting science both politically knowledge. They define science as ‘an ensemble of knowl- and economically falls well below that of other developed edge formed during several centuries that, though variable in countries. The book also reveals that an ‘Italian’ scientific content and methods, yet shares some fundamental features community was present and operating well before political that allow it to be distinguished from other cultural issues. unification (1860). Scientists from different parts of the country Moreover science implies theories which have an internal logic and an explicit, testable relationship with the real world’.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Shoulders of Hipparchus a Reappraisal of Ancient Greek Combinatorics
    Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. 57 (2003) 465–502 Digital Object Identifier (DOI) 10.1007/s00407-003-0067-0 On the Shoulders of Hipparchus A Reappraisal of Ancient Greek Combinatorics F. Acerbi Communicated by A. Jones 1. Introduction To write about combinatorics in ancient Greek mathematics is to write about an empty subject. The surviving evidence is so scanty that even the possibility that “the Greeks took [any] interest in these matters” has been denied by some historians of mathe- matics.1 Tranchant judgments of this sort reveal, if not a cursory scrutiny of the extant sources, at least a defective acquaintance with the strong selectivity of the process of textual transmission the ancient mathematical corpus has been exposed to–afactthat should induce, about a sparingly attested field of research, a cautious attitude rather than a priori negative assessments.2 (Should not the onus probandi be required also when the existence in the past of a certain domain of research is being denied?) I suspect that, behind such a strongly negative historiographic position, two different motives could have conspired: the prejudice of “ancient Greek mathematicians” as geometri- cally-minded and the attempt to revalue certain aspects of non-western mathematics by tendentiously maintaining that such aspects could not have been even conceived by “the Greeks”. Combinatorics is the ideal field in this respect, since many interesting instances of combinatorial calculations come from other cultures,3 whereas combina- torial examples in the ancient Greek mathematical corpus have been considered, as we have seen, worse than disappointing, and in any event such as to justify a very negative attitude.
    [Show full text]
  • La Rivoluzione Dimenticata (The Forgotten Revolution)
    La Rivoluzione Dimenticata (The Forgotten Revolution) by Lucio Russo Feltrinelli, Milan, 2001 [This remarkable book, published by Feltrinelli in Milan, first in 1996 and then in a new edition in 2001, is still available only in Italian. An English language edition is in preparation, and will appear with Springer Verlag. The excerpt below, Chapter I, is translated by Mark A. Peterson after correspon- dence with the author. ] 1 The Birth of Science 1.1 The suppression of the scientific revolution The central role of science in the development of our civilization is gener- ally recognized. One might therefore expect that its birth, the scientific revolution, would be considered a fundamental turning point in human his- tory. Instead, the importance of this event is almost never noticed. The history of scientific thought typically obscures it, by blurring the differ- ences among Hellenistic science, the pre-scientific knowledge of ancient Egyp- tian and Mesopotamian civilizations, and the natural philosophy of classi- cal Greece. Books on ancient history usually say nothing about it at all. Most of the time we are told only that in the Hellenistic period certain “sci- ences” flourished. One can typically find more attention to Archimedes or Aristarchus of Samos in a book on the Renaissance, dealing with their redis- covery, than in a book on classical civilization. The student of the modern age thinks of the Renaissance or the 17th century with an eye to present – what came after. Thus she cannot ignore the importance of the “Rebirth of Science.” The student of antiquity, on 1 the other hand, feels obliged (more so in the past, it is true) to compare Hellenism with the supposed perfection of classical Greece, or with Rome.
    [Show full text]
  • Socrates (470–399 BC), a Classical Greek Philosopher, Developed Deduction, Logic, and Logical Reasoning
    Eratosthenes and Pliny, Greek geometry and Roman follies Khristo N. Boyadzhiev Department of Mathematics and Statistics Ohio Northern University Ada, OH 45810 Abstract. In this note we point out that supportive attitudes can bring to a blossoming science, while neglect and different values can quickly remove science from everyday life and provide a very primitive view of the world. We compare one important Greek achievement, the computation of the Earth meridian by Eratosthenes, to its later interpretation by the Roman historian of science Pliny. 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification, 01A20 Keywords. Eratosthenes, the meridian of the Earth, Greek mathematics, Roman empire, Pliny the Elder. 1. Timeline Something extraordinary happened in ancient Greece during the period 600-100 BC. During these five centuries the Greeks created the foundations of present-day science and mathematics. They achieved unprecedented results. The quality of these results is compatible only to those obtained seventeen centuries later. After the rise of the Roman Empire, however, the development of science and mathematics slowed down and came to an end. For several centuries after that there were practically no scientific activities in Europe. Here is a short timeline. Pythagoras of Samos (575-496 BC). Created the Pythagorean mathematical school. Obtained many theorems in Geometry and Number Theory. Socrates (470–399 BC), a classical Greek philosopher, developed deduction, logic, and logical reasoning. His student Plato strongly influenced Aristotle, whom he taught on his part. Plato (424-348 BC); Aristotle (384-322 BC) 1 Aristotle worked with Alexander the Great and taught him science, mathematics and history. Alexander the Great (356-323 BC) introduces Greek science and culture to his vast empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Lucio Russo: L'america Dimenticata. I Rapporti Tra Le Civilta` E Un Errore Di
    Lett Mat Int (2014) 2:111–112 DOI 10.1007/s40329-014-0053-1 BOOK REVIEW Lucio Russo: L’America dimenticata. I rapporti tra le civilta` eun errore di Tolomeo Mondadori Universita`, Milan, 2013 Liliana Curcio Published online: 18 July 2014 Ó Centro P.RI.ST.EM, Universita` Commerciale Luigi Bocconi 2014 BC), several centuries earlier, had calculated the same measurement with an almost exact result (with a deviation of less than 1 % from the actual known dimension)? This question, apparently of interest only to mathema- ticians, cartographers and geographers, becomes the point of departure for a fascinating investigation that gives rise to unexpected suppositions. In fact, Lucio Russo maintains the surprising hypothesis that the reason for Ptolemy’s error lies in the collapse of knowledge that followed the Roman conquests. According to this theory, the broadening of territories conquered by Rome went hand-in-hand with a systematic destruction of the culture of all peoples con- quered. One example is sufficient: the destruction of the Library of Alexandria and its inestimable patrimony of codices and volumes containing the entirety of human knowledge. In Russo’s words: This was not only the largest collection of books in existence in the world, but also the most important centre of editorial production, closely connected to the Musaeum of Alexandria, that is, to the principal public research institution of the ancient world, where scholars were lived at the expense of the state, devoting themselves to their own work without material worries (p. 90, our trans.). The loss of knowledge was not limited to the scientific methodologies of mathematical geography and cartogra- phy, but also regarded the information about places and Why did the celebrated Ptolemy (ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Water-Lifting Technology in the Graeco-Roman World and Its Development Through the Renaissance
    CHAPTER 2 Water-Lifting Technology in the Graeco-Roman World and Its Development through the Renaissance The Invention of Water-Lifting Devices The invention of the waterwheel and its applications, such as the water mill, is generally ascribed to the Greek world, between the third and first cen- tury BCE. In fact, all water-lifting devices based on subdivided wheels and cylinders seem to have originated in that period.1 The reference to water- raising devices in the extant writings of Ctesibius (285–222 BCE),2 Philo of Byzantium (c.280−220 BCE), Marcus Vitruvius Pollio (c.75–15 BCE) and Hero of Alexandria (c.10–70 CE) bear testimony to the fact that lifting water con- stituted an important challenge for the outstanding mechanical technologists 1 For discussions on this subject, see: Adam Robert Lucas, Wind, water, work: ancient and me- dieval milling technology, Leiden: Brill, 2006, Technology and Change in History, (ongoing series), Vol. 8; John Peter Oleson, Greek and Roman Mechanical Water-Lifting Devices: The History of a Technology, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1984, pp. 325–331; John Peter Oleson, “Water-Lifting,” in Örjan Wikander, (ed.), Handbook of Ancient Water Technology, Technology and Change in History, (ongoing series), Vol. 2, Leiden: Brill (2000), pp. 217–302, specially pp. 229–241; Örjan Wikander, “The Water-Mill,” in Örjan Wikander, (ed.), Handbook of Ancient Water Technology, Technology and Change in History, (ongoing series), Vol. 2, Leiden: Brill (2000), pp. 371–400; K. Donners, M. Waelkens and J. Deckers, “Water Mills in the Area of Sagalassos: A Disappearing Ancient Technology,” Anatolian Studies, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly Newsletter of the Durban Centre - July 2017
    Page 1 Monthly Newsletter of the Durban Centre - July 2017 Page 2 Table of Contents Chairman’s Chatter …...…………………………………....….…… 3 Spring Spiral Galaxies ….….………………...…………….….…... 5 At The Eyepiece …………………………………….…....…………. 8 The Cover Image - Messier 5 ………….….………………….….. 10 Ancient Astronomer - Hipparchus ……...………...………….... 12 Planetary Nebula …...……...…………...…….……………….….. 16 . Saturn ………………..…………….…………...……...…….….…... 23 The Month Ahead ………………………………………………….. 24 Minutes Of The Meeting ………..……………….………………... 25 AGM Notice …………………………………………………...…….. 26 Public Viewing Roster …………………………….………………. 27 ASSA Symposium 2018 ……………………………………...…… 28 Member Submissions Disclaimer: The views expressed in ‘nDaba are solely those of the writer and are not necessarily the views of the Durban Centre, nor the Editor. All images and content is the work of the respective copyright owner Page 3 Chairman’s Chatter By Mike Hadlow Dear Members, On 21 June we had the winter solstice, the shortest day and longest night of the year. The sun is now on its way back to the southern hemisphere, passing the equator on its way to the Tropic of Capricorn which it will reach in December, when we have the summer solstice. Our days are now starting to get longer. As expected, we have had some fantastic viewing evening. Our star party held at Murray McKenzie’s farm in Cato Ridge went off without a hitch and was well attended. Even though the moon was at its first quarter we managed to have some fantastic viewing including the planets Jupiter and Saturn and the ‘Big Five of the African Sky’, Omega Centauri, Eta Carina, Southern Pleiades, the Milky Way and the Coal Sack nebula, although due to the brightness of moon the Coal Sack nebula was not easily defined.
    [Show full text]