Kashmir and Kashmiriyat

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kashmir and Kashmiriyat Kashmiri and Kashmiriyat The Politics of Language, Religion and Region Madhu Kishwar During my recent visit to Kashmir written literature. Moreover, unlike the Valley, I never once heard two I was shocked to learn that hardly their western educated counterparts Kashmiris speak to each other in any anyone in Kashmir can read or write in other regions of India, Kashmiris other language except Kashmiri. Kashmiri. Kashmir is one of the few always speak to each other in Those fighting for azadi (freedom) places in the world where not more Kashmiri. During my five day stay in never tire of stressing the uniqueness than a handful of people can read or of Kashmiri culture and identity. write in their mother tongue. Kashmiri Kashmir is one of the For people all over the world is neither taught in schools nor in most few places in the world language is one of the key definers of colleges. Therefore, there is no identity. Most nation states in the question of it being used as the where not more than a modern world are carved along language of administration. handful of people can linguistic lines. Not too long ago in This despite the fact that the read or write in their the sub-continent, Bangladesh broke Kashmiri language has a rich body of mother tongue. away from Pakistan because the 2 MANUSHI Bangladeshis resented the imposition of Urdu on them leading to a subjugation of their mother tongue, Bengali. This repudiated the founding principle of Pakistan that Muslims were a distinct and separate nationality on account of their religion. Even after the separation of Bangladesh from Pakistan, the domination of Urdu has caused deep resentment among other linguistic groups in Pakistan the Sindhis, the Baluchis, the Pushtoons, the Punjabis and others. On the other hand, in India, Urdu is a suspect language and neglected even in the land of its birth Uttar Pradesh. Hindus are extremely wary of giving Urdu official recognition because it has come to be stigmatised as the language which led to the Partition of the country. The main momentum for the creation of Pakistan came from Urdu speaking Muslims in India and not from those areas which today constitute Pakistan. As the proud creators of Pakistan, the Urdu speaking Muslim migrants from North India, tried to impose national unity among different linguistic groups in Pakistan by making Urdu the national language even though it was the mother tongue of this tiny minority which had migrated from Uttar Pradesh. In its spoken version, Urdu is indistinguishable from Hindustani, the spoken language of most north Indian Hindus. The two sister A Vakh from Bhaskara’s Lalla Vakh (the Vakh of Lal Ded) in Sharada script languages were torn asunder despite their close kinship, because the by the Muslims and the Hindus of the 14th century mystic poet of scripts were different and they came Kashmir. The Kashmiri Pandits tell Kashmir, who is, by common to be identified with different religious you that real Kashmiri can only be consensus, regarded as the mother of traditions Urdu uses the Persian script written in the Sharada script whereas modern Kashmiri language. The and gets identified with Islam and the Kashmiri Muslims believe that the Hindus believe that she belonged to Hindustani, using the Devanagari Persian script can serve the Kashmiri a Brahmin family and was a proponent script, gets associated with the language better since it has already of Shaivism; they call her Lalleshwari. Hindus. been in use for nearly four hundred On the other hand, there are also The neglect in the study of years in Kashmir and has been longstanding legends, recorded in Kashmiri language is also in large part suitably modified to meet with the Persian chronicles that she accepted due to the fact that a different history special requirements of Kashmiri. The Islam and was influenced by the Sufi and ethos is imposed on the language controversy extends even to Lal Ded, tradition. Thus both the communities NUMBER 82 (May-June 1994) claim her as their own and they both How come there has been no have a strong sense of attachment to political pressure for making Kashmiri the Kashmiri language. learning a matter of routine rather than Yet, despite a long history of giving it the status of a special course popular upsurges asserting the as is done with foreign languages? I Kashmiri identity to justify the asked this question of Naseem as well demands of autonomy and separation as several important political leaders from both India and Pakistan, there of the Kashmiri movement for has been hardly any demand by the “freedom”. Some leaders glibly proponents of Kashmiriyat (Kashmiri blamed it all on the Indian government identity) and the “fighters” or azadi and its conspiracy to suppress the for the introduction of Kashmiri as Kashmiri people. But they could not part of school and college curricula explain why the Kashmiris had not and its adoption as the language of even raised it as an issue. Some like the administration. Zafar Meharaj, a Srinagar-based Naseem Meharaj is one of the very journalist, say that the continuing few in Kashmir who can read and write political instability in the state and the the script in its Persian version. She unresolved issue of Kashmir’s right teaches Kashmiri language and to self-determination overshadowed literature in one of the very few all other concerns. Others are satisfied Yasin Malik, JKLF chief colleges which offer a diploma course that Kashmiri is used by them for their in the language. In her opinion, it is a everyday oral communication. After great misfortune that Kashmiris are a living language because it absorbed all you cannot get jobs by studying illiterate in their mother tongue. In the outside influences. It is a sign of our Kashmiri, was a common response. In 70’s, under pressure from some slavish mentality that we have failed schools the Muslim students learn Kashmiri writers, a decision was taken to give Kashmiri its due. Ever since Urdu and the Kashmiri Pandits learn by the government that Kashmiri the Mughals deposed the last Hindi. would be taught in schools up to class Kashmiri king, Yusuf Shah Chak, by Sonnaullah Butt, the forthright 5, but that decision could not be fraud, there has been a conspiracy to editor of Aftab, a Srinagar based Urdu implemented and most children undermine the Kashmiri language.” paper, explained it thus: “Since the continued learning Urdu. Some It is noteworthy that the Mughal time of the Sikh rulers, Urdu has been writers and intellectuals then ruler Akbar who is held in high esteem the official language in Kashmir. pressured the government to in the rest of the country is considered Earlier the Mughals had introduced introduce it from above. As a result, a an enemy by the Kashmiris because Persian. Even after Dogra rulers took 9-month diploma course was started he arrested and deposed Yusuf Shah over Kashmir, they continued using at the University level. Since then Chak. Kashmiris believe that they Urdu as the language of some colleges have provided for have been enslaved ever since administration. After 1947 the elementary study of Kashmiri. But because Kashmir was ruled from then Assembly resolved that Urdu would whatever little work is being done in on to the present times by outsiders be the state language though most Kashmiri is confined to two Mughals, Afghans, Sikhs, Dogras and government offices used English. institutions the state government run now “Indians”! Moreover, the Muslim sentiment is Cultural Academy and the Kashmiri attached to Urdu since a lot of Islamic Department at the Kashmir University. literature is available in this language Naseem was among the first batch The two sister languages and not in Kashmiri. When Radio of students to take the diploma. She (Urdu and Hindustani) Kashmir started in the 50s, it began to explains that the earlier manuscripts were torn asunder despite broadcast daily news in Kashmiri. of Kashmiri are all in the Sharada Though the Pandits were keen to script. “Most of our words were their close kinship, encourage the use of the Kashmiri originally Sanskrit based. But later a because the scripts were language, the Muslims began to lot of Persian words were absorbed different and they came to be resent the fact that Kashmiri was into the language because of the identified with different being propagated at the cost of influence of Muslim kings. It remained religious traditions. Urdu.” Thus Urdu has come to play a 4 MANUSHI divisive role between Kashmiri alongwith it. The substantial Hindu Kashmiriyat has become a sub-set of Pandits and Kashmiri Muslims on the minority in J&K is, by and large, dead Islamiyat. one hand and Kashmiri speaking opposed to azadi because the Does that mean that for the Muslims and other ethnic groups symbolism of azadi has come to be Kashmiri Muslims their religious living in Jammu and Laddakh. more Islamic than Kashmiri. identity has overshadowed their Yasin Malik, the much lionised The attempt of JKLF leaders to Kashmiri identity? Has azadi for JKLF leader answered this question neutralise the sub-regional sentiment Kashmiri Muslims come to mean on a more politically pragmatic note: while defining their own politics cleansing all those elements of their “The Kashmiri language is not the simultaneously in regional and culture which smack of Hindu or non- only language of the people of Jammu religious terms has created a vicious Muslim ethos, Kashmiri language and Kashmir. Dozens of languages are circle. The more they resort to Urdu being one of them? The answer is spoken in this state Punjabi, Dogri, and Islam, the more are they estranged both yes and no.
Recommended publications
  • Kashmir: January 2019 by Jon Lunn
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 7356, 2 January 2019 Kashmir: January 2019 By Jon Lunn update Contents: 1. 2016: The killing of Burhan Wani triggers renewed violence 2. Developments during 2017 3. Developments during 2018 4. Low-key response from Western governments 5. Impasse without end? www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 Kashmir: January 2019 update Contents Summary 4 1. 2016: The killing of Burhan Wani triggers renewed violence 6 Protests, strikes and curfews 6 Response of the Indian Government 6 Flaring up of tension between India and Pakistan 7 2. Developments during 2017 8 2017 the deadliest year since 2010 8 Main flashpoints and incidents 8 3. Developments during 2018 10 2018 more violent than 2017 10 Flashpoints and incidents 10 Deepening political crisis 12 4. Responses of Western governments and the UN 13 US response 13 UK response 13 EU response 14 UN response 14 5. Conclusion: impasse without end? 15 3 Commons Library Briefing, 2 January 2019 Cover page image copyright: Indian Army Act on Kashmiris by Usama302. Wikimedia Commons Licensed by CC BY 4.0 / image cropped. 4 Kashmir: January 2019 update Summary This briefing covers events in Indian-administered Kashmir since July 2016, which have been characterised by a dramatic upsurge in protest and violence on the ground – what some have called the “worst crisis in a generation”. On 8 July 2016, Burhan Wani, a 22-year-old leader of the armed group Hizbul Mujahedin, was killed by the Indian security forces. Following Wani’s death, the Kashmir Valley saw its biggest outbreak of protest and violence since 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • An Exploratory Study
    OCTOBER 2016 Physical Disengagement and Ideological Reorientation Among Militants in Kashmir: An Exploratory Study NIKHIL RAYMOND PURI Physical Disengagement and Ideological Reorientation Among Militants in Kashmir: An Exploratory Study NIKHIL RAYMOND PURI ABOUT THE AUTHOR Nikhil Raymond Puri is a Visiting Fellow at Observer Research Foundation, New Delhi. An independent researcher and risk analyst, Nikhil's research interests include religious education and state-led madrasa reform efforts, and militant radicalisation and disengagement in South Asia. He has conducted extensive fieldwork across India and Bangladesh. He consults in the area of operational and political risk management, and publishes widely on security-related developments in South Asia. He holds a BA in South Asian Studies from the University of Virginia and obtained his MPhil and PhD degrees in Politics from the University of Oxford. © 2016 Observer Research Foundation. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from ORF. Physical Disengagement and Ideological Reorientation Among Militants in Kashmir: An Exploratory Study ABSTRACT This qualitative study employs semi-structured interviews to explore the phenomenon of militant disengagement as experienced by six former militants in Jammu and Kashmir. The paper seeks to understand how and why individuals who enthusiastically joined the militant campaign against the Indian state beginning in the late 1980s subsequently moved away – physically – from armed violence. The study also aims to shed light on the nature and extent of ideological evolution experienced by the same individuals before and/or after their physical departures from militancy. The paper attends closely to the interplay between these physical and ideological aspects of disengagement, asking – in the case of each interviewee – how one relates to the other.
    [Show full text]
  • X`G Ea=Ky; Vf/Klwpuk Ubz Fnyyh] 25 Flrecj] 2019 Dk-Vk- 3460¼V½-—Tcfd] Dsunzh; Ljdkj Us] Fof/Kfo:) Fø;Kdyki ¼Fuokj.K½ Vf/K
    jftLVªh laö Mhö ,yö&33004@99 REGD. NO. D. L.-33004/99 vlk/kj.k EXTRAORDINARY Hkkx II—[k.M 3—mi -[k.M (ii) PART II—Section 3—Sub-section (ii) izkf/dkj ls izdkf'kr PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY la- 3154] ubZ fnYyh] cq/okj] flrEcj 25] 2019@vkf'ou 3] 1941 No. 3154] NEW DELHI, WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 2019/ASVINA 3, 1941 x`g ea=ky; vf/klwpuk ubZ fnYyh] 25 flrEcj] 2019 dk-vk- 3460¼v½-—tcfd] dsUnzh; ljdkj us] fof/kfo:) fØ;kdyki ¼fuokj.k½ vf/kfu;e] 1967 ¼1967 dk 37½ ¼ftls ;gka blds ckn mDr vf/kfu;e dgk x;k gS½ dh /kkjk 3 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznRr “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] Hkkjr ljdkj ds x`g ea=ky; dh Hkkjr ds jkti=] vlk/kkj.k] Hkkx& II ] [kaM&3] mi&[kaM ¼ ii ½ esa izdkf”kr fnukad 22 ekpZ] 2019 dh vf/klwpuk la[;k dk-vk- 1403 ¼v½ ¼ftls blesa blds ckn mDr vf/klwpuk dgk x;k gS½ ds rgr tEew vkSj d”ehj fycjs”ku ÝaV ¼eks- ;klhu efyd xqV½ ¼tsds,y,Q&okbZ½ dks fof/k&fo:) laxe ?kksf’kr fd;k gS( vkSj] tcfd , dsUnzh; ljdkj us mDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 5 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznRr “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] Hkkjr ljdkj ds x`g ea=ky; dh fnukad 29 ekpZ] 2019 dh vf/klwpuk la[;k dk-vk- 1491 ¼v½ ds rgr fof/k fo:) fØ;kdyki ¼fuokj.k½ vf/kdj.k ¼ftls ;gka blds ckn mDr vf/kdj.k dgk x;k gS½ dk xBu fd;k Fkk] ftlesa fnYyh mPp U;k;ky; ds ekuuh; U;k;ewfrZ Jh pUnz “ks[kj “kkfey Fks( vkSj] tcfd , dsUnzh; ljdkj us mDr vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 4 dh mi&/kkjk ¼1½ }kjk iznRr “kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq,] bl U;k;fu.kZ;u ds iz;kstu ds fy, fd D;k tEew vkSj d”ehj fycjs”ku ÝaV ¼eks- ;klhu efyd xqV½ ¼tsds,y,Q&okbZ½ dks fof/kfo:) laxe ?kksf’kr fd, tkus dk Ik;kZIr dkj.k gS ;k ugha] fnukad 16 vizSy]
    [Show full text]
  • Government of India Ministry of Home Affairs Lok Sabha
    GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS LOK SABHA STARRED QUESTION NO.†*481 TO BE ANSWERED ON THE 28TH APRIL, 2015/VAISAKHA 8, 1937 (SAKA) SEPARATIST ACTIVITIES IN J&K †*481. SHRIMATI RAMA DEVI: SHRI ELUMALAI V.: Will the Minister of HOME AFFAIRS be pleased to state: (a) whether separatist and terrorist activities have been reported in Jammu and Kashmir recently and if so, the details thereof along with the number of security forces and civilians injured and killed in such incidents during the last one year and the current year, incident-wise; (b) whether there are inputs suggesting the involvement of some foreign agencies in this regard, if so, the details thereof and the reaction of the Government thereto; (c) whether the Government is aware of separatists having been released from the Jails, if so, the details thereof and the reaction of the Government thereto; and (d) the measures being taken to check separatist/terrorist activities including dialogue with the separatist groups in the State? ANSWER MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS (SHRI HARIBHAI PARATHIBHAI CHAUDHARY) (a) to (d): A Statement is laid on the Table of the House. ****** -2- STATEMENT REFERRED TO IN REPLY TO LOK SABHA STARRED QUESTION NO. *481 FOR 28.04.2015. (a): Details of terrorist incidents along with the number of security forces and civilians injured and killed during the last one year and the current year are given below: Sl. No. Incidents 2014 Upto 19th April, 2015 1. Terrorist incidents 222 32 2. Civilians Killed 28 04 3. Civilians injured 71 07 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Ceasefire Violations in Jammu and Kashmir a Line on Fire
    [PEACEW RKS [ CEASEFIRE VIOLATIONS IN JAMMU AND KASHMIR A LINE ON FIRE Happymon Jacob ABOUT THE REPORT Ceasefire violations along the Line of Control and international border between India and Pakistan have over the last decade been the primary trigger of tensions and conflict between New Delhi and Islamabad in the long-disputed Kashmir region. This report, supported by the United States Institute of Peace (USIP) and based on extensive field visits to the border areas, in-depth interviews with Indian and Pakistani military officials, and several primary datasets explains the factors behind the violations and suggests ways to control them within the context of the broader bilateral political dispute. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Happymon Jacob is associate professor of diplomacy and disarmament studies at the School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. He has previously worked with the Observer Research Foundation (New Delhi), University of Jammu (J&K), Central European University (Budapest), and the Jamia Millia Islamia University (New Delhi), has participated in or organized some of the influential India-Pakistan Track II dialogues, and has written extensively on India’s foreign policy, the Kashmir conflict, India-Pakistan relations, and security issues in South Asia. Cover photo: Hindustan Times/Getty Images The views expressed in this report are those of the author(s) alone. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Institute of Peace. United States Institute of Peace 2301 Constitution Ave., NW Washington, DC 20037 Phone: 202.457.1700 Fax: 202.429.6063 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.usip.org Peaceworks No.
    [Show full text]
  • Kashmiri Separatists: Origins, Competing Ideologies, and Prospects for Resolution of the Conflict
    Order Code RL31587 Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Kashmiri Separatists: Origins, Competing Ideologies, and Prospects for Resolution of the Conflict September 30, 2002 name redacted Foreign Affairs Analyst Foreign Affairs, Defense and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Kashmiri Separatists: Origins, Competing Ideologies, and Prospects for Resolution of the Conflict Summary The recent military standoff and threatened nuclear exchange between India and Pakistan have lately focused congressional attention on the longstanding territorial dispute over the former princely state of Kashmir. Although recent trips to the region by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage have dampened the rhetoric of both nations’ leaders, state elections set for October of 2002 on the Indian side of the Line of Control raise the specter of more violence in the disputed area and a continued threat of war. And although Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf has largely reduced infiltrations by Islamic militants into Jammu and Kashmir state in India, recent reports indicate that this may be an unsustainable long-term policy for any Pakistani leader, at least in the country’s current political climate. Thus despite India’s insistence that the Kashmiri insurgency is a domestic issue and adamant rejection of any international intervention, the dispute has been seen by many State Department officials as “that other conflict” whose nuclear character may make the dispute as dangerous to regional stability as that of the most recent round of Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This report focuses exclusively on the uprising in the Indian-controlled portion of Kashmir, which has been disputed since both countries became independent in 1947.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloadable Links: We Make No Representations As to the Accuracy Or Completeness of Any Information in This Study and Site Or Found by Following Any Link on Our Site
    CONTENTS CONTENTS 2 DISCLAIMER 5 FOREWORD 7 UNDERSTANDING THE REGION OF JAMMU & KASHMIR 8 HISTORY OF KASHMIR 9 Kashmir of Antiquity 10 Ashoka and Buddhism 10 The Shah Mir Dynasty 11 The Mughals 11 The Afghans 12 The Sikhs 12 The Dogras 12 The Sale of Kashmir 13 KASHMIR UNDER THE DOGRAS 13 The Great Divide 14 Winds of Change 15 The Rising of 1931 15 The Rise of Sheikh Abdullah 15 Blueprint for a Naya Kashmir 16 1947: The Birth of Two Nations and a Dilemma 17 The Dilemma 17 A War, An Accession & the Death of Monarchy 18 Epilogue 18 HOW GILGIT WAS LOST 19 KASHMIR REBORN: A CONSTITUTION, A FLAG & A PRIME MINISTER 19 A Temporary Provision? 21 1950-1977: Kashmiriyat vs Nationalism 22 Changing Dynamics: 1962, 1965, 1971 22 RISE OF MILITANCY IN KASHMIR 24 Beginning of the Islamization of Kashmir 25 Pakistan and Jihad 26 Jihad as State Motto 26 Jihad comes to Kashmir 27 Economic Development of the State 27 The 1987 Elections 28 The Kidnapping of Rubaiya Sayeed 29 THE WAR IN KASHMIR 31 Exodus of Kashmiri Pandits 31 Thereafter 33 Kunan Poshpora 34 Continued Rise of Insurgency 35 Inter-militia Clashes 35 Attacks on Security Forces 35 The Hazratbal Siege 35 Communal Attacks 36 A Change in Track 36 Human Rights Abuses by Militants 37 Epilogue 37 The Simla Accord 38 The Siachen Conflict 39 The 1990s 40 The Vajpayee Era 41 Between Kargil & Bloody Tuesday 42 Musharraf's 4-Point Formula 42 Kashmir: 2002-2004 43 The UPA Years 44 2010: Annus Horribilis 45 Kashmir Under the BJP 46 Burhan Wani 47 Kashmir: 2015-2020 47 Biting the Bullet: Abrogation of Article
    [Show full text]
  • Burhan Wani and the Masculinities of the Indian State
    Article Burhan Wani and the Masculinities of the Indian State Fabian Hartwell SOAS, London Abstract Burhan Wani, the pin-up boy of Kashmiri separatism was shot dead by Indian Special Forces in July 2016. Wani, a commander for Kashmir-based militant outfit Hizbul Mujahideen, was popular on social media for his advocacy against Indian rule in Kashmir and his calls suggesting violent insurrection against the Indian state. As a Kashmiri Muslim, Wani was doubly marginalised by the dominant Hinduised space of the imagined Indian nation; his reactive masculinity directly challenged the Hindu bravado he encountered in the state-sanctioned hyper-masculinity exemplified by the Indian Armed Forces. The article is inspired by the theoretical contributions of Jasbir Puar and Sudhir Kakar, who argue that the heteronormativity of society is produced through the homosexual and that the Hindu is constituted through the Muslim Other. Furthermore, utilizing Dibyesh Anand’s critical conceptualization of Indian nationalism as ‘porno nationalism’, the article argues that the way the Muslim is constituted is by fetishisation of the Muslim body as ‘hypersexed’, ‘abnormal’ and often criminal. Wani’s masculinity and his public representation constitute a nexus between the technological advancement that enables growing linkages between elements of the global jihad, the emergence of a transnational jihadi culture and him as a role model for young men, whose class and religious identity is superseded by the irredentist claims of the freedom fighter. Refocusing our attention from the superstructures of global masculine posturing to localized, individual experiences of violence, this article aims to reposition Wani, and Muslims, as integral to the masculinities of the Indian State.
    [Show full text]
  • Raising the Stakes in Jammu and Kashmir
    Raising the Stakes in Jammu and Kashmir Asia Report N°310 | 5 August 2020 Headquarters International Crisis Group Avenue Louise 235 • 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 • Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Preventing War. Shaping Peace. Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. A Torn History .................................................................................................................. 3 A. Roots of the Insurgency ............................................................................................. 3 B. Lost Opportunities ..................................................................................................... 5 III. Unilateral Change of Status .............................................................................................. 8 A. Abrogation of Article 370 ........................................................................................... 8 B. The Crackdown .......................................................................................................... 9 C. Betraying the Flag Bearers ......................................................................................... 10 D. Shrinking Political Space ........................................................................................... 11 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • March 2019 Editor Published in This Magazine in Volume: 08 Muhammad Sarfraz Khan Good Faith
    C o n t e n t s Let's legality prevail Kashmir dispute in 01 over Kashmir dispute 02 perspective Dr. Muhammad Khan M Yahya Mujahid Kashmir clarion UDHR & brutalities call for justice in IoK 04 Syed Qamar Afzal Rizvi 05 Muzaffar Ali Kashmir solidarity day Unflinching support 07 2019: Int'l dimension 09 to Kashmir cause Reema Shaukat KASHMIR DISPUTE, Pattern to blame DENIAL OF PROMISE Pakistan continues 10 11 Durdana Najam Dr Nasreen Akhtar Kashmir hearing in 13 15 EU Parliament Syed Qaiser Sheraz Kazmi KHURSHID News Section HASSAN 24 33 KHURSHID Published by: Patron Chief Editor Kashmir Today K-Block, New District Mansoor Qadir Dar Complex, Muzaffarabad. Website: www.jklc.org Chief Editor E-mail: [email protected] DISCLAIMER Raja Muhammad Sajjad Khan Ph: 05822-920072, 05822-920074 The articles and columns are Month: March 2019 Editor published in this magazine in Volume: 08 Muhammad Sarfraz Khan good faith. However the Issue: 03 contents of these writings do Quantity: 1000 Assistant Editor not necessary reflect views of Price Rs. 150/- Matloob Hussain the magazine. Yearly Subscription: Rs. 1000/- Circulation Registration No.MZD-31 Naqeebullah Gardezi Printed by Dharti Art Press Let's legality prevail over Kashmir dispute here is a basic contradiction Kas hmi r, the re wer e ove r fiv e was favouring state's accession to b e t w e e n w h a t I n d i a hundred sixty princely states in British P a k i s t a n , w h i c h w a s n o t Tproclaims and what Indian India at the time of its partition.
    [Show full text]
  • Kashmir Conflict
    K a s h mi r C o n f l i c t : A S t u d y o f W h a t L e d t o t h e I n s u r g e n c y i n K a s h m i r V a l l e y & P r o p o s e d F u t u r e S o l u t i o n s By P r iy an k a Bak ay a and S u meet Bh at t i 1 Introduction Throughout ancient times, the breathtakingly beautiful Valley of Kashmir has stood for peaceful contemplation, intellectual advancement and religious diversity co- existing in an atmosphere of tolerance for the most part. In the modern geopolitical era, this same diversity, evident from the blend of Islam, Hinduism, Sikhism and Buddhism in this single state, has made it a center of warfare rather than cultural advancement. In the late 1980s, an insurgency in the valley threatened not only to rip Kashmir apart, but also pull the rest of the world into a dangerous war. In this paper, we will examine the major reasons for the insurgency, and why it only gained momentum some 40 years after India’s partition. Finally, we will explore some of the modern-day proposed solutions to the ongoing conflict over Kashmir. In order to gain a better understanding of why the insurgency of 1987-89 took place, we will examine the origins and development of the Kashmir independence movement.
    [Show full text]
  • A Índia Imaginada No Filme Mission Kashmir (2000)
    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SÃO PAULO ESCOLA DE FILOSOFIA, LETRAS E CIÊNCIAS HUMANAS O MELODRAMA DO TERROR: A ÍNDIA IMAGINADA NO FILME MISSION KASHMIR (2000) GUARULHOS 2017 BRUNO TADEU NOVATO RESENDE O MELODRAMA DO TERROR: A ÍNDIA IMAGINADA NO FILME MISSION KASHMIR (2000) Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação à Universidade Federal de São Paulo para obtenção do título de Mestre em História. Área de concentração: História Orientação: Prof. Dra. Samira Adel Osman GUARULHOS 2017 RESENDE, Bruno Tadeu Novato O melodrama do terror: A Índia imaginada no filme Mission Kashmir (2000). 155 f. Dissertação Mestrado em História – Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas, Guarulhos, 2017. Orientador: Professa Dra. Samira Adel Osman Título em Inglês: The melodrama of terror: India imagined in the film Mission Kashmir (2000) 1. Terrorismo. 2. Melodrama. 3. Índia. I. Samira Osman. II. O melodrama do terror: A Índia imaginada no filme Mission Kashmir (2000). BRUNO TADEU NOVATO RESENDE TÍTULO: O MELODRAMA DO TERROR: A ÍNDIA IMAGINADA NO FILME MISSION KASHMIR (2000) Aprovação: ____/____/________ Prof. Dra. Samira Adel Osman Instituição: Universidade Federal de São Paulo – UNIFESP Prof. Dr. Jorge Luzio Matos Silva Instituição: Centro Universitário Assunção – Unifai/Puc-SP Prof. Dra. Carolyn Overhoff Ferreira Instituição: Universidade Federal de São Paulo – UNIFESP AGRADECIMENTOS Agradeço a minha orientadora Prof. Dra. Samira Osman por acreditar nesse projeto e oferecer o suporte necessário desde o começo. Agradeço também a disponibilidade da professora em elaborar as aulas da graduação levando em conta as nossas temáticas de pesquisa, o que permitiu que pensássemos os objetos de pesquisa a partir de uma perspectiva mais didática.
    [Show full text]