DOCSLIB.ORG

Crop Progress

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Crop Progress Crop Progress ISSN: 1948-3007 Released August 30, 2021, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). NASS Survey Update! In September, NASS will survey U.S. small grains growers for final production. USDA relies on these numbers for farm programs that benefit producers. We will also ask hog producers about their summer pig crop, current inventory, and farrowing intentions. Respond online, or alternately by phone or mail. Responding online is better than before! It is faster and more intuitive. Your information matters! Look for results on September 24 and 30 and Small Grains County Estimates on December 9 at www.nass.usda.gov/Publications. Corn Dough – Selected States [These 18 States planted 92% of the 2020 corn acreage] Week ending 2016-2020 State August 29, August 22, August 29, Average 2020 2021 2021 (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) Colorado ................................... 84 66 88 77 Illinois ....................................... 96 85 88 93 Indiana ..................................... 93 87 93 88 Iowa .......................................... 94 90 95 91 Kansas ..................................... 95 86 91 92 Kentucky ................................... 89 71 78 87 Michigan ................................... 84 78 87 73 Minnesota ................................. 96 86 95 91 Missouri .................................... 96 93 96 95 Nebraska .................................. 98 89 93 94 North Carolina .......................... 98 97 99 98 North Dakota ............................ 77 75 89 79 Ohio .......................................... 90 81 87 82 Pennsylvania ............................ 65 45 70 69 South Dakota ............................ 94 81 89 86 Tennessee ................................ 97 95 98 98 Texas ....................................... 94 90 95 96 Wisconsin ................................. 87 74 83 76 18 States .................................. 93 85 91 89 Corn Dented – Selected States [These 18 States planted 92% of the 2020 corn acreage] Week ending 2016-2020 State August 29, August 22, August 29, Average 2020 2021 2021 (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) Colorado ................................... 37 18 27 31 Illinois ........................................ 68 50 65 64 Indiana ...................................... 50 36 57 52 Iowa .......................................... 68 47 66 57 Kansas ...................................... 69 48 63 66 Kentucky ................................... 71 53 62 72 Michigan ................................... 38 20 36 31 Minnesota ................................. 59 30 50 46 Missouri .................................... 81 54 73 77 Nebraska .................................. 72 41 64 60 North Carolina ........................... 89 88 94 92 North Dakota ............................. 23 23 45 31 Ohio .......................................... 36 38 54 39 Pennsylvania ............................ 28 4 20 36 South Dakota ............................ 47 29 42 40 Tennessee ................................ 75 70 80 85 Texas ........................................ 83 82 84 84 Wisconsin ................................. 42 23 46 35 18 States .................................. 60 41 59 55 Corn Mature – Selected States [These 18 States planted 92% of the 2020 corn acreage] Week ending 2016-2020 State August 29, August 22, August 29, Average 2020 2021 2021 (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) Colorado ................................... 3 1 3 1 Illinois ........................................ 10 - 4 10 Indiana ...................................... 7 1 8 8 Iowa .......................................... 10 3 6 6 Kansas ...................................... 17 3 12 19 Kentucky ................................... 35 21 30 40 Michigan ................................... 1 - 1 1 Minnesota ................................. 3 - 6 1 Missouri .................................... 6 2 11 17 Nebraska .................................. 10 1 8 5 North Carolina ........................... 71 55 74 76 North Dakota ............................. - 2 5 2 Ohio .......................................... 1 - 3 3 Pennsylvania ............................ 1 - 1 1 South Dakota ............................ 7 6 8 4 Tennessee ................................ 20 7 25 36 Texas ........................................ 64 57 60 62 Wisconsin ................................. 6 1 2 3 18 States .................................. 11 4 9 10 - Represents zero. 2 Crop Progress (August 2021) USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service Corn Condition – Selected States: Week Ending August 29, 2021 [These 18 States planted 92% of the 2020 corn acreage] State Very poor Poor Fair Good Excellent (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) Colorado ................................ 3 12 25 47 13 Illinois .................................... 2 4 24 49 21 Indiana .................................. 2 6 23 55 14 Iowa ....................................... 2 8 32 50 8 Kansas .................................. 5 12 29 46 8 Kentucky ................................ 2 4 14 64 16 Michigan ................................ 1 3 23 49 24 Minnesota .............................. 9 18 37 30 6 Missouri ................................. 2 7 28 52 11 Nebraska ............................... 5 8 20 45 22 North Carolina ....................... 1 3 15 61 20 North Dakota ......................... 15 32 37 16 - Ohio ....................................... 1 5 17 57 20 Pennsylvania ......................... - 1 14 65 20 South Dakota ......................... 16 29 32 22 1 Tennessee ............................. 1 4 19 58 18 Texas .................................... 1 9 29 44 17 Wisconsin .............................. 1 4 17 45 33 18 States ............................... 4 10 26 46 14 Previous week ....................... 4 10 26 46 14 Previous year ......................... 5 9 24 48 14 - Represents zero. Soybeans Setting Pods – Selected States [These 18 States planted 96% of the 2020 soybean acreage] Week ending 2016-2020 State August 29, August 22, August 29, Average 2020 2021 2021 (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) Arkansas .................................. 98 92 96 97 Illinois ....................................... 96 84 95 94 Indiana ..................................... 94 90 94 90 Iowa .......................................... 96 95 97 94 Kansas ..................................... 86 72 81 86 Kentucky ................................... 82 80 84 82 Louisiana .................................. 100 95 100 100 Michigan ................................... 99 95 100 90 Minnesota ................................. 99 96 98 97 Mississippi ................................ 97 95 96 96 Missouri .................................... 87 70 82 84 Nebraska .................................. 100 93 97 95 North Carolina .......................... 83 77 86 81 North Dakota ............................ 96 93 95 96 Ohio .......................................... 96 87 89 92 South Dakota ............................ 96 94 97 93 Tennessee ................................ 90 82 90 91 Wisconsin ................................. 96 89 95 92 18 States .................................. 95 88 93 92 Crop Progress (August 2021) 3 USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service Soybeans Dropping Leaves – Selected States [These 18 States planted 96% of the 2020 soybean acreage] Week ending 2016-2020 State August 29, August 22, August 29, Average 2020 2021 2021 (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) Arkansas ................................... 13 9 15 16 Illinois ........................................ - - 5 2 Indiana ...................................... 6 1 9 7 Iowa .......................................... 3 - 2 1 Kansas ...................................... 7 1 6 5 Kentucky ................................... 7 3 5 4 Louisiana .................................. 54 19 31 48 Michigan ................................... 8 - 3 4 Minnesota ................................. 2 3 9 2 Mississippi ................................ 25 19 25 27 Missouri .................................... - - 3 1 Nebraska .................................. 14 4 12 8 North Carolina ........................... 4 1 7 5 North Dakota ............................. 15 9 24 16 Ohio .......................................... 7 - 3 5 South Dakota ............................ 19 14 23 13 Tennessee ................................ 7 3 10 7 Wisconsin ................................. 3 - 1 1 18 States .................................. 7 3 9 7 - Represents zero. Soybean Condition – Selected States: Week Ending August 29, 2021 [These 18 States planted 96% of the 2020 soybean acreage] State Very poor Poor Fair Good Excellent (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) Arkansas ................................ 2 5 27 46 20 Illinois ..................................... 3 4 22 51 20 Indiana ................................... 3 7 24 55 11 Iowa ....................................... 2 7 31 51 9 Kansas ................................... 5 8 34 47 6 Kentucky ................................ 2 4 19 62 13 Louisiana ............................... 1 2 9 79 9 Michigan ................................ 1 3 24 49 23 Minnesota .............................. 9 18 42 28 3 Mississippi ............................. 1 2 16 71 10 Missouri ................................. 2 7 32 52 7 Nebraska ............................... 3 7 21 51 18 North Carolina .......................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Salix Production for the Floral Industry in the USA Who Grow Willows
    Salix production for the floral industry in the USA Who grow willows • Plant nurseries (ornamental and erosion control) • Biomass growers • Basket makers • Floral cut-stem production The USDA Specialty Crop Initiative • the production of woody ornamental cut stems, representing a specialty niche in cut flower production, has risen in popularity • dogwood (Cornus), Forsythia, Hydrangea, lilac (Syringa), and Viburnum • potential as an off-season production option, or third crop enterprise Objectives • to characterize the extent of Salix cultivation as a floral crop in the USA by identifying the active willow growers and their profiles, production acreage and gross sales • to identify if the production practices are well defined and consistent to support crop expansion • the potential the crop’s expansion Distribution and concentration of Salix survey recipients in the United States 52 growers The Association of Specialty Cut Flower Growers (ASCFG) Grower profile • Small scale specialty cut flower producers (58.6%) • Large scale specialty cut flower producers (24.1%) • 24.1% considered Salix as “major crop” –Total gross sales for 80.0% was less than $25,000; 17.0% grossed $25,000- 50,000 and 3% grossed $50,000- 100,000 • good cash return, up to $1.25 to $1.75 per stem of common pussy willow • annual gross financial returns for willow plants, up to $24.94, is much higher than for many other woody florals Taxa in cultivation • For catkins •For Stems The seasonality of the crop Willow harvest for ornamental value by number of growers reporting
    [Show full text]
  • Ouray County Sheriff's Office Blotter August 23, 2021
    Ouray County Sheriff’s Office Blotter August 23, 2021 – August 29, 2021 August 23, 2021 Deputy responded to an Animal Stray on County Road at MM 12 Deputy Assisted a Motorist on County Road 14 and Bighorn Lane Deputy responded to a suspicious report in the 2100 Block of County Road 22 Deputy did a VIN Inspection in the 4000 Block of County Road 12 Deputy did a VIN Inspection in the 500 Block of Badger Trail Deputy responded to Highway 550 for a reported Traffic Complaint Deputy arrested male party with a Warrant on County Road 14 and Gold Mountain Trail Deputy responded to a Bear call in the 36000 Block of Highway 550 Deputy responded to a 911 Open in the 7600 Block of Highway 62 Deputy responded to a Tree Fire on County Road 5 and Green Street Deputy Assisted the Colorado State Patrol on Highway 550 Deputy arrested a female party with a Warrant on County Road 14 and Sunshine Deputy responded to a report of an Overdue Party on Red Mountain Pass August 24, 2021 Deputy did a VIN Inspection at the Ouray County Sheriff’s Office Deputy Assisted the Gunnison County Sheriff’s Office with an Information report in the 5800 Block of County Road 1 Deputy responded to a report of a fall victim in the 100 Block of County Road 24C Deputy responded to a 911 Open call in the 100 Block of Fisher Canyon Drive Deputy did a VIN Inspection in the 400 Block of Snowbush Drive Deputy responded to a Lockout in the 700 Block of County Road 24A August 25, 2021 Deputy responded to a Criminal Mischief at the Blue Lakes Trail Head Deputy took a Lost Property report
    [Show full text]
  • 1 What Is Scientific Progress?
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by PhilSci Archive What is Scientific Progress? Lessons from Scientific Practice Moti Mizrahi St. John’s University Forthcoming in Journal for General Philosophy of Science Abstract: Alexander Bird argues for an epistemic account of scientific progress, whereas Darrell Rowbottom argues for a semantic account. Both appeal to intuitions about hypothetical cases in support of their accounts. Since the methodological significance of such appeals to intuition is unclear, I think that a new approach might be fruitful at this stage in the debate. So I propose to abandon appeals to intuition and look at scientific practice instead. I discuss two cases that illustrate the way in which scientists make judgments about progress. As far as scientists are concerned, progress is made when scientific discoveries contribute to the increase of scientific knowledge of the following sorts: empirical, theoretical, practical, and methodological. I then propose to articulate an account of progress that does justice to this broad conception of progress employed by scientists. I discuss one way of doing so, namely, by expanding our notion of scientific knowledge to include both know-that and know-how. Keywords: aim of science; Alexander Bird; Darrell Rowbottom; scientific knowledge; scientific practice; scientific progress 1 1. Introduction According to Chang (2007, p. 1), “Scientific progress remains one of the most significant issues in the philosophy of science today.” This is partly because it seems rather odd to deny that science is making progress, but it is difficult to articulate in what sense exactly science is making progress.
    [Show full text]
  • 2024 7 Day Working Days Calendar
    2024 7 Day Working Days Calendar The Working Day Calendar is used to compute the estimated completion date of a contract. To use the calendar, find the start date of the contract, add the working days to the number of the calendar date (a number from 1 to 1000), and subtract 1, find that calculated number in the calendar and that will be the completion date of the contract Date Number of the Calendar Date Monday, January 1, 2024 228 Tuesday, January 2, 2024 229 Wednesday, January 3, 2024 230 Thursday, January 4, 2024 231 Friday, January 5, 2024 232 Saturday, January 6, 2024 233 Sunday, January 7, 2024 234 Monday, January 8, 2024 235 Tuesday, January 9, 2024 236 Wednesday, January 10, 2024 237 Thursday, January 11, 2024 238 Friday, January 12, 2024 239 Saturday, January 13, 2024 240 Sunday, January 14, 2024 241 Monday, January 15, 2024 242 Tuesday, January 16, 2024 243 Wednesday, January 17, 2024 244 Thursday, January 18, 2024 245 Friday, January 19, 2024 246 Saturday, January 20, 2024 247 Sunday, January 21, 2024 248 Monday, January 22, 2024 249 Tuesday, January 23, 2024 250 Wednesday, January 24, 2024 251 Thursday, January 25, 2024 252 Friday, January 26, 2024 253 Saturday, January 27, 2024 254 Sunday, January 28, 2024 255 Monday, January 29, 2024 256 Tuesday, January 30, 2024 257 Wednesday, January 31, 2024 258 Thursday, February 1, 2024 259 Friday, February 2, 2024 260 Saturday, February 3, 2024 261 Sunday, February 4, 2024 262 Date Number of the Calendar Date Monday, February 5, 2024 263 Tuesday, February 6, 2024 264 Wednesday, February
    [Show full text]
  • Perennial Polyculture Farming: Seeds of Another Agricultural Revolution?
    THE ARTS This PDF document was made available from www.rand.org as a public CHILD POLICY service of the RAND Corporation. CIVIL JUSTICE EDUCATION Jump down to document ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT 6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research NATIONAL SECURITY POPULATION AND AGING organization providing objective analysis and effective PUBLIC SAFETY solutions that address the challenges facing the public SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY and private sectors around the world. SUBSTANCE ABUSE TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Support RAND WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Pardee Center View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non- commercial use only. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. This product is part of the RAND Corporation occasional paper series. RAND occasional papers may include an informed perspective on a timely policy issue, a discussion of new research methodologies, essays, a paper presented at a conference, a conference summary, or a summary of work in progress. All RAND occasional papers undergo rigorous peer review to ensure that they meet high standards for research quality and objectivity. Perennial Polyculture Farming Seeds of Another Agricultural Revolution? James A. Dewar This research was undertaken as a piece of speculation in the RAND Frederick S.
    [Show full text]
  • Pragmatism and Progressivism in the Educational Thought and Practices of Booker T
    PRAGMATISM AND PROGRESSIVISM IN THE EDUCATIONAL THOUGHT AND PRACTICES OF BOOKER T. WASHINGTON Ronald E. Chennault DePaul University Few men, particularly Black men, have wielded the power and influence of Booker T. Washington during his lifetime. A good deal of his colorful life is recounted in his autobiography, Up from Slavery.1 Here Washington details the most notable events of his life, from the time he spent in slavery as a youth, to his exploits and education during his adolescence, and well into his career as head of the then-Tuskegee Normal and Industrial Institute in Alabama. Washington tells of his experiences at present-day Hampton University and the extraordinary influence the lessons he learned and the people he met there had on his life philosophy. He also reserves a large part of his story to describe numerous occasions during which he spread his institution’s seeds of success and offered his advice on improving America’s race relations. Yet as revealing as his account is, both by reading its lines and between its lines, Washington’s autobiography represents only a piece of his life’s puzzle. If Washington is the “trickster” that Harlan imagines and McElroy argues,2 a fairer and fuller understanding of Washington’s wizardry necessitates moving beyond his autobiography. Restricting our understanding of Washington to his self-representation in Up from Slavery (even extending to his photographic self-representation)3 and allowing his account to epitomize his worldview does more than “oversimplify Washington . it further contributes to the uncritical acceptance of Washington’s propagandistic portrayal of Tuskegee’s goals, programs, and accomplishments.”4 Many gaps in his life story can be filled by consulting primary sources such as Washington’s writings and speeches as well as by looking to extensive biographical and numerous scholarly works on Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Pacific: the Fastest Way to Turn Ideas Into Business Reality
    OVERVIEW www.progress.com THE FASTEST WAY TO TURN IDEAS INTO BUSINESS REALITY OVERVIEW Businesses require powerful applications with purpose. Today, business works in the HIGHLIGHTS palm of your user’s hands—so your applications must work there as well. To meet Rapid application business user expectations, your company must have a simple way to create apps fast development: Browser- without relying on deep technical skills or expensive IT resources. Apps must connect to based visual design critical data in real-time. And they must be able to analyze data results immediately. requiring minimal coding Mobile & Web: Create apps WHAT IT DOES tailored for the best web and Progress® Pacific™ is a modern Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) that makes it easy for mobile experience businesses to rapidly build data-driven apps and deploy them on any cloud or device. Data driven: Connect your The Pacific (PaaS gives you the freedom to choose the data sources, deployment app to the data used inside environments and business logic that best fit your needs. Support your enterprise, your company and by your developers and customers with cloud-enabled applications and grow into new markets customers with Progress Pacific. Gain business insight: Self- service data integration, BENEFITS report building and CREATE NEW APPS FAST WITH MINIMAL CODING collaboration Modern application development is about the immediate ability to turn ideas into Platform Services: deployed solutions. Your customers want to move from “What if?” to “Now I can” as Core architectural and soon as tomorrow. Your Pacific installation includes a rapid application development governance services enable platform that works within a web browser.
    [Show full text]
  • SQL08 – Intercropping to Improve Soil Quality and Increase Biodiversity
    United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service 2012 Ranking Period 1 Soil Quality Enhancement Activity – SQL08 – Intercropping to improve soil quality and increase biodiversity Enhancement Description This enhancement involves the use of intercropping principles, growing two or more crops in close proximity to each other, to promote interaction resulting in improved soil and water quality while increasing biodiversity. Land Use Applicability Cropland Benefits Incorporating intercropping principles into an agricultural operation increases diversity and interaction between plants, arthropods, mammals, birds and microorganisms resulting in a more stable crop-ecosystem. This collaboration that mimics nature is subject to fewer pest outbreaks; improved nutrient cycling and crop uptake; and increased water infiltration and moisture retention. Soil quality, water quality and wildlife habitat all benefit. Conditions Where Enhancement Applies This enhancement applies to all crop land use acres. Criteria One or more of the following intercropping systems will be used; systems can be mixed during the contract period allowing for a different system to be used each year on the same field. 1. Relay inter-cropping – the growing of two or more crops on the same field with the planting of the second crop after the first one, e.g. over seeding of a clover cover crop into cotton during defoliation, or planting of clover at lay by time of corn. 2. Row inter-cropping – the growing of two or more crops simultaneously on the same field with at least one crop planted in rows, e.g. planting corn in the rows and inter-seeding sorghum between the rows, harvesting all as silage or planting clover in between orchard tree rows.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Row Crop Plant-Back Intervals for Common Herbicides
    DIVISION OF AGRICULTURE RESEARCH & EXTENSION University of Arkansas System Footnotes (continued) Authors 10 Replant only with Concep-treated or screen-treated seed. 2021 11 Needs 15 inches cumulative precipitation from application to planting rotational crop. Leah Collie, Program Associate - Weed Science 12 Needs 30 inches cumulative precipitation from application to planting rotational crop. Aaron Ross, Program Associate - Weed Science Tom Barber, Professor - Weed Science 13 ­Time­interval­is­based­on­8­oz/A­application­rate­and­does­not­begin­until­1­inch­of­ Row Crop Plant-Back rainfall is received. Tommy Butts, Assistant Professor - Weed Science 14­If­­4­oz/A­or­less­used­and­1­inch­of­rainfall/irrigation­received­after­application. Jason Norsworthy, Distinguished Professor - Weed Science 15 Days listed are based on University data and after receiving 1 inch of rainfall. 16 Enlist corn, cotton and soybeans can be planted immediately. University of Arkansas System, Division of Agriculture Intervals for 17 STS Soybeans can be planted immediately. Weed Science Program 18 Soil PH below 7.5. 19 ­For­Newpath/Preface­use­rates­greater­than­8­oz/A­per­season;­only­soybeans­may­be­ Common Herbicides planted the following year. 20 Rotation interval for soybean is 2 months where pH is less than 7.5. 21 Immediately if Poast Protected Crop. 22 If less than 15 inches of rainfall received since application, extend replant intervals to 18 months. If pH greater than 6.5, do not plant rice the following year. 23 18­months­for­cotton­if­rate­is­greater­than­5­oz/A­and­pH­>7.2.­ 24 Rotation­to­grain­sorghum­is­18­months­when­Spartan­is­applied­at­8­oz/A.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 7 Day Working Days Calendar
    2021 7 Day Working Days Calendar The Working Day Calendar is used to compute the estimated completion date of a contract. To use the calendar, find the start date of the contract, add the working days to the number of the calendar date (a number from 1 to 1000), and subtract 1, find that calculated number in the calendar and that will be the completion date of the contract Date Number of the Calendar Date Friday, January 1, 2021 133 Saturday, January 2, 2021 134 Sunday, January 3, 2021 135 Monday, January 4, 2021 136 Tuesday, January 5, 2021 137 Wednesday, January 6, 2021 138 Thursday, January 7, 2021 139 Friday, January 8, 2021 140 Saturday, January 9, 2021 141 Sunday, January 10, 2021 142 Monday, January 11, 2021 143 Tuesday, January 12, 2021 144 Wednesday, January 13, 2021 145 Thursday, January 14, 2021 146 Friday, January 15, 2021 147 Saturday, January 16, 2021 148 Sunday, January 17, 2021 149 Monday, January 18, 2021 150 Tuesday, January 19, 2021 151 Wednesday, January 20, 2021 152 Thursday, January 21, 2021 153 Friday, January 22, 2021 154 Saturday, January 23, 2021 155 Sunday, January 24, 2021 156 Monday, January 25, 2021 157 Tuesday, January 26, 2021 158 Wednesday, January 27, 2021 159 Thursday, January 28, 2021 160 Friday, January 29, 2021 161 Saturday, January 30, 2021 162 Sunday, January 31, 2021 163 Monday, February 1, 2021 164 Tuesday, February 2, 2021 165 Wednesday, February 3, 2021 166 Thursday, February 4, 2021 167 Date Number of the Calendar Date Friday, February 5, 2021 168 Saturday, February 6, 2021 169 Sunday, February
    [Show full text]
  • Crop Progress
    Crop Progress ISSN: 1948-3007 Released August 9, 2021, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Corn Silking – Selected States [These 18 States planted 92% of the 2020 corn acreage] Week ending 2016-2020 State August 8, August 1, August 8, Average 2020 2021 2021 (percent) (percent) (percent) (percent) Colorado ............................................. 93 86 95 89 Illinois ................................................. 99 96 97 97 Indiana ............................................... 96 93 96 92 Iowa .................................................... 98 92 96 96 Kansas ............................................... 94 88 93 94 Kentucky ............................................. 94 91 93 93 Michigan ............................................. 94 91 97 83 Minnesota ........................................... 99 96 99 96 Missouri .............................................. 99 89 96 98 Nebraska ............................................ 97 97 99 96 North Carolina .................................... 100 98 100 99 North Dakota ...................................... 90 69 86 89 Ohio .................................................... 93 88 93 87 Pennsylvania ...................................... 72 57 72 83 South Dakota ...................................... 94 83 94 91 Tennessee .......................................... 97 95 97 98 Texas ................................................. 97 93 94 97 Wisconsin ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cuesta Student Planning Calendar
    SUMMER SESSION 2021: June 14 – July 23 WINTER BREAK: December 18 - January 17 March 26……….....……...Class Finder available online 2021-2022 December 23–24, 27–30..…..................Board Holidays Beginning April 1………………………….…Apply online STUDENT December 31.……New Year’s Day Holiday (observed) April 19….......……………Priority myCuesta reg begins PLANNING CALENDAR January 12–14, 2022.…..……...……………..Flex Days April 22.………...New/returning/transfer student priority January 17, 2022……….Martin Luther King, Jr Holiday April 27..…............Enrichment/Dual Enrollment priority June 2021 December 2021 May 1...…..…International student application deadline U M T W R F S U M T W R F S SPRING SEMESTER 2022: January 18 – May 20 Day Prior to 1st Class Meeting……..Drop for full refund 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Day Prior to Census Date……..Late add with add code Beginning October 1, 2021…...…......…….Apply online 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 October 29..………..…….Class Finder available online July 5 (observed).........……Independence Day Holiday 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 27 28 29 30 26 27 28 29 30 31 November 9……..………..Priority myCuesta reg begins July 2021 January 2022 November 22…. New/returning/transfer student priority U M T W R F S U M T W R F S FALL SEMESTER 2021: August 16 – December 17 1 2 3 1 December 1..………International student application deadline 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Beginning October 1, 2020....………..…….Apply online December 3…..…Enrichment/Dual Enrollment student priority 11 12 13 14 15
    [Show full text]