DOCSLIB.ORG

Celebrating 35 Years

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

6 20 CELEBRATING 35 YEARS 1 2019-2020 Year in Review WILDLIFE & HABITAT 157,836 native trees, pollinator plants, marsh grasses, and other native plants installed 34 acres of forests, stream buffers, meadow, and wetlands created or restored 28 acres of invasive species removed 295,595 oysters and fish raised and released STORMWATER 80 acres of impervious surface treated or removed 59,384 square feet of rain gardens created 213 storm drains stenciled 317 rain barrels installed 76,136 pounds of trash removed, including single-use plastics that choke wildlife and harm our ecosystems’ health EDUCATION & OUTREACH 48,199 students engaged by 2,758 teachers 50,219 people educated through 1,826 workshops 14,681 volunteers engaged, donating 117,008 hours cbtrust.org ANNUAL REPORT 2019-2020 2 CHESAPEAKE BAY TRUST The Chesapeake Bay Trust is a nonprofit, grant-making FISCAL YEAR 2020 GOVERNOR-APPOINTED TRUSTEES organization working towards a vision of healthy and safe watersheds in Maryland and the Chesapeake Bay region by CHAIR OF THE BOARD TREASURER empowering diverse groups to take actions that enrich natural Gary Jobson F. Carter Heim Jobson Sailing, Inc. HeimLantz, P.C. resources and local communities. Since 1985, the Trust has VICE CHAIR SECRETARY awarded more than $130 million in grants and projects for Benjamin S. Wechsler Dr. Erica Anthony Yumkas, Vidmar, Sweeney, Morgan State University education, watershed restoration, capacity building, and science & Mulrenin that have engaged over two million dedicated individuals. Coretta Bennett The Honorable Johns Hopkins University David Fraser-Hidalgo Maryland House of Delegates J. Robert Bradshaw Our Core Values Joseph Farren Jason Keppler Porter Novelli Maryland Department LEARNING of Agriculture Joe Koch The Trust is constantly learning from a wide range of constituencies, Washington Area New Automobile COUNCILMEMBERS including our collaborators, our grantees, and our critics, and is willing Dealers Association and able to embrace new approaches that help us meet our goals. Beth Caro Anthony Murray Leigh Tag and Title Service of Maryland U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs SCIENCE AND INNOVATION Thomas C. Ervin The Trust uses the best available natural and social scientific Dr. Thomas Miller The Snyder-Ervin Group Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, information to guide our actions. Where needs or information gaps University of Maryland Center for Dr. Rhonda Jeter exist, the Trust supports the pursuit of new tools and information. Environmental Science Bowie State University The Honorable Todd Morgan Vernice Miller-Travis ENGAGEMENT OF A GRANTEE COMMUNITY St. Mary’s County Board of Metropolitan Group Our vision of healthy natural resources for all relies on a wide range Commissioners John Quinn of types of groups. Power exists in giving local on-the-ground Bryan Offutt BGE groups ownership of projects that make a difference. E3 Ranch Company TRUSTEES COUNCIL DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION Thomasina Poirot Venable LLP The Honorable John Astle The watershed will not be restored without a broad range of John R. Valliant The Honorable Virginia Clagett communities investing in their natural resources, reaping the benefits Grayce B. Kerr Fund Paul Allen of a healthier environment and economic and health co-benefits. Peter Byrnes Success hinges on understanding and connecting to the values and EFFECTIVE JULY 2020: Fran Flanigan interests of diverse, often under-engaged communities. Alexander G. Núñez John Griffin BGE FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY Warren Hamel The Trust holds itself to the highest standards as the steward of EX OFFICIO TRUSTEES Bob Hoyt contributions made to the Trust. The Honorable Pam Beidle Virginia Kearney Maryland State Senate Midgett Parker TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY Lee Currey Martin Poretsky The Trust uses transparent and rigorous decision-making in its Maryland Department of the Tara Potter management of contributions made to the Trust, in implementing Environment Terence Smith our grant-making programs, and in operating internally. Matt Fleming Melanie Teems Maryland Department of Natural Resources ANNUAL REPORT 2019-2020 cbtrust.org 1 Letter from the Executive Director The year 2020 was transformational for almost everyone: nonprofits, for profits, governments all struggling with changing revenue streams amidst dealing with personal impact as a result of the novel coronavirus and the illness it causes, COVID-19. We feel so fortunate at the Chesapeake Bay Trust to still be standing strong at the end of our Fiscal Year 2020. The main reason is the unbelievable resilience of our grantees and our partners, who showed how adaptable and ingenious they are as a community and how quickly we can all adjust. Our educator grantees shifted to virtual learning, and adeptly brought their environmental stewardship work to that forum. Instead of large group field trips, teachers offered outdoor lessons students could do independently at home. Our community group grantees did not give up on their projects; they simply found a way to enable physical distancing. One of our favorite stories is a church rain garden project that was initially envisioned as a group volunteer planting day. The organizers ingeniously shifted to a “plant by number” (after the “paint by number”) model that volunteers could undertake at different times but still feel part of a larger effort. Our researchers got back in the field as soon as they could to continue data collection. Most importantly, a larger audience than we ever hoped for began to understand the value of the outdoors because indoor venues were closed. Fishing license applications CHESAPEAKE BAY TRUST STAFF skyrocketed, visits to local parks exploded, and people Jana Davis, Ph.D. RESTORATION PROGRAMS found natural resource gems in their backyards they never Executive Director Sadie Drescher knew existed. Director of Programs FINANCE AND for Restoration ADMINISTRATION More and more people are beginning to understand what Jeanne Nelson Jeffrey Popp science has shown us for decades: People who spend time Senior Program Officer outdoors are healthier, which means they likely have fewer Controller Sarah Koser underlying conditions, which means they are poised to be Heather Adams Senior Program Officer able to withstand attacks like COVID-19 better. We need to Administration Officer make sure ALL of our residents have access to healthy, clean, Sarah Higgins Nguyen Le green outdoor spaces, and that we work to solve race-based, Office Manager Program Coordinator socioeconomics-based, and other disparities in this access. Millicent Goodger Katherine Somoza-Garcia Accounting Consultant Program Assistant In the pages that lie ahead is our portfolio of the $11.1 Emma Cwalinski million in projects the Trust was able to fund this year, Sandi Hiller Accounting Consultant Intern through the Chesapeake Bay vehicle license plate, donation line on the state tax form, multiple partnerships with other OUTREACH AND DEVELOPMENT, funders, and other sources that reach such incredibly diverse EDUCATION PROGRAMS MARKETING, AND audiences in every corner of our watersheds. Taken together, COMMUNICATIONS these 350 projects tell the story that hundreds of thousands of Kacey Wetzel Director of Programs for Kelly Swartout people care about our natural resources, want to take action, Outreach and Education Director of Development and will find a way to do so even in light of COVID-19. and Marketing Tara Drennan Senior Program Officer Terry Pompey Marketing Officer Bre’Anna Brooks Program Officer Nikki Tyree Development Coordinator Emily Stransky Program Officer Kristina Arreza Intern Jana Davis, Ph.D. Joseph Toolan Executive Director Program Assistant cbtrust.org ANNUAL REPORT 2019-2020 2 The Chesapeake Bay Trust works 2019-2020 Grants and Projects with many funding partners to collaboratively support natural Arundel Rivers Federation, $1,456 to plant ALLEGHANY trees, shrubs, and marsh plants to help resources projects in several key Allegany County Recycling, $1,250 to stabilize a shoreline in the West Shoreham create a used cooking oil drop off site for Community topic areas: future recycling into biofuels Arundel Rivers Federation, $102,807 to The Nature Conservancy, $1,250 design the Quiet Waters Park Caffrey’s Run EDUCATION: to quantify biological impacts of fire on stream restoration project. We advance environmental education resiliency of Appalachian forests through student experiential learning, Arundel Rivers Federation, $364,225 to restore 3,760 linear feet of stream and outdoor experiences, professional ANNE ARUNDEL riparian buffer in Broad Creek Park development for teachers, and curriculum development. Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay, $15,778 Arundel Rivers Federation, $349,312 to for communications tools and processes restore 2118 linear feet of stream in the Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay, $1,225 Beards Creek watershed RESTORATION: to develop an experiential watershed and Arundel Rivers Federation, $43,198 to We support the restoration of our bays, agriculture curriculum for middle schoolers restore 1300 linear feet of stream at the Girl rivers, streams, forests, parks, and other Scout Camp Woodlands natural systems in ways that engage Annapolis Elementary School PTA, $4,315 for field experiences at Back Creek Nature Chesapeake Conservancy, $54,000 for communities and individuals. Park and via boat on the Severn River for 30 environmental project technical assistance students to private landowners COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: Annapolis Green, $750 to showcase a Chesapeake
Recommended publications
  • Keystone Fund Projects by Applicant (1994-2017) Propose DCNR Contract Requeste D Region Applicant Project Title # Round Grant Type D Award Allocatio Funding Types

    Keystone Fund Projects by Applicant (1994-2017) Propose DCNR Contract Requeste D Region Applicant Project Title # Round Grant Type D Award Allocatio Funding Types

    Keystone Fund Projects by Applicant (1994-2017) Propose DCNR Contract Requeste d Region Applicant Project Title # Round Grant Type d Award Allocatio Funding Types Alverthorpe Manor BRC-PRD- Region 1 Abington Township Cultural Park (6422) 11-3 11 Development $223,000 $136,900 Key - Community Abington Township TAP Trail- Development BRC-PRD- Region 1 Abington Township (1101296) 22-171 22 Trails $90,000 $90,000 Key - Community Ardsley Wildlife Sanctuary- BRC-PRD- Region 1 Abington Township Development 22-37 22 Development $40,000 $40,000 Key - Community Briar Bush Nature Center Master Site Plan BRC-TAG- Region 1 Abington Township (1007785) 20-12 20 Planning $42,000 $37,000 Key - Community Pool Feasibility Studies BRC-TAG- Region 1 Abington Township (1100063) 21-127 21 Planning $15,000 $15,000 Key - Community Rubicam Avenue Park KEY-PRD-1- Region 1 Abington Township (1) 1 01 Development $25,750 $25,700 Key - Community Demonstration Trail - KEY-PRD-4- Region 1 Abington Township Phase I (1659) 4 04 Development $114,330 $114,000 Key - Community KEY-SC-3- Region 1 Aldan Borough Borough Park (5) 6 03 Development $20,000 $2,000 Key - Community Ambler Pocket Park- Development BRC-PRD- Region 1 Ambler Borough (1102237) 23-176 23 Development $102,340 $102,000 Key - Community Comp. Rec. & Park Plan BRC-TAG- Region 1 Ambler Borough (4438) 8-16 08 Planning $10,400 $10,000 Key - Community American Littoral Upper & Middle Soc/Delaware Neshaminy Watershed BRC-RCP- Region 1 Riverkeeper Network Plan (3337) 6-9 06 Planning $62,500 $62,500 Key - Rivers Keystone Fund Projects by Applicant (1994-2017) Propose DCNR Contract Requeste d Region Applicant Project Title # Round Grant Type d Award Allocatio Funding Types Valley View Park - Development BRC-PRD- Region 1 Aston Township (1100582) 21-114 21 Development $184,000 $164,000 Key - Community Comp.
  • Historic-Register-OPA-Addresses.Pdf

    Historic-Register-OPA-Addresses.Pdf

    Philadelphia Historical Commission Philadelphia Register of Historic Places As of January 6, 2020 Address Desig Date 1 Desig Date 2 District District Date Historic Name Date 1 ACADEMY CIR 6/26/1956 US Naval Home 930 ADAMS AVE 8/9/2000 Greenwood Knights of Pythias Cemetery 1548 ADAMS AVE 6/14/2013 Leech House; Worrell/Winter House 1728 517 ADDISON ST Society Hill 3/10/1999 519 ADDISON ST Society Hill 3/10/1999 600-02 ADDISON ST Society Hill 3/10/1999 2013 601 ADDISON ST Society Hill 3/10/1999 603 ADDISON ST Society Hill 3/10/1999 604 ADDISON ST Society Hill 3/10/1999 605-11 ADDISON ST Society Hill 3/10/1999 606 ADDISON ST Society Hill 3/10/1999 608 ADDISON ST Society Hill 3/10/1999 610 ADDISON ST Society Hill 3/10/1999 612-14 ADDISON ST Society Hill 3/10/1999 613 ADDISON ST Society Hill 3/10/1999 615 ADDISON ST Society Hill 3/10/1999 616-18 ADDISON ST Society Hill 3/10/1999 617 ADDISON ST Society Hill 3/10/1999 619 ADDISON ST Society Hill 3/10/1999 629 ADDISON ST Society Hill 3/10/1999 631 ADDISON ST Society Hill 3/10/1999 1970 635 ADDISON ST Society Hill 3/10/1999 636 ADDISON ST Society Hill 3/10/1999 637 ADDISON ST Society Hill 3/10/1999 638 ADDISON ST Society Hill 3/10/1999 639 ADDISON ST Society Hill 3/10/1999 640 ADDISON ST Society Hill 3/10/1999 641 ADDISON ST Society Hill 3/10/1999 642 ADDISON ST Society Hill 3/10/1999 643 ADDISON ST Society Hill 3/10/1999 703 ADDISON ST Society Hill 3/10/1999 708 ADDISON ST Society Hill 3/10/1999 710 ADDISON ST Society Hill 3/10/1999 712 ADDISON ST Society Hill 3/10/1999 714 ADDISON ST Society Hill
  • A Case Study of Philadelphia's Preservation Policy: the Square Block of Chestnut, Walnut, Front and Second Streets

    A Case Study of Philadelphia's Preservation Policy: the Square Block of Chestnut, Walnut, Front and Second Streets

    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 1999 A Case Study of Philadelphia's Preservation Policy: The Square Block of Chestnut, Walnut, Front and Second Streets Meghan MacWilliams University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons MacWilliams, Meghan, "A Case Study of Philadelphia's Preservation Policy: The Square Block of Chestnut, Walnut, Front and Second Streets" (1999). Theses (Historic Preservation). 393. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/393 Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: MacWilliams, Meghan (1999). A Case Study of Philadelphia's Preservation Policy: The Square Block of Chestnut, Walnut, Front and Second Streets. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/393 For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Case Study of Philadelphia's Preservation Policy: The Square Block of Chestnut, Walnut, Front and Second Streets Disciplines Historic Preservation and Conservation Comments Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: MacWilliams, Meghan (1999). A Case Study of Philadelphia's Preservation Policy:
  • Lackawanna Valley National Heritage Area Evaluation Findings

    Lackawanna Valley National Heritage Area Evaluation Findings

    Lackawanna Valley National Heritage Area Evaluation Findings Authors Prepared for Prepared by Chandria Jones, Ph.D. United States National Park Service Westat Laurel Lunn, Ph.D. Washington, D.C. 1600 Research Boulevard Teodora Vassileva Rockville, Maryland 20850-3129 Nataly Johanson (301) 251-1500 July 2015 Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................................................................................................4 Purpose of the Report . .. 4 Key Evaluation Questions. 4 Key Findings . 5 Section 1– Introduction ...............................................................................................................................................................................................10 1 1. National Heritage Areas . 10 1 .2 Report Purpose . 10 1 .3 Lackawanna Valley National Heritage Area . 11 1 .4 Evaluation Methodology . 14 1 1.4 Methodology. 14 1 .4 .2 Site Introduction and Background Research . 14 1 .4 .3 Data Collection . 14 1 .4 .4 Data Analysis . 15 1 .4 .5 Evaluation Limitations . 15 1 .5 Roles . 16 Section 2 – Overview of the Lackawanna Valley National Heritage Area ....................................................................17 2 1. Introduction to the Lackawanna Valley . 17 2 .2 Introduction to the Lackawanna Heritage Valley Authority . 19 2 .2 1. Authorizing Legislation and LVNHA Vision and Mission . 19 2 .2 .2 The LHVA’s Organizational Structure . 20 2 .3 LVNHA’s Relationships
  • Dept Or Interior

    Dept Or Interior

    RECEivED LRRC Interior 1nited States Department of the 2015 MY 19 Ptl ‘4 38 NATIONAL PARK SRV ICE ort1ieast Region United Slates Custom House 200 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, PA 19106 l R PlY RErEl II) A.1.2, (NER-RS&S) MAY 192015 Department of Environmental Protection Policy Office 400 Market Street P.O. Box 2063 Harrisburg, PA 17105-2063 Subject: 25 PA. Code CHS. Th and 78a Proposed Rulemaking: Environmental Protection Performance Standards at Oil and Gas Well Sites Dear l)epartment of Environmental Protection Policy Office: The National Park Service (‘NPS) is pleased 10 provide comments on 25 PA. Code CHS. 78 and 78a. Draft Final Rulemaking: Environmental Protection Performance Standards at Oil and Gas Well Sites. The NPS appreciates the proactive steps the Department of Environmental Protection (I)EP) is taking in revising, these regulations to protect the significant and vital natural resources in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (Commonwealth). Tb is effort will result in necessary and important environmental protections for state and federally managed or administered lands. held in trust for [he public, and the resources and ecosystem services they provide that arc counted upon by present and future generations for essential benefits such as clean water. The NPS offers the following comments which are intended to promote understanding cf the diverse and nationally significant resources within NPS units and affiliated areas in the Commonwealth: to claril’ and strengthen the proposed regulations: to aid in a more efficient and effective penmtflng process: to promote open and early communication between ibe NPS and Commonwealth regulatory agencies: and to promote the protection of N’ PS resources.
  • Copyrighted Material

    Copyrighted Material

    INDEX See also Accommodations and Restaurant indexes, below. GENERAL INDEX AIA Bookstore and Design traveling to, 233 Center, 172, 173 visitor information, 234 AIDSinfo, 258 Amish Experience (Inter- cademic trips and language A Airport Wireless, 51–52 course), 234 classes, 49 Air travel, 37–38 Amish Farm and House Academy of Music, 191 A.K.A. Music, 182 (Lancaster), 237 Academy of Natural Sciences, AllCell, 52 Anabaptists, 230 139 All Join Hands (mural), 131 Animal-rights issues, 49 Academy of Vocal Arts, 189 Amada, 205 Annenberg Center at the Uni- Access America, 257 America-Italia Society of Phila- versity of Pennsylvania, Accommodations, 1, 64–83. delphia, 49 192, 193 See also Accommodations American Express, 254 Antiquarian’s Delight, Index American Helicopter Museum 169–170 B&B agencies, 64–65 (West Chester), 223 Antiques, 169–171 best, 7–9 American Music Theatre Pennsylvania Dutch Brandywine Valley, 226–227 (Lancaster), 253 Country, 242 Center City American Revolution (Revolu- Antiques Show, 34 east of Broad, 84–94 tionary War), 18–19 Aquarium, Adventure, 146 west of Broad, 94–103 American Swedish Historical Architectural highlights, City Line and Northeast, 82 Museum, 140–141 129–132 hostels, 82–83 America the Beautiful Access Architecture, 21–23, 25, 162 near the airport, 80–82 Pass, 45 historic buildings and mon- New Hope area, 219–220 America the Beautiful Senior uments, 135–138 Old City and Convention Pass, 46 Arch Street Meeting House, Center area, 65–72 The Amish, 229, 232–237, 240, 133, 166 Pennsylvania Dutch 243–245, 247–249,
  • 2014 PCCD Annual Report

    2014 PCCD Annual Report

    2014 Annual Report “Those who can, do. Those who can do more, volunteer.” … Unknown As a member of the of the Pike County Conservation District Board of Directors over the past eleven years, I have been very privileged to work with some amazing people on the Conservation District Board. They are a dynamic group of dedicated volunteers who all see the many benefits of their volunteer work. These people give of their time and expertise working as volunteers to affect important conservation work in Pike County. They come from diverse backgrounds and interests bringing expertise and input to the policy decisions which guide the District’s programs and staff. With the declining rates of volunteerism across the county, and country, which are effecting many organizations, particularly volunteer fire and emergency personnel, it is becoming increasingly difficult to find individuals who have the time and inclination to “..do more.” Our Conservation District Board continually seeks out dedicated individuals – volunteers who will work towards the conservation of our County’s natural resources. This annual report highlights the broad range of conservation activities and projects which our Board volunteers and our professional staff have worked on over the past year. I am hoping that as you read through the articles you will find something that really interests you. Perhaps it will interest you enough to attend one of our monthly meetings or educational events or to follow our website or Facebook page to see what your Conservation District is all about. Or perhaps you will find yourself with time and the inclination to become part of the heart of our Conservation organization.
  • Ftmsm. Keystone State's \ Official / FISHING BOATING ) Magazine

    Ftmsm. Keystone State's \ Official / FISHING BOATING ) Magazine

    ftmsm. Keystone State's \ Official / FISHING BOATING ) Magazine... ^J 25< ^•••^••••^^•••^^••r Single Copy CONSERVATION VIEWPOINT by ROBERT J. BIELO Executive Director SILENT MAJORITY MUST STAND The decade of the 70's should be one of great progress in advancing far-reaching pro­ grams to preserve our environment—not simply for the sake of conservation, but for the urgent need of mankind to have clean air and water and productive soil. Stronger state and national legislation has been signed into law to protect our environ­ ment for our own benefit. Now what we need are leaders at national, state and local levels that have the courage to implement these laws. Certainly changes won't be effected over­ night, correcting years of air, water and land abuse. But, we should see progress in the environmental cleanup program occur at a rate that exceeds the new levels of damage civilization manages to inflict on the essential elements of our existence. Throughout the coming months I hope to use this column to present some comments on advances in environmental protection and also to point out areas where we may be slid­ ing backward. I plan to do this as I believe that we, the silent majority President Nixon is relying on to support his national and worldwide programs, must also be the underlying strength in environmental protection efforts. As an example we must stand together and speak out clearly, not only as states, but as a nation against the industrial giants whose reaction to pollution cleanup measures occasionally takes the form of threats to close down and leave town.
  • We Are America's Travel Industry, A

    We Are America's Travel Industry, A

    The Honorable Mitch McConnell The Honorable Nancy Pelosi Majority Leader Speaker of the House of Representatives United States Senate United States House of Representatives Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510 The Honorable Charles Schumer The Honorable Kevin McCarthy Minority Leader Minority Leader United States Senate United States House of Representatives Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510 March 20, 2020 Dear Leader McConnell, Leader Schumer, Speaker Pelosi, and Leader McCarthy: We are America’s travel industry, an economic sector that directly employs 9 million American workers and supports a total of 15.8 million jobs. The travel and tourism industry—including but not limited to transportation, lodging, recreation and entertainment, food and beverage, meetings, conferences and business events, travel advisors, destination marketers—is comprised of businesses of all sizes, but the vast majority, 83%, are small businesses. Together we are grappling with the immediate and devastating impact of the current health crisis. Furloughs of American travel workers are happening right now. Travel to and within the United States has essentially ground to a stop due to the actions needed to halt the spread of coronavirus. Aggressive financial relief is needed immediately. Taking care of our employees will always be our top priority, but the hard fact is we cannot continue supporting them through this disaster without relief. To that end, we greatly appreciate and strongly support provisions in the ‘‘Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act’’ that provide: • $300 billion for enhanced Small Business Administration (SBA) loans distributed through an expedited process and can be partially forgiven for employee retention; and • Tax relief to mitigate economic losses, including deferral of tax liability, extension of the Net Operating Loss deduction, and delay of estimated tax payments.
  • National Park Service Heister

    National Park Service Heister

    3,04^ United States Department ofthe Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Northeast Region United States Custom House 200 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, PA 19106 IN REPLY REFER TO: U U L±3 \^ L^=3 u \J L=nir> MAR 1 4 2014 March 13, 2013 INDEPENDENT REGUUTORY REVIEW COMMISSION Environmental Quality Board P.O. Box 8477 Harrisburg, PA 17105-8477 RegComments@pa. gov http://www.ahs.dep.pa.gov/RegComments Subject: 25 PA. Code CH. 78 Proposed Rulemaking: Environmental Protection Performance Standards at Oil and Gas Well Sites Dear Environmental Quality Board members, The National Park Service (NPS) is pleased to provide comment on 25 PA. Code CH. 78 Proposed Rulemaking: Environmental Protection Performance Standards at Oil and Gas Well Sites. The NPS appreciates the proactive steps the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) is taking in revising these regulations to protect the significant and vital natural resources in the Commonwealth. This effort will result in necessary and important environmental protections for state and federally managed or administered lands, held in trust for the public, and the resources and ecosystem services they provide that are counted upon by present and future generations for essential benefits such as clean water. The NPS offers the following comments which are intended to promote understanding ofthe diverse and nationally significant resources within NPS units and affiliated areas in Pennsylvania, to clarify and strengthen the proposed regulations to aid in a more efficient and effective permitting process, to promote open and early communication between the NPS and PA state regulatory agencies, and to promote the protection of NPS resources.
  • United States Department of the Interior - OFFICE of the SECRETARY Washington, DC 20240 AUG O9 2Or1

    United States Department of the Interior - OFFICE of the SECRETARY Washington, DC 20240 AUG O9 2Or1

    United States Department of the Interior - OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY Washington, DC 20240 AUG O9 2or1 The Honorable Paul Gosar Chairman Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources Committee on Natural Resources House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Chairman Gosar: Enclosed are responses prepared by the Department to questions submitted following the Subcommittee's July 12, 2017, oversight hearing on "Evaluating Federal Offshore Oil and Gas Development on the Outer Continental Shelf." We apologize for the delay and thank you for the opportunity to provide this material to the Committee. Sincerely, . O~~ ~ Christopher P. Salotti Legislative Counsel Office of Congressional and Legislative Affairs Enclosure cc: The Honorable Alan Lowenthal Ranking Member Committee on Natural Resources Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources Oversight Hearing 1324 Longworth House Office Building July 12, 2017 10:00 a.m. Oversight Hearing on "Evaluating Federal Offshore Oil and Gas Development on the Outer Continental Shelf" Questions from Rep. Gosar for Katharine MacGregor, Acting Assistant Secretary 1. Does BOEM consider impacts to microorganisms (or plankton) when completing Programmatic Environmental Impact Statements for OCS G&G activities? Response: Yes. BOEM considers impacts to microorganisms, such as plankton, when completing a PEIS for OCS G&G activities. It is important to look at potential effects to all levels of the ocean food chain. Recently, a study offshore Tasmania, Australia tested the potential impacts of seismic airguns on zooplankton. It found significant plankton mortality at greater distances from airgm1 arrays in near-shore, shallow environments than previously thought possible. BOEM has examined the study methods and results and determined that further study is needed before determining direct application of these study results to the offshore, deeper water environments of the U.S.
  • HISTORY of PENNSYLVANIA's STATE PARKS 1984 to 2015

    HISTORY of PENNSYLVANIA's STATE PARKS 1984 to 2015

    i HISTORY OF PENNSYLVANIA'S STATE PARKS 1984 to 2015 By William C. Forrey Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Office of Parks and Forestry Bureau of State Parks Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Copyright © 2017 – 1st edition ii iii Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................................................................................... vi INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................. vii CHAPTER I: The History of Pennsylvania Bureau of State Parks… 1980s ............................................................ 1 CHAPTER II: 1990s - State Parks 2000, 100th Anniversary, and Key 93 ............................................................. 13 CHAPTER III: 21st CENTURY - Growing Greener and State Park Improvements ............................................... 27 About the Author .............................................................................................................................................. 58 APPENDIX .......................................................................................................................................................... 60 TABLE 1: Pennsylvania State Parks Directors ................................................................................................ 61 TABLE 2: Department Leadership .................................................................................................................