DOCSLIB.ORG

I-Team Dam Document for Web.Xlsx

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Connecticut Dams Data Source: Associated Press Dams Highlighted in Blue have been found to be in Poor Condition in High-Risk Areas DAM NAME COUNTY CONDITION ASSESSMENT HAZARD STATUS LAST INSPECTION DATE YEAR DAM COMPLETED PRIMARY PURPOSE OWNER TYPE ABBOTT'S POND DAM WINDHAM Not Rated Significant 5/7/2013 1960 Recreation Private Hazard Status Defined: ACME POND DAM WINDHAM Poor High 12/16/2014 1846 Recreation Private (Source: Natl Inventory of Dams) ADDER RESERVOIR MIDDLESEX High 11/20/2014 1934 Water Supply Local Government ADDISON POND DAM HARTFORD Not Rated Significant 9/26/1996 1820 Recreation Private High Hazard: Dams assigned ALDON MILL POND DAM TOLLAND Poor Significant 1/23/2015 1920 Recreation State the high hazard potential ALLEN RESERVOIR DAM LITCHFIELD Satisfactory Significant 6/22/2018 Water Supply classification are those where AMERICAN CAN COMPANY DAM FAIRFIELD Not Rated High 6/21/2017 1970 Recreation Private failure or misoperation will AMERICAN FELT DAM FAIRFIELD Satisfactory High 8/28/2017 1867 Recreation Private probably cause loss of human AMSTON LAKE DAM TOLLAND Not Rated Significant 8/14/1984 1910 Recreation Private life. ANDOVER LAKE DAM TOLLAND Satisfactory Significant 11/3/2014 1920 Recreation Private ANGUS PARK POND DAM HARTFORD Fair Significant 1/20/2015 1920 Recreation Local Government Significant Hazard: Dams ANSONIA LEVEE NEW HAVEN Not Rated High Flood Control Local Government assigned the significant ARRIGONI POND DAM MIDDLESEX Satisfactory Significant 8/11/2008 1945 Recreation Private hazard potential classification ARTISTIC WIRE COMPANY POND DAM MIDDLESEX Not Rated Significant 3/27/1984 Other Private are those dams where failure ASHFORD LAKE DAM WINDHAM Satisfactory Significant 11/13/2009 1949 Recreation Private or misoperation results in no ASHLAND POND DAM NEW LONDON Fair High 5/26/2015 1800 Recreation State probable loss of human life ASPETUCK RESERVOIR DAM FAIRFIELD Significant 10/10/2014 1913 Water Supply but can cause economic loss, ASYLUM RESERVOIR #2 DAM MIDDLESEX Satisfactory Significant 11/7/2014 Water Supply State environment damage ASYLUM RESERVOIR #4 DAM MIDDLESEX Satisfactory Significant 11/7/2014 Water Supply State disruption of lifeline facilities, ASYLUM RESERVOIR #5 DAM MIDDLESEX Satisfactory Significant 11/7/2014 1879 Water Supply State or impact other concerns. ASYLUM RESERVOIR DAM #6 MIDDLESEX Satisfactory Significant 11/7/2014 1954 Water Supply State Significant hazard potential AVERY FLOOD CONTROL SITE #1 DAM HARTFORD Satisfactory High 1/23/2015 1992 Flood Control State classification dams are often AVERY FLOOD CONTROL SITE #2 DAM HARTFORD Satisfactory High 1/23/2015 1993 Flood Control State located in predominantly BABCOCK POND DAM #1 NEW LONDON Not Rated Significant 1880 Recreation State rural or agricultural areas, BALDWINS POND DAM NEW HAVEN Not Rated Significant 5/21/2014 1850 Recreation Local Government but could be located in areas BALLOUVILLE DAM WINDHAM Not Rated Significant 11/6/1984 1900 Recreation Private with population and BALTIC RESERVOIR DAM (EAST) NEW LONDON Significant 8/29/2016 0 Water Supply Local Government significant infrastructure. BALTIC RESERVOIR DAM (WEST) NEW LONDON Significant 8/29/2016 1900 Water Supply Local Government BANTAM POND DAM LITCHFIELD Satisfactory Significant 8/3/2015 1970 Recreation Private Low Hazard: Dams assigned BARBER POND DAM HARTFORD Fair High 4/14/2016 1955 Recreation State the low hazard potential BARNES RESERVOIR DIKE NEW LONDON Significant 5/8/2012 1902 Water Supply classification are those where BARNES RESERVOIR DAM NEW LONDON Significant 5/8/2012 1902 Water Supply failure or misoperation BASHAN LAKE DAM MIDDLESEX Not Rated Significant 5/23/2008 1939 Recreation State results in no probable loss BATTERSON PARK POND DAM HARTFORD Satisfactory High 6/23/2008 1878 Recreation Local Government of human life and low BATTERSON PARK POND DIKE HARTFORD Satisfactory High 6/23/2008 Recreation Local Government economic and/or environ- BEACH POND DAM NEW LONDON Not Rated Significant 9/19/2013 1885 Recreation State mental losses. Losses are BEACHDALE POND DAM NEW LONDON Fair Significant 5/26/2015 Recreation State principally limited to the BEAUPRES POND DAM WINDHAM Fair High 10/28/2002 1952 Recreation Private owner's property. BEAVER DAM LAKE DAM FAIRFIELD Satisfactory High 8/1/2016 1901 Recreation Private BEAVER POND DAM NEW HAVEN Poor Significant 6/22/2017 1893 Recreation Private BELDEN DAM WINDHAM Not Rated Significant 1900 Other Private BELLEVIEW LAKE DAM NEW HAVEN Satisfactory High 11/6/2017 1899 Recreation Local Government BENDELS POND DAM FAIRFIELD Satisfactory Significant 4/15/2016 Recreation Local Government BENEDICT POND DAM LITCHFIELD Satisfactory Significant 5/1/2015 1920 Recreation Private BERLIN FISH & GAME DAM MIDDLESEX Not Rated Significant 1972 Recreation Private BEVINS POND DAM MIDDLESEX Fair Significant 6/16/2016 1898 Recreation Private BIG MEADOW POND A.K.A. JUDD POND DAM LITCHFIELD Significant 9/12/2018 1860 Recreation BIG POND DAM WINDHAM Satisfactory High 6/26/2017 1870 Recreation Private BIGELOW POND DAM TOLLAND Not Rated Significant 1941 Recreation State BIGELOW POND DAM LITCHFIELD Not Rated Significant 1900 Recreation Private BILLINGS AVERY DAM NEW LONDON Significant 7/31/2013 1968 Water Supply Local Government DAM NAME COUNTY CONDITION ASSESSMENT HAZARD STATUS LAST INSPECTION DATE YEAR DAM COMPLETED PRIMARY PURPOSE OWNER TYPE BILLINGS LAKE DAM NEW LONDON Not Rated Significant 6/7/2016 1900 Recreation State BIRCH MILL POND DAM MIDDLESEX Fair Significant 8/25/2017 1850 Recreation Private BIRD POND DAM LITCHFIELD Fair Significant 10/6/2015 Recreation Private BISHOP FOSTERS POND DAM NEW HAVEN Satisfactory Significant 6/3/2009 1900 Recreation Local Government BISHOP SWAMP DAM TOLLAND Not Rated Significant 6/2/2008 Recreation State BISSONETTE POND DAM TOLLAND Satisfactory Significant 9/8/2015 1930 Recreation Private BLACK POND DAM NEW HAVEN Satisfactory High 4/18/2018 1880 Recreation Local Government BLACK ROCK POND DAM LITCHFIELD Satisfactory High 4/28/2015 1945 Recreation State BLACK SPRUCE POND DAM WINDHAM Not Rated Significant 1960 Fish and Wildlife Pond State BLADENS RIVER DAM NEW HAVEN Poor Significant 8/6/2015 1906 Water Supply Private BLAST & CAST POND DAM HARTFORD Satisfactory Significant 6/9/2016 1953 Recreation Private BLEACHERY DAM LITCHFIELD Poor low 10/20/2014 1920 Recreation Local Government BLISSVILLE POND DAM NEW LONDON Not Rated low 1930 Recreation Local Government BLOOMFIELD FLOOD CONTROL SITE #3 DAM HARTFORD Satisfactory High 4/22/2015 1962 Flood Control State BLUE HILLS FLOOD CONTROL SITE #2 DAM HARTFORD Satisfactory High 4/22/2015 1964 Flood Control State BLUE HILLS FLOOD CONTROL SITE #2 DIKE HARTFORD Satisfactory High 4/22/2015 Flood Control State BLUE LAKE DAM NEW LONDON Satisfactory Significant 9/26/2017 1900 Recreation Private BOG MEADOW RESERVOIR DAM NEW LONDON Not Rated Significant 8/1/2013 1893 Recreation Local Government BOGGS POND DAM FAIRFIELD Satisfactory Significant 11/14/2017 1900 Recreation Local Government BOGUE BROOK RESERVOIR DAM NEW LONDON Significant 11/21/2017 1920 Water Supply Local Government BOULDER LAKE DAM MIDDLESEX Fair Significant 12/31/2015 1940 Recreation Private BRADLEY HUBBARD RESERVOIR DAM NEW HAVEN Satisfactory High 10/11/2017 1891 Recreation Local Government BRADLEY POND DAM HARTFORD Not Rated Significant Recreation Private BRADWAY POND DAM TOLLAND Satisfactory Significant 11/13/2017 Recreation Private BRADWAY RESERVOIR SITE #4 DAM TOLLAND Satisfactory Significant 4/29/2015 1961 Flood Control State BRANDAGEE LAKE DAM NEW LONDON Fair Significant 11/8/2017 1897 Recreation Local Government BRANFORD SUPPLY PONDS DAM NEW HAVEN Fair Significant 6/18/2015 1911 Recreation Local Government BREWSTER POND DAM NEW LONDON Poor Significant 5/13/2015 1854 Recreation State BREWSTER POND DAM FAIRFIELD Not Rated Significant 3/12/2014 Recreation Local Government BREWSTER POND DIKE NEW LONDON Not Low Other Private BRISTOL FISH & GAME CLUB POND NEW HAVEN Satisfactory Significant 7/10/2018 1961 Recreation Private BRISTOL RESERVOIR #1 DAM HARTFORD High 5/22/2015 1885 Water Supply Local Government BRISTOL RESERVOIR #2 DAM LITCHFIELD Significant 5/15/2015 1889 Water Supply Local Government BRISTOL RESERVOIR #3 DAM LITCHFIELD Significant 5/15/2015 Water Supply Local Government BRISTOL RESERVOIR #4 DAM LITCHFIELD Significant 5/12/2015 1906 Water Supply Local Government BRISTOL RESERVOIR #5 DAM LITCHFIELD High 5/12/2015 1932 Water Supply Local Government BROAD BROOK MILL POND DAM HARTFORD Not Rated Significant 1880 Recreation Local Government BROAD BROOK RESERVOIR DAM NEW HAVEN High 10/11/2017 1913 Water Supply Local Government BRONSON E. LOCKWOOD DAM LITCHFIELD High 9/12/2018 1958 Water Supply BROPHY POND DAM LITCHFIELD Not Rated Significant 1900 Recreation Private BRUSH RESERVOIR DAM FAIRFIELD low 10/9/2014 1925 Water Supply BUCKINGHAM RESERVOIR DAM HARTFORD Not Rated Significant 9/26/1996 1925 Recreation Local Government BUCKLEY DAMS LITCHFIELD Not Rated low 1957 Recreation Private BUCKLEY POND DAM (also #15807) FAIRFIELD Poor Significant 1/10/1987 1885 Recreation Private BUGBEE FLOOD CONTROL DAM HARTFORD Satisfactory High 4/22/2015 1969 Flood Control State BULL POND DAM DAM LITCHFIELD Not Rated Significant 1900 Recreation Private BUNNELLS POND DAM FAIRFIELD Satisfactory High 4/15/2015 1906 Recreation State BURNT HILL FLOOD CONTROL DAM HARTFORD Satisfactory High 5/1/2015 1966 Flood Control State BURR POND DAM LITCHFIELD Satisfactory High 4/28/2015 1935 Recreation State BUSHY
Recommended publications
  • The Farmington River Watershed Map

    The Farmington River Watershed Map

    Farmington River Watershed Education Curriculum: Elementary FRWA Curriculum Guide Week II Watershed 28 Farmington River Watershed Association Farmington River Watershed Education Curriculum: Elementary Watershed – Background Information “The river moves from land to water to land, in and out of organisms, re- minding us what the native peoples have never forgotten; that you cannot separate the land from the water, or the people from the land. – Lynn Noel, Voyages Canada’s Heritage Rivers A watershed consists of an area of land and water where water drains into particular water basins, such as rivers, lakes, ponds, wetlands, or streams. It encompasses all the land, animals, plants, buildings, towns and people within the area. The precipitation that falls that is not used by the plants or animals travels within the watershed. Land elevation determines the flow of water, while surrounding ridge areas define the boundaries. Farmington River Watershed is a sub-basin of the Connecticut River Watershed. All the tributaries of the Farmington River are included in the watershed. The area of land encompasses 386,000 acres, or 609 square miles, which drains into the Farmington River and its tributaries. Included in the watershed are 10 towns in Massachusetts and 23 towns in Connecticut. The Farmington River, in turn, drains into the Connecticut River. The 81 miles of river begin at an elevation of 2,180 feet in the Berkshire Hills of Becket, MA, traveling 16 miles through Otis and Tolland, and enter Connecticut in Colebrook at 1,300 feet. The west branch river flows through land areas that feature hills, ponds, wetlands and lakes.
  • Water-Supply Paper 374 Hartford, Stamford, Salisbury, Willimantic and Saybrooi Areas, Connecticut

    Water-Supply Paper 374 Hartford, Stamford, Salisbury, Willimantic and Saybrooi Areas, Connecticut

    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRANKLIN K. LANE, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 374 GROUND WATER IN THE HARTFORD, STAMFORD, SALISBURY, WILLIMANTIC AND SAYBROOI AREAS, CONNECTICUT BY HERBERT E. GREGORY AND ARTHUR J. ELUS Prepared IB cooperation with the CoBBectleat State Geological and Natural Hbtorjr Surer WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1016 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRANKLIN K. LANE, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Water-Supply Paper 374 GROUND WATER IN THE HARTFORD, STAMFORD, SALISBURY, WILLIMANTIC AND SAYBROOK AREAS, COHECTICUT HERBERT E. GREGORY AND Prepared in cooperation with the Connecticut State Geological and Natural History Surrey WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT FEINTING OFFICE 1916 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction.. ........................................................... 9 The problem. ........................................................ 9 History of the investigation. ........................................... 10 Acknowledgments. ................................................... 11 Areas selected for study. .................................................. 11 Reliability of data. ....................................................... la Occurrence of ground water. .............................................. 14 Origin.. .............................................................. 14 Water in the glacial drift. ............................................. 15 Circulation.... ...................................................
  • The New Deal Versus Yankee Independence: the Failure of Comprehensive Development on the Connecticut River, and Its Long-Term Consequences

    The New Deal Versus Yankee Independence: the Failure of Comprehensive Development on the Connecticut River, and Its Long-Term Consequences

    The New Deal versus Yankee independence: The failure of comprehensive development on the Connecticut River, and its long-term consequences Eve Vogel1 Department of Geosciences, UMass Amherst With assistance from Alexandra Lacy 2011 alumna (BS, Environmental Sciences), UMass Amherst Adapted from: Vogel, Eve and Alexandra Lacy. Forthcoming. The New Deal versus Yankee independence: The failure of comprehensive development on the Connecticut River, and its long-term consequences. The Northeastern Geographer 4 (2) Introduction For a person familiar with federal dams on major rivers in the American West or South, a visit to an Army Corps of Engineers dam in New England’s largest river basin, the Connecticut, can be a startling experience. Instead of an extended reservoir, one looks down from the empty heights and on both sides sees only a small river far below. Nor is there the fanfare – the visitors center, the historical information, the celebratory propaganda. Simply finding one of the Connecticut River’s federal dams can take some effort. None are on the mainstem. One must drive through the bucolic New England byways and forested hills to find a dam on a tributary (See Figure 1). For New Englanders, the near-invisibility of federal dams may not seem surprising. New England’s history and identity, including the Connecticut Valley’s, seem to rest with the small- to medium-scale development of rivers with mill dams during the 17th thru 19th centuries (e.g. Delaney 1983; Steinberg 1991). It might be more startling for many to learn that during the mid- twentieth century, the federal government did build a series of very large dams in the Connecticut Basin, which have had profound effect on the river.
  • AQUIFERPROTECTIONAREA SC Romwell , CONNECTICUT

    AQUIFERPROTECTIONAREA SC Romwell , CONNECTICUT

    !n M W C d R I S o L v d Mill Brook P M a r e R p u i u y E n Dr r n Par V t R r D r d J S l n a d n n s M n l ! L l ry Newington High School o L d nd R i m c ipsic Rd ru o St R a o i n n t Ne a L D y s d t p B a e S un g n lls m rd d o l m a r e m i e g ba l r d r e D d l H p E W o r S b n d u l r d r n e C d H Ln r n s D i o R n Gideon Welles School S a e n l e m w t y l S S ar D e el s e ly P t a M ! l e r n y W s S m t e a Exit 29 D e t s A v Pulaski Middle School o w o b t r s a R i t e t t a S R t s e i d B l 2 D t C h R o i e r F R o rt d o s u b l H w X r r sw l I er S u l d D w l D c r d T r E t l e R r e n t d l u r y D D e i n ly h y l Rams Pond h d l D b s B 2 o e e H m r l o t p d D R t ! R d T n m r rm u o a a a u a w D H t o O D b F l H R S e ar ld r N C l d L L B O t r n n e e e r e S v K p R l W o d Nipsic Bog r w t c i Webb Kindergarten Center R R Wickham Brook a H o n o a t i l n t a e C o r l e D 175 n r i i s R H L l ni d T d H n i e n en d R Rd o R w s a D S e d l g e R V a a y s g a C n H s y l t d n w 2 p g g S z d d v e W d i y d d R ! l t e R R O o d w u e d y P a R u ld l e t n n fie fie t M r a t l d n t m S o R n a i e T R e r 9 n m n d t i d l N arl St R C B S g p R a e S M n r S o a c d u d r d le 9 i t u e l D R D k t C lonia a d h q Co d e o r l D r e S e e d e e d l D d 5 t n a e R 7 e i R B R 1 l k f l e y n i l r l d r g L S il y i i a n d v n y d w m r n ia o r i H H M H r J R F r r L L a n ke le te Nathaniel D B is y ar ! d a u e a L d a r l P e t rr l r C B R ad S Mill Pond a e u e e G S l r n t
  • Town of North Branford

    Town of North Branford

    Town of North Branford Plan of Conservation and Development DRAFT FOR REVIEW June 20, 2019 Prepared for: The Town of North Branford Planning and Zoning Commission with assistance from Town of North Branford Planning and Zoning Commission Harry Dulak, Chair William Galdenzi, Vice Chair Ronald Siena Alexander DeFrancesco Trish Mase Stephen Scavo Plan of Conservation and Development Steering Committee Harry Dulak, Planning and Zoning Commission Carey Duques, AICP, Town Planner Michael Paulus, Town Manager Roger Salway, Economic Development Coordinator David Sargent, North Branford Land Conservation Trust Consultant Thank you to the South Central Regional Council of Governments (SCRCOG), who provided much of the mapping used in this Plan. Town of North Branford 2 Plan of Conservation and Development Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 4 Chapter 2: Preserve and Protect the Town’s Agricultural Lands and Rural Character..........10 Chapter 3: Protect, Connect, and Enhance Open Spaces and Natural Areas ..........................17 Chapter 4: Provide Housing Choices that Meet the Town’s Demographic Needs ................31 Chapter 5: Grow the Tax Base in Areas with Existing Infrastructure ............................................40 Chapter 6: Maintain High Quality Town Facilities and Services ....................................................50 Chapter 7: Support a Safe, Appropriate, and Connected Transportation
  • Waterbody Regulations and Boat Launches

    Waterbody Regulations and Boat Launches

    to boating in Connecticut! TheWelcome map with local ordinances, state boat launches, pumpout facilities, and Boating Infrastructure Grant funded transient facilities is back again. New this year is an alphabetical list of state boat launches located on Connecticut lakes, ponds, and rivers listed by the waterbody name. If you’re exploring a familiar waterbody or starting a new adventure, be sure to have the proper safety equipment by checking the list on page 32 or requesting a Vessel Safety Check by boating staff (see page 14 for additional information). Reference Reference Reference Name Town Number Name Town Number Name Town Number Amos Lake Preston P12 Dog Pond Goshen G2 Lake Zoar Southbury S9 Anderson Pond North Stonington N23 Dooley Pond Middletown M11 Lantern Hill Ledyard L2 Avery Pond Preston P13 Eagleville Lake Coventry C23 Leonard Pond Kent K3 Babcock Pond Colchester C13 East River Guilford G26 Lieutenant River Old Lyme O3 Baldwin Bridge Old Saybrook O6 Four Mile River Old Lyme O1 Lighthouse Point New Haven N7 Ball Pond New Fairfield N4 Gardner Lake Salem S1 Little Pond Thompson T1 Bantam Lake Morris M19 Glasgo Pond Griswold G11 Long Pond North Stonington N27 Barn Island Stonington S17 Gorton Pond East Lyme E9 Mamanasco Lake Ridgefield R2 Bashan Lake East Haddam E1 Grand Street East Lyme E13 Mansfield Hollow Lake Mansfield M3 Batterson Park Pond New Britain N2 Great Island Old Lyme O2 Mashapaug Lake Union U3 Bayberry Lane Groton G14 Green Falls Reservoir Voluntown V5 Messerschmidt Pond Westbrook W10 Beach Pond Voluntown V3 Guilford
  • Multi-Temporal Assessment of Connecticut Lake Water Clarity Using Landsat Satellite Imagery

    Multi-Temporal Assessment of Connecticut Lake Water Clarity Using Landsat Satellite Imagery

    Multi-temporal Assessment of Connecticut Lake Water Clarity Using Landsat Satellite Imagery Multi-temporal Assessment of Connecticut Lake Water Clarity Using Landsat Satellite Imagery Basic Information Title: Multi-temporal Assessment of Connecticut Lake Water Clarity Using Landsat Satellite Imagery Project Number: 2010CT208B Start Date: 3/1/2010 End Date: 2/28/2011 Funding Source: 104B Congressional District: District 2 Research Category: Water Quality Focus Category: Water Quality, Surface Water, None Descriptors: None Principal Investigators: Daniel Civco, James D Hurd Multi-temporal Assessment of Connecticut Lake Water Clarity Using Landsat Satellite Imagery1 Multi-temporal Assessment of Connecticut Lake Water Clarity Using Landsat Satellite Imagery Progress Report May 2011 Daniel Civco – Principal Investigator James Hurd – Co-Investigator Center for Landuse Education and Research (CLEAR) Department of Natural Resources and the Environment The University of Connecticut 1376 Storrs Road Storrs, CT 06269-4087 (p) 860-486-4610, (f) 860-486-5408 [email protected] [email protected] RESEARCH PROBLEM Connecticut has over 1,000 lakes and ponds larger than 5 acres in area. These water bodies provide important recreational opportunities, aesthetic values, and ecosystem services that contribute to the quality of life, environment, and economy of the state. Over the past 400 years, Connecticut has undergone significant alterations to its landscape. As a result of these mostly anthropogenic activities, including clearing of forests, agriculture, and urban and rural development, there have been significant impacts to the water quality of Connecticut’s lakes and ponds. While a natural process, the eutrophication of lakes caused by excess nutrient export in runoff has been, and continues to be, a pervasive problem (Siver et al., 1996).
  • 2021 Connecticut Boater's Guide Rules and Resources

    2021 Connecticut Boater's Guide Rules and Resources

    2021 Connecticut Boater's Guide Rules and Resources In The Spotlight Updated Launch & Pumpout Directories CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION HTTPS://PORTAL.CT.GOV/DEEP/BOATING/BOATING-AND-PADDLING YOUR FULL SERVICE YACHTING DESTINATION No Bridges, Direct Access New State of the Art Concrete Floating Fuel Dock Offering Diesel/Gas to Long Island Sound Docks for Vessels up to 250’ www.bridgeportharbormarina.com | 203-330-8787 BRIDGEPORT BOATWORKS 200 Ton Full Service Boatyard: Travel Lift Repair, Refit, Refurbish www.bridgeportboatworks.com | 860-536-9651 BOCA OYSTER BAR Stunning Water Views Professional Lunch & New England Fare 2 Courses - $14 www.bocaoysterbar.com | 203-612-4848 NOW OPEN 10 E Main Street - 1st Floor • Bridgeport CT 06608 [email protected] • 203-330-8787 • VHF CH 09 2 2021 Connecticut BOATERS GUIDE We Take Nervous Out of Breakdowns $159* for Unlimited Towing...JOIN TODAY! With an Unlimited Towing Membership, breakdowns, running out GET THE APP IT’S THE of fuel and soft ungroundings don’t have to be so stressful. For a FASTEST WAY TO GET A TOW year of worry-free boating, make TowBoatU.S. your backup plan. BoatUS.com/Towing or800-395-2628 *One year Saltwater Membership pricing. Details of services provided can be found online at BoatUS.com/Agree. TowBoatU.S. is not a rescue service. In an emergency situation, you must contact the Coast Guard or a government agency immediately. 2021 Connecticut BOATER’S GUIDE 2021 Connecticut A digest of boating laws and regulations Boater's Guide Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Rules and Resources State of Connecticut Boating Division Ned Lamont, Governor Peter B.
  • CT DEEP 2017 FISHING REPORT NUMBER 27 10/12/2017 Atlantic Salmon (Salmo Salar)

    CT DEEP 2017 FISHING REPORT NUMBER 27 10/12/2017 Atlantic Salmon (Salmo Salar)

    CT DEEP 2017 FISHING REPORT NUMBER 27 10/12/2017 Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) YOU CAN FIND US DIRECTLY ON FACEBOOK. This page features a variety of information on fishing, hunting, and wildlife watching in Connecticut. The address is www.facebook.com/CTFishandWildlife. INLAND REPORT Fall TROUT and ATLANTIC SALMON Stockings- This week we began our 2017 stockings of broodstock Atlantic Salmon. Mount Tom Pond (115 fish) and Crystal Lake (Ellington) (115 fish) on Wednesday, 10/11, and the Shetucket River (230 fish) was stocked on Thursday, October 12. The upper Nauguatuck River broodstock area is scheduled to be stocked on Friday, 10/13. Trout stockings continued this week (see Lakes & Ponds and Rivers & Streams sections below for locations). (Hamden) TMA, Hockanum River TMA, Highland Lake, East Twin Lake, Stay up to date with our daily stocking post on Facebook, our interactive trout stocking map, and our stocking report. TROUT-LAKES & PONDS – Improving quickly with re-start of fall stocking. Here is this week’s stocking list: Highland Lake and East Twin Lake, both in the west. TROUT- RIVERS & STREAMS. Conditions for trout fishing are improving out of the poor conditions earlier this fall. Flows are variable across the State- see stream flow graphic on page 4). This week the Hockanum River TMA, Shetucket River, Sleeping Giant TMA, and the Naugatuck River TMA were stocked. For the latest information on what has been stocked, follow our daily posts on Facebook Page or Twitter Page, view our current stocking report, or check out the interactive trout stocking map. Farmington River – Fishing remains very good.
  • Unapproved Draft

    Unapproved Draft

    UNAPPROVED DRAFT Representative Policy Board Land Use Committee South Central Connecticut Regional Water District Minutes of August 11, 2021 Meeting The regular meeting of the Land Use Committee of the Representative Policy Board of the South Central Connecticut Regional Water District (“RWA”) took place on Wednesday, August 11, 2021 at Lake Gaillard, 105 North Street, North Branford, Connecticut. In Chair Betkoski’s absence, Mr. Harvey presided. Present: Committee Members: P. DeSantis, B. Eitzer, R. Harvey, M. Horbal, M. Levine, G. Malloy, and J. Oslander Authority: C. LaMarr Management: J. Courchaine and J. Triana RPB Staff: J. Slubowski Mr. Harvey called the meeting to order at 5:31 p.m. He reviewed the Safety Moment distributed to members. On motion made by Mr. Malloy, seconded by Mr. Horbal, and unanimously carried, the Committee approved the minutes of its July 14, 2021 meeting. Mr. Triana, the RWA’s Real Estate Manager, led a discussion on the history of Lake Gaillard, which included: 1924 Appraisal Historical farms and houses Rhine Valley Dam construction East Dike Water storage and supply Gouidin Y. Gaillard Wildlife At 5:41 p.m., Mr. Levine entered the meeting. Mr. Triana reported that the lake was named after Gouidin Y. Gaillard who was appointed to the board in 1916 and served until his death in 1959. In 1924, he was appointed as president of the company to succeed his father-in-law Eli Whitney III and served until 1954. He also reported that the Lake Gaillard dam construction was completed in 1924. The reservoir currently holds 15 billion gallons of water of which 13 billion gallons is available for water supply.
  • NPDES Phase 2 Stormwater Management Plan

    NPDES Phase 2 Stormwater Management Plan

    NPDES Phase 2 Stormwater Management Plan Prepared For: Town of Trumbull Trumbull, Connecticut October 18, 2012 Introduction Tighe&Bond Section 1 Introduction 1.1 Program Background In 1990, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) promulgated Phase I of its municipal stormwater program under the authority of the Clean Water Act (CWA). Phase I utilized National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit coverage to address stormwater runoff from large municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s) that served urbanized areas. The Stormwater Phase II Final Rule promulgated on December 8, 1999 requires MS4 operators in smaller urbanized areas to implement programs and practices aimed at controlling polluted stormwater runoff through the NPDES permit program. The EPA defines urbanized areas (UA) as “land comprising one or more places – central place(s) – and the adjacent densely settled surrounding area – urban fringe – that together have a residential population of at least 50,000 and an overall population density of at least 1,000 people per square mile”. Based upon this criteria, the Town of Trumbull is located entirely within an urbanized area. The program requires Phase II municipalities to develop a stormwater management plan outlining how the municipality intends to address the six minimum control measures set forth by EPA: ■ Public Education and Outreach ■ Public Involvement/Participation ■ Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination ■ Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Control ■ Post-Construction Stormwater Management in New Development and Redevelopment ■ Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations 1.2 Statewide General Permit The Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (CTDEEP) administers NPDES permitting in Connecticut and has issued a General Permit for the Discharge of Stormwater from Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4).
  • New Haven County, Connecticut (All Jurisdictions)

    New Haven County, Connecticut (All Jurisdictions)

    VOLUME 1 OF 10 NEW HAVEN COUNTY, CONNECTICUT (ALL JURISDICTIONS) COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER TOWN OF PROSPECT 090151 CITY OF ANSONIA 090071 TOWN OF SEYMOUR 090088 TOWN OF BEACON FALLS 090072 TOWN OF SOUTHBURY 090089 TOWN OF BETHANY 090144 TOWN OF WALLINGFORD 090090 TOWN OF BRANFORD 090073 CITY OF WATERBURY 090091 TOWN OF CHESHIRE 090074 CITY OF WEST HAVEN 090092 CITY OF DERBY 090075 TOWN OF WOLCOTT 090093 TOWN OF EAST HAVEN 090076 TOWN OF WOODBRIDGE 090153 TOWN OF GUILFORD 090077 BOROUGH OF WOODMONT 090168 TOWN OF HAMDEN 090078 TOWN OF MADISON 090079 CITY OF MERIDEN 090081 TOWN OF MIDDLEBURY 090080 CITY OF MILFORD 090082 BOROUGH OF NAUGATUCK 090137 CITY OF NEW HAVEN 090084 TOWN OF NORTH BRANFORD 090085 TOWN OF NORTH HAVEN 090086 TOWN OF ORANGE 090087 TOWN OF OXFORD 090150 REVISED: MAY 16, 2017 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 09009CV001D Version Number 2.3.3.2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Volume 1 – May 16, 2017 Page SECTION 1.0 – INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 The National Flood Insurance Program 1 1.2 Purpose of this Flood Insurance Study Report 2 1.3 Jurisdictions Included in the Flood Insurance Study Project 2 1.4 Considerations for using this Flood Insurance Study Report 5 SECTION 2.0 – FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS 16 2.1 Floodplain Boundaries 16 2.2 Floodways 16 2.3 Base Flood Elevations 32 2.4 Non-Encroachment Zones 32 2.5 Coastal Flood Hazard Areas 32 2.5.1 Water Elevations and the Effects of Waves 32 2.5.2 Floodplain Boundaries and BFEs for Coastal Areas 34 2.5.3 Coastal High Hazard Areas 35 2.5.4 Limit of Moderate Wave Action 36 SECTION