D R E R I C B
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Rural Plant Clinics Bangladesh
Global Plant Clinic CABI Rothamsted Research CSL BANGLADESH Policy and Planning Workshop on Plant Health Services Spectra Convention Centre, Dhaka 5-6 December 2007 RURAL DEVELOPMENT ACADEMY, BOGRA AGRICULTURAL ADVISORY SOCIETY SHUSHILAN cover: virus symptoms on beans, one of many problems that plant doctors in Bangladesh handle with confidence. www.globalplantclinic.org www.reserach4development.info www.youtube/user/globalplantclinic Fixed Plant Clinic at Jonail, Natore, managed by AAS (photo Paula Kelly) PARTNERS IN THE PLANT HEALTH SERVICES INITIATIVE The Global Plant Clinic provides and coordinates plant health services. It supports over 80 plant clinics in Bolivia, Nicaragua, Uganda, DR Congo, Sierra Leone, Bangladesh, India, Nepal and Vietnam. The GPC is managed by CABI in alliance with Rothamsted Research and the Central Science Laboratory and is funded by the UK Department for International Development. Bangladesh coordinator. Paula Kelly [[email protected]] Head of GPC. Eric Boa [[email protected]]. The Rural Development Academy, Bogra is a government-supported institute has been running clinics since 2004. Plant health services coordinator: AKM Zakaria. Director General: Abdul Mannan. The Agricultural Advisory Society (AAS) is a non-governmental organisation and has been running clinics since 2005. Plant health services coordinator and director: Harun ar-Rashid. Shushilan is a non-governmental organisation and has been running clinics since 2005. Plant health services coordinator: Shahriar Zaman Dider. Director: Md. Nuruzzaman We thank Mr Harun ar-Rashid of AAS and RDA Bogra and all staff for organising this meeting. This report is written by Eric Boa and Paula Kelly. 1 Everyday help for farmers Agriculture is the backbone of life in Bangladesh yet farmers consistently fail to get the support they need. -
The CABI Development Fund (CDF) Mid-Term Report to DFID 2010-2011
The CABI Development Fund (CDF) Mid-term report to DFID 2010-2011 www.cabi.org KNOWLEDGE FOR LIFE 2 CABI improves people’s lives worldwide by providing information and applying scientific expertise to solve problems in agriculture and the environment www.cabi.org sustainable agriculture KNOWLEDGE FOR LIFE contents about CABI .........................................................................................................04 the CABI Development Fund .............................................................................05 lose less, feed more: CDF iniatives in 2010-2011 ............................................07 overview of the Plantwise initiative ..................................................................08 supporting farmers ............................................................................................09 Plantwise clinics ........................................................................................................................09 improving food security.....................................................................................12 providing a new variety of kale seed to smallholders in Kenya.............................................12 management of cocoa pod borer in Papua New Guinea ........................................................13 management of coffee berry borer in Papua New Guinea and Indonesia ...........................14 African inputs to coffee berry borer work ...............................................................................15 protecting biodiversity -
Bioeconomic Evaluation of Feedings Beef Cattle in Mozambique
Livestock Science 247 (2021) 104466 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Livestock Science journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/livsci Bioeconomic evaluation of feedings strategies in the yearling beef cattle system in Mozambique T´elis Adolfo Cumbe a,b, Amir Gil Sessim a, Fredy Andrey Lopez-Gonz´ alez´ a, Daniele Zago a, Antonia´ Mendes Paizano Alforma a,c, Júlio Otavio´ Jardim Barcellos a,* a Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), 7.712 Bento Gonçalves Ave., Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 91540-000, Brazil b Faculty of Agricultural Science, Zambezi University (UniZambeze) P.O. Box 213, Ulongu´ `e, Tete, 2306, Mozambique c Estaçao~ Zoot´ecnica de Angonia´ (EZA), Centro Regional da Zona Centro, Instituto de Investigaçao~ Agraria´ de Moçambique (IIAM), Ulongu´ `e, Tete, Moçambique HIGHLIGHTS • Simulation is a valuable tool for the feeding management of beef cattle. • Communal cattle grazing systems may be improved by using alternative feedstuffs. • Diets based on low-cost feeding strategies provide better economic returns. ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The application of feeding strategies (FS) to meet nutrient requirements of beef cattle grazing on native pastures Communal pasture during the dry season, are required to improve the productivity of production systems in tropical regions. The Feeding strategy objective of this study was to evaluate the bioeconomic effects of different FSs applied to yearling bulls in Economic analysis Mozambique, using modeling and simulations as tools to support decision making. A simple deterministic simulation model was developed, assuming initial body weight (120 kg), average daily gain (ADG), feedstuffs, and production costs as inputs. -
Diversity and Genetic Differentiation Among Subpopulations of Gllricidia Sepium Revealed by PCR-Based Assays
Heredity74 (1995) 10—18 Received 17 January 1994 Genetical Society of Great Britain Diversity and genetic differentiation among subpopulations of Gllricidia sepium revealed by PCR-based assays I. K. DAWSON*, A. J. SIMONSt, R. WAUGH & W. POWELL Scottish Crop Research Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA and f Oxford Forestry Institute, South Parks Road, Oxford 0X1 3R8, U.K. Randomlyamplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), and a mitochondrial marker based on amplifica- tion of the V7 region of the mitochondrial small ribosomal RNA (srRNA) gene, were used to partition genetic variation within a single population of Gliricidia sepium sampled from Guatemala. Seventeen per cent of the variation detected with RAPDs was partitioned among subpopulations and indicated a greater level of discrimination than previously detected with isozymes. Cluster analysis indicated a direct relationship between this variation and the geographical distance between subpopulations. A polymorphism identified within the maternally inherited mitochondrial V7 srRNA product, which relied on digestion with restriction endonucleases, confirmed the genetic subdivision identified with RAPDs, and suggested a relatively limited role for seed in gene dispersal. Introduction PCR is less technically demanding than RFLPs and requires only small amounts of DNA. In addition, PCR Theoptimal collection and utilization of genetic provides great flexibility in detecting genetic variation resources from natural plant populations requires a as a variety of primers can be used which are designed -
Analysing the Potential of Plant Clinics to Boost Crop Protection in Rwanda Through Adoption of IPM: the Case of Maize and Maize Stem Borers
Food Security https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-019-00910-5 ORIGINAL PAPER Analysing the potential of plant clinics to boost crop protection in Rwanda through adoption of IPM: the case of maize and maize stem borers Silvia Silvestri1 & Martin Macharia1,2 & Bellancile Uzayisenga3 Received: 1 June 2018 /Accepted: 5 March 2019 # The Author(s) 2019 Abstract Maize plays an important role in the livelihoods of rural communities in Rwanda. However, maize yields are threatened by the presence of pests and diseases and a general lack of knowledge and information for their management. In this study we sought to assess if plant clinics are making farmers more aware and knowledgeable of pests and diseases and are indirectly contributing to higher yields. We interviewed 644 farmers across Rwanda, both users and non-users of plant clinics. Propensity score matching was used to match the users and non-users of plant clinics and logistic regression was used to assess a number of factors, including interactions with plant clinics, that affect farmers’ adoption of pest management practices. Our analysis shows that users of plant clinics are more aware and knowledgeable in recognizing and handling maize stem borers. Furthermore, users of plant clinics have on average higher yields than non-users and this difference is highly significant (P < 0.001). The analysis therefore demonstrates that plant clinics are beneficial to farmers in Rwanda. However, efforts are required to diversify the spectrum of practices that are promoted by plant clinics and by extension and advisory services in Rwanda. Keywords Plant clinics . Maize . Pests . Awareness . Adoption . -
GLIRICIDIA SEPIUM FACTSHEET Establishment, Management and Benefits
GLIRICIDIA SEPIUM FACTSHEET Establishment, management and benefits What is Gliricidia sepium? 4. Gliricidia stabilizes soils against acidification. Application of 1.6 to 4.0 tonnes of fresh mulch of gliricidia per acre Gliricidia sepium, commonly known as ‘gliricidia’, is a (0.4 hectare) increases soil pH, nutrient content and crop fast-growing, nitrogen-fixing shrub, exotic to Kenya but native yields. to El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama and the United States of America. 5. Gliricidia is a deep-rooted agroforestry tree with limited lateral root growth (except in areas with hard pan where lateral root is more pronounced). This lessens competition with food crops for water and nutrients. 6. Its ability to pull up nutrients from far beneath the ground into a crop’s root zone makes it one of the best agroforestry trees for intercropping. 7. Gliricidia can tolerate repeated cuttings and has high shoot regrowth. It can be managed in this way in crop Figure 1. Gliricidia sepium seedling (left) and flower (right). fields for at least two decades before replanting is Photo: World Agroforestry needed. Gliricidia as an agroforestry species 1. It is a fast-growing shrub and establishes well on acidic, degraded and infertile soils. 2. Gliricidia is an excellent biomass producer (both wood and leaf). Thus, it provides households with both firewood (including charcoal) and fodder for livestock and poultry. The fodder is rich in nitrogen. Figure 3. Coppiced gliricidia. Photo: World Agroforestry 3. It is an excellent soil improver, being both a nitrogen fixer and an excellent recycler of nutrients. Thus, it causes increase in soil fertility and crop yields by almost 2 to 3 Other benefits times without any fertilizer application. -
Feed Value of Selected Tropical Grasses, Legumes and Concentrates
VETERINARSKI ARHIV 76 (1), 53-63, 2006 Feed value of selected tropical grasses, legumes and concentrates Paul Sebastian Mlay1*, Appolinaria Pereka1, Eliot Chikula Phiri1, Sakurani Balthazary1, Jelantik Igusti2, Torben Hvelplund3, Martin Riis Weisbjerg3, and Jørgen Madsen4 1Department of Physiology, Biochemistry, Pharmacology and Toxicology, Morogoro, Tanzania 2Department of Animal Science, The University of Nusa Cendana, Kupang, Indonesia 3Department of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Research Centre Foulum, Tjele, Denmark 4Department of Animal Science and Animal Health, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copen- hagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark MLAY, P. S., A. PEREKA, E. C. PHIRI, S. BALTHAZARY, J. IGUSTI, T. HVELPLUND, M. R. WEISBJERG, J. MADSEN: Feed value of selected tropical grasses, legumes and concentrates. Vet. arhiv 76, 53-63, 2006. ABSTRACT Feed value is the potential of the feed to supply the nutrients required by an animal both quantitatively and qualitatively in order to support a desired type of production. Where chemical composition and digestibility of a given feed is known it is possible to calculate its energy content by using appropriate regression equations. Eleven tropical grass species and mixed grass hay, seven legumes and browse trees, and six concentrates were evaluated in terms of chemical composition (CP, EE, OM, CHO and NDF), digestibility (in vitro organic matter digestibility -IVOMD and enzyme solubility of organic matter- EZOM) and calculated energy values. The grass species were: Andropogon timorensis (Kunth), Rev. Gram., Brachiaria brizantha, (A.Rich) Stapf, Bothriochloa radicans (Lehm) A. camus, Chloris guyana Kunth, Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers, Hyparrhenia rufa (Nees) Stapf, Panicum maximum (Jacq.), Pannisetum purpureum (Schumacher), Setaria sphacelata Stapf & C. -
The Global Plant Clinic
The Global Plant Clinic: what we do and why ERIC BOA CABI 1910 – 2009: the modern CABI UK 1910 – 2009: the modern CABI Switzerland ••Imperial Imperial BureauxBureaux (Entomology,(Entomology, Mycology)Mycology) Trinidad & Tobago Kenya ••Colonial Colonial ––Commonwealth Commonwealth ––International International Pakistan India ••CABI CABI BioscienceBioscience ––CABI CABI Malaysia China COFFEE RUST CABI and diagnostics Sri Lanka changing contexts • 1920s – food security, colonial commerce COFFEE BERRY DISEASE • 1960s – taxonomy, E Africa commodity diseases • 1990s – crop protection projects, CPC • 2000s – Index fungorum, COFFEE WILT plant health services and E Africa …foodsecurity GPC: what and why WHAT • Diagnostics • Extension • Research WHY • Satisfy sponsors (mostly donors) • CABI member countries (43) • Consultancy/one-off projects Donors mainly UK, but also Swiss, Denmark, Australia and IFAD. GPC: adapting to change BUT Diagnostic service expensive to run and needs reliable business Extension is a national remit Research CHANGE Shift emphasis from diagnostics/crop protection towards plant health systems. Good idea – but what does it mean? How will this happen and unfold? Activities • Establish and supervise plant health clinics India, plant health clinic • Build plant healthcare systems • Provide expert diagnostic service • Develop new extension methods • Vigilance/surveillance CABI diagnostic lab • Training PLUS research on all of above HEALTHY PLANTS FOR HEALTHY PEOPLE Nepal plant doctor course Research: best ways to … • establish -
G/SPS/GEN/121/Add.9 4 March 2011 ORGANIZATION (11-1098) Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures
WORLD TRADE G/SPS/GEN/121/Add.9 4 March 2011 ORGANIZATION (11-1098) Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures APPLICANTS FOR OBSERVER STATUS Note by the Secretariat1 Addendum 1. An application for observer status in the SPS Committee was received on 11 February 2011 from CABI. Information provided by CABI is summarized below. 1. CABI Member Countries (45) Anguilla* Colombia Malaysia South Africa Australia Cote d'Ivoire Mauritius Sri Lanka Bahamas Cyprus Montserrat* St Helena* Bangladesh Gambia Myanmar Switzerland Bermuda* Ghana Nigeria Tanzania Botswana Grenada The Netherlands* Trinidad & Tobago British Virgin Islands* Guyana Pakistan Uganda Brunei Darussalam India Papua New Guinea United Kingdom Burundi Jamaica Philippines Vietnam Canada Kenya Rwanda** Zambia Chile DPR Korea Sierra Leone Zimbabwe China Malawi Solomon Islands *UK Overseas Territories **The Netherlands and Rwanda are in the process of joining. 2. Mandate, scope and area of work 2. CABI is an inter-governmental, not-for-profit organisation established in 1910 by a United Nations treaty-level agreement and is governed by 45 Member Countries, 90 per cent of which are developing countries. 3. CABI is a science-based development organisation with knowledge management, publishing and international development programmes. The organisation has a unique combination of publishing, science and development experience, including more than 30 years' experience in the management and dissemination of scientific information in the electronic environment. It maintains a broad portfolio of information products and has an established network of partners and collaborators in both the international development and scholarly publishing communities. 4. CABI's work is decentralised through centres and offices around the world – including in China, Malaysia, Pakistan, India, Kenya, Switzerland, Trinidad & Tobago, and the United States. -
Characterization of Riparian Tree Communities Along a River Basin in the Pacific Slope of Guatemala
Article Characterization of Riparian Tree Communities along a River Basin in the Pacific Slope of Guatemala Alejandra Alfaro Pinto 1,2,* , Juan J. Castillo Mont 2, David E. Mendieta Jiménez 2, Alex Guerra Noriega 3, Jorge Jiménez Barrios 4 and Andrea Clavijo McCormick 1,* 1 School of Agriculture & Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North 4474, New Zealand 2 Herbarium AGUAT ‘Professor José Ernesto Carrillo’, Agronomy Faculty, University of San Carlos of Guatemala, Guatemala City 1012, Guatemala; [email protected] (J.J.C.M.); [email protected] (D.E.M.J.) 3 Private Institute for Climate Change Research (ICC), Santa Lucía Cotzumalguapa, Escuintla 5002, Guatemala; [email protected] 4 School of Biology, University of San Carlos of Guatemala, Guatemala City 1012, Guatemala; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (A.A.P.); [email protected] (A.C.M.) Abstract: Ecosystem conservation in Mesoamerica, one of the world’s biodiversity hotspots, is a top priority because of the rapid loss of native vegetation due to anthropogenic activities. Riparian forests are often the only remaining preserved areas among expansive agricultural matrices. These forest remnants are essential to maintaining water quality, providing habitats for a variety of wildlife Citation: Alfaro Pinto, A.; Castillo and acting as biological corridors that enable the movement and dispersal of local species. The Mont, J.J.; Mendieta Jiménez, D.E.; Acomé river is located on the Pacific slope of Guatemala. This region is heavily impacted by intensive Guerra Noriega, A.; Jiménez Barrios, agriculture (mostly sugarcane plantations), fires and grazing. Most of this region’s original forest J.; Clavijo McCormick, A. -
ESPECIES FORRAJERAS-Trópico Americano.Indd
Especies Forrajeras Multipropósito Opciones para Productores del Trópico Americano Michael Peters, Luis Horacio Franco, Axel Schmidt y Belisario Hincapié PAGINA DE CATALOGACION Contenido Página Prefacio vi Dedicatoria viii Gramíneas 1 Andropogon gayanus Kunth 2 Axonopus scoparius (Flüggé) Kuhlm. 4 Botrhriochloa pertusa (L.) A. Camus 6 Brachiaria arrecta (Hack. ex T. Durand & Schinz) Stent 8 Brachiaria brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Stapf. 10 Brachiaria decumbens Stapf. 12 Brachiaria dictyoneura (Fig. & De Not) Stapf. 14 Brachiaria humidicola (Rendle) Schweick. 16 Brachiaria híbrido 18 Brachiaria mutica (Forssk.) Stapf 20 Chloris gayana Kunth 22 Cynodon plectostachyus (K. Schum.) Pilg. – C. nlemfuensis Vanderyst 24 Dichantium aristatum (Poir.) C.E. Hubb. 26 Digitaria eriantha Steud. 28 Digitaria swazilandensis Stent 30 Echinochloa polystachya (Kunth.) Hitchc. 32 Hemarthria altissima (Poir.) Stapf & C.E. Hubb. 34 Hyparrhenia rufa (Nees) Stapf. 36 Ischaemum indicum (Houtt.) Merr. 38 Melinis minutiflora P. B e a u v. 4 0 Panicum maximum Jacq. 42 Paspalum atratum Swallen 44 Paspalum notatum Flüggé 46 Pennisetum clandestinum Hochst. ex Chiov. 48 Pennisetum purpureum Schumach. 50 Sacharum officinarum L. 52 Setaria sphacelata (Schumach.) Stapf & C.E. Hubb. Var. Anceps (Stapf) Veldkamp 54 Tripsacum laxum Nash – Tripsacum andersonii J. R. Gray 56 iii Página Leguminosas Herbáceas 59 Arachis pintoi Krapov. & W.C. Grez. 60 Calopogonium mucunoides Desv. 62 Centrosema acutifolium Benth. 64 Centrosema brasilianum (L.) Benth. 66 Centrosema macrocarpum Benth. 68 Centrosema molle Mart. ex Benth. 70 Centrosema pascuorum Mart. ex Benth. 72 Centrosema plumieri (Turpin ex Pers) Benth. 74 Chamaecrista rotundifolia (Pers.) Greene 76 Clitoria ternatea L. 78 Desmodium heterocarpon (L.) DC. subsp. ovalifolium (Prain) Ohashi 80 Galactia striata (Jacq.) Urb. -
The Biosecurity Approach
08 2016 ENG The Biosecurity Approach A review and evaluation of its application by IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW AND SUPPORT SYSTEM FAO, internationally and in various countries International Plant Protection Convention Protecting the world’s plant resources from pests 08 2016 The Biosecurity Approach A review and evaluation of its application by FAO, internationally and in various countries IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Publication notes: Version 1.0 Published August 2016. This paper reviews and evaluates current biosecurity approaches, specifically approaches be- ing applied in various international bodies and individual countries. This paper was drafted by M. Megan Quinlan, James Alden, Ferdinand Habbel and Rebecca Murphy, through Imperial Col- lege Consultants Ltd., and reviewed by the IPPC Implementation Facilitation Unit. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. All rights reserved. FAO encourages reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Non-commercial uses will be authorized free of charge, upon request. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes, including educational purposes, may incur fees. Applications for permission to reproduce or disseminate FAO copyright materials, and all queries concerning rights and licences, should be addressed by email to [email protected] or to the Chief, Publishing Policy and Support Branch, Office of Knowledge Exchange, Research and Extension, FAO, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy.