DOCSLIB.ORG

2010 TMX GROUP Factbook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2010 TMX GROUP Factbook Toronto Stock Exchange TSX Venture/NEX Exchange 2010 TMX GROUP FactBook 2010 FactBook Table of Contents Chapter 1 TSX AT A GLANCE Chapter 2 TSX TRADING DISTRIBUTION Chapter 3 TSX EQUITY TRADING Chapter 4 S&P/TSX INDICES Chapter 5 TORONTO STOCK EXCHANGE – CHANGES IN STOCK LIST 2010 Chapter 6 TORONTO STOCK EXCHANGE – LISTED COMPANIES & NAICS TABLE Chapter 7 TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE– LISTED ISSUES & DEBT INSTRUMENTS Chapter 8 TSX VENTURE EXCHANGE – CHANGES IN STOCK LIST 2010 Chapter 9 TMX GROUP INC. – THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT, & GUIDE TO PARTICIPATING ORGANIZATIONS © 2010/2010 TSX Inc. All rights reserved. You may not copy, distribute, sell or modify this publication (or any part thereof) in any form without TSX Inc.’s prior written consent. The FactBook is provided for information purposes only. TMX Group Inc. and its affiliated companies do not make any rep- resentation, warranty or guarantee, express or implied, with respect to the completeness or accuracy of the information contained in this publication and we are not responsible for any errors or omissions in or your use of, or reliance on, the in- formation provided. The information provided in this publication is not an invitation to purchase securities listed on Toronto Stock Exchange or TSX Venture Exchange. TMX Group and its affiliated companies do not endorse or recommend any se- curities referenced in this publication. This publication is provided with the express condition, to which everyone using this publication assents, that no obligation, responsibility or liability shall be incurred by TMX Group, its affiliated companies or their information providers, for any loss or damage whatsoever (including any direct, indirect, special, incidental, conse- quential or punitive damages) arising from or relating to any use of or reliance on the information in this publication. For more information concerning the content of this publication please contact. Catherine McGravey Editor TSX Datalinx The Exchange Tower 130 King St. West Toronto, Ontario M5X 1J2 416-947-4655 [email protected] Chapter 1 Chapter 1 · Toronto Stock Exchange and TSX Venture Exchange at a Glance 3 Chapter 1 TSX at a Glance Total issuers listed for trading on Toronto Stock Exchange rose to 1,516 with 2,069 securities. One hundred and eighty seven issuers listed one hundred and ninety two securities in 2010 compared with 100 issuers with 104 securities in 2009. Equities - Toronto Stock Exchange 2010 2009 Toronto Value Traded $1,390,747,798,461 Down 11.8% from 2009 Toronto Volume Traded 104,555,199,337 Down 0.5% from 2009 Toronto Trades 189,117,628 Down 1.2% from 2009 Average Daily Value $5,551.9 million $5,582.4 million Average Daily Volume 417.4 million 473.2 million Average Daily Trades 754,961 763,757 Equities - TSX Venture Exchange (including NEX) 2010 2009 TSX Venture Value Traded $34,358,151,228 Up 44.9% from 2009 TSX Venture Volume Traded 67,887,794,824* Up 113.5% from 2009 TSX Venture Trades 9,226,926* Up 72.9% from 2009 Average Daily Value $137.2 million $64.2 million Average Daily Volume 271.0 million 186.9 million Average Daily Trades 36,834 21,302 Index 2010 % Change from 2009 S&P/TSX Composite Index 13,443.22 Up 14.45% from 2009 S&P/TSX Capped Composite 15,574.95 Up 14.45% from 2009 S&P/TSX Completion 927.11 Up 26.47% from 2009 S&P/TSX Smallcap 753.93 Up 31.32% from 2009 S&P/TSX 60 768.65 Up 10.88% from 2009 S&P/TSX 60 Capped 849.98 Up 10.88% from 2009 S&P/TSX Venture Composite 2,287.85 Up 50.4% from 2009 * record breaking 4 Chapter 2 Chapter 2 · Trading Distribution on TSX Inc. · Distribution of Value and Volume Traded in Canadian Based-Interlisted Issues · Trading on Major North American Exchanges · Top 20 World Exchange Equity Trading Summary 5 Chapter 2 Trading Distribution on TSX Inc. VALUE $ Exchange 2010 % 2009 % % Change Toronto 1,390,747,798,461 97.6 1,398,386,393,311 98.9 -0.5 TSX Venture 34,358,151,228 2.4 16,092,576,249 1.1 +113.5 Total 1,425,105,949,689 100 1,414,478,969,560 100.0 +0.8 VOLUME Exchange 2010 % 2009 % % Change Toronto 104,555,199,337 60.6 118,525,934,101 71.7 -11.8 TSX Venture 67,887,794,824 39.4 46,825,340,177 28.3 +44.9 Total 172,442,994,161 100.0 165,351,274,278 100.0 +4.3 TRADES Exchange 2010 % 2009 % % Change Toronto 189,117,628 95.3 191,321,204 97.3 -1.2 TSX Venture 9,226,926 4.7 5,336,030 2.7 +72.9 Total 198,344,554 100.0 196,657,234 100.0 +0.9 6 Chapter 2 Distribution of Value and Volume Traded in Canadian Based Interlisted* Issues 2010 Exchange Volume Value$ %Volume %Value Toronto 29,400,218,126 798,906,364,426 47.9 48.0 NAS 15,612,875,827 375,458,783,113 25.5 22.6 PAC 6,239,269,891 194,041,298,515 10.2 11.7 NY 7,172,659,694 241,451,873,174 11.7 14.5 BOS 1,221,299,962 27,929,175,971 2.0 1.7 NAT 361,622,991 8,096,383,744 0.6 0.5 CHI 173,180,385 9,210,261,900 0.3 0.6 NYAM 1,110,152,835 7,481,936,394 1.8 0.5 2009 Exchange Volume Value$ %Volume %Value Toronto 35,413,799,901 815,034,436,259 48.3 44.2 NAS 18,381,983,980 460,232,249,991 25.1 25.0 PAC 8,965,490,717 288,255,599,768 12.2 15.7 NY 8,242,984,000 240,270,588,681 11.2 13.0 BOS 753,417,016 18,766,422,286 1.0 1.0 NAT 390,406,002 9,421,286,138 0.5 0.5 CHI 139,072,999 4,953,507,722 0.2 0.3 NYAM 1,070,368,100 4,909,337,893 1.5 0.3 * An issue that is listed for trading firstly on Toronto Stock Exchange and on any other North American Exchange 7 Chapter 2 TRADING ON MAJOR NORTH AMERICAN EXCHANGES Percentage of Value Traded on Major North American Exchanges The value percentage of Canadian based interlisted trading captured by Toronto Stock Exchange in 2010. Percentage of Volume Traded on Major North American Exchanges The volume percentage of Canadian based interlisted trading captured by the Toronto Stock Exchange in 2010. 8 Chapter 2 Top 20 World Exchange Equity Trading Summary (in Millions of U.S. Dollars) Market Capitalization Equity Trading Domestic Shares Only 2010 2009 Exchange 2010 2009 year end year end NYSE Euronext (US) 17,795,600 17,521,119 13,394,082 11,837,793 NASDAQ OMX 12,659,198 13,608,077 3,889,370 3,239,492 Shanghai SE 4,496,193 5,055,691 2,716,470 2,704,779 Tokyo SE Group 3,787,952 3,704,009 3,827,774 3,306,082 Shenzhen SE 3,572,529 2,771,984 1,311,370 868,374 London SE Group 2,741,325 2,717,703 3,613,064 3,453,622 NYSE Euronext (Europe) 2,018,077 1,935,241 2,930,072 2,869,393 Deutsche Borse 1,628,496 1,516,537 1,429,719 1,292,355 Korea Exchange 1,607,247 1,569,779 1,091,912 834,597 Hong Kong Exchanges 1,496,432 1,416,450 2,711,316 2,305,143 TMX Group 1,368,954 1,245,456 2,170,433 1,676,814 BME Spanish Exchanges 1,360,910 1,259,213 1,171,625 1,434,541 Australian SE 1,062,650 798,681 1,454,491 1,261,909 Taiwan SE Corp. 903,062 904,583 818,490 658,991 BM&FOBVESPA 868,813 644,732 1,545,566 1,337,248 National Stock Exch India 801,017 791,930 1,596,625 1,224,806 SIX Swiss Exchange 788,361 739,635 1,229,357 1,064,687 NASDAQ OMX Nordic 750,279 669,787 1,042,154 817,223 Istanbul SE 411,469 305,031 307,052 233,997 MICEX 408,078 444,117 949,150 736,307 9 Chapter 2 Top 20 World Exchanges Equity Trading A quick reference indicator of world trading percentages for each continent. 10 Chapter 3 Chapter 3 TORONTO STOCK EXCHANGE · Toronto Stock Exchange Equity Trading Records · Trading Records for the year 2010 · Comparison of Monthly Equity Trading · Historical – yearly Totals · Historical – Daily Averages · Extended Hours Trading - 2010 · Summary of Block Trading Information 2010 · Historical – Short Positions 11 Chapter 3 Toronto Stock Exchange Equity Trading Records Volume Highest Lowest All Time Daily Record 895,769,152 711,080 December 19, 2008 January 3, 1972 Weekly Record 3.448,697,209 4,991,298 Week Ending (since 1959) September 19, 2008 August 8, 1975 Monthly Record 12,176,994,926 1,956,225 October, 2008 August, 1942 Yearly Record 118,525,934,101 38,805,347 2009 1942 Value$ Highest Lowest All Time Daily Record $19,278,924,809 $2,508,763 September 18, 2008 April 18, 1960 Weekly Record $68,187,522,320 $15,109,323 Week Ending (since 1959) September 19, 2008 August 5, 1960 Monthly Record $194,571,549,818 $3,177,627 September, 2008 August, 1942 Yearly Record $1,853,162,141,814 $58,287,507 2008 1942 Trades Highest Lowest All Time Daily Record 1,609,707 1,914* May 6, 2010 January 2, 1976 Weekly Record 6,063,943 13,389** Week Ending (since 1959) October 10, 2008 August 8, 1975 Monthly Record 22,677,628 74,128 October, 2008 October, 1976 Yearly Record 191,321,204 141,484 2009 1942 * since 1965 ** since 1969 12 Chapter 3 Trading Records for the year 2010 Volume Highest Lowest Daily Record 834,177,030 144,250,131 December 17, 2010 July 5, 2010 Weekly Record 2,938,509,993 1,347,478,147 Week Ending week ending Dec 17 week ending July 2 Monthly Record 10,920,329,746 6,632,701,701 November July Value$ Highest Lowest Daily Record $14,326,291,302 $1,446,832,558 December 17, 2010 July 5, 2010 Weekly Record $41,951,425,628 $18,815,870,363 Week Ending May 8 February 19 Monthly Record $133,522,977,520 $92,991,167,184 November August Trades Highest Lowest Daily Record 1,609,707 240,098 May 6, 2010 July 5, 2010 Weekly Record 5,827,364 2,604,439 Week Ending May 7 February 19 Monthly Record 20,063,707 13,165,508 May February 13 Chapter 3 Comparison of Monthly Equity Trading Volume Month 2010 2009 January 8,760,933,904 9,125,854,656 February 7,124,718,494 9,547,034,760 March 9,451,973,986 11,359,347,528 April 8,858,786,472 10,676,901,193 May 9,320,907,735 11,462,309,022 June 7,964,157,187 10,856,684,577 July 6,632,701,701 8,740,413,393 August 7,223,528,198 8,606,992,280 September 9,686,465,053
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Naming the Extrasolar Planets
    Naming the extrasolar planets W. Lyra Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, K¨onigstuhl 17, 69177, Heidelberg, Germany [email protected] Abstract and OGLE-TR-182 b, which does not help educators convey the message that these planets are quite similar to Jupiter. Extrasolar planets are not named and are referred to only In stark contrast, the sentence“planet Apollo is a gas giant by their assigned scientific designation. The reason given like Jupiter” is heavily - yet invisibly - coated with Coper- by the IAU to not name the planets is that it is consid- nicanism. ered impractical as planets are expected to be common. I One reason given by the IAU for not considering naming advance some reasons as to why this logic is flawed, and sug- the extrasolar planets is that it is a task deemed impractical. gest names for the 403 extrasolar planet candidates known One source is quoted as having said “if planets are found to as of Oct 2009. The names follow a scheme of association occur very frequently in the Universe, a system of individual with the constellation that the host star pertains to, and names for planets might well rapidly be found equally im- therefore are mostly drawn from Roman-Greek mythology. practicable as it is for stars, as planet discoveries progress.” Other mythologies may also be used given that a suitable 1. This leads to a second argument. It is indeed impractical association is established. to name all stars. But some stars are named nonetheless. In fact, all other classes of astronomical bodies are named.
    [Show full text]
  • Astral Media Affichage Affiche Ses Couleurs Et
    MEDIA RELEASE Dozens of Additional Canadian Artists, Athletes, and Icons Announced for Historic STRONGER TOGETHER, TOUS ENSEMBLE Broadcast this Sunday – Justin Bieber, Mike Myers, Ryan Reynolds, Serge Ibaka, Avril Lavigne, Kiefer Sutherland, Geddy Lee, Dallas Green, Morgan Rielly, Dan & Eugene Levy, Catherine O’Hara & Annie Murphy, David Foster, Robbie Robertson, Charlotte Cardin, Burton Cummings, and Cirque du Soleil confirmed to appear in biggest multi-platform broadcast event in Canadian history – – Previously announced participants include Céline Dion, Michael Bublé, Bryan Adams, Shania Twain, Sarah McLachlan, Howie Mandel, Jann Arden, Barenaked Ladies, Rick Mercer, Alessia Cara, Russell Peters, and Connor McDavid – – All-star collection of more than two dozen artists join together in ensemble performance of timely and treasured classic to be released following broadcast – – StrongerTogetherCanada.ca and @strongercanada launch today – Tags: #StrongerTogether #TousEnsemble @strongercanada TORONTO (April 23, 2020) – More than four dozen big-name Canadians have signed on for the historic broadcast STRONGER TOGETHER, TOUS ENSEMBLE, it was announced today. Airing commercial-free Sunday, April 26 at 6:30 p.m. across all markets/7 p.m. NT and now on hundreds of platforms, Canadian artists, activists, actors, and athletes will share their stories of hope and inspiration in a national salute to frontline workers combatting COVID-19 during the 90-minute show. The unprecedented event, in support of Food Banks Canada, has become the biggest multi-platform broadcast in Canadian history, with 15 broadcasting groups led by Bell Media, CBC/Radio-Canada, Corus Entertainment, Groupe V Média, and Rogers Sports & Media presenting the star-studded show on hundreds of TV, radio, streaming, and on demand platforms (see broadcast details below).
    [Show full text]
  • Management Information Circular April 11, 2016 Management Information Circular
    WSP GLOBAL INC. NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 19, 2016 MANAGEMENT INFORMATION CIRCULAR APRIL 11, 2016 MANAGEMENT INFORMATION CIRCULAR April 11, 2016 Dear Shareholders: You are cordially invited to attend the 2016 annual meeting (the “Meeting”) of holders (the “Shareholders”) of common shares (the “Shares”) of WSP Global Inc. (the “Corporation”) to be held at the McCord Museum (J. Armand Bombardier Hall), situated at 690 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec on May 19, 2016 at 11:00 a.m. The accompanying management information circular describes the annual business of the Corporation to be conducted at the Meeting, including (a) the presentation before Shareholders of the audited financial statements of the Corporation, for the year ended December 31, 2015, and the auditor’s report thereon; (b) the election of each of the directors of the Corporation, who will serve until the end of the next annual meeting of the Shareholders or until their successors are appointed; (c) the appointment of the auditors of the Corporation; (d) the annual shareholder advisory vote on the Corporation’s approach to executive compensation policies; and (e) the consideration of such other business, if any, that may properly come before the Meeting or any adjournment thereof. As a Shareholder, you have the right to vote your Shares on all items that come before the Meeting. This management information circular will provide you with information about these items and how to exercise your right to vote. It will also tell you about the nominee directors, the proposed auditors, the compensation of directors and certain executive officers, and our corporate governance practices.
    [Show full text]
  • O Verviewof a Ustralia
    Overview of A ustralia's M edia O w nership Law s Commercial Free-to-Air TV Broadcasting 1975 (FATA), which applies to all media. All Control direct proposals for foreign investment of Licences A person who has company interests in a more than 5% are subject to case-by-case company which exceed 15% is regarded as A person must not control (see control below): examination, as are proposals for portfolio being in a position to exercise control of the shareholdings of more than 5%. Up to 25% • licences whose combined licence area company (the '15% rule’) (cl. 6, Sch. 1, BSA). foreign investment by a single shareholder populations exceed 75°/o of the population Company interests include shareholding, in a mass circulation newspaper is permitted, of Australia; voting, dividend or winding-up interests (s. 6 with a maximum of 30% for all foreign BSA). Importantly, the 15% rule does not only • more than one licence in the same licence interests. Aggregate investment in provincial apply to direct interests held in a company, it area (though see exception below) (s. 53 and suburban newspapers is limited to 50%. A also applies to an interest of more than 15% Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (BSA)). separate policy relates to foreign ownership of which is carried through a chain of companies ethnic newspapers in Australia. Similar limits apply to directors of companies (cl. 7, Sch. 1, BSA). Minor company interests can that control licences; a director of two or more also be traced through a chain of companies companies that between them control licences; Cross-Media Controls *• (fractional tracing method) and combined to a person who controls a licence and who is a A person must not control: determine a person's relevant interest in a director of a company that controls another company (cl.
    [Show full text]
  • Wireless Competition in Canada: an Assessment
    Volume 6•Issue 27•September 2013 WIRELESS COMPETITION IN CANADA: AN ASSESSMENT Jeffrey Church † Professor, Department of Economics and Director, Digital Economy Program, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary Andrew Wilkins † Research Associate, Digital Economy Program, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary SUMMARY If there’s one thing Canadians agree on, it’s that Canada’s wireless industry can and should be more competitive. The federal government is on side with the policy objective of having four carriers in every region and has responded with policies that provide commercial advantages to entrants. But, the rub is that there has not been a study that actually assesses the state of competition in wireless services in Canada, until now. Those in favour of policies that will promote and sustain entry point to Canada’s high average revenue per user and low wireless penetration rate (mobile connections per capita) as evidence that there is insufficient competition. The difficulty is that the facts are not consistent with this simplistic analysis. Measurements of wireless penetration are skewed toward countries that maintain the Calling Party Pays Protocol and favour pay-as-you-go plans, both of which encourage inflated user counts. Canada’s participation per capita on monthly plans and minutes of voice per capita are not outliers. Moreover, in terms of smartphone adoption and smartphone data usage, Canada is a global leader, contributing to high average revenue per user. Consistent with being world leaders in the rollout of high speed wireless networks, Canada lead its peer group in capital expenditures per subscriber in 2012: the competition of importance to Canadians is not just over price, but also over the quality of wireless networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Broadcasting Decision CRTC 2007-359
    Broadcasting Decision CRTC 2007-359 Ottawa, 28 September 2007 Astral Media Radio (Toronto) Inc. and 4382072 Canada Inc., partners in a general partnership, carrying on business as Astral Media Radio G.P. Across Canada Application 2007-0769-8 Public Hearing in the National Capital Region 27 August 2007 Acquisition of assets The Commission approves an application by which Astral Media Radio (Toronto) Inc. and 4382072 Canada Inc., partners in a general partnership, carrying on business as Astral Media Radio G.P., will acquire the assets of the radio and television undertakings owned by Standard Radio Inc. The approval is subject to three conditions of approval, set out in Appendix 4 to this decision, which relate to the proposed tangible benefits package. Introduction 1. The Commission received an application by Astral Media Radio Inc. (Astral), initially filed on its own behalf, and on behalf of a general partnership consisting of two of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, to acquire the assets of the radio and television programming undertakings across Canada owned by Standard Radio Inc. (Standard). A list of the undertakings to be acquired is set out in Appendix 1 to this decision. Astral also applied for licences to continue the operation of these undertakings under the same terms and conditions as those set out in the current licences. 2. In a letter to the Commission dated 17 August 2007, Astral clarified that the assets of Standard would be acquired by a general partnership consisting of Astral Media Radio (Toronto) Inc. and 4382072 Canada Inc., both wholly-owned subsidiaries of Astral, carrying on business as Astral Media Radio G.P.
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT Proposed Development Plan OPTI
    PUBLIC DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT Proposed Development Plan OPTI Canada Inc. & Nexen Inc. Long Lake Phase 2 SAGD Project July 2005 1.0 INTRODUCTION OPTI Canada Inc. and Nexen Inc. (OPTI/Nexen) are proposing to expand our Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) bitumen production at our Long Lake Project. This document has been prepared to inform you about our preliminary plans related to the proposed Long Lake Phase 2 SAGD Project (Phase 2). We encourage and welcome your input on this plan and your participation in the regulatory process. OPTI Canada and Nexen Inc. are joint-venture partners developing the Long Lake Project in the Athabasca oil sands region of northern Alberta. The Long Lake Project (Phase 1) is located on Lease 27, approximately 40 kilometres southeast of Fort McMurray, Alberta. Throughout the life of the Long Lake Project, we are committed to: • Understanding & addressing stakeholder concerns • Enhancing local employment & business development • Investing in communities to build capacity & self-sufficiency • Developing the Project in a safe & environmentally responsible manner Under the Memorandum of Understanding (IL 96-7) between the Alberta Energy and Utilities Board (EUB) and Alberta Environment (AENV) with respect to Oil Sands Developments, OPTI/Nexen will be filing a joint application related to the Long Lake Phase 2 SAGD Project to amend the following approvals: • Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act Approval No. 137467-00-00 • Oil Sands Conservation Act Approval No. 9151 We view the consultation process for the OPTI/Nexen Phase 2 Project as building on an ongoing co-operative approach with stakeholders that addresses such regional issues as fresh water conservation and protection, and air quality management.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Investment in the Oil Sands and British Columbia Shale Gas
    Canadian Energy Research Institute Foreign Investment in the Oil Sands and British Columbia Shale Gas Jon Rozhon March 2012 Relevant • Independent • Objective Foreign Investment in the Oil Sands and British Columbia Shale Gas 1 Foreign Investment in the Oil Sands There has been a steady flow of foreign investment into the oil sands industry over the past decade in terms of merger and acquisition (M&A) activity. Out of a total CDN$61.5 billion in M&A’s, approximately half – or CDN$30.3 billion – involved foreign companies taking an ownership stake. These funds were invested in in situ projects, integrated projects, and land leases. As indicated in Figure 1, US and Chinese companies made the most concerted efforts to increase their profile in the oil sands, investing 2/3 of all foreign capital. The US and China both invested in a total of seven different projects. The French company, Total SA, has also spread its capital around several projects (four in total) while Royal Dutch Shell (UK), Statoil (Norway), and PTT (Thailand) each opted to take large positions in one project each. Table 1 provides a list of all foreign investments in the oil sands since 2004. Figure 1: Total Oil Sands Foreign Investment since 2003, Country of Origin Korea 1% Thailand Norway 6% UK 7% 2% US France 33% 18% China 33% Source: Canoils. Foreign Investment in the Oil Sands and British Columbia Shale Gas 2 Table 1: Oil Sands Foreign Investment Deals Year Country Acquirer Brief Description Total Acquisition Cost (000) 2012 China PetroChina 40% interest in MacKay River 680,000 project from AOSC 2011 China China National Offshore Acquisition of OPTI Canada 1,906,461 Oil Corporation 2010 France Total SA Alliance with Suncor.
    [Show full text]
  • 12 September 2019
    Official Visit to Switzerland 7 – 12 September 2019 The Honourable Annastacia Palaszczuk MP Premier of Queensland and Minister for Trade Page 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PROGRAM.............................................................................................................................................. 3 SATURDAY 7 SEPTEMBER 2019 ................................................................................................................................. 3 SUNDAY 8 SEPTEMBER 2019 .................................................................................................................................... 3 MONDAY 9 SEPTEMBER 2019 ................................................................................................................................... 4 TUESDAY 10 SEPTEMBER 2019 ................................................................................................................................. 5 WEDNESDAY 11 SEPTEMBER 2019 ............................................................................................................................ 6 THURSDAY 12 SEPTEMBER 2019 ............................................................................................................................... 6 DELEGATES AND MEMBERS .............................................................................................................. 7 OFFICIAL PARTY MEMBERS ....................................................................................................................................... 7 AUSTRALIAN
    [Show full text]
  • COMMERCIAL RADIO AWARDS (Acras) Please Note: Category Finalists Are Denoted with the Following Letters: Country>Provincial>Non-Metropolitan>Metropolitan
    FINALISTS FOR 2016 AUSTRALIAN COMMERCIAL RADIO AWARDS (ACRAs) Please note: Category Finalists are denoted with the following letters: Country>Provincial>Non-Metropolitan>Metropolitan BEST ON-AIR TEAM – METRO FM Kate, Tim & Marty; Kate Ritchie, Tim Blackwell & Marty Sheargold, Nova Network, NOVA Entertainment M The Kyle & Jackie O Show; Kyle Sandilands & Jackie Henderson, KIIS 106.5, Sydney NSW, Australian Radio Network M The Hamish & Andy Show; Hamish Blake & Andy Lee, Hit Network, Southern Cross Austereo M Jonesy & Amanda; Brendan Jones & Amanda Keller, WSFM , Sydney NSW, Australian Radio Network M Fifi & Dave; Fifi Box & Dave Thornton, hit101.9 Fox FM, Melbourne VIC, Southern Cross Austereo M Chrissie, Sam & Browny; Chrissie Swan, Sam Pang & Jonathan Brown, Nova 100, Melbourne VIC, NOVA Entertainment M BEST ON-AIR TEAM – METRO AM FIVEaa Breakfast; David Penberthy & Will Goodings, FIVEaa, Adelaide SA, NOVA Entertainment M 3AW Breakfast; Ross Stevenson & John Burns, 3AW, Melbourne VIC, Macquarie Media Limited M 3AW Nightline/Remember When; Bruce Mansfield & Philip Brady, 3AW, Melbourne VIC, Macquarie Media Limited M The Big Sports Breakfast with Slats & TK; Michael Slater & Terry Kennedy, Sky Sports Radio, Sydney NSW, Tabcorp M Breakfast with Steve Mills & Basil Zempilas; Steve Mills & Basil Zempilas, 6PR, Perth WA, Macquarie Media Limited M Nights with Steve Price; Steve Price & Andrew Bolt, 2GB, Sydney NSW, Macquarie Media Limited M BEST ON-AIR TEAM COUNTRY & PROVINCIAL Bangers & Mash; Janeen Hosemans & Peter Harrison, 2BS Gold, Bathurst
    [Show full text]
  • Grant Buchanan Is Counsel in Our Business Law Group in Toronto
    Grant Grant Buchanan is counsel in our Business Law Group in Toronto. Buchanan He is an experienced communications lawyer who has focused his Counsel practice on broadcast and telecom regulation and Copyright Board work. Grant has a broad understanding of the communications Toronto industry, related agreements and the framework for broadcast and [email protected] telecom regulation and financing. t. +1 416-601-8372 He was with WIC Western International Communications Ltd. for 12 years, primarily as Vice-President, Corporate and Regulatory Affairs. Grant is well-known and highly respected in the communications industry. Prior to his work at WIC, he was with The Bank of Nova Scotia for seven years. Grant Buchanan Grant’s experience includes: Counsel counsel to the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation in the licence Toronto renewal of its English- and French-language networks and other matters; [email protected] t. +1 416-601-8372 counsel to BCE Inc. in its acquisition of Manitoba Telecom Services Inc. and of Astral Media Inc., of CTV globemedia Inc. and other regulatory matters; Bar Admission counsel to Goldman Sachs in its investment with CanWest Global for Ontario 1980 the acquisition of Alliance Atlantis Communications Inc. and in Goldman Sachs’ subsequent sale of its interest to Shaw to Law School Communications Inc.; University of Western Ontario counsel to Stingray Digital Group Inc. in its initial public offering, its acquisition of Newfoundland Capital Corporation, its acquisition of other media properties and in various regulatory proceedings; counsel to Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment with respect to its sale to a corporation jointly controlled by BCE Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • September 27, 2011 Filed Electronically Mr. Robert A. Morin
    September 27, 2011 Filed Electronically Mr. Robert A. Morin Secretary General Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N2 Dear Mr. Morin: Re: Broadcasting Notice of Consultation CRTC 2011-525: Development of a regulatory framework for the French-language television market, licence renewals for Astral Media Inc., Quebecor Media Inc. and Serdy Media Inc., and review of certain conditions of licence for V Interactions Inc. Astral Media Inc.: Application 2011-0483-5 The Family Channel Inc: Application 2011-0526-3 (Family Channel) Astral Broadcasting Group Inc.: Application 2011-0510-7 (Mpix) Astral Broadcasting Group Inc.: Application 2011-0511-4 (The Movie Network) 1. The Canadian Media Production Association (“CMPA”)1 welcomes the opportunity to comment regarding the above-referenced applications by Astral Media Inc. (“Astral”) respecting renewal of the licences for its English-language pay television services, Family Channel, Mpix and The Movie Network (collectively, “the Astral English- language services”). 2. The CMPA acknowledges and appreciates Astral’s use of and support for independently-produced Canadian programming during its last licence terms. In particular, we wish to acknowledge that Astral is a signatory to the Terms of Trade Agreement that the CMPA signed with the major English-language broadcasters last April. We also welcome Astral’s confirmation that it will maintain its existing commitments and obligations regarding independent productions and that it will continue to rely almost exclusively on independently-produced programming to fill its schedules during its next licence terms.2 1 The CMPA represents the interests of screen-based media companies engaged in the production and distribution of English-language television programs, feature films, and new media content in all regions of Canada.
    [Show full text]