ATM 241, Spring 2020 Lecture 8 Ocean Dynamics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ATM 241, Spring 2020 Lecture 8 Ocean Dynamics ATM 241, Spring 2020 Lecture 8 Ocean Dynamics Paul A. Ullrich [email protected] Marshall & Plumb Ch. 9 Paul Ullrich Ocean Dynamics Spring 2020 In this section… Definitions Questions • Taylor-Proudman Theorem • How does the concept of balanced flow from • Steric effects atmospheric dynamics translate to the ocean? • How do the thermodynamic properties of the ocean determine its dynamical character? • What is the effect of temperature and salinity on sea surface height? Paul Ullrich Ocean Dynamics Spring 2020 Balanced Flow in the Ocean Paul Ullrich Ocean Dynamics Spring 2020 The Ocean Fluid Equations du uv tan φ uw 1 @p + = +2⌦v sin φ 2⌦w cos φ + ⌫ 2u dt − r r −⇢r cos φ @ − r dv u2 tan φ vw 1 @p + + = 2⌦u sin φ + ⌫ 2v dt r r −⇢r @ − r dw u2 + v2 1 @p = g +2⌦u cos φ + ⌫ 2w dt − r −⇢ @r − r u =0 (Incompressible fluid) r · dT d 1 c + p = J v dt dt ⇢ Material derivative: ✓ ◆ d @ dq = + u i = S dt @t · r dt i Paul Ullrich Ocean Dynamics Spring 2020 Seawater Equation of State Approximated equation of state by Taylor expansion σ(T,S) σ + ⇢ ↵ [T T ]+β [S S ] ⇡ 0 ref − T − 0 S − 0 ⇣ ⌘ Thermal expansivity: Effect of salinity on density: 1 @⇢ 1 @⇢ ↵T = βS = −⇢ref @T ⇢ref @S T =T0,S=S0 T =T0,S=S0 Surface 1km Depth o o o o o o T0 -1.5 C 5 C 15 C -1.5 C 3 C 13 C � (x 10-4 K-1) 0.3 1 2 0.65 1.1 2.2 Figure: Density anomalies plotted S0 (psu) 34 36 38 34 35 38 against salinity and temperature. -4 -1 �S (x 10 psu ) 7.8 7.8 7.6 7.1 7.7 7.4 -3 �0 (kg m ) 28 29 28 -3 0.6 6.9 Source: Marshall and Plumb Table 9.4 Paul Ullrich Ocean Dynamics Spring 2020 Hydrostatic Balance From the vertical momentum equation: Dw 1 @p = g Dt −⇢ @r − Assuming vertically balanced flow: @p = ⇢g @z − Writing this in terms of the density anomaly: @p = g(⇢ + σ) @z − ref Paul Ullrich Ocean Dynamics Spring 2020 Hydrostatic Balance @p = g(⇢ + σ) @z − ref Neglecting the contribution from �, this equation can be integrated directly: ps ⌘ dp = g⇢ dz − ref Zp Zz Where � is the height of the Ocean’s free surface, where p(⌘)=ps p(z)=p g⇢ (z ⌘) s − ref − Observe the linear dependency of pressure with height. How does this compare to the atmosphere? Paul Ullrich Ocean Dynamics Spring 2020 Hydrostatic Balance The pressure at a depth of 1km in the ocean is thus about 107 Pa or 100 times atmospheric pressure. Note that the the g ⇢ ref z part of this pressure is dynamically inert (does not drive dynamical circulations− at constant depth). Horizontal pressure gradients are generally only associated with: • Variations in the free surface height • Time-mean horizontal variations in surface atmospheric pressure (small) • Interior density anomalies (associated with T and S variations, neglected above) Paul Ullrich Ocean Dynamics Spring 2020 Buoyancy in the Ocean Recall our derivation of the Brunt-Väisälä Frequency in the atmosphere: D2∆z g 2 + (Γd Γ)∆z =0 Dt T (z0) − g(Γ Γ) d − > 0 Stable atmosphere T (z0) Brunt-Vaisala Frequency 2 g(Γd Γ) ∆z = ∆z sin ( t + φ) = − 0 N N T (z0) Oscillatory solutions (magnitude of 2 Units of seconds oscillation depends on initial velocity) Paul Ullrich Ocean Dynamics Spring 2020 Buoyancy in the Ocean Figure: Consider a fluid parcel initially located at height z1 in an environment whose density is �(z). The fluid parcel has density �1 = �(z1). Depth It is now displaced adiabatically a small vertical distance z2 = z1 + δz. By Taylor series: @⇢ ⇢ = ⇢(z ) ⇢ + δz E 2 ⇡ 1 @z ✓ ◆z=z1 Stable Unstable (⇢p ⇢E) abuoyant = g − − ⇢p Figure: Convectively stable and unstable vertical density profiles in the ocean. g @⇢ abuoyant = δz ⇢1 @z ✓ ◆z=z1 Paul Ullrich Ocean Dynamics Spring 2020 Buoyancy in the Ocean How about in the ocean? 2 D ∆z g @⇢E 2 = ∆z Dt ⇢E @z g @⇢E Stable ocean < 0 ⇢E = ⇢ref + σ ⇢E @z Brunt-Vaisala Frequency 2 g @ ∆z = ∆z sin ( t + φ) = 0 N N −⇢E @z Oscillatory solutions (magnitude of -2 Units of seconds oscillation depends on initial velocity) Paul Ullrich Ocean Dynamics Spring 2020 Buoyancy in the Ocean Brunt-Vaisala Frequency g @ 2 = N −⇢E @z Near the thermocline temperature gradients are much larger than salinity gradients, and so @T 2 g↵ N ⇡ T @z ↵T Thermal expansion coefficient of water Using ∆T 15◦C 4 1 ⇡ In surface layer ↵T 2 10− K− ∆z 1000 m ⇡ ⇥ ⇡ 3 1 5 10− s− Or about 20 min. period of oscillation N ⇡ ⇥ Paul Ullrich Ocean Dynamics Spring 2020 Geostrophic Balance Recall the horizontal momentum equation: Du 1 = p fk u + Dt −⇢r − ⇥ F Acceleration Pressure Grad. Friction (curvature) Coriolis In the ocean, the length scale is determined by the size of typical ocean gyres (about 2000 km). Hence, the Rossby number is U (0.1 m/s) 3 Ro = = 10− fL (10 4 s 1)(2 106 m) ⇠ − − ⇥ Compare: The atmosphere has a Rossby number of 0.1 Paul Ullrich Ocean Dynamics Spring 2020 Geostrophic Balance For small Rossby number, curvature of the flow can be neglected: Du 1 = p fk u + Dt −⇢r − ⇥ F Acceleration Pressure Grad. Friction (curvature) Coriolis This implies that geostrophic balance is an excellent approximation for the interior of the ocean away from the equator (where Coriolis force is large) and away from the surface, bottom and lateral boundaries (where friction is large). Paul Ullrich Ocean Dynamics Spring 2020 Geostrophic Balance In the ocean the geostrophic wind is given by 1 @p 1 @p u = v = g −f⇢ @y g f⇢ @x ref ✓ ◆z ref ✓ ◆z Since density varies little throughout the ocean, one can replace � with �ref in the denominator. Paul Ullrich Ocean Dynamics Spring 2020 Thermal “Wind” in the Ocean In the ocean the geostrophic wind is given by 1 @p 1 @p u = v = g −f⇢ @y g f⇢ @x ref ✓ ◆z ref ✓ ◆z Differentiate with respect to z (approximate f as constant): @v 1 @ @p @ug 1 @ @p g = = @z f⇢ @x @z @z −f⇢ref @y @z ref @p Use hydrostatic relationship = g(⇢ + σ) @z − ref Thermal wind @ug g @ @v g @ = g = relationship: @z f⇢ref @y @z −f⇢ref @x Paul Ullrich Ocean Dynamics Spring 2020 Thermal “Wind” in the Ocean Figure: Annual-mean cross section of zonal average potential density σ. Paul Ullrich Ocean Dynamics Spring 2020 Thermal “Wind” in the Ocean ? z u 0 g ⇡ @u g @ Question: Where are the major east-west g = oceanic currents? @z f⇢ref @y Paul Ullrich Ocean Dynamics Spring 2020 Thermal “Wind” in the Ocean ? − + − + − z u 0 g ⇡ @u g @ Question: Where are the major east-west g = oceanic currents? @z f⇢ref @y Paul Ullrich Ocean Dynamics Spring 2020 Thermal “Wind” in the Ocean ? + − − + − − + − + − ? z u 0 g ⇡ @u g @ Question: Where are the major east-west g = oceanic currents? @z f⇢ref @y Paul Ullrich Ocean Dynamics Spring 2020 GloBal Ocean Currents Figure: Subtropical gyres and associated ocean currents (Source: NOAA) Recall that the direction of shallow ocean currents is largely independent of depth. Paul Ullrich Ocean Dynamics Spring 2020 Thermal “Wind” in the Ocean Thermal wind @ug g @ @v g @ = g = relationship: @z f⇢ref @y @z −f⇢ref @x Assuming that the Abyssal currents are weak, the mean surface geostrophic flow should be g H∆σ 1 usurface 8 cm s− ⇠ f⇢ref L ⇠ 3 ∆σ 1.5kgm− (between 20N and 40N) ⇠ L 2000 km Horizontal length scale ⇠ H 1000 m Vertical length scale ⇠ Paul Ullrich Ocean Dynamics Spring 2020 Taylor-Proudman Theory Paul Ullrich Ocean Dynamics Spring 2020 Taylor-Proudman Taylor-Proudman Theorem: If flow is geostrophic and homogeneous (� = constant) then the flow is two dimensional and does not vary in the direction of the rotation vector. 1 @p 1 @p Proof: From u = v = g −⇢f @y g ⇢f @x ✓ ◆z ✓ ◆z Assume � and f constant. Then: @u 1 @ @p 1 @ g = = ( ⇢g)=0 @z −⇢f @y @z −⇢f @y − @v 1 @ @p 1 @ g = = ( ⇢g)=0 @z ⇢f @x @z ⇢f @x − So the geostrophic flow does not vary in the direction z. Paul Ullrich Ocean Dynamics Spring 2020 Taylor-Proudman Taylor-Proudman Theorem: If flow is geostrophic and homogeneous (� = constant) then the flow is two dimensional and does not vary in the direction of the rotation vector. Proof (more generally): For low Rossby number flows (low curvature), acceleration can be neglected and so the dynamic primitive equations read 1 2⌦ u + p (gz)=0 ⇥ ⇢r r Taking the curl of this expression, and using the fact that ug =0 and f =0 then yields r · r⇥r (⌦ )u =0 · r In other words, u does not vary in the direction �. Paul Ullrich Ocean Dynamics Spring 2020 Taylor Columns Taylor-Proudman Theorem: If flow is geostrophic and homogeneous (� = constant) then the flow is two dimensional and does not vary in the direction of the rotation vector. Figure: For slow, steady, frictionless flows the wind vectors do not vary along the direction of rotation. Vertical columns of fluid (Taylor columns) remain vertical and undisturbed. These columns cannot be tilted. Paul Ullrich Ocean Dynamics Spring 2020 Taylor Columns Figure: Under the Taylor- Proudman theorem flows must be along contours of constant fluid depth (otherwise the flow will lose its 2D character). Placing an obstacle on the base of the tank in a rotating environment will reveal that Rotating fluid tank the fluid above the obstacle will not mix with the environment.
Recommended publications
  • Role of Regional Ocean Dynamics in Dynamic Sea Level Projections by the End of the 21St Century Over Southeast Asia
    EGU21-8618, updated on 25 Sep 2021 https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-8618 EGU General Assembly 2021 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Role of Regional Ocean Dynamics in Dynamic Sea Level Projections by the end of the 21st Century over Southeast Asia Dhrubajyoti Samanta1, Svetlana Jevrejeva2, Hindumathi K. Palanisamy2, Kristopher B. Karnauskas3, Nathalie F. Goodkin1,4, and Benjamin P. Horton1 1Nanyang Technological University, Singapore ([email protected]) 2Centre for Climate Research Singapore, Singapore 3University of Colorado Boulder, USA 4American Museum of Natural History, USA Southeast Asia is especially vulnerable to the impacts of sea-level rise due to the presence of many low-lying small islands and highly populated coastal cities. However, our current understanding of sea-level projections and changes in upper-ocean dynamics over this region currently rely on relatively coarse resolution (~100 km) global climate model (GCM) simulations and is therefore limited over the coastal regions. Here using GCM simulations from the High-Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP) of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) to (1) examine the improvement of mean-state biases in the tropical Pacific and dynamic sea-level (DSL) over Southeast Asia; (2) generate projection on DSL over Southeast Asia under shared socioeconomic pathways phase-5 (SSP5-585); and (3) diagnose the role of changes in regional ocean dynamics under SSP5-585. We select HighResMIP models that included a historical period and shared socioeconomic pathways (SSP) 5-8.5 future scenario for the same ensemble and estimate the projected changes relative to the 1993-2014 period.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Service
    Vol. 62 Bollettino Vol. 62 - SUPPLEMENT 1 pp. 327 di Geofisica An International teorica ed applicata Journal of Earth Sciences IMDIS 2021 International Conference on Marine Data and Information Systems 12-14 April, 2021 Online Book of Abstracts SUPPLEMENT 1 Guest Editors: Michèle Fichaut, Vanessa Tosello, Alessandra Giorgetti BOLLETTINO DI GEOFISICA teorica ed applicata 210109 - OGS.Supp.Vol62.cover_08dorso19.indd 3 03/05/21 10:54 EDITOR-IN-CHIEF D. Slejko; Trieste, Italy EDITORIAL COUNCIL SUBSCRIPTIONS 2021 A. Camerlenghi, N. Casagli, F. Coren, P. Del Negro, F. Ferraccioli, S. Parolai, G. Rossi, C. Solidoro; Trieste, Italy ASSOCIATE EDITORS A. SOLID EaRTH GeOPHYsICs N. Abu-Zeid; Ferrara, Italy J. Ba; Nanjing, China R. Barzaghi; Milano, Italy J. Boaga; Padova, Italy C. Braitenberg; Trieste, Italy A. Casas; Barcelona, Spain G. Cassiani; Padova, Italy F. Cavallini; Trieste, Italy A. Del Ben; Trieste, Italy P. dell’Aversana; San Donato Milanese, Italy C. Doglioni; Roma, Italy F. Ferrucci, Vibo Valentia, Italy E. Forte; Trieste, Italy M.-J. Jimenez; Madrid, Spain C. Layland-Bachmann, Berkeley, U.S.A. Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata G. Li; Zhoushan, China c/o Istituto Nazionale di Oceanografia P. Paganini; Trieste, Italy e di Geofisica Sperimentale V. Paoletti, Naples, Italy Borgo Grotta Gigante, 42/c E. Papadimitriou; Thessaloniki, Greece 34010 Sgonico, Trieste, Italy R. Petrini; Pisa, Italy e-mail: [email protected] M. Pipan; Trieste, Italy G. Seriani; Trieste, Italy http-server: bgta.eu A. Shogenova; Tallin, Estonia E. Stucchi; Milano, Italy S. Trevisani; Venezia, Italy M. Vellico; Trieste, Italy A. Vesnaver; Trieste, Italy V. Volpi; Trieste, Italy A.
    [Show full text]
  • Shallow Water Waves and Solitary Waves Article Outline Glossary
    Shallow Water Waves and Solitary Waves Willy Hereman Department of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado, USA Article Outline Glossary I. Definition of the Subject II. Introduction{Historical Perspective III. Completely Integrable Shallow Water Wave Equations IV. Shallow Water Wave Equations of Geophysical Fluid Dynamics V. Computation of Solitary Wave Solutions VI. Water Wave Experiments and Observations VII. Future Directions VIII. Bibliography Glossary Deep water A surface wave is said to be in deep water if its wavelength is much shorter than the local water depth. Internal wave A internal wave travels within the interior of a fluid. The maximum velocity and maximum amplitude occur within the fluid or at an internal boundary (interface). Internal waves depend on the density-stratification of the fluid. Shallow water A surface wave is said to be in shallow water if its wavelength is much larger than the local water depth. Shallow water waves Shallow water waves correspond to the flow at the free surface of a body of shallow water under the force of gravity, or to the flow below a horizontal pressure surface in a fluid. Shallow water wave equations Shallow water wave equations are a set of partial differential equations that describe shallow water waves. 1 Solitary wave A solitary wave is a localized gravity wave that maintains its coherence and, hence, its visi- bility through properties of nonlinear hydrodynamics. Solitary waves have finite amplitude and propagate with constant speed and constant shape. Soliton Solitons are solitary waves that have an elastic scattering property: they retain their shape and speed after colliding with each other.
    [Show full text]
  • An Unconditionally Stable Scheme for the Shallow Water Equations*
    810 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW VOLUME 128 An Unconditionally Stable Scheme for the Shallow Water Equations* MOSHE ISRAELI Computer Science Department, Technion, Haifa, Israel NAOMI H. NAIK AND MARK A. CANE Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York (Manuscript received 24 September 1998, in ®nal form 1 March 1999) ABSTRACT A ®nite-difference scheme for solving the linear shallow water equations in a bounded domain is described. Its time step is not restricted by a Courant±Friedrichs±Levy (CFL) condition. The scheme, known as Israeli± Naik±Cane (INC), is the offspring of semi-Lagrangian (SL) schemes and the Cane±Patton (CP) algorithm. In common with the latter it treats the shallow water equations implicitly in y and with attention to wave propagation in x. Unlike CP, it uses an SL-like approach to the zonal variations, which allows the scheme to apply to the full primitive equations. The great advantage, even in problems where quasigeostrophic dynamics are appropriate in the interior, is that the INC scheme accommodates complete boundary conditions. 1. Introduction is easy to code and boundary conditions for the discre- The two-dimensional linearized shallow water equa- tized equations are fairly natural to impose. At the other tions represent the evolution of small perturbations in end of the spectrum, the CP algorithm is speci®cally the ¯ow ®eld of a shallow basin on a rotating sphere. designed with the characteristics of the physics of the Our interest in these model equations arises from our equatorial ocean dynamics in mind. By separating the interest in solving for the motions in a linear beta-plane free modes into the eastward propagating Kelvin mode deep ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, Nonautonomous Dynamical Systems, and the Climate Sciences
    Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, Nonautonomous Dynamical Systems, and the Climate Sciences Michael Ghil and Eric Simonnet Abstract This contribution introduces the dynamics of shallow and rotating flows that characterizes large-scale motions of the atmosphere and oceans. It then focuses on an important aspect of climate dynamics on interannual and interdecadal scales, namely the wind-driven ocean circulation. Studying the variability of this circulation and slow changes therein is treated as an application of the theory of nonautonomous dynamical systems. The contribution concludes by discussing the relevance of these mathematical concepts and methods for the highly topical issues of climate change and climate sensitivity. Michael Ghil Ecole Normale Superieure´ and PSL Research University, Paris, FRANCE, and University of California, Los Angeles, USA, e-mail: [email protected] Eric Simonnet Institut de Physique de Nice, CNRS & Universite´ Coteˆ d’Azur, Nice Sophia-Antipolis, FRANCE, e-mail: [email protected] 1 Chapter 1 Effects of Rotation The first two chapters of this contribution are dedicated to an introductory review of the effects of rotation and shallowness om large-scale planetary flows. The theory of such flows is commonly designated as geophysical fluid dynamics (GFD), and it applies to both atmospheric and oceanic flows, on Earth as well as on other planets. GFD is now covered, at various levels and to various extents, by several books [36, 60, 72, 107, 120, 134, 164]. The virtue, if any, of this presentation is its brevity and, hopefully, clarity. It fol- lows most closely, and updates, Chapters 1 and 2 in [60]. The intended audience in- cludes the increasing number of mathematicians, physicists and statisticians that are becoming interested in the climate sciences, as well as climate scientists from less traditional areas — such as ecology, glaciology, hydrology, and remote sensing — who wish to acquaint themselves with the large-scale dynamics of the atmosphere and oceans.
    [Show full text]
  • MAR 542 – Fundamentals of Atmosphere and Ocean Dynamics Instructor: Marat Khairoutdinov Room: 158 Endeavour Time: Tuesdays and Thursday 11:30 AM – 12:50 PM
    MAR 542 – Fundamentals of Atmosphere and Ocean Dynamics Instructor: Marat Khairoutdinov Room: 158 Endeavour Time: Tuesdays and Thursday 11:30 AM – 12:50 PM Text: Atmosphere, Ocean, and Climate Dynamics: An Introductory Text By John R. Marshall and R. Alan Plumb, Academic Press 2008 This course serves as an introduction to atmosphere and ocean dynamics. It is required of first-year atmospheric science graduate students, and it is recommended for first-year physical oceanography students. It assumes a working knowledge of differential and integral calculus, including partial derivatives and simple differential equations. Its purpose is to prepare students in atmospheric sciences and physical oceanography to move onto more advanced courses in these areas, as well as to acquaint each other with some fundamental aspects of dynamics applied to geophysical fluids outside your area of specialization. It is anticipated that the entire book will be covered. The chapter contents of this text are as follows, but some other topics will also be covered. 1. Characteristics of the atmosphere 2. The global energy balance 3. The vertical structure of the atmosphere 4. Convection 5. The meridional structure of the atmosphere 6. The equations of fluid motion 7. Balanced flow 8. The general circulation of the atmosphere 9. The ocean and its circulation 10. The wind-driven circulation 11. The thermohaline circulation of the ocean 12. Climate and climate variability • !"#$"%"&'"()*"+(,&-.)*/*0-",+--"1-"2*3&4"5$"6,7" • 8+9:";&<*/-"+2&=(">$"%"&'"()*"?+/()0-"-=/'+;*7" • @)*"+<*/+A*":*.()"&'"()*"&;*+9-"1-"+2&=("B"6,7" • !C$"%"&'"()*"?+/()0-"3+9:"1-"19"()*"D&/()*/9"E*,1-.)*/*7" Atmosphere is very thin: 99.9% of mass is below 50 km Compared to the Earth’s radius (6500 km), it is only 1% which is comparable to the thickness of an apple’s skin Thus, the synoptic-scale systems are quasi-two-dimensional! Vertical structure of the atmosphere Pressure (mb) 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 Permanent vs.
    [Show full text]
  • A 2004-06 Ocean Atlas
    Mapping Ocean Observations in a Dynamical Framework: A 2004-06 Ocean Atlas The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Forget, Gaël. “Mapping Ocean Observations in a Dynamical Framework: A 2004–06 Ocean Atlas.” Journal of Physical Oceanography 40.6 (2010) : 1201-1221. Copyright c2010 American Meteorological Society As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2009jpo4043.1 Publisher American Meteorological Society Version Final published version Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/62582 Terms of Use Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. JUNE 2010 F O R G E T 1201 Mapping Ocean Observations in a Dynamical Framework: A 2004–06 Ocean Atlas GAE¨ L FORGET Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Manuscript received 1 May 2008, in final form 13 March 2009) ABSTRACT This paper exploits a new observational atlas for the near-global ocean for the best-observed 3-yr period from December 2003 through November 2006. The atlas consists of mapped observations and derived quantities. Together they form a full representation of the ocean state and its seasonal cycle. The mapped observations are primarily altimeter data, satellite SST, and Argo profiles. GCM interpolation is used to synthesize these datasets, and the resulting atlas is a fairly close fit to each one of them. For observed quantities especially, the atlas is a practical means to evaluate free-running GCM simulations and to put field experiments into a broader context.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Surface Topography Mission/ Jason 2 Launch
    PREss KIT/JUNE 2008 Ocean Surface Topography Mission/ Jason 2 Launch Media Contacts Steve Cole Policy/Program Management 202-358-0918 Headquarters [email protected] Washington Alan Buis OSTM/Jason 2 Mission 818-354-0474 Jet Propulsion Laboratory [email protected] Pasadena, Calif. John Leslie NOAA Role 301-713-2087, x174 National Oceanic and [email protected] Atmospheric Administration Silver Spring, Md. Eliane Moreaux CNES Role 011-33-5-61-27-33-44 Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales [email protected] Toulouse, France Claudia Ritsert-Clark EUMETSAT Role 011-49-6151-807-609 European Organisation for the [email protected] Exploitation of Meteorological Satellites Darmstadt, Germany George Diller Launch Operations 321-867-2468 Kennedy Space Center, Fla. [email protected] Contents Media Services Information ...................................................................................................... 5 Quick Facts .............................................................................................................................. 7 Why Study Ocean Surface Topography? ..................................................................................8 Mission Overview ....................................................................................................................13 Science and Engineering Objectives ....................................................................................... 20 Spacecraft .............................................................................................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • APPH E4210. Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Spring 2005
    Department of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics Columbia University APPH E4210. Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Spring 2005 Instructor: Samar Khatiwala ([email protected]) Lamont: Oceanography 201, 845-365-8454); Mudd: 292C, 212-854-8111 Office hours: TBD Course home page: http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/˜spk/Classes/APPH4210_GFD/ gfd.html and CourseWorks Course description: This is an introductory course on the large scale dynamics of rotating geo- physical and planetary fluids such as the ocean and atmosphere. The focus of this class will be on using simplified physical and mathematical models to understand how the ocean and atmo- sphere “adjust” when perturbed by “external” forces. This adjustment is strongly modified by the combined effects of gravity and rotation, and largely manifested through “waves”. A variety of processes fundamental to how the ocean and atmosphere operate can be understood by studying these wave motions, and that is the approach we will take. This class is a prerequisite for more advanced courses in climate studies, atmospheric science, and physical oceanography. Topics to be covered include: Review of the governing equations of mass and momentum conservation; wave kinematics, dispersion, group velocity; surface and internal gravity waves; shallow water theory; stratified fluids and normal mode analysis; waves in rotating fluids: Kelvin, Poincare, and Rossby waves; the Rossby adjustment problem and conservation of potential vortic- ity; the quasi-geostrophic approximation; planetary waves and Charney-Drazin theory; barotropic and baroclinic instability theory. Prerequisites Basic linear algebra and PDEs (at the level of E3102 - Applied Math II); a course in fluid dynamics such as Physics of Fluids (E4200); some knowledge of programming would be useful.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies of Coastal Ocean Dynamics and Processes Using Emerging Optical Technologies
    COASTAL OCEAN OPTICS AND DYNAMICS Studies of Coastal Ocean Dynamics and Processes Using Emerging Optical Technologies BY TOMMY D. DICKEY Increasing emphasis is being placed upon clude prediction of underwater visibility and anthropogenic effects. Further, the infl u- scientifi c research, monitoring, and manage- water depth for purposes including naviga- ences of the ocean bottom (which varies ment of the coastal ocean for many compel- tion, shipping, and tactical naval operations. greatly from rocky to sandy to muddy and ling reasons. It is estimated that over 60 per- Bio-optical oceanography, also termed from barely vegetated to densely vegetated), cent of the human population dwells within bio-optics, concerns the interactions be- on water column light fi elds and water-leav- the coastal zone (defi ned as the region lying tween organisms and light in the sea, and ing radiance (i.e., optically shallow waters) within –200 m and +200 m of mean sea encompasses studies of oceanic organisms, have only begun to be explored. Nonetheless, level; Pernetta and Milliman, 1995). Benefi ts derived from coastal waters include fi sher- ...within the past decade, bio-optical and optical oceanography ies, natural resources, transport of goods, have matured to the point that most plans for coastal experiments, and recreation. These same waters are often adversely affected by pollution from river observations, and observatories, regardless of application, include and storm runoff, spills and resuspension in situ and remote-sensing optical instrumentation and bio-optical of waste materials, input of fertilizers caus- ing eutrophication and sometimes anoxia, models as essential components. blooms of harmful algal species (e.g., red tides, brown tides, fi sh kills), and transport these organisms’ effects on the propagation within the past decade, bio-optical and opti- of ecologically damaging non-endemic spe- and spectral distribution of light (color) in cal oceanography have matured to the point cies.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Waves in a Multi-Layer Shallow Water System with Bathymetry Ocean Waves in a Multi-Layer Shallow Water System with Bathymetry
    Ocean waves in a multi-layer shallow water system with bathymetry Ocean waves in a multi-layer shallow water system with bathymetry By Afroja Parvin, A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in the Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Masters of Science McMaster University c Copyright by Afroja Parvin June 22, 2018 McMaster University Masters of Science (2018) Hamilton, Ontario (School of Computational Science and engineering) TITLE: Ocean waves in a multi-layer shallow water system with bathymetry AUTHOR: Afroja Parvin (McMaster University) SUPERVISOR: Dr. Nicholas Kevlahan NUMBER OF PAGES: xiv, 134 ii Abstract Mathematical modeling of ocean waves is based on the formulation and solution of the appropriate equations of continuity, momentum and the choice of proper initial and boundary conditions. Under the influence of gravity, many free surface water waves can be modeled by the shallow water equations (SWE) with the assumption that the horizontal length scale of the wave is much greater than the depth scale and the wave height is much less than the fluid’s mean depth. Furthermore, to describe three dimensional flows in the hydrostatic and Boussinesq limits, the multilayer SWE model is used, where the fluid is discretized horizontally into a set of vertical layers, each having its own height, density, horizontal velocity and geopotential. In this study, we used an explicit staggered finite volume method to solve single and multilayer SWE, with and without density stratification and bathymetry, to understand the dynamic of surface waves and internal waves. We implemented a two-dimensional version of the incompressible DYNAMICO method and compare it with a one-dimensional SWE.
    [Show full text]
  • How Long Is the Memory of Tropical Ocean Dynamics?*
    3518 JOURNAL OF CLIMATE VOLUME 15 How Long is the Memory of Tropical Ocean Dynamics?* Z. LIU Center for Climatic Research/IES, and Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of WisconsinÐMadison, Madison, Wisconsin 1 March 2002 and 3 July 2002 ABSTRACT Combining classic equatorial wave dynamics and midlatitude wave dynamics, a uni®ed view is proposed to account for the memory of tropical ocean dynamics in terms of oceanic basin modes. It is shown that the dynamic memory of the ocean is bounded by the cross-basin time of planetary waves along the poleward basin boundary. For realistic ocean basins, this memory originates from the mid- and high-latitude processes and is usually at interdecadal timescales. 1. Introduction long, the tropical ocean itself might be able to provide A fundamental issue for our understanding of inter- memory for climate variability on interdecadal and lon- decadal climate variability is the dynamic memory of ger timescales. the ocean. This issue is particularly unclear for the trop- This paper clari®es the nature of these S modes. The ical ocean. Earlier studies of tropical oceans have fo- classic equatorial and midlatitude wave dynamics are cused on the upper-ocean dynamic memory that is as- reexamined from a uni®ed perspective. We show that sociated with the equatorial Kelvin and Rossby waves. the S mode is identical to the planetary wave basin mode This tropical memory is less than interannual timescales (hereafter P mode) that has been studied recently in even in the large Paci®c Ocean (e.g., Cane and Moore terms of classic midlatitude wave dynamics by Cessi 1981) and is unlikely to contribute signi®cantly to in- and Louazel (2001, hereafter CL).
    [Show full text]