DOCSLIB.ORG

Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2015/0100882 A1 Severenuk Et Al

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2015/0100882 A1 Severenuk Et Al US 2015O100882A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2015/0100882 A1 Severenuk et al. (43) Pub. Date: Apr. 9, 2015 (54) METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR INTERACTIVE Publication Classification FONT FEATURE ACCESS (51) Int. Cl. G06F 7/2 (2006.01) (71) Applicant: COREL CORPORATION, Ottawa G06F 3/0482 (2006.01) (CA) G06F 3/0484 (2006.01) (52) U.S. Cl. CPC .......... G06F 17214 (2013.01); G06F 3/04842 (72) Inventors: Tony Severenuk, Kemptville (CA); (2013.01); G06F 3/0482 (2013.01) Claude Peloquin, Gatineau (CA); Pauline Branigan, Ottawa (CA); Neville (57) ABSTRACT Wai Chun Ko, Nepean (CA) OpenType fonts have become a standard with desktop pub lished with over 150,000 fonts available each potentially comprising up to 65.535 characters and even more glyphs. (21) Appl. No.: 14/386,573 Accordingly it is difficult for anybody to know the endless combinations for every font or even a significant Subset of PCT Fled: Mar. 19, 2013 these OpenType fonts. At present users must go through a (22) series of trial and error modifications to observe the fonts inherent design variations to find either the one they want or (86) PCT NO.: PCT/CA2O13/OOO360 determine that the font is not appropriate. Embodiments of the invention in contrast provide users with a solution wherein S371 (c)(1), the appearance of the characters and/or glyphs is first deter (2) Date: Sep.19, 2014 mined by the system and then presented to the user. Based on the appearance of the characters the user can then select the (30) Foreign Application Priority Data appearance they desire and the system determines which features are required for that appearance and proceeds Mar. 19, 2012 (CA) .................................... 2,772,554 accordingly. Network Device 1007 Audio Out 1016 Processor Video Out 1020 Audio. In 104 O10 Memory Video. In 1018 O2 File O56 Application 1022 Video Codec 1054 1050 Call Control 104.8 Media Negotiation | 1046 RTSP 1044 SIP 1042 SAP 1040 RTP 1038 TCP 1036 UDP 1034 IP 1032 IEEE 802.2 LLC 1030 IEEE 802.11 MAC ; L 1026 IEEE 802.11 PHY NY:............................Protocol Stack 1024. 1028 Front-End TX/RX & Antenna Device OO4 Patent Application Publication Apr. 9, 2015 Sheet 1 of 11 US 201S/O100882 A1 I9InáH as - - - - or e > a $..“(,, Patent Application Publication Apr. 9, 2015 Sheet 2 of 11 US 201S/O100882 A1 Z9.InãIAI Patent Application Publication Apr. 9, 2015 Sheet 3 of 11 US 201S/O100882 A1 jouayuanguosans:xeºrgon “”suoradoaunuopun suomas„----------- xoneusuunn--~~~~~)---------·Joueurwodºo J §9.InãIAIJLRIVRHOIRICH ?? Patent Application Publication US 201S/O100882 A1 JUOH Patent Application Publication US 201S/O100882 A1 Patent Application Publication Apr. 9, 2015 Sheet 6 of 11 US 201S/O100882 A1 : 20%,modoºu/yºuvymy usuanpoq §345 saulipuoI upraE BullanoFt saeaenae Patent Application Publication Apr. 9, 2015 Sheet 7 of 11 US 201S/O100882 A1 9InãIAI Patent Application Publication Apr. 9, 2015 Sheet 8 of 11 US 201S/O100882 A1 JLO?HTEIS uoneblaenT||ºuea suuoueuJO Patent Application Publication Apr. 9, 2015 Sheet 9 of 11 US 2015/O100882 A1 praebe, 098 Patent Application Publication Apr. 9, 2015 Sheet 10 of 11 US 201S/O100882 A1 i Patent Application Publication Apr. 9, 2015 Sheet 11 of 11 US 201S/O100882 A1 9IOIInOopnvL00I QOTITZ’Z08FIFIGII DVWII’Z08FIFIGII IOITUODIBO0çOI JosSºoOJA IIOI 000I US 2015/O 100882 A1 Apr. 9, 2015 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR INTERACTIVE around 10,000 and today FontShop (www.fontshop.com) FONT FEATUREACCESS alone carries over 150,000 fonts for commercial and private use for in applications from publishing to website design to FIELD OF THE INVENTION digital marketing to product and company branding. With the PostScript format established by Adobe in the 1980s being 0001. The present invention relates to fonts and more spe limited to 256 characters per file metrics information and cifically to displaying font options to a user without knowl extra characters often needing to be stored in additional files edge of the font's structure. becoming especially unwieldy, e.g. with a Windows Tru eTypefont where a single typeface family could require hun BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION dreds of pieces. OpenType removed those organizational 0002 Afont was traditionally defined as a quantity of sorts issues and provided, based on Unicode, a file format that composing a complete character set of a single size and style could contain up to 65.535 characters or glyphs once the of a particular typeface. For example, the complete set of all number of glyphs is included, this is pretty much limitless. the characters for “9-point Bulmer' was called a font, and The 65,535 count being implemented for Unicode, where “10-point Bulmer another separate font, but part of the same there was one specific appearance for each character, or sym font family, whereas “9-point Bulmer boldface' would be bol for Asian/Middle East text. This allowed for extensive another font in a different font family of the same typeface. language Support and made room for advanced typographic However, today font is frequently used synonymously with features like ligatures, various figure styles, fractions, stylis the term typeface, although they had clearly understood dif tic alternates, Swashes, Small caps, ornaments, borders, and so ferent meanings before the advent of digital typography and on. Accordingly, a single OpenType file contains all the infor desktop publishing. mation required for a typeface style: metrics, kerning, out 0003 Beginning in the 1980s, with the introduction of lines, and hinting, plus potentially other contents including computer fonts, a broader definition for the term “font bitmaps. evolved, because different sizes of a single style which had 0006. However, designers are now faced with a different been separate fonts in metal type were now generated from a challenge in that knowing which of these advanced typo single computer font, because vector shapes can be scaled graphic features including, but not limited to, ligatures, mul freely. As such there is no separate font for “9-point Bulmer tiple figure styles, fractions, stylistic alternates, Swashes, italic” as opposed to “10-point Bulmer italic’”. “Bulmer, the Small caps, ornaments, borders, etc. the font developer has typeface, may include the fonts “Bulmer roman”, “Bulmer included within the font. Whilst this may be relatively com italic”, “Bulmer bold' and “Bulmer extended. Accordingly, plex mental task for a designer who only works with a couple a wide variety of applications including, but not limited to, of common fonts, e.g. Arial and Times New Roman, it is an word processors, graphics design Suites, graphics presenta incredibly difficult if not impossible task for a designer with tion Suites, web publishing applications and operating sys a couple of hundred fonts yet alone a designer seeking new tems are bought with a library of standard fonts and the fonts from online stores such as FontShop with over 150,000 applications allow the user to access fonts as well as some fonts and more being added daily. For the average individual characteristics of those fonts. By the late 1980s Apple had even common fonts present an incredibly complex array of developed “TrueType' as an outline font standard to compete options for each one. with Adobe's Type 1 fonts used in PostScript offering font 0007 Accordingly as nobody could know the endless developers a high degree of control over precisely how their combinations for every font, they have to go through a series fonts are displayed of trial and error modifications by clicking on buttons or 0004 Microsoft failure to license Apple's advanced selecting items in a dropdown list and then observing the typography technology in the early 1990s led to their own effects upon the text they are working with. If they do not find solution, dubbed “TrueType Open, released in 1994. Adobe that selected appearance attractive they have to undo these joined Microsoft in 1996, adding support for the glyph outline changes and then try another combination. It would therefore technology used in its Type 1 fonts. A glyph being an indi be beneficial to provide a user with a solution wherein the vidual element of writing where the individual mark contrib appearance of the characters and/or glyphs is first determined utes to the meaning of what is written. At the same time the by the system and then presented to the user. Based on the two companies recognised the need for an expressive font appearance of the characters the user can then select the format capable of handling fine typography and the complex appearance they desire and the system determines which behavior of many of the world’s writing systems and features are required for that appearance and proceeds expanded “TrueType Open adding new extensions to accordingly. address these limitations, naming the combined technology 0008 Further, given a potential 65,535 characters and “OpenType' and continuing to develop the OpenType adding even more glyphs within a font it is very difficult for a approach as a proprietary solution until 2005. At this point designer to evaluate a potential font as one that they wish to OpenType began migrating to an open standard under the purchase in any significant extent even where an online font International Organization for Standardization (ISO) within retailer provides a list of the glyphs. It would therefore be the MPEG group, which had previously adopted OpenType beneficial for a user to evaluate a font within their own pub 1.4 by reference for MPEG-4. Adoption of the new standard lishing, desktop or mobile environment that they are working reached formal approval in March 2007 as ISO Standard within prior to having to commit to purchasing it. ISO/IEC 14496-22 (MPEG-4 Part 22) called Open FontFor 0009.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Graphics Design
    Graphics Design - Typography Exercise 7 - ‘Arial’ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Closest Fonts: {Arial, Helvetica, MS Gothic} Closer Fonts: {Newhouse DT Condensed, CG Triumvirate Condensed} Chosen Focus Font: {Arial Narrow Bold Italic} ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Font: Monotype Grotesque Birth-Date: 1926 Creator: Frank Hinman Pierpont Publisher: Monotype Foundry Based Off: Grotesque (by H. Berthold AG Foundry & William Thorowogood, 1832) Family: Largely-Extended: Multiple Widths (Condensed,...,Extended) Recognition: Easily Recognisable as san-serifs were few and unusual in England. Use: Early 20th Century Avant Garde Printing from Western & Central Europe ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Font: Arial Alias: (Original) Sonoran Sans Serif, (After Microsoft Acquisition) Arial MT Birth-Date: 1982 Self-Description: “Contemporary sans serif design, Arial contains more humanist characteristics than many of its predecessors and as such is more in tune with the mood of the last decades of the twentieth century. The overall treatment of curves is softer and fuller than in most industrial style sans serif faces. Terminal strokes are cut on the diagonal which helps to give the face a less mechanical appearance. Arial is an extremely versatile family of typefaces which can
    [Show full text]
  • Apple Lisa Computer Font Charts
    Apple Lisa Computer Font Charts Apple Lisa Computer Technical Information APPLE LISA COMPUTER FONT CHARTS Printed by David T. Craig Printed by: Macintosh Picture Printer 0.0.2 1998-12-06 Printed: 1998-12-15 17:06:07 Printed by David T. Craig Page 0000 of 0028 Apple Lisa Computer Font Charts Printed by David T. Craig Page 0001 of 0028 “Apple Lisa Font Chart 01/28.PIC” 16 KB 1998-12-13 dpi: 72h x 72v pix: 576h x 720v Apple Lisa Computer Font Charts Printed by David T. Craig Page 0002 of 0028 “Apple Lisa Font Chart 02/28.PIC” 22 KB 1998-12-13 dpi: 72h x 72v pix: 576h x 720v Apple Lisa Computer Font Charts Printed by David T. Craig Page 0003 of 0028 “Apple Lisa Font Chart 03/28.PIC” 12 KB 1998-12-13 dpi: 72h x 72v pix: 576h x 720v Apple Lisa Computer Font Charts Printed by David T. Craig Page 0004 of 0028 “Apple Lisa Font Chart 04/28.PIC” 14 KB 1998-12-13 dpi: 72h x 72v pix: 576h x 720v Apple Lisa Computer Font Charts Printed by David T. Craig Page 0005 of 0028 “Apple Lisa Font Chart 05/28.PIC” 16 KB 1998-12-13 dpi: 72h x 72v pix: 576h x 720v Apple Lisa Computer Font Charts Printed by David T. Craig Page 0006 of 0028 “Apple Lisa Font Chart 06/28.PIC” 21 KB 1998-12-13 dpi: 72h x 72v pix: 576h x 720v Apple Lisa Computer Font Charts Printed by David T.
    [Show full text]
  • Advancements in Web Typography (Webfonts and WOFF)
    Advancements in Web Typography (WebFonts and WOFF) Aaron A. Aliño Graphic Communication Department California Polytechnic State University 2010 Advancements in Web Typography (WebFonts and WOFF) Aaron A. Aliño Graphic Communication Department California Polytechnic State University 2010 Table of Contents Chapter I: Introduction………………………………………………………….…………..2 Chapter II: Literature Review……………………………………………………….………5 Chapter III: Research Methods………………………………………………….…..…....18 Chapter IV: Results………………………………………………………………….……..24 Chapter V: Conclusions……………………………………………………………….…..38 References……………………………………………………………………………...…..41 1 Chapter I: Introduction When it comes to the control one has in designing and creating content for the World Wide Web, typography should be no different. Print designers have had the advantage for a long time over their ability to choose exactly how type is printed, limited only by their imagination and the mechanical limits of setting and printing type. Web designers, on the other hand, have been held back by the inherent hardware and software limitations associated with web design and font selection. What this means is that web designers have not been able to control type exactly the way they want. Web designers have been limited to fonts that can safely be displayed on most computers and web browsers. If web designers wanted to display type with a special font, they had to resort to a workaround that was not always effective. Web designers should have the same absolute control over typography as print designers. Control of web typography has gotten much better compared to the early days of web design, but 2 considering how powerful and robust computers and web browsers are now, it seems unfortunate that control over web typography is so primitive That has changed now.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Free Typewriter Font 14 Fun Fonts to Put a Smile on Your Face
    download free typewriter font 14 fun fonts to put a smile on your face. Who doesn't want a bunch of fun fonts to cheer up their projects? The good news is there's almost an endless supply of friendly, happy fonts whirling around the web, and we've picked out the best ones available, for an injection of fun typography into your work. The fun fonts on the list below have a range of price points and have been selected by us – whether that's 'cos they are funny fonts, exciting fonts, friendly fonts or they just make us happy. With the list below, you're sure to be able to find the best fun font for your project (and don't worry – Comic Sans didn't make the cut). If you want something slightly different, then don't miss our selection of top retro fonts, free script fonts or calligraphy fonts. 01. Balgin. Balgin is here to take you back to the '90s for a dose of nostalgic fun. This happy font designed by Cahya Sofyan is formed from basic shapes and is available in three 'flavours' – display, normal and text and six different weights. It supports over 75 languages and we just love its bright and friendly look – the very definition of fun typography. It's available from £7.99. 02. Mohr Rounded. A curvier version of the Mohr typeface, this fun font features soft terminals for a friendly look. The family includes three versions (normal, alt and italic) in a wide range of weights, making it nice and versatile.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on the Application of Chinese Fonts in the Computer Shen-Ao
    2017 4th International Conference on Social Science (ICSS 2017) ISBN: 978-1-60595-525-4 Study on the Application of Chinese Fonts in the Computer Shen-Ao LIU Wuhan, Hubei, China, Hubei University of Technology [email protected] Keywords: Computer, Font library, Printing fonts, Design application Abstract. A font library is a collection of fonts with different shapes but the same styles, sizes, and forms. It is made based on the number of Chinese characters and the standard of font shape in accordance with the regulations of our country, and there is no originality in choosing and arranging the contents and number of fonts. Therefore, a computer font library is not a compiled work, but a database, a frequently used computer font library. By the end of the 1980s, the computer font library has basically replaced the traditional type printing, accelerating the diversification of China's print fonts design. This paper discusses the design and creation of computer font libraries and the diversification of fonts design, and explores the application of computer fonts in the press and multimedia. Introduction By the end of 1980s, the type printing technology which has been used in China for nearly a hundred years has been replaced by laser typesetting, computer font library, and computer typesetting technology. China’s printing industry bade farewell to the era of lead and fire and ushered in a technological revolution featuring light and electricity. The computer font library of Chinese characters firstly entering in printing and typesetting was developed and used. The design of printing fonts through computer is convenient and fast, and has various art forms.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding, Testing, and Using Web Fonts Laura Franz, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth 1
    Finding, Testing, and Using Web Fonts Laura Franz, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth 1 Finding, Testing, and Using Web Fonts Laura Franz, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth Where should I get my fonts? There is no wrong or right answer. It depends on your needs. • Ease of use (how much CSS do you need/want to know/use? How easy is the interface?) • Control/ownership (do you or your client want to own the font license?) • Cost • Quality • Availability of specific fonts (do you or your client need a specific font?) • Availability of desktop fonts for mock-ups • Screenshots of how fonts work cross browser Web font providers in alphabetical order (leaving out those with confusing interfaces and pricing plans): Self Host? Host on Desktop fonts Screenshots Pricing Fee Free Trial their for mock-ups of fonts cross Schedule available? server? provided? browser? Fontdeck No Yes No No Pay per font. Example: Din Text Pro Annual Yes (each weight/style charged separate- ly) $12.50/year. (1m page views) Fonts.com Yes, with Yes Yes, with Pro Yes Standard plan (500,000 monthly Monthly Yes Pro Plan Plan page views) is $20/mo. Pro plan is $100/mo. FontSpring Yes No Yes (otf) No Purchase font licenses. A full One Free fonts family (3–14 weights and styles) Time available costs $0–$300. Fee FontSquirrel Yes No Yes (otf) No Free None Free Google Web Fonts Yes Yes Yes No Free None Yes Justanotherfoundry No Yes No No Each family (all weights and styles, Annual Yes 2gb/Month traffic) €19/year myfonts.com Yes No Yes, with Yes Futura (6 weights and styles) 10,000 One Yes higher plan monthly views $133.68.
    [Show full text]
  • Portable Document Format Specifications
    Portable Document Format Specifications Portable Document Format Specifications Revision History Date Version Summary of Changes 2005-04-08 1.0 Initial version 2008-06-04 2.0 Changed “Bookmarks and Page” to “Bookmarks Panel and Page” in Open Dialog Box section Version 1.0 1 Portable Document Format Specifications PORTABLE DOCUMENT FORMAT SPECIFICATIONS These specifications are for submitting documents in Portable Document Format (PDF). VERSION Use PDF Version 1.4. PDF version 1.4 is for use with Adobe Acrobat 5.0 or higher1. No additional software should be needed to read and navigate the PDF files. FONTS Embed fonts. PDF viewing software automatically substitutes a font to display text if the font used to create the text is unavailable on the reviewer’s computer. In some cases, font substitution can occur even when the fonts are available. For example, Helvetica or Times are substituted even if available on the reviewer’s computer. Font substitution can affect a document’s appearance and structure, and in some cases it can affect the information conveyed by a document. Font availability is not guaranteed. Font availability to the reviewer is ensured if all fonts are embedded. When fonts are embedded, all characters for the font should be included not just a subset of the fonts being used in the document. Limit fonts to those listed in Table 1. Font embedding does not always solve the problems that occur when a reviewer tries to paste text from a PDF document into another software format. If the font is not available on the reviewer’s computer, font substitution results even if the fonts are embedded.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Font for It Resume
    Best Font For It Resume How ailurophilic is Rustie when ignitible and uncompanioned Archie vermilions some trones? Taddeus remains hippocampal: she polka her arborization circumfuses too purblindly? Rudd is unfledged and denaturise consequently as laith Fonsie preheat digestedly and taxi irrationally. If you need to read as we interact with font for best it safe and what is great choices you get Other resume best serif, it is considered the future of! Determines the best for its use only and even the rest and modern and section. In this article we discuss the importance of picking a good resume font. Choosing The Best Font for job Resume ResumeWriterSG. For resumes for those without going to tnr, less is a screen readability and section titles of your resume headers without any relevant experience. The Best Font Size And Styles For all Resume ResumeOK. Not as hard, make all, rank it? Yet simple as for resumes to use comic sans serif font that a favorable impression for resume should erase from listing, supplying thousands of unitary matrices, and interests section. What is known Best Font for success Resume? The load Resume Fonts Garamond If you more looking up a more modern version of the standard Times New Roman Garamond is nothing perfect. See it for resume more modern looking for a resume fonts? They will motivate and it is too crowded or too much alike, may be used in a tough task as important goal of. Calibri is fluid new Comic Sans Stop using it by Caroline Medium. The best options to its staying power generation and printed cover letter construction of a font style from? Take your pick of best font for supreme resume review that same resume fonts the effect is subliminal Focus on ones that will subtly impress.
    [Show full text]
  • Web Type: the Next Big Thing NYC Web Design Meetup July 19, 2010
    Web Type: The Next Big Thing NYC Web Design Meetup July 19, 2010 Jaron J. Rubenstein Rubenstein Technology Group http://www.rubensteintech.com/ Overview Technology Licensing Foundries and Distributors Code Results Issues Conclusion References Copyright © 2010, Rubenstein Technology Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Evolution of Web Type Web Fonts – Arial, Times New Roman, etc. – Verdana, Georgia, Tahoma, Trebuchet MS, etc. Scalable Inman Flash Replacement (sIFR) – JavaScript/Flash text replacement – Requires Flash plugin – Limitations for animation, dynamic text, Cufón – Replaces text with VML (MSIE) or SVG (everything else) – Rather slow, complex, has some issues with text selection and screen rendering CSS and @font-face – Method of specifying and downloading fonts – Not “HTML5” , introduced in CSS2 in 1998, standardized in CSS3 – Works with MSIE4+, Firefox 3.5+, Safari 3.1+, Opera 10+ and Chrome 4.0+ – Specification: http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-fonts/#font-resources Copyright © 2010, Rubenstein Technology Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved. @font-face Font Formats TrueType (TTF) – Firefox 3.5+ , Opera 10+, Safari 3.1+, Chrome 4.0.249.4+ Embedded OpenType (EOT) – Microsoft Internet Explorer 4+ Web Open Font Format (WOFF) – Firefox 3.6+, Internet Explorer 9+, Chrome 5+ Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) – iPad and iPhone Scalable Vector Graphics, gzipped (SVGZ) – Compressed SVG files (via gzip compression) – iPad only Copyright © 2010, Rubenstein Technology Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Format Browser Compatibility Browser TrueType WOFF EOT SVG SVGZ MSIE 4 - 8 Yes MSIE 9 Soon Yes Firefox 3.5+ Yes Firefox 3.6+ Yes Yes Safari 3.1+ Yes Yes Yes Chrome 4+ Yes Soon Yes Yes Opera 10+ Yes Soon Yes Yes iPhone Yes iPad Yes Yes Source: http://www.fontspring.com/fontface Copyright © 2010, Rubenstein Technology Group, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Old English Newsletter
    OLD ENGLISH NEWSLETTER Published for The Old English Division of the Modern Language Association of America by The Department of English, University of Tennessee, Knoxville VOLUME 40 NUMBER 1 Fall 2006 ISSN 0030-1973 Old English Newsletter Volume 40 Number 1 Fall 2006 Editor R. M. Liuzza, University of Tennessee, Knoxville Associate Editors Year’s Work in Old English Studies: Daniel Donoghue, Harvard University Bibliography: Thomas Hall, University of Notre Dame Contributing Editors Research in Progress: Heide Estes, Monmouth University Conference Abstracts: Robert Butler, Alcorn State University Bibliography: Melinda Menzer, Furman University Editorial Board Patrick W. Conner, West Virginia University Antonette diPaolo Healey, Dictionary of Old English David F. Johnson, Florida State University Catherine Karkov, University of Leeds Ursula Lenker, University of Munich Mary Swan, University of Leeds Assistant to the Editor: Jonathan Huffstutler The Old English Newsletter (ISSN 0030-1973) is published for the Old English Division of the Modern Lan- guage Association by the Department of English, University of Tennessee, 301 McClung Tower, Knoxville, TN, 37996-0430; email [email protected]. The generous support of the International Society of Anglo- Saxonists and the Department of English at The University of Tennessee is gratefully acknowledged. Subscriptions: The rate for institutions is $20 US per volume; the rate for individuals is $15 per volume, but in order to reduce administrative costs the editors ask individuals to pay for two volumes at once at the discounted rate of $25. Individual back issues can be ordered for $5 each. All payments must be made in US dollars. A subscription form is online at http://www.oenewsletter.org/OEN/subscription_form.pdf.
    [Show full text]
  • Pageplus X2 © 2007 Serif (Europe) Ltd
    How to Contact Us Our main office (UK, Europe): The Software Centre PO Box 2000, Nottingham, NG11 7GW, UK Main: (0115) 914 2000 Registration (UK only): (0800) 376 1989 Sales (UK only): (0800) 376 7070 Technical Support (UK only): (0845) 345 6770 Customer Service (UK only): (0845) 345 6770 Customer Service/ (0115) 914 9090 Tech. Support (International): General Fax: (0115) 914 2020 Technical Support email: [email protected] American office (USA, Canada): The Software Center 13 Columbia Drive, Suite 5, Amherst NH 03031, USA Main: (603) 889-8650 Registration: (800) 794-6876 Sales: (800) 55-SERIF or 557-3743 Technical Support: (603) 886-6642 Customer Service: (800) 489-6720 General Fax: (603) 889-1127 Technical Support email: [email protected] Online Visit us on the Web at: http://www.serif.com/ Serif forums: http://www.serif.com/forums.asp International Please contact your local distributor/dealer. For further details please contact us at one of our phone numbers above. Comments or other feedback We want to hear from you! Please email [email protected] with your ideas and comments! This document, and the software described in it, is furnished under an end user License Agreement, which is included with the product. The agreement specifies the permitted and prohibited uses. © 2007 Serif (Europe) Ltd. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Serif (Europe) Ltd. All Serif product names are trademarks of Serif (Europe) Ltd. Microsoft, Windows, and the Windows logo are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation. All other trademarks acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard Rutter
    Where Web Typography Goes to Next Richard Rutter Sunday, 13 March 2011 apple.com Sunday, 13 March 2011 ÿ Sunday, 13 March 2011 Ultra light Adelle Light Adelle Regular Adelle Bold Adelle Black Adelle Ultra black Adelle Sunday, 13 March 2011 Light Adelle Regular Adelle SemiBold Adelle Bold Adelle ExtraBold Adelle Heavy Adelle Sunday, 13 March 2011 h1 { font-family: “Adelle”, Cambria, Georgia, serif; font-weight: bold; } Sunday, 13 March 2011 h1 { font-family: “Adelle”, Cambria, Georgia, serif; font-weight: 200; } Sunday, 13 March 2011 Values for font-weight property 100 Ultra Light, Extra Light 200 Light, Thin 300 Book 400 Normal, Regular 500 Medium 600 Demi Bold, Semi Bold 700 Bold 800 Black, Extra Bold 900 Ultra Bold, Fat, Heavy Sunday, 13 March 2011 Opera 11 Sunday, 13 March 2011 Firefox 3.6 Sunday, 13 March 2011 Safari 5 Sunday, 13 March 2011 Adelle in FontExplorer X Sunday, 13 March 2011 Sunday, 13 March 2011 Extra condensed Clarendon Condensed Clarendon Regular Clarendon Expanded Clarendon Extra expanded Clarendon Sunday, 13 March 2011 h1 { font-family: “Clarendon”, Georgia, serif; font-stretch: condensed; } Sunday, 13 March 2011 Values for font-stretch property Ultra Condensed Extra Condensed Condensed Semi Condensed Normal Semi Expanded Expanded Extra Expanded Ultra Expanded Sunday, 13 March 2011 Sunday, 13 March 2011 Sunday, 13 March 2011 Sunday, 13 March 2011 Sunday, 13 March 2011 Font Linking Sunday, 13 March 2011 @font-face { font-family: "Clarendon"; src: url("clarendon-nar-eb.woff"); } Sunday, 13 March 2011 @font-face { font-family:
    [Show full text]