D P CONSISTENCY GUIDE I NAVAL SHOREINFRASTRUCTURE A FRAMEWORK VERSION 1.0 FINAL November 2013 NSTALLATION LAN EVELOPMENT

MASTER PLAN The history of facilities master planning in the U.S. Navy dates back 188 years. In 1825, Secretary of the Navy Samuel Southard noted with alarm the rapidly deteriorating state of the nation’s Naval yards and recommended an urgent program of planning for their restoration.

While master planning got an early start in the Navy, it did not constitute a dedicated program until 1952, when the Master Shore Station Development Program was initiated.

Facilities planning became systematized in the Navy in 1960 when the Shore Facilities Planning and Programming System was instituted as a component of the Department of Defense’s well-known Planning, Programming, and Budgeting System (PPBS).

“Evaluation of the Navy Master Planning Program” by Robert W. Forsyth May 1976 Table of Contents

1.0 Introduction...... 1

2.0 IDP Process...... 7

Phase 1: Plan Initiation...... 10

Phase 2: Collect Data and Develop a Vision...... 12

Phase 3: Analyze Existing Data ...... 16

Phase 4: Analyze Capability Gaps...... 22

Phase 5: Develop Alternative Courses of Action (COAs)...... 26

Phase 6: Develop Preferred Plan...... 30

Phase 7: Plan Execution...... 38

3.0 Product & Content Development...... 41

4.0 Appendix...... 45

Appendix A – IDP Standard Table of Contents ...... 47

Appendix B – Introducing iNSIPP...... 51

Appendix C – Strategic Guidance Resources...... 53

Appendix D – Typical Installation Data...... 55

Appendix E – Typical Off-installation Data Sources...... 57

Appendix F – Acronyms...... 59 Figures

Figure 1.1 IDP Planning Priorities...... 2 Figure 1.2 The Scales of Shore Infrastructure Planning ...... 3 Figure 1.3 CNIC Shore Capability Areas...... 3 Figure 1.4 IDP Consistency Guide and Installation Master Planning UFC Focus Comparison Diagram...... 4 Figure 1.5 iNSIPP Concept Diagram...... 5 Figure 2.1 Installation Development Plan (IDP) Planning Process Diagram...... 7 Figure 2.2 IDP Process...... 9 Figure 2.3 Phase 1 Process Diagram...... 10 Figure 2.4 Strategic Guidance Sources...... 11 Figure 2.5 Phase 1 IDP Plan Components...... 11 Figure 2.6 Phase 2 Process Diagram...... 12 Figure 2.7 Generalized Diagram of the Shore Facility Planning System...... 13 Figure 2.8 iNFADS Descriptions...... 13 Figure 2.9 EPG and IPL Description...... 14 Figure 2.10 Vision Session Planning Drivers Example...... 15 Figure 2.11 Vision Session Planning Priority Example...... 15 Figure 2.12 Phase 2 IDP Plan Components...... 15 Figure 2.13 Phase 3 Process Diagram...... 16 Figure 2.14 Requirements and Assets by Shore Capability Area Summary from iNFADS Example...... 17 Figure 2.15 FRES Description...... 19 Figure 2.16 Screen Shot from FRES...... 20 Figure 2.17 Mission Dependency Index Description...... 20 Figure 2.18 Capacity Planning Description...... 21 Figure 2.19 Phase 3 IDP Plan Components ...... 21 Figure 2.20 Phase 4 Process Diagram...... 22 Figure 2.21 Capability Gap Analysis Process Diagram...... 23 Figure 2.22 Data import from FRES/iNFADS into MS Excel for use during the analysis phase...... 23 Figure 2.23 Phase 4 IDP Plan Components...... 24 Figure 2.24 Phase 5 Process Diagram...... 26 Figure 2.25 COA Alternative Solutions Continuum Diagram...... 27

TOC 2 • INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE FINAL Figure 2.26 COA Development Process Diagram ...... 27 Figure 2.27 Phase 5 IDP Plan Components...... 28 Figure 2.28 Phase 6 Process Diagram...... 30 Figure 2.29 ADP Description...... 31 Figure 2.30 Degree of Applicability of Master Planning Strategies to the CNIC Shore Capability Areas...... 31 Figure 2.31 Phase 6 IDP Plan Components...... 36 Figure 2.32 Phase 7 Process Diagram...... 38

FINAL INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE • TOC 3 TOC 4 • INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE FINAL 1.0 Introduction

Effective long-term development The final product of the IDP upon and management of the Department completion of the master planning of Defense’s buildings, land, and process and critical thinking presented “Department of Defense (DOD) infrastructure resources requires in this Guide will be a strategic shore military installations are invaluable a thoughtful and comprehensive infrastructure development plan for national defense resources that approach to installation master a Navy installation. This plan will planning that delivers consistent contain planning information, in text must be planned and developed in results. For Navy shore activities, and graphic form, following a standard a sustainable manner that supports planning is the process of providing table of contents presented throughout current missions and preserves for the efficient use and orderly this Guide and specifically shown in long-term military capabilities. development of real estate and facility Appendix A. resources in response to assigned Fundamental to the effectiveness and missions, functions, and tasks. Purpose of the Installation sustainability of our installations is Development Plan (IDP) the master planning process, which An Installation Development Plan Consistency Guide establishes a clear and principled (IDP) is the official planning document long-range vision for the development that guides installation physical This IDP Consistency Guide (herein development activities. It conveys after Guide) specifically defines the of installations that support the strategic, efficient and orderly Navy installation level next-generation Department’s defense mission and development of the installation around planning process, methods, and enrich the communities they serve.” specific mission requirements and outputs necessary to support the incorporates flexibility to adapt to defense mission, promote quality The Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisition, dynamic and changing conditions, of life, and enhance sustainability Technology, and Logistics, Frank Kendall, May such as unforeseen missions or and environmental viability for 28, 2013. events. each installation. This Guide is designed to promote consistency An IDP is a road map to achieving a and standardization of common vision, allowing planners to anticipate information among all IDPs and the future, prioritize infrastructure coordination among the IDP and other Nomenclature Rule actions, reduce risk and improve Shore Infrastructure Planning (SIP) business processes and policies products at the regional and global The term Installation Development Plan, through a collaborative process. The level. Through this Guide, installation or IDP, is the preferred phrase when IDP, while guided by a vision and planners will understand the necessary referring to an installation master plan and focused on mission excellence, is components for executing a strategic is used throughout this guide. The IDP is also developed to achieve plausible, and long-range installation master plan a consolidated planning document that feasible and implementable planning that will guide the investment planning integrates strategic installation planning solutions influenced and guided process. components such as installation-wide Vision Plan, Framework/Planning Districts, Future by fiscal realities. The ideas, plans, Development Plan, Infrastructure Network direction and courses of action (COAs) Plans, Development Program and Planning provided by the IDP should provide Standards. The IDP also includes plans that the Installation Commanding Officer, provide installation development information Public Works and NAVFAC with a clear at a smaller scale for specific areas on an picture of development priorities and installation such an Area Development Plans actions for the short, mid and (ADPs), Functional Plans, Site Development long-term. Plans, etc.

FINAL INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE • 1 1.0 Introduction – defines the The Scales of Shore Infrastructure purpose of the IDP, explains Planning IDP Planning Priorities how the IDP fits within the SIP process, identifies applicable Shore Infrastructure Planning (SIP) is • Mission strategic guidance, and the umbrella under which separate but • Mission Support interdependent planning processes • Workplace describes the organization of • Workplace Support the Guide. occur to produce global, regional, and installation-level plans, as illustrated • Housing 2.0 IDP Process – describes the • Quality of Life in Figure 1.12. The SIP products • Fitness/Recreation objectives, inputs, methods, vary in scale but are all designed to • Aesthetics and outputs for each of the IDP guide cost-effective infrastructure process phases. investments to meet mission Figure 1.1 IDP Planning Priorities 3.0 Product and Content requirements and shore facility Development – defines infrastructure needs. standards and requirements DOD Instruction 4165.70 (Real for IDP content to ensure Global Shore Infrastructure Plans Property Management 6 April 2005) compatibility with the iNSIPP. establishes the requirement for (GSIP) installation master plans. Unified IDP Context GSIPs translate the global, strategic Facilities Criteria (UFC) 2-100-01 view of the individual Warfare Installation Master Planning, 15 The Naval Shore Establishment Enterprise/Provider’s operational May 2012, sets forth minimum mission requirements into current requirements and standards for master The Naval Shore establishment and future shore facility infrastructure planning processes and products in provides support to the operating requirements to achieve mission accordance with the DOD instruction. forces (known as “the Fleet”) in the success. GSIPs are long-range (25 This Guide recognizes these form of: sustainable shore station years+) planning documents that instructions and further defines and facilities for the repair of machinery identify a vision, guiding principles, clarifies the specific inputs and outputs and electronics; communications operational concepts, and strategic necessary to complete a successful centers; training areas and simulators; actions that drive shore facility IDP for the Navy. The Guide places ship and aircraft repair; intelligence infrastructure needs specific to intentional emphasis and focus on and meteorological support; storage a warfare or provider enterprise. infrastructure planning requirements areas for repair parts, fuel, and The outputs of the GSIP provide for mission first as the primary driver munitions; medical and dental Regions and Installations with the that should influence all IDP outcomes. facilities; delivers utilities and services operational assessment of shore Figure 1.1 illustrates the primary facility for our nations global installations. facility infrastructure which can then be and infrastructure areas that IDPs combined with facility-level analyses should focus on. According to the Facility Readiness undertaken via a Regional Integration Evaluation System (FRES), the Naval Plan (RIP), including associated Organization of the IDP Shore establishment includes 108,600 high-level operational courses of Consistency Guide facilities totaling approximately 463 action (COAs), and an Installation million square feet (SF) and a Plant Development Plan. A Shore Mission This Guide provides a framework for Replacement Value (PRV) of over Integration Group (SMIG) prioritizes developing an effective IDP and its use $190 billion. These resources are trade-offs among shore investments will ensure consistency across all IDP distributed across 70 installations based on recommendations from the efforts and alignment with SIP goals worldwide and support a workforce Enterprise/Providers. and expectations. This Guide defines of 633,000 active duty, reserve, and the methods of analysis and outputs civilian personnel. for IDP products and is organized into three primary sections:

2 • INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE FINAL Regional Integration Plan (RIP) RIPs address the relationship between the thirteen CNIC Shore Capability Areas (SCAs), as shown in Figure 1.3, into a comprehensive infrastructure plan at the regional level. A RIP integrates requirements, opportunities, and funding and defines COAs to address capability gaps identified in Warfare Enterprise/Provider GSIPs in addition to region priorities and infrastructure capability gaps. A RIP addresses total infrastructure requirements and informs investment decisions at all levels of the region, including Installation Development Plans. A Region Mission Integration Group (RMIG) identifies and prioritizes COAs as part of the RIP process.

Installation Development Plan (IDP) In the past, the nomenclature of Figure 1.2 The Scales of Shore Infrastructure Planning installation level planning has broadly included various types of distinct plans, such as Installation Master Plans, Installation Appearance Plans, Encroachment Action Plans, Cultural Resource Management Plans, etc. This Consistency Guide defines the phrase ‘Installation Development Plan’ as the primary and preferred phrase CNIC Shore Capability Areas when referring to an installation master • Airfield Operations plan. In this manner, distinct plans that • Base Support address topics such as appearance, • Command,Control, Communications, capital improvements, anti-terrorism real property, capital improvement and Computers, Combat Systems, force protection, cultural resources, resource management solutions at Intelligence, Surveillance, and space management, etc., roll up as the installation level. IDPs implement Reconnaissance (C5ISR)Operations components of an IDP. GSIP and RIP priorities and guiding • Depot / Intermediate /Operational principles, and also serve as input into • Maintenance Support • Expeditionary Operations GSIP and RIP processes. Each step An IDP provides a developmental • Ordnance / Weapons Operations path forward that incorporates known of the IDP process described in this • Research, Development, Acquisition, and projected mission requirements, Guide builds upon the previous step, Test & / Evaluation (RDAT&E) developmental constraints and providing a logical framework for a • Sailor and Family Support opportunities, and recommended comprehensive planning effort. An IDP • Supply Storage Support COAs to achieve optimal use of lands, enables the Installation Commanding • Training Support facilities, and resources in support of Officer (ICO) at each installation to • Utilities mission and installation performance. make effective development decisions • Waterfront Operations IDPs typically emphasize a 10-20 year affecting their installation and the planning horizon and provide specific surrounding community. Figure 1.3 CNIC Shore Capability Areas

FINAL INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE • 3 IDP Relationship to Master Planning Guidance

The Guide is intended to represent the Navy’s official process for creating long-range master plans for Navy Installations. The Guide interprets and incorporates all major facility and infrastructure planning goals, objectives and planning principles of DOD and Navy master planning guidance currently in effect such as the UFC 2-100-01 Installation Master Planning, 2012 and as appropriate other guidance referenced herein. The IDP Table of Contents included in Appendix A identifies how the Master Figure 1.4 IDP Consistency Guide and Installation Master Planning UFC Focus Planning UFC directly or indirectly is Comparison Diagram incorporated into this Guide. It should be clarified that the planning focus of this Guide is at the installation level whereas the planning focus of the UFC is at the ADP level. Figure 1.4 illustrates a comparison between the Similarly, Functional Plans are Area Development Plans (ADP), planning intent of both documents to considered components of an IDP and or planning district plans, are include common planning strategies provide an in-depth analysis of shore considered components of an IDP and principles. and show both short-term and long- facility infrastructure at the SCA level range development. The number for a 10-20 year planning horizon. • This Guide further clarifies and of planning districts or ADPs within The need for a Functional Plan can be enhances the organization and an installation is determined during determined through a GSIP, RIP or IDP content requirments for the IDPs the development of an installation- process. in recognition on the Navy’s own wide Vision and Framework Plan in unique planning processes. Phase 2 of this IDP Guide. An ADP is Influential Policies • This Guide emphasizes the a detailed plan for a defined district importance of mission requirements that illustrates the functional, physical, The Shore Infrastructure Planning as the primary planning and human aspects of areas to be process is informed by strategic consideration and lens through guidance set forth by the DOD, Chief developed. ADPs describe constraints which analysis, opportunities and and opportunities, system studies, of Naval Operations (CNO), the constraints, COAs, and priorities will existing facility assessment, program Enterprise/Provider, Congress, and be validated. requirements, and alternative analysis the President. Applicable strategic and specifically include an Illustrative guidance should be reviewed and • This Guide seeks to strengthen the Plan, Regulating Plan and Phasing incorporated into the IDP process to importance and role of overall Vision Plan. These plans are developed at a ensure consistency with established and Installation-level planning. A fundamental tenant of this Guide different scale than the IDP. The scale visions, goals, and criteria and to is that the Installation Plan drives of the ADP typically allows for more confirm an understanding of any the ADPs and the IDP is more design and development detail at impacts from current guidance on than the sum of all ADPs within an the area site level. The development mission or shore facility infrastructure. installation. standards developed for the IDP will A full listing of strategic guidence guide the development of the ADPs. resources is provided in Appendix C.

4 • INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE FINAL • This Guide incorporates the Integrated Shore Management concepts with a strong emphasis on coordination and alignment between global, regional, and installation level planning. This integration is reflected in the development of WCOAs as a key element of the IDP, and in consideration of requirements and capability gaps from the global/ regional plans that will influence the IDP.

The Evolution of Navy Shore Infrastructure Planning

The Navy is transitioning its shore infrastructure planning processes and products from a static, paper document-centric delivery to a dynamic knowledge-centric electronic information-based enterprise. This transition will dramatically enhance the processes, productivity and decision outcomes for Navy leadership and the Navy Planning Community world-wide.

The intranet Navy Shore Infrastructure Planning Platform, or iNSIPP, is an online tool that provides a single Navy Planning Community + Leadership consolidated resource for planning Figure 1.5 iNSIPP Concept Diagram information across Global, Regional and Installation levels. Figure 1.5 illustrates the concept behind the iNSIPP as a key tool for the NAVFAC Installation, Planning District, planning community. See Appendix and Area Definitions B for more information regarding the iNSIPP. This Guide recognizes Installation – an aggregation of contiguous and reflects the product and content or near contiguous, common mission requirements that are part of the new supporting real property holdings under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Navy. web-enabled enterprise planning global levels and allow for consistent tool. The outputs from each phase data-mining for analytics across the Planning District – an area within an of the IDP process described in this installations. Through the iNSIPP tool, installation that has defining characteristics Guide are intended to be electronic IDPs will become ‘living’ documents such as geography, mission, land use, and and will be input into iNSIPP through that can be directly updated and building types that entail a unifying theme. the use of defined templates to reviewed by section, parts, or as a ensure compatibility and consistency Area – an area within the installation and whole plan, thereby maintaining a planning district with defining characteristics for all SIPs. The templates will be higher level of relevancy. Section 3 such as geography, mission, land use, and designed to facilitate roll-up of certain of this Guide more fully describes building types that entail a unifying theme. information to the regional and the iNSIPP content development

FINAL INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE • 5 Mission Focus - Shore Capability Areas

Airfield Operations Waterfront Operations

Expeditionary Operations Training Support

RDTA&E Maintenance Support

Ordnance/ Weapons Operations Sailor and Family Support

Base Support Utilities

6 • INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE FINAL Version for FINAL Guide 2.0 IDP Process– for combined process only Installation Development Plan (IDP) Process

ESTABLISH THE PLANNING BASELINE ANALYSIS PLAN STRATEGY & DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXECUTION

PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 PHASE 5 PHASENITC to certify, 6 PHASE 7 Plan Collect Data & Analyze Analyze Develop Developload, program, Plan PHASE Initiation Develop Vision Existing Data Capability Gaps Alternative COAs Preferredtest and readyPlan for Execution global launch

Develop Concepts, Plan Initiation & Collect & Inventory Analyze Facility Perform Analysis to Alternatives & Course of Develop Obtain Management Plan Relevant Data Condition, Configuration, & Determine Gross Capability Actions (COAs ) to Rectify Preferred IDP IDP Approval Capacity Gaps (Requirements less Existing Priority Capability Gaps Kick Off • Real Property Meeting • Infrastructure Assets = Gross Gaps) Analyze Infrastructure Prepare Provide IDP Maintenance • Facilities Establish Key Condition, Configuration, & Development Plan & Enhancements • Operations Investment Drivers Define Installation Mission, Capacity Determine Net Capability Vision, Goals & Objectives • Known Existing & Gaps Future Projects (Gross gaps less Approved Prepare Provide Annual Review • Mission Requirements Define COA Planning Analyze Transportation & pipeline projects = Net Gaps) Supporting Plans of Development Plan Review Strategic Guidance, • Current & Future Actions Circulation Networks Traditional, Progressive, Policies & Strategies Personnel & Aggressive Equipment Loading Perform Impact Analysis, Prepare Investment Enhance IDP Data by • Existing Plans & Risk Assessment & Gap Identify Key Planning Drivers, Prepare Combined Constraints Strategy, Priorities & Executing Follow on Studies Prioritization Identify Principles & Business Rules & Opportunities Maps Capital Investment Plan Studies as Needed • Adjacent Community Non-Facility Solutions Information Gap Analysis Provide for a Analyze Mission Review & Prepare Define Relevant DoD & Navy Prioritization Comprehensive IDP Requirements & Loading Phasing Plan Initiatives Meeting Identify Policy Change Identify & Rectify Changes Update every 5 Years Data Gaps Recommendations Prepare Prioritized Assess Functional Identify Relevant Future Capability Gap Matrix Prepare Perform Site Visit & Interview Relationships & Land Use PRIMARY TASKS PRIMARY Trends & Areas of Influence Design Guidelines Key Stakeholder to Assess Compatibilities Develop Draft Existing Situation & to Investment Strategy Pre-Final Identify Envisioned Changes Comments Assess Internal & Meeting External Encroachment Concept Data Review / Workshop Data Gap Meeting Prepare & Submit Final Plan This Phase is Concept with Supporting Materials to be developed in Assess Access, Out Brief future versions of IDP the Guide. Vision Session Security & AT/FP Final Brief Assess Compliance with Sustainability & Environmental Mandates D E L I V E R A B L E S D E L I V E R A B L E S

Concept Draft Pre-Final Final

FEEDBACK LOOP

Figure 2.1 Installation Development Plan (IDP) Planning Process Diagram

IDP Process

The IDP process defined in this Guide The IDP development process The core IDP methodology aligns and illustrated in Figure 2.1 and recognizes that fulfilling mission with four primary steps beginning Figure 2.2 intentionally promotes an requirements will remain the primary with establishing a planning baseline, installation-wide philosophy to masterIDP Consistencyplanning Guide consideration | July 2013 | and Working lens Draft followed by analysis, plan strategy and planning. The process, comprehensive through which analysis, opportunities development, and ending with plan and iterative, relies upon a creative and constraints,Intranet NAVY COAs, SHORE INFRASTRUCTURE and priorities PLANNING execution PLATFORM and feedback. and implementable vision of the future will be validated. It also establishes state of the installation, analysis of the importance of a unified and The IDP planning process shall data, and alternatives exploration long-term installation vision as the include seven phases as shown in to create an installation-wide IDP foundation and upon which Figure 2.1. Outputs from each phase development program that responds subsequent detailed district or area are designed to provide standard to mission priorities and meets current plans should be based. The IDP planning products and information and future anticipated facility and should be developed first to establish across the Navy and to align with the infrastructure requirements. The the vision and direction, followed by requirements for transferring plan evaluation and analysis performed as district or area development, followed data seamlessly into the iNSIPP. The part of the IDP is both qualitative and by site or facility specific plans. All IDP Table of Contents is included quantitative. The outputs from an IDP land use, development, and real in Appendix A for reference. Each should align with global and regional estate actions on an installation shall phase is briefly summarized below objectives and requirements defined conform to the IDP. and explained in more detail in the in applicable GSIPs, RIPs and other remainder of this section. strategic guidance documents.

FINAL INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE • 7 STEP 1: ESTABLISH THE PLANING BASELINE Phase 1 – Plan Initiation • Clarify project approach and methodology, relevant stakeholders, and required government provided information, including strategic planning guidance and operational drivers. • Conduct kick-off meeting. Phase 2 – Collect Data and Develop a Vision • Establish a baseline inventory for planning opportunity and constraints analyses, solicit input from stakeholders and site visits, define a vision, goals, and objectives for the installation and define planning district areas. • Conduct data review and gaps meeting. • Conduct vision session.

STEP 2: ANALYSIS Phase 3 – Analyze Existing Data • Review installation and community reports and data, perform qualitative and quantitative analyses on existing conditions and develop site analysis summary that will form the basis for a draft framework plan. Phase 4 – Analyze Capability Gaps • Determine and document operational facility and infrastructure capability gaps. • Conduct gap analysis review and prioritization meeting.

STEP 3: PLAN STRATEGY AND DEVELOPMENT Phase 5 – Develop Alternative COAs • Develop COAs to address infrastructure gaps, new mission requirements, RIP/GSIP guidance and other infrastructure change triggers. Evaluate COAs against defined risk factors and evaluation criteria. • Conduct concept workshop. • Conduct concept workshop outbrief. Phase 6 – Develop Preferred Plan • Define a preferred COA, and supporting plans, that best meets the installation vision, goals and objectives. • Conduct pre-final brief. • Conduct final brief.

STEP 4: IMPLEMENTATION Phase 7 – Plan Execution • Advance the IDP through the approval and endorsement process and integrate it into iNSIPP.

8 • INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE FINAL • Executive • UFCs The following sections more fully • DOD • NAVFACINSTs describe the IDP development • DON • Consistency • CNIC/NAVFAC Guides • Vision Plan process, Existing • Illustrative Plan • Existing Land & • Framework Plan sub-processes and resulting products. GUIDANCE Facility Assets • Land Use Plan Each section contains information • Condition • Regulating Plan within the following areas: • Constraints • Circulation Plan • Opportunities Installation • Green Infrastructure Future NOW Development Plan 2035 Plan

• Objectives • GSIP/RIP INPUTS • Primary Utility OUTPUTS OUTPUTS • Missions IDP Networks • Inputs + Supporting Tools • Platforms • Future Development • Initiatives Summary SUPPORT • Methods • Developable Area • Planning & Design • Outputs • COAs Standards People Process Systems • Infrastructure • NAVFAC • SFPS • iNFADS Development Program • List of IDP Components Aligned with • CNIC • UFC • FRES Standard IDP Table of Contents • Enterprise • IDP • EPG • Region/FEC • iNSIPP • Contractors

Figure 2.2 IDP Process 7

FINAL INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE • 9 Version for Guide

2.0 IDP Process Phase 1: Plan Initiation

Objectives Inputs + Supporting Tools PHASE 1 A projectPHASE kick-off meeting 2 serves The installationPHASE mission 3 is the most PHASE 4 PHASE 5 PHASE 6 PHASE 7 as an official initiation of the IDP important element affecting the NITC to certify, load, program, Plan planningCollect process. & Data A defined and project future directionAnalyze of base development. Analyze Develop Develop Plan Initiation Develop Vision Existing Data Capability Gaps Alternative COAs Preferredtest and readyPlan for Execution management approach confirms Assigned missions dictate functional global launch expectations, communication requirements, associated facility and protocols, and identifies key drivers infrastructure needs, ideal functional Develop Concepts, Plan Initiation & to the IDPCollect process & Inventory so that an efficient relationshipsAnalyze andFacility influence the Perform Analysis to Alternatives and Course of Develop Management Plan and effective Relevant planning Data process is physicalCondition, layout Configuration, of the installation. & Determine Gross Capability Obtain IDP Approval Actions (COAs ) to Rectify Preferred IDP delivered from Phase 1 through NumerousCapacity data sources will provide Gaps (Requirements less Existing Priority Capability Gaps Kick Off Phase• Real7. Figure Property 2.3 illustrates the meaningful input to the IDP process. Meeting general process diagram for Data inputs for Phase 1 should include Assets = Gross Gaps) • Infrastructure Prepare Development Provide IDP Maintenance and Phase 1. previouslyAnalyze Infrastructurecompleted Master Plans, • Facilities Establish Key Plan Enhancements AreaCondition, Development Configuration, Plans, & Functional Define Installation Mission, • Operations Determine Net Capability Investment Drivers Key Questions to Address during Plans, alongCapacity with strategic-level Vision, Goals & Objectives • Known Existing & Gaps Phase Future1 Projects guidance, such as GSIPs and RIPs, to (Gross gaps less Approved Prepare Provide Annual Review • Mission Requirements provide an understanding of current Define COA Planning Analyze Transportation & pipeline projects = Net Gaps) Supporting Plans of Development Plan Review Strategic Guidance, • What• Current is the context & Future of the installation planning strategies. Actions Circulation Networks Traditional, Progressive, Policies & Strategies “Installation”?Personnel Contiguous& vs. The review and analysis of this non-contiguous sites? information collected and provided Aggressive Equipment Loading Perform Impact Analysis, Prepare Investment Enhance IDP Data by by the Government Point of Contact • What• Existing is the approach Plans & and notional Risk Assessment & Gap Strategy, Priorities & Executing Follow on Identify Key Planning Drivers, Preparewill provide Combined baseline Constraints information in scheduleStudies for the project? Prioritization Identify Non-Facility Capital Investment Plan Studies as Needed Principles & Business Rules support& Opportunities of the initiation Maps and kick off of • Who• Adjacentare the core Community IDP stakeholder Solutions the project. Figure 2.4 lists potential teamInformation members? Gap Analysis strategic guidance sources that should Review & Provide for a Define Relevant DoD & Navy • What are the expectations of Analyze Mission Requirements Prioritization Prepare Phasing Plan Comprehensive IDP be reviewed as part of Phase 1. Meeting Initiatives installationIdentify management? and Rectify and Loading Changes Identify Policy Change Update every 5 Years • What is theData installation’s Gaps core An IDP Kickoff brief should be Recommendations function(s)? provided to define the IDP planning Prepare Prioritized Identify Relevant Future Trends Assess Functional Prepare Design team, full project scope, process, Capability Gap Matrix & Areas of Influence • WhatPerform factors Site Visitare driving& Interview mission Relationships & Land Use Guidelines growth?Key Stakeholder New mission(s), to Assess new schedule,Compatibilities and deliverables. Included Develop Draft Existingplatforms, Situation new DOD/Navy & to Identify in the kickoff meeting should be an Investment Strategy Installation Command Brief by the Pre-Final initiatives,Envisioned etc. Changes Comments installationAssess Internal leadership and to convey to • Are there specific strategic Meeting theExternal planning Encroachment team the installation’s Concept guidance documents,Data Review / Workshop Data Gap mission, vision, and goals, to policies, or businessMeeting rules Prepare & Submit Final Plan This Phase is communicate any known shortfalls in Concept that have mission impact or shore with Supporting Materials to be developed at existingAssess infrastructure Access, components and Out Brief a later date. infrastructure impacts?IDP Vision Session to identifySecurity any & planning AT/FP expectations • What current relevant information or desired results. should the planning team collect? Final Brief Assess Compliance with • Who are the primary stakeholders Sustainability & Environmental that are critical to understanding Mandates D E L I V E R A B L E S D E L I V E R A B L E S current and future operations? % 35 % 65 90 100 • Are there special areas or annexes to the main base to be considered? Concept Draft Pre-Final Final

Figure 2.3 Phase 1 Process Diagram

10 • INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE FINAL

IDP Consistency Guide | July 2013 | Working Draft

Intranet NAVY SHORE INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING PLATFORM 2.0 IDP Process

Methods The kickoff meeting is the appropriate time to initiate collection of A desktop review of strategic government information, such as data, Primary Sources of Strategic Guidance for the IDP guidance, policies, and relevant reports, studies and other resources. A initiatives should be undertaken data request list should be developed (See Appendix C for complete listing) to prepare for the Project Kickoff and provided prior to the kickoff that • Quadrennial Defense Review meeting. The Kickoff Meeting defines desired government provided • The Undersecretary of Defense May 28, should be attended by personnel information. This list will be reviewed 2013 Memorandum on Installation Master Planning representing the mission and at the kickoff meeting and points of • CNO Guidance primary tenant commands as well contact for data collection will be • SECNAV Goals as cross-functional disciplines such identified. The data request list should • Shore Energy Execution Plan as planning, asset management, be actively monitored and updated • NAVFAC Strategic Plan public works, environmental, security, during Phase 1 and 2 of the IDP • Unified Facility Criteria (UFC): UFC community support, encroachment, process. 2-100-01 Installation Master Planning exchanges and commissaries, fleet • UFC 3-201-01 Civil Engineering and family services, and housing. This • Global Shore Infrastructure Plans Outputs • Regional Integration Plans approach will allow a broad-based • Installation Master Plans understanding of the IDP approach, Phase 1 outputs establish the • Area Development Plans objectives, deliverables, and schedule. IDP management approach for • Functional Plans the complete planning process A primary objective of the kickoff through documentation of the Figure 2.4 Strategic Guidance Sources meeting is to gain an understanding team organization and contact of the current and future mission, information, project approach and goals and vision of the installation schedule, contact information of and to confirm key drivers of mission key stakeholders, a request list of growth that will influence the IDP government provided information process and outputs. Discussion (updated regularly), a kickoff meeting during the kickoff meeting should brief, and meeting minutes. define key drivers affecting mission and installation growth, including Each phase of the IDP process Phase 1 IDP Plan Components established principles or business is designed to address content requirements of the Final Plan as the rules for operations. Specific (See Appendix A for full IDP Table of Contents) stakeholders should be identified process is being executed. Inputs and that will be critical to the process for supporting tools and methods are 1.0 Introduction the team to interview and who might designed to allow for the generation of 1.1 Purpose 1.2 Background participate in subsequent workshops. required content as defined in the full 1.3 Vision/Mission IDP Table of Contents (see Appendix The kickoff meeting should include 2.0 Strategic Planning Guidance and Operational an installation windshield tour to A). Figure 2.5 identifies the required Drivers reinforce an understanding of the Phase 1 plan components, including 2.1 DoD and Navy Guidance mission and current planning and the introduction and review of strategic 2.2 Installation Planning Initiatives programming issues and opportunities guidance and operational drivers. 2.3 Operational Drivers on site. Follow-up meetings with key 2.4 Planning Guiding Principles and Drivers tenants might be necessary to gain 2.5 IDP Planning Assumptions a full understanding of their mission IDP Appendix Content requirements, needs and future • Kickoff Meeting Brief and Notes organizational construct that might influence the IDP. Figure 2.5 Phase 1 IDP Plan Components

FINAL INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE • 11 2.0 IDP Process Phase 2: Collect Data and Develop a Vision

Objectives • What are potential development themes? PHASE 1 PHASE 2 A baselinePH inventoryASE 3 of data and PHASE 4 PHASE 5 PHASE 6 • What are the long-term vision and NITC to certify, PHASE 7 Plan Collect Data & solutions Analyzeto any defined data gaps supportingAnalyze goals, objectives and Develop Developload, program, Plan Initiation Develop Vision enablesExisting thorough Data and subsequent Capability Gaps Alternative COAs Preferredtest and readyPlan for Execution planning principles for the physical global launch analyses during all planning development of the installation? phases of the IDP process. Data Develop Concepts, Plan Initiation & Collect & Inventory providesAnalyze a confident Facility understanding Perform Analysis to of current conditions so that an Inputs + Supporting Tools Alternatives & Course of Develop Obtain Management Plan Relevant Data Condition, Configuration, & Determine Gross Capability Preferred IDP optimal vision statement can be Actions (COAs ) to Rectify IDP Approval Capacity A numberGaps of data inputs, from on- established defining the desired Priority Capability Gaps • Real Property (Requirementsand-off installation less Existing sources, should Kick Off physical development end-state Meeting • Infrastructure beAssets assembled = Gross Gaps)to establish a baseline for theAnalyze installation, Infrastructure including goals Prepare Provide IDP Maintenance • Facilities inventory of data and to allow for a Establish Key relatedCondition, long-term Configuration, redevelopment & and Development Plan & Enhancements Define Installation Mission, • Operations thorough opportunities and constraints Investment Drivers constructionCapacity and specific objectives Determine Net Capability Vision, Goals & Objectives • Known Existing & analysis. These data sources for how the goals can be achieved. Gaps Future Projects are managed, manipulated and A vision statement is developed (Gross gaps less Approved Define COA Planning Prepare Provide Annual Review • Mission Requirements pipelinemaintained projects to = provideNet Gaps) a standardized throughAnalyze a Transportationcollaborative process& with Actions Supporting Plans of Development Plan Review Strategic Guidance, • Current & Future data model and tool that results stakeholdersCirculation and Networks decision-makers, Traditional, Progressive, Policies & Strategies Personnel & in consistency for mapping and reinforces strategic guidance, and Aggressive Equipment Loading Performanalyses Impact within Analysis, the IDP process. Prepare Investment Enhance IDP Data by expresses how the Installation • Existing Plans & RiskFurthermore, Assessment input & Gap from stakeholders Strategy, Priorities & Executing Follow on Identify Key Planning Drivers, CommanderPrepare Combined will satisfy Constraints future Studies and Prioritizationsite installation tours will greatly Identify Capital Investment Plan Studies as Needed Principles & Business Rules mission& Opportunities needs. Figure Maps 2.6 illustrates • Adjacent Community enhance the understanding of current Non-Facility Solutions Information the general process diagram for Gap Analysis conditions and provide first hand Provide for a Phase 2.Analyze Mission Review & Prepare Define Relevant DoD & Navy observations ofPrioritization challenges and Comprehensive IDP Requirements & Loading Meeting Phasing Plan Initiatives opportunities. Navy systems and Identify Policy Change Update every 5 Years Identify & Rectify Key QuestionsChanges to Address during databases such as Internet Navy Recommendations Data Gaps Phase 2 FacilitiesPrepare AssetsPrioritized Data Store (iNFADS), Assess Functional Identify Relevant Future FacilityCapability Readiness Gap Matrix Evaluation System Prepare Perform Site Visit & Interview • DoesRelationships the planni & ngLand team Use have all of Trends & Areas of Influence (FRES), and Electronic Project Design Guidelines Key Stakeholder to Assess the baselineCompatibilities information required Develop Draft Generator (EPG) provide authoritative Existing Situation & to to move forward? Investment Strategy asset information. NAVFACs Pre-Final Identify Envisioned Changes • How will data gaps be addressed? Comments Assess Internal & GeoReadiness Centers provide Meeting External Encroachment Concept Data Review / • What projects or initiatives are the repository for all geodata and Workshop Data Gap already planned or programmed? Geographic Information System (GIS) Meeting Prepare & Submit Final Plan This Phase is • What natural, environmental or mapping. Concept with Supporting Materials to be developed in Assess Access, Out Brief operational factors exist on future versions of IDP Security & AT/FP the Guide. Vision Session site? Methods • What is the extent of existing Final Brief Assess Compliance with On-Installation Data Collection infrastructure networks and their capacity?Sustainability & Environmental Mandates Data should be collected as availableD E L I V E R A B L E S D E L I V E R A B L E S • What community-based initiatives and relevant to the installation. Digital outside of the installation could installation data should be collected support or hinder mission growth? to document natural and manmade Concept Draft Pre-Final Final • Are there significant constraints or conditions, including land use, existing weaknesses that may impede facilities, infrastructure systems, Figure 2.6 Phase 2 Process Diagram realization of the vision? natural conditions, operations and impact areas, restricted areas, • Are there any internal or external and specific mission requirements encroachment issues?

12 • INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE FINAL

IDP Consistency Guide | July 2013 | Working Draft

Intranet NAVY SHORE INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING PLATFORM 2.0 IDP Process

to ensure a comprehensive All relevant and recent studies, plans understanding of existing physical and reports should be collected during iNFADS conditions on site. Data layers from this phase for analysis during the next iNFADS is the authoritative database on the GeoReadiness Center will allow phase. owned and leased real property to meet the development of a comprehensive the facilities inventory, planning and GIS database and enable detailed Off-Installation Data Collection management information requirements of constraints and opportunities the Department of the Navy (DON). Key planning components that feed critical analyses. Typical installation data Regional or Installation Community layers that should be considered are information into iNFADS and associated Plans and Liaison Officers (CPLOs) real property management systems include identified in Appendix D. Additional as well as local, state and federal Basic Facility Requirements (BFRs), Asset facility data, such as Computer agencies can be contacted to identify Evaluations (AEs) and Facility Planning Aided Design and Drafting (CADD) relevant off-installation data, reports, Documents (FPDs). files or three-dimensional models and plans that may be helpful to the BFR from applications such as SketchUp, planning process. For example, data Basic Facility Requirement (BFR) refers may also be required for certain key from adjacent local governments, such buildings. In addition, data should be to the optimal shore base footprint, by as projected population changes, land category code, required in order to perform collected to understand base loading use proposals, transportation plans, peacetime missions. BFRs are not based on characteristics, including personnel and zoning data will provide a regional contingencies. BFRs cover entire functional working on the installation, personnel context and ensure an understanding categories of use, such as administrative living off the installation, dependents, of potential challenges or opportunities offices, general warehouses and public and retirees. associated with compatibility. Typical works shops. BFRs are based on an authorized five year projection of base off-installation data sources are loading information. Installation planners should provide a identified in the Appendix E. complete list of project data for major AE Military Construction (MILCON), major Installation Site Visits and Asset Evalutaion (AE) is an assessment of renovation or recapitalization (i.e. Stakeholder Interviews an installation’s physical facility assets. SRM), Demolition, Operations and This on site evaluation is used to update Maintenance (O&M), Military Family Installation site visits should be and verify data in the Facilities Module Housing (MFH), Non-appropriated of iNFADS. The primary purpose of an scheduled to coincide with stakeholder AE is to validate key information on the Funds (NAF), retail, Exchange, Marine interviews to fully maximize installation Corps Community Services (MCCS), real property asset, including uses and staff resources. functional adequacy. An AE is not a Defense Commissary Agency (DeCA), conditional inspection. Rather, it focuses on Morale, Welfare and Recreation evaluating the functionality of a space and (MWR), energy and sustainability its suitability for a specific purpose. projects, real estate actions, public- private initiatives, and any privatized FPD housing, lodging or utilities initiatives. FRES A Facility Planning Document (FPD) is Facility prepared for each category code and Readiness Reports tenant activity on an installation for which a Facility data from the iNFADS and MODULES requirement—through the BFR process— ACTIVITY AEs FRES should be collected for each FACILITY and asset utilization(s)—through the AE BFRs PLANNING facility to provide an accurate picture iNFADS FPDs process—have been assigned. It is during CAT CODE of current facility conditions and needs the analysis, concepts, and proposals Facility at both the installation level and at Planning phase of the SFPS process that the FPD is Document used to show facility deficiencies/surpluses an individual facility level. Figure 2.7 DD1391 DOCs EPG and the planning actions needed to resolve shows a generalized diagram of the IPL any identified deficiencies and/or surpluses. Shore Facility Planning System as described in the SFPS Guidebook. Figure 2.7 Generalized Diagram of the Shore Facility Planning Figure 2.8 iNFADS Descriptions See Figures 2.8, 2.9 and 2.15 of System definitions for iNFADS, EPG and FRES. 9

FINAL INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE • 13 Stakeholders, to include installation, development will provide guidance regional, NAVFAC, CNIC, key tenants, for later development of COAs and EPG and warfare enterprise personnel, Electronic Project Generator (EPG) is a for the cross evaluation of different web-based application used for the creation, input is a critical component of the IDP COAs. Goals should address broad storage, retrieval, review, approval, and process. Installation points of contact functional and location considerations submission of DD1391 documents for (POCs) should assist in scheduling for future physical development rather all MILCON projects. An EPG generated interviews and installation leadership than specific facilities or sites. The DD1391, with all fields completed, is should emphasize the need and goals should also be responsive to required for a project to be considered importance for installation personnel the particular combination of natural, for funding during program development. staff participation in interviews for the A project will be considered for the POM man-made, and operational conditions cycle only if the appropriate DD1391 for IDP effort. Interview questionnaires at the installation. the project is linked to the iNFADS IPL tailored to the subject matter and module. The EPG/IPL is synchronized with interviewee can be provided in The vision workshop should involve iNFADS and updated on a daily basis with advance to assist in preparing for the installation leadership, mission iNFADS data (e.g., MDI, condition rating, discussion. operators, and key personnel involved configuration rating, capacity rating, etc.). in the stakeholder interviews. The The IPL is synchronized daily with EPG. Stakeholders that should be workshop should be organized around IPL interviewed include installation a defined agenda that is bookended The Integrated Priority List (IPL) is the leadership, mission operators, tenants, by an in-brief to define objectives and application that installations and regions use civil engineering/planning/public goals of the session and an outbrief to submit their MILCON, Special Projects works staff, environmental, natural and that describes the draft vision and and Unspecified Military Construction- cultural resources staff, community outcomes from the session. MILCON (UMC-MCON) projects to CNIC. support personnel, security and Projects only appear in the IPL after the anti-terrorism personnel, military installation has linked a DD1391 from EPG Outputs to the IPL. police, privatized housing and lodging partners, and private utility partners. Phase 2 outputs include a Figure 2.9 EPG and IPL Description Consultation may also be required with comprehensive GIS database of operators of specific buildings, land information and supporting materials. or infrastructure to better understand Information from on-installation and unique mission requirements or off-installation sources, and input from operational requirements and needs. stakeholder interviews and site visits is summarized for analysis in Phase 3. A Installation Master Plan Vision comprehensive list of data sources is Workshop established along with identified data gaps and solutions. Establishing a long-term installation vision is a critical milestone in the IDP The vision session results are process. The vision will provide the summarized in a recap memorandum 96 foundation and direction needed to or brief. As part of the vision process, develop the COAs and preferred IDP; a draft planning district or framework subsequent detailed district or area plan should be developed to convey plans will be formulated to support the the functional and spatial context for overall vision. A multi-day planning long-term development based on vision workshop will engage a diverse mission requirements. The Framework set of stakeholders in defining the Plan should represent the ideal desired end-state for the installation arrangement of future functional that maximizes existing resources land use areas, planning districts and prioritizes mission requirements. and otherwise defined areas which Specific goals for future installation will accommodate both existing facility and program needs and long-

14 • INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE FINAL Key Planning Drivers and Planning Continuum For each planning driver / change agent, a continuum exists that defines the Phase 2 IDP Plan Components planning approach extremes of that driver. STATUS QUO PROGRESSIVE AGGRESSIVE (See Appendix A for full IDP Table of Contents) 50% Streamlined/Efficient Enduring Installations Fully Integrated 3.0 Planning Opportunities and Constraints Demo/Renovation/MILCON Asset Optimization Recapitalized & Vertical 3.1 Natural, Environment and Cultural Constraints

Fort Mentality Safety / ATFP Consolidate & Minimum Footprint 3.1.1 Topography 3.1.2 Hydrology Silos Encroachment Pro-active Partners 3.1.3 Geology/Soils Meet Requirements Environmental Set the Standard 3.1.4 Vegetation Modest Improvements Training Virtual, Real-Time, School House 3.1.5 Threatened and Endangered Species

Make Do’s with Upgrades Logistics Right Place, Right Size, Right Time 3.1.6 Historical and Archeological 3.1.7 Climate and Environmental Influences Internal DoD Policy Regional Sphere of Influence 3.2 Man-Made / Operational Constraints Decrease Op Tempo Increase 3.2.1 AICUZ/RAICUZ Status Quo Community Services Outsourced 3.2.2 Existing Land Use 3.2.3 Ordinance Transportation and Storage Status Quo Professional Workforce Outsourced 3.2.4 Small Arms Range Surface Danger Zones Stovepipes Team Integration Seamless 3.2.5 AT/FP Figure 2.10 Vision Session Planning Drivers Example 3.2.6 Electromagnetic Areas 3.2.7 Enhanced Use Lease / PPV Initial Planning Priorities 3.2.8 Encroachment

Maximum Minimum MaxMax Extent MinMin 3.3 Utilities Degree to which we pursue and execute solutions and investments Expected Possible 3.3.1 Energy – Conventional 1 2 3 4 3.3.2 Energy – Alternative Functional 3.3.3 Fiber Optics / Cable Linkages Relationships Encroachment Sustainability 3.3.4 Storm Sewer 3.3.5 Waste Water • Physical • Physical • Internal • Energy 3.3.6 Water • Technical • Political • External • Water • Internal • Functional • High Perf. Bldg 3.4 Transportation/Circulation • External • Internal • Walkability 3.4.1 Easement and Rights-of-Way • External • Right Facilities 3.4.2 Circulation and Parking Figure 2.11 Vision Session Planning Priority Example 3.4.3 Sidewalks, Trails 3.4.4 Airfield Runways / Aprons / Taxiways 3.4.5 Piers / Wharves term development requirements. will be used to develop COAs and 3.4.6 Other Paved Areas Development of the Framework the Preferred Plan. The Preferred 3.4.7 Federal Transit Services Plan should consider installation Plan will be assessed to determine its 3.4.8 Troop Movement Corridors scale and operational environments alignment with the vision and planning 5.1 Vision Plan when determining potential districts. principles. 5.1.1 Vision Statement 5.1.2 Planning Goals and Objectives Planning districts within the 5.1.3 Framework Plan – Districts/Areas Framework Plan could be defined Outputs should align with the based upon geographic features, key requirements for transferring plan IDP Appendix Content transportation systems, open space data seamlessly into the intranet Navy • Stakeholder interview summary notes networks, existing land use patterns Shore Infrastructure Planning Platform • Vision Session Recap and boundaries or historic districts. (iNSIPP). See Section 3.0 for iNSIPP • Constraints and Opportunities The vision session should also content development standards. • Supporting Documentation develop, through a consensus-building Figure 2.12 identifies the required process, planning drivers, goals, Table of Contents sections that should Figure 2.12 Phase 2 IDP Plan Components objectives and planning principles that be completed as part of Phase 2, help to define the vision. Figures 2.10 including planning opportunities and and 2.11 provide examples of planning constraints and the vision plan. See driver and priorities graphics used Appendix A for the full IDP Table of in vision sessions. These principles Contents.

FINAL INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE • 15 2.0 IDP Process Phase 3: Analyze Existing Data

Objectives • What efforts are being made to address sustainability and PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 The analysisPH Aof dataSE collected 4 during environmentalPHASE mandates?5 PHASE 6 PHASE 7 Phase 2 allows for a thorough NITC to certify, Plan Collect Data & Analyze Analyze • WhatDevelop environmental impacts can be Developload, program, Plan Initiation Develop Vision Existing Data understandingCapability of the Gaps installation’s Alternativeanticipated due COAs to changing climatic Preferredtest and readyPlan for Execution development opportunities, conditions? global launch constraints, and overall capacity to • What is the development capacity of rectify current infrastructure and facility Develop Concepts, Plan Initiation & Collect & Inventory Analyze Facility Perform Analysis to the installation? capability gaps and to handle current Alternatives & Course of Develop Obtain Management Plan Relevant Data Condition, Configuration, & Determine Gross Capability and anticipated mission growth. The Actions• How does(COAs the ) to installation Rectify relate to Preferred IDP IDP Approval Capacity findings documentedGaps during Phase and work with local communities? (Requirements less Existing Priority Capability Gaps Kick Off • Real Property 3 should be compared to the vision Assets = Gross Gaps) Meeting • Infrastructure and goals previously established to Analyze Infrastructure Inputs + Supporting Tools Prepare Provide IDP Maintenance • Facilities confirm alignment with the vision and Establish Key Condition, Configuration, & Development Plan & Enhancements • Operations feasibility of the goals and objectives. The baselineInvestment inventory Drivers data Define Installation Mission, Capacity Determine Net Capability Vision, Goals & Objectives • Known Existing & Data should beGaps analyzed through an assembled during Phase 2 provides Future Projects in-depth and integrated approach the primary source of information (Gross gaps less Approved Define COA Planning Prepare Provide Annual Review • Mission Requirements whereby data layers and information for conducting analyses. Spatial Analyze Transportation & pipeline projects = Net Gaps) Actions Supporting Plans of Development Plan Review Strategic Guidance, • Current & Future are assessed across the installation to data from on-installation and off- Circulation Networks Traditional, Progressive, Policies & Strategies Personnel & form the basis for planning decisions. installation sources is compiled and Aggressive Equipment Loading FigurePerform 2.13 Impactillustrates Analysis, the general consolidated in a compatible format Prepare Investment Enhance IDP Data by • Existing Plans & processRisk diagramAssessment for & Phase Gap 3. using databases and GIS to allow for Identify Key Planning Drivers, Prepare Combined Constraints Strategy, Priorities & Executing Follow on Studies Prioritization in-depth analysisIdentify of independent and Principles & Business Rules & Opportunities Maps Capital Investment Plan Studies as Needed • Adjacent Community Key Questions to Address during interrelatedNon-Facility variables. Solutions Information Gap Analysis Phase 3 Provide for a Analyze Mission Review & Prepare Define Relevant DoD & Navy Prioritization Unless scoped otherwise, most if Comprehensive IDP Requirements & Loading Meeting not all of the source information for Phasing Plan Initiatives Identify & Rectify • What are the current condition, Identify Policy Change Update every 5 Years Changes analyses is provided by the installation Data Gaps configuration and capacity of Recommendations installationPrepare facilities? Prioritized or GeoReadniness Center and should Identify Relevant Future Assess Functional be available, current and relevant. • To whatCapability extent Gap do Matrixfacility assets and Prepare Trends & Areas of Influence Perform Site Visit & Interview Relationships & Land Use No in-depth analyses or engineering Design Guidelines requirements differ (capacity)? Develop Draft Key Stakeholder to Assess Compatibilities studies are required for high-level Existing Situation & to • What natural, environmental or Investment Strategy master plan considerations. Unless Pre-Final Identify Envisioned Changes operational conditions could scoped otherwise, most if not all of Comments Assess Internal & positively or negatively impact Meeting External Encroachment the source informationConcept for analyses is Data Review / existing and future facilities provided by theWorkshop installation and should Data Gap and infrastructure on the Meeting be available, current and relevant. ForPrepare & Submit Final Plan This Phase is installation? Concept the basic IDP, it is desirable that the with Supporting Materials to be developed in Assess Access, Out Brief future versions of IDP Security & AT/FP • Are there limitations within the following information is current and the Guide. Vision Session existing utility, transportation and available to the extent possible. circulation networks? Final Brief Assess Compliance with • Do land use relationships reinforce • iNFADS data Sustainability & functional compatibility and help •D BFRs/AEs E L I V E R are A B current L E S and in iNFADSD E L I V E R A B L E S Environmental Mandates minimize internal and external • Facility condition data encroachment? • Transportation analysis and plans • Can future mission or personnel loading changes be • Natural resourcesConcept management Draft Pre-Final Final accommodated? plans • Operational constraints data Figure 2.13 Phase 3 Process Diagram

16 • INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE FINAL

IDP Consistency Guide | July 2013 | Working Draft

Intranet NAVY SHORE INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING PLATFORM 2.0 IDP Process

•2.4 Utilities conditionFaC andility capacity datarEqUand guidanceirEMEnts into the installation • Sustainability analysis existing situation assessment. Installation planners and information Facilities requirements data used for this Master need to be addressed through subsequent • Project IPLs within the Electronic Project Generator •Plan Consolidation are provided Plans in Table 2.2 and Table (EPG)2.3. shouldanalyses provide informationto ensure that iNFADS accurately reflects Facility assets and requirements are identified existing real property conditions at NWS yorktown. • FPD Planning Actions about existing project lists and by Shore Capability Area in Table 2.2, anddocumentation reflect to assist in determining • Current COAs the delta between gross assets minus where short, midAs shown and long-term in Table 2.2, NWS yorktown has a requirements. Table 2.3 lists assets and planning gaps1.61 might million exist. square-foot deficit of required Facility data from iNFADS and FRES requirements by major tenant. facilities. The largest deficits are in logistics & will provide an understanding of facility Reports and direct input from base Supply, Intermediate/Depot level Maintenance, performance and capability gaps planners, energy managers and relatedNote that to conditionthese tables through rely on the iNFADS Facility data public as of works staffSailor will & provideFamily Readiness, an and Ordnance/Weapons Condition1 April 2009. Assessment However, Program this information mayunderstanding Operations of the installation’s capability areas. Only C5ISR Operations (FCAP),be out-of-date capacity and BFR, current configuration requirements currentdata and plannedshow a effortssurplus to in reduce assets. andmay missionnot yet bedependency included in index iNFADS. MDI Basic energy facility and water consumption, (See Figure 2.14.) Information from requirements for NECE units were updatedimprove during energy and water these Navy systems will help to efficiency, reduce green house gas the master planning process, as were a handful develop an operational assessment emissions, and integrate sustainable of criticalvarious shore facilities infrastructure throughout and the a station.technologies But, into federal facilities. descriptivea fence line-to-fence assessment line of BFR any updateshore and asset infrastructureevaluation has or not facility been receiving completed a and wouldInformation contained on the following yellow (poor) or red (failing) rating. pages describes the series of data and Shore Facility Infrastructure Analysis maps to be created during this phase findings and recommendations from of developing the IDP. RIPsTable and 2.2: GSIPs Requirements will also provide and Assets input by Shore Capability Area

REQUiREMEnT aSSETS aSSETS aSSETS SURPlUS / SHORE CaPaBiliTY aREa (Sf) (GROSS) (inaD) (aDQ + SUB) DEfiCiT

Airfield Operations 442 442 192 250 0

Base Support 790,395 701,745 35,989 665,756 (88,650)

C5ISR Operations 12,927 17,869 0 17,869 4,942

Expeditionary Operations 29,013 18,930 0 18,930 (10,083)

Intermediate / Depot level Maintenance 980,513 786,898 0 786,898 (193,615)

logistics & Supply 3,751,179 2,795,389 4,745 2,790,644 (955,790)

Ordnance / Weapons Operations 1,547,523 1,449,017 18,006 1,431,011 (98,506)

RDAT&E 101,376 101,376 140 101,236 0

Sailor & Family Readiness 567,529 399,272 7,746 391,526 (168,257)

Training 75,033 61,247 11,840 49,407 (13,786) for official use only for

Waterfront Operations 175,228 86,058 0 86,058 (89,170) |

TOTal 8,031,158 6,418,243 78,658 6,339,585 (1,612,915) july 2009 july |

Figure 2.14 Requirements and Assets by Shore Capability Area Summary from iNFADS Example Source: iNFADS, 1 April 2009, and FRES, 8 April 2009. final FINAL INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE • 17

NWS yorktoWN master plan plaNNiNg aNalySiS section 2-14 Environmental Conditions – includes but is not limited to floodplains, wetlands, open space, green infrastructure and stormwater best management practices, storm surge areas, changing climatic conditions, restoration sites, soils, steep slopes, and rare, threatened, and endangered Environmental Constraints

Figure 2.3 SUBASE New London species (flora and fauna). Master Plan

Naval Submarine Base New London Master Plan FINAL January 2010 ExiStiNg CoNditioNS / ChAPtEr two 2-15

Tank 484 500

455 441

137 159 Gate 5/East Gate 278 Gate 7 GeoReadiness mapping layers describes the 160 Route 12 135 492 152 429

499 108 430 156 Parking – includes an inventory of OT 12 461A 388 534 435 OT 13 120 521 434 543 515 462 389 141 GPA 526 OWS1549 522 Thresher Ave Navy’s Geospatial Information and Services 148 83C 482 446 83 77 elec util 436 410 485 553 556 592 560 481 Rd Lake Crystal 475 554 533 520A 439 84 460 464 33 surface lot, on-street and structured 498 168 520 460 86 164 476 Tautog Ave 569

469 TangAve 564 559 (GI&S) program for facilities, infrastructure, 558 518 493 433 SBD3 327 SBD4 332 448 428 445 532 169 324 110 A113 519 474 550 SBD 85 427 87 524 76 488 393 465 79 484 SBD parking supply, and an analysis of 17 487480 Tank Gate 1/Main Gate 471 483 Tank 500 562 38 75 547 A112 and environment. NAVFAC uses GI&S for 546 561 Rock Lake 527 548 A-86 455 Pump Sta 107 20 544 137 477 463 159 160 571 135 449 492 152 376 325 499 108 Wahoo Ave 156 528 451 120 521 Grayling Ave parking utilization based upon existing 340 462 141 Trout Ave planning, overlay constraints features such as 523 Nautilus 148 83C 83 77 495 485 529 574 553 351 475 554 84 Scorpion Ave 498 168 Legend Triton Ave. Gate 2 86 164 476 North Lake 564 Key Pedestrian Areas 169 Shark Blvd324 332 parking demand of current facilities 532 110 Primary Route endangered species habitat areas, wetlands, 281 454 85 468 375 87 458 282 166 76 Secondary Route PRI 348 349 Gate 6 Gate 3/North Gate 17 79 311 347 350 Pier 2 Base Shuttle System 337 B 128 3875 371 386 548 Golf Course 527 Lower Base Express Loop 292 Gate 8 107 20 54H 318 Upper Base Loop 286 235 Pier 6 A 234 C R! Major Pickup Points and explosive safety quanitity distance arcs and proposed facilities. 352 88 29 525 153 89 Pier 8 Pedestrian Network 456 106 40 490 One-Way Street 555 530 178 157 Pier 10 Gate 10 478 173 Primary Access Pier 12 295 174 176 175 385 181 535501 602 Gate together in GIS to develop large-area land 473 355 397 Pier 15 Pier 31 Pier 17 Pier 32 Pier 33 Circulation and Parking use plans or to determine the optimal site for Figure 2.8 SUBASE New London 0 255 510 1,020 a single new facility. Engineers can quickly Master Plan Naval Submarine Base New London Master Plan FINAL January 2010 ExiStiNg CoNditioNS / ChAPtEr two 2-25 access facility information and work order Cultural and Historical Resources – requests by facility in the interactive map to better maintain and operate Navy facilities. includes but is not limited to historic Geospatial data are also fed to Computer buildings, structures, landscape Aided Dispatch systems to help Emergency features, districts, and pre-historic, Responders protect the Navy’s facilities and archeological sites, if any. personnal. NAVFAC uses modern techniques like Global Positioning Systems (GPS), high- resolution satellite and aircraft imagery, LIDAR Historic/Cultural (Light Detection And Ranging), and GIS to Resources

Figure 2.5 SUBASE New London collect and perform geospatial analysis, and Master Plan

Naval Submarine Base New London Master Plan FINAL January 2010 ExiStiNg CoNditioNS / ChAPtEr two 2-19 develop both digital and hardcopy maps. Functional Land Uses – includes Each Navy Region has a GeoReadiness Center existing land use patterns that have whose responsibilities are as follows: resulted from growth on the installation • Regions single authoritative source of over time, as well as the current geospatial Information requirements of the installation. • Provide overall coordination and Interdependence among functional acquisition of GIS data and resources uses, especially those most important

• Responsible for maintaining Common to the mission, should be identified. Existing Land Use

Figure 2.7 Installation Picture (CIP) data layers Existing functional relationships SUBASE New London Master Plan • Insure that geospatial data holdings of may differ from desired functionalCompressed Air Naval Submarine Base New London Master Plan FINAL January 2010 ExiStiNg CoNditioNShot / ChAP watertEr two 2-23 the Navy Regions meet quality control relationships. standards for accuracy, currency, and compliance • Provide GeoReadiness Services via Utilities – includes but is not limited to Regional Shore Installation Management networks associated with domestic hot System (RSIMS) water/potable water, sanitary sewer, • Enable program managers, activities, and tenant commands to view, report, stormwater, electricity, natural gas, analyze and update data renewable energy (ground source heat • Publish GIS data to the RSIMS Map pumps, wind, solar, biomass), stream, Steam Electricity Viewer (GRX) compressed air, and communications (fiber optic and telecommunications). Utilities (Map 1)

Figure 2.10a

Naval Submarine Base New London Master Plan FINAL January 2010 ExiStiNg CoNditioNS / ChAPtEr two 2-29

18 • INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE FINAL Tank 484 500 Transportation – includes pedestrian 455 441

137 159 Gate 5/East Gate 278 Gate 7 160 Route 12 135 492 152 429

499 108 430 156 OT 12 461A 388 534 435 OT 13 120 521 networks (sidewalks and trails) and 434 543 515 462 389 141 GPA 526 OWS1549 522 Thresher Ave 148 83C 446 482 83 77 elec util 436 410 485 Facility Readiness Evaluation System (FRES) 553 556 592 560 481 Rd Lake Crystal 475 554 533 520A 439 84 460 464 33 168 520 498 460 86 164 476 amenities, bicycle networks (on- Tautog Ave 569

469 TangAve 559 564 518 493 433 SBD3 327 558 SBD4 332 448 428 445 532 169 324 110 A113 519 474 550 SBD FRES is a decision support system designed 85 427 87 524 76 488 393 465 79 484 SBD 17 487480 Tank Gate 1/Main Gate 471 483 Tank 500 street and off-street) and facilities, 562 38 75 547 A112 546 561 Rock Lake 527 548 A-86 455 Pump Sta 107 20 544 137 477 463 159 to help all levels of decision makers objectively 160 571 135 449 492 152 376 325 499 108 Wahoo Ave 156 528 451 120 521 Grayling Ave 340 462 141 Trout Ave installation gates, primary and 523 Nautilus 148 83C 83 77 495 485 553 evaluate and monitor the quality and quantity 529 574 351 475 554 84 Scorpion Ave 498 168 Legend Triton Ave. Gate 2 86 164 476 North Lake 564 Key Pedestrian Areas 169 Shark Blvd324 332 532 110 Primary Route secondary roadways, airfield surface 281 454 85 468 375 87 458 282 166 76 Secondary Route PRI 348 349 Gate 6 Gate 3/North Gate 17 79 311 347 350 Pier 2 of facilities. It presents facility readiness in Base Shuttle System 337 B 128 3875 371 386 548 Golf Course 527 Lower Base Express Loop 292 Gate 8 107 20 54H 318 Upper Base Loop 286 235 Pier 6 A 234 C R! Major Pickup Points 352 88 29 525 153 89 Pier 8 pavements, piers and wharves, Pedestrian Network 456 106 terms familiar to the senior managers (F1-F4 40 490 One-Way Street 555 530 178 157 Pier 10 Gate 10 478 173 Primary Access Pier 12 295 174 176 175 385 181 535501 602 Gate 473 355 397 Pier 15 Pier 31 Pier 17 installation bus / transit service existing Pier 32 Pier 33 Circulation readiness ratings) and includes calculated and Parking

Figure 2.8 and proposed routes, bus stops, funding requirements to raise ratings to the SUBASE New London 0 255 510 1,020 Master Plan Naval Submarine Base New London Master Plan FINAL January 2010 ExiStiNg CoNditioNS / ChAPtEr two 2-25 regional transportation services, and next higher level(s). FRES provides a view documentation of alternative transport of current facility readiness with drilldown to programs (telework, carpooling, etc.) regions, installations, and facility level. Facility and participation levels. readiness is indicated by an Installation Figure of Merit (IFOM). The rating reflects the lowest of the condition, configuration or capacity Operational Conditions – includes rating. but is not limited to Air Installation Configuration ratings are a measurement Compatible Use Zones (AICUZ), of the facilities capability to support the Accident Potential Zones (APZs), component commands or mission with respect Noise Contours, Anti-Terrorism Force to functionality. Ratings are calculated in Protection (AT/FP) requirements, iNFADS and consider deficiency codes. Explosive Safety Quantity Distance (ESQD) Arcs, Explosive Transportation Condition ratings are evaluated based on Operational Constraints physical condition of the facility as calculated Routes, Hazards of Electromagnetic Figure 2.4 SUBASE New London Master Plan by the Facility Condition Assessment Program Naval Submarine Base New London Master Plan FINAL January 2010 ExiStiNg CoNditioNS / ChAPtEr two 2-17 Radiation to Ordnance (HERO), People (HERP) and Fuels (HERF), and (FCAP). restricted areas, as applicable. Capacity ratings indicate if there are sufficient facilities to meet the mission at a site or installation location. It is a percentage Indoor Small Arms range transient P481 BQ PXXX Damage Control Fitness Center trainer P925 Developable Area – includes PXXX Submarine Bridge calculation of the sum of total assets compared team Simulator P137

Potential Enhanced MK48 torpedo Use Lease Magazines areas on the installation that Phases 2 and 3 to the total requirement. In FRES, capacity PXXX

MK48 torpedo Magazines Phase 1 P848 could be developed. These areas ratings are not available at the facility level. NEX renovation/ torpedo/tomahawk Consolidation Maintenance Facility Utility P989 Enhanced Use Lease NSMrL Addition Commissary rM001/002-07 (DECA) are unconstrained by natural,

BEQ P996 90-100 Good condition and ability Future Building environmental, and operational Site NIoDEt PXXX Squadron Submarine hQ P858 Learning Center Security hQ headquarters Flag/Senior Officer P478 Food to support current mission PXXX housing Area Vendor constraints. These areas also include PXXX

Parking Fire Station Garage P997 or function Inside Machine Pier 8 replacement Shop waterfront operations Small infill opportunities that are either P194 P189 Craft Facility P402

Pier 33 replacement or Dive Locker Map Title Quay wall Berth Pier 32 Pier 31 P994 currently vacant or developable once replacement replacement P898 P464 Golf/All hands Chapel LineDevelopment Two If Needed Plan

Clubhouse Sub Group two Addition PXXX headquarters P125 P850 Figure 4.X4.5 80-89 Fair condition and ability Mast/Antenna Production Ship’s Complement Maintenance Management Fuel Cell Plant SUBASE New London P193 Facility Facility PXXX P113 P190 Master Plan planned demolition on these sites is Naval Submarine Base New London Master Plan FINAL January 2010 dEvELoPMENt PLaN / ChAPtEr FoUr 4-13 to support current mission completed. or function

60-79 Poor condition and ability to support current mission

Indoor Small Arms range transient P481 BQ PXXX Damage Control Fitness Center trainer P925 Future Development – includes PXXX or function Submarine Bridge team Simulator P137

Potential Enhanced Use Lease MK48 torpedo on-going active, programmed, and Magazines Phases 2 and 3 PXXX

MK48 torpedo Magazines Phase 1 P848 un-programmed development projects 0-59 Failing condition and ability

NEX renovation/ torpedo/tomahawk Consolidation Maintenance Facility Utility P989 Enhanced Use Lease to support current mission NSMrL Addition Commissary (demolition and construction) that rM001/002-07 (DECA)

BEQ P996 should be documented, mapped and or function Future Building Site NIoDEt PXXX Squadron hQ Submarine P858 Learning Center Security hQ headquarters factored into the asset assessment, Flag/Senior Officer P478 Food PXXX housing Area Vendor PXXX

Parking Fire Station Garage P997 condition analysis and the capacity Figure 2.15 FRES Description Pier 8 waterfront operations Small Inside Machine replacement Craft Facility Shop P194 P402 P189

Pier 33 analysis. replacement or Quay wall Berth Pier 32 Pier 31 Dive Locker replacement replacement P994 P898 P464 MILCON Projects Golf/All hands Chapel Clubhouse Sub Group two Annex Ship’s PXXX headquarters P125 Figure 5.1 P850 Complement P193 Mast/Antenna Production SUBASE New London Maintenance Management Fuel Cell Plant Facility Facility PXXX P113 P190 Master Plan

Naval Submarine Base New London Master Plan FINAL January 2010 CaPitaL iMProvEMENtS PLaN / ChAPtEr FIVE 5-5

FINAL INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE • 19 Figure 2.16 Screen Shot from FRES Methods Current facility and infrastructure assets should be analyzed to formulate A first step in the analysis is to define a comprehensive assessment of the extent of the area and facilities of existing installation facilities. A detailed an installation that are to be studied in review of FRES data and Installation depth as some installations have Figure of Merit (IFOM) scores for each non-contiguous areas. Installation facility will provide an understanding plans, reports and supporting data of how each facility currently supports along with community reports and the mission. Data anomalies observed studies should be reviewed and in iNFADS or FRES should be flagged documented as part of the analysis. and reviewed with installation planners during the analysis. Facilities that A series of GIS maps should be score as failing to support current developed to define the existing mission or function or have a poor Mission Dependency Index (MDI) ability to support current mission or MDI is an Operational Risk Metric jointly environmental and operational developed, tested and validated by conditions and associated function should be easily identified. NAVFAC, USCG & US Army. All major Navy constraints. All mapping should See Figure 2.16 for a basic screenshot installations have been assessed and MDI follow standards as defined by the from FRES for SUBASE New London. scores have been uploaded to iNFADS. NAVFAC GeoReadiness Center. The Refinement of this data continues to occur. specific types of information included Mission Dependency Index (MDI) data MDI Scores range from 0 to 100, and are should also be reviewed to understand subdivided into five categories. in the analysis will be influenced by installation location. However, the relative importance of a facility in terms of mission criticality. MDI 100 Critical the mapping methodology should consider and show the regional evaluates the impact and operational 85 Significant context and conditions beyond risk to the mission on a scale of 1 the fenceline where applicable. to 100 if the function provided by 70 Relevant The methodology should ensure the infrastructure is interrupted or a thorough understanding of the relocated. See Figure 2.17 for MDI 55 Moderate following elements. description. It can be used to identify and evaluate physical security and 40 Low vulnerability issues from a mission perspective and is an important Figure 2.17 Mission Dependency Index consideration as part of the capability Description

20 • INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE FINAL gaps analysis. MDI considers the Outputs ability to relocate or replace a facility Capacity Planning against the timeframe of interruptability The analysis outputs should serve as of the function. input for completing an operational Capacity planning allows planners to capability gap analysis in Phase 4 determine an installation’s maximum The off-installation and on-installation which will guide the development development capacity based on analyses together identify those of COAs and the preferred plan. conformance to the installation’s planning conditions which combine to delimit The outputs of this phase provide vision, goals, and objectives without buildable areas for the installation. The the foundation and background seriously degrading the environment, function, activity, or assets of the developable areas of an installation information that will support installation or some portion thereof while informed decision making as the exclude all portions of the installation remaining fiscally responsible. This is having one or more site development IDP is developed. While much of also referred to as carrying capacity. limitations or constraints. From the this information will remain in the While existing and known short-term Developable Area Map the installations background it is important that the requirements and proposed mid to long- development carrying capacity analysis is thorough, comprehensive term planning actions need to be sited in can be derived. Capacity planning and accurate to the extent possible. the IDP, unconstrained property needs to be reserved for unknown future requirements. in the context of identifying the This future growth area is shown on a Phase 3 outputs should clearly maximum development capacity of an Developable Area Map. The difference installation (including open space and summarize existing installation site, between the existing land/facilities and redevelopment areas) which should facility and infrastructure conditions programmed projects over the FYDP as be addressed as part of Phase 3 at the through supported text, and a series of compared to the future build-out potential of installation level. Carrying capacity is detailed maps, charts, and graphics. an installation is described as its capacity. defined as the maximum capability of The summaries should clearly convey Capacity is shown on illustrative plans the installation to support designated why particular conditions are important through the use of “notional buildings and/ or areas” designated for “potential future in relation to the overall character of functions or activities without seriously growth.” A table should be provided on degrading function, activity, or existing and future development of maps that identify how many square feet assets of the installation or some the installation. The number of maps of facilities (by three digit DOD facility portion thereof. See Figure 2.18 for will depend upon the complexity of category code number) and the number more capacity planning information. resources present at each installation. of acres of other potential land within the Examples include the ability to support relevant installation land use categories. training at certain levels of intensity, Key outputs include: Figure 2.18 Capacity Planning Description or availability of utilities (water, sewer, electricity), to support a new activity, • Opportunities and Constraints Summary or the ability of the transportation Phase 3 IDP Plan Components network to carry levels of traffic safety • Network Summaries - Transportation and efficiently. Carrying capacity and Key Utilities (See Appendix A for full IDP Table of Contents) considerations should be integrated 3.1.8 Natural/Environmental/Cultural Constraints • Developable Area Map into the analysis in Phase 3 at the Summary installation level; additional capacity • Future Development Summary Map 3.2.9 Man-Made/Operational Constraints Summary planning considerations will be 3.3.7 Utilities Summary 3.4.9 Transportation/Circulation Summary addressed in Phase 5 as part of COA Outputs should align with the 3.5 Developable Area Map considerations and in Phase 6, as part requirements for transferring plan 3.6 Sustainability Scorecard of the installation-wide development data seamlessly into the iNSIPP. 3.7 Facility Condition/Capacity/Configuration Matrix plan and any ADPs completed in See Section 3.0 for iNSIPP content 3.8 Future Development Summary Map support of the IDP. development standards. Figure 3.9 Regional and Community Summary 2.19 identifies the required Table of Contents sections that should be IDP Appendix Content • GIS Mapping completed as part of Phase 3. See • Facility Condition Analysis Worksheets Appendix A for the complete IDP Table of Contents. Figure 2.19 Phase 3 IDP Plan Components

FINAL INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE • 21 2.0 IDP Process Phase 4: Analyze Capability Gaps

Objectives configuration and capacity issues and gaps between current requirements, PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 A comparisonPHA ofS currentE 5 facility assets existingPH ANITCfacilities,S toE certify, 6 and in consideration PHASE 7 Plan Collect Data & Analyze Analyze and knownDevelop requirements, organized of anyDevelop programmedload, program, or planned Plan Initiation Develop Vision Existing Data Capability Gaps by ShoreAlternative Capability COAs Areas, will identify pipelinePreferredtest projects and readyPlan (Integrated for Priority Execution and prioritize significant facility and Lists). Theglobal analysis launch will also be guided infrastructure capability gaps and by identified gaps in current GSIP, will helpDevelop determine Concepts, how well existing Plan Initiation & Collect & Inventory Analyze Facility Perform Analysis to RIP, and other regional or higher level Alternatives & Course of Develop Obtain Management Plan Relevant Data Condition, Configuration, & Determine Gross Capability facilities support required operational guidance documents. Actions (COAs ) to Rectify Preferred IDP IDP Approval Capacity Gaps capabilities at the installation. Known and plausiblePriority Capability planning Gaps change agents The analysis relies heavily upon data • Real Property (Requirements less Existing Kick Off or triggers should be considered as Meeting • Infrastructure Assets = Gross Gaps) directly from Navy Shore Facilities Analyze Infrastructure well during this phase. Figure 2.20 Prepare Provide IDP Maintenance • Facilities Establish Key Planning System (SFPS) electronic Condition, Configuration, & illustrates the general process diagram tools Developmentsuch as iNFADS, Plan FRES and EPG & Enhancements Define Installation Mission, • Operations Investment Drivers Capacity Determine Net Capability for Phase 4. as introduced in Phase 3. This data, Vision, Goals & Objectives • Known Existing & Gaps Future Projects embellished with relevant data derived (Gross gaps less Approved Prepare Provide Annual Review • Mission Requirements Key QuestionsDefine COAto Address Planning during from information collected during Analyze Transportation & pipeline projects = Net Gaps) Supporting Plans of Development Plan Review Strategic Guidance, • Current & Future Phase 4 Actions early phases, provides the information Circulation Networks Traditional, Progressive, Policies & Strategies Personnel & required to analyze the facility and Aggressive infrastructure capability gaps - facilities Equipment Loading Perform Impact Analysis, • What are the installation’s key Prepare Investment Enhance IDP Data by • Existing Plans & Risk Assessment & Gap infrastructure and facility capability needed to perform assigned missions; Identify Key Planning Drivers, Prepare Combined Constraints Strategy, Priorities & Executing Follow on Studies Prioritization gaps (condition,Identify capacity, and existing facilities and their condition, Principles & Business Rules & Opportunities Maps Capital Investment Plan Studies as Needed • Adjacent Community configuration)?Non-Facility Solutions capacity and configuration; existing Information Gap Analysis projects that have been identified • What is the status and planning Provide for a Analyze Mission Review & to rectify knownPrepare issues should be Define Relevant DoD & Navy Prioritization actions described in the BFRs and Comprehensive IDP Requirements & Loading reviewedPhasing to determine Plan if they are still Initiatives Meeting FPDs?Identify Policy Change Identify & Rectify Changes relevant, need to be updated based on Update every 5 Years Recommendations Data Gaps • What are the installations primary new information, deleted, or Prepare Prioritized Assess Functional SCAs? How do they score? re-prioritized in the IPL. Identify Relevant Future Capability Gap Matrix Prepare Trends & Areas of Influence Perform Site Visit & Interview Relationships & Land Use • How will planned and programmed Design Guidelines Develop Draft Key Stakeholder to Assess Compatibilities projects affect identified capability Methods Existing Situation & to Investment Strategy gaps? Pre-Final Identify Envisioned Changes The process forComments analyzing capability Assess Internal & • What are the installation’s gaps should followMeeting a standard process External Encroachment future infrastructureConcept and facility Data Review / Workshop that will result in standard outputs that Data Gap requirements? Planning change Meeting Preparecan be & used Submit in Finalfollow-on Plan phases as This Phase is agents? Triggers?Concept with Supporting Materials to be developed in Assess Access, Out Brief well as rolled up for use at the Region • Does the installation have the future versions of IDP Security & AT/FP and Global levels. A typical process the Guide. Vision Session facilities necessary to support the is shown in Figure 2.21. This process mission of each tenant? identifies key grossFinal Brief capability gaps (all Assess Compliance with • What key capability gaps have facility gaps identified as high MDI and Sustainability & been identified at the region and IFOM ratings of yellow or red). Known Environmental Mandates D E L I V E R A B L E S D E L I V E R A B L E S enterprise level that flow down to projects that have been identified or the installation? have been further developed with DD1391 project documentation should Inputs + SupportingConcept Tools be comparedDraft toPre the-Final gross Final capability gaps. Gaps with projects that have Figure 2.20 Phase 4 Process Diagram The capability gaps analysis takes been identified that address the facility data from Phase 3 a step further or infrastructure issues are noted. This to isolate specific condition, list is then filtered to identify capability

22 • INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE FINAL

IDP Consistency Guide | July 2013 | Working Draft

Intranet NAVY SHORE INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING PLATFORM 2.0 IDP Process

Capability Gap Analysis Process gaps with no solution becoming the and Prioritization Meeting. The CAPABILITY GAP ANALYSIS PROCESS net capability gaps. The net capability outcome of the meeting will guide gap list is modified to include plausible the development of planning Analyze Capacity, planning change agents and triggers. alternatives and COAs to address Condition, Configuration, Existing Installation This new net capability gap list is then key mission critical capability gaps MDI - Defining GROSS Capability Gaps Planning Data prepared for a prioritization exercise by and to define potential solutions to core stakeholders. include new construction, recapitalize, IFOM Ratings from FRES Site Visits, consolidation, dispose, pursuit of Interviews, A visual representation (See Figure public/private ventures, etc. GOOD FAIR POOR FAILING Assess Existing Situation 2.22) should be developed to clearly • Detailed facility show a comparison of the condition, The minimum meeting procedures information from iNFADS capacity, configuration and mission and resulting outcomes should be as Identify Known Projects dependency index for installation follows: Projects: FYPD (IPL/EPG) facilities within the various shore Do they rectify a capability gap? capability areas. The information is • Confirm capability gap analysis Change presented using the FRES and iNFADS approach, process and results. NET Infrastructure Agents - Capability Gaps Identified Triggers reporting system providing planners • Review and update the list of Gross with IFOM ratings (condition, capacity, (prior to applying known projects • Organizational configuration), MDI, Q-ratings, backlog against gaps) Capability Gaps Prioritize Capability Gaps Changes of restoration and modernization, • New Mission(s) based on attendee feedback. If • New Platform(s) facility utilization, PRV values, etc. all overrides are used, they must be Develop Courses of • DoD / Navy organized by shore capability, shore fully documented. Action to Rectify Priority Initiatives Capability Gaps • Change in Op function and/or category code. The • Confirm status of existing or known Tempo resulting analysis table is filtered, projects that address key capability 2 Figure 2.21 Capability Gap Analysis queried and sorted to provide a gaps. prioritized list of facilities that should Process Diagram be considered for action during the • Develop a list of operational or COA (Phase 5) and Preferred Plan business process solutions to (Phase 6) of the project. This analysis address appropriate capability gaps. should be integrated with any planned • Summarize list of Net Capability or programmed projects that could Gaps. alter the results due to current or • Prioritize and gain consensus on Net short-term construction or demolition Capability Gaps to be addressed activities. during the COA Phase 5.

A risk assessment should be completed to understand which identified capability gaps have the greatest potential to negatively impact mission readiness. The risk assessment should consider how proposed solutions may improve condition, configuration or capacity ratings and address identified space deficiencies.

Major facility and infrastructure net Figure 2.22 Data import from FRES/iNFADS into MS Excel for use during the analysis capability gaps revealed through phase. This data can then be drilled down to the facility level to identify the this process will form the basis for worst facilities with the highest MDI in order to prioritize potential planning a Capability Gap Analysis Review actions.

FINAL INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE • 23 Outputs Phase 4 IDP Plan Components Outputs from Phase 4 should (See(See AppendixAppendix AA forfor fullfull IDPIDP TableTable ofof Contents)Contents) include the capability gap analysis of 4.1 Facility and Infrastructure Capability Gap Analysis specific shore facility infrastructure requirements and priorities at the IDP Appendix Content overall installation level needed to • Capability Gap Analysis backup analysis and support current and future missions, supporting information promote sustainable operations, • Capability Gap Analysis promote stewardship of the land, • Review and Prioritization Workshop Meeting environment and culture, and to Notes maintain and enhance a safe, healthy 93 Figure 2.23 Phase 4 IDP Plan Components and high quality of life for current and future generations. Outputs from this phase should include:

• A summary of the facility and infrastructure capability gap analysis • A list of known or existing projects identified to rectify gaps • The identification of key change agents or triggers that could influence the planning process

          
 • A list of operational or business process alternatives to consider for Phase 5 PAX • Meeting notes from the Capability Gap Analysis Review and Prioritization Workshop. These will further document priority capability gaps and potential solutions to   

 




         be considered during the COA development phase

Outputs should align with the requirements for transferring plan data seamlessly into iNSIPP. See Section 3.0 for iNSIPP content development standards. Figure 2.23 identifies the required Table of Contents sections that should be completed as part of Phase 4. See Appendix A for the full IDP Table of Contents.

97

24 • INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE FINAL NSA Mechanicsburg / NSA Philadelphia / PNY Annex Master Plan

NSA Mechanicsburg

Legend Installation Area jk Installation Gates

E KE V Fence Line RIC TTS R I OAD R D

N Roads E T T A Railroad P 24 N A 19 V Helicopter Landing Pad Tenants kj D27 DISA kj26 101 3 D31 DLA D32 DLA DRMO 102 4 D36 DLA DSC D37 DAPS 201 103 5 FIRST AVENUE D39 DSADC

"A" STREET 202 104 6 N00023 NAVSUP SYSCOM N00104 NAVSUP WSS

301 203 105 7 ZERO AVENUE N00189 NAVSUP FLC N00367 NAVSUP BSC 302 204 8 "C" STREET N3172A NAVSUP LOC THIRD AVENUE "E" STREET N32414 NSA Mechanicsburg 303 205 107 9 PATROL ROAD N40085 NFEC Midlant

FOURTH AVENUE 304 206 108 10 N65538 NAVSEA 402 SECOND AVENUE Housing / MWR 403 305 "G" STREET207 109 11 LCI 306A FIFTH AVENUE NMCI 404 208 110 12 306B Army Reserve

CGOWAN ROAD M 306C 111 405 307 209 FIRST AVENUE

"H" TRACK 406 210 112 14 "E" STREET 308 "J" TRACK "K" STREET 505 407 309 211 "M" STREET113 "O" STREET

506 408 310A 212 114 BALL ROAD "J" TRACK 15 FOX ROAD 507 311A 409 213 704 kj34 "I" STREET "L" TRACK 508 410 312 214

Helicopter SIXTH AVENUE Landing 509 "K" STREET411 313 215 Pad 510 412 314

" STREET "Q

FINAL INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE • 25 513 kj909

Figure X- 4 Tenant Utilization 0 700 1,400 2,800 Feet 2.0 IDP Process Phase 5: Develop Alternative Courses of Action (COAs)

Objectives • Which COAs best express how an installation will make the most PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 PHASE 5 AlternativePH COAs,ANITCS toE certify,or 6 planning PeffectiveHAS useE 7of limited resources? Plan Collect Data & Analyze Analyze Develop alternatives,Developload, depict program, potential • WhatPlan potential impacts do COAs Initiation Develop Vision Existing Data Capability Gaps Alternative COAs solutionsPreferred andtest andphysical readyPlan for development haveExecution on the surrounding community? approaches globalfor addressing launch capability gaps, an installation’s • What are the advantages and Develop Concepts, disadvantages of each COA? Plan Initiation & Collect & Inventory Analyze Facility Perform Analysis to current capability gaps, future Alternatives & Course of Develop Obtain Management Plan Relevant Data Condition, Configuration, & Determine Gross Capability functional needs, operational mission • What policy changes are needed to Actions (COAs ) to Rectify Preferred IDP IDP Approval Capacity Gaps requirements and investment priorities support the COAs? (Requirements less Existing Priority Capability Gaps defined during previous phases. COAs Kick Off • Real Property • What rough order of magnitude Meeting Assets = Gross Gaps) will be unique to each installation and (ROM) level of investment is • Infrastructure Prepare Provide IDP Maintenance Analyze Infrastructure will be influenced by GSIP and RIP associated with each COA? • Facilities Establish Key Development Plan & Enhancements Condition, Configuration, & guidance, the installation vision, goals, Define Installation Mission, • Operations Determine Net Capability Investment Drivers Capacity principles, and analyses conducted Vision, Goals & Objectives • Known Existing & Gaps Inputs + Supporting Tools Future Projects as part of Phases two through four (Gross gaps less Approved Define COA Planning Prepare Provide Annual Review • Mission Requirements of the IDP process. COAs at the The installation vision and goals Analyze Transportation & pipeline projects = Net Gaps) Actions Supporting Plans of Development Plan Review Strategic Guidance, • Current & Future installation level could depict different should provide guideposts for the Circulation Networks Traditional, Progressive, Policies & Strategies Personnel & physical arrangements of installation Aggressive development of various COAs along Equipment Loading Perform Impact Analysis, componentsPrepare through Investment variation in withEnhance the Constraints IDP Data bySummaries, • Existing Plans & Risk Assessment & Gap land utilization or density levels, or Identify Key Planning Drivers, Prepare Combined Constraints Strategy, Priorities & DevelopableExecuting FollowAreas Summary,on Land Studies Prioritization Identify they could be based upon broad Principles & Business Rules & Opportunities Maps Capital Investment Plan Use Studiesand Framework as Needed Plans, and • Adjacent Community Non-Facility Solutions development preferences (renovation Facility and Infrastructure Capability Information Gap Analysis or new construction) or themes (land Gap Analysis.Provide Directfor a input from the Analyze Mission Review & Prepare Define Relevant DoD & Navy Prioritization use, circulation network, utilities). participantsComprehensive of the COAIDP Concept Requirements & Loading Phasing Plan Initiatives Meeting Identify Policy Change They may also define variations or Workshop held during this phase Identify & Rectify Changes Update every 5 Years Data Gaps Recommendations modifications to existing policies or will provide a forum for evaluating Prepare Prioritized contemplate new policies. Installation the merits of different COAs. The Identify Relevant Future Assess Functional Capability Gap Matrix leadership willPrepare evaluate which COAs, development of COAs shall consider Trends & Areas of Influence Perform Site Visit & Interview Relationships & Land Use or componentsDesign thereof,Guidelines best fulfill Compatibilities Develop Draft the planning strategies outlined in the Key Stakeholder to Assess solutions for current capability gaps Existing Situation & to Investment Strategy Undersecretary of Defense May 28, and future mission Prerequirements-Final and 2013 Memorandum on Installation Identify Envisioned Changes Comments Assess Internal & align with the visionMeeting of the future state Master Planning. Tenants of External Encroachment Concept of the installation during an interactive Data Review / Workshop form-based planning (primarily used Data Gap concept workshop. Figure 2.24 for new construction in non-mission Meeting Prepare & Submit Final Plan This Phase is Concept illustrates the general process diagram areas ofto the be developed installation) in may inform Out Brief with Supporting Materials Assess Access, for Phase 5. the developmentfuture versions of of COAs; however, IDP Security & AT/FP the Guide. Vision Session the concept of form-based planning, Key Questions to FinalAddress Brief during which guides the scale and character Assess Compliance with Phase 5 of development, is best addressed at Sustainability & the Preferred Plan stage for ADPs only Environmental Mandates D E L I V E R A B L E S • WhatD E areL I V the E Rkey A Bplanning L E S drivers - or the facility site level versus at the and principles that must be installation COA scale. addressed in each COA? Concept • To what degreeDraft doesPre-Final each Final COA address the installation’s vision, Figure 2.24 Phase 5 Process Diagram priorities, capability gaps, and mission requirements?

26 • INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE FINAL

IDP Consistency Guide | July 2013 | Working Draft

Intranet NAVY SHORE INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING PLATFORM 2.0 IDP Process

Methods T Traditional Approach P Progressive Approach A Aggressive Approach COAs should address existing and new HIGH • Business as Usual • Divest excess, • Use innovative mission requirements and identified • MILCON, SRM and obsolete and acquisition tools such capability gaps documented during Demo executed devalued assets as EUL, PPV prior analyses. Each COA should be project-by-project • Focus on long-term • Use energy evaluated against a set of established • Investment commitment to innovations planning principles and criteria to allow approaches that are program • Consolidate and a transparent comparison of ideas. not integrated • Integrate groups of integrate processes projects to form and CONOPs “clusters” of “Centers • Base-to-Base / Value Benefit A sensitivity analysis of each COA will of Excellence” consolidations further allow an understanding of the • Recap key mission • Leverage jointness how critical (i.e. level of dependence) assets • Change Policy each COA is to meeting current and • Mission / Function future missions. Sensitivity analysis consolidation LOW of a COA measures the degree of LOW Degree of Transformation HIGH responsiveness a given COA has to meeeting a set of planning objectives Figure 2.25 COA Alternative Solutions Continuum Diagram focused on achieving mission. This could be expressed in terms of high, medium, or low.

The evaluation process of the COAs In today’s fiscally challenging and COA DEVELOPMENT PROCESS will be initiated during the Concept ever evolving business environment Workshop to determine which it is important for the planner to Develop Courses of Action (COAs) to Rectify elements in each concept come think beyond the traditional methods Priority Capability Gaps Gap Gap Gap Gap Gap Gap Gap closest to achieving installation’s of executing projects. Figure 2.26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 priorities, capability gaps, and mission illustrates the COA development requirements. One COA may be process utilizing themes and THEME A THEME B THEME C selected as the most appropriate. alternative solutions continuum Apply Appropriate Planning Business Rules to Further However, it is more likely that the best methodology. Define and Guide the Theme and Resulting COAs elements of several COAs will be Develop Courses of Action (COAs) combined to form the Preferred COA or All COAs should be presented and to Rectify Priority Capability Gaps Plan as part of Phase 6. COAs should discussed during an interactive COA

be developed to address the defined Concept Workshop, or charrette A.1 T B.1 C.1 gaps along a continuum of possible with installation leadership and key solutions. As illustrated in Figure 2.25, stakeholders. The workshop should A.2 P B.2 C.2 the continuum of alternatives should provide sufficient information to allow A.3 A B.3 C.3 look at traditional, progressive and for the comparison of COAs and T = Traditional aggressive potential solutions to solve a should lead to the identification of the P = Progressive A = Aggressive given planning issues or COA. Preferred Plan to be further developed Develop Preferred COAs and Resulting in Phase 6. Preferred Plan 3 Figure 2.26 COA Development Process Diagram

FINAL INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE • 27 5.2.6 Impact Analysis Summary The results of the impact analysis indicates that the five COAs listed below are the most beneficial and have the Figure 5-13 illustrates the consolidated impact analysis easiest execution. completed for each of the facility theme COAs described in the previous section. A summary of the impact analysis is Tier 1 Recommendations: also provided in Table 5-8. • Waterfront Ops - Progressive (W-P) Coordinate with other tenants to share berthing and ancillary assets (lifting capabilities). Tier 1 Phase 5 IDP Plan Components Sweet M-P W-T W-A Outputs• Storage - Progressive (S-P) Refine BFRs to reduce Spot storage requirement. S-A High (See Appendix A for full IDP Table of Contents) At• thisTraining stage - Progressive of the (T-P) IDP Multipurpose process and leverage training assets across units. W-P S-P H-P 4.2 Alternative Courses of Action H-T a• ConceptMaintenance Submittal - Progressive should(M-P) Fully be implement T-T 4.3 Impact Analysis / Risk Assessment assembledESU for all Echelon that includesIV commands. the outputs T-P • HQ/Admin/Ops - Progressive (H-P) Right-size, 4.4 Alignment with Stakeholder Strategic Guidance S-T fromshare, Phases multipurpose. one Right-sizethrough office five space of the Medium

Benefit requirements. Tier 2 process which correspond to sections IDP Appendix Content • materials and resources – including the storage and low impactSweet development is the use of small collection of recyclables, building reuse, and the use scale stormSpot water management controls that are Tier1.0 2 Recommendations:through 5.0 of the IDP Table of • Key COA Concepts Considered of regionally extracted and manufactured building placed at pollution sources to control the effects materials and products of urban runoff. lID measures are designed • HQ/Admin/Ops - Aggressive (H-A) Conduct to filter pollutants, control peak runoff rates, Contents. Figure 2.27 identifies the • indoor environmental Quality – including enhanced and control runoff volume that enters receiving highest and best use analysis for Fleet Concentration indoor air quality, use low-emitting materials, and Figure 2.27 Phase 5 IDP Plan Components water and wetlands. When used in conjunction required Table of Contents sections providing daylight and views for building occupants Areas (JEB Little Creek Fort Story and NAVBASE

Low with proper site design and pollution prevention • innovation and design process. measures, lID becomes a powerful tool in thatCoronado). should be completed as part of protecting the environment. The DoN’s lID policy • Storage - Aggressive (S-A) Refine/reduce TOA to “…sets a goal of no net increase in storm water Phase 5. See Appendix A for the full volume and sediment or nutrient loading from reduce requirement. Easy Moderatemajor renovation and constructionDifficult projects.” The policy directs bases to consider lID in the IDP• Training Table - ofAggressive Contents. (T-A) ConsolidatedOutputs fromtraining Executiondesign of all projects. requirements. Centrally manage and schedule Figure 5-13 Overall COAs Impact Analysis Summary each phase should align with the Legend training assets at the Echelon III level. Theme: H = HQ/Admin/Ops M = Maintenance S = Storage T = Training requirements• Waterfront Ops for- Progressive transferring (W-T) Construct/ plan data W = Waterfront Ops renovate berthing. COA: T = Traditional P = ProgressivePreserve natural A = vegetation Aggressive seamlessly into the iNSIPP. Natural drainage Table 5-8 COAs Impact RainAnalysis garden Summary by Theme Theme Type Course of Action In summary, theExecution Concept submittalBenefit T Execute existing projects Difficult Medium - High HQ/Admin/ shall include a draft of the following P Right-size, share, multipurpose Moderate Medium - High Ops A Conduct highest and best use analysis sections: Moderate – Difficult High T Execute existing projects Difficult Medium - High Maintenance P Fully implement ESU for all ECH IV commands Moderate High Reduce hardscape 1.0 Introduction A Use outsourcing, JIT, reach-back Porous pavement Moderate – Difficult High T Execute existingAmended soilprojects Bioretention cell 2.0 Strategic PlanningDifficult GuidanceMedium for official use only for Grassy swale | Storage P Refine BFRs, SMG Analysis, Consolidated Distribution and OperationalEasy DriversMedium - High A Refine TOA, form SMG, use more consolidated distribution, use JIT Moderate – Difficult High july 2009 july |

T Execute existing projects 3.0 Planning OpportunitiesDifficult andMedium - High

final Alternative I Training P Multipurpose and leveraged assets across units Constraints Easy Medium

NWS yorktoWN master plan A Consolidated training requirementsdevelopmeNt plaN section 3-49 Moderate – Difficult High T Construct/renovate berthing at NSA Bahrain 4.0 Planning AnalysisModerate and COAHigh

Waterfront Expansion Expansion .V ]`Q]QVR]C:JJ1J$:HQJ]`VVJ VR1J .1H.:] V``V]RP Partner for joint/shared .V`VI:1J1J$RVH1 Q`55 ­‡^ ]V`HVJ $:]_1 berthing space and ancillary facilities Priorities Easy Medium - High `VVJ  .V]`V`V``VRQC%QJ`Q` ;H.VCQJQII:JR8Ops :RR`VVRG7Š‰ :HQJ11 .:‰Š1J0V IVJ $  .VV]C:JJ1J$:HQJ:RR`V Q`:$VRVH1 : 1J :CC:R109 Š1CC1QJ8 .1$`Q%]Q`:HQJ1JHC%RV .QVV :GC1.VRŠ‰  QJ:H`QV1$. V$1QJ8 .V`V:`V 1QHQIIQJ .VIV:`VA Maximum build-out .: :RR`V1:`V.Q%V:JR Q`:$V:JR:`VH%``VJ C7C1 VRQJ for full acquisition (Global) Difficult High :RR`VVRG7 .V]C:JJ1J$:HQJ8 ;1J V$`: VR]`1Q`1 7C1 G% .:0V7V  QGV]`Q$`:IIVR2186 5.0 Installation Development Plan  VH1 1JGQ: :JR­ Q`:$V:`V .VIQ HQIIQJ Q``%JRVR8Š‰ :HQJ1RVJVR:> ™ ?:`VJV1Š‰  H:]:G1C1 7$:]8 :HQJ .: .:0VJQ GVVJ]`V01Q%C7]`Q]QVR:JR:`VJQ 101  € %J1 HQJJ%V QV0QC0V51:`V.Q%V:JR Q`:$V H%``VJ C7QJ ;1J V$`: VR]`1Q`1 7C1 8 (vision plan only) 1J``: `%H %`VI% GV:R:] :GCV QIVV `% %`VJVVR: 1VCC:H%``VJ JVVR8 %`1J$ .V­QC%QJQ`@.Q]:0:`1V 7Q`]C:JJ1J$:HQJ Q]QJ1V`V1RVJVR8Š:J7Q` .VQ]QJR1H%VR]`Q01RVR .1 %R71RVJVR: Q :CQ`  5 ­‡.Q` :JRI1RR V`I 1J V`1IQC%QJ:JRQ .V`:C V`J:0V8CI: VC75 .VQJC7 64]C:JJ1J$:HQJ5:VVJ1J‡1$%`V8 8 .VVI: VRQ%$.NAVY EXPEDITIONARY COMBAT:HQJ .: 1Q%CRIVV  .V`V_%1`VIVJ `V%C VR1J:JV1 ENTERPRISE GSIP DRAFT ‰`RV`Q`Š:$J1 %RV^‰Š_1J0V IVJ Q` .VV]C:JJ1J$:HQJ `QQ ]`1J 01:Š‰ R%V Q .VC:H@Q`:0:1C:G1C1 7Q`V61J$ 1$Š1CC1QJ8 .V.Q`  QI1RR V`I]C:JJ1J$:HQJ:RR`V :V 8€C .Q%$.Š‰ 1JQ  .V]`V`V``VR:C V`J:0V51 1For Offi cial UseAdditional Only outputs should include  ]V`HVJ Q` .VQ0V`:CC  Q`:$VRVH1 11 .Q%  .V%VQ` :JH1]: VR .: QIV]`Q]QVRŠ‰ :HQJI:7GVI1$: VR Š‰ :HQJ5Q .V` .:J .QVH%``VJ C7%JRV`HQJ `%HQJ8 .`Q%$.:C V`J:0V .: 1V`VJQ :0:1C:GCV:  .VIVQ` .1 .VV:HQJ1JHC%RVGQ .H.:J$V1J .VG%1JV`%CV:JR  %R78 11CCHQJJ%V Q]:` JV`11 .V$1QJ:C:JRJ :CC:R Legend meeting notes from the COA Concept .VHQJJ%VR%VQ`V61J$`:H1C1V .: `VR%HV .V`V_%1`VR QJ]C:JJV` Q1RVJ`7:C V`J:0V QŠ‰ 8 1J0V IVJ 8QJQC1R:QJ5`VJQ0:QJ5]VH1:C]`Q=VH 5:JR ŠQ]QJ:`V:CQ`V]`VVJ VR1J .1$`Q%]8 Workshop and the preparation of an Outbrief documenting the outcome Š
˜‰ 

‹Œ  €  ‚€Ž‘Š’€ ˜“”‡” of the COAs Concept Workshop and 
identification of a Preferred COA or 


ˆ‰Š ‹Œ  €  ‚€Ž‘
€ Plan. It should also be noted that Š’“”‡” 
with the deployment of iNSIPP all 


major COAs developed during the   




planning process will be captured and Naval Base 2035 Vision | 15   €„   •„  

ƒ    ­€ € ‚ € ‚ € ‚ made available for review or use by    ‚ ­„   †‡

ƒ •‹– ‹‚ ‚ ‹­­€ — installation and region planners in the

‡1$%`V8 L—`Q]QVR—C:JJ1J$€HQJG7 7]V:JR 1I1J$ future.

       

28 • INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE FINAL FIGURE 4.3: SITE ANALYSIS

LEGEND Gateways/Entrances

Pedestrian Crossing Concerns Pedestrian/Automobile Con ict Areas

Parking Concerns Congested Route

Truck Route Primary Street

Secondary Street Tertiary Street Obstructed View

CATCODES

100 Ops and Training 200 & 800 Public Works and Utilities

200 Maintenance and Production

400 Ammunition

400 Supply 500 Hospital and Medical

600 Administration 700 Housing/BEQ/Mess

700 MWR and Recreation

700 Other Community Support Undeveloped

FINAL INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENTNAS PLAN JA CONSISTENCYCKSO GUIDE N VILLE• 29 MASTER PLAN

SCALE IN FEET 0 700 1400 2100

DECEMBER 2009 2.0 IDP Process Phase 6: Develop Preferred Plan

Objectives • Is the plan implementable and responsive to fiscal realities? PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 PHASE 5 PHASE 6 The PreferredPHA PlanSE represents 7 the NITC to certify, preferred COA to achieve optimum load, program, Inputs + Supporting Tools Plan Collect Data & Analyze Analyze Develop Develop use of existingPlan facilities, disposition Initiation Develop Vision Existing Data Capability Gaps Alternative COAs Preferredtest and readyPlan for Execution global launch of surplus facilities, and satisfaction The Preferred Plan is derived from of deficiencies in an effort to satisfy direction received from installation Develop Concepts, mission requirements. The Preferred leadership and key stakeholders Plan Initiation & Collect & Inventory Analyze Facility Perform Analysis to Alternatives & Course of Develop Plan should enhanceObtain the installation during the COA Concept Workshop. Management Plan Relevant Data Condition, Configuration, & Determine Gross Capability Actions (COAs ) to Rectify Preferred IDP mission andIDP provide Approval needed capacity It responds to existing conditions Capacity Gaps and flexibility for future requirements. (Requirements less Existing Priority Capability Gaps and analyses findings from prior Kick Off • Real Property The Preferred Plan covers the entire Assets = Gross Gaps) phases and addresses established Meeting • Infrastructure installation and provides the basis for Analyze Infrastructure Prepare Provide IDP Maintenance priorities formulated during the COA • Facilities Establish Key more detailed elements including area Condition, Configuration, & Development Plan & Enhancements development process. • Operations Investment Drivers Define Installation Mission, Capacity Determine Net Capability development plan(s), planning design Vision, Goals & Objectives • Known Existing & Gaps standards, and capital investment Methods Future Projects (Gross gaps less Approved Prepare programsProvide that are Annual part Reviewof the Final IDP • Mission Requirements Define COA Planning Analyze Transportation & pipeline projects = Net Gaps) Supporting Plans deliverable.of Development Figure 2.28 illustratesPlan the Development of the Preferred Plan will Review Strategic Guidance, • Current & Future Actions Circulation Networks Traditional, Progressive, gereral process diagram for Phase 6. occur through iterative refinement of Policies & Strategies Personnel & Aggressive preferred COA elements and founded Equipment Loading Perform Impact Analysis, Prepare Investment Key QuestionsEnhance to IDP Address Data by during on the desired planning principles and • Existing Plans & Risk Assessment & Gap Prepare Combined Constraints Strategy, Priorities & Phase 6 Executing Follow on strategies defined previously. A review Identify Key Planning Drivers, Studies Prioritization & Opportunities Maps Identify Capital Investment Plan Studies as Needed process will ensure the Preferred Plan Principles & Business Rules • Adjacent Community Non-Facility Solutions • Does the Preferred Plan support the addresses the necessary requirements Information Gap Analysis installationProvide vision and for a goals? of the IDP Table of Contents and is Analyze Mission Review & Prepare Define Relevant DoD & Navy Prioritization Comprehensive IDP consistent with the requirements for Requirements & Loading Phasing Plan • Does the Preferred Plan meet all of Initiatives Meeting Identify Policy Change transferring plan data seamlessly into Identify & Rectify Changes the statedUpdate requirements? every 5 Years Data Gaps Recommendations iNSIPP. The Preferred Plan will focus Prepare Prioritized • Does the Preferred Plan address the on installation-wide components and Assess Functional Identify Relevant Future Capability Gap Matrix Prepare gaps identifies in Phase 4? will include ADPs (if applicable) for Relationships & Land Use Trends & Areas of Influence Perform Site Visit & Interview Design Guidelines • What policy changes are needed to defined districts, which will be reflected Key Stakeholder to Assess Compatibilities Develop Draft support the Preferred Plan? through appropriately scaled outputs. Existing Situation & to Investment Strategy Pre-Final • What rough order of magnitude Identify Envisioned Changes Comments Assess Internal & Meeting (ROM) level of investment is The Preferred Plan will be consistent External Encroachment Concept with the installation vision, goals and Data Review / Workshop associated with the Preferred Plan? objectives which will be reflected Data Gap Prepare & Submit Final Plan • What acquisition options are Meeting This Phase is through installation-wide outputs like Concept with Supporting Materials available toto execute be developed the inprojects and Assess Access, Out Brief an illustrative, framework plan, land solutions identifiedfuture versions in the of Preferred IDP Security & AT/FP the Guide. Vision Session Plan - MILCON? Special Projects? use plan, circulation and parking plan and utility network plan. Installation Final Brief Other People’s Money (OPM)? Assess Compliance with design standards will be addressed at • What is the annual estimated average the installation level in a diagrammatic Sustainability & financial spend rate for each funding Environmental Mandates D E L I V E R A B L E S D E L I V E R A B L E S form due to scale and should category for the installation over the reference existing available approved past five years? Is it projected to design guidelines from Installation change? Appearance Plans (IAP) or Base Concept Draft Pre-Final Final • Does the plan contain or implement Exterior Architecture Plans (BEAP). sound planning principles and Figure 2.28 Phase 6 Process Diagram strategies such as those defined in Navy and DOD master planning guidance?

30 • INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE FINAL

IDP Consistency Guide | July 2013 | Working Draft

Intranet NAVY SHORE INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING PLATFORM 2.0 IDP Process

Applicable ADPs will support the • Mission-focused Planning overall installation vision and goals • Program-based Planning and will provide a more detailed level Area Development Plan • Sustainable Planning of planning for a specific area or site. The Installation Development Plan provides (See Figure 2.29.) While areas covered • Natural, Historic and Cultural broad planning direction at a installation- through an ADP may have a focused Resource Management wide high level. In contrast, the Area vision that requires specific planning • Healthy Community Planning Development Plan (ADP) shows the goals and objectives for the area’s proposed development of a planning district • Defensible and Safety Planning or geographic areas on an installation at mission, alignment with the overall • Capacity Planning a smaller scale illustrating proposed site installation vision is retained. ADPs development in finer detail. Usually, ADPs will include a similar list of outputs as • District/Area Small Scale are holistic in scope, unified by function the overall installation plan along with Form-based Planning or architectural character. Some examples a regulating plan that guides specific • Utilities Network Planning include an airfield, a waterfront, a sailor and construction and design standards family support area, or an administrative that are relevant at a site-level scale. • Circulation Network Planning area. Planning and design standards • Facility Planning and Design provided in the IDP, Installation Standards Appearance Plan (IAP) or Base Exterior The Development Program or Capital Architecture Plan (BEAP) should be used Investment Plan (CIP) will address to guide proposed development. The all installation short, mid- and long- The application of these planning ADP should show both short-term and range recommendations to provide strategies will depend on the mission, long-range development. In all cases, the a comprehensive understanding of functional requirements, location, ADP presents much of its data through graphics. Each ADP will be described with the overall development program and and physical configuration of an phasing plan. The CIP will integrate an Illustrative Plan, Regulating Plan, and a installation and its associated planning Phasing Plan as appropriate. all ADP program summaries as well districts. There may be installations to ensure consistency at both the in which several of these planning installation and area/site level. strategies are not appropriate or Figure 2.29 ADP Description applicable. Figure 2.30 provides a Outputs notional matrix of the applicability of the various master planningDEGREE OF strategies APPLICABILITY TO INSTALLATION-WIDE MASTER PLANS - IDPs The Final Plan or IDP should focus to the shore capability areas. Red SHORE CAPABILITY AREAS first and foremost on providing land, indicates a high applicability, orange a infrastructure, and facilities to maintain medium applicability and yellow a low or enhance the mission readiness of applicability. our nation’s warfighters and those that support them through efficient, Utilities Waterfront Operations Training Support RDTA&E Sailor/Family Support Ordnance/Weapons Ops Expeditionary Ops C5ISR Ops Maintenance Base Support innovative and fiscally responsive KEY INSTALLATION MASTER PLANNING STRATEGIES Airfield Ops solutions. The IDP should be 1 Mission-Focused Planning HMHHHHHMHMH developed using sound and applicable 2 Program-based Planning HMHHHHHMHMH 3 Sustainable Planning LHMMM LMH LML planning strategies that reinforce the 4 Natural, Historic and Cultural Resource Management LHLLLLLHMML installations capability to support the 5 Healthy Community Planning LHLLLLLHLLL warfighters defense mission, promote 6 Defensible and Safety Planning HHHHHHHHHMH quality of life, and as stewards of 7 Capacity Planning HMHMHHHMHHH 8 District/Area Small Scale Form-base Planning LMLLLL LMLLL the shore installation, enhance 9 Circulation Network Planning MHMMMMMHM LM sustainability and environmental 10 Utilities Network Planning MHMMMMMMMHM viability. 11 Facility Planning and Design Standards LHLLLLLHLLL

H High degree of applicability The following planning strategies M Medium degree of applicability should be used to the extent feasible L Low degree of applicability and possible in crafting the IDP: Figure 2.30 Degree of Applicability of Master Planning Strategies to the CNIC Shore Capability Areas

FINAL INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE • 31 The key products that comprise the Final IDP, as defined in this Guide, and the IDP Table of Contents are described below:

1. Executive Summary This is a summary of the main proposals resulting from the IDP planning process. The intended audience is at the Flag Officer level, including Base Commanders, Tenant Commanders, Regional Commanders and other Navy leadership with interest in the development and long-term future of the installation. The format and length can vary as appropriate. Because of iNSIPP requirements affecting production of the IDP document itself, a desk-top published 8 ½’ x 11” brochure format can be helpful to graphically show the IDP as an attractive, stand-alone, printed piece. At a minimum, the

Executive Summary should show the installation-wide Illustrative Plan, key EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ADPs as relevant, and a summary of the proposed development program for the installation. 110 2. Vision Plan The Vision Plan is a summary statement capturing the overall development vision for the base. This can be graphically illustrated or articulated as VISION text (short and to the point) reflecting all input received in the visioning session conducted as Phase 2 of the IDP planning process. If desired, other components of the process can be combined under the Vision Plan to include but not limited to: opportunity and constraints mapping, a

developable area map resulting from the constraints analysis, a framework 2035 plan for the installation, and a future development plan documenting existing planned projects at the installation as recorded in iNFADS or other relevant Navy databases.

VIP Streetscape Improvements

3. Illustrative Plan Gate 4 and NEX Parking Lot NEX Lodge Improvements (P459) Expansion (PXXX) Administrative Facility/Post Offi ce (P466)

Permanent Party BQ Dental/Medical (P946) Repairs to Bldg 346 Clinic (P100V/ (P487) The installation Illustrative Plan is the long-term development plan for the P452) Transient BQ (P478) Coddington Naval Justice School VIP Streetscape Renovations (P455) Improvements Point

base showing all proposed physical improvements. The detail shown in this OTC Quarters NSCS (P101V) Visitor Center/Pass & ID/ NAVSTA Museum (P865) (P451) Proposed for Excess

Training Pool (P370)

Bldg 1112 Renovation plan can vary depending on the scale of the installation. Ideally, all future (P101V)

Brett Hall Vehicular Renovation buildings, runways and other aviation-related facilities, piers and waterfront Bridge (P339) PXXX NHCNE SEA Renovations (P482)

Relocate NAPS HQ (P485) A/C 18 Classrooms (P489)

facilities, training facilities and ranges, roads, parking, major landscape Fitness Facility (P347)

Central Pedestrian Green Space/ Recreation Pedestrian-only Street Pedestrian 1164 Campus Naturalized improvements and other physical development as relevant should be Buffer Areas Galley Addition (P481) Regulation-size Baseball Field Figure 3.6 114 OTC Quarters (P452) Potential Reuse Naval Station Newport Construct of Bldg 1164 52 NWC Running Trail Recap Illustrative Master Plan (P488) illustrated. A less detailed graphic illustration for larger installations can Drill Hall Addition/ CSS (P104V) Renovation (P480) NWC Recap Main Base Legend Coasters Harbor (map 1 of 2) New Construction Centralized/Additional Parking Island Coasters Harbor Island & Coddington Point International Forum (P479) (Potential Incorporation of be appropriate with the area plans as the better scale for more detailed Schonland Hall (Bldg 52) NAVSTANAVSTA Newport FacilitFacilityy Master Plan FINAL JulJulyy 20020088 DEVELOPMENTDEVELOPMENT PLAPLANN / CHACHAPTERPTER TTHREEHREE 43-21 rendering(s). In some cases, illustrative plans will only be prepared for selected planning districts or areas within the installation where the scale or nature of the installation does not lend itself to a single drawing. In other cases, the individual area plans can be combined to create a single installation-wide Illustrative Plan. In all cases, the Illustrative Plan should reflect the documented installation vision and represent the preferred COA resulting from Phase 6 of the planning process.

4. Planning Districts/Areas Plans A Planning District or Area Plan is prepared for each district or area defined in the Installation Framework Plan produced during Phase 2 of the planning process. The Framework Plan divides the installation into discrete districts or areas (for the purposes of this Consistency Guide, these terms are

32 • INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE FINAL interchangeable) based on geography, key transportation systems, existing land use patterns or other defined boundaries as agreed to by all parties involved in the process. The Area Development Plan (ADP) is a detailed illustrative plan for the districts that deserve this level of detail showing all proposed improvements as described above. Additional graphics, renderings, and ‘sketch-up’ perspective drawings can also be included as appropriate or desired by planning staff or base leadership.

Patuxent River 5. Land Use Plan An installation-level Land Use Plan serves as the ‘zoning’ map for the installation. This plan depicts varying uses proposed on the installation Test Pilot School & Other RDAT&E Atlantic Test Range Rotary Wing (compared to existing land use prepared in Phase 3) providing Patrol & Recon Gate 1 Center of Excellence Center of & AVMI Excellence Work ITTCluster / Eng recommended locations for all future development types. To encourage

Admin / IPT UAS Center of Command / Excellence & Aircraft Base Support / IPT Carrier Landing Systems Admin vertically and horizontally mixed uses or types of development (for example,

Research, Engineering, APZ I Ground Test & Gate 2 Prototype Work Cluster combined administrative and personnel support functions and buildings), a Tactical Center of Excellence

Chesapeake Bay ‘mixed use’ zone can be used in this plan. Otherwise, the plan designates Gate 3 where like uses should be located when considering future facility siting to encourage a logical, development pattern that avoids locating incompatible

NAVAL WEAPONS STATION EARLE MASTER PLAN uses in close proximity.

34 Figure 2 Future Land Use Plan for NAS Patuxent River Legend SAIPAN RD Restricted Area AlCUZ and Airfield Safety Zones

AIPAN RD EN DR S Mission Complex GRE 6. Regulating Plan (ADPs only) GELA RD Mission Cluster Open Space / PreservationLegend Family & Bachelor Housing MACASSAR RD Installation Area Industrial Complex A Regulating Plan provides information on the type, form and scale of Existing Structure Utilities Installation Roads Storage Railroad Town Center buildings recommended for individual building parcels comprising the area Streams

BURMA RD Temporary Lodging GELA RD ESQD Arc Construct Recreational Uses Port Operations Primary Growth Boundary Boat House / TARAWA RD CORAL RD Laydown development plan. This plan is typically done at the smaller, district or area Regulating Plan

Building Frontage Building Types Administration scale because of the detailed site-specific information it contains. It also is Industrial

Mixed-Use Naval Base 2035 Vision | 11 Recreation more appropriate for certain districts or areas (e.g., base ‘town centers’,

MEMORIAL DR Key Entrances Parking Areas administrative or housing areas, training campuses, community/personnel ESPERANCE RD support areas, etc.) and not as appropriate for others (e.g., airfields,

ROAD T-1

ROAD T-3 BLANDY DR waterfronts, ranges, ordnance storage areas, etc). The Regulating Plan

LAKE EARLE RD

34 ROAD T-6

AD T-4 ROAD T-5 RO can include build-to lines, minimum and maximum building heights, key Figure 4.10 Mainside Cantonment Area Primary Circulation 0 175 350 700 1,050 Metro Station South Capitol Street Regulating Plan Feet Gate Access Secondary Circulation Bus Stop I-295 entry locations, proposed use, parking and roadway configurations. This Tertiary Circulation Planned Streetcar Line Marina Access CSX Rail Easement or Ownership Proposed Streetcar Line Installation Boundary plan is typically an important building block in developing the proposed

ADP describedNORTH above. Its genesis comes from the ‘Form-Based Code’ Reagan National Airport N methodology used in the civilian planning arena and a major focus of

current planning guidance in UFC 2-100-01, Installation Master Planning. E R I V P O T O M A C R East 7. CirculationPotomac and Parking Plan Naval Park Research Laboratory Hains Point The Circulation and Parking Plan is a key network plan to show existing and proposed transportation systems on the installation. This plan can be done

Bellevue Angell St.

Tinker StreetBX Fortas McNair a combined plan or separate plans for the different types of circulation §¨¦¦295 Chappie James Blvd.

South MacDill Blvd. Gate Luke Avenue comprising the transportation network: vehicular, pedestrian, bicycle, and

Castle Avenue 2 McChord St. Duncan Avenue 1Brookley Avenue HMX-1 DIA transit, as relevant, depending on the scale and level of detail desired. The Defense Blvd. A N A C

entranceO gates are another important feature, as well as links to the outside DIA Access Rd. S T I Brookley Avenue A R Arnold I 295 V §¨¦¦ Gate South Capitol Street streetE R network and sidewalk and pedestrian/bike paths, if any. For some South Gate Thomas Road Mitscher Road

Arnold Gate North installations,North the parking areas should include parking numbers to account Gate Gate Firth Sterling Gate Navy Yard §¨¦¦295 2000ft Walking Radius Ave. Malcolm X Firth Sterlingfor all required parking where this is a particular issue. This plan can also Gate Anacostia To Congress Heights Metro To Anacostia Metro Poplar St. Elizabeths link to Pointrecommended streetscape treatment included in the Installation Congress 11th St. Bridge Metro Green Line Heights 0 1250 Figure 2.7 Existing Access, Circulation and Transit Design Standards (or IAP or BEAP). Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling Master Plan Chapter 2 Existing Conditions / 25

FINAL INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE • 33 8. Green Infrastructure Plan The Green Infrastructure Plan depicts all existing and proposed open space elements on the installation, including parks, wetlands, riparian corridors, water bodies and other natural features comprising the installations open space system. This plan can vary depending on the scale of the installation. The intent is to plan for open space areas that thread through developed areas forming ecological, social functions, or buffers to land uses requiring separation. Green infrastructure naturally manages stormwater, reduces flooding risk and improves water quality. In addition to identifying major green infrastructure elements at an installation-wide planning level, green infrastructure is an important concept at the more detailed planning level as well since it reflects a more sustainable development pattern where open spaces are integral parts of the installation plan, potentially enjoyed

by installation residents and employees or servingTable 25 Existing to naturally Building Energy Packages manage in Scenario 2 and

filter storm water, reducing risk to flooding and improving water quality,Existing or Building to Packages from External Packages from Integration Model protect environmental habitat and promote other ecological benefits forEnergy the Core System Model No Change Package B Package C Package B + D Ext ECM 1 & 2 Ext ECM 2 Ext ECM 2 & 3 Ext ECM 3 long-term. Package Descriptions No Change High Upgrade High Efficiency Retrofit Implement Implement Upgrade to ( left as Efficiency to high T5 lighting building with a Retro- a Retro- Ground souce Existing T5 lighting efficiency fixtures condensing Commissioning Commissioning Heat pumps 9. Primary Utility Network Summary Plans Condition) fixtures gas boiler (requires boiler Program for the Program for the (requires plant on whole fixture + Implement building building+ whole fixture each building replacement) Retro- Upgrade to Utility Plans are another important network plan that show existingreplacement) and (where including the Commissioning Ground Source including the applicable) provision of Heat Pumps future utilities systems supporting all proposed development on theprovision of for space occupancy and occupancy and hot lighting controls installation. Primary utilities include water, wastewater, storm sewer,and lighting water heating + electricity, natural gas, steam, compressed air, and telephone andcontrols cable systems Solar Hot Water # Facilities Applied* 229 8 10 19 4 10 5 2 systems. These plans should include transmissionGFA Affected and distribution1,929,293 415,634 lines, 204,663 584,878 373,195 521,985 105,639 43,313 Energy Efficiency as well as all structures that support these systems such as 0.0%transformers, -8.3% -22.0% -15.8% -10.5% -14.0% -39.4% -11.0% Improved cell towers, power plants, dams, wells, treatmentAdditional plants, Capital Cost and $0other $2,878,277 utility- $467,353 $3,742,885 $1,040,929 $260,566 $1,109,878 $105,411 Additional Annual related facilities. In addition, the network plans should show $0all alternative $55,695 $0 $52,501 $38,500 $20,444 -$6,160 -$1,045 Maintenance energy facilities and sites such as solar farms, Annualwind Utility turbines,Savings $0 and any -$57,736 other -$75,010 -$111,255 -$123,318 -$121,696 -$52,666 -$3,173 Baseline Payback (yrs) Development 49.9 6.2 33.6Results & 8.4Sustainability 2.1 21.1 33.2 Introduction Mandates & Core Systems GAMEBOARD renewable energy features. These plansEvaluation can be preparedProgram as combined or Analysis Report *See Technical Appendix for a complete list of the facilities with ECMs applied in Scenario 2. separate maps and depend on available data collectedSSIM JEB Little Creekin ‐Phase Fort Story (West) 3 Sustainability Model of the planning process. Scenario Summary by Facility Scenario Summary by Package Scenario Prioritization Cost Analysis Figure 20 Location of ExistingFACILITY Buildings REVIEW with PackagesCONSOLE Applied in Scenario 2

Facility Summary Facility Map Update Map

10. SustainabilitySelect Development Facility by ID SummaryCB310 Plan ECM Package GFA % of Tot GFA # Fac Freeform 124 Best 0 0.0% 0 The SustainabilityFacility Name DevelopmentPHIBCB2 HQ. Summary Plan describes the alternative Better 584,878 11.3% 19 Type Office energy and otherGFA (sf) sustainable33,420 facilities and programs that will be developed Good 620,297 12.0% 18 Occupancy 153 External ECMs 1,044,132 20.2% 35 as part of the long-termAge installation19 development program. This section Num Stories 2 Baseline (No Change) 2,178,090 42.0% 221 MDI 65

can vary in contentCondition and detail.85 In some cases, adaptive responses to Demolished 92,743 1.8% 18 PROGRAM SUSTAINABILITY INTEGRATED

climate changeFacility will Status be appropriate;Improved (Energy+Water) in others, renewable energy facilities 108 ECM Package Applied Good - (Option C) and systems areReference suitable Model to108-F create a more sustainable installation. Many ECM Package Description Upgrade to high efficiency gas boiler plant for space and hot water heating installations are moving towardssystems ‘net-zero’ installation goals and all improvements, new energy sources, conservation programs and other

Simulated Performance means to achievePost ECM Electricalthese Usage goals should571,400 be described in this section of the Post ECM Natural Gas Usage 231,737 IDP. Other sustainabilityPost ECM Steam Usage targets or goals,0 such as Executive Order 13423, Post ECM Renewable Energy 0 Federal LeadershipExpected Energy in Efficiency Environmental,19% Energy and Economic Performance Water Package Applied Best and other FederalExpected Watermandates Efficiency or regulations,26% should also be addressed. Referencing otherCBSB Participant existing sustainableyes plans or documents can also be HPSB Eligible no

appropriate sinceROM Sustainability extensive Capital Cost work $166,226on this subject is done outside the context ROM Utility Savings/Yr $14,429 of master planningROM Simple Payback(for (Yrs)example, as12 engineering reports by the public works

Override ECM Setting ECM Package GFA % of Tot GFA # Fac department). Best 0 0.0% 0 Select ECM Package Better Better 584,878 11.3% 19 Good 620,297 12.0% 18 Remove Override Change ECM Setting External ECMs 1,044,132 20.2% 35 Baseline (No Change) 2,178,090 42.0% 221 Demolished 92,743 1.8% 18 Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Fort Story (West) 33 207 34 • INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE FINAL Indoor Small Arms range transient P481 BQ PXXX Damage Control Fitness Center 11. Future Development Summary Plan trainer P925 PXXX Submarine Bridge team Simulator P137 The Future Development Summary Plan shows the sequencing of all

Potential Enhanced Use Lease MK48 torpedo proposed development. It is preferably one map or drawing, installation- Magazines Phases 2 and 3 PXXX MK48 torpedo wide, which prioritizes future development projects and includes all district/ Magazines Phase 1 Page 32/33 – Standards Example – from Earle Master Plan Draft PDF P848 area plan proposed development. A color-coded methodology could be Label: NEX renovation/ torpedo/tomahawk Consolidation Maintenance Facility Utility P989 Enhanced Use Lease used to depict the different phases of development in different increments, Earle MasterNSMrL Plan DRAFT FOR QA Aug27.pdf Addition Commissary rM001/002-07 (DECA) as relevant (e.g., short, mid and long-term). The planning timeframe can

BEQ P996 vary depending on the timeframe needed to execute the overall installation

Future Building Site NIoDEt vision. This plan is a summary plan or map; more detailed phasing PXXX Squadron hQ Submarine P858 Learning Center Security information is provided in the Development Program of the IDP (see below). hQ headquarters Flag/Senior Officer P478 Food PXXX housing Area Vendor PXXX

Parking Fire Station Garage P997 12. Installation-wide Planning and Design Standards

Pier 8 waterfront operations Small Inside Machine replacement Craft Facility Shop P194 P402 P189 Installation-wide Planning and Design Standards provide a basic set of

Pier 33 guidelines to achieve the base vision and planning objectives. This section replacement or Quay wall Berth Pier 32 Pier 31 Dive Locker replacement replacement P994 P898 P464 MILCON Projects Golf/All hands Chapel is intended to be brief and to the point; ideally an Installation Appearance Clubhouse Sub Group two Annex Ship’s PXXX headquarters P125 Figure 5.1 P850 Complement P193 Mast/Antenna Production SUBASE New London Maintenance Management Fuel Cell Plant Plan (IAP) or Base Exterior Architectural Plan (BEAP) is available and can Facility Facility PXXX P113 P190 Master Plan

Naval Submarine Base New London Master Plan FINAL January 2010 CaPitaL iMProvEMENtS PLaN / ChAPtEr FIVE 5-5 be referenced for recommended guidelines for base development and aesthetics. The standards, at a minimum, should address building, streets 4.2 Summary Projects List tions and funding sources are also listed for and parking, and landscape standards. If these standards differ for different The following project summary tables list each project in the table. Table 4-2 summarizes projects included in this RSIP and that support by funding sponsor the total project cost of the Rota Re-Cap. Table 4-1 lists all projects the RSIP project recommendations included in portions of the installation, then an overall summary will be appropriate and grouped according to the geographic areas the fi rst table. More detail on these projects is described in this chapter. Both the IMAP func- provided in Appendix A.8. planning/design standards provided at the district/area scale.

Table 4-1 RSIP Summary Project List PROJ AREA AREA COST AREA SPONSOR PROJECT DESCRIPTION NO M2 SF ($000) 13. Installation Development Program (Capital Investment Plan) AIR CNRE P-662 Air Operations Consolidation 10,594 114,050 $43,420 CNRE P-695 Construct Air Passenger Terminal/ 5,644 60,763 $26,779 The Installation Development Program is the same as the Capital Ramp Expansion CNRE P-XXX Construct Airfi eld Perimeter Fencing N/A N/A $1,775 Improvement Plan (CIP) in previous master planning terminology. This USAF P-661 Airfi eld Improvements N/A N/A $14,200 CNRE RX-XX Building 58 Seismic Rehabilitation N/A N/A $1,000 Development Program should list all programmed and unprogrammed PORT CNRE P-551 Consolidated Port Ops Complex 2,411 25,952 $21,040 NATO CP-13 Pier One Extension N/A N/A $51,000 projects included in the IDP (and all district/area plans). The Development NATO CP-13 Construct New Pier 4 N/A N/A $46,410 NATO CP-13 Upgrade Pier 2 N/A N/A $23,800 Program should also include project70 numbers (if available), order of NATO CP-13 Channel and Harbor Dredging N/A N/A $15,700 NATO CP-13 Pier 3 Repairs N/A N/A $12,400 magnitude costs, timeframe for development (e.g., short, mid and long-term NATO CP-13 Replacement of F-44 (JP-5) Pipeline N/A N/A $7,000 CNRE R21-01 Pier 1 Miscellaneous Repairs N/A N/A $5,300 or proposed year if available), and funding sources. Demolition projects CNRE RC8-04 Repair and Upgrade Harbor Water N/A N/A $800 System and their proposed timing should also be included. Funding program CNRE M18-04 Access Channel Maintenance/ N/A N/A $750 Dredging types include Military Construction(MILCON); Sustainment, Restoration CNRE C10-04 Pier 2 Saltwater Fire Suppression N/A N/A $513 System CNRE C7-04 Pier 2 Sewage Collection N/A N/A $375 & Modernization (SRM), and other special funding sources such as the DLA RX-XX Recoat Piping and Valves on Pier 3 N/A N/A $228 DLA CX-XX Install Remote Control Units on N/A N/A $164 Defense Commissary Agency (DeCA), Navy Exchange (NEX), etc. In Marine Loading Arms CORE CNRE P-648 Construct Consolidated Public 9,058 97,513 $38,259 addition and as appropriate, Public-Private Venture (PPV) and Enhanced Works Compound CNRE P-645 Consolidated Command Ops and 7,076 76,176 $32,700 Use Lease (EUL) projects should also be included. Support Facility CNRE P-510 QOL-1 Operational Training 4,506 48,513 $19,880 Facilities CNRE P-XXX Building 8 Seismic Rehabilitation N/A N/A $1,700 NAFCON P-XXX QOL-2 Rec Mall 4,417 47,551 $14,518 The Developement Phasing Summary Plan graphically depicts the NAFCON P-XXX Construct 3-Bay Car Wash Facility 287 3,088 $980 NEX/DeCA P-503 Construct Consol. NEX/Commissary 18,323 197,259 $42,625 Installation Development Program, over time, from its current state to the Fac./NEX Mini Mart & Gas Sta. NEX P-XXX Expand Navy Lodge 1,115 12,000 $3,123 final state shown on the Illustrative Plan. SOCOM P-802 Construct NSWU Operations Facility 6,967 75,000 $20,304 BUMED CX-XX Expand the Emergency Room 37 400 $200 CNRE RX-XX Building 55 Seismic Rehabilitation N/A N/A $5,600 14. Appendix The Appendix should include any supporting material used to develop the 4-28 CHAPTER FOUR NAVAL STATION ROTA OVERVIEW RSIP STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN FINAL IDP. These should be presented as separate appendices with dividers and do not require special formatting unless desired.

FINAL INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE • 35 Figure 2.31 identifies the required Table of Contents sections that Phase 6 IDP Plan Components should be completed as part of (See Appendix A for full IDP Table of Contents) Phase 6. At this stage of the IDP ES Executive Summary process the Concept Submittal from 5.2 Installation-wide Development Plan Phase 5 will be revised through two 5.2.1 Illustrative subsequent and additional submittals 5.2.2 Land Use Plan at the Draft and Pre-Final completion 5.2.3 Circulation and Parking Plan levels. Comments received during 5.2.4 Green Infrastructure each review cycle will be reviewed 5.2.5 Primary Utility Plans 5.2.6 Sustainability Development and reconciled satisfactorily before 5.2.7 Installation Future Development Plan Summary proceeding to the next level of 5.3 Area Development Plans submittal. 5.3.1 Area A 5.3.2 Area B In summary, the Draft and Pre-Final 5.4 Installation Planning and Design Standards submittals shall include all required 5.4.1 Building Envelope Standards information for sections one through 5.4.2 Street Standards 5.4.3 Site Planning Guidelines five of the IDP TOC as noted below. 5.4.4 Landscape Standards The Executive Summary should not be 5.4.5 Signage/Wayfinding Guidelines completed until the Pre-Final submittal. 5.4.6 Sustainability Guidelines 5.5 Installation Development Program (Capital Investment ES Executive Summary Plan) 1.0 Introduction 5.5.1 Short-range Development Program 2.0 Strategic Planning Guidance and 5.5.2 Mid-range Development Program 5.5.3 Long-range Development Program Operational Drivers 5.5.4 Development Phasing Summary Plan 3.0 Planning Opportunities and Constraints 4.0 Planning Analysis and COA Figure 2.31 Phase 6 IDP Plan Components Priorities 5.0 Installation Development Plan

In addition to the content sections noted for the Pre-Final, the Final submittal shall include supporting files and required source files as defined in the scope of work and the iNSIPP Content Guide (see Section 3.0). Outputs should align with the requirements for transferring plan data seamlessly into the iNSIPP.

36 • INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE FINAL CORE AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Aquatic Center MWR Rec Mall (Theater/Bowling) Operational Training Facility Center Library/Education Facility

Community Support Facility

Chapel

Command Ops Headquarters

Telephone Exchange

Command Command Personnel Support Human Resources Detachment Offi ce

Figure 4-19 Proposed Core Area Illustrative Plan

FINAL INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE • 37

4-18 CHAPTER FOUR NAVAL STATION ROTA OVERVIEW RSIP STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN FINAL Version for FINAL Guide – for individual processes Installation Development Plan (IDP) Process 2.0 IDP Process Phase 7: Plan Execution

ESTABLISH THE PLANNING BASELINE ANALYSIS PLAN STRATEGY & DEVELOPMENT Phase 7 is to be completed in the that a particular Region is expected next version of the Guide. to address to support overall Navy PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 PHASE 5 PHASE 6 PHASE 7 mission. NITC to certify, Objective Plan Collect Data & Analyze Analyze Develop Developload, program, Plan • SMIG will endorse RMIG planning PHASE test and ready for Initiation Develop Vision Existing Data Capability Gaps Alternative COAs Preferred Plan Execution The Installation Commanding and priorities, redirecting them as global launch required to integrate and balance Officer (ICO) of each installation is higher priorities. responsible for the preparation of the Develop Concepts, Plan Initiation & Collect & Inventory Analyze Facility Perform Analysis to IDP. The ICO will ensure alignment • SMIG will ensure Enterprise BOD Alternatives & Course of Develop Obtain Management Plan Relevant Data Condition, Configuration, & Determine Gross Capability with existing global and regional concerns are considered and Actions (COAs ) to Rectify Preferred IDP IDP Approval Capacity Gaps infrastructure plans and guidance. balance risk and requirements (Requirements less Existing Priority Capability Gaps across all WE/P mission areas. Kick Off • Real Property Key governance checks and balances Meeting • Infrastructure Assets = Gross Gaps) will occur through the Shore-Mission • SMIG will provide feedback to the Analyze Infrastructure Prepare Provide IDP Maintenance • Facilities Establish Key Integration Group (SMIG), Region- Enterprise BODs, RMIGs, WEFOs, Condition, Configuration, & Development Plan & Enhancements Define Installation Mission, • Operations Investment Drivers Mission Integration Group (RMIG), and and CNIC programs on decisions, Capacity Determine Net Capability Installation Mission Integration Group priorities and changes to Shore Vision, Goals & Objectives • Known Existing & Gaps Future Projects (IMIG). The Regional Commander (RC) objectives. (Gross gaps less Approved Prepare Provide Annual Review • Mission Requirements Define COA Planning shall establish installation planning Analyze Transportation & pipeline projects = Net Gaps) Actions Supporting Plans of Development Plan Review Strategic Guidance, • Current & Future boards to review and endorse RMIG Roles and Responsibilities Circulation Networks Traditional, Progressive, Policies & Strategies Personnel & installation master plans, which Aggressive shall be approved by the Regional Equipment Loading Perform Impact Analysis, Prepare Investment • Region RMIGs will integrate and Enhance IDP Data by Commander no less frequently than • Existing Plans & Risk Assessment & Gap Strategy, Priorities & prioritize installation requirements Identify Key Planning Drivers, Prepare Combined Constraints Executing Follow on every 5 years. Figure 2.32 illustrates Studies Prioritization Identify Capital Investment Plan Studies as Needed across a respective Region with Principles & Business Rules & Opportunities Maps the general process diagram for • Adjacent Community Non-Facility Solutions inputs from stakeholders. RMIGs Information Gap Analysis Phase 7. will evaluate capability gaps within Provide for a Review & Prepare their Regions and impact to other Define Relevant DoD & Navy Analyze Mission Requirements Prioritization Comprehensive IDP Phasing Plan Governance non-MILCON support products. Initiatives Meeting Identify Policy Change Identify & Rectify & Loading Changes Update every 5 Years RMIGs will evaluate any identified Recommendations Data Gaps The roles and responsibilities for the ‘available’ space and consolidation Prepare Prioritized SMIG and RMIG are described below. Assess Functional alternatives. Identify Relevant Future Trends Capability Gap Matrix Prepare Perform Site Visit & Interview Relationships & Land Use PRIMARY TASKS PRIMARY • RMIGs will oversee the development & Areas of Influence Design Guidelines SMIG Roles and Responsibilities Key Stakeholder to Assess Compatibilities Develop Draft of Regional Integration Plans Existing Situation & to Identify Investment Strategy (RIP) and Regionally Integrated Pre-Final • SMIG will use Department of the Envisioned Changes Mast Programs (RIMP). RIPs Assess Internal & Comments Navy (DON) guidance, including Meeting are envisioned as integrated External Encroachment Concept CNO Sailing Directions and Data Review / Workshop and executable multi-year facility Guidance, DON Objectives, Naval Data Gap investment programs that include Meeting Prepare & Submit Final Plan This Phase is Operations Concepts, Strategic Concept to be completed in operational concept improvements Out Brief with Supporting Materials Laydown decisions, and specific Assess Access, the next version of that span beyond the FYDP. RIPs IDP the Guide. programmatic guidance to interpret Vision Session Security & AT/FP should assist in identifying critical the vision and inform the field. In capability gaps, addressing Final Brief this construct, “field” is defined mission capability gaps and Assess Compliance with as Regions, service providers, infrastructure requirements, and Sustainability & Environmental CNIC Warfare Enterprise Flag D E L I V E R A B L E S D E L I V E R A B L E S informing investment decisions Mandates Officers (WEFOs) and Action at all levels within the Region to Officers (WEAOs), and Enterprise include Sustainment, Restoration, BODs. This includes identification and Modernization (SRM) funds, of priorities, establishment of Concept Draft Pre-Final Final MILCON funds, Non-MILCON funds, guidance, and infrastructure-related Non-Appropriated Fund (NAF) deliberative decisions. The SMIG projects, and other Alternative Figure 2.32 Phase 7 Process Diagram will dictate to RMIGs capability gaps FEEDBACK LOOP Funding Sources.

38 • INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE FINAL

IDP Consistency Guide | July 2013 | Working Draft

Intranet NAVY SHORE INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING PLATFORM 2.0 IDP Process

• Region RMIGs will conduct the • Periodicity of deliberations for the enterprise level planning analysis RMIG is envisioned to be at least within its domain. quarterly. The expanded scope of • Global Shore Infrastructure Plans the new RMIG process will require (GSIP) are envisioned to continue, additional time and attention. Initial however the format and deliverables standup of RMIG governance and are under review and are expected organizing a RIP will initially require to change to include WEFO meeting more often and probably an engagement based on capability extended offsite effort. gaps vice specific location desires. Key elements of the GSIP effort is to refresh and inform on capability gaps, now and in the foreseeable future (not specific location-centric).

FINAL INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE • 39 Page 32/33 – Historic Structure Example – from Great Lakes Master Plan Final PDF Label: Naval Station Great Lakes Historic Structures Example [ NAVSTA Great Lakes Master Plan 28 May 2010 FINAL.pdf ]

80 40 • INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE FINAL 3.0 Product & Content Development

Introduction

As of the writing of this Guide, iNSIPP is under development and has not been deployed to the NAVFAC planning community for use. It is intended that all IDPs will be loaded into iNSIPP once the website becomes available. To this end, the following information will be helpful in preparing plans until iNSIPP is available.

The development of IDP content for posting to the iNSIPP website is generally no different than developing a hard copy plan. One of the main differences is the page layout, style sheet and hyperlinks. The page layout of the IDP is simplified in its web form. The web does not allow for the layout and configuration alternatives that a desktop publishing and production application like Adobe InDesign provides. The style for fonts, labels, tables, etc., will be controlled by the iNSIPP web style format. The web version of the IDP will contain hyperlinks to add functionality and improve the user experience.

In addition to the full IDP being published on the iNSIPP website, it is expected that the IDP Executive Summary will be prepared using an application like Adobe InDesign and made available in a brochure-style hardcopy and PDF format for use in communicating and demonstrating the key master planning elements and strategic investment strategies of the IDP to executive and flag-level leadership.

Preparing Content for Posting to the Intranet Navy Shore Infrastructure Planning Platform (iNSIPP) Web Site

Document Components

Text: Text is prepared using MS Word. Prepare the document as required by the subject being addressed followed by a grammar and spelling check using the word processors native functions. Have the text reviewed by internal subject matter experts if required.

Tip: Keep the text formatting to a minimum.

Images: Images include photographs, charts, diagrams, graphics, map images, etc. that support the subject being addressed. All images should be referenced in the body of the text immediately preceding the image.

File Format: Do not use JPG file formats since the file degrades with each save action. Use lossless image file formats such as PNG or GIF to retain the exact image quality of the source image. TIFF file format may be used if the lossless method of compression is used.

Image Size: Size the image to fit the desired size within the web page. The recommended standard size is as follows: • Full width: 700 pixels wide • Half width: 350 pixels wide • Quarter width: 175 pixels wide Tip: It is highly recommended to keep multiple graphics on a page similar in height or width.

Tables: Tables present tabular information relevant to the plan. Tables should not be any wider than the size standards for images. The MS Excel source files for all tables should be located in the Tables folder. All tables should be referenced in the body of the text immediately preceding the table.

FINAL INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE • 41 the document. This is done by using the “Save As > Reduced Size PDF” function found under the “File” Adobe Acrobat menu. This reduced document will load faster and will require less storage space on the server.

Document Content Folders  Installation Name Tip: Keep the table formatting Exec clean Summary and simple.  Maps: Maps of all types are contained withinText most planning documents. Map documents can include PDFs  images and ArcGIS files. Users of theImages iNSIPP will typically be presented with three types of map file  links – 1) graphic image of the mapTables (follow the image standards), 2) a link to the PDF version of the  map (follow the PDF standards), andMaps 3) a link to the ArcGIS map service (this map will only launch if the user has a local version ArcGIS Reference loaded) Docs  1.0 Introduction Reference Docs: These are documents used to support Text the planning content. These include PDFs of DOD Instructions, Navy/NAVFAC Instructions, Installation Images Master Plans, Area Development Plans, Environmental Studies, etc. These documents areTables typically PDFs and should be reduced in size to the extent possible while maintaining the fidelity Maps of the document. This is done by using the “Save As > Reduced Size PDF” function found Reference under the Docs “File” Adobe Acrobat menu. This reduced document will load faster and will require less2.0 Strategicstorage Guidancespace on the server.  Text  Images Document Content Folders  Tables  Maps  Reference Docs Document Componentsthe document. This is done by3.0 using Stakeholder the “Save Guidance_Op As > Reduced Drivers Size PDF” function found under the “File” Adobe Acrobat Text menu. This reduced document will load faster Document componentsand willshould require be storedless storage in folders space to on helpImages the server.organize the data and to assist in posting to iNSIPP. The following folder structure is recommended for all plans: Tables

 Maps Document Content Folders  Reference Docs  Installation Name  4.0 Capability Gap Analysis  Exec Summary  Text  Text  Images  Images  Tables  Tables  Maps  Maps  Reference Docs  Reference Docs  5.0 Priorities_Impact Analysis  1.0 Introduction  Text  Text  Images  Images  Tables  Tables  Maps  Maps  Reference Docs  Reference Docs  6.0 Acronyms  2.0 Strategic Guidance  Text  Text  7.0 Appendices  Images  Reference Docs  Tables  Maps  Reference Docs 3 Appendix  3.0 Stakeholder Guidance_Op Drivers  Text  Images  Tables  Maps  Reference Docs  4.0 Capability Gap Analysis  Text 42 • INSTALLATION Images DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE FINAL  Tables  Maps  Reference Docs  5.0 Priorities_Impact Analysis  Text  Images  Tables  Maps  Reference Docs  6.0 Acronyms  Text  7.0 Appendices  Reference Docs

3 Appendix

 7.0 Appendices 7.0 Appendices  Reference Docs Reference Docs Content File Size and Name Size Constraints Content File Size andContent Name File Size Size Constraints and Name Size Constraints The file size of certain file types has been restricted in an effort to manage the web page loading time and the server The file size of certainThe file file types size ofhas certain been filerestricted types has in beenan effort restricted to manage in an effort the web to manage page loading the web time page loading time storage space requirements for the full potential of iNSIPP. The following are those restrictions: and the server storageand space the server requirements storage space for the requirements full potential for ofthe iNSIPP. full potential The following of iNSIPP. are The those following are those restrictions: restrictions: • File Name: <128 characters x File Name: <128 characters • Filex Size:File Name: <50 <128 megabytes characters x File Size: <50 xmegabytesFile Size: <50 megabytes

File Naming ConventionsFile Naming Conventions File Naming Conventions In order to provide for file organization and efficient file query functionality it is recommended that the In order to provide for file organization and efficient file query functionality it is recommended that the following file In order to provide forfollowing file organization file naming and convention efficient be file used: query functionality it is recommended that the namingfollowing convention file naming be used: convention be used: File/Document Name File/DocumentFile/Document Name Name x 3 Parts – Location, Title, Type x 3 Parts – Locationx , TitleExample:, Type Guam Main Base Land Use Plan Image x Example: GuamxMainLocations: Base Land SUBASE Use Plan NLON,Image Guam, NS Coronado, etc. x Locations: SUBASEx NLON,Document Guam, Types: NS Coronado,Photo, Chart, etc. Diagram, Map Image, PDF x Document Types: Photo, Chart, Diagram, Map Image, PDF

Unique iNSIPP Web Formatting Unique iNSIPP Web Formatting Unique iNSIPP Web Formatting Font Styles: 2.0 Page Title Page Title – System Generated (based on TOC) Font Styles: Font Styles: 2.0 Page TitleSECTION Page TITLE Title – SystemSection Generated Title – All(based Caps, on Arial, TOC) Bold, 12pt, Navy blue SECTION TITLEBody textSection Title – All BodyCaps, Text Arial, – Arial, Bold, 11pt, 12pt, Black Navy blue Body text Subsection Body Title Text – Arial,Subsection 11pt, Black Title – Arial, 11pt, Bold, Underline, Navy blue Subsection Title Subsection Title – Arial, 11pt, Bold, Underline, Navy Sub Subsectionblue Title Sub Subsection Title – Arial, Italic, 11pt, Navy blue Sub Subsection Title Sub Subsection Title – Arial, Italic, 11pt, Navy blue Captions: Captions for all content elements within the web document are generated based on the metadata provided in the document asset data form. Figures and tables will not Captions: Captions for all contentreceive elements numbers within as in a the typical web hard document copy document. are generated Only the based caption on title will be Captions: Captions for all content elements within the web document are generated based on the metadata the metadata provideddisplayed. in the document asset data form. Figures and tables will not providedreceive in thenumbers document as in aasset typical data hard form. copy Figures document. and tablesOnly the will caption not receive title will numbers be as in a typical hard copy document. Only the caption title will be displayed. Pagedisplayed. Layout: Page Layout: Single Column Page Layout: Pagination: Web documents are continuous on the screen and therefore do not have page Pagination: Web documents are continuousnumbers. on the screen and therefore do not have page numbers. Pagination: Web documents are continuous on the screen and therefore do not have page In-line References: Do notIn-linenumbers. put References: in-line document Do not referencesput in-line document to tables, references charts, images, to tables, maps, charts, etc. images, within maps, the body etc. within of the text. All referenced objectsthe body should of the be text. located All referenced near the textobjects that should is describing be located them. near Forthe example:text that is In-line References:“See DoTable not 3.12put in-line for an documentillustration references of the…” wouldto tables, become charts, “See images, the COAmaps, Prioritization etc. within Table for an illustration of the …” the body of the text. All referenced objects should be located near the text that is 4 Appendix

4 Appendix

FINAL INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE • 43 Page 44 Label = iNSIPP Screen Example

What’s New in V2 :

101

44 • INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE FINAL 4.0 Appendix

Appendix A – IDP Standard Table of Contents

Appendix B – Introducing iNSIPP

Appendix C – Strategic Guidance Resources

Appendix D – Typical Installation Data

Appendix E – Typical Off-installation Data Sources

Appendix F – Acronyms

FINAL INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE • APPENDIX TOC • 45 This page intentionally left blank.

46 • INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE FINAL Appendix A – IDP Standard Table of Contents

Installation Development Plan Consistency Guide IDP Standard Table of Contents 11/5/2013 Direct (D) or Implied MUST PLAN (I) Representation in HAVE NOTES PHASE Corresponding UFC Section Reference UFC High level summaries of sections 1‐4. Brief, ES Executive Summary tabular and use of info graphics where possible. ES 1 Introduction and Purpose X 6 ES 2 Installation Overview X 63‐5.1 D ES 3 Vision/Mission X 6 ES.3.1 Vision Statement X 63‐5.3 ES.3.2 Planning Goals and Objectives X 63‐5.4, 3‐5.5 ES.3.3 Strategic Planning Guidance and Operational Drivers Summary X 63‐5.1, 3‐5.6.1.1, I ES.3.4 Framework Plan ‐ Districts/Areas X 62‐7.1, 3‐5.8 D ES 4 Planning Analysis Summary X 6 ES.4.1 Facility and Infrastructure Gap Analysis X 6 ES.4.2 Developable Areas Summary X 62‐6, 3‐5.7 ES.4.3 Recommended Courses of Action (COAs) X 6 ES.4.4 Impact Analysis/Risk Assessment X 62‐5.1, 2‐5.1.1 D ES.4.4 Alignment with Stakeholder Strategic Guidance X 6 ES 5 Installation Development Plan X 6 ES.5.1 Installation‐wide Development Plan X 6 ES.5.1.1 Illustrative X 63‐6.4.1 D ES.5.1.2 Planning Districts/Framework Plan X 62‐7.1, 3‐5.8 D ES.5.1.3 Land Use Plan X 63‐6.4.2 ES.5.1.4 Sustainability Development X 6 ES.5.1.5 Summary Future Development Plan X 63‐5.9 D ES.5.2 Key Area Development Plan Summaries L 6 ES 7 Installation Development Program (Capital Investment Plan) X 63‐8 ES.7.1 Short‐Range Development Program X 63‐8 ES.7.2 Mid‐Range Development Program X 63‐8 ES.7.3 Long‐Range Development Program X 63‐8 ES.7.4 Development Phasing Plan X 63‐8

Overview of IDP project, installation 1.0 Introduction context, mission, and vision that guide the IDP recommendations. 1.1. Purpose X 1 1.1.1 Scope X 1 1.1.2 Methodology X 1 1.1.3 Schedule X 1 1.2. Background X 13‐5.1 1.2.1. Installation History X 13‐5.1 I 1.2.2 Population/Demographics X 13‐5.1, 3‐5.6.1.2, 3‐5.6.2.2 D 1.2.3 Infrastructure X 13‐5.6.1 D 1.2.4 Current Primary Tenants X 13‐5.1 D 1.2.5 Surrounding Community Context X 13‐5.6.2 D 1.3. Vision / Mission X 13‐5D 1.3.1 Overall Regional Vision / Mission X 13‐5.6.1.1 I 1.3.2 Installation Vision / Mission X 13‐5.1, 3‐5.2, 3‐5.3 D

Brief descriptions of guidance and drivers 2.0 Strategic Planning Guidance and Operational Drivers that have an influence on the installation and would direct and support the IDP. 2.1 DoD and Navy Guidance X 13‐5.6.1.1 D 2.1.1 Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) Guidance X 13‐5.6.1.1 I 2.1.2 CNIC Strategic Plan X 13‐5.6.1.1 I 2.1.3 NAV 2030 X 13‐5.6.1.1 I 2.1.4 Global Shore Infrastructure Plans (GSIP) X 13‐5.6.1.1 I 2.1.5 Regional Shore Infrastructure Plan (RIP) X 13‐5.6.1.1 I 2.1.6 Major Tenant Strategic Plans X 13‐5.6.1.1 I 2.1.7 Other Relevant DOD/Navy Instructions X 13‐5.6.1.1 I 2.2 Installation Planning Initiatives X 13‐5.1, 3‐5.6.1 I 2.3 Operational Drivers X 1/2 3‐5.1 I 2.3.1 New Platforms X 1/2 3‐5.1 I 2.3.2 New Mission / Realignments X 1/2 3‐5.6.1.1 I 2.3.3 GSIP Enterprise COAs X 13‐5.6.1.1 I 2.3.4 RIP COAs X 13‐5.6.1.1 I 2.4 Planning Guiding Principles and Drivers X 1/2 2.5 IDP Planning Assumptions X 1/2

FINAL INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE • APPENDIX A 47

1 Installation Development Plan Consistency Guide IDP Standard Table of Contents 11/5/2013 Direct (D) or Implied MUST PLAN (I) Representation in HAVE NOTES PHASE Corresponding UFC Section Reference UFC 3.0 Planning Opportunities and Contraints

3.1 Natural, Environmental and Cultural Constraints X 2 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2.3 D 3.1.1 Topography (Steep Slopes) X 23‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2.3 D 3.1.2 Hydrology (Wetlands) X 2 2‐2.16, 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2.3 D 3.1.3 Geology / Soils X 23‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2.3 D 3.1.4 Vegetation X 23‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2.3 D 3.1.5 Threatened and Endangered Species X 23‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2.3 D 3.1.6 Historical and Archeological X 2 2‐3.3, 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2.3 D 3.1.7 Climate and Environmental Influences L 23‐5.6.2.3 D 3.1.7.1 Climate Change L 23‐5.6.2.3 I 3.1.7.1.1 Stom Surge L 23‐5.6.2.3 I 3.1.7.1.2 Sea Level Rise L 23‐5.6.2.3 I 3.1.7.1.3 Flood Plain L 22‐2.16, 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2.3 D 3.1.7.2 Environmental Quality L 2 3.1.7.2.1 Greenhouse Gas Emissions L 2 3.1.7.2.2 Contaminated Soils / IR L 23‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2.3 I 3.1.8 Summary Natural/Environmental/Cultural Constraints X Map summarizing key contraints. 33‐5.6, 3‐5.6.1.3 D 3.2 Man‐Made / Operational Constraints X 23‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.1 D 3.2.1 AICUZ / RAICUZ / APZ X 23‐5.6.1 I 3.2.2 Existing Land Use Plan / Land Use Controls X 23‐5.6.1 D 3.2.3 Ordnance Transportation and Storage (ESQD) X 23‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.1 I 3.2.4 Small Arms Range Surface Danger Zones X 23‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.1 I 3.2.5 AT/FP X 22‐5.2 D 3.2.6 Electromagnetic Areas X 23‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.1 I 3.2.7 Enhanced Use Lease / PPV X 23‐5.6.1 I 3.2.8 Encroachment X 22‐3.2, 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.2 I 3.2.9 Summary Man‐Made/Operational Constraints X Map summarizing key contraints. 33‐5.6 D 3.3 Utility Networks L 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2 D 3.3.1 Energy ‐ Conventional L 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2 I 3.3.1.1 Electric L 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2 I 3.3.1.2 Natural Gas L 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2 I 3.3.1.3 Steam L 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2 I 3.3.1.4 Advanced Metering / Smart Energy Infrastructure L 2‐2.11.1, 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3 I 3.3.2 Energy ‐ Alternative L 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2 I 3.3.2.2 Wind L 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2 I 3.3.2.3 Solar L 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2 I 3.3.2.4 Hydro L 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2 I 3.3.2.5 Geothermal /Ground Source L 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2 I 3.3.2.6 Biomass L 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2 I 3.3.3 Fiber Optics/Cable L 22‐8.2, 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3 D 3.3.3.1 Communications Networks (phone, data) L 22‐8.2, 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3 D 3.3.3.2 Security L 22‐8.2, 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3 I 3.3.4 Storm Sewer L 23‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3 I 3.3.5 Waste Water L 23‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2 I 3.3.6 Water L 23‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2 I 3.3.7 Summary Utilities Network X Map(s) summarizing key contraints. 33‐5.6 D 3.4 Transportation/Circulation Networks X 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3 D 3.4.1 Easement and Rights‐of‐Way X 22‐2.6, 3‐5.6.1 I 3.4.2 Circulation and Parking X 22‐6.1, 3‐5.6.1 D 3.4.3 Sidewalks, Trails X 22‐4.1, 2‐4.2 D 3.4.4 Airfield Runways / Aprons / Taxiways X 23‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3 I 3.4.5 Piers / Wharves X 23‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3 I 3.4.6 Other Paved Areas X 23‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3 I 3.4.7 Federal Transit Services X 23‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3 I 3.4.8 Troop Movement Corridors X 23‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3 I 3.4.9 Summary Transporation/Circulation Networks X Map(s) summarizing key contraints. 33‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3 D 3.5 Developable Areas Map X 32‐6, 3‐5.7 D 2‐2.7, 2‐2.8, 2‐2.11, 2‐2.12, 2‐2.13, 2‐ 3.6 Sustainability Scorecard L I Status on meeting sustainability mandates 2.14 3.7 Facility Condition and Requirements X 2 Info graphics summaries based on analyis of data from FRES and iNFADS. 3.7.1 Facility Condition, Configuration, Capacity Summary X Requirements analyis is contained within 23‐5.6.1.1 I the Capacity summary. Summaries as appropriate for IDP directly 3.7.2 Major Shore Capability Area Summaries X from FRES/iNFADS data pull to complete 23‐5.1, 3‐5.6.1 I 3.7.2.x. 3.7.2.1 Airfield Ops L 23‐5.1, 3‐5.6.1 I 3.7.2.2 Base Support L 23‐5.1, 3‐5.6.1 I 3.7.2.3 C5ISR Ops L 23‐5.1, 3‐5.6.1 I 3.7.2.4 Expeditionary Ops L 23‐5.1, 3‐5.6.1 I 3.7.2.5 Inter/Depot Level Maint L 23‐5.1, 3‐5.6.1 I 3.7.2.6 Logistics & Supply L 23‐5.1, 3‐5.6.1 I 3.7.2.7 Ordnance/Weapons Ops L 23‐5.1, 3‐5.6.1 I 3.7.2.8 RDAT&E L 23‐5.1, 3‐5.6.1 I 3.7.2.9 Sailor & Family Readiness L 23‐5.1, 3‐5.6.1 I 3.7.2.10 Training L 23‐5.1, 3‐5.6.1 I 3.7.2.11 Utilities L 23‐5.1, 3‐5.6.1 I 3.7.2.12 Waterfront Ops L 23‐5.1, 3‐5.6.1 I 3.8 Future Development Summary Map X Map of existing known projects. 23‐5.9 D 3.9 Regional and Community X 23‐5.6.2 D 3.9.1 Context X 23‐5.6.2 D 3.9.2 Transportation X 23‐5.6.2 D 3.9.3 Utilities X 23‐5.6.2 D 3.9.4 Green Infrastructure L 23‐5.6.2 I

APPENDIX A 48 • INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE FINAL

2 Installation Development Plan Consistency Guide Installation Development Plan Consistency Guide IDP Standard Table of Contents IDP Standard Table of Contents 11/5/2013 Direct (D) or Implied 11/5/2013 Direct (D) or Implied MUST PLAN (I) Representation in MUST PLAN (I) Representation in HAVE NOTES PHASE Corresponding UFC Section Reference UFC HAVE NOTES PHASE Corresponding UFC Section Reference UFC

3.0 Planning Opportunities and Contraints 4.0 Planning Analysis and COA Priorities 4.1 Facility and Infrastructure Capability Gap Analysis X 42‐11.1 I 3.1 Natural, Environmental and Cultural Constraints X 2 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2.3 D 4.2 Alternative Courses of Action (COAs) X 53‐6.1.3, 3‐6.1.4 D 3.1.1 Topography (Steep Slopes) X 23‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2.3 D 4.3 Impact Analysis/Risk Assessment X 52‐5.1, 2‐5.1.1 D Alignment with Stakeholder Strategic Guidance X 3.1.2 Hydrology (Wetlands) X 2 2‐2.16, 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2.3 D 4.4 53‐3D 3.1.3 Geology / Soils X 23‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2.3 D 5.0 Installation Development Plan 3.1.4 Vegetation X 23‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2.3 D 5.1 Vision Plan X 23‐5.3 D 3.1.5 Threatened and Endangered Species X 23‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2.3 D 5.1.1 Vision Statement X 23‐5.3 D 3.1.6 Historical and Archeological X 2 2‐3.3, 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2.3 D 5.1.2 Planning Goals and Objectives X 23‐5.4, 3‐5.5 D 5.1.3 Framework Plan ‐ Districts/Areas X 3.1.7 Climate and Environmental Influences L 23‐5.6.2.3 D 2/3 2‐7.1, 3‐5.8 D 5.2 Installation‐wide Development Plan X 3.1.7.1 Climate Change L 23‐5.6.2.3 I 63‐6D 5.2.1 Illustrative X 3.1.7.1.1 Stom Surge L 23‐5.6.2.3 I 62‐9.1, 3‐6.4.1 D 5.2.2 Land Use Plan X Installation‐wide scale. 3.1.7.1.2 Sea Level Rise L 23‐5.6.2.3 I 2/6 2‐9.2, 3‐6.4.2 I Includes roads, major sidewalks, 5.2.3 Circulation and Parking Plan X 62‐4.1, 2‐4.2, 3‐6.4.3, 3‐6.4.4 D 3.1.7.1.3 Flood Plain L 22‐2.16, 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2.3 D bikeways, etc. Openspace, parks, wetlands, riparian 3.1.7.2 Environmental Quality L 2 5.2.4 Green Infrastructure X 63‐6.4.5 D 3.1.7.2.1 Greenhouse Gas Emissions L 2 corridors, water bodies. 3.1.7.2.2 Contaminated Soils / IR L 23‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2.3 I 5.2.5 Primary Utility Plans X 63‐6.4.6 D Brief analysis with appendix material as 3.1.8 Summary Natural/Environmental/Cultural Constraints X Map summarizing key contraints. 33‐5.6, 3‐5.6.1.3 D 5.2.6 Sustainability Development X 63‐6.4 I 3.2 Man‐Made / Operational Constraints X 23‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.1 D appropriate and available. 3.2.1 AICUZ / RAICUZ / APZ X 23‐5.6.1 I 5.2.7.1 Air Quality L 63‐6.4 I 3.2.2 Existing Land Use Plan / Land Use Controls X 23‐5.6.1 D 5.2.7.2 Energy Use L 63‐6.4 I 3.2.3 Ordnance Transportation and Storage (ESQD) X 23‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.1 I 5.2.7.3 Renewable Energy L 63‐6.4 I 3.2.4 Small Arms Range Surface Danger Zones X 23‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.1 I 5.2.7.4 Water Quality/Quantity L 63‐6.4 I 3.2.5 AT/FP X 22‐5.2 D 5.2.7.5 Waste Reduction ‐ Non HAZ L 63‐6.4 I 3.2.6 Electromagnetic Areas X 23‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.1 I Summary of IDP execution sequencing of 3.2.7 Enhanced Use Lease / PPV X 23‐5.6.1 I 5.2.7 Installation Future Development Plan Summary X Existing and Proposed Projects shown on a 63‐5.9 D 3.2.8 Encroachment X 22‐3.2, 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.2 I map. 3.2.9 Summary Man‐Made/Operational Constraints X Map summarizing key contraints. 33‐5.6 D As prioritized and available. These could 5.3 Area Development Plans X 6‐May 2‐9, 3‐6.1 D 3.3 Utility Networks L 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2 D be district plans as well. 3.3.1 Energy ‐ Conventional L 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2 I 5.3.1 Area AX5/6 3.3.1.1 Electric L 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2 I 5.3.1.1 ADP A Mission and Vision X 5/6 3.3.1.2 Natural Gas L 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2 I 5.3.1.2 ADP A Planning Goals and Objectives X 5/6 3.3.1.3 Steam L 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2 I 5.3.1.3 ADP A Site Analysis Summary X 5/6 3‐6.1.1 I 3.3.1.4 Advanced Metering / Smart Energy Infrastructure L 2‐2.11.1, 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3 I 5.3.1.4 ADP A COAs / Preferred COA X 5/6 3‐6.1.2, 3‐6.1.3, 3‐6.1.4 D 3.3.2 Energy ‐ Alternative L 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2 I 5.3.1.5 ADP A Illustrative Plan X 5/6 2‐9.1, 3‐6.1.7 D 3.3.2.2 Wind L 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2 I 5.3.1.6 ADP A Land Use / Regulating Plan X 5/6 2‐9.2, 3‐6.1.6 D 3.3.2.3 Solar L 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2 I 5.3.1.7 ADP A Circulation and Parking Plan X 5/6 3‐3.4 D 3.3.2.4 Hydro L 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2 I 5.3.1.8 ADP A Sidewalk and Bikeway Plan X 5/6 2‐4.1, 2‐4.2 D 3.3.2.5 Geothermal /Ground Source L 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2 I Summary of ADP execution sequencing of 3.3.2.6 Biomass L 5.3.1.9 ADP A Future Development Plan Summary X 5/6 3‐5.9 D 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2 I existing and proposed projects. 3.3.3 Fiber Optics/Cable L 22‐8.2, 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3 D Short, Mid and Long‐Range Development 3.3.3.1 Communications Networks (phone, data) L 22‐8.2, 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3 D 5.3.1.10 ADP A Development Program Summary X 5/6 3‐8.1 D Program. 3.3.3.2 Security L 22‐8.2, 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3 I 5.3.1.11 ADP A‐Specific Planning and Design Standards X 3.3.4 Storm Sewer L 23‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3 I 5/6 3‐7D 5.3.2 Area B…n L 3.3.5 Waste Water L 23‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2 I 5/6 3.3.6 Water L 23‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3, 3‐5.6.2 I IDP should reference IAP, BEAP or other 3.3.7 Summary Utilities Network X Map(s) summarizing key contraints. 33‐5.6 D 3.4 Transportation/Circulation Networks X 3‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3 D 5.4 Installation Planning and Design Standards X avail design guide; otherwise 3‐7D 3.4.1 Easement and Rights‐of‐Way X 22‐2.6, 3‐5.6.1 I summary/diagramatic only or address as 3.4.2 Circulation and Parking X 22‐6.1, 3‐5.6.1 D appropriate to conform to UFC. 3.4.3 Sidewalks, Trails X 22‐4.1, 2‐4.2 D 5.4.1 Building Envelope Standards X 62‐9.3, 3‐7.1 D 3.4.4 Airfield Runways / Aprons / Taxiways X 23‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3 I 5.4.2 Street Standards X 62‐9.4, 3‐7.2 D 3.4.5 Piers / Wharves X 23‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3 I 5.4.3 Site Planning Guidelines L 6 3.4.6 Other Paved Areas X 23‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3 I 5.4.4 Landscape Standards X 62‐9.5, 3‐7.3 D 3.4.7 Federal Transit Services X 23‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3 I 5.4.5 Signage / Wayfinding Guidelines L 6 3.4.8 Troop Movement Corridors X 23‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3 I 5.4.6 Sustainability Guidelines L 6 3.4.9 Summary Transporation/Circulation Networks X Map(s) summarizing key contraints. 33‐5.6.1, 3‐5.6.1.3 D 5.5 Installation Development Program (Capital Investment Plan) X 63‐8D 3.5 Developable Areas Map X 32‐6, 3‐5.7 D 5.5.1 Short‐Range Development Program X 63‐8D 2‐2.7, 2‐2.8, 2‐2.11, 2‐2.12, 2‐2.13, 2‐ 5.5.1.1 Military Construction X 63‐8D 3.6 Sustainability Scorecard L I Status on meeting sustainability mandates 2.14 5.5.1.2 Special Projects/SRM X 63‐8D 3.7 Facility Condition and Requirements X 2 5.5.1.3 Demolition X 63‐8D Info graphics summaries based on analyis 5.5.1.4 Utilities/Energy X 63‐8D of data from FRES and iNFADS. 5.5.1.5 PPV X 63‐8D 3.7.1 Facility Condition, Configuration, Capacity Summary X Requirements analyis is contained within 23‐5.6.1.1 I 5.5.1.6 EUL X 63‐8D the Capacity summary. 5.5.2 Mid‐Range Development Program X 63‐8D Summaries as appropriate for IDP directly 5.5.3 Long‐Range Development Program X 63‐8D 3.7.2 Major Shore Capability Area Summaries X from FRES/iNFADS data pull to complete 23‐5.1, 3‐5.6.1 I 5.5.4 Development Phasing Summary Plan X 63‐8D 3.7.2.x. 3.7.2.1 Airfield Ops L 23‐5.1, 3‐5.6.1 I 6.0 Acronymn List 6 3.7.2.2 Base Support L 23‐5.1, 3‐5.6.1 I 3.7.2.3 C5ISR Ops L 23‐5.1, 3‐5.6.1 I 7.0 Appencices 6 3.7.2.4 Expeditionary Ops L 23‐5.1, 3‐5.6.1 I 3.7.2.5 Inter/Depot Level Maint L 23‐5.1, 3‐5.6.1 I 7.1 Known Project List X 3‐8.1.2 3.7.2.6 Logistics & Supply L 23‐5.1, 3‐5.6.1 I 7.1.1 Military Construction X 3‐8.1.2 3.7.2.7 Ordnance/Weapons Ops L 23‐5.1, 3‐5.6.1 I 7.1.2 Special Projects X 3‐8.1.2 3.7.2.8 RDAT&E L 23‐5.1, 3‐5.6.1 I 7.2 Proposed Studies List X 3‐8.1.2 3.7.2.9 Sailor & Family Readiness L 23‐5.1, 3‐5.6.1 I 7.3 Other Studies, Plans, Reports, etc. that support the IDP X 3.7.2.10 Training L 23‐5.1, 3‐5.6.1 I 3.7.2.11 Utilities L 23‐5.1, 3‐5.6.1 I KEY: 3.7.2.12 Waterfront Ops L 23‐5.1, 3‐5.6.1 I 3.8 Future Development Summary Map X Map of existing known projects. 23‐5.9 D X These major sections should be required for each IDP. The sub‐sections will vary based on the installation, scope of work, and 3.9 Regional and Community X 23‐5.6.2 D avaiable information. Generally, all 1st, 2nd and 3rd level sections are mandatory. 4th level sections will vary based on the 3.9.1 Context X 23‐5.6.2 D installation. 3.9.2 Transportation X 23‐5.6.2 D 3.9.3 Utilities X 23‐5.6.2 D L Provide as available. No in‐depth analysis is required for high level master plan input. Reference subject‐specific studies, plans, and 3.9.4 Green Infrastructure L 23‐5.6.2 I supporting documentation where appropriate and available. Provide summary maps where possible. Provide summary text that describes critical issues that may have an impact on the development and execution of the IDP.

FINAL INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE • APPENDIX A 49

2 3 This page intentionally left blank.

50 • INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE FINAL

) [email protected] ( Management Asset Atlantic, NAVFAC Wang, Tracy : contact information, additional For

AECOM by developed and NAVFAC by sponsored application planning prototype a is Platform) Planning Infrastructure Shore Navy intranet ( iNSIPP 2013 September 2, Version Draft

ability up’ - ‘roll automated information

documents planning and vertically with with vertically and relevant planning planning relevant

assignment and editing of of editing and assignment global scales horizontally horizontally scales global linked to current and and current to linked

framework for review, review, for framework installation, region and and region installation, informational dashboards dashboards informational

-based -based role and workflow information between between information executive, analytical and and analytical executive,

Provide an effective effective an Provide Facilitate seamless flow of of flow seamless Facilitate Integrate well designed designed well Integrate

6 6 5 4

Framework Framework Automation Infographics

Governance Governance Data Flow Flow Data &

Workflows & & Workflows Horizontal Dashboards

based based - Role Vertical and and Vertical Smart

Intelligence Production

capability update - auto

*Course of Action of *Course

Data Data Data

scales global and regional data and and data - meta keywords,

applicable to installation, installation, to applicable maps maps

datasets, searchable searchable datasets, COAs*. and analysis on time more and

planning products products planning documents from within within from documents

and charts linked to ‘live’ ‘live’ to linked charts and

efficiency, less time on data gathering gathering data on time less efficiency,

Consistency Guides for for Guides Consistency -tagged -tagged geo discover

photos, graphics, tables tables graphics, photos,

improving work work improving - products planning

templates and and templates

within documents and and documents within such as text, maps, maps, text, as such

more frequent and focused updates to to updates focused and frequent more

Integrate standard standard Integrate

Embed live GRX maps maps GRX live Embed Incorporate content types types content Incorporate

making. making. decision sustainment iNSIPP allows allows iNSIPP paradigm, document

platform, operations, BOS and and BOS operations, platform, -line -line on connected and ‘live’ a using By

3 3 2 1

outcomes that help shape shore shore shape help that outcomes

value planning planning value high developing towards decisions. decisions.

templates, guidance, data and tools tools and data guidance, templates,

-aligned -aligned mission and responsive

Maps Smart Content Content Information of

Planning Community, facilitating facilitating Community, Planning

Appendix B – Introducingmore better, facilitate and products iNSIPP

Documents & & Documents Connected Connected Standardization Standardization

knowledge platform for the Navy Navy the for platform knowledge streamline the production of planning planning of production the streamline

-Integrated -Integrated Geo Smart & & Smart & Centralization

seeks to provide a common common a provide to seeks iNSIPP utilizes the core principles to to principles core the utilizes iNSIPP

iNSIPP Value Proposition Proposition Value iNSIPP Concepts iNSIPP Core

Platform Planning Infrastructure Shore Navy

Intranet Intranet

iNSIPP Introducing the FutureiNSIPP of Navy Planning… V2.0 V2.0

V2.0

Introducing the Future of Navy Planning… Navy of iNSIPPFuture the Introducing Intranet Navy Shore Infrastructure Planning Platform

Core iNSIPP Concepts iNSIPP Value Proposition

iNSIPP utilizes the core principles to iNSIPP seeks to provide a common Centralization & Smart & Geo-Integrated streamline the production of planning knowledge platform for the Navy Standardization Connected Documents & products and facilitate better, more Planning Community, facilitating of Information Content Smart Maps responsive and mission-aligned templates, guidance, data and tools decisions. towards developing high value planning 1 2 3 outcomes that help shape shore By using a ‘live’ and connected on-line platform, operations, BOS and document paradigm, iNSIPP allows sustainment decision making. Incorporate content types Embed live GRX maps Integrate standard more frequent and focused updates to such as text, maps, within documents and templates and planning products - improving work Consistency Guides for photos, graphics, tables discover geo-tagged efficiency, less time on data gathering planning products and charts linked to ‘live’ documents from within applicable to installation, datasets, searchable maps and more time on analysis and COAs*. regional and global scales keywords, meta-data and auto-update capability *Course of Action Data Data Production Intelligence

Smart Vertical and Role-based Dashboards Horizontal Workflows & & Data Flow Governance Infographics Automation Framework 4 5 6

Integrate well designed Facilitate seamless flow of Provide an effective executive, analytical and information between workflow and role-based informational dashboards installation, region and framework for review, linked to current and global scales horizontally assignment and editing of relevant planning and vertically with planning documents information automated ‘roll-up’ ability

iNSIPP (intranet Navy Shore Infrastructure Planning Platform) is a prototype planning application sponsored by NAVFAC and developed by AECOM Draft Version 2, September 2013 For additional information, contact : Tracy Wang, NAVFAC Atlantic, Asset Management ([email protected])

FINAL INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE • APPENDIX B 51 21st Century Navy Planning: CNIC, NAVFAC and the Navy Asset Management business line are seeking to enhance our planning agility and productivity by enhancing our planning People data transparency, processes and decision CPU outcomes for all Navy planning stakeholders through an online tool - intranet Navy Shore Process Technology Infrastructure Planning Platform (iNSIPP).

DOCUMENT Envisioned as a one-stop resource for reviewing, ENGINE

generating and updating a variety of planning ASSET products across the installation, regional, and LIBRARY DASHBOARDS global scales, iNSIPP seeks to facilitate via the latest technologies, the 21st century paradigm of GEOSPATIAL data-driven, highly relevant and responsive, MAPPING iNSIPP knowledge-centric electronic planning for the Navy Enterprise. FORUMS / TRAINING LIBRARY & TOOLS MODULE Navy Leadership Navy Planning Community

Key iNSIPP Features:

• One-stop access to Navy Planning related information

iNSIPP is currently under development as a prototype • Standardized templates and will be implemented under NAVFAC eTools as a for Installation, Regional, module under the GRX application. and Global planning documents, maps and data • Executive dashboards linked to enterprise information supporting planning efforts • Rapid updates to “live” planning documents • Integrated with GRX maps and data • Integrated document and content management • Role-based review and editing • Integrated Course of Action (COA) database to track and align COAs at Installation, Region and GSIP levels. • GIS-based toolsets for scenario planning and analysis • Sustainability tracking tools

APPENDIX B 52 • INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE FINAL Appendix C – Strategic Guidance Resources

• Unified Facility Criteria (UFC): UFC 2-100-01 Installation Master Planning, May 12, 2012 • Business Management System (BMS) B-2.2.1 Regional Shore Infrastructure Planning (RSIP), 18 September 2008 • Business Management System (BMS) B-2.2.2 Shore Infrastructure Planning (SIP) Visioning, 26 October 2007 • Business Management System (BMS) B-2.2.3 Global Shore Infrastructure Planning (GSIP), 15 October 2007 • Business Management System (BMS) B-2.2.8 Comprehensive Installation Master Plan, 20 October 2010 • Department of the Navy Correspondence Manual, SECNAV 5216.5 • DOD Instruction 4165.70, Real Property Management, 6 April 2005 • DOD Instruction 4170.11, Installation Energy Management, 11 December 2009 • MILCON/SP Warn Ord and scoring matrix • Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) 2003 with revisions 1 and 2 http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/ kno_2003r1r2.htm • NAVFACINST 11010.45 Various topics • NAVFAC P-72 Department of the Navy Facility Category Codes • NAVFAC P-78 Real property Inventory (RPI) Procedures Manual • NAVFAC P-80.3 App E. Airfield Safety Clearances, Jan 82 • Navy Ashore Vision 2030 & 2035 (draft) • NAVSEA OP 5, Volume 1, Ammunition and Explosives Safety (latest revision) • Professional Services Guide (July 2004 Edition) https://portal.navfac.navy.mil/portal/page?_pageid=181,3458211&_ dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL • Shore Facilities Planning System (SFPS) Guidebook, 09 October 2009 • The Undersecretary of Defense May 28, 2013 Memorandum on Installation Master Planning UFC 2-000-02AN Installation Master Planning (03-01-2005), http://www.wbdg.org/ccb/DOD/UFC/ufc_2_000_02an.pdf • UFC 2-000-05N Facility Planning for Navy and Marine Corps Shore Installations (formerly known as P-80) • UFC 3-210-10, Low Impact Development • UFC 3-260-01, Airfield and Heliport Planning and Design • UFC 4-101-01, DOD Minimum Antiterrorism Standards of Buildings • Other Government documents, drawings and regulations: -- Architectural Barriers Act (ABA) Accessibility Standard for Department of Defense Facilities, http://www.access- board.gov/ada-aba/aba-standards-dod.cfm#blocks, (replaces UFAS and ADA) -- Energy Independence and Security Act, Section 438, December 2007 -- Executive Order 11990, Protection of Wetlands, 24 May 1977 -- Executive Order 11988, Floodplain Management, 24 May 1977 -- Executive Order 13423, Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and Transportation Management, 24 January 2007 -- Executive Order 13514, Federal Leadership Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance, 5 October 2009 -- National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 1 January 1970 -- National Historic Preservation Act (16 USC, 470)

FINAL INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE • APPENDIX C 53 This page intentionally left blank.

54 • INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE FINAL Appendix D - Typical Installation Data

Typical Government Furnished Information (GFI)

• Installation Organization Chart and Mission • Installation population data (Base Loading) • Installation phone book • List of Tenants or Tenant Commands • Where available; MOU’s for space provisions (tenant organizations) • Where available; Inter/ Intra-service support agreements • Current Capital Improvements Plan/Project list • Current MCON Project Data Sheets/1391s • Current BFR/iNFADS Data • Updated/Recent Area Improvement Plans • Existing Maintenance and Repair Projects • GIS information and shape files • Existing Facility Building floor plans and base mapping • Where available; Recent Building/Facilities Assessment • Where available; Pollution Prevention Plan • Where available; Solid Waste Management Report • Where available; Naval Installation Restoration Program Study • Explosives data • Hazardous Material storage facility listing • Where available; Electromagnetic Radiation Survey data • Where available; Energy Conservation Plan • Available Utilities data: maps, owners, restrictions

GIS Data Layers

The GeoReadiness Center (GRC) is the single, authoritative source and distribution point for all geospatial facility data. The GRC houses the most current geospatial information and provides access to the comprehensive data set and analysis tools to Regional and DOD decision makers/managers, sponsored contractors, and other sponsored individuals via a secure government Internet site. GIS data deliverable specifications address file naming conventions, metadata, data collection procedures, QA/QC standards, and geodatabase requirements and shall be adhered to in the development of project mapping.

• Airfield Constraints • AT/FP Restrictions • Quantity-Distance Arcs (Munitions Safety) • Noise Contours • Safety Buffers (setbacks required) • Former Firing Ranges and Impact Areas • Impact Areas (dudded and non-dudded)

FINAL INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE • APPENDIX D 55 • Chemical Storage/Pesticide Areas • Topography • Wetlands • Threatened/Endangered Species Habitat • Protected Natural/Cultural Areas or Protected Sites • Floodplains • Soil Restrictions • Environmental Contamination • Desirable and undesirable land use features off the installation • Landfills • Historic Districts • Transportation Systems (roadways, sidewalks, trails, transit routes and stops) • Open Space Systems • Utility Systems • Encroachment Areas • Areas Proposed for Disposal/Deconstruction • Pesticide-Sensitive Application Facilities and Areas • Surface and Subsurface Hazardous Material Storage • Existing Facility Assessment • Future Development • In/Out Grants • Overall Real Estate boundaries (borders, easements, etc.) • Access Control Points • Open and Closed IRPs • High Resolution Aerial Photography/ LIDAR Contour Mapping

APPENDIX D 56 • INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE FINAL Appendix E - Typical Off-installation Data Sources

• Federal Agencies, including the Census Bureau, National Weather Service, Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, etc. • State and County Departments, including Highways and Transportation, Natural Resources and Conservation, Fish and Wildlife, Planning and Community Affairs, Housing, Public Health, Environmental Policy, State Historic Preservation Officers/Offices, etc. • Local Government Offices, including City Hall, Public Works, Planning, Public Health, Parks and Recreation, School Districts, Fire and Police Departments, etc. • Other Local Agencies, including Utilities and Power Companies, Chamber of Commerce, Regional Planning Agencies, etc.

FINAL INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE • APPENDIX E 57 This page intentionally left blank.

58 • INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE FINAL Appendix F - Acronyms

Acronym Definition

ADP Area Development Plan AE Asset Evaluation AICUZ Air Installation Compatible Use Zone APZ Accident Potential Zone AT/FP Anti-Terrorism Force Protection BEAP Base Exterior Architecture Plan BFR Basic Facility Requirements C5ISR Command Control Communications Computers Combat Systems Intelligence Surveillance and Reconnaissance CADD Computer Aided Design and Drafting CIP Capital Investment Plan CNIC Commander, Navy Installations Command CNO Chief of Naval Operations CO Commanding Officer COA Course of Action CONOPS Concept of Operations CPLO Community Plans and Liaison Officer DeCA Defense Commissary Agency DOD Department of Defense DON Department of the Navy EAP Encroachment Action Plan EPG Electronic Project Generator ESQD Explosive Safety Quantity Distance EUL Enhanced Use Leasing FCAP Facility Condition Assessment Program FPD Facility Planning Document FRES Facility Readiness Evaluation System FYDP Fiscal Year Development Program GIF Graphics Interchange Format bitmap image file format GIS Geographic Information System GRC GeoReadiness Center GSIP Global Shore Infrastructure Plan HERF Hazards of Electromagnetic Radiation to Fuels HERO Hazards of Electromagnetic Radiation to Ordnance HERP Hazards of Electromagnetic Radiation to People IAP Installation Appearance Plan ICO Installation Commanding Officer IDP Installation Development Plan IFOM Installation Figure of Merit IMIG Installation Mission Integration Group iNFADS internet Navy Facility Assets Data Store iNSIPP intranet Navy Shore Infrastructure Planning Platform (future) IPL Integrated Priority List IR Installation Restoration LIDAR Light Detection and Ranging MCCS Marine Corps Community Services MDI Mission Dependency Index

FINAL INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE • APPENDIX F 59 MFH Military Family Housing MILCON Military Construction MWR Morale Welfare and Recreation NAF Non-appropriated Funds NAVFAC Naval Facilities Engineering Command NAV2030 Navy Ashore Vision 2030 NE Naval Enterprise NEPA National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 NEX Naval Exchange O&M Operations and Maintenance OPM Other People’s Money PNG Portable Network Graphics bitmap image file format POC Point of Contact POM Program Objective Memorandum PPV Public-Private Venture PRC Property Record Card PRV Plant Replacement Value QDR Quadrennial Defense Review RDAT&E Research, Development, Acquisition, Test, & Evaluation RIMP Regional Integration Master Plan Program RIP Regional Integration Plan RMIG Regional Mission Integration Group RSIP Regional Shore Infrastructure Plan SCA Shore Capability Area SF Square Feet SFIM Shore Facility Investment Model SFPS Shore Facilities Planning System SIP Shore Infrastructure Plan SME Subject Matter Expert SMIG Shore Mission Integration Group SP Special Programs SRM Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization TIFF Tagged Image File format TOC Table of Contents UFC Unified Facilities Criteria UMC-MCON Unspecified Military Construction-MILCON WEFO Warfare Enterprise Flag Officer WEAO Warfare Enterprise Action Officer WE/P Warfare Enterprise/Provider

APPENDIX F 60 • INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE FINAL This page intentionally left blank.

FINAL INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY GUIDE • 61 MASTER PLAN