DOCSLIB.ORG

Black Nubble Wind Farm Section 6 Visual Impact Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Black Nubble Wind Farm Section 6 Visual Impact Assessment Black Nubble Wind Farm Section 6 Visual Impact Assessment Prepared by Terrence J. DeWan & Associates Landscape Architects Yarmouth, Maine Black Nubble Wind Farm Page 6-i Section 6. Visual Impact Assessment Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 2.0 DATA COLLECTION........................................................................................... 6 3.0 PROJECT STUDY AREA ..................................................................................... 8 3.1 Introduction......................................................................................................... 8 3.2 Regional Description........................................................................................ 10 3.3 Landscape within Fifteen Miles of the Project ................................................. 13 3.3.1 Landform................................................................................................... 15 3.3.2 Water Bodies............................................................................................. 16 3.3.3 Vegetation................................................................................................. 19 3.3.4 Cultural Features....................................................................................... 19 4.0 SCENIC RESOURCES WITHIN THE VIEWSHED.......................................... 21 4.1 Visible from Scenic Resources / DEP Field Evaluation Checklist................... 21 4.2 Closest Distance to Similar Activity................................................................. 39 4.3 Closest Distance to Public Facility Intended for a Similar Use........................ 39 4.4 Seasonal Visibility............................................................................................ 39 4.5 Use of Resources by the Public ........................................................................ 40 5.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................41 5.1 Wind Turbines .................................................................................................. 41 5.2 Project Lighting ................................................................................................ 43 5.3 Summit Roadways ............................................................................................ 43 5.4 Access Roads.................................................................................................... 44 5.5 Electrical Collection System............................................................................. 44 5.6 34.5 kV Collection Line.................................................................................... 45 5.7 Substation.......................................................................................................... 45 5.8 115 kV Transmission Line................................................................................ 45 5.9 Meterorological Towers.................................................................................... 46 5.10 Laydown Areas................................................................................................. 47 5.11 Maintenance Facility......................................................................................... 47 5.12 Crane Pads and Crane Assembly Areas............................................................ 47 6.0 VISUALIZATIONS ............................................................................................. 48 6.1 Visualizations.................................................................................................... 48 6.2 3D Model Methodology.................................................................................... 50 6.3 Cross Sections................................................................................................... 52 Black Nubble Wind Farm Page 6-ii Section 6. Visual Impact Assessment 7.0 AFFECTED POPULATION / USER EXPECTATIONS .................................... 53 7.1 Introduction....................................................................................................... 51 7.2 1994 Intercept Surveys ..................................................................................... 55 7.2.1 Hikers........................................................................................................ 55 7.2.2 Hunters...................................................................................................... 56 7.2.3 Local Residents......................................................................................... 56 7.2.4 Skiers......................................................................................................... 57 7.2.5 Snowmobilers ........................................................................................... 57 7.3 2003/2004 Hiker Surveys ................................................................................. 58 7.3.1 Overview................................................................................................... 59 7.3.2 Hikers Survey............................................................................................59 7.3.3 Visualizations............................................................................................ 60 7.3.4 Respondent Characteristics....................................................................... 60 7.3.5 Assessment of Visual Impact.................................................................... 61 7.4 Searsburg Community Acceptance Study ........................................................ 63 8.0 VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT ..................................................................... 65 8.1 Summary of Impacts......................................................................................... 65 8.2 Assessment........................................................................................................ 73 8.3 Compliance with LURC Section 10.25 Scenic Character Standards ............... 77 8.4 Conclusion ........................................................................................................ 82 9.0 MITIGATION STRATEGIES..............................................................................84 9.1 Wind Turbines .................................................................................................. 84 9.1.1 Site Selection and Planning ...................................................................... 84 9.1.2 Design ....................................................................................................... 85 9.1.3 Construction.............................................................................................. 85 9.2 Access Road Network....................................................................................... 86 9.3 34.5 kVCollection Line..................................................................................... 90 9.4 Substation.......................................................................................................... 90 9.5 115 kV Transmission Line................................................................................ 90 9.6 Maintenance Facility......................................................................................... 91 9.7 Management and Maintenance ......................................................................... 91 9.8 Public Contact and Education........................................................................... 92 9.9 Black Nubble Only Alternative ........................................................................ 92 10.0 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................... 95 Black Nubble Wind Farm Page 6-iii Section 6. Visual Impact Assessment List of Figures Figure 6-1 Natural Regions of Maine............................................................................ 12 Figure 6-2 Study Area ................................................................................................... 14 Figure 6-3 MDEP Visual Evaluation Field Survey Checklist....................................... 24 Figure 6-4 Representative Cross Section for Summit Roads on the East Side of Black Nubble .......................................................................... 89 List of Tables Table 6-1 Comparison of Visual Characteristics ........................................................... 2 Table 6-2 Lakes and Ponds within the Study Area...................................................... 17 Table 6-3 Recreational Users....................................................................................... 54 Table 6-4 Summary of Visual Impacts ........................................................................ 66 List of Appendices Appendix A – Characteristic Viewpoint Maps Map 6-1 Study Area Map and Key Map 6-2 Characteristic Viewpoints from Lakes, Ponds, and Roads Map 6-3 Characteristic Viewpoints from Lakes, Ponds, and Roads Map 6-4 Characteristic Viewpoints from Lakes, Ponds, and Roads Map 6-5 Hiking Trails East and North of BNWF Map 6-6 Hiking Trails West and South of BNWF Map 6-7 Views from the Appalachian Trail Map 6-8 Views from the Appalachian Trail Map 6-9 Views from the Appalachian Trail Black Nubble Wind Farm Page 6-iv Section 6. Visual Impact Assessment Appendix B – Visualizations Visualization 6-1 View from Bald Mountain Visualization 6-2 View below AT on North Summit of Crocker
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ecoregions of New England Forested Land Cover, Nutrient-Poor Frigid and Cryic Soils (Mostly Spodosols), and Numerous High-Gradient Streams and Glacial Lakes
    58. Northeastern Highlands The Northeastern Highlands ecoregion covers most of the northern and mountainous parts of New England as well as the Adirondacks in New York. It is a relatively sparsely populated region compared to adjacent regions, and is characterized by hills and mountains, a mostly Ecoregions of New England forested land cover, nutrient-poor frigid and cryic soils (mostly Spodosols), and numerous high-gradient streams and glacial lakes. Forest vegetation is somewhat transitional between the boreal regions to the north in Canada and the broadleaf deciduous forests to the south. Typical forest types include northern hardwoods (maple-beech-birch), northern hardwoods/spruce, and northeastern spruce-fir forests. Recreation, tourism, and forestry are primary land uses. Farm-to-forest conversion began in the 19th century and continues today. In spite of this trend, Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, and 5 level III ecoregions and 40 level IV ecoregions in the New England states and many Commission for Environmental Cooperation Working Group, 1997, Ecological regions of North America – toward a common perspective: Montreal, Commission for Environmental Cooperation, 71 p. alluvial valleys, glacial lake basins, and areas of limestone-derived soils are still farmed for dairy products, forage crops, apples, and potatoes. In addition to the timber industry, recreational homes and associated lodging and services sustain the forested regions economically, but quantity of environmental resources; they are designed to serve as a spatial framework for continue into ecologically similar parts of adjacent states or provinces. they also create development pressure that threatens to change the pastoral character of the region.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maine Chance
    The claim of a federal “land grab” in response to the creation of Katahdin Woods and Waters National Monument in Maine revealed a lack of historical awareness by critics of how two other cherished parks were established there: through private-public partnerships and the donation of land by private citizens. The maine chance PRIVATE-PUBLIC PARTNERSHIP AND THE KATAHDIN WOODS AND WATERS NATIONAL MONUMENT t is never over until it is…and even then, it might not be. That conundrum-like declaration is actually a straightforward assessment of the enduring, at times I acrimonious, and always tumultuous series of political debates that have enveloped the U.S. public lands—their existence, purpose, and mission—since their formal establishment in the late nineteenth century. From Yellowstone Washington. Congress shall immediately pass universal legislation National Park (1872) and Yellowstone Timberland Reserve (1891) providing for a timely and orderly mechanism requiring the federal to Bears Ears National Monument (2017), their organizing prin- government to convey certain federally controlled public lands to ciples and regulatory presence have been contested.1 states. We call upon all national and state leaders and represen- The 2016 presidential campaign ignited yet another round of tatives to exert their utmost power and influence to urge the transfer this longstanding controversy. That year’s Republican Party plat- of those lands, identified in the review process, to all willing states form was particularly blunt in its desire to strip away federal man- for the benefit of the states and the nation as a whole. The residents agement of the federal public lands and reprioritize whose interests of state and local communities know best how to protect the land the party believed should dominate management decisions on where they work and live.
    [Show full text]
  • 1922 Elizabeth T
    co.rYRIG HT, 192' The Moootainetro !scot1oror,d The MOUNTAINEER VOLUME FIFTEEN Number One D EC E M BER 15, 1 9 2 2 ffiount Adams, ffiount St. Helens and the (!oat Rocks I ncoq)Ora,tecl 1913 Organized 190!i EDITORlAL ST AitF 1922 Elizabeth T. Kirk,vood, Eclttor Margaret W. Hazard, Associate Editor· Fairman B. L�e, Publication Manager Arthur L. Loveless Effie L. Chapman Subsc1·iption Price. $2.00 per year. Annual ·(onl�') Se,·ent�·-Five Cents. Published by The Mountaineers lncorJ,orated Seattle, Washington Enlerecl as second-class matter December 15, 19t0. at the Post Office . at . eattle, "\Yash., under the .-\0t of March 3. 1879. .... I MOUNT ADAMS lllobcl Furrs AND REFLEC'rION POOL .. <§rtttings from Aristibes (. Jhoutribes Author of "ll3ith the <6obs on lltount ®l!!mµus" �. • � J� �·,,. ., .. e,..:,L....._d.L.. F_,,,.... cL.. ��-_, _..__ f.. pt",- 1-� r�._ '-';a_ ..ll.-�· t'� 1- tt.. �ti.. ..._.._....L- -.L.--e-- a';. ��c..L. 41- �. C4v(, � � �·,,-- �JL.,�f w/U. J/,--«---fi:( -A- -tr·�� �, : 'JJ! -, Y .,..._, e� .,...,____,� � � t-..__., ,..._ -u..,·,- .,..,_, ;-:.. � --r J /-e,-i L,J i-.,( '"'; 1..........,.- e..r- ,';z__ /-t.-.--,r� ;.,-.,.....__ � � ..-...,.,-<. ,.,.f--· :tL. ��- ''F.....- ,',L � .,.__ � 'f- f-� --"- ��7 � �. � �;')'... f ><- -a.c__ c/ � r v-f'.fl,'7'71.. I /!,,-e..-,K-// ,l...,"4/YL... t:l,._ c.J.� J..,_-...A 'f ',y-r/� �- lL.. ��•-/IC,/ ,V l j I '/ ;· , CONTENTS i Page Greetings .......................................................................tlristicles }!}, Phoiitricles ........ r The Mount Adams, Mount St. Helens, and the Goat Rocks Outing .......................................... B1/.ith Page Bennett 9 1 Selected References from Preceding Mount Adams and Mount St.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountains of Maine Title
    e Mountains of Maine: Skiing in the Pine Tree State Dedicated to the Memory of John Christie A great skier and friend of the Ski Museum of Maine e New England Ski Museum extends sincere thanks An Exhibit by the to these people and organizations who contributed New England Ski Museum time, knowledge and expertise to this exhibition. and the e Membership of New England Ski Museum Glenn Parkinson Ski Museum of Maine Art Tighe of Foto Factory Jim uimby Scott Andrews Ted Sutton E. John B. Allen Ken Williams Traveling exhibit made possible by Leigh Breidenbach Appalachian Mountain Club Dan Cassidy Camden Public Library P.W. Sprague Memorial Foundation John Christie Maine Historical Society Joe Cushing Saddleback Mountain Cate & Richard Gilbane Dave Irons Ski Museum of Maine Bruce Miles Sugarloaf Mountain Ski Club Roland O’Neal Sunday River Isolated Outposts of Maine Skiing 1870 to 1930 In the annals of New England skiing, the state of Maine was both a leader and a laggard. e rst historical reference to the use of skis in the region dates back to 1871 in New Sweden, where a colony of Swedish immigrants was induced to settle in the untamed reaches of northern Aroostook County. e rst booklet to oer instruction in skiing to appear in the United States was printed in 1905 by the eo A. Johnsen Company of Portland. Despite these early glimmers of skiing awareness, when the sport began its ascendancy to popularity in the 1930s, the state’s likeliest venues were more distant, and public land ownership less widespread, than was the case in the neighboring states of New Hampshire and Vermont, and ski area development in those states was consequently greater.
    [Show full text]
  • Redington Mountain Wind Farm Page 6C-1 Section 6. Visual Impact Assessment Appendix C
    Redington Mountain Wind Farm Page 6C-1 Section 6. Visual Impact Assessment Appendix C 6-P1. Lookout tower at the summit of Bald Mountain in Rangeley. Photos taken October, 2003. 6-P2. Picnic area at the summit of Bald Mountain near the base of the lookout tower. Redington Mountain Wind Farm Page 6C-2 Section 6. Visual Impact Assessment Appendix C 6-P3. View looking north from Bald Mountain lookout tower. Communications tower in foreground. Photos taken October, 2003. 6-P4. View looking north-northeast from Bald Mountain lookout tower. Redington Mountain Wind Farm Page 6C-3 Section 6. Visual Impact Assessment Appendix C 6-P5. View toward East Kennebago Mountain approximately 14.8 miles northeast of Bald Mountain lookout tower. Photos taken October, 2003. 6-P6. View toward Rangeley Village (6 miles to east-northeast). The wind farm will be 15.7 miles away. See Visualization 6-1a-c. Redington Mountain Wind Farm Page 6C-4 Section 6. Visual Impact Assessment Appendix C 6-P7. View looking north-northeast from Bald Mountain lookout tower. Photos taken October, 2003. 6-P8. View looking east from Bald Mountain lookout tower. Redington Mountain Wind Farm Page 6C-5 Section 6. Visual Impact Assessment Appendix C 6-P9. View looking east from Bald Mountain toward Rangeley Village (6 miles to east-northeast). The wind farm will be 15.7 miles away. Compare this photograph with 6-P12, taken on a day with less atmospheric haze. Photos taken October, 2003. See visualization, Figure 6-V1a-c. 6-P10. View looking east-southeast from Bald Mountain over Rangeley Lake.
    [Show full text]
  • 100 Things to Do in the Greater Bangor Region!
    100 Things to Do in the Greater Bangor Region! 1. Take a cruise on the Katahdin Steamship on Moosehead Lake. 2. Meet Abraham Lincoln’s Vice President, Hannibal Hamlin on the Kenduskeag Promenade, between Central and State Streets. 3. Walk the boardwalk through a National Natural Landmark at the Orono Bog Walk. 4. Hike hundreds of miles of natural trails at the Bangor City Forest. 5. Drive up Thomas Hill to visit the 50-foot high and 75-foot diameter steel tank, which holds 1.75 million gallons of water, called the Thomas Hill Standpipe. 6. Admire the lighted water fountain and a waterfall that's more than 20 feet high at Cascade Park. 7. Tour through the rotating exhibition galleries at the UMaine Art Museum. 8. Fish for small mouth bass, land-locked salmon, or wild brook trout on Moosehead Lake. 9. Play 27 holes of golf in the middle of the city at the Bangor Municipal Golf Course. 10. Browse through thousands upon thousands of books at the Bangor Public Library. 11. Check out an old River City Cinema movie at a local church or outside venue during the summer. 12. Grab your binoculars and watch the abundant bird life at the Jeremiah Colburn Natural Area. 13. Escape the city heat take a ride down the waterslides at the Beth Pancoe Municipal Aquatic Center. 14. Leisurely walk along the Penobscot River at Bangor’s Waterfront Park and enjoy the sunset. 15. Savor the deliciousness of different kinds of local wines at the Winterport Winery. 16. Pet a lamb or milk a cow at many of Maine’s farms while learning how they operate, meeting animals, and tasting their farm fresh products on Open Farm Day.
    [Show full text]
  • Whiteface Veterans Memorial Highway
    area. The center has been run since 1999 by the Whiteface Whiteface Veterans Preservation and Resource Association. On display are exhibits highlighting area geolo- gy, flora and fauna, along with Memorial Highway maps, aerial and satellite images, and historic photographs depict- ing the planning and construction A 5-mile drive to the top of the world of the Memorial Highway and its associated buildings. Unfortunately, the WPRA has Words and pictures by Lee Manchester, Lake Placid News, June 10, 2005 had trouble finding enough volun- teers to keep the visitors center open every day. WILMINGTON — It’s been 70 The tollhouse, and the history A road up the mountain was years since President Franklin D. Just ahead, you’ll see what first suggested over 100 years ago Roosevelt drove up to Wilmington looks like a Swiss alpine chalet. by a Lake Placid entrepreneur, but in an open car to inaugurate the That’s the 1934 tollhouse that it was not until the 1920s that a new Veterans Memorial Highway marks the beginning of the 5-mile- highway up Whiteface was pro- in 1935. long Veterans Memorial Highway. moted with real vigor — after a You, too, can drive to the top of It’s more than just a toll gate road was paved up Pike’s Peak in Whiteface, New York’s fifth high- where you’ll pay your part for the Colorado. est mountain. upkeep of this amazing feat of The prospect of constructing a civil engineering — it’s also a vis- new road through the Wilmington The toll road has been open itors interpretive center, with Wild Forest split the membership since the middle of last month, exhibits highlighting the historic of the Adirondack Mountain Club and will continue to welcome vis- and natural significance of the and was opposed by other leading itors through the Columbus Day/Canadian Thanksgiving weekend.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation of a Rare Alpine Plant (Prenanthes Boottii) in the Face of Rapid Environmental Change
    Conservation of a rare alpine plant (Prenanthes boottii) in the face of rapid environmental change Kristen Haynes SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry End of Season Report, 2014 Background The northeast alpine zone is one of our region’s rarest biological communities, comprised of a series of habitat islands totaling less than 35 km (figure 1; Capers et al. 2013). These mountaintop communities are hotbeds of local biodiversity, home to a suite of rare and endangered plant and animal species, including regional endemics as well as arctic species at the southern limit of their range. This biodiversity is now threatened by human-imposed environmental changes. Climate change is considered by Sala et al. (2010) to be the most important driver of biodiversity change in alpine ecosystems. Alpine communities are predicted to be highly susceptible to climate change for several reasons. First, high-elevation areas are warming faster than low-elevation areas (Wang et al. 2013). Second, the effects of climate change are predicted to be most severe for communities at climatic extremes, such as alpine communities (Pauli et al. 1996, Sala et al. 2010). Finally, the alpine biome is expected to contract as treelines and lower- elevation species move upward in elevation (Parmesan et al. 2006). There is already some evidence of advancing treelines and invasion of lowland species in the northeast alpine (Harsch et al. 2009; Nancy Slack, pers. comm.). In addition to climate change, northeast alpine species are threatened by high rates of nitrogen deposition and damage due to hiker trampling (Kimball and Weirach 2000). Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • High Peaks Region Recreation Plan
    High Peaks Region Recreation Plan An overview and analysis of the recreation, possibilities, and issues facing the High Peaks Region of Maine Chris Colin, Jacob Deslauriers, Dr. Chris Beach Fall 2008 Maine Appalachian Trail Land Trust – High Peaks Initiative: The Maine Appalachian Trail Land Trust (MATLT) was formed in June 2002 by a group of Mainers dedicated to the preservation of the natural qualities of the lands surrounding the Appalachian Trail in Maine. Following its campaign to acquire Mount Abraham and a portion of Saddleback Mountain, MATLT is embarking on a new initiative to research and document the ecological qualities of the entire Western Maine High Peaks Region. The MATLT website describes the region as follows: “The Western Maine High Peaks Region is the 203,400 acres roughly bounded by the communities of Rangeley, Phillips, Kingfield and Stratton. In this region, there are about 21,000 acres above 2700 feet. It is one of only three areas in Maine where the mountains rise above 4000 feet. The other two are the Mahoosuc Range and Baxter Park. Eight (8) of the fourteen (14) highest mountains in Maine are in this region (Sugarloaf, Crocker, South Crocker, Saddleback, Abraham, The Horn, Spaulding and Redington Peak.) These are all above 4000 feet. If one adds the Bigelow Range, across Route 27/16 from Sugarloaf, the region hosts ten (10) of the highest mountains (Avery Peak and West Peak added)). This area is comparable in size to Baxter Park but has 40% more area above 2700 feet.” Table of Contents I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 1 A. Purpose and Need for High Peaks Area Recreation Plan ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • North Maine Woods2013 $3
    experience the tradition North Maine Woods2013 $3 On behalf welcomeof the many families, private corporations, conservation organizations and managers of state owned land, we welcome you to this special region of Maine. We’re proud of the history of this remote region and our ability to keep this area open for public enjoyment. In addition to providing remote recreational opportunities, this region is also the “wood basket” that supports our natural resource based economy of Maine. This booklet is designed to help you have a safe and enjoyable trip to the area, plus provide you with important information about forest resource management and recreational use. P10 Katahdin Ironworks Jo-Mary Forest Information P14 New plan for the Allagash Wilderness Waterway P18 Moose: Icon of P35 Northern Region P39 Sharing the roads the North Woods Fisheries Update with logging trucks 2013 Visitor Fees NMW staff by photo RESIDENT NON-RESIDENT Under 15 .............................................................. Free Day Use & Camping Age 70 and Over ............................................... Free Day Use Per Person Per Day ...................................................$7 ................ $12 Camping Per Night ....................................................$10 ............. $12 Annual Day Use Registration ...............................$75 ............. N/A Annual Unlimited Camping ..................................$175 .......... N/A Checkpoint Hours of Operation Camping Only Annual Pass ...................................$100 .......... $100 Visitors traveling by vehicle will pass through one of the fol- lowing checkpoints. Please refer to the map in the center of Special Reduced Seasonal Rates this publication for locations. Summer season is from May 1 to September 30. Fall season is from August 20 to November 30. Either summer or fall passes NMW Checkpoints are valid between August 20 and September 30. Allagash 5am-9pm daily Caribou 6am-9pm daily Seasonal Day Use Pass ............................................$50 ............
    [Show full text]
  • Letters-Of-Support-Nov-26
    United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Appalachian National Scenic Trail P.O. Box 50 (252 McDowell Street) Harpers Ferry, WV 25425 IN REPLY REFER TO: October 8, 2008 Mr. Alan Stearns Deputy Director, Bureau of Parks & Lands Maine Department of Conservation 22 State House Station Harlow Building Augusta, ME 04333-0022 Dear Mr. Stearns: I am writing on behalf of the National Park Service and the Appalachian National Scenic Trail to express my support for the Rangeley High Peaks (Phase I) Forest Legacy application. This application seeks funding for three land tracts in the Rangeley/High Peaks region, totaling 13,446 acres, and represents a significant first step towards the larger overall conservation effort envisioned with the High Peaks Initiative. The Appalachian National Scenic Trail (A.T.) was designated our country’s first national scenic trail forty years ago on October 2, 1968 with passage of the National Trails System Act. Since then, the National Park Service has acquired over 111,000 acres along the length of the A.T. as part of a protected corridor, almost 32,000 acres of which are located in Maine. The A.T. is now a proud unit of our National Park System, as well as the flagship of our National Trails System, but its protected corridor is slender and fragile. This Forest Legacy application is a perfect example of the kind of partnership with the State that can result in protection of Maine’s timberlands and important additional protection for the A.T. The section of the A.T. that passes through western Maine on the ridgeline of the Saddleback range of peaks is considered one of the most scenic segments of the entire Appalachian Trail.
    [Show full text]
  • Crocker Mountain Unit Management Plan
    Crocker Mountain Unit Management Plan Adopted April 2015 Appendices A. Public Consultation Process: Advisory Committee Members; Public Consultation Summary; Public Comments and Responses B. Guiding Statutes and Agreements • MRSA Title 12 • Commemorative Agreement Celebrating the Crocker Mountain Conservation Project • Letter to State of Maine from The Trust for Public Land – Crocker Mountain Ecological Reserve C. Integrated Resource Policy (IRP) Resource Allocations - Criteria and Management Direction D. Crocker Mountain Ecological Reserve Nomination E. Caribou Valley Road Easement F. Sources Appendix A: Public Review Process Advisory Committee Members; Public Consultation Process; Public Comments and Bureau Responses Flagstaff Region Advisory Committee Members: Name Organization Tarsha Adams Natanis Point Campground Rep. Jarrod S. Crockett House District 91 Debi Davidson Izaak Walton League Ernie DeLuca Brookfield White Pine Hydro LLC Thomas Dodd American Forest Management Eliza Donoghue Natural Resources Council of Maine Greg Drummond Claybrook Lodge Rep. Larry C. Dunphy House District 88 Dick Fecteau Maine Appalachian Trail Club Jennifer Burns Gray Maine Audubon Society Bob Luce Town of Carrabassett Valley Douglas Marble High Peaks Alliance Rick Mason E. Flagstaff Lake Property Owners Assoc. John McCatherin Carrabassett Valley Outdoor Association/C.V. ATV Club Bill Munzer JV Wing Snowmobile Club Claire Polfus Appalachian Trail Conservancy Josh Royte The Nature Conservancy Allan Ryder Timber Resource Group Senator Tom Saviello Senate District 18 Dick Smith Flagstaff Area ATV Club Ken Spalding Friends of Bigelow Josh Tauses Carrabassett Region Chapter, NEMBA Senator Rodney Whittemore Senate District 26 Kenny Wing none Charlie Woodworth Maine Huts & Trails A-1 Public Consultation Process: Plan Phase/Date Action/Meeting Focus Attendance/Responses Public Scoping July 15-16, 2014 Notice of Public Scoping Meeting Press release sent out; meeting notice published in papers.
    [Show full text]