Galaxy Formation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Galaxy Formation COSMOLOGICAL GALAXY FORMATION 13 1 1 2 3 F R Pearce C S Frenk A Jenkins J M Colb erg P A Thomas 4 2 5 6 H M P Couchman S D M White G Efstathiou J A Peaco ck 7 A H Nelson The Virgo Consortium 1 Physics Department South Rd Durham DH LE UK 2 MaxPlankInstitut fur Astrophysik Garching Germany 3 CPES University of Sussex Falmer Brighton BN QH UK 4 Department of Physics and Astronomy Univ of Western Ontario London Ontario NA K Canada 5 Institute of Astronomy Madingley Rd Cambridge CB OHA UK 6 Physics Department Edinburgh University Blackford Hil l Edinburgh EH HJ UK 7 Department of Physics and Astronomy Cardi University Cardi CF YB UK Abstract We discuss the rst results from two successful simulations of galaxy formation within a cosmological volume With over large ob jects forming in each we have sucient numb ers to reliably pro duce b oth galaxy correlation and luminosity functions We nd that the observed galaxy counts are well tted by these mo dels and that the galaxies display an almost unevolving correlation function back to a redshift of which closely resembles the featureless observed form and amplitude Intro duction astro-ph/9906032 2 Jun 1999 The quest for a detailed understanding of galaxy formation has b ecome one of the central goals of mo dern astrophysics On the observational side data from the Keck and Hubble Space telescop es have revolutionised our view of the high redshift Universe and there are claims that the ep o ch of galaxy formation has already b een observed From the theoretical p oint of view the problem is fundamental b ecause its resolution involves the synthesis of work from a wide range of sp ecialities A full treatment requires consideration of the early Universe pro cesses that create primordial density uctuations the microphysics and chemistry that precipitate star formation within giant molecular clouds the energy exchange present in sup ernova feedback the dissipational pro cesses of co oling gas the dynamics of galaxies moving within a dense environment and the large scale tidal torques which determine the angular momentum proles of the resultant ob jects Analytic approaches to the problem founder partly b ecause of the lack of symmetry As high redshift observations show real galaxies do not form in a smo oth spherically symmetric fashion but rather form as complicated collections of bright knots which merge and evolve into normal galaxies Because of its complexity this problem is often approached using numerical simulation In one of the rst attempts demonstrated the a wide variety of observed galaxy prop erties could b e tted by even the most basic of simulations Unfortunately their computational volume like that of was to o small to pro duce a reliable correlation function and they had to stop the simulation at z but this work clearly demonstrated the p otential for simulations of this kind Both these groups used smo othed particle hydro dynamics SPH to mo del the gas In a complimentary investigation used a grid based co de providing a useful crosscheck of the results More recently several groups have attempted to tackle the problem by coupling a semianalytic approach to a collisionless simulation and have again pro duced interesting results In this pap er we simulate the pro cess of galaxy formation within a representative volume of the Universe in two contrasting cosmologies The volume is large enough Mp c on a side that several thousand galaxies form and we can reliably measure the galaxy correlation function and study the eects of bias Previous work by the Virgo Consortium predicted the magnitude of the bias that would b e required to reconcile stateoftheart collisionless simulations to the observed galaxy correlation function Here we examine whether the inclusion of a gaseous comp onent and basic physics can indeed pro duce this bias The simulation The simulations we have carried out are stateoftheart SPH calculations of million gas plus million dark matter particles in a b ox of side Mp c using a parallel adaptive particle particle particlemesh plus SPH co de We have completed b oth a standard Cold Dark Matter SCDM run and a run with a p ositive cosmological constant CDM Both have the same parameters as detailed by The baryon fraction was set from nucleosynthesis constraints 2 h and we assume an unevolving gas metallicity of times the solar value This b 9 leads to a gas mass p er particle of M for b oth runs As we typically smo oth over SPH 10 particles this gives us an eective minimum gas mass resolution of M We employ a 1 comoving Plummer gravitational softening of h kp c and the minimum SPH resolution was set to match this Underlying assumptions This simulation is based up on two fundamental assumptions These are that the feedback of energy due to sup ernovae explosions can b e approximated by assuming that this pro cess eectively imp oses a mass resolution threshold Ob jects b elow this mass cannot form whereas ob jects ab ove this mass are unaected Comparing the simulated star formation rate to the observed one shows that such an approximation do es not lead to a ridiculous star formation history The second assumption is that once gas has co oled into tight dense blobs it is eectively decoupled from the surrounding hot gas This is equivalent to assuming that this gas has b een converted into stars or is isolated by additional physics such as magnetic elds The main further approximation we are forced to employ for computational reasons is a spatial resolution 1 of h kp c This is over twice the value we would have liked to have used and leads to enhanced tidal disruption drag and merging within the larger clusters of ob jects The microphysics of star formation and sup ernovae explosions typically have parsec length scales and so happ en far b elow our resolution limit The combination of p o or mans feedback and decoupling the cold dense gas eectively negates these eects over which we have no con trol anyway for all ob jects ab ove our resolution threshold All ob jects must cross this threshold at some time as a large ob ject cannot simply pop into existence presumably via the merger -2 -3 -4 -5 -22 -24 -26 Figure A comparison b etween the observed Kband luminosity function and that obtained by the SCDM simulation with two dierent assumptions for the stellar IMF of smaller subresolution and so unresolved fragments Our assumptions are equivalent to presuming that the absence of previous levels of the hierarchy has no eect on the subsequent evolution or prop erties of our ob jects and that these ob jects are large enough to resist the destructive eects of sup ernovae explosions It should b e stressed that b ecause of our relatively p o or physical resolution we can only predict accurate masses and p ositions for our ob jects We do not have sucient resolution to resolve internal structure and so cannot directly ascertain a morphological typ e for our galaxies as each ob ject typical only contains b etween and particles Analysis The presence of gas makes the identication of a set of ob jects which we would like to equate to galaxies very straightforward Co oling leads to large collapse factors and small knots of cold gas residing within a much hotter halo For the purp oses of this pap er we use a standard friendsoffriends group nder with a small linking length to reliably extract a group catalog from each simulation output time At the end of the simulation there are over signicant ob jects within each simulation volume roughly the observed numb er density The luminosity of any ob ject is then extracted by tracking each of the particles that nally reside inside each ob ject backwards in time and extracting the time at which each of them rst b ecame cold and dense Standard p opulation synthesis techniques eg can then b e applied to pro duce the luminosity of each ob ject in any desired pass band In Fig we show a comparison b etween the observed Kband luminosity function and the SCDM simulation The observations are neatly bracketed by the simulation within the un certainties imp osed by the choice of initial mass function Clearly the shape of the observations are well repro duced with no excess at the bright end The faint end slop e is not well repro duced b ecause of the relatively high resolution imp osed mass cuto which was delib erately chosen to b e close to L For the LCDM simulation the shap e of the luminosity function is also well mo delled but the ob jects tend to b e to o bright This is b ecause the parameters chosen for this simulation lead to a higher global fraction of cold dense gas making all ob jects more luminous Conclusions For the rst time we have b een able to mo del galaxy formation within a large enough volume of the Universe that reliable calculations can b e made of the galaxy correlation and luminosity functions As has b een shown elsewhere in these pro ceedings the observed correlation function is well tted by these mo dels which also simultaneously t the observed luminosity functions The galaxies in our mo dels are not only reasonably distributed they also have a sensible range of masses and formation times Acknowledgments The work presented in this pap er was carried out as part of the programme of the Virgo Sup ercomputing Consortium using computers based at the Computing Centre of the Max Planck So ciety in Garching and at the Edinburgh Parallel Computing Centre References Baugh C M Cole S Frenk C S Lacey C G ApJ Bruzual G Charlot S ApJ Cen R Ostriker J ApJ Evrard A E Summers F J
Recommended publications
  • Curriculum Vitæ 0000-0002-2769-9507
    Institut de Physique des 2 Infinis de Lyon 4 rue Enrico Fermi, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 Lyon, 69622 Villeurbanne B [email protected] Oliver Newton MusicalNeutron Musical-Neutron Curriculum Vitæ 0000-0002-2769-9507 Employment & voluntary work Vocational 2019– Postdoctoral Researcher, Institut de Physique des Deux Infinis, Lyon, France. 2014–2015 Graduate Trading Platform Engineer, Fidessa, Woking, UK. Volunteering 2014–2020 Founding trustee & Treasurer, UniBrass Foundation (charity number: 1159359), UK. Education 2015–2019 PhD, Institute for Computational Cosmology, Durham, UK. Probing the nature of dark matter with small-scale cosmology Supervisors: Prof. Adrian Jenkins and Prof. Carlos Frenk 2010–2014 BSc MPhys, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK, 1st Class (Hons). Masters project: Determining the fundamental properties of Higgs candidates at the LHC Awards and scholarships 2019 ICC Research Scholarship, Institute for Computational Cosmology, Durham, UK. 2015–2019 STFC Postgraduate Studentship, Institute for Computational Cosmology, Durham, UK. Conference contributions Contributed talks July 2020 EAS (Online), Leiden, Netherlands. Constraining the properties of WDM using the satellite galaxies of the Milky Way Jan 2020 VIRGO Consortium meeting, Durham, UK. Constraining the properties of WDM using the satellite galaxies of the Milky Way Sep 2019 CLUES Collaboration meeting, IN2P3, Lyon, France. Constraints on thermal relic WDM from satellites of the LG July 2019 Small Galaxies, Cosmic Questions, Durham, UK. Constraints on the mass of the thermal relic warm dark matter particle Jan 2019 DEX XV, Edinburgh, UK. Constraints on the mass of the thermal relic warm dark matter particle Dec 2018 VIRGO Consortium meeting, Leiden University, Netherlands. Constraints on the mass of the thermal relic warm dark matter particle Aug 2018 XXX IAU General Assembly, Vienna, Austria.
    [Show full text]
  • Indra: a Public Computationally Accessible Suite of Cosmological 푁-Body Simulations
    MNRAS 000,1–12 (2021) Preprint 5 August 2021 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0 Indra: a Public Computationally Accessible Suite of Cosmological #-body Simulations Bridget Falck,1¢ Jie Wang,2,3 Adrian Jenkins,4 Gerard Lemson,1 Dmitry Medvedev,1 Mark C. Neyrinck,5,6 Alex S. Szalay1 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA 2National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China 3School of Astronomy and Space Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 4Institute for Computational Cosmology, Department of Physics, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, UK 5Ikerbasque, the Basque Foundation for Science, 48009, Bilbao, Spain 6Department of Physics, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, 48080, Bilbao, Spain Accepted XXX. Received YYY; in original form ZZZ; Draft version 5 August 2021 ABSTRACT Indra is a suite of large-volume cosmological #-body simulations with the goal of providing excellent statistics of the large-scale features of the distribution of dark matter. Each of the 384 simulations is computed with the same cosmological parameters and different initial phases, with 10243 dark matter particles in a box of length 1 ℎ−1 Gpc, 64 snapshots of particle data and halo catalogs, and 505 time steps of the Fourier modes of the density field, amounting to almost a petabyte of data. All of the Indra data are immediately available for analysis via the SciServer science platform, which provides interactive and batch computing modes, personal data storage, and other hosted data sets such as the Millennium simulations and many astronomical surveys.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2Df Galaxy Redshift Survey and Cosmological Simulations Carlos S
    University of Durham The 2dF galaxy redshift survey and cosmological simulations Carlos S. Frenk Institute for Computational Cosmology, Durham Institute for Computational Cosmology The 2dF Galaxy Redshift University of Durham Survey 1997- 2002 250 nights at 4m AAT 221,000 redshifts to bj<19.45 median z = 0.11 First 100k z's released June/01 Full catalogue released July/03 Institute for Computational Cosmology 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: University of Durham Team Members Ivan K. Baldry10 Carlton M. Baugh2 Joss Bland-Hawthorn1 Terry Bridges1 Russell Cannon1 Shaun Cole2 Matthew Colless3 Chris Collins13 Warrick Couch5 Nicholas Cross6 Gavin Dalton9 Kathryn Deely5 Roberto De Propris5 Simon P. Driver6 George Efstathiou8 Richard S. Ellis7 Carlos S. Frenk2 Karl Glazebrook10 Edward Hawkins12 Carole Jackson3 Ofer Lahav8 Ian Lewis9 Stuart Lumsden11 Steve Maddox12 Darren Madgwick8 Stephen Moody8 Peder Norberg2 John A. Peacock4 Will Precival4 Bruce A. Peterson3 Mark Seaborne9 Will Sutherland4 Keith Taylor7 Institutions 1Anglo-Australian Observatory 2University of Durham 3The Australian National University 4University of Edinburgh 5University of New South Wales 6University of St Andrews 7California Institute of Technology 8University of Cambridge 9University of Oxford 10Johns Hopkins University 33 people at 11University of Leeds 12University of Nottingham 13 Liverpool John Moores University 12 Institute for Computational Cosmology institutions The 2dF galaxy redshift survey University of Durham QuickTimeã and a YUV420 codec decompressor are needed to
    [Show full text]
  • Public Release of N-Body Simulation and Related Data by the Virgo Consortium
    Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 1–4 (2000) Printed 25 October 2018 (MN LATEX style file v1.4) Public Release of N-body simulation and related data by the Virgo consortium. C. S. Frenk,1 J. M. Colberg,2 H. M. P. Couchman,3 G. Efstathiou,4 A. E. Evrard,5 A. Jenkins,1 T. J. MacFarland,6 B. Moore,1 J. A. Peacock,7 F. R. Pearce,1 P. A. Thomas,8 S. D. M. White2 and N. Yoshida.2 (The Virgo Consortium)10 1 Dept Physics, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE. 2 Max-Planck Inst. for Astrophysics, Garching, Munich, D-85740, Germany. 3 Department of Physics and Astronomy, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4M1, Canada 4 Institute of Astronomy, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 OHA 6 Now at 105 Lexington Avenue, Apt. 6F,New York, NY 10016 5 Dept Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI-48109-1120. 7 Royal Observatory, Institute of Astronomy, Edinburgh, EH9 3HJ 8 Astronomy Centre,CPES, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9QJ 10 http://star-www.dur.ac.uk/∼frazerp/virgo/ 25 October 2018 ABSTRACT We are making available on the WWW a selection of the archived data from N-body simulations carried out by the Virgo consortium and related groups. This currently includes: (i) time-slice, lightcone and cluster data from the two 109-particle Hubble volume simulations described by Evrard 1998; (ii) time-slice data from simula- tions of 4 different cold dark matter cosmological models with 2563 particles analysed by Jenkins et al 1998; (iii) Dark halo catalogs, merger trees and galaxy catalogs from arXiv:astro-ph/0007362v1 25 Jul 2000 the GIF project described by Kauffmann et al 1999.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimising FLASH for Cosmological Simulations
    I V N E R U S E I T H Y T O H F G E R D I N B U Optimising FLASH for Cosmological Simulations Chris Daley August 24, 2007 M.Sc. in High Performance Computing The University of Edinburgh Year of Presentation: 2007 Abstract Runtime performance is a limiting factor in large cosmological simulations. A paral- lel application code called FLASH, which can be used for cosmological simulations is investigated in this report. FLASH is an Adaptive Mesh Refinement (AMR) code, parallelised using MPI, and incorporating a Particle-Mesh (PM) Poisson solver. Pro- files of a cosmological simulation based on FLASH, indicate that the procedure which accumulates particle mass onto the mesh is the major bottleneck. A parallel algorithm devised by the FLASH center may help to overcome this bottleneck. In this project, the algorithm is implemented for the latest beta release of FLASH, which cannot currently perform cosmological simulations. There is interest in FLASH because the adaptive mesh can be refined to resolve shocks in cosmological simulations. In addition, the new version of FLASH is designed with an emphasis on flexible and easy to extend code units. The communication strategy in the implemented parallel algorithm does not involve guard cell exchanges (halo swaps). As such, it uses less memory than the previous im- plementation in the previous version of FLASH. Due to time restrictions, the delivered implementation is only compatible with a uniform grid in both uniform and adaptive grid modes. In addition, results indicate it is approximately 3-5 times slower than the previous implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • Craf Pub Eng050126.Indd
    I NFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC The Crafoord Prize 2005 The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences has decided to award the Crafoord Prize in Astronomy 2005 to James Gunn, Princeton University, USA, James Peebles, Princeton University, USA, and Martin Rees, University of Cambridge, UK, “for contributions towards understanding the large-scale structure of the Universe”. How was the Universe formed? One of the most obvious facts about the Universe is that it shows a wealth of struc- ture on all scales from planets, stars and galaxies up to clusters of galaxies and super-clusters extending over several hundred million light years. Astronomi- cal observations have shown that the galaxies are not evenly distributed, but are mainly found in clusters and enormous filaments (Fig. 1). Often this is referred to as the ’cosmic web’. The origin and history of this structure has long been one of the most important problems for astronomy and cosmology. The recipients of this year’s Crafoord Prize have all made fundamental contributions to the dramatic increase in our understanding of how this large-scale structure was formed. The first traces of structure in the Universe can be seen in the fluctuations of the cosmic microwave background radiation about 380,000 years after Big Bang (Fig. 2). The origin of the fluctuations can, however, be traced back to epochs much earlier in the history of the Universe when small quantum fluctuations gave rise Fig. 1. Two dimensional distribution of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. The plot corresponds to a thin slice in the ’vertical’ direction, but covering most of the sky in the other direction.
    [Show full text]
  • Brandon Burkholder
    Brandon Burkholder Uses Structures Information Projects Millenium, Eris, Virgo Consortium, Bolshoi Pleiades, Titan, Hyades Physics Cosmological Principle General Relativity N-Body Problem Hydrodynamics Methods Brute Force Particle Mesh Tree Method Hybrids Initial Conditions Software ChaNGa GADGET GRAPE RAMSES Planets Galaxies Stars CDM Halos IGM/ISM Big Bang Exotic objects (black holes, neutron stars, supernovae, gamma-ray bursts) Explaining Observation Choosing Observation Targets Explaining Structure Formation Predicting Evolution of Structure A basic scientific tool to test theories in cosmology is to evaluate their consequences for the observable parts of the universe. One piece of observational evidence is the distribution of matter, including galaxies and intergalactic gas, which are observed today. Light emitted from more distant matter must travel longer in order to reach Earth, meaning looking at distant objects is like looking further back in time. This means the evolution in time of the matter distribution in the Universe can be observed. Millennium Run (cosmology) 2e9 ly cube, 1010 particle (dark matter) N-body simulation Starts at emission of CMB to utilize inhomogenous matter distribution initial conditions 25 TB output data, > 1 month computing time Eris (galactic formation) 7 6e particles, 13 billion years Dark matter foundation & galactic gas Feedback (UV background heating, supernovae blast wave enrichment, cooling) 9 months computing time (1.6 million cpu hours) Bolshoi (cosmology)
    [Show full text]
  • Gravitational Waves
    Gravitational waves Jo van den Brand, Nikhef and VU University Amsterdam, [email protected] Maratea, June 30, 2018 February 2016: discovery of gravitational waves Tiny vibrations in space can now be observed by using the kilometer-scale laser-based interferometers of LIGO and Virgo. This enables an entire new field in science Event GW150914 Chirp-signal from gravitational waves from two Einsteincoalescing black holes were Telescope observed with the LIGO detectors by the LIGO-Virgo Consortium on September 14, 2015 The next gravitational wave observatory Intermezzo Metric tensor and geometry Geometry Geometry is the study of shapes and spatial relations Euclidean geometry - sum of internal angles of a triangle is 180o - circumference of a circle with radius R has length 2R - a sphere with radius R has area A = 4R2 - Newton: space is Euclidean and time is universal - Newton thus assumes a flat spacetime Euclidian geometry is not the only kind of geometry - Bolyai, Lobachevsky, Gauss discovered other geometries Especially, Carl Friedrich Gauss (1777 – 1855) and Bernhard Riemann (1826 – 1866) have made important contributions to the development of geometry. The defined differential geometry Determining the geometric properties of the space (or even spacetime) around us is an experimental enterprise. It is not the subject of pure mathematics Differential geometry and the line element Line element is the central element of any geometry Example: Length of a curve in Euclidean flat geometry in 2D - Cartesian coordinates - divide the curve in segments - use Pythagoras for each segment - sum in order to find the entire length of the curve Take the limit to infinitesimal elements - this defines the line element Now we only need to know how to evaluate such an integral.
    [Show full text]
  • The Illustris Simulation: Public Data Release
    The illustris simulation: Public data release The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Nelson, D. et al. “The Illustris Simulation: Public Data Release.” Astronomy and Computing 13 (November 2015): 12–37 © 2015 Elsevier B.V. As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ascom.2015.09.003 Publisher Elsevier Version Author's final manuscript Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/111982 Terms of Use Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License Detailed Terms http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ The Illustris Simulation: Public Data ReleaseI Dylan Nelsona,∗, Annalisa Pillepicha, Shy Genelb,a,1, Mark Vogelsbergerc, Volker Springeld,e, Paul Torreyc,g, Vicente Rodriguez-Gomeza, Debora Sijackif, Gregory F. Snyderh, Brendan Griffenc, Federico Marinaccic, Laura Blechaj,2, Laura Salesi, Dandan Xud, Lars Hernquista aHarvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA bDepartment of Astronomy, Columbia University, 550 West 120th Street, New York, NY, 10027, USA cKavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Department of Physics, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA dHeidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies, Schloss-Wolfsbrunnenweg 35, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany eZentrum f¨urAstronomie der Universit¨atHeidelberg, ARI, M¨onchhofstr.12-14, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany fInstitute of Astronomy and Kavli Institute for Cosmology, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK gTAPIR, Mailcode 350-17, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA hSpace Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Dr, Baltimore, MD 21218 iDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Riverside, 900 University Avenue, Riverside, CA 92521, USA jUniversity of Maryland, College Park, Department of Astronomy and Joint Space Science Institute Abstract We present the full public release of all data from the Illustris simulation project.
    [Show full text]
  • Halo and Galaxy Formation Histories from the Millennium Simulation
    Halo and Galaxy Formation Histories from the Millennium Simulation: Public release of a VO-oriented and SQL-queryable database for studying the evolution of galaxies in the ΛCDM cosmogony Gerard Lemson∗† and the Virgo Consortium 31 July 2006 ABSTRACT The Millennium Run is the largest simulation of the formation of structure within the ΛCDM cosmogony so far carried out. It uses 1010 particles to follow the dark matter distribution in a cubic region 500h−1Mpc on a side, and has a spatial resolution of 5 h−1kpc. Application of simplified modelling techniques to the stored output of this calculation allows the formation and evolution of the ∼ 107 galaxies more luminous than the Small Magellanic Cloud to be simulated for a va- riety of assumptions about the detailed physics involved. As part of the activities of the German Astrophysical Virtual Observatory we have used a relational database to store the detailed assembly histories both of all the haloes and subhaloes resolved by the simulation, and of all the galaxies that form within these structures for two independent models of the galaxy formation physics. We have created web applica- tions that allow users to query these databases remotely using the standard Structured Query Language (SQL). This allows easy access to all properties of the galaxies and halos, as well as to the spatial and temporal relations between them and their en- vironment. Information is output in table format compatible with standard Virtual Observatory tools and protocols. With this announcement we are making these struc- tures fully accessible to all users. Interested scientists can learn SQL, gain familiarity arXiv:astro-ph/0608019v2 3 Aug 2006 with the database design and test queries on a small, openly accessible version of the Millennium Run (with volume 1/512 that of the full simulation).
    [Show full text]
  • Carlos S. Frenk (Sept 2020)
    Curriculum Vitae: Carlos S. Frenk (Sept 2020) Personal Details: Name: Carlos S. Frenk Nationality: British & Mexican Date of Birth: 27/Oct/51 Address: Institute for Computational Cosmology (44 191) 3343641 Ogden Centre, Physics Department (44 191) 3343635 (secretary) University of Durham (44 191) 3343645 (fax) Durham DH1 3LE, England [email protected] Summary and highlights, as detailed in remainder of CV: Publications, citations, etc • Founding Director of Institute for Computational Cosmology (2001 - 2020) • Have published 500 papers in the refereed scientific literature. • My papers have been cited over 95,002 times (H-index 136), making me one of most cited authors ever in astronomy and space science in the world. My average number of citations per refereed paper is 190. • Author of 4 of the 100 most cited papers ever published in astronomy and space science (a total of over 930,000). • Included in the list of \Highly cited" researchers (that is those whose papers rank among the top 1% most cited in their field the previous year), published by the Web of Science Group, every year since this list was introduced. • 2020 Clarivate Web of Science Citation Laureate (out of 24 across all areas of science and eco- nomics). • Have delivered 232 invited talks at major international conferences. • Supervised 44 PhD students (37 graduated so far) and 43 postdoctoral researchers, many of whom have gone on to influential positions in industry and academia around the world. • Included in \The world's most influential scientific minds, 2015", a list of 3000 highly cited researchers (compiled by Thomson Reuters).
    [Show full text]
  • A Primer on LIGO and Virgo Gravitational Wave Detection
    A primer on LIGO and Virgo gravitational wave detection Jo van den Brand, Nikhef and VU University Amsterdam, and Maastricht University, [email protected] The 2019 European School of High-Energy Physics, St Petersburg, September 16, 2019 Interferometric gravitational wave detectors Tiny vibrations in space can now be observed by using the kilometer-scale laser-based interferometers of LIGO and Virgo. This enables an entire new field in science Eleven detections…so far First gravitational wave detection with GW150914 and first binary neutron star GW170817 Event GW150914 Chirp-signal from gravitational waves from two Einsteincoalescing black holes were Telescope observed with the LIGO detectors by the LIGO-Virgo Consortium on September 14, 2015 The next gravitational wave observatory Event GW150914 On September 14th 2015 the gravitational waves generated by a binary black hole merger, located about 1.4 Gly from Earth, crossed the two LIGO detectors displacing their test masses by a small fraction of the radius of a proton Displacement Displacement ( 0.005 0.0025 0.000 Proton radii Proton - 0.0025 - 0.005 ) Proton radius=0.87 fm Measuring intervals must be smaller than 0.01 seconds Intermezzo Metric tensor and geometry Geometry Geometry is the study of shapes and spatial relations Euclidean geometry - sum of internal angles of a triangle is 180o - circumference of a circle with radius R has length 2R - a sphere with radius R has area A = 4R2 - Newton: space is Euclidean and time is universal - Newton thus assumes a flat spacetime Euclidian geometry is not the only kind of geometry - Bolyai, Lobachevsky, Gauss discovered other geometries Especially, Carl Friedrich Gauss (1777 – 1855) and Bernhard Riemann (1826 – 1866) have made important contributions to the development of geometry.
    [Show full text]