Fire and Avian Ecology in North America FIRE and AVIAN ECOLOGY in NORTH AMERICA

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fire and Avian Ecology in North America FIRE and AVIAN ECOLOGY in NORTH AMERICA Fire and Avian Ecology in North America FIRE AND AVIAN ECOLOGY IN NORTH AMERICA VICTORIA A. SAAB AND HUGH D. W. POWELL, EDITORS Saab and Powell Studies in Avian Biology No. 30 Studies in Avian Biology No. 30 A Publication of the Cooper Ornithological Society FIRE AND AVIAN ECOLOGY IN NORTH AMERICA Victoria A. Saab and Hugh D. W. Powell, Editors Studies in Avian Biology No. 30 A PUBLICATION OF THE COOPER ORNITHOLOGICAL SOCIETY Cover drawing: Black-backed Woodpecker (Picoides arcticus), Grasshopper Sparrow (Ammodramus savannarum), and Northern Bobwhite (Colinus virginianus). Drawing by Joyce V. VanDeWater. STUDIES IN AVIAN BIOLOGY Edited by Carl D. Marti Raptor Research Center Boise State University Boise, ID 83725 Studies in Avian Biology is a series of works too long for The Condor, published at irregular intervals by the Cooper Ornithological Society. Manuscripts for consideration should be submitted to the editor. Style and format should follow those of previous issues. Price $18.00 including postage and handling. All orders cash in advance; make checks payable to Cooper Ornithological Society. Send orders to Cooper Ornithological Society, c/o Western Foundation of Vertebrate Zoology, 439 Calle San Pablo, Camarillo, CA 93010. The Cooper Ornithological Society hereby grants permission to copy chapters (in whole or in part) appear- ing in Studies in Avian Biology for personal use, or educational use within one’s home institution, without payment, provided that the copied material bears the statement “©2005 The Cooper Ornithological Society” and the full citation, including names of all authors. Authors may post copies of their chapters on their per- sonal or institutional website, except that whole issues of Studies in Avian Biology may not be posted on websites. Any use not specifi cally granted here, and any use of Studies in Avian Biology articles or portions thereof for advertising, republication, or commercial uses, requires prior consent from the editor. ISBN: 0-943610-64-8 Library of Congress Control Number: 2005925879 Printed at Cadmus Professional Communications, Ephrata, Pennsylvania 17522 Issued: 27 July 2005 Copyright © by the Cooper Ornithological Society 2005 CONTENTS LIST OF AUTHORS ............................................................................................................ v–vi PREFACE ........................................................................................................................... vii Fire and avian ecology in North America: process infl uencing pattern ................................. ..........................................................................Victoria A. Saab and Hugh D. W. Powell 1 Fire and birds in the southwestern United States................................................................... .................................................................................. Carl E. Bock and William M. Block 14 Changing fi re regimes and the avifauna of California oak woodlands................................... .......................................................................... Kathryn L. Purcell and Scott L. Stephens 33 Fire and birds in maritime Pacifi c Northwest ........................................................................ ...................... Mark H. Huff, Nathaniel E. Seavy, John D. Alexander, and C. John Ralph 46 The role of fi re in structuring sagebrush habitats and bird communities ............................... ................................................Steven T. Knick, Aaron L. Holmes, and Richard F. Miller 63 Variation in fi re regimes of the Rocky Mountains: implications for avian communities and fi re management ........................ Victoria A. Saab, Hugh D. W. Powell, Natasha B. Kotliar, and Karen R. Newlon 76 Bird responses to burning and logging in the boreal forest of Canada .................................. ................................................................................. Susan J. Hannon and Pierre Drapeau 97 Fire regimes and avian responses in the central tallgrass prairie .................Dan L. Reinking 116 Fire ecology and bird populations in eastern deciduous forests............................................. ....................................... Vanessa L. Artman, Todd F. Hutchinson, and Jeffrey D. Brawn 127 Infl uence of fi re and other anthropogenic practices on grassland and shrubland birds in New England ......................... Peter D. Vickery, Benjamin Zuckerberg, Andrea L. Jones, W. Gregory Shriver, and Andrew P. Weik 139 Effects of fi re regime on birds in southeastern pine savannas and native prairies ................. .......... R. Todd Engstrom, Peter D. Vickery, Dustin W. Perkins, and W. Gregory Shriver 147 LITERATURE CITED ......................................................................................................... 161 LIST OF AUTHORS JOHN D. ALEXANDER ANDREA L. JONES Klamath Bird Observatory Massachusetts Audubon Society Box 758, Ashland, OR 97520 Lincoln, MA 01773 VANESSA L. ARTMAN STEVEN T. KNICK Department of Biology USGS Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center DePauw University Snake River Field Station Greencastle, IN 46135 970 Lusk Street, Boise, ID 83706 WILLIAM M. BLOCK NATASHA B. KOTLIAR USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain U.S. Geological Survey Research Station Fort Collins Science Center 2500 S. Pine Knoll 2150 Centre Ave, Building C Flagstaff, AZ 86001 Fort Collins, CO 80526 ICHARD ILLER CARL E. BOCK R F. M Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center University of Colorado Oregon State University Boulder, CO 80309-0334 Department of Rangeland Resources Corvallis, OR 97331 JEFFREY D. BRAWN Illinois Natural History Survey and University of Illinois KAREN R. NEWLON 607 East Peabody Drive USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station Champaign, IL 61820 1648 S. 7th Ave. Bozeman, MT 59717-2780 PIERRE DRAPEAU DUSTIN W. PERKINS Département des sciences biologiques Department of Natural Resources Conservation Université du Québec à Montréal University of Massachusetts Montréal, QC, H3C 3P8 Amherst, MA 01003 (Current address: National Park Service R. TODD ENGSTROM P.O. Box 239 Tall Timbers Research Station Lyndon B. Johnson National Park 13093 Henry Beadel Drive Johnson City, TX 78636) Tallahassee, FL 32312 (Current address: The Nature Conservancy HUGH D. W. POWELL 4340 Highway 84 West High Desert Ecological Research Institute Thomasville, GA 31792) 15 SW Colorado Ave., Suite 300 Bend, OR 97702 SUSAN J. HANNON (Current address: [email protected]) Department of Biological Sciences University of Alberta KATHRYN L. PURCELL Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E9 USDA Forest Service, Pacifi c Southwest Research Station Sierra Nevada Research Center AARON L. HOLMES 2081 E. Sierra Avenue PRBO—Conservation Science Fresno, CA 93710 4990 Shoreline Highway Stinson Beach, CA 94970 C. JOHN RALPH USDA Forest Service, Pacifi c Southwest Research Station MARK H. HUFF Redwood Sciences Laboratory USDI Fish and Wildlife Service 1700 Bayview Drive Offi ce of Technical Support-Forest Resources Arcata, CA 95521 911 N.E. 11th Ave. Portland, OR 97232 DAN L. REINKING Sutton Avian Research Center TODD F. HUTCHINSON Oklahoma Biological Survey USDA Forest Service University of Oklahoma 359 Main Road P.O. Box 2007 Delaware, OH 43015 Bartlesville, OK 74005-2007 VICTORIA A. SAAB PETER D. VICKERY USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station Center for Ecological Research 1648 S. 7th Avenue Richmond, ME 04357 Montana State University and Bozeman, MT 59717-2780 Department of Natural Resources Conservation University of Massachusetts NATHANIEL E. SEAVY Amherst, MA 01003 Department of Zoology University of Florida ANDREW P. WEIK Gainesville, FL 32611-8029 Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife and Bangor, ME 04401 Klamath Bird Observatory Box 758 BENJAMIN ZUCKERBERG Ashland, OR 97520 Department of Natural Resources Conservation University of Massachusetts W. GREGORY SHRIVER Amherst, MA 01003 State University of New York (Current address: State University of New York Syracuse, NY 13210 Syracuse, NY 13210) (Current address: National Park Service 54 Elm Street Woodstock, VT 05091) SCOTT L. STEPHENS University of California Division of Ecosystem Science Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management University of California 139 Mulford Hall Berkeley, CA 94720-3114 Studies in Avian Biology No. 30:vii PREFACE Many North American ecosystems evolved under graciously served as peer reviewers for the chap- the infl uence of wildfi re. Nevertheless, for much of ters in this volume: Robert Askins, Bill Block, the twentieth century, land managers concentrated Carl Bock, Greg Butcher, Mary Chase, Courtney their fi re management activities on minimizing the Conway, Richard DeGraff, Jane Fitzgerald, Luke amount of land that burned. The 1980s saw wider George, Matt Vander Haegen, Chuck Hunter, Dick acceptance of fi re with both wild and managed fi re Hutto, Frances James, Rudy King, John Lehmkuhl, commonly incorporated into land management Ed Murphy, Ken Rosenberg, Robin Russell, Janet plans. Interest in this topic grew over the course of Ruth, Tom Sisk, and Joel Sauder. We are grateful several years during informal discussions between to the United States Forest Service for generously the editors and organizers of the Third International providing funds to support the publication of this Partners in Flight Conference in Asilomar, California volume, facilitated by Beatrice Van Horne and in 2002. Those discussions led to a half-day
Recommended publications
  • El Dorado County Oak Woodland Management Plan
    El Dorado County Oak Woodland Management Plan April 2008 Planning Commission Recommended Version El Dorado County Development Services Department – Planning Services 2850 Fairlane Court, Placerville, CA 95667 OAK WOODLAND MANAGEMENT PLAN Table of Contents 1. Introduction.....................................................................................................................1 A. Purpose ....................................................................................................................1 B. Goals and Objectives of Plan...................................................................................2 C. Oak Woodland Habitat in El Dorado County..........................................................3 D. Economic Activity, Land, and Ecosystem Values of Oak Woodlands ...................4 E. California Oak Woodlands Conservation Act .........................................................4 2. Policy 7.4.4.4.................................................................................................................5 A. Applicability and Exemptions.................................................................................5 B. Replacement Objectives ..........................................................................................7 C. Mitigation Option A ................................................................................................7 D. On-Site Mitigation...................................................................................................8 E. Mitigation Option B.................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Determining Significance and Report Format and Content Requirements
    COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING SIGNIFICANCE AND REPORT FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENT GROUP Department of Planning and Land Use Department of Public Works Fourth Revision September 15, 2010 APPROVAL I hereby certify that these Guidelines for Determining Significance for Biological Resources, Report Format and Content Requirements for Biological Resources, and Report Format and Content Requirements for Resource Management Plans are a part of the County of San Diego, Land Use and Environment Group's Guidelines for Determining Significance and Technical Report Format and Content Requirements and were considered by the Director of Planning and Land Use, in coordination with the Director of Public Works on September 15, 2O1O. ERIC GIBSON Director of Planning and Land Use SNYDER I hereby certify that these Guidelines for Determining Significance for Biological Resources, Report Format and Content Requirements for Biological Resources, and Report Format and Content Requirements for Resource Management Plans are a part of the County of San Diego, Land Use and Environment Group's Guidelines for Determining Significance and Technical Report Format and Content Requirements and have hereby been approved by the Deputy Chief Administrative Officer (DCAO) of the Land Use and Environment Group on the fifteenth day of September, 2010. The Director of Planning and Land Use is authorized to approve revisions to these Guidelines for Determining Significance for Biological Resources and Report Format and Content Requirements for Biological Resources and Resource Management Plans except any revisions to the Guidelines for Determining Significance presented in Section 4.0 must be approved by the Deputy CAO.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire and Emergency Medical Services Operations and Data Analysis Flint, Michigan Center for Public Safety Management
    Fire and Emergency Medical Services Operations and Data Analysis Flint, Michigan December 2014 FIRE EMS Operational Analysis Center for Public Safety Management 474 K Street, NW, Suite 702 Washington, DC 20001 www.cpsm.us – 716-969-1360 Exclusive Provider of Public Safety Technical Assistance for the International City/County Management Association General Information About ICMA The International City/County Management Association (ICMA) is a 100-year-old, nonprofit professional association of local government administrators and managers, with approximately 9,000 members located in 32 countries. Since its inception in 1914, ICMA has been dedicated to assisting local governments in providing services to its citizens in an efficient and effective manner. Its work spans all of the activities of local government—parks, libraries, recreation, public works, economic development, code enforcement, brownfields, public safety, etc. ICMA advances the knowledge of local government best practices across a wide range of platforms including publications, research, training, and technical assistance. ICMA’s work includes both domestic and international activities in partnership with local, state, and federal governments as well as private foundations. For example, it is involved in a major library research project funded by the Bill &Melinda Gates Foundation and it is providing community policing training in Panama working with the U.S. State Department. It worked in Afghanistan assisting with building wastewater treatment plants and has teams in Central America working with SOUTHCOM to provide training in disaster relief. Center for Public Safety Management LLC The ICMA Center for Public Safety Management (ICMA/CPSM) is one of four Centers within the Information and Assistance Division of ICMA providing support to local governments in the areas of police, fire, EMS, emergency management, and homeland security.
    [Show full text]
  • Quercus ×Coutinhoi Samp. Discovered in Australia Charlie Buttigieg
    XXX International Oaks The Journal of the International Oak Society …the hybrid oak that time forgot, oak-rod baskets, pros and cons of grafting… Issue No. 25/ 2014 / ISSN 1941-2061 1 International Oaks The Journal of the International Oak Society … the hybrid oak that time forgot, oak-rod baskets, pros and cons of grafting… Issue No. 25/ 2014 / ISSN 1941-2061 International Oak Society Officers and Board of Directors 2012-2015 Officers President Béatrice Chassé (France) Vice-President Charles Snyers d’Attenhoven (Belgium) Secretary Gert Fortgens (The Netherlands) Treasurer James E. Hitz (USA) Board of Directors Editorial Committee Membership Director Chairman Emily Griswold (USA) Béatrice Chassé Tour Director Members Shaun Haddock (France) Roderick Cameron International Oaks Allen Coombes Editor Béatrice Chassé Shaun Haddock Co-Editor Allen Coombes (Mexico) Eike Jablonski (Luxemburg) Oak News & Notes Ryan Russell Editor Ryan Russell (USA) Charles Snyers d’Attenhoven International Editor Roderick Cameron (Uruguay) Website Administrator Charles Snyers d’Attenhoven For contributions to International Oaks contact Béatrice Chassé [email protected] or [email protected] 0033553621353 Les Pouyouleix 24800 St.-Jory-de-Chalais France Author’s guidelines for submissions can be found at http://www.internationaloaksociety.org/content/author-guidelines-journal-ios © 2014 International Oak Society Text, figures, and photographs © of individual authors and photographers. Graphic design: Marie-Paule Thuaud / www.lecentrecreatifducoin.com Photos. Cover: Charles Snyers d’Attenhoven (Quercus macrocalyx Hickel & A. Camus); p. 6: Charles Snyers d’Attenhoven (Q. oxyodon Miq.); p. 7: Béatrice Chassé (Q. acerifolia (E.J. Palmer) Stoynoff & W. J. Hess); p. 9: Eike Jablonski (Q. ithaburensis subsp.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Fire with Flint and Steel
    Making Fire with Flint and Steel. Early Failures Many survival or scouting books give different instructions on how one can start a fire with flint and steel. These books suggest various materials that are supposed to catch the spark (punk – the powdery dry rot from the insides of fallen logs, cottonwood fluff, fine dry grass, fine wood shavings, dry moss, and various lichens. The people who wrote those books had obviously never tried it. None of these materials work well, although they all make excellent small kindling once you have a fire started. Problem Solved The Oxford Universal Dictionary defines tinder as "a flammable substance used to kindle a fire, especially charred linen". When a spark hits charred cloth, it creates a tiny red spot, which slowly grows like a glowing fairy ring. It is impossible to blow out; in fact, the more wind there is the better, as the spark simply gets hotter and hotter. The only way to put it out is by suffocation (which preserves the rest of the charred cloth for future use), or by dousing it with water (which ruins the char cloth). The amazing thing is that charred cloth in windy weather makes it easier to start a fire with flint and steel than a match. Well, almost! Making Charred Cloth Here is how to put together your own tinder box, so that you can make a fire the same way that people did two hundred years ago. First, you will need some cloth. Linen is the traditional fabric, but 100% cotton works just fine, and it is a lot cheaper! Do not use synthetic or synthetic blend fabrics.
    [Show full text]
  • Sora Rail in Stilly and the Identification of Immature Small Crakes D
    Sora Rail in Stilly and the identification of immature small crakes D. I. M. Wallace The immature Sora Rail Porzana Carolina present on St Agnes, Isles of Scilly, from 26th September to 9th October 1973 (Brit. Birds, 67: 320; Scilly Bird Report for IQ73'- 19-21) was the first to be recorded in Europe since 1920. The record was accepted by both the Rarities Committee and the Records Committee of the British Ornithologists' Union, and the species was once again listed in category A of the British and Irish list (Ibis, 116: 578). This short paper, which stems from the decision to publish in this journal the details of records that result in category promotion, also includes some comparative notes on immature small crake identification. DETAILS OF THE SORA RAIL IN SCILLY The bird was first seen in the rushes of the Big Pool by D. Smallshire, but early opinions on its identity were hopelessly divided. DS, A. R. Dean and B. R. Dean persisted in seeing slight but distinct differences from the closely related Spotted Crake P. porzana, the species to which others ascribed the bird on the basis of its noticeably buff under tail. The literature available at the time implied that this was a character only of the Spotted Crake and the controversy might have remained unresolved but for the arrival of fresh, open- minded observers, some already familiar with Sora Rails. A phone call from DS to DIMW on 7th produced redoubled efforts at identification. Close attention had already been paid to the bird by B.
    [Show full text]
  • Life History Account for Sora
    California Wildlife Habitat Relationships System California Department of Fish and Wildlife California Interagency Wildlife Task Group SORA Porzana carolina Family: RALLIDAE Order: GRUIFORMES Class: AVES B146 Written by: E. Beedy Reviewed by: H. Cogswell Edited by: S. Granholm, R. Duke DISTRIBUTION, ABUNDANCE, AND SEASONALITY In summer, fairly common and widespread in fresh emergent wetlands of northern California. It breeds throughout the San Francisco Bay area, north into Sonoma and Napa cos., throughout the Central Valley, and east of the Cascade-Sierra Nevada crest south at least to Mono Lake (Grinnell and Miller 1944). It probably breeds regularly in southern California mountains, but the only recent breeding record is from Fain Springs in the San Bernardino Mts. Historical nesting localities include Big Bear Lake in the San Bernardino Mts. and the Owens Valley, Inyo Co. There are a few summer records from the Salton Sea district and along the coastal lowlands, but recent nesting there has not been confirmed (Garrett and Dunn 1981). In winter, northern and high-elevation populations migrate southward. Widespread along the southern California coast in winter, as well as at the Salton Sea and the Colorado River, and visitors occasionally reach the Channel Islands (Garrett and Dunn 1981). There are historical, northern coast wintering records (Grinnell and Miller 1944). Although absent from the immediate coast in summer (McCaskie et al. 1979), visits saline emergent wetlands in the nonbreeding season. Most common rail in California and North America, but numbers have been reduced by loss of wetlands. SPECIFIC HABITAT REQUIREMENTS Feeding: Primarily forages on the ground in dense, emergent vegetation, but less commonly walks on mudflats in marsh openings, wades into water, or swims.
    [Show full text]
  • Science Notes Science
    MDC Resource Science The Timing of Autumn Rail Migration in Missouri Yellow Rail Science Notes Science Sora Virginia Rail Missouri Department of Conservation (MDC) 2017 VOLUME 12 NO. 3 The Timing of Autumn Rail Migration in Missouri By Auriel M.V. Fournier, University of Arkansas and Doreen C. Mengel, Missouri Department of Conservation Background Information: We do not have population estimates for the three Monitoring and conserving waterbirds in Missouri, study species so it is difficult to speculate if the including Sora (Porzana carolina), Virginia Rail (Rallus difference in number of detections is related to limicola), and Yellow Rail (Coturnicops noveboracensis), population size, survey methodology, habitat are constrained by the lack of information on migration selection decisions, or differences in migration phenology. Understanding the timing of a species’ ecology. This question is worthy of future evaluation. migration is as important as knowing the species’ habitat needs and stopover ecology. Awareness regarding the time of year that habitat is needed is vital to inform habitat management, especially in highly ephemeral Figure 1 – Comparision of autumn migratory timing of habitats such as palustrine emergent wetlands. Public Virginia Rail (Rallus limicola), Yellow Rail (Coturnicops wetlands across the central United States, including noveboracensis) and Sora (Porzana carolina) from 2012 Missouri, are typically managed as migratory bird -2016 in Missouri USA. Virginia Rail and Yellow Rail stopover habitat, with a focus on waterfowl; other graphs represent the proportion of counts of individuals. wetland-dependent bird species, including rails, also use The Sora graph represents a smoothed spline of the these habitats although the timing of their need is less formal density estimates.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Evaluation: Guidance for the Review of Environmental Impact Assessment Documents
    HABITAT EVALUATION: GUIDANCE FOR THE REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT DOCUMENTS EPA Contract No. 68-C0-0070 work Assignments B-21, 1-12 January 1993 Submitted to: Jim Serfis U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Federal Activities 401 M Street, SW Washington, DC 20460 Submitted by: Mark Southerland Dynamac Corporation The Dynamac Building 2275 Research Boulevard Rockville, MD 20850 CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ... ...... .... ... ................................................. 1 Habitat Conservation .......................................... 2 Habitat Evaluation Methodology ................................... 2 Habitats of Concern ........................................... 3 Definition of Habitat ..................................... 4 General Habitat Types .................................... 5 Values and Services of Habitats ................................... 5 Species Values ......................................... 5 Biological diversity ...................................... 6 Ecosystem Services.. .................................... 7 Activities Impacting Habitats ..................................... 8 Land Conversion ....................................... 9 Land Conversion to Industrial and Residential Uses ............. 9 Land Conversion to Agricultural Uses ...................... 10 Land Conversion to Transportation Uses .................... 10 Timber Harvesting ...................................... 11 Grazing ............................................. 12 Mining .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Before Matches
    Fire before matches by David Mead 2020 Sulang Language Data and Working Papers: Topics in Lexicography, no. 34 Sulawesi Language Alliance http://sulang.org/ SulangLexTopics034-v2 LANGUAGES Language of materials : English ABSTRACT In this paper I describe seven methods for making fire employed in Indonesia prior to the introduction of friction matches and lighters. Additional sections address materials used for tinder, the hearth and its construction, some types of torches and lamps that predate the introduction of electricity, and myths about fire making. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction; 2 Traditional fire-making methods; 2.1 Flint and steel strike- a-light; 2.2 Bamboo strike-a-light; 2.3 Fire drill; 2.4 Fire saw; 2.5 Fire thong; 2.6 Fire plow; 2.7 Fire piston; 2.8 Transporting fire; 3 Tinder; 4 The hearth; 5 Torches and lamps; 5.1 Palm frond torch; 5.2 Resin torch; 5.3 Candlenut torch; 5.4 Bamboo torch; 5.5 Open-saucer oil lamp; 5.6 Footed bronze oil lamp; 5.7 Multi-spout bronze oil lamp; 5.8 Hurricane lantern; 5.9 Pressurized kerosene lamp; 5.10 Simple kerosene lamp; 5.11 Candle; 5.12 Miscellaneous devices; 6 Legends about fire making; 7 Additional areas for investigation; Appendix: Fire making in Central Sulawesi; References. VERSION HISTORY Version 2 [13 June 2020] Minor edits; ‘candle’ elevated to separate subsection. Version 1 [12 May 2019] © 2019–2020 by David Mead All Rights Reserved Fire before matches by David Mead Down to the time of our grandfathers, and in some country homes of our fathers, lights were started with these crude elements—flint, steel, tinder—and transferred by the sulphur splint; for fifty years ago matches were neither cheap nor common.
    [Show full text]
  • Coyote Creek South Management Plan
    Coyote Creek South Management Plan Photo credit: Philip Bayles Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife 4034 Fairiew Industrial Drive SE Salem, Oregon 97302 March 2016 LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS The following individuals, mainly consisting of Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife biologists and program coordinators, provided valuable input into this plan: • Ann Kreager, Willamette Wildlife Mitigation Project Biologist, South Willamette Watershed, ODFW • Emily Steel, Restoration Ecologist, City of Eugene • Trevor Taylor, Natural Areas Restoration Team Supervisor, City of Eugene • Bruce Newhouse, Ecologist, Salix Associates • David Stroppel, Habitat Program Manager, South Willamette Watershed, ODFW • Wayne Morrow, Wildlife Manager, Fern Ridge Wildlife Area, ODFW • Kevin Roth, Wildlife Technician Senior, Fern Ridge Wildlife Area, ODFW In addition, the plan draws on the work of professional ecologists and planners, and feedback from a wide variety of representatives from ODFW and partner agencies, including: • Ed Alverson, Botanist • Diane Steeck, Wetland Ecologist, City of Eugene • Paul Gordon, Wetland Technical Specialist, City of Eugene • Steve Marx, SW Watershed District Manager, ODFW • Bernadette Graham-Hudson, Fish & Wildlife Operations and Policy Analyst, ODFW • Laura Tesler, Wildlife Wildlife Mitigation Staff Biologist, ODFW • Shawn Woods, Willamette Wildlife Mitigation Restoration Biologist, ODFW • Sue Beilke, Willamette Wildlife Mitigation Project Biologist, ODFW • Susan Barnes, NW Region Wildlife Diversity Biologist, ODFW • Keith Kohl,
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Oak Woodland Resources in BLM's Eugene District
    Assessment of Oak Woodland Resources in BLM’s Eugene District Lane County, Oregon Technical Note 406 June 2000 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management December 1999 Assessment of Oak Woodland Resources in BLM’s Eugene District Lane County, Oregon Technical Note 406 By: David G. Chiller Research Biologist, Pacific Wildlife Research Inc. David G. Vesely Senior Forest Ecologist, Pacific Wildlife Research Inc. William I. Dean Wildlife Biologist, Bureau of Land Management, Eugene District Eugene District Office 2890 Chad Drive Eugene, OR 97440-2226 June 2000 BLM/OR/WA/PL-00/052+6635 ABSTRACTABSTRACT Because of the significant loss of oak (Quercus were delineated; and the topographic features, spp.) habitat and the subsequent increased value vegetation structure, and composition of the placed on oak woodlands for wildlife habitat, the sites were characterized. Current conditions preservation and restoration of native oak wood- were then compared with conditions docu- lands has become a priority for land man- mented in historical records. In addition, the agers and conservationists in the Western wildlife species most likely occurring on the United States. In 1998, reconnaissance sur- sites were identified. Literature from oak wood- veys were conducted on 13 oak woodland sites land studies was then reviewed to determine managed by the Bureau of Land Management’s whether certain management and restoration (BLM’s) Eugene District in Lane County, methods, such as eliminating conifer encroach- Oregon. The sites were classified as either ment and thinning closed-canopy stands, would meadow-type communities or woodland-type be effective in addressing conditions observed at communities; oak patches within the sites the BLM sites.
    [Show full text]