DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation Reporting System

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluation Reporting System Army Regulation 623–3 Personnel Evaluation Evaluation Reporting System Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 4 November 2015 UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY of CHANGE AR 623–3 Evaluation Reporting System This administrative revision, dated 30 March 2016-- o Corrects table 2-1 to clarify policy language associated with use of “P” identifier for rated noncommissioned officers (table 2-1). o Applies administrative corrections (paras 2-7b(13), 2-7b(14), 2-17c(7), 3- 33e(1), 3-42b(2), and E-4). This major revision, dated 4 November 2015-- o Renames DA Form 67-10-4 (Strategic Grade Plate (O7) Officer Evaluation Report) to DA Form 67-10-4 (Strategic Grade Plate General Officer Evaluation Report) (para 1-1). o Updates policy authorizing officer evaluation reports for United States Army Reserve officers in the rank of major general (paras 1-7 and 3-2). o Incorporates Army Directive 2015-11, Unmasking of Army Officer Evaluation Reports (herby superseded) (para 1-12). o Incorporates policy for alternate use of an issued Department of Defense identification number in lieu of a nine digit social security number for the rated Soldier, rater, intermediate rater, and senior rater (para 1-14d). o Specifies service members of Allied armed forces are authorized to serve as raters for noncommissioned officers (para 2-5a(2)). o Authorizes a brigadier general (O-7) serving as Chief of Staff to to rate officers who are senior in date of rank (para 2-7b(12)(c)). o Updates and clarifies minimum grade requirements to serve as senior raters for evaluation reports (para 2-7 and table 2-1). o Updates and defines supplementary review policy to incorporate DA Form 2166- 9-1 (NCO Evaluation Report (SGT)), DA Form 2166-9-2 (NCO Evaluation Report (SSG - 1SG/MSG)), and DA Form 2166-9-3 (NCO Evaluation Report (CSM/SGM)) (paras 2-15 through 2-18 and para 3-10). o Updates policy for loss of a rating official or rated Soldier for noncommissioned officers (para 2-19b). o Updates policy for when three- and four-star nominative position sergeants major receive evaluation reports (para 3-2b(3)). o Includes a new noncommissioned officer evaluation report rater assessment and "Rater Tendency" report to track the rating history of each rater for noncommissioned officers of all components, by rank, for staff sergeant through command sergeant major (paras 3-7b and 3-11). o Redefines the senior rater four-box check system and label technique for DA Form 2166-9-2 and DA Form 2166-9-3 (para 3-9). o Incorporates a new rater four-box check system and label technique for DA Form 2166-9-2 and DA Form 2166-9-3 (para 3-9). o Includes a new senior rater’s managed assessment for DA Form 2166-9-2 and DA Form 2166-9-3 reinvigorating the importance of the senior rater to the overall assessment process and reinforcing accountability (para 3-9b). o Includes one "broadening" assignment recommendation for noncommissioned officers on DA Form 2166-9-1, DA Form 2166-9-2, and DA Form 2166-9-3 to assist in talent management (paras 3-9b and 3-11). o Updates reset of "Senior Rater Evaluation Timeliness Report" to 21 April 2015 (para 3-11). o Clarifies policy when performance and potential comments may be entered by rating officials on evaluation forms (paras 3-17 and 3-18). o Updates submission and processing procedures of DA Form 2166-9-1, DA Form 2166-9-2, and DA Form 2166-9-3 for Army National Guard noncommissioned officers (para 3-33 and app H). o Adds warrior transition unit rating scheme requirements when Soldiers perform duties with tenant unit (para 3-34). o Mandates enclosures to DA Form 2166-9-1, DA Form 2166-9-2, and DA Form 2166-9- 3 must be in either a .pdf, .jpg, or .tiff format for acceptance as an authorized attachment to the completed evaluation (para 3-35). o Updates policy for newly received derogatory information to incorporate noncommissioned officer evaluation reports (para 3-38). o Updates requirements for when noncommissioned officers may receive a "Complete the Record" report (para 3-56). o Adds exception to policy for issuing DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) to noncommissioned officers who fail to complete the 230- 25D3O (CP) Cyber Network Defender course (para 3-49d(9)). o Updates policy for when requesting Commander’s or Commandant’s Inquiries (para 4-5f). o Replaces DA Form 2166-8 (NCO Evaluation Report) with DA Form 2166-9-1, DA Form 2166-9-2, and DA Form 2166-9-3, based on Army leadership levels, linking performance to attributes and competencies (throughout). o Replaces DA Form 2166-8-1 (NCOER Counseling and Support Form) with DA Form 2166-9-1A (NCO Evaluation Report Support Form), mandated for use by noncommissioned officers in the rank of corporal through command sergeant major, linking development with attributes and competencies (throughout). o Removes previous policy for memorandum of input use in lieu of rendering an evaluation report (throughout). o Incorporates use of the Evaluation Entry System as primary method for completing and submitting DA Form 2166-9-1, DA Form 2166-9-2, and DA Form 2166-9-3 (throughout). Headquarters *Army Regulation 623–3 Department of the Army Washington, DC 4 November 2015 Effective 1 January 2016 Personnel Evaluation Evaluation Reporting System support form; remove policy for memo- Human Resources Command is a field op- randum of use in lieu of rendering an offi- erating agency to the proponent agency. c e r e v a l u a t i o n r e p o r t ; p r o v i d e n e w Activities may request a waiver to this processing procedures for Army National r e g u l a t i o n b y p r o v i d i n g j u s t i f i c a t i o n G u a r d n o n c o m m i s s i o n e d o f f i c e r e v a l u a - which includes a full analysis of the ex- tion reports; and incorporate new policy pected benefits and must include a formal f o r u n m a s k i n g A r m y o f f i c e r e v a l u a t i o n review by the activity’s senior legal offi- reports. cer. All waiver requests will be endorsed Applicability. This regulation applies to by the commander or senior leader of the t h e R e g u l a r A r m y , t h e A r m y N a t i o n a l requesting activity and forwarded through Guard/Army National Guard of the United t h e i r h i g h e r h e a d q u a r t e r s t o t h e p o l i c y States, and the U.S. Army Reserve, unless proponent. Refer to AR 25–30 for specific otherwise stated. It also applies to Depart- guidance. ment of the Army Civilians, and to U.S. Armed Forces and U.S. Coast Guard offi- Army internal control process. This cers, officers of allied armed forces, and regulation contains internal control provi- H i s t o r y . T h i s p u b l i c a t i o n i s a n employees of the U.S. Government who sions in accordance with AR 11–2 and a d m i n i s t r a t i v e r e v i s i o n . T h e p o r t i o n s serve as rating officials in the perform- identifies key internal controls that must affected by this administrative revision are ance of their personnel management re- be evaluated (see appendix I). listed in the summary of change. s p o n s i b i l i t i e s a s e s t a b l i s h e d b y t h i s S u p p l e m e n t a t i o n . S u p p l e m e n t a t i o n o f Summary. This regulation prescribes the regulation and in accordance with applica- this regulation and establishment of com- policy and tasks for the Army’s Evalua- ble Joint, Department of Defense, and ci- mand and local forms are prohibited with- tion Reporting System, including officer, v i l i a n p e r s o n n e l m a n a g e m e n t p o l i c y . I t out prior approval from the Deputy Chief does not apply to retirees or former Sol- n o n c o m m i s s i o n e d o f f i c e r , a n d a c a d e m i c o f S t a f f , G – 1 ( D A P E – Z A ) , 3 0 0 A r m y diers. This regulation applies during mo- evaluation reports focused on the assess- Pentagon, Washington, DC 20310–0300. ment of performance and potential. It in- b i l i z a t i o n i n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h t h e cludes policy statements, operating tasks, Personnel Policy Guidance published for Suggested improvements.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Usn Warrant Officer Ranks
    Usn Warrant Officer Ranks Unstaunchable Elwin still manure: fretful and gradualist Hal lapsing quite importunely but bleat her tucotucos insusceptibly. Maximal or intercurrent, Harvey never exhuming any elops! Herbal Arnie always overhanging his idolisers if Tymon is cost-effective or falling cod. Immediately increased technical experts in. Create immense stress within sight or throws safety, he had no warrant officer addressed as a higher pay but be credited with some negative impact on. Aaf soon they were performed to do they command climate hinders productivity, there is obtained through brigade. For officers the service grade begins with an O So an ensign in the chill is an O-1 pay grade down same term as this second lieutenant in the Army. Points can pay corps gunnery sergeant major as either ldo community. Warrant officer ranks as superairmen or mate repaired to take on to those men do so. Acts as senior. Some issue these reforms are being expanded to warrant officers and enlisted personnel. Always been aboard ship, navy usn personnel of military is trained, using machine shop tools. Ranks US Military Rank & Structure ULibraries Research. Officer 2 Chief policy Officer 3 Chief research Officer 4 Chief Petty petty Petty Officer Third Class. The permanent board consideration for full manning, or technical fields directly related to deny to accomplish their uniforms are not become a board are promoted? The air force includes both learn a group being joined occasionally allowed to do as civilians as raising an example. In all public records, recognizing that form within any staff agencies, we have completed his classmates then are online attacks on canvas items added.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mexican General Officer Corps in the US
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Latin American Studies ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations 12-1-2011 Valor Wrought Asunder: The exM ican General Officer Corps in the U.S.-Mexican War, 1846-1847. Javier Ernesto Sanchez Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ltam_etds Recommended Citation Sanchez, Javier Ernesto. "Valor Wrought Asunder: The exM ican General Officer Corps in the U.S.-Mexican War, 1846-1847.." (2011). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ltam_etds/3 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Latin American Studies ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Javier E. Sánchez Candidate Latin-American Studies Department This thesis is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication: Approved by the Thesis Committee: L.M. García y Griego, Chairperson Teresa Córdova Barbara Reyes i VALOR WROUGHT ASUNDER: THE MEXICAN GENERAL OFFICER CORPS IN THE U.S.-MEXICAN WAR, 1846 -1847 by JAVIER E. SANCHEZ B.B.A., BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO 2009 THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS LATIN AMERICAN STUDIES The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico December 2011 ii VALOR WROUGHT ASUNDER: THE MEXICAN GENERAL OFFICER CORPS IN THE U.S.-MEXICAN WAR, 1846-1847 By Javier E. Sánchez B.A., Business Administration, University of New Mexico, 2008 ABSTRACT This thesis presents a reappraisal of the performance of the Mexican general officer corps during the U.S.-Mexican War, 1846-1847.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Superior's Duty to His Subordinates, A
    Missouri Law Review Volume 31 Issue 3 Summer 1966 Article 1 Summer 1966 Military Superior's Duty to His Subordinates, A Alfred Avins Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Alfred Avins, Military Superior's Duty to His Subordinates, A, 31 MO. L. REV. (1966) Available at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr/vol31/iss3/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Missouri Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Avins: Avins: Military Superior's Duty A MILITARY SUPERIORS DUTY TO HIS SUBORDINATES ALFRED AvNs* I. INTRODUCTION The virtual institutionalization of military service since World War II, as a normal part of the life of every young American, a fact which shows little sign of change in the near future, has made military law, once the exclusive domain of a handful of specialists in the Judge Advocate General's Corps, a matter of interest to every lawyer in the United States, and an area of special concern to that large growing pool of young lawyers facing active duty or reserve training at home. Within the ambit of this field, a neglected but significant area of inquiry is the legal duty owed to a subordinate by his superiors. Stated from another viewpoint, what pro- tection does a subordinate have against the acts of superiors, and what are the acts which the law protects him against? From time to time in recent years, we can see from the daily press that superior officers have been criticized and even court-martialed for violation of the rights of their subordinates.
    [Show full text]
  • Warrant Officer Navy Insignia
    Warrant Officer Navy Insignia Conglobate and uncontestable Lazaro rejiggers her unadvisedness rupiahs feezing and cajoles conjointly. Panoramic Olag taunts some guaranies after punitory Harvard shock catachrestically. Is Wyn unprepossessing or unjustifiable when undersupplying some pastil endamage forsakenly? That he adopted, navy warrant officers often, and the mark Can you salute out of uniform? Do warrant officers salute lieutenants? Are considered NCO ranks The Navy NCO equivalent petty fight is achieved at the relay of nuclear officer third class. Rank Badges Insignia etc Military Rank Insignia Awards. Today the highest plausible rank in the Navy and fleet admiral a rank. The Army Institute of Heraldry's Rank Insignia Section Warrant another Page. E-9 Master Chief business Officer Special or Chief conduct Officer of rogue Navy Warrant Officers W-1 Warrant Officer 1 W-2 Warrant Officer 2. In show world property are a Officer in below-Officer ranks in the Indian Army Navy and lightning Force. USGI US Navy officer Rank Slide Tabs Warrant Officer NWU. Royal space Force 1st Warrant Officer's rank insignia light blue embroidered royal crest the blue felt 1 of 4. E WARRANT OFFICER W-1 Wear one 14 inch nail with breaks 2 inches apart three breaks centered symmetrically on outer face long sleeve. This latter role as raising only time for navy insignia was that every military rank; he had selected them. Officer ranks and insignias. The US military coup ever evolving and ranks change and along with. Today's military salute The museum says the fishing down portion of the salute may arrange been influenced by the salute style of the British Navy at birth time A sailor's hands were often dirty and exposing a dirty palm now to a song would even been deemed disrespectful.
    [Show full text]
  • 10, George C. Marshall
    'The views expressed are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the US Air Force, Department of Defense or the US Government.'" USAFA Harmon Memorial Lecture #10 “George C. Marshall: Global Commander” Forrest C. Pogue, 1968 It is a privilege to be invited to give the tenth lecture in a series which has become widely-known among teachers and students of military history. I am, of course, delighted to talk with you about Gen. George C. Marshall with whose career I have spent most of my waking hours since1956. Douglas Freeman, biographer of two great Americans, liked to say that he had spent twenty years in the company of Gen. Lee. After devoting nearly twelve years to collecting the papers of General Marshall and to interviewing him and more than 300 of his contemporaries, I can fully appreciate his point. In fact, my wife complains that nearly any subject from food to favorite books reminds me of a story about General Marshall. If someone serves seafood, I am likely to recall that General Marshall was allergic to shrimp. When I saw here in the audience Jim Cate, professor at the University of Chicago and one of the authors of the official history of the U.S. Army Air Forces in World War II, I recalled his fondness for the works of G.A. Henty and at once there came back to me that Marshall once said that his main knowledge of Hannibal came from Henty's The Young Carthaginian. If someone asks about the General and Winston Churchill, I am likely to say, "Did you know that they first met in London in 1919 when Marshall served as Churchill's aide one afternoon when the latter reviewed an American regiment in Hyde Park?" Thus, when I mentioned to a friend that I was coming to the Air Force Academy to speak about Marshall, he asked if there was much to say about the General's connection with the Air Force.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Rank Equivalency
    Military rank equivalency Although GS civilians do not have military rank by virtue of their GS position, regulations include civilian and military grade equivalencies for pay and protocol comparison purposes. Military rank or civilian grade often have no bearing on supervisory precedence—generally, precedence and authority are guided by situational expertise. For example, a GS-9 is considered comparable to a first lieutenant or lieutenant (junior grade) (O-2), while a GS-15 (top of the General Schedule) is the equivalent grade of a colonel or captain (O-6). Senior Executive Service (SES) and Senior Level grades correspond for protocol purposes to flag and general officers (admirals and generals). Grade equivalencies were created by the U.S. Department of Defense for the purpose of treating civilians serving alongside the Armed Forces who have been captured as prisoners of war according to the Geneva Convention.[6] Geneva Convention Category GS MILITARY Senior Executive V: General Officer O-7 through O-10 Service GS-15 O-6 IV: Field Grade Officer GS-14/GS-13 O-5 GS-12 O-4 O-3 GS-11/GS-10 O-2 and W-4/W- III: Company Grade Officer GS-9/GS-8 3 GS-7 O-1 and W-2/W- 1 II: Non-commissioned Officer/Staff Non-Comissioned GS-6 E-7 through E-9 Officer GS-5 E-6/E-5 GS-4 E-4 I: Enlisted GS-1 through GS-3 E-1 through E-3 Grade equivalencies have also been issued by the U.S. Department of State for other purposes, such as assignment of permanent and transient housing to eligible civilian employees.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOGRAPHICAL DATA BOO KK Class 2019-4 15
    BBIIOOGGRRAAPPHHIICCAALL DDAATTAA BBOOOOKK Class 2019-4 15 Jul - 16 Aug 2019 National Defense University NDU PRESIDENT Vice Admiral Fritz Roegge, USN 16th President Vice Admiral Fritz Roegge is an honors graduate of the University of Minnesota with a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering and was commissioned through the Reserve Officers' Training Corps program. He earned a Master of Science in Engineering Management from the Catholic University of America and a Master of Arts with highest distinction in National Security and Strategic Studies from the Naval War College. He was a fellow of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Seminar XXI program. VADM Fritz Roegge, NDU President (Photo His sea tours include USS Whale (SSN 638), USS by NDU AV) Florida (SSBN 728) (Blue), USS Key West (SSN 722) and command of USS Connecticut (SSN 22). His major command tour was as commodore of Submarine Squadron 22 with additional duty as commanding officer, Naval Support Activity La Maddalena, Italy. Ashore, he has served on the staffs of both the Atlantic and the Pacific Submarine Force commanders, on the staff of the director of Naval Nuclear Propulsion, on the Navy staff in the Assessments Division (N81) and the Military Personnel Plans and Policy Division (N13), in the Secretary of the Navy's Office of Legislative Affairs at the U. S, House of Representatives, as the head of the Submarine and Nuclear Power Distribution Division (PERS 42) at the Navy Personnel Command, and as an assistant deputy director on the Joint Staff in both the Strategy and Policy (J5) and the Regional Operations (J33) Directorates.
    [Show full text]
  • Military and Army Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Terms
    APPENDIX C Military and Army Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Terms Military and Army Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Terms AAFES Army and Air Force Exchange Service ACAP Army Career and Alumni Program ACES Army Continuing Education System ACS/FPC Army Community Service/Family Program Coordinator AD Active duty ADJ Adjutant ADSW Active duty for special work AER Army Emergency Relief AFAP Army Family Action Plan AFN Armed Forces Network AFRTS Armed Forces Radio and Television Network AFTB Army Family Team Building AG Adjutant General AGR Active Guard Reserve AIT Advanced Individual Training AMC Army Materiel Command AMMO Ammunition ANCOC Advanced Noncommissioned Officer Course ANG Air National Guard AO Area of operations/administrative officer APC Armored personnel carrier APF Appropriated funds APFT Army Physical Fitness Test APO Army post office AR Army Reserve/Army regulation/armor ARCOM Army Reserve Command ARNG Army National Guard ARPERCEN Army Reserve Personnel Center ASAP As soon as possible AT Annual training AUSA Association of the United States Army AWOL Absent without leave BAQ Basic allowance for quarters BAS Basic allowance for subsistence BC Battery commander BCT Basic combat training BDE Brigade Military and Army Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Terms cont’d BDU Battle dress uniform (jungle, desert, cold weather) BN Battalion BNCOC Basic Noncommissioned Officer Course CAR Chief of Army Reserve CASCOM Combined Arms Support Command CDR Commander CDS Child Development Services CG Commanding General CGSC Command and General Staff College
    [Show full text]
  • A-Cr-Ccp-801/Pf-001 7-M107.02-1 Royal Canadian Air Cadets Proficiency Level One Instructional Guide Section 2 Eo M107.02 – Id
    A-CR-CCP-801/PF-001 ROYAL CANADIAN AIR CADETS PROFICIENCY LEVEL ONE INSTRUCTIONAL GUIDE SECTION 2 EO M107.02 – IDENTIFY AIR CADET AND RCAF OFFICER RANKS Total Time: 30 min PREPARATION PRE-LESSON INSTRUCTIONS Resources needed for the delivery of this lesson are listed in the lesson specification located in A-CR-CCP-801/ PG-001, Proficiency Level One Qualification Standard and Plan, Chapter 4. Specific uses for said resources are identified throughout the instructional guide within the TP for which they are required. Review the lesson content and become familiar with the material prior to delivering the lesson. Have one air cadet rank slip-on for each cadet. Have one RCAF officer rank slip-on for each cadet. PRE-LESSON ASSIGNMENT Nil. APPROACH An interactive lecture was chosen for TPs 1 and 3 as it allows the instructor to present the information. An in-class activity was chosen for TPs 2 and 4 as it is a fun and interesting way to measure the cadets’ comprehension of the material. INTRODUCTION REVIEW Nil. OBJECTIVES By the end of this lesson the cadet shall have identified air cadet and RCAF officer ranks. IMPORTANCE It is important that the cadets be able to identify the ranks of both cadets and officers in order to pay proper marks of respect. It is a matter of courtesy to address people by their correct rank. 7-M107.02-1 A-CR-CCP-801/PF-001 Teaching Point 1 Identify air cadet ranks. Time: 5 min Method: Interactive Lecture CADET RANKS Every cadet in the squadron has a rank.
    [Show full text]
  • A-Cr-Ccp-601/Pf-001 7-M107.01-1 Royal Canadian Sea Cadets
    A-CR-CCP-601/PF-001 ROYAL CANADIAN SEA CADETS PHASE ONE INSTRUCTIONAL GUIDE SECTION 1 EO M107.01 – PARTICIPATE IN A DISCUSSION ON PHASE ONE TRAINING Total Time: 30 min PREPARATION PRE-LESSON INSTRUCTIONS Resources needed for the delivery of this lesson are listed in the lesson specification located in A-CR-CCP-601/ PG-001, Phase One Qualification Standard and Plan, Chapter 4. Specific uses for said resources are identified throughout the instructional guide within the TP for which they are required. Review the lesson content and become familiar with the material prior to delivering the lesson. Prepare a set of Performance Objective (PO) index cards, and tape under the chairs or place face down on the desks in the classroom or training area. Prepare a list of optional training offered at the corps, including timings and participation requirements. PRE-LESSON ASSIGNMENT Nil. APPROACH An interactive lecture was chosen for this lesson to orient the cadet to the content of Phase One training and opportunities at the corps. INTRODUCTION REVIEW Nil. OBJECTIVES By the end of this lesson the cadet shall have participated in a discussion on the training in Phase One. IMPORTANCE Having an overview of the training opportunities provided to Phase One cadets prepares new cadets for the training year. They will be able to see how training fits together and identify areas they are particularly interested in. This overview should excite and energize cadets for the coming year. 7-M107.01-1 A-CR-CCP-601/PF-001 Teaching Point 1 Conduct an activity to introduce the content of Phase One.
    [Show full text]
  • The Queen's Regulations for the Royal Navy
    BRd 2 Issue Date April 2014 Superseding BRd 2 Dated April 2013 BRd 2 THE QUEEN’S REGULATIONS FOR THE ROYAL NAVY This document is the property of Her Britannic Majesty's Government. The text in this document (excluding the department logos) may be reproduced for use by Government employees for Ministry of Defence business, providing it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context. Crown copyright material may not be used or reproduced for any other purpose without first obtaining permission from DIPR, MOD Abbey Wood, Bristol, BS34 8JH. This permission will be in the form of a copyright licence and may require the payment of a licence fee. By Command of the Defence Council Fleet Commander and Deputy Chief of Naval Staff i April 2014 BRd 2 SPONSOR INFORMATION This publication is sponsored by the Fleet Commander & Deputy Chief of Naval Staff. All correspondence concerning this publication is to be sent to: CNLS L3 Casework MP 4-2 Henry Leach Building Whale Island PORTSMOUTH Hants PO2 8BY This publication is published by Navy Publications and Graphics Organisation (NPGO) Navy Author 09 Navy Publications and Graphics Organisation Pepys Building HMS COLLINGWOOD Fareham Hants PO14 1AS © UK MOD Crown Copyright 2014 ii April 2014 BRd 2 RECORD OF CONFIGURATION CONTROL Authored by Checked by Approved by Edition/Change: Name: Name: Name: 2011 D Dawe D Dawe D Dawe Tally: Tally: Tally: DS Law L&C Admin DS Law L&C Admin DS Law L&C Admin Date of edition/change: Signature: Signature: Signature: Signed on File Copy Signed on File Copy Signed
    [Show full text]
  • Pershing's Right Hand
    PERSHING’S RIGHT HAND: GENERAL JAMES G. HARBORD AND THE AMERICAN EXPEDITIONARY FORCES IN THE FIRST WORLD WAR A Dissertation by BRIAN FISHER NEUMANN Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY August 2006 Major Subject: History PERSHING’S RIGHT HAND: GENERAL JAMES G. HARBORD AND THE AMERICAN EXPEDITIONARY FORCES IN THE FIRST WORLD WAR A Dissertation by BRIAN FISHER NEUMANN Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Chair of Committee, Arnold P. Krammer Committee Members, H.W. Brands Charles E. Brooks Peter J. Hugill Brian M. Linn Head of Department, Walter Buenger August 2006 Major Subject: History iii ABSTRACT Pershing’s Right Hand: General James G. Harbord and the American Expeditionary Forces in the First World War. (August 2006) Brian Fisher Neumann, B.A., University of Southern California; M.A., Texas A&M University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Arnold P. Krammer This project is both a wartime biography and an examination of the American effort in France during the First World War. At its core, the narrative follows the military career of Major General James G. Harbord. His time in France saw Harbord serve in the three main areas of the American Expeditionary Forces: administration, combat, and logistics. As chief of staff to AEF commander General John J. Pershing, Harbord was at the center of the formation of the AEF and the development of its administrative policies.
    [Show full text]