Grand Union: Taking a Chance on Dance Robb Er

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Grand Union: Taking a Chance on Dance Robb Er 39 GRAND UNION: TAKING A CHANCE ON DANCE ROBB ER In a solo performance in 1969, Trisha Brown walked I. PERFORMERS TOGETHER creative issue, created partial forms to be completed in out on s.tage and announced to her audience, "I want This spring Grand Union presented its most extensive performance." He relates how the individual dancers you to yell yellow belly at me." She kepf egging the New York season to date, offering seventeen company were then allowed to order the pre-set sections, to crowd on until they· responded as requested, with jeers performances (plus several solo appearances by bring in their own music or props, and, finally, to insert and catcalls and loud shouts of the proposed phrase, members of the group) and sponsoring various other their own bits bf choreography while throwing out parts which means "coward" in good old American slang. And music and dance concerts during two months of of the original. "The development that Rainer's par­ then she danced to the taunts. As she now explains it, residence at the Dance Gallery on East Fourteenth ticularly orderly mind evolved began to function as a "I was playing with the whole concept of being booed Street. valuable exercise for the company" (in such areas as onstage. I got them to do what I feared most-from Six performers participated in this set of Grand role playing, how to build mutual trust and how to make the very beginning. My movement was totally im­ Union programs: Trisha Brown , Douglas Dunn, Nancy artistic decisions). "When Rainer had ritually merged provised. The only thing I knew for sure ahead of time Green, David Gordon, Barbara Lloyd and Steve Paxton. her separate ego with those of the company via was that I was going to stand on my head and give Yvonne Rainer, the dancer/choreographer out of whose 'Continuous Project-Altered Daily,' they had reached them the finger. " dance company Grand Union originally sprang, the beginning of Grand Union." "Yellow Belly Dance" is an interesting forerunner of appeared briefly in two of the seventeen concerts, but, The new company (so named by David Gordon: "We the performance philosophy of Grand Union, an im­ as she herself stressed in a conversation following the specifically wanted something without dance in it as provisational dance company formed about a year later final performance, her own energy at that time was our name") beautifully exemplified what critic Jill (in the fall of 1970), with Ms. Brown and eight other being channeled into her own activities, not those of Johnson had described two years earlier as the "dance dancer/choreographers making up its membership. Grand Union's Dance Gallery series. The two other underground": "The new choreographers are out­ Grand Union likewise toys with the dangers per­ original members of the group, Becky Arnold and Dong, rageously invalidating the very nature of authority. The formers face in confronting a possibly hostile public have now left the company. thinking behind the work goes beyond democracy into (and the corresponding self-trust necessary to deal The six members of Grand Union involved in the anarchy. No member outstanding. No bOdy necessarily with such a situation), with the subtleties and vagaries series come from varied backgrounds (different more important or more beautiful than any other body. of performer/audience interaction, with improvised birthplaces, different astrological signs, different paths No movement necessarily more important or more movement (incorporating, in this case, one preplanned to dance). But they do share certain significant pre­ beautiful than any other movement. It is, at last, seeing "bit"), with calling on the collective memory of Grand Union experiences. All studied regularly with beyond our subjective tastes and conditioning, always audience and performer alike (the "yellow belly" Merce Cunningham at one time or another, and three admittedly operative, to a phenomenological un­ reference), with making performing itself (instead of a of them (Steve, Barbara and Doug) have been derstanding of the world. " story or pretty visuals) the focus of a performance. members of the Cunningham company. All six spent As Steve points out, each member of the group-to-be Multiply Trisha's "Yellow Belly Dance" by six (there summers (at various times) at the Connecticut College realized what was happening at separate, individual being, at present, six active members of Grand Union), American Dance Festival-where most of them ob, times. Near the end of the evolution, Trisha, Nancy and keeping in mind not just arithmetic progression, but the jected to the rigidly set up composition courses taught Dong were invited to join what was still ostensibly geometric range of possible new relationships as well by Louis Horst and his followers . Trisha , Steve and Yvonne's group, but what was in actuality the budding (five dancers relating to one dancer; four dancers David (along with Yvonne) later took a very different, of a new leaderless, improvisational dance company relating to two dancers; one dancer relating to another far more experimental composition course offered by (with Yvonne simply a member/contributor, like all the at the left side of the stage, while a third dancer relates Bob and Judith Dunn at the Cunningham studio back in others) . to the remaining three at the right side of the stage; all New York--and participated as choreographer/per­ Initially there was predictable confusion as to direc­ six dancers relating individually to the audience; etc., formers in the now-famous dance concerts by students tion (who would make artistic decisions in a group that etc., etc.)-and you begin to get an idea of what an of that class at Judson Church (Barbara also danced in was all leaders? when? how?) . Doug describes it "The exploratory improvisational concert by Grand Union can some of the Judson works, though she did not present beginnings were very awkward. We tried to make a be like. any of her own choreographies there). work where everyone contributed a phrase, so that for Not that it always works, as Grand Union members In 1966, Rainer choreographed a work entitled "Trio a while, it was semi-structured work. This led to are the first to admit. When you play with chance, you A," with Steve, David and herself featured. The piece complete improvisation-on-the-spot decisions based also risk failure. Improvisation is always a gamble, and became part of a longer work called "The Mind Is a on our own familiarity with each other and our sometimes Grand Union does lose . The audience may Muscle" (which had another section that Barbara was experience of having performed together. Our im ­ on occasion go away bored if, on some particular night, in). Doug joined the Rainer company for "Rose Frac­ provisation is still about making decisions, setting the chemistry doesn 't work or the improvisation simply tions, " Yvonne's contribution to the Billy Rose Theatre limits." The improvisation structure perhaps was self­ fails to come off. avant garde dance series in 1969. Rainer also took her determined to "go all the way." As David puts it, Yet such a case is the exception rather than the rule. whole company to Connecticut College that summer, "There 's no such thing as a little freedom ." And many Grand Union audiences come back, rather where they began working on a flexible piece entitled II. PERFORMERS ALONE regularly, because they find something uniquely per­ "Continuous Project-Altered Daily." "Without exception," Steve Paxton says, "we each do sonal /universal about the Grand Union experience. As Doug describes that work as follows: "There was no very different work alone or in other groups than we do Barbara Lloyd, another member of the present group, question as to the direction that 'Project' was taking as in Grand Union. Each social or artistic configuration we puts it "Among the particular set of New York artists a piece-choreographically and emotionally. Things participate in produces a different head." with whom most of us are associated, Grand Union had started out very precise , very cool. Then literally Steve himself has choreographed and performed represents a kind of [dramatized] human community. tiny bit by tiny bit, things began to change. Yvonne extensively in other groups. He grew up in Arizona, took We provide a kind of collective psyche that in ­ encouraged our playing around with the material. More gymnastics and modern dance (Graham technique ) dividual-and very individualistic-artists can identify and more of the structures opened up; improvisation there, moved to New York and studied with Limon and with. We 're objects of curiosity and fascination . Every began to creep in. By the time of the Whitney Museum Cunningham, joining the latter's company from 1961 to audience member experiences Grand Union individual­ concerts in 1970, this was in full swing. Yvonne had 1965. He took the Dunns' composition course and ly, just the way every Grand Union member himself begun to let us choose the order of the bits. She was began to make his own dances, employing chance , experiences the group individually. There is no easy being challenged , again and again , and little by little picture scores, animals onstage, nudity, everyday description of who we are ." she turned loose the reins. But she worked with the activities (such as walking),plastic inflatables and other challengers all along-and upped their antes. 'O.K. So props, videotape and film , outdoor and non -proscenium you want to do that, ' she would say. 'You can. Fine . But environments, non-trained dancers, experiments with At left: Time-out at a Grand Union concert? Not really. not only that, you have to do this as well ."' Grand Union performances usually begin before the space and time perspectives, minimal movement, audience arrives and are so structured that even when Steve has interestingly chronicled (in an article on sports-related movement, and verbal accompaniment one of the performers announces "Intermission" or Grand Union in the September 1972 Drama Review) (often spoken material relating to the dance movement "The End," you more than likely are not supposed to how Yvonne carefully controlled the dissolution of her being performed onstage at the same time).
Recommended publications
  • Performance and Interaction: Judson Dance Theater
    Performance and Interaction: Judson Dance Theater In 1980, Arlene Croce, a respected dance critic, said in a column in the New Yorker that Robert Wilson had been the main influence, after Merce Cunningham, on the choreography of the day. Yvonne Rainer responded angrily to what she saw as lack of perspective and knowledge of modern dance in a letter published in the performance magazine Live. The letter included a genealogy chart of contemporary dance and how it related to the visual arts world, which is shown here. Simone Forti was at the Judson Dance Theater with Brown and Rainer and also made an argument for dance as sculpture with her first minimalist works. Their objec- tives included the idea of actually involving the spectator’s gaze, rejecting the concept of audience as voyeur. Bibliography Krauss, Rosalind E. Passages in Modern Sculpture. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT, 1977. Lambert, Carrie. “More or Less Minimalism: Six Notes on Performance and Visual Art in the 60s” en: Goldstein, Ann. The close, simultaneous connections between dance and the visual arts in the 1960s A Minimal Future? Art as Object and 70s can be seen both in the works of Yvonne Rainer (1934), Trisha Brown (1936) 1958-1968. Los Angeles: Museum and Simone Forti (1935), which are exhibited in the room, and in the theoretical analyses of Contemporary Art; Cambridge: presented by Barbara Rose and Rosalind Krauss about the theatrical tone of sculpture MIT Press, cop., 2004. and minimal painting. Trio A, Rainer’s choreography created in 1966 as the first part of her tetralogy The Mind Rainer, Yvonne.
    [Show full text]
  • Wookey Current CV
    SARA HASTINGS WOOKEY [email protected] www.sarawookey.com CURRICULUM VITAE EDUCATION Master of Fine Arts, Dance University of California, Los Angeles 2008 Bachelor of Fine Arts, Dance Presidential Honors, The Ohio State University 1996 CHOREOGRAPHY & PERFORMANCE Disappearing Acts & Resurfacing Subjects: Concerns of (a) Dance Artist(s) 2013 Premiere: New Museum, NYC Trio A: Revisited and Reversed 2013 Premiere: Hammer Museum, Los Angeles Collaboration with dancer & choreographer Yvonne Rainer Trio A: Unplugged Premiere: Performance Space, Sydney 2013 Transmitting Trio A Premiere: VIVA! Performance Art Festival, Montreal 2011 Performing Navigations: (Re)Mapping the Museum 2010 Premiere: Hammer Museum, Los Angeles Walking L.A / (Sur)facing the City 2008 Premiere: Museum of Contemporary Art, San Diego Love’s Geography: Revisited 2006 Premiere: Stadschouwburg Theater, Brugges FACE 2003 Premiere: Frascati Theater, Amsterdam Surface 2002 Premiere: Theater aan het Spui, The Hague Fields on the 4th Floor 2001 Premiere: Kunstcentrum Vooruit, Gent The Skirt 2000 Premiere: Korzo Theater, The Hague Manner 2000 Premiere: Künstlerhaus gallery, Bremen Marion’s Hips 1998 Premiere: Korzo Theater, The Hague MUSEUM & GALLERY BASED PROJECTS Station to Station Dancer with Siobhan Davies Dance 2015 Barbican Center, London reDANCE Founder & Organizer 2011-Present Curated program of four dance solos by Judson Dance Era choreographers (Childs, Forti, Hay and Rainer) danced by another generation of dancers Yvonne Rainer: Dance Works Dancer 2014 Raven Row Gallery,
    [Show full text]
  • Simone Forti Goes to the Zoo*
    Simone Forti with a lion cub at the Giardino Zoologico di Roma, 1968. Courtesy Simone Forti and The Box, LA. Simone Forti Goes to the Zoo* JULIA BRYAN-WILSON In the photograph, a young woman in a short skirt and sandals sits on a bench. With her crooked elbow, she braces her handbag to her body, tucking her large sketchpad into her armpit. She is petting a lion cub, and as she gazes down to witness the small but extraordinary fact of her hand on its fur, the ani- mal’s face turns towards the camera lens with closed eyes. This is dancer and choreographer Simone Forti on one of her many visits to the zoo during the brief time she lived in Rome in the late 1960s. Far from today’s “wildlife sanctu- aries” where animals can ostensibly wander freely, as the photo of this uncaged cub might suggest, the Giardino Zoologico di Roma offered a highly controlled environment in which animals lived within tight enclosures; Forti was here indulging in a staged, paid encounter, one that she characterized as “irre- sistible.”1 Irresistible because she was consistently moved by the creatures she drew and studied—moved as in stirred, or touched, as well as in shifted, or altered. As I argue, her dance practice changed dramatically as a result of the time she spent in Rome observing animal motions and interacting with other, animate forms of art. Petting a lion cub: irresistible, but still melancholy. Designed in part by German collector and merchant Carl Hagenbeck and built in 1911, the Roman zoo is an example of the turn-of-the-century “Hagenbeck revolution” in zoo architecture, which attempted to provide more naturalistic-appearing, open-air surroundings that were landscaped with artificial rocks and featured moats instead of bars, often creating tableaux of animals from different taxonomic * This article was made possible by the indefatigable Simone Forti, who talked with me, danced for me, and pulled all manner of documents and photographs out of her dresser drawers for me; thank you, Simone.
    [Show full text]
  • A Choreographer's Handbook
    A Choreographer’s Handbook On choreography: ‘Choreography is a negotiation with the patterns your body is thinking’ On rules: ‘Try breaking the rules on a need to break the rules basis’ A Choreographer’s Handbook invites the reader to investigate how and why to make a dance performance. In an inspiring and unusually empowering sequence of stories, ideas and paradoxes, internationally renowned dancer, choreographer and teacher Jonathan Burrows explains how it’s possible to navigate a course through this complex process. It is a stunning reflection on a personal practice and professional journey, and draws upon five years of workshop discussions, led by Burrows. Burrows’ open and honest prose gives the reader access to a range of exercises, meditations, principles and ideas on choreography that allow artists and dance-makers to find their own aesthetic process. It is a book for anyone interested in making performance, at whatever level and in whichever style. Jonathan Burrows has toured and worked internationally as a dancer and choreographer and is currently a resident artist at Kaaitheater Brussels. In 2002 he was commended by the Foundation for Contempor- ary Performance Arts in New York for his contribution to contemporary dance, and in 2004 received a New York Dance and Performance ‘Bessie’ for his work ‘Both Sitting Duet’. He has made commissioned work for many companies, including William Forsythe’s Ballett Frankfurt, Sylvie Guillem and The Royal Ballet. He is a visiting member of faculty at P.A.R.T.S. in Brussels and is a Visiting Professor at Hamburg University and Royal Holloway University of London.
    [Show full text]
  • University of California Irvine
    University of California Irvine A Study on the Confluence of Resilience Skill Building and Contact Improvisation on Collegiate Dancers THESIS Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF FINE ARTS In Dance By Connor B. Senning Thesis Committee: Dr. Kelli Sharp, Chair Dr. Lisa Naugle Assistant Professor Lindsay Gilmour 2020 © 2020 Connor B Senning ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES.........................……………………………………………………………… v LIST OF TABLES........................................................................................................................... vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS………………………………………………………………………....vi i ABSTRACT OF THESIS……………………………………………………………………….... viii INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………………....1 • Why Contact Improvisation? • Why Resilience Skill Sets? CHAPTER ONE: CONTACT IMPROVISATION AND THE RELATIONSHIP TO SELF-AWARENESS ...................................................................................................................... 4 • Deepening the Practice of Contact Improvisation • How Self-Awareness is Experience • Why Self-Awareness First? CHAPTER TWO: SELF-REGULATION & MENTAL AGILITY……………………………… 9 • Self-Regulating within Practice • Shifting into Mental Agility CHAPTER THREE: CONNECTION & OPTIMISM…………………………………………..... 13 • Touch and Voice as Connection • Encountering the Future • Entertaining Optimism CHAPTER FOUR: Methods……………………………………………………………………… 17 • Screening • Dance Workshop Structure • Surveys CHAPTER FIVE: Results………………………………………………………………………… 24 CHAPTER
    [Show full text]
  • For Immediate Release CONTACT: Payal Kumar Director of Communications & Marketing
    For Immediate Release CONTACT: Payal Kumar Director of Communications & Marketing 714.541.8314 ext. 119 [email protected] DANCE LEGEND STEVE PAXTON TO TEACH WORKSHOP WITH LOW-INCOME YOUTH AT THE WOODEN FLOOR SANTA ANA, Calif. (February 28, 2012) – Steve Paxton, one of the most important living figures in dance, will teach a two-week workshop entitled Material for the Spine with students of The Wooden Floor, a leading edge arts-based youth development nonprofit in Southern California dedicated to breaking the cycle of poverty in low-income children. Paxton, the father of Contact Improvisation, a form of dance that explores the relationship between the body and momentum, gravity, and friction, has made an influence on choreography globally. Students at The Wooden Floor eagerly await the arrival of Paxton and his workshop, which runs March 12-24. “With Material for the Spine, I am interested in alloying a technical approach to the processes of improvisation,” states Paxton. ”It is a system for exploring interior and exterior muscles of the back. It aims to bring consciousness to the dark side of the body, that is the ‘other’ side, or the inside, those sides not much self-seen, and to submit sensations from them to the mind for consideration.” His arrival at The Wooden Floor underscores the organization’s forward-thinking artistic vision to use dance as a means of positive transformation for the 375 low-income youth it serves annually. “Dance is at the center of everything we do,” affirms Melanie Ríos Glaser, Artistic Director for
    [Show full text]
  • Brochure, Yvonne Rainer.Pdf
    Yvonne Rainer Dia:Beacon Riggio Galleries 3 Beekman Street Beacon New York 12508 845 440 0100 www.diaart.org Dia Art Foundation presents Yvonne Rainer Program 1 'I! Saturday, October 22, and Sunday, October 23, 2011 1 pm and 3 pm Program 2 Saturday, February 25, and Sunday, February 26 , 201 2 12 pm and 2 pm Program 3 Saturday, May 12, 2012 1 pm and 3 pm related program Artists on Artists Lecture Series at Dia:Chelsea Babette Mangolte on Yvonne Rainer Monday, May 14, 2012, 6:30 pm Dia:Chelsea 535 West 22nd Street 5th Floor New York City Yvonne Rainer OBJECTS DANCES Central to Yvonne Rainer's renowned choreographic practice is an undeniable, 7 wistful rebellion. Immediately upon her emergence as a choreographer in the eliminate or minimize early 1960s, Rainer distinguished herself by actively challenging the expressive 1. role of the artist's hand phrasing J movement conventions and narrative structure popularized by the modern-dance establishment. Inspired by her interest in the everyday, Rainer pioneered an 2. hierarchical relationship of parts development and climax autonomous dance language-rooted in considering the body as material object­ 3. texture variation: rhythm, shape, dynamics that emphasized the nuances of task-oriented movement and brought attention 4. figure reference character to the physicality of the body. 5. illusionism performance After training for several years at the Martha Graham Dance School in New 6. complexity and detail variety: phrases and the spatial field York in the late 1950s, Rainer attended what would become an historic summer 7. monumentality the virtuosic movement feat and the workshop in San Francisco in 1960 guided by the improvisatory teachings of fully-extended body choreographer Anna Halprin and composer La Monte Young.
    [Show full text]
  • Judson Dance Theater: the Work Is Never Done
    Judson Dance Theater: The Work Is Never Done Yvonne Rainer, Simone Forti, and Steve Paxton reflect on Robert Ellis Dunn and Judith Dunn’s composition class YVONNE RAINER: My name is Yvonne Rainer. SIMONE FORTI: I’m Simone Forti. STEVE PAXTON: My name is Steve Paxton. I’m a dancer. RAINER: Choreographer. FORTI: Artist. RAINER: Writer. Filmmaker. FORTI: I’ve mainly worked with movement. PAXTON: I came from Arizona with my banjo on my knee about 1958. RAINER: I felt I’d come into dance pretty late, so I was in a hurry in 1960. I mean, absorbing everything, and that included ballet. It included Cunningham, it included Waring and Cage. PAXTON: The modern dance world was not homogeneous. I mean, it wasn’t all just one big thing. There were a lot of different aesthetics and dance approaches in it. FORTI: When Bob Dunn offered his composition class, it was like something solid to work with. RAINER: I enrolled in Robert Dunn’s composition class in the fall of 1960. At that point there were only five of us. And Bob rolled out these scores for John Cage’s Fontana Mix and started talking about ways that score might be adapted for choreographic purposes. FORTI: I remember the scores themselves, transferring into movement rather than sound. RAINER: I was looking for some other way to look at things. I mean, painters were defying all the rules already and Cage came along and introduced a whole new vocabulary of sounds and movements. PAXTON: Chance methods meant that instead of trying to imagine a new way to do something, you just set out using dice, coins to decide what part of the body to use or entrances and exits and length durations.
    [Show full text]
  • Steve Paxton and Lisa Nelson, Night Stand, 2004.Pdf
    Lisa Nelson and Steve Paxton Night Stand, 2004 Dia:Chelsea 541 West 22nd Street New York City 212 989 5566 www.diaart.org Dia Art Foundation presents Lisa Nelson and Steve Paxton Night Stand, 2004 Thursday, October 10–Saturday, October 12, 2013, 8 pm Thursday, October 17–Saturday, October 19, 2013, 8 pm Dance, setting, and sound compilation by Lisa Nelson and Steve Paxton Lighting by Carol Mullins performers Lisa Nelson and Steve Paxton production manager Adam Macks music Excerpts from Automatic Writing (1979), eL/Aficionado (1994), and Dust (2000) by Robert Ashley (Lovely Music) and Zvuki Mu (1989) by Pyotr Mamonov (Opal Records). Dia’s presentation of Night Stand marks the United States premiere. Night Stand has been previously performed at Centre chorégraphique national de Montpellier Languedoc–Roussillon, France; Marseille Objectif Danse, France; Side Step Festival, Helsinki, Finland; SESC Belenzinho, São Paulo, Brazil; L’animal a l’esquena, Celrà, Spain; and Spiral Hall, Tokyo, Japan. This program is made possible in part by Dia’s Commissioning Committee: Jill and Peter Kraus, Leslie and Mac McQuown, Genny and Selmo Nissenbaum, and Liz Gerring Radke and Kirk August Radke. Front Cover: Lisa Nelson and Steve Paxton, Night Stand, 2004. Performance at L’animal a l’esquena, Celrà, Spain, 2008. Photo © Jordi Bover. Progress Report: Night Stand Night Stand is the third collaboration between Lisa Nelson and Steve Paxton, Paxton and Nelson’s performing partnership dates back to 1975. Paxton’s after PA RT, which they performed from 1978 to 2002, and Population, which approach to physical improvisation is sourced in an ongoing investigation of the was performed once in 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • Letters from Yvonne Rainer, Meredith Monk, Kenneth King
    Letters from Yvonne Rainer, Meredith Monk, Kenneth King In her New Yorker column of June 30 temporary American dance, perform- dance critic Arlene Croce claimed that ance art and theatre - and critics who R.E.: Robert Wilson "as a writer and director have a historical grasp of the overlapping of esoteric visionary plays and as a performance and art worlds - has con- teacher of movement has been the biggest tributed to the confusion in the perform- influence, after Cunningham, on chore- ance world. Critics and audiences alike ographers working today." Croce disre- have trouble deciding who's influencing CROCE garded the early work of Yvonne Rainer, who these days. Some of those artists Kenneth King, Meredith Monk, Lucinda angry enough to respond to Croce in Childs. and the Judson Dance Theatre. print have forwarded their letters to LIVE for publication. The absence of accurate histories of con- The Editors Dear Arlene: other than a sequence of one-man/woman epiphanies. Things are May I add my two-cents plain to the brouhaha accruing from your always more complicated than that. True, Cunningham/Cage were article of June 30? Insofar as Kenneth King has done so admirable doing their thing 30 years ago. But why was their influence a job (and one with which I largely concur) on the Monk-King-- in the dance world not felt in any visible degree until 1960? Clear- Dean-Wilson-Glass connections, let me confine my remarks to my ly it required a convergence of a number of people from different own peers. For this purpose I am enclosing a crudely drawn-and areas of art-making to manifest the ideas that in the intervening vastly oversimplified-genealogy chart which adds several 10 years had lain fallow.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance Art and the American Post-Modern Dance of the Judson Dance Theater
    Performance Art and the American Post-Modern Dance of the Judson Dance Theater MICHELLE MOURA RELÂCHE – CASA HOFFMANN e-MAGAZINE | 2004 1 Performance Art and the American and their lives. The Fluxus movement,1 for instance, Post-Modern Dance of the Judson Dance Theater emphasized the motto ‘life above art’: “they wanted to suppress the idea that art has special qualities. Art should Michelle Moura match life, and life should match art, for the most fas- cinating and interesting things are into life” (SMITH, 1991, p.55). Some North American choreographers at that time were also dealing with the same question: how to bring art closer to their lives. At ‘Perform: a workshop on body and action’, by André Lepecki and Eleonora Fabião, performance art was ex- Based on this concept of bringing art and daily life to- perienced as a present happening, the here and now, by gether, I made use of the introduction of Eleonora and touching the limits between art and real life. André’s workshop about performance and live art as a hint. So, I decided to write about the Judson Dance “This is not the place for rehearsals or classes. This is a Theater, an important group of artists from the 1960s place for experiments and performance.” This statement which was responsible for the creation of the so-called was repeated several times by Eleonora and André, and American post-modern dance, by bringing about new was the propeller of a series of experimentation tasks, in and revolutionary notions on choreographic structures which there was definitely no space for elaborating or re- and postures.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Released for Review Purposes Only. Not for Publication Or Wide Distribution
    JUDSON Giampaolo Bianconi is Thomas J. Lax is Associate Julia Robinson is Associate In the early 1960s, an assembly of choreographers, visual artists, composers, and Curatorial Assistant in the Curator in the Department of Professor of Modern and filmmakers made use of a church in New York’s Greenwich Village to present Judson Dance Theater The Work Is Never Done Department of Media and Media and Performance Art Contemporary Art at New performances that redefined the kinds of movement that could be understood as Performance Art at MoMA. at MoMA. York University. She is the dance—performances that Village Voice critic Jill Johnston would declare the most editor of the October Files exciting in a generation. The group was Judson Dance Theater, its name borrowed Harry C. H. Choi is a Twelve- Victor “Viv” Liu was a volume John Cage (2011) from Judson Memorial Church, the socially engaged Protestant congregation Month Intern in the Department Seasonal Intern in the and the author of a forthcom- that hosted the dancers’ open workshops. The Judson artists emphasized new DANCE of Media and Performance Art Department of Media and ing book on George Brecht. compositional methods meant to strip dance of its theatrical conventions and fore- at MoMA. Performance Art at MoMA. Robinson is an active curator. grounded “ordinary” movements—gestures more likely to be seen on the street or at home. Although Judson Dance Theater would last only a few years, the artists affili- Vivian A. Crockett is the Jenny Harris is Curatorial Gloria Sutton is Associate ated with it, including Trisha Brown, Lucinda Childs, Philip Corner, Bill Dixon, Judith 2017–18 Andrew W.
    [Show full text]