Reconceptualizing Learning: a Review of the Literature on Informal Learning

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reconceptualizing Learning: a Review of the Literature on Informal Learning Reconceptualizing Learning: A Review of the Literature on Informal Learning Michelle Van Noy Heather James Crystal Bedley Reconceptualizing Learning: A Review of the Literature on Informal Learning Michelle Van Noy Heather James Crystal Bedley With Steven Malick & Justin Vinton Education and Employment Research Center School of Management and Labor Relations Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey Janice H. Levin Building 94 Rockafeller Road Piscataway, NJ 08854 April 2016 Prepared for the ACT Foundation ABOUT RUTGERS SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT AND LABOR RELATIONS Rutgers' School of Management and Labor Relations (SMLR) is the leading source of expertise on the world of work, building effective and sustainable organizations, and the changing employment relationship. The school is comprised of two departments—one focused on all aspects of strategic human resource management and the other dedicated to the social science specialties related to labor studies and employment relations. In addition, SMLR provides many continuing education and certificate programs taught by world-class researchers and expert practitioners. SMLR was originally established by an act of the New Jersey legislature in 1947 as the Institute of Management and Labor Relations (IMLR). Like its counterparts that were created in the other large industrial states at the same time, the Institute was chartered to promote new forms of labor-management cooperation following the industrial unrest at the end of World War II. It officially became a school at the flagship campus of the State University of New Jersey in New Brunswick/Piscataway in 1994. For more information, visit smlr.rutgers.edu. ABOUT THE EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT RESEARCH CENTER Rutgers’ Education and Employment Research Center (EERC) is housed within the School of Management and Labor Relations. EERC conducts research and evaluations on education and workforce development programs and policies. EERC research expertise includes community colleges, state and federal workforce developmental systems, skills development, college completion, and innovative and technology-based programs. TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................... i Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 1 I.Broad Overview of Informal Learning ................................................................................................. 2 A. What Is Informal Learning? ............................................................................................................. 2 1. The Continuum of Learning Formality ....................................................................................... 3 2. Definitions of Informal Learning ................................................................................................. 5 B. How Does Informal Learning Occur? ........................................................................................... 10 1. Theories on Learning ................................................................................................................... 10 2. Role of Technology ...................................................................................................................... 14 C. Who Benefits from Informal Learning? ....................................................................................... 18 1. Variation across Individuals ....................................................................................................... 18 2. Organizational versus Individual Goals ................................................................................... 20 II. Specific Types of Informal Learning ................................................................................................. 22 A. Organized Informal Learning ....................................................................................................... 23 1.Noncredit Learning ....................................................................................................................... 23 2. Work-based Learning .................................................................................................................. 25 3. Volunteerism and Service Learning .......................................................................................... 33 4. Mentoring and Coaching ............................................................................................................ 37 5. Communities of Practice ............................................................................................................. 39 B. Everyday Informal Learning in the Workplace .......................................................................... 41 1. Subtypes of Everyday Informal Learning ................................................................................ 42 2. Influence of Workplace Structure on Learning ........................................................................ 46 III. Understanding the Impact of Informal Learning .......................................................................... 49 A. Efforts to Measure Informal Learning ......................................................................................... 50 B. Strategies to Recognize Informal Learning .................................................................................. 51 1. Prior Learning Assessment (PLA) ............................................................................................. 51 2. Certifications and Licenses ......................................................................................................... 53 3. Workplace Rewards ..................................................................................................................... 54 4. Learn and Earn Models ............................................................................................................... 55 C. Implications and Remaining Questions ....................................................................................... 56 References ................................................................................................................................................. 59 Appendix: Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 73 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Given the importance of learning to economic and life success, this review seeks to broaden the conception of learning beyond traditional formal education. Learning occurs every day in many ways and in a range of settings. This broad scope of learning—termed “informal learning”—is increasingly important in the rapidly changing knowledge economy. As such, in this review paper, we examine the different types of informal learning, their opportunities and challenges, and their issues of access and equity. Spanning multiple disciplines, we draw particular attention to the workplace and adult learning literature. This meta-review is a synthesis of over 600 publications with a focus on review articles published in the last 25 years. I. Broad Overview of Informal Learning A useful framework for understanding informal learning is to view learning as occurring on a continuum of formality based on the following attributes: the location in which learning occurs, whether learning is instructor or student led, the extent to which the content learned is an organized curriculum, and one’s purpose for seeking knowledge. Learning that is most formal can be characterized as learning that occurs in schools that award credentials, is instructor led, covers an organized curriculum, and where knowledge is intentionally sought. Based on this framework, we categorize informal learning into broad categories. Organized informal learning can occur in a range of settings including schools, work, the community, and home. It is intentionally sought by learners, employs a curriculum and an instructor, but does not lead to an educational credential. Everyday informal learning also takes place at school, work, community, or home. It does not include an instructor or an organized curriculum, and learners have a range of intentionality in which the learning can be self-directed, incidental, and/or embedded in the process of socialization. Learning occurs in a variety of ways across the continuum of learning formality. A few of these ways are particularly common with informal learning: experiential, relational, and situated learning. Situated learning attends to the influence of the context in which learning occurs. Both experiential learning, learning through action, and relational learning, learning from others, are related to situated learning. In addition, technology has an important role in how learning occurs across all types of learning. Through opportunities such as online learning, massive open online courses (MOOCS), games and simulations, and mobile learning, technology may expand access to learning opportunities. At the same time, access to the Internet differs by socioeconomic status, and attrition rates for some of these opportunities are high. Informal learning, like formal learning, has issues with access and equity. Not all individuals are able to access and benefit from informal learning. A variety of characteristics, including cognitive ability and motivation, influence how much
Recommended publications
  • Middle-School-Aged Homeschool Students' Experiences With
    Paper ID #13327 Informal Pathways to Engineering: Middle-School-Aged Homeschool Stu- dents’ Experiences with Engineering (Fundamental) Tamecia R Jones, Purdue University, West Lafayette Tamecia Jones is currently a doctoral student in the Engineering Education department at Purdue Uni- versity with a research focus on K-12 engineering education, assessment, and informal and formal learn- ing environments. She is a graduate of Johns Hopkins and Stanford University. Originally trained as a biomedical engineer, she spent years in the middle school classroom, teaching math and science, and consulting with nonprofits, museums, and summer programs. Dr. Monica E Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette Monica E. Cardella is the Director of the INSPIRE Institute for Pre-College Engineering Education and is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Dr. Christine Andrews Paulsen, Concord Evaluation Group Christine Andrews Paulsen is founder of Concord Evaluation Group (CEG) in Massachusetts. Dr. Paulsen holds a Ph.D. in education research, evaluation, and measurement from the University of Pennsylvania. She has been conducting evaluation research since 1990 and, prior to CEG, worked for the Institute for Social Analysis and the American Institutes for Research. Dr. Paulsen routinely directs evaluations of STEM-related projects in informal settings, focusing on learners as well as practitioners. Her main research interest lies in evaluating programs that hold the promise of enhancing the lives of traditionally underserved populations (children, parents, and communities). Marisa Wolsky, WGBH Educational Foundation Marisa Wolsky is an Executive Producer at WGBH Educational Foundation with over 20 years of ex- perience turning STEM content into entertaining and educational media for kids.
    [Show full text]
  • Informal Learning in the Family and Community
    Informal learning in the family and community )XWXUHRI6NLOOV /LIHORQJ/HDUQLQJ (YLGHQFH5HYLHZ Foresight, Government Office for Science Informal learning in the family and community John Field and Alan Tuckett August 2016 This review has been commissioned as part of the UK government’s Foresight Future of Skills and Lifelong Learning project. The views expressed do not represent policy of any government or organisation. Informal learning in the family and community Contents Informal learning in the family and community .................................................................................... 4 References ............................................................................................................................................ 10 Informal learning in the family and community Informal learning in the family and community The combination of population ageing, technological change, globalisation and increased international competition at work, alongside evidence of wider benefits to health and well-being, is stimulating interest in promoting learning throughout adult life. While much of the focus is on skills acquisition and workplace learning, there is also growing attention to informal learning in communities and homes, and in the ways that skills developed in these settings can be transferred across contexts. Much debate has focused on terminology and definitions. This is hardly surprising: ‘community’ is notoriously hard to pin down, and it has become harder to produce a precise definition of ‘family’. Adult education
    [Show full text]
  • Formal, Nonformal and Informal Coach Learning: a Holistic Conceptualisation
    Sports Science 1-3_3 proof 7/9/06 10:50 am Page 247 International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching Volume 1 · Number 3 · 2006 247 Formal, Nonformal and Informal Coach Learning: A Holistic Conceptualisation Lee J. Nelson1, Christopher J. Cushion2 and Paul Potrac3 1School of Sport and Education, Brunel University, UK; 2Carnegie Faculty of Sport and Education, Leeds Metropolitan University, UK 3School of Sport, UNITEC, Auckland, New Zealand. ABSTRACT Using Coombs and Ahmed’s [1] framework of formal, non-formal, and informal learning as the analytical framework, this paper aims to review and conceptually locate literature exploring how sports coaches acquire the knowledge that underpins their professional practice. Furthermore, in an attempt to develop a robust set of accessible terms and concepts this paper identifies, explores and positions various terminologies under the broader heading of coach learning. It was hoped that this conceptual review would not only stimulate discussion and research into coach learning, but that it would also promote the construction of models of how coaches currently learn, as well as models for enhancing coach learning. The paper concludes that coaches learn from a wide range of sources, but formalised (i.e., formal and nonformal) learning episodes were found to be relatively low impact endeavours when compared to informal, self-directed modes of learning. Key words: Coach Education, Coach Learning, Formal Learning, Informal Learning, Nonformal learning. INTRODUCTION According to Schempp [2], “the degree of success that professionals experience in meeting societal demands is largely dependent upon the knowledge they generate and accumulate for the tasks and obligations that they undertake” (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematics in Informal Learning Environments: a Summary of the Literature
    MATHEMATICS IN INFORMAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS: A SUMMARY OF THE LITERATURE Scott Pattison, Andee Rubin, Tracey Wright Updated March 2017 Research on mathematical reasoning and learning has long been a central part of the classroom and formal education literature (e.g., National Research Council, 2001, 2005). However, much less attention has been paid to how children and adults engage with and learn about math outside of school, including everyday settings and designed informal learning environments, such as interactive math exhibits in science centers. With the growing recognition of the importance of informal STEM education (National Research Council, 2009, 2015), researchers, educators, and policymakers are paying more attention to how these experiences might support mathematical thinking and learning and contribute to the broader goal of ensuring healthy, sustainable, economically vibrant communities in this increasingly STEM-rich world. To support these efforts, we conducted a literature review of research on mathematical thinking and learning outside the classroom, in everyday settings and designed informal learning environments. This work was part of the NSF-funded Math in the Making project, led by TERC and the Institute for Learning Innovation and designed to advance researchers’ and educators’ understanding of how to highlight and enhance the mathematics in making experiences.1 Recognizing that the successful integration of mathematics and making requires an understanding of how individuals engage with math in these informal learning environments, we gathered and synthesized the informal mathematics education literature, with the hope that findings would support the Math in the Making project and inform the work of mathematics researchers and educators more broadly.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Work for the Mathematics As a Gatekeeper to Engineering Project: a Review of Informal Learning, Engineering and Design Thinking Literature
    Paper ID #8106 Early work for the Mathematics as a Gatekeeper to Engineering Project: A Review of Informal Learning, Engineering and Design Thinking Literature Ms. DeLean A Tolbert, Purdue University, West Lafayette DeLean Tolbert is a doctoral student of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She earned a B.Sc. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Michigan–Dearborn and a M.S. in Industrial Engineer- ing from the University of Michigan. Her research interests include: informal engineering learning and teaching, K-12 engineering education, and engineering thinking and learning within ethnic minority com- munities. Dr. Monica E Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Monica Cardella is an assistant professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She is also the director of Informal Learning Environments Research for the Institute for P-12 Engineering Learn- ing and Research (INSPIRE). She conducts research on undergraduate engineering students’ design and mathematical thinking in formal and informal contexts in addition to research on how children develop engineering thinking in informal learning environments. Page 23.446.1 Page c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Early work for the Mathematics as a Gatekeeper to Engineering Project: A Review of Informal Learning, Engineering and Design Thinking Literature This project is funded through the EEC and TUES programs Abstract Engineering education and engineering practice tend to be characterized by two complementary halves: engineering sciences and engineering design. While both are critical to engineering education and practice, the two are often treated separately – as separate classes, taught by separate faculty, and at times separate job functions. This project examines the relationships between these two “halves” by exploring the relationship between mathematical thinking and design thinking.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of Adult and Nonformal Education in Selected Countries of the Southeast Asian Region
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1978 A comparative study of adult and nonformal education in selected countries of the Southeast Asian region John Brown-Parker The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Brown-Parker, John, "A comparative study of adult and nonformal education in selected countries of the Southeast Asian region" (1978). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 7664. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/7664 This Professional Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ADULT AND NONFORMAL EDUCATION IN SELECTED COUNTRIES OF THE SOUTHEAST ASIAN REGION By John Brown-Parker B.A., University of Papua New Guinea, 1976 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Education in Administration UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA 1978 Approved by: irman, Boatd of Examiners Dean, Graduate Schooc (if., f V. f '1 7 Date Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: EP38465 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Informal and Formal Learning and the Pursuit of Environmental Education in Young Children: the Role of Forest School
    Informal and formal learning and the pursuit of environmental education in young children: the role of Forest School Suguna Nair UCL Institute of Education Master of Philosophy in Education 1 ‘I, Suguna Nair, confirm that this research study and the work presented in this thesis are my own. Where information has been obtained from other sources for the purpose of this study, appropriate references have been made in the thesis.’ Signed: 2 Abstract The continuing conflict between formal and informal education processes has many scholars divided in relation to the impact on learning and learner development. Though formal education, often characterised as ‘traditional’, usually has a distinct, set boundaries and curriculum ‘subjects’, whereas informal education spans from adventure and discovery activities to field work with the emphasis on holistic ‘experience’. Formal education focuses on specialist subject knowledge whilst informal learning can potentially nudge learners to take risks and inform themselves through their own experiences. When it comes to environmental education, informal learning occurring outside the classroom and possibly in natural environments claims to connect learners to nature and its elements in a manner that is elusive to formal education occurring within classrooms and laboratories. This research focuses on the dissimilarities between the formal and informal education in interest of environmental education through the case study of Forest School. Forest School, as a concept, exposes young learners to the natural at regular intervals and allows them to learn through experiences and child-led and initiated activities. This study examines through case study techniques Dewey’s notion of experiential learning and ways in which this is valued by various participants.
    [Show full text]
  • Attacking Rural Poverty
    HOW NONFORMALEDUCATION CAN HELP PHILIP H. COOMBS WITH MANZOOR AHMED Public Disclosure Authorized ~~~~1 0091 Public Disclosure Authorized ua6-~Re ort Nc 95w4.09,r,_§ w ~~~IL bCOPY Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized f qTLA ATTACKINGRURAL POVERTY How Nonformal EducationCan Help The InternationalCouncil for EducationalDevelopment (ICED)is a nonprofit researchorganization concerned with improvingthe contribution of education to social and economic developmentthroughout the world. ICED'sstaff, con- sultants,and governing board are multinational. The presentstudy was largelyfinanced by the World Bank,with supplemen- tary funds from the Ford Foundation. ICED NonformalEducation Projects Staff Philip H. Coombs .............. Director *Sven Grabe .............. Deputy Director of the World Bank Study *Roy C. Prosser .............. Deputy Director of the UNICEFStudy Manzoor Ahmed .... .......... Assistantto the Director *RoshanR. Billimoria .............. ResearchAssistant *StephenF. Brumberg .............. ResearchAssociate EllenG. Helfer .............. Documentalist Debra S. Hyde .............. Secretary BarbaraBaird Israel .............. Senior Editor FrancesO'Dell .............. Office Manager *FranciscoX. Swett .............. ResearchAssistant *Cynthia Wharton .............. ResearchAssistant Staffmembers who contributed to theWorld Bank Study for a portionof the periodrequired for the study'scompletion. ResearchInterns (Summer1971) RameshGaonkar Haile Menkerios Clifford Gilpin ThomasK. Morgan J. PaulMartin RichardF. Tompkins
    [Show full text]
  • Informal Learning and Transfer of Learning: How New Trade and Industrial Teachers Perceive Their Professional Growth and Development
    Career and Technical Education Research, 33(1), pp. 3-24 ©2008 Informal Learning and Transfer of Learning: How New Trade and Industrial Teachers Perceive Their Professional Growth and Development Janet Zaleski Burns Georgia State University Abstract This study is an examination of the extent to which new inservice trade and industrial (T&I) teachers, enrolled in an alternative certification program, engaged in formal learning through structured experiences and informal learning related to 25 core competencies at their school (work) site. The study also investigated the degree to which the new T&I teachers transferred each of the 25 core teaching skills on the job. The study found that while T&I teachers-in-training reported learning most competencies formally, they perceived that they use those competencies learned informally more often than those learned formally. New perspectives are offered regarding the importance of alternative certification programs acknowledging and integrating informal learning in teacher education programs. Introduction Trade and industrial (T&I) teachers take on numerous roles to work effectively in schools. Among their many roles they are, like all teachers, program managers, instructional designers, facilitators of learning, and student advisors. To successfully perform these roles, teachers master a myriad of complex skills that fall into at least four categories. Danielson (1996) defined these categories as planning and preparation of instruction, creating a supportive learning environment, engaging the students in instruction, and assuming professional responsibilities outside of and in addition to those in the classroom. Customarily, new teachers complete formal training programs through coursework, workshops, student teaching, and other structured events before they obtain certification or licensure.
    [Show full text]
  • Informal Learning and the Social Justice Practices of Academic Leaders As Invisible and Visible Pedagogical Inputs in Higher Education Institutions
    InformalVOICES INLearning EDUCATION and the Social Justice Practices of Vol. 5, August 2019 Academic Leaders Informal Learning and the Social Justice Practices of Academic Leaders as Invisible and Visible Pedagogical Inputs in Higher Education Institutions Olutoyin Mejiuni Abstract This paper calls attention to the need to foster an understanding of the intersection of informal learning and social justice issues during the training of academic leaders (professors and administrators) and makes the case for academic leaders to take cognizance of informal learning in their social justice practices. The author posits that the intersection of informal learning and social justice issues/practices are important in(visible) pedagogical inputs in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs), and this nexus affects students’ success. KEY WORDS: Academic leaders, informal learning, social justice, higher education institutions Introduction Informal learning is central to our lives and it is pervasive. We learn, informally, right from birth until our last moments on earth - that is, from cradle to grave. There is a need to understand the presence and processes of informal learning in the formal school system, especially in higher education institutions. Informal learning could have either positive or negative outcomes and it is often through informal learning that unconscious and hidden bias (including stereotypes and prejudices) about persons who are different from the mainstream or ‘us’ could be learned or unlearned (Fashina, 2001; Mejiuni, 2013a; Mejiuni, Cranton, & Taiwo, 2015; Schugurensky, 2015). Unconscious and hidden biases that are left unchallenged would usually become our frames of reference which may later be noticed and changed or may be noticed and reinforced through deliberate forms of informal learning - that is, explicit and self-directed learning (Mejiuni, 2013a; Mejiuni, Cranton, & Taiwo, 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • Diverse Pleasures: Informal Learning in Community Phoenix De Carteret Monash University, Gippsland, Victoria
    Australian Journal of Adult Learning Volume 48, Number 3, November 2008 Diverse pleasures: informal learning in community Phoenix de Carteret Monash University, Gippsland, Victoria In this paper I suggest that social dances and local markets are examples of resilient practices of place-making and community that involve active participation. These two activities create mobile and pliant communities of participants that involve considerable informal and incidental learning. With dances and markets in mind, I look at the two concepts, social capital and community, that are used to link adult education and development and explore the notion of place. Place is conceived here as necessarily involving the inter-relationship of environment, social and economic landscapes. Somerville’s place pedagogy framework is introduced as a methodological approach to research informal learning in the two activities and explore the pedagogies that sustain social attributes broadly conceived under the umbrella of social capital. The paper establishes dances and markets as a nexus of people, place and purpose, a ground from which to research the informal learning that occurs in these diverse pleasures. Diverse pleasures: informal learning in community 503 Introduction Adult education is assuming an increasingly central place in community development as a means to strengthen and sustain communities by building the store of social, human and economic capital (Allison et al. 2006:11). With local regions impacted by change driven by globalisation, the recognition that adult learning ‘eases the burden of change’ (Falk 2001:3) and has transformative potential, is focusing attention on the significance of community-based education (McIntyre 2005:1). With this, there is a developing awareness that useful learning often takes place incidental to educational purposes in adult and community education, for example the development of social capital in adult literacy and numeracy courses (Balatti, Black & Falk 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • THE POWER of INFORMAL LEARNING REVEALED by STUDENTS’ CONNECTIVITY Dr
    GSJ: Volume 8, Issue 9, September 2020 ISSN 2320-9186 660 GSJ: Volume 8, Issue 9, September 2020, Online: ISSN 2320-9186 www.globalscientificjournal.com THE POWER OF INFORMAL LEARNING REVEALED BY STUDENTS’ CONNECTIVITY Dr. Saif Aqachmar Dr. Saif Aqachmar was awarded a doctorate degree at Ibn Tofail University, Morocco. E-mail: [email protected] KeyWords Informal learning, formal learning, students’ connectivity, Abstract This paper investigated the extent to which students’ connectivity has revealed the power of informal learning by taking it to the next higher level. It studied how students became vulnerable to getting more input and producing better output. This study adopted a correlational study, which probed the impact of students’ connectivity on the betterment of their informal learning. It narrowed the scope by analyzing students’ learning behaviors in the English department at Moroccan universities. The analysis measured the frequency of using different internet platforms in either formal learning or informal learning and their impact on speaking and writing. It used different statistical tests of analysis to measure factor variables and independent variables. The study used stratified random sampling to guarantee a sample, which could be representative of the whole population. The results showed the inclination of students towards using the internet to learn informally and confirmed the impact on their achievement in speaking and writing. The findings came up with implications for teachers. GSJ© 2020 www.globalscientificjournal.com GSJ: Volume 8, Issue 9, September 2020 ISSN 2320-9186 661 Introduction Informal learning is one of the most focal components of the lifelong learning process of every individual.
    [Show full text]