Peer and Family Effects in Work and Program Participation Peer and Family Effects in Work and Program Participation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Peer and Family Effects in Work and Program Participation Peer and Family Effects in Work and Program Participation Peer and Family Effects in Work and Program Participation Peer and Family Effects in Work and Program Participation Gordon B. Dahl Summary People don’t base decisions about their economic life solely on their own individually formed ideas and preferences. Rather, they’re influenced by the experiences of their peers and by social group norms. Gordon Dahl reviews the various ways family and neighborhood peer groups influence decisions to participate in the workforce and in government social assistance programs. These social spillover effects are hard to estimate because of the problems that economists refer to as reflection, correlated unobservables, and endogenous group membership. Dahl explains how researchers have overcome these challenges to produce credible estimates of the effects of family and peer groups on work and program participation. He reviews the most rigorous evidence to date and discusses possible mechanisms. Understanding neighborhood and family group influences is critical to thinking about policy, Dahl writes. The spillover effects on children, siblings, and neighbors can be just as important as the direct impact on parents and directly targeted peers, due to social multiplier effects. www.futureofchildren.org Gordon B. Dahl is a professor of economics at the University of California, San Diego. He is also an affiliated professor at the Norwegian School of Economics, the area director for labor economics for the CESifo Research Network, a research associate of the National Bureau of Economic Research, a research professor at the ifo Institue, a CESifo research fellow, a research fellow of the Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), and a fellow of the Stanford Center for the Study of Poverty and Inequality. Elizabeth Ananat of Barnard College reviewed and critiqued a draft of this article. VOL. 30 / NO. 1 / SPRING 2020 107 Gordon B. Dahl t’s a longstanding question in social that could alter the child’s perceptions science: do families and other about the relative costs, benefits, and peers transmit cultures of work stigma associated with the two alternatives. and program participation? In this Information transmission or differential article, I review the evidence for investment could also occur as a result Itwo settings where these types of peer of having a parent receive government effects could be especially important: social transfers. On the other hand, characteristics assistance programs and a selected set of like poor health or reduced opportunities labor market outcomes. My focus is on could be correlated across generations, family and neighborhood peer effects. The creating mechanical intergenerational links effects of other cultural factors, such as that don’t reflect a behavioral response on ancestry and language, have mostly been the child’s part. studied using an epidemiological approach, and have been reviewed elsewhere.1 Of course, the United States has many Likewise, research on peer effects for other different social programs. Traditional groups, such as college roommates, and for welfare programs include Temporary other outcomes, such as crime, is beyond Assistance to Needy Families and the earlier the scope of this review.2 Aid to Families with Dependent Children. Other means-tested programs include the First, I’ll address the subject of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program intergenerational links in welfare use. (that is, food stamps) and Women, Infants, Academics and policymakers alike have and Children. Social assistance programs heatedly debated whether such links reflect also include the Earned Income Tax Credit, a culture of welfare. A Nobel Prize winner Unemployment Insurance, and Social in Economics, Gary Becker, expressed the Security Disability Insurance. In this article, belief that “mothers on welfare convey the I discuss peer effects for a varied but limited impression to their children that it is normal set of social assistance programs, based on to live off government handouts. In such an the availability of research. environment, it is difficult for children to place a high value on doing well at school Turning to family effects related to the and preparing for work by seeking out labor force, we find the rhetorical debate training on jobs and in schools.”3 However, less intense, at least when unemployment the fact that children with parents on is decoupled from welfare participation. welfare are more likely to be on welfare But people make similar arguments about themselves as adults doesn’t mean that the whether family members and other peer parents’ participation is what caused the groups influence how much individuals children to also participate. As the saying work and earn. For example, attitudes about goes, “correlation doesn’t imply causation.” traditional gender roles and the desire to fit into one’s group might affect a mother’s Still, the question has proven difficult to decision to work, especially after the birth of resolve. Parents’ participation in a welfare a child. But mothers in the same family or program isn’t randomly assigned. On the workplace are also likely to share common one hand, when a child has a parent who characteristics, such as similar levels of isn’t working and is on public assistance, income, which affect work decisions. 108 THE FUTURE OF CHILDREN Peer and Family Effects in Work and Program Participation It has proven difficult to estimate causality these caveats in mind, the best evidence to for these types of peer effects in work and date supports the idea that family members social assistance programs, given the well- and neighborhood peers play an important known problems of what economists refer role in decisions about work and program to as reflection, correlated unobservables, participation. and endogenous group membership (I define these terms below in the section “Challenges We know less about the mechanisms behind in Estimating Peer Effects”). It can also these peer effects. Several channels have be difficult to define the appropriate peer been postulated, most of which can be group and to access data that link members classified into four categories. The first of a peer group. But this is changing, both can be broadly defined as cultural factors, in the United States and even more in other including the transmission of preferences countries, where high-quality administrative regarding stigma related to program data collected by governments is increasingly participation, or the desire to conform available. to a group’s social norms. The second is information transmission, such as how to In this article I review recent advances in apply for a welfare program or how an the estimation of causal peer effects in the employer will react if a mother takes parental family and neighborhood contexts. A key leave. The third is direct interactions with takeaway is that the statistical methods used other similar individuals; for example, the to study peer effects aren’t equally credible. benefit of staying home could be greater if Recognizing this, I organize my discussion your friends aren’t working and also have by the statistical method used, rather than free time. The final category is changes to by type of question or peer group. Though the home environment, such as in family early studies documented clear correlations income or parental stress levels. Economists in both program participation and labor and sociologists have found some suggestive market outcomes, causality was tenuous. evidence consistent with channels in each of Recent research has identified causal these categories. effects using more convincing methods and better data. Taken together, these more empirically rigorous studies generally Preferences for work and indicate the presence of intergenerational program participation aren’t links and a strong influence of families and fixed at birth or formed in neighborhoods. isolation. The emerging evidence is compelling, but we should be cautious about how we interpret the findings. Just because spillovers—where Recent findings on peer effects, regardless of one peer influences another—may occur in the underlying mechanisms, have important certain settings and for certain populations policy implications. What children learn doesn’t mean they occur in other settings from their parents about employment versus and populations. Moreover, the existence governmental assistance could matter for of peer effects doesn’t mean that other the financial stability of a number of social contextual factors aren’t also important. With insurance and safety net programs. Similarly, VOL. 30 / NO. 1 / SPRING 2020 109 Gordon B. Dahl peers who serve as important information could matter is social custom or group transmission networks, or are influential in identity. People may be sanctioned for changing social norms, can amplify the effects behaving differently, or may simply increase of policy reforms that affect work and social their happiness by behaving like their peers. assistance programs. This is particularly true Information is another channel that scholars when information is scarce and perceptions discuss. These channels include learning are still being formed. Some of the evidence from family members and neighbors about indicates that these social interactions lead to how to sign up for a welfare program, what long-run effects that are substantially larger the requirements are, and what it’s like to than otherwise expected. be on the program. Similarly, peers could Possible Mechanisms provide insights about writing a résumé, job interviews, and proper work etiquette. When Most economists and sociologists would information is scarce, people can also learn agree that preferences for work and program from family members and peers about the participation aren’t fixed at birth or formed costs and benefits of work.5 Moreover, peers in isolation. The experiences of a person’s can serve as a network for job referrals.6 families and neighbors are key inputs into preference formation. Moreover, families and Peers could also matter if the benefits of neighbors could provide valuable information work or program participation directly related to both work and program depend on interactions with other similar participation.
Recommended publications
  • Social Network Effects in Developing Countries
    SOCIAL NETWORK EFFECTS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES PREPARED FOR THE OXFORD HANDBOOK OF ELECTORAL PERSUASION CESI CRUZ∗ HORACIO LARREGUYy JOHN MARSHALLz MARCH 2019 How do social networks influence and moderate electoral persuasion in developing countries? An extensive literature shows that social networks are important for un- derstanding electoral persuasion in established democracies. At the same time, these theories might not necessarily apply to democracies in the developing world, particu- larly when they are characterized by clientelism, coercion, and other modes of politi- cal engagement outside of formal democratic institutions. In such contexts, networks can matter for politics in different, and sometimes unexpected, ways. In surveying the literature, we identify three general functions of networks that are important for understanding electoral persuasion behavior in developing countries: (i) information diffusion; (ii) social persuasion; and (iii) coordination and enforcement. We explore the implications of these network mechanisms by exploring the roles of both voter and politician networks. ∗Vancouver School of Economics and Department of Political Science, University of British Columbia. Email: [email protected] yDepartment of Government, Harvard University. Email: [email protected] zDepartment of Political Science, Columbia University. Email: [email protected] 1 1 Introduction Social networks are undoubtedly an important part of politics. In established democracies, social networks are associated with a host of positive
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Peer Effects on Youth Smoking Behavior
    Review of Economic Studies (2007) 00, 1–41 0034-6527/07/00000001$02.00 °c 2007 The Review of Economic Studies Limited Measuring Peer Effects on Youth Smoking Behavior RYO NAKAJIMA University of Tsukuba, Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences First version received July 2004; final version accepted November 2006 (Eds.) This paper examines the role of peer effects in teenagers’ smoking behavior in the United States. I present a random utility model that incorporates complementarity between individual and peer smoking. A Markov process model of smoking interactions between individuals is presented. I estimate the structural parameters of the model using a steady state distribution that is determined by the Markov process. The empirical results strongly support the presence of positive peer effects. Interestingly, peer interactions are found to be stronger within the same gender than across genders. The same result is found for race. Moreover, a multiplier effect is found. 1. INTRODUCTION The prevalence of youth smoking is a major public health concern in the United States. During the last three decades, federal and local government tobacco policies have achieved a dramatic reduction in the number of adult smokers in the United States. The same progress, however, has not been made for American youth. For example, in the 1990s, the smoking rate increased by about a half among 8th and 10th graders and by nearly one-third among 12th graders. Although smoking has declined since the late 1990s and into the 2000s, nearly a quarter of youths are smokers by the time they complete high school (Johnston et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Interactions in Labor Supply Andrew Grodner East Carolina University
    Syracuse University SURFACE Center for Policy Research Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs 10-2005 Social Interactions in Labor Supply Andrew Grodner East Carolina University Thomas J. Kniesner Syracuse University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/cpr Part of the Labor Economics Commons Recommended Citation Grodner, Andrew and Kniesner, Thomas J., "Social Interactions in Labor Supply" (2005). Center for Policy Research. 180. https://surface.syr.edu/cpr/180 This Working Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Center for Policy Research by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ISSN: 1525-3066 Center for Policy Research Working Paper No.51 SOCIAL INTERACTIONS IN LABOR SUPPLY Andrew Grodner and Thomas J. Kniesner Center for Policy Research Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs Syracuse University 426 Eggers Hall Syracuse, New York 13244-1020 (315) 443-3114 | Fax (315) 443-1081 e-mail: [email protected] Revised October 2005 $5.00 Up-to-date information about CPR’s research projects and other activities is available from our World Wide Web site at www-cpr.maxwell.syr.edu. All recent working papers and Policy Briefs can be read and/or printed from there as well. CENTER FOR POLICY RESEARCH – Fall 2005 Timothy Smeeding, Director Professor of Economics & Public Administration __________ Associate Directors Margaret Austin Douglas Holtz-Eakin Associate Director, Professor of Economics Budget and Administration Associate Director, Center for Policy Research Douglas Wolf John Yinger Professor of Public Administration Professor of Economics and Public Administration Associate Director, Aging Studies Program Associate Director, Metropolitan Studies Program SENIOR RESEARCH ASSOCIATES Badi Baltagi...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Social Interactions in Breast Cancer Prevention Among Women in the Nitu Ed States Natallia Gray University of South Florida, [email protected]
    University of South Florida Masthead Logo Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 6-27-2014 Social Interactions In Breast Cancer Prevention Among Women In The nitU ed States Natallia Gray University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Economics Commons Scholar Commons Citation Gray, Natallia, "Social Interactions In Breast Cancer Prevention Among Women In The nitU ed States" (2014). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/5228 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Social Interactions In Breast Cancer Prevention Among Women In The United States by Natallia Gray A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Economics College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Gabriel Picone, Ph.D. Andrei Barbos, Ph.D. Murat Munkin, Ph.D. Joshua K.Wilde, Ph.D. Arthur R. Williams, Ph.D. Date of Approval: June 27, 2014 Keywords: peer effects, mammography, social multiplier Copyright © 2014 , Natallia Gray Dedication I would like to dedicate this dissertation to my family. To my dear daughters, Julia and Olivia: I hope that, in the years to come, this work will be a kind reminder that you, my darlings, are capable of achieving anything, once you put your minds to it.
    [Show full text]
  • Students' Cheating As a Social Interaction: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment in a National Evaluation Program
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Lucifora, Claudio; Tonello, Marco Working Paper Students' cheating as a social interaction: Evidence from a randomized experiment in a national evaluation program IZA Discussion Papers, No. 6967 Provided in Cooperation with: IZA – Institute of Labor Economics Suggested Citation: Lucifora, Claudio; Tonello, Marco (2012) : Students' cheating as a social interaction: Evidence from a randomized experiment in a national evaluation program, IZA Discussion Papers, No. 6967, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/67183 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend
    [Show full text]
  • On the Mechanisms of Ability Peer Effects
    DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 13938 On the Mechanisms of Ability Peer Effects Alexandra de Gendre Nicolás Salamanca DECEMBER 2020 DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 13938 On the Mechanisms of Ability Peer Effects Alexandra de Gendre University of Sydney, LCC and IZA Nicolás Salamanca University of Melbourne, LCC and IZA DECEMBER 2020 Any opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but IZA takes no institutional policy positions. The IZA research network is committed to the IZA Guiding Principles of Research Integrity. The IZA Institute of Labor Economics is an independent economic research institute that conducts research in labor economics and offers evidence-based policy advice on labor market issues. Supported by the Deutsche Post Foundation, IZA runs the world’s largest network of economists, whose research aims to provide answers to the global labor market challenges of our time. Our key objective is to build bridges between academic research, policymakers and society. IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author. ISSN: 2365-9793 IZA – Institute of Labor Economics Schaumburg-Lippe-Straße 5–9 Phone: +49-228-3894-0 53113 Bonn, Germany Email: [email protected] www.iza.org IZA DP No. 13938 DECEMBER 2020 ABSTRACT On the Mechanisms of Ability Peer Effects* Studying with higher ability peers increases student performance, yet we have little idea why.
    [Show full text]
  • Peer Effect on Consumption*
    Thy Neighbor’s Misfortune: Peer Effect on Consumption* Sumit Agarwal†, Wenlan Qian‡, and Xin Zou§ November 2017 * We have benefited from the comments of Chris Carroll, Tullio Jappelli, Michael Haliassos, Erik Hurst, Matti Keloharju, Jessica Pan, Ivan Png, Nagpurnanand Prabhala, Tarun Ramadorai, David Reeb, Nick Souleles, Johannes Stroebel, Bernard Yeung, Brad Barber, and seminar participants at the CEPR Household Finance Conference, Johns Hopkins, USC Marshall, Baruch College, Atlanta Fed, Georgia Institute of Technology, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Singapore Management University, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Baptist University, and National University of Singapore. All errors are our own. † Sumit Agarwal, Department of Finance, Georgetown University, Email: [email protected]. ‡ Wenlan Qian, NUS Business School, Department of Finance, Email: [email protected]. Please send correspondence to Wenlan Qian. § Xin Zou, Hong Kong Baptist University, Department of Finance and Decision Science, Email: [email protected]. 1 Thy Neighbor’s Misfortune: Peer Effect on Consumption November 2017 Abstract Using a representative sample of credit and debit card transactions in Singapore, we study the consumption response of individuals whose same-building neighbors experienced personal bankruptcy. The unique setting in Singapore suggests liquidity shocks drive personal bankruptcy and the bankrupts significantly reduce spending afterwards. Peers’ monthly card consumption decreases by 3.4 percent during the one-year period. We find no occupation concentration in the bankruptcy-hit buildings, no consumption decrease among individuals in immediately adjacent buildings, or for consumers with diminished post-event social ties with the bankrupt individual. Our findings imply a significant social multiplier effect of 0.8-1.2 times the original consumption shock.
    [Show full text]
  • Students' Cheating As a Social Interaction
    IZA DP No. 6967 Students’ Cheating as a Social Interaction: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment in a National Evaluation Program Claudio Lucifora Marco Tonello October 2012 DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit Institute for the Study of Labor Students’ Cheating as a Social Interaction: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment in a National Evaluation Program Claudio Lucifora Università Cattolica and IZA Marco Tonello Bank of Italy and Defap Discussion Paper No. 6967 October 2012 IZA P.O. Box 7240 53072 Bonn Germany Phone: +49-228-3894-0 Fax: +49-228-3894-180 E-mail: [email protected] Any opinions expressed here are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but the institute itself takes no institutional policy positions. The IZA research network is committed to the IZA Guiding Principles of Research Integrity. The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in Bonn is a local and virtual international research center and a place of communication between science, politics and business. IZA is an independent nonprofit organization supported by Deutsche Post Foundation. The center is associated with the University of Bonn and offers a stimulating research environment through its international network, workshops and conferences, data service, project support, research visits and doctoral program. IZA engages in (i) original and internationally competitive research in all fields of labor economics, (ii) development of policy concepts, and (iii) dissemination of research results and concepts to the interested public. IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Disruptive Peers in Endogenous Social Networks
    Effects of Disruptive Peers in Endogenous Social Networks∗ Torsten Santavirtay Miguel Sarzosaz June 12, 2019 Abstract This study explores the role of social networks in shaping the diffusion (i.e., spread and heterogenous impact) of the negative classroom externalities generated by disruptive peers. We recognize that social networks are endogenous and model friendship formation based on homophily. Using the Stockholm Birth Cohort 1953, we find that classmates exposed to abuse and neglect have negative effects on peers’ cognitive achievement at ages 13, 16 and 19. We find stronger effects for those students who are socially closer to the disruptive peers and a fade out that limits the reach of the externality to a path length of three edges. Finally, social networks provide instruments that allow us to estimate the structural parameters of the modified linear-in-means model. We find that most of the effect disruptive peers exert on their classmates is accounted for by the direct effect of their disruptiveness, leaving no scope for social multiplier effects. JEL Classification: I21, J13, J24 ∗This paper was supported by the Handelsbanken Research Foundation grant number P2016-0093. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Handelsbanken Research Foundation. We would like to thank Ylva Almquist and Jannike Kjellström at Centre for Health Equity Studies (CHESS) for their help with the data construction. We are grateful to thank Eric Auerbach, Manuel Bagues, Tim Bond, Vincent Boucher,
    [Show full text]
  • Peer Effects, Tobacco Control Policies, and Youth Smoking Behavior
    Peer Effects, Tobacco Control Policies, and Youth Smoking Behavior Lisa M. Powell, PhD John A. Tauras, PhD Hana Ross, PhD February 2003 Research Paper Series, No. 24 ImpacTeen is part of the Bridging the Gap Initiative: Research Informing Practice for Healthy Youth Behavior, supported by The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and administered by the University of Illinois at Chicago. Peer Effects, Tobacco Control Policies, and Youth Smoking Behavior February 2003 Lisa M. Powell, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Queen’s University and Senior Research Specialist, HRPC, UIC 850 West Jackson Blvd, Suite 400 Chicago, IL 60607-3025 [email protected] John A. Tauras, Ph.D. Hana Ross, Ph. D. Assistant Professor of Economics, UIC Research Specialist, HPRC, UIC and Faculty Research Fellow, NBER 850 West Jackson Blvd, Suite 400 601 S. Morgan St., Room 2103 Chicago, IL 60607-3025 Chicago, IL 60607-7121 [email protected] [email protected] Acknowledgements We gratefully acknowledge funding support for this research from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation through the Substance Abuse Policy Research Program and ImpacTeen (A Policy Research Partnership to Reduce Youth Substance Use). We thank Frank Chaloupka and Richard Peck for their comments and suggestions. The authors are grateful to Yanjun Bao for her excellent research assistance. Copyright 2003 University of Illinois at Chicago 2 Abstract This paper expands the youth cigarette demand literature by undertaking an examination of the determinants of smoking among high school students incorporating the importance of peer effects and allowing cigarette prices (taxes) and tobacco control policies to have a direct effect and an indirect effect (via the peer effect) on smoking behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of Social Norms in Th
    Dynamics of social norms in the city Fabien Moizeau To cite this version: Fabien Moizeau. Dynamics of social norms in the city. Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, 2015, 51, pp.70-87. 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2015.01.005. halshs-01114139 HAL Id: halshs-01114139 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01114139 Submitted on 11 Apr 2015 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Dynamics of Social Norms in the City∗ Fabien MOIZEAU† January 2015 Abstract We study how in a city either opposite social norms remain or a particular code of behavior spreads and ultimately prevails. We develop a multicommunity model with overlapping generations. When young, an individual chooses a certain level of educational effort. The crucial feature is that the decision is influenced by peers living in the area who favor a social norm either valuing education or discrediting it. When an adult, an individual who cares about both her offspring’s expected income and the social norm chooses the family’s location. Endogenous location leads to different patterns of social norms in the city. We identify two types of urban equilibrium: a culturally-balanced city where social norms are distributed evenly among urban areas and where the rate of education is the same in each urban area and a culturally-divided city where urban areas oppose on their prevailing social norm and exhibit different rates of education.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-‐Efficacy and Modernization on the Origin of Chang
    Self-­‐Efficacy and Modernization. On the Origin of Change. Barbara Drosten 2016 Self-­‐Efficacy and Modernization On The Origin of Change Universität Hamburg Fakultät für Wirtschafts-­‐ und Sozialwissenschaften Dissertation zur Erlangung der einer Würde Doktorin der Wirtschafts-­‐ und Sozialwissenschaften “Dr. rer. ” pol. (gemäß der PromO vom 17. Juni 1998) vorgelegt von Barbara Drosten aus Meppen Hamburg, den 23.Januar 2018 Vorsitzender: Pro. Dr. Andreas von Staden Erstbetreuer: Prof. Dr. Rainer Tetzlaff Zweitbetreuer: Prof. Dr. Matthias Basedau Datum der Disputation: 13. Dezember 2017 Self-­‐Efficacy and Modernization. On the Origin of Change. Barbara Drosten 2016 For Ruben, Lea and David Self-­‐Efficacy and Modernization. On the Origin of Change. Barbara Drosten 2016 Self-­‐Efficacy and Modernization On the Origin of Change ABSTRACT: Self-­‐efficacy is the critical link between environment, culture, institutions, and modernization. It is the primum movens of change through learning by enabling human tation adap to environmental and circumstantial stimuli. Self-­‐efficacy develops everywhere at all times, but in different strengths, domains, and levels. It is equally required in both developed and less developed economies. A lack f o self-­‐efficacy in leaders, elites, and ordinary electorate reating can foster ret to manipulation or force, to exploitation and circumventing rules to pursue one´s interests. Self-­‐efficacy is not genetic but learned and culturally transmitted. Individuals and communities with high self-­‐efficacy believe to be able to learn and change their behavior favorably, and profit from doing so because they rned have lea that through positive past experience in a effort rewarding environment. Their past success ts bege future success through opportunity recognition, higher risk taking, better cooperation, and higher and longer .
    [Show full text]