<<

Doc Math J DMV

Chow Groups with Coefficients

Markus Rost

Received Octob er

Communicated by Alexander S Merkurjev

Abstract We develop a generalization of the classical Chow groups in

order to have available some standard prop erties for theories long

exact sequences sp ectral sequences for brations homotopy invariance and

intersections The basis for our constructions is Milnors K theory

Mathematics Sub ject Classication Primary C

Contents

Summary

Conventions and Notations

Introduction

Cycle Premo dules

Cycle Mo dules

The Four Basic Maps

Compatibilities

Cycle Complexes and Chow Groups

Acyclicity for Smo oth Lo cal Rings

The Cycle Mo dules A M

q

Fibrations

Homotopy

Deformation to the Normal Cone

The Basic Construction

The Pullback Map

for Fibrations

Pro ducts

References

Documenta Mathematica

Markus Rost

Summary

The pap er considers generalities for lo calization complexes for varieties Examples of

these complexes are given by the Gersten resolutions in various contexts in particular

in K theory and in etale The pap er gives a general notion of co ecient

systems for such complexes the so called cycle mo dules There are the corresp onding

complexes of cycles with co ecients and their homology groups the Chow groups

with co ecients For these some general constructions are developed prop er push

forward at pullback sp ectral sequences for brations homotopy invariance and

intersection theory

If one sp ecializes the material to the case of Milnors K theory as co ecient

system one obtains in particular an elementary development of intersections for the

classical Chow groups This treatment is somewhat dierent to former approaches

The main to ol is still the deformation to the normal cone The ma jor dierence is

that homotopy invariance is not established alone for the Chow groups but for the

cycle complex with co ecients in Milnors K Theory This enables one to keep

control in b ered situations The pro of of asso ciativity of intersections is based on a

doubled version of the deformation to the normal cone

Conventions and Notations

We work over a ground eld k and a base B Sp ec k The word scheme means

a lo calization of a separated scheme of nite type over k This includes schemes of

nite type over a eld nitely generated over k From Section on all schemes are

of nite type over a eld Moreover all schemes and morphisms are dened over B

with exceptions in Section The letter M stands from Section on for a cycle

mo dule If not mentioned otherwise it is dened over B in Sections or over X

in Sections

fxg of x in X For x X we denote by dim x X the dimension of the closure

and by co dimx X the dimension of the lo calization X The set of p oints of X of

x

p

dimension resp co dimension p is denoted by X resp X We make free use

p

of some basic facts from commutative algebra and refer for this to Hartshorne

Matsumura and in particular to Fulton App A App B

p

In Sections and we use the sp ecial notation X Y for certain

maps b etween the cycle complexes This is explained in

Documenta Mathematica

Chow Groups with Coefficients

Introduction

The classical Chow groups CH X of pdimensional cycles on a variety X may b e

p

dened as the cokernel of the divisor map

a a

d

x Z

xX xX

(p+1) (p)

Here X is the set of p oints of X of dimension p and x is the residue class eld

p

of x This pap er studies complexes C X M of the following type

a a a

d d d d

M x M x M x

xX xX xX

(p+1) (p) (p1)

Here M is what we call a cycle mo dule This is a F M F on elds to

ab elian groups equipp ed with four structural data the even ones restriction and

corestriction the o dd ones multiplication with K and residue maps for discrete

valuations Moreover there is imp osed a list of certain rules and axioms A particular

example of a cycle mo dule is M K given by Milnors or Quillens K

K F Z F K F

Other examples are provided by Galois cohomology sp ecically

a

n n

M F H F D

r

n

with D a Galois mo dule over a ground eld k with char k prime to r

The complex C X M is called the chain complex of cycles on X and its ho

mology groups A X M are called the Chow groups of X with co ecients in M

p

The Chow groups A X M enclose various familiar ob jects The classical Chow

p

CH X is a direct summand of A X K The E terms of the lo cal

p p

global sp ectral sequences in etale cohomology and in Quillens K theory are of type

A X M For prop er smo oth X of dimension d the group A X M is a birational

p d

invariantthe M valued analogue of unramied Galois cohomology

The pap er develops some basic constructions for the cycle complexes

C X M and the Chow groups A X M for schemes X of nite type over a eld

There are prop er pushforward at pullback and homotopy invariance Moreover

intersection theory is available for regular imbeddings and morphisms to smo oth

varieties there is a pullback map Finally for a morphism X Z there is a

sp ectral sequence

E A Z A M A X M

p q pq

pq

Here the A M are certain cycle mo dules obtained from taking homology in the

q

b ers All the mentioned functorial b ehavior extends for appropriate b er diagrams

to the cycle mo dules A M and the sp ectral sequences

q

Documenta Mathematica

Markus Rost

The constructions are carried out on complex level in a p ointwise manner

The treatment has some parallels to a standard development of homology of CW

complexes This analogy should not b e taken to o serious but may give a rst impres

sion ab out the sort of technicalities In this picture our cells are just all p oints of

the variety in question The patching data for the cells are given by the geomet

ric valuations on the residue class eld of one p oint having center in another p oint

The appropriate lo cal co ecient systems are the cycle mo dules However the nature

of these co ecient systems is more complicated than in top ology First of all their

ground ring is provided by Milnors K theory of elds Moreover b esides the usual

functorial b ehavior there is need for transfer maps basically b ecause one has to deal

with non algebraically closed elds and there are residue maps for valuations to give

passage from one p oint of a variety to its sp ecializations

The material of this pap er grew out from considerations concerning the bijectivity

of the norm residue homomorphism and Hilb erts Satz for Milnors K There the

n

computation of the Chow groups of certain norm varieties and quadrics plays an

imp ortant role As a general technique see also Karp enko and Merkurjev we

used a sp ectral sequence for morphisms X Z relating the Chow groups of the

total space to something like the Chow groups of the base with co ecients in the

Chow groups of the b ers moreover these sp ectral sequences should b e compatible

with intersection op erations The goal of the pap er was to present an appropriate

framework in a fairly direct manner

With the remarks following we have tried to draw the line of development of

the pap er In the discussion of intersection theory we restrict for simplicity to typi

cal situations and with Milnors K theory as co ecient system although the actual

treatment is more general

Even if one is interested in classical Chow groups alone one is led to consider

some more general versions of Chow groups To start with a simple situation let

Y X b e a closed subvariety Then there is an

CH Y CH X CH X n Y

p p p

For concrete computations as well as for general considerations there app ears the

problem to extend this sequence to the left in a reasonable way by a sort of higher

variants of Chow groups Similarly let X Z b e a morphism of varieties and

try to relate the Chow groups of X with the Chow groups of Z and of the b ers

When working within the classical Chow groups alone there will b e no go o d answer

in general

In this pap er the approach to these problems is provided by Milnors K theory

For a variety X one forms for n Z the complex C X n with

a

C X n K x

p np

xX

(p)

}

The complex of cycles with co ecients in Milnors K theory to b e considered later splits up as

C X n according to the grading of Milnors K ring a direct sum C X K

  

n

Documenta Mathematica

Chow Groups with Coefficients

where K F is Milnors nth K group of a eld F The homology groups of the

n

complex C X n are denoted by A X n For n p it ends up with

p

a a a

d d d

K x K x K x

xX xX xX

(p+2) (p+1) (p)

and one has CH X A X p

p p

Then for a subvariety Y X there is a long exact sequence

A X n Y n A Y n A X n A X n Y n

p p p p

Moreover let X Z b e a morphism The ltration of the set X given by

p

the dimension of the image gives rise to a ltration of the complex C X n The

corresp onding E sp ectral sequence lo oks like

a

E A X n p A X n

q z pq

pq

z Z

(p)

with X X Sp ec z

z Z

A ma jor problem in intersection theory is to pro duce for a regular imbedding

q

f X X a pullback map f on the Chow groups having the geometric meaning of

intersecting cycles on X with X For a general account on intersections we refer to

Fulton

These maps are in the actual context of type

q

f A X n A X n d

p pd

with d co dimf

q

In the pap er the maps f are dened by rst constructing homomorphisms of

complexes

I f C X n C X n d

d

and then passing to homology In a b ered situation that is f lies over some map

Z Z with appropriate smo othness conditions the maps I f can b e chosen

to resp ect the ltrations thereby inducing homomorphisms on the corresp onding

sp ectral sequences

As the reader might guess the maps I f cannot b e dened canonically in

terms of f Namely I f gives in particular a lift of the classical pullback map

q

f CH X CH X to the cycle groups But if a cycle W on X do es not

p pd

meet X prop erly there is in general no way to dene W X by a canonical cycle

It may b e surprising that one can handle with such pullback maps I f on

complex level in a reasonable way Therefore we will discuss here the nature of these

maps in some detail

When working with the complexes C X n it turns out that the necessary

constructions can b e describ ed in terms of four basic op erations These called the

four basic maps are of the following type

Documenta Mathematica

Markus Rost

For a morphism f X Y there is a pushforward map

f C X n C Y n

p p

For a morphism g X Y with b er dimension s there is a pullback map

g C Y n C X n s

p ps

Moreover there is multiplication with K for a global unit a on X there is a

map

fag C X n C X n

p p

given by p ointwise multiplication with ax x K x

Finally for a closed immersion there is a canonical b oundary map

C X n Y n C Y n

p p

All these maps are dened in a p ointwise manner If f is prop er and g is at the

maps f and g commute with the dierentials of the complexes One uses f also

for op en immersions f and g also for closed immersions g then f and g are just

the corresp onding pro jections and dont commute with the dierentials The maps

fag and anticommute with the dierentials

In fact the four basic maps are enough to dene intersections on complex level

by their very denition the maps I f are sums of comp ositions of the four basic

maps For the construction of the I f the rst ma jor to ol is the deformation to the

normal cone This yields a canonical deformation map

C X n C N n

where N is the normal cone of f The next step is to dene for a

V X of dimension d a homotopy inverse

C V n C X n d

d

to the pullback map It is at this place where one needs some extra noncanonical

choices The choice to b e made is at most that of what we call a co ordination

of This is a stratication of X together with bundle trivializations on the strata

In the end there is a canonical pro cedure which starts from the choice of a co

ordination of the normal bundle of f and yields a map I f as desired dened in

terms of the four basic maps Dierent choices lead to homotopic maps I f with

the homotopies again expressible in terms of the four basic maps In a b ered situ

ation one may arrange things to end up with ltration preserving maps I f Once

having made the necessary choices the construction is quite functorial For example

it is compatible with resp ect to base change and lo calization In order to establish

functoriality namely I f f should b e homotopic to I f I f if necessary under

a ltration preserving homotopy we use a kind of doubled deformation space

Documenta Mathematica

Chow Groups with Coefficients

The viewp oint of the pap er is to put the four basic maps in the center In

particular the maps fag are treated as if they were a kind of morphisms in their own

right of equal rank as the more familiar pushforward and pullback maps This has

at least technical advantages For example in order to check various compatibilities

q

concerning the maps f it is very convenient to reduce to a separate treatment of the

four basic maps

The reader may ask why we insist to stay on complex level although one is

interested mainly in the Chow groups Over some range this is quite natural from the

material However the pro of of homotopy invariance with resp ect to vector bundles

is much simpler for the Chow groups using the sp ectral sequences than for the cycle

complexes themselves where one has to construct explicit homotopy inverses

The ma jor motive for keeping the complex level throughout was to keep control

on the ltrations in b ered situations

Besides this we hop e that our metho d is of some interest concerning questions

e

for corresp ondences b etween arbitrary varieties To give an example let f X X

b e a prop er birational morphism with X smo oth Then there are pullback maps

e

I f C X n C X n

similar to the I f ab ove The I f are unique up to homotopy and have the standard

pushforward map f as left inverse In particular I f identies C X n as a

e

sub complex of C X n In the case of a blow up in a p oint x the choice to b e made

in the construction of I f is at most that of a system of parameters around x

We think of the maps I f as a sort of generalized corresp ondences One can make

this more precise in a further development which we call bivariant theory of cycles

There the four basic maps nd their place as morphisms of varieties in an appropriate

dierential category and the homotopy classes of the maps I f app ear rather as

morphisms in a category of varieties admitting pro ducts than just as homomorphisms

of complexes as in this pap er

The motive of introducing a general notion of co ecient systems for cycles ap

p ears when lo oking at the sp ectral sequence Its E terms are the homology

groups of complexes of type

a a

d d d

A X n A X n

q z q z

z Z z Z

(p) (p1)

We interpret this by saying that the collection of with n Z

A n F A X Sp ec F n

q q Z

dened on elds F over Z app ear as new co ecient systems This pro cess of creating

co ecient systems may in fact b e iterated

Therefore it seems convenient to have available some appropriate general notion

of co ecient systems The class considered in this pap er is provided by the notion

of what we call cycle mo dules Its denition is formal and somewhat ad ho c The

imp ortant thing for us is that it contains standard functors like Milnors or Quillens

K theory and Galois cohomology as indicated ab ove that it is closed under pro cesses

like M A M and that it allows intersection theory Anyway it might b e of at

q

least heuristic interest that many general constructions intersections also the pro of

of acyclicity for smo oth lo cal rings can b e based on pure formal prop ertiesat least

if one starts from Milnors K theory of elds

Documenta Mathematica

Markus Rost

Milnors K theory is the fundamental base of the whole pap er This was at rst

suggested by our original problem Hilb erts Satz for Milnors K Besides this

n

Milnors K theory seems to give the minimal framework needed in order to express

the considerations on intersections discussed ab ove By the way it seems likely that

the general metho d works also with Milnors K theory replaced by the Witt ring of

quadratic forms of elds of characteristic dierent from

Milnors K theory has a simple denition in terms of generators and relations

Despite this fact it is by no means a simple and well understo o d functor Already

to dene the norm homomorphisms takes some eort An even more serious and in

general an unsolved problem is for example the computation of the torsion in Mil

nors K groups These problems are related with Hilb erts Satz Merkurjev and

Suslin and are part of a broader picture Beilinson conjectures motivic co

homology In this context there app ear other and more general higher versions of the

classical Chow groups than the groups A X n based on Milnors K theory namely

p

Blo chs higher Chow groups and Suslins singular homology and

also K cohomology Blo ch Quillen Suslin and Voevodsky Milnors

K theory forms a central part of motivic cohomology and of Quillens K theory In

fact in the smo oth case there are natural maps from the motivic cohomology of X

to the groups A X n and from A X n to the K cohomology of X b oth of which

are isomorphisms in some low degrees On the other hand motivic cohomology and

Quillens K theory give rise to cycle mo dules in our sense In the case of Quillens

K theory this is made more precise in Sections and These functors are def

initely necessary for a full understanding of Milnors K theory For the purp ose of

this pap er however it turned out to b e enough to rely on elementary prop erties of

Milnors K theory

The pap er may b e roughly divided in four parts In Sections the notion

of cycle mo dules is dened Here we have lent some weight to a discussion of the

axioms In Sections the cycle complexes the Chow groups and their basic func

torial b ehavior are established Section is a side remark concerning the acyclicity

of Gerstentype resolutions Sections treat the sp ectral sequences Sections

are concerned with intersection theory

I am indebted to Inge Meier for typesetting a rst version of this pap er

Documenta Mathematica

Chow Groups with Coefficients

Cycle Premodules

Cycle premo dules are roughly said functors on elds which have transfer are mo dules

over Milnors K theory are equipp ed with residue maps for discrete valuations and

satisfy the usual rules The denition is quite formal It forms the lo cal dimension

part of the notion of cycle mo dules A ma jor dierence to cycle mo dules is that cycle

premo dules do not have to ob ey laws involving an innite number of valuations like

the sum formula for P

Cycle premo dules are dened by a list of data and rules These are just usual

prop erties quite familiar to standard examples Equivalently one may dene cycle

premo dules as the additive functors on a certain category which has an explicit de

scription in terms of Milnors K theory and valuations see Remark This p oint

of view is p erhaps more satisfying It tells that our list of data and rules is in a sense

a complete list However it would take some eort to establish the comp osition rule

in the category and we omit therefore a detailed discussion Moreover in order to

establish certain functors as cycle premo dules it is more convenient to refer to the

explicit lists of prop erties

The viewp oint of the four basic maps mentioned in the introduction would at

rst lead to functors F M F such that each M F is a mo dule over the tensor

algebra TF However the existence of norm maps and the homotopy prop erty leads

one to pass to mo dules over Milnors K ring see Remark

We rst recall basic facts from Milnors K theory Let F b e a eld By denition

Milnors K ring Milnor of F is

K F TF J

where F is the multiplicative group of F TF is the tensor algebra of F as ab elian

group and J is the twosided ideal of TF generated by the set

f a b j a b F a b g

The standard grading on TF induces a grading

a

K F K F

n

n

K F is the nth Milnors K group of F By denition K F Z and K F F

n

The elements of K F represented by tensors a a a F are called

n n i

symbols and denoted by fa a g The group law in K F is written additively

n n

eg fabg fag fbg There are the rules fa ag and fa bg fb ag see

Milnor In particular K F is an anticommutative ring with resp ect to the

natural Zgrading

For a homomorphism of elds F E there is the ring homomorphism

K F K E

fa a g fa a g

n n

} M

In the literature one often uses the notation K F for Milnors K ring while K F stands for





Quillens K ring

Documenta Mathematica

Markus Rost

If is nite there is the norm homomorphism

K E K F

preserves the Zgrading Its comp onent Z Z in degree is multiplication with

deg E F In degree it is the usual norm map N E F for the nite eld

extensions has b een dened by Bass and Tate with resp ect to a choice of

generators of E over F it is in fact indep endent of such a choice Kato For a

characterization of see the remark after Theorem

For a valuation v F Z we denote by O m v its ring maximal ideal and

v v

residue class eld resp ectively For nontrivial v there is the residue homomorphism

K F K v see Milnor is of degree It has the characterizing

v v

prop erties

f u u g fu u g

v n n

fu u g

v n

for a prime of v and for v units u with residue classes u v Dene

i i

s K F K v

v

s x f g x

v

v

is a ring homomorphism and is characterized by s

v

s fu u g fu u g

n n

v

s f u u g

n

v

Rules b etween the maps and the multiplicative structure of K are com

v

prised b elow in Theorem

Let B b e a scheme over a eld k recall our conventions In the following we

mean by a eld over B a eld F together with a morphism Sp ec F B such that F

is nitely generated over k By a valuation over B we mean a discrete valuation v

of rank together with a morphism Sp ec O B such that v is of geometric type

v

over k The latter means that O is the lo calization of an integral domain of nite

v

type over k in a regular p oint of co dimension Alternatively valuations of geometric

type may b e characterized by k O the quotient eld F and the residue class eld

v

v are nitely generated over k and trdegF jk trdegv jk

This geometric setting is convenient for our later purp oses We imp ose its re

strictive conditions from the b eginning in order to keep things straight For some

purp oses one may consider also arbitrary elds and valuations discrete of rank

and eventually not equicharacteristic over an arbitrary scheme B

In the following the letters stand for homomorphisms of elds over B and

all maps b etween various M F M E are understo o d as homomorphisms of

graded ab elian groups

Definition Let F B be the class of elds over B A cycle premodule M

consists of an object function M F B A to the class of abelian groups together

with a Zgrading M M M or a Zgrading M M and with the fol lowing

n

n

data DD and rules RaRe

Documenta Mathematica

Chow Groups with Coefficients

D For each F E there is M F M E of degree

D For each nite F E there is M E M F of degree

D For each F the group M F is equipp ed with a left K F mo dule structure

denoted by x for x K F and M F The pro duct resp ects the

gradings K F M F M F

n m nm

D For a valuation v on F there is M F M v of degree

v

For a prime of v on F we put

s M F M v

v

s f g

v

v

Ra For F E E L one has

Rb For nite F E E L one has

Rc Let F E F L with nite Put R L E For p Sp ec R

F

let L R p E R p b e the natural maps Moreover let l b e the

p p p

length of the lo calized ring R Then

p

X

l

p p p

p

R For F E x K F y K E M F M E one has with

nite in the pro jection formulae Rb and Rc

Ra x x

Rb x x

Rc y y

Ra Let E F and let v b e a valuation on F which restricts to a nontrivial

valuation w on E with ramication index e Let w v b e the induced

map Then

e

v w

Rb Let F E b e nite and let v b e a valuation on F For the extensions w

of v to E let v w b e the induced maps Then

w

X

v w

w

w

Rc Let E F and let v b e a valuation on F which is trivial on E Then

v

Rd Let v b e as in Rc let E v b e the induced map and let b e a

prime of v Then

s

v

Re For a valuation v on F a v unit u and M F one has

fug fug

v v



Documenta Mathematica

Markus Rost

The maps are called the restriction and corestriction homomorphisms resp ec

tively We use the notations r c if there is no ambiguity

E jF E jF

Note that Rc with y K E gives

Rd For nite F E one has

deg id

Moreover Rc implies

Re For nite totally inseparable F E one has

deg id

We consider M F also as a right K F mo dule via

nm

x x

for x K F and M F

n m

The maps are called the residue homomorphisms and the maps s are called the

v

v

sp ecialization homomorphisms It is easy to check that Re implies

Rf For a valuation v on F x K F M F and a prime of v one has

n

n

x x s s x fg x

v v v v v

v v

s x s x s

v v v

If is another prime and u is the v unit with u then

0

s x s x fug x

v v

From this and the rule Rc it follows in particular that the rule Rd holds for every

prime

More remarks concerning these formulae and the residue homomorphisms in general

are given b elow

All relevant cycle premo dules M known to us are Zgraded with M for

n

n Within the general theory however there is need only for a Zgrading and

we will understand this case if not mentioned otherwise

A morphism f B B denes a transformation F B F B and the restric

tion of a cycle premo dule M over B to F B is a cycle premo dule over B It will

b e sometimes denoted by f M but mostly by M as well If B Sp ec R is ane we

call a cycle premo dule over B a cycle premo dule over R If R is a eld we sp eak of

a constant cycle premo dule The reference to the base B will b e often dropp ed

Definition A pairing M M M of cycle premodules over B is given by

bilinear maps for each F in F B

M F M F M F

which respect the gradings and which have the properties PP stated below

A ring structure on a cycle premodule M is a pairing M M M which induces

on each M F an associative and anticommutative ring structure

Documenta Mathematica

Chow Groups with Coefficients

P For x K F M F M F one has

Pa x x

Pb x x

P For F E M F M E M F M E one has with

nite in Pb Pc

Pa

Pb

Pc

P For a valuation v on F M F M F and a prime of v one has

n

n

s s fg

v v v v v

v v



Note that P implies

s s s

v v v

Definition A homomorphism M M of cycle premodules over B of even

resp odd type is given by homomorphisms

M F M F

F

which are even resp odd and which satisfy with the signs corresponding to even resp

odd type

F E

E F

fag fag

F F

v F v

v

A unit a on B provides a simple example of a homomorphism of o dd type namely

fag M M given by fag fa g where a F is the restriction of a

F F F

The cycle premo dules over B together with the notion of homomorphism of

Denition form an Zgraded ab elian category

Theorem Milnors K theory K together with the data

multiplication

v

is a Zgraded cycle premodule over any eld k With its multiplication K is a cycle

premodule with ring structure 

This statement is a compact form of results in Bass and Tate Kato

Milnor we omit a detailed deduction

Documenta Mathematica

Markus Rost

Theorem holds also in the setting of arbitrary elds and valuations discrete

of rank and with a restriction in Rb see Remark b elow

Given the rings K F for each F in F Sp ec k the maps and are

v

uniquely determined by Rb Rc P P and

fag fag

deg

fag N a

v

fag v a

v

v av b v a v b

fa bg b a mo d m

v v

Here v denotes a normalized valuation v

This statement is trivial for the maps and for the uniqueness of the maps

v

see in particular Bass and Tate p

The multiplication maps of the K F mo dule structures on M F for each F give

rise to a pairing of cycle premo dules

K M M

Here the axioms P P and P follow from D R and Rf

In order to establish a cycle premo dule it is convenient to use the following

reduction

Lemma For the validity of Rd it suces under presence of the other rules

of Denition to require Rd for the case E v

Proof By Ra the rule Rd holds for E if it holds for some extension E of E with

E O Moreover by Ra we may replace O by any unramied extension O with

v v

v

since the same residue class eld we dont want to pass to the henselization lim O

v

our elds should b e nitely generated over k Now by lifting a transcendence base of

v over E to O we may assume that v is nite over E Moreover we may assume

v

as ab ove Then v is totally inseparable that E is algebraically closed in any O

v

over E Supp ose p char F We argue by induction on v E Let a E

p

p

Then the extension v a is contained in v but not in any O such that E E

v

p

p

a has ramication index p has the same residue class eld and of v to F F

v E v E Using Rc Rb Rc and Re it is now easy to see that Rd

holds for the pair v E if it holds for the pair v E use the fact that the norm of

a prime for v is a prime for v 

The rest of this section will not b e used later within the general theory However

the following remarks may b e of at least heuristic interest and we will refer to them

partially in later sideremarks

Remark There is the following p oint of view concerning Rf See also Bass

and Tate Milnor remark at the end of p

For a valuation v F Z let

K v K F f m g K F

v

Documenta Mathematica

Chow Groups with Coefficients

Consider the ring homomorphisms

p K F K v

i K v K v

given by pro jection resp by the formula

ifu u g pfu u g

n n

for v units u There is an exact sequence

i

i

K v K v K v

with p Any prime gives rise to a section y pf g iy of

v

We put

M v K v M v

K v



Then there is an exact sequence

i

M v M M v v

and the splittings ab ove give for every a decomp osition of K v mo dules

M v M v M v

We dene

p M F M v

p s pf g

v

v

Note that p is indep endent of the choice of One has p

v

Now Rf may b e reformulated by saying that p is a mo dule homomorphism over

the ring homomorphism p Similarly one may understand P via pairings

M v M v M v

K v



Remark A particular consequence of Re is the fact that the subgroup

f m g M F

v

is killed whenever one passes to M v This seems to b e a reasonable condition

from a geometric p oint of view However note that the continuous Steinberg symbol

K Q Z corresp onding to the adic valuation on Q Milnor x maps

f g to the nontrivial element

Remark If one wants to consider arbitrary valuations discrete and of rank

one has to require in Rb that the integral closure of O in E is nite over O This

v v

condition holds for geometric and for complete valuation rings see Serre By

lo oking at completions and using Rc and Ra one may then derive for arbitrary

valuations a formula

X

l

v w w

w

w

with certain l This remark applies in particular to Milnors K theory

w

Documenta Mathematica

Markus Rost

Lemma In the situation of Ra let be a prime of v let be a prime of w

e

and let u be the v unit with u Then

s s fug

w

v w

Proof First note that the validity of the statement do es not dep end on the choices

of and Moreover if E K F is an intermediate eld we may restrict to

consider the extensions K jE and F jK

If F jE is unramied e we may take and the claim follows from Ra

and Ra

After lifting a transcendence base of v over w to O we may therefore

v

assume that F is nite over E

If e F E case of total ramication see Serre Chap I x we may

take N then u and the claim follows from Rc and Rb We have

now already covered totally inseparable extensions

For a separable nite extension F jE let LjE b e a Galois extension containing F

x some extension of v to L and let D LjF D LjE GalLjE b e the decomp o

sition groups

D LjF

Then F L is unramied over F with the same residue class eld by Ra

D LjE

we are reduced to consider the extension F jE The eld E L is contained

in F since it is unramied over E we know the claim for E jE and we are reduced

U

to consider F jE Let K L where

U f g GalLjE j g acts trivially on v g

is the inertia group Then K jE is unramied and F jK is totally ramied 

Remark The rules and Lemma show that every comp osite of maps b e

tween various M F given by the data DD is a sum of comp osites of the form

x y

v v

1 r

This kind of normal form for comp osites can b e made more precise as follows There

e

is a category F with ob jects the class of arbitrary elds and with morphism groups

a a

b

HomF E K H K v

K v



v

H

r

Here v runs through the valuations on F with value groups Z with lexicographical

order and with r The groups K v are dened exactly as ab ove for r

Moreover H runs through those comp osites of v and E which are nite over E

b

and denotes the graded tensor pro duct

Restricting to the class F B and to geometric higher rank valuations one ob

e

tains a category F B The cycle premo dules over B may b e then characterized as

e

the additive functors on F B In this alternative denition all the rules including

e

Lemma are hidden in the comp osition law of F

Documenta Mathematica

Chow Groups with Coefficients

Remark Galois cohomology as cycle premodule Any torsion etale sheaf

on B with the torsion prime to char k gives rise via Galois cohomology to a cycle

premo dule over B For simplicity we restrict here to the case B Sp ec k with k a

eld and to nite Galois mo dules over k For generalities of Galois cohomology we

refer to Serre Shatz

Let k b e a separable closure of k let r b e prime to char k let k b e the group

r

of r th ro ots of unity and let D b e a nite continous Galk jk mo dule of exp onent r

For a eld F over k let F b e a separable closure containing k Then and D are

r

GalF jF mo dules via GalF jF Galk jk Put

a

n n

e

H F D H F D

r

n

Here we use for a nite Galois mo dule C the notation

n n n

H F C H GalF jF C lim H GalLjF C

where L runs through the nite Galois sub extensions of F jF such that GalF jL acts

trivially on C

e e e

H F Zr is a ring and H F D is a mo dule over H F Zr via cup pro ducts

e

The ob ject function H D on F k given by H D F H F D is in a

natural way a Zgraded cycle premo dule over k This statement is just a collection

of wellknown prop erties of Galois cohomology In the following we restrict ourselves

to a description of the data DD The rules follow from standard prop erties of the

cohomology of nite groups and from standard ramication theory

D and D For F E let F E b e some extension over k and let

GalE jE GalF jF b e the induced map Dene as the usual restriction

homomorphism induced from For nite dene as the usual transfer homo

morphism induced from times the degree of inseparability E E F cf Serre

e

D The K F mo dule structure on H F D is given by cup pro ducts and the

norm residue homomorphism

e

h K F r K F H F Zr

F

h is the Z homomorphism which in degree is given by the Kummer

F

r

isomorphism F F H F For the rule h fag h f ag see for

r F F



example Tate or Remark

D Let E b e the completion of F with resp ect to v Then there is a natural

exact sequence

I GalE jE Gal j

n

where I is the inertia group Put D D and consider the corresp onding

n

r

Ho chschildSerre sp ectral sequences

pq

p q pq

H H I D H E D E

n n

Documenta Mathematica

Markus Rost

The cohomology of the inertia group I is given by H I D D H I D

n n n

q

Hom D D and H I D for q Serre Chap IV Hence

r n n n

the sp ectral sequences give rise to homomorphisms

n n

H E D H D

v n n

n n

Comp osing with H F D H E D denes the desired maps

n n

n n

H D F H D

v

Remark Quil lens K theory as cycle premodule We denote by K F

K F Quillens K ring of a eld F Hereby we understand the denition K F

n n

n

BQ ModF of Quillen with the pro duct as dened in Grayson

n

Here Mod F is the category of nite dimensional F mo dules For generalities of

Quillens K theory see also Grayson Srinivas

The ob ject function F K F denes a Zgraded cycle premo dule with ring

structure over any eld k Its data are given as follows

D and D One takes the pullback map resp the pushforward map of

Quillen x where Sp ec E Sp ec F is the morphism corresp onding to

D One uses the natural homomorphism K F K F from Milnors to

F BGLF and the com Quillens K theory To dene one may refer to K

n

n

putations BGLF H GLF Z K F BGLF H EF Z

K F Matsumotos theorem see Milnor Another p ossibility is to dene directly

a homomorphism F K F and then to check the rule fag f ag

using the arguments of Remark

D One uses the connecting map of the long exact lo calization sequence for O

v

Quillen x

The verication of the rules is omitted It is a lengthy but straightforward exercise

to deduce them from Grayson Quillen

}

According to the conventions made for the cup pro duct and the sp ectral sequence one may

have dierent signs in the pro duct rules for the dierentials This aects rule Re so if necessary

one should replace by an appropriate sign dep ending alone on n

v

Documenta Mathematica

Chow Groups with Coefficients

Cycle Modules

In this section we dene the notion of a cycle mo dule and derive imp ortant prop erties

the homotopy prop erty for A and the sum formula for prop er curves Moreover we

give a simplication of the axioms for a constant cycle mo dule over a p erfect eld

The axioms of a cycle mo dule are basic for all further considerations Therefore we

have included discussions on various related prop erties to a much larger extent than

is actually needed in the following sections

Throughout the section M denotes a cycle premo dule over some scheme B recall

our conventions

For a scheme X over B we write M x M x for x X The generic

p oint of an irreducible scheme X is denoted by or If X is normal then for

X

x X the lo cal ring of X at x is a valuation ring let M M x b e the

x X

corresp onding residue homomorphism

For x y X we dene

x

M x M y

y

x

as follows Let Z fxg If y Z then Otherwise let Z Z b e the

y

normalization and put

X

x

c

z

z jy

y

z jy

with z running through the nitely many p oints of Z lying over y

Definition A cycle module M over B is a cycle premodule M over B which

satises the fol lowing conditions FD and C

FD Finite support of divisors Let X b e a normal scheme and M

X

Then for all but nitely many x X

x

C Closedness Let X b e integral and lo cal of dimension Then

X

x

M M x

X

x x

0

(1)

xX

where is the generic and x is the closed p oint of X

X

Many remarks and denitions of Section are understo o d accordingly for cycle mo d

ules For example a homomorphism of cycle mo dules is a homomorphism of the

underlying cycle premo dules

Of course C has sense only under presence of FD which guarantees niteness in

the sum More generally note that if FD holds then for any X x X and M x

x

one has for all but nitely many y X

y

If X is integral and FD holds for X we put

a

d M M x

(1)

X

xX

x

(1)

xX

Documenta Mathematica

Markus Rost

Sp ec F u is the ane line In the following F denotes a eld over B and A

F

over F with function eld F u Pro ofs of Prop osition and Theorem are given

after Remark

Proposition Let M be a cycle module over B Then the fol lowing properties

H and RC hold for al l elds F over B

H Homotopy property for A The sequence

a

r d

M F M F u M x

1

xA

F

(0)

is an exact complex with r r

F ujF

RC Reciprocity for curves Let X b e a prop er curve over F Then

a

d c

M M x M F

X

xX

(0)

P

c is a complex c d with c

xjF

The prop erties FD C H RC are all what we need in further sections Axiom

FD enables one to write down the dierentials d of the complexes C X M axiom

C guarantees that d d prop erty H yields the homotopy invariance of the

Chow groups A X M and nally prop erty RC is needed to establish prop er push

forward For the material from Section on the reader may take H and RC just

as additional axioms of cycle mo dules and skip without much harm everything after

Remark b elow

For another example of the fundamental role of axioms like RC in formal de

nitions of functors on elds see also Somekawa

For integral X we put

ker M A X M ker d

X

x

(1)

xX

One may think of A X M as the group of unramied M valued functions on X

Theorem Let M be a cycle premodule over a perfect eld k Then M is a

cycle module over k if and only if the fol lowing properties FDL and WR hold for

al l elds F over k

FDL Finite support of divisors on the line Let M F u Then

for all but nitely many valuations v of F u over F

v

WR Weak reciprocity Let b e the residue map for the valuation of

F ujF at innity Then

A A M

F

One implication here is obvious from Prop osition since trivially FD FDL

and RC WR Conditions FDL and WR are comparatively weak they deal

only with the ane line and involve no corestriction maps For nonconstant cycle

mo dules ie B is not the sp ectrum of a eld we dont know any similar simplication

of the axioms FD and C

Documenta Mathematica

Chow Groups with Coefficients

Further prop erties of cycle mo dules are

Co Continuity Let X b e smo oth and lo cal and let Y X b e the blow up

in the unique closed p oint x Then

A X M A Y M

In other words if v is the valuation corresp onding to the exceptional b er

over x then

A X M

v

E Evaluation In the situation of Co there is a unique homomorphism

ev A X M M x

evaluation at x such that

r ev s j A X M

v jx

v

0

for any prime of v

The validity of these two prop erties will follow from the construction of the pullback

q

maps f A X M A Z M for morphisms f Z X in Section Namely

q

the inclusion of Co is given by f with f Y X the blow up Moreover in E one

q

has ev f with f Sp ec x X the inclusion See also Remark b elow

Remark A basic example of a cycle mo dule over any eld k is Milnors K

ring K Axiom FD follows as for classical divisors For H see Milnor The

validity of RC for X P is intrinsic to the denition of the norm homomorphisms

in Bass and Tate Kato has used RC to prove C by passing to

completions

of Remarks and are Remark The cycle premo dules H D and K

cycle mo dules Axioms FD and C are contained in Blo ch and Ogus and in

Quillen x Sect resp ectively

For H D one may use here alternatively Theorem and Tsens Theorem as

follows see also Serre FDL follows from the fact that every nite exten

sion of F u is ramied only in nitely many places of F ujF One has trivially

H WR If F is separably closed then H follows from Tsens Theorem ie

q

H F u for q see for example Shatz and the Kummer isomor

r

phism K F ur H F u To deduce H for arbitrary F one applies the

r

Ho chschildSerre sp ectral sequence for the extension F ujF u

Remark Probably the considerations of this section and of the whole pap er

may b e developed in characteristic also for a version of cycle mo dules which

are mo dules over the Witt ring of quadratic forms instead over Milnors K ring A

transferring would b e not at all formal b ecause the residue maps for the Witt ring

dep end on choices of parameters

Documenta Mathematica

Markus Rost

In the following pro ofs of Prop osition and Theorem we use the notations

A Sp ec F u A Sp ec F s t and Z A the lo calization of A at

st

Moreover y z Z A denote the p oints with parameters s t resp ectively

We pro ceed in several steps

Step FD C WR Given A A M put

ftg ts M F s t

or more precisely ftg with F u F s t u ts Using R

and R one nds

for x Z n fy z g

x

ftg r

y

y jF

fug fsg

z z

r fug fsg r

z jF z jF

C and give

X

y

x



x y

(1)

xZ

Step FDL WR H Note that d r by Rc Moreover any sp ecial

ization map for an F rational p oint on P is a left inverse to r by Rd

Surjectivity of d For a closed p oint x A let

x

M x M F u

x

c fu uxg r

xujF u xujx

and let

X a

x

M x M F u

1

x

xA

( 0)

Then d id by RbRe

Exactness at M F u Given A A M put

ftg u t u M F ut

More precisely Let E F u let i E E t b e the homomorphisms over F with

iu u u u t and put ftg i

We compute for the valuations w of E t over E One nds easily

w w

for w But also by Rd since the valuation at t restricts trivially

under i and and since the induced homomorphisms E coincide Hence WR

tells On the other hand one has

ftg i

ftu tg fu tg ftg

fug tu t g f

r fug

E jF

by making particular use of Rd and Re note that tu t has residue class

So

r fug r M F 

E jF E jF

Documenta Mathematica

Chow Groups with Coefficients

Step FD H RC There is a nite morphism X P over F Using

this and Rb one reduces to the case X P Then it suces to check

X

x

c

u

ujF

1

uP

(0)

x

for as in Step This equation follows from the computation d id and

x

c

xjF

a consequence of Rb and Rd 

The pro of of Prop osition is now complete We next consider the nontrivial

implication of Theorem We will refer at some places to Sections and but

only in a mild way Note that H is available by Step

n n n

Step FDL FD for X A Let p A A b e the n standard pro

i

jections Then

n

p A

i

i

n

where is the generic p oint of A FD follows from FDL applied to F 

Step FD for X A WR C for X Z As in Step we have

X

x

M M F s M x

Z

1

x A

F (s)

(0)

with

x

c ft txg r

xtjF st xtjx

x

C holds obviously on M F s Let us verify C on the image of for xed x

By d id in Step we are reduced to check

y

x x

y

Let v run through the valuations on xt which restrict on F s t to the valuation

with parameter s and corresp onding to y Let v b e the restriction of v to x and let

fxg b e the center of v If cv then tx is a vunit with residue tcv cv

Supp ose fxg and let R b e the residue class ring of x lo calized at The

x

valuations v with cv restrict in a onetoone manner to the valuations w of x

with R O For these one has vtx since tx is nilp otent in R sR

x w x x

Documenta Mathematica

Markus Rost

In the following u runs through fxg fy g n fg One nds

X

x

ft txg r c

y v

xtjx v jy

v

X

c ft t cv g r

v

v jy v jv

v cv

X

c r fty g

v

v jy v jv

v cv

X

x

ft tug r c

utju utjy

u

u

x

fty g r

y jF

y

Since tu the sum vanishes under and we are done by Rd 

Step Reduction of C to the case x O Let X b e as in C and

X

write X Sp ec R Lift a transcendence base of x over k to elements t R

i

and put K k t t R Then x is a nite extension of K Since k is

n

p erfect we may take here a transcendence base such that x is separable over K

Let X Sp ec R x let u X b e the canonical lift of x and let X b e the

K

lo calization of X in u We assume that FD holds for X and X Consider the pull

back along the at map X X see Section The induced map M x M u

is injective since x and u have the same residue class elds An application of Ra

and Rb see Prop osition shows that C holds for X if C holds for X 

We know now in particular that C holds for every lo calization of A in some

closed p oint

Step Proof of FD There exists a generically nite separable rational map

n n

X A All but nitely many x X corresp ond to p oints of A The argument

k

of Step yields a reduction to a plane curve X over some eld K So consider the case

We may assume that X maps dominantly to Sp ec F s fxg for some x A X

x x

so that as in Step is dened Put We have Moreover

x

only for nitely many u Step The closure of u x meets X only

u

in nitely many p oints Now since C holds for every lo calization of A we have

for all but nitely many w X A 

w

Step Proof of C By Step we may assume that F x is contained in O

X

n

Cho ose a closed dimensional subscheme Y P such that X is the lo calization

F

n

of Y in a F rational p oint y We consider the generic pro jection from P to P

F F

n

More precisely let T b e the Grassmannian of co dimensional linear subspaces of P

F

n n

let E F T let H P b e the tautological subspace and let P n H P b e

E E E

a linear pro jection Then H Y and restricts to a prop er map p Y P

E E

E

Let D p py Then D is the intersection of Y with a generic co dimensional

E

linear subspace passing through y Hence

D n fy g Y n Y

E

Documenta Mathematica

Chow Groups with Coefficients

In particular D Y fy g Now we consider at pullback along the base change

q Y Y followed by the pushforward along p see Section One nds see

E

and of Prop osition for M

X

X X

u x

r p q

u

E jF

x x

pu

0

(1) (1)

uU xX

where U is the lo calization of P in py The right hand side vanishes by Step

E

and r is injective since E jF is a rational extension 

E jF

We conclude with some more considerations concerning the axioms of cycle mo d

ules These have b een included here more for illustration than for application In

order not to b e to o tiring we have taken here the freedom to b e a bit vague ab out

our actual assumptions

Remark In the datum D of cycle premo dules there is hidden a strong rule

namely the relation fa ag of Milnors K theory The main justication within

this pap er for using Milnors K theory is that it works well Asking naively one may

try to weaken D by requiring only the existence of bilinear pairings

K F M F M F

fag fag

and restricting to x K E y K F in R Then M F would b e a TF mo dule

However if one wants to develop a geometric theory one is in the end led to

pass to mo dules over Milnors K theory A reasoning for this is given by the following

little game It refers in a mild way to the rules of cycle premo dules and to a part of

the homotopy prop erty H

Let M F let L b e an overeld of F let u L n f g and consider

u fug f ug r M L

LjF

Our aim is to conclude u for the case L F Assuming reasonable sp ecial

ization maps this follows from the generic case L F u with u a variable To treat

this case our strategy is to argue that u is unramied on the whole ane line

Then by homotopy invariance u is constant An extra argument nally shows

u

To b e sp ecic rst a little calculation which provides by the way already the

divisibility of u referring only to the existence of norm maps and the pro jection

F u b e the function eld in the variable u and let L F u L formula Let L

n

0

with u u Then u N u and the pro jection formulae Rb and Rc

L jL

give

0

u fug fN u g r

L jL LjF

0 0

fug c f u g r

L jL L jF

n

0 0

c fu g f u g r

L jL L jF

0

n c u

L jL

Documenta Mathematica

Markus Rost

u for all nite places v of LjF This is We want to conclude that

v

quite natural to assume as long as u and u are v units For the place at u

and similarly at u one may argue as follows

Let u M F b e the residue for the valuation of LjF at u

Similarly let u now with resp ect to the valuation of L jF at u A

change of variables u u shows But the ab ove computation and rule Rb

yields n Taking n gives

Now H tells that u comes from M F that is u r for some

LjF

M F Naturality with resp ect to the homomorphisms L L over F with

u u and u u gives

u u u

On the other hand one has

u u u

just by linearity One concludes u But then u as well and the ab ove

computation for n tells u

Remark As already mentioned the prop erties Co and E of cycle mo dules

follow from the material in Section The considerations there use the deformation

to the normal cone and homotopy inverses But things simplify considerably if one

may pass to the limits X Sp ec k t t In the following we consider the

n

case X Sp ec k s t tacitly assuming that our cycle mo dules are dened on an

appropriate category of schemes In fact we could have taken also more general

schemes as basis for our notions say excellent schemes over a p erfect eld however

one should then b e careful with Theorem

C Co Let E F u and T Sp ec E s t Given A X M put

ft usg r M

T

E stjF st

One may then calculate

X

z

z v

(1)

z T

Hence by C

v

C E By the last argument we may use Co It follows that for A X M

the value of s is indep endent of the choice of the prime Since v F ts is

v

rational one is by H reduced to check

s

w

v

for all valuations w of F ts over F except the one with w ts Every w

denes a p oint in the exceptional b er of the blow up Y X One calculates for

the w in question

X

y

fsg fsg

y w v

w

(1)

y Y

Finally note s fsg for the choice s

v

v

Documenta Mathematica

Chow Groups with Coefficients

Remark In the case of a constant cycle premo dule one may derive C from

Co under presence of FD This tells that axiom C app ears naturally in our

q

framework if we require the existence of pullback maps f As in Remark we

consider here the case X Sp ec k s t

Co C To derive C from Co for constant M and for X Sp ec k s t

one argues rst similarly as for Step ab ove as follows Let y b e the p oint with

parameter s and dene for x X n fy g

x

M x M

X

x

r c ft txg r

F stjF st xtjF st xtjx

x x

As in Step one has id and for z x y moreover one nds

x z

x x x

ftg r This shows that C holds on the image of the

y

F tjF

In order to verify C for M we may arrange things such that

X y

We are reduced to check C for

X

x

x

x y

Using the ab ove computations one nds

for x y

x

ftg r for x y

y jF

for some M F

We must show Put E F r andwritten in a somewhat sloppy form

r s r t s t fs r g M E s t

One computes A Sp ec E s t M and

fr g M E st

v

Co gives fr g in M F r st Applying appropriate sp ecialization and

residue maps shows

Documenta Mathematica

Markus Rost

The Four Basic Maps

The purp ose of this section is to introduce the cycle complexes and all the types of

op erations on them needed further on except the cross pro ducts to b e dened in

Section

Let M b e a cycle mo dule over X let N b e a cycle mo dule over Y and let U X

V Y b e subsets For a homomorphism

a a

M x N y

xU y V

x

we write M x N y for the comp onents of

y

Change of coefficients Let M N b e a homomorphism of cycle mo d

ules over X and let U X b e a subset We put

a a

M x N x

xU xU

x x

where and for x y

x

x y

Cycle complexes For a cycle mo dule M over X and an p let

a

C X M M x

p

xX

(p)

We dene

d d C X M C X M

X p p

x x x

by d with as in This denition has sense by axiom FD

y y y

Lemma d d

X X

x

Proof One has to check d d for x X z X This is trivial

p p

z

fxg Otherwise let Y b e the lo calization of fxg in z Since our schemes are if z

catenary we have X Y Y and dim Y Now apply axiom C to Y 

p

The complex C X M C X M d is called the complex of cycles

p X p

on X with coecients in M

When developing a theory of cycles rst natural questions are the following

Given a prop er morphism f X Y what is the pushforward map f on cycles

Or given a at morphism g Y X what is the pullback map g on cycles In

fact we will dene such maps However these questions are not our guiding p oint of

view We rather x schemes X Y and numbers p q and then ask what is the class

of maps

C X M C Y M

p q

Documenta Mathematica

Chow Groups with Coefficients

which we should consider Our answer is then motivated by what we want to do with

the complexes namely developing intersection theory etc This leads to the four

basic maps as dened in

The denitions of the basic maps multiplication with K and b oundary maps

in and are easy to understand However our way of introducing push

forward and pullback maps as in and deserves some words of comment It

turns out that these maps denoted by f and A g s are sums of comp ositions of

maps of simpler type namely pushforward maps f for prop er morphisms f pullback

maps g for at morphisms g and the pro jections i and inclusions j corresp onding

to closed or op en subvarietes see This fact which we will not prove seems

to b e however only of heuristic interest In fact it would b e a nuisance if we had to

consider at each step such a reduction of the language expressing the maps b etween

the cycle complexes

Pushforward For a morphism f X Y of schemes of nite type over a

eld we dene

f C X M C Y M

p p

x

c Otherwise as follows If y f x and if x is nite over y then f

xjy

y

x

f

y

Pullback Our main interest is to dene the particular types of pullback

maps as considered in b elow In our general denition in we dene

pullback maps C X M C Y M asso ciated to any morphism g Y X of

p q

relative dimension q p Moreover we use coherent sheaves A on Y as mo diers

of the arising multiplicities This construction gives great technical exibility and is

useful in Section

For a morphism g Y X let

sg max dimy Y dim g y X j y Y

Moreover let Y Y Sp ec x for x X

x X

Note that if x X y Y g y x and sg q p then necessarily

p q

y Y

x

Let g Y X b e a morphism and let A b e a on Y For x X

and y Y we dene an integer

x

x

Z A g

y

as follows The lo calization Y of Y in y is the sp ectrum of an artinian ring R

x

xy

with only residue class eld y Let A b e the pullback of A via Y Y Y

x

xy

x

l A as the length of A considered as R mo dule for the notion and dene A g

R

y

of length and further prop erties we refer to Fulton App A

Documenta Mathematica

Markus Rost

Fix s Z Let g Y X b e a morphism with sg s and let A b e a coherent

sheaf on Y We dene homomorphisms

A g s C X M C Y M

p ps

by

x

A g r if g y x

y jx

y

x

A g s

y

otherwise

Here x is considered as a subeld of y via g

Let F b e a eld let g Y Sp ec F b e a morphism and let

A A A

b e an exact sequence of coherent sheaves over Y Then

A g s A g s A g s

This follows from the additivity of length with resp ect to short exact sequences

For some particularly interesting cases we use the following notations Let F E

b e a homomorphism of elds let X b e of nite type over F and let g Y X

Sp ec F

Sp ec E X b e the base change Then we put g O g

Y

A morphism g Y X of schemes of nite type over a eld is said to have

constant relative dimension s if all b ers are either empty or equidimensional of

dimension s In this case we write dim g s and put

g O g dimg

Y

Particular cases are here op en and closed immersions with s

Multiplication with units For global units a a O we dene

n

X

homomorphisms

fa a g C X M C X M

n p p

by

fa x a xg for x y

n

x

fa a g

n

y

otherwise

This denition turns C X M into a mo dule over the tensor algebra of O If X is

p

X

dened over some eld F then C X M b ecomes via F O a mo dule over K F

p

X

Boundary maps Let X b e of nite type over a eld let i Y X b e a closed

immersion and let j U X n Y X b e the inclusion of the op en complement We

will refer to Y i X j U as a b oundary triple and dene

U

C U M C Y M

p p

Y

x U

by taking for the denition in with resp ect to X The map is called the

y

Y

b oundary map asso ciated to the b oundary triple or just the b oundary map for the

closed immersion i Y X

Documenta Mathematica

Chow Groups with Coefficients

We conclude this section with a few notations and remarks concerning the four

basic maps

Generalized correspondences We introduce the notation

p

X Y

to denote homomorphisms

C X M C Y M

which are sums of comp osites of the four basic maps f g fag and for schemes of

nite type over a eld

This notation is made for the sake of simplication It also stresses the fact that

we think of the maps in question rather as a sort of morphisms of varieties than just

maps of complexes asso ciated to every M As mentioned in the introduction this can

b e made more precise in a further development The dierential d is not sub ject

X

to this notation conventionwe rather think of d as a part of the inner structure

X

of X Similarly for homomorphisms induced by a change of co ecients

Gradings The Zgradings on M induces a Zgrading on C X M by

a

C X M n M x

p np

xX

(p)

p

with n Z Supp ose X Y resp ects this grading in the sense that

C X M n C Y M n r

r

for some r Z In this case we write sgn One has sgnf sgng

n

sgnfa a g and sgn Moreover we put

n

d sgn d

Then

sgn sgn

sgn

All the maps to b e considered will resp ect the Zgrading Moreover if M is

Zgraded then the will resp ect the corresp onding Zgradings on the complexes

Additionally they resp ect the natural Zgradings given by dimension So if M is

Zgraded there is an underlying Z Zgrading see also Section In the general

treatment however there is need only for the Zgrading

Documenta Mathematica

Markus Rost

Boundary triples Let Y i X j U b e a b oundary triple The set theoretic

union X Y U yields a natural decomp osition

p p p

C X M C Y M C U M

p p p

of ab elian groups Here the complex C Y M is a sub complex of the complex

C X M with C U M as quotient complex The maps i j and i j are the

corresp onding inclusions and pro jections resp ectively In a formal way the situation

is describ ed by the following formulae

i d j

X

i i id j j id

Y U

i j j i

i i j j id

X

j i i j

i j i j

i j

Later on we will make free use of these simple rules in particular in Sections

and The canonical decomp osition is the source of our formal treatment of

intersection theory on complex level

Compatibilities

In this section we establish the basic compatibilities for the maps considered in the

last section All arguments are simple in nature or at least familiar to cycle theories

They are basically of lo cal nature As usual the treatment of at pullback causes

most of the technicalities

Rules among the maps of are formulated in Prop osi

tion is concerned with the compatibility with the dierentials The compatibilities

with change of co ecients are obvious and we dont make a p oint of them here and

further

Proposition

For f X Y f Y Z as in one has f f f f

Let g Y X and g Z Y be morphisms Let s sg and s sg

and let A A be coherent sheaves on Y Z respectively with A at over Y Then

s s sg g and

A g g s s A g s A g s g A

O

Z

In particular

g g g g

for g g as in with g at

Documenta Mathematica

Chow Groups with Coefficients

Consider a pul lback diagram

0

g

U Z

0

f

f

y y

g

Y X

with f and f as in Let s sg sg and let A be a coherent sheaf on Y

Then

A g s f f f A g s

In particular

g f f g

for g as in

Proof is immediate from the denitions and Ra

Pro of of The inequality is obvious Let x X y Y z Z with

x y

dimy Y dimx X s dim z Z dimy Y s We have to check

x y x

A g g A g A g g A

O

Z

z z y

We may assume X Sp ec x and Y Sp ec R with R as in By devisage

using the atness of A over R and we may reduce to the case A y Now

the claim is trivial

z

Pro of of Let A g s f f f A g s We have to show for

y

z Z and y Y

p ps

This obvious if f z g y Otherwise let x f z g y Our assumptions

give dim x X dimz Z and dimx X dim y Y sg p hence dim x X

dimz Z p and z is nite over x

Let u U b e a maximal p oint of the b er over z Our assumptions give

z

dimu U dim y Y p s and dim u U dimz Z sg p s hence

z

remains unchanged if we replace X by Sp ec x Z u U This shows that

ps

y

by Sp ec z Y by Y Sp ec R see and p s by Then f is nite and at

xy

Hence f is at and by devisage using we may assume A y as R mo dule

But then it suces to consider the case Y Sp ec y and the claim follows from

rule Rc 

Lemma Let f Y X be as in

If a is a unit on X then

f ff ag fag f

Let f be nite and at and let a be a unit on Y Then

f fag f ff ag

Here f O O is the standard transfer map

Y X

Proof is immediate from Rb For we may assume X Sp ec F with F a

eld Then for y Y let l b e the length of O By Rc we have

y y Y

X

f fag f l c fay g

y

y jF

y

and the claim follows 

Documenta Mathematica

Markus Rost

Lemma Let a be a unit on X

For g Y X as in one has

g fag fg ag g

For a boundary triple Y i X j U one has

U U

fj ag fi ag

Y Y

Proof follows from Ra and from Rb and Re 

Let h X X b e a morphism of schemes of nite type over a eld and let

Y X b e a closed immersion Consider the induced diagram given by U X n Y

and pullback

Y X U

h

h

y y y

h

Y X U

Proposition

If h is proper then

0

U U

h h

0

Y Y

If h is at of constant relative dimension then

0

U U

h h

0

Y Y

Proof Immediate from Prop osition and b elow 

Lemma Let g Y X be a smooth morphism of schemes of nite type over a

eld of constant ber dimension let X Y be a section to g and let t O be

Y

a global parameter dening the subscheme X Moreover let g Y n X X be

the restriction of g and let be the boundary map associated to Then

g and ftg g id

X

Proof One reduces to X Sp ec E and applies Rc and Rd 

Proposition

For proper f X Y as in one has

d f f d

Y X

Let g Y X be a morphism and let A be a coherent sheaf on Y at over X

Then

d A g s A g s d

Y X

for s sg In particular

g d d g

X Y

for at g as in

Documenta Mathematica

Chow Groups with Coefficients

For a unit a on X one has

d fag fag d

X X

For a boundary triple Y i X j U one has

U U

d d

Y U

Y Y

Proof follows as Lemma and follows from Lemma

x

Pro of of Let f d f f d We have to show f for

Y X

y

fz g the claim is x X and y Y Let z f x and q dim z Y If y

p p

obvious If y z we rst replace Y by Sp ec y and then X by fxg This is the

case of a prop er curve over a eld considered in RC of Section If y fz g and

fz g and y z we must have q p and x is nite over z We may assume Y

X fxg Consider the diagram

g

X X

f

f

y y

h

Y Y

where g and h are the normalizations Let x X and z Y b e the generic p oints

lying over x and z resp ectively We have g j M x by the very denition of

the dierentials similarly h j M z This and show

f g j M x d h f f g d j M x

Y

X

h f j M x

x

Since g j M x is an isomorphism onto M x we are reduced to show f for

y

x

y Y Let u X b e a p oint over y We have u X Now f follows

p

y

from rule Rb the prop erness of f and the fact that the lo cal rings of y and of all

the preimages u are valuation rings

x

Pro of of Let d A g s A g s d We have to show for

Y X

y

x X y Y Put z g y If z fxg the claim is obvious If z x then

p ps

for u Y all valuations on u with center y are trivial on x the claim follows

x

fxg z x Then z X from rule Rc We are now reduced to the case z

p

since dim z X dim y Y s p We may assume X fxg Moreover

by Prop ositions and we may additionally assume that X is normal Let

U u Y j y fug Then

x

X

x x z x u

A g s A g s

y z y u y

uU

We may replace X and Y by its lo calizations in z and y resp ectively Then X

Sp ec R with R a valuation ring Y Sp ec S with S lo cal of dimension and

U Y

Documenta Mathematica

Markus Rost

In this case we have by denition

X

x u x

A r l A A r l

S S

u ujx y jz

y y z

(u)

uU

where S A are the lo calizations at u and where is a prime element of R

u u

For u U let S b e the normalization of Su For a S mo dule H of nite length

u u

we dene

X

L H l H w y

u

w

S

(w )

w

where w runs through the maximal prime ideals of S and where S resp H are

u

w w

the lo calizations of S resp H at w We claim that L H is the length of H as

u u

S mo dule

L H l H

u S

To prove this use devisage to reduce to the trivial case H w for some w

Moreover we have

l S S l Su S

S u u S

This follows from the fact that the cokernel and the trivial kernel of Su S

u

have nite S length and is a nonzero divisor of Su and S see Fulton

u

Lemma A

We have for xed u

X

u u

r c r

ujx w jy ujx

y w

w

X

x

l S S c r

w w w jy w jz

z

S

(w )

w

x

L S S r

u u u

y jz

z

u

Here we used the denition of and Ra Rb Rd

y

x

Putting things together one nds that follows from

y

X

l A A A l Su S l

S S S

u

(u)

uU

This formula is exactly the formula of Fulton Lemma A b ecause the map

A A a a is injective by the atness of A over R 

Documenta Mathematica

Chow Groups with Coefficients

Cycle Complexes and Chow Groups

This section contains notations and a few remarks and examples In Section we

have introduced for a cycle mo dule M over X the complexes

a

C X M M x

p

xX

(p)

with dierentials

d d C X M C X M

X p p

Sometimes it is convenient to use the co dimension index instead of the dimension

index We put

a

p

M x C X M

(p)

xX

and dene

p p

d d C X M C X M

X

x x x

again by d with as in Similar as in Lemma one nds d d

y y y

The choice b etween the dimension and co dimension index dep ends on the matter

Our basic interest is in schemes X of nite type over a eld F In this case the

dimension setting is in general appropriate since then the dimension of a p oint x is

an absolute notion indep endent of the ambient space dimx X trdegxjF

p

If X is in addition equidimensional of dimension d then X X and

dp

p

C X M C X M Then we will freely switch b etween the two notions if

dp

it is convenient in particular if we consider intersections in the smo oth case The

co dimension setting will also b e used for certain schemes not necessarily of nite type

over a eld eg for sp ectra of lo cal rings In this case we understand the material of

Section to b e transferred from the dimension to the co dimension setting via nite

type mo dels

In practice all M have a Zgrading and one likes to keep track on it We put for

Zgraded M

a

C X M n M x

p np

xX

(p)

a

p

C X M n M x

np

(p)

xX

with n Z Then there are decomp ositions of complexes

a

C X M C X M n

n

a

C X M C X M n

n

In the introduction we have used the notation C X n C X K n

Documenta Mathematica

Markus Rost

The Chow group of pdimensional cycles with coecients in M is dened as the

pth homology group of the complex C X M and denoted by A X M Similarly

p

p p

we dene A X M A X M n and A X M n according to the notations used

p

for the complexes

U

The homomorphisms f for prop er f g for at g fa a g and of

n

Y

Section anticommute with the dierentials see Prop osition The induced

maps on the cohomology groups will b e denoted by the same letters The compat

ibilities of carry over for prop er f f and at g

It is obvious from that for a b oundary triple Y i X j U there is the long

exact sequence

j

i i



 

A X M A Y M A U M A Y M

p p p p

We conclude by mentioning a few examples H D and K denote the cycle

mo dules given by Galois cohomology and Quillens K theory as considered in Sec

tions

Remark Classical Chow groups We understand here CH X as the group

p

of pcycles mo dulo rational equivalence as dened in Fulton Sect denoted

by A X From this denition it is obvious that

p

A X K p CH X

p p

p

For the Chow group CH X of pco dimensional cycles for smo oth irreducible X say

our notations give

p

p

A X K p CH X

Remark Unramied cohomology For a prop er smo oth variety X over a

eld k and a cycle mo dule M over k the group

A X M M k X

is a birational invariant of the eld extension k X jk see Corollary A well

known example here is the unramied Brauer group of k X jk Its ntorsion subgroup

is in our notations given by A X H

n

Remark Relations with localglobal spectral sequences In Quillens K

theory as well as in etale cohomology there are sp ectral sequences given by co di

mension of supp ort see Quillen Sect Blo ch and Ogus The corre

sp onding E terms together with the d dierentials may b e identied with the com

plexes C X K n and C X H D n The corresp onding E terms are of the

pq pq

p p q

form E A X K q and E A X H D q resp ectively where

r

r D

}

Namely the denition of CH X mentioned in the rst sentence of the introduction

p

Documenta Mathematica

Chow Groups with Coefficients

Remark The map from Milnors to Quil lens K theory The natural ho

momorphisms K F K F form a homomorphism of cycle mo dules It is an isomor

phism in degrees Moreover for a valuation v on F one has K F K F

v v

see Merkurjev and Suslin It follows that the induced homomorphisms

A X K n A X K n

p p

are bijective for n p

Acyclicity for Smooth Local Rings

The following observations have b een included to underpin the notion of cycle mo d

ules They are not needed in further sections M is a cycle mo dule over a eld k

Theorem Let X be smooth and semilocal Then

p

A X M for p

This theorem is known in Quillens K theory Quillen x Theorem and

in etale cohomology Blo ch and Ogus and has b een proved by O Gabb er for

Milnors K theory The main step in these pro ofs is sometimes called Quillens trick

and carries over to cycle mo dules as well Here we follow essentially this metho d but

with a simplication due to I Panin

Let V b e a vector space over k and let A V b e the asso ciated ane space For

a linear subspace W of V let

A V A V W

W

v v W

W

b e the pro jection

Lemma Let X A V be an equidimensional closed subvariety with dim X d

and let Y X be a closed subvariety with dim Y d Moreover let S Y be a nite

subset such that X is smooth in S Then for a generic d codimensional linear

subspace W of V the fol lowing conditions hold

The restriction

j Y Y A V W

W

is nite

The restriction

j X X A V W

W

is locally around S smooth of relative dimension

Documenta Mathematica

Markus Rost

Proof Panin We extend the situation to the pro jective closure A V PV k

with PV PV k as hyperplane at innity Let

PV k n PW PV W k

W

v t v W t

W

b e the pro jection is an ane bundle over PV W k which extends the ane

W

bundle over A V W

W

PV k b e the closure of Y and let Y Y PV Then dim Y Let Y

d Hence for generic d co dimensional W we have Y PW Therefore

there is the map

j Y Y PV W k

W

This map is nite since it is prop er and since is an ane bundle This shows

W

b ecause j Y is the pullback of j Y along A V PV k

W W

For condition one just needs to guarantee that maps for each s S the

W

tangent space T X V of X in s epimorphically onto the tangent space V W of

s

A V W in s This is again an op en condition for W 

W

This lemma is very close to Quillen x Lemma and suces for all

applications I know The existence of such a space W is not clear over nite ground

elds and needs some extra discussion However if one is in the end interested in

cohomology groups there is usually no problem with replacing the ground eld k

by a rational extension k t t In this case one may take for W for example

r

the tautological subspace of V dened over the function eld of the Grassmannian of

d co dimensional subspaces of V In our situation we refer here to the following

remark

Lemma Let X be a variety over k and let g X X be the base change

k t

Then

g A X M A X M

q q

k t

is injective

This lemma will b e b ecome obvious in the next section where we show that F

A X M is a cycle mo dule Then g is just the restriction map r for this cycle

q F

k tjk

at a rational p oint of P yields a left inverse What mo dule and any sp ecialization s

v

one really uses here is Lemma with Y X P and Prop osition

Proposition Let X be a smooth variety over a eld and let Y X be a closed

subscheme of Then for any nite subset S Y there is an open

neighborhood X of S in X such that the map

i A Y X M A X M

is the trivial map Here i Y X X is the inclusion

Documenta Mathematica

Chow Groups with Coefficients

Proof We may assume that X is ane By Lemma we nd a diagram at least

after replacing k by a rational extension

i

Y X

A

with Y A nite and with X A smo oth of relative dimension in S

Put Z Y X and consider the diagram

A

Z

g

i

Y X

where g and are the pro jections and is the diagonal Note that is nite g is

smo oth of relative dimension in S and that is a section to g and a lift of the immer

sion i Moreover after a lo calization to an op en subset X X containing S we may

assume that there is a global parameter t O dening the closed subscheme Y

Z

Let Y Z j Q b e the b oundary triple given by with Q Z n Y and let

g Q Y b e the restriction of g Now consider the comp osite



ftg

g j





p p p p

X Z H Y Q Q

One nds

Q

ftg g i H

Y

by Lemma Therefore i is nullhomotopic 

Pro of of Theorem We may assume that X is connected Put d dim X

Consider pairs U S where U is a smo oth ddimensional variety of nite type over k

and S U is a nite subset such that X is the lo calization of U in S Then

p p

C X M lim C U M

US

Moreover

p

C U M C U M lim C Y M

dp dp

Y

where Y runs over the closed pco dimensional subsets of U Hence

p p

A X M lim A U M lim lim A Y M

dp

Y

US US

p p

But Prop osition tells that A Y M A U M A U M is the trivial

dp

map for small enough U U 

Documenta Mathematica

Markus Rost

In the smo oth case we sheafy cycle mo dules as follows For a smo oth variety X

let M b e the Zariski sheaf on X given by

X

M U A U M M

X X

for op en subsets U of X

Corollary For a smooth variety X over k there are natural isomorphisms

p

p

A X M H X M

X

Zar

p

Proof Dene the Zariski sheaves C on X by

p p

C U C U M

Then there is a complex of sheaves

d d

C M C

X

The complex is exact This holds at M and at C by the very denitions Theo

X

p

rem implies exactness at p ositive dimensions The corollary follows since the C

are asque 

The resolution of M considered in this pro of has nice functorial prop erties

X

Namely we will dene for morphisms f Y X maps of complexes Section

p p

I f C X M C Y M

and under presence of a ring structure for M a pairing of complexes Section

C X M C X M C X M

These are functorial with resp ect to lo calizations Therefore the isomorphisms of

Corollary are compatible with pullbacks and with pro ducts

The following example is a nice illustration of Corollary Let X b e smo oth

and dene the Zariski sheaf K on X by

n

K U A U K n K k X

n n

The sheaf K has a comparatively simple denition it just refers to the denition

n

of Milnors K groups for elds and of the residue maps for valuations Corollary

yields the following interpretation of the classical Chow groups on a smo oth variety

p

p

X K CH X H

p

Zar

The same result holds with Milnors K theory replaced by Quillens K theory

The corresp onding sheaf K coincides with the sheaf induced from the presheaf U

n

Q Q

K U where K U denotes the nth Quillens K group of the category of vector

n n

bundles on U In this context is known as Blo chs formula see Quillen

Thm Grayson

Another sp ecial case of Corollary for M K is

d

A X K n H X K

nd

Zar

with d dim X This interpretation of the Chow groups of zero cycles on X with

co ecients in K was obtained already in Kato

n

Documenta Mathematica

Chow Groups with Coefficients

The Cycle Modules A M

q

In this section we show that new cycle mo dules can b e obtained from the Chow groups

of the b ers of a morphism It was in fact this pro cess of forming lo cal co ecient

systems for cycles which motivated the notion of cycle mo dules

Let Q B b e a morphism of nite type and let M b e a cycle mo dule over Q

For elds F over B let Q Q Sp ec F We dene an ob ject function A M

F B q

on F B by

A M F A Q M

q q F

Our aim is to show that A M is in a natural way a cycle mo dule over B

q

All the prop erties of cycle mo dules except axiom C hold already on complex

level ie for the groups C Q M It is appropriate to establish rst the corre

q F

sp onding ob ject function as a cycle premo dule

c

So let M b e the ob ject function on F B dened by

c

M F C Q M

q F

b

We rst describ e its data as a cycle premo dule These will b e denoted by b b

v

rb bc etc in order to distinguish them from the data etc of M

v

E jF E jF

For a homomorphism of elds F E let Q Q b e the induced mor

E F

phism We dene the data D and D by

b C Q M C Q M

q F q E

b C Q M C Q M

q E q F

For D we take the K F mo dule structure on C Q M describ ed in To

q F

e

establish D put Q Q Sp ec O It has over Sp ec O the generic b er Q and

v B v v F

the sp ecial b er Q Dene

v

b

C Q M C Q M

v q F q

v

x x x

b

e

by with as in with resp ect to the scheme Q

v v

y y y

c

Theorem Together with these data M is a cycle premodule over B

Proof All the required prop erties follow from the rules and axioms for M and from

Section

Below we consider Ra in detail Here is a sketch for the other less complicated

cases

for Ra use for Rb use

for Rc use and a length consideration

for Ra use for Rb use for Rc use Rc and Rc

for Rb use for Rc use Rc

for Rd use and Rd for Re use Rb and Re

Documenta Mathematica

Markus Rost

Pro of of Ra Let g Q Q and g Q Q b e the pro jections We

F E

v w

have to show that the following diagram is commutative

b

v

C Q M C Q M

q q F

v

x x





g

eg

0

b

w

C Q M C Q M

q q E

w

e e

We want to apply Prop osition to the pro jection g Q Q The pullback

v w

of g along Sp ec E Sp ec O is g Let

w

e

Sp ec w Q g Q Q

v Sp ec O

w v

w

b e the pullback of g along Sp ec w Sp ec O Note that Q and Q have

w

v v

the same reductions and therefore the same cycle groups

w Note that g g are the pull We claim g e g Let R O

v O

w

backs along Q Sp ec w of the morphisms Sp ec v Sp ec w Sp ec R

w

Sp ec w resp ectively The claim follows from e l R and a standard length

R

consideration

It remains to show that the diagram commutes with e g replaced by g This

follows cum grano salis see the following remark from Prop osition

Remark When applying here Prop osition in a formal way there app ears

an articial problem caused by the fact that the dimension index do es not b ehave

e

p erfectly well for schemes over lo cal rings like Q However note that to check a

v

it suces to restrict to the comp onents cor g commutativity like g

w v

fxg Q For these p oints one resp onding to p oints x Q with

w q E q

e

has x Q by the dimension inequality Matsumura p A similar

w

q

e

remark applies to Q Therefore the desired identity follows from d g g d on

v

e

C Q M One may avoid these considerations by lo oking more closely to the

q w

pro of of Prop osition 

c

We have to relate the dierentials for the cycle premo dule M to the dierentials

for the cycle mo dule M

e

Let X B b e a scheme over B and let X Q X Then for x y X there

B

is the map

x

b

c c

M x M y

y

according to By denition this is a map

x

b

C Q M C Q M

q q

x y

y

b etween cycle groups with co ecients in M

e

Proposition Let x y X be points lying over x y X respectively and

x x x

b b

suppose x Q and y Q Denote by the component of with

x q y q

y y

y

respect to x and y Then

x x x

b

M x M y

y y y

Documenta Mathematica

Chow Groups with Coefficients

Proof We may assume y fxg since otherwise b oth sides are trivial The dimen

fxg Let v run through sion inequality Matsumura p shows then y

the valuations of x with center y in X Moreover let w run through the valuations

on x with center y in X The restriction of any w to x is one of the valuations v

e

Let w Q b e the center of w in X Sp ec O Now the claim follows from

X v

v

X

x x x

b b

bc

v

v jy

y y y

v

X X

w x

b

bc

v

v jy

y w

v

w jv

X X

c c

w

w jy w jw

v

w jv

X

x

c 

w

w jy

y

w

c

It follows from Prop osition that the data of the cycle premo dules M for

various q commute resp anticommute with the dierentials of the complexes

C Q M Passing to homology we obtain data DD for the ob ject functions

F

A M

q

Theorem Together with these data A M is a cycle module over B

q

Proof The rules for the data of the cycle premo dule A M are immediate from

q

c

the rules for M Moreover axiom FD for M and Prop osition show that FD

c

holds for M consequently also for A M It remains to verify axiom C

q

Consider the maps

a

C Q C Q C Q C Q C Q

q q q q q

x x x

0 0

(1)

xX

z z z

dened by with as in with resp ect to the scheme Q X

B

y y y

By Prop osition we are reduced to show It suces to check

z

for z Q and y Q with y fz g here fz g is the

q x q

y

0

e

closure of z in X The dimension inequality Matsumura p shows

Q Q Z Q

x q x q q

0

x

with Z fz g We are done by axiom C for M 

y

In the following prop osition we formulate some functorial prop erties of the con

struction A M Let

q

h

Y X

B

}

Here the indication of the cycle mo dule M has b een dropp ed

Documenta Mathematica

Markus Rost

b e a commutative diagram with and of nite type and let M b e a cycle mo dule

over X For a eld F over B let

h Y X

F F F

b e the morphism induced by h

Proposition The fol lowing transformations are homomorphisms of cycle

modules over B

For proper h let

h A M A M

q q

with h h

F F

For at h of relative dimension s let

h A M A M

q q s

with h h

F

F

For a global unit a on X let

fag A M A M

q q

with fag fa j X g

F F

For a boundary triple Y i X j U let

U

A j M A i M

q q

Y

with the boundary map for Y X

F F F

Proof One has to check the compatibility with DD This follows for from

and for from and

for from the anticommutativity of K and for from

and C 

Let Q B b e at and not necessarily of nite type One may then dene

q

cycle mo dules A M with

q q

A M F A Q M

F

To establish these cycle mo dules one pro ceeds analogous to the A M ab ove Al

q

ternatively one may reduce to the consideration of the A M as follows If is of

q

nite type one may assume that it is of constant dimension s In this case one has

q

A M A M For the general case note that at least lo cally with resp ect

sq

q q

to B one has A Q M lim A Q M where Q B runs through the at

F

F

nite type mo dels of

Documenta Mathematica

Chow Groups with Coefficients

Fibrations

In this section we consider the sp ectral sequence asso ciated to a morphism and formu

late some basic functorial prop erties A rst application yields the homotopy prop erty

for vector bundles

From now on all schemes are assumed to b e of nite type over a eld and M is

with exceptions in Section a cycle mo dule over X

For a morphism X X we put

a

C M x C X M

pl l

xX

(pl)

where

p X x X j dim x X

pl l

Then

C C C X M

p p

is a nite ltration of C X M by sub complexes This ltration has the sub quotients

a

C X M

u

0

uX

(p)

n

b e the asso ciated sp ectral sequence see eg Hilton and Stamm Let E

pq

n

bach The dierential for X restricts on C X M to the dierential

u

for X Therefore

u

a

E A X M

q

u

pq

0

uX

(p)

of this spectral sequence equals the dier Proposition The dierential d

pq

0

for the cycle module A M ential d

q X

we have to check equality of the corresp onding y X Proof For u X

p p

0

comp onents of d and d

X

pq

0

0

u

u

0

0 0

d A X M A X M d

0

q q X

u y

0

pq

y

y

0

u

The map d is by denition induced from the map

0

pq

y

0 0

C X M C X M

q q

u y

u u

where for u y X lying over u y resp ectively

y y

The claim follows from Prop osition 

Documenta Mathematica

Markus Rost

Corollary There is a convergent spectral sequence

E A X A M A X M

p q pq

pq

If X is equidimensional and is at then there is a convergent spectral sequence

pq

p q pq

E A X A M A X M 

Here the second statement follows from the rst by a formal switch to co dimension

index In this co dimension setting one may drop the nite type hypotheses

Remark We will use the following dictions Let X X Y Y b e

p

morphisms Then X Y is called ltration preserving with resp ect to of

degree r t if

C C

pl prlt

If see Sec for the denition of then is homomorphism of ltered

complexes and induces maps denoted by the same letter

n n

E E

pq prq tr

p

Two ltration preserving maps X Y of degree r t are called homotopic

p

if there is a ltration preserving H X Y of degree r t such that

H If and then the induced maps on the E

terms coincide If the homotopy H can b e chosen of degree r t then already

the induced maps on the E terms coincide This follows from a little calculation

working for arbitrary ltered complexes

Let

f

Y X

y y

0

f

X Y

b e a commutative diagram of morphisms The following statement is trivial

Lemma

One has

C C f

pl pl

Suppose f has relative dimension t and let s sf see Then

C C f

pl pslt

If a is a unit on X then

fag C C

pl pl

Documenta Mathematica

Chow Groups with Coefficients

Let Y i X j U be a boundary triple Then

U

C j C i

pl pl

Y

For the diagram one has

U

h C h  C

pl pl

Y

Let

f f

b

Y Y X

y y y

0

f

Y Y X

b

0

X and f f f b e the natural decomp osition of diagram with Y Y

X

We call the diagram a at square if f and f are at of some constant relative

dimensions This holds then also for f

We use the natural identication

A f M f A M

q q

of cycle mo dules over Y

Proposition

If f and f are proper then the map

f E E

pq pq

corresponding to equals the composite

0

f

f



#



A Y A M A Y A M A X A M

p q p q p q

Suppose the square is at and put r dimf s dimf Then the map

f E E

pq prq s

corresponding to equals the composite



0 

f

f

#

A X A M A Y A M A Y A M

p q pr q pr q s

For a global unit a on X the map

fag E E

pq pq

corresponding to equals fag

Documenta Mathematica

Markus Rost

The map

E j E i

pq pq

U

corresponding to equals

Y

The map

h E h E

pq pq

corresponding to equals the map

0

U

A U A h M A Y A h M

0

p q p q

Y

Proof is trivial follows from Prop osition In and one may supp ose

either f f or f f

Pro of of for f f Here X Y and the map

f C Y M C X M

l l

is the family of maps

f C Y M C X M

q q

u u u

with u X and p q l On the other hand

p

f C X A M C X A M

p q p q

is comp onentwise induced by the maps f

u

0

X We Pro of of for f f Here we have a pullback diagram Y Y

X

consider the maps induced by

f C Y M C X M

l l

on the E terms These are maps with p q l

a a

0 0

C X M C X M

q q

y x

0 0

0 0

y Y x X

(p) (p)

0

Their comp onents are the corestrictions c with y X y Y and

y jx y q

p

0

f y X x f y X Here y is necessarily nite over x since

x q p

b oth elds have the same transcendence degree Therefore the maps on the E terms

are given by the maps

0 0 0

f C X M C X M

0

q q

y f y

y

with y Y such that y jf y is nite and where

p

0 0 0

f X X

0

y f y

y

is the asso ciated nite morphism On the other hand

f C Y A M C X A M

p q p q

is induced exactly by the maps f

0

y

Documenta Mathematica

Chow Groups with Coefficients

Pro of of for f f One argues as for and notes that

f C X M C Y M

l ls

is the family of maps

f C X M C Y M

q q s

u u u

with u X and p q l

p

Pro of of for f f The map

f C X M C Y M

l lr

is the family of maps

x

O f r M x M y

Y

y jx

y

with y Y x X and f y x

lr l

The map

f C X A M C Y A M

p q pr q

is the family of maps induced by the maps

0

x

0

0 0

f O f C X M C X M

0 0

Y q q

x y

y y

0 0

f y x and where f x X with y Y X X is the natural

0

y x

y

p pr

map Moreover f is the family of maps

0

y

x

O y f r M x M y

0

X O

xjy

0

y y

X

with y Y lying over x X and over y

pq r pq

The claim amounts to show for such p oints y x y x the equality

0 0

0

l x y l x O l x O

O O Y O Y

y 0 y y 0 0

X X X

For this see Fulton A

Pro of of The map

U

C U M C Y M

l l

Y

is on the sub quotients of the ltrations given by the family of maps

C U M C Y M

u q q

u u

with u X p q l and where is the b oundary map for the closed immersion

u

p

Y X On the other hand

u u

U

C X A j M C X A i M

p q p q

Y

is comp onentwise induced by the maps 

u

Documenta Mathematica

Markus Rost

By an ane bundle of dimension n we mean a bundle V X which is lo cally

n

on X isomorphic to X A X with ane transition maps In applications we

are mainly interested in the sp ecial case of vector bundles

A rst application of the sp ectral sequence is

Proposition Let V X be an ane bund le of dimension n Then

A X M A V M

p pn

is bijective for al l p If X is equidimensional then

p p

A X M A V M

is bijective for al l p

Here again the second statement follows from the rst and one may drop in the

co dimension setting the nite type hypothesis

Proof By Corollary and Prop osition applied to Y X X Y V

f f all we need to show is

A M for q n

q

and that

M A id M A M

X n

is an isomorphism of cycle mo dules over X

Therefore we are reduced to the case X Sp ec F Then V is a trivial bundle

n

V A For n the claim is H of Section So we know Prop osition for

F

n

line bundles over an arbitrary base But then the case V A follows by induction

F

on n 

Documenta Mathematica

Chow Groups with Coefficients

Homotopy

We have just observed the homotopy prop erty for ane bundles In this section we

show that this fact can b e made more precise on cycle level by means of a homotopy

inverse

p

A homomorphism X Y with is called a strong homotopy equiva

p p

lence if there is r Y X and H Y Y such that

r

r id

H

H id r

The pair r H will b e called hdata for

p

Let V X b e an ane bundle We will show that X V is a strong

homotopy equivalence A crucial p oint here is the treatment of the case V X A

The general case is then more or less clear in view of the decomp osition of the cycle

complexes corresp onding to b oundary triples We give here explicit formulas in order

to make clear compatibility with base change and ltrations

By a coordination X of an ane bundle V X of dimension n we

i i

mean a sequence X X X X of closed subsets of X together with

k

trivializations

n

V j X n X X n X A

i i i i i

We use the notation V j U V U for U W and a scheme V W over W

W

Co ordinations clearly exist since X is no etherian For a morphism f Y X we

denote by f the induced co ordination on the pullback bundle f V

In the following we construct in several steps hdata

r C V M C X M

p pn

H C V M C V M

p p

for dep ending on a co ordination

p

The case V X A hdata r H for X X A are given by the

comp osites



ftg

j

1

p p p

X r X A X A nfg X A nfg



p

p

fstg

1

2 

p p p

H X A X A A n X A A n X A

Here t is the co ordinate of A Sp ec Zt and s t are the co ordinates of A A

Sp ec Zs Sp ec Zt Moreover fs t g is the diagonal j is the standard

inclusion p and p are given by the standard pro jections and is induced by

X X X P n fg with op en complement X A n fg

Documenta Mathematica

Markus Rost

We have to verify for r H the dening prop erties of hdata and

are immediate and follows from Lemma To check consider the

decomp osition

p

q

1





p p

X A P X A p X A A n

where q is the inclusion and p is the pro jection p is prop er and therefore

H p q fs tg p

Moreover

q i i

where i X X A P i X A X A P are the inclusions

and are the b oundary maps for X X A A X A

X A P n resp ectively

Since s t is a parameter for one nds

p i fs tg p id

by Lemma

Let W A P n A Moreover let p b e the restriction of p to

U X W n A and let b e the b oundary map corresp onding to the

inclusion X A X W Then

fs tg p fs tg p

Since s tt is a unit on W with constant value on X A one has

fs tg p ftg p

The compatibility of the b oundary maps with at pullback now gives

p i fs tg p r

Putting things together yields

n n

The case V X A Let X A X b e the pro jection and put

n

n n n n n

p

X X A By induction on n we dene hdata r H for

n

X X X X

n

n n n

Let Y X A so that Y A X A Note that where

X

Y

Y X is the pro jection Put

n

n

r r r

X

Y

n n n

n

H H r H

X

Y Y Y

Here r H are the hdata for from moreover r id and H

Y

Y Y Y

Documenta Mathematica

Chow Groups with Coefficients

The prop erties and can b e easily veried For note that

n

n n n

H H

X X X

Y

n n n n

n

H H r

Y

Y Y Y Y

n

H

Y

Finally follows from

n n n

n

H H H r

X

Y Y Y

n n n n

r r r

Y Y Y Y

n n

r

X Y

Glueing Let V X b e an ane bundle let Y X b e closed let

U X n Y and put V V j Y V V j U For given hdata r H for

p p

j V Y V and r H for j V U V we dene hdata r H for

p

X V by the formulae

H H H r r H

H r

H r

Here the matrix notation refers to the natural decomp ositions

C X M C Y M C U M

C V M C V M C V M

p

Moreover V V is the b oundary map corresp onding to V V The veri

cation of is straightforward and omitted

The general case Given a co ordination one uses iteratively the recip e of

to construct hdata r H for

It turns out that the glueing pro cess of is asso ciative in the sense that

r H do es not dep end on the ordering in which the dierent pieces are glued

together However this is not at all imp ortant for us one should just decide oneself

for some xed standard ordering

Functoriality The construction of r H is compatible with manip

ulations on the base given by the four types of maps f g fag and We omit a

formulation since this will b e used only in the trivial case of op en immersions g

Proposition

Let V X be an ane bund le of dimension n with coordination and let

X X be a morphism Then

r C C

pl pln

H C C

pl pl

Documenta Mathematica

Markus Rost

Let

V X

y y

0

V X

be a pul lback diagram with an ane bund le of dimension n and let be a coor

dination for Then

r C C

pl pnln

H C C

pl pl

Proof This is straightforward but nevertheless tedious by following the construc

tions 

In order to dene hdata as ab ove one needs less than the choice of a co ordination

For example in one refers alone to trivializations of the onedimensional bundles

m m

X A X A

We have not tried to describ e the precise amount of information of a co ordination

needed in order to p erform the ab ove construction

Deformation to the Normal Cone

This section describ es three general constructions asso ciated to closed imbeddings

the normal cone the deformation space and the double deformation space

For the general role of the deformation space in intersection theory we refer to

Fulton The double deformation space will b e our to ol to verify asso ciativity

of the intersection op erations

We rst x notations and describ e some signicant prop erties Explicit descrip

tions are given in b elow

Let Z Y X b e closed imbeddings

The normal cone to Y in X is denoted by N N X N X Y There is the

Y

pro jection N X Y and the inclusion Y N X If Y X is a regular imbedding

Y Y

then N X is a vector bundle over Y with the inclusion as zero section

Y

The deformation space D D X Y is a scheme over X A It is at over A

Over A n fg A one has

D j A n fg X A n fg

Furthermore the pro jection D j fg X fg factors through Y X fg and one

has

D j fg N X

Y

Documenta Mathematica

Chow Groups with Coefficients

as schemes over Y Our D is in Fulton Chap denoted by M moreover we

have taken instead of as the basep oint of the sp ecial b er

D X Y Z is a scheme over X A It is The double deformation space D

at over A and one has the following canonical identications of schemes over A

assuming in that Z Y X are regular imbeddings

D j A A n fg D X Y A n fg

j A n fg A A n fg D X Z D

D j A fg D N X N Y

Z Z

D j fg A D N X N X j Z

Y Y

j f g X f g factors through Z X and one Moreover the pro jection D

has

D j f g N N X N Y N N X N X j Z

Z Z Y Y

as schemes over Z

There is a more symmetric but less general version of the double deformation

space Namely let Y Y b e closed subschemes of X and let Z b e the intersection

e

of Y and Y ie Z Y Y Then there is a double deformation space D

X

e

D X Y Y X A relating in the transversal case all ve inclusions induced

e

from Z Y Y X The deformation space D is at over A and symmetric with

resp ect to a simultaneous interchange of Y Y and of the factors of A A A

Supp ose that Y and Y meet transversally Then

e

D j A n fg A D X Y A

e

D j fg A D N X N X j Z

Y Y

e

Moreover one has D j L D X Z for any line L A through the origin as long as

L is dierent from the two axes

X Y Z is the pullback of the space In the case Z Y Y the space D

X

e e

D X Y Y along the ane blow up A A t s ts s We dont need D but

we have included b elow its denition since it might b e a bit simpler to understand

than D

We have to recall facts from lo cal algebra Remark is a sp ecial version of

the lo cal criterion of atness Matsumura G p Remark may b e

deduced by considering lo cally regular sequences for J containing regular sequences

for I see Serre For a compact account of other facts needed in the following

we refer to Fulton App A App B

Remark A morphism U V A is at if and only if the morphisms

1 1

U A n fg V A n fg U fg V fg and U A are at 

A A

Documenta Mathematica

Markus Rost

Remark If Z Y and Y X are regular imbeddings then Z X is a

regular imbedding If X is ane and if X Sp ec A and I J A are the ideals

corresp onding to Y and Z resp ectively then

n m mn n m

I J J I J

n m n n m

I J I I J

n n

Here we understand n m Z with I J A for n 

e

and D for ane X From the naturality We next give the denitions of N D D

of the ane constructions it will b e obvious that they extend to global ones

We keep the notations of Remark Moreover we use the co ordinates A

Sp ec k t and A Sp ec k t s The indices n m always run in Z

The normal cone N N X is dened as the sp ectrum of the ring

Y

a

n n

O I I

N

n

O is a ring over O AI and pro jection to the degree zero summand gives a

N Y

homomorphism O O

N Y

The deformation space D D X Y is dened as the sp ectrum of the

subring

X

n n

O I t At t

D

n

O is a nitely generated ring over At with generators x t if x are generators

D i i

of I After inverting t one has

O t At t

D

Since t is not a zero divisor it follows that O is at over k t Moreover

D

a

n n

O t O I I O

D D N

n

n

For later purp oses we are very precise ab out this identication for x I the residue

n n n n n

of x t mo d I t corresp onds to x mo d I This sign convention

will avoid some other signs later on

The double deformation space D D X Y Z is the sp ectrum of the

subring

X

n mn n m

O I J t s At s t s

D

nm

is nitely generated over As t After inverting s or t one has with D O

D

D X Z

X

n n m

O s I t s O s s

D

D

nm

X

m n m

0

t t t O J t s O

D

D

nm

Documenta Mathematica

Chow Groups with Coefficients

This shows and For note rst

a

n mn n mn n m

s O I J I J t s O

D D

nm

In order to make clear the ring structures in particular as ring over k t s we keep

n m

here the terms t s having now merely the meaning of symbols

Moreover N X and N Y are the sp ectra of

Z Z

a

m m m

R J J s

m

a

m m m

R J I J I s

m

The pro jection R R yields an inclusion N Y N X

Z Z

m m

e

Let I kerR R By Remark one has J I I J and therefore

a

m m m m

e

I I J J J s

m

and

a

n n mn m m m

e

I I J J J s

m

Hence D N X N Y is the sp ectrum of

Z Z

a a

n n mn m m n m

e

I I J J J t s

n nm

follows now from Remark

For note rst

a

n mn n mn n m

t O I J I J t s O

D D

nm

For the ring of N X we write now

Y

a

n n n

O I I u

N

n

e

Let J O b e the ideal corresp onding to the closed subscheme N X j Z Its p owers

N Y

are

a

m m n n n n

e

J J I I I u

n

Hence D N Z N X j Z is the sp ectrum of

Y Y

a

m n n n n m

R J I I I u s

nm

Dene

O t O R

D D

n mn n m n n mn

x mo d I J t s x mo d I u s

It is easy to see that is a surjective ring homomorphism over k s Moreover

is injective by Remark The map gives the identication of Now

is obvious The atness over A not needed in the following may b e deduced

from Remark

Documenta Mathematica

Markus Rost

e

The double deformation space D We just give the denition Let I A

b e the ideal corresp onding to Y X One puts

X

n m n m

O I I v s Av s v s

e

D

nm

e

in In the transversal case one has One may handle with D similar as with D

O k t s O

k v s

D

e

D

where k v s k t s via v ts s s and with J I I

The Basic Construction

For a closed immersion i Y X we dene

p

J i J X Y X N X

Y

as the comp osite of



ftg

p p p

X X A n fg X A n fg N X

Y

Here X A n fg X is the pro jection A Sp ec k t and is the b oundary

map for N X D X Y One has J X Y so that J X Y is a homomor

Y

phism of complexes C X M C N X M

Y

If M K then the restriction of J X Y to the classical cycle groups coincides

with the sp ecialization homomorphisms of Fulton Chap this may b e

deduced from the description of in Fulton Prop via Cartier divisors

As for classical cycles one may think of J X Y as the pullback along tubular

neighborho o ds followed by a linearization pro cess In the following we have collected

the remarks on J X Y which are needed in further sections We have not tried to

give a detailed geometrical description

The construction of J X Y is lo cal in the sense that

J U Y U j J X Y

where j U X is an op en immersion and N X j Y U N X is the induced

Y Y

inclusion

Lemma Let Y N X be the inclusion Then

Y

J X Y i

Proof The statement follows from Lemma and the fact that the closure of Y

A n fg in D X Y is Y A 

Documenta Mathematica

Chow Groups with Coefficients

Let X b e normal y X and Y fy g Moreover let F and E b e the function

elds of X and N X resp ectively We want to compute the co dimension comp onent

Y

J M F M E

of J X Y The problem is purely lo cal in y Let v b e the valuation on F corre

sp onding to y and let y v Moreover let m b e the ideal of y let m

b e a prime and let mm b e its image The normal cone N X is the sp ectrum of

Y

a

n n

m m

n

and one has E

The following lemma shows that there is a factorization

p

J M F M v M E

where p is from Remark

Lemma

J r s f g r

v

E j E j

v

Proof We may supp ose X Sp ec A and that the ideal I corresp onding to y is

generated by Then D X Y is the sp ectrum of

At t At t

By denition we have

J ftg r

w

F tjF

where w is the valuation on F t corresp onding to the principal ideal t At t

Note that E w and that is the residue of the w unit t by the sign

convention in The claim follows now from

ftg r f g r f t g r

w w w

F tjF F tjF F tjF

r f g f g r

w w

F tjF F tjF

and the fact that w restricts on F to v 

The preceding remarks yield a complete description of J X Y for smo oth

curves X

The rest of the section contains a series of technical lemmata

Lemma Let Y X be a closed immersion let g V X be at of constant

relative dimension and let

N g N V Y V N X Y V N X Y

X X

be the projection Then

J V Y V g N g J X Y

X

Proof This follows from the atness of D V Y V D X Y 

X

Documenta Mathematica

Markus Rost

Lemma Let U V be a closed immersion and let p V W be at Suppose

that the composite

q N V U V W

U

is at of the same relative dimension as p Then

p

J V U p q W N V

U

Proof Let W A n fg W b e the pro jection and let f b e the comp osite

pid

f D V U V A W A

Then by denition

J V U p ftg f j V A n fg

Now f is at by Remark and f j N V q Hence

U

J V U p q ftg

where is the b oundary map corresp onding to W fg W A But ftg

id by Lemma 

Lemma Let U V be a regular imbedding let p V W be smooth of con

stant relative dimension and suppose p i is a regular imbedding Then the projection

q N V N W

U U

is an epimorphism of vector bund les and

J V U p q J W U

Proof Use the atness of D V U D W U 

Lemma Let T T be a morphism let T T T be closed subschemes

0

T for i and let T T

i T

i

e e

Put T T n T T T T T T T n T T T n T and let

be the boundary maps for the closed immersions

e e

T T n T T T T T n T T T

respectively Then

p

T T

under a ltration preserving homotopy of degree

Documenta Mathematica

Chow Groups with Coefficients

Proof Corresp onding to the set theoretic decomp osition of T we have

e e

C T M C T M C T M C T M C T M

Let

p

T T

b e the corresp onding comp onent of d Then d d gives

T T T

Hence is a homotopy as required 

D X Y Z T D j fg A T D j A fg We keep the Let T D

notations of Lemma Then T X A n fg A n and T D j f g

Let T X b e the pro jection and let t s b e the co ordinates of A as in

so that T ft g T fs g

Lemma Let Z Y X be regular imbeddings Then

ft sg J N X N X j Z J X Y

Y Y

fs tg J N X N Y J X Z

Z Z

Proof Let

i

X A n fg A n fg X A n fg X A n fg X

i

b e the pro jections with

x t s x s x s x

x t s x t x t x

One nds using in particular Lemma

ft sg fsg ftg

fsg J X A n Y A n fg

fsg N X A n fg N X J X Y

Y Y

J N X N X j Z J X Y

Y Y

fsg ftg fs tg

ftg J X A n fg Z A n fg

J X Z ftg N X A n fg N X

Z Z

J N X N Y J X Z 

Z Z

Documenta Mathematica

Markus Rost

The Pullback Map

In this section we dene the pullback maps for morphisms to smo oth varieties Some

prop erties are formulated in particular the functoriality of the sp ectral sequences

We conclude with applications and discussions concerning birational questions The

pro ofs of Theorems and are given in the next section

In the following all schemes X Y X are at over B of some constant relative

dimension denoted by dim X All pro ducts Y X Y X are taken over B

B

and cycle mo dules will b e induced via pro jection to the second factor pro jection to

the rst factor do es not exist for us We use the notations T X N X X and

S X S

TX T X We are primarily interested in the case B Sp ec k but we dont have

B

to pay much for considering arbitrary B M is a cycle mo dule over X

Let X b e smo oth over B Then TX is a vector bundle on X For a morphism

f Y X let

p

i

f Y Y X X

b e the factorization with iy y f y and py x x Then i is a regular

imbedding and N Y X f TX

Y

We choose a co ordination on TX and dene

p

I f I f r f J Y X Y p X Y

Note that the construction is lo cal in the sense that for an op en immersion j U X

one has

I f j j I f

where f f U U is the restriction of f and f U Y is the inclusion

One has I f and

I f C X M C Y M

p pr

where r dim Y dim X If B is equidimensional then

B B

p p

I f C X M C Y M

We dene

q

f A X M A Y M

p pr

and

q

p p

f A X M A Y M

q

as the induced maps on cohomology f do es not dep end on the choice of One

has the following prop erties

Theorem For g Z Y and f Y X with X and Y smooth over B one

q q q

has f g g f

For the pro of see the next section

Documenta Mathematica

Chow Groups with Coefficients

Proposition If f is at then I f f

Proof It suces to show

J Y X Y p f

where f TX Y is the pro jection For this apply Lemma with U Y

V Y X and W X 

Proposition If i Y X is a regular imbedding and X is smooth over B

p

then I i is homotopic to r J i where r is any retraction to Y N X

Y

Proof Apply Lemma with U Y V Y X and W X 

The following corollary applied to the blow up at x implies together with The

orem prop erty E of Section

p

Corollary Let X be smooth over B Sp ec k let x X and let

fxg X i

x

be the inclusion Moreover let be any regular sequence at x and let

p

v v be the induced sequence of valuations with the fraction elds k X

p

v v and with the residue classes of as primes Then

p p

q

i A X M A fxg M

x

is the restriction of

1 p

M k X M x s s

v v

1 p

Proof Let X X X X b e the sequence of smo oth schemes lo cally

p

around x with X dened by h i Using Theorem one reduces to p

i i

This case follows from Prop osition and Lemma 

Proposition Pro jection formula Consider a pul lback square

f

X Y

h

y y

h

f

Y X

with h smooth and proper and with X smooth over B Then

q q

h f f h

Documenta Mathematica

Markus Rost

Proof One considers the diagram

Y X X Y

y

h

Y Y X X

h

h

y y y

Y Y X X

Here the b ottom diagram is the pullback along h and h h id We have three

X

p

Y the rst is constructed along D Y maps X X Y and is given by pullback

X and sp ecialization to Y followed by pushforward the second go es along to Y

D Y X Y and is given by pullback to Y X and sp ecialization to Y followed by

pushforward the third go es along D Y X Y and is given by pushforward pull

back to Y X and sp ecialization to Y The rst two may b e related using Lemma

V Y X and W Y X the last two by the compatibility of the with U Y

constructions with prop er pushforward 

Consider the triangle and assume that is smo oth and is at Dene

p p

hB A M A M

q q

by hB h Here we understand B Sp ec F in the denition of h

F F F

Proposition hB is a homomorphism of cycle modules over B

Proof We apply Prop osition Since the pro jection N Y X Y Y is a

vector bundle we know that

q q

A A

is an isomorphism of cycle mo dules Moreover

hB ftg p

where p Y X A n fg X is the pro jection and is the b oundary for

N Y X Y D Y X Y 

Theorem Consider the square and its decomposition Suppose

that B is equidimensional is at is smooth and X hence also X is smooth

over B Then the spectral sequences

pq

p q pq

E A X A M A X M

pq

p q pq

E A Y A M A Y M

commute with the maps

q

0

0

f Y

f

#

p q p q p q

A X A M A Y A M A Y A M

q

p p

f A X M A Y M

For the pro of see the next section Switching to dimension indices this theorem holds

without the equidimensionality assumption on B

Documenta Mathematica

Chow Groups with Coefficients

For the rest of the section we assume B Sp ec k

Lemma Let X be smooth let Y be integral let f Y X be a dominant

morphism and let k X k Y be the induced homomorphism of the function

elds Then

I f j M k X M k X M k Y

Proof After replacing Y by an op en subset we may assume that f is at The claim

follows from Prop osition 

Lemma Assume in additional ly that f is proper and that is an iso

morphism Then f I f id

Proof Let

f D Y X Y D X X X

b e the prop er map induced from f There is the commutative diagram



ftg r f

p p p

n fg TX X Y X A f Y

p p p p

f

f

f 

y y y y





ftg r

p p p

X X X A n fg TX X

where f f are the restrictions of f The diagram shows f I f I id But

I id id by Prop osition 

Lemma shows in particular that for any blow up Y X the complex

C X M is a direct summand of C Y M This splitting via I f dep ends alone

on the choice of a co ordination of TX near the singular lo cus and is unique up to

homotopy

Corollary Let X be a proper smooth variety over k and let M be a cycle

module over k Then the group A X M is a birational invariant of X

Proof If X X are prop er and birational isomorphic there exist a prop er Y and

birational morphisms Y X take for Y the closure in X X of a common

i

M one has the trivial op en subset of the X Then as subgroups of M

Y i X

i

inclusions A Y M A X M Lemma shows A X M A Y M 

i i

For an illustration let X b e a smo oth and prop er variety over k with function

eld F Then for any geometric valuation v on F of rank there is a birational

morphism f Y X such that v has center y in Y with v y The map I f

yields a formula

X

x

x v

v

(1)

xX

where

x

M x M v

v

x

equals the comp onent I f

y

Documenta Mathematica

Markus Rost

This formula is a sort of higher dimensional analogue of the sum formula for

onedimensional function elds It has the following prop erties

where z is the center of v in X in it is lo cal that is x runs only through X

z

x

other words for x X

v

z

it is not unique but dep ends only on the choice of a co ordination of the tangent

bundle of X restricted to X

z

x

it is universal in the sense that the can b e written as sums of comp ositions of the

v

data of cycle mo dules indep endent of M This is quite obvious from the construction

x

of I f One can make this more precise by interpreting the as morphisms in the

v

e e

category F of Remark In this way the category F app ears as the natural place

x

for the co ecients of formulas like

y

x

Exercise Describ e the for dim X and v the valuation corresp onding to the

v

exceptional b er of the blow up in a closed p oint see Remark

Birational invariants like A X M have b een considered in various contexts

like etale cohomology and K theory see ColliotThelene for a survey The

advantage of the metho d of pro of of Corollary lies in its general and essentially

simple nature after having established the functors in question as cycle mo dules

moreover the formula makes things p erhaps more enlightening A similar

metho d works probably for functors related with the Witt ring of quadratic forms

To mention a particular example let Z Sp ec k b e prop er and let M

resp N b e the Zgraded cycle mo dule over k given as the cokernel resp image of

A K A id K K

Sp ec k

By Corollary the group A X M which is a sub quotient of k X is a

birational invariant for prop er smo oth X over k The pro of of this fact was the main

aim of Rost There it was achieved by a dierent metho d using the triviality of

e e

A X N for smo oth lo cal X proved in this pap er in more generality in Section

Documenta Mathematica

Chow Groups with Coefficients

Intersection Theory for Fibrations

The purp ose of this section is to prove Theorems and We dene pullback

maps on complex level for regular imbeddings and for morphisms to smo oth varieties

in b ered situations Moreover we establish functoriality of the constructions Most

of the work has b een done already in Sections

Consider a commutative square

f

Y X

y y

0

f

Y X

The square is called a regular imbedding if f and f are regular imbeddings of

some constant co dimensions and if the induced map

0

X p N X N

Y Y

is an epimorphism of vector bundles over Y The kernel bundle of p is denoted by N

0

We consider p also as vector bundle and identify it with q N where q N X Y

Y

is the pro jection

Let b e a regular imbedding and let and b e co ordinations of N Y and

0

X Y resp ectively We dene of N

Y

p

X Y J

by

J r r q J X Y J

The following is clear from Sections One has J and

J C C

pl pslt

with s co dimf and t co dimf Moreover the homotopy class of J

with resp ect to the degree s t do es not dep end on the choice of and

we wanted to b e as canonical as p ossible If one is In the denition of J

interested only in the homotopy class one may put J r J X Y for any

ltration preserving retraction r to N X X ltration preserving means always

Y

with resp ect to the natural degrees

Next consider a diagram

f f

1 2

Z Y X

y y y

0 0

f f

1 2

Z Y X

We denote the left square by the right square by and the comp osed square

by

Documenta Mathematica

Markus Rost

Theorem If and are regular imbeddings then is a regular imbed

ding and

J J J

under a ltration preserving homotopy

Proof The rst statement is straightforward In the following deduction of the second

statement the letters r stand for some ltration preserving retractions We make use

i

of Lemma for the homotopy of Lemmata and for the homotopy

and of Lemma for the equality

J r J Y Z r J X Y J

r N N X N X j Z N Y Z J Y Z r J X Y

Y Y

r J N X N X j Z N Y X Y r J X Y

Y Y

r J N X N X j Z J X Y

Y Y

r J N X N Y J X Z

Z Z

r J N X N Y N X Z r J X Z

Z Z Z

r N N X N Y Z r J X Z

Z Z

r J X Z

J 

The square is called admissible if is at is smo oth and X is smo oth

over B Consider the diagram

i

Y Y X X

y y y

0

0

i

X Y X Y

and denote the left square by and the right square by If is admissible then

i p

is a regular imbedding and is a at square see Moreover the normal

i p

is given bundles of i and i are given by f TX and f TX resp ectively and N

i

0

by f T X

X

0

X and TX resp ec Let b e admissible and let and b e co ordinations of T

X

tively We dene

p

I X Y

by

I I J f f p

i

One has I and

C C I

pl pslt

with s dim Y dim X and t dim Y dim X Moreover the homotopy

B B B B

class of I with resp ect to the degree s t do es not dep end on the choice of

and

Documenta Mathematica

Chow Groups with Coefficients

Theorem If in the squares and are admissible then the

square is admissible and

I I I

under a ltration preserving homotopy

Proof The rst statement is trivial For the second we consider the diagrams

i i

4 1

Z Y X Z Y Z

p p

4 1

y y

i

2

Y X Y

p

2

y

X

p

i i

5

5 3

Z Y X Z X X Z

The regular imbeddings i lie over accordingly dened regular imbeddings i the

j

j

corresp onding squares are denoted by

j

The are regular imbeddings An application of Lemma and Theorem

j

shows that by noting i i i i and p p p

I J J p I

By denition we have

I J p i

Finally Lemma shows

p p i  J

Theorem implies Theorem by passing to homology For a pro of of

Theorem we consider six squares with the top arrows

i i

2 1

0

Y X X Y Y

X

p p

2 1

y y

p

i

3

3

0

Y X Y X X

X

lying over the b ottom arrows

0

i

Y Y Y X

0

0

p

i

Y Y X X

Documenta Mathematica

Markus Rost

Let b e the square corresp onding to i for j The are regular imbed

j j j

q

By the denition of I and Theorem dings The map f is induced from I

we have

I J J p p

Lemma shows that

p p J J

q

Therefore f is the comp osition of the maps induced by J p and by J p

Next note that p i f An application of Prop osition shows that J

p induces on the E terms the map f Y Finally note that p i f and that

the squares under i and p are pullback squares An application of Prop osition

q

shows that J p induces on the E terms the map f 

Products

In this section M is a cycle mo dule over B and N is a cycle mo dule over k We

assume that either N K or that M N is a cycle mo dule with ring structure over

B Sp ec k So in any case we are given a pairing N M M of cycle mo dules

over B

The restriction to these sp ecial cases are made for simplication For example

in forming intersections of cycles with co ecients in a cycle mo dule M with ring

structure one needs to know that its pairing factors through a cycle mo dule over

B B However the existence of a corresp onding appropriate notion of tensor pro duct

of cycle mo dules is not clear to me and a settling of this question would lead to far here

anyway The problem could b e avoided in the following by assuming the necessary

factorizations but this is somewhat tiring

Cross products Let Y b e a scheme over k and let Z b e a scheme over B

all of nite type over k We dene the cross pro duct

C Y N C Z M C Y Z M

p q pq

as follows For y Y let Z Sp ec y Z let Z Z b e the pro jection and let

y y y

i Z Y Z b e the inclusion For z Z we understand similarly Y Y Y

y y z z z

and i Y Y Z We give the following two equivalent denitions

z z

X

i

y y

y

y Y

(p)

X

i

z z

z

z Z

(q )

Here N y is the y comp onent of and the pro duct is understo o d after p ointwise

y

restriction of The map

y

i C Z M C Y Z M

y q y pq

Documenta Mathematica

Chow Groups with Coefficients

is the inclusion corresp onding to Z Y Z Similarly we understand

y q pq

M z and

z

i C Y M C Y Z M

z p z pq

To check equality of the two denitions consider the ucomp onents for u Y Z Let

y z b e the images of u under the pro jections Y Z Y Z and let R y z

k

Then the ucomp onents are either trivial or u is a minimal prime of R In the latter

case the ucomp onents are given by

r r l R

u y z R

ujy ujz u

Associativity Additionally let X b e of nite type over k and let

C X N Then

r

For a pro of consider the ucomp onents for u X Y Z Let x y z b e the

images of u in X Y Z resp ectively and let R x y z Then the

k k

ucomp onents are either trivial or u is a minimal prime of R In the latter case it

follows from standard rules for length that the ucomp onents are given by

r r r l R

u x y z R

ujx ujy ujz u

Commutativity Supp ose M N is a cycle mo dule with ring structure over

B Sp ec k Let Y Z Z Y b e the interchange of factors For C Y M n

p

and C Z M m one has

q

nm

C Z Y M n m

pq

This is immediate from the denitions

Chain rule For C Y N n and C Z M m one has

p q

n

d d d

For a pro of we may assume M y M z for some y Y and z Z

p q

Consider for u Y Z the ucomp onents of the three terms If one of them is

nontrivial we must have dim u Y Z p q and the images y z of u must b e

in the closures of y z resp ectively Dimension reasons show y y or z z Now the

claim follows from one of the two denitions of the cross pro duct and Prop osition

Compatibility The cross pro duct is compatible with the four basic types

of maps f g fag and acting on one of the two factors This follows from the

compatibility with at pullback and Denition We omit a detailed formulation

We conclude with a consideration of the intersection pairing for cycles on a

smo oth variety Let X b e smo oth over k and let b e a co ordination of TX We

dene

I C X N C X M C X M

X

I r J X X X

X

By this is a pairing of complexes Let

A X N A X M A X M



b e the induced pairing

Documenta Mathematica

Markus Rost

The next theorem follows from the preceding remarks and in particular from

Theorem It holds accordingly on chain level up to homotopy

Theorem If M N is a cycle module with ring structure over B Sp ec k

the pairing turns A X M into an anticommutative associative ring If N K



the pairing turns A X M into a module over A X K 



We have dened in particular a ring structure on the classical Chow groups

a

p

CH X A X K p

p

of a smo oth variety This ring structure coincides with the classical one This

may b e deduced from the remark at the b eginning of Section and Fulton

Chaps

References

Bass H Tate J The Milnor ring of a global eld in Algebraic KTheory I I

Classical Algebraic KTheory and Connections with Arithmetic Pro ceedings

Battelle Institute Lecture Notes in Math

Blo ch S Algebraic cycles and higher algebraic Ktheory Adv Math

Blo ch S Ogus A Gerstens conjecture and the homology of schemes Ann

scient Ec Norm Sup

ColliotThelene JL Birational invariants purity and the Gersten conjecture

KTheory and connections with quadratic forms and division

algebras Santa Barbara CA Pro c Symp os Pure Math Part

Amer Math So c Providence RI

Fulton W Intersection Theory Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer

Grenzgebiete Springer

Grayson D Higher Algebraic KTheory I I in Algebraic KTheory Evanston

Lecture Notes in Math

Grayson D Pro ducts in KTheory and Intersecting Algebraic Cycles Invent

Math

Hartshorne R Algebraic Geometry Graduate Texts in Mathematics Sprin

ger

Hilton P J Stammbach U A Course in Homological Algebra Graduate

Texts in Mathematics Springer

Karp enko N A Merkurjev A S Chowgroups of pro jective quadrics

Leningrad Math J No

Kato K A generalization of lo cal class eld theory by using Kgroups I I J

Fac of Sc Univ of Tokyo A

Documenta Mathematica

Chow Groups with Coefficients

Kato K Milnor Ktheory and the Chowgroup of zero cycles in Applications

of Algebraic KTheory to Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory Part I

Pro ceedings Contemp Math

Matsumura H Commutative Algebra Second Edition Math Lecture Note

Series BenjaminCummings Reading

Merkurjev A S Suslin A A Kcohomology of SeveriBrauer varieties and

the norm residue homomorphism Izv Akad Nauk SSSR engl

transl in Math USSR Izv

Merkurjev A S Suslin A A On the norm residue homomorphism of degree

three preprint LOMI also Math USSR Izv

Merkurjev A S Suslin A A On the K for a eld preprint LOMI

also Math USSR Izv

Milnor J Algebraic Ktheory and quadratic forms Invent Math

Milnor J Introduction to Algebraic KTheory Annals of Math Studies

Princeton Univ Press

Quillen D Higher algebraic KTheory in Algebraic KTheory IHigher K

Theories Pro ceedings Battelle Institute Lecture Notes in Math

Rost M Durch Normengrupp en denierte birationale Invarianten C R

Acad Sci Paris Serie I

Serre JP Algebre lo cale Multiplicites Lecture Notes in Math

Serre JP Corps Lo caux Hermann Paris

Serre JP Resume de cours Annuaire du College de France

repro duced in Serre

Serre JP Cohomologie Galoisienne cinquieme edition Lecture Notes in

Math

Shatz S Pronite groups arithmetic and geometry Annals of Math Studies

Princeton Univ Press

Somekawa M On Milnor Kgroups attached to SemiAb elian Varieties K

Theory no

Srinivas V Algebraic KTheory Progress in Math

Suslin A A Voevodsky V Singular homology of abstract algebraic varieties

Invent Math

Tate J Relations b etween K and Galois Cohomology Invent Math

Fakultat f ur Mathematik

Universitat Regensburg

D Regensburg

Germany

markusrostrphsphysikuniregensburgde

Documenta Mathematica

Documenta Mathematica