DOCSLIB.ORG

The Basic Timeline/Lineage of Real Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Basic Timeline/Lineage of Real Analysis The basic timeline/lineage of real analysis Classical ! Medieval ! Early Renaissance mathematics (500 BCE{1600 CE): A few major achievements include the axiomatization of geometry; the discovery of irrational numbers, Archimedes' proof of the area formula for a circle around 250 BCE; Omar Khayyam's geometric solution of the cubic equation around 1100 CE; the algebraic solution (in radicals) of the cubic equation by del Ferro/Tartaglia/Cardano around 1540 CE. Awareness of the fact that there were line segments whose lengths could not be represented as ratios of integers generally led mathematicians to view geometry as a separate (and more general) field from number theory. Birth of Analytic Geometry (early 1600's) Rene Descartes (1596{1650) and Pierre de Fermat (1601{1665) normalize the practice of allowing each point on a geometric line to symbolize a real number. Similarly a point in the plane could be represented as an ordered pair of numbers (hence the term Cartesian plane). This philosophical shift allowed the techniques of algebra/number theory to use to solve geometric problems. Descartes posed the tangent line problem and wrote: I dare say that this is not only the most useful and the most general problem in geometry that I know, but even that I have ever desired to know, and he worked on solving it using algebra. This laid the groundwork for the development of the calculus in the mid 1600's, which is probably the most important advancement in math history. The term calculus is meant to emphasize its use as a computational tool in applied sciences, especially for computing tangent lines and areas bounded by curves. Ren´eDescartes (1789{1857) Pierre de Fermat (1815{1897) Now vs. then: mathematical culture Modern (20th/21st century) Late 17th/18th century Mathematical statements are purely abstract Mathematics is inseparable from the study of statements, irrespective of their potential physics, astronomy, and other empirical fields application to physical phenomena Mathematical statements may be justified by a All mathematical statements should be combination of intuitive/plausibility arguments, justified by precise, careful definitions and plus empirical evidence detailed, logical proof Much faith in the power of symbolic Awareness of \counterexamples," skepticism of manipulation to solve deep problems \symbol-pushing" as a method of argument A function is an expression that can be clearly A function is an arbitrary correspondence explained by a combination of algebraic between inputs and outputs operations and geometric descriptions Infinitesimals The early calculus was developed on the basis of an \infinitely small quantity" or an \infinitesimal." Other terms and notations for infinitesimals Differentials fluxions, fluents dx, dy, dz o_,_y In computations of derivatives and integrals, infinitesimals were used simultaneously as both: a nonzero quantity (so they can be divided out of expressions), and as a negligible quantity, i.e. an amount so close to zero it can be safely ignored. Despite this seeming inconsistency, early authors of the calculus did not generally try to give a formal definition of an infinitesimal quantity, and instead resorted to vague descriptions involving \continuous motion" or \evanescent increments." Newton's Description of Infinitesimals (emphasis mine) Perhaps it may be objected, that there is no ultimate proportion of evanescent quantities; because the proportion, before the quantities have vanished, is not the ultimate, and when they are vanished, is none. But by the same argument, it may be alleged, that a body arriving at a certain place, and there stopping, has no ultimate velocity; because the velocity, before the body comes to that place, is not its ultimate velocity; when it has arrived, it has none. But the answer is easy; for by the ultimate velocity is meant that with which the body is moved, neither before it arrives at its last place and the motion ceases, nor after, but at the very instant it arrives; that is, that velocity with which the body arrives at its last place, and with which the motion ceases. And in like manner, by the ultimate ratio of evanescent quantities is to be understood the ratio of the quantities not before they vanish, nor afterwards, but with which they vanish. In like manner the first ratio of nascent quantities is that with which they begin to be. And the first or last sum is that with which they begin and cease to be(or to be augmented or diminished). There is a limit which the velocity at the end of the motion may obtain, but not exceed. This is the ultimate velocity. And there is the like limit in all quantities and proportions that begin and cease to be. And since such limits are certain and definite, to determine the same is a problem strictly geometrical. But whatever is geometrical we may be allowed to use in determining and demonstrating any other thing that is likewise geometrical. {Isaac Newton The power of infinitesimals The calculus developed rapidly due in part to its immense computational power and empirical effectiveness, and its developers' faith in algebraic manipulation. The \free-wheeling calculus" reached its pinnacle in the time of Leonhard Euler (1707{1783). Euler was possibly the most prolific mathematician of all time, and made vast contributions to calculus, number theory, physics, including developing the study of transcendental functions like exponentials, logarithms, trig functions, etc... He also freely manipulated infinitesimals and “infinitely large numbers" in his mathematics to prove absurdities, like 1 1 − 1 + 1 − 1 + 1 − 1 + ::: = 2 and 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + ::: = −1. An Excerpt on Euler From Burton's History of Mathematics Criticisms of calculus and infinitesimals Mathematicians, and especially geometricians, abstracting a quantity from a material, make for themselves of it a kind of kingdom which is as free as possible... In a word then, there are mathematicians who, in their kingdom of abstraction, assume indivisible substances which are without parts, without length, and without width... but not, however, the physicists for whom, working in the field of matter, no such thing is permitted. {Pierre Gassendi (1592{1655) And what are these Fluxions? The Velocities of evanescent Increments? And what are these same evanescent Increments? They are neither finite Quantities nor Quantities infinitely small, nor yet nothing. May we not call them the ghosts of departed quantities? {Bishop George Berkeley (The Analyst 1734) Another criticism: infinitesimals violate the \Principle of Archimedes": for every > 0 no matter how small and every K > 0 no matter how large, there exists a positive integer N such that N > K. Euler's Institutiones Calculi Differentialis (1755) which tried to develop calculus operations as a natural extension of algebra; treated infinite series more or less as long polynomials; completely ignored questions of convergence. Joseph Louis Lagrange's Theorie des fonctions analytiques (1797) which tried to circumvent infinitesimals and limits altogether by assuming that EVERY function admits Taylor series representations. Derivatives are defined simply by taking the coefficients from the Taylor series representation. He wrote that his calculus was redeemed from all considerations of the infinitely small, from vanishing quantities, from limits and from fluxions, and reduced to algebraic analysis of finite quantities. Jean-le-Rond d'Alembert, in the 1750's, advocated for the limit as the underlying notion of the calculus, defining it thus: One magnitude is said to be the limit of another magnitude when the second may approach the first within any given magnitude however small, though the first magnitude may never exceed the magnitude it approaches. Early (Failed?) Attempts at Foundations Colin Maclaurin's Treatise on Fluxions (1742) a massive tome that was a direct response to Berkeley's criticisms, but apparently inadequate in addressing problems with infinitesimals as a foundational concept. Joseph Louis Lagrange's Theorie des fonctions analytiques (1797) which tried to circumvent infinitesimals and limits altogether by assuming that EVERY function admits Taylor series representations. Derivatives are defined simply by taking the coefficients from the Taylor series representation. He wrote that his calculus was redeemed from all considerations of the infinitely small, from vanishing quantities, from limits and from fluxions, and reduced to algebraic analysis of finite quantities. Jean-le-Rond d'Alembert, in the 1750's, advocated for the limit as the underlying notion of the calculus, defining it thus: One magnitude is said to be the limit of another magnitude when the second may approach the first within any given magnitude however small, though the first magnitude may never exceed the magnitude it approaches. Early (Failed?) Attempts at Foundations Colin Maclaurin's Treatise on Fluxions (1742) a massive tome that was a direct response to Berkeley's criticisms, but apparently inadequate in addressing problems with infinitesimals as a foundational concept. Euler's Institutiones Calculi Differentialis (1755) which tried to develop calculus operations as a natural extension of algebra; treated infinite series more or less as long polynomials; completely ignored questions of convergence. Jean-le-Rond d'Alembert, in the 1750's, advocated for the limit as the underlying notion of the calculus, defining it thus: One magnitude is said to be the limit of another magnitude when the second may approach the first within any given magnitude however small, though the first magnitude
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Symmetry and the Cubic Formula
    SYMMETRY AND THE CUBIC FORMULA DAVID CORWIN The purpose of this talk is to derive the cubic formula. But rather than finding the exact formula, I'm going to prove that there is a cubic formula. The way I'm going to do this uses symmetry in a very elegant way, and it foreshadows Galois theory. Note that this material comes almost entirely from the first chapter of http://homepages.warwick.ac.uk/~masda/MA3D5/Galois.pdf. 1. Deriving the Quadratic Formula Before discussing the cubic formula, I would like to consider the quadratic formula. While I'm expecting you know the quadratic formula already, I'd like to treat this case first in order to motivate what we will do with the cubic formula. Suppose we're solving f(x) = x2 + bx + c = 0: We know this factors as f(x) = (x − α)(x − β) where α; β are some complex numbers, and the problem is to find α; β in terms of b; c. To go the other way around, we can multiply out the expression above to get (x − α)(x − β) = x2 − (α + β)x + αβ; which means that b = −(α + β) and c = αβ. Notice that each of these expressions doesn't change when we interchange α and β. This should be the case, since after all, we labeled the two roots α and β arbitrarily. This means that any expression we get for α should equally be an expression for β. That is, one formula should produce two values. We say there is an ambiguity here; it's ambiguous whether the formula gives us α or β.
    [Show full text]
  • Solving Cubic Polynomials
    Solving Cubic Polynomials 1.1 The general solution to the quadratic equation There are four steps to finding the zeroes of a quadratic polynomial. 1. First divide by the leading term, making the polynomial monic. a 2. Then, given x2 + a x + a , substitute x = y − 1 to obtain an equation without the linear term. 1 0 2 (This is the \depressed" equation.) 3. Solve then for y as a square root. (Remember to use both signs of the square root.) a 4. Once this is done, recover x using the fact that x = y − 1 . 2 For example, let's solve 2x2 + 7x − 15 = 0: First, we divide both sides by 2 to create an equation with leading term equal to one: 7 15 x2 + x − = 0: 2 2 a 7 Then replace x by x = y − 1 = y − to obtain: 2 4 169 y2 = 16 Solve for y: 13 13 y = or − 4 4 Then, solving back for x, we have 3 x = or − 5: 2 This method is equivalent to \completing the square" and is the steps taken in developing the much- memorized quadratic formula. For example, if the original equation is our \high school quadratic" ax2 + bx + c = 0 then the first step creates the equation b c x2 + x + = 0: a a b We then write x = y − and obtain, after simplifying, 2a b2 − 4ac y2 − = 0 4a2 so that p b2 − 4ac y = ± 2a and so p b b2 − 4ac x = − ± : 2a 2a 1 The solutions to this quadratic depend heavily on the value of b2 − 4ac.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Survey of Methods of Solving Cubic Equations Minna Burgess Connor
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Master's Theses Student Research 7-1-1956 A historical survey of methods of solving cubic equations Minna Burgess Connor Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/masters-theses Recommended Citation Connor, Minna Burgess, "A historical survey of methods of solving cubic equations" (1956). Master's Theses. Paper 114. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A HISTORICAL SURVEY OF METHODS OF SOLVING CUBIC E<~UATIONS A Thesis Presented' to the Faculty or the Department of Mathematics University of Richmond In Partial Fulfillment ot the Requirements tor the Degree Master of Science by Minna Burgess Connor August 1956 LIBRARY UNIVERStTY OF RICHMOND VIRGlNIA 23173 - . TABLE Olf CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE OUTLINE OF HISTORY INTRODUCTION' I. THE BABYLONIANS l) II. THE GREEKS 16 III. THE HINDUS 32 IV. THE CHINESE, lAPANESE AND 31 ARABS v. THE RENAISSANCE 47 VI. THE SEVEW.l'EEl'iTH AND S6 EIGHTEENTH CENTURIES VII. THE NINETEENTH AND 70 TWENTIETH C:BNTURIES VIII• CONCLUSION, BIBLIOGRAPHY 76 AND NOTES OUTLINE OF HISTORY OF SOLUTIONS I. The Babylonians (1800 B. c.) Solutions by use ot. :tables II. The Greeks·. cs·oo ·B.c,. - )00 A~D.) Hippocrates of Chios (~440) Hippias ot Elis (•420) (the quadratrix) Archytas (~400) _ .M~naeobmus J ""375) ,{,conic section~) Archimedes (-240) {conioisections) Nicomedea (-180) (the conchoid) Diophantus ot Alexander (75) (right-angled tr~angle) Pappus (300) · III.
    [Show full text]
  • Analytical Formula for the Roots of the General Complex Cubic Polynomial Ibrahim Baydoun
    Analytical formula for the roots of the general complex cubic polynomial Ibrahim Baydoun To cite this version: Ibrahim Baydoun. Analytical formula for the roots of the general complex cubic polynomial. 2018. hal-01237234v2 HAL Id: hal-01237234 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01237234v2 Preprint submitted on 17 Jan 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Analytical formula for the roots of the general complex cubic polynomial Ibrahim Baydoun1 1ESPCI ParisTech, PSL Research University, CNRS, Univ Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cit´e, Institut Langevin, 1 rue Jussieu, F-75005, Paris, France January 17, 2018 Abstract We present a new method to calculate analytically the roots of the general complex polynomial of degree three. This method is based on the approach of appropriated changes of variable involving an arbitrary parameter. The advantage of this method is to calculate the roots of the cubic polynomial as uniform formula using the standard convention of the square and cubic roots. In contrast, the reference methods for this problem, as Cardan-Tartaglia and Lagrange, give the roots of the cubic polynomial as expressions with case distinctions which are incorrect using the standar convention.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Equation-Solving: Linear, Quadratic, and Cubic
    California State University, San Bernardino CSUSB ScholarWorks Theses Digitization Project John M. Pfau Library 2006 The evolution of equation-solving: Linear, quadratic, and cubic Annabelle Louise Porter Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project Part of the Mathematics Commons Recommended Citation Porter, Annabelle Louise, "The evolution of equation-solving: Linear, quadratic, and cubic" (2006). Theses Digitization Project. 3069. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/etd-project/3069 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the John M. Pfau Library at CSUSB ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses Digitization Project by an authorized administrator of CSUSB ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE EVOLUTION OF EQUATION-SOLVING LINEAR, QUADRATIC, AND CUBIC A Project Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degre Master of Arts in Teaching: Mathematics by Annabelle Louise Porter June 2006 THE EVOLUTION OF EQUATION-SOLVING: LINEAR, QUADRATIC, AND CUBIC A Project Presented to the Faculty of California State University, San Bernardino by Annabelle Louise Porter June 2006 Approved by: Shawnee McMurran, Committee Chair Date Laura Wallace, Committee Member , (Committee Member Peter Williams, Chair Davida Fischman Department of Mathematics MAT Coordinator Department of Mathematics ABSTRACT Algebra and algebraic thinking have been cornerstones of problem solving in many different cultures over time. Since ancient times, algebra has been used and developed in cultures around the world, and has undergone quite a bit of transformation. This paper is intended as a professional developmental tool to help secondary algebra teachers understand the concepts underlying the algorithms we use, how these algorithms developed, and why they work.
    [Show full text]
  • How Cubic Equations (And Not Quadratic) Led to Complex Numbers
    How Cubic Equations (and Not Quadratic) Led to Complex Numbers J. B. Thoo Yuba College 2013 AMATYC Conference, Anaheim, California This presentation was produced usingLATEX with C. Campani’s BeamerLATEX class and saved as a PDF file: <http://bitbucket.org/rivanvx/beamer>. See Norm Matloff’s web page <http://heather.cs.ucdavis.edu/~matloff/beamer.html> for a quick tutorial. Disclaimer: Our slides here won’t show off what Beamer can do. Sorry. :-) Are you sitting in the right room? This talk is about the solution of the general cubic equation, and how the solution of the general cubic equation led mathematicians to study complex numbers seriously. This, in turn, encouraged mathematicians to forge ahead in algebra to arrive at the modern theory of groups and rings. Hence, the solution of the general cubic equation marks a watershed in the history of algebra. We shall spend a fair amount of time on Cardano’s solution of the general cubic equation as it appears in his seminal work, Ars magna (The Great Art). Outline of the talk Motivation: square roots of negative numbers The quadratic formula: long known The cubic formula: what is it? Brief history of the solution of the cubic equation Examples from Cardano’s Ars magna Bombelli’s famous example Brief history of complex numbers The fundamental theorem of algebra References Girolamo Cardano, The Rules of Algebra (Ars Magna), translated by T. Richard Witmer, Dover Publications, Inc. (1968). Roger Cooke, The History of Mathematics: A Brief Course, second edition, Wiley Interscience (2005). Victor J. Katz, A History of Mathematics: An Introduction, third edition, Addison-Wesley (2009).
    [Show full text]
  • History of Mathematics Mathematical Topic Ix Cubic Equations and Quartic Equations
    HISTORY OF MATHEMATICS MATHEMATICAL TOPIC IX CUBIC EQUATIONS AND QUARTIC EQUATIONS PAUL L. BAILEY 1. The Story Various solutions for solving quadratic equations ax2 + bx + c = 0 have been around since the time of the Babylonians. A few methods for attacking special forms of the cubic equation ax3 +bx2 +cx+d = 0 had been investigated prior to the discovery and development of a general solution to such equations, beginning in the fifteenth century and continuing into the sixteenth century, A.D. This story is filled with bizarre characters and plots twists, which is now outlined before describing the method of solution. The biographical material here was lifted wholesale from the MacTutor History of Mathematics website, and then editted. Other material has been derived from Dunham’s Journey through Genius. 1.1. Types of Cubics. Zero and negative numbers were not used in fifteenth cen- tury Europe. Thus, cubic equations were viewed to be in different types, depending on the degrees of the terms and there placement with respect to the equal sign. • x3 + mx = n “cube plus cosa equals number” • x3 + mx2 = n “cube plus squares equals number” • x3 = mx + n “cube equals cosa plus number” • x3 = mx2 + n “cube equals squares plus number” Mathematical discoveries at this time were kept secret, to be used in public “de- bates” and “contests”. For example, the method of depressing a cubic (eliminating the square term by a linear change of variable) was discovered independently by several people. The more difficult problem of solving the depressed cubic remained elusive. 1.2. Luca Pacioli.
    [Show full text]
  • Solving the Cubic Equation
    Solving the Cubic Equation Problems from the History of Mathematics Lecture 9 | February 21, 2018 Brown University A Brief History of Cubic Equations The study of cubic equations can be traced back to the ancient Egyptians and Greeks. This is easily seen in Greece and appears in their attempts to duplicate the cube and trisect arbitrary angles. As reported by Eratosthenes, Hippocrates of Chios (c. 430 BC) reduced duplicating the cube to a problem in mean proportionals: a : b = b : c = c : 2a: This idea would later inspire Menaechmus' work (c. 350 BC) in conics. The Greeks were aware of methods to solve certain cubic equations using intersecting conics,1 but did not consider general cubic equations because their framework was too influenced by geometry. 1One solution is due to Apollonius (c. 250-175 BC) and uses a hypoerbola. 1 A Brief History of Cubic Equations The Greek method of intersecting conics was completed by Islamic mathematicians. For example, Omar Khayyam (1048-1131) gave 1. examples of cubic equations with more than one solution 2. a conjecture that cubics could not be solved with ruler and compass 3. geometric solutions to all forms of cubics using intersecting conics While the techniques were geometric, the motivation was numeric: the goal in mind was to numerically approximate the roots of cubics.2 These ideas were taken back to Europe by Fibonacci. In one example, Fibonacci computed the positive solution to x3 + 2x2 + 10x = 20 to 8 decimal places (although he gives his solution in sexagesimal). 2Work done resembles Ruffini’s method. 2 Cubics in Renaissance Italy Cubics in Renaissance Italy The first real step towards the full algebraic solution of the cubic came from an Italian mathematician named Scipione del Ferro (1465-1526), who solved the depressed cubic3 x3 + px = q: Scipione del Ferro kept his method secret until right before his death.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of Complex Numbers
    A Short History of Complex Numbers Orlando Merino University of Rhode Island January, 2006 Abstract This is a compilation of historical information from various sources, about the number i = √ 1. The information has been put together for students of Complex Analysis who − are curious about the origins of the subject, since most books on Complex Variables have no historical information (one exception is Visual Complex Analysis, by T. Needham). A fact that is surprising to many (at least to me!) is that complex numbers arose from the need to solve cubic equations, and not (as it is commonly believed) quadratic equations. These notes track the development of complex numbers in history, and give evidence that supports the above statement. 1. Al-Khwarizmi (780-850) in his Algebra has solution to quadratic equations of various types. Solutions agree with is learned today at school, restricted to positive solutions [9] Proofs are geometric based. Sources seem to be greek and hindu mathematics. According to G. J. Toomer, quoted by Van der Waerden, Under the caliph al-Ma’mun (reigned 813-833) al-Khwarizmi became a member of the “House of Wisdom” (Dar al-Hikma), a kind of academy of scientists set up at Baghdad, probably by Caliph Harun al-Rashid, but owing its preeminence to the interest of al-Ma’mun, a great patron of learning and scientific investigation. It was for al-Ma’mun that Al-Khwarizmi composed his astronomical treatise, and his Algebra also is dedicated to that ruler 2. The methods of algebra known to the arabs were introduced in Italy by the Latin transla- tion of the algebra of al-Khwarizmi by Gerard of Cremona (1114-1187), and by the work of Leonardo da Pisa (Fibonacci)(1170-1250).
    [Show full text]
  • Cubic Polynomials with Real Or Complex Coefficients: the Full
    Cubic polynomials with real or complex coefficients: The full picture Nicholas S. Bardell RMIT University [email protected] Introduction he cubic polynomial with real coefficients y = ax3 + bx2 + cx + d in which Ta | 0, has a rich and interesting history primarily associated with the endeavours of great mathematicians like del Ferro, Tartaglia, Cardano or Vieta who sought a solution for the roots (Katz, 1998; see Chapter 12.3: The Solution of the Cubic Equation). Suffice it to say that since the times of renaissance mathematics in Italy various techniques have been developed which yield the three roots of a general cubic equation. A ‘cubic formula’ does exist—much like the one for finding the two roots of a quadratic equation—but in the case of the cubic equation the formula is not easily memorised and the solution steps can get quite involved (Abramowitz & Stegun, 1970; see Chapter 3: Elementary Analytical Methods, 3.8.2 Solution of Cubic Equations). Hence it is not surprising that with the advent of the digital computer, numerical root- finding algorithms such as those attributed to Newton-Raphson, Halley, and Householder have become the solution of choice (Weisstein, n.d.). Students studying a mathematics specialism as a part of the Victorian VCE (Mathematical Methods, 2010), HSC in NSW (Mathematics Extension in NSW, 1997) or Queensland QCE (Mathematics C, 2009) are expected to be able Australian Senior Mathematics Journal vol. 30 no. 2 to recognise, plot, factorise, and even solve cubic polynomials as described by ACARA (ACARA, n.d., Unit 1, Topic 1: Functions and Graphs).
    [Show full text]
  • An Episode of the Story of the Cubic Equation: the Del Ferro-Tartaglia-Cardano’S Formulas
    An Episode of the Story of the Cubic Equation: The del Ferro-Tartaglia-Cardano’s Formulas José N. Contreras, Ph.D. † Abstra ct In this paper, I discuss the contributions of del Ferro, Tartaglia, and Cardano in the development of algebra, specifically determining the formula to solve cubic equations in one variable. To contextualize their contributions, brief biographical sketches are included. A brief discussion of the influence of Ars Magna , Cardano’s masterpiece, in the development of algebra is also included. Introduction Our mathematical story takes place in the Renaissance era, specifically in sixteenth-century Italy. The Renaissance was a period of cultural, scientific, technology, and intellectual accomplishments. Vesalius’s On the Structure of the Human Body revolutionized the field of human anatomy while Copernicus’ On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres transformed drastically astronomy; both texts were published in 1543. Soon after the publication of these two influential scientific treatises, a breakthrough in mathematics was unveiled in a book on algebra whose author, Girolamo Cardano (1501-1576), exemplifies the common notion of Renaissance man. As a universal scholar, Cardano was a physician, mathematician, natural philosopher, astrologer, and interpreter of dreams. Cardano’s book, Ars Magna ( The Great Art ), was published in 1545. As soon as Ars Magna appeared in print, the algebraist Niccolo Fontana (1499- 1557), better known as Tartaglia – the stammerer– was outraged and furiously accused the author of deceit, treachery, and violation of an oath sworn on the Sacred Gospels. The attacks and counterattacks set the stage for a fierce battle between the two mathematicians. What does Ars Magna contain that triggered one of the greatest feuds in the history of mathematics? (Helman, 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • ON the CASUS IRREDUCIBILIS of SOLVING the CUBIC EQUATION Jay Villanueva Florida Memorial University Miami, FL 33055 Jvillanu@Fmu
    ON THE CASUS IRREDUCIBILIS OF SOLVING THE CUBIC EQUATION Jay Villanueva Florida Memorial University Miami, FL 33055 [email protected] I. Introduction II. Cardan’s formulas A. 1 real, 2 complex roots B. Multiple roots C. 3 real roots – the casus irreducibilis III. Examples IV. Significance V. Conclusion ******* I. Introduction We often need to solve equations as teachers and researchers in mathematics. The linear and quadratic equations are easy. There are formulas for the cubic and quartic equations, though less familiar. There are no general methods to solve the quintic and other higher order equations. When we deal with the cubic equation one surprising result is that often we have to express the roots of the equation in terms of complex numbers although the roots are real. For example, the equation – 4 = 0 has all roots real, yet when we use the formula we get . This root is really 4, for, as Bombelli noted in 1550, and , and therefore This is one example of the casus irreducibilis on solving the cubic equation with three real roots. 205 II. Cardan’s formulas The quadratic equation with real coefficients, has the solutions (1) . The discriminant < 0, two complex roots (2) ∆ real double root > 0, two real roots. The (monic) cubic equation can be reduced by the transformation to the form where (3) Using the abbreviations (4) and , we get Cardans’ formulas (1545): (5) The complete solutions of the cubic are: (6) The roots are characterized by the discriminant (7) < 0, one real, two complex roots = 0, multiple roots > 0, three real roots.
    [Show full text]