The Confederacy Forfeited Control of the Nashville, Tenn., Depot in Early
downfall,” stated Ramsdell’s pioneering July 1917 article in The American Historical Review, “yet it is impossible not to conclude that the solution of that problem was one of the important conditions of success.” Ramsdell’s piece inspired no other scholar to produce a full-scale treatment of the subject, and in 1939 Douglas Southall Freeman’s The South to Posterity: An Introduction to the Writing of Confederate History listed “a study of the Southern Lost Locomotion: The Confederacy forfeited railroads” as one of the topics deserving control of the Nashville, Tenn., depot in attention. early 1862, along with supplies and rolling stock. Robert C. Black III’s The Railroads of the Confederacy filled the glaring gap in the By Gary W. Gallagher literature. Published by the University of JUNE 2019 • CIVIL WAR TIMES North Carolina Press in 1952, and reprinted MAGAZINE in paperback in 1998, it remains, after more than 65 years, a superior overview that has The Confederacy failed to take advantage been augmented but never superseded. of railroad technology Modern readers will find a few anachronistic elements of the book. For example, Black On April 12, 1864, Robert E. Lee implored subscribed in significant measure to Frank L. Secretary of War James A. Seddon to Owsley’s thesis in State Rights in the address the management of railroads in the Confederacy (1925); namely, that John C. Confederacy. Problems of supply plagued Calhoun’s “glorification of the individual the Army of Northern Virginia, and Lee state” carried over into the war and proved wanted all obstacles to deliveries removed.
[Show full text]