TOWN OF HARDISTY
AGENDA
December 10, 2019
The Regular Council meeting for the Town of Hardisty will be held on December 10, 2019 in the Council Chambers, Municipal Office, Hardisty, Alberta, commencing at 7:00 PM.
Page
1 CALL TO ORDER & RELATED BUSINESS 1.1 Call to Order
1.2 Adoption of Consent Agenda
a) Minutes 7 - 13 Regular Council Meeting - November 19th, 2019 Minutes Regular Council - 19 Nov 2019 - Minutes - Pdf
b) Reports 14 - 17 Councillor Gaetzman Hardisty Library Board - Oct 29 2019 Minutes Hardisty Library Board - Oct 29 2019 Minutes 18 - 22 Deputy Mayor Lane (DRAFT) FRSWMA - Nov 25, 2019 Organizational Meeting Minutes (Draft) Nov 25, 2019 FRSWMA Regular Board Meeting Minutes 2020 FRSWMA Board - Oct 2019 (DRAFT) FRSWMA - Nov 25, 2019 Organizational Meeting Minutes (Draft) Nov 25, 2019 FRSWMA Regular Board Meeting Minutes 2020 FRSWMA Board - Oct 2019 23 - 25 CAO Otto Notes from the Regional CAO Meeting- November 29 2019
Page 1 of 214
Notes from the Regional CAO Meeting-November 29 2019
c) Financial Reports 26 - 39 Operating & Capital Budget as at October 31 2019 Financial Position Statement as at October 31 2019 October Budget 2019 OCTOBER FINANCIAL
d) Correspondence 40 - 41 Alberta Health - Red Deer Regional Hospital Centre Alberta Health - Red Deer Regional Hospital Centre 42 - 43 BRSD Board Highlights - November 2019 BRSD Board Highlights - November 2019 44 Flagstaff County re Flagstaff Regional Solid Waste Management Association (FRSWMA) - Curbside Pick up and 2020 Proposed Budget Flagstaff County re Flagstaff Regional Solid Waste Management Association (FRSWMA) - Curbside Pick up and 2020 Proposed Budget 45 - 46 Flagstaff County re Minister of Municipal Affairs - Voluntary Amalgamation of Flagstaff Municipalities Flagstaff County re Minister of Municipal Affairs - Voluntary Amalgamation of Flagstaff Municipalities 47 - 48 Flagstaff County re Towns and Villages - Voluntary Amalgamation of Flagstaff Municipalities Flagstaff County re Towns and Villages - Voluntary Amalgamation of Flagstaff Municipalities 49 TOH re FIP Committee Recommendation to Eliminate FIP and Split Up Responsibilities - Decision TOH re FIP Committee Recommendation to Eliminate FIP and Split Up Responsibilities - Decision 50 TOH re Proposed FRSWMA 2020 Budget TOH re Proposed FRSWMA 2020 Budget 51 TOH re Proposed FRSWMA Alternative Curbside Collection System TOH re Proposed FRSWMA Alternative Curbside Collection System 52 Town of Daysland re Extension of Fire Services Agreement and Regional Fire Chief Agreement Approval Town of Daysland re Extension of Fire Services Agreement and Regional Fire Chief Agreement
Page 2 of 214
Approval 53 Town of Daysland re Letter to Flagstaff County - Amalgamation of Flagstaff Communities to MA Town of Daysland re Letter to Flagstaff County - Amalgamation of Flagstaff Communities to MA 54 Town of Daysland re Response to 2020 FRSWMA Budget & Alternative Curbside Pick-Up Town of Daysland re Response to 2020 FRSWMA Budget & Alternative Curbside Pick-Up 55 Town of Killam re Flagstaff FCS 2020 Budget Town of Killam re Flagstaff FCS 2020 Budget 56 Town of Killam re Flagstaff Waste 2020 Budget Town of Killam re Flagstaff Waste 2020 Budget 57 Village of Heisler-Approval Letter to FRSWM re Curotto Can Village of Heisler-Approval Letter to FRSWM re Curotto Can 58 Village of Lougheed re FRSWMA 2020 Budget Approval Village of Lougheed re FRSWMA 2020 Budget Approval
1.3 Adoption of Regular Agenda
2 ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION & RELATED BUSINESS 2.1 Public Hearings
2.2 Presentations (Delegations)
2.3 Requests for Decision
59 - 76 a) RFD 19-12-088 Flagstaff Family and Community Services 2020 Budget RFD 19-12-088 Flagstaff Family and Community Services 2020 Budget RFD 19-12-088 (info#1) Letter of Request for Approval of 2020 Budget for FFCS RFD 19-12-088 (info#2) Proposed 2020 FFCS Budget RFD 19-12-088 (info#3) FCSS Alberta Fact Sheet & FFCS Program Info 77 - 90 b) RFD 19-12-089 Flagstaff Regional Solid Waste Management Association 2020 Budget (v2) RFD 19-12-089 FRSWMA 2020 Budget (v2)
Page 3 of 214
RFD 19-12-089 (info#1) E-mail from FRSWMA re Board Motion for Approval of the Draft Budget 2020(v2) RFD 19-12-089(info#2) FRSWMA Draft 2020 Budget (v2) Request for Approval 91 - 92 c) RFD 19-12-090 Extension of Fire Services Agreement to Flagstaff County– 1 yr. RFD 19-12-090 Extension of Flagstaff County Fire Services Agreement to December 31, 2020 93 - 100 d) RFD 19-12-091 Approval of the Hardisty Public Library Board 2020 Budget along with 3 Year Budget 2019-2021 RFD 19-12-091 Hardisty Public Library Board 2020 Budget & 2021 Proposed Budget RFD 19-12-091 (Info #1) Hardisty Public Library 2020 Proposed Budget RFD 19-12-091 (Info #2) HLB - Financials to Nov 15, 2019 (1) RFD 19-12-091 (Info #3) HLB - Financials to Nov 15, 2019 (2) 101 - 105 e) RFD 19-12-092 Request for Donation to the 22nd Annual FIRST Auction & Supper – Feb. 1, 2020 – in Alliance, AB RFD 19-12-092 Request for Donation to the 22nd Annual FIRST Auction & Supper – Feb. 1, 2020 – in Alliance, AB RFD 19-12-092 (Info#1) FIRST Supper and Auction - Invitation & Donation - Sponsorship Request 106 - 109 f) RFD 19-12-093 Flagstaff Regional Housing Group 2020 Requisition RFD 19-12-093 Flagstaff Regional Housing Group - 2020 Lodge Requisition RFD 19-12-093 (info) Flagstaff Regional Housing Group - 2020 Lodge Requisition 110 - 111 g) RFD 19-12-094 Transfer of Funds to Water Resources Reserve – 2019 Boating License Revenue RFD 19-12-094 Transfer Funds to Water Resources Reserve Savings 112 - 113 h) RFD 19-12-095 Request for office closure for Holiday Season (outside of policy) Dec. 24th & 27th RFD 19-12-095 Request for office closure for Holiday Season (outside of policy) Dec. 24th & 27th 114 - 122 i) RFD 19-12-096 Go East Travel Guide – Membership & Advertising for 2020 RFD 19-12-096 Go East Travel Guide – Membership & Advertising for 2020
Page 4 of 214
RFD 19-12-096 (info #1) Go East Municipal Membership & Benefits RFD 19-12-096 (info #2) Go East RFD 19-12-096 (info #3) Go East RFD 19-12-096 (info #4) Go East RFD 19-12-096 (info #5) Go East 123 - 124 j) RFD 19-12-097 Request for Public Lane Way Closure & Purchase RFD 19-12-097 (info#1) E-mail request from Trimac Energy Services re request to acquire public laneway RFD 19-12-097 (info#2) Proposed Public Laneway Acquiring - Trimac Energy Services 125 - 191 k) RFD 19-12-098 Proposed Municipal Requisition for Populations <5000 for Police Funding RFD 19-12-098 Proposed Municipal Requisition for Municipalities With Populations Less Than 5000 or Police Funding RFD 19-12-098 (info#1) Provincial Announcement of Police Funding Model RFD 19-12-098 (info#2) Police Funding Example Calculation Sheet RFD 19-12-098 (info#3) Police Costing Model - Municipal Costs by Municipality l) RFD 19-12-099 Interim 2020 Operating Budget Approval 192 - 208 m) RFD 19-12-100 Proposal from MuniSight Ltd. – For a Regional GIS Assessment Study to be funded through the Alberta Community Partnership Grant & Managing Partner Town of Sedgewick RFD 19-12-100 Proposal from MuniSight Ltd. – For a Regional GIS Assessment Study to be funded through the Alberta Community Partnership Grant & Managing Partner Town of Sedgewick RFD 19-12-100 (info#1) ACP Proposal 2019-2020 - Flagstaff Regional RFD 19-12-100 (info#2) - MuniSight's Breakout of Town of Hardisty's Portion of a Regional GIS Assessment Study 2.4 Public Question Period
3 REPORTS 3.1 Mayor Irving
209 - 214 a) Meeting with Gibson Energy & USD Developments re
Page 5 of 214
Jt. Venture to Construct DRU Gibson Energy and USD Announce Jt. Venture to Construct DRU 3.2 Deputy Mayor Lane
3.3 Councillor Beringer
3.4 Councillor Gaetzman
3.5 Councillor Wurz
3.6 Chief Administrative Officer
4 CORRESPONDENCE
5 CLOSED SESSION 5.1 Labour
5.2 Legal
5.3 Land
6 ADJOURNMENT
Page 6 of 214 a) Page 1 of 7
Town of Hardisty November 19, 2019 Regular Council
A Regular Council meeting was held in Council Chambers at 7:00 PM on Tuesday, November 19, 2019.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Irving, Deputy Mayor Lane, Councillor Beringer, Councillor Gaetzman, and Councillor Wurz REGRETS:
OTHERS PRESENT: CAO and Recording Sandy Otto
CALL TO ORDER & RELATED BUSINESS:
CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Irving called the meeting to order at 7:03 pm.
ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA:
200/19 MOVED by Councillor Gaetzman THAT Council accept the Consent Agenda as presented. CARRIED
MINUTES: Regular Meeting of Council - October 8th, 2019 Minutes
Special Council Organizational Meeting - October 22nd, 2019 Minutes
Special Council Meeting - October 22nd, 2019 Minutes
REPORTS: Councillor Beringer October 15, 2019 Hall Board Meeting
Councillor Gaetzman 2019 Flagstaff Regional Emergency Services Working Group - October Update Parkland Regional Library Board Meeting Minutes September 12 2019 (DRAFT) Hardisty Library Board Minutes - October 1, 2019
Councillor Wurz September STATS
Page 7 of 214 a) Page 2 of 7 Deputy Mayor Lane FRSWM - Draft Oct 28 2019 regular board meeting minutes
Mayor Irving FRHG-June-25-2019 Minutes FRHG-July-2-2019 Minutes
FINANCIAL REPORTS: September 2019 Budget September 2019 Financial Comments with regard to Operating & Capital - September 2019
CORRESPONDENCE: 2020 ATCO Franchise Fee Letter BRSD Board Highlights - September 2019 BRSD Board Highlights -October 2019 County of Flagstaff re 2019 Flagstaff Intermunicipal Partnership (FIP) - Management Options Flagstaff County re 2019-2020 Boards and Committees List MA Minister re Budget 2019 Letter from Hon. Kaycee Madu PRL Board Talk - September 12 2019 Town of Daysland re Future of FIP(October 30th 2019) Town of Killam Committee List 2019-20 Town of Killam re FIP management and commitment Town of Sedgewick Organizational Meeting - 2019-2020 Committee list Town of Sedgewick re FIP Management & Recommendation to Dissolve FIP Town of Sedgewick re PRL 2020 Budget Approval Village of Alliance re Council Committee Appts. Village of Forestburg re FIP Management - Going Forward Village of Heisler re PRL Budget Approval 2020 Village of Lougheed re Committees Representation 2019-2020 Village of Lougheed re FIP-Recommendations Management WiMacTel Canada Inc - Removal of TELUS Payphone at the Hardisty General Hospital
ADOPTION OF REGULAR AGENDA:
201/19 MOVED by Mayor Irving THAT Council accept (2) additions to the Regular Agenda: RFD 19-11-086 Proposal from Munisight Ltd. for Full Service GIS Software and Membership to the Alberta Municipal Data Sharing Partnership and RFD 19-11-087 Recommendation from the FIP Committee re Elimination of the FIP Committee & Split Up of FIP Responsibilities.
SECONDED by Deputy Mayor Lane
CARRIED Page 8 of 214 a) Page 3 of 7
ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION & RELATED BUSINESS:
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
PRESENTATIONS (DELEGATIONS):
REQUESTS FOR DECISION: RFD 19-11-080 Muniware Software Support Agreement & Software License Agreement for 2020
202/19 MOVED by Councillor Beringer THAT Council approve the new software support agreement in the amount of $954.88 per month ($11,458.56) for 2020 and directs the CAO to sign both the Software Support Agreement & Software License Agreement with Municipal Information Systems Inc. (aka: Muniware) CARRIED RFD 19-11-081 Battle River Community Foundation - Grant Approvals from Designated Funding
203/19 MOVED by Councillor Wurz THAT Council accept as information the following grants that were designated from certain Funds controlled by the Battle River Community Foundation to go towards their designated uses: Hardisty Cemetery for $2,175 designated from the following donors: Darrell and Winnie Goodrich Fund Lou and Charlotte Golka Fund Joe Kost Memorial Fund Hardisty Community Project $400 designated as follows: Hardisty Community Fund Hardisty Fire Dept $150 designated from the following donor: Axel and Isabel Nelson Memorial Fund CARRIED
204/19 MOVED by Councillor Wurz THAT Council directs the CAO to use the funds from the Hardisty Community Fund in the amount of $400 to be used towards the Welcome Sign Project and for funds to be transferred into the sign project reserve. CARRIED
205/19 MOVED by Councillor Wurz THAT Council directs the CAO to use the funds from the BRCF - Axel and Isabel Nelson Memorial Fund in the amount of $150 allocated to go towards the Hardisty Fire and Rescue Dept to be used towards Bunker Gear and new SCBA Masks purchased this year. CARRIED RFD 19-11-082 Flagstaff Regional Solid Waste Management Association 2020 Budget
Page 9 of 214 a) Page 4 of 7
206/19 MOVED by Deputy Mayor Lane THAT Council approve the proposed 2020 budget for Flagstaff Regional Solid Waste Management Association representing a 2.9% increase from 2019 with a requisition from the Town of Hardisty for $94,191.69. DEFEATED
207/19 MOVED by Deputy Mayor Lane THAT Council direct the CAO to advise Flagstaff Regional Solid Waste Management, Board Chair that they desire the Board to revisit the proposed 2020 budget and come back with a 0% requisition increase for member municipalities.
SECONDED by Mayor Irving
CARRIED RFD 19-11-083 Flagstaff Regional Solid Waste Management Urban Curbside Collection Alternative
208/19 MOVED by Mayor Irving THAT Council directs the CAO to advise Flagstaff Waste Management THAT they approve the recommendation by the Board to move towards the delivery of curbside solid waste management for Urban Municipalities through the purchase of roll out bins for ALL residents with street side pick-up via a front end truck mounted with a curotto can. DEFEATED
209/19 MOVED by Mayor Irving THAT Council direct the CAO to advise Flagstaff Regional Solid Waste Management THAT based on the information supplied in the Review of Alternative Collection Systems dated September 20, 2019, they approve the stay at "status quo" option and proceed with budgeting for the purchase of a new "medium duty truck" complete with a new Burro system and continue with the transfer system in place for 2021.
SECONDED by Deputy Mayor Lane
CARRIED RFD 19-00-085 Change of Scope - Stormwater Master Plan
210/19 MOVED by Deputy Mayor Lane THAT Council accept the required change of scope to a staged plan as proposed by Morrison Hershfield within the Town’s boundary and outside it’s boundary and directs the CAO to advise Morrison Hershfield to make the required changes in the Storm Water Master Plan and re-submit this changes to Alberta Environment & Parks for approval. CARRIED
211/19 MOVED by Mayor Irving THAT Council approves the additional cost of $3,922 + GST proposed by Morrison Hershfield to make the required changes and proceed with the approval from Alberta Environment & Parks.
Page 10 of 214 a) Page 5 of 7 CARRIED RFD 19-11-086 Proposal from MuniSight Ltd. - Full Service GIS (Geographical Information System) Software & Membership to the Alberta Municipal Data Sharing Partnership
212/19 MOVED by Councillor Beringer THAT Council directs the CAO to advise MuniSight that the Town of Hardisty will enter into a five (5) contract in the amount of $5545/yr to provide a full service GIS solution which will build up to date maps, asset data and emergency services data into a database which houses infrastructure information, assessment data, asset location, and emergency services information that can be easily shared and quickly accessed in the event of an emergency. CARRIED
213/19 MOVED by Mayor Irving THAT Council directs the CAO to have the Town of Hardisty become a member of the Alberta Municipal Data Sharing Partnership for the annual fee of $35 and make application in January 2020 for a subsidy from AMDSP of approximately $1200 which if awarded would be used to go towards the cost of uploading our information into AMDSP’s system which is used by emergency services providers, AHS, utility companies, school divisions, Statistics Canada, TransCanada Pipelines, Alberta One Call Corporation, RCMP/Peace Officers and more. CARRIED RFD 19-11-087 Recommendation from the FIP Committee re: Elimination of the FIP Committee & Split Up of FIP Responsibilities
214/19 MOVED by Mayor Irving THAT Council directs the CAO to advise the Flagstaff Intermunicipal Partnership (FIP) Chair and current members THAT they do not agree with the recommendation of the FIP Committee to eliminate FIP, split up FIP responsibilities and form an informal structure for elected officials to discuss relevant issues and bring back direction to the CAO's. The Town of Hardisty supports the original intent of the Flagstaff Intermunicipal Partnership Committee and pursuant to their motions made June 11th, 2019 outlining their commitment to working together and taking over the role of Managing Partner still stands and directs the CAO to reach out to the municipalities who have expressed a desire to continue with FIP to come up with a proposed cost for continuing FIP responsibilities and that the Town of Hardisty will supply administrative support as a managing partner based on a cost recovery basis for the services supplied WHEREAS the CAO's are to come up with a proposed rate for these services and how these costs shall be shared which may entail the drafting of a new working agreement or memorandum of understanding. CARRIED
PUBLIC QUESTION PERIOD:
REPORTS:
Page 11 of 214 a) Page 6 of 7
MAYOR IRVING: FIP Fall Forum - Council needs to review the presentation / report and commence discussion in January 2020 on the proposed (10) requests for decision.
Letter from Minister of Service of Alberta re Broadband Internet - Commitment from Service Alberta to work with municipalities, telecommunication providers, and infrastructure owners to find ways to expand high-speed broadband services across the province.
DEPUTY MAYOR LANE:
COUNCILLOR BERINGER:
COUNCILLOR GAETZMAN:
COUNCILLOR WURZ: CAC Meeting - Interim Sargeant Clevland is seeking a letter of support from municipalities to be appointed Sargeant.
FCSS Meeting November 13th, 2019 - Proposed 2020 budget & continuation of Skills Link Program.
CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER: Letter of Opinion from Brownlee LLP re draft Land Use Bylaw
CORRESPONDENCE:
CLOSED SESSION:
215/19 MOVED by Mayor Irving THAT Council move into an "in camera" session at 9:24 pm pursuant to the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act Sec. 16(1)(c-i) and the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Regulation Sec. 18 (1) CARRIED
216/19 MOVED by Mayor Irving THAT Council come out of an "in camera" session at 9:26 pm and to reconvene into an open session o f Council at 9:30 pm. CARRIED
LABOUR:
LEGAL: RFD 19-11-084 Snow Removal Contract Award 2019-2021
217/19 MOVED by Deputy Mayor Lane THAT Council direct the CAO to advise GCS Energy Services Ltd. THAT they approve a renewal of contract for Page 12 of 214 a) Page 7 of 7 snow removal, gravel and oiled road maintenance which expired on September 1, 2019 for an additional period up to September 1, 2021 as per their submission dated October 8th, 2019 based on their hourly rate sheet for labour and equipment. CARRIED
LAND:
ADJOURNMENT: Mayor Irving adjourned the meeting at 9:35 pm
CAO Sandy Otto
CEO Doug Irving
Page 13 of 214 b)
Page 14 of 214 b)
Page 15 of 214 b)
Page 16 of 214 b)
Page 17 of 214 b)
FRSWMA Organizational Meeting Nov 25, 2019 Sterling Room of the County Office, Sedgewick, AB Minutes
1.0) Attendance BOARD MEMBERS: Susan Armer Village of Lougheed Elaine Fossen Village of Forestburg Rick Krys Town of Killam Dean Lane Town of Hardisty Stephen Levy Town of Sedgewick Brandon Martz Village of Heisler Josephine Mackenzie Village of Alliance Janice McTavish Village of Rosalind James Robertson Town of Daysland Howard Shield Flagstaff County STAFF: David Dahl FRSWMA Murray Hampshire FRSWMA
With a quorum in attendance, the meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Executive Director M. Hampshire. He gave a brief overview of the purpose and required outcomes of the organizational meeting.
3.0) Agenda Resolution # 491/2019. Board member J. Robertson moved to accept agenda as presented. CARRIED
4) Appointment of Executive Director M. Hampshire called for nominations for the election of Chair Chair for the following year. Board member J. McTavish nominated member R. Krys. Board member J. Mackenzie called for nominations to cease.
Resolution # 492/2019. There being only one nomination, board member R. Krys was declared Chair for the 2019/2020 year. R. Krys assumed role of Chair for the remainder of the meeting.
5) Appointment of Chair R. Krys called for nominations for the appointment of Vice Chair. Vice Chair Board member J. Robertson nominated board member S. Levy. Chair R. Krys called for further nominations. Board member J. Robertson moved nominations cease.
Resolution # 493/2019. There being only one nomination, board member S. Levy was declared Vice-Chair for the 2019/2020 year.
6) Nomination of Chair R. Krys called for nomination for 3rd position on Management Committee. FRSWMA Board Board member S. Levy nominated board member J. Robertson as the third Management member of the Management committee. Board member S. Levy moved Committee nominations cease.
Resolution #494/2019. Board member S. Levy moved that the Management Committee for 2019/2020 year shall be the Chair, Vice-Chair and board member J. Robertson. CARRIEDPage 18 of 214 b) 7) Appointment of Resolution # 495/2019. Board member S. Armer moved that Executive Director Signing Authority M. Hampshire, Chair R. Krys, board member S. Levy and board member E. Fossen act as the signing authorities for FRSWMA for the 2019/2020 year. For checks and online banking, any two of the four signatures are required. CARRIED. 8) Appointment of Chair R. Krys called for the appointment of Auditor. Auditor Resolution #496/2019 Board member H. Shield made a motion to appoint the Audit firm of Gitzel & Company to conduct the 2018 financial audit at the bid price of $9,500 + Alberta CPI. CARRIED
9) Correspondence Resolution #497/2019. Board member J. Mackenzie moved that we accept the & Information information package presented as inclusions for information in the meeting materials. CARRIED
Adjournment Chair R. Krys adjourned the meeting @ 7:10 p.m.
______Chair Manager
Page 19 of 214 b)
FRSWMA Regular Monthly Board Meeting Nov 25, 2019 Sterling Room of the County Office, Sedgewick, AB Minutes 1.0) Attendance DIRECTORS: Susan Armer Village of Lougheed Elaine Fossen Village of Forestburg Rick Krys Town of Killam Dean Lane Town of Hardisty Stephen Levy Town of Sedgewick Brandon Martz Village of Heisler Josephine Mackenzie Village of Alliance Janice McTavish Village of Rosalind James Robertson Town of Daysland Howard Shield Flagstaff County STAFF: David Dahl FRSWMA Murray Hampshire FRSWMA
2.0) Call to Order Chair R. Krys called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m.
3.0) Agenda Agenda was reviewed.
Resolution # 498/2019. Board member E. Fossen moved to accept agenda as amended. CARRIED
4.0) Adoption of 4.a) Minutes of the Oct 28, 2019 regular meeting were reviewed. Minutes Resolution # 499/2019. Board member S. Levy moved to approve the minutes of the Oct 28, 2019 regular meeting, attached to and forming part of these minutes. CARRIED
5.0) Reports 5.1) Operations update: Executive Director M. Hampshire provided operations update attached to and forming part of these minutes.
Resolution # 500/2019. Board member S. Armer moved that the board accept Operations Report as presented. CARRIED
5.2) Financial reports: Executive Director M. Hampshire provided Oct 31, 2019 Profit & Loss Statement and Nov 21, 2019 Cash Position.
Resolution # 501/2019. Board member J. Mackenzie moved that the board accept Profit & Loss statements and Cash Position report as presented. CARRIED
Page 20 of 214 b)
6.0) Business 6.1) Curbside Collection Review. Executive Director M. Hampshire provided results of the proposal recommended to member councils for review. To date we have received two letters of support, five letters of rejection and 3 responses still pending. Lively discussion ensued with key points of resistance being impacts on roadways and lack of support for increasing costs at this time.
Resolution # 502/2019. Board member E. Fossen moved that Flagstaff Waste provide a detailed comparison of the Curotto Can option and the Status Quo Burro option next year when budgets are being prepared for the burro replacement in 2020. It is important to calculate the OH&S implications and recognize that the next replacement locks us into a program for at least 5 years. CARRIED
6.2) 2020 Draft Budget. Executive Director M. Hampshire reviewed 2020 Draft operations budget in detail. To date we have received three letters of support, 5 letters of rejection and 3 response pending. Discussion revolved around the small surplus contained in the first draft budget, and the municipal financial uncertainty at this time. A recommendation to consider zero increase in requisition was suggested.
Executive Director M. Hampshire introduced a second draft of the 2020 Budget (Version 2), which information was circulated at the meeting.
Resolution # 503/2019. Board member S. Levy moved to recommend the proposed Draft 2020 Operating Budget (Ver.2) with a total municipal requisition of $1,253,550 (with zero increase over 2019) to all FRSWMA members for approval. CARRIED 6.3) Staff Christmas Bonus. Board members discussed the annual Christmas gift for staff and acknowledged the strong financial position of Flagstaff Waste due to the extra efforts exhibited by staff in all aspects of the operation.
Resolution # 504/2019. Board member J. Robertson moved to provide a Christmas gift card of $250 for all permanent staff and $100 for all casual staff as a Christmas Bonus recognizing and excellent year by staff. Noted vote of 2 opposed and 8 in favor. CARRIED 7.0) Correspondence Resolution # 505/2019. Board member J. Mackenzie moved that we accept the Fleet Age Calculation, and various correspondence letter from members, attached to and forming part of these minutes as information for the Board. CARRIED
8.0) Resolution #506/2019. Board Chair R. Krys moved to adjourn the meeting at 8:55 Adjournment
______Chair Manager
Next Meeting – January 27, 2020 – 6:00 p.m. working supper with strategic planning exercise to follow immediately after. Page 21 of 214 b)
Board Roster - 2020 FRSWMA Board Members confrmd Name Representing Email Address Home Phone Mobile Phone Elaine Fossen Village of Forestburg [email protected] (780) 242-3527 (780) 242-3527 Rick Krys Town of Killam [email protected] (780) 385-3993 (780) 385-8078 Dean Lane Town of Hardisty [email protected] (780) 888-3939 (780) 888-5000 Stephen Levy Town of Sedgewick [email protected] (587) 218-0240 Josephine Mackenzie Village of Alliance [email protected] (867) 445-1945 Brandon Martz Village of Heisler bmartz@village of heisler.ca Janice McTavish Village of Rosalind [email protected] (780) 375-3931 (780) 781-0816 James Robertson Town of Daysland [email protected] (780) 679-5586 Howard Shield Flagstaff County [email protected] (780) 374-2496 (780) 781-0046 Susan Armer Village of Lougheed [email protected] (780) 888-2642 (780) 888-7288
Alternates Dwayne Giroux Village of Forestburg [email protected] (780) 385-1937 Jeanette Herle Flagstaff County [email protected] (780) 583-2109 (780) 385-8946 Jon Williams Village of Heisler [email protected] Murray Candlish Town of Daysland [email protected] Tim Schmutz Town of Sedgewick [email protected] Town of Hardisty Deb Smith Village of Lougheed [email protected] (780) 386-3930 (780) 384-2215 Dell Wickstrom Village of Alliance
Chair Vice Chair Executive Page 22 of 214 b)
CAO Meeting Notes – November 29, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. Held at Town of Hardisty Administration Building Attendance Sandy Otto Town of Hardisty Debra Moffatt Village of Forestburg Carmen Frank Village of Alliance Rod Krips Town of Daysland Brent Hoyland Flagstaff County Karen O’Connor Village of Lougheed Jim Fedyk Town of Sedgewick Absent Kim Borgel Town of Killam Heidi Rohe Village of Heisler
1. Approval of Agenda – a) Additions – ACP Grant for Regional GIS Assessment Study Extension of Fire Agreements 2. Meeting Notes – No comments 3. a) SustainErgy Scoping Audit Peter Hart of SustainErgy attended to present the MCCAC program for recreation centres • Energy assessment done of the facility assists with identifying needed upgrades and energy savings • Report is covered by MCCAC grant o 50% for the report, 50% for implementation o If the municipality does not implement recommended changes, SustainErgy will waive the remaining 50% of the cost o Projects must be over $10,000 in order to get the rebate • Program runs until the end of 2021 • SustainErgy will prepare the grant application for the report • If upgrades are planned an engineer report is done, which is funded through the same formula • Further information is available on the MCCAC website Energy Efficiency APP • SustainErgy is developing an energy efficiency APP and will be putting in a bid for the Digital Innovation In Clean Energy (DICE) program, which is an Alberta Innovates program • They will conduct a municipal greenhouse gas audit free of charge • They are developing the APP in an effort to eliminate consulting fees • The APP is free of charge
Page 23 of 214 b)
• They are requesting a letter of support for them for the DICE program by December 18, 2019 b) Regional Amalgamation • Discussion was held regarding concerns with the Detailed Operation and Transition Report which was presented at the Regional Forum on November 4, 2019 • Some had concerns with the potential savings in year 1 and 2 – felt the numbers were exaggerated c) Future Management of FIP • The Town of Hardisty has renewed their offer to act as the managing partner for FIP by way of providing administrative services. • A motion is required from each Council accepting them as the managing partner effective January 1, 2020. d) Disposition of FIP Excess Funds • D. Moffatt will finalize the 2019 year end for FIP and close the bank account, all excess funds will be paid back to the partners based on the 2019 requisition formula e) ACP Grant for Regional GIS Assessment Study • MuniSight has recommended that we apply for an ACP grant to do a regional GIS assessment study. • This study is not for the GIS mapping system we have contracted for, but is for the development of the policies required for an assessment management program. The information provided in the GIS Assessment Study will enhance our mapping system and provide with the program as required by the federal government. • They are requesting that the following motion be approved by each participating Council: Be it resolved that Council direct Administration to apply for a grant opportunity with the Town of Sedgewick, Town of Hardisty, Town of Killam, Village of Forestburg, Village of Alliance, Village of Heisler and Village of Lougheed, from the Alberta Municipal Affairs Alberta Community Partnership (ACP) program through the Intermunicipal Collaboration Stream for the Regional GIS and Asset Management project and that the (insert your municipal name) commit to conducting the following activities in its proposed project to advance regional service delivery with the following two activities: - Regional GIS Assessment Study to identify regional service delivery gaps - Implementation of Asset Management Program
f) Fire Services Agreement and Regional Fire Chief Agreement • These agreements will expire on December 31, 2019. • As the creation of the Regional Fire Services Society has been delayed, Flagstaff County is requesting that Councils approve a motion extending the Fire Services Agreement and Regional Fire Chief Agreement to December 31, 2020.
Page 24 of 214 b)
Other Issues: • Regional Safety Program o The Town of Sedgewick was paid a visit by an OH&S officer and no written orders were received. o S. Otto reported that a proposal will be coming in January to move forward with the regional safety program. o The Town of Daysland indicated they would be interested in participating in the regional safety program in 2020. • Lead testing in residential properties o A short discussion was held on how we would be handling the testing of lead in the water in residential properties Next Meeting – no meeting planned at this time
Adjourn – 11:45 a.m.
Page 25 of 214 c)
Page 26 of 214 c)
Page 27 of 214 c)
Page 28 of 214 c)
Page 29 of 214 c)
Page 30 of 214 c)
Page 31 of 214 c)
Page 32 of 214 c)
Page 33 of 214 c)
Page 34 of 214 c)
Page 35 of 214 c)
Page 36 of 214 c)
Page 37 of 214 c)
Page 38 of 214 c)
Town of Hardisty - Financial Position As of October 31, 2019
31-Jul 31-Aug 30-Sep 31-Oct Closing Closing Closing Closing Cash $1,783,575.55 $1,633,824.49 $1,174,007.45 $982,885.91
RECEIVABLES Property Tax Receivable $95,293.37 $69,297.17 $49,148.36 $31,469.36 Utility Receivable $59,399.81 $63,715.16 $60,285.35 $54,892.93 Trade Accounts Receivable $63,051.74 $10,645.94 $48,377.64 $11,644.58
Grant(s) Receivable $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 GST Receivable $8,843.79 $0.00 $37,559.82 $37,559.82 Total of all Receivables $226,588.71 $143,658.27 $195,371.17 $135,566.69
LOANS & PAYABLES
Trade Accounts Payable $1,729.24 $1,730.71 $1,923.06 $5,456.47 Other Payables $3,924.21 $3,441.33 $3,454.34 $145.00 Total Short Term Liabilities $5,653.45 $5,172.04 $5,377.40 $5,601.47
Loans: ACFA - #3100004 $69,013.85 $69,013.85 $60,447.74 $60,447.74 Total o/s to ACFA $69,013.85 $69,013.85 $60,447.74 $60,447.74
RESERVE HOLDINGS Deferred Revenue Holdings Arena Retro Fit Project $52,056.94 $52,069.19 $52,081.06 $52,093.35 Community Hall $9,513.95 $9,534.15 $9,553.74 $9,574.03 Water Resources $9,608.94 $9,616.57 $9,623.97 $9,631.63 Recreation $30,724.62 $30,784.64 $30,842.84 $30,903.09 Land Development $123,788.55 $124,011.86 $124,228.39 $124,452.56 Public Works - Mobile equip $30,090.95 $30,149.73 $30,206.73 $30,265.74 Cemetery $50,392.56 $15,089.77 $15,089.99 $15,090.22 Water Reserve "Water for Life" $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 Water/Wastewater $738,344.83 $739,787.13 $741,185.63 $742,633.48 Emergency Preparedness $25,855.53 $25,894.20 $25,931.70 $25,970.53 Joint Emergency Preparedness $13,709.59 $13,709.59 $13,709.59 $13,709.59 Total Holdings $1,084,536.46 $1,051,096.83 $1,052,903.64 $1,054,774.22
Page 39 of 214 >2 3&8 zo Im. < ._.:max<0: En OE. uo Ell d) Page 41 of 214 d) Board of Trustees Battle River School Division BRSD looking to the future At their first Board meeting since becoming aware of fund- ing realities created by this year’s lower enrollment and complicated by both insurance increases and funding chang- es announced in the Provincial Budget on October 24, BRSD Trustees spent much of their time on November 28 getting a grasp on the issues and discussing next steps. Assistant Superintendent, Business Imogene Walsh outlined Every Student, Every Day, A Success. some of the more difficult realities facing the school division, reviewing the impact of declining student numbers, rising costs and other issues. The Board of Trustees She reminded Board members of the decline in revenue caused by a lower Board Chair: Norm Erickson enrollment, as well as the additional deficit created by the government’s decision to re-allocate some grant dollars. The school division anticipated an Vice Chair: Karen Belich enrollment drop and had already planned for a 1% reduction in grants this Beaver County East: Lyle Albrecht school year, but a greater drop than expected, along with other changes, has West: Zsuzsanna Hemperger created the need for additional spending adjustments within this school year. Camrose County The BRSD Facilities budget continues to be very stretched. A significant por- North: Karen Belich tion of the budget is used to cover items the division can’t control, such as South: Kendall Severson the cost of utilities and insurance. Building insurance has increased 274% this Flagstaff County year and vehicle insurance rates may change as well. In addition, a five-year East: Laurie Skori plan for roofing repairs at existing buildings outlines the need for significant West: Jeff Kimball work. The average cost of a roof repair is about $300,000. The Facilities City of Camrose department has recently reduced staff, in order to cut spending. Norm Erickson Val Sims Mrs. Walsh also outlined how lower enrollment has impacted the utilization rates of schools. Lower building utilization makes it less likely the provincial Administration government will provide capital support for a school in need of substantial Superintendent: repair. Rita Marler Mrs. Walsh spoke about the ongoing need to replace a portion of the school Assistant Supt, Learning: bus fleet, as some of the division’s 117 buses reach the end of their lifespan. Shan Jorgenson-Adam There are 13 school buses that are 15 years old this year and, as Mrs. Walsh Assistant Supt, System Supports explained, it’s important to keep the fleet safe and viable. A new school bus Natasha Wilm costs about $110,000. Assistant Supt, Business: In addition, BRSD already knows the entire provincial funding framework for Imogene Walsh schools is under review and it’s possible that further reductions will have to be accommodated starting next year. The Board acknowledged that, based on these realities, “everything” is on the table for the future. A current year budget will be finalized December 12, but discussions and preparations for next year will continue. For more information contact Diane Hutchinson, Director of Communications 5402-48A Avenue, Camrose, Alberta, T4V 0L3 Ph. 780-672-6131 ext. 5248; Cell 780-806-6632; [email protected] 780-672-6131; www.brsd.ab.ca Page 42 of 214 d) Board of Trustees Battle River School Division The Board of Trustees Board Chair: Norm Erickson Vice Chair: Karen Belich Beaver County East: Lyle Albrecht West: Zsuzsanna Hemperger Camrose County North: Karen Belich South: Kendall Severson Flagstaff County Shifting the timetable to create a better experience for students East: Laurie Skori Students from Ecole Camrose Composite High School visited with the BRSD West: Jeff Kimball Board of Trustees on November 28, to talk about the new schedule their school City of Camrose has implemented this year, and how it impacts their learning. Norm Erickson The school has shortened their 80 minute blocks, and created a specific time in Val Sims each day’s timetable for students to either take additional option classes, get Administration additional support from teachers or work on classwork. The overall response has been very positive. Superintendent: Rita Marler BRSD meets the “gold standard” Assistant Supt, Learning: A representative of the audit firm KPMG reviewed the 2018-2019 audited fi- Shan Jorgenson-Adam nancial statements with the BRSD Board of Trustees on November 28 and said the division’s “clean” audit is the “gold standard” all organizations want to Assistant Supt, Systems Support Natasha Wilm achieve. Assistant Supt, Business: Hearing from stakeholders Imogene Walsh The Battle River School Division online public consultation process has generat- ed over 1000 participants and almost 1300 comments. The themes that have emerged during this phase will form the basis of the second round of questions, coming soon! Please watch for additional information. For more information contact Diane Hutchinson, Director of Communications 5402-48A Avenue, Camrose, Alberta, T4V 0L3 Ph. 780-672-6131 ext. 5248; Cell 780-806-6632; [email protected] 780-672-6131; www.brsd.ab.ca Page 43 of 214 d) November 22, 2019 Flagstaff Regional Solid Waste Management Association Box 309 Sedgewick, AB TOB 4C0 Dear Murray: Re: Curbside Pick Up and Proposed 2020 Budget At the November 20, 2019 Flagstaff County Council meeting, Council reviewed and discussed the Urban Curbside Collection Proposal and the 2020 proposed budget. Please be advised that Council did not approve the " Curotto Can" system recommendation put forth by Flagstaff Regional Solid Waste Management due to the negative impact that the heavy- duty truck would have on the streets within the communities of Galahad and Strome. Additionally, Council did not approve the 2020 Budget with Flagstaff County' s total requisition being $ 491, 291. 84. Due to a significant drop in our municipal revenue, Flagstaff County is making cuts to ensure that we keep municipal taxes flat. In the midst of the current financial climate that is impacting most of our region, we do not wish to burden our ratepayers with an increase for 2020. Council encourages Flagstaff Regional Solid Waste Management Association to seek efficiencies from within their organization to maintain a 0% increase in membership fees for 2020. If you have any questions, please advise. You rent Hoyland Assistant Chief Administrative Officer gb c. Flagstaff Waste Member Municipalities FLAGSTAFF COUNTYTY Box 358, Sedgewick, Alberta TOB '4•C0 Phone: ( 780) 384- 4100 Fax: ( 780) 384- 3635 E- mail address: county@flagstaf£ ab. ca Page 44 of 214 d) November 21, 2019 Hon. Kaycee Madu Minister of Municipal Affairs Office of the Minister 132 Legislature Building 10800 97- Ave Edmonton, AB T5K 2B6 Dear Minister Madu: Re: Voluntary Amalgamation of Flagstaff Municipalities Like many rural areas across Western Canada, the Flagstaff region is facing a future that will increasingly be defined by ever- present change, ongoing challenges to longer term rural community sustainability, and the imperative to adapt and reposition to take full advantage of future opportunities. Since 2014, the nine Flagstaff Intermunicipal Partnership ( FIP) communities consisting of Flagstaff County, Town of Daysland, Town of Hardisty, Town of Killam, Town of Sedgewick, Village of Alliance, Village of Forestburg, Village of Heisler and Village of Lougheed have been involved in a fairly comprehensive and ongoing analysis of various governance options aimed at further leveraging intermunicipal collaboration on shared services delivery across the region. We have been exploring the option of moving to a sinc! le- tier government ( amalgamation) - combining all, or some of the nine FIP communities into one ( or more) municipality( ies) within a new regionalized governance structure on a voluntary basis. At the November 20, 2019 Flagstaff County Council meeting, Council reviewed and discussed the Flagstaff Intermunicipal Partnership ( FIP) Transition Plan for Proposed Amalgamation that was prepared by New West Opportunities, which was also provided to your office. The report provides a detailed overview of the efficiencies and opportunities for the Flagstaff region should we decide to voluntarily amalgamate, and a detailed plan for the process of doing so. The municipalities in the Flagstaff region have different municipal taxation levels and different mill rates. This is the result of past decisions in funding municipal programs and services, supporting mandated service levels, and differing assessment bases. Page 1 of 2 FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Box 358, Sedgewick, Alberta TOB 4C0 Phone: ( 780) 384-4100 Fax: ( 780) 384- 3635 E-mail address: couniy@Ilagstaff: ab. ca Page 45 of 214 d) Provincial transitional measures will be required as there is a large difference between existing municipal taxation levels, mill rates and the existing fiscal capacities of the nine municipalities. Transitional assistance will also be required to address identified one- time transitional costs and, most importantly, to ensure transitional fairness and equity. Please be advised that at the November 20, 2019 Council meeting, Council approved to consider amalgamation only if the Province of Alberta agrees to an acceptable financial commitment by March 31, 2020. For the dissolution of the Villages of Galahad and Strome, Flagstaff County was awarded grants in the amount of approximately $ 2. 3 million for the transition; however, additional funding to address ongoing infrastructure and operating issues would have been well - utilized. Flagstaff County is committed to moving forward in the broader interests of regional prosperity and sustainability, which contributes to a rural essence and quality of life for future generations. Thanks for your consideration and we look forward to your response. Yours truly, Don Kroetch, Reeve Flagstaff County gb c. Town of Daysland, Town of Hardisty, Town of Killam, Town of Sedgewick, Village of Alliance, Village of Forestburg, Village of Heisler and Village of Lougheed c. Jackie Lovely, MLA for Camrose Page 2 of 2 Page 46 of 214 d) To: Village of Alliance November 22, 2019 Town of Daysland Village of Forestburg Town of Hardisty Village of Heisler Town of Killam Village of Lougheed Town of Sedgewick Dear Councils: RE: Voluntary Amalgamation of Flagstaff Municipalities Flagstaff County's commitment to exploring the option of moving to a single -tier government has been unwavering since the outset of this extensive undertaking initiated five years ago. We remain steadfast in seeking ways to strengthen regional viability for generations to come. At the same time, we continue to be cognizant of the fiduciary responsibility we have to our residents. Following New West Opportunities' November 4, 2019 presentation on the regional governance initiative, each participating Council was requested to adopt a clear position for the future of this project. Each municipality, including the Town of Sedgewick, was also encouraged to vote in favour of at least one of the options listed within the report. Flagstaff County Council considered an additional option during the November 20, 2019 Flagstaff County Council Meeting, where Council reviewed the Flagstaff Intermunicipal Partnership Operation and Transition Plan for Proposed Amalgamation. After considerable discussion, Council agreed that they " may consider amalgamation only if the Province of Alberta agrees to an acceptable financial commitment by March 31, 2020." As stated in the report: " One of the common issues which typically comes up in most amalgamation work relates to the fact that nobody wants to see their taxes increase or services or service levels reduced as a result of a change in municipal structure or boundaries." The proposed amalgamation plan demonstrates that residential/ farm mill rates across the region will not increase over the historical inflation -adjusted trend line for any ratepayer. In fact, base residential rates will fall significantly for all seven ( 7) participating urban municipalities as regional mill rates are harmonized, again relative to the historical inflation -adjusted trend line. Flagstaff County would not see a tax increase; however, we would anticipate a drop in service level to our ratepayers and not realize the potential residential tax savings that the urban municipalities would receive. Page 1 of 2 FLAGSTAFF COUNTY Box 358, Sedgewick, Alberta TOB 4C0 Phone: ( 780) 384- 4100 Fax: ( 780) 384- 3635 E- mail address: county@flagstaff. ab. ca Page 47 of 214 d) Flagstaff County is also acutely aware of the dissolution process. The Villages of Galahad and Strome both became hamlets under Flagstaff on January 1, 2016, after both municipalities voted overwhelmingly to dissolve. During this process, grant funding was provided to address one-time operating and capital costs and assist with transitional and sustainability- related revenue gaps 1. 1 million for Strome and $ 1. 2 million for Galahad). However, additional funding to address ongoing infrastructure and operating issues would have been well -utilized. This is why we believe the province should provide a commitment of funding for our consideration of amalgamation. The report also identifies that ` residents and ratepayers also expressed the view that — after almost five ( 5) years of review and study — the final phase of the Regional Governance Project, the Operation and Transition Plan for Proposed Amalgamation, needed to be completed in 2019." With this in mind, we have requested a firm commitment from the Province of Alberta indicating the amount of transitional assistance they would commit for our consideration prior to March 31, 2020. Enclosed is a copy of the letter sent to the Minister of Municipal Affairs. Yours truly, l Don Kroetch, Reeve Flagstaff County gb Enclosure. Page 2 of 2 Page 48 of 214 d) November 20th, 2019 via e-mail: [email protected] Flagstaff Intermunicipal Partnership Committee Attn: Chair, Bob Coutts c/o Village of Forestburg PO Box 210, Forestburg, AB T0B 1N0 RE: Recommendation from the FIP Committee re Elimination of the FIP Committee & Split Up of FIP Responsibilities Dear Chair, Bob Coutts and FIP Municipalities, The Town of Hardisty at their November 19th, 2019 regular meeting of Council reviewed the recommendation of the FIP Committee. Council did not agree with the Committee’s recommendation and would like to continue with FIP and those municipalities who have expressed a desire to also continue with FIP. The following motion reaffirms our interest of becoming the Managing Partner and realigning operational costs in order to continue on with the intent that FIP was originally formed: #214/19 MOVED by Mayor Irving THAT Council directs the CAO to advise the Flagstaff Intermunicipal Partnership (FIP) Chair and current members THAT they do not agree with the recommendation of the FIP Committee to eliminate FIP, split up FIP responsibilities and form an informal structure for elected officials to discuss relevant issues and bring back direction to the CAO's. The Town of Hardisty supports the original intent of the Flagstaff Intermunicipal Partnership Committee and pursuant to their motions made June 11th, 2019 outlining their commitment to working together and taking over the role of Managing Partner still stands and directs the CAO to reach out to the municipalities who have expressed a desire to continue with FIP to come up with a proposed cost for continuing FIP responsibilities and that the Town of Hardisty will supply administrative support as a managing partner based on a cost recovery basis for the services supplied WHEREAS the CAO's are to come up with a proposed rate for these services and how these costs shall be shared which may entail the drafting of a new working agreement or memorandum of understanding. CARRIED Thank you to the Village of Forestburg for providing EXCELLENT Managing Partner services for the past few years. We hope that we can continue working together as local elected officials and administrators to strengthen our region and keep the intent of the partnership moving forward. Yours truly, On behalf of the Town of Hardisty Council Sandy Otto, CAO cc. Flagstaff Municipalities Page 49 of 214 d) November 20th, 2019 via e-mail: [email protected] Flagstaff Regional Solid Waste Management Attn: Chair, Rick Krys PO Box 309 Sedgewick, AB T0B 4C0 RE: Proposed 2020 Budget Dear Chair, Rick Krys, Board Members and Manager, Murray Hampshire, The Town of Hardisty at their November 19th, 2019 regular meeting of Council reviewed the proposed 2020 Budget and municipal requisitions. Unfortunately, Council defeated the recommendation of the Board as noted in the following motion: #206/19 MOVED by Deputy Mayor Lane THAT Council approve the proposed 2020 budget for Flagstaff Regional Solid Waste Management Association representing a 2.9% increase from 2019 with a requisition from the Town of Hardisty for $94,191.69. DEFEATED Council is requesting by way of the following motion: #207/19 MOVED by Deputy Mayor Lane THAT Council direct the CAO to advise Flagstaff Regional Solid Waste Management, Board Chair, that they desire the Board to revisit the proposed 2020 budget and come back with a 0% requisition increase for member municipalities. SECONDED by Mayor Irving CARRIED We thank the Board for their time in providing the proposed 2020 budget however with municipalities facing tight revenue streams with potentially declining assessments and grant funding sources along with rate payer concerns with property tax costs and service fees we are encouraging our regional entities to work with us to help meet these challenging times. Yours truly, On behalf of the Town of Hardisty Council Sandy Otto, CAO cc. FRSWMA Member Municipalities Page 50 of 214 d) November 20th, 2019 via e-mail: [email protected] Flagstaff Regional Solid Waste Management Attn: Chair, Rick Krys PO Box 309 Sedgewick, AB T0B 4C0 RE: Urban Curbside Collection Alternative Dear Chair, Rick Krys, Board Members and Manager, Murray Hampshire, The Town of Hardisty at their November 19th, 2019 regular meeting of Council reviewed the recommendation of the Board of moving towards a new curbside collection system in 2021 via the Front- End Truck mounted with a Curotto Can collection arm and curb side bins for residents. Unfortunately, Council defeated the Board’s recommendation noted by way of the following motion: #208/19 MOVED by Mayor Irving THAT Council directs the CAO to advise Flagstaff Waste Management THAT they approve the recommendation by the Board to move towards the delivery of curbside solid waste management for Urban Municipalities through the purchase of roll out bins for ALL residents with street side pick-up via a front end truck mounted with a curotto can. DEFEATED The Town of Hardisty Council advises by way of the following motion that: #209/19 MOVED by Mayor Irving THAT Council direct the CAO to advise Flagstaff Regional Solid Waste Management THAT based on the information supplied in the Review of Alternative Collection Systems dated September 20, 2019, they approve the stay at "status quo" option and proceed with budgeting for the purchase of a new "medium duty truck" complete with a new Burro system and continue with the transfer system in place for 2021. SECONDED by Deputy Mayor Lane CARRIED We thank the Board and Administration for their review of the curbside collection system and providing a synopsis of systems available. The recommendation of the Board is not a viable option in all areas of our community and for all seasons and therefore see the option of “status quo” as our best alternative for the 2021 capital replacement plan going forward. Yours truly, On behalf of the Town of Hardisty Council Sandy Otto, CAO cc. FRSWMA Member Municipalities Page 51 of 214 d) No. max90 U?imsa. V9.3 50 pa?x gs &.w$S§&%§& zo UmmaUm? Emmmm_om8_<_:a .33 m?Em zo mam-momsd? H?mwcum" umo-mE-$3 menumo-wE-§mm d) 2o Ummq Do? 0: U16: o.":..m_um<.n._m:Q8:32.. Em mwm_._mEo<3 mmm2.6» mHwo-mom?dm? H?mwrosau.mmo-w.m-33 menumo-wE-P_mm d) TO. wow90 UmwamQ.Ewm?m zo _u_mmm.82_~mm.o:m_mo_E < .5 3m 8.3m Bmmzzm.mxmqBcn: Emncmaos.m30:0: Emm 3% S8 amncm? _£m<<_<_> W82 8 .: Oznm mmmi.< mpwo- o mama Hamuo 9 .mwo-w.E- menumo-mE-§.mm II ._.O< _u_mcm.§4O95? woxmam mmo_om<<_ox_>w ._.omgoo >=m::o:” w?mz.Io<_m:Q_>O>O mm”_u_mnm$2 _u.o.m.monowcaomn Ummwwasn EmmmmcmmgsmmqSm: :6 ._.o<<:2 X.__m3 mv_o8 x_3c2_< _wo6m__O_.®_<_ O>O Oo _.<::m._m:::mo:_mxmoS_ m3m__;x.__m3 6:5 _m:m..:m. <<_.~IOCH < 2 1:... ._.o<<: 2 §__m3 «mmc_m_.no::n__ Bmmzsm3%. o: zo 1.5 32: 1 _A___m3_m.n.2o:m_ _: m:33 Esmammmmmmmamimm_,m20.33 8 am«macaw; man.mo ._.:m:_A<0: 5 mQ <95 ..._,:_<. , \ . u K _§a2_<\@e3\ibQ§>moqmm:Pm n>O . no .£m<<_<_> _<_::_n€m_2.3.3; Page 56 of 214 . hm.\\ 8_:m _m:3.:m. E3 21:05 < Page 57 of 214 d) xmm .33: Qnozzow nz1>._3.=.m§. no _<_::_n_um.3 zo Immmmmram95. mg... < Ummw_<_::.m<” <=_wmaomFcumraaa woxm. rosmrooa.>w Sm NS. : <0: :m :53 _<_o Page 58 of 214 m?xmwd m:::m_ n>xw_mo 1o 2.3 a) Town of Hardisty REQUEST FOR DECISION 19-12-088 December 10th, 2019 SUBJECT: Flagstaff Family and Community Services 2020 Budget RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council approve the proposed 2020 Flagstaff Family and Community Services Budget as presented which will reflect a 0% increase over 2019 with a $8.70/capita requisition for a total requisition in the amount of $4,819.80 to the Town of Hardisty. CAO COMMENTS: FFCS is proposing a 0% increase per capita over their 2019 per capita amount. It appears that FFCS is forecasting a revenue DECREASE of $14,166 with the main difference coming from the Skills Link Program gaining momentum however the Counselling service contracts have decreased 23.5% with only (1) part time general family Counsellor. Administrative costs increased 3% over 2019, Counselling expenses decreased by 23.5% and Other expenses increased almost 300% to cover costs associated with Consulting Fees & Office Equipment which were not part of the 2019 budget expense. RECOMMENDATION REPORT/DOCUMENT: Attached _X_ Available__ Nil __ KEY ISSUE(S)/CONCEPTS DEFINED: In 1975 the 11 municipalities of Flagstaff County entered into a joint agreement to establish Flagstaff Preventative Social Services. In 1981 the name was changed to Family and Community Services. The eleven municipalities are responsible for maintaining local responsibility and authority for the FCS program and contributing 20% of the funds on a per capita basis. The Government of Alberta funds the remaining 80% of the FCS programs. Programs are governed under the FCS Act and Regulations of Alberta. FFCS assist people in improving their quality of life. Programs and services offered AND Administered through FFCS includes Counselling Services, Flagstaff’s Informed Response Sharing Team which includes its response to Spousal Trauma (FIRST). Other Programs consist of: acting as a Referral Agency for other Government Agencies for seeking help, Interagency Host, Skills Link Program, Low German Mennonite Assistance Program, Christmas Sharing Program in conjunction with the Foodbank, Seniors FIRST, Momentum Financial Literacy, Harm Reduction, Care-A-Van, Flagstaff Beaver Early Childhood Coalition and the Partner Programs consisting of the Flagstaff Satellite Family Day Home Society. RELEVANT POLICY/PRACTICES/LEGISLATION: Page 59 of 214 2.3 a) Hardisty Bylaw #818 Municipal Government Act Sec. 243 - 1 Contents of an Operating Budget (e) STRATEGIC RELEVANCE: Provide Family and Community Support Services within the Town of Hardisty and the Flagstaff Region. RESPONSE OPTIONS and DESIRED OUTCOME(S): 1. Approve as presented 2. Reject with reason IMPLICATIONS OF RECOMMENDATION: . GENERAL: ORGANIZATIONAL: FINANCIAL: Include in 2020 Operating Budget ENVIRONMENTAL: NIL FOLLOW UP ACTION/COMMUNICATIONS: Inform FFCS/ Flagstaff County of Council’s decision Submitted & Reviewed By: Sandy Otto, CAO Page 60 of 214 2.3 a) Page 61 of 214 2.3 a) Page 62 of 214 2.3 a) Page 63 of 214 < xmz. u:o:mwC:=:mm 214 of 64 Page _:m:—m:nm >:amSu.o*mmm_o:m_ mmmm o.:._mm mmaxmm2_nm O...m..mmm rzmamm? O38 mn:._u3m3 Ooamzaaunmmm _<_m»m_._m_m” >q .84>_.m umo ._._~o mcommamom meow m mr>oma>m_u _u>_<_=: 88 38 Go 2.3 a) 2.3 as; Page 65 of 214 of 65 Page 88 ._.o.m_n8_mn_mqmmmm8. mm2om mmmm.9 mm2_nm Emma ._.o_m__u2u_mQmamcauio mmmm8. mm2_nm m __m_._:x no::mn.3:a_.a _u3<.:n_m_ .u:_..q__._m 83 man 2 03m. _S::_n__um_nc:a_:m >n_3_:_m=m._o: uomm?_ Oo::mm____..m MEu» m:Eo_m m:§o.m_ O=..m_. 88 m:Eo.m_ A88» mn._.mn. _u8_mn.mamm 3o.m2£_ m:€_:m.Um.._o5 a Amoco 8; Amoco Auwmo MmmomA Aooo S .\ Ao mmmmo ummm Nomemi. 3 I Edm >q3S_m:m:o: Oo::mm___:m 059 955. u..umu P an _»m o um_m~ 5&3 E9 . a) 2.3 2.3 a) Page 66 of 214 2.3 a) Page 67 of 214 2.3 a) _ o P.m Emmmnwmm—..m_==<.wno::=:=5~ mmninmma mumcs...“ no3=E:= Page 69 of 214 2.3 a) 05. Same: _u_mmmnmR_umB= OE. _<:mmE= mnunmiman £8 E mmoaacia. a2_§§_ o..mmaNm:o:Sin: mmnmmmmn_ Eunm_..._.om..m=..m _=nm_.mmm=&.:8" Zo=:.__ .n 2.3 a) Page 71 of 214 2.3 a) Page 72 of 214 2.3 a) Page 73 of 214 2.3 a) Page 74 of 214 2.3 a) Page 75 of 214 2.3 a) Page 76 of 214 2.3 b) Town of Hardisty REQUEST FOR DECISION 19-12-089 December 10th, 2019 SUBJECT: Flagstaff Regional Solid Waste Management Association 2020 Budget (v2) RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council approve the proposed (v2) 2020 budget for Flagstaff Regional Solid Waste Management Association representing a 0.19%% decrease from 2019 with a requisition from the Town of Hardisty for $91,837.78. CAO COMMENTS: December 10th, 2019 Comments: As version (1) of the budget did not receive the required amount of approval from the municipalities, Manager Hampshire and the Board reviewed comment as given by the municipalities to seek a 0% 2020 requisition increase to the municipalities. As identified in Manager Hampshire’s commentary, while adjustments to revenue were made to decrease 3.1% this was offset in expense cost by taking out $60K for crushing of recycled concrete aggregate. Which basically keeps inventory for resale reduced. Minor reductions to reduce estimated costs for vehicle repairs and deferring the construction of (2) new ground water monitoring wells for 1yr. FRSWMA has provided a balanced budget with a net 0 (zero) surplus/deficit. (November 19th Comments): The CAO’s in flagstaff all met with FRSWM – Manager, Murray Hampshire on October 29th, 2019 to review the Curb Side Pick-Up options presented to the Board earlier in October and where as the Board made a recommendation of moving towards the option of the Front End Truck with Curroto Can and also approved the proposed 2020 FRSWM Budget with an increase to requisition of approximately 2.9%. There was significant disapproval amongst the CAO’s with the 2.9% requisition increase with the state of the economy and the impacts to the municipalities with the Provincial Budget and the decrease in provincial funding that will occur. Special attention and comment was made regarding the surpluses identified in the Draft, Projected & Actual Summaries: 2018 – Surplus AFTER transfers to savings ie Closure & Post Closure & Capital Replacement $298,000 Page 77 of 214 2.3 b) 2019 – Surplus Projected AFTER transfers to savings ie. Closure & Post Closure & Capital Replacement $323,193. 2020 – Surplus Budgeted AFTER transfers to savings ie. Closure & Post Closure & Capital Replacement $25,461. CAO’s brought forward comment that perhaps previous year’s surpluses could be used to negate increase in requisition costs or be used to fund capital purchases. Murray did advise that Asbestos Contracts are questionable and the reason that they made $200K over projected revenue was due to Beaver Regional Waste Services not taking as much asbestos & the wait time for unloading. As well he mentioned there was another landfill that had closed their asbestos pit and were finishing up building another pit which should be in commission for 2020. A few of the CAO’s had advised Murray that they would not be recommending the proposed 2020 Budget to their Council’s and that they would like to see a 0% increase to requisitions. The CAO has reviewed the budget and although the proposed increase to requisitions of 2.9% moves our requisition up from $92,000 to $94,000 the Town would not have to increase garbage service fees to cover the new requisition. However, good management on creating adequate reserves is important in the event a Waste Mgmt truck goes down and lengthening out the life of capital could be a detriment in the delivery of service of FRSWM. The CAO is not confident with the recommendations by other CAO’s in requesting that Murray take a longer capital outlook on equipment in comparison to what Municipalities are doing. It will only catch up to you along the way when you operating heavy equipment which is making many miles, and depending on the approach to curb side pick-up in the future we could be looking at another hike next year in requisitions to pay for a more expensive piece of equipment. We also need to be cognisant that efficient operation comes with good equipment and expense mitigation of repair & maintenance costs. I believe the CAO’s are more concerned with the proposed wage increases & additional tiers that were approved in the wage scales causing increases to requisitions when Municipalities are looking at very tight budgets and COLA’s (cost of living adjustments) only as increases. It is important to retain good staff, and it appears that Murray has completed this endeavor with more staff moving onto benefit packages due to meeting probationary periods and employment longevities. If we are concerned about a 2.9% requisition increase then are we prepared to look at a reduced service delivery ie. bi-weekly curbside pick-up? RECOMMENDATION REPORT/DOCUMENT: Attached X Available__ Nil __ KEY ISSUE(S)/CONCEPTS DEFINED: To provide solid waste management services to the Town of Hardisty, the regional waste management organization has proposed their 2020 Capital & Operating Budget. Highlights: Municipal Requisition: o Municipal Requisition – (v2) reflects a flat requisition for municipalities. Page 78 of 214 2.3 b) o On a per capita basis, the impact of FRSWM budget is as follows: Capital - highlights of the budget include: Capital expenditure of $255,000 includes 1 new Roll-off truck, bins. Page 79 of 214 2.3 b) Town of Hardisty Budget The Town of Hardisty Master Rate Bylaw 1244/19 Schedule “A” has set rates for 2019-2022. Residential solid waste disposal fees currently are $30.50 per month and non-residential $50.00 per month. 2019-2022 rates Non-Residential Accts: 7 @ $50/mth x 12 = $4,200.00 Residential Accts: 328 @ $30.50/mth x 12 = $120,048.00 Institutional Accts: 4 @ $30.50/mth x 12= $1,464.00 Total funds collected: $125,712 (less proposed 2020 requisition) ($94,192) (less proposed 2020 costs for other solid waste costs ($7,000) ie. spring cleanup, composting bins, recycle bins, improvements for transfer site & etc Net: $24,520 RELEVANT POLICY/PRACTICES/LEGISLATION: Municipal Government Act 243(1) Town of Hardisty Bylaw #1002 Page 80 of 214 2.3 b) Town of Hardisty Master Rate Bylaw 1244/19 Schedule “A” STRATEGIC RELEVANCE: 2015-2017 - Strategic Priorities: Regional Collaboration RESPONSE OPTIONS and DESIRED OUTCOME(S): 1. Pass (v2)2020 FRSWMA Budget as presented 2. Defeat the recommended motion IMPLICATIONS OF RECOMMENDATION: . GENERAL: ORGANIZATIONAL: NIL FINANCIAL: Reflect new requisition amount in 2020 budget. ENVIRONMENTAL: Proper disposal service for solid wastes creates a better environment, public health & environmental health. FOLLOW UP ACTION/COMMUNICATIONS: Inform FRSWMA of Council’s decision & Flagstaff Member Municipalities Submitted & Reviewed By: Sandy Otto, CAO Page 81 of 214 2.3 b) From: Murray Hampshire To: [email protected]; Carmen; Debra Moffat; Heidi Rohe; Jim Fedyk; Karen O"Connor; Kim Borgel; Nancy Friend; Rod Krips; Sandy Otto; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; Brandon Martz; Dean Lane; Elaine Fossen; Howard Shield; James "Butch" Robertson; Janice McTavish; Josephine Mackenzie; Rick Krys; Stephen Levy; Susan Armer Subject: Draft Budget 2020 - Version 2 Date: November-26-19 12:39:22 PM Attachments: Draft 2020 Budget - Ver.2.pdf Dear CAO’s and Member Councils: At our most recent Flagstaff Waste Board meeting held October 28, 2019, the following resolutions was approved: Resolution # 503/2019. Board member S. Levy moved to recommend the adjusted Draft 2020 Operating Budget (Ver.2) with a total municipal requisition of $1,253,550 (with zero increase over 2019) to all FRSWMA members for approval. CARRIED To that end, I am forwarding the Draft 2020 Budget Package for you to present to your respective councils for deliberation. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Regards, Murray Hampshire, Manager Flagstaff Waste 780.384.3950 [email protected] Page 82 of 214 2.3 b) Draft 2020 Budget – Ver.2 • Ver.1, which included a 2.9% increase in the municipal requisition over 2019 did not receive support from enough members to achieve approval status. Some members specifically requested Flagstaff Waste hold the requisition at the same level as 2019 due to current financial uncertainty in the municipal sector. • In this draft, Ver.2, all accounts were reviewed with this cautious perspective. o All 2019 projections were updated with data up to and including Nov 15. o Municipal requisition was reduced to zero increase, which reduces Flagstaff Waste revenue by $36,353 (2.8%) o Asbestos revenues were re-evaluated and reduced $27,200 (10.7%) to reflect future uncertainty on this stream. o Revenue from transfer site fees in Ver.1 were too aggressive and reduced $12,000 in Ver.2 o These changes and other minor changes to revenue resulted in a net total reduction in revenue of $82,866.46 (3.1%) in Ver.2. • Similarly, all expenses were reviewed to balance expense to revenue: o Trimming of vehicle expenses and recycling expenses reduced total expense by $36,083.18 (1.6%). o Annual allocations to capital reserves were reduced by $21,322.36 (7.1%) and the small surplus ($25,460.92) in Ver.1 was eliminated to balance the operating P&L. • Wages and benefits were not adjusted in Ver.2, nor was the annual allocation to the Closure/Post-Closure reserves. • Construction of two new ground water monitoring wells on the landfill have been deferred for at least one year. • An allowance of $60,000 to grind our current 4000 tonne stockpile of concrete in included to ensure a steady supply of RCA for re-sale. If the grind operation is removed, we will need to reduce our revenue from RCA as the current stockpile is reduced to less than 1000 tonnes at this time. • Our current capital purchases have not been impacted to ensure we stay on plan for our capital replacement goals. • While Ver.2 results in a net zero change for the total requisition, there are slight variations in how it impacts each municipality. So called 'regional' members will see a net 0.19% reduction in requisition while ‘transitional’ members will see a very small 0.31% increase over 2019. This is due to the agreed differential fees structures for transfer site costs. Page 83 of 214 Flagstaff Waste Draft 2020 Budget - Ver.2 11/25 Page 1 of 8 2.3 b) 2020 Draft Budget (V.2), 2019 Projection and 2018 Actual - Summary Draft Budget % change Revenue Projection 2019 Budget 2019 Actual 2018 2020 budget Landfill - Scales & Property $ 66,250.00 $ 106,200.00 $ 56,550.00 $ 56,832.72 17.2% Asbestos Contracts $ 227,800.00 $ 401,300.00 $ 160,000.00 $ 304,296.73 42.4% Bin Rentals & Service $ 896,650.00 $ 863,650.00 $ 959,650.00 $ 869,460.47 -6.6% Municipal$ 1,253,550.00 $ 1,265,550.04 $ 1,253,550.00 $ 1,230,439.96 0.0% Recycle $ 65,400.00 $ 72,010.00 $ 61,100.00 $ 67,013.52 7.0% Administration $ 43,786.53 $ 54,300.00 $ 23,100.00 $ 64,281.29 89.6% Transfer Sites $ 26,000.00 $ 25,800.00 $ 35,000.00 $ 38,493.59 -25.7% Total Revenue $ 2,579,436.53 $ 2,788,810.04 $ 2,548,950.00 $ 2,630,818.28 1.2% Draft Budget % change Expense Projection 2019 Budget 2019 Actual 2018 2020 budget Human Resources $ 1,423,558.89 $ 1,345,400.00 $ 1,366,681.51 $ 1,213,805.75 4.2% Transportations Services $ 397,700.00 $ 414,300.00 $ 399,800.00 $ 387,993.44 -0.5% Landfill Expenses $ 114,200.00 $ 109,075.88 $ 116,000.00 $ 137,908.83 -1.6% Recycling Expenses $ 73,900.00 $ 13,300.00 $ 17,500.00 $ 91,659.92 322.3% Bin Services $ 10,000.00 $ 17,300.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 3,421.24 42.9% Transfer Site Expenses $ 14,000.00 $ 21,900.00 $ 39,000.00 $ 39,128.02 -64.1% Administration $ 130,600.00 $ 128,950.00 $ 135,800.00 $ 130,177.03 -3.8% Marketing & Communication $ 3,000.00 $ 700.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 2,759.99 -33.3% Sales Strategy $ 1,800.00 $ - $ 1,800.00 $ - 0.0% Safety $ 8,000.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 7,258.57 0.0% TOTAL EXPENSE $ 2,176,758.89 $ 2,057,925.88 $ 2,079,581.51 $ 2,014,112.79 4.7% Closure Post Closure Annual Allocation $ 124,000.00 $ 120,385.37 $ 120,385.37 $ 118,242.35 3.0% Capital Reserve/capital Depreciation $ 278,677.64 $ 300,000.00 $ 300,000.00 $ 200,000.00 Page 84 of 214 NET INCOME -$ 0.00 $ 310,498.79 $ 48,983.12 $ 298,463.14 Flagstaff Waste Draft 2020 Budget - Ver.2 11/25 Page 2 of 8 2.3 b) 2020 Draft Budget (V.2), 2019 Projection and 2018 Actual - Detailed Accounts Revenue BUD 2020 PROJ 2019 BUD 2019 Actual 2018 Scales Revenue $ 58,000.00 $ 95,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 50,704.42 Property Income - Agri Lease $ 2,500.00 $ 2,250.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 1,958.30 Property Income - Gas Lease $ 2,750.00 $ 2,750.00 $ 2,750.00 $ 2,750.00 Other landfill Revenue $ 3,000.00 $ 6,200.00 $ 1,300.00 $ 1,420.00 Landfill - Scales & Property $ 66,250.00 $ 106,200.00 $ 56,550.00 $ 56,832.72 Overweight charges - Asbestos $ - $ 1,300.00 $ - $ 1,500.00 Contracts - Asbestos $ 227,800.00 $ 400,000.00 $ 160,000.00 $ 302,796.73 Asbestos Contracts $ 227,800.00 $ 401,300.00 $ 160,000.00 $ 304,296.73 Permanent - 40Y, 20Y, Gravel Boxes $ 45,000.00 $ 45,000.00 $ 60,000.00 $ 57,704.80 Temporary - 40Y, 20Y, Gravel Boxes $ 95,000.00 $ 90,000.00 $ 135,000.00 $ 144,794.22 includes free weekends Permanent - 6 Y Bins $ 215,000.00 $ 215,000.00 $ 210,000.00 $ 189,680.32 Temporary - 6Y Bins $ 13,000.00 $ 16,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 14,840.00 Permanent - 3 YBins $ 500,000.00 $ 460,000.00 $ 525,000.00 $ 427,328.29 Permanent - 2Y Bins $ 650.00 $ 650.00 $ 650.00 $ 666.84 All Fuel Surcharge $ 25,000.00 $ 29,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 31,446.00 Overweight charges $ 3,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 3,000.00 Bin Rentals & Service $ 896,650.00 $ 863,650.00 $ 959,650.00 $ 869,460.47 Municipal Requisitions $ 1,253,550.00 $ 1,253,550.04 $ 1,253,550.00 $ 1,219,999.96 Fees for Service - Municipal $ 12,000.00 $ 10,440.00 Municipal$ 1,253,550.00 $ 1,265,550.04 $ 1,253,550.00 $ 1,230,439.96 Cardboard Sales $ 5,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 16,230.59 Paint Sales $ 1,000.00 $ 600.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 539.75 E - Waste Sales $ 1,800.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 2,262.26 Clean Concrete Revenue $ 4,500.00 $ 5,200.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 3,949.33 Concrete - RCA Sales $ 22,000.00 $ 32,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 12,546.10 Plastic Sales $ - $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 964.74 Paper Sales $ 800.00 $ 600.00 $ 500.00 Metal Sales $ 25,000.00 $ 24,800.00 $ 26,000.00 $ 25,865.10 Propane Bottles Sales $ 100.00 $ 10.00 $ 150.00 $ 86.57 Freon Revenue $ 1,500.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,764.88 Mattress Revenue $ 1,500.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,175.85 Antifreeze Sales $ 700.00 $ 600.00 $ 100. 00 $ 68. 34 Battery Sales $ 500.00 $ 400.00 $ 350.00 $ 404.76 Used Oil & Filters Sales $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,155.25 Recycle $ 65,400.00 $ 72,010.00 $ 61,100.00 $ 67,013.52 Bank Interest Earned $ 29,000.00 $ 34,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 21,071.60 Patronage Dividends Income $ 9,900.00 $ 14,500.00 $ 5,500.00 $ 11,670.09 Alberta Recycling Grant $ 900.00 $ 19,855.00 NSF Charges $ - $ - $ 100.00 $ 20.00 Overdue Interest Collected $ 400.00 $ 500.00 $ 400.00 $ 374.83 Amortization of Deferred Capital $ 561.22 Gain on Sale of Capital assets $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 10,001.18 Residential Bag Tags $ 200.00 $ - $ 200.00 Other income $ 86.53 $ 500.00 $ 100.00 $ 84.91 WCB Partners in Injury & Surplus $ 1,200.00 $ 900.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 642.46 Administration $ 43,786.53 $ 54,300.00 $ 23,100.00 $ 64,281.29 Transfer Site - Fees $ 26,000.00 $ 25,800.00 $ 35,000.00 $ 38,493.59 Transfer Sites $ 26,000.00 $ 25,800.00 $ 35,000.00 $ 38,493.59 Total Revenue $ 2,579,436.53 $ 2,788,810.04 $ 2,548,950.00 $ 2,630,818.28 Page 85 of 214 Flagstaff Waste Draft 2020 Budget - Ver.2 11/25 Page 3 of 8 2.3 b) Expense BUD 2020 PROJ 2019 BUD 2019 Actual 2018 WCB $ 12,500.00 $ 12,400.00 $ 13,000.00 $ 9,954.08 Wages/Salary $ 1,187,109.31 $ 1,125,000.00 $ 1,131,348.21 $ 1,017,177.75 EI - Paid by Employer $ 21,106.17 $ 21,000.00 $ 20,984.31 $ 19,828.77 CPP - Paid by Employer $ 43,438.06 $ 43,600.00 $ 43,348.99 $ 37,809.75 Benefits - Paid by Employer $ - $ - Lapp - Employer Portion $ 94,786.46 $ 85,000.00 $ 95,000.00 $ 85,244.19 Benefits - ClaimSecure ER $ 31,005.69 $ 33,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 28,025.89 Benefits - Encon ER $ 33,613.20 $ 25,400.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 23,366.30 Payroll Rebates (Skills Link, STEP) $ - $ - $ 8,000.00 -$ 7,600.98 Human Resources $ 1,423,558.89 $ 1,345,400.00 $ 1,366,681.51 $ 1,213,805.75 Misc Fleet Expenses $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 615.83 Shop Supplies, Repair, Maintenance $ 7,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 14,040.70 Fuel $ 220,000.00 $ 215,000.00 $ 220,000.00 $ 206,273.17 Tires $ 30,000.00 $ 36,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 31,477.97 Repairs $ 126,000.00 $ 138,000.00 $ 125,000.00 $ 120,895.21 Lubrication $ 8,000.00 $ 11,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 9,789.46 Miscellaneous $ 1,000.00 $ 800.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 128.00 Fleetmatics $ 5,200.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 4,800.00 $ 4,773.10 Transportations Services $ 397,700.00 $ 414,300.00 $ 399,800.00 $ 387,993.44 Landfill Engineering $ 28,000.00 $ 26,000.00 $ 28,000.00 $ 30,056.91 Landfill Repair & Maintenance $ 7,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 6,222.66 Landfill Fuel $ 29,000.00 $ 28,000.00 $ 18,000.00 $ 19,431.94 Landfill Equipment R & M $ 500.00 $ - $ 2,000.00 $ 125.50 Landfill Supplies $ 500.00 $ 400.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,288.35 973 Cat $ 10,000.00 $ 9,500.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 17,242.60 Old Bob Cat $ 1,000.00 $ - $ 1,000.00 $ 707.13 New Bob Cat $ 500.00 $ 600.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 947.65 Bomag 43-EB Compactor $ 2,000.00 $ 5,675.88 $ 5,000.00 $ 7,997.75 John Deere Gator Unit 879 $ 200.00 $ 50.00 $ 500.00 $ 1,969.13 Lawnmovers/Tractors $ 1,200.00 $ 1,150.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 612.05 Misc Landfill equipment $ 300.00 $ 100.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 6,776.33 Landfill Pit/Development $ 28,000.00 $ 28, 000.00 $ 22,000.00 $ 41,475.00 Landfill Road Maintenance $ 5,000.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 2,567.50 Landfill Miscellaneous $ 1,000.00 $ 100.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 488.33 Landfill Expenses $ 114,200.00 $ 109,075.88 $ 116,000.00 $ 137,908.83 Recycle - processing $ 4,000.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 18,802.25 Recycle - Fees $ - $ - $ 2,500.00 $ 297.90 Recycle Supplies $ 2,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 8,206.12 Recycle Miscellaneous $ - $ 800.00 $ - $ 904.05 Concrete Grind $ 60,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 57,000.00 Hazardous Waste Disposal $ 7,900.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 6,449.60 Recycling Expenses $ 73,900.00 $ 13,300.00 $ 17,500.00 $ 91,659.92 Bin Services - Bin Repair $ 8,000.00 $ 13,200.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 579.54 Bin Services - Misc/Frght $ 2,000.00 $ 4,100.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,841.70 Bin Services $ 10,000.00 $ 17,300.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 3,421.24 Transfer Site Equipment & Supplies $ 1,500.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 462.81 Mileage, Meals, and Lodging $ 7,500.00 $ 6,500.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 6,969.24 Transfer Site Repair & Maintenance $ 5,000.00 $ 14,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 31,695.97 Transfer Site Expenses $ 14,000.00 $ 21,900.00 $ 39,000.00 $ 39,128.02 Page 86 of 214 Flagstaff Waste Draft 2020 Budget - Ver.2 11/25 Page 4 of 8 2.3 b) Expense BUD 2020 PROJ 2019 BUD 2019 Actual 2018 Management Services $ - Audit & Legal Fees $ 14,000.00 $ 9,500.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 11,613.25 Cleaning Services $ 15,000.00 $ 14,400.00 $ 14,400.00 $ 14,400.00 Bad Debt Expense $ 47.81 Gain/Loss on disposal of assets $ - $ - -$ 1,904.76 Staff Training & Development $ 2,500.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 1,513.85 Staff Awards, Recognition $ 2,000.00 $ 3,400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 4,746.00 Liability Insurance/ directors Ins $ 1,000.00 $ 1,300.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,737.80 Property & Equipment Insurance $ 11,000.00 $ 7,100.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 6,446.09 Vehicle Insurance. $ 17,000.00 $ 18,200.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 11,050.43 Credit Card Fees $ 4,000.00 $ 3,900.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,022.11 Bank Service Charges $ 200.00 $ 150.00 $ 200.00 $ 181.25 Late Fees Paid $ - $ 1,200.00 $ - -$ 12.14 Memberships/Subscriptions $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 831.76 Meals & Lodging & Mileage $ 2,500.00 $ 5,500.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 2,707.78 Telephones $ 14,000.00 $ 13,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,439.56 Utilities $ 16,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 14,251.93 Postage & Courier $ 7,500.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 7,645.28 Security $ 1,900.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 700.00 $ 423.92 POS - 1st data $ - $ - $ 6,493.55 Photocopier - lease, supplies $ 6,500.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 7,042.20 Office Supplies $ 6,500.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 5,992.44 Computer - Hardware/software $ 3,000.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 6,640.88 Operations Advertising $ 3,000.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 6,928.15 Internet $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,607.89 Admin-Miscellaneous $ - $ - $ 330.00 Administration$ 130,600.00 $ 128,950.00 $ 135,800.00 $ 130,177.03 Marketing - Promotions $ 2,000.00 $ 700.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 2,759.99 Education Supplies, Transportation $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ - Marketing & Communication $ 3,000.00 $ 700.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 2,759.99 Sales Strategy Development $ 1,800.00 $ 1,800.00 $ - Sales Implementation $ - $ - $ - Sales Strategy $ 1,800.00 $ - $ 1,800.00 $ - Safety Supplies $ 3,500.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,500. 00 $ 4, 385.34 Safety Training $ 1,500.00 $ 2,800.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 1,102.76 Safety Miscellanous $ 3,000.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 1,770.47 Safety $ 8,000.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 7,258.57 Admin, M&C, Sales, Safety $ 143,400.00 $ 136,650.00 $ 149,600.00 $ 140,195.59 TOTAL EXPENSE $ 2,176,758.89 $ 2,057,925.88 $ 2,079,581.51 $ 2,014,112.79 Closure Post Closure Annual Allocation $ 124,000.00 $ 120,385.37 $ 120,385.37 $ 118,242.35 Capital Reserve/capital Depreciation $ 278,677.64 $ 300,000.00 $ 300,000.00 $ 200,000.00 NET INCOME -$ 0.00 $ 310,498.79 $ 48,983.12 $ 298,463.14 Page 87 of 214 Flagstaff Waste Draft 2020 Budget - Ver.2 11/25 Page 5 of 8 2.3 b) Estimated Cost by Department - For Requisitions Budget 2020 From GL Surplus Short fall Total Indirect Allocated Expenses Landfill Asbestos Bin Serv Collection Recycle Transfer Agricultural Admin Direct/Indirect applied A Human Resources $ 240,581.45 $ 106,766.92 $ 427,067.67 $ 177,944.86 $ 170,827.07 $ 128,120.30 $ 29,894.74 $ 142,355.89 $ 1,423,558.89 % of HR 16.90% 7.50% 30.00% 12.50% 12.00% 9.00% 2.10% 10.00% 100.00% B Transport Services $ 23,862.00 $ 31,816.00 $ 169,022.50 $ 53,689.50 $ 53,689.50 $ 45,735.50 $ 15,908.00 $ 3,977.00 $ 397,700.00 % of TS 6.0% 8.0% 42.5% 13.5% 13.5% 11.5% 4.0% 1.0% 100.0% C Capital & Depreciation $ 58,522.30 $ 22,294.21 $ 110,077.67 $ 25,080.99 $ 22,294.21 $ 13,933.88 $ 4,180.16 $ 22,294.21 $ 278,677.64 % of CD 21.0% 8.0% 39.5% 9.0% 8.0% 5.0% 1.5% 8.0% 100.0% D Closure/Post Closure Funding $ 11,160.00 $ 11,160.00 $ 54,560.00 $ 22,320.00 $ 1,240.00 $ 16,120.00 $ 7,440.00 $ - $ 124,000.00 9.0% 9.0% 44.0% 18.0% 1.0% 13.0% 6.0% 0.0% 100.0% E Direct Expense $ 114,200.00 $ - $ 10,000.00 $ - $ 73,900.00 $ 14,000.00 $ - $ 143,400.00 $ 355,500.00 G less Administration Revenue $ (43,786.53) $ (43,786.53) H Net Administration Expense $ 99,613.47 F Sub-Total Expenses $ 448,325.76 $ 172,037.13 $ 770,727.84 $ 279,035.35 $ 321,950.78 $ 217,909.68 $ 57,422.90 $ 268,240.57 $ 2,535,650.00 I Administration Expense Applied $ 43,607.10 $ 22,452.74 $ 99,283.38 $ 36,417.19 $ 32,373.36 $ 26,612.46 $ 7,494.32 J Exp Sub-Total by Department $ 491,932.86 $ 194,489.87 $ 870,011.22 $ 315,452.54 $ 354,324.14 $ 244,522.15 $ 64,917.22 $ 2,535,650.00 K less Dept Specific Revenue $ (66,250.00) $ (227,800.00) $ (896,650.00) $ (65,400.00) $ (26,000.00) $ (1,282,100.00) L Net Expense by Department $ 425,682.86 $ (33,310.13) $ (26,638.78) $ 315,452.54 $ 288,924.14 $ 218,522.15 $ 64,917.22 $ 1,253,550.00 M 2020 Municipal Requisition $ 365,733.94 $ - $ - $ 315,452.54 $ 288,924.14 $ 218,522.15 $ 64,917.22 $ - $ 1,253,550.00 N Net Business $ (59,948.91) $ 33,310.13 $ 26,638.78 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ (0.00) % funded by Requisition 85.9% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Page 88 of 214 Flagstaff Waste Draft 2020 Budget - Ver.2 11/25 Page 6 of 8 2.3 b) Proposed 2020 Budget with Allocations to Municipalities Proposed 2019 Difference % Municipality Population Landfill Collection Transfer Recycling Ag Services Fees - 2020 Fees 2019-2020 Change Alliance 154 $6,588.26 $9,374.70 $4,361.33 R $5,204.62 $25,528.91 $25,576.75 -$47.84 -0.19% Daysland 824 $35,251.46 $50,160.73 $23,335.96 R $27,848.11 $136,596.26 $136,852.21 -$255.95 -0.19% Forestburg 875 $37,433.29 $53,265.34 $24,780.30 R $29,571.72 $145,050.64 $145,322.44 -$271.79 -0.19% Galahad 111 $4,748.68 $6,757.09 $2,200.02 T $3,751.38 $17,457.17 $17,403.46 $53.72 0.31% Hardisty 554 $23,700.62 $33,724.57 $15,689.47 R $18,723.12 $91,837.78 $92,009.86 -$172.08 -0.19% Heisler 160 $6,844.94 $9,739.95 $3,171.20 T $5,407.40 $25,163.49 $25,086.06 $77.43 0.31% Killam 989 $42,310.31 $60,205.05 $19,601.98 T $33,424.49 $155,541.83 $155,063.23 $478.61 0.31% Lougheed 256 $10,951.91 $15,583.92 $5,073.92 T $8,651.84 $40,261.59 $40,137.70 $123.89 0.31% Rosalind 188 $8,042.81 $11,444.44 $3,726.16 T $6,353.70 $29,567.10 $29,476.12 $90.98 0.31% Sedgewick 811 $34,695.31 $49,369.36 $16,074.02 T $27,408.76 $127,547.45 $127,154.98 $392.47 0.31% Strome 260 $11,123.03 $15,827.41 $5,153.20 T $8,787.03 $40,890.67 $40,764.85 $125.82 0.31% Flagstaff Cty rural 3367 $144,043.30 $0.00 $95,354.59 R $113,791.97$ 64,917.22 $418,107.09 $418,702.33 -$595.24 -0.14% Total 2020 8549$ 365,733.94 $ 315,452.54 $ 218,522.15 $ 288,924.14 $ 64,917.22 $ 1,253,550.00 $1,253,550.00 $0.00 0.00% (County Total) 3738$ 159,915.02 $ 22,584.50 $ 102,707.81 $ 126,330.38 $ 64,917.22 $ 476,454.93 $ 476,870.64 $ (415.70) -0.09% Total 2020 $365,733.94 $315,452.54 $218,522.15 $288,924.14 $64,917.22 $1,253,550.00 Total 2019 $324,449.74 $325,474.50 $238,754.54 $293,892.86 $70,978.36 $1,253,550.00 Year over Year $ $41,284.20 -$10,021.96 -$20,232.39 -$4,968.72 -$6,061.14 $0.00 Year over Year % 12.72% -3.08% -8.47% -1.69% -8.54% 0.00% Annual Rates Per Capita Urban - Service Urban Regional Rural Regional Transitional Landfill $ 42.78 $ 42.78 $ 42.78 Collection $ 60.87 $ 60.87 $ - Transfer $ 19.82 $ 28.32 $ 28.32 Recycling $ 33.80 $ 33.80 $ 33.80 Ag Services $ - $ - $ 19.28 2020 Total: $ 157.27 $ 165.77 $ 124.18 2019 total $ 156.79 $ 166.08 $ 124.35 $ change $ 0.48 $ (0.31) $ (0.17) % change 0.31% -0.19% -0.14% Transfer Site Fees (per capita) Population Weighted Share R = Regional 5774 $28.32 $163,521.65 T = Transitional 2775 $19.82 $55,000.50 Total 8549 $218,522.15 Page 89 of 214 69.99% Flagstaff Waste Draft 2020 Budget - Ver.2 11/25 Page 7 of 8 2.3 b) 2020 Capital Budget Description Additions number Price Extension Roll off Truck Replacement 1 $ 225,000.00 $ 225,000.00 Bins varies $ 30,000.00 - - $ - $ - TOTAL EXPENSES $ 255,000.00 Funding From Reserves, Operations, or loan $ 200,000.00 From Budget Surplus - General Operations $ 55,000.00 $ - $ - $ - TOTAL FUNDING $ 255,000.00 Capital Reserve Plan for Budget year 2020 credit Debit Balance Opening January 2019 $ 346,621.00 Bomag - out $ 200,000.00 $ 146,621.00 Year end funds in $ 300,000.00 $ 446,621.00 2019 interest $ 5,806.07 $ 452,427.07 Opening January 2020 $ 452,427.07 2020 budget requirements from reserves $ 200,000.00 $ 252,427.07 Year end funds in $ 278,677.64 $ 531,104.71 2020 interest $ 3,786.41 $ 534,891.12 Page 90 of 214 Flagstaff Waste Draft 2020 Budget - Ver.2 11/25 Page 8 of 8 2.3 c) Town of Hardisty REQUEST FOR DECISION 19-12-090 December 10th, 2019 SUBJECT: Extension of Fire Services Agreement to Flagstaff County– 1 yr. RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council directs the CAO to advise Flagstaff County THAT the Town of Hardisty agrees to extend the existing Joint Fire Services Agreement until December 31, 2020 while the RESC continues the transition and set up of the Flagstaff Regional Emergency Services Society. CAO COMMENTS: In order to continue Fire Services to Flagstaff County while the RESC is in a transitional state to move into the Society, and due to the delay in getting the Society set up prior to the end of 2019, Flagstaff County wishes to renew and extend their existing Fire Service Agreements with all the Urban municipalities. It is anticipated that the Society should be up and running in 2020. RECOMMENDATION REPORT/DOCUMENT: Attached _X_ Available__ Nil __ KEY ISSUE(S)/CONCEPTS DEFINED: Require an extension to the existing Fire Services Agreement with Flagstaff County due to expire Dec. 31 2019 due to the delay in getting the Flagstaff Regional Emergency Services Society up and running. July 11th, 2017 – Motion# 158/17 MOVED by Deputy Mayor Lane THAT Council directs the CAO to advise Flagstaff County THAT upon the recommendation from the Regional Emergency Services Committee THAT the Town of Hardisty agree to extend the existing Joint Fire Services Agreement dated November 25, 2015 effective January 1, 2015 and expiring December 31, 2017 for one year to December 31, 2018. CARRIED September 11th, 2018 – Motion #192/18 MOVED by Councillor Gaetzman with an amendment THAT Council direct the CAO to advise Flagstaff County THAT upon the recommendation from the Regional Emergency Services Committee THAT the Town of Hardisty will agree to extend the existing Joint Fire Service Agreement for another 1yr to December 31, 2019. However Flagstaff County and the Town of Hardisty must be in agreement to proceed with the Regional Emergency Services Society by April 30th, 2019. If both parties are not in agreement to proceed with a proposed Regional Emergency Services Society, the Town of Hardisty hereby provides notice to Flagstaff County that they wish to amend Article 5 – Covenants sub sec. 5.1 (b) ii that the housing benefit of joint owned Page 91 of 214 2.3 c) fire equipment will be $12,000 plus 3% CPI (Consumer Price Index) retroactive to January 1, 2019. SECONDED by Deputy Mayor Lane. CARRIED. RELEVANT POLICY/PRACTICES/LEGISLATION: Jt. Fire Service Agreement between Town of Hardisty & Flagstaff County Regional Fire Chief Services Agreement STRATEGIC RELEVANCE: RESPONSE OPTIONS and DESIRED OUTCOME(S): 1. Approve as presented 2. Reject with reason IMPLICATIONS OF RECOMMENDATION: . GENERAL: ORGANIZATIONAL: FINANCIAL: ENVIRONMENTAL: FOLLOW UP ACTION/COMMUNICATIONS: Advise Flagstaff County of Council’s decision. Submitted & Reviewed By: Sandy Otto, CAO Page 92 of 214 2.3 d) Town of Hardisty REQUEST FOR DECISION 19-12-091 December 10th, 2019 SUBJECT: Approval of the Hardisty Public Library Board 2020 Budget along with 3 Year Budget 2019-2021 RECOMMENDATION: Motion #1: THAT Council accept the proposed 2020 Hardisty Public Library Board Budget and accept as information the proposed 2021 Budget. CAO COMMENTS: The Hardisty Public Library Board provided Council with their proposed 3 Year Budget for 2019-2021 for approval. With the direction of council and CAO administration has been working with the Library Board helping them create a 3 Year Budget that would help them to move forward. There have been significant changes with the Library Board and the Chair Ricci Matthews, Treasurer Anne Hackney have been working diligently going through all the Library information. They have been in contact with Parkland Regional Library and have worked through the issues with the Rural Library Grant. With the hiring of the new Librarian they have had significant support in promoting the library. The Library Board have agreed to have the library open on Fridays and are finding that the library is showing more people accessing the facility. The Library Board had a representative from Parkland Regional Library present at the past Library meeting and the information was very well received by the Board. The Library Board will be working on a new plan of service in 2020 as the plan is to be updated for 2021. The Library Board has also been working with the Friends of the Library Society which attends Casinos to raise funds for the Library. The Board is working on learning more about the criteria for the use of the funds from the Friends of the Library Society. These funds will be helpful for the Library budget going forward. With help from the Town of Hardisty by changing the phone system, helping with sidewalk snow removal this has helped with the budget to keep the costs down. Chair, Ricci Matthews, provided to Council an excellent presentation that addressed concerns that Council had with their long-term planning and financial sustainability. At the May 22nd, 2019 Council Meeting the Library Board delivered (2) documents: their Plan of Service 2016-2020 which they reviewed with Council and their 2017 statistical report which was prepared in accordance with Parkland Regional Library’s guiding principles for reporting statistical information. They clarified their hours of operation with Council to Page 93 of 214 2.3 d) reveal that they are providing more evening service so that working families can participate in the services of the Library. It appears that our Library is engaging with our residents and community members to deliver not only reading materials but internet services, job hunting tools, lighter entertainment with DVD’s, audio books and e-books. The HPLB is proposing a $6,370 grant for 2020 which is consistent since 2014. This grant represents a per capita grant of $11.50/pp based on our population count of 554. They still are showing that they are running an annual deficit which is supported by their reserve/savings. The Board has been working hard to raise additional funds for the library and found that the Bottle Drive was very profitable raising $1,934.65 the library also received donations along with drive. Realizing that this is not sustainable and that the cost savings of moving to a VOIP telephone system & municipal services being absorbed by the Town will help them to become more sustainable going forward. RECOMMENDATION REPORT/DOCUMENT: Attached _X_ Available__ Nil __ KEY ISSUE(S)/CONCEPTS DEFINED: As part of the Town of Hardisty appointed committees, the Hardisty & District Public Library must annually have their budget approved by the Town of Hardisty Council. In preparation of the Town of Hardisty’s 2020 budget this information is required. www.municipalaffairs.alberta.ca/plsb_funding_and_grants This statement is to be submitted by municipal and intermunicipal library boards serving fewer than 10,000 people. Boards serving more than 10,000 may submit this form or their own budget document. The budget is required to evaluate the status of the application and to ensure that the local appropriation is sufficient for the board to receive the provincial operating grant. The library board must receive a local appropriation from council of at least $2.00 per resident and be in compliance with the Libraries Act and Libraries Regulation. Budget (As per the Libraries Act) 8(1) The municipal board shall before December 1 in each year prepare a budget and an estimate of the money required during the ensuing fiscal year to operate and manage the municipal library. (2) The budget and the estimate of money shall be forthwith submitted to the council of the municipality. (3) Council may approve the estimate under subsection (1) in whole or in part. RSA 2000 cL-11 s8;2006 c5 s5 Board duties (As per the Libraries Act) 7. The municipal board, subject to any enactment that limits its authority, has full management and control of the municipal library and shall, in accordance with the regulations, organize, promote and maintain comprehensive and efficient library services in the municipality and may co-operate with other boards and libraries in the provision of those services. 1983 cL-12.1 s1 Page 94 of 214 2.3 d) RELEVANT POLICY/PRACTICES/LEGISLATION: Libraries Act of Alberta, Revised Statues of Alberta 2000, Chapter L-11 current as of October 4, 2007 Sec & 7 8 – Board Duties & Budget Town of Hardisty Bylaw 695 STRATEGIC RELEVANCE: Marketing and Economic/Community Development Marketing of Town Recreational Facilities to improve usage RESPONSE OPTIONS and DESIRED OUTCOME(S): Accept as presented Accept with amendments Defeat IMPLICATIONS OF RECOMMENDATION: GENERAL: Information provision ORGANIZATIONAL: 8 hours of administrative assistance for preparation of Budget FINANCIAL: Budgetary amount as per Policy #7401 and for 2020 ENVIRONMENTAL: Nil FOLLOW UP ACTION/COMMUNICATIONS: Send letter to Hardisty Library Board advising them of Council’s decision. Submitted by Jackie Fenton, Finance & Legislative Assistant and Reviewed by: Sandy Otto, CAO Page 95 of 214 2.3 d) Hardisty Library Board Income and Expense Statement 2020 Budget Income: 2020 Budget 2019 Budget 2019 Actual Bank Balance Provincial Grant $ 8,503.00 $ 8,503.00 $ 4,252.00 PRL Service Grant $ 1,200.00 $ 2,492.00 $ 1,246.00 Town Grant $ 6,370.00 $ 6,370.00 $ 7,870.00 Hardisty Agricultural Society $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 9,675.00 Fundraising $ 5,400.00 $ 5,396.50 $ 4,156.15 Donations $ 5,000.00 $ 6,118.50 $ 3,568.75 Friends of the Library/Casino $ 2,000.00 $ - $ 268.72 Book Sales/Lost Books $ 300.00 $ 300.00 $ 370.00 Memberships/Fees/Fines $ 1,500.00 $ 2,100.00 $ 838.85 Pinter/Copy/Fax $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 160.85 History Books $ 500.00 TOTAL $ 35,773.00 $ 36,780.00 $ 32,906.32 Expenses: Staff Salary $ 22,100.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 19,452.48 CRA Expense $ 2,700.00 $ 1,296.00 $ 2,554.74 WCB $ 203.00 $ 200.00 $ 203.01 Book Replacement $ - $ - $ 500.00 Financial Review (Audit Fees) $ 200.00 $ 200.00 $ - Board Expenses $ 800.00 $ 800.00 $ - Program Expenses $ 2,000.00 $ 300.00 $ - Membershipes (AUMA) $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 57.75 Bank Charges $ 50.00 $ 145.00 $ - Library Supplies $ 200.00 $ 204.00 $ 28.02 Postage $ 100.00 $ 85.00 $ 94.50 Maint/Cleaning/Supplies $ 500.00 $ 2,150.00 $ 1,997.30 Insurance/Security $ 1,900.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,870.62 Utiltities $ 4,920.00 $ 4,800.00 $ 3,447.13 Supplies/MISC 50/50 Raffle Payout Capital TOTAL $ 35,773.00 $ 36,780.00 $ 30,205.55 NET SURPLUS (DEFICIT) $ - $ - $ 2,700.77 Notes to Budget 2020: 1. November, 2019 Bank Balance $4,015.51 2. History Book - Continue to sell History Books 3. Town of Hardisty - Received a contingency Grant for $1,500 3. Portion of the 2019 Library Optg Grant Rec'd Oct 3/19 - $4,252 Remainder of grant to be received Page 96 of 214 2.3 d) 4. Rural Library Services Grant 50% was to be sent out Oct 25/19 Rural Library Grant will be decrease due to population 5. The Library Board is working with the Friends of the Library and the Account has $17,000 Approx funds for Library use-Board would like to Budget $2,000/year from the Friends Account 6. Fundraising - Have increase awareness of the Library and possible increase in donation from other sources. Page 97 of 214 2.3 d) Hardisty Library Board Income and Expense Statement January 1st, 2019 to November 15th, 2019 Income: Budget Actual 2018 Comparison Bank Balance - Oct 1, 2019 $ 1,022.61 Provincial Grant $ 8,503.00 $ 4,252.00 $ 8,503.00 PRL Service Grant $ 2,492.00 $ 1,245.98 $ - Town Grant $ 6,370.00 $ 7,870.00 $ 6,370.00 Hardisty Agricultural Society $ 5,000.00 $ 9,675.00 $ 5,000.00 Fundraising $ 5,396.50 $ 4,156.15 $ 3,598.50 Donations $ 6,118.50 $ 3,568.75 $ 3,397.05 Friends of the Library/Casino $ 268.72 Book Sales/Lost Books $ 300.00 $ 200.00 $ 80.00 Memberships/Fees/Fines $ 2,100.00 $ 890.68 $ 1,653.30 Pinter/Copy/Fax $ 500.00 $ 160.85 $ 282.90 History Books $ 500.00 TOTAL $ 36,780.00 $ 33,810.74 $ 28,884.75 Expenses: Staff Salary $ 25,000.00 $ 19,453.16 $ 13,877.10 CRA Expense $ 1,296.00 $ 2,554.74 $ 2,280.96 WCB $ 200.00 $ 203.01 $ 200.00 Book Replacement $ - $ - $ - Financial Review (Audit Fees) $ 200.00 $ - $ - Board Expenses $ 800.00 $ 74.70 Program Expenses $ 300.00 $ - $ 439.00 Membershipes (AUMA) $ 100.00 $ 57.75 $ 57.75 Bank Charges $ 145.00 $ - $ - Library Supplies $ 204.00 $ 122.52 $ 105.80 Postage $ 85.00 $ - Janitorial & Supplies $ 1,800.00 $ 1,462.30 $ 2,073.82 Snow Removal $ 350.00 $ - Insurance/Security $ 1,500.00 $ 1,870.62 $ 1,249.79 Utiltities $ 4,800.00 $ 3,036.13 $ 3,499.49 Supplies/MISC 50/50 Raffle Payout $ 1,035.00 Capital TOTAL $ 36,780.00 $ 29,795.23 $ 23,858.41 NET SURPLUS (DEFICIT) Bank Balance $ - $ 4,015.51 $ 5,026.35 Notes to Budget 2019: 1. Jan 1, 2019 Opening Bank Balance $12,722.26 2. History Book - $500 - Sold $500 3. Portion of the 2019 Library Optg Grant Rec'd Oct 3/19 - $4,252 Remainder will arrive once GOA Budget has been approved Page 98 of 214 2.3 d) 4. Rural Library Services Grant 50% was to be sent out Oct 25/19 - $1245.98 Remainder will arrive once GOA Budget has been approved 5. The Library Board is working with the Friends of the Library and the Account has $17,000 Approx funds for Library use- Page 99 of 214 2.3 d) TOWN OF HARDISTY LIBRARY BOARD 3 YEAR BUDGET INCOME 2019 Budget 2019 Actual 2020 Budget 2020 Actual 2021 Budget 2021 Actual Provincial Grants 8,503.00 4,252.00 8,503.00 8,503.00 PRL Service Grant 2,492.00 1,246.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 Town Grant 6,370.00 7,870.00 6,370.00 6,370.00 Hardisty Agricultural Society 5,000.00 9,675.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 FUNDRAISING/DONATIONS Fundraising 5,396.50 4,156.15 5,400.00 5,400.00 Donations 6,118.50 3,568.75 5,000.00 5,000.00 Friends of the Library/Casino 268.72 2,000.00 2,000.00 OTHER REVENUE Book Sales/Lost Books 300.00 370.00 300.00 300.00 Memberships/Fees/Fines 2,100.00 838.85 1,500.00 1,500.00 Printer/Copy/Fax 500.00 160.85 500.00 500.00 OTHER REVENUE 500.00 TOTAL INCOME 36,780.00 32,906.32 35,773.00 - 35,773.00 - EXPENSE OPERATING Staff Salary 25,000.00 19,452.48 22,100.00 22,600.00 EI/CPP/IT Expense 1,296.00 2,554.74 2,700.00 2,900.00 WCB 200.00 203.01 203.00 200.00 Other 500.00 MATERIALS Book Replacement ADMINISTRATION Financial Review/BookKeeper 200.00 200.00 200.00 Board Expenses 800.00 800.00 800.00 Program Expenses 300.00 2,000.00 1,000.00 Memberships (AUMA) 100.00 57.75 100.00 100.00 Telephone Bank Charges 145.00 50.00 150.00 Library Supplies 204.00 28.02 200.00 230.00 Postage 85.00 94.50 100.00 100.00 BUILDING MANTENANCE Maint/Cleaning/Supplies 1,800.00 1,997.30 500.00 500.00 Snow Removal 350.00 Insurance/Security 1,500.00 1,870.62 1,900.00 1,950.00 Utilities 4,800.00 3,447.13 4,920.00 5,043.00 CAPITAL TOTAL EXPENSES 36,780.00 30,205.55 35,773.00 - 35,773.00 - INCOME/(EXPENSE) - 2,700.77 - - - - Page 100 of 214 2.3 e) Town of Hardisty REQUEST FOR DECISION 19-12-092 December 10th, 2019 SUBJECT: Request for Donation to the 22nd Annual FIRST Auction & Supper – Feb. 1, 2020 – in Alliance, AB RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council approve a donation in the amount of ______ CAO COMMENTS: This is an annual event that the Town of Hardisty has been a supporter of in many different fashions (when hosted here in Hardisty we have donated the Hardisty Community Hall Rental Fee, we have purchased tickets to the event for our elected officials to attend, and we have donated an item for the silent or live auction). In 2019 the Council approved a donation towards the FIRST Supper & Auction as silver sponsor of $250 and purchased 4 tickets for the elected officials, as per Motion 232/18 – November 13th, 2018 Council meeting. This donation fits within the parameters of our Charitable Donations Policy #1202 and is providing a service to our residents who have to call on it for support. It provides an educational component to our children through our school system encouraging them to be better citizens and individuals. RECOMMENDATION REPORT/DOCUMENT: Attached _X_ Available__ Nil __ KEY ISSUE(S)/CONCEPTS DEFINED: FIRST’s mission is to promote healthy relationships for people of all ages whom live in Flagstaff. The program provides outreach, response, services and community education aimed at making life better for families and children in Flagstaff. FIRST is the prevention of domestic violence and bullying program in Flagstaff. This program provides outreach, responses, services and community education aimed at making life better for families and children in Flagstaff. FIRST partners with many agencies in Flagstaff to reduce risky behaviour in youth and also partner with Flagstaff Family and Community Services in offering a counselling program. FIRST is here to promote healthy relationships for all age groups and works closely with Flagstaff Schools. FIRST was instrumental in introducing the Olweus anti-bullying program to the majority of Page 101 of 214 2.3 e) Flagstaff Schools & this event will assist in continuing to fund that program. This will be incorporated within our budgeted amount for Donations to Other Groups for 2018 (GL #2-12-00-990-00) RELEVANT POLICY/PRACTICES/LEGISLATION: Town of Hardisty – Charitable Donations Policy #1202 Municipal Government Act 243(1) Contents of an operating budget STRATEGIC RELEVANCE: RESPONSE OPTIONS and DESIRED OUTCOME(S): Accept as presented IMPLICATIONS OF RECOMMENDATION: . GENERAL: ORGANIZATIONAL: Minimal FINANCIAL: Budgetary amount for 2020 ENVIRONMENTAL: Support and assistance to the social environment of families in the Flagstaff County Region. FOLLOW UP ACTION/COMMUNICATIONS: Letter to F.I.R.S.T Board regarding Council’s decision on the donation to the FIRST event. Advertising of the event on the Town of Hardisty website & facebook. Submitted By: Jackie Fenton, Legislative & Finance Assist. Reviewed By: Sandy Otto –CAO Page 102 of 214 2.3 e) Page 103 of 214 2.3 e) 9.5 $8 m=<2. $8 ¢ Page 105 of 214 2.3 f) Town of Hardisty REQUEST FOR DECISION 19-12-093 December 10th, 2019 SUBJECT: Flagstaff Regional Housing Group 2020 Requisition RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council accept as information the 2020 Flagstaff Regional Housing Group total municipal lodge requisition in the amount of $250,000 WHEREAS the funding formula is based on the 2020 Equalized Assessment calculation, the Town of Hardisty accounts for 5.34% of this requisition for a total of $13,350. CAO COMMENTS: FRHG has decreased the 2020 requisition from 2019 by $50,000 in total which represents a $2220 decrease for the Town of Hardisty. The reduction comes from a healthy surplus in reserves and using a small amount of savings to provide member municipalities with a lesser taxation burden during these uncertain financial times for municipalities. Council as a member of the FRHG and pursuant to the Ministerial Order can only accept this requisition as is as it is set by the FRHG Board. RECOMMENDATION REPORT/DOCUMENT: Attached _X_ Available__ Nil __ KEY ISSUE(S)/CONCEPTS DEFINED: 2020 requisition is showing a 14% reduction for the Town of Hardisty which is less than FRHG’s 3-yr plan committing to retaining municipal contributions at a level of $15,570, with the total requisitions at $300,000 for 2019. FRHG Board will closely monitor expense pressures and reserve balances. RELEVANT POLICY/PRACTICES/LEGISLATION: Hardisty Bylaw #818 Ministerial Order # H:028/16 Municipal Government Act Sec. 243 - 1 Contents of an Operating Budget (e) STRATEGIC RELEVANCE: Provide affordable senior’s housing within the Town of Hardisty and the Flagstaff Region. RESPONSE OPTIONS and DESIRED OUTCOME(S): Page 106 of 214 2.3 f) 1. Approve as presented 2. Reject with reason IMPLICATIONS OF RECOMMENDATION: GENERAL: ORGANIZATIONAL: FINANCIAL: Include in 2020 Operating Budget ENVIRONMENTAL: NIL FOLLOW UP ACTION/COMMUNICATIONS: Submitted and Reviewed By: Sandy Otto, CAO Page 107 of 214 2.3 f) December 6, 2019 Ms. Sandy Otto, CAO Town of Hardisty 4807 - 49 Street Box 10 Hardisty, AB T0B 1V0 Dear Ms. Otto: Re: 2020 Lodge Requisition At the Flagstaff Regional Housing Group meeting on December 3, 2019 the Board passed their 2020 budget that included a lodge requisition for a total of $250,000. The reduction in the requisition was supported in respect of the current municipal budget climate and healthy reserve balances that can accommodate operational losses. While the current 3-year plan calls for the Municipal contributions through requisition to remain at this level, the board will closely monitor expense pressures and reserve balances. Below is a table outlining your portion of the requisition payable for 2020: Municipality 2020 Equalized % Requisition Assessment Payable Flagstaff County $ 1,474,117,092 76.04 % $ 190,100 Town of Killam $ 97,726,259 5.04 % $ 12,600 Town of Sedgewick $ 90,097,718 4.65 % $ 11,625 Town of Hardisty $ 103,487,008 5.34 % $ 13,350 Town of Daysland $ 72,076,790 3.72 % $ 9,300 Village of Forestburg $ 66,641,285 3.44 % $ 8,600 Village of Lougheed $ 18,319,008 0.94 % $ 2,350 Village of Alliance $ 7,907,442 0.41 % $ 1,025 Village of Heisler $ 8,177,399 0.42 % $ 1,050 $ 1,938,550,001 100.00% $ 250,000 1 | Page Page 108 of 214 2.3 f) A formal invoice will be sent separately. Please remit payment to: The Bethany Group, 4612 - 53 Street, Camrose AB T4V 1Y6. The Municipal contributions supports the operations of the Big Knife Lodge in Forestburg. In total 41 spaces are supported that enable seniors to access safe, secure and affordable supportive housing option where they can age close to family and friends. The total requisition represents 35% of total revenue and supports a local payroll of $475,000 for the 13 employees at the Lodge. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at any time. Yours truly, Mike Leathwood, CEO The Bethany Group Office: 780.679.2010 Email: [email protected] 2 | Page Page 109 of 214 2.3 g) Town of Hardisty REQUEST FOR DECISION 19-12-094 December 10th, 2019 SUBJECT: Transfer of funds to Water Resources Reserve – 2019 Boating License Revenue RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council approve the transfer of funds generated from 2019 in the amount of $1,130 from GL #1-12-00-410-00 to the Water Resources Reserve Savings 3-01-09-320-00 for the year end of Dec 31, 2019. CAO COMMENTS: The amount of funds received from the collection of the 2019 Boating Licenses is $1,130.00. Giving a total of $1,130.00 to be transferred to the Water Resources Reserve Savings. RECOMMENDATION REPORT/DOCUMENT: Attached __ Available__ Nil __ KEY ISSUE(S)/CONCEPTS DEFINED: The Water Resources Reserve was established to provide funding for the Hardisty Lake Stabilization which also is linked to our hydrological connection to the stabilization of our water supply for the Town. In dry years we have approval from Alberta Environment to divert water from the Battle River into Hardisty Lake to keep the water level up. RELEVANT POLICY/PRACTICES/LEGISLATION: Town of Hardisty Water Resources Reserve Policy No: 1514 Municipal Government Act, RSA 2000, Chpt M-26, Sec 243 (e) 1 STRATEGIC RELEVANCE: Funds transferred to Reserves to be used to help with operational costs for the lake stabilization when required. RESPONSE OPTIONS and DESIRED OUTCOME(S): 1. Approve as presented 2. Reject with reason IMPLICATIONS OF RECOMMENDATION: . Page 110 of 214 2.3 g) GENERAL: ORGANIZATIONAL: FINANCIAL: Transfer of funds to Water Resources Reserve $1,130 for 2019. ENVIRONMENTAL: NIL FOLLOW UP ACTION/COMMUNICATIONS: Direct the Legislative/Financial Assistant to Transfer funds in the amount of $1,130 to Water Resources Reserves Submitted Jackie Fenton, Legislative/Financial Assistant & Reviewed By: Sandy Otto, CAO Page 111 of 214 2.3 h) Town of Hardisty REQUEST FOR DECISION 19-12-095 December 10th, 2019 SUBJECT: Request for office closure for Holiday Season (outside of policy) Dec. 24th & 27th RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council agree to the request for office closure outside of Policy 1983-06 for Tuesday, December 24th, 2019 for the full day as all employees scheduled to work this day will get full pay for this extra time off and at the request of the CAO, the office to be closed on Friday, December 27th, and this day will be considered a personal vacation day or time off in lieu of banked time. CAO COMMENTS: It is considered a warranted request by the CAO to grant a day off with pay to staff for recognition of the Holiday Season outside of policy. Pursuant to Policy 1983-06 the office is to be open until Noon on the 24th if it falls on a Monday to Friday work schedule. With the holiday season falling very close to the weekend and with staff looking to take extended holiday time the CAO feels that having (1) person in the office is unnecessary. Very little interference or ratepayer inconvenience. Public work’s staff will be on call in the event of a utility emergency. However public works will be required to come in on the 27th for a part day in order to be compliant with our Operating Authority for the Town of Hardisty Waterworks System. RECOMMENDATION REPORT/DOCUMENT: Attached ______Available____ KEY ISSUE(S)/CONCEPTS DEFINED: Pursuant to Policy #1983-06 December 24th is not a statutory holiday but allows for the office to be open from 9:00am till Noon. The request for an additional day of office closure along with the extension of making December 24th a full day of closure is outside of policy and requires authorization of Council. RELEVANT POLICY/PRACTICES/LEGISLATION: Town of Hardisty Policy #1983-06 Town of Hardisty Public Notification Bylaw #1231/18 STRATEGIC RELEVANCE: RESPONSE OPTIONS and DESIRED OUTCOME(S): Page 112 of 214 2.3 h) 1. Approve 2. Defeat 3. Approve with amendments IMPLICATIONS OF RECOMMENDATION: GENERAL: ORGANIZATIONAL: FINANCIAL: Employee wages are all ready budgeted. ENVIRONMENTAL: FOLLOW UP ACTION/COMMUNICATIONS: Notice needs to be posted on website, Facebook & in the Annual Season’s Greetings ad in the Community Press the Holiday Season Office hours. Prepared and Reviewed By: Sandy Otto, CAO Page 113 of 214 2.3 i) Town of Hardisty REQUEST FOR DECISION 19-12-096 December 10th, 2019 SUBJECT: Go East Travel Guide – Membership & Advertising for 2020 RECOMMENDATION: Motion #1: THAT Council moves to renew our membership with Go East RTO at the price of $400 for 2020 Motion #2: That Council moves to run a half page ad in the Go East 2020 Travel Guide at the cost of $1000 or $2000 for a full page ad if Lakeview Golf Course and the Hardisty Ag Society wish to each pay $400 which would bring the Town’s share down to $1200 for the advertising section in the Travel Guide. CAO COMMENTS: The Town of Hardisty has held a membership in Go East Rural Tourism since 2013 and have taken out advertising in various amounts from ¼ page ads to full page ads. Being a member of the Go East RTO Board has leveraged additional funding from Alberta Tourism through grant applications that the membership has applied for. This leverage has helped to build a strong partnership with Alberta Tourism and helped the development of promoting rural Alberta (eastern) corridor between highway 14 & highway 12 as a place to travel for interesting events and short term “stay kations”. While budgeting is tight it appears that Go East is performing well for the dollar investment the Town of Hardisty is providing. All the different forms of media used in their advertising does present a good network for our recreation facility and organizations to be able to get the exposure required for them to generate outside revenue. By partnering with a few of our non-profit organizations & recreational managers we can get some good mileage. RECOMMENDATION REPORT/DOCUMENT: Attached _X_ Available__ Nil __ KEY ISSUE(S)/CONCEPTS DEFINED: In the 2019 Go East edition, the Town of Hardisty shared a full page ad at the cost of $2000 with the Lakeview Golf Course and the Hardisty Ag Society each paying $400. RELEVANT POLICY/PRACTICES/LEGISLATION: Page 114 of 214 2.3 i) STRATEGIC RELEVANCE: Hardisty Strategic Plan 2016 – 2017 and Beyond Growth: (People/Business/Promotion) Strategies: a. Increase population: more people=more business= better downtown. Increase Collaboration with Counties/other Towns Strategies: a. Communication between the governing bodies. b. Knowledge of need, resources, partnerships. c. Regional Initiatives. RESPONSE OPTIONS and DESIRED OUTCOME(S): Accept as presented Accept with amendments Defeat IMPLICATIONS OF RECOMMENDATION: . GENERAL: ORGANIZATIONAL: FINANCIAL: $400 for the 2020 membership, and $1000 for a half page or $2000 for full page ad with partnering organizations if they wish to do in the 2020 Travel Guide ENVIRONMENTAL: FOLLOW UP ACTION/COMMUNICATIONS: Advise Go East of council’s decision. Submitted By: Marge Gausvik, Utilities & Development Assistant Reviewed by: Sandy Otto, CAO Page 115 of 214 2.3 i) Znn? omn5.D.osd\ Page 117 of 214 Page 118 of 214 Page 118 mu.>_m_Em.Es2;> m$m.§.o2 w.93 S : < ._EmI 21.. Ez?sme & sum. 8R.8m.o§ :3 35.38 St . ;o:=m_Eon u__n:nE502 . om.__..oo=00 3m_>9_m._ bm_u._mIucm _m_u::o._monto. .u:oEm_u __mnu__n:a.:mum_u<. _§m>m_._ ucm.mmm._mo_:u_a2.2a _m2_mnEmU. mw._m m:_E:.:>>m_u_._mcomum. bm_u._I Eso._. mg ..ou._ono£ :_£_3 _u2moo_ Ewm<. mu...Bubm._u._m:§§.s ...m.S=o.=m:.:8S EoE Bu . mmw~.mmw.emKE0 .mm.m._w_nm:ommm._>.m>.E mmm:3 mm 6. .__._o>m~__m:om._mn_Em_3 :o>._commom__m._o ?cmxmms >._m>m>m.mucm._m__m.=._.._o>x._mn_.._mw>2 .59»bmtom.E9: \m§So.:m< annual 9: >5nmmmcms.. :o_Eo m_.= <5 ?commww. om%.m%.2: =8 mmsxooaBk . :e m msmnow:2 o>m: 9358 52:5 §__§ .25. gram 2: t 2.2 2___e on?mm. w>w_2muzmEcommmw.mczmmmEgo. ucmmczmmm..o__mE_ . >__E E3.._o_mmmu:oo. >._. _nm_<_._ .._ Em._:m.mm. umm:mu__ ucm _e_.s§ _§§._ m_m.:m._ £_3 n_o:m.o.amwm._3m£ mm:o;n_.._o?wmzm.wzmzsmw.__.=9 % m._wto VE: mc__5o. 2: 2. E2 2: :3 co m..__m:m__m:o mEmmb 2 bammn m_nm__m>m9__.9_m2.25 . ..~:.m$.oE_mcomuzjossoE .%m< 82$:oEoEum_bm.:.:mI.9830 ummw ucmEmmmwa .22: was3:: m.6_..u_.o 3 ac mmmEm>_...m mwsoo m_o: gems.__2 .3050 . m.mw.mm5 3 moxm. m. §$ .03use :30 .. w._:oc m.u._uwm u2muo_ v=.__..mo_uma.m_m:_m >_:_.$C_?S— N255: <0 30> 23.2. MEGS 3m__:a_._.so_>9_m._E9_.umm..._?:u._$3m_En_._m._.=>2E592: 3wetum:2.5 .m5>m._w:m5 =om.__..< . .0—uU.=v&.—.00..—+W 2.3 i) 2.3 i) Milestones Reached Through 2019 Annual Travel Guide - 2019 was the most popular year for our Travel Guide with over 73,000 copies printed with high demand at Tradeshows, Visitor Centres and hundreds of Edmonton area racks and outlets. - We had a 50% increase in views to the online version of the Travel Guide totalling over 150,000 pageviews and the year is not over yet. - There is more traffic in the online version of the Travel Guide than most websites in the region. Combined with the printed guide we are reaching and influencing over 100,000 more people than any other travel guide in this region and we have results and testimonials from all over the region! Testimonials Every year more and more testimonials pour in from local Government, businesses and non-profit organizations with comments such as: - "You do an amazing job to promote our local Communities and events!" – from Hampton Inn-St Paul and MCSNET, and many others. - "You have helped local tourism businesses who have said up to 50% of their business came from Go East” – from AB Labour- Bonnyville-Lakeland office - "We get a lot of business from the Go East magazine and they are great supporters of ours." – from Twisted Fork, St Paul. - "No one has more tourism experience, nor more knowledgeable than you at Go East.”- from Community Futures – Lac La Biche. So Many Major Milestones for Go East of Edmonton Website We created more content and reached over 1500 webpages of information which includes featured webpages on all your communities, confirming once again we are by far the most comprehensive tourism and event website in the region. Leads to partners or click-thrus from the Go East website to our partners websites is consistently over 20,000 annually between 15-20% of total traffic and is an above average ROI. Traffic is growing at 60% organic growth every year and we achieved over 200% increase in the Go- Roadtrips and Community webpages sections on our website in 2019. We reached a milestone in one month - July 2019 with over 15,000 users, from over 22,000 site visits that reached over 41,000 pageviews! In September 2019 we reached these milestones for the Go East website: - Since 2014 we have now reached over 200,000 users, over 300,000 site visits, and over 600,000 pageviews. (And if you add in the over 400,000 pageviews from the Online version of the Travel Guide since 2014, we have now reached over 1 Million pages read by travellers and potential visitors!) Fact - there is more traffic in one month on the Go East website than other websites have for a whole year! We are on track for 2020 to be reaching annually; 100,000 users, 150,000 site visits with 250,000 pageviews. Not only is it the #1 Tourism website but in summer 2019 it was the #1 highest traffic local website in our region. That means higher traffic than all the local media and local community websites. Page 119 of 214 2.3 i) Another Summer of Award Winning Digital Campaign Success In partnership with Travel Alberta Cooperative Marketing and nine of our member attractions and communities provided funding for the 2019 Go East Staycations Summer/Fall Marketing Campaign. In 2018 we won an Alberta Tourism marketing award for this project and we have just been nominated for a 2019 Alto-Alberta Tourism Marketing award! Go East continues to work with the award-winning digital marketing consultants, Strong Coffee Marketing, to implement this campaign that helps increase exposure, traffic, and social media engagement for our communities. In total, there was over $15,000 in digital advertising which started in June and will run into November to promote the region. Radio, TV, Video and other Digital promotions included: - Weekly Radio on air Talk show on Country 106.ca - June, Bob Layton 630 Ched promotion - June, August (2) on Lakeland Connect Media - July, Global TV Edmonton Live Morning Show - August, CTV Edmonton Live Morning Show - Facebook and Instagram Ad campaigns - Google Search, Display and Re-targeting Ads The results of this campaign have been extremely impressive. We have larger than expected gains from previous years in website and social media traffic. Over 1.5 million impressions from ads and over 50,000 clicks from the Google and Facebook ads promoting the region. Over 20,000 people clicked to go into the website to see the partners pages. We expect this number to keep growing which is very exciting! More details on these numbers and some valuable stats will be available at our upcoming Fall meeting and event. Amazing Growth for Social Media In the summer of 2019 the Go East Facebook page recorded milestones in that we achieved a post reach monthly of over 200,000 people with over 45,000 people who engaged through clicking, commenting, liking and sharing on the events and activities we promoted. Annually we now have grown to a post reach of over 1 million and over 200,000 engagements. Did you know that we have now grown by over 5000 followers in the past year bringing our total to over 24,000 followers on Social Media. This includes Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and our E- News. We have the most experienced tourism staff and consultants who are promoting the communities events and activities up to 7 days per week. This is the largest and most engaging audience for any type of regional tourism social media in the region reaching over 100,000 more people than other tourism social media pages. Outperforming Other Tourism Organizations around Alberta Fact - No Tourism Organization from the region past or present has ever reached the traffic, results and ROI, we are achieving now every year at Go East RTO. We have even compared our website traffic and leads to partners against others around Alberta and have found we have more traffic and ranked higher than Canadian Badlands-Drumheller, Red Deer Tourism, Travel Lakeland and many others. Google continues to rank Go East of Edmonton higher than other websites in the region and Google searches are bringing up Go East of Edmonton more often than any other tourism website, and especially for your community events. Tourism Development Continues Go East RTO was the first tourism organization in Alberta to receive a CARES grant for Tourism development. In fact we have received over 10 grants over the past 6 years and we are still working on our current Tourism Development projects. We have been extremely busy this summer on these projects and so we are planning to send a separate update for the new Roadtrip Videos and Itineraries that will cover the 5 main Highway corridors, and the new Go East Website that will have new features that no website has in the region, and special sections will drive more traffic to our businesses and Communities. Overall, no one has ever undertaken such an important project for the region and we will be pleased to send you an update very soon. Page 120 of 214 2.3 i) #1 Monthly E-News #1 Page 121 of 214 2.3 i) Ads Page 122 of 214 2.3 j) From: Patrick Carriere To: Sandy Otto Cc: Mike Karleen Subject: FW: **External E-Mail**scan from G20618 Date: December-04-19 11:04:40 AM Attachments: 191204120359.pdf Hey Sandy I have outlined the laneways we are looking at taking over from our conversation last week. I have included my supervisor in this email. Thanks Pat From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2019 5:04 AM To: Patrick Carriere ------This e-mail was sent to you by Trimac Transportation or its affiliates (“Trimac”). To prevent future correspondence from Trimac, reply to this e-mail with "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the Subject. This e-mail contains confidential information and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. ------Ce courriel vous a été envoyé par Transportation Trimac ou par son entreprise affiliée (“Trimac”). Pour ne plus recevoir de correspondance de Trimac, répondez à ce courriel avec “SE DÉSABONNER” comme sujet. Ce message courriel contient de l’information confidentielle et possiblement privée, si vous n’êtes pas le destinataire visé, veuillez avertir l’expéditeur immédiatement et détruire ce courriel. Page 123 of 214 2.3 j) "I1/25/2019 Google Maps Go gée Maps ‘lg, ti Imagery ©2019 CNESI Airbus.Imagery ©2019 CNES/ Airbus,MaxarTechnologies, Map data ©2019 20 m nc[psi/www.googte.ca/maps/@52.6693681,-1113149691,268m/da1a—!3m1!1e3, Page 1241/1 of 214 2.3 k) Town of Hardisty REQUEST FOR DECISION 19-12-098 December 10th, 2019 SUBJECT: Proposed Municipal Requisition for Populations <5000 for Police Funding RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council accept the information received from AUMA and verified by the Alberta Solicitor General’s Office as the proposed requisition for police funding with an estimated commencement date of 2020 and provide financial funding for the new Policing Requisition in the interim budget for 2020. CAO COMMENTS: Pursuant to the Province of Albert’s budget, and Premier Kenney’s plan to get tough on rural crime. $86 Million will come from the federal government and $200 Million from the municipalities with < than 5000 populations. This $200 Million would be collected over a 5yr period. Additional investment will be made into the Alberta Law Enforcement Response Team and creating an Alberta Police Advisory Board where municipal leaders will work in collaboration with law enforcement to endure local needs are heard and implemented. 300 RCMP Officers to be added to the frontline Additional support staff to aid in tactical units and provide technical expertise Improving call centre response times While the Alberta Government is still contemplating and reviewing the concern of the formalization of the requisition AFTER municipal budgets are approved in 2020, AUMA has advocated on our behalf to have these requisitions come into effect for 2021. RECOMMENDATION REPORT/DOCUMENT: Attached __ Available__ Nil __ KEY ISSUE(S)/CONCEPTS DEFINED: New requisition from our Provincial Stakeholder to address the significant increase in rural crime. Municipalities with < than 5000 populations in the past did not have to pay for policing this was absorbed by the Province. However, in order to address the climbing crime rates in rural Alberta and respond to the need of additional policing a requisition will be administered to us municipalities with populations < than 5000. The Alberta Solicitor General’s Office has shared their Police Funding Model which clearly shows and provides transparency to their calculation of requisition costs to municipalities. Those Municipalities who have entered into Community Resource Officer (or Page 125 of 214 2.3 k) enhanced policing agreements) with the AB Gov’t are receiving a credit for the cost of the CRO position. Flagstaff County has held the contract for our CRO position and over the last few years have fully funded this position. HOWEVER, at the regular meeting of Council on June 11th, 2019 Council made a motion (Motion #126/19) to partner with Flagstaff County in funding the CRO Position for a 3yr term commencing 2020 in the amount of $2500/yr. with a request that an emphasis of their job duty be to assist the Rural Crime Watch program which educates our residents on crime prevention practices and news. RELEVANT POLICY/PRACTICES/LEGISLATION: Municipal Government Act Sec. 243 - 1 Contents of an Operating Budget (e) STRATEGIC RELEVANCE: Rural crime prevention and safer communities. RESPONSE OPTIONS and DESIRED OUTCOME(S): 1. Approve as presented 2. Reject with reason IMPLICATIONS OF RECOMMENDATION: . GENERAL: ORGANIZATIONAL: Minimal - Budgeting FINANCIAL: 2020 - $11,941, 2021 - $17,925, 2022 - $23,882, 2023 - $35,849, 2024 - $35,849 ENVIRONMENTAL: Safer communities FOLLOW UP ACTION/COMMUNICATIONS: Submitted & Reviewed By: Sandy Otto, CAO Page 126 of 214 2.3 k) From: President Subject: Provincial Announcement of Police Funding Model Date: December-05-19 3:06:07 PM Attachments: image001.png image003.png image004.png 2019-12 Police Costing Model - Municipal Costs by Municipality.pdf Dear municipal colleagues, I’m sure you have already been made aware of yesterday’s provincial government announcement of a new police costing model that applies to urban municipalities with populations under 5,000 and all rural municipalities. AUMA has long advocated for a more equitable police funding model to address RCMP vacancies and the rising costs of policing while improving community safety. We have been equally clear in our advocacy that any new funding model must take into consideration a municipality’s ability to pay for policing services, and that paying for policing must give municipalities a say in the delivery of police service in their community. The new police costing model reflects many of AUMA’s recommendations, such as use of population and equalized assessment to simulate demand and ability to pay, and the establishment of an Alberta Police Advisory Board with equal representation from AUMA and RMA to guide the implementation of the new model. The funds generated by this new model, a total of $286 million over five years, will be invested in frontline law enforcement, with the federal government contributing an additional $85.6 million to rural policing. However, there is more work to be done. We are very concerned with the proposed timelines for implementation, which suggest that invoices will be issued as early as next spring, well after municipal budgets have been set for 2020. We are working with senior staff at the Ministry of Justice and Solicitor General to see if the implementation of the new model can be delayed in order to align with the 2021 municipal budgeting process, and we will pass along any further information once it becomes available. Provincial staff have also provided us with the attached table that outlines preliminary estimates of the funding model’s financial impacts to municipalities. The Ministry of Justice and Solicitor General staff have told AUMA that they will contact municipalities directly to confirm these amounts and provide additional information. We remain committed to working with our partners at the Rural Municipalities Association (RMA) and the provincial government on this critical priority, as safe and healthy municipalities build strong communities and a stronger Alberta. If you would like to discuss this further, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Page 127 of 214 2.3 k) Barry Morishita | President Mayor, City of Brooks C: 403.363.9224 | [email protected] Alberta Municipal Place | 300 8616-51 Ave Edmonton, AB T6E 6E6 Toll Free: 310-AUMA | www.auma.ca This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this email. Page 128 of 214 2.3 k) Example Calculation Sheet – Police Funding Model Scenario: If province were to distribute 10% of the costs of frontline policing = $23.25M BASE MODEL Muni population x $23.25M x 50% = Weighted population cost Total population Municipal equalized assessment x $23.25M x 50% = Weighted equalized assessment cost Total equalized assessment Weighted equalized assessment cost + weighted population cost = TOTAL SHARE POLICING COST MODIFIERS (Subsidies) Crime Severity Index (CSI) Muni CSI 3 year average - Total CSI average = Muni CSI points above average Muni CSI points above average x 0.05% (subsidy per muni CSI point > average) = CSI % subsidy CSI % subsidy x TOTAL SHARE POLICING COST = CSI DOLLAR SUBSIDY Shadow Population Muni shadow population = Shadow pop % subsidy (max 5%) Muni population Shadow pop % subsidy x TOTAL SHARE POLICING COST = SHADOW POPULATION DOLLAR SUBSIDY Detachment No detachment in community = Base Cost x subsidy (5%) = DETACHMENT DOLLAR SUBSIDY YEARLY COST TO MUNICIPALITY = TOTAL SHARE POLICING COST - CSI DOLLAR SUBSIDY - SHADOW POP DOLLAR SUBSIDY - DETACHMENT DOLLAR SUBSIDY 1 | P a g e Page 129 of 214 2.3 k) Municipality A: Large specialized municipality Weighted population cost $547,595 = 36,072 x 23.25M x 50% 765,780 Weighted equalized assessment $1,738,859 = 42,670,899,320 x 23.25M x 50% cost 285,272,766,093 TOTAL SHARE POLICING COST $2,286,454 = 547,595 + 1,738,859 Muni CSI points above avg 349.96 = 465.21 (muni) – 115.25 (prov) CSI % subsidy 17.5% = 349.96 x 0.0005 CSI DOLLAR SUBSIDY $400,087* = 17.5% x 2,286,454 (*rounding difference) Shadow pop % subsidy 4.6% = 33,119 = 1.001 (max 0.05) 36,072 SHADOW POP DOLLAR SUBSIDY $104,964 = 5% x 2,286,454 NO DETACHMENT SUBSIDY $0 = 0 YEARLY COST TO $1,781,403 = 2,286,454 - 400,087 - 104,964 MUNICIPALITY Municipality B: Mid-sized municipal district Weighted population cost $119,456 = 7,869 x 23.25M x 50% 765,780 Weighted equalized assessment $83,317 = 2,044,554,084 x 23.25M x 50% cost 258,272,776,093 TOTAL SHARE POLICING COST $202,773 = 119,456 + 83,317 Muni CSI points above avg 0 = 76.35 (muni) – 115.25 (prov) CSI % subsidy 0% = 0 x 0.0005 CSI DOLLAR SUBSIDY $0 = 0% x 202,773 Shadow pop % subsidy 0% = none reported SHADOW POP DOLLAR SUBSIDY $0 = 0% x 202,773 NO DETACHMENT SUBSIDY $0 = 0 YEARLY COST TO $202,773 = 202,773 - 0 - 0 MUNICIPALITY Municipality C: Small summer village Weighted population cost $1,108 = 73 x 23.25M x 50% 765,780 Weighted equalized assessment $656 = 16,108,372 x 23.25M x 50% cost 285,272,776,093 TOTAL SHARE POLICING COST $1,765 = 1108 + 656 Muni CSI points above avg 59.30 = 174.55 (muni) – 115.25 (prov) CSI % subsidy 3% = 59.30 x 0.0005 CSI DOLLAR SUBSIDY $52* = 3% x 1,765 (*rounding difference) Shadow pop % subsidy 0% = none reported SHADOW POP DOLLAR SUBSIDY $0 = 0% x 1,765 DETACHMENT SUBSIDY $88 = no detachment = 5% x 1,765 YEARLY COST TO $1,625 = 1,176 - 52 - 88 MUNICIPALITY 2 | P a g e Page 130 of 214 2.3 k) Municipal Impacts of the Police Funding Model As supplied to AUMA by Government of Alberta, Ministry of Justice and Solicitor General NET IMPACT Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 10% 15% 20% 30% 30% Police Police Police Police Police Funding Funding Funding Funding Funding Model Share Model Share Model Share Model Model with with with Share with Share with MUNICIPALITY modifiers modifiers modifiers modifiers modifiers less less less less less Enhanced Enhanced Enhanced Enhanced Enhanced Policing Policing Policing Policing Policing Billing Billing Billing Billing Billing $ $ $ $ $ Lac La Biche County (1,095) 158,700 317,810 637,400 637,400 $ $ $ $ $ Mackenzie County (36,348) 105,784 247,305 531,567 531,567 Municipality of Crowsnest $ $ $ $ $ Pass 124,526 186,923 249,052 373,845 373,845 $ $ $ $ $ Municipality of Jasper 126,269 189,540 252,539 379,080 379,080 $ $ $ $ $ Strathcona County (rural) 919,675 1,380,501 1,839,350 2,761,003 2,761,003 Regional Municipality of Wood $ $ $ $ $ Buffalo (rural) 1,781,403 2,674,020 3,562,806 5,348,039 5,348,039 $ $ $ $ $ Athabasca County 202,773 304,377 405,545 608,754 608,754 $ $ $ $ $ Beaver County 139,239 209,008 278,477 418,016 418,016 $ $ $ $ $ Big Lakes County (188,802) (123,062) (57,604) 73,876 73,876 $ $ $ $ $ Birch Hills County 36,119 54,217 72,238 108,434 108,434 $ $ $ $ $ Brazeau County 105,163 238,029 370,326 636,059 636,059 $ $ $ $ $ Camrose County 211,608 317,639 423,215 635,278 635,278 $ $ $ $ $ Cardston County 93,715 140,673 187,430 281,347 281,347 $ $ $ $ $ Clear Hills County 89,005 133,603 178,009 267,205 267,205 $ $ $ $ $ Clearwater County 450,124 675,670 900,248 1,351,340 1,351,340 1 Page 131 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ $ $ $ County of Barrhead No. 11 133,492 200,382 266,985 400,764 400,764 $ $ $ $ $ County of Forty Mile No. 8 85,813 128,811 171,626 257,623 257,623 $ $ $ $ $ County of Grande Prairie No. 1 (605,040) (266,835) 69,919 746,331 746,331 $ $ $ $ $ County of Minburn No. 27 81,798 122,785 163,596 245,569 245,569 $ $ $ $ $ County of Newell 286,063 429,403 572,127 858,805 858,805 $ $ $ $ $ County of Northern Lights 109,705 164,676 219,411 329,352 329,352 $ $ $ $ $ County of Paintearth No. 18 77,276 115,997 154,552 231,995 231,995 $ $ $ $ $ County of St. Paul No. 19 166,790 250,364 333,580 500,728 500,728 $ $ $ $ $ County of Stettler No. 6 145,321 218,138 290,643 436,277 436,277 $ $ $ $ $ County of Two Hills No. 21 82,207 123,399 164,414 246,798 246,798 $ $ $ $ $ County of Vermilion River (87,822) 28,517 144,356 377,034 377,034 $ $ $ $ $ County of Warner No. 5 86,510 129,858 173,021 259,717 259,717 $ $ $ $ $ County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 124,800 267,506 409,600 695,012 695,012 $ $ $ $ $ Cypress County 156,636 315,294 473,272 790,588 790,588 $ $ $ $ $ Flagstaff County (42,885) 15,799 74,230 191,598 191,598 $ $ $ $ $ Kneehill County 159,611 239,589 319,223 479,178 479,178 $ $ $ $ $ Lac Ste. Anne County 235,655 353,736 471,311 707,473 707,473 $ $ $ $ $ Lacombe County 82,039 283,491 484,078 886,981 886,981 $ $ $ $ $ Lamont County 106,559 159,953 213,118 319,907 319,907 $ $ $ $ $ Leduc County 215,011 483,092 750,022 1,286,184 1,286,184 $ $ $ $ $ Lethbridge County 234,569 352,106 469,138 704,212 704,212 $ $ $ $ $ Mountain View County 373,364 560,448 746,729 1,120,896 1,120,896 Municipal District of Acadia $ $ $ $ $ No. 34 10,894 16,352 21,788 32,705 32,705 2 Page 132 of 214 2.3 k) Municipal District of Bighorn $ $ $ $ $ No. 8 66,850 100,346 133,699 200,692 200,692 Municipal District of $ $ $ $ $ Bonnyville No. 87 407,789 612,122 815,578 1,224,244 1,224,244 Municipal District of Fairview $ $ $ $ $ No. 136 38,437 57,697 76,875 115,395 115,395 Municipal District of Foothills $ $ $ $ $ No. 31 665,963 999,660 1,331,925 1,999,320 1,999,320 Municipal District of $ $ $ $ $ Greenview No. 16 168,074 412,636 656,148 1,145,271 1,145,271 Municipal District of Lesser $ $ $ $ $ Slave River No. 124 105,820 158,844 211,640 317,687 317,687 Municipal District of $ $ $ $ $ Opportunity No. 17 (648,636) (572,792) (497,272) (345,583) (345,583) Municipal District of Peace No. $ $ $ $ $ 135 38,304 57,497 76,607 114,994 114,994 Municipal District of Pincher $ $ $ $ $ Creek No. 9 (52,044) 2,050 55,912 164,100 164,100 Municipal District of Provost $ $ $ $ $ No. 52 133,305 200,100 266,609 400,200 400,200 Municipal District of $ $ $ $ $ Ranchland No. 66 8,483 12,734 16,966 25,467 25,467 Municipal District of Smoky $ $ $ $ $ River No. 130 52,619 78,985 105,237 157,969 157,969 Municipal District of Spirit $ $ $ $ $ River No. 133 19,955 29,955 39,911 59,909 59,909 $ $ $ $ $ Municipal District of Taber 194,241 291,570 388,481 583,139 583,139 Municipal District of $ $ $ $ $ Wainwright No. 61 149,270 224,065 298,540 448,131 448,131 Municipal District of Willow $ $ $ $ $ Creek No. 26 139,653 209,630 279,307 419,260 419,260 $ $ $ $ $ Northern Sunrise County 115,727 173,715 231,455 347,431 347,431 $ $ $ $ $ Parkland County 907,378 1,362,043 1,814,756 2,724,085 2,724,085 $ $ $ $ $ Ponoka County (49,063) 86,697 221,874 493,394 493,394 $ $ $ $ $ Red Deer County 387,121 661,269 934,242 1,482,539 1,482,539 $ $ $ $ $ Rocky View County 826,018 1,480,431 2,132,036 3,440,863 3,440,863 $ $ $ $ $ Saddle Hills County 130,042 195,202 260,083 390,404 390,404 $ $ $ $ $ Smoky Lake County 63,702 95,621 127,404 191,242 191,242 3 Page 133 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ $ $ $ Starland County 61,335 92,068 122,670 184,137 184,137 $ $ $ $ $ Sturgeon County 586,497 880,376 1,172,993 1,760,751 1,760,751 $ $ $ $ $ Thorhild County 79,141 118,796 158,281 237,592 237,592 $ $ $ $ $ Vulcan County 123,665 185,631 247,331 371,262 371,262 $ $ $ $ $ Westlock County 151,066 226,762 302,132 453,524 453,524 $ $ $ $ $ Wheatland County 300,446 450,993 600,893 901,985 901,985 $ $ $ $ $ Woodlands County 171,195 256,977 342,390 513,953 513,953 $ $ $ $ $ Yellowhead County 534,094 801,716 1,068,188 1,603,431 1,603,431 $ $ $ $ $ Special Areas Board 224,012 336,259 448,024 672,518 672,518 Improvement District No. 04 $ $ $ $ $ (Waterton) 13,819 20,743 27,638 41,486 41,486 Improvement District No. 09 $ $ $ $ $ (Banff) 43,796 65,740 87,591 131,481 131,481 Improvement District No. 12 $ $ $ $ $ (Jasper National Park) 2,829 4,246 5,658 8,493 8,493 Improvement District No. 13 $ $ $ $ $ (Elk Island) 220 331 441 662 662 Improvement District No. 24 $ $ $ $ $ (Wood Buffalo) 9,960 14,951 19,921 29,902 29,902 $ $ $ $ $ Improvement District No. 349 103,197 154,906 206,394 309,812 309,812 Kananaskis Improvement $ $ $ $ $ District 10,985 16,489 21,970 32,979 32,979 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Athabasca 58,176 87,326 116,351 174,652 174,652 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Barrhead (69,828) (24,645) 20,344 110,709 110,709 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Bashaw 15,703 23,572 31,407 47,144 47,144 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Bassano 23,250 34,900 46,500 69,799 69,799 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Beaverlodge 48,871 73,358 97,741 146,717 146,717 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Bentley 19,344 29,037 38,689 58,075 58,075 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Black Diamond 53,623 80,493 107,247 160,986 160,986 4 Page 134 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ $ $ $ Town of Bon Accord 27,797 41,726 55,594 83,451 83,451 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Bow Island 37,693 56,581 75,387 113,161 113,161 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Bowden 22,160 33,264 44,321 66,529 66,529 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Bruderheim 26,110 39,193 52,220 78,386 78,386 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Calmar 40,555 60,876 81,110 121,752 121,752 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Cardston 72,508 108,840 145,017 217,681 217,681 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Carstairs (78,065) (37,010) 3,869 85,980 85,980 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Castor 16,386 24,597 32,772 49,193 49,193 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Claresholm 73,730 110,674 147,460 221,349 221,349 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Coalhurst 49,229 73,896 98,457 147,792 147,792 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Coronation 17,494 26,259 34,987 52,519 52,519 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Crossfield (91,947) (57,848) (23,895) 44,304 44,304 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Daysland 14,322 21,499 28,645 42,998 42,998 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Didsbury 104,043 156,177 208,086 312,353 312,353 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Eckville 20,881 31,344 41,762 62,688 62,688 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Elk Point 25,661 38,519 51,322 77,038 77,038 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Fairview 57,864 86,858 115,727 173,715 173,715 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Falher 18,556 27,854 37,112 55,708 55,708 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Fort Macleod 59,003 88,567 118,005 177,135 177,135 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Fox Creek 41,727 62,635 83,454 125,271 125,271 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Gibbons 60,142 90,277 120,283 180,555 180,555 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Grande Cache 70,059 105,164 140,119 210,329 210,329 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Granum 7,129 10,701 14,258 21,402 21,402 5 Page 135 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ $ $ $ Town of Grimshaw 52,340 78,567 104,680 157,133 157,133 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Hanna 48,830 73,298 97,661 146,596 146,596 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Hardisty 11,941 17,925 23,882 35,849 35,849 $ $ $ $ $ Town of High Level (88,915) (53,296) (17,830) 53,408 53,408 $ $ $ $ $ Town of High Prairie 47,832 71,799 95,663 143,598 143,598 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Irricana 22,689 34,058 45,378 68,116 68,116 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Killam 19,068 28,622 38,136 57,245 57,245 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Lamont 32,745 49,153 65,491 98,306 98,306 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Legal 24,454 36,707 48,907 73,414 73,414 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Magrath 42,868 64,347 85,735 128,695 128,695 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Manning 22,833 34,275 45,667 68,550 68,550 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Mayerthorpe 23,064 34,620 46,127 69,241 69,241 $ $ $ $ $ Town of McLennan 13,735 20,617 27,470 41,235 41,235 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Milk River 15,219 22,845 30,438 45,689 45,689 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Millet 34,863 52,332 69,726 104,663 104,663 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Mundare 15,902 23,870 31,804 47,740 47,740 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Nanton 45,465 68,247 90,930 136,493 136,493 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Nobleford 23,644 35,492 47,289 70,984 70,984 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Onoway (140,495) (130,721) (120,989) (101,442) (101,442) $ $ $ $ $ Town of Oyen 18,876 28,334 37,752 56,669 56,669 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Penhold 62,442 93,730 124,883 187,459 187,459 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Picture Butte 34,363 51,581 68,725 103,162 103,162 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Pincher Creek 72,426 108,717 144,852 217,434 217,434 6 Page 136 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ $ $ $ Town of Provost 39,984 60,019 79,968 120,039 120,039 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Rainbow Lake 14,585 21,894 29,171 43,788 43,788 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Raymond 77,189 115,866 154,378 231,733 231,733 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Redwater 44,282 66,471 88,565 132,942 132,942 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Rimbey 50,576 75,918 101,152 151,837 151,837 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Sedgewick 15,222 22,850 30,445 45,700 45,700 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Sexsmith 49,794 74,745 99,588 149,490 149,490 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Smoky Lake 18,124 27,206 36,248 54,411 54,411 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Spirit River 18,638 27,977 37,276 55,955 55,955 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Stavely 10,019 15,039 20,037 30,077 30,077 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Sundre 56,573 84,920 113,146 169,840 169,840 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Swan Hills 24,870 37,331 49,740 74,663 74,663 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Thorsby 19,291 28,957 38,581 57,913 57,913 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Three Hills 61,763 92,710 123,525 185,421 185,421 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Tofield 41,564 62,391 83,128 124,782 124,782 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Trochu 18,689 28,053 37,377 56,106 56,106 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Turner Valley 54,632 82,006 109,263 164,013 164,013 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Two Hills 25,423 38,162 50,847 76,325 76,325 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Valleyview 34,239 51,396 68,478 102,791 102,791 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Vauxhall 20,787 31,203 41,574 62,406 62,406 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Vermilion 86,897 130,439 173,794 260,878 260,878 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Viking 20,284 30,449 40,569 60,897 60,897 $ $ $ $ $ Town of Vulcan 37,877 56,857 75,755 113,714 113,714 7 Page 137 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ $ $ $ Town of Wembley 28,570 42,886 57,140 85,772 85,772 $ $ $ $ $ Alberta Beach 21,520 32,303 43,040 64,606 64,606 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Acme 11,749 17,637 23,499 35,273 35,273 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Alix 14,675 22,028 29,350 44,056 44,056 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Alliance 2,571 3,859 5,142 7,718 7,718 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Amisk 3,448 5,176 6,896 10,351 10,351 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Andrew 7,495 11,251 14,990 22,501 22,501 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Arrowwood 3,088 4,635 6,176 9,270 9,270 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Barnwell 16,721 25,100 33,443 50,200 50,200 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Barons 5,625 8,444 11,251 16,889 16,889 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Bawlf 7,374 11,069 14,749 22,139 22,139 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Beiseker 16,617 24,943 33,234 49,886 49,886 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Berwyn 9,202 13,814 18,405 27,627 27,627 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Big Valley 5,992 8,994 11,984 17,988 17,988 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Bittern Lake 3,964 5,951 7,929 11,901 11,901 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Boyle 17,777 26,684 35,554 53,369 53,369 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Breton 10,913 16,381 21,825 32,761 32,761 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Carbon 8,737 13,115 17,473 26,229 26,229 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Carmangay 4,342 6,518 8,684 13,036 13,036 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Caroline 8,439 12,667 16,877 25,334 25,334 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Cereal 1,774 2,662 3,547 5,324 5,324 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Champion 5,367 8,056 10,734 16,112 16,112 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Chauvin 5,856 8,791 11,713 17,581 17,581 8 Page 138 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ $ $ $ Village of Chipman 4,977 7,470 9,953 14,941 14,941 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Clive 12,631 18,961 25,263 37,922 37,922 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Clyde 7,412 11,126 14,824 22,252 22,252 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Consort 13,373 20,074 26,746 40,147 40,147 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Coutts 4,410 6,620 8,820 13,239 13,239 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Cowley 3,718 5,581 7,437 11,163 11,163 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Cremona 8,169 12,263 16,339 24,526 24,526 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Czar 3,390 5,089 6,781 10,178 10,178 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Delburne 16,143 24,232 32,286 48,464 48,464 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Delia 3,754 5,636 7,509 11,271 11,271 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Dewberry 3,100 4,653 6,200 9,306 9,306 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Donalda 3,667 5,505 7,335 11,010 11,010 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Donnelly 5,813 8,725 11,626 17,451 17,451 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Duchess 19,435 29,173 38,869 58,345 58,345 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Edberg 2,440 3,662 4,879 7,324 7,324 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Edgerton 7,242 10,871 14,485 21,743 21,743 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Elnora 5,221 7,837 10,442 15,674 15,674 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Empress 2,533 3,802 5,066 7,605 7,605 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Ferintosh 3,504 5,260 7,009 10,520 10,520 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Foremost 9,524 14,296 19,048 28,592 28,592 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Forestburg 15,198 22,813 30,396 45,627 45,627 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Gadsby 633 950 1,265 1,899 1,899 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Girouxville 4,770 7,160 9,540 14,320 14,320 9 Page 139 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ $ $ $ Village of Glendon 8,642 12,973 17,284 25,945 25,945 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Glenwood 5,585 8,384 11,170 16,767 16,767 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Halkirk 1,902 2,855 3,804 5,710 5,710 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Hay Lakes 8,908 13,372 17,817 26,744 26,744 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Heisler 2,629 3,946 5,258 7,892 7,892 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Hill Spring 2,897 4,349 5,795 8,698 8,698 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Hines Creek 5,753 8,636 11,506 17,272 17,272 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Holden 6,010 9,021 12,020 18,043 18,043 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Hughenden 3,985 5,982 7,971 11,965 11,965 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Hussar 3,380 5,074 6,760 10,148 10,148 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Hythe 14,323 21,500 28,647 43,001 43,001 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Innisfree 3,728 5,596 7,456 11,193 11,193 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Irma 9,229 13,854 18,459 27,708 27,708 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Kitscoty 18,542 27,833 37,085 55,667 55,667 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Linden 14,962 22,458 29,923 44,917 44,917 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Lomond 2,851 4,280 5,702 8,559 8,559 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Longview 6,414 9,628 12,828 19,256 19,256 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Lougheed 4,357 6,540 8,714 13,080 13,080 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Mannville 14,116 21,188 28,231 42,377 42,377 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Marwayne 10,280 15,432 20,561 30,863 30,863 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Milo 1,715 2,575 3,430 5,149 5,149 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Morrin 4,077 6,120 8,154 12,240 12,240 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Munson 3,485 5,231 6,970 10,463 10,463 10 Page 140 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ $ $ $ Village of Myrnam 5,639 8,465 11,279 16,930 16,930 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Nampa 7,174 10,768 14,347 21,537 21,537 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Paradise Valley 2,876 4,318 5,753 8,635 8,635 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Rockyford 5,744 8,622 11,487 17,243 17,243 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Rosalind 3,242 4,866 6,484 9,732 9,732 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Rosemary 6,673 10,017 13,346 20,034 20,034 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Rycroft 10,816 16,235 21,631 32,470 32,470 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Ryley 8,372 12,566 16,743 25,133 25,133 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Spring Lake 15,018 22,544 30,037 45,087 45,087 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Standard 6,776 10,172 13,553 20,344 20,344 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Stirling 21,775 32,685 43,549 65,371 65,371 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Veteran 3,881 5,826 7,763 11,652 11,652 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Vilna 4,651 6,981 9,301 13,962 13,962 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Wabamun 13,274 19,926 26,548 39,851 39,851 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Warburg 13,311 19,981 26,623 39,963 39,963 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Warner 6,334 9,508 12,668 19,016 19,016 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Waskatenau 3,942 5,917 7,884 11,834 11,834 $ $ $ $ $ Village of Youngstown 2,572 3,861 5,144 7,721 7,721 Summer Village of Argentia $ $ $ $ $ Beach 3,427 5,144 6,853 10,287 10,287 Summer Village of Betula $ $ $ $ $ Beach 1,034 1,552 2,068 3,104 3,104 $ $ $ $ $ Summer Village of Birch Cove 1,114 1,673 2,229 3,346 3,346 $ $ $ $ $ Summer Village of Birchcliff 7,970 11,963 15,939 23,926 23,926 $ $ $ $ $ Summer Village of Bondiss 3,612 5,422 7,224 10,844 10,844 11 Page 141 of 214 2.3 k) Summer Village of Bonnyville $ $ $ $ $ Beach 2,357 3,539 4,715 7,077 7,077 Summer Village of Burnstick $ $ $ $ $ Lake 1,160 1,742 2,321 3,484 3,484 Summer Village of Castle $ $ $ $ $ Island 609 914 1,218 1,829 1,829 Summer Village of Crystal $ $ $ $ $ Springs 3,309 4,967 6,618 9,934 9,934 $ $ $ $ $ Summer Village of Ghost Lake 3,083 4,628 6,167 9,256 9,256 Summer Village of Golden $ $ $ $ $ Days (153,295) (149,935) (146,589) (139,870) (139,870) $ $ $ $ $ Summer Village of Grandview 4,764 7,152 9,529 14,303 14,303 $ $ $ $ $ Summer Village of Gull Lake 5,695 8,548 11,390 17,097 17,097 Summer Village of Half Moon $ $ $ $ $ Bay 2,111 3,169 4,222 6,338 6,338 Summer Village of Horseshoe $ $ $ $ $ Bay 1,624 2,438 3,248 4,876 4,876 $ $ $ $ $ Summer Village of Island Lake 6,899 10,356 13,798 20,711 20,711 Summer Village of Island Lake $ $ $ $ $ South 1,702 2,554 3,403 5,109 5,109 Summer Village of Itaska $ $ $ $ $ Beach 1,699 2,551 3,398 5,101 5,101 $ $ $ $ $ Summer Village of Jarvis Bay 8,969 13,464 17,939 26,928 26,928 $ $ $ $ $ Summer Village of Kapasiwin 1,199 1,800 2,398 3,600 3,600 $ $ $ $ $ Summer Village of Lakeview 1,002 1,504 2,004 3,008 3,008 $ $ $ $ $ Summer Village of Larkspur 1,950 2,927 3,900 5,854 5,854 Summer Village of Ma-Me-O $ $ $ $ $ Beach 4,726 7,094 9,451 14,187 14,187 Summer Village of Mewatha $ $ $ $ $ Beach 3,227 4,844 6,454 9,688 9,688 Summer Village of Nakamun $ $ $ $ $ Park 2,663 3,997 5,326 7,995 7,995 Summer Village of $ $ $ $ $ Norglenwold 11,469 17,215 22,937 34,431 34,431 Summer Village of Norris $ $ $ $ $ Beach 1,583 2,376 3,165 4,751 4,751 Summer Village of Parkland $ $ $ $ $ Beach 4,964 7,451 9,928 14,903 14,903 12 Page 142 of 214 2.3 k) Summer Village of Pelican $ $ $ $ $ Narrows 4,554 6,836 9,108 13,671 13,671 $ $ $ $ $ Summer Village of Point Alison 985 1,478 1,970 2,956 2,956 $ $ $ $ $ Summer Village of Poplar Bay 4,674 7,016 9,347 14,031 14,031 Summer Village of Rochon $ $ $ $ $ Sands 3,526 5,293 7,053 10,586 10,586 $ $ $ $ $ Summer Village of Ross Haven 4,591 6,892 9,182 13,783 13,783 Summer Village of Sandy $ $ $ $ $ Beach 5,545 8,323 11,089 16,646 16,646 $ $ $ $ $ Summer Village of Seba Beach 8,062 12,101 16,123 24,202 24,202 Summer Village of Silver $ $ $ $ $ Beach 3,793 5,694 7,587 11,388 11,388 $ $ $ $ $ Summer Village of Silver Sands 4,277 6,420 8,554 12,840 12,840 Summer Village of South $ $ $ $ $ Baptiste 1,612 2,420 3,224 4,840 4,840 $ $ $ $ $ Summer Village of South View 1,626 2,441 3,252 4,881 4,881 Summer Village of Sunbreaker $ $ $ $ $ Cove 6,055 9,089 12,111 18,179 18,179 Summer Village of Sundance $ $ $ $ $ Beach 3,112 4,671 6,223 9,342 9,342 Summer Village of Sunrise $ $ $ $ $ Beach 2,700 4,053 5,401 8,107 8,107 Summer Village of Sunset $ $ $ $ $ Beach 1,783 2,677 3,566 5,353 5,353 Summer Village of Sunset $ $ $ $ $ Point 4,922 7,388 9,844 14,776 14,776 $ $ $ $ $ Summer Village of Val Quentin 5,510 8,270 11,019 16,541 16,541 $ $ $ $ $ Summer Village of Waiparous 1,853 2,781 3,705 5,562 5,562 Summer Village of West $ $ $ $ $ Baptiste 1,639 2,461 3,279 4,921 4,921 $ $ $ $ $ Summer Village of West Cove 4,114 6,175 8,228 12,351 12,351 Summer Village of Whispering $ $ $ $ $ Hills 3,596 5,399 7,193 10,797 10,797 Summer Village of White $ $ $ $ $ Sands 6,011 9,023 12,022 18,045 18,045 Summer Village of $ $ $ $ $ Yellowstone 3,335 5,006 6,670 10,013 10,013 13 Page 143 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ $ $ $ Total 15,407,888 26,655,970 37,855,777 60,351,940 60,351,940 Based on 2018 data from Municipal Affairs Financial Statistics for population and equalized assessment Based on 2015-2017 weighted crime severity data from Statistics Canada with detachment workload divisions from RCMP Note: Negative numbers are included in the table to show the police funding model billing minus the cost of enhanced officers. However, when it comes time to bill, every municipality will receive a PFM invoice and enhanced policing positions will not be billed. See enhanced positions tables for further details. 14 Page 144 of 214 2.3 k) BASE + NET At 10% MODIFIERS ENHANCED POLICING IMPACT Cost per enhanced officer $160,000 Subsidy from Enhanced Policing Positions Police Number Funding Police of Model Share Funding Enhanced Dollar costs - with MUNICIPALITY Model Policing 100% modifiers less Share with Positions reimbursement Enhanced modifiers (Full- Policing time) Billing $ $ $ Lac La Biche County 318,905 2 320,000 (1,095) $ $ $ Mackenzie County 283,652 2 320,000 (36,348) $ $ $ Municipality of Crowsnest Pass 124,526 - 124,526 $ $ $ Municipality of Jasper 126,269 - 126,269 $ $ $ Strathcona County (rural) 919,675 - 919,675 $ $ $ Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo (rural) 1,781,403 - 1,781,403 $ $ $ Athabasca County 202,773 - 202,773 $ $ $ Beaver County 139,239 - 139,239 $ $ $ Big Lakes County 131,198 2 320,000 (188,802) $ $ $ Birch Hills County 36,119 - 36,119 $ $ $ Brazeau County 265,163 1 160,000 105,163 $ $ $ Camrose County 211,608 - 211,608 $ $ $ Cardston County 93,715 - 93,715 $ $ $ Clear Hills County 89,005 - 89,005 $ $ $ Clearwater County 450,124 - 450,124 $ $ $ County of Barrhead No. 11 133,492 - 133,492 15 Page 145 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ $ County of Forty Mile No. 8 85,813 - 85,813 $ $ $ County of Grande Prairie No. 1 674,960 8 1,280,000 (605,040) $ $ $ County of Minburn No. 27 81,798 - 81,798 $ $ $ County of Newell 286,063 - 286,063 $ $ $ County of Northern Lights 109,705 - 109,705 $ $ $ County of Paintearth No. 18 77,276 - 77,276 $ $ $ County of St. Paul No. 19 166,790 - 166,790 $ $ $ County of Stettler No. 6 145,321 - 145,321 $ $ $ County of Two Hills No. 21 82,207 - 82,207 $ $ $ County of Vermilion River 232,178 2 320,000 (87,822) $ $ $ County of Warner No. 5 86,510 - 86,510 $ $ $ County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 284,800 1 160,000 124,800 $ $ $ Cypress County 316,636 1 160,000 156,636 $ $ $ Flagstaff County 117,115 1 160,000 (42,885) $ $ $ Kneehill County 159,611 - 159,611 $ $ $ Lac Ste. Anne County 235,655 - 235,655 $ $ $ Lacombe County 402,039 2 320,000 82,039 $ $ $ Lamont County 106,559 - 106,559 $ $ $ Leduc County 535,011 2 320,000 215,011 $ $ $ Lethbridge County 234,569 - 234,569 $ $ $ Mountain View County 373,364 - 373,364 $ $ $ Municipal District of Acadia No. 34 10,894 - 10,894 $ $ $ Municipal District of Bighorn No. 8 66,850 - 66,850 16 Page 146 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ $ Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87 407,789 - 407,789 $ $ $ Municipal District of Fairview No. 136 38,437 - 38,437 $ $ $ Municipal District of Foothills No. 31 665,963 - 665,963 $ $ $ Municipal District of Greenview No. 16 488,074 2 320,000 168,074 $ $ $ Municipal District of Lesser Slave River No. 124 105,820 - 105,820 $ $ $ Municipal District of Opportunity No. 17 151,364 5 800,000 (648,636) $ $ $ Municipal District of Peace No. 135 38,304 - 38,304 $ $ $ Municipal District of Pincher Creek No. 9 107,956 1 160,000 (52,044) $ $ $ Municipal District of Provost No. 52 133,305 - 133,305 $ $ $ Municipal District of Ranchland No. 66 8,483 - 8,483 $ $ $ Municipal District of Smoky River No. 130 52,619 - 52,619 $ $ $ Municipal District of Spirit River No. 133 19,955 - 19,955 $ $ $ Municipal District of Taber 194,241 - 194,241 $ $ $ Municipal District of Wainwright No. 61 149,270 - 149,270 $ $ $ Municipal District of Willow Creek No. 26 139,653 - 139,653 $ $ $ Northern Sunrise County 115,727 - 115,727 $ $ $ Parkland County 907,378 - 907,378 $ $ $ Ponoka County 270,937 2 320,000 (49,063) $ $ $ Red Deer County 547,121 1 160,000 387,121 $ $ $ Rocky View County 1,306,018 3 480,000 826,018 $ $ $ Saddle Hills County 130,042 - 130,042 $ $ $ Smoky Lake County 63,702 - 63,702 $ $ $ Starland County 61,335 - 61,335 17 Page 147 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ $ Sturgeon County 586,497 - 586,497 $ $ $ Thorhild County 79,141 - 79,141 $ $ $ Vulcan County 123,665 - 123,665 $ $ $ Westlock County 151,066 - 151,066 $ $ $ Wheatland County 300,446 - 300,446 $ $ $ Woodlands County 171,195 - 171,195 $ $ $ Yellowhead County 534,094 - 534,094 $ $ $ Special Areas Board 224,012 - 224,012 $ $ $ Improvement District No. 04 (Waterton) 13,819 - 13,819 $ $ $ Improvement District No. 09 (Banff) 43,796 - 43,796 Improvement District No. 12 (Jasper National $ $ $ Park) 2,829 - 2,829 $ $ $ Improvement District No. 13 (Elk Island) 220 - 220 $ $ $ Improvement District No. 24 (Wood Buffalo) 9,960 - 9,960 $ $ $ Improvement District No. 349 103,197 - 103,197 $ $ $ Kananaskis Improvement District 10,985 - 10,985 $ $ $ Town of Athabasca 58,176 - 58,176 $ $ $ Town of Barrhead 90,172 1 160,000 (69,828) $ $ $ Town of Bashaw 15,703 - 15,703 $ $ $ Town of Bassano 23,250 - 23,250 $ $ $ Town of Beaverlodge 48,871 - 48,871 $ $ $ Town of Bentley 19,344 - 19,344 $ $ $ Town of Black Diamond 53,623 - 53,623 $ $ $ Town of Bon Accord 27,797 - 27,797 18 Page 148 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ $ Town of Bow Island 37,693 - 37,693 $ $ $ Town of Bowden 22,160 - 22,160 $ $ $ Town of Bruderheim 26,110 - 26,110 $ $ $ Town of Calmar 40,555 - 40,555 $ $ $ Town of Cardston 72,508 - 72,508 $ $ $ Town of Carstairs 81,935 1 160,000 (78,065) $ $ $ Town of Castor 16,386 - 16,386 $ $ $ Town of Claresholm 73,730 - 73,730 $ $ $ Town of Coalhurst 49,229 - 49,229 $ $ $ Town of Coronation 17,494 - 17,494 $ $ $ Town of Crossfield 68,053 1 160,000 (91,947) $ $ $ Town of Daysland 14,322 - 14,322 $ $ $ Town of Didsbury 104,043 - 104,043 $ $ $ Town of Eckville 20,881 - 20,881 $ $ $ Town of Elk Point 25,661 - 25,661 $ $ $ Town of Fairview 57,864 - 57,864 $ $ $ Town of Falher 18,556 - 18,556 $ $ $ Town of Fort Macleod 59,003 - 59,003 $ $ $ Town of Fox Creek 41,727 - 41,727 $ $ $ Town of Gibbons 60,142 - 60,142 $ $ $ Town of Grande Cache 70,059 - 70,059 $ $ $ Town of Granum 7,129 - 7,129 $ $ $ Town of Grimshaw 52,340 - 52,340 19 Page 149 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ $ Town of Hanna 48,830 - 48,830 $ $ $ Town of Hardisty 11,941 - 11,941 $ $ $ Town of High Level 71,085 1 160,000 (88,915) $ $ $ Town of High Prairie 47,832 - 47,832 $ $ $ Town of Irricana 22,689 - 22,689 $ $ $ Town of Killam 19,068 - 19,068 $ $ $ Town of Lamont 32,745 - 32,745 $ $ $ Town of Legal 24,454 - 24,454 $ $ $ Town of Magrath 42,868 - 42,868 $ $ $ Town of Manning 22,833 - 22,833 $ $ $ Town of Mayerthorpe 23,064 - 23,064 $ $ $ Town of McLennan 13,735 - 13,735 $ $ $ Town of Milk River 15,219 - 15,219 $ $ $ Town of Millet 34,863 - 34,863 $ $ $ Town of Mundare 15,902 - 15,902 $ $ $ Town of Nanton 45,465 - 45,465 $ $ $ Town of Nobleford 23,644 - 23,644 $ $ $ Town of Onoway 19,505 1 160,000 (140,495) $ $ $ Town of Oyen 18,876 - 18,876 $ $ $ Town of Penhold 62,442 - 62,442 $ $ $ Town of Picture Butte 34,363 - 34,363 $ $ $ Town of Pincher Creek 72,426 - 72,426 $ $ $ Town of Provost 39,984 - 39,984 20 Page 150 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ $ Town of Rainbow Lake 14,585 - 14,585 $ $ $ Town of Raymond 77,189 - 77,189 $ $ $ Town of Redwater 44,282 - 44,282 $ $ $ Town of Rimbey 50,576 - 50,576 $ $ $ Town of Sedgewick 15,222 - 15,222 $ $ $ Town of Sexsmith 49,794 - 49,794 $ $ $ Town of Smoky Lake 18,124 - 18,124 $ $ $ Town of Spirit River 18,638 - 18,638 $ $ $ Town of Stavely 10,019 - 10,019 $ $ $ Town of Sundre 56,573 - 56,573 $ $ $ Town of Swan Hills 24,870 - 24,870 $ $ $ Town of Thorsby 19,291 - 19,291 $ $ $ Town of Three Hills 61,763 - 61,763 $ $ $ Town of Tofield 41,564 - 41,564 $ $ $ Town of Trochu 18,689 - 18,689 $ $ $ Town of Turner Valley 54,632 - 54,632 $ $ $ Town of Two Hills 25,423 - 25,423 $ $ $ Town of Valleyview 34,239 - 34,239 $ $ $ Town of Vauxhall 20,787 - 20,787 $ $ $ Town of Vermilion 86,897 - 86,897 $ $ $ Town of Viking 20,284 - 20,284 $ $ $ Town of Vulcan 37,877 - 37,877 $ $ $ Town of Wembley 28,570 - 28,570 21 Page 151 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ $ Alberta Beach 21,520 - 21,520 $ $ $ Village of Acme 11,749 - 11,749 $ $ $ Village of Alix 14,675 - 14,675 $ $ $ Village of Alliance 2,571 - 2,571 $ $ $ Village of Amisk 3,448 - 3,448 $ $ $ Village of Andrew 7,495 - 7,495 $ $ $ Village of Arrowwood 3,088 - 3,088 $ $ $ Village of Barnwell 16,721 - 16,721 $ $ $ Village of Barons 5,625 - 5,625 $ $ $ Village of Bawlf 7,374 - 7,374 $ $ $ Village of Beiseker 16,617 - 16,617 $ $ $ Village of Berwyn 9,202 - 9,202 $ $ $ Village of Big Valley 5,992 - 5,992 $ $ $ Village of Bittern Lake 3,964 - 3,964 $ $ $ Village of Boyle 17,777 - 17,777 $ $ $ Village of Breton 10,913 - 10,913 $ $ $ Village of Carbon 8,737 - 8,737 $ $ $ Village of Carmangay 4,342 - 4,342 $ $ $ Village of Caroline 8,439 - 8,439 $ $ $ Village of Cereal 1,774 - 1,774 $ $ $ Village of Champion 5,367 - 5,367 $ $ $ Village of Chauvin 5,856 - 5,856 $ $ $ Village of Chipman 4,977 - 4,977 22 Page 152 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ $ Village of Clive 12,631 - 12,631 $ $ $ Village of Clyde 7,412 - 7,412 $ $ $ Village of Consort 13,373 - 13,373 $ $ $ Village of Coutts 4,410 - 4,410 $ $ $ Village of Cowley 3,718 - 3,718 $ $ $ Village of Cremona 8,169 - 8,169 $ $ $ Village of Czar 3,390 - 3,390 $ $ $ Village of Delburne 16,143 - 16,143 $ $ $ Village of Delia 3,754 - 3,754 $ $ $ Village of Dewberry 3,100 - 3,100 $ $ $ Village of Donalda 3,667 - 3,667 $ $ $ Village of Donnelly 5,813 - 5,813 $ $ $ Village of Duchess 19,435 - 19,435 $ $ $ Village of Edberg 2,440 - 2,440 $ $ $ Village of Edgerton 7,242 - 7,242 $ $ $ Village of Elnora 5,221 - 5,221 $ $ $ Village of Empress 2,533 - 2,533 $ $ $ Village of Ferintosh 3,504 - 3,504 $ $ $ Village of Foremost 9,524 - 9,524 $ $ $ Village of Forestburg 15,198 - 15,198 $ $ $ Village of Gadsby 633 - 633 $ $ $ Village of Girouxville 4,770 - 4,770 $ $ $ Village of Glendon 8,642 - 8,642 23 Page 153 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ $ Village of Glenwood 5,585 - 5,585 $ $ $ Village of Halkirk 1,902 - 1,902 $ $ $ Village of Hay Lakes 8,908 - 8,908 $ $ $ Village of Heisler 2,629 - 2,629 $ $ $ Village of Hill Spring 2,897 - 2,897 $ $ $ Village of Hines Creek 5,753 - 5,753 $ $ $ Village of Holden 6,010 - 6,010 $ $ $ Village of Hughenden 3,985 - 3,985 $ $ $ Village of Hussar 3,380 - 3,380 $ $ $ Village of Hythe 14,323 - 14,323 $ $ $ Village of Innisfree 3,728 - 3,728 $ $ $ Village of Irma 9,229 - 9,229 $ $ $ Village of Kitscoty 18,542 - 18,542 $ $ $ Village of Linden 14,962 - 14,962 $ $ $ Village of Lomond 2,851 - 2,851 $ $ $ Village of Longview 6,414 - 6,414 $ $ $ Village of Lougheed 4,357 - 4,357 $ $ $ Village of Mannville 14,116 - 14,116 $ $ $ Village of Marwayne 10,280 - 10,280 $ $ $ Village of Milo 1,715 - 1,715 $ $ $ Village of Morrin 4,077 - 4,077 $ $ $ Village of Munson 3,485 - 3,485 $ $ $ Village of Myrnam 5,639 - 5,639 24 Page 154 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ $ Village of Nampa 7,174 - 7,174 $ $ $ Village of Paradise Valley 2,876 - 2,876 $ $ $ Village of Rockyford 5,744 - 5,744 $ $ $ Village of Rosalind 3,242 - 3,242 $ $ $ Village of Rosemary 6,673 - 6,673 $ $ $ Village of Rycroft 10,816 - 10,816 $ $ $ Village of Ryley 8,372 - 8,372 $ $ $ Village of Spring Lake 15,018 - 15,018 $ $ $ Village of Standard 6,776 - 6,776 $ $ $ Village of Stirling 21,775 - 21,775 $ $ $ Village of Veteran 3,881 - 3,881 $ $ $ Village of Vilna 4,651 - 4,651 $ $ $ Village of Wabamun 13,274 - 13,274 $ $ $ Village of Warburg 13,311 - 13,311 $ $ $ Village of Warner 6,334 - 6,334 $ $ $ Village of Waskatenau 3,942 - 3,942 $ $ $ Village of Youngstown 2,572 - 2,572 $ $ $ Summer Village of Argentia Beach 3,427 - 3,427 $ $ $ Summer Village of Betula Beach 1,034 - 1,034 $ $ $ Summer Village of Birch Cove 1,114 - 1,114 $ $ $ Summer Village of Birchcliff 7,970 - 7,970 $ $ $ Summer Village of Bondiss 3,612 - 3,612 $ $ $ Summer Village of Bonnyville Beach 2,357 - 2,357 25 Page 155 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ $ Summer Village of Burnstick Lake 1,160 - 1,160 $ $ $ Summer Village of Castle Island 609 - 609 $ $ $ Summer Village of Crystal Springs 3,309 - 3,309 $ $ $ Summer Village of Ghost Lake 3,083 - 3,083 $ $ $ Summer Village of Golden Days 6,705 1 160,000 (153,295) $ $ $ Summer Village of Grandview 4,764 - 4,764 $ $ $ Summer Village of Gull Lake 5,695 - 5,695 $ $ $ Summer Village of Half Moon Bay 2,111 - 2,111 $ $ $ Summer Village of Horseshoe Bay 1,624 - 1,624 $ $ $ Summer Village of Island Lake 6,899 - 6,899 $ $ $ Summer Village of Island Lake South 1,702 - 1,702 $ $ $ Summer Village of Itaska Beach 1,699 - 1,699 $ $ $ Summer Village of Jarvis Bay 8,969 - 8,969 $ $ $ Summer Village of Kapasiwin 1,199 - 1,199 $ $ $ Summer Village of Lakeview 1,002 - 1,002 $ $ $ Summer Village of Larkspur 1,950 - 1,950 $ $ $ Summer Village of Ma-Me-O Beach 4,726 - 4,726 $ $ $ Summer Village of Mewatha Beach 3,227 - 3,227 $ $ $ Summer Village of Nakamun Park 2,663 - 2,663 $ $ $ Summer Village of Norglenwold 11,469 - 11,469 $ $ $ Summer Village of Norris Beach 1,583 - 1,583 $ $ $ Summer Village of Parkland Beach 4,964 - 4,964 $ $ $ Summer Village of Pelican Narrows 4,554 - 4,554 26 Page 156 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ $ Summer Village of Point Alison 985 - 985 $ $ $ Summer Village of Poplar Bay 4,674 - 4,674 $ $ $ Summer Village of Rochon Sands 3,526 - 3,526 $ $ $ Summer Village of Ross Haven 4,591 - 4,591 $ $ $ Summer Village of Sandy Beach 5,545 - 5,545 $ $ $ Summer Village of Seba Beach 8,062 - 8,062 $ $ $ Summer Village of Silver Beach 3,793 - 3,793 $ $ $ Summer Village of Silver Sands 4,277 - 4,277 $ $ $ Summer Village of South Baptiste 1,612 - 1,612 $ $ $ Summer Village of South View 1,626 - 1,626 $ $ $ Summer Village of Sunbreaker Cove 6,055 - 6,055 $ $ $ Summer Village of Sundance Beach 3,112 - 3,112 $ $ $ Summer Village of Sunrise Beach 2,700 - 2,700 $ $ $ Summer Village of Sunset Beach 1,783 - 1,783 $ $ $ Summer Village of Sunset Point 4,922 - 4,922 $ $ $ Summer Village of Val Quentin 5,510 - 5,510 $ $ $ Summer Village of Waiparous 1,853 - 1,853 $ $ $ Summer Village of West Baptiste 1,639 - 1,639 $ $ $ Summer Village of West Cove 4,114 - 4,114 $ $ $ Summer Village of Whispering Hills 3,596 - 3,596 $ $ $ Summer Village of White Sands 6,011 - 6,011 $ $ $ Summer Village of Yellowstone 3,335 - 3,335 27 Page 157 of 214 2.3 k) BASE + NET At 15% MODIFIERS ENHANCED POLICING IMPACT Cost per enhanced officer $160,000 Subsidy from Enhanced Policing Positions Police Number Funding Police of Model Share Funding Enhanced Dollar costs - with MUNICIPALITY Model Share Policing 100% modifiers with Positions reimbursement less modifiers (Full- Enhanced time) Policing Billing $ $ $ Lac La Biche County 478,700 2 320,000 158,700 $ $ $ Mackenzie County 425,784 2 320,000 105,784 $ $ Municipality of Crowsnest Pass 186,923 $ - 186,923 $ $ Municipality of Jasper 189,540 $ - 189,540 $ $ Strathcona County (rural) 1,380,501 $ - 1,380,501 $ $ Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo (rural) 2,674,020 $ - 2,674,020 $ $ Athabasca County 304,377 $ - 304,377 $ $ Beaver County 209,008 $ - 209,008 $ $ $ Big Lakes County 196,938 2 320,000 (123,062) $ $ Birch Hills County 54,217 $ - 54,217 $ $ $ Brazeau County 398,029 1 160,000 238,029 $ $ Camrose County 317,639 $ - 317,639 $ $ Cardston County 140,673 $ - 140,673 $ $ Clear Hills County 133,603 $ - 133,603 $ $ Clearwater County 675,670 $ - 675,670 $ $ County of Barrhead No. 11 200,382 $ - 200,382 28 Page 158 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ County of Forty Mile No. 8 128,811 $ - 128,811 $ $ $ County of Grande Prairie No. 1 1,013,165 8 1,280,000 (266,835) $ $ County of Minburn No. 27 122,785 $ - 122,785 $ $ County of Newell 429,403 $ - 429,403 $ $ County of Northern Lights 164,676 $ - 164,676 $ $ County of Paintearth No. 18 115,997 $ - 115,997 $ $ County of St. Paul No. 19 250,364 $ - 250,364 $ $ County of Stettler No. 6 218,138 $ - 218,138 $ $ County of Two Hills No. 21 123,399 $ - 123,399 $ $ $ County of Vermilion River 348,517 2 320,000 28,517 $ $ County of Warner No. 5 129,858 $ - 129,858 $ $ $ County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 427,506 1 160,000 267,506 $ $ $ Cypress County 475,294 1 160,000 315,294 $ $ $ Flagstaff County 175,799 1 160,000 15,799 $ $ Kneehill County 239,589 $ - 239,589 $ $ Lac Ste. Anne County 353,736 $ - 353,736 $ $ $ Lacombe County 603,491 2 320,000 283,491 $ $ Lamont County 159,953 $ - 159,953 $ $ $ Leduc County 803,092 2 320,000 483,092 $ $ Lethbridge County 352,106 $ - 352,106 $ $ Mountain View County 560,448 $ - 560,448 $ $ Municipal District of Acadia No. 34 16,352 $ - 16,352 $ $ Municipal District of Bighorn No. 8 100,346 $ - 100,346 29 Page 159 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87 612,122 $ - 612,122 $ $ Municipal District of Fairview No. 136 57,697 $ - 57,697 $ $ Municipal District of Foothills No. 31 999,660 $ - 999,660 $ $ $ Municipal District of Greenview No. 16 732,636 2 320,000 412,636 $ $ Municipal District of Lesser Slave River No. 124 158,844 $ - 158,844 $ $ $ Municipal District of Opportunity No. 17 227,208 5 800,000 (572,792) $ $ Municipal District of Peace No. 135 57,497 $ - 57,497 $ $ $ Municipal District of Pincher Creek No. 9 162,050 1 160,000 2,050 $ $ Municipal District of Provost No. 52 200,100 $ - 200,100 $ $ Municipal District of Ranchland No. 66 12,734 $ - 12,734 $ $ Municipal District of Smoky River No. 130 78,985 $ - 78,985 $ $ Municipal District of Spirit River No. 133 29,955 $ - 29,955 $ $ Municipal District of Taber 291,570 $ - 291,570 $ $ Municipal District of Wainwright No. 61 224,065 $ - 224,065 $ $ Municipal District of Willow Creek No. 26 209,630 $ - 209,630 $ $ Northern Sunrise County 173,715 $ - 173,715 $ $ Parkland County 1,362,043 $ - 1,362,043 $ $ $ Ponoka County 406,697 2 320,000 86,697 $ $ $ Red Deer County 821,269 1 160,000 661,269 $ $ $ Rocky View County 1,960,431 3 480,000 1,480,431 $ $ Saddle Hills County 195,202 $ - 195,202 $ $ Smoky Lake County 95,621 $ - 95,621 $ $ Starland County 92,068 $ - 92,068 30 Page 160 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ Sturgeon County 880,376 $ - 880,376 $ $ Thorhild County 118,796 $ - 118,796 $ $ Vulcan County 185,631 $ - 185,631 $ $ Westlock County 226,762 $ - 226,762 $ $ Wheatland County 450,993 $ - 450,993 $ $ Woodlands County 256,977 $ - 256,977 $ $ Yellowhead County 801,716 $ - 801,716 $ $ Special Areas Board 336,259 $ - 336,259 $ $ Improvement District No. 04 (Waterton) 20,743 $ - 20,743 $ $ Improvement District No. 09 (Banff) 65,740 $ - 65,740 Improvement District No. 12 (Jasper National $ $ Park) 4,246 $ - 4,246 $ $ Improvement District No. 13 (Elk Island) 331 $ - 331 $ $ Improvement District No. 24 (Wood Buffalo) 14,951 $ - 14,951 $ $ Improvement District No. 349 154,906 $ - 154,906 $ $ Kananaskis Improvement District 16,489 $ - 16,489 $ $ Town of Athabasca 87,326 $ - 87,326 $ $ $ Town of Barrhead 135,355 1 160,000 (24,645) $ $ Town of Bashaw 23,572 $ - 23,572 $ $ Town of Bassano 34,900 $ - 34,900 $ $ Town of Beaverlodge 73,358 $ - 73,358 $ $ Town of Bentley 29,037 $ - 29,037 $ $ Town of Black Diamond 80,493 $ - 80,493 $ $ Town of Bon Accord 41,726 $ - 41,726 31 Page 161 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ Town of Bow Island 56,581 $ - 56,581 $ $ Town of Bowden 33,264 $ - 33,264 $ $ Town of Bruderheim 39,193 $ - 39,193 $ $ Town of Calmar 60,876 $ - 60,876 $ $ Town of Cardston 108,840 $ - 108,840 $ $ $ Town of Carstairs 122,990 1 160,000 (37,010) $ $ Town of Castor 24,597 $ - 24,597 $ $ Town of Claresholm 110,674 $ - 110,674 $ $ Town of Coalhurst 73,896 $ - 73,896 $ $ Town of Coronation 26,259 $ - 26,259 $ $ $ Town of Crossfield 102,152 1 160,000 (57,848) $ $ Town of Daysland 21,499 $ - 21,499 $ $ Town of Didsbury 156,177 $ - 156,177 $ $ Town of Eckville 31,344 $ - 31,344 $ $ Town of Elk Point 38,519 $ - 38,519 $ $ Town of Fairview 86,858 $ - 86,858 $ $ Town of Falher 27,854 $ - 27,854 $ $ Town of Fort Macleod 88,567 $ - 88,567 $ $ Town of Fox Creek 62,635 $ - 62,635 $ $ Town of Gibbons 90,277 $ - 90,277 $ $ Town of Grande Cache 105,164 $ - 105,164 $ $ Town of Granum 10,701 $ - 10,701 $ $ Town of Grimshaw 78,567 $ - 78,567 32 Page 162 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ Town of Hanna 73,298 $ - 73,298 $ $ Town of Hardisty 17,925 $ - 17,925 $ $ $ Town of High Level 106,704 1 160,000 (53,296) $ $ Town of High Prairie 71,799 $ - 71,799 $ $ Town of Irricana 34,058 $ - 34,058 $ $ Town of Killam 28,622 $ - 28,622 $ $ Town of Lamont 49,153 $ - 49,153 $ $ Town of Legal 36,707 $ - 36,707 $ $ Town of Magrath 64,347 $ - 64,347 $ $ Town of Manning 34,275 $ - 34,275 $ $ Town of Mayerthorpe 34,620 $ - 34,620 $ $ Town of McLennan 20,617 $ - 20,617 $ $ Town of Milk River 22,845 $ - 22,845 $ $ Town of Millet 52,332 $ - 52,332 $ $ Town of Mundare 23,870 $ - 23,870 $ $ Town of Nanton 68,247 $ - 68,247 $ $ Town of Nobleford 35,492 $ - 35,492 $ $ $ Town of Onoway 29,279 1 160,000 (130,721) $ $ Town of Oyen 28,334 $ - 28,334 $ $ Town of Penhold 93,730 $ - 93,730 $ $ Town of Picture Butte 51,581 $ - 51,581 $ $ Town of Pincher Creek 108,717 $ - 108,717 $ $ Town of Provost 60,019 $ - 60,019 33 Page 163 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ Town of Rainbow Lake 21,894 $ - 21,894 $ $ Town of Raymond 115,866 $ - 115,866 $ $ Town of Redwater 66,471 $ - 66,471 $ $ Town of Rimbey 75,918 $ - 75,918 $ $ Town of Sedgewick 22,850 $ - 22,850 $ $ Town of Sexsmith 74,745 $ - 74,745 $ $ Town of Smoky Lake 27,206 $ - 27,206 $ $ Town of Spirit River 27,977 $ - 27,977 $ $ Town of Stavely 15,039 $ - 15,039 $ $ Town of Sundre 84,920 $ - 84,920 $ $ Town of Swan Hills 37,331 $ - 37,331 $ $ Town of Thorsby 28,957 $ - 28,957 $ $ Town of Three Hills 92,710 $ - 92,710 $ $ Town of Tofield 62,391 $ - 62,391 $ $ Town of Trochu 28,053 $ - 28,053 $ $ Town of Turner Valley 82,006 $ - 82,006 $ $ Town of Two Hills 38,162 $ - 38,162 $ $ Town of Valleyview 51,396 $ - 51,396 $ $ Town of Vauxhall 31,203 $ - 31,203 $ $ Town of Vermilion 130,439 $ - 130,439 $ $ Town of Viking 30,449 $ - 30,449 $ $ Town of Vulcan 56,857 $ - 56,857 $ $ Town of Wembley 42,886 $ - 42,886 34 Page 164 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ Alberta Beach 32,303 $ - 32,303 $ $ Village of Acme 17,637 $ - 17,637 $ $ Village of Alix 22,028 $ - 22,028 $ $ Village of Alliance 3,859 $ - 3,859 $ $ Village of Amisk 5,176 $ - 5,176 $ $ Village of Andrew 11,251 $ - 11,251 $ $ Village of Arrowwood 4,635 $ - 4,635 $ $ Village of Barnwell 25,100 $ - 25,100 $ $ Village of Barons 8,444 $ - 8,444 $ $ Village of Bawlf 11,069 $ - 11,069 $ $ Village of Beiseker 24,943 $ - 24,943 $ $ Village of Berwyn 13,814 $ - 13,814 $ $ Village of Big Valley 8,994 $ - 8,994 $ $ Village of Bittern Lake 5,951 $ - 5,951 $ $ Village of Boyle 26,684 $ - 26,684 $ $ Village of Breton 16,381 $ - 16,381 $ $ Village of Carbon 13,115 $ - 13,115 $ $ Village of Carmangay 6,518 $ - 6,518 $ $ Village of Caroline 12,667 $ - 12,667 $ $ Village of Cereal 2,662 $ - 2,662 $ $ Village of Champion 8,056 $ - 8,056 $ $ Village of Chauvin 8,791 $ - 8,791 $ $ Village of Chipman 7,470 $ - 7,470 35 Page 165 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ Village of Clive 18,961 $ - 18,961 $ $ Village of Clyde 11,126 $ - 11,126 $ $ Village of Consort 20,074 $ - 20,074 $ $ Village of Coutts 6,620 $ - 6,620 $ $ Village of Cowley 5,581 $ - 5,581 $ $ Village of Cremona 12,263 $ - 12,263 $ $ Village of Czar 5,089 $ - 5,089 $ $ Village of Delburne 24,232 $ - 24,232 $ $ Village of Delia 5,636 $ - 5,636 $ $ Village of Dewberry 4,653 $ - 4,653 $ $ Village of Donalda 5,505 $ - 5,505 $ $ Village of Donnelly 8,725 $ - 8,725 $ $ Village of Duchess 29,173 $ - 29,173 $ $ Village of Edberg 3,662 $ - 3,662 $ $ Village of Edgerton 10,871 $ - 10,871 $ $ Village of Elnora 7,837 $ - 7,837 $ $ Village of Empress 3,802 $ - 3,802 $ $ Village of Ferintosh 5,260 $ - 5,260 $ $ Village of Foremost 14,296 $ - 14,296 $ $ Village of Forestburg 22,813 $ - 22,813 $ $ Village of Gadsby 950 $ - 950 $ $ Village of Girouxville 7,160 $ - 7,160 $ $ Village of Glendon 12,973 $ - 12,973 36 Page 166 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ Village of Glenwood 8,384 $ - 8,384 $ $ Village of Halkirk 2,855 $ - 2,855 $ $ Village of Hay Lakes 13,372 $ - 13,372 $ $ Village of Heisler 3,946 $ - 3,946 $ $ Village of Hill Spring 4,349 $ - 4,349 $ $ Village of Hines Creek 8,636 $ - 8,636 $ $ Village of Holden 9,021 $ - 9,021 $ $ Village of Hughenden 5,982 $ - 5,982 $ $ Village of Hussar 5,074 $ - 5,074 $ $ Village of Hythe 21,500 $ - 21,500 $ $ Village of Innisfree 5,596 $ - 5,596 $ $ Village of Irma 13,854 $ - 13,854 $ $ Village of Kitscoty 27,833 $ - 27,833 $ $ Village of Linden 22,458 $ - 22,458 $ $ Village of Lomond 4,280 $ - 4,280 $ $ Village of Longview 9,628 $ - 9,628 $ $ Village of Lougheed 6,540 $ - 6,540 $ $ Village of Mannville 21,188 $ - 21,188 $ $ Village of Marwayne 15,432 $ - 15,432 $ $ Village of Milo 2,575 $ - 2,575 $ $ Village of Morrin 6,120 $ - 6,120 $ $ Village of Munson 5,231 $ - 5,231 $ $ Village of Myrnam 8,465 $ - 8,465 37 Page 167 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ Village of Nampa 10,768 $ - 10,768 $ $ Village of Paradise Valley 4,318 $ - 4,318 $ $ Village of Rockyford 8,622 $ - 8,622 $ $ Village of Rosalind 4,866 $ - 4,866 $ $ Village of Rosemary 10,017 $ - 10,017 $ $ Village of Rycroft 16,235 $ - 16,235 $ $ Village of Ryley 12,566 $ - 12,566 $ $ Village of Spring Lake 22,544 $ - 22,544 $ $ Village of Standard 10,172 $ - 10,172 $ $ Village of Stirling 32,685 $ - 32,685 $ $ Village of Veteran 5,826 $ - 5,826 $ $ Village of Vilna 6,981 $ - 6,981 $ $ Village of Wabamun 19,926 $ - 19,926 $ $ Village of Warburg 19,981 $ - 19,981 $ $ Village of Warner 9,508 $ - 9,508 $ $ Village of Waskatenau 5,917 $ - 5,917 $ $ Village of Youngstown 3,861 $ - 3,861 $ $ Summer Village of Argentia Beach 5,144 $ - 5,144 $ $ Summer Village of Betula Beach 1,552 $ - 1,552 $ $ Summer Village of Birch Cove 1,673 $ - 1,673 $ $ Summer Village of Birchcliff 11,963 $ - 11,963 $ $ Summer Village of Bondiss 5,422 $ - 5,422 $ $ Summer Village of Bonnyville Beach 3,539 $ - 3,539 38 Page 168 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ Summer Village of Burnstick Lake 1,742 $ - 1,742 $ $ Summer Village of Castle Island 914 $ - 914 $ $ Summer Village of Crystal Springs 4,967 $ - 4,967 $ $ Summer Village of Ghost Lake 4,628 $ - 4,628 $ $ $ Summer Village of Golden Days 10,065 1 160,000 (149,935) $ $ Summer Village of Grandview 7,152 $ - 7,152 $ $ Summer Village of Gull Lake 8,548 $ - 8,548 $ $ Summer Village of Half Moon Bay 3,169 $ - 3,169 $ $ Summer Village of Horseshoe Bay 2,438 $ - 2,438 $ $ Summer Village of Island Lake 10,356 $ - 10,356 $ $ Summer Village of Island Lake South 2,554 $ - 2,554 $ $ Summer Village of Itaska Beach 2,551 $ - 2,551 $ $ Summer Village of Jarvis Bay 13,464 $ - 13,464 $ $ Summer Village of Kapasiwin 1,800 $ - 1,800 $ $ Summer Village of Lakeview 1,504 $ - 1,504 $ $ Summer Village of Larkspur 2,927 $ - 2,927 $ $ Summer Village of Ma-Me-O Beach 7,094 $ - 7,094 $ $ Summer Village of Mewatha Beach 4,844 $ - 4,844 $ $ Summer Village of Nakamun Park 3,997 $ - 3,997 $ $ Summer Village of Norglenwold 17,215 $ - 17,215 $ $ Summer Village of Norris Beach 2,376 $ - 2,376 $ $ Summer Village of Parkland Beach 7,451 $ - 7,451 $ $ Summer Village of Pelican Narrows 6,836 $ - 6,836 39 Page 169 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ Summer Village of Point Alison 1,478 $ - 1,478 $ $ Summer Village of Poplar Bay 7,016 $ - 7,016 $ $ Summer Village of Rochon Sands 5,293 $ - 5,293 $ $ Summer Village of Ross Haven 6,892 $ - 6,892 $ $ Summer Village of Sandy Beach 8,323 $ - 8,323 $ $ Summer Village of Seba Beach 12,101 $ - 12,101 $ $ Summer Village of Silver Beach 5,694 $ - 5,694 $ $ Summer Village of Silver Sands 6,420 $ - 6,420 $ $ Summer Village of South Baptiste 2,420 $ - 2,420 $ $ Summer Village of South View 2,441 $ - 2,441 $ $ Summer Village of Sunbreaker Cove 9,089 $ - 9,089 $ $ Summer Village of Sundance Beach 4,671 $ - 4,671 $ $ Summer Village of Sunrise Beach 4,053 $ - 4,053 $ $ Summer Village of Sunset Beach 2,677 $ - 2,677 $ $ Summer Village of Sunset Point 7,388 $ - 7,388 $ $ Summer Village of Val Quentin 8,270 $ - 8,270 $ $ Summer Village of Waiparous 2,781 $ - 2,781 $ $ Summer Village of West Baptiste 2,461 $ - 2,461 $ $ Summer Village of West Cove 6,175 $ - 6,175 $ $ Summer Village of Whispering Hills 5,399 $ - 5,399 $ $ Summer Village of White Sands 9,023 $ - 9,023 $ $ Summer Village of Yellowstone 5,006 $ - 5,006 40 Page 170 of 214 2.3 k) BASE + MODIFIER ENHANCED NET At 20% S POLICING IMPACT Cost per enhanced officer $160,000 Subsidy from Enhanced Policing Positions Number Police Funding of Police Funding Dollar costs - Model Share Enhanced Model Share 100% re- with modifiers MUNICIPALITY Policing with modifiers imbursement less Enhanced Positions Policing Billing (Full-time) Lac La Biche County $637,810 2 $320,000 $317,810 Mackenzie County $567,305 2 $320,000 $247,305 Municipality of Crowsnest Pass $249,052 $0 $249,052 Municipality of Jasper $252,539 $0 $252,539 Strathcona County (rural) $1,839,350 $0 $1,839,350 Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo (rural) $3,562,806 $0 $3,562,806 Athabasca County $405,545 $0 $405,545 Beaver County $278,477 $0 $278,477 Big Lakes County $262,396 2 $320,000 -$57,604 Birch Hills County $72,238 $0 $72,238 Brazeau County $530,326 1 $160,000 $370,326 Camrose County $423,215 $0 $423,215 Cardston County $187,430 $0 $187,430 Clear Hills County $178,009 $0 $178,009 Clearwater County $900,248 $0 $900,248 County of Barrhead No. 11 $266,985 $0 $266,985 County of Forty Mile No. 8 $171,626 $0 $171,626 County of Grande Prairie No. 1 $1,349,919 8 $1,280,000 $69,919 County of Minburn No. 27 $163,596 $0 $163,596 County of Newell $572,127 $0 $572,127 County of Northern Lights $219,411 $0 $219,411 County of Paintearth No. 18 $154,552 $0 $154,552 County of St. Paul No. 19 $333,580 $0 $333,580 County of Stettler No. 6 $290,643 $0 $290,643 County of Two Hills No. 21 $164,414 $0 $164,414 County of Vermilion River $464,356 2 $320,000 $144,356 County of Warner No. 5 $173,021 $0 $173,021 County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 $569,600 1 $160,000 $409,600 Cypress County $633,272 1 $160,000 $473,272 Flagstaff County $234,230 1 $160,000 $74,230 41 Page 171 of 214 2.3 k) Kneehill County $319,223 $0 $319,223 Lac Ste. Anne County $471,311 $0 $471,311 Lacombe County $804,078 2 $320,000 $484,078 Lamont County $213,118 $0 $213,118 Leduc County $1,070,022 2 $320,000 $750,022 Lethbridge County $469,138 $0 $469,138 Mountain View County $746,729 $0 $746,729 Municipal District of Acadia No. 34 $21,788 $0 $21,788 Municipal District of Bighorn No. 8 $133,699 $0 $133,699 Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87 $815,578 $0 $815,578 Municipal District of Fairview No. 136 $76,875 $0 $76,875 Municipal District of Foothills No. 31 $1,331,925 $0 $1,331,925 Municipal District of Greenview No. 16 $976,148 2 $320,000 $656,148 Municipal District of Lesser Slave River No. 124 $211,640 $0 $211,640 Municipal District of Opportunity No. 17 $302,728 5 $800,000 -$497,272 Municipal District of Peace No. 135 $76,607 $0 $76,607 Municipal District of Pincher Creek No. 9 $215,912 1 $160,000 $55,912 Municipal District of Provost No. 52 $266,609 $0 $266,609 Municipal District of Ranchland No. 66 $16,966 $0 $16,966 Municipal District of Smoky River No. 130 $105,237 $0 $105,237 Municipal District of Spirit River No. 133 $39,911 $0 $39,911 Municipal District of Taber $388,481 $0 $388,481 Municipal District of Wainwright No. 61 $298,540 $0 $298,540 Municipal District of Willow Creek No. 26 $279,307 $0 $279,307 Northern Sunrise County $231,455 $0 $231,455 Parkland County $1,814,756 $0 $1,814,756 Ponoka County $541,874 2 $320,000 $221,874 Red Deer County $1,094,242 1 $160,000 $934,242 Rocky View County $2,612,036 3 $480,000 $2,132,036 Saddle Hills County $260,083 $0 $260,083 Smoky Lake County $127,404 $0 $127,404 Starland County $122,670 $0 $122,670 Sturgeon County $1,172,993 $0 $1,172,993 Thorhild County $158,281 $0 $158,281 Vulcan County $247,331 $0 $247,331 Westlock County $302,132 $0 $302,132 Wheatland County $600,893 $0 $600,893 Woodlands County $342,390 $0 $342,390 Yellowhead County $1,068,188 $0 $1,068,188 Special Areas Board $448,024 $0 $448,024 Improvement District No. 04 (Waterton) $27,638 $0 $27,638 42 Page 172 of 214 2.3 k) Improvement District No. 09 (Banff) $87,591 $0 $87,591 Improvement District No. 12 (Jasper National Park) $5,658 $0 $5,658 Improvement District No. 13 (Elk Island) $441 $0 $441 Improvement District No. 24 (Wood Buffalo) $19,921 $0 $19,921 Improvement District No. 349 $206,394 $0 $206,394 Kananaskis Improvement District $21,970 $0 $21,970 Town of Athabasca $116,351 $0 $116,351 Town of Barrhead $180,344 1 $160,000 $20,344 Town of Bashaw $31,407 $0 $31,407 Town of Bassano $46,500 $0 $46,500 Town of Beaverlodge $97,741 $0 $97,741 Town of Bentley $38,689 $0 $38,689 Town of Black Diamond $107,247 $0 $107,247 Town of Bon Accord $55,594 $0 $55,594 Town of Bow Island $75,387 $0 $75,387 Town of Bowden $44,321 $0 $44,321 Town of Bruderheim $52,220 $0 $52,220 Town of Calmar $81,110 $0 $81,110 Town of Cardston $145,017 $0 $145,017 Town of Carstairs $163,869 1 $160,000 $3,869 Town of Castor $32,772 $0 $32,772 Town of Claresholm $147,460 $0 $147,460 Town of Coalhurst $98,457 $0 $98,457 Town of Coronation $34,987 $0 $34,987 Town of Crossfield $136,105 1 $160,000 -$23,895 Town of Daysland $28,645 $0 $28,645 Town of Didsbury $208,086 $0 $208,086 Town of Eckville $41,762 $0 $41,762 Town of Elk Point $51,322 $0 $51,322 Town of Fairview $115,727 $0 $115,727 Town of Falher $37,112 $0 $37,112 Town of Fort Macleod $118,005 $0 $118,005 Town of Fox Creek $83,454 $0 $83,454 Town of Gibbons $120,283 $0 $120,283 Town of Grande Cache $140,119 $0 $140,119 Town of Granum $14,258 $0 $14,258 Town of Grimshaw $104,680 $0 $104,680 Town of Hanna $97,661 $0 $97,661 Town of Hardisty $23,882 $0 $23,882 Town of High Level $142,170 1 $160,000 -$17,830 Town of High Prairie $95,663 $0 $95,663 43 Page 173 of 214 2.3 k) Town of Irricana $45,378 $0 $45,378 Town of Killam $38,136 $0 $38,136 Town of Lamont $65,491 $0 $65,491 Town of Legal $48,907 $0 $48,907 Town of Magrath $85,735 $0 $85,735 Town of Manning $45,667 $0 $45,667 Town of Mayerthorpe $46,127 $0 $46,127 Town of McLennan $27,470 $0 $27,470 Town of Milk River $30,438 $0 $30,438 Town of Millet $69,726 $0 $69,726 Town of Mundare $31,804 $0 $31,804 Town of Nanton $90,930 $0 $90,930 Town of Nobleford $47,289 $0 $47,289 Town of Onoway $39,011 1 $160,000 -$120,989 Town of Oyen $37,752 $0 $37,752 Town of Penhold $124,883 $0 $124,883 Town of Picture Butte $68,725 $0 $68,725 Town of Pincher Creek $144,852 $0 $144,852 Town of Provost $79,968 $0 $79,968 Town of Rainbow Lake $29,171 $0 $29,171 Town of Raymond $154,378 $0 $154,378 Town of Redwater $88,565 $0 $88,565 Town of Rimbey $101,152 $0 $101,152 Town of Sedgewick $30,445 $0 $30,445 Town of Sexsmith $99,588 $0 $99,588 Town of Smoky Lake $36,248 $0 $36,248 Town of Spirit River $37,276 $0 $37,276 Town of Stavely $20,037 $0 $20,037 Town of Sundre $113,146 $0 $113,146 Town of Swan Hills $49,740 $0 $49,740 Town of Thorsby $38,581 $0 $38,581 Town of Three Hills $123,525 $0 $123,525 Town of Tofield $83,128 $0 $83,128 Town of Trochu $37,377 $0 $37,377 Town of Turner Valley $109,263 $0 $109,263 Town of Two Hills $50,847 $0 $50,847 Town of Valleyview $68,478 $0 $68,478 Town of Vauxhall $41,574 $0 $41,574 Town of Vermilion $173,794 $0 $173,794 Town of Viking $40,569 $0 $40,569 Town of Vulcan $75,755 $0 $75,755 44 Page 174 of 214 2.3 k) Town of Wembley $57,140 $0 $57,140 Alberta Beach $43,040 $0 $43,040 Village of Acme $23,499 $0 $23,499 Village of Alix $29,350 $0 $29,350 Village of Alliance $5,142 $0 $5,142 Village of Amisk $6,896 $0 $6,896 Village of Andrew $14,990 $0 $14,990 Village of Arrowwood $6,176 $0 $6,176 Village of Barnwell $33,443 $0 $33,443 Village of Barons $11,251 $0 $11,251 Village of Bawlf $14,749 $0 $14,749 Village of Beiseker $33,234 $0 $33,234 Village of Berwyn $18,405 $0 $18,405 Village of Big Valley $11,984 $0 $11,984 Village of Bittern Lake $7,929 $0 $7,929 Village of Boyle $35,554 $0 $35,554 Village of Breton $21,825 $0 $21,825 Village of Carbon $17,473 $0 $17,473 Village of Carmangay $8,684 $0 $8,684 Village of Caroline $16,877 $0 $16,877 Village of Cereal $3,547 $0 $3,547 Village of Champion $10,734 $0 $10,734 Village of Chauvin $11,713 $0 $11,713 Village of Chipman $9,953 $0 $9,953 Village of Clive $25,263 $0 $25,263 Village of Clyde $14,824 $0 $14,824 Village of Consort $26,746 $0 $26,746 Village of Coutts $8,820 $0 $8,820 Village of Cowley $7,437 $0 $7,437 Village of Cremona $16,339 $0 $16,339 Village of Czar $6,781 $0 $6,781 Village of Delburne $32,286 $0 $32,286 Village of Delia $7,509 $0 $7,509 Village of Dewberry $6,200 $0 $6,200 Village of Donalda $7,335 $0 $7,335 Village of Donnelly $11,626 $0 $11,626 Village of Duchess $38,869 $0 $38,869 Village of Edberg $4,879 $0 $4,879 Village of Edgerton $14,485 $0 $14,485 Village of Elnora $10,442 $0 $10,442 Village of Empress $5,066 $0 $5,066 45 Page 175 of 214 2.3 k) Village of Ferintosh $7,009 $0 $7,009 Village of Foremost $19,048 $0 $19,048 Village of Forestburg $30,396 $0 $30,396 Village of Gadsby $1,265 $0 $1,265 Village of Girouxville $9,540 $0 $9,540 Village of Glendon $17,284 $0 $17,284 Village of Glenwood $11,170 $0 $11,170 Village of Halkirk $3,804 $0 $3,804 Village of Hay Lakes $17,817 $0 $17,817 Village of Heisler $5,258 $0 $5,258 Village of Hill Spring $5,795 $0 $5,795 Village of Hines Creek $11,506 $0 $11,506 Village of Holden $12,020 $0 $12,020 Village of Hughenden $7,971 $0 $7,971 Village of Hussar $6,760 $0 $6,760 Village of Hythe $28,647 $0 $28,647 Village of Innisfree $7,456 $0 $7,456 Village of Irma $18,459 $0 $18,459 Village of Kitscoty $37,085 $0 $37,085 Village of Linden $29,923 $0 $29,923 Village of Lomond $5,702 $0 $5,702 Village of Longview $12,828 $0 $12,828 Village of Lougheed $8,714 $0 $8,714 Village of Mannville $28,231 $0 $28,231 Village of Marwayne $20,561 $0 $20,561 Village of Milo $3,430 $0 $3,430 Village of Morrin $8,154 $0 $8,154 Village of Munson $6,970 $0 $6,970 Village of Myrnam $11,279 $0 $11,279 Village of Nampa $14,347 $0 $14,347 Village of Paradise Valley $5,753 $0 $5,753 Village of Rockyford $11,487 $0 $11,487 Village of Rosalind $6,484 $0 $6,484 Village of Rosemary $13,346 $0 $13,346 Village of Rycroft $21,631 $0 $21,631 Village of Ryley $16,743 $0 $16,743 Village of Spring Lake $30,037 $0 $30,037 Village of Standard $13,553 $0 $13,553 Village of Stirling $43,549 $0 $43,549 Village of Veteran $7,763 $0 $7,763 Village of Vilna $9,301 $0 $9,301 46 Page 176 of 214 2.3 k) Village of Wabamun $26,548 $0 $26,548 Village of Warburg $26,623 $0 $26,623 Village of Warner $12,668 $0 $12,668 Village of Waskatenau $7,884 $0 $7,884 Village of Youngstown $5,144 $0 $5,144 Summer Village of Argentia Beach $6,853 $0 $6,853 Summer Village of Betula Beach $2,068 $0 $2,068 Summer Village of Birch Cove $2,229 $0 $2,229 Summer Village of Birchcliff $15,939 $0 $15,939 Summer Village of Bondiss $7,224 $0 $7,224 Summer Village of Bonnyville Beach $4,715 $0 $4,715 Summer Village of Burnstick Lake $2,321 $0 $2,321 Summer Village of Castle Island $1,218 $0 $1,218 Summer Village of Crystal Springs $6,618 $0 $6,618 Summer Village of Ghost Lake $6,167 $0 $6,167 Summer Village of Golden Days $13,411 1 $160,000 -$146,589 Summer Village of Grandview $9,529 $0 $9,529 Summer Village of Gull Lake $11,390 $0 $11,390 Summer Village of Half Moon Bay $4,222 $0 $4,222 Summer Village of Horseshoe Bay $3,248 $0 $3,248 Summer Village of Island Lake $13,798 $0 $13,798 Summer Village of Island Lake South $3,403 $0 $3,403 Summer Village of Itaska Beach $3,398 $0 $3,398 Summer Village of Jarvis Bay $17,939 $0 $17,939 Summer Village of Kapasiwin $2,398 $0 $2,398 Summer Village of Lakeview $2,004 $0 $2,004 Summer Village of Larkspur $3,900 $0 $3,900 Summer Village of Ma-Me-O Beach $9,451 $0 $9,451 Summer Village of Mewatha Beach $6,454 $0 $6,454 Summer Village of Nakamun Park $5,326 $0 $5,326 Summer Village of Norglenwold $22,937 $0 $22,937 Summer Village of Norris Beach $3,165 $0 $3,165 Summer Village of Parkland Beach $9,928 $0 $9,928 Summer Village of Pelican Narrows $9,108 $0 $9,108 Summer Village of Point Alison $1,970 $0 $1,970 Summer Village of Poplar Bay $9,347 $0 $9,347 Summer Village of Rochon Sands $7,053 $0 $7,053 Summer Village of Ross Haven $9,182 $0 $9,182 Summer Village of Sandy Beach $11,089 $0 $11,089 Summer Village of Seba Beach $16,123 $0 $16,123 Summer Village of Silver Beach $7,587 $0 $7,587 47 Page 177 of 214 2.3 k) Summer Village of Silver Sands $8,554 $0 $8,554 Summer Village of South Baptiste $3,224 $0 $3,224 Summer Village of South View $3,252 $0 $3,252 Summer Village of Sunbreaker Cove $12,111 $0 $12,111 Summer Village of Sundance Beach $6,223 $0 $6,223 Summer Village of Sunrise Beach $5,401 $0 $5,401 Summer Village of Sunset Beach $3,566 $0 $3,566 Summer Village of Sunset Point $9,844 $0 $9,844 Summer Village of Val Quentin $11,019 $0 $11,019 Summer Village of Waiparous $3,705 $0 $3,705 Summer Village of West Baptiste $3,279 $0 $3,279 Summer Village of West Cove $8,228 $0 $8,228 Summer Village of Whispering Hills $7,193 $0 $7,193 Summer Village of White Sands $12,022 $0 $12,022 Summer Village of Yellowstone $6,670 $0 $6,670 48 Page 178 of 214 2.3 k) BASE + At 30% MODIFIERS ENHANCED POLICING NET IMPACT Cost per enhanced officer $160,000 Subsidy from Enhanced Policing Positions Number of Police Funding Police Funding Enhanced Dollar costs - Model Share MUNICIPALITY Model Share Policing 100% with modifiers with modifiers Positions reimbursement less Enhanced (Full- Policing Billing time) $ $ $ Lac La Biche County 957,400 2 320,000 637,400 $ $ $ Mackenzie County 851,567 2 320,000 531,567 $ $ $ Municipality of Crowsnest Pass 373,845 - 373,845 $ $ $ Municipality of Jasper 379,080 - 379,080 $ $ $ Strathcona County (rural) 2,761,003 - 2,761,003 $ $ $ Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo (rural) 5,348,039 - 5,348,039 $ $ $ Athabasca County 608,754 - 608,754 $ $ $ Beaver County 418,016 - 418,016 $ $ $ Big Lakes County 393,876 2 320,000 73,876 $ $ $ Birch Hills County 108,434 - 108,434 $ $ $ Brazeau County 796,059 1 160,000 636,059 $ $ $ Camrose County 635,278 - 635,278 $ $ $ Cardston County 281,347 - 281,347 $ $ $ Clear Hills County 267,205 - 267,205 $ $ $ Clearwater County 1,351,340 - 1,351,340 $ $ $ County of Barrhead No. 11 400,764 - 400,764 $ $ $ County of Forty Mile No. 8 257,623 - 257,623 49 Page 179 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ $ County of Grande Prairie No. 1 2,026,331 8 1,280,000 746,331 $ $ $ County of Minburn No. 27 245,569 - 245,569 $ $ $ County of Newell 858,805 - 858,805 $ $ $ County of Northern Lights 329,352 - 329,352 $ $ $ County of Paintearth No. 18 231,995 - 231,995 $ $ $ County of St. Paul No. 19 500,728 - 500,728 $ $ $ County of Stettler No. 6 436,277 - 436,277 $ $ $ County of Two Hills No. 21 246,798 - 246,798 $ $ $ County of Vermilion River 697,034 2 320,000 377,034 $ $ $ County of Warner No. 5 259,717 - 259,717 $ $ $ County of Wetaskiwin No. 10 855,012 1 160,000 695,012 $ $ $ Cypress County 950,588 1 160,000 790,588 $ $ $ Flagstaff County 351,598 1 160,000 191,598 $ $ $ Kneehill County 479,178 - 479,178 $ $ $ Lac Ste. Anne County 707,473 - 707,473 $ $ $ Lacombe County 1,206,981 2 320,000 886,981 $ $ $ Lamont County 319,907 - 319,907 $ $ $ Leduc County 1,606,184 2 320,000 1,286,184 $ $ $ Lethbridge County 704,212 - 704,212 $ $ $ Mountain View County 1,120,896 - 1,120,896 $ $ $ Municipal District of Acadia No. 34 32,705 - 32,705 $ $ $ Municipal District of Bighorn No. 8 200,692 - 200,692 $ $ $ Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87 1,224,244 - 1,224,244 50 Page 180 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ $ Municipal District of Fairview No. 136 115,395 - 115,395 $ $ $ Municipal District of Foothills No. 31 1,999,320 - 1,999,320 $ $ $ Municipal District of Greenview No. 16 1,465,271 2 320,000 1,145,271 $ $ $ Municipal District of Lesser Slave River No. 124 317,687 - 317,687 $ $ $ Municipal District of Opportunity No. 17 454,417 5 800,000 (345,583) $ $ $ Municipal District of Peace No. 135 114,994 - 114,994 $ $ $ Municipal District of Pincher Creek No. 9 324,100 1 160,000 164,100 $ $ $ Municipal District of Provost No. 52 400,200 - 400,200 $ $ $ Municipal District of Ranchland No. 66 25,467 - 25,467 $ $ $ Municipal District of Smoky River No. 130 157,969 - 157,969 $ $ $ Municipal District of Spirit River No. 133 59,909 - 59,909 $ $ $ Municipal District of Taber 583,139 - 583,139 $ $ $ Municipal District of Wainwright No. 61 448,131 - 448,131 $ $ $ Municipal District of Willow Creek No. 26 419,260 - 419,260 $ $ $ Northern Sunrise County 347,431 - 347,431 $ $ $ Parkland County 2,724,085 - 2,724,085 $ $ $ Ponoka County 813,394 2 320,000 493,394 $ $ $ Red Deer County 1,642,539 1 160,000 1,482,539 $ $ $ Rocky View County 3,920,863 3 480,000 3,440,863 $ $ $ Saddle Hills County 390,404 - 390,404 $ $ $ Smoky Lake County 191,242 - 191,242 $ $ $ Starland County 184,137 - 184,137 $ $ $ Sturgeon County 1,760,751 - 1,760,751 51 Page 181 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ $ Thorhild County 237,592 - 237,592 $ $ $ Vulcan County 371,262 - 371,262 $ $ $ Westlock County 453,524 - 453,524 $ $ $ Wheatland County 901,985 - 901,985 $ $ $ Woodlands County 513,953 - 513,953 $ $ $ Yellowhead County 1,603,431 - 1,603,431 $ $ $ Special Areas Board 672,518 - 672,518 $ $ $ Improvement District No. 04 (Waterton) 41,486 - 41,486 $ $ $ Improvement District No. 09 (Banff) 131,481 - 131,481 Improvement District No. 12 (Jasper National $ $ $ Park) 8,493 - 8,493 $ $ $ Improvement District No. 13 (Elk Island) 662 - 662 $ $ $ Improvement District No. 24 (Wood Buffalo) 29,902 - 29,902 $ $ $ Improvement District No. 349 309,812 - 309,812 $ $ $ Kananaskis Improvement District 32,979 - 32,979 $ $ $ Town of Athabasca 174,652 - 174,652 $ $ $ Town of Barrhead 270,709 1 160,000 110,709 $ $ $ Town of Bashaw 47,144 - 47,144 $ $ $ Town of Bassano 69,799 - 69,799 $ $ $ Town of Beaverlodge 146,717 - 146,717 $ $ $ Town of Bentley 58,075 - 58,075 $ $ $ Town of Black Diamond 160,986 - 160,986 $ $ $ Town of Bon Accord 83,451 - 83,451 $ $ $ Town of Bow Island 113,161 - 113,161 52 Page 182 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ $ Town of Bowden 66,529 - 66,529 $ $ $ Town of Bruderheim 78,386 - 78,386 $ $ $ Town of Calmar 121,752 - 121,752 $ $ $ Town of Cardston 217,681 - 217,681 $ $ $ Town of Carstairs 245,980 1 160,000 85,980 $ $ $ Town of Castor 49,193 - 49,193 $ $ $ Town of Claresholm 221,349 - 221,349 $ $ $ Town of Coalhurst 147,792 - 147,792 $ $ $ Town of Coronation 52,519 - 52,519 $ $ $ Town of Crossfield 204,304 1 160,000 44,304 $ $ $ Town of Daysland 42,998 - 42,998 $ $ $ Town of Didsbury 312,353 - 312,353 $ $ $ Town of Eckville 62,688 - 62,688 $ $ $ Town of Elk Point 77,038 - 77,038 $ $ $ Town of Fairview 173,715 - 173,715 $ $ $ Town of Falher 55,708 - 55,708 $ $ $ Town of Fort Macleod 177,135 - 177,135 $ $ $ Town of Fox Creek 125,271 - 125,271 $ $ $ Town of Gibbons 180,555 - 180,555 $ $ $ Town of Grande Cache 210,329 - 210,329 $ $ $ Town of Granum 21,402 - 21,402 $ $ $ Town of Grimshaw 157,133 - 157,133 $ $ $ Town of Hanna 146,596 - 146,596 53 Page 183 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ $ Town of Hardisty 35,849 - 35,849 $ $ $ Town of High Level 213,408 1 160,000 53,408 $ $ $ Town of High Prairie 143,598 - 143,598 $ $ $ Town of Irricana 68,116 - 68,116 $ $ $ Town of Killam 57,245 - 57,245 $ $ $ Town of Lamont 98,306 - 98,306 $ $ $ Town of Legal 73,414 - 73,414 $ $ $ Town of Magrath 128,695 - 128,695 $ $ $ Town of Manning 68,550 - 68,550 $ $ $ Town of Mayerthorpe 69,241 - 69,241 $ $ $ Town of McLennan 41,235 - 41,235 $ $ $ Town of Milk River 45,689 - 45,689 $ $ $ Town of Millet 104,663 - 104,663 $ $ $ Town of Mundare 47,740 - 47,740 $ $ $ Town of Nanton 136,493 - 136,493 $ $ $ Town of Nobleford 70,984 - 70,984 $ $ $ Town of Onoway 58,558 1 160,000 (101,442) $ $ $ Town of Oyen 56,669 - 56,669 $ $ $ Town of Penhold 187,459 - 187,459 $ $ $ Town of Picture Butte 103,162 - 103,162 $ $ $ Town of Pincher Creek 217,434 - 217,434 $ $ $ Town of Provost 120,039 - 120,039 $ $ $ Town of Rainbow Lake 43,788 - 43,788 54 Page 184 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ $ Town of Raymond 231,733 - 231,733 $ $ $ Town of Redwater 132,942 - 132,942 $ $ $ Town of Rimbey 151,837 - 151,837 $ $ $ Town of Sedgewick 45,700 - 45,700 $ $ $ Town of Sexsmith 149,490 - 149,490 $ $ $ Town of Smoky Lake 54,411 - 54,411 $ $ $ Town of Spirit River 55,955 - 55,955 $ $ $ Town of Stavely 30,077 - 30,077 $ $ $ Town of Sundre 169,840 - 169,840 $ $ $ Town of Swan Hills 74,663 - 74,663 $ $ $ Town of Thorsby 57,913 - 57,913 $ $ $ Town of Three Hills 185,421 - 185,421 $ $ $ Town of Tofield 124,782 - 124,782 $ $ $ Town of Trochu 56,106 - 56,106 $ $ $ Town of Turner Valley 164,013 - 164,013 $ $ $ Town of Two Hills 76,325 - 76,325 $ $ $ Town of Valleyview 102,791 - 102,791 $ $ $ Town of Vauxhall 62,406 - 62,406 $ $ $ Town of Vermilion 260,878 - 260,878 $ $ $ Town of Viking 60,897 - 60,897 $ $ $ Town of Vulcan 113,714 - 113,714 $ $ $ Town of Wembley 85,772 - 85,772 $ $ $ Alberta Beach 64,606 - 64,606 55 Page 185 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ $ Village of Acme 35,273 - 35,273 $ $ $ Village of Alix 44,056 - 44,056 $ $ $ Village of Alliance 7,718 - 7,718 $ $ $ Village of Amisk 10,351 - 10,351 $ $ $ Village of Andrew 22,501 - 22,501 $ $ $ Village of Arrowwood 9,270 - 9,270 $ $ $ Village of Barnwell 50,200 - 50,200 $ $ $ Village of Barons 16,889 - 16,889 $ $ $ Village of Bawlf 22,139 - 22,139 $ $ $ Village of Beiseker 49,886 - 49,886 $ $ $ Village of Berwyn 27,627 - 27,627 $ $ $ Village of Big Valley 17,988 - 17,988 $ $ $ Village of Bittern Lake 11,901 - 11,901 $ $ $ Village of Boyle 53,369 - 53,369 $ $ $ Village of Breton 32,761 - 32,761 $ $ $ Village of Carbon 26,229 - 26,229 $ $ $ Village of Carmangay 13,036 - 13,036 $ $ $ Village of Caroline 25,334 - 25,334 $ $ $ Village of Cereal 5,324 - 5,324 $ $ $ Village of Champion 16,112 - 16,112 $ $ $ Village of Chauvin 17,581 - 17,581 $ $ $ Village of Chipman 14,941 - 14,941 $ $ $ Village of Clive 37,922 - 37,922 56 Page 186 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ $ Village of Clyde 22,252 - 22,252 $ $ $ Village of Consort 40,147 - 40,147 $ $ $ Village of Coutts 13,239 - 13,239 $ $ $ Village of Cowley 11,163 - 11,163 $ $ $ Village of Cremona 24,526 - 24,526 $ $ $ Village of Czar 10,178 - 10,178 $ $ $ Village of Delburne 48,464 - 48,464 $ $ $ Village of Delia 11,271 - 11,271 $ $ $ Village of Dewberry 9,306 - 9,306 $ $ $ Village of Donalda 11,010 - 11,010 $ $ $ Village of Donnelly 17,451 - 17,451 $ $ $ Village of Duchess 58,345 - 58,345 $ $ $ Village of Edberg 7,324 - 7,324 $ $ $ Village of Edgerton 21,743 - 21,743 $ $ $ Village of Elnora 15,674 - 15,674 $ $ $ Village of Empress 7,605 - 7,605 $ $ $ Village of Ferintosh 10,520 - 10,520 $ $ $ Village of Foremost 28,592 - 28,592 $ $ $ Village of Forestburg 45,627 - 45,627 $ $ $ Village of Gadsby 1,899 - 1,899 $ $ $ Village of Girouxville 14,320 - 14,320 $ $ $ Village of Glendon 25,945 - 25,945 $ $ $ Village of Glenwood 16,767 - 16,767 57 Page 187 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ $ Village of Halkirk 5,710 - 5,710 $ $ $ Village of Hay Lakes 26,744 - 26,744 $ $ $ Village of Heisler 7,892 - 7,892 $ $ $ Village of Hill Spring 8,698 - 8,698 $ $ $ Village of Hines Creek 17,272 - 17,272 $ $ $ Village of Holden 18,043 - 18,043 $ $ $ Village of Hughenden 11,965 - 11,965 $ $ $ Village of Hussar 10,148 - 10,148 $ $ $ Village of Hythe 43,001 - 43,001 $ $ $ Village of Innisfree 11,193 - 11,193 $ $ $ Village of Irma 27,708 - 27,708 $ $ $ Village of Kitscoty 55,667 - 55,667 $ $ $ Village of Linden 44,917 - 44,917 $ $ $ Village of Lomond 8,559 - 8,559 $ $ $ Village of Longview 19,256 - 19,256 $ $ $ Village of Lougheed 13,080 - 13,080 $ $ $ Village of Mannville 42,377 - 42,377 $ $ $ Village of Marwayne 30,863 - 30,863 $ $ $ Village of Milo 5,149 - 5,149 $ $ $ Village of Morrin 12,240 - 12,240 $ $ $ Village of Munson 10,463 - 10,463 $ $ $ Village of Myrnam 16,930 - 16,930 $ $ $ Village of Nampa 21,537 - 21,537 58 Page 188 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ $ Village of Paradise Valley 8,635 - 8,635 $ $ $ Village of Rockyford 17,243 - 17,243 $ $ $ Village of Rosalind 9,732 - 9,732 $ $ $ Village of Rosemary 20,034 - 20,034 $ $ $ Village of Rycroft 32,470 - 32,470 $ $ $ Village of Ryley 25,133 - 25,133 $ $ $ Village of Spring Lake 45,087 - 45,087 $ $ $ Village of Standard 20,344 - 20,344 $ $ $ Village of Stirling 65,371 - 65,371 $ $ $ Village of Veteran 11,652 - 11,652 $ $ $ Village of Vilna 13,962 - 13,962 $ $ $ Village of Wabamun 39,851 - 39,851 $ $ $ Village of Warburg 39,963 - 39,963 $ $ $ Village of Warner 19,016 - 19,016 $ $ $ Village of Waskatenau 11,834 - 11,834 $ $ $ Village of Youngstown 7,721 - 7,721 $ $ $ Summer Village of Argentia Beach 10,287 - 10,287 $ $ $ Summer Village of Betula Beach 3,104 - 3,104 $ $ $ Summer Village of Birch Cove 3,346 - 3,346 $ $ $ Summer Village of Birchcliff 23,926 - 23,926 $ $ $ Summer Village of Bondiss 10,844 - 10,844 $ $ $ Summer Village of Bonnyville Beach 7,077 - 7,077 $ $ $ Summer Village of Burnstick Lake 3,484 - 3,484 59 Page 189 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ $ Summer Village of Castle Island 1,829 - 1,829 $ $ $ Summer Village of Crystal Springs 9,934 - 9,934 $ $ $ Summer Village of Ghost Lake 9,256 - 9,256 $ $ $ Summer Village of Golden Days 20,130 1 160,000 (139,870) $ $ $ Summer Village of Grandview 14,303 - 14,303 $ $ $ Summer Village of Gull Lake 17,097 - 17,097 $ $ $ Summer Village of Half Moon Bay 6,338 - 6,338 $ $ $ Summer Village of Horseshoe Bay 4,876 - 4,876 $ $ $ Summer Village of Island Lake 20,711 - 20,711 $ $ $ Summer Village of Island Lake South 5,109 - 5,109 $ $ $ Summer Village of Itaska Beach 5,101 - 5,101 $ $ $ Summer Village of Jarvis Bay 26,928 - 26,928 $ $ $ Summer Village of Kapasiwin 3,600 - 3,600 $ $ $ Summer Village of Lakeview 3,008 - 3,008 $ $ $ Summer Village of Larkspur 5,854 - 5,854 $ $ $ Summer Village of Ma-Me-O Beach 14,187 - 14,187 $ $ $ Summer Village of Mewatha Beach 9,688 - 9,688 $ $ $ Summer Village of Nakamun Park 7,995 - 7,995 $ $ $ Summer Village of Norglenwold 34,431 - 34,431 $ $ $ Summer Village of Norris Beach 4,751 - 4,751 $ $ $ Summer Village of Parkland Beach 14,903 - 14,903 $ $ $ Summer Village of Pelican Narrows 13,671 - 13,671 $ $ $ Summer Village of Point Alison 2,956 - 2,956 60 Page 190 of 214 2.3 k) $ $ $ Summer Village of Poplar Bay 14,031 - 14,031 $ $ $ Summer Village of Rochon Sands 10,586 - 10,586 $ $ $ Summer Village of Ross Haven 13,783 - 13,783 $ $ $ Summer Village of Sandy Beach 16,646 - 16,646 $ $ $ Summer Village of Seba Beach 24,202 - 24,202 $ $ $ Summer Village of Silver Beach 11,388 - 11,388 $ $ $ Summer Village of Silver Sands 12,840 - 12,840 $ $ $ Summer Village of South Baptiste 4,840 - 4,840 $ $ $ Summer Village of South View 4,881 - 4,881 $ $ $ Summer Village of Sunbreaker Cove 18,179 - 18,179 $ $ $ Summer Village of Sundance Beach 9,342 - 9,342 $ $ $ Summer Village of Sunrise Beach 8,107 - 8,107 $ $ $ Summer Village of Sunset Beach 5,353 - 5,353 $ $ $ Summer Village of Sunset Point 14,776 - 14,776 $ $ $ Summer Village of Val Quentin 16,541 - 16,541 $ $ $ Summer Village of Waiparous 5,562 - 5,562 $ $ $ Summer Village of West Baptiste 4,921 - 4,921 $ $ $ Summer Village of West Cove 12,351 - 12,351 $ $ $ Summer Village of Whispering Hills 10,797 - 10,797 $ $ $ Summer Village of White Sands 18,045 - 18,045 $ $ $ Summer Village of Yellowstone 10,013 - 10,013 61 Page 191 of 214 2.3 m) Town of Hardisty REQUEST FOR DECISION 19-12-100 December 10th, 2019 SUBJECT: Proposal from MuniSight Ltd. – For a Regional GIS Assessment Study to be funded through the Alberta Community Partnership Grant & Managing Partner Town of Sedgewick RECOMMENDATION: Motion #1: THAT Council directs the CAO to apply for a grant opportunity with (Town of Sedgewick, Town of Daysland, Town of Killam, Village of Alliance, Village of Heisler, Village of Forestburg & the Village of Lougheed), from the Alberta Municipal Affairs Alberta Community Partnership (ACP) program through the Intermunicipal Collaboration Stream for the Regional GIS and Asset Management project and that the Town of Hardisty is committed to conducting the following activities in its proposed project to advance regional service delivery with the following two activities: Regional GIS Assessment Study to identify regional service delivery gaps Implementation of Asset Management Program Motion #2: THAT Council accepts that the Town of Sedgewick will act as the Managing Partner in the Regional GIS Assessment Study ACP Grant Application. CAO COMMENTS: The intent of this project is to enhance the GIS mapping system by developing a coordinated Asset Management Framework for the region. The results of this project will provide us with the policies and procedures required to meet the requirement from the Federal Government to have an asset management program. As well, a proactive approach to infrastructure maintenance to improve public safety and service delivery. This ACP Grant does not have a matching component and would not impact our 2020 Budget. RECOMMENDATION REPORT/DOCUMENT: Attached _X_ Available__ Nil __ KEY ISSUE(S)/CONCEPTS DEFINED: Pursuant to our Agreement with Canada-Alberta Federal Gas Tax Grant funding and the Alberta Municipal Corporate Planning Regulation, municipalities for the 2020 Budget year prepare financial plan that include: Page 192 of 214 2.3 m) Anticipated total revenues and total expenditures by major category for 3 years; Anticipated annual surplus or deficit and Anticipated accumulated surplus or deficit 5 yr Capital plans must include: Planned capital property additions and Allocated or anticipated funding sources RELEVANT POLICY/PRACTICES/LEGISLATION: Municipal Corporate Planning Regulation Municipal Government Act – Financial Plan and Capital Plan Sec. 283.1 STRATEGIC RELEVANCE: RESPONSE OPTIONS and DESIRED OUTCOME(S): Accept as presented Accept with amendments Defeat IMPLICATIONS OF RECOMMENDATION: GENERAL: ORGANIZATIONAL: Administrative/Public Works est. time - 32hrs in preparation and consultation ENVIRONMENTAL: Public safety and delivery of essential services in a proactive approach FINANCIAL: NIL – If not awarded ACP Grant the project will be postponed. Project value $146,208 for ALL (7) municipalities. FOLLOW UP ACTION/COMMUNICATIONS: Administration to advise MuniSight and member municipalities of Council’s decision. Submitted and Reviewed By: Sandy Otto, CAO Page 193 of 214 2.3 m) MuniSight Proposal: Alberta Community Partnership Grant November 25, 2019 Page 194 of 214 2.3 m) Alberta Community Partnership Grant Overview The 2019/2020 ACP budget commitment is $16.5 million. The objective of the ACP program is to improve the viability and long-term sustainability of municipalities by providing support for regional collaboration and capacity building initiatives. Key program outcomes include: • New or enhanced regional municipal services; • Improved municipal capacity to respond to municipal and regional priorities; and • Effective intermunicipal relations through joint and collaborative activities. The ACP grant covers 100% of project costs. MuniSight has successfully helped multiple Alberta municipalities obtain funding and achieve program outcomes. Project Overview Under the Intermunicipal Collaboration component of the ACP grant we are proposing to deliver a Regional GIS Assessment Study for the Towns of Sedgewick, Hardisty, and Killam, and the Villages of Lougheed, Forestburg, Heisler, and Alliance with the purpose of producing a roadmap to better coordinate the region's emergency services, asset management, and infrastructure maintenance objectives through the use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS). To do this, we will need to first identify the current situation of the seven municipalities, including their individual systems and data to bring all parties to the same state with the purpose of optimal operation coordination. We will accomplish this goal through the analysis of the current data within each municipal entity to identify regional gaps in emergency services, asset management, and infrastructure maintenance. Finally, the primary outcome of the project is the creation of a coordinated framework to improve public safety and service delivery through proactive infrastructure maintenance. These activities will be closely guided by a project steering committee, which will consist of members from each of the seven municipalities as well as a member from a third-party provider. The role of the steering committee will be to develop a committee terms of reference, an intermunicipal collaboration framework, a regional service governance model for database usage once the project is complete, and to collaboratively guide all project activities and decisions. 2 Page 195 of 214 2.3 m) Deliverables 1. Establish a Project Steering Committee • One member from each municipality plus a member from a third-party provider • Development of an intermunicipal framework for infrastructure decision making • Creation of Steering Committee Terms of Reference 2. Regional GIS Assessment Study • Provide current status, progress, and a roadmap to progress systems within each municipality and as a region • Identify a best practice for the region in line with Canadian standards and within the current operations of each municipality • Identify GIS gaps within each organization and within the region (emergency services, planning, asset management, infrastructure maintenance, and operations) 3. Identify and Analyze Current Spatial Data • Identify the current GIS data for quality and accuracy • Analyze infrastructure data (GIS) for gaps • Set up processes to better manage operational tasks within the GIS that is standard for the region 4. Creation of a coordinated Asset Management Framework • Creation of Asset Management Policies, Strategies, and Plans for each municipality • Asset Management training for municipal staff • Creation of a coordinated regional approach to asset management Tangible Outcomes ✓ Clear direction for collaboration ✓ Clear direction to guide infrastructure investment decisions ✓ Efficiency in maintaining municipal infrastructure ✓ Framework to decrease likelihood of service gaps and lower risks ✓ Asset Management Strategies, Policies, and Plans for each municipality ✓ Roadmap to optimal service delivery throughout the region 3 Page 196 of 214 2.3 m) Proposal MuniSight has been a trusted-advisor for multiple ACP projects identical to the one being proposed. MuniSight will: 1. Write the grant application for all municipalities 2. Deliver the outcomes all 7 municipalities are looking to achieve as a region 3. Develop post-project reporting, as required by the provincial government The only deliverables required for each municipality to provide is a letter of support from local government, in the form of a council resolution, and a signed MuniSight contingent order form. Budget TOTAL BUDGET The ACP grant will cover 100% of costs. The proposed total cost for all 7 municipalities will be: Fee Individual Asset Management Plans $ 105,000 Regional GIS Study 30,000 General Support Services (70 hours) 11,200 Grant Writing Services 8 SUBTOTAL $ 146,208 Project Schedule 4 Page 197 of 214 2.3 m) MuniSight Ltd. Quote Ref#: 191143 171 Pembina Rd. Date: November 25, 2019 Sherwood Park, AB T8H 2W8 Quote valid for 30 days ORDER FORM Client Information Clients: Town of Hardisty Address: 4807 – 49 Street, Box 10 Contact Name: Sandy Otto Hardisty, AB Email Address: [email protected] T0B 1V0 Terms and Conditions Payment Method: EFT Auto-Renewal: NO Products and Services Services Fee Asset Management Services (Sched. B)* 15,000 General Support Services (10 hours)* 1,600 Grant Writing Services 1 SUBTOTAL $ 16,601 Notes Fees do not include applicable Taxes. Fees associated with Grant Writing Services are payable upon acceptance of this Order Form. Items highlighted by an asterixis (*) are only payable in the case that the Grant has been successfully awarded to the Municipality, and are payable within 15 days of the Grant being awarded. Acceptance Client acknowledges and agrees that this Order Form shall become legally binding and Client shall be bound by the terms and conditions of the MuniSight Terms and Conditions. Effective Date: Town of Hardisty MuniSight Ltd. Per: Per: Name: Name: Title: Title: Page 198 of 214 2.3 m) MuniSight Ltd. Quote Ref#: 191143 171 Pembina Rd. Date: November 25, 2019 Sherwood Park, AB T8H 2W8 Quote valid for 30 days SCHEDULE B – ASSET MANAGEMENT SERVICES MuniSight will provide services to assist with setting up an Asset Management Program. These services will involve: 1. identifying any gaps in the Asset Management information; and 2. developing the framework for an Asset Management Program, based on MuniSight’s templated framework. MuniSight’s Asset Management Program template is based on the following Table of Contents: • Asset Management Policy o Intent o Scope o Role of asset management policy o Principles o responsibilities • Asset Management Strategy o Intent & scope o Town of Hardisty o Asset management decision-making approaches o Asset management objectives and performance targets o Key asset management improvement initiatives o Asset management roles & responsibilities o How to monitor and improve asset management • Asset Management Plan o Summary o Introduction o Methodology o Limitations and assumptions o Data completeness and accuracy o Conclusions o Recommendations Page 199 of 214 2.3 m) MuniSight Terms & Conditions MUNISIGHT TERMS AND CONDITIONS Each Order Form placed by you for services (including the Services) is subject to these standard terms and conditions and the terms of the applicable Order Form, and is conditional upon our agreement to such terms. If you are entering into an Order Form on behalf of a company or other legal entity, you represent that you have the authority to bind such entity and its affiliates to these terms and conditions and the terms of the Order Form, in which case the terms "you" or "your" shall refer to such entity and its affiliates. If you do not have such authority, or if you do not agree with these terms and conditions, you must not accept these terms and conditions, you must not execute an Order Form and you must not use the services (including the Services). These terms and conditions were last updated on November 1, 2019. It is effective between you and us as of the effective date set out in the Order Form. SECTION 1: DEFINITIONS "Affiliate" means any entity that directly or indirectly controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with the subject entity. "Control," for purposes of this definition, means direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 50% of the voting interests of the subject entity. “Beta Services” means MuniSight services or functionality that may be made available to you to try at its option at no additional charge which is clearly designated as beta, pilot, limited release, developer preview, non-production, evaluation, or by a similar description. “Content” means information obtained by MuniSight from publicly available sources or third party content providers and made available to you through the Services, Beta Services or pursuant to an Order Form. “General Service Hours” means General Support Service Hours, as specified in the Order Form. “Malicious Code” means code, files, scripts, agents or programs intended to do harm, including, for example, viruses, worms, time bombs and Trojan horses. “Non-MuniSight Application” means a Web-based, mobile, offline or other software application functionality that is provided by you or a third party and interoperates with a Service or an application that is developed by or for you. “Order Form” means the order form attached to these Terms and Conditions specifying the Services to be provided hereunder that is entered into between you and us or any of our Affiliates, including any addenda and supplements thereto. By entering into an Order Form hereunder, you to be bound by the terms of these Terms and Conditions. “Purchased Services” means Services that you purchase under an Order Form, as distinguished from those provided pursuant to a free trial. “Services” means the products and services that are ordered by you under an Order Form or provided to you under a free trial, and made available online by us, including associated MuniSight offline or mobile components. “Services” exclude Content and Non-MuniSight Applications. “Terms and Conditions” means these MuniSight Terms and Conditions. “User” means an individual who is authorized by you to use a Service, for whom you have purchased a subscription (or in the case of any Services provided by us without charge, for whom a Service has been provisioned), and to whom you (or, when applicable, us at your request) have supplied a user identification and password (for Services utilizing authentication). Users may include, for example, your employees, consultants, contractors and agents, and third parties with which you transact business. Page 1 of 9 Page 200 of 214 2.3 m) MuniSight Terms & Conditions “we,” “us” or “our” means MuniSight Ltd. a body corporate duly incorporated under the laws of the Province of Alberta, having an address at: 203 – 10328 81 AVE NW, Edmonton, Alberta, T6E1X2. “you” or “your” means the company or other legal entity for which you are accepting these Terms and Conditions. “Your Data” means electronic data and information submitted by or for you to the Services, excluding Content and Non-MuniSight Applications. SECTION 2: OUR RESPONSIBILITIES 2.1 Provision of Purchased Services. We will (a) make the Services and Content available to you pursuant to these Terms and Conditions and the Order Form, (b) provide applicable MuniSight standard support for the Services to you at no additional charge, and/or upgraded support (“General Support Services”) if purchased, (c) use commercially reasonable efforts to make the online Services available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, except for: (i) planned downtime (of which we shall give advance electronic notice), and (ii) any unavailability caused by circumstances beyond our reasonable control, including, for example, an act of God, act of government, flood, fire, earthquake, civil unrest, act of terror, strike or other labor problem (other than one involving our employees), Internet service provider failure or delay, Non-MuniSight Application, or denial of service attack. 2.2 Protection of Your Data. We will maintain administrative, physical, and technical safeguards for protection of the security, confidentiality and integrity of Your Data. 2.3 Our Personnel. We will be responsible for the performance of our personnel that we are legally responsible for (including our employees and contractors that we are legally responsible for) and their compliance with our obligations under these Terms and Conditions, except as otherwise specified herein. 2.4 Beta Services. From time to time, we may make Beta Services available to you at no charge. You may choose to try such Beta Services or not in your sole discretion. Beta Services are intended for evaluation purposes and not for production use, are not supported, and may be subject to additional terms. Beta Services are not considered “Services” under these Terms and Conditions, however, all restrictions, our reservation of rights and your obligations concerning the Services, and use of any related Non-MuniSight Applications and Content, shall apply equally to your use of Beta Services. Unless otherwise stated, any Beta Services trial period will expire upon the earlier of one year from the trial start date or the date that a version of the Beta Services becomes generally available without the applicable Beta Services designation. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, we may discontinue Beta Services at any time in our sole discretion and may never make them generally available. We will have no liability for any harm or damage arising out of or in connection with a Beta Service. 2.5 Worker’s Compensation Act. We will comply with the Workers’ Compensation Act (Alberta) when such Act applies to us and shall, upon demand by you, deliver to you a certification from the Workers’ Compensation Board (Alberta) showing that we are registered and are in good standing with the Workers’ Compensation Board (Alberta). SECTION 3: USE OF SERVICES AND CONTENT 3.1 Subscriptions. Unless otherwise provided in the applicable Order Form, (a) Services and access to Content are purchased as subscriptions, (b) subscriptions may be added during a subscription term at the same pricing as the underlying subscription pricing, prorated for the portion of that subscription term remaining at the time the subscriptions are added, and (c) any added subscriptions will terminate on the same date as the underlying subscriptions. 3.2 Your Responsibilities. You will (a) be responsible for Users’ compliance with these Terms and Conditions, and Order Form, (b) be responsible for the accuracy, quality and legality of Your Data and the means by which you acquired Your Data, (c) use commercially reasonable efforts to prevent unauthorized access to or use of Services and Content, and notify us promptly of any such unauthorized access or use, (d) use Page 2 of 9 Page 201 of 214 2.3 m) MuniSight Terms & Conditions Services and Content only in accordance with these Terms and Conditions, Order Form and applicable laws and government regulations, (e) comply with terms of service of any Non-MuniSight Applications with which you use Services or Content, (f) maintain any Non-MuniSight Applications that may be required to deliver the Services as specified in the Order Form. 3.3 Usage Restrictions. You will not (a) make any Service or Content available to, or use any Service or Content for the benefit of, anyone other than you or Users, unless expressly stated otherwise in an Order Form, (b) sell, resell, license, sublicense, distribute, make available, rent or lease any Service or Content, or include any Service or Content in a service bureau or outsourcing offering, (c) use a Service or Non- MuniSight Application to store or transmit infringing, libelous, or otherwise unlawful or tortious material, or to store or transmit material in violation of third-party privacy rights, (d) use a Service or Non- MuniSight Application to store or transmit Malicious Code, (e) interfere with or disrupt the integrity or performance of any Service or third-party data contained therein, (f) attempt to gain unauthorized access to any Service or Content or its related systems or networks, (g) permit direct or indirect access to or use of any Service or Content in a way that circumvents a contractual usage limit, or use any of our Services to access or use any of our intellectual property except as permitted under these Terms and Conditions, or Order Form, (h) copy a Service or any part, feature, function or user interface thereof, (i) copy Content except as permitted herein or in an Order Form, (j) frame or mirror any part of any Service or Content, other than framing on your own intranets or otherwise for your own internal business purposes, (k) access any Service or Content in order to build a competitive product or service or to benchmark with a Non-MuniSight product or service (including any Service), or (l) reverse engineer any service (including any Service) (to the extent such restriction is permitted by law). Any use of the services (including the Services) in breach of these Terms and Conditions or Order Form, by you or Users that in our judgment threatens the security, integrity or availability of our services (including the Services), may result in our immediate suspension of the services (including the Services), however we will use commercially reasonable efforts under the circumstances to provide you with notice and an opportunity to remedy such violation or threat prior to such suspension. SECTION 4: NON-MUNISIGHT PROVIDERS 4.1 We or third parties may make available third-party products or services, including, for example, Non- MuniSight Applications and implementation and other consulting services. Any acquisition by you of such products or services, and any exchange of data between you and any Non- MuniSight provider, product or service is solely between you and the applicable Non- MuniSight provider. We do not warrant or support Non-MuniSight Applications or other Non- MuniSight products or services, whether or not they are designated by us as “certified” or otherwise, unless expressly provided otherwise in an Order Form. 4.2 Non- MuniSight Applications and Your Data. If you choose to use a Non- MuniSight Application with a Service, you grant us permission to allow the Non- MuniSight Application and its provider to access Your Data as required for the interoperation of that Non- MuniSight Application with the Service. We are not responsible for any disclosure, modification or deletion of Your Data resulting from access by such Non- MuniSight Application or its provider. 4.3 Integration with Non-MuniSight Applications. The Services may contain features designed to interoperate with Non- MuniSight Applications. To use such features, you may be required to obtain access to such Non- MuniSight Applications from their providers, and may be required to grant us access to your account(s) on such Non- MuniSight Applications. We cannot guarantee the continued availability of such Service features, and may cease providing them without entitling you to any refund, credit, or other compensation, if for example and without limitation, the provider of a Non- MuniSight Application ceases to make the Non- MuniSight Application available for interoperation with the corresponding Service features in a manner acceptable to us. Page 3 of 9 Page 202 of 214 2.3 m) MuniSight Terms & Conditions SECTION 5: FEES AND PAYMENT FOR PURCHASED SERVICES 5.1 Fees. You will pay all fees specified in Order Form. Except as otherwise specified herein or in an Order Form, (i) fees are based on Services and Content subscriptions purchased and not actual usage, unless explicitly noted, (ii) payment obligations are non-cancelable and fees paid are non-refundable, and (iii) quantities purchased cannot be decreased during the relevant subscription term. 5.2 Invoicing and Payment. We will invoice you in advance and otherwise in accordance with the relevant Order Form. Unless otherwise stated in the Order Form, invoiced charges are due net 30 days from the invoice date. You are responsible for providing complete and accurate billing and contact information to us and notifying us of any changes to such information. 5.3 Overdue Charges. If any invoiced amount is not received by us by the due date, then without limiting our rights or remedies, (a) those charges may accrue late interest at the rate of 1.5% of the outstanding balance per month, or the maximum rate permitted by law, whichever is lower. 5.4 Suspension of Service and Acceleration. If any amount owing by you under this or any other agreement for our services (including the Services) is 30 or more days overdue (or 10 or more days overdue in the case of amounts you have authorized us to charge to your credit card), we may, without limiting our other rights and remedies, accelerate your unpaid fee obligations under such agreements so that all such obligations become immediately due and payable, and suspend our services (including the Services) to you until such amounts are paid in full. Other than for customers paying by credit card or direct debit whose payment has been declined, we will give you at least 10 days’ prior notice that your account is overdue, in accordance with Section 12.2 (Manner of Giving Notice) for billing notices, before suspending services to you. 5.5 Payment Disputes. We will not exercise our rights under Section 5.3 (Overdue Charges) or 5.4 (Suspension of Service and Acceleration) above if you are disputing the applicable charges reasonably and in good faith and are cooperating diligently to resolve the dispute. 5.6 Taxes. Our fees do not include any taxes, levies, duties or similar governmental assessments of any nature, including, for example, value-added, sales, use or withholding taxes, assessable by any jurisdiction whatsoever (collectively, “Taxes”). You are responsible for paying all Taxes associated with your purchases hereunder. If we have the legal obligation to pay or collect Taxes for which you are responsible under this Section 5.6, we will invoice you and you will pay that amount unless you provide us with a valid tax exemption certificate authorized by the appropriate taxing authority. For clarity, we are solely responsible for taxes assessable against us based on our income, property and employees. 5.7 Future Functionality. You agree that your purchases are not contingent on the delivery of any future functionality or features, or dependent on any oral or written public comments made by us regarding future functionality or features. 5.8 General Service Hours. At the end of the expiring subscription term, or one year (whichever is shorter), any remaining & unused General Service Hours will roll-over to the subsequent subscription term, or one year (whichever is shorter), at a rate of 80% of monetary value. In the case that a contract is not renewed, any remaining & unused General Service Hours will expire at the end of the subscription term, without refund. SECTION 6: PROPRIETARY RIGHTS AND LICENSES 6.1 Reservation of Rights. Subject to the limited rights expressly granted hereunder, we and our licensors and Content Providers reserve all of our/their right, title and interest in and to the Services and Content, including all of our/their related intellectual property rights. No rights are granted to you hereunder other than as expressly set forth herein. 6.2 Access to and use of Content. You have the right to access and use applicable Content subject to the terms of the Order Form and these Terms and Conditions. Page 4 of 9 Page 203 of 214 2.3 m) MuniSight Terms & Conditions 6.3 License to Host Your Data and Applications. You grant us, our Affiliates and applicable contractors a worldwide, limited-term license to host, copy, transmit and display Your Data, and any Non-MuniSight Applications and program code created by or for you using a Service or for use by you with the Services, as reasonably necessary for us to provide the Services in accordance with these Terms and Conditions. Subject to the limited licenses granted herein, we acquire no right, title or interest from you or your licensors under these Terms and Conditions in or to any of Your Data, Non-MuniSight Application or such program code. 6.4 License to use Feedback. You grant to us and our Affiliates a worldwide, perpetual, irrevocable, royalty- free license to use and incorporate into our and/or our Affiliates’ services (including the Services) any suggestion, enhancement request, recommendation, correction or other feedback provided by you or users relating to the operation of our or our Affiliates’ services (including the Services). SECTION 7: CONFIDENTIALITY 7.1 Definition of Confidential Information. “Confidential Information” means all information disclosed by a party (“Disclosing Party”) to the other party (“Receiving Party”), whether orally or in writing, that is designated as confidential or that reasonably should be understood to be confidential given the nature of the information and the circumstances of disclosure. Your Confidential Information includes Your Data; our Confidential Information includes the Services and Content; and Confidential Information of each party includes the terms and conditions of these Terms and Conditions and all Order Forms (including pricing), as well as business and marketing plans, technology and technical information, product plans and designs, and business processes disclosed by such party. However, Confidential Information does not include any information that (i) is or becomes generally known to the public without breach of any obligation owed to the Disclosing Party, (ii) was known to the Receiving Party prior to its disclosure by the Disclosing Party without breach of any obligation owed to the Disclosing Party, (iii) is received from a third party without breach of any obligation owed to the Disclosing Party, or (iv) was independently developed by the Receiving Party. 7.2 The Receiving Party will use the same degree of care that it uses to protect the confidentiality of its own Confidential Information of like kind (but not less than reasonable care) to (i) not use any Confidential Information of the Disclosing Party for any purpose outside the scope of these Terms and Conditions and (ii) except as otherwise authorized by the Disclosing Party in writing, limit access to Confidential Information of the Disclosing Party to those of its and its Affiliates’ employees and contractors who need that access for purposes consistent with these Terms and Conditions and who have signed confidentiality agreements with the Receiving Party containing protections not materially less protective of the Confidential Information than those herein. Neither party will disclose the terms of these Terms and Conditions or any Order Form to any third party other than its Affiliates, legal counsel and accountants without the other party’s prior written consent, provided that a party that makes any such disclosure to its Affiliate, legal counsel or accountants will remain responsible for such Affiliate’s, legal counsel’s or accountant’s compliance with this “Confidentiality” section. Notwithstanding the foregoing, we may disclose the terms of these Terms and Conditions and any applicable Order Form to a subcontractor or Non-MuniSight Application Provider to the extent necessary to perform our obligations to you under these Terms and Conditions, under terms of confidentiality materially as protective as set forth herein. 7.3 Compelled Disclosure. The Receiving Party may disclose Confidential Information of the Disclosing Party to the extent compelled by law to do so, provided the Receiving Party gives the Disclosing Party prior notice of the compelled disclosure (to the extent legally permitted) and reasonable assistance, at the Disclosing Party's cost, if the Disclosing Party wishes to contest the disclosure. If the Receiving Party is compelled by law to disclose the Disclosing Party’s Confidential Information as part of a civil proceeding to which the Disclosing Party is a party, and the Disclosing Party is not contesting the disclosure, the Page 5 of 9 Page 204 of 214 2.3 m) MuniSight Terms & Conditions Disclosing Party will reimburse the Receiving Party for its reasonable cost of compiling and providing secure access to that Confidential Information. SECTION 8: REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES, EXCLUSIVE REMEDIES AND DISCLAIMERS 8.1 Representations. Each party represents that it has validly entered into the Order Form and has accepted these Terms and Conditions and has the legal power to do so. 8.2 Our Warranties. We warrant that during an applicable subscription term (a) these Terms and Conditions, and the Order Form will accurately describe the applicable administrative, physical, and technical safeguards for protection of the security, confidentiality and integrity of Your Data, (b) We will not materially decrease the overall security of the Services, and (c) subject to the “Integration with Non- MuniSight Applications” section above, we will not materially decrease the overall functionality of the Services. For any breach of a warranty above, your exclusive remedies are those described in the “Termination” and “Refund or Payment upon Termination” sections below. 8.3 Disclaimers. EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY PROVIDED HEREIN, NEITHER PARTY MAKES ANY WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, WHETHER EXPRESS, IMPLIED, STATUTORY OR OTHERWISE, AND EACH PARTY SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR NON-INFRINGEMENT, TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW. CONTENT AND BETA SERVICES ARE PROVIDED “AS IS,” EXCLUSIVE OF ANY WARRANTY WHATSOEVER. EACH PARTY DISCLAIMS ALL LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATIONS FOR ANY HARM OR DAMAGES CAUSED BY ANY THIRD-PARTY HOSTING PROVIDERS. SECTION 9: MUTUAL INDEMNIFICATION 9.1 Indemnification by us. We will defend you against any claim, demand, suit or proceeding made or brought against you by a third party alleging that any Service infringes or misappropriates such third party’s intellectual property rights (a “Claim Against You”), and will indemnify you from any damages, attorney fees and costs finally awarded against you as a result of, or for amounts paid by you under a settlement approved by us in writing of, a Claim Against You, provided you (a) promptly give us written notice of the Claim Against You, (b) give us sole control of the defense and settlement of the Claim Against You (except that We may not settle any Claim Against You unless it unconditionally releases you of all liability), and (c) give us all reasonable assistance, at our expense. If we receive information about an infringement or misappropriation claim related to a Service, we may in our discretion and at no cost to you (i) modify the Services so that they are no longer claimed to infringe or misappropriate, without breaching our warranties under “Our Warranties” above, (ii) obtain a license for your continued use of that Service in accordance with these Terms and Conditions, or (iii) terminate your subscriptions for that Service upon 6 months’ written notice and refund you any prepaid fees covering the remainder of the term of the terminated subscriptions. The above defense and indemnification obligations do not apply to the extent a Claim Against You arises from Content, a Non-MuniSight Application or your use of the Services in violation of these Terms and Conditions or the Order Form. 9.2 Indemnification by you. You will defend us against any claim, demand, suit or proceeding made or brought against us by a third party alleging that any of Your Data infringes or misappropriates such third party’s intellectual property rights, or arising from your use of the Services or Content in violation of the Terms and Conditions, Order Form or applicable law (each a “Claim Against Us”), and you will indemnify us from any damages, attorney fees and costs finally awarded against us as a result of, or for any amounts paid by us under a settlement approved by you in writing of, a Claim Against Us, provided we (a) promptly give you written notice of the Claim Against Us, (b) give you sole control of the defense and settlement of the Claim Against Us (except that you may not settle any Claim Against Us unless it unconditionally releases us of all liability), and (c) give you all reasonable assistance, at your expense. Page 6 of 9 Page 205 of 214 2.3 m) MuniSight Terms & Conditions 9.3 Exclusive Remedy. This Section 9 sets out the indemnifying party’s sole liability to, and the indemnified party’s exclusive remedy against, the other party for any type of claim described in this Section 9. SECTION 10: LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 10.1 Limitation of Liability. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AGGREGATE LIABILITY OF EACH PARTY TOGETHER WITH ALL OF ITS AFFILIATES ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT EXCEED THE TOTAL AMOUNT PAID BY YOU AND YOUR AFFILIATES HEREUNDER FOR THE SERVICES GIVING RISE TO THE LIABILITY IN THE TWELVE MONTHS PRECEDING THE FIRST INCIDENT OUT OF WHICH THE LIABILITY AROSE. THE FOREGOING LIMITATION WILL APPLY WHETHER AN ACTION IS IN CONTRACT OR TORT AND REGARDLESS OF THE THEORY OF LIABILITY, BUT WILL NOT LIMIT YOUR AND YOUR AFFILIATES’ PAYMENT OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE “FEES AND PAYMENT” SECTION ABOVE. 10.2 Exclusion of Consequential and Related Damages. IN NO EVENT WILL EITHER PARTY OR ITS AFFILIATES HAVE ANY LIABILITY ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT FOR ANY LOST PROFITS, REVENUES, GOODWILL, OR INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, COVER, BUSINESS INTERRUPTION OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES, WHETHER AN ACTION IS IN CONTRACT OR TORT AND REGARDLESS OF THE THEORY OF LIABILITY, EVEN IF A PARTY OR ITS AFFILIATES HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES OR IF A PARTY’S OR ITS AFFILIATES’ REMEDY OTHERWISE FAILS OF ITS ESSENTIAL PURPOSE. THE FOREGOING DISCLAIMER WILL NOT APPLY TO THE EXTENT PROHIBITED BY LAW. SECTION 11: TERM AND TERMINATION 11.1 Term of Terms and Conditions. The applicability of these Terms and Conditions commence on the effective date set out in the Order Form and continues until all subscriptions hereunder have expired or have been terminated. 11.2 Term of Purchased Subscriptions. The term of each subscription shall be as specified in the applicable Order Form. Except as otherwise specified in an Order Form, subscriptions will automatically renew for additional periods equal to the expiring subscription term or one year (whichever is shorter), unless either party gives the other notice of non-renewal at least 6 months before the end of the relevant subscription term. The per- unit pricing during any renewal term may increase by up to 5% above the applicable pricing in the prior term, unless we provide you notice of different pricing at least 8 months prior to the applicable renewal term. Except as expressly provided in the applicable Order Form, renewal of promotional or one-time priced subscriptions will be at our applicable list price in effect at the time of the applicable renewal. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, any renewal in which subscription volume for any Services has decreased from the prior term will result in re-pricing at renewal without regard to the prior term’s per-unit pricing. 11.3 Termination. A party may terminate an Order Form forthwith upon giving notice in writing to the other Party if the other commits any material breach of any term of these Terms and Conditions or terms of the Order Form and shall have failed, within thirty (30) days after the receipt of a request in writing from the other Party, to remedy the material breach. 11.4 Refund or Payment upon Termination. If an Order Form is terminated by you in accordance with Section 11.3 (Termination), we will refund you any unused prepaid fees covering the remainder of the term of the Order Form after the effective date of termination. In no event will termination relieve you of your obligation to pay any fees payable to us for the period prior to the effective date of termination. 11.5 Your Data Portability and Deletion. Upon request by you made within 30 days after the effective date of termination of an Order Form, we will make Your Data available to you for export or download. After such 30-day period, We will have no obligation to maintain or provide any Your Data and will thereafter delete or destroy all copies of Your Data in our systems or otherwise in our possession or control, unless legally prohibited. Page 7 of 9 Page 206 of 214 2.3 m) MuniSight Terms & Conditions 11.6 Surviving Provisions. The sections titled “Fees and Payment,” “Proprietary Rights and Licenses,” “Confidentiality,” “Disclaimers,” “Mutual Indemnification,” “Limitation of Liability,” “Refund or Payment upon Termination,” “Customer Data Portability and Deletion,” “Removal of Content and Non-MuniSight Applications,” “Surviving Provisions” and “General Provisions” will survive any termination or expiration of a Purchase Order. SECTION 12: WHO YOU ARE CONTRACTING WITH, NOTICES, GOVERNING LAW AND JURISDICTION 12.1 General. Any notice required or permitted to be given under these Terms and Conditions shall be in writing and shall be mailed by prepaid registered mail, emailed, sent by facsimile transmission or delivered, to us at the address shown below, or such other address notified by the us in writing: MuniSight Ltd. 203 – 10328 81 AVE NW Edmonton, AB T6E 1X2 Attn: MuniSight Support +1-780-464-4648 [email protected] 12.2 Manner of Giving Notice. Except as otherwise specified in these Terms and Conditions, all notices related to these Terms and Conditions will be in writing and will be effective upon (a) personal delivery, (b) the second business day after mailing, or (c), except for notices of termination or an indemnifiable claim (“Legal Notices”), which shall clearly be identifiable as Legal Notices, the day of sending by email. Billing-related notices to you will be addressed to the relevant billing contact designated by you. All other notices to you will be addressed to the relevant Services system administrator designated by you. 12.3 Terms and Conditions to Governing Law and Jurisdiction. Each party agrees to the governing of the laws of the Province of Alberta. The parties irrevocably attorn to the jurisdiction of the courts of Alberta in Calgary, which will have non-exclusive jurisdiction over any matter arising out of these Terms and Conditions or Order Form. SECTION 13: GENERAL PROVISIONS 13.1 Anti-Corruption. You agree that you have not received or been offered any illegal or improper bribe, kickback, payment, gift, or thing of value from any of Our employees or agents in connection with this Terms and Conditions. Reasonable gifts and entertainment provided in the ordinary course of business do not violate the above restriction. If you learn of any violation of the above restriction, you will use reasonable efforts to promptly notify us. 13.2 Entire Terms and Conditions and Order of Precedence. These Terms and Conditions and Order Form are the entire agreement between you and us regarding your use of Services and Content and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous agreements, proposals or representations, written or oral, concerning its subject matter. Except as otherwise provided herein, no modification, amendment, or waiver of any provision of these Terms and Conditions will be effective unless in writing and signed by the party against whom the modification, amendment or waiver is to be asserted. The parties agree that any term or condition stated in your purchase order or in any other of your order documentation (excluding Order Forms) is void. In the event of any conflict or inconsistency among the following documents, the order of precedence shall be: (1) the applicable Order Form and (2) these Terms and Conditions. 13.3 Assignment. Neither party may assign any of its rights or obligations hereunder, whether by operation of law or otherwise, without the other party’s prior written consent (not to be unreasonably withheld); provided, however, either party may assign these Terms and Conditions in its entirety (together with all Order Forms), without the other party’s consent to its Affiliate or in connection with a merger, Page 8 of 9 Page 207 of 214 2.3 m) MuniSight Terms & Conditions acquisition, corporate reorganization, or sale of all or substantially all of its assets. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a party is acquired by, sells substantially all of its assets to, or undergoes a change of control in favor of, a direct competitor of the other party, then such other party may terminate these Terms and Conditions upon written notice. In the event of such a termination, we will refund to you any prepaid fees allocable to the remainder of the term of all subscriptions for the period after the effective date of such termination. Subject to the foregoing, these Terms and Conditions will bind and inure to the benefit of the parties, their respective successors and permitted assigns. 13.4 Relationship of the Parties. The parties are independent contractors. These Terms and Conditions do not create a partnership, franchise, joint venture, agency, fiduciary or employment relationship between the parties. 13.5 Third-Party Beneficiaries. There are no third-party beneficiaries under these Terms and Conditions. 13.6 Waiver. No failure or delay by either party in exercising any right under these Terms and Conditions will constitute a waiver of that right. 13.7 Severability. If any provision of these Terms and Conditions is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be contrary to law, the provision will be deemed null and void, and the remaining provisions of these Terms and Conditions will remain in effect. Page 9 of 9 Page 208 of 214 3.1 a) Page 209 of 214 . . < 3m_._nn: _cmo:m:m_. .._u33 m: _::o _<_mn=mm_: slz 3.1 a) Page 211 of 214 3.1 a) Page 212 of 214 3.1 a) =::m:.& :.m:nn8a Em?mBan» 8 2.3» s2=%a S m..32_.m 335: =._\o:=n2o: E3. 132. E93 A 5.5 nuénu 2. mac»: nann Page 213 of 214 E. 3:: 3.: nan3.0. can25 Bed %3=3 §s:._.=§_ §2§§a S3 3:5 n§mnQ=§.m m<2:m 33. ..12=a_ S .E..:mm 3. an _.s.3 :5 mS5.=a nanmx:_.=§.. n.o=_==.m&o= Sarina xG.§==n_ anus:E. 3:: 3.5.3 Sm<92 :53 UmnmsamaS. Him 25 uz?mnnma.Enuau. 9/S 3.1 a) Page 214 of 214