Hydrologic Evidence of Climate Change in Monroe County, New York

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hydrologic Evidence of Climate Change in Monroe County, New York OF M TY ON N R U O O E C S T K A T R E YO OF NEW Maggie Brooks County Executive Prepared in cooperation with the Monroe County Department of Health Hydrologic Evidence of Climate Change in Monroe County, New York ncreasing evidence of climate change has raised concerns that the predicted increases in air temperature and attendant changes in precipitation patterns will affect water resources around the world. An analysis of long-term meteorological and streamflow records can be used to identify trends that might be indicative of climate change, especially with respect to the magnitude and Ifrequency of floods and droughts in western New York, including Monroe County. IN BRIEF . Long-term annual mean air temperatures have been increasing over the past 40 years, but not beyond the historical range as defined by temperatures that have been recorded since 1890. Annual precipitation totals in the Great Lakes Basin within the United States have increased by an average of 4.5 inches since 1915. The chance that daily precipitation will exceed 2.0 inches has increased from once in 5 years prior to 1963 to nearly once every year since 1992, and the chance that daily precipitation will exceed 2.5 inches has increased from once every 20 years to almost once every 4 years. In urban streams, 7-day high flows and the Streams under drought (above) and flood (below) conditions. frequency of peak flows are increasing, whereas base flows are decreasing. In rural streams, base flows and 7-day low flows are increasing, whereas 7-day high flows show no discernible trend. Discrepancies in flow characteristics between rural and urban streams are attributed to differences in the amounts of impervious areas in each basin type. Flow characteristics of the Genesee River are unique because regulation of the outflow from Mount Morris Lake moderates the extreme flows, both high and low, that might otherwise occur in this river. U.S. Department of the Interior Open-File Report 2008–1199 U.S. Geological Survey August 2008 1 Value of Long-Term Weather and monthly precipitation at more than 1,200 sites throughout the contiguous United States. Stations are selected for inclusion in Streamflow Records this network on the basis of length of record, completeness of record, number of station relocations, and other station changes The National Weather Service (NWS) has collected that could affect the homogeneity of the data. The records are meteorological data in the Rochester, N.Y., area since at least subjected to quality-control tests and are adjusted for biases or 1872 (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, anomalies resulting from “suspect” and “outlier” values (those 2007). The NWS station is currently at the Greater Rochester that exceed 3.5 and 5.0 standard deviations from the mean, International Airport (fig. 1), and the data are available at the respectively); they also are adjusted for time-of-observation U.S. Historical Climatology Network (HCN) web site (Williams differences, changes in and relocation of measurement and others, 2007). This data set includes monthly average instrumentation, station relocations, and the localized warming maximum, minimum, and mean air temperatures and total effects caused by urbanization (Williams and others, 2007). Monroe County NEW YORK 78° LOCATION MAP 43°22'30" 77°22'30" 43°22'30" Lake Ontario Orleans County Monroe County 04232000 Rochester Greater Rochester 0423205010 International Airport Genesee County Churchville River East Wayne County Wayne Allen Creek Rochester Monroe County Black Creek 04232050 04231000 Creek 04230500 Genesee Scottsville Oatka Ontario County 43° Creek Garbutt Creek 78° Irondequoit Honeoye 43° Livingston County 77°22'30" Honeoye Falls 04229500 Base from U.S. Geological Survey, Seamless Data Distribution System, 0 5 10 MILES accessed in 2008 at http://seamless.usgs.gov, Universal Transverse Mercator projection, Zone 18 0 5 10 KILOMETERS EXPLANATION Stream County boundary 04232000 Streamflow-monitoring site and site number Figure 1. Locations of streamflow-monitoring sites and streams in Monroe County, N.Y. (Site-identification number, drainage area, and period of record for each site are given in table 1.) 2 Annual mean air temperatures in Monroe County have Rainfall quantity or intensity during individual storms fluctuated as much as 8 degrees Fahrenheit from 1890 through may be a more informative indicator of changes in precipitation 2005, according to data from Williams and others (2007). The patterns, and the effects of such changes, than total annual apparent increase in temperature over the past 4 decades is precipitation. Short-term extreme events are the most likely to within the historical range of temperatures shown in figure 2. produce large, potentially destructive flows. A comparison of the Unlike the air-temperature records, the records of annual upward trend in annual precipitation from 1948 through 1963 with that from 1992 through 2007 indicates that (1) the average precipitation at Rochester from 1872 through 2005 (Williams number of days per year on which precipitation exceeded and others, 2007) indicate an upward trend since about 1950 0.5 inch has increased from 16 to 22; (2) the chance that daily that currently exceeds historic levels (fig. 3). This trend has precipitation will exceed 2.0 inches has increased from once been verified through an analysis of annual mean precipitation in 5 years to nearly once every year; and (3) the occurrence of records collected at 34 HCN stations across the Great Lakes daily precipitation in excess of 2.5 inches has increased from Basin within the United States, including western New York, once every 20 years to about once every 4 years. These apparent from 1915 through 2004 that indicates a 4.5-inch increase in increases in the frequency of large precipitation quantities could annual precipitation during that 90-year period (Hodgkins and contribute to larger peak stormflows than have occurred in others, 2007). the past. 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 Figure 2. Annual mean of monthly mean air temperatures at the National Weather Service TEMPERATURE, IN DEGREES FAHRENHEIT 43 meteorological station, Rochester, N.Y., 1890–2005. Locally weighted smooth line (Based on data from Williams and others, 2007) 42 (The locally weighted smooth line in figure 2 and 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 the similar scatterplots that follow highlight the YEAR central tendency of the data.) 50 Locally weighted smooth line 45 40 35 30 25 ANNUAL PRECIPITATION, IN INCHES 20 Figure 3. Annual precipitation measured at the 15 National Weather Service meteorological station, 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 Rochester, N.Y., 1872–2005. (Based on data from YEAR Williams and others, 2007) 3 Possible Effects of an Increase be scrutinized to identify anomalies and their causes. For example, urbanization of a watershed can affect peak flows. in Precipitation The magnitude of peak flows and the damages associated with flooding typically are greatest in urbanized areas, especially The possible effects of the apparent recent increase in where floodplains have been developed. Regulation of precipitation on the water resources of the county have not been streamflow also can affect long-term peak-flow records. Past defined. The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the flooding on the lower Genesee River, such as the historic floods Monroe County Department of Health, however, has monitored of 1865, 1916, and 1942, is unlikely to recur because the Mount streamflow and water quality in many streams in Monroe County Morris Dam, constructed on the river near Mount Morris, N.Y., for several decades. Six of these streams—Honeoye, Oatka, in 1951, provides flood protection for downstream communities. Black, Allen, and Irondequoit Creeks, and Genesee River (fig. 1; The floods of 1960 and 1974 on Allen Creek and numerous table 1)—have been monitored for periods ranging from 26 years floods during the past decade on Allen and Irondequoit Creeks (Irondequoit Creek) to more than 75 years (Genesee River). are examples of regional flood events that caused extensive Long-term streamflow records can reveal changes and damage to property in the developed areas of the county. trends that cannot be identified in records that cover shorter Evidence of increased flooding can be seen in the peak-flow periods of time. Streamflow characteristics that can best be records of these two streams. During 1998–2006, Irondequoit 3 defined from long-term records are the magnitude and frequency Creek had eight peak flows that exceeded 1,800 ft /s (cubic of peak flows, the percentage of total streamflow that represents feet per second), each of which exceeded the highest flow base flow (the ground-water component of streamflow), and recorded during the previous 16 years (fig. 4). Peak flows on the duration of low and high flows (the percentage of time that Allen Creek, which has a smaller, more developed drainage flow in a stream is likely to equal or exceed some specified basin than Irondequoit Creek, also seem to be occurring more value). Trends in these characteristics for the six streams frequently than in the past (fig. 5). Although the number of 3 and their relation to climate change in Monroe County are peak flows exceeding 900 ft /s on Allen Creek during the last discussed below. 20 years (1986–2006) is equal to the number that occurred during 1960–80 (14 peak flows), only three of those flows exceeded 1,300 ft3/s during the earlier period, whereas seven Magnitude and Frequency of Peak Flows flows equaled or exceeded that rate during the later period. These apparent increases in the magnitude and frequency of Flooding in Monroe County is not new, but whether the floods on Irondequoit and Allen Creeks in the last 20 years can magnitudes of peak flows are increasing, or whether floods are be attributed partly to the increase in impervious area (roads, occurring more frequently than in the past, can be determined parking lots, and buildings) that has accompanied development through an examination of peak-flow records.
Recommended publications
  • Modeling of the Genesee River Watershed Using Swat 2000
    MODELING OF THE GENESEE RIVER WATERSHED USING SWAT 2000 Introduction The Genesee River is a major tributary to Lake Ontario and has a watershed area of about 2500 square miles. At its mouth the river flows thru the City of Rochester and the federal navigation channel in the city. The watershed is primarily agricultural (52%), closely followed by forest (40%). About 4.6% of the land area is classified as urban. The remaining land is split between water and wetlands (2%). Water quality concerns of the watershed include the amount of sediment that is present in the river. Average annual volumes of dredge material from the federal channel approach 250,000 cubic yards. Disposal of this material occurs at an open lake site located approximately 1.5 miles northeast of the harbor. Two beneficial use impairments for the area of concern are the degradation of the benthos and restrictions on dredging. The degradation of benthos is primarily the result of excessive sedimentation.. The restrictions on dredging activities are, in fact, simply a mandate against overflow dredging for the purpose of reducing the impact of the release of sediment into the navigation channel. Section 516e of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996, as amended (WRDA96) directs the United States Army Corps of Engineers to develop sediment transport models for tributaries to the Great Lakes that flow into Federal navigation channels or areas of concern. The purpose of the program is to evaluate the impact of land use and other management practices on the production and delivery of sediment on a watershed scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Events
    Spring 2020 FLTC Weekend & Annual Membership Meeting June 12th, 13th, 14th 2020 Jointly hosted by Foothills Trail Club & Genesee Valley Hiking Club Houghton College Houghton, N.Y. 14744 Join us for a weekend of all things Finger Lakes Trail! Connect with fellow members, hear from exciting and interesting speakers, share in our annual Awards Presentation and attend the Annual Meeting, and of course GO FOR A COUPLE OF HIKES! This year’s Spring Weekend and Annual Membership Meeting will be help at Houghton College. Houghton College was established in 1776 as a seminary to provide leaders for the Wesleyan Church. It is a nationally ranked Christian liberal arts college located in the scenic Genesee Valley of western New York State. It is built on the steeper shores of the Genesee River with stones brought up from the river bed by the grandfathers of some of the present staff. It is a beautiful setting with buildings of soft gray exhibiting classic Greek architecture. It is a church oriented campus, so alcohol is prohibited. The campus is on 1300 acres and has over 4 miles of hiking trails in the Houghton Forest and a creek that runs through the campus. Bring your kayak or canoe to paddle on the Genesee River. The campus is located 15 miles south of Letchworth State Park, “The Grand Canyon of the East,” with gorgeous waterfalls and hiking trails. Schedule of Events Friday, June 12 11 AM – 5 PM Registration opens, first floor of Reinhold Campus Center 12 – 2 PM Hikes, events depart, from Gillette Hall parking lot - see MAP 4:30 – 5:30 Social hour at StillWaters Inn, 7 miles South on Rt.
    [Show full text]
  • Frasnian (Upper Devonian) Strata of the Genesee River Valley, Western New York State
    FRASNIAN (UPPER DEVONIAN) STRATA OF THE GENESEE RIVER VALLEY, WESTERN NEW YORK STATE WILLIAM T. KIRCHGASSER D. JEFFREY OVER Deprtment of Geology Department of Geological Sciences SUNY-Potsdam SUNY-Geneseo Potsdam, New York 13676 Geneseo, New York 14454 DONALD L. WOODROW Department of Geoscience Hobart and William Smith Colleges Geneva, New York 14456 INTRODUCTION History of Investigation The Frasnian section in the Genesee Valley is located in the western part of the central Devonian outcrop belt of New York State that stretches 'from the Catskill Mountains to Lake Erie. The Genesee Valley was close to the center of the Fourth Geologic District of the first state survey, the district between Cayuga Lake and Lake Erie, covered by James Hall. Hall's final report, the monumental Part IV of the Geology of New York (Hall, 1843), is the starting point for Devonian studies in the region (Figure 1). The rocks of the classical Genesee, Portage and Chemung divisions consist of a succession of marine siliciclastics beginning with dark basinal shales (Genesee) that contain a pelagic molluscan fauna, which are overlain by lighter colored shales and siltstones that contain a pelagic and benthic fauna (Portage and Naples to the east) that were deposited in basin-and-slope environments. These strata are overlain by siltstones and sandstones bearing a benthic brachiopod fauna (Chemung) that were deposited on the slope and outer­ shelf. Most of the fossils in these units were described in monographs by Hall (1879) and Clarke (1899, 1904). The excellent exposures in the Genesee Valley made this section a center for geological studies of the distal rocks of the Catskill Delta, which record stages in the filling of the Appalachian Foreland Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase 1A Historic Resources Survey Morris Ridge Solar Energy Center Town of Mount Morris, Livingston County, New York
    Phase 1A Historic Resources Survey Morris Ridge Solar Energy Center Town of Mount Morris, Livingston County, New York Prepared for: EDF Renewables Development, Inc. A subsidiary of EDF Renewables, Inc. 15445 Innovation Dr. San Diego, California 92128 Prepared by: Environmental Design & Research, Landscape Architecture, Engineering & Environmental Services, D.P.C. 217 Montgomery Street, Suite 1000 Syracuse, New York 13202 P: 315.471.0688 F: 315.471.1061 www.edrdpc.com May 2019 Phase IA Historic Resources Survey Morris Ridge Solar Energy Center (Case 18-F-0440) Town of Mount Morris, Livingston County, New York Prepared for: Morris Ridge Solar Energy Center, LLC An indirect subsidiary of EDF Renewables, Inc. 15445 Innovation Dr. San Diego, California 92128 Contact: Kevin Campbell Phone: (844) 553-3336 Project Email: [email protected] Prepared by: Environmental Design & Research, Landscape Architecture, Engineering, & Environmental Services, D.P.C. 217 Montgomery Street, Suite 1000 Syracuse, New York 13202 www.edrdpc.com May 2019 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY SHPO Project Review Number: 19PR01246 Involved State/Federal Agencies: New York State Office of Parks Recreation and Historic Preservation (Section 14.09); New York State Department of Public Service (Article 10) Phase of Survey: Phase IA Historic Resources Survey Location Information: Town of Mount Morris, Livingston County Survey Area: Project Description: 177-megawatt utility-scale solar facility consisting of ground-mounted photovoltaic arrays and associated infrastructure. Project Area:
    [Show full text]
  • The Genesee River Basin
    Bureau of Watershed Assessment and Research Division of Water NYS Department of Environmental Conservation The 2001 Genesee River Basin Waterbody Inventory and Priority Waterbodies List Encompassing all or portions of Allegany, Cattaraugus, Genesee, Livingston, Monroe, Ontario, Orleans, Steuben and Wyoming Counties March 2003 Table of Contents The Waterbody Inventory and Priority Waterbodies List. 1 Comprehensive Assessment Strategy. ...............................................1 Statewide Waters Monitoring Program.........................................2 Water Quality Assessments: Updating the WI/PWL . 2 An Expanded Waterbody Inventory ...........................................2 The Genesee River Basin ...............................................................5 Basin Description ...............................................................5 Water Quality Issues/Problems .....................................................5 Genesee River Basin Water Quality Assessment . 7 Basin Water Quality Summary .....................................................8 The 2001 Genesee River Basin Waterbody Inventory/Priority Waterbodies List. 9 Waterbody Inventory Data Sheets Lower Genesee River Watershed ............................................1 1 Lower Genesee River, Main Stem . ....................................1 3 Tribs to Lower Genesee River, Rochester to Rush .. 2 2 Black Creek Watershed ........................................2 6 Oatka Creek Watershed . ......................................3 5 Tribs to Lower Genesee River, Rush
    [Show full text]
  • Letchworth State Park
    2020 Wyoming County Adventure Guide Home of the Grand Canyon of the East Letchworth State Park ”OUR HOME, YOUR ADVENTURE” GOWYOMINGCOUNTYNY.COM | 1-800-839-3919 WELCOME TO WYOMING COUNTY Montreal Ottawa Yours to Explore 401 VT 81 87 GREAT BEND AT LETCHWORTH STATE PARK, PHOTO CREDIT DARREN FOX Toronto NY NH Lake Ontario QEW Syracuse Niagara Rochester Falls 90 90 Buffalo Boston 81 Albany Lake Erie 88 MA Welcome and thank you! 90 86 Thank you for picking up the 2020 Wyoming County, NY, Visitor Guide. We invite 17 87 Erie 17 you to visit our home, and have your next family adventure in our beautiful 90 CT RI Scranton outdoor landscape. 79 PA New York City We are very proud to be the home of Letchworth State Park, and invite you to 81 NJ Harrisburg experience its majestic beauty. Come and see why it was voted #1 State Park in Pittsburgh Newark the US, and #1 attraction in New York State. Philadelphia • Albany, NY – 3.75 hours After your visit to Letchworth State Park, there are plenty more attractions waiting just a short drive away. Enjoy a historic train excursion aboard the Arcade & Attica • Cleveland, OH – 3.25 hours Railroad, get up-close with exotic animals at Hidden Valley Animal Adventure, and • New York City, NY – 5 hours enjoy delicious food while watching a drive-in movie at the one-of-a-kind Charcoal • Pittsburgh, PA – 3.75 hours Corral and Silver Lake Twin Drive-in. These are just a few of the fun and exciting • Boston, MA - 7 hours experiences that await you here in Wyoming County, NY.
    [Show full text]
  • 14 Section 5.4.4
    Section 5.4.4: Risk Assessment – Flood 5.4.4 Flood This section provides a profile and vulnerability assessment of the flood hazard. 5.4.4.1 Hazard Profile This section provides profile information including description, location, extent, previous occurrences and losses, probability of future occurrences, and climate change impacts, as well as the vulnerability assessment for the flood hazard in Monroe County. Description Floods are one of the most common natural hazards in the United States. They can develop slowly over a period of days or develop quickly, with disastrous effects that can be local (impacting a neighborhood or community) or regional (affecting entire river basins, coastlines, and multiple counties or states) (Federal Emergency Management Agency [FEMA] 2008). Most communities in the United States have experienced some kind of flooding after spring rains, heavy thunderstorms, coastal storms, or winter snow thaws (George Washington University 2001). Floods are the most frequent and costly natural hazards in New York State (NYS) in terms of human hardship and economic loss, particularly in communities that lie within flood-prone areas or flood plains of a major water source. As defined in the NYS Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP), flooding is a general and temporary condition of partial or complete inundation on normally dry land deriving from any of the following: • Riverine flooding, including overflow from a river channel, flash floods, alluvial fan floods, dam-break floods, and ice jam floods • Local drainage or high groundwater levels • Fluctuating lake levels • Coastal flooding • Coastal erosion (NYS Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Services [DHSES] 2014) • Unusual and rapid accumulation or runoff of surface waters from any source • Mudflows (or mudslides) • Collapse or subsidence of land along the shore of a lake or similar body of water caused by erosion, waves, or currents of water exceeding anticipated cyclical levels (FEMA 2014) • Sea Level Rise • Climate Change (U.S.
    [Show full text]