CAPS at Ten Community Policing in Chicago

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CAPS at Ten Community Policing in Chicago CAPS at Ten Community Policing in Chicago An Evaluation of Chicago’s Alternative Policing Strategy Prepared by The Chicago Community Policing Evaluation Consortium Wesley G. Skogan Lynn Steiner ________________________________________________________________ Claudia Benitez Jason Bennis Sarah Borchers Jill DuBois Rita Gondocs Susan Hartnett So Young Kim Sarah Rosenbaum The Chicago Community Policing Evaluation Consortium is coordinated by the Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University. It also includes the University of Illinois-Chicago. It is supported by grants from the Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority. January 2004 This project was supported by Grant #01-DB-BX-0017, awarded to the Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority by the Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. The Assistant Attorney General Office of Justice Programs, coordinated the activities of the following program office and bureaus: Bureau of Justice Assistance, Bureau of Justice Statistics, National Institute of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, and the Office for Victims of Crime. Points of view or opinions contained within this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority or the U.S. Department of Justice. Printed by authority of the State of Illinois, Month 2004 Printing order #XX-XXX X, XXX copies CAPS Report Contributors 1993-2003 Scott Althaus Kimberly Lacker Edward Anderson Paul J. Lavrakas Jonathan Anfinsen Justine H. Lovig Claudia Benítez Arthur J. Lurigio Susan F. Bennett Scott Medlock Jason Bennis Melissa Miller Aaron Bicknese Gail Musial Richard L. Block Gabriela Nava-Campos Sarah Borchers Jonathan Parker Paula Brandao Aaron Petty Chelsea Brown Saty Reddy Katey Casper Judee Richardson Dana Cole Dennis P. Rosenbaum Jennifer T. Comey Sarah Rosenbaum Zachary Cook Brandon Rottinghaus Gail Dantzker Betty Ruiz Sirgulina Davidsdottir Diana Ruiz Jill DuBois Rosie Ruiz Aimee Fagan Steve Ryan Tulia Faletti Wesley G. Skogan Archon Fung Jinney Smith Aneta Galary Jennifer Smith Rita Gondocs Lynn Steiner Noelle Gonzalez Cody Stephens Lisa Graziano Aaron Sumrall J. Erik Gudell Joseph Tan Susan M. Hartnett Negar Tekeei Ricky Hazelwood William Troutman Lynn Higgins Karla Twedt-Ball Sheila Houmes Raj C. Udeshi Almas Hussein Kimmy Van Robert Jessen Mai Van Kayla Johnson Robert VanStedum Tabatha R. Johnson Alice Virgil Marianne Kaiser Wuyi Wang Katie Kaminski Dominique Whelan Emily Keebler Sheri Wong Tom Kelly Norman Wyroll Jinha Kim Alexander Young So Young Kim Lisa Zhao Joel F. Knutson Contents Executive Summary............................................................ i Introduction ..................................................................1 Public Involvement ............................................................2 Trends in Awareness of CAPS .............................................2 Sources of Information About CAPS ........................................4 Participation in Beat Meetings..............................................6 Who Gets Involved? ....................................................12 Marketing CAPS .......................................................17 Efforts to Improve Beat Meetings..........................................17 Trends in Beat Meeting Quality ............................................19 Public Satisfaction......................................................24 Representativeness......................................................25 What Makes Beat Meetings Work?.........................................31 District Advisory Committees.............................................35 Confidence in the Police .......................................................38 Trends in Public Confidence..............................................39 Continued Racial Divisions...............................................43 Age, Affluence and Family Factors.........................................45 Personal Experiences....................................................46 Personal Experience and Neighborhood Effects ...............................49 Trends in Crime and Fear ......................................................52 Trends in Recorded Crime................................................52 Race and Trends in Crime ................................................54 Why is Crime Down?....................................................57 Public Perceptions of Crime ..............................................61 Trends in Fear of Crime..................................................68 How Did Chicago Do?...................................................73 Tackling Neighborhood Problems ................................................75 Agency Partnerships ....................................................77 Resident Involvement in Problem-Solving ...................................88 Trends in Decay and Disorder .............................................94 What Happened to Latinos in Chicago? ....................................103 CAPS and the Latino Community...............................................108 Study Beat Profiles ....................................................109 Methodology .........................................................113 Neighborhood Problems ................................................113 Distinctive Latino Concerns .............................................118 Involvement in CAPS ..................................................124 Relationships Between the Police and the Latino Community...................131 Recommendations .....................................................133 Management Accountability ...................................................134 Overview of the Management Accountability Process .........................135 Aspects of Management Accountability ....................................136 Management Accountability and Technology ................................147 Management Accountability and Community Policing .........................148 Findings.............................................................151 Other Recommendations................................................152 Conclusion and Final Grades...................................................153 Figures Figure 1 Sources of CAPS Awareness, 1996-2003 .................................4 Figure 2 Trends in Beat Meeting Attendance, 1995-2003 ...........................7 Figure 3 Awareness of Beat Meetings, 2003 .....................................8 Figure 4 Factors Associated with Beat Community Meeting Attendance, 2002 .........10 Figure 5 Organization Involvement and CAPS Participation, 2003 ...................13 Figure 6 Frequent Beat Meeting Participants, 2003 ...............................16 Figure 7 Trends in Satisfaction with Beat Meetings, 1995-2003 .....................25 Figure 8 Demographic Representation at Beat Meetings, 2002 ......................27 Figure 9 Interest Representation at Beat Meetings, 2002 ...........................29 Figure 10 Representativeness of District Advisory Committees ......................37 Figure 11 Trends in Assessments of Police Service Quality, 1993-2003 ................41 Figure 12 Race Differences in Opinions About Police, 2003 .........................44 Figure 13 Age and Other Factors Affecting Attitudes Toward Police, 2001-2003 ........45 Figure 14 Age-Race-Sex Distribution of Stops by Police, 2001 .......................47 Figure 15 Attitudes and Contacts with Police, 2001 ................................48 Figure 16 Trends in Recorded Crime, 1991-2002 ..................................53 Figure 17 Race and Trends in Violent Crime, 1991-2002 ...........................55 Figure 18 Trends in Property Crime, 1991-2002 ..................................56 Figure 19 High-Rate Robbery Beats, 1991-02 and 2001-02 ..........................57 Figure 20 Neighborhood Crime Problems by Race, 1994-2001 .......................63 Figure 21 Official and Survey Crime Trends, 1994-2003............................66 Figure 22 Race, Neighborhood Problems and Contacts with Police, 2001 ..............67 Figure 23 Trends in Fear, by Race, Age, Gender and Language ......................70 Figure 24 Robbery Trends in 10 Cities, 1991-2002 ................................73 Figure 25 Chicago and Big-City Trends in Crime, 1991-2002 ........................74 Figure 26 City Service Request Form ..........................................86 Figure 27 Race and Trends in Physical Decay, 1994-2003 ..........................95 Figure 28 Race and Trends in Social Disorder, 1995-2001 .........................100 Figure 29 Areas of Latino Concentration, 2003 ..................................104 Figure 30 Language, Latino Concentration and Neighborhood Problem ...............105 Figure 31 Field Study Areas .................................................109 Figure 32 Selected Latino Problems, 2001 and 2003 ..............................114 Figure 33 Perceptions of Police Corruption and Excessive Force, 2003 ...............120 Figure 34 OMA Functions ..................................................137 Figure 35 OMA Analyses of District Crime and Plan Implementation ................138 Figure 36 OMA Analysis of Trends in Crime....................................139 Tables Table 1 Personal Background and Awareness of CAPS, 1996-2003 ..................3 Table 2 Components of a Model Meeting, 1998 and 2002 .........................20
Recommended publications
  • Graffiti: a Visual Vernacular As Graphic Design Source Sung Hun Choi Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2007 Graffiti: a visual vernacular as graphic design source Sung Hun Choi Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Art and Design Commons, and the Fine Arts Commons Recommended Citation Choi, Sung Hun, "Graffiti: a visual vernacular as graphic design source" (2007). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 15068. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/15068 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Graffiti: A visual vernacular as graphic design source by Sung Hun Choi A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF FINE ARTS Major: Graphic Design Program of Study Committee: Roger Baer, Major Professor Paul Bruski Fred Malven Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2007 Copyright © Sung Hun Choi, 2007. All rights reserved. UMI Number: 1446067 UMI Microform 1446067 Copyright 2007 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing Public Violence and Homicide in Chicago: Strategies and Tactics of the Chicago Police Department
    Reducing Public Violence and Homicide in Chicago: Strategies and Tactics of the Chicago Police Department Prepared by Dennis P. Rosenbaum and Cody Stephens Center for Research in Law and Justice University of Illinois at Chicago June 15, 2005 This project was supported by Grant #02DBBX0017, awarded to the Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority by the Bureau of Justice assistance, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. The Assistant Attorney General Office of Justice Programs, coordinated the activities of the following program office and bureaus: Bureau of Justice Assistance, Bureau of Justice Statistics, National Institute of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, and the Office of Victims of Crime. Points of view or opinions contained within this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority, the U.S. Department of Justice or the Chicago Police Department. Correspondence should be addressed to: Dr. Dennis Rosenbaum, Professor and Director, Center for Research in Law and Justice, 1007 W. Harrison St. (M/C 141), University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607. (312) 355-2469. Acknowledgements This report would not have been possible without the full support of the Chicago Police Department (CPD). We wish to acknowledge and thank Superintendent Philip Cline, who opened the doors of the organization and gave us full access to people, meetings, and records. Deputy Superintendent Thomas Byrne played a key role in facilitating all aspects of this study from start to finish. Each of the Deputy Superintendents, including First Deputy Dana Starks, Hiram Grau, Jerry Robinson, and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • South Street Journal Bridgeport Investigation in Question
    South Street Journal News for and serving: Grand Boulevard, Douglas, Oakland, Kenwood, Woodlawn, Washington Park, Hyde Park, Near South, Gap, Fuller Park, Armour Snuam volumn 4 Number 6 April 4 - 24, 1997 Bridgeport Investigation in Question Yohance J. Lacour Bridgeport the following Thursday. Eddie Read, UnanswereStaff Writer- d questionpresidens to off witnesseCBUC (Chicago Blacsk Uniteandd other attackers lead to talk of cover up Douglas/Bridgeport —From the office President Communities) march to the scene of the crime Clinton, nearly everyone has heard via media or the following day. CBUC's march included de­ word of mouth of the vicious hate crime in livering a summons to De LaSalle High School, Bridgeport that left 13 year old Stateway Gar­ Patrick Huels, alderman of the 11th ward of dens resident Lenard Clark fighting for his Bridgeport, and Thomas Folliard, commander of young life. However, questions has still yet to be the 9th district in Bridgeport. fully detailed with answers in the three weeks Read stated "They are summoned to a public since the brutal attack took place, several ques­ hearing in the black community to answer why tionable developments have occurred. Bridgeport has the 2nd largest number of hate Left is Lenard Clark, who was beaten and left comatose by So far, the answers surrounding what tran­ crimes in Chicago and what is being done about mob of Bridgeport teens. Suspects from left to right: Michael Kwidzinski, 19, Frank Caruso, 17, Victor Jasas, 17. Three spired that afternoon has been reported as such: it. "White leadership must be held accountable more attackers identified by eyewitness but no further arrests Lenard, another 13 year old African American, for racist acts committed by their constituents," have been pursued.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Budget Overview
    ALBANY PARK ✶ ARCHER HEIGHTS ✶ ARMOUR SQUARE ✶ ASHBURN ✶ AUBURN GRESHAM ✶ AUSTIN ✶ AVALON PARK ✶ AVONDALE ✶ BELMONT CRAGIN ✶ BEVERLY ✶ BRIDGEPORT ✶ BRIGHTON PARK ✶ BURNSIDE ✶ CALUMET HEIGHTS ✶ CHATHAMCITY ✶ CHICAGO OF LAWN ✶ CHICAGOCLEARING ✶ DOUGLAS ✶ DUNNING ✶ EAST GARFIELD PARK ✶ EAST SIDE ✶ EDGEWATER ✶ EDISON PARK ✶ ENGLEWOOD ✶ FOREST GLEN ✶ FULLER PARK ✶ G AG E PARK ✶ GARFIELD RIDGE ✶ GRAND BOULEVARD ✶ GREATER GRAND CROSSING ✶ HEGEWISCH ✶ HERMOSA ✶ HUMBOLDT PARK ✶ HYDE PARK ✶ IRVING PARK ✶ JEFFERSON PARK ✶ KENWOOD ✶ LAKE VIEW ✶ LINCOLN PARK ✶ LINCOLN SQUARE ✶ LOGAN SQUARE ✶ LOOP ✶ LOWER WEST SIDE ✶ MCKINLEY PARK ✶ MONTCLARE ✶ MORGAN PARK ✶ MOUNT GREENWOOD ✶ NEAR NORTH SIDE ✶ NEAR SOUTH SIDE ✶ NEAR WEST SIDE ✶ NEW CITY ✶ NORTH CENTER ✶ NORTH LAWNDALE ✶ NORTH PARK ✶ NORWOOD PARK ✶ OAKLAND ✶ OHARE ✶ PORTAGE PARK ✶ PULLMAN ✶ RIVERDALE ✶ ROGERS PARK ✶ ROSELAND ✶ SOUTH CHICAGO ✶ SOUTH DEERING ✶ SOUTH LAWNDALE ✶ SOUTH SHORE ✶ UPTOWN ✶ WASHINGTON HEIGHTS ✶ WASHINGTON PARK ✶ WEST ELSDON ✶ WEST ENGLEWOOD ✶ WEST GARFIELD PARK ✶ WEST LAWN ✶ WEST PULLMAN ✶ WEST RIDGE ✶ WEST TOWN ✶ WOODLAWN2021 ✶ ALBANY PARK ✶ ARCHER HEIGHTS ✶ ARMOUR SQUARE ✶ ASHBURN ✶ AUBURN GRESHAM ✶ AUSTIN ✶ AVALON PARK ✶ AVONDALE ✶ BELMONT CRAGIN ✶ BEVERLY ✶ BRIDGEPORT ✶ BRIGHTON PARK ✶ BURNSIDE ✶ CALUMET HEIGHTS ✶ CHATHAM ✶ CHICAGO LAWN ✶ CLEARING ✶ DOUGLAS ✶ DUNNING ✶ EAST GARFIELD PARK ✶ EAST SIDE ✶ EDGEWATER ✶ EDISON PARK ✶ ENGLEWOOD ✶ FOREST GLEN ✶ FULLERBUDGET PARK ✶ GAGE PARK ✶ GARFIELD RIDGE ✶ GRAND BOULEVARD ✶ GREATER GRAND CROSSING ✶ HEGEWISCH ✶ HERMOSA ✶ HUMBOLDT
    [Show full text]
  • Community Policing in Chicago, Year 1\Vo: an Interim Report
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. ·_~, '. -I • ' . .... Community Policing in Chicago, Year 1\vo: An Interim Report June 1995 Prepared by the Chicago Community Policing Evaluation Consortium Evaluation funded by Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority u.s. Department of Justice , National Institute of Justice Chicago Community Foundation John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Jim Edgar, Governor Bob Kustra, Lieutenant Governor Peter B. Bensinger, Chairman Thomas F. Baker, Executive Director I ... '. ~ ~ ...; •. r- ... ~ .,-. oJ ill ~ w u l~'·.--rr. .~ .• :.". ~ Community Policing in Chicago, Year Two: An Interim Report Prepared by The Chicago Community Policing Evaluation Consortium Wesley G. Skogan Susan F. Bennett Susan M. Hartnett Paul J. Lavrakas Justine H. Lovig Arthur J. Lurigio Jill DuBois Richard L. Block Sheila Hournes Dennis P. Rosenbaum Sirgulina Davidsdottir Scott Althaus Robert VanStedum Dominique Whelan Marianne Kaiser Tabatha R. Johnson Dana Cole Lynn Higgins Noelle Gonzalez .l\CQUISITiON§ The Chicago Community Policing Evaluation Consortium is coordinated by the Center for Urban Affairs and Policy Research, Northwestern University. It also includes faculty and students from Loyola University of Chicago, DePaul University and the University of Illinois-Chicago, and staff members from the Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority. It is supported by grants from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the Chicago Community Foundation, the Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority and the National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice. June 1995 156071 U.S. Department of Justi~e National Institute of Justice d d exactly as received from the This document has been re~ro ,uceoints of view or opinions stated in person or organization onr:gat\O~~t.
    [Show full text]