CITY of NAPLES AIRPORT AUTHORITY (NAA) Part 150 Noise Study Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Notice of Regular Meeting

CITY OF NAPLES AIRPORT AUTHORITY (NAA) Part 150 Noise Study Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Notice of Regular Meeting

AGENDA

Airport Office Building, 200 Aviation Drive North, Naples or By Registering via the Virtual Meeting Link Below

Tuesday, April 13, 2021 9:30 a.m.

Please note: Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the TAC meeting will be a hybrid meeting whereby the public is invited to participate in person or via Zoom. Members of the public may join the webinar by registering at the following link: http://bit.ly/APFTACMeeting4

Committee Members Bruce Barone – Fifth Avenue South Business Improvement District Representative Joan Tobin – Third Street South Business Improvement District Representative Phil Boyer – Piston Representative Jerry Brown – City at Large Representative Michael Dalby – Greater Naples Chamber Representative Danielle Hudson – Naples Area Board of Realtors Representative Steve Kingston – Jet Representative David Norgard – Southeast Representative Daniel O’Brien – Northwest Representative Andy Reed – County at Large Representative Jamie Robinson – Northeast Representative Raymond Stricklen– Southwest Representative

Liaisons/Participants Commissioner Donna M. Messer – Naples Airport Authority Liaison City Councilor Gary Price – Noise Compatibility Committee Liaison Peter Green – Federal Aviation Administration Liaison Joe Molsen – TRACON/RSW Liaison Stacey Nichols – Naples Air Traffic Control Tower Liaison Erica Martin – City of Naples Planning Department Liaison Jamie French – Collier County Growth Management Division Liaison Christopher A. Rozansky – Executive Director William L. Owens, Esq. of Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC – Authority Counsel Technical Advisory Committee Notice of Regular Meeting April 13, 2021 Page 2

Welcome. All written, audio-visual, and other materials distributed to Committee members or staff during this meeting will become the property of NAA and will be a public record. Thank you for your interest and participation.

NOTICE

Formal action may be taken on any item listed on the Agenda below, or added to the Agenda before or during the meeting, or discussed during the meeting without being added to the Agenda. Also, the sequence of items may be changed as the meeting progresses. Any person who decides to appeal a recommendation made by the Technical Advisory Committee with respect to any matter considered at this meeting may do so at the next Regular City of Naples Airport Authority Board Meeting.

Any person with a disability requiring auxiliary aids or services in order to participate in this proceeding for online meetings may call the NAA Executive Assistant’s Office at 643-0733, with requests at least two business days before the meeting.

Information on Action Items and other items which has been provided in advance of this meeting may be inspected at the office of the Executive Assistant, General Aviation Terminal Building, 2nd Floor, 160 Aviation Drive North. Minutes of this meeting will be prepared for Committee approval, usually at the next Regular Meeting.

Actions of this committee are subject to the Florida Sunshine Law. Florida Statute 286.011 states, “any gathering, whether formal or casual, of two or more members of the same Board or commission to discuss some matter on which foreseeable action will be taken by the public Board or Commission must be conducted in accordance with the Sunshine Law.”

A. ROLL CALL – ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATES (ESA)

1. Determine Committee Quorum

a. In person attendance – 25% or greater

b. Action required by majority of in-person members to allow virtual attendance

c. Committee Quorum – Majority of appointed committee members

B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

C. AGENDA (Add, delete or re-sequence items)

D. MINUTES

1. Approval of November 5, 2020 Meeting Minutes

E. PRESENTATIONS AND TIME CERTAIN ITEMS

1. Part 150 Study Presentation – ESA

a. Summary of TAC Meeting #3 b. Amended Aircraft Activity Forecast

Technical Advisory Committee Notice of Regular Meeting April 13, 2021 Page 3

c. Baseline Operational Analysis

i. Runway Use ii. Fleet Mix iii. Stage Length

d. Baseline Land Use e. Noise Modeling f. Noise Comment Analyses g. Supplemental Analyses h. Recent Stakeholder Outreach i. Next Steps

F. PUBLIC COMMENTS

G. ACTION ITEMS

H. OLD BUSINESS

I. NEW BUSINESS

1. Next Meeting Date

J. PUBLIC COMMENTS

K. CORRESPONDENCE/COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS - Committee Members

L. ADJOURNMENT

Minutes of the November 5, 2020 Regular Meeting of the City of Naples Airport Authority Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Virtual Zoom Video Conference

A. ROLL CALL

The meeting was called to order by Michael Arnold at 9:30 a.m. on the Zoom video call.

Committee members present were Jamie Robinson (in person), Daniel O’Brien (virtual), David Norgard (virtual), Raymond Stricklen (virtual), Phil Boyer (in person), Steve Kingston (virtual), Joan Tobin (virtual), Bruce Barone (virtual), Michael Dalby (virtual), Danielle Hudson (virtual), Jerry Brown (in person), and Andy Reed (virtual).

Liaisons present were Commissioner Donna M. Messer (virtual), City Councilor Gary Price (virtual), Robin Singer (virtual), Jamie French (virtual), and FAA representative Peter Green (virtual).

Project Team members present were Michael Arnold (virtual) and Autumn Ward (virtual) of ESA and Natalie Palomino (virtual), Melissa Barnett (virtual), and Yvonne Garth (virtual) of Garth Solutions.

Staff and Authority Counsel present were Mr. Christopher Rozansky (virtual), Ms. Diane Terrill (in person), Mr. Zachary Burch (in person), Ms. Ute Vandersluis (in person), Mr. William Owens (in person), and Ms. Robin Menard (in person).

Authority Counsel indicated that the Naples Airport Authority (NAA) adopted a change to its By- Laws that requires a committee to attain an in-person quorum of 25-percent of membership in response to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. In the case of the TAC, quorum is met with at least three (3) in person committee members. It was confirmed that quorum was established, as there were three in-person committee members in attendance. The three committee members in attendance took a vote to allow the participation of those attending virtually. It was stated that extraordinary circumstances exist and a motion to allow those TAC members not present to be able to vote was moved by Jerry Brown. Phil Boyer seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously 3-0.

B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

Mr. Arnold led the Pledge of Allegiance.

C. AGENDA (Add, delete or re-sequence items)

There were no changes to the agenda.

D. MINUTES

Mr. Norgard moved to approve the June 23, 2020 Noise Compatibility Committee Meeting Minutes. Ms. Tobin seconded the motion. The motion passed 12 – 0.

TAC #3 Meeting Minutes November 5, 2020 Page 1

E. PRESENTATIONS AND TIME CERTAIN ITEMS

1. Summary of TAC Meeting #2 – ESA

Mr. Arnold of ESA began the presentation by introducing the materials that would be reviewed during the TAC meeting. The first item on the list was a summary of the previous meeting, TAC #2, which was held on June 23, 2020 via virtual Zoom video conference. Topics covered during TAC #2 included items such as results from February’s three public workshops, an overview of Naples Airport’s noise history, and an overview of airspace operations. TAC members were also introduced to noise modeling, operational analysis and land use compatibility. Mr. Arnold also encouraged a discussion about alternative community outreach strategies in the COVID-19 environment. TAC Meeting #2 finished with updates on the project schedule and anticipated dates for the next TAC meeting.

Mr. Stricklen asked if it was possible to distribute the previous meeting minutes soon after the meeting date, as it can be difficult to remember the discussion months later. Mr. Arnold confirmed that this is something the team would be able to accommodate.

Ms. Terrill introduced Mr. Zac Burch, the new Community Outreach and Communications Manager for Naples Airport Authority, to meeting attendees before the presentation continued on.

2. Principles of Noise Impacts – ESA

Mr. Arnold introduced the Principles of Noise Impacts, which covered the physics of noise and the meaning of Day-Night Average Sound Level (DNL). He also discussed the relationship between noise and altitude, sensitivity of DNL to activity increases, and other factors such as runway use and fleet mix that can affect noise levels.

3. Aircraft Activity Forecasts – ESA

Mr. Arnold noted the forecasts that were developed as part of the Master Plan effort back in 2018 are no longer considered appropriate for use in the Part 150 Study because activity already exceeded projected levels, resulting in the need for a forecast update. The goal of the forecast update is to develop a reasonable estimate of the activity expected in 2021 2026 for use in developing the APF Part 150 Noise Exposure Maps. To do so, there is a need for understanding the effects of COVID-19 on airport activity at the Naples Airport. The forecast memorandum (dated October 10, 2020) reviewed prior ‘shock’ events and recovery at the Naples Airport, such as September 11th and the Great Recession. After September 11th, Naples Airport traffic recovered by 2005. If COVID-19 had not occurred, APF was projected to fully recover from the 2008 Great Recession in 2024. Through September 2020, total traffic activity at APF is down by a little over 11,000 aircraft operations in comparison to 2019 levels through the same time period. However, Mr. Arnold mentioned that total jet operations through September 2020 are only down by just over a thousand operations relative to 2019. Mr. Arnold mentioned that jet aircraft activity has been really strong and is one of the key drivers of noise; therefore, the study team is interested in that particular segment of activity in future projections. Mr. Arnold anticipates jet activity will remain at a 34% range of total aircraft operations given the demand in the jet segment. Mr. Arnold

TAC #3 Meeting Minutes November 5, 2020 Page 2

explained that the forecast memo projects growth in jet activity through 2026, with 34,200 operations in 2020 increasing to 39,700 operations by 2026.

Ms. Tobin had two questions. She asked how the decrease in traffic caused by COVID-19 has impacted revenue and budgets at APF. She also wanted to know if business traveler versus vacationers are being measured when analyzing the impacts of COVID-19. Mr. Rozansky responded that April had a 70% decline in fuel sales, but with the stronger than budgeted months that followed, APF made up for the shortfall. There has been more general aviation aircraft travel than expected at APF because people prefer flying private aircraft instead of commercial airlines at this time. There has been a shift in travel patterns. APF is still seeing typical busy days, but now additional days (such as a Monday or Tuesday) are often busy as well. Ms. Tobin also asked if business passengers have been flying into Naples Airport. Mr. Arnold noted that leisure travel has driven the recovery – while business has been lagging.

Mr. Stricklen asked if the study team has looked into the differences in aircraft mix, such as jet and turboprop. He noted that jet traffic and the flight tracks are a part of the noise problem. Mr. Arnold responded that they have been able to break out the aircraft by type and understand the dynamics. He noted that by business aircraft, he is referring to the general aviation jet aircraft segment of the fleet. There has been a shift in the fleet profile. The leisure travelers are tending to use the smaller cabin aircraft in comparison to business travel that uses larger cabin aircraft. The team will be looking at trends and making necessary adjustments. Mr. Stricklen stated that he is not sure that it matters if its business or leisure travel—a jet operation is a jet operation.

Ms. Vandersluis asked what the October 2020 operations numbers were. Ms. Terrill responded that there have been 8,213 operations in October at APF—a 21% decreases from last October. However, APF was 30% above 2019 in Jet fuel sales for the month.

4. Data Collection – Operational Analysis – ESA

Mr. Arnold stated that a detailed analysis with available information on aircraft activity at Naples Airport is performed. Naples has a fair amount of real operational data available because the airport had the aircraft noise and operations system, which captures radar tracks and information related to aircraft activity. Once the data is pulled from the system, actual aircraft types are grouped into specific AEDT aircraft types and then a fleet mix that represents operations at APF is created for the purposes of modeling.

Mr. Reed asked if any forecasts have been done with consideration to weight limits between aircraft or if any deviation in weight restrictions may occur. Mr. Arnold responded that they are assuming no changes are taking place with weight limit restrictions.

Ms. Tobin asked how government (military) flights fit in and if they are segmented out. Mr. Arnold responded that they are included in the fleet mix and operation count. These operations are not weighted differently, as they make noise just like other operations.

Mr. Stricklen wanted to know if it was possible to distinguish stage three aircraft from stage four or five aircraft. Mr. Arnold stated that this is something that will be done moving forward, but also noted that there is no good source of this information publicly available at this point in time.

TAC #3 Meeting Minutes November 5, 2020 Page 3

Mr. Stricklen also noted that the GAO report compared to APF needs further clarification because the GAO report is largely based on commercial traffic while APF has a broad range of general aviation aircraft. He was hesitant to make an analogy using GAO with regard to Naples general aviation aircraft. Mr. Arnold agreed that they needed to be cautious about jumping to broad conclusions.

Ms. Robinson asked if AEDT correlates with stage aircraft classifications. Mr. Arnold responded that AEDT looks at different aircraft noise signatures based on the actual aircraft operational profiles. Ms. Robinson also asked if there is any way that the fleet mix stages can be included. Mr. Arnold confirmed that there is going to be an investigation of this as they move through the process.

Mr. Arnold then reviewed runway use, which was broken down into daytime and nighttime departures and arrivals, as well as by different categories of aircraft. He noted that departures use Runway 5 at night more often than any other runways and that daytime runway use is more balanced in comparison. He also noted that use of Runway 14/32 appeared to be lower based on the most recent information than the historical use of approximately 20 percent.

Mr. Price indicated that he has noticed more charter jets prefer Runway 5/23 because of the approaches, although winds may suggest Runway 14/32. He stated the importance of analyzing this in the Part 150 process because it impacts those who live under Runway 5/23. Ms. Tobin seconded this because this is where she has heard people complaining.

Mr. Stricklen noted that runway use can change from manager to manager at the ATC. It was an observable change when management changed at ATC. Currently, there may be a shift back to Runway 5/23. Mr. Arnold responded that this is what they are trying to establish as a baseline for noise conditions. If things are shifting, the team wants to be as accurate as possible and show the impact if it is modified. Mr. Rozansky added that he is not sure if it is a change in procedure from one manager to another. There has been a greater proportion of jets and a reduction in flight trainings. It is too early to jump to conclusions—they are not aware of any changes to air traffic procedures.

Ms. Robinson wanted to note that there was no open house in the NE quadrant and there has not been one scheduled even though they have most of the noise. Mr. Rozansky responded that has been offered in the past, a small group community meeting can be scheduled at any time and that part of the role of TAC members is to help encourage these opportunities for public outreach.

Ms. Messer asked if pilot preference factors into the numbers for runway use. Mr. Arnold responded that it can if the pilot requests a certain runway and air traffic accommodates them. From a jet standpoint they may want access to a longer runway or a runway with the best wind conditions. Ms. Messer asked if it would be hard to get a sense of how often this happens, and Mr. Arnold stated that the air traffic group would be able to give insight into this.

Ms. Tobin followed up on Ms. Robinson’s comment by requesting that someone follow up with her, as she would like to set up a meeting with 3rd Street South Merchants Association. Mr. Rozansky confirmed that they will follow up with her. Ms. Terrill reaffirmed that they will follow

TAC #3 Meeting Minutes November 5, 2020 Page 4

up and stated that she can always reach out to Mr. Burch directly as well. Ms. Tobin noted that she has issues with her Naples email and Ms. Terrill responded that they will have IT reach out to her.

Mr. Boyer commented that it pays to look at the length of Runway 5/23 and the instrument approach capability. Runway length and instrument approach are significant in determining runway use from an operator standpoint, even with the different winds. He indicated that he has seen this from personal use.

Mr. Stricklen noted that he found it interesting arrivals were almost the same and departures were different despite the meteorological conditions likely being the same.

Mr. Stricklen asked if Mr. Arnold would be able to decipher which aircraft and the number of aircraft that are operating at 1,000 feet, so one can distinguish what kind of altitudes aircraft operate at over the old Naples area. Mr. Arnold responded that during the last meeting, graphical information that show the altitude of aircraft as they departed was presented but they are still doing a statistical analysis on the data to get a better understanding on what the average altitudes are at Naples Airport. This is something that they hope to have ready for a future meeting.

5. Data Collection – Land Use – ESA

Mr. Arnold stated that the team has been working on compiling data from different sources to establish the base maps that will be used in the Noise Exposure Maps. Most recently, they have been able to collect property appraiser information. Noise sensitive land use types were noted as being residential, historic properties, places of worship, assisted living, schools, colleges, universities, libraries, hospitals and healthcare facilities, and daycares. While some areas on the existing conditions land use map are marked as commercial, they could also be mixed use which includes residential. The team will distribute what is currently being presented to the TAC for their review and feedback.

Ms. Robinson commented that when looking at the legend, environmentally protected properties have not been addressed. Mr. Arnold responded that they are probably classified as open space but if necessary, they can include different classifications.

Ms. Singer asked if there will be a category for transient lodging or hotels and consideration for residential mixed-use developments. Mr. Arnold confirmed that the team will take this into consideration.

Ms. Hudson asked Mr. Arnold if the task at hand was to confirm what is classified within Naples. Mr. Arnold responded that the team is trying to complete the base map and acknowledge some areas that are shown to be commercial but might also have a residential use. Ms. Hudson stated that she can take a look from her end to identify some of the information for Naples land use.

Ms. Tobin asked what the difference between orange and yellow is on the map. Mr. Arnold responded that orange is apartments or condos, while yellow is single family homes.

Ms. French asked Mr. Arnold to reach out to him for updated Collier County map information.

TAC #3 Meeting Minutes November 5, 2020 Page 5

Mr. Stricklen noted that moving forward, he assumes that the team is going to accommodate the trend in development and how it is moving toward retail and residential. He asked if the mixed- use area on 5th Avenue would be classified as predominantly residential or commercial. Mr. Arnold responded that it would be typically classified as a mixed-use area. He also questioned whether there are any requirements being placed on those residential areas to protect them from noise. Ms. Singer stated that developments have coordinated with the airport in the approval process to have some noise attenuation built into the construction. The City of Naples has also requested a disclaimer for property owners that says they understand and acknowledge where they live in relation to the airport.

Mr. Norgard asked if data of this sort, land use data, is required for all permitting and zoning questions that go before the City. Ms. Singer responded that noise overlays are checked in the permitting process and depending on where they fall within that, there may be additional processes that they have to go through depending on the use.

6. Noise Modeling

Mr. Arnold stated that all information previously discussed will ultimately be put into the noise model. The modelling effort will generate contours, which will be overlaid on the land use maps to determine compatibility.

Mr. Stricklen asked if there is a different departure profile used in AEDT that may not be represented at Naples Airport. Mr. Arnold responded that AEDT has a standard profile for each aircraft. ESA will be looking at the climb profiles for each aircraft.

7. Next Steps

Mr. Arnold presented the recent and scheduled outreach activities. He noted that on March 25, 2020, there will be an Old Naples Association outreach presentation and reinforced that TAC members will need to assist with outreach.

Mr. Reed requested that the times and locations of meetings be distributed to the TAC as they are scheduled. Mr. Arnold confirmed that this will be done.

Ms. Garth wanted to make a note that coming out of this meeting, there are two requests for meetings. There is one from Ms. Robinson for the NE quadrant and one from Mr. Barone for the 5th Avenue businesses. Ms. Ward added that Ms. Tobin of the 3rd Street Merchants Association would also like a meeting.

Mr. Arnold stated that there was a meeting anticipated for January 2021; however, the timeframe is uncertain as the team does not have approval from FAA on the forecast. Furthermore, Mr. Arnold mentioned that the study team has been working to understand the impact of COVID-19 and what that means moving forward. He mentioned that the team has a few dates to consider for the next meeting which will be discussed at the end of the presentation.

Mr. Arnold reviewed the anticipated future schedule. The study team plans to setup the noise model and develop the draft contours this winter. The goal is to have a complete draft of the NEM

TAC #3 Meeting Minutes November 5, 2020 Page 6

report and to conduct public outreach in Spring 2021. He mentioned that the study team would like to distribute the draft NEM to the TAC before going to the public and conducting outreach. After the study team responds to public comments, the NEM will be finalized and distributed to FAA for initial review. After FAA’s initial review, the draft NEM would be finalized and sent to FAA for final review which would ultimately result in FAA acceptance, likely to take place in Fall 2021. The goal would be to have the NCP process proceed and be tracking as the study moves forward next year.

Mr. Stricklen asked if there is a schedule for the NCP at this point. Mr. Arnold responded that the Airport is still working through the funding process with the FAA. Ms. Terrill added that the airport is preparing to submit a pre-application to the FAA for phase two of the study, which is the NCP. The deadline for this is November 16, 2020. Mr. Green added that the study is being accomplished by two separate grants. They want to keep things on track, but did not anticipate COVID and the effects on aviation—especially forecasts. As far as specific questions, the NAA would have to discuss with Program Manager Krystal Ritchey for information about the transition between phases for the grants.

F. PUBLIC COMMENTS

There were no public comments.

G. ACTION ITEMS

There were no action items at this time.

H. OLD BUSINESS

There was no old business at this time.

I. NEW BUSINESS

1. Next Meeting Date

The next meeting was scheduled during TAC #3 for February 11, 2021 (TAC #4).

A roll call vote was taken on the date for TAC #4. February 11th was chosen over February 4th in a 12-0 vote.

J. PUBLIC COMMENTS

There were no public comments.

K. CORRESPONDENCE/COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS – COMMITTEE MEMBERS

There were no additional TAC member comments.

TAC #3 Meeting Minutes November 5, 2020 Page 7

L. ADJOURNMENT With no further business, the meeting adjourned at 12:04 p.m.

______Diane J. Terrill Secretary

NOTE: Printed copies of all visual presentations and handouts are on file in the Executive Assistant’s Office.

TAC #3 Meeting Minutes November 5, 2020 Page 8

Naples Airport – April 13, 2021 Part 150 Study Technical Advisory Committee Meeting preliminary data – subject to change Pledge Of Allegiance

preliminary data – subject to change Presentation Materials Overview

• Summary of TAC #3 • Baseline Land Use • Amended Aircraft Activity Forecast • Noise Modeling • Baseline Operational Analysis • Noise Comment Analyses − Runway Use • Supplemental Analyses − Fleet Mix • Recent Stakeholder Outreach − Stage Length • Next Steps

Part 150 Studies Must Adhere to 14 CFR Part 150 Guidelines to be Accepted and Approved by FAA preliminary data – subject to change Summary of TAC #3

preliminary data – subject to change Summary of TAC #3

• Brief overview of the principles of noise impacts Pending final results for the • Discussion on aircraft activity forecast from October 10, following: 2020 • Baseline runway utilization • Results from runway use and fleet mix analysis using • Baseline fleet mix calendar year 2019 operational data • Activity forecast • Results from flight track analysis • Baseline land use

• Discussion of land use data collection and preliminary results

• Noise modeling overview

• Updates on Project Schedule and anticipated dates for the next TAC meeting

preliminary data – subject to change Amended Aircraft Activity Forecast

preliminary data – subject to change APF Amended Forecast Overview

• Overall 20-year forecast of annual operations (approved by the FAA on May 9, 2018) are no longer considered appropriate for use in the Part 150 Study. • Forecast memorandum (dated October 10, 2020) projected total operations and jet activity based on partial year 2020 data. • October 10, 2020 memorandum was amended on January 22, 2021 to reflect actual jet activity experienced in calendar year 2020. • Goal is to use the most current operational fleet mix to develop a reasonable estimate of noise exposure expected in 2021 and 2026.

FAA has approved the amended forecast developed January 22, 2021 for use in the APF Part 150 Noise Exposure Maps

preliminary data – subject to change Projected Aircraft Activity - October 10, 2020

• October 10, 2020 memorandum used Approved Annual and Jet Aircraft Operations – October 10, 2020 Memorandum partial year 2020 activity level to project a year’s worth of data. Annual Jet Annual Year • Jet activity expected to increase Operations Operations Share 2.5% each year for the duration of Estimate of Annual Total the Part 150 Study (5 years). 2020 100,600 34,200 34.0% Projected Activity 2021 101,900 35,100 34.4% 2026 108,700 39,700 36.5% Source: • ESA Analysis, 2020. Notes: • Includes 2020 jet activity through September 2020. October through December includes 2019 operations since these data were unavailable at the time of the October 10, 2020 memorandum.

preliminary data – subject to change Projected Aircraft Activity - January 22, 2021

• Jet operations in CY 2020 were 1,340 Revised Jet Aircraft Operations for Developing Noise Exposure Maps higher than anticipated in the October 10, 2020 forecast memorandum. Annual Jet Annual Year • Jet operations are expected to Operations Operations Share continue to grow, fueled by the shift Estimate of Annual Total from commercial to private air travel. 2020 97,284 35,540 36.5% • Total jet activity is still expected to increase 2.5% each year for the Projected Activity duration of the Part 150 Study (5 2021 101,900 36,400 35.7% years). 2026 108,700 41,200 37.9% Source: • ESA Analysis, 2021. Notes: • Includes CY 2020 operations at APF.

preliminary data – subject to change Baseline Operational Analysis

preliminary data – subject to change Naples Airport Runway Use

Perform QA/QC on Review aircraft Review and 'clean' Organize data final runway use operational data from data to remove according to runway, information before Vector Airport incomplete or time of day, aircraft performing noise Systems for CY 2020. inaccurate category, and/or modeling. information. arrivals/departures.

Since the last TAC meeting, the Noise Study Team has updated and finalized the runway use numbers to reflect operations in CY 2020.

preliminary data – subject to change Runway Use – All Fixed Wing Aircraft

Legend DAY: 8.1% DAY: 54.8% NIGHT: 8.9% NIGHT: 63.0% Arrivals Departures 14 23

32 5

DAY: 50.4% DAY: 8.5% NIGHT: 53.3% NIGHT: 8.9%

preliminary data – subject to change Runway Use – All Fixed Wing Aircraft

Legend DAY: 4.6% DAY: 36.7% NIGHT: 6.6% NIGHT: 33.6% Arrivals Departures 14 23

32 5

DAY: 32.2% DAY: 4.8% NIGHT: 21.4% NIGHT: 4.2%

preliminary data – subject to change Naples Airport Percent Fleet Mix

• Calendar Year 2020 data from Vector Airport Systems was reviewed to determine the baseline fleet mix of aircraft in operation at APF. • Modeling fleet mix from 2020 data resulted in 67 different AEDT noise profile classifications. • AEDT noise profile classifications include % % % multiple types of aircraft.

preliminary data – subject to change Naples Airport 2021 Jet Fleet Mix

Jet Fleet Mix Business Jet Total Examples Category Cessna 510, Embraer 450/500, Eclipse 500, CIRRUS SF50, SJ-30, Honda HA-420 Hondajet, VLJ 7.1% Raytheon Premier I, Beechjet 400, Mitsubishi MU-300 Diamond Cessna 550/551, Raytheon Premier I, Embraer 505/550, Beechjet 400, Pilatus PC-24, Learjet Light 39.0% 31/35/45/50/55/60, Hawker 700/800/850/900/1000, Cessna 500/501/525, Cessna 525C CitationJet Cessna 560 Citation XLS, Cessna 560 Citation V, Israel IAI-1125 Astra, Gulfstream, G100/150/280, Midsize 15.6% Cessna 560 Citation V, Falcon 20 Cessna 680/680A/700, Cessna 750, Falcon 2000, Hawker 4000, Gulfstream G200, Cessna 650 Super-Mid 18.5% Citation III Bombardier Challenger 300/350/600/601, Gulfstream GIV, G300/350/400, Falcon 7X, Falcon Large 17.6% 50/900, Gulfstream GV, G500/550, Embraer 135, Gulfstream II-B, Bombardier CRJ-700 Bombardier Global Express, Gulfstream GV, G650, Bombardier Global 5000 Business, Embraer LR 2.1% 190

Other 0.1% L-39 Albatros

Source: • ESA Analysis, 2021. Notes: • Calendar year 2020 data obtained from Vector Airport Systems. Numbers may not add up to 100% due to rounding. Does not include touch and go/pattern activity. VLJ = “Very Light Jet.” LR = “Long Range.”

preliminary data – subject to change Stage Length

• Stage length is the distance an airplane flies directly from one airport to another. • The stage length determines the gross takeoff weight assigned to each aircraft type. • The aircraft weight serves as the basis for determining the appropriate departure climb altitude and thrust profiles used for modeling purposes. • For most general aviation aircraft including business jets, AEDT defaults to a stage length of 1 and maximum takeoff weight even though they are traveling more than 500 miles. − Maximum takeoff weight means the climb performance for these aircraft is modeled as if these aircraft are fully loaded.

preliminary data – subject to change Stage Length – Modeled vs. Actual

Departure Stage Length of 2020 Operations Stage Departure Modeled Stage Length Actual Stage Length Length Route Length Category (nautical miles) Jet Turboprop Piston Helicopter Jet Turboprop Piston Helicopter

1 0 - 500 95.9% 100% 100% 100% 34.8% 60.6% 96.7% 100% 2 501 – 1,000 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 45.5% 33.1% 3.1% 0.0% 3 1,001 - 1,500 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 17.6% 6.1% 0.1% 0.0% 4 1,501 - 2,500 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 5 2,501 - 3,500 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6 3,501 - 4,500 0.01% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.01% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Source: • Environmental Science Associates, 2021. Notes: • Most GA aircraft default to stage length 1 which is the maximum takeoff weight in AEDT regardless of distance flown. Values may not add to 100% due to rounding. No aircraft were modeled for a stage length of 5 and greater than 6.

preliminary data – subject to change Baseline Land Use

preliminary data – subject to change Land Use Data Coordination

• The land use database for the baseline NEMs was developed by coordinating with the Collier County Appraiser's office. • The County Appraiser's office provided several data sources that were used to Collier County County Appraiser create a comprehensive database of land • Hospitals • Parcel Data use in areas surrounding APF. • City Boundaries • Places of Worship • The Study Team has also been active in • Libraries • Nursing Homes coordinating with the City of Naples • Schools Planning Department. • Roadways • Park locations

preliminary data – subject to change Draft Land Use – Existing Conditions (2021)

Draft For Illustration Purposes Only

preliminary data – subject to change Noise Modeling

Modeling Inputs Modeling Program

Noise modeling will be performed to generate Detailed Meteorological Time of Fleet Mix conditions Day noise contours which will be overlaid on a land use Aviation map to identify Environmental noncompatible land uses. Flight Track } Design Tool Location Runway Stage Length (AEDT) Version 3c Use and Use

preliminary data – subject to change Historical Noise Exposure Maps

preliminary data – subject to change Draft For Illustration Purposes Only Draft Noise Exposure – 2021

The City of Naples and Collier County have adopted DNL 60 dB for land use planning purposes.

Notes: • The City of Naples and Collier County has adopted DNL 60 dB for land use planning purposes.

preliminary data – subject to change Draft For Illustration Purposes Only Draft Noise Exposure within DNL 55 Contour – 2021

DNL 55 dB was NOT adopted by the City of Naples and Collier County for land use planning purposes— this is for informational purposes only.

Notes: • DNL 55 dB was NOT adopted by the City of Naples and Collier County for land use planning purposes—this is for informational purposes only.

preliminary data – subject to change Draft For Illustration Purposes Only Draft Noise Exposure – 2021 and Master Plan Update – 2017 DNL 60 Contours

The City of Naples and Collier County have adopted DNL 60 dB for land use planning purposes.

Notes: • The City of Naples and Collier County has adopted DNL 60 dB for land use planning purposes.

preliminary data – subject to change Review of 2021 NEM contours vs. 2017 Master Plan Contours

• A number of factors contribute to the differences between 2021 noise contours and 2017 noise contours − Noisier aircraft such as the Mitsubishi MU-300 Diamond (MU2001) or similar decreased 75% − The Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) Equipment mandate of Jan. 1, 2020 accelerated retirement of some older aircraft − Recent updates to AEDT now include newer aircraft types which are often quieter than the previous surrogates (F900EX, G650ER, etc.) − Detailed runway use analysis of both 2019 and 2020 indicate that use of Runway 14-32 has decreased − 2017 was a contour update largely based on a previously developed model and did not include an exhaustive evaluation of flight tracks and other factors considered in 2021

preliminary data – subject to change Draft Noise Exposure Map – 2021

The City of Naples and Collier County have adopted DNL 60 dB for land use planning purposes.

Notes: Draft For Illustration Purposes Only • The City of Naples and Collier County has adopted DNL 60 dB for land use planning purposes.

preliminary data – subject to change Draft Noise Exposure within DNL 55 Contour – 2021

DNL 55 dB was NOT adopted by the City of Naples and Collier County for land use planning purposes— this is for informational purposes only.

Notes: Draft For Illustration Purposes Only • DNL 55 dB was NOT adopted by the City of Naples and Collier County for land use planning purposes—this is for informational purposes only.

preliminary data – subject to change Draft Noise Exposure within DNL 55 Contour – 2021

Runway End 14 Runway End 23

Draft For Illustration Purposes Only DNL 55 dB was NOT adopted by the City of Naples and Collier County for land use planning purposes—this is for informational purposes only.

preliminary data – subject to change Draft Noise Exposure within DNL 55 Contour – 2021

Runway End 5 Runway End 32

Draft For Illustration Purposes Only DNL 55 dB was NOT adopted by the City of Naples and Collier County for land use planning purposes—this is for informational purposes only.

preliminary data – subject to change Naples Airport 2021 and 2026 Jet Fleet Mix

Jet Fleet Mix Business Jet 2021 2026 Examples Category Cessna 510, Embraer 450/500, Eclipse 500, CIRRUS SF50, SJ-30, Honda HA-420 Hondajet, Raytheon VLJ 7.1% 6.6% Premier I, Beechjet 400, Mitsubishi MU-300 Diamond Cessna 550/551, Raytheon Premier I, Embraer 505/550, Beechjet 400, Pilatus PC-24, Learjet Light 39.0% 33.3% 31/35/45/50/55/60, Hawker 700/800/850/900/1000, Cessna 500/501/525, Cessna 525C CitationJet Cessna 560 Citation XLS, Cessna 560 Citation V, Israel IAI-1125 Astra, Gulfstream, G100/150/280, Cessna Midsize 15.6% 16.4% 560 Citation V, Falcon 20

Super-Mid 18.5% 23.6% Cessna 680/680A/700, Cessna 750, Falcon 2000, Hawker 4000, Gulfstream G200, Cessna 650 Citation III

Bombardier Challenger 300/350/600/601, Gulfstream GIV, G300/350/400, Falcon 7X, Falcon 50/900, Large 17.6% 17.2% Gulfstream GV, G500/550, Embraer 135, Gulfstream II-B, Bombardier CRJ-700

LR 2.1% 3.0% Bombardier Global Express, Gulfstream GV, G650, Bombardier Global 5000 Business, Embraer 190

Other 0.1% 0.1% L-39 Albatros

preliminary data – subject to change Draft For Illustration Purposes Only

Draft Noise Exposure – 2021 and 2026

The City of Naples and Collier County have adopted DNL 60 dB for land use planning purposes.

Notes: • The City of Naples and Collier County has adopted DNL 60 dB for land use planning purposes.

preliminary data – subject to change Draft For Illustration Purposes Only

Draft Noise Exposure within DNL 55 contour – 2021 and 2026

DNL 55 dB was NOT adopted by the City of Naples and Collier County for land use planning purposes— this is for informational purposes only.

Notes: • DNL 55 dB was NOT adopted by the City of Naples and Collier County for land use planning purposes—this is for informational purposes only.

preliminary data – subject to change Noise Comment Analyses

preliminary data – subject to change 2020 Noise Comments Summary

363 +313% +90* compared New households Total Comments to 2019 commented in received in 2020 104* 2020 Total households commented in 2020 3.5 Average comments Sunday filed per household February* Day when most comments were made Month with the most 37 (36%) 1 comments 6 AM Households made more Median comments Time when most than 1 comment in 2020 filed per household comments were reported *20 households have an unknown address location and are considered distinct households *Part 150 Kick-off meetings held in February 2020. making new comments in 2020.

preliminary data – subject to change Noise Comment Analysis Noise Comments Number of Noise Number of Distinct Year • Three households represent 30% of Comments Households the total comments received between 2012 203 71 2012 through 2020. 2013 764 108 2014 265 74 • Average number of comments filed 2015 138 65 per household is over 3.4 between 2016 138 65 2012 and 2020. 2017 153 71 • Large increase (>300%) in the 2018 92 46 number of noise comments filed in 2019 116 50 2020 363 104 2020 when compared to 2019. Total 2,232 654 − Part 150 Kick-off Meetings held in Source: • Data represents calendar year 2012 through 2020. February 2020. Notes: • 48 comments received between January 2012 to December 2020 did not have address locations and are classified as “Unknown” or “N/A.” Unknown locations were treated as distinct households.

preliminary data – subject to change Comments Since 2018 by Month

• 571 overall comments (248 annual average). − 2018 Comments: 92 − 2019 Comments: 116 − 2020 Comments: 363 • Increase in comments driven primarily by increases in 4 months. − February − March − May − December • Each of these four months individually have had more comments than any month since the beginning of 2018.

Part 150 Kick-off Meetings preliminary data – subject to change Comments Since 2012

2,232 overall 2013 (764) and comments (248 annual 2020 (363) were average) were years with highest received between noise comment 2012 through 2020 counts Since 2012, comments are generally concentrated around airport, but are sometimes as far away as 25 miles

preliminary data – subject to change Types of Comments Since 2012

• A single comment received by NAA is categorized based on information received from commenter. • The most frequent comment type received by NAA includes: − Too loud, too frequent, too low, disturbed sleep, too early, and too late. • Quality of life, pattern training, engine run-up, feared crash, and turn too early/late were the least used comment types between 2012 and 2020.

preliminary data – subject to change 2020 Comments by Neighborhood

• Six Locations had 10 or more comments in 2020 • A single residence made 94 comments • Comments from Grey Oaks, Lakewood, Old Naples, Park Shore, and Wyndemere make up 78% of all 2020 comments • Old Naples is the neighborhood with the most comments in 2020 (55% of all comments) • Grey Oaks, Lakewood, and Park Shore had a total of 6 addresses while Old Naples and Wyndemere had >10 addresses each.

preliminary data – subject to change Supplemental Analyses

preliminary data – subject to change CY 2019 Jet Aircraft Departures Population Study

• As a part of the NEMs, NAA plans to perform a population study of areas surrounding APF for the Existing (2021) and Future (2026) Condition.

Notes: Draft For Illustration Purposes Only • Draft 2021 NEM Contours. • Flight track density maps for jet aircraft departures – CY 2019. • DNL 55 dB was NOT adopted by the City of Naples and Collier County as a threshold of significance—this is for informational purposes only. preliminary data – subject to change CY 2019 Jet Aircraft Arrivals Population Study

Notes: Draft For Illustration Purposes Only • Draft 2021 NEM Contours. • Flight track density maps for jet aircraft arrivals – CY 2019. • DNL 55 dB was NOT adopted by the City of Naples and Collier County as a threshold of significance—this is for informational purposes only. preliminary data – subject to change Supplemental Noise Analyses

• To help inform the NCP, we may 2016 – 2019 Monthly Takeoff and Landings conduct a seasonal analysis and/or single event analysis to gain additional insights into the variations in noise exposure due to seasonal peaks in travel.

Seasonal variations in noise exposure are often not well represented in the average conditions reflected in DNL contours. Itinerant Local

preliminary data – subject to change Supplemental Noise Metrics

• Maximum A-Weighted Sound Level (Lmax) is the maximum, or peak, sound level during a noise event. • Sound Exposure Level (SEL) is a time integrated measure, expressed in decibels, of the sound energy of a single noise event at a reference duration of one second. • Equivalent Noise Level (Leq) is the “energy” average noise level during the time period of the sample. • Number Above (N-level or Count Above) is the total number of aircraft sound events that exceeded a specified sound level threshold. • Time Above noise metric measures the total time or percentage of time that the A-weighted aircraft noise level exceeds an indicated level.

preliminary data – subject to change Recent Stakeholder Outreach

preliminary data – subject to change Recent and Scheduled Outreach Activities

Recent Outreach • February 9. 2021 – Moorings Property Owner’s Association • February 19, 202 – Bayfront Condo Association • February 22, 2021 – Naples Area Board of REALTORS • March 15, 2021 – Northeast Quadrant Communities • April 7, 2021 – Mariner’s Cove Upcoming Outreach • April 22, 2021 – Old Naples Association • May 4, 2021 – Noise Compatibility Committee Meeting • May 26, 2021 – Greater Naples Leadership • Week of May 24, 2021 – Public Open House

preliminary data – subject to change Next Steps

preliminary data – subject to change Next Steps and Timeline of APF NEMs (Phase 1)

Winter 2020 Spring 2021 Summer 2021 Fall 2021 • Finalize modeling • Complete Draft • Complete Final • FAA Acceptance of assumptions NEM Report and Draft NEM Report NEM Report • Conduct noise Conduct Public • FAA Completes modeling Outreach Initial Review • Develop Noise • Respond to • Complete Final Exposure Maps Comments on NEM Report Draft NEM Report

preliminary data – subject to change Next Steps and Timeline of APF Part 150 Study Phase 2: Noise Compatibility Program (NCP)

Spring 2021 Summer/Fall 2021 Winter 2021/2022 Spring 2022 • Solicit input at • Supplemental • Complete Draft • Complete Final NEM Public analyses NCP Report and NCP Report and Open House • Initiate NCP (Phase release for Public submit to FAA for 2) Comment review and • Analyze measures • Conduct Public findings to reduce noise Workshop and exposure Public Hearing

preliminary data – subject to change Future Meetings

• TAC Meeting #5 (Tentative) TBD 2021

• TAC Meeting #6 (Tentative) TBD 2021

• Public Open House Week of May 24th, 2021

• Reminder notices will be sent out in advance of each meeting

All TAC Materials will be posted on the Project Website following the meeting at: https://flynaples.com/noisestudy/

preliminary data – subject to change Questions

preliminary data – subject to change