DOCSLIB.ORG

Inc 2019, 2020 Action & Impact

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Parlour : Inc Action & 2019, 2020 impact: Welcome to our bumper The second half of 2019 was an exciting time – we expanded our core team, our activity report, covering extensive record of work and action was Parlour action over the period recognised through the Paula Whitman May 2019–December 2020. Prize for Gender Equity, the WikiD film was on display at the London Design We are pleased to document Museum, we gave a keynote address at the successes of the latter part Fielding Architecture in the UK, and we of 2019, which paved the way finished the year with Transformations: Action on Equity, a two-day symposium for the decisive action and with the University of Melbourne that burgeoning event and editorial brought speakers from around the world. program of 2020 as Parlour Then came the pandemic. As the harsh rallied in response to the realities of COVID-19 became clearer, COVID-19 pandemic. we introduced an extensive editorial and online event program to assist Parlour is a small, lean non-profit our communities to navigate the new organisation that has a big impact. challenges and set up new futures. We thank all those who support our We launched three new event series – Light work, and the many organisations and at the End of the Tunnel, Midday Monday individuals who collaborate with us. and Parlour LAB – and moved the Parlour Salons online. These provided venues for We are particularly grateful that our camaraderie and connection, information Parlour Partners are standing by us and story telling, insight and reflection. through these challenging economic times. Their continuing financial and moral Parlour’s editorial program focused on support has enabled Parlour to respond understanding the ever-changing situation, quickly and effectively to the challenges what it meant and how to navigate it. In of the pandemic. addition to one-off articles we developed two new series – Home/Work and The Path Parlour numbers Ahead. Contributors were universally generous with their advice, wisdom and Instagram: 18.9K followers tips for coping through difficult times. Twitter: 5.6K followers The Work & Wellbeing survey gathered an Subscribers: 5.9K subscribers extensive body of data to understand the Website visitors: 49.6K annual individual visitors impact on Australian architecture and to explore and effect possible new futures. In all of this, we used our substantial reach to broaden the conversation and help make space for a wider range of voices. Parlour: Activity report: 2019, 2020 1 Naomi Stead, Alison Cleary, Gill Matthewson, Susie Ashworth, Justine Clark, Julie Willis, Sarah Lynn Rees. Photo: Peter Bennetts. Architecture Profession: Women, Work & Leadership. Paula Whitman Prize Other initiatives include: Parlour Guides to Equitable Practice, Marion’s List (an online register of Parlour was delighted to be awarded the women active in the Australian built environment 2020 Paula Whitman Leadership in Gender professions), WikiD: Women, Wikipedia, Design, Equity Prize from the Australian Institute Transform Symposium, Seasonal Salons, and the of Architects. most recent research report – Parlour Census Report 2001–2016: Women in Architecture in Australia which This recognition of eight years of research, extends the mapping of women’s participation in the advocacy and action is much appreciated. We Australian profession. have all worked very hard on and for Parlour, and Parlour’s research and advocacy led to the it is lovely to have this work celebrated, and the development of the Gender Equity Policy for impact valued. the Australian Institute of Architects and the We are particularly pleased to receive an award establishment of the National Committee for Gender named after Paula Whitman. There are many Equity which has successfully championed for intersections between Paula’s work and our own. significant reform across the organisation. While Some of us also had the good fortune to know Parlour has many contributors, most notably it has Paula personally – she was a lively, sparkly, super been led by six women; Naomi Stead, Justine Clark, smart woman who contributed a huge amount to Julie Willis, Gill Matthewson, Susie Ashworth and Australian architecture. Karen Burns. Each has made long-standing and significant contributions to gender equity. Current Citation Parlour office holders also include Alison Cleary and Sarah Lynn Rees. Launched in 2012, Parlour is synonymous with gender equity in architecture. Combining research, Parlour’s compelling and wide-reaching projects education, advocacy and engagement, Parlour’s work work to transform architecture into a more equitable has led to significant changes in policy, structure and robust profession demonstrating outstanding and attitudes across the profession in Australia and leadership in gender equity in architecture. increasingly around the world. Activist and advocacy work of Parlour is based on scholarly research developed through the research project Equity and Diversity in the Australian Parlour: Activity report: 2019, 2020 2 Research: knowledge in action Architectural Work Cultures: professional identity, education and wellbeing Rigorous research provides the ground Parlour is very pleased to be associated with the for Parlour’s activities, and we continue a substantial new research project looking at to develop this through new projects and mental wellbeing in architecture, led by Naomi action-based research. Stead and Maryam Gusheh of Monash University. The project is modelled, in part, on the research project that led to Parlour, which was also “I fell into the survey. It was long, but I initiated and led by Naomi. Justine Clark is also was absorbed by it. I felt like I was doing involved in the new project in an advisory role. something important.” Architectural Work Cultures is a multi-disciplinary —Monica Edwards project funded through the ARC Linkage Program. Research partners include industry bodies and “My whole office has completed the survey. six architectural practices. The research builds on Great questions. Vital research.” themes identified in part through Parlour work. It will result in a set of guides, events and forums —Shaun Carter in addition to scholarly outcomes. Parlour looks forward to supporting this Work & Wellbeing: Australian Architecture important new work. and the COVID-19 pandemic In June 2020, Parlour conducted a comprehensive survey to help understand the impacts of the Potential for positive workplace change COVID-19 pandemic on the people of Australian architecture and the built environment. The survey results help us understand the demographics, working environments and wellbeing of our broad community. Work & Wellbeing: Australian Architecture and the COVID-19 pandemic was a collaboration with Architects Champions of Change and the Architects Accreditation Council of Australia. The survey identified significant changes in work arrangements and circumstances, explored what new aspects are valued and what people would Do you see the opportunity for permanent improvements in workplace and work like to take forward into the workplaces of the cultures following COVID-19 future. It provides the data to support individuals, practices and organisations as they consider next Flexibility steps and future plans. The results will also inform the research project “Architectural Work Cultures: Professional identity, education and wellbeing”. We had an amazing turnout – 2,082 people responded, with 1,883 providing useful data. Analysis is being undertaken by Gill Matthewson and Anwyn Hocking, with Justine Clark. Among the very many fascinating findings, one of the most notable is that 96% of respondents see opportunity for permanent improvements in workplace and work cultures following the If you have the opportunity to work flexible hours (regardless of full or part-time pandemic. Now, the challenge is to make this arrangements), which options are of the most interest. happen! Analysis is being published over time on the website and on our Instagram account. Parlour: Activity report: 2019, 2020 3 Events: building networks Light at the End of the Tunnel If there was a silver lining to 2020, it was the Parlour’s event program is going strong. opportunity for the Parlour community to come Over 2019 we had held more events than together online for our weekly Light at the End of ever before – 17 Salons across the country, the Tunnel sessions. Topics ranged from flexibility, including our first regional sessions, and negotiation and employment to mentoring and sponsorship, ethics and architectural citizenship, additional one-off events, including a and procurement and new models of practice. live Letters to My Younger Self reading, and a public conversation between Adam Way back in May, Justine Clark and Naomi Nathaniel Furman and Naomi Stead. Stead devised the online talk series to help our communities navigate the world of work, the This program was turbocharged in early futures of the profession and paths forward in 2020 when we moved online - all together the midst of the pandemic. Little did we know it would be running 30 weeks later! we ran 54 events in 2020! It became a valuable way to provide mutual The pandemic provided unexpected support, solidarity and camaraderie in a time opportunities to launch new online event of great uncertainty. Many new people joined series, which significantly expanded the the Parlour community, forging connections reach to regional audiences and those across the country. Continuing professional overseas. Regular sessions
Recommended publications
  • Becoming a Feminist Architect, … Visible, Momentous, With

    Becoming a Feminist Architect, … Visible, Momentous, With

    1 ISSN: 1755-068 www.field-journal.org vol.7 (1) Becoming a Feminist Architect, … visible, momentous, with Karin Reisinger and Meike Schalk 1 Besides this issue, the conference has led This issue is one of three publications subsequent to the 13th International to Hélène Frichot, Catharina Gabrielsson Architectural Humanities Research Association (AHRA) Conference and Helen Runting, eds., Architectures “Architecture & Feminisms: Ecologies, Economies, Technologies,” which and Feminisms: Ecologies, Economies, th Technologies (London: Routledge, was held at KTH School of Architecture, Stockholm, between the 17 to 2017) and Karin Reisinger and Meike 19th November in 2016.1 The conference gathered around 200 participants Schalk, eds., “Styles of Queer Feminist and included over a hundred paper presentations and performances, Practices and Objects,” Architecture and Culture Vo. 5 Issue 3 (2017). as well as two exhibitions. The overwhelming interest in reviving the feminist discourse in architecture gave us the opportunity to reflect on the 2 Elizabeth Grosz, ed., Becomings: process of becoming feminist architects. Becoming a feminist architect Explorations in Time, Memory, and is a complex process, rife with strategies, tactics, frictions, advances and Futures (Ithaca and London: Cornell retreats, that will continue to engage us in the future as it does now. University Press,1999), 77-157. This became clear through the presentations of a wide range of different 3 Doina Petrescu. “Foreword: From feminist architectural practices, both historical and contemporary, Alterities and Beyond,” in Altering their diverse theoretical underpinnings and methodological reflections Practices: Feminist Politics and Poetics and speculations. The present publication assembles a series of vital of Space, ed. Doina Petrescu (London and New York: Routledge, 2007), xvii.
  • The Case of Australian Architect Nell Mccredie

    The Case of Australian Architect Nell Mccredie

    $UFKLWHFWXUDO Volz, K. 2020. Reconsidering ‘Minor’ Archives: The Case of Australian Architect Nell McCredie. Architectural Histories, 8(1): 24, pp. 1–9. DOI: +LVWRULHV https://doi.org/10.5334/ah.408 RESEARCH ARTICLE Reconsidering ‘Minor’ Archives: The Case of Australian Architect Nell McCredie Kirsty Volz This paper discusses the recent discovery of the archive of the Australian interwar architect Nell McCredie. Finding this archive was crucial to the identification of McCredie as the author of several Georgian Revival houses in suburban Brisbane from the 1920s and 1930s. From an intersectional perspective, this text examines McCredie’s career as a practice outside the canon and presents her design for Uanda House (1928), and her work as a public service architect prior to expanding her career into ceramics. Like it has many other women, gender bias limited her career in terms of both longevity and agency. The aim of this text is to propose an understanding of McCredie’s archive as ‘minor’. The ‘minor’ c ategory for architectural history is a valuable way to reposition canonical ‘major’ histories, especially in relation to the 20th-century history of modern architecture. In doing so, the ‘major’ and the ‘minor’ are understood as connected rather than opposed ideas, following Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari’s under- standing of these concepts. Thus, rather than viewing the work of women and minorities as ‘absent’ from canonical histories of architecture, this text addresses the historiographical potential of their reconsid- eration as ‘minor’, which shifts the discussion from a dichotomous relationship to one of interdependence. McCredie’s archive is as an opportunity to develop new frameworks through which to analyse the archives of early women architects.
  • ASAA Abstract Booklet

    ASAA Abstract Booklet

    ASAA 2020 Abstract Book 23rd Biennial Conference of the Asian Studies Association of Australia (ASAA) The University of Melbourne Contents Pages ● Address from the Conference Convenor 3 ● 2020 ASAA Organising Committee 4 ● Disciplinary Champions 4-6 ● Conference Organisers 6 ● Conference Sponsors and Supporters 7 ● Conference Program 8-18 ● Sub-Regional Keynote Abstracts 19-21 ● Roundtable Abstracts 22-25 ● Speaker Abstracts ○ Tuesday 7th July ▪ Panel Session 1.1 26-60 ▪ Panel Session 1.2 61-94 ▪ Panel Session 1.3 95-129 ○ Wednesday 8th July ▪ Panel Session 2.1 130-165 ▪ Panel Session 2.2 166-198 ▪ Panel Session 2.3 199-230 ○ Thursday 9th July ▪ Panel Session 3.1 231-264 ▪ Panel Session 3.2 265-296 ▪ Panel Session 3.3 297-322 ● Author Index 323-332 Page 2 23rd Biennial Conference of the Asian Studies Association of Australia Abstract Book Address from the Conference Convenor Dear Colleagues, At the time that we made the necessary decision to cancel the ASAA 2020 conference our digital program was already available online. Following requests from several younger conference participants who were looking forward to presenting at their first international conference and networking with established colleagues in their field, we have prepared this book of abstracts together with the program. We hope that you, our intended ASAA 2020 delegates, will use this document as a way to discover the breadth of research being undertaken and reach out to other scholars. Several of you have kindly recognised how much work went into preparing the program for our 600 participants. We think this is a nice way to at least share the program in an accessible format and to allow you all to see the exciting breadth of research on Asia going on in Australia and in the region.
  • Parlour: the First Five Years

    Parlour: the First Five Years

    143 ISSN: 1755-068 www.field-journal.org vol.7 (1) Parlour: The First Five Years Naomi Stead, Gill Matthewson, Justine Clark, and Karen Burns Parlour: women, equity, architecture is a group whose name derives from a rather subversive feminist take on the 'parlour' as the room in a house traditionally used for receiving and conversing with visitors. In its first five years, Parlour has grown from a scholarly research project into an activist group with an international reach, but a localised approach to working through issues of equity and diversity in architecture. This paper is a lightly edited version of a keynote 'lecture' given jointly by four of the key members of the Parlour collective. 144 www.field-journal.org vol.7 (1) Some readers may be familiar with the work of the activist group Parlour: 1 Please note that the order of women, equity, architecture.1 Some might even know the origins of our authors’ names are listed by the name: a rather subversive feminist take on the ‘parlour’ as the room in a order in which we spoke – as house traditionally used for receiving and conversing with visitors. The opposed to a hierarchical account of importance or contribution. name itself derives from the French parler – to speak – hence, a space to speak. But even if you knew these things, you might not realize that what has become an internationally recognized activist organization, working towards greater gender equity in the architecture profession, began its existence as a scholarly research project. This paper is a lightly edited version of a keynote ‘lecture’ given jointly by four of the key members of the Parlour collective.
  • Mapping the (Invisible) Salaried Woman Architect: the Australian Parlour Research Project Karen Burns, Justine Clark and Julie Willis

    Mapping the (Invisible) Salaried Woman Architect: the Australian Parlour Research Project Karen Burns, Justine Clark and Julie Willis

    143 Review Article Mapping the (Invisible) Salaried Woman Architect: The Australian Parlour Research Project Karen Burns, Justine Clark and Julie Willis The (invisible) salaried woman architect: The architects in the service of bureaucracies. This Parlour project special journal issue retrieves a domain of ‘invis- During the 1970s, feminist historians highlighted ible’ architects, and our paper offers a distinctive ‘women’s invisibility’ in written histories and argued focus on the topic by exploring the gendering of the that these absences exposed structural biases in salaried architect. We begin by drawing attention to history writing.1 Through mainstream history and its the over-representation of women as salaried archi- privileging of particular topics and institutional struc- tects in both the historical record and contemporary tures, history’s very objects of inquiry threatened practice. Moving beyond this demographic outline, to perpetuate women’s invisibility. For example, the paper studies women architects’ everyday work although women had been political participants in the office.5 Focusing the gaze of historians and throughout history, they had organised and oper- theorists on the office rather than the building site ated in informal ways and their practices were provides an important shift of attention that chal- marginalised within the historical record.2 For some lenges them to conceptualise the production of historians, it was not simply a task of adding women buildings within the organisation of the architectural in and
  • Architectural Historiography and Fourth Wave Feminism

    Architectural Historiography and Fourth Wave Feminism

    $UFKLWHFWXUDO Lange, T and Pérez-Moreno, LC. 2020. Architectural Historiography and Fourth Wave Feminism. Architectural Histories, 8(1): 26, +LVWRULHV pp. 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ah.563 EDITORIAL Architectural Historiography and Fourth Wave Feminism Torsten Lange* and Lucía C. Pérez-Moreno† Over the course of the last decade, women from all over the world and from different social and cultural backgrounds continued to strive for equal rights in the face of discrimination, sexism, and misogyny. Uti- lizing new tools and strategies for communication, this ‘fourth wave’ of feminist thinking and activism is characterized by its commitment to a ‘diversity of purpose’ that recognises intersectionality as a key issue of our time and questions established sex/gender systems and gender as a binary category. This Spe- cial Collection explores the impact of current feminist discourse on architectural historiography. It offers critical debate on the legacy of second and third wave feminism, and asks for the ongoing relevance of the concerns and methodologies. It also highlights the potential of new strategies for documenting and researching the work of women architects, investigating the possibilities of digital tools and networked knowledge. Moreover, the collection considers histories of feminist architectural writing in relation to non-canonical geographies and takes a broader view to include LGBTIQ+ perspectives on the built envi- ronment. It offers diverse explorations of these key issues and presents necessary reflections to widen feminist enquiries in architectural discourse. Introduction of established sex/gender systems, heterosexism, and Feminism is back. Indeed, we might argue that it was binary gender norms.
  • The Politics of Friends in Modern Architecture, 1949-1987”

    The Politics of Friends in Modern Architecture, 1949-1987”

    Title: “The politics of friends in modern architecture, 1949-1987” Name of candidate: Igea Santina Troiani, B. Arch, B. Built Env. Supervisor: Professor Jennifer Taylor This thesis was submitted as part of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Design, Queensland University of Technology in 2005 i Key words Architecture - modern architecture; History – modern architectural history, 1949-1987; Architects - Alison Smithson, Peter Smithson, Denise Scott Brown, Robert Venturi, Elia Zenghelis, Rem Koolhaas, Philosophy - Jacques Derrida, Politics of friendship; Subversive collaboration ii Abstract This thesis aims to reveal paradigms associated with the operation of Western architectural oligarchies. The research is an examination into “how” dominant architectural institutions and their figureheads are undermined through the subversive collaboration of younger, unrecognised architects. By appropriating theories found in Jacques Derrida’s writings in philosophy, the thesis interprets the evolution of post World War II polemical architectural thinking as a series of political friendships. In order to provide evidence, the thesis involves the rewriting of a portion of modern architectural history, 1949-1987. Modern architectural history is rewritten as a series of three friendship partnerships which have been selected because of their subversive reaction to their respective establishments. They are English architects, Alison Smithson and Peter Smithson; South African born architect and planner, Denise Scott Brown and North American architect, Robert Venturi; and Greek architect, Elia Zenghelis and Dutch architect, Rem Koolhaas. Crucial to the undermining of their respective enemies is the friends’ collaboration on subversive projects. These projects are built, unbuilt and literary. Warring publicly through the writing of seminal texts is a significant step towards undermining the dominance of their ideological opponents.
  • No. 113 (October 1983)Broadsheet

    No. 113 (October 1983)Broadsheet

    up. The major expenses were wages and the hire of the van. Considering the stresses and strains of touring a show around The Broadsheet Office is on the first floor of the Gane Building, the country the wages (although union rates) seem pathetically 43 Anzac Avenue, Auckland. Office and bookshop hours: 9 low, but low or not they have to be paid out of the takings am — 4 pm Monday — Friday, Saturdays 10 am — 1 pm for and in smaller areas the audiences were not large enought the bookshop. Phone 794-751. Our box number is PO Box to cover costs. We have had dozens of letters, cards, 5799 Wellesley Street, Auckland, New Zealand. telephone calls and personal approaches from women who want another roadshow. We would like one too, but the severe financial drain on our bank balance is something we can’t sus­ Deadline for December — October 10 tain and keep somewhere near solvent. We receive generous Deadline for January — November 10 donations from time to time and we’re enormously grateful Small items, News, “What's New?” and adverts can reach us for these. Angela, Jess, Hilary, Margaret, Bernadette and up to two weeks after this date. Phee gave their time free during the month of rehearsals and Renee donated her royalties. Many women gave time on front- of-house and many others provided hospitality and billets. Without these we would be even more in the red than we are. Stuffing of the November issue will be on Saturday October We take your requests for another roadshow very seriously 29 at the Broadsheet Office from 10am.
  • Women's Careers in the Australian Architecture Profession

    Women's Careers in the Australian Architecture Profession

    Dimensions of Gender: Women’s Careers in the Australian Architecture Profession Gillian Mary Matthewson BArch, University of Auckland MA in Architecture, University of East London A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2015 School of Architecture Abstract Statistics on women in the architecture profession in Australia tell a story of women having truncated careers, limited longevity in the profession, and relative invisibility, despite significant and longstanding contributions. While Dana Cuff argues that the career path for all architects is fraught with uncertainty, gender appears to figure powerfully in making a career in architecture even more difficult for women.1 The situation is not well understood, since previous research has tended to draw on simple statistical counts, surveys, and anecdotal reportage—methods that are not necessarily subtle enough to investigate gendered practices in depth. However, research from other fields, particularly those investigating gender and the professions more broadly, reveals that architecture, while perhaps an extreme case, is not alone in its patterns of women’s participation. The fact that this has been rarely drawn upon within the field of architecture points to a significant gap in current knowledge regarding the impact of gender in the profession. Gaining a deeper understanding of this situation was a major impetus behind the Australian Research Council–funded Linkage Project: “Equity and Diversity in the Australian Architecture Profession: Women, Work and Leadership (2011–2014),” of which this dissertation forms a discrete part. This thesis contributes to knowledge by examining the complexity of gender in the Australian architecture profession through two main strategies, combining quantitative and qualitative methods in a complementary manner.
  • Stead CV and Publications 2014 For

    Stead CV and Publications 2014 For

    Curriculum Vitae for Dr Naomi Stead BArch (Hons), PhD personal and contact details name: Naomi Stead citizenship: Australian email: [email protected] education and qualifications 1999 – 2004 PhD ‘On the Object of the Museum and its Architecture’ Conferred October 2004, School of Geography Planning & Architecture The University of Queensland 1993 – 1998 Bachelor of Architecture with first class honours Louis Laybourne Smith School of Architecture, University of South Australia. employment history 2009 – present Senior Research Fellow ATCH (Architecture Theory Criticism History) Research Centre University of Queensland, Australia 2005 – 2009 Senior Lecturer – Architecture University of Technology Sydney, Australia Oct 07 – Feb 08 Funded Postdoctoral Fellow – Advanced Cultural Studies Institute of Sweden Linkoping University, Sweden Jun – Dec 2005 Honorary Visiting Scholar – School of Architecture Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium 2001 – 2005 Lecturer - Architecture University of Technology, Sydney, Australia 1999 – 2000 Tutorial Assistant, School of Geography, Planning and Architecture University of Queensland, Australia professional media roles 2003 – 2012 Contributing Editor and Critic – Architecture Australia, Journal of the Australian Institute of Architects, Architecture Media, Melbourne 2003 – present Architecture Critic – Architectural Review Australia journal, Niche Media, Melbourne, Australia 2003 – present Architecture Critic – Monument journal, Text Pacific Publishing, Sydney, 2006 – present Architecture Critic – Artichoke:
  • Reading Ruskin: Architecture and Social Reform in Australia, 1889–1908

    Reading Ruskin: Architecture and Social Reform in Australia, 1889–1908

    The University of New South Wales Doctor of Philosophy Degree READING RUSKIN: ARCHITECTURE AND SOCIAL REFORM IN AUSTRALIA, 1889–1908 2010 MARK DOUGLAS STILES ABSTRACT This thesis examines the reception of John Ruskin’s work in Australia between 1889 and 1908, and seeks to answer two questions: what Australians made of Ruskin’s ideas at a critical moment in their history, and what we may make of Australia a century ago with Ruskin as our guide. The period covered here spans the decades before and after the federation of the Australian colonies in 1900, and the quest for political unity forms the background to the thesis. What Ruskin’s perspective adds to this account is his search for unity in diversity, a search paralleled in Australia in the struggle to establish the foundations of a just society. Because Ruskin thought that art, and especially architecture, was the true expression of national life and character, the thesis uses a study of Australian architecture to reflect on the search for social justice in this period. This study is developed by comparing the experiences of the progressive architects influenced by Ruskin with those of leading figures in the early Australian labour and feminist movements. Their contrasting perspectives fill out the account given here not only of the understanding of Ruskin’s work in Australia, but also of the hopes of Australian reformers in a turbulent period marked by economic distress and political unrest. Ruskin was not the only writer to find eager readers in Australia as it moved closer to Federation, but he was read by more people, and his opinions cited on a wider range of issues, than almost any other contemporary figure.

  • Architectural Historiography and Fourth Wave Feminism

    Research Collection Other Journal Item Editorial. Architectural Historiography and Fourth Wave Feminism Author(s): Lange, Torsten; Pérez-Moreno, Lucía C. Publication Date: 2020-12-18 Permanent Link: https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000465203 Originally published in: Architectural Histories 8(1), http://doi.org/10.5334/ah.563 Rights / License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International This page was generated automatically upon download from the ETH Zurich Research Collection. For more information please consult the Terms of use. ETH Library $UFKLWHFWXUDO Lange, T and Pérez-Moreno, LC. 2020. Architectural Historiography and Fourth Wave Feminism. Architectural Histories, 8(1): 26, +LVWRULHV pp. 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ah.563 EDITORIAL Architectural Historiography and Fourth Wave Feminism Torsten Lange* and Lucía C. Pérez-Moreno† Over the course of the last decade, women from all over the world and from different social and cultural backgrounds continued to strive for equal rights in the face of discrimination, sexism, and misogyny. Uti- lizing new tools and strategies for communication, this ‘fourth wave’ of feminist thinking and activism is characterized by its commitment to a ‘diversity of purpose’ that recognises intersectionality as a key issue of our time and questions established sex/gender systems and gender as a binary category. This Spe- cial Collection explores the impact of current feminist discourse on architectural historiography. It offers critical debate on the legacy of second and third wave feminism, and asks for the ongoing relevance of the concerns and methodologies. It also highlights the potential of new strategies for documenting and researching the work of women architects, investigating the possibilities of digital tools and networked knowledge.