King City, Oregon

URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY

FOR EXPANSION SALE

RESIDENTIAL

DEVELOPMENT SW BEEF BEND RD OPPORTUNITY BEEF BEND NEIGHBORHOOD MAIN FOR GREEN BLVD - in the - STREET SALE / TOWN CENTER CENTRAL NEIGHBORHOOD

KING CITY RD ROGERS ROY SW GREEN BLVD

URBAN RESERVE MAIN ST / TOWN CTR EMPLOYMENT AREA MASTER PLAN

15822 SW BEEF BEND RD, KING CITY OR 2839 SW 2nd Avenue Portland OR, 97201 503.222.1655 SHARLIN FARM DEVELOPMENT www.reig.com

George N. Diamond PRICING: PLEASE CALL KING APPROVED UGB 503.222.2178 AREA: 42.27 AC GROSS • 34.06 AC NET CITY EXPANSION [email protected] KING CITY DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY Nicholas G. Diamond Property Features: 503.222.2655 [email protected] • Residential Development Opportunity in King City, Washington County OR • Low, Medium and High Density Proposed Zoning Designations • Part of the Proposed Beef Bend and Central Neighborhoods • Potential to Donate Undevelopable Land as Parks for SDC Credits • See king-city.or.us for the Urban Reserve Area 6D Final Concept Plan Location Features: View Site Location • Central Location in the King City Urban Reserve Area • Immediately Adjacent to Proposed Main Street / Town Center Section • New Waste Water Pump Station to be Installed on Roy Rogers Rd. West of the Site • Southwest of Tigard in the Portland Metro’s Fast-Growing Southwest Region

04.08.2019 RESIDENTIAL OPPORTUNITY IN KING CITY MASTER PLAN SHARLIN FARM DEVELOPMENT 15822 SW BEEF BEND RD, KING CITY OR

• 25 Minutes to downtown Portland

• 20 Minutes to Nike Headquarters

• 40 Minutes to Portland Airport

• 40 Minutes KING CITY to wine country • <2 Hours Welcome to to the Oregon Coast KING CITY, OREGON

Just southwest of Portland, King City is a small but growing community nestled in the Tualatin Valley in the greater Portland Metro Area. The city is home to urban amenities, farms and natural spaces, a golf course, and a 17-acre city park. King City’s location on the edge of the Urban Growth Boundary places it close to urban amenities in neighboring cities as well as an abundance of preserved natural space and forest lands. The area is considered the gateway to Willamette valley wine country. King City’s proposal to expand the Urban Growth Boundary has been approved, which would almost double the 460 acres currently occupied by the city. 400 of these could be developed, bringing around 3,300 new homes. A new business district and town center is planned west of the currently developed area, part of the Concept Plan King City Urban Reserve Area 6D. Major growth in this area is planned to extend West to East from Roy Rogers Rd. King City Housing Needs Analysis Washington County presents one of the hottest mature and growing job markets in the region, with massive growth being driven by firms such as the Nike World Headquarters and Intel’s multiple corporate and manufacturing campuses. Newly-created jobs have increased the demand for housing in Washington County in the recent years. Intel’s Ronler Acres campus boasts over 14,500 employees and is expected to add 1,750 more in its planned expansion.

PAGE 2 The information contained herein has been obtained from sources we deem reliable. We cannot, however, guarantee its accuracy. RESIDENTIAL OPPORTUNITY IN KING CITY MASTER PLAN SHARLIN FARM DEVELOPMENT Figure 1: Neighborhood Map 15822 SW BEEF BEND RD, KING CITY OR

KING CITY URBAN RESERVE AREA 6D CONCEPT PLAN - TO BE ANNEXED INTO URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY

SUBJECT PROPERTY 42.27 AC

The concept for URA 6D includes having a compact, affordable community with easy access to retail, services, entertainment, recreation, and other amenities. URA 6D will boast a mixed-use and higher density main street to encourage more 1. INTRODUCTION energy efficient units and more walkable and transit-supportive development character.

Planning Area

The URA 6D planning area is approximately 528 Source: Urbsworks, Inc. acres located immediately west of King City. It was Page 4 King City Urban Reserve Area 6D Concept Plan designated by Metro as an Urban Reserve Area in 2011. SW Beef Bend Road and SW Roy Rogers Road border the area on the north and west, respec- tively. The south boundary is formed primarily by the southern segment of SW Elsner Road and the Tualatin River.

Land along the river is within the 100-year Tualatin River flood plain, and five drainages generally run south from Bull Mountain to the river. Riparian and wetland habitat is found in portions of these areas. The land outside of the flood plain and drainages is currently devoted to agriculture, rural home sites, and a retail garden and landscaping business on SW Roy Rogers Road. The eastern portion of the URA is within Rivermeade Subdivision, which has lots ranging between approximately 1/3 to 3 ½ acres. Property sizes in the URA tend to become larger from east to west. Please View Full King City URA 6D UGB Proposal Here

Vicinity Map PAGE 3 The information contained herein has been obtained from sources we deem reliable. We cannot, however, guarantee its accuracy.

King City Urban Reserve Area 6D Concept Plan | May 2018 page 1 RESIDENTIAL OPPORTUNITY IN KING CITY MASTER PLAN

Land Use Framework CITY OF KING CITY, OREGON, URBAN RESERVE AREA 6D | CONCEPT PLAN NEIGHBORHOODS SHARLINMain Street/Town FARM Center DEVELOPMENT The main street/town center character area is in the north- western area of the URA. It would include majority of town center15822 commercial and mixed SW use residential BEEF uses, with BEND major RD, KING CITY OR activity around the intersection of collector streets visible and Land Use Framework CITY OF KING CITY, OREGON, URBAN RESERVE AREA 6D | CONCEPT PLAN accessible from SW Roy Rogers Road and SW Beef Bend Road. This neighborhood will represent the most dense NEIGHBORHOODS development in the URA and would include possible civic uses such as a new city hall, school and library, to be further defined in the Master Plan process. Neighborhood-scale Main Street/Town Center Land Use Frameworkcommercial activity is desirable, as are public plazas, parks CITY OF KING CITY,Th eOREGON, main URBAN street/town RESERVE AREA center6D | CONCEPT character PLAN area is in the north- and other places for gathering. The southern portion of the western area of the URA. It would include majority of town Main Street area is envisioned to accommodate a school and NEIGHBORHOODS campus-style mixed employment and, possibly, institutional center commercial and mixed use residential uses, with major Land Use Framework CITY OF KING CITY, OREGON, URBAN RESERVE AREA 6D | CONCEPTuses. PLAN As urban development occurs, care will be taken to activityCITY OF KING around CITY, OREGON, URBAN the RESERVE intersectionAREA 6D | CONCEPT PLAN of collector streets visible and separate the Main Street/Town Center area from designated NEIGHBORHOODS Main Street/Town Center rural areas to the southeast of SW Elsner Road and west of accessible from SW Roy Rogers Road and SW Beef Bend Main Street/Town Center The main street/town center character area SWis inRoy the Rogers north Road. - Road. This neighborhood will represent the most dense 14 The main street/town center character area is in the north- development in the URA and would include possible civic western area of the URA. It would include Beefmajority Bend Neighborhoodof town western area of the URA. It would include majority of town uses such as a new city hall, school and library, to be further center commercial and mixed use residentialcenter uses, withcommercial major and mixed use residentialTh euses, Beef Bend with character major area is directly adjacent to SW activity around the intersection of collector streets visible and Beef Bend Road to the south, between 137th and SW defined in the Master Plan process. Neighborhood-scale accessible from SW Roy Rogers Road andactivity SW Beef Bendaround the intersection of collectorElsner streets Road, visible north of aand potential east/west street. This commercial activity is desirable, as are public plazas, parks area is defined by improvements to SW Beef Bend Road Road. This neighborhood will represent the most dense and other places for gathering. The southern portion of the development in the URA and would includeaccessible possible civic from SW Roy Rogers Road and SWand has Beef the second Bend highest density, with both attached uses such as a new city hall, school and library,Road. to beTh furtheris neighborhood will represent theand most detached dense residential development. There is potential Main Street area is envisioned to accommodate a school and defined in the Master Plan process. Neighborhood-scale for this area to support a small amount of neighbor- campus-style mixed employment and, possibly, institutional commercial activity is desirable, as are public plazas, parks hood-scale commercial uses in conjunction with housing. development in the URA and would include possible civic CITY OF KING CITY, OREGON, URBAN RESERVE AREA 6D | CONCEPT PLAN and other places for gathering. The southern portion of the Commercial uses would take the form of home-based uses. As urban development occurs, care will be taken to Main Street area is envisioned to accommodateuses sucha school asand a new city hall, school and library,businesses, to be and, further if there is market demand, office or retail separate the Main Street/Town Center area from designated uses on the ground floor of residential buildings. The campus-style mixed employment and, possibly,defined institutional in the Master PlanLand process. Use Neighborhood-scale Framework ruralCITY OF KINGareas CITY, OREGON,to the URBAN southeast RESERVE AREA 6D of | CONCEPT SW PLANElsner Road and west of uses. As urban development occurs, care will be taken to CITY OF KING CITY, OREGON, URBAN RESERVE AREA 6D | CONCEPTBeef PLAN Bend Neighborhood is connected east-west, and separate the Main Street/Town Center areacommercial from designated activity is desirable, as are publicnot plazas,constricted parks by the deep wooded ravines farther to the SW Roy Rogers Road. 14 rural areas to the southeast of SW Elsner Road and west of NEIGHBORHOODSsouth in the URA.

and other places for gathering. The southern portion of the 14 17 SW Roy Rogers Road. Main Street/Town Center Beef Bend Neighborhood Main Street area is envisioned to accommodate a school and Beef Bend Neighborhood The main street/town centerpage 34character area is in the north- The Beef Bend character area is directly adjacent toLand SW Use Framework The Beef Bend character area is directlycampus-style adjacent to SW mixed employmentwestern area of and, the URA.possibly, It would institutional include majority of town Beef Bend Road to the south, between 137th and SW Beef Bend Road to the south, between 137th and SW CITY OF KING CITY, OREGON, URBAN RESERVE AREA 6D | CONCEPT PLAN Elsner Road, north of a potential east/westuses. street. As Th urbanis developmentcenter commercialoccurs, care and will mixed be use taken residential to uses, with major Elsner Road, north of a potential east/west street. This area is defined by improvements to SWseparate Beef Bend Roadthe Main Street/Townactivity around Center the intersectionarea from ofdesignated collector streets visible and area is defined by improvements to SW Beef Bend Road and has the second highest density, with both attached accessible from SW Roy Rogers Road and SW Beef Bend and has the second highest density, with both attached and detached residential development.rural There isareas potential to the southeast of SW Elsner Road and west of for this area to support a small amount of neighbor- Road. This neighborhood will represent the most dense and detached residential development. There is potential hood-scale commercial uses in conjunctionSW withRoy housing. Rogers Road.development in the URA and would include possible civic for this area to support a small amount of neighbor- 14 Commercial uses would take the form of home-based businesses, and, if there is market demand, office or retail uses such as a new city hall, school and library, to be further hood-scale commercial uses in conjunction with housing. uses on the ground floor of residentialBeef buildings. Bend The Neighborhooddefined in the Master Plan process. Neighborhood-scale Commercial uses would take the form of home-based Beef Bend Neighborhood is connected east-west, and commercial activity is desirable, as are public plazas, parks businesses, and, if there is market demand, office or retail not constricted by the deep wooded ravinesThe fartherBeef to Bend the character area is directly adjacent to SW and other places for gathering. The southern portion of the uses on the ground floor of residential buildings. The south in the URA. Beef Bend Road to the south, between 137th and SW Main Street area is envisioned to accommodate a school and 17 Beef Bend Neighborhood is connected east-west, and Elsner Road, north ofcampus-style a potential mixed east/west employment street. and, Th possibly,is institutional not constricted by the deep wooded ravines farther to the page 34 Land Use Framework area is defined by improvementsuses. As urban todevelopment SW Beef occurs, Bend care Road will be taken to southCITY OF KING in CITY, the OREGON, URA. URBAN RESERVE AREA 6D | CONCEPT PLAN and has the second highestseparate density, the Main withStreet/Town both Centerattached area from designated 17 rural areas to the southeast of SW Elsner Road and west of and detached residential development. There is potential SW Roy Rogers Road. 14 for this area to support a small amount of neighbor- page 34 Land Use Framework

hood-scale commercialBeef uses Bend in conjunction Neighborhood with housing.CITY OF KING CITY, OREGON, URBAN RESERVE AREA 6D | CONCEPT PLAN Commercial uses wouldThe takeBeef Bendthe form character of home-basedarea is directly adjacent to SW businesses, and, if thereBeef is Bend market Road demand, to the south, offi betweence or retail 137th and SW Elsner Road, north of a potential east/west street. This uses on the ground floor of residential buildings. The Central Neighborhood area is defined by improvements to SW Beef Bend Road The central neighborhood character area is in the center of Beef Bend Neighborhoodand has is theconnected second highest east-west, density, and with both attached the URA. Two smaller neighborhoods are defined by the drainage ravines running north-south towards the Tualatin not constricted by theand deep detached wooded residential ravines development. farther to Th theere is potential River. The ravines create separate areas that are well-sized south in the URA. for this area to support a small amount of neighbor- for individual developments, but are connected by a small hood-scale commercial uses in conjunction with housing. number of east-west streets and a trail system. This character area is defined as residential, with both attached and detached 17 Commercial uses would take the form of home-based dwellings, ample neighborhood parks and plenty of wild businesses, and, if there is market demand, office or retail natural areas along the ravine and river edges. CITY OF KING CITY, OREGON, URBAN RESERVE AREA 6D | CONCEPT PLAN page 34 uses on the ground floor of residential buildings. The Land Use Framework

Beef Bend Neighborhood is connected east-west,CITY OF KING CITY, OREGON, and URBAN RESERVE AREA 6D | CONCEPT PLAN Rural Character Neighborhood not constricted by the deep wooded ravines farther to the The rural character neighborhood is the eastern-most section of the planning area. It connects to SW 137th south in the URA. Avenue and includes the established Rivermeade neigh- 18 borhood. This area has a rural character, with low density Central Neighborhood 17 residential uses and opportunities for modest redevelop- The central neighborhood character area is in the center of ment. Generally, streets have a residential character and the URA. Two smaller neighborhoods are defined by the carry low-volume local traffic shared by all modes. Natural page 34 areas are prominent both on the edges of developmentLand and Use Framework drainage ravines running north-south towards the Tualatin within neighborhoods. River. The ravines create separate areas that are well-sized for individual developments, but are connected by a small number of east-west streets and a trail system. This character area is defined as residential, with both attached and detached dwellings, ample neighborhood parks and plenty of wild natural areas along the ravine and river edges.

CITY OF KING CITY, OREGON, URBAN RESERVE AREA 6D | CONCEPT PLAN Rural Character Neighborhood King CityTh Urbane rural Reserve character Area 6D Concept neighborhood Plan | May 2018 is the eastern-most page 35 section of the planning area. It connects to SW 137th Avenue and includes the established Rivermeade neigh- 18 borhood. This area has a rural character, with low density residential uses and opportunities for modest redevelop- ment. Generally, streets have a residential character and PAGE 4 The informationcarry contained low-volume herein local hastraffi beenc shared obtained by all modes.from sources Natural we deem reliable. We cannot, however, guarantee its accuracy. areas are prominent both on the edges of development and within neighborhoods.

King City Urban Reserve Area 6D Concept Plan | May 2018 page 35 RESIDENTIAL OPPORTUNITY IN KING CITY MASTER PLAN SHARLIN FARM DEVELOPMENT 15822 SW BEEF BEND RD, KING CITY OR Figure 2: Concept Land Use Designations* Figure 2: Figure Concept 2: LandConcept Use Land Designations* UseKING Designations* CITY URBAN RESERVE AREA 6D

l l l l

l l # l SW CAPULET LN SUBJECT # PROPERTY SW CAPULET LN# l l42.27 AC S SW CAPULET LN S S lS S S S l S S l l # Figure 2: Concept Land Use Designations* SW FISCHER RD # l l # SW FISCHER RD SW FISCHER RD l l l SW BEEF BEND RD SW BEEF BEND RD l l SUBJECT SUBJECT PROPERTY PROPERTYl # SW CAPULET LN

R0527852 Tu R0527852 alatin S Riv er

T S Tualatin River ualat Tual S in R atin l iv Riv er er Tualatin River Tualatin River l # SW FISCHER RD

Legend Land Use Designation Medium Density Proposed Potential Regional Mixed Use/Town Center Medium Density Res.- URA 6D !! !! !! !! Proposed River Trail S Residential (MDR) Open Space (OS) l Community Park Stormwater Facility (MU-TC) Low Density Res. (MDR-LDR) Legend Legend Proposed Land Use DesignationLand Use Designation Proposed ROW Proposed Roadway l Neighborhood Medium MediumDensity DensityHigh/MediumMedium Residential Density - Medium LowMedium/LowDensity Density Res.- Residential 1 in = 300 ft ! !! !! !! Proposed Potential Regional Mixed Use/Town Center Medium Density Res.-Open Space (OS) URA 6D Proposed River!! Trail !! !! !! NeighborhoodProposed Park S Potential Regional Mixed Used (NMU)Mixed Use/Town CenterResidential Institutional (MDR) (MDR-INST)Density Residential (LDR)Density Residential Open Space (OS) Feet URA 6D Proposedl Community River Trail Parkl Stormwater FacilityS (MU-TC) Residential (MDR) Low Density Res. (MDR-LDR)Low Density Res. (MDR-LDR) Community Park Stormwater Facility (MU-TC) 0150 300 600 900 Proposed Proposed Neighborhood Medium Density Residential - Low Density Residential Proposed ROW ProposedProposed ROW Roadway Proposedl Roadway l Neighborhood *Zoning MediumDesignations Density are Conceptual Residential and - Subject to ChangeLow Density Residential 1 in = 300 ft 1 in = 300 ft Neighborhood Park Neighborhood Park Mixed Used (NMU) Mixed Used (NMU) Institutional (MDR-INST)Institutional (MDR-INST)(LDR) (LDR) Feet Feet PAGE 5 0150 300 6000150 900 300 600 900 *This land use plan is a conceptual representation of the land uses and neighborhood areas generallyl described on in the Land Use Framework section of the Concept Plan document. It is expected that land use The information contained herein has been obtained from sources we deem reliable. We cannot, however, guarantee its accuracy. designations and locations will be refined after further community input and engagement through the community planning process. *This land use *Thisplan island a conceptual use plan is representation a conceptual representation of the land uses of andthe landneighborhood uses and neighborhood areas generally areas described generally on in described the Land on Use in Framework the Land Use section Framework of the Conceptsection of Plan the document.Concept Plan It is document. expected thatIt is expectedland use that land use designations and designations locations willand be locations refined willafter be further refined community after further input community and engagement input and through engagement the community through the planning community process. planning process. Page 6 King City Urban Reserve Area 6D Concept Plan Page 6 Page 6 King City UrbanKing Reserve City Urban Area Reserve 6D Concept Area 6D Plan Concept Plan

Tu alatin Riv er Tualatin River

*This land use plan is a conceptual representation of the land uses and neighborhood areas generally described on in the Land Use Framework section of the Concept Plan document. It is expected that land use designations and locations will be refined after further community input and engagement through the community planning process.

Page 6 King City Urban Reserve Area 6D Concept Plan RESIDENTIAL OPPORTUNITY IN KING CITY MASTER PLAN SHARLIN FARM DEVELOPMENT 15822 SW BEEF BEND RD, KING CITY OR

42.27 AC GROSS AREA 34.06 NET DEVELOPABLE AREA PAGE 6 The information contained herein has been obtained from sources we deem reliable. We cannot, however, guarantee its accuracy. RESIDENTIAL OPPORTUNITY IN KING CITY MASTER PLAN SHARLIN FARM DEVELOPMENT 15822 SW BEEF BEND RD, KING CITY OR

T 5 R 55 E 40 0 E

20 P 5 E

A WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT PRELIMINARY530 OPTIONS C Ú3 H Pump Station

T 5 R 0 55 E 50 0 4 E 510 5 0 0 4 52047 530 0 Ú3 Pump Station

I Force main 90 00 50 0 N 4 10 5 4 3 I Y 5 Option 1: 47 3 R 0 46

F 0

S U

4 I 31 B 480 90 Force main 0 3 0 N 4

3 I S Y 3 0 R 46 F E U 0 3 K 4 B 480 10 3 S 4 0 W 0 E 1 38 E K 0 4 Beef Bend Tru0 nk W 10 440Beef Bend Trunk 38 Gravity Trunk Service through URA 6D: This T E 440 220 220 T 340 340 APRIL 3 9 C Local Gravity Piping 0 O APRIL 3 C 9 L 0 Y Local Gravity Piping option would involve the installation of a gravity 4O20 E L R 37 3 40 Y 0 River Terrace South Force Main 60 420 0 E 260 R 3 40 70 River Terrace South Force Main trunk line beginning north of the planning area 360 0 350 Roy Rogers Gravity 260 CHINN LASICH 320 Existing Trunk Sewer along SW Roy Rogers Road, south and east to 30 0 0 Roy Rogers Gravity 290 35 280 Wetland SW Beef Bend Road, and then east to the exist- CHINN LASICH EBuxildisabtilen Lga nTdrunk Sewer 0 320 Ú3 30 0 25 270 ing gravity flow system in King City. With this 290 BEEF B 30 240 END 28 2 Wetland 0 H

T 210 N design, the western portion of the planning area O 7 DICKS

1 Ú3 200 Buildable Land would rely upon gravity flow to the CWS pump 250 270 190

0 station on SW Roy Rogers Road. With the excep- 18 MACBETH

2 E BEEF BEND 230 40 A 160

H H tion of the southern-most portion of the URA,

T 170 T 210 N R d O 7 KS x 5 DIC E 5 3 CARMEL m 5 . 4 0 E 1

7 0 1

0 P 0 2 the land located east of SW Elsner Road would E

2 5

A 20

_ 1

530 C 0 Ú3 110 H

3 Pump Station

T _ 00 R 2 FISCHER 8 5 0 5 E _ 5 50 0 4 0 E 4 1 510 5 0 T 0 generally be able to connect with the trunk line 5247 P 530 0 Ú3 0 E Pump Station 15 S Ú3

I C 140 Force main 90 00 50 190 N 0 N 4 10 5 4 3 I Y 5 Option 1: 3 47 O R 0 46

F 0 C

S U 4 I 480 Force main 31 _ B 0 without pumping. 9 0 3 0 N 4

3 I S Y 3 0 D R 46

F 0 E4 U 31 N River TeKrrace B 480 0 3 S 4 80 0 E W 0 E 1 Beef Bend Trunk 3 18 K 0 R 4 0 MACBETH B E W 10 440Beef Bend Trunk 38 Gravity Trunk Service through URA 6D: This SoutTh Pump Station E _ E 440 T N 20 F 2 220 S E L 340 340 E 130 E

APRIL 3 C B 9 \ Local Gravity Piping 0 O APRIL 3 S C D L

9 R Y Local Gravity Piping option60 would involve the installation of a gravity 0 X 1 4O20 E

E R BEDFORD

M L G 3 \ Option 2: Y 70 O 4 S 3 00 River Terrace South Force Main I 6 420 E

0 R

2 G R

6 \ 0 Y 3 D O 7 170 trunk line beginning north of the planning area d 0

A Ú3 3 R 400 0 River Terrace South Force Main x 5 Roy Rogers Gravity 6 C 3

0 \

h CARMEL t 260 m Small Subdistrict Pump Stations: This option u . INN o CH 7

LASICH S Existing Trunk Sewer

320 alongK SW Roy Rogers Road, south and east to 1 e 30 0 U c 0 0 Roy Rogers Gravity M a 35 r 2 290 M r 20 T e _ 1 R

S would involve the installation of a series of small- 2 Wetland T 80 O

r 11 0 3 SWW Beef Bend Road, and then east to the exist- e

1 3 N v IN i CH _ F R ISCHER

LASICH 8 320 Ú3 EBuxildisabtilen Lga nTdrunk Sewer S

_ 250

3 W 270 er sub-area drainage pump stations that avoid 1 0 0

C ing gravity flow system in King City. With this

T - 290 2 P

0 2 BEEF BEND 230 40 0 0 E Wetland UT 15 Ú3 2 2 E 8 \ 0 H

C 140 7 T 210 drainage crossings and can develop incrementally. N design, the western portion of the planning area O 1 7 ICKS

\ D N 3 DRAFT s

1 t c O Figure 1 e King City j C o 0 1,000 2,000 Feet r Option 1: Gravity trunk service2 00through drainageBuildable L aculvertsnd adjacent to roadways. _ Beef Bend Rd P Ú3 Beef Bend Concept Plan would rely upon gravity flow to the CWS pump _ D 0 Smaller pump stations provide flexibility in the 25 X Service Area Analysis Sewer Service Concept 1

0 D N River Terrace 27 190 © P \ E : WORK IN PROGRESS - SUBJECT TO CHANGE

R G B 0 station on SW Roy Rogers Road. With the excep- South Pump Station E 18 MACBETH _ N location and timing of development, however, BEEF BE F 30 240 S The figure shown above is preliminary in nature. It was developed to test the feasibility of public utility service at a concept level ND E 2 L 0 E 130 16 E

H tion of the southern-most portion of the URA, B

T \ 170 210 N d S O 7 KS x of planning, and is subject to change during master planning. DuringIC the Master Plan phase, the City will work closely with D D from a cost and maintenance standpoint, the 3 CARME R L m .

1 X 7

E 1

P BEDFORD 0 M

G the land located east of SW Elsner Road would 2 \ E 20

_ 1

O Clean Water Services and other municipalities to refine the design, location, phasing and funding of public utilities. A 0 S 110 3 I

R _ 00 FIS preferred design would be a series of gravity fed 2 CHER

H G _ \

Y 1

T generally be able to connect with the trunk line

R D

O P 0 E 5 5 E 1

A Ú3 R 55 Ú3 C 140 4 0 E 190 N C 0 \

O nodes with occasional localized pump stations.

0 P C h 2 E _ t 5 without pumping.

A D

C u 530

N River Terrace Ú3 H Pump Station o 0 E 8 T 1 R MACBETH B R

S South Pump Station E _ 5 5 E 0 5 N 0 K F 5 0 4 0 E 5 0 S 4 E e 10 L 5 U 0 E 130 E 247 c 5

B 0 M \ 530

S Ú3 a Pump Station

S D r

R I 0 6 M X Force main 1 r E 0 0 0 T The design of the sanitary/sewer system includ- 9 0 5 BEDFORD

N 4 4 0 M G 0 5 \ 1 I

e 5 3 Y Option 1: R Option 2: 3 47 S

O R S 0 46

F 0 I T

R O

S U 1

4 I 3 G 480 Force main

B \

Y 1 r 90

0 N 4 3 0 3

I S 3 Y W D 3 0 O R 46 17 e F E 0 0 1 d

A Ú3U 310 K 4 R B 480 v x 3 4 0 C S 8

i 3 0 \ E 1 W K 0 Beef Bend Trunk h 4 0 ing pipe locations and configurations will be E 40 8 CARMEL t 1 4 3 m W Small Subdistrict Pump Stations: This option 0 Beef Bend Trunk R T Gravity Trunk Service through URA 6D: This u . TE 440

20 o 2 7 220 S

40 S 3 K 1 340 e

U c 0 APRIL 3 C M a W 9 Local Gravity Piping r 2 0 O M APRIL 3 r C T 20L e _ 9 1 R Y S C Local Gravity Piping option would involve the installation of a gravity would involve the installation of a series of small- 0 T determined during the master planning process, O 4 O 1

2 0 E 0 r 11 3 - 0 R L W e 3 1 3 7 v Y i 4 0

_ 0 River Terrace South Force Main 2 36 420 0 E F 0 R ISCHER

2 0 R 60 S _ 3 0 W 7 er sub-area drainage pump stations that avoid 1 0 trunk line beginning north of the planning area UT C 4 2 0 River Terrace South Force Main E in coordination with CWS. Pipe conveyance T 3 - 0 6 \ 350 Roy Rogers Gravity 0 2 P 7

2 0 0

1 0 60 E UT 15 \ Ú 2 NN E 3 I \ CH DRAFT C 140 7 LASICH s Existing Trunk Sewer drainage crossings and can develop incrementally. t 1 320 along SW Roy Rogers Road, south and east to \ N DRAFT s c 3

0 0 t

c 0 O 5 Roy Rogers Gravity Figure 1 or future pump stations will be analyzed and e 3 King City Figure 1 e King City j 29

0 j C o 0 1,000 2,000 Feet r o Option 1: Gravity trunk service throughWe tldrainageand culverts adjacent to roadways. _ 28 Beef Bend Rd 0 1,000 2,000 Feet P r 0 Beef Bend Concept Plan _

D SW Beef Bend Road, and then east to Btheeef existBend- Rd Smaller pump stations provide flexibility in the P X INN Service Area Analysis Beef Bend ConSceweepr Ste Prvilcae nConcept 1 D N River Terrace H

_ C © P \ E LA : Buildable Land coordinated with transportation projects. SICH X 320 Ú3 WORK IN PROGERxEiSsSt i-n SgU BTJEruCTn kTO S CeHAwNeGrE Sewer Service Concept 1 R G B 250 Service Area Analysis South Pump Station D E _ 270 © 3 0 0 N location and timing of development, however, P F ing gravity flow system in King City. With this \ S The figure shown above is preliminary in nature. It was developed to test the feasibility of public utility service at a concept level : E 290 L E 130 WORK IN PROGRESS - SUBJECT TO CHANGE E 240 BEEF BEND 230G

B Wetland \ 28 0 H

S of planning, and is subject to changeT 0 during master planning. During the Master Plan phase, the City will work closely with D 21 from a cost and maintenance standpoint, the N design, the western portion of the planning area O 7 KS R DIC

3 X

1 E BEDFORD M

G \

O Clean Water Services and other municipalities to refine the design, location, phasing and funding of public utilities. S 00 I 2 Buildable Land R preferred design would be a series of gravity fed Ú3 would rely upon gravity flow to the CWS pump G \

0 Y 25 270 D O 190

A Ú3

R C

\ 0 station on SW Roy Rogers Road. With the excep- nodes with occasional localized pump stations. 18 MACBETH h t

BEEF u 240 BEND o 230 160 S

H tion of the southern-most portion of the URA, e

T c 170 210 N M d O 7 KS a x DIC

3 r CARM M EL m r .

1 T The design of the sanitary/sewer system includ- 7

e R

1 S T 0 O

the land located east of SW Elsner Road would 2 r 0 2 3

_ 1 W 0 e 110 1 3 v _ i 200 FISCHER

8 ing pipe locations and configurations will be _ R

T generally be able to connect with the trunk line S P 0 E Ú3 15 W C 140 190 N C determined during the master planning process,

O - C

_ without pumping. 2 D 0 N River Terrace 0 E 0 18 R MACBETH U B T South2 Pump Station E E _ in coordination with CWS. Pipe conveyance \ N F S 7 E L 130

1 E E \

B DRAFT \ s

S t D

R 60 X

c 1 E or future pump stations will be analyzed and BEDFORD

M Figure 1 e G King City \

j Option 2:

O S I o

0 1,000 2,000 Feet r G \ Y Beef Bend Rd P D O 170 Beef Bend Concept Plan d

A Ú3

R _ x C

\ page 78 coordinated with transportation projects. Public Utilities and Services Framework X Sewer Service Concept 1 h CARMEL t m Service Area Analysis Small Subdistrict Pump Stations: This option D u . © o 7 P S \

K 1 : e

U c 0 WORK IN PROGRESS - SUBJECT TO CHANGE

M G a r 2

M r 20 T e _ 1 R

S would involve the installation of a series of small- T

0 r 11 0 3 W e

1 3 v i _ F R ISCHER

8 S _

W er sub-area drainage pump stations that avoid 1 C

T -

2 P 0

0 0 E UT 15 Ú3 2 E \

C 140 7 drainage crossings and can develop incrementally. 1 \ N DRAFT s t c O Figure 1 e King City j C o 0 1,000 2,000 Feet r Option 1: Gravity trunk service through drainage culverts adjacent to roadways. _ Beef Bend Rd

P Beef Bend Concept Plan _

D Smaller pump stations provide flexibility in the X Service Area Analysis Sewer Service Concept 1 D N River Terrace © P \ E : WORK IN PROGRESS - SUBJECT TO CHANGE

R G B South Pump Station E _ N location and timing of development, however, F S The figure shown above is preliminary in nature. It was developed to test the feasibility of public utility service at a concept level E L E 130 E B \

S of planning, and is subject to change during master planning. During the Master Plan phase, the City will work closely with PAGE 7 D from a cost and maintenance standpoint, the

R X E BEDFORD M

G \

O Clean Water Services and other municipalities to refine the design, location, phasing and funding of public utilities. S The information contained herein has been obtained from sources we deem reliable. We cannot, however, guarantee its accuracy. I

R preferred design would be a series of gravity fed

G \

Y D

A Ú3

R C

\ nodes with occasional localized pump stations. h t u o page 78 Public Utilities and Services Framework S

K e

U c

M a r

M r

T The design of the sanitary/sewer system includ-

e R

S T

1 r

W e

1 v i ing pipe locations and configurations will be R

S W

C determined during the master planning process,

2 0

0 UT 2 E in coordination with CWS. Pipe conveyance \ 7 1 \ DRAFT s t c Figure 1 or future pump stations will be analyzed and e King City j o 0 1,000 2,000 Feet r Beef Bend Rd

P Beef Bend Concept Plan _ coordinated with transportation projects. X Service Area Analysis Sewer Service Concept 1 D © P \ : WORK IN PROGRESS - SUBJECT TO CHANGE G

page 78 Public Utilities and Services Framework RESIDENTIAL OPPORTUNITY IN KING CITY MASTER PLAN SHARLIN FARM DEVELOPMENT 15822 SW BEEF BEND RD, KING CITY OR

PAGE 8 The information contained herein has been obtained from sources we deem reliable. We cannot, however, guarantee its accuracy. RESIDENTIAL OPPORTUNITY IN KING CITY MASTER PLAN SHARLIN FARM DEVELOPMENT 15822 SW BEEF BEND RD, KING CITY OR

Metro exec gives green light to Beaverton, King City expansion Jim Redden - Thursday, August 28 2018

They, along with Hillsboro and Wilsonville, hope to expand and create more housing

Beaverton and King City just received the green light from the chief operating officer of the Metro regional government to move forward with plans to expand westward, creating areas for more housing.

The ruling from Martha Bennett, Metro chief operating officer, was handed down today (Tuesday, Aug. 28). The recommendation now goes to Metro's elected council, which controls the urban growth boundary, the invisible barrier around Portland's suburbs beyond which urban development is not allowed.

Beaverton and King City had asked for an expansion of the boundary to make room for more housing. So, too, did Hillsboro and Wilsonville. Continued on next page

PAGE 9 The information contained herein has been obtained from sources we deem reliable. We cannot, however, guarantee its accuracy. RESIDENTIAL OPPORTUNITY IN KING CITY MASTER PLAN SHARLIN FARM DEVELOPMENT 15822 SW BEEF BEND RD, KING CITY OR

Continued

Bennett is recommending a “yes” decision for all three.

“I believe that all four cities are ready to take the next steps towards getting homes built in the proposed UGB expansion areas,” Bennett wrote. “These cities have demonstrated governance, infrastructure and market factors that will lead to housing development. All four cities are working to reduce barriers to development in their existing urban areas and seeking to improve their engagement with diverse communities. For those reasons, I recommend that the Metro Council expand the region’s UGB in the areas proposed by these four cities.”

The cities’ proposals include:

• Beaverton — Cooper Mountain: 1,232 total acres; 600 buildable acres; 3,760 homes planned.

• King City — Beef Bend South: 528 total acres; 400 buildable acres; 3,300 homes planned.

• Hillsboro — Witch Hazel Village South: 150 total acres; 75 buildable acres; 850 homes planned.

• Wilsonville — Advance Road (Frog Pond): 271 total acres: 192 buildable acres;1,325 homes planned.

“The four expansion proposals constructively explored the elements that lead to readiness for urban growth boundary (UGB) expansions: governance, infrastructure funding strategies and market conditions,” Bennett wrote.

Beaverton Mayor Denny Doyle said he was confident that the plan would pass muster. “This is really good news but staff worked really hard for it,” he said Tuesday evening. “Metro council likely will put conditions on it. That’s OK. We’re ready for that. We’re going to do this, but we’re going to do it right.”

The Metro council is expected to take up Bennett’s recommendations Tuesday, Sept. 4. https://pamplinmedia.com/bvt/15-news/404544-302263-metro-exec-gives-green-light-to-beaverton-king-city-expansion

PAGE 10 The information contained herein has been obtained from sources we deem reliable. We cannot, however, guarantee its accuracy. RESIDENTIAL OPPORTUNITY IN KING CITY MASTER PLAN SHARLIN FARM DEVELOPMENT 15822 SW BEEF BEND RD, KING CITY OR

PORTLAND HOUSING MARKET: AT A GLANCE Business Insider #9 Hottest Market for 2018

PAGE 11 The information contained herein has been obtained from sources we deem reliable. We cannot, however, guarantee its accuracy. RESIDENTIAL OPPORTUNITY IN KING CITY MASTER PLAN Portland’s economy, neighborhoods, resources, natural setting and the lifestyle options they support continue SHARLIN FARMto attract DEVELOPMENT new residents AND VISITORS to the city. Over 15822 SW BEEFthe BENDnext 20 RD, years, KING Portland CITY OR is EXPECTED to add MORE THAN WELCOME TO 260,000 new residents to the roughly 620,000 people who live here today and about 140,000 new jobs to the MORE THAN 370,000 in Portland RIGHT now. -Bureau of Planning Portland & Sustainability “Portland is one of the most beautiful cities in the country. Oregon It caters to everyone, having activities for families, young professionals and the elderly population alike. There’s some of the best restaurants in the world, access to gorgeous nature, even a professional basketball team. People US News want to live here, they’ll continue to live here, and that won’t be changing anytime soon.” #6 in USA -Portland Development Group Best Places to Live

The long-standing development commitment in Portland is to grow UP, not OUT.

Portland became one of the country’s top urban destinations in 2017. With this type of influx comes the increase in rental properties, higher demands for housing, and the largest equity gains and appreciation rates. Because of this, for cities with a high number of millennials—which also includes Austin, Denver and Boston—investors can see some of the greatest returns. Portland continues to be a highly desirable place to live, work and play in the Pacific Northwest.

Portland is the longtime home of three of the world’s largest brands: Nike, Adidas and Intel. Many other companies are choosing to relocate major operations to the Portland area or open new locations. AirBnB has set up a downtown office, bringing a wave of employees and economic boost with it. Google has made public its plans to start a Portland location office, and Under Armour has recently completed the awaited construction of its new headquarters and campus in the beautiful southern part of the city’s urban core.

POPULATION (CITY) POPULATION (METRO) ZILLOW MEDIAN HOME (2019) MEDIAN FAMILY INCOME 647,805 2,453,168 $426,300 $86,771

PAGE 12 The information contained herein has been obtained from sources we deem reliable. We cannot, however, guarantee its accuracy. RESIDENTIAL OPPORTUNITY IN KING CITY MASTER PLAN Culture and Events A major portionSHARLIN of Portland’s culture is in theFARM arts and entertainment, DEVELOPMENT from markets to museums and stages of all sizes, you will find what keeps this city so vibrant. Additionally Portland is comprised of a number of shopping districts with national retailers, designer15822 boutiques,and SW BEEF BENDpop-up RD,and consignmentKING CITY shops. OR

Oregon Zoo • Portland Art Museum • Oregon Historical Society • Oregon Museum of Science and Industry • World Forestry Cen- ter • Pittock Mansion • Art Walk • Oregon Symphony • Portland Opera • Portland Youth Philharmonic • Portland Baroque Orchestra • Portland Center Stage • Artists Repertory Theatre • Oregon Ballet Theatre • Portland Rose Festival • Saturday Market • Oregon Brewers Festival • Portland Intl. Film Festival

Urban Gastronomy Farmers markets, local co-op grocers, and national grocers supply not only your kitchen at home, but restaurants and food carts all over Portland. With its vast breweries, local wineries in the Willamette and Tualatin valleys, and artisan distilleries. Portland hosts a number of festivals throughout the year. Oregon Brewers Festival is the largest outdoor craft beer festival in North Amer- ica with 100,000 attendees, and Bite of Oregon is the state’s top culinary event attracting over 50,000 foodies.

Higgins • Departure • Luc Lac • Deschutes Brewery • Bamboo Sushi • Duck House • Le Pigeon • Ataula • Olympia Provisions • Nostrana • Ava Gene’s • Pok Pok • Ned Ludd • Ox • Aviary • Mother’s Bistro • Voodoo Doughnut • Blue Star Donuts • STASH Tea • Townshend’s Tea • Stumptown Coffee Nossa Familia • Kiosko • Upper Left Roasters • Steven Smith Teamaker • Portland Farmer’s Market • Bridgeport Brewing Company • Hair of the Dog Brewing • Hopworks Urban Brewery • Base Camp Brewing • Cascade Brewing • McMenamins • Widmer Brothers

Lifestyle & Green Space In Portland, even when it is raining, it is difficult to stay inside, there is so much to explore. When it does eventually stop raining and the sun comes out from behind the clouds, it becomes apparent why people love this city so much. Portlanders love the natural beauty, ample parks and gardens that span the entire city, the ease of transportation, and especially its sports.

Washington Park • Forest Park • Intl. Rose Test Garden • Lan Su Chinese Garden • Japanese Garden • Crystal Springs Rhododen- dron Garden • Mill Ends Park • Oaks Park • Sauvie Island • Mt Hood • Timberline Lodge • Hoyt Arboretum • Park Blocks • Council Crest Park • Laurelhurst Park • Cathedral Park • Tom McCall Waterfront • Mt Tabor

PAGE 13 The information contained herein has been obtained from sources we deem reliable. We cannot, however, guarantee its accuracy. RESIDENTIAL OPPORTUNITY IN KING CITY MASTER PLAN SHARLIN FARM DEVELOPMENT 15822 SW BEEF BEND RD, KING CITY OR

SILICON FOREST HIGH-TECH CORRIDOR

KING CITY Source: Silicon Maps - www.siliconmaps.com Leading PORTLAND AREA Employers NIKE Intel 18,600 Blue Ribbon Sports founded in 1964, in Eugene Oregon, took on the name Providence Health System 16,139 Nike in 1971 when they prepared to Oregon Health Sciences University 14,963 launch their own line of footwear. As they expanded, they began man- Kaiser Permanente 11,898 ufacturing apparel for a variety of Fred Meyer (Kroger) 10,813 sports, and moved their headquarters to an eight building campus in Legacy Health Systems 8,700 Beaverton, Oregon. The campus Nike 8,500 has expanded to 35 buildings and employs 8,500 people in the state of Portland Public Schools 6,135 Oregon. Multnomah County 5,995 City of Portland 5,481 INTEL Intel was founded on a vision for Beaverton School District 4,637 semiconductor memory products in Wells Fargo 4,527 1968 by scientists Robert Noyce and Gordon Moore, and in 1971 they had Portland Community College 3,906 introduced the world’s first micropro- US Bank 3,757 cessor.

United States Postal Service 3,533 Intel has 82,500 employees world- Portland State University 3,418 wide, 18,600 of which are locally based at the company’s Ronler Acres Source: Portland Business Journal “2015-16 Book of Lists” Campus in Hillsboro, OR is undergo- ing a 3.6 million SF expansion that will bring in 1,000 additional employees.

PAGE 14 The information contained herein has been obtained from sources we deem reliable. We cannot, however, guarantee its accuracy. AREA RETAILRESIDENTIAL HIGHLIGHTS OPPORTUNITY IN KING CITY MASTER PLAN SHARLIN FARM DEVELOPMENT 15822 SW BEEF BEND RD, KING CITY OR

COOPER MOUNTAIN MASTER PLAN

SITE

EXPANSION AREA

PAGE 15 The information contained herein has been obtained from sources we deem reliable. We cannot, however, guarantee its accuracy. RESIDENTIAL OPPORTUNITY IN KING CITY MASTER PLAN SHARLIN FARM DEVELOPMENT 15822 SW BEEF BEND RD, KING CITY OR

FULL PROFILE FULL PROFILE Location 2000-2010 Census, 2018 Estimates wit2h0 20002-230 P1r0o jCeectniosnus, 2018 Estimates with 2023 Projections Site Calculated using Weighted Block Centroid fromCalculated Block Groups using Weighted Block Centroid from Block Groups

Lat/Lon: 45.4010/-122.8397 Lat/Lon: 45.4010/-122.8397 RF1 RF1 15822 SW Beef Bend Rd 15822 SW Beef Bend Rd Hillsboro 1 mi radius 3 mi radius 5 mi radiu1s mi radius 3 mi radius 5 mi radius Portland, OR 97224 Portland, OR 97224

2018 Estimated Population 2018 Estimated Population 4,039 65,242 185,159 4,039 65,242 185,159 N N

O 2023 Projected Population O 2023 Projected Population 4,379 70,919 200,699 4,379 70,919 200,699 I I T 2010 Census Population T 2010 Census Population 3,535 60,030 170,236 3,535 60,030 170,236 L A Beaverton L A U 2000 Census Population U 2000 Census Population 2,325 46,948 142,500 2,325 46,948 142,500 P P

O Projected Annual Growth 2018 to 2023O Projected Annual Growth 2018 to 2023 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% P P Historical Annual Growth 2000 to 2018 Historical Annual Growth 2000 to 2018 4.1% 2.2% 1.7% 4.1% 2.2% 1.7%

2018 Estimated Households 2018 Estimated Households 1,443 26,193 71,028 1,443 26,193 71,028 S S

L D 2023 Projected Households L D 2023 Projected Households 1,540 28,070 76,042 1,540 28,070 76,042

H O 2010 Census Households H O 2010 Census Households 1,282 24,403 66,054 1,282 24,403 66,054 E E

S 2000 Census Households S 2000 Census Households 864 19,171 55,280 864 19,171 55,280 U Projected Annual Growth 2018 to 2023U Projected Annual Growth 2018 to 2023 1.3% 1.4% 1.4% 1.3% 1.4% 1.4% SITE H O Historical Annual Growth 2000 to 2018H O Historical Annual Growth 2000 to 2018 3.7% 2.0% 1.6% 3.7% 2.0% 1.6% 2018 Est. Population Under 10 Years 2018 Est. Population Under 10 Years 13.1% 12.0% 12.2% 13.1% 12.0% 12.2% 2018 Est. Population 10 to 19 Years 2018 Est. Population 10 to 19 Years 13.4% 12.5% 12.8% 13.4% 12.5% 12.8% 2018 Est. Population 20 to 29 Years 2018 Est. Population 20 to 29 Years 8.9% 11.2% 11.8% 8.9% 11.2% 11.8% SW BEEF BEND RD E 2018 Est. Population 30 to 44 YearsE 2018 Est. Population 30 to 44 Years 22.2% 21.7% 21.9% 22.2% 21.7% 21.9% G G

SW ROY ROGERS RD SW ROY 2018 Est. Population 75 Years or Over 2018 Est. Population 75 Years or Over 3.2% 7.2% 5.6% 3.2% 7.2% 5.6% FULL2018 PR Est.OF MedianILE Age FULL2018 PR Est.OF MedianILE Age 39.3 39.9 38.8 39.3 39.9 38.8 2000-2010 Census, 2018 Estimates wit2h0 20002-230 P1r0o jCeectniosnus, 2018 Estimates with 2023 Projections

S 2018 Est. Male Population S 2018 Est. Male Population 48.9% 47.9% 48.7% 48.9% 47.9% 48.7% Calculated using Weighted Block Centroid fromCalculated Block Groups using Weighted Block Centroid from Block Groups U U T T R 2018 Est. Female Population R 2018 Est. Female Population 51.1% 52.1% 51.3% 51.1% 52.1% 51.3% A A E E T T

S 2018 Est. Never Married S 2018 Est. Never Married 24.4% 25.6% 27.5% 24.4% 25.6% 27.5% N D N D L L E E A A

Lat/LoG n: 201845.40 Est.10/- 1Now22.8 Married397 Lat/LoG n: 201845.40 Est.10/- 1Now22.8 Married397 62.7% 53.0% 52.2% 62.7% 53.0% 52.2%

T T I I

& & RF1 RF1

R 2018 Est. Separated or Divorced R 2018 Est. Separated or Divorced 10.3% 15.3% 15.4% 10.3% 15.3% 15.4% A A

15M 822 2018SW BEst.ee Widowedf Bend Rd 15M 822 2018SW BEst.ee Widowedf Bend Rd 2.6% 6.0% 5.0% 2.6% 6.0% 5.0% GROWTH IN PORTLAND, OR 1 mi radius 3 mi radius 5 mi radiu1s mi radius 3 mi radius 5 mi radius Portlan2018d, O Est.R 9 7HH22 Income4 $200,000P oro rMoretlan2018d, O Est.R 9 7HH22 Income4 $200,000 or More 19.9% 11.0% 10.6% 19.9% 11.0% 10.6% PORTLAND RANKED #21 IN THE 2018COUNTRY Est. HH FOR Income $150,000 to $199,9992018 Est. HH Income $150,000 to $199,999 9.3% 11.4% 11.1% 9.3% 11.4% 11.1% 2018 EstimatedEst. HH Income Population $100,000 to $149,9992018 Est.Estimated HH Income Population $100,000 to $149,999 20.3%4,039 65,24219.4% 185,15920.1% 20.3%4,039 65,24219.4% 185,15920.1% PRIVATE SECTOR JOB GROWTH BETWEENN 2007-2017 N O 2023 Projected Population O 2023 Projected Population 4,379 70,919 200,699 4,379 70,919 200,699 I I 2018 Est. HH Income $75,000 to $99,9992018 Est. HH Income $75,000 to $99,999 18.0% 12.9% 13.2% 18.0% 12.9% 13.2% T T This report was produced using data from private and government sources deemed to be reliable. The information herein is provided without representation or warranty. representation herein is provided without information The be reliable. sources deemed to and government private from was produced using data report This or warranty. representation herein is provided without information The be reliable. sources deemed to and government private from was produced using data report This

CHANGE JULY 2007: 904,100 JOBS | July 2017:2010 1,024,700 Census JOBS Population A 2010 Census Population 3,535 60,030 170,236 3,535 60,030 170,236

L A 2018 Est. HH Income $50,000 to $74,999L 2018 Est. HH Income $50,000 to $74,999 16.6% 14.9% 15.2% 16.6% 14.9% 15.2% E E

0.8% U U M 2000 Census Population M 2000 Census Population 2,325 46,948 142,500 2,325 46,948 142,500 PERCENT CHANGE:P +13.3%2018 Est. HH Income $35,000 to $49,999P 2018 Est. HH Income $35,000 to $49,999 10.4% 10.2% 10.1% 10.4% 10.2% 10.1%

3.2% O O 3.8% © Business First of Buffalo 2017O Projected Annual Growth 2018 to 2023O Projected Annual Growth 2018 to 2023 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% P 2018 Est. HH Income $25,000 to $34,999P 2018 Est. HH Income $25,000 to $34,999 4.4% 8.4% 7.9% 4.4% 8.4% 7.9% N C N C 5.2% I Historical Annual Growth 2000 to 2018I Historical Annual Growth 2000 to 2018 4.1% 2.2% 1.7% 4.1% 2.2% 1.7% 5.3% 2018 Est. HH Income $15,000 to $24,9992018 Est. HH Income $15,000 to $24,999 1.0% 6.1% 6.4% 1.0% 6.1% 6.4% 6.7% EMPLOYMENT PORTLAND-VANCOUVER-HILLSBORO 8.1% 2018 EstimatedEst. HH Income Households Under $15,000 2018 EstimatedEst. HH Income Households Under $15,000 1,4430.1% 26,1935.7% 71,0285.5% 1,4430.1% 26,1935.7% 71,0285.5% S S 10.3% 1,300,000 DEMOGRAPHICS 12.0% 2018 Est. Average Household Income 2018 Est. Average Household Income $121,508 $108,712 $107,422$121,508 $108,712 $107,422 L D 2023 Projected Households L D 2023 Projected Households 1,540 28,070 76,042 1,540 28,070 76,042 12.6% 1,200,000 2018 Est. Median Household Income 2018 Est. Median Household Income $99,441 $87,430 $87,404 $99,441 $87,430 $87,404 13.3% H O 2010 Census Households H O 2010 Census Households 1,282 24,403 66,054 1,282 24,403 66,054 E E 13.8% 2018 Est. Per Capita Income AREA 2018 Est. Per Capita Income $43,463 $43,686 $41,347 $43,463 $43,686 $41,347 S 2000 Census Households S 2000 Census Households 864 19,171 55,280 864 19,171 55,280 14.7%

1,100,000 U U 15.2% Projected Annual Growth 2018 to 2023Projected Annual Growth 2018 to 2023 1.3% 1.4% 1.4% 1.3% 1.4% 1.4% Bureau of 2018 Est. Total Businesses 2018 Est. Total Businesses 37 1,887 8,905 37 1,887 8,905 18.4% H O H O Labor Statistics 1/07 1/08 1/09 1/10 1/11 1/12 1/13 Historical20181/14 1/15Est. AnnualTotal1/16 1/17 Employees Growth 2000 to 2018 2018Historical Est. AnnualTotal Employees Growth 2000 to 2018 3.7%140 16,8622.0% 88,5671.6% 3.7%140 16,8622.0% 88,5671.6% 2018 Est. Population Under 10 Years 2018 Est. Population Under 10 Years 13.1% 12.0% 12.2% 13.1% 12.0% 12.2% *Demographic Information, Traffic Counts, and Merchant Locations 2018 Est. Population 10 to 19 Years 2018 Est. Population 10 to 19 Years 13.4% 12.5% 12.8% 13.4% 12.5% 12.8% are Provided by REGIS Online at SitesUSA.com 2018 Est. Population 20 to 29 Years 2018 Est. Population 20 to 29 Years 8.9% 11.2% 11.8% 8.9% 11.2% 11.8% ©2018, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 ©2018, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 1 of 3 Demographic Source: page Applied 1 of 3 Geographic Solutions 04/2018,Demographic TIGER Geography Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 04/2018, TIGER Geography

E 2018 Est. Population 30 to 44 YearsE 2018 Est. Population 30 to 44 Years 22.2% 21.7% 21.9% 22.2% 21.7% 21.9% G G

A 2018 Est. Population 45 to 59 YearsA 2018 Est. Population 45 to 59 Years 24.0% 20.3% 21.3% 24.0% 20.3% 21.3% 2018 Est. Population 60 to 74 Years 2018 Est. Population 60 to 74 Years 15.3% 15.2% PAGE14.5% 16 15.3% 15.2% 14.5% 2018The information Est. Population contained 75 Years herein or hasOver been2018 obtained Est. Population from sources 75 Years we deem or Over reliable. We cannot,3.2% however, guarantee7.2% its accuracy.5.6% 3.2% 7.2% 5.6% 2018 Est. Median Age 2018 Est. Median Age 39.3 39.9 38.8 39.3 39.9 38.8

S 2018 Est. Male Population S 2018 Est. Male Population 48.9% 47.9% 48.7% 48.9% 47.9% 48.7% U U T T R 2018 Est. Female Population R 2018 Est. Female Population 51.1% 52.1% 51.3% 51.1% 52.1% 51.3% A A E E T T

S 2018 Est. Never Married S 2018 Est. Never Married 24.4% 25.6% 27.5% 24.4% 25.6% 27.5% N D N D L L E E A A

G 2018 Est. Now Married G 2018 Est. Now Married 62.7% 53.0% 52.2% 62.7% 53.0% 52.2%

T T I I & &

R 2018 Est. Separated or Divorced R 2018 Est. Separated or Divorced 10.3% 15.3% 15.4% 10.3% 15.3% 15.4% A A

M 2018 Est. Widowed M 2018 Est. Widowed 2.6% 6.0% 5.0% 2.6% 6.0% 5.0%

2018 Est. HH Income $200,000 or More2018 Est. HH Income $200,000 or More 19.9% 11.0% 10.6% 19.9% 11.0% 10.6% 2018 Est. HH Income $150,000 to $199,9992018 Est. HH Income $150,000 to $199,999 9.3% 11.4% 11.1% 9.3% 11.4% 11.1% 2018 Est. HH Income $100,000 to $149,9992018 Est. HH Income $100,000 to $149,999 20.3% 19.4% 20.1% 20.3% 19.4% 20.1% 2018 Est. HH Income $75,000 to $99,9992018 Est. HH Income $75,000 to $99,999 18.0% 12.9% 13.2% 18.0% 12.9% 13.2% This report was produced using data from private and government sources deemed to be reliable. The information herein is provided without representation or warranty. representation herein is provided without information The be reliable. sources deemed to and government private from was produced using data report This or warranty. representation herein is provided without information The be reliable. sources deemed to and government private from was produced using data report This 2018 Est. HH Income $50,000 to $74,9992018 Est. HH Income $50,000 to $74,999 16.6% 14.9% 15.2% 16.6% 14.9% 15.2% E E

M 2018 Est. HH Income $35,000 to $49,999M 2018 Est. HH Income $35,000 to $49,999 10.4% 10.2% 10.1% 10.4% 10.2% 10.1% O O 2018 Est. HH Income $25,000 to $34,9992018 Est. HH Income $25,000 to $34,999 4.4% 8.4% 7.9% 4.4% 8.4% 7.9% N C N C I I 2018 Est. HH Income $15,000 to $24,9992018 Est. HH Income $15,000 to $24,999 1.0% 6.1% 6.4% 1.0% 6.1% 6.4% 2018 Est. HH Income Under $15,000 2018 Est. HH Income Under $15,000 0.1% 5.7% 5.5% 0.1% 5.7% 5.5% 2018 Est. Average Household Income 2018 Est. Average Household Income $121,508 $108,712 $107,422$121,508 $108,712 $107,422 2018 Est. Median Household Income 2018 Est. Median Household Income $99,441 $87,430 $87,404 $99,441 $87,430 $87,404 2018 Est. Per Capita Income 2018 Est. Per Capita Income $43,463 $43,686 $41,347 $43,463 $43,686 $41,347

2018 Est. Total Businesses 2018 Est. Total Businesses 37 1,887 8,905 37 1,887 8,905 2018 Est. Total Employees 2018 Est. Total Employees 140 16,862 88,567 140 16,862 88,567

©2018, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 ©2018, Sites USA, Chandler, Arizona, 480-491-1112 page 1 of 3 Demographic Source: page Applied 1 of 3 Geographic Solutions 04/2018,Demographic TIGER Geography Source: Applied Geographic Solutions 04/2018, TIGER Geography