DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix E Cultural Resources

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Appendix E Cultural Resources Appendix E.1 Historical Resource Technical Report Art Center College of Design Master Plan Pasadena, California Historical Resource Technical Report Prepared by: November 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose and Qualifications ................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 2 2. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK .................................................................................... 3 2.1 National Register of Historic Places .................................................................................... 3 2.2 California Register of Historical Resources ........................................................................ 4 2.3 Pasadena Historic Preservation Ordinance ..................................................................... 6 3. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ..................................................................................... 7 3.1 Hillside Campus ..................................................................................................................... 7 3.2 South Campus ..................................................................................................................... 12 4. PROJECT IMPACTS ................................................................................................ 16 4.1 Project Description .............................................................................................................. 16 4.2 Determining the Significance of Impacts on Historical Resources ............................. 16 4.3 Analysis of Project Impacts ................................................................................................ 17 5. CONCLUSION ....................................................................................................... 19 6. SOURCES ............................................................................................................... 20 APPENDIX A – Résumés APPENDIX B – Design & Historic Preservation Comments from City of Pasadena Historical Resource Technical Report – ArtCenter College of Design Master Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY GPA Consulting (GPA) was retained to complete this report as part of the environmental review for the proposed ArtCenter College of Design (ArtCenter) Master Plan (Master Plan, sometimes referred to as "the project") in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). ArtCenter has submitted an application for a new 15-year Master Plan that encompasses development on its Hillside Campus and South Campus. Both campuses are located in the City of Pasadena. GPA conducted a field inspection of each campus to identify known or potential historical resources, and then analyzed the impacts of the Master Plan on the identified historical resources. The Hillside Campus comprises two permanent buildings, one modular building, one structure, and two surface parking lots in a wooded, hillside setting. The main building, commonly called the Ellwood Building, was designated a City of Pasadena Historic Monument in 2005. It is considered a historical resource for the purposes of CEQA. None of the other buildings or structures on the Hillside Campus are historical resources. The South Campus comprises four buildings and four surface parking lots in an urban setting. The Master Plan would affect buildings within the campus boundaries. However, none of the buildings on the South Campus is a historical resource for the purposes of CEQA. The City of Pasadena has reviewed the Master Plan and determined the work described therein does not propose any major exterior or interior modifications to the identified historical resource, namely the Ellwood Building, that require review by the City’s Planning & Community Development Department (see Attachment B - Design & Historic Preservation Comments from City of Pasadena). GPA also analyzed the potential for direct or indirect impacts on the historical resource as a result of work proposed in the Master Plan in compliance with CEQA. GPA concluded that the Master Plan would have a less than significant impact on the historical resource. The project would not affect the physical integrity of the Ellwood Building, the historical resource. It would not be demolished, altered, or relocated as a result of the project. The improvements to the infrastructure and changes to other buildings on the Hillside Campus would not diminish the setting of the Ellwood Building. The ability of the historical resource to convey its significance would not be materially impaired by the project. As the project would have a less than significant impact, no mitigation is required or recommended for historical resources. Historical Resource Technical Report – ArtCenter College of Design Master Plan 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose and Qualifications The purpose of this report is to determine whether or not a proposed Master Plan (Master Plan) for the ArtCenter College of Design (ArtCenter) would impact historical resources. ArtCenter was established in Los Angeles in 1930 and moved to its current Hillside Campus located at 1700 Lida Street in the City of Pasadena in 1976. In 2004, ArtCenter established a second campus, referred to as the South Campus, at 950 S. Raymond Avenue. As academic programs offered at the South Campus, which is located approximately five miles to the south of the Hillside Campus, have expanded and operations shifted to the South Campus over time, the Hillside Campus and the South Campus have become increasingly connected. Despite the distance between the two campuses, the campuses are integrated functionally and programmatically. ArtCenter has submitted an application for a new 15-year Master Plan that encompasses development on, and comprehensively identifies a vision for, both the Hillside Campus and the South Campus. ArtCenter would focus growth on its South Campus, while providing for infrastructure improvements and building renovations on its Hillside Campus.1 The Hillside Campus comprises two permanent buildings, one modular building, one structure, and two surface parking lots in a wooded, hillside setting. The main building was designed by noted Modern architect Craig Ellwood and is commonly called the Ellwood Building. On the Hillside Campus, work associated with the Master Plan would be limited to removing a temporary modular building, altering a structure completed in 2001, renovation and expansion of a maintenance building, improving circulation, and enhancing the main vehicular entrance. No major exterior or interior modifications to the Ellwood Building are proposed. The South Campus comprises four buildings and four surface parking lots in an urban setting. None of the buildings on the campus is currently designated as a landmark under national, state, or local programs. None of the buildings has been determined eligible for listing at the national, state, or local level through previous historic resource surveys. On the South Campus, work associated with the Master Plan would involve renovating and expanding existing buildings, constructing six2 new buildings primarily dedicated to student housing, and improving circulation and connections. GPA Consulting (GPA) was retained to identify known and potential historical resources on the Master Plan project site, and to analyze impacts on the identified historical resources in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Teresa Grimes, Principal Architectural Historian at GPA, and Allison M. Lyons, Associate Architectural Historian, were responsible for the preparation of this report. They both fulfill the qualifications for historic preservation professionals outlined in Title 36 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 61. Their résumés are attached in Appendix A. 1 Eyestone Environmental, Initial Study for the ArtCenter College of Design Master Plan (Pasadena, CA: 2016). 2 This number includes the following six buildings: 888 S. Raymond Avenue – Four separate buildings 966 S. Raymond Avenue – One building 1101 S. Arroyo Parkway – One building Historical Resource Technical Report – ArtCenter College of Design Master Plan Page 1 1.2 Methodology In preparing this report, GPA performed the following tasks: 1. Established the study area for the report. The study area was identified as the Master Plan project site. Please refer to Figures 1 and 2 below for maps of the study area. 2. Researched the Hillside Campus and South Campus to determine whether or not buildings on the project site are currently listed as landmarks under national, state, or local programs and whether or not buildings on the campuses have been previously identified or evaluated as historical resources. This involved a search of the California Historical Resources Inventory System (CHRIS) and the City of Pasadena’s California Historical Resources Inventory Database. CHRIS is a database maintained by the State Office of Historic Preservation that includes properties listed and determined eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, listed and determined eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, California Registered Historical Landmarks, Points of Historical Interest, as well as properties that have been
Recommended publications
  • Los Angeles Bibliography

    Los Angeles Bibliography

    A HISTORICAL BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT IN THE LOS ANGELES METROPOLITAN AREA Compiled by Richard Longstreth 1998, revised 16 May 2018 This listing focuses on historical studies, with an emphasis is on scholarly work published during the past thirty years. I have also included a section on popular pictorial histories due to the wealth of information they afford. To keep the scope manageable, the geographic area covered is primarily limited to Los Angeles and Orange counties, except in cases where a community, such as Santa Barbara; a building, such as the Mission Inn; or an architect, such as Irving Gill, are of transcendent importance to the region. Thanks go to Kenneth Breisch, Dora Crouch, Thomas Hines, Greg Hise, Gail Ostergren, and Martin Schiesl for adding to the list. Additions, corrections, and updates are welcome. Please send them to me at [email protected]. G E N E R A L H I S T O R I E S A N D U R B A N I S M Abu-Lughod, Janet, New York, Chicago, Los Angeles: America's Global Cities, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999 Adler, Sy, "The Transformation of the Pacific Electric Railway: Bradford Snell, Roger Rabbit, and the Politics of Transportation in Los Angeles," Urban Affairs Quarterly 27 (September 1991): 51-86 Akimoto, Fukuo, “Charles H. Cheney of California,” Planning Perspectives 18 (July 2003): 253-75 Allen, James P., and Eugene Turner, The Ethnic Quilt: Population Diversity in Southern California Northridge: Center for Geographical Studies, California State University, Northridge, 1997 Avila, Eric, “The Folklore of the Freeway: Space, Culture, and Identity in Postwar Los Angeles,” Aztlan 23 (spring 1998): 15-31 _________, Popular Culture in the Age of White Flight: Fear and Fantasy in Suburban Los Angeles, Berkeley: University of California Pres, 2004 Axelrod, Jeremiah B.
  • Being There (Esther Mccoy) (Dragged)

    Being There (Esther Mccoy) (Dragged)

    JLJ8EDFI>8E Esther McCoy, the Accidental Architectural Historian “If you lived in New York, it was proper to make fun of Los Angeles,” remarked Esther McCoy (1904–1989) fifty years after she’d left Greenwich Village to pursue life on the wrong coast.( McCoy was a keen observer, and her sharply attentive writing was elegantly spare, unpretentious, and confident. Her short stories were featured in literary quarterlies and the best of “the slicks,” including Harper’s Bazaar and The New Yorker. A contributor to progressive political journals, she also collaborated on several pseudonymously published detective novels and unproduced screenplays. In both her fiction- writing and reporting, McCoy was remarkably adept at portraying the contemporary moment and articulating palpable concerns about how people lived. Her story “The Cape,” included in The Best Short Stories of 1950,) follows an afternoon in the life of a sophisticated, urban divorcee: while undergoing radiation treatment for breast cancer, the woman endures thoughtless remarks from a misogynist doctor and allows her memory to wander over her own richly complex life. For Epic News, the weekly paper produced by Upton Sinclair’s 1934 EPIC (End Poverty in California) campaign, McCoy wrote about Los Angeles slum clearances and the city’s need for low-cost housing.* In 1960 McCoy published Five California Architects, her ground- breaking book that clearly identified the significance of American modernist design and its indisputably West Coast origins.+ Through McCoy’s original and well-considered study on the varied work of Irving Gill, Bernard Maybeck, and R. M. Schindler, the richness Esther McCoy with Albert Robert, 1926.
  • NPS Form 10 900 OMB No. 1024 0018

    NPS Form 10 900 OMB No. 1024 0018

    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5/31/2012) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional certification comments, entries, and narrative items on continuation sheets if needed (NPS Form 10-900a). 1. Name of Property historic name Case Study House #16 other names/site number 2. Location street & number 1811 Bel Air Road not for publication city or town Los Angeles vicinity state California code CA county Los Angeles code 037 zip code 90077 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property _ meets _ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: national statewide local Signature of certifying official/Title Date State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria.
  • NRHP Registration Form

    NRHP Registration Form

    SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFED (SBU) PROPERTY OF UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT COPYING, DISSEMINATION, OR DISTRIBUTION OF THIS DOCUMENT TO UNAUTHORIZED RECIPIENTS IS PROHIBITED Do not remove this notice Properly destroy or return documents when no longer needed United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Federal Building Los Angeles, California Name of Property County and State ______________________________________________________________________________ 4. National Park Service Certification I hereby certify that this property is: entered in the National Register determined eligible for the National Register determined not eligible for the National Register removed from the National Register other (explain:) _____________________ ______________________________________________________________________ Signature of the Keeper Date of Action ____________________________________________________________________________ 5. Classification Ownership of Property (Check as many boxes as apply.) Private: Public – Local Public – State Public – Federal X Category of Property (Check only one box.) Building(s) X District Site Structure Object Sections 1-6 page 2 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Federal Building Los Angeles, California Name of Property County and State Number of Resources within Property (Do not include previously listed

  • Recent Past Bibliography

    A HISTORICAL BIBLIOGRAPHY OF ARCHITECTURE, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, AND URBANISM IN THE UNITED STATES SINCE WORLD WAR II Compiled by Richard Longstreth, last revised 10 May 2019 I have focused on substantive historical accounts related to the shaping of the American landscape since World War II. To facilitate use, listings are divided into several subject categories: Building Types, Houses and Housing, Architects, Landscape Architecture, Architecture and Place, Planning – Urbanism, Materials – Technology, and Other Studies, covering material not readily placed in any of the previous categroies. Most listings are scholarly in nature, but I have also included some popular accounts that are particularly rich in the historical material presented. I have also included a separate section for Historic Preservation that focuses on intellectual and related issues concerning the protection of the recent past. Any additions or corrections are welcome and will be included in updated editions of this bibliography. Please send them to me at [email protected]. B U I L D I N G T Y P E S Banks and Office Buildings Albrecht, Donald, and Chrysanthe Broikos, eds., On the Job: Design and the American Office, New York: Princeton Architectural Press, and Washington: National Building Museum, 2000 Belfoure, Charles, Monuments to Money: the Architecture of American Banks, Jefferson, N.C.: McFarland, 2005 Clausen, Meredith L., “Belluschi and the Equitable Building in History,” Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 50 (June 1991): 109-29 _________________,

  • Recent Past Historic Context Report

    Cultural Resources of the Recent Past Historic Context Report City of Pasadena Prepared by Historic Resources Group & Pasadena Heritage October 2007 Cultural Resources of the Recent Past Historic Context Report City of Pasadena Prepared for City of Pasadena 117 East Colorado Boulevard Pasadena, California 91105 Prepared by Historic Resources Group 1728 Whitley Avenue Hollywood, California 90028 & Pasadena Heritage 651 South Saint John Avenue Pasadena, California 91105 October 2007 Table of Contents I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ......................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 1 OBJECTIVES & SCOPE................................................................................ 2 METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................... 3 II. CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION................................................................... 6 NATIONAL REGISTER................................................................................. 6 CALIFORNIA REGISTER ............................................................................... 6 CITY OF PASADENA .................................................................................. 7 ASPECTS OF INTEGRITY .............................................................................. 8 III. HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT ...........................................................10 INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................10
  • Appendix A: Biographies of Local Practitioners

    Appendix A: Biographies of Local Practitioners

    APP-A-1 Appendix A: Biographies of Local Practitioners These biographies are intended to provide brief information about known architects, designers, builders, and landscape architects practicing in Palm Springs These are not definitive histories of each practitioner. Information is derived from a variety of primary and secondary sources including the Pacific Coast Architecture Database; the AIA Historical Directories and Membership Files; finding aids for architect archives; and publications of the Palm Springs Preservation Foundation, the Palm Springs Modern Committee, the Palm Springs Historical Society, and the Cultural Landscape Foundation. FINAL DRAFT – FOR CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL City of Palm Springs Citywide Historic Context Statement & Survey Findings HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP APP-A-2 Ainsworth, Robert (1895-1970), AIA Born: Shawano, WI Education: University of Michigan, B.S. Architecture (1922) Firms: Robert H. Ainsworth, Architect (1932-1963); Ainsworth, Angel and McClellan, AIA (1963-1966) Wisconsin-born architect Robert H. Ainsworth, AIA, graduated from the University of Michigan with a B.S. in Architecture in 1922. Prior to opening his own practice he worked for Chatten & Hammond in Chicago, Marston & Van Pelt in Pasadena, and was chief draftsman in the office of Wallace Neff. Ainsworth went on to establish a practice in Pasadena. Early in his career, he designed a number of large estates in period revival styles for wealthy clients in the Pasadena area. In the postwar period Ainsworth’s designs shifted toward the Mid-century Modern aesthetic. In 1963, Ainsworth joined forces with Herbert W. Angel and Robert B. McClellan in the firm of Ainsworth, Angel and McClellan, AIA. Armét, Louis L.
  • CASE STUDY HOUSE #16 1811 North Bel Air Road CHC-2017-1702-HCM ENV-2017-1703-CE

    CASE STUDY HOUSE #16 1811 North Bel Air Road CHC-2017-1702-HCM ENV-2017-1703-CE

    CASE STUDY HOUSE #16 1811 North Bel Air Road CHC-2017-1702-HCM ENV-2017-1703-CE Agenda packet includes: 1. Final Determination Staff Recommendation Report 2. Commission/ Staff Site Inspection Photos—June 8, 2017 3. Categorical Exemption 4. Under Consideration Staff Recommendation Report 5. Historic-Cultural Monument Application Please click on each document to be directly taken to the corresponding page of the PDF. Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMISSION CASE NO.: CHC-2017-1702-HCM ENV-2017-1703-CE HEARING DATE: July 20, 2017 Location: 1811 North Bel Air Road TIME: 10:00 AM Council District: 5 - Koretz PLACE: City Hall, Room 1010 Community Plan Area: Bel Air - Beverly Crest 200 N. Spring Street Area Planning Commission: West Los Angeles Los Angeles, CA 90012 Neighborhood Council: Bel Air - Beverly Crest Legal Description: Tract TR 10798, Lot 6 EXPIRATION DATE: August 1, 2017 PROJECT: Historic-Cultural Monument Application for the CASE STUDY HOUSE #16 REQUEST: Declare the property a Historic-Cultural Monument OWNER: Norton, Muriel A., Trustee, Muriel A. Norton Trust 1811 Bel Air Road Los Angeles, CA 90077 APPLICANT: Kit Boss 2337 Hill Street Santa Monica, CA 90405 PREPARERS: Katie Horak and Mickie Torres-Gil Architectural Resources Group 8 Mills Place, Ste. 300 Pasadena, CA 91105 RECOMMENDATION That the Cultural Heritage Commission: 1. Declare the subject property a Historic-Cultural Monument per Los Angeles Administrative Code Chapter 9, Division 22, Article 1, Section 22.171.7. 2. Adopt the staff report and findings. VINCENT P. BERTONI, AICP Director of Planning [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] Ken Bernstein, AICP, Manager Lambert M.
  • Surveyla Survey Report Template

    Surveyla Survey Report Template

    Historic Resources Survey Report Bel Air – Beverly Crest Community Plan Area Prepared for: City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning Office of Historic Resources Prepared by: GPA Consulting, Inc. El Segundo, CA November 2013 Table of Contents Project Overview 1 SurveyLA Methodology Summary 1 Project Team 3 Survey Area 3 Designated Resources 11 Community Plan Area Survey Methodology 13 Summary of Findings 15 Summary of Property Types 15 Summary of Contexts and Themes 16 For Further Reading 42 Appendices Appendix A: Individual Resources Appendix B: Non-Parcel Resources Appendix C: Historic Districts & Planning Districts SurveyLA Bel Air–Beverly Crest Community Plan Area Project Overview This historic resources survey report (“Survey Report”) has been completed on behalf of the City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning’s Office of Historic Resources (OHR) for the SurveyLA historic resources survey of the Bel Air–Beverly Crest Community Plan Area (CPA). This project was undertaken from October 2012 to September 2013 by GPA Consulting, Inc. (GPA). This Survey Report provides a summary of the work completed, including a description of the Survey Area; an overview of the field methodology; a summary of relevant contexts, themes and property types; and complete lists of all recorded resources. This Survey Report is intended to be used in conjunction with the SurveyLA Field Results Master Report (“Master Report”) which provides a detailed discussion of SurveyLA methodology and explains the terms used in this report and associated appendices. The Master Report, Survey Report, and Appendices are available at www.surveyla.org SurveyLA Methodology Summary Below is a brief summary of SurveyLA methodology.
  • Architecture and Engineering, 1850-1985 Sub-Context: Engineering Theme: Technological Developments in Construction Subtheme: Hill Houses, 1920-1985

    Architecture and Engineering, 1850-1985 Sub-Context: Engineering Theme: Technological Developments in Construction Subtheme: Hill Houses, 1920-1985

    LOS ANGELES CITYWIDE HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT Context: Architecture and Engineering, 1850-1985 Sub-Context: Engineering Theme: Technological Developments in Construction Subtheme: Hill Houses, 1920-1985 Prepared for: City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning Office of Historic Resources July 2017 Page | 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE 1 CONTRIBUTOR 1 THEME INTRODUCTION 1 HISTORIC CONTEXT 3 CRITERIA FOR HILL HOUSES 35 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY 37 Page | 2 SurveyLA Citywide Historic Context Statement Architecture and Engineering/Technological Developments in Construction/Hill Houses, 1920-1983 PREFACE This sub-theme of Hill Houses, 1920-1985 is a component of Los Angeles’s historic context statement, and provides guidance to field surveyors in identifying and evaluating potential historic resources relating to this building type. Refer to HistoricPlacesLA.org for information on designated resources associated with this theme as well as those identified through SurveyLA and other surveys. CONTRIBUTOR Daniel Prosser is a historian and preservation architect. He holds an M.Arch. from Ohio State University and a Ph.D. in history from Northwestern University. Before retiring he was the Historic Sites Architect for the Kansas State Historical Society. THEME INTRODUCTION The modernist hill house was a product of the automobile and the resulting development of hillside sites. Beginning in the early 1920s the passenger car permitted access to districts in which grades were too steep for streetcar service. Hill houses occupied sites in those districts in which developers left the slopes of the lots intact, rather than grade to create level building pads. In fitting onto these sites, the hill house broke with the traditional level-lot concept of foundation and superstructure.
  • Everyday Modernisms by Alan Hess

    Everyday Modernisms by Alan Hess

    EVERYDAY MODERNISMS: DIVERSITY, CREATIVITY AND IDEAS IN L.A. ARCHITECTURE, 1940-1990 by Alan Hess, for the Los Angeles Conservancy May 2013 DEFINING MODERNISM Modernism is the broad term defining a wide range of buildings and city planning concepts reflecting the new conditions of twentieth century life. Modern architects believed that new conditions of lifestyles and technology should be given a fresh interpretation, rather than being forced into the forms of previous eras. Modernism derives its forms and beauty from a fresh use of materials, structures, and functions. Modernism includes a wide range of styles, looks, and aesthetics, including (but not limited to) the rich ornament and natural materials of Organic Modernism, the smooth sculptural volumes of Late Moderne, the muscular exposed concrete of Brutalism, the exuberant structural expressionism of Googie, the exposed steel or wood structures of the Case Study House Program, and the spare flat-roofed steel- and-glass International Style. The primary theme linking these varied expressions is the free exploration of the new, wherever that search led the architect. L.A. BEFORE 1940 Well before 1940, Los Angeles architects (both native-born and immigrant) had developed a free-thinking, exploratory Modernism blended with commercial pragmatism that generated new forms, new architectures, and a new decentralized city. Southern California had been nurturing a culture of architectural experimentation as early as 1900. Inspired by a near-ideal climate and a dramatic natural landscape that inspired artists, the brothers Charles and Henry Greene had turned to the Arts and Crafts Movement (not the Classicism fashionable at the times) to create an informal, airy, and beautiful new architecture.